►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 02072019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
C
Morning,
it
has
been
said
that
the
moral
test
of
a
government
is
how
that
government
treats
those
in
the
dawn
of
life
or
children.
Those
in
the
twilight
of
life
are
elderly
and
those
who
are
in
the
shadows
of
life,
the
sick,
the
needy
and
the
disabled.
With
that
in
mind,
let
us
pray
dear
Lord,
be
present
with
us
today
join
us
as
we
gather
in
a
wider
search
for
truth
and
purpose
in
this
quest.
May
we
greet
one
another
with
open
hearts
and
minds?
C
May
we
inspire
each
other
to
consider
new
questions
and
seek
deeper
meaning,
and
may
we
cultivate
wisdom
and
compassion
on
behalf
of
everyone
in
our
community?
Let
all
who
enter
this
chamber
today
see
a
welcome
face
here,
a
kind
word
and
find
comfort
in
our
community
and
may
all
that
is
said
and
done
here
today
be
in
service
to
love,
fellowship
and
justice,
amen.
E
E
F
E
B
Good
morning,
City
Council
and
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
come
before
you.
My
name
is
Celeste
Gibbons
Peters
I'm,
the
president
of
the
city
of
temples,
Black,
History,
Committee
and
me,
along
with
the
committee
we
like
to
formally
invite
you
to
our
upcoming
31st
annual
Black
History
celebration,
which
is
held
on
February
12th
at
11:00
a.m.
at
the
Tampa
Convention
Center
in
ballroom,
C
and
B.
I
will
theme
this
year.
Is
ingenuity
stems
from
the
black
community,
as
we
know
the
STEM
science,
technology,
engineering
and
mathematics.
So
we
also
were
having
our
keynote.
B
Speaker
is
former
city
architect,
mr.
James
Jackson.
He
will
be
I
keno
as
he
was
the
city
of
temples,
first
african-american
city
architect,
so
he'll
be
our
keynote
and
we'll
have
it
attained,
meant
by
a
local
jazz
artist
by
the
name
of
Tom,
Tom
Baptists,
so
I
should
be
getting
entertaining,
bring
it
open
to
the
public.
We
invite
you
to
come
and
joy
will
have
vendors.
You
know
authors,
retail,
sellers
and
community
partners,
and
some
of
our
sponsors
will
have
a
table
in
ballroom
D,
it's
free
open
to
the
public.
B
B
B
Well,
I'm,
so
glad
you
always
a
nice
tip,
Marcus
I.
Thank
you
for
that
I.
Thank
you
and
I.
Just
wanna
say
you
know,
resoled
appreciate
all
the
support
that
counsel
has
given
us
throughout
the
years
for
come
and
support.
My
celebration
coming
to
you
know
and
supporting
our
fundraisers
and
just
you
know,
there's
been
very
nice
and
open
to
talking
with
us
and
any
suggestions.
You
know
that
we
have
you,
you
have
been
taking
the
time
to
listen
to
and
for
those
that
it
may
be
our
last
time.
B
F
At
this
time,
thirty
minutes
have
been
set
aside
this
morning
for
citizens
speaking
about
matters
that
are
not
set
for
a
public
hearing.
If
you
are
here
to
speak
on
a
matter
that
is
set
for
a
public
hearing,
you
will
have
that
opportunity
later
during
today's
meeting
speakers
addressing
items
on
the
agenda
will
be
given
preference
before
citizens
speaking
on
non-agenda
matters,
each
speaker
is
given
three
minutes.
F
F
B
H
Further
live
Iraq
about
11:00
I
can
battle.
Everyone,
I
am
worldwide
global,
sovereign
that
spot
I
am
the
living
system.
I
am
the
living
government
I
am
delivering
through
tribunal
court
I'm
gonna
explain
what's
going
on
with
all
of
your
governments
right
now,
because
all
of
your
governments
globe,
we
are
going
through
a
reorganization
reform
being
overseen
by
Prime
Minister
for
United
States,
President,
Donald,
J
Trump.
H
Don't
get
that
mixed
up
with
formal
United
States,
which
Barack
Obama
illegally
not
lawfully,
never
constitutionally
sold
citizens
names
and
identity
under
his
presidency
right
now,
we're
going
through
a
global
release
out
of
a
what
to
call
like
modern-day
slave
system.
That
is
why
blue
campaign
and
blue
star
is
head
up
all
across
the
globe.
I
am
you're
living
in
Homeland,
Security,
you're
living
law
enforcement,
you're
a
living
system.
I
am
the
living
system
that
oversees
everything
in
your
commercial
system.
H
Your
commercial
system
was
set
up
before
I
got
here,
that's
the
whole
can
denied
in
agreement.
Okay,
the
12
tribes
are
the
ones
running
the
commercial,
see
a
13
family
isomeric
over
here.
That's
Aboriginal
indigenous,
the
ancient
families,
their
original
families.
Freemasons
eastern
stars,
we
are
coming
back
in
the
place
and
they're
taking
our
positions.
Look
you
guys
set
up
the
works
in
you
guys
set
up
the
workers,
that's
where
your
civilians
and
public
sector
and
citizens
members
residence
tenants
come
into
play,
but
you
can't
have
that
without
a
living
family.
H
That's
where
chuckles
trying
to
explain
to
you
that
we
over
here
America.
We
are
the
living
family,
the
rest
of
the
globe
like
Africa
and
the
rest
of
them.
They
are
like
business
now.
Business
is
never
supposed
to
ever
overrun
family
ever
overrun
people,
as
we
have
opened
up
the
government
here
and
time
faster
headquarters
here
in
temple
as
the
capital,
because
only
a
living
people
can
open
up
a
government
and
only
eleven
people
can
issue
true
living
currency.
H
That's
the
lawfulness
in
the
only
lawful
kingdom
and
the
only
living
Kingdom
to
set
for
2019
years.
Ask
the
rest.
The
globe
went,
a
long
list
went
under
policy
went
under
Miller
to
win
under
everything,
but
law
asks
all
the
religions
agree
that
they
were
not
under
law
and
not
under
God.
So,
as
we
come
out
of
Darkness
come
out
of
negativeness
come
into
the
light
come
into
intellectual.
H
This
we
need
the
government's
to
get
set
on
a
mind
frame,
moving
forward,
we're
not
chasing
your
ghosts,
we're
not
sitting
there
dwelling
and
your
wickedness
as
we
need
all
people
to
heal
all
families
yeah
as
we
nee.
You
know,
families
to
return
to
families,
communities,
stop
all
this
petty
warring.
Thank
you.
I
I
My
wife
and
I
moved
into
Seminole
Heights
two
years
ago.
We
love
several
heights.
We
love
the
city
of
Tampa,
we're
from
the
perpetual
dreariness
of
Ohio
originally,
so
we
really
enjoyed
the
sunshine
on
the
hotter,
the
better
we're
always
outside
purchased
a
house
two
years
ago,
as
I
mentioned,
and
we
put
in
a
pool,
we
invest
in
our
house.
It's
our
largest
investment.
I
Approximately
this
past.
At
the
end
of
December,
we
had
a
new
neighbor
move
in
actually
the
last
last
summer.
At
the
end
of
December,
he
decided
to
build
a
skate
ramp
in
his
backyard.
Without
permits
right
on
our
property
line,
it's
700
square
feet.
We
lost
all
privacy
on
our
first
floor
under
we
lose
all
privacy
on
our
first
floor,
but
from
our
second-floor
window,
when
you
look
out,
all
you
can
see
is
a
skate
ramp,
skating
structure.
I
didn't
want
to
be
that
neighbor
I
try
to
work
with
them.
I.
I
I
My
biggest
frustration
I,
my
I,
have
so
many
concerns
which
I've
listed
all
and
they
handout
that
I
gave
you.
But
my
largest
concern
is
obviously
my
property
value
of
my
privacy.
Nobody
would
ever
want
to
buy
our
home
should
we
have
to
sell
our
home
because
of
what
this
neighbor
has
done.
The
more
importantly
in
all
the
ordinances
I
couldn't
find,
and
ever
have
talked
with,
there's
some
there's
some
discrepancies
as
to
what's
considered
a
structure
or
not.
I
They
need
to
move
it
in
21
days,
but
in
the
meantime
we
have
to
listen
to
it.
Every
night
in
the
brochure
I
also
bought
a
decibel
reading
as
well
too
he's
every
time
they
use
it.
It's
higher
than
60
decibels.
Sorry
I'm
nervous
this
morning,
council
I'd,
like
something
done,
you
know
obviously
immediately
but
I
know
that's
not
realistic,
but
you
don't
add
anything.
J
J
I'd
received
your
email
I,
send
it
on
to
both
Tom
Snelling
who's
in
charge
of
our
construction
services
to
find
out
it
was
built
with
a
permit
or
not
I'm,
not
sure.
If
you
knew
that
or
not,
and
then
also
about
what
code
enforcement
to
find
out,
you
know
what
what
is
going
on
so
I
haven't
gotten
a
response,
yet
I
just
sent
it
this
morning,
you
had
sent
your
email
a
couple
days
ago
or
I
had
some
technology
issues
from
my
computer,
so
I
saw
it
this
morning
and
we'll
get
back
to
you.
I
E
K
I
K
F
F
Had
a
constituent
that
had
this
problem
about
six
years
ago
in
Beach
Park
and
it
was
extremely
upsetting
to
them,
because
they
would
sit
in
their
backyard
and
listen
to
the
noise
and
at
the
time
we
were
investigating
it,
there
was
some
reliance
from
the
person
who
built
it
on
the
swing
on
the
way
swing
sets
are
constructed.
They
had
used
this,
the
the
playground
equipment
rules
to
justify
doing
this,
and
what
ultimately
happened
is
while
it
was
going
on,
the
thing
was
destroyed
in
a
storm
and
it
ended
up.
J
I
Know
it's
it's
a
giant.
It's
it's
a
giant
sail!
Yes,
not
it's
not
on
the
grounds
that
the
dangering
of
skateboards
flying
over
our
fence,
because
it's
right
on
the
property
line,
there's
there's
so
many
negative
things
there
that
are.
Our
property
value
is
greatly
diminished
as
a
result
of
this
in
a
quiet
enjoyment,
yeah
exactly
and
our
privacy,
we
have
no
privacy
anymore,
any
anything
the
council
to
do
to
expedite
this
processing.
You
get
this
issue
resolved
and,
more
importantly,
get
it
addressed
in
our
ordinances
will
be
really
appreciated
because
more
are
coming.
I
B
You
are
aware
of
the
tree.
Ordinate
thing
we're
back
at
it
again.
It's
number
62
on
the
agenda,
so
it's
going
to
be
in
your
after
lunch
would
like
to
make
sure
that
you
are
in
with
plan
B
option
B
and
also
make
sure
that
the
neighborhoods
are
noticed
whenever
there's
a
problem
with
the
tree,
whether
it's
good,
bad
or
indifferent.
Thank
you
very
much.
L
Good
morning,
honorable
counsel,
Cynthia
Duncan
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
patience,
your
time
and
attention
to
the
tree
code
issue
you're
like
how
did
this
happen
when
we
briefed
you
last
year
we
briefed
six
of
you
and
the
briefing
was
the
trigger
move.
Ozone
is
the
small
lot
that
hasn't
changed,
but
it
was
the
tree.
It's
within
ten
feet
of
the
structure.
10
feet
the
builders
and
the
tree
advocates
were
all
on
board
with
that
we
just
hadn't
gotten
the
city
on
board.
L
So
we
came
to
you
when
we
briefed
you
Gina
Grimes
came
with
this
Jennifer
Motsinger
came
with
this.
We
were
all
in
sync
and
it
was
10
feet
from
the
tree.
Look
at
the
slide.
I
gave
you
last
year.
Then.
When
we
met
with
the
city,
they
said
it
has
to
be
scientific,
it
has
to
be.
The
people
needs
to
be
the
prz,
so
I
questioned
it
at
the
time,
but
I
changed
it
Gary
Browns.
Now
asking
me:
why
are
you
trying
to
fix
this?
Do
you
feel
guilty
because
you
wrote
the
code?
L
Yes,
I
do.
As
Councilwoman
campaign
said,
you
make
a
deal.
You
stick
with
the
deal.
Not
if
you
realize
the
deal
is
flawed.
In
December
of
last
year
we
started
working
with
the
city
on
implementation
of
the
tree
removal
zone
amendment,
and
then
we
saw
the
flaw
there's
nothing
to
prevent
a
builder
from
moving
a
house
closer
to
a
tree
just
to
cut
it
down.
That's
been
fixed
by
Krista
Mora
and
the
rewrite
we
were
either
coming
to
you
to
fix
the
rewrite
or
where
you
were
coming
to
you
to
change
the
amendment.
L
So
we've
been
working
with
the
builders
for
two
months
now
and
we
can't
come
to
closure.
All
I
will
ask
is
that
the
tree
removal
zone
was
supposed
to
remove
trees
that
the
vrb
is
going
to
remove.
Anyway,
the
VRP
is
not
going
to
remove
a
tree.
That's
20
feet
from
a
structure
they're
going
to
look
at
the
limbs.
Can
you
prune
the
lamps
they're
gonna?
Look
at
setbacks.
Can
you
move
into
the
setbacks?
They're
gonna,
look
at
reconfiguration.
L
Can
you
reconfigure
they're
gonna,
look
at
pruning
and
alternate
construction
methods
for
the
tree
removal
zone,
we're
not
looking
at
any
of
that.
It's
a
streamlined
process.
Where's.
The
tree
is
that
in
the
zone,
is
it
so
close
to
the
house
that
you
couldn't
shift
or
use
alternate
construction
methods
and
save
it
that
distance
is
the
critical
root
zone,
so
we
agreed
to
the
prz,
but
now
we
see
working
with
Kathy
Beck
on
the
actual
implementation
that
too
many
trees
are
going
to
be
removed.
L
So
worst-case,
if
you
make
that
a
shorter
distance,
a
few
treats
we'll
have
to
go
to
the
VR,
because
they're
no
longer
eligible
and
the
VR
B
we'll
look
at,
can
we
prove?
Can
we
use
reasonable
reconstruction
and
save
the
tree?
So
it's
like
when
you
go
and
you
get
your
hair
cut
the
military.
You
got
to
keep
your
hair
a
certain
length,
so
you
go
every
month
and
get
it
to
him
to
get
it
trimmed
to
get
a
drink
and
then
cut
a
little
bit.
And
then
you
go.
L
Let's
streamline
this
process,
let's
not
get
our
hair
cut
every
four
days.
Let's
cut
it
off,
let's
cut
our
hair
so
that
we
don't
have
to
do
this
to
streamline
the
process.
Well,
that
happened.
I
can't
undo
that
I
can't
put
it
back
when
you
cut
down
these
live
oaks,
because
you
set
that
that
barrier
out
too
far,
you
can't
unplan
them
that
50
inch
live
oak
will
not
grow
back
in
our
lifetime
in
your
lifetime,
your
children's
lifetime,
probably
anyone
who's
alive,
todays
lifetime.
So
let's
err
on
the
side
of
the
trees.
J
L
J
Let's
get
clear
on
something
two
things:
one:
the
options,
the
choices
that
were
presented
and
I
think
you
probably
saw
them
I
hope
that
they
sent
it
to
you.
What
are
the
options
that
you're
asking
us
to
approve
today?
That's
option
B
option
B
on
everything.
Yes,
all
all
your
recommendations
is
what
you
say:
okay,
I.
J
M
A
L
L
E
L
B
My
name's
kept
the
frankweiler
William
Paradise
Missionary
Baptist
Church.
We
shall
have
done
much
damage
to
my
church
by
putting
a
fence
around
the
church.
I
can't
get
into
my
parking
lot
and
I've
been
coming
here
dirt
out.
The
third
doubt
the
third
did
nothing
never
get
done
as
if
y'all
don't
care
and
when
you
talk
about
black
history,
I
need
to
know
what
money
the
white
history
so
I
could
write
a
book
about
it
and
I
could
tell
you
it's
true.
B
I
just
was
a
dark
history
for
black
folks
and
I'm
gonna
write
a
book
about
it
and
I'm
writing
a
book
about
that
sweet
talk,
the
basis
reason
I
come
up
here.
Like
Fallujah,
don't
know
black
history
long
time
ago.
They
call
us
from
the
slaves
was
yet
they
say
we
was
almost
one-fifth
of
the
human
beings,
not
realizing
God
created
us
in
His
image.
B
If
it's
calling
us
one
people,
the
human
being,
what
you're
gonna
call
God
I
got
to
be
problem
with
death,
so
we
have
to
understand
God
made
everything
created
to
heaven
on
earth
all
the
inhabited
areas,
but
we
want
to
leave
God
out
of
everything
we
got
so
much
killing
going
on
in
the
schoolyard.
Now,
when
that
woman,
Marilyn
O'hare
our
safety
hooked,
her
up
daughter
didn't
have
the
prints
go.
They
took
her
out
of
school,
took
the
Bible
out
us
to
nine.
It's
the
eightieth
devil,
going
that
killing
up
all
the
innocent
children.
B
They
came
go
to
school
in
peace,
it's
so
sad
and
yet
y'all
promote
stuff.
Like
that.
Looked
like
to
me
and
not
having
a
problem,
which
is
it's
a
administration
supposed
to
be
doing
what
the
people
who
need
them
to
do,
and
we
supposed
to
be
the
one
that
they
elected
y'all
but
y'all
not
doing
nothing
for
us
only
thing
y'all
doing
what
y'all
calm
and
it
be
agrees,
and
that's
not
right.
If
you
people
put
you
in
it,
then
y'all
to
stand
up
for
the
people
say.
B
No,
it's
not
going
like
that
glory
be
to
God
God's
gonna.
Have
this
judgment.
One
day
sooner
later,
I'm
gonna
read
some
scripture
out
of
the
Bible.
Well,
y'all
cut
me
off:
let
not
your
just
14th
chapter
things
young,
let
not
your
heart,
be
troubled.
You
believe
in
God
believe
also
in
me,
that's
what
Jesus
Christ
talking
about.
Not
me
myself
in
my
father
house
of
many
mansions.
B
If
it
were
not
so
I
would
have
told
you
I
go
to
prepare
a
place
for
you
and
if
I
go
to
prepare
a
place
for
you,
I
will
come
again
and
receive
you
unto
myself
that
where
I
am
there
you
be
also
and
whether
I
go
you
know
and
the
way
you
know,
Thomas
heed
unto
Him
Lord.
We
know
not
to
whether
that
go
and
how
can
we
know
the
way
Jesus
Christ
said:
I
am
the
way,
the
truth
and
the
life.
C
Goodmorning
counsel,
Steve
Nicolini,
you
know
the
word
compromise
means
that
both
sides
give,
and
this
has
been
a
very
long
process
regarding
the
tree
code.
There's
there's
no
side,
particularly
that
is
winning
or
losing
we
sat.
We
discussed
we
modified,
we
amended,
we
revised.
We
sent
all
of
that
stuff
into
the
City
Council.
We
worked
with
a
city
staff
with
a
city
legal
department
and
to
come
up
and
say
we
want
all
of
our
options
being
included
as
the
option
for
the
ordinance
adoption
is
fundamentally
wrong.
That
is
not
a
compromise.
C
That
is,
we
wanted
our
way.
I,
don't
have
any
here
to
cut
off
and
be
dramatic
and
say:
oh,
you
know
cut
this,
and
this
is
gonna
happen.
That's
not
the
point.
The
point
is
we
sat
down,
we
reached
an
agreement
and
if
you
want
to
come
back
and
later
and
amend
this
code,
that
can
happen
it's
being
transferred
out
of
one
section
of
the
code
and
it's
being
placed
in
the
chapter
27,
where
those
amendments
can
take
place
fairly
quickly.
C
We
haven't
even
tried
this
code,
yet
we
are
imagining
that
people
are
going
to
abuse
it.
You
cannot
assume
that
there's
going
to
be
abuse
before
it
happens.
These
are
good
people
that
are
trying
to
do
this,
not
just
builders
and
developers.
These
are
homeowners,
so
you
know
all
those
rules
will
apply
to
everyone
and
it's
extremely
difficult
to
get
through
the
process.
It
will
be
even
more
difficult
for
a
homeowner
to
get
through
the
process
once
this
is
adopted.
C
This
is
not
an
easy
decision
and
it's
not
an
easy
process,
so
I'm
respectfully
requesting
that
you
go
with
what
the
city
has
requested.
We
agreed
on
the
20-foot
on
the
roof
protective
zone.
I
don't
see
any
reason,
except
for
speculation
to
change
it.
I
would
appreciate
your
consideration
and
supporting
that.
Thank
you.
E
D
P
J
Portions
of
Walton,
Street,
Wall,
Street,
Cumberland,
Street,
garrison,
Avenue,
Caesar
Street,
together
with
certain
alleys
line
and
airy
area
generally
bounded
by
Finley
Street
on
the
north,
boin
street
and
channel
side
drive
on
the
south
Nebraska
Avenue
on
the
west
and
beneficial
drive
and
CSX
railroad
right
of
way
on
the
east
in
map
of
Finley
and
Caesar
subdivision
aw,
Gilcrest,
Oak
Grove
to
Tampa
and
timberlands
subdivision
all
being
subdivisions
into
the
city
of
Tampa,
Hillsborough,
County
Florida
to
be
null
and
void
by
operation
of
law.
Due
to
petitioners.
E
F
E
E
K
You
very
much
mr.
Chairman
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
and
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
declaring
ordinance
number
2005
1:04,
which
vacated
it
closed.
This
consent
discontinued
and
abandon
a
portion
of
right
away,
Judas
Avenue,
lying
between
Morgan
Street
on
the
west
and
Jefferson
Street
on
the
east
and
the
henry
and
knights
map
of
the
garrison,
a
subdivision
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
Hillsborough,
County,
Florida,
to
be
known,
buoyed
by
operation
of
law
due
to
petitioners.
K
A
You
mr.
chair
found
number
c0
7-12
ordinance
being
presented.
First,
we
can
consider
a
consideration:
an
ordinance
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
clearing
ordinance,
numbered
2007
236,
which
vacated
closed
discontinuing,
abandoned
certain
right
away
and
all
the
portion
all
the
that
portion
of
ball
Street
that
is
bound
by
Caesar
Caesar
Street
to
the
west
and
south
Meridian
Avenue
to
the
beach
in
aw
Gilchrist,
Oak,
Grove
subdivision
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
Hillsborough,
County
Florida
to
be
null
and
void
by
operation
of
law
due
to
petitioners.
E
N
You
for
chairman
move
file,
number
six
five
number
2019,
eight
27
or
as
B
percent
for
first
reading,
consideration
on
order
designate
any
portion
of
tap
as
a
clean
zone
in
order
to
regulate
activities
from
April
3rd
2019
through
April
8
2019,
in
preparation
for
hosting
the
2019
and
c-double-a
women.
Final
for
designating.
E
E
E
E
E
R
R
The
first
policy
issue
is
the
question
of
proximity
of
the
structure
to
the
tree
in
the
tree
removal
zone.
This
is
for
Grand
trees.
Only
actually
here,
the
protected
trees
would
be
tree,
specific,
pre
protective
root
zone
for
all
the
protected
trees.
So
this
is
just
the
question
of
proximity
for
grand
trees.
As
we
discussed
last
week
and
as
you
heard,
testimony
from
from
Miss
Kathy
back
with
our
natural
resources,
the
majority
of
Grand
trees
can
be
saved
at
15
feet,
based
on
the
experience
of
the
staff
and
the
the
tree
advocacy
groups.
R
R
So
while
consideration
we
can,
we
can
state
it
as
a
consideration
in
the
code,
I
think
as
a
practical
reality,
it's
probably
going
to
become
a
requirement
I
just
so
that
you
have
the
full
information
in
front
of
you
that
explanation.
The
other
part
of
this
is
the
having
the
new
automatic
reductions.
R
This
is
the
25%
front
yard,
regardless
of
planning
district,
40%,
rear
yard
and
one
both
sides
automatic
or
in
this
case
we're
talking
about
it
in
terms
of
grand
trees
where
it
would
where
that
would
protect
the
tree
and
allow
it
to
be
preserved,
the
advocacy
groups
of
suggested
that
should
apply
to
all
Lots
within
the
city.
That
is
the
second
part
of
this.
This
consideration
and
just
to
briefly
touch
on
that.
A
R
Yeah,
this
is
part
of
the,
so
these
these
reductions
were
part
of
the
original
agreement.
That's
in
the
interim.
Well,
it
was
a
part
of
the
agreement
for
the
interim
ordinances,
so
this
was
not
that
it
be
considered,
but
the
automatic
reductions
were
this
is
in
the
code
today.
These
are
reductions
that
are
allowed
in
the
code
today
through
a
design
exception,
and
these
would
be
required
to
attempt
to
be
utilized
to
save
the
tree
before
it
can
be
removed.
What.
R
A
R
A
A
My
apology,
you
don't
need
to
apologize.
I
just
want
the
public
to
know
that
this
was
what
was
agreed
to
in
the
first
place
and
it's
in
its
being
built,
as
only
the
industry
wanted
it,
and
that's
not
true.
That
is
absolutely
not
true
and
then,
if
the
other
ones
build
as
tree
advocacy
group
recommendation.
This
is
a
change
to
what
was
agreed
to
the
first
time
and
that's
how
that
title
should
read.
It.
R
So
so
option
C
here
this
would
allow.
This
is
a
little
bit
different
from
the
tree.
Aapke
see
groups
recommendation
sort
of
a
middle
ground.
If
you
will,
it
would
allow
the
design
exception,
permitted
distances,
which
is
the
same
as
what
the
building
industry
has
on
here,
but
where
the
new
automatic
reductions
are
allowed
for
the
tree
removal
zone
eligible
Lots,
they
would
be
required
to
utilize
this
automatic
reduction
since
they
can
take
those
reductions.
R
So
it's
a
little
bit
of
an
interim
is
that
there
are
going
to
be
situations
where
a
tree
removal
zone
eligible
loss
does
have
to
go
to
the
BRB.
If
the
tree
is
not
in
the
tree
removal
zone,
for
example,
it
will
not
be
allowed
to
be
removed,
administrative
leave,
it
will
have
to
go
to
the
BRB,
and
in
that
case
the
question
of
whether
or
not
shifting
the
setbacks
would
save.
The
tree
will
come
up
so
option.
C
is
sort
of
a
middle
ground
that
that
is
another
option.
R
City
Council
could
take
on
the
last
point
the
pruning
work
that
requires
a
permit.
What
you
heard
from
the
tree
out
busy
group
this
week
is
that
they
sort
of
married
their
position
to
the
staff
recommendation
that
all
grand
tree
limbs
require
a
permit
for
pruning
these.
That
is
actually
current
code
and
I'll
just
write
this
in
here
as
another
option
that
you
could
stick
with
the
current
code.
R
So
that
is
the
essence
of
the
staff
recommendation,
more
so
than
the
change
of
these
specimen
tree
limbs.
So
that's
a
little
bit
more
background
in
discussion
on
these.
As
you
can
see,
I
have
these
lovely
boards
that
I
have
created
and
I'm
more
than
happy
to
discuss
tree
removal
zones,
setback,
reductions
and
anything
else.
The
council
would
like
me
to
discuss.
A
E
A
A
We
needed
to
title
it
the
correct
way,
and
it
really
bothers
me
that
I
that
it
looks
like
we're
being
biased
by
titling
it
that
the
only
the
building
industry
recommended
this.
It
really
isn't
true
and
that
so
maybe
we
could
write
on
the
top
tree
advocacy
group
and
building
industry.
That
would
help
me.
Thank
you.
B
J
Could
cheer-
and
you
know,
there's
a
couple
things
here
and
Miska
being
touched
a
little
bit
on
it?
There's
some
there's
a
little
bit
of
changes.
What
I
was
looking
at
from
last
week
and
mr.
Cohen
had
made
the
comment
about
the
15-foot
that
became
a
discussion
item
obviously
became
it
came
added
in
there.
I'm,
always
one
of
those
people
that
say
all
right.
We've
got
one
site
that
says
this
at
the
time
it
was
twelve
feet
in
the
building
on
decisions,
selection,
number
one
and
then
the
building
industry
was
20.
J
Foot
15
feet
to
me
seems
like
a
adequate
compromise
from
both
sides.
Originally,
okay
I
know
that
the
original
previous
tree
advocacy
was
20,
foot
and
I
understand
what
miss
keen
was
saying
and
I
was
always
looking.
How
do
we
get
to
a
compromise
on
one
of
them?
Somebody's
gonna
come
out
of
this
happy
and
I.
Think
it's
just
us
because
there's
not
gonna
build
our
desk
anymore.
Everyone
else
is
probably
going
to
be
coming
out
of
this
not
happy.
J
I
do
like,
in
my
mind,
I
think
that,
because
of
the
changes
from
last
week,
I
would
select
in
my
this
is
my
own
opinion.
The
option
be
under
one
the
options,
and
you
know
the
option
C
and
an
option
B
on
number
two
or
similar
and
I
think
easier
to
explain
when
you're
going
forward
to
try
and
deal
with
things
so
I
mean
I
have
no
problem
with
with
the
tree.
Apis
group
recommendation
option
P
and
then,
in
all
honesty,
the
third
one
is
really
the
staff
recommendation.
J
If
you
look
at
it,
it
is
almost
exactly
the
same
as
the
tree,
a
VC
route,
so
there's
a
little
bit
of
you
know
play
on
each
one
of
them.
I
don't
have
a
problem
necessarily
with
some
of
the
other
discussions.
I
think
on
number
two
is
really
where
most
of
what
my
discussion
item
would
be,
which
is
the
option
B
I
want
to
make
sure
we
stick
with
that,
but
that
that
is
just
my
opinion.
Let's
see
what
we
can
come
up
with
and
and
finally
get
this
thing.
J
Moving
I
had
some
it'll
be
a
motion
to
accept
on
policy
decision
number
one
option:
B
on
policy
decision
number
two,
and
this
is
according
to
the
the
form
that
was
given
to
us
by
Miss
Miss
Morin
on
number
two.
It
would
also
be
option
B
in
a
non
policy
decision,
number
three
they're,
actually
the
same
as
the
staff
recommendation
and
as
the
tree
advocacy
group.
So
that
was
that
would
be
my
my
motion.
E
R
The
natural
resources
staff
spends
a
lot
of
time
in
the
field
and
they
have
a
lot
of
opportunities
to
interact
with
people.
They
know
a
lot
of
the
individuals
that
they're
running
into
and
they
are
utilizing
those
types
of
channels
to
try
and
make
direct
contact
for
possible
and-
and
there
are
some
where
it's
a
language
barrier
but
we're
very
lucky.
We
have
some
some
bilingual
people
over
at
our
construction
services,
land
development
sections
and
they
they
assist
in
those
types
of
situations
all.
N
N
R
A
A
So
the
20
foot
grand
tree
with
a
six-month
review
is
the
way
I
would
go.
I'm
not
gonna,
vote
for
15
foot,
but
it
may
pass,
but
it's
not
gonna
pass
with
my
vote.
I'm
just
I'm.
Sorry
I.
Just
think
that
they
had
plenty
of
time
plenty
more
than
enough
time
to
look
at
this,
to
bring
it
to
us
at
20
feet
and
it
just
needs
to
be
but
six-month
review.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned.
R
E
R
Would
suggest
that
you
might
do
a
separate
motion
to
set
that
review?
Also
I
handed
out
to
each
of
you
a
next
steps.
There
are
some
cleanup
items
that
were
agreed
to
over
the
course
of
the
last
couple
of
community
meetings.
I
want
to
make
sure
those
changes
are
in
there
as
well.
If
you
just
want
to
reference
that,
if.
R
E
E
C
E
R
Q
E
P
Sir
mr.
chair
I
hereby
move
and
ordens
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption:
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
9:08
east
fern,
Street
9:05,
East,
North
Street
in
six
three
zero,
seven
North
Nebraska
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
SHR
s,
Seminole,
Heights,
single-family,
detached
residential
to
or
and
excuse
me,
sh
CI,
Seminole,
Heights,
commercial,
intensive,
SH,
PD,
Seminole
Heights,
planned
development,
multi-family
residential
and
business
professional
office
providing
an
effective
date.
E
R
F
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
chair
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption,
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
1745
West
Tulsa
Pro
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
RS
50,
residential
single-family
and
CG
commercial
general
to
CG
commercial
general,
providing
an
effective
date
on.
E
B
E
K
You
very
much
mr.
chairman
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption,
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
1
1
1
West
Genesee
Street
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classifications,
SH
rs.700,
hi
to
people
family,
detached
residential
2's,
HPD,
Summer,
Heights,
plan
development,
residential
multi-family.
A
A
18-1
114
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption,
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
3511
Weston
barato
street
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
Florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classifications
are
in
succeed,
16
residential
multi-family,
armed
18,
residential
multifamily,
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
B
O
J
E
R
F
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
chair
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption,
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
28
12
and
28
14
West,
dr.
Martin,
Luther
King,
jr.
Boulevard
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
opie
office,
professional
2cg,
commercial
general,
providing
an
effective
date.
E
K
You
very
much
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
and
ordinance
vacating
closing
discontinuing
and
abandoning
a
portion
of
alleyway
right-of-way
line
south
of
8th
Avenue
north
of
7th
Avenue
east
of
35th
Street
in
West
at
36th
Street
and
a
revised
map
of
East
Bay.
Addition,
a
subdivision
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
Hillsborough,
County,
Florida,
the
same
be
more
being
more
fully
described
in
section
one
here
of
subject,
subject
to
certain
easement
reservations,
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions
more
particularly
set
forth
here
in
providing
an
effective
date.
M
Good
morning,
Council
South's
Radio
City
attorney
we're
here
on
item
number
55
to
clarify
an
ambiguity.
That's
it's
that
basic
and
let
me
ask
you
to
keep
this
public
hearing
open
on
this
one.
When
you
make
your
decision
who
the
decision
should
be
made
in
the
public
hearing.
Also
caution
you
this
is
in
litigation,
so
I'd
rather
not
go
into
too
much
detail.
J
T
Morning
counsel,
Randy,
Gore's
of
the
planning
and
development
the
department
here
you
asked
us
to
deal
with
the
Planning
Commission
and
to
look
at
the
future
land
use
designations
of
the
parks
that
are
on
the
dedicated
parks
list.
What
we
found
that
there's
158
sites
that
are
on
the
list,
39
have
a
designation
which
is
a
recreation
open
space.
Today,
there's
about
24
that
some
sort
of
combination
of
recreation,
of
Recreation,
open
space
and
right
away
or
public
some
a
public
plays
a
public
right
away.
You
know
some
sort
of
public
category.
T
The
big
number
is
the
92
sites
that
are
designated
something
else:
residential
mixed
use,
industrial
and
so
forth.
What
that
would
mean
to
move
forward
on
any
kind
of
plan
amendment
which
you
often
I
think
would
be
able
to
figure
that
out
was
ninety.
Two
legal
descriptions
is
ninety
two
newspaper
advertisements,
ninety
two
mailings
to
adjacent
properties.
T
Ninety
two
Planning
Commission
public
hearings
and
ninety-two
City
Council
public
hearings,
I
think
also-
is
that
what
we
found
is
that
there's
twenty-eight
Park
sites
that
are
not
on
the
list,
so
the
question
has
to
be
last:
should
they
be
on
the
list
and
if
they
should
be,
will
they
require
additional
plan
limits?
Also,
none
of
the
sites
have
a
zoning
category
which
would
be
consistent
with
a
park.
T
Excuse
me
category:
doesn't
it
really
not
in
our
zoning
category?
We
have
something
that
could
be
used,
so
we
change
the
land
use
category.
Obviously
the
question
would
be:
do
we
need
to
come
back
with
zoning,
in
which
case
would
be
158,
plus
rezoning
hearings?
I
think
you
know
where
we
may
be
going
with
this,
and
that
is
initially.
T
It
sounded
like
a
great
idea
to
change
the
land-use
categories
to
Recreation
open
space,
but
it
will
trigger
a
large
play
on
them
effort
that
staff
has
to
go
through
the
Planning
Commission
as
well
as
as
you
all.
What
may
also
trigger
an
equally
large
rezoning
effort
and
as
we
stick,
we
staffed
stood
back.
You
looked
at
it
and
we
came
to
the
conclusion:
it
really
isn't
the
land
use
or
the
zoning
of
the
site,
it's
the
ownership
of
the
site
that
really
determines
the
what
happens
with
it
and
so
forth.
T
So
as
long
as
a
city
or
retains
ownership,
you
know
it's
going
to
stay
in
a
public
use
the
public
public
domain.
There
are
a
couple
of
additional
protections
that
we
did
come
up
that
before
the
Comprehensive
Plan
in
chapter
16,
which
you
may
want
to
consider.
One
of
them
is
to
in
the
comprehensive
plan
to
update
the
current
inventory
of
parks
and
recreation.
As
I
mentioned,
there's
28
sites
that
are
not
on
it.
The
list
has
buildings
on
it.
It
has
cemeteries.
It
has
right
away
these
small
little
pocket
cards.
T
So
the
question
is,
you
know
what
really
should
be
on
a
dedicated
parts
list
and
what
is
that
criteria
so
I
think
there
could
be
a
motion
to
update
the
inventory
and
Recreation
open
space
element.
There
could
be
some
additional
policies
calling
for
some
public
communication
or
engagement,
what
we
did
in
the
West
River
area.
If
you
all
remember,
we
had
two
planning
efforts
for
the
choice:
neighborhood
grant
that
showed
that
the
the
Little
League
was
going
to
be
used
for
something
else,
and
they
were
going
to
be
relocated.
T
We
have
an
extensive
public
outreach
by
the
time
we
came
to
you
with
the
change
of
the
ordinance.
Everyone
in
the
area
knew
what
was
going
on
and
why
why
it
was
happening.
It
was
maybe
not
everybody
that
was
supportive
of
it,
but
there
was
a
very
in-depth
public
information
process,
so
the
current
plan
could
require
some
additional
policies
to
require
some
sort
of
engagement.
T
This
is
my
last
weight
as
and
then
a
fee.
Of
course,
we
we
update
the
comprehensive
plan
done.
They
come
back
and
to
a
man
chapter
16,
to
make
it
consistent.
You've
already
I
passed
the
motion
making
a
boat
of
five
council
members
to
make
a
change,
a
list
which
we
agree
would
would
add
that
extra
protection
and
then
the
other
part
would
be
any
changes.
We
make
any
inventory
any
policies,
bring
that
back
the
ordinance
and
make
the
ordinance
completely
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
Okay,.
J
If
I
could
you
know
you're
the
last
recommendation,
which
we've
already
we've
already
established,
which
is
to
try
and
change
the
nature,
we're
how
you
change
a
public
use,
primarily
parks
to
a
private
use
or
to
for
any
other
changes?
And
you
know
the
reason
that
Miska
pean
have
mentioned
it
when
we
were
having
the
discussion
last
time
was
that
the
underlying
land
use
is
different.
J
In
some
of
these
places
we
had
the
same
situation
come
up
at
Rocky
Point
now
wasn't
a
publicly
owned
piece
of
land,
but
at
the
same
time
the
argument
could
be
made
that
some
of
that
could
have
been
publicly
loan
in
some
way.
Now,
not
that
particular
parcel,
but
other
things
so
I
think
that
we
might
have
to
do.
You
did
lay
out
there's
a
lot
of
different
changes
that
might
need
to
be
done.
J
I
think
we
need
to
look
and
be
strategic
about
those
pieces
of
land
that
are
the
most
important
or
largest
and
find
out
how
we
change
that
to
make
sure
that
the
land
use
and
the
zoning
classifications
match
up
with
what
the
public
use
is.
I
think
that
it's
incredibly
important,
because
the
other
part
that
we
just
changed
on
chapter
16-
that's
the
last
part
and
I.
J
Rather
it
I'd,
rather
be
even
more
difficult
in
order
for
them
to
go
back
and
be
able
to
do
change,
they'd
have
to
change
land
use
and
zoning
in
order
to
get
to
that
next
step,
which
is
the
designation
and
then
the
vote
here
on
council.
If
you
follow
my
stand
so
again,
yes,
it's
a
lot
of
work,
but
we're
gonna
have
to
I.
Think
we're
gonna
have
to
get
those
those
parcels
and
really
take
a
look
and
see
which
ones
are
already
designated.
J
Now,
okay
and
the
most
important
one
you're
right,
there's
give
me
a
lot
of
them
that
are
small
parcels
that
may
be
pocket
parks
or
maybe
even
just
rights
away.
That
you
know
are
considered
greenways
now
as
opposed
to
a
park
or
something
else.
But
we
need
to
know
what
those
are
so
I
think
that
that
might
be
the
next
step,
which
is
get
with
the
parks
department.
I,
see
mister
dial
back
there,
I,
don't
know
why
staff
goes
all
the
way
in
the
back.
J
You
can
come
forward,
we're
not
going
to
do
anything
to
you,
sir.
It's
not
guaranteed.
That
is
true
it's
to
Mississippi,
but
we
may
need
to
do
then.
I
may
make
a
motion
after
the
discussion
is
over.
To
have
Parks
Department
designate
I
mean
excuse
me
come
back
with
that
list
so
that
our
council
can
look
at
it
and
determine
to
take
it
over
and
send
it
over
to
Planning
Commission
to
change
them
to
land
use
depending
on
what
property
that's
and
do
the
ones
that
are
most
critical
right
now.
T
T
J
Then
you
answered
my
first
question,
which
is
that's
an
important
part
that
we
believe
I
think
that
I.
My
colleagues
would
probably
agree
that
that
would
probably
should
be
underlying
land
use
should
be
a
park,
and
you
know
so
you've
already
made
my
point,
which
is.
We
do
definitely
need
to
look
at
some
of
these
immediately
yeah.
T
And
that's
why
I
think
our
recommendation
was
to
update
the
inventory
to
determine
which
ones
really
should
be
because
we
all
have
you
know.
You
I
think
you
experiences
that
we
all
what
we
consider
to
be
an
important
part,
and
once
we
get
into
the
public
hearing,
we
would
expect
to
have
neighborhoods
say
we
have
an
important
part
sure.
So
we
that's
why
we
would
say
we
try.
T
We
recommend
a
if
you
update
the
comprehensive
plan
inventory
you
allow
it
to
be
a
public
process
and
let
everybody
bring
their
information
in
and
we
come
to
you
with.
Finally,
a
dedicated
parts
list
which
hopefully
has
passed
the
criteria
test,
though
not
only
well,
what
staff
would
think
would
be
an
important
part,
but
also
what
the
public
would
think.
How.
J
Long
would
it
take
you
to
get
especially
some
of
the
more
important
parts
like
you
know,
curse
Dixon,
which
is
a
larger
Park
and
some
of
the
other
larger
parks
that
might
have
some
different
designations
and
excuse
me,
land
use
categories.
How
long
do
you
think
that
would
take
to
bring
back
to
us
so
that
we
can
transmit
to
plan
commission.
T
J
A
N
A
J
T
That
are
maintained
things
I
read
that
at
one
time
we're
counted
is
to
comply
with
concurrency
with
concurrency
no
longer
exists
right.
So
that's
why,
when
you
get
into
discussions
about
parks,
we
will
have
this
discussion
that
we're
having
today
kind
of
broader
level.
People
will
say
well
that
piece
of
land
is
important
to
me.
J
Yeah
I
think
the
start
is
to
give
us
those
92
locations
so
that
we
can
then
make
determinations
on
each
and
every
one
of
them.
You
know
whether
we
do
it
as
a
holistic
and
I,
don't
know
legally,
we
probably
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
do
it
holistically.
We
have
done
larger,
comprehensive
plan
changes
in
this
city
on
a
larger
basis
and
it
may
be
possible
for
us
I
mean
you.
You
gave
us
the
worst-case
scenario,
which
is
all
the
hearings
all
at
once.
J
It's
may
be
possible
for
us
to
do
it
at
one
fell
swoop,
depending
on
what
those
those
properties
are.
So
I
think
that
that's
the
first
step.
We
need
to
know
what
those
properties
are
that
are
not
currently
designated
under
a
land-use
category
that
would
consider
it
a
park.
So
I
think
that
that's
our
first
step,
we.
P
A
J
The
list
of
92
that
are
already
designated
as
parks,
but
not
under
the
underlying
land-use
you
can
bring
those
back
to
us
on
March
7th.
Is
that
a
good
time
frame
for
you?
Yes,
ok.
Terrific
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
would
have
Parks
Department
come
back
and
land
development
about
the
92
properties
that
are
currently
designated
as
parks,
but
land
use
does
not
match
up
so.
N
E
B
E
Okay
in
our
current
budget,
see
the
budget,
then
suppose
that
started
the
renovation
of
William
Park
back
in
June
and
you
live
right.
They
haven't
started
and
I
haven't
gotten
no
updates
on
when
it's
gonna
happen,
but
I
would
tell
you.
I
went
out
there
a
past
weekend
and
it's
a
danger.
Their
boats
are
all
loose.
E
C
Say
to
you
that
the
project
construction
administration
is
working
with
that
project.
I
do
know
that
we
are
very
close
to
a
looking
at
dates
for
potential
groundbreaking,
for
that
so
I
believe
that
it
has
already
been
awarded,
but
they're
working
through
some
details
related
to
that.
So
we
should
be
at
the
very
near
future.
C
As
far
as
your
concerns,
though
you
mentioned,
of
something
loose
over
there
today
will
be
over
there
today
and
taking
a
look
at
that
in
the
meantime,
but
I
think
you're
gonna
see
that
project
understand
there
have
been
delays
with
and
we
can
check
with
the
construction
administration
to
get
to
more
specifics
on
the
date
we're
looking
at,
but
I
think
it's
very
close.
Yeah.
C
C
There
are
many
parcels
that
are
here
within
the
city
that
we
have
the
people,
love
their
parks
here
and
they're
very
passionate
about
those
and
and
I
love
that
within
parks
and
recreation.
But
we
also
have
people
that
are
in
areas
where
we
have
I'll
say
a
pork
chop
of
a
roadway
where
there's
an
island
in
the
middle
of
its
grass
and
that
and
the
community
have
made
that
into
a
gathering
site.
C
So
we
have
locations
like
that
as
well,
and
so,
ultimately,
on
some
of
these,
some
of
the
decisions
are
gonna,
have
to
be
made
of
what
is
appropriate
as
Park
or
possibly
green
space
or
other
determinations
as
well.
That
I
think
we
would
need
to
go
through
as
well,
so
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
make
you
where
there
are
the
larger
parks
but
they're
all
smaller,
and
there
are
some
that
have
almost
kind
of
migrated
to
that
community.
Yes,.
C
C
C
Just
saying,
if
you
look
at
this
issue
down
the
road,
we'll
be
looking
in
the
92
at
this
point,
but
there
is
some
complexity
that
there's
time
involved
to
look
and
determine
what
your.
What
your
boundaries
are,
your
considerations
for
those
are
being
truly
Park
space
or,
if
you
have
other
terminology
for
open
space
or
green.
C
J
O
First
of
all,
as
it
relates
to
funding
for
city
of
Tampa
capital
projects,
the
process
begins
with
the
department's
who
identify
the
project
needs
once
the
project
needs
are
defined,
including
any
engineering
and
any
architect
architectural
requirements.
Its
then
moved
on
to
revenue
and
Finance
to
start
developing
a
funding
plan.
So
with
that
funding
plan
its
moved
forward
as
a
part
of
the
budget
process.
O
So
last
year
City
Council
adopted
the
current
annual
budget,
which
is
FY
19
annual
budget
in
that
process,
and
if
you'll
recall,
you
not
only
adopted
an
operating
budget,
but
you
also
adopted
a
capital
budget.
The
capital
budget
is
a
five-year
plan
and
then
annually
council
adopts
the
current
or
upcoming
budget
year.
So
every
year
you
have
to
come
back
and
adopt
a
capital
plan.
O
If
a
project
materializes
after
adoption
of
the
annual
budget
staff
has
to
come
back
to
Council
to
get
the
budget
amended
when
staff
comes
back
to
Council
by
the
time
it
comes
before
you
all
the
modeling,
the
financial
modeling
will
have
been
done.
We
will
have
engaged
consultants
to
assist
to
make
sure
that
the
city
is
pursue.
J
Hypothetically
I
know
that
the
rule
of
thumb
concerning
a
certain
amount
of
dollars
that
are
gonna,
be
coming
in
the
difference
between
creating
and
Enterprise
Fund
for
those
particular
uses,
because
they
are
specific
as
part
of
the
referendum
and
things
that
we
can
spend
it
for,
if
that's
a
good
plan
to
go
forward.
Secondly,
how
much
money
might
be
available
using
the
best
practices
that
are
necessary
in
terms
of
bonding?
J
What
are
the
potential
amounts
of
dollars?
We
might
have
available
again
and
the
hypothetical
we
know,
hypothetically
what
we
might
be
receiving,
which
is
about
33
or
34
million
dollars,
so
how
much
of
that
would
be
go
would
go
towards
a
bonding
plan
for
larger
projects
and
I.
Know
that
your
your
look,
a
capital
improvement
project
on
the
five-year
basis,
but
it's
very
specific
we
have
to.
We
have
to
present
a
plan
to
the
independent
Oversight.
J
O
F
E
O
A
look
at
those
revenues,
as
they
are
projected
to
come
in
and
matching
that
against
what
is
deemed
to
be
the
priority
of
projects
to
be
funded
over.
Let's
use
the
five
year
period
of
time,
then
it's
determined
by
doing
financial
analysis,
both
in-house
and
with
the
assistance
of
our
outside
financial
consultants,
to
determine
what's
in
the
city's
best
interest.
Now
we
can
have
pay,
go
right.
N
O
We
actually
have
cash
and
pay
for
projects
for
the
larger
projects
that
we
will
not
have
sufficient
cash
coming
in
to
meet
the
construction
needs
of
the
project,
then
we
consider
either
bonding
attaining
a
short-term
loan,
a
long-term
loan,
a
line
of
credit,
various
vehicles
that
we
can
use
to
fund
the
larger
longer-term
projects.
So.
J
The
question:
let's:
let's
back
up,
because
you
you-
you
brought
me
down
to
ant
I
level:
okay,
let's,
let's
get
it
up
to
about
20,000
feet,
20,000
feet
in
terms
of
what
we're
talking
about
as
a
rule
of
thumb,
you're
gonna
be
receiving
33
or
34
million
dollars.
What
kind
of
bond
fund
can
be
created
with
that
amount
of
money
using
all
the
criteria
that
you
need
in
order
to,
if
you're
saying,
30
million
a
year
will
wait,
150
million
200
million
whatever
that
might
be?
J
There
must
be
some
type
of
formula
or
rule
of
thumb
in
terms
of
building
a
fund
like
that.
Not
all
of
it
would
go
directly
to
repaint
any
bonds
that
might
be
issued,
but
there's
going
to
be
a
certain
amount
of
reserve.
There's
gonna
be
a
certain
amount
of
money
that
we
will
reserve
for
paid
Pago
depending
on
you
know,
who's.
The
next
mayor
is
so
that
aspect
of
what
do
you
usually
do
for
something
like
that,
because
you
know
we've
got
other
enterprise
funds,
so
my
my
question
is:
is
it?
J
Is
it
a
proper
way
of
setting
up
for
this
type
of
funding
mechanism
to
have
a
enterprise
fund
available
to
us,
as
opposed
to
creating
the
recommendations
of
the
the
our
departments
and
then
spending
dollars
because
remember,
we
already
know
that
there
are
specifics
on
what
we're
supposed
to
be
able
to
spend
this
money
on
so
we're
already.
We
already
know
that
there's
projects
that
have
not
been
funded
with
other
sources-
and
this
is
a
way
to
fund
some
some
some
of
those
projects
now
and
to
expand
it
to
do
it
for
for
the
future.
J
So
we
already
know
that
that's
going
to
happen
period,
okay,
regardless
of
what
you
know,
cuz
Transportation,
Department
and
any
other
department
is
going
to
come
back
and
say:
here's
what
we
need
and
here's
the
backlog.
What
do
we
have
to
spend
and
that's
my
question?
What
do
we
have
to
spend
if
we
start
receiving
that
money?
We
have
a
bond
fund
that
create
is
creative
because
for
that
purpose,
so.
O
Now
that
fund
is
matched
with
the
capital
improvement
plan
and
once
it's
determined
and
I'll
go
down
what
I
believe
you
were
asking
as
far
as
how
the
bonds
would
work
once
it's
determined
that
the
city
will
issue
bonds
to
fund
one
or
more
capital
projects,
then
we
have
to
establish
other
funds
that
further
segregate
those
monies
coming
in
and
those
funds
would
include
enough
money
to
pay
for
the
debt
service
on
obviously
the
annual
principle
and
interest
payments.
It
would
also
include
any
reserve
requirements
and
any
rate
covenants
or
anything
to
that
effect.
O
All
of
that
would
be
driven
by
the
credit.
So
as
we
start
to
formulate
any
type
of
bond
program
for
a
hypothetical
program,
as
we
start
to
formulate
that
program,
it
will
be
based
on
the
conversations
that
we
have
with
the
rating
agencies,
because
our
goal
is
to
achieve
the
highest
possible
rating.
For
that
particular
credit,
so
that
it
drives
down
the
city's
cost
of
funding.
And
by
doing
that,
we
pay
very
close
attention
to,
for
example,
the
reserves.
Will
they
require
us
to
have
30
days
of
our
operating
and
maintenance?
O
Will
they
require
us
to
have
60
days
set
aside
in
the
program?
All
of
those
will
be
driven
at
the
time
that
we
present
the
program
to
the
to
the
rating
agencies
to
dictate
how
we
actually
structure
it,
because
for
a
new
credit,
those
things
have
not
been
identified.
Yet
for
our
existing
credits,
we
know
where
we
need
to
be
in
order
to
Chiefs
specific
ratings,
so
I.
J
Go
back
to
what
the
hypothetical
is,
which
is
you're
receiving
funds,
and
you
know
and
I
know
that
you've
done
so
many
of
these
all
over
the
place
and
to
private
practice
and
then
also
here,
you're
receiving
thirty
four
million
dollars
a
year.
What
kind
of
fun
does
that
equate
to?
Typically,
you
know,
I
mean
I'm,
not
looking
at
the
rates
and
everything
else.
How
much
money
is
a
potential
that's
available
there
for
a
30
year
bond
fund,
let's
say
because
that's
that's
when
the
life
of
that
particular
taxes,
I'm.
O
J
Understand
but
I
mean
you
know,
this
is
based
on.
This
is
based
on
your
expertise
in
terms
of
what's
the
best
use
of
trying
to
do
something
like
this,
which
is
you're,
not
gonna,
you're,
not
gonna
bond
out
to
all
34
million
per
year,
okay,
you're,
gonna,
you're
gonna,
look
and
see
what
that
amount
is
there's
going
to
be
long.
There's
gonna
be
longer-term
projects
that
we're
gonna
have
to
fund
okay
by
virtue
of
the
way
that
the
legislation
is
written.
J
It's
not
like
we
can
do
everything
on
a
pay
goal,
necessarily
because
there
are
some
long-term
goals
that
are
part
of
the
referendum.
If
you
follow
what
I'm
saying
and
I
know,
you've
read
it
and
I
know
what
you're
you're
saying,
but
there
is
a
time
frame
problem
that
we
have,
because
we
do
have
to
present
not
only
the
projects
but
we're
gonna
have
to
know
how
we're
gonna
pay
for
those.
J
So
just
on
a
hypothetical,
because
I
was
told,
hypothet
go
only
if
you
said:
we'd
have
to
put
away
20
million
a
year
to
come
up
with
a
bond
fund
of
X.
That's
what
I'm
talking
about
just
as
a
rule
of
thumb,
it's
hypothetical
remember,
and
it's
only
just
us
two
talking
here,
don't
worry
about
it,
don't
worry
about
the
cameras
and
everything
nobody's
gonna
say
anything.
The.
O
Reason,
I
I
hesitate
is
because
the
only
thing
that
I
can
give
you
would
assume
that
we
would
bond
out
thirty
four
million
dollars
okay
annually,
so.
J
You're
not
doing
that
I'm
right.
So
would
it
be
fair
to
say
that
with
a
twenty
million
dollar
amount
and
I'm
will
take
out
the
other
fourteen
million
and,
let's
say,
let's
say,
20
million
to
four
purposes:
only
would
that
amount
equal
to
somewhere
in
200
million
dollar
range
or
300
million
arrange
400
million?
What
would
that
be?
I.
D
O
J
B
O
Revenues
would
be
spent
to
pay
for
the
capital
projects.
Those
revenues
would
then
be
spent
to
pay
for
debt
service.
The
amount
going
into
that
bond
fund
would
depend
on
how
much
debt
we
have
outstanding
to
cover
typically
one-sixth
every
month
of
the
interest
payment
would
go
into
a
debt
service
fund
right.
J
O
Of
the
outstanding
principal
payment
coming
due
in
that
year
would
go
into
the
debt
service
fund.
We
would
either
fund
upfront
a
reserve
for
the
debt
service
fund
at
the
time
of
the
issuance.
So
typically,
that
fund
is
already
taken
care
of
the
reserve.
The
only
time
it
would
change
is
heaven
forbid.
You'd
have
to
hit
it
to
pay
the
debt
service,
but
that's
taken
care
of
right
upfront
and
that
is
typically
based
on
the
amount
of
debt
that
you
issue.
O
Annual
debt
service
up
actually
it's
10%
of
the
maximum
annual
debt
service.
In
some
cases,
it's
typically
20%
of
the
principal
amount
or
an
amount
equal
to
maximum
annual
debt
service,
and
in
this
case
I
believe
the
figure
I
gave.
You
was
1.3
million
dollars.
So
one
point:
three
million
dollars,
maybe
half
it-
may
have
to
be
set
aside,
typically
for
a
hat.
O
Edible
new
credit
rating
agencies
want
to
see
that
not
only
are
you
building
a
project,
but
you
can
maintain
it
over
time,
so
they
may
require
in
order
to
get
the
highest
level
of
a
rating
and
operations
and
maintenance,
fun
mm-hmm
equal
to
a
certain
number
of
days
of
annual
operating
and
maintenance.
So
whatever
we
deemed
to
be
that
amount,
we
may
have
to
put
money
aside
in
that
fund
as
well.
J
O
J
Know
that's
six
hundred
million
dollars,
probably
it
would
it
at
five
percent,
but
you
know
what
percentage
of
that
would
be
debt
as
opposed
to
as
opposed
to
what
we
will
be
able
to
spend.
So
that's
where
I'm
getting
at
okay
we've
got
six
hundred
million
dollars,
so
certain
amount
it's
gonna,
go
to
debt
and
you've.
You've
explained
in
a
very,
very
good
detail
and
I'm
sure
that
people
out
there
are
really
understanding
bond
financing
now
a
lot
more
than
I
am
so.
What
would
that
fund
look
like?
Would
it
be
three
hundred
million
dollars?
J
J
Well,
listening
we're
all
out
there
and
people
are
asking
us
questions
about
what
does
this
mean
in
terms
of
changing
the
way
that
we
do
business
in
the
city
and
in
the
county
and
in
the
heart
there's
a
certain
money,
the
amount
of
money
that's
gonna
be
coming
in.
There
is
a
requirement
for
us
to
do
some
long-term
projects.
So
let's
say
we
create
a
fun
using
twenty
million
dollars.
How
much
would
that
fund
be
available
for
a
capital
project,
not
the
debt
service
and
not
everything?
J
Would
it
be
about
300
million
dollars,
man
I
just
well.
Let
me
let
me
if
I
could
I
just
I
want
to
make
sure
that
she
understands
what
I'm
asking
as
a
hypothetical,
and
this
is
a
math
problem.
It
is
not
a
problem
about
all
the
capital
projects
that
might
be
there.
It's
a
math
problem.
How
much
would
be
available
for
us
to
pay
on
a
for
a
long-term
project?
Let's
say
we
had
a
fun
that
was
bringing
in
20
million
it's
bonded
out.
How
much
would
that
create.
A
J
N
J
O
N
J
J
D
O
J
J
O
J
E
O
O
E
E
M
City
Attorney
the
the
way
things
are
structured
now
and
again
we're
talking
hypotheticals,
but
the
way
things
are
structured.
Now
that
that
board
that's
sitting
out.
There
really
is
just
to
make
sure
we're
following
the
provisions:
they're,
not
just
how
you
spend
the
money
as
the
city
of
Tampa,
Temple,
Terrace,
whomever
you
go,
make
sure
the
projects
that
are
funded
are
funded
properly.
There
are
certain
percentages
dealing
with
different
functions.
You
can't
spend
more
of
this
money
on
this
function.
M
They're
really
overseeing
to
make
sure
we're
following
it's
kind
of
like
an
audit
they're,
not
really
determining
how
the
money
is
being
spent.
If
they
have
a
problem
with
it,
they
could
bring
it
to
our
attention,
but
they
don't
have
the
final
word
on
how
you
spend
right
unless
they
want
to
challenge
it.
M
M
J
In
Cherry
it's
as
long
as
we
are
spending
as
per
the
referendum
requirements,
there
are
certain
percentages
for
different
projects
or
types
of
projects.
We
can
do
what
we
want
as
long
as
it
fits
within
those
buckets.
Ok,
so,
and
that's
that's,
why
there's
a
time
frame
that
we
have
to
follow
in
order
for
us
to
get
those
projects
going
and
that's
why
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
got
this
question
answered
so
I
appreciate
it
chair
all
right.
Thank.
E
D
N
F
E
Q
Rebecca
Curtin
legal
apartment,
I
am
here
in
item
57
I'm
gonna
be
handing
out
some
papers
for
you
to
look
at.
This
is
a
petition
for
review
hearing
City
Council.
When
you
hear
these
petition
for
review
hearings,
there's
about
between
twelve
and
fourteen
different
standards
of
review
that
you're
being
asked
to
apply
so
we're
trying
to
help
you
guys
get
clear
for
each
one.
Q
As
a
preliminary
matter,
the
requested
is
before
you
today
is
for
a
designed
exception
to,
but
if
you
will
look
at
the
third
page
that
I've
handed
to
you,
it
is
the
code
provisions
that
govern
a
design
exception
to
when
you
are
seeing
whether
or
not
you're
going
to
approve
or
deny
this
design
exceptions.
These
are
the
criteria
that
you
have
to
evaluate
so
I
printed
them
out
separately.
So
you
can
look
at
them.
Q
What
has
come
before
you
is?
There
was
a
request
to
the
Zoning
Administrator
for
the
design
exception
to
that
was
approved.
So,
what's
coming
before,
you
is
an
approval
of
a
design
exception
to
that
was
challenged.
A
petition
review
was
filed
by
a
third
party,
a
neighbor.
The
petition
for
review
actually
was
filed
both
by
an
adjoining
neighbor
or
a
neighbor
within
250
feet
and
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Association,
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Civic
Association.
Q
The
best
that
I've
been
able
to
determine
does
not
have
own
property
within
250
feet,
so
they
are
not
a
petitioner
in
this
case,
but
you
still
have
a
petitioner
and
Davis
Island
Civic
Association
can
participate
as
a
member
of
the
public,
along
with
the
rest
of
the
public
they're.
Just
not
the
petitioner
in
this
case,
I
have
also
handed
you
sample,
motions
again,
I
know
that,
because
all
of
these
are
different,
it
can
get
very
confusing.
Q
This
came
as
an
approval,
so,
if
you
want
to
uphold
the
approval,
there
is
an
emotion
that
will
end
up
granting
the
design
exception.
If
you
want
to
deny
the
design
exception,
that's
also
highlighted
and
that's
the
motion
you
will
be
overturning,
then
the
approval
that
was
granted
again.
This
comes
to
you,
as
and
as
already
approved
design
exception.
So
it
is
the
petitioner
who
is
challenging
it.
Who
has
the
burden
of
proof
in
this
case
the
first
page
that
I
handed
you
is
a
process
that
you
typically
follow
in
these.
D
Marette
and
land
development:
this
is
a
design
exception
to
18
56.
The
property
is
located
at
90
of
Columbia
Drive
and
the
property
is
zoned
R
and
24.
The
RM
24
allows
for
a
maximum
height
of
60
feet.
I
got
the
under
maximum
hyper
arm.
24
60
feet
that
you'll
notice
that
there's
a
footnote
to
that
says
for
every
for
the
building
height
above
30,
all
guards
must
be
increased
to
by
one
foot.
D
D
D
This
is
the
proposed
townhouse.
Development
is
for
six
units,
basically
a
flat
roof
with
a
33
foot
height.
This
is
a
stairwell
which
is
exempt
from
height
limitation.
In
terms
of
my
review.
I
looked
at
the
request.
They
are
in
Davis
Island,
which
has
flood
issues
in
terms
that
they're
having
to
raise
their
elevation.
The
design
of
the
townhouses
was
going
to
be
oriented
towards
Columbia
Drive,
which
I
felt
was
the
character
characteristic
pattern
of
development
in
the
area,
photographs
of
the
property.
So
this
is
directly
across
the
street
at
the
corner.
D
D
In
my
review
of
the
request,
I
conditioned
the
approval
that
they
had
to
comply
with
the
Hillsborough
County
Aviation
Authority
hike
limitation,
although
I
think
they
should
not
have
any
problems
with
that.
I
felt
that
the
request
did
not
interfere
with
the
rights
of
others
and
that
it
was
a
reasonable
request.
It's
only
a
10%
height.
If
you
look
at
the
RS
districts,
the
RS
60
districts
by
right,
they
are
able
to
go
up
to
35
feet
in
height
at
the
base
setbacks.
In
this
case,
they
were
asking
for
33
feet
at
the
base.
G
G
The
approval
of
a
height
increase
from
30
feet
to
33
feet
without
the
RM
24
code
requirements
of
an
increased
setback
at
1
foot
to
1
foot
ratio
is
not
supported
by
the
criteria,
as
required
in
section
27
65
over
25
residents
from
our
Columbia
Drive
and
bearing
Street
blocks,
attended
the
November,
9th
2017
zoning
hearing
in
front
of
Council
to
express
our
concern
about
the
zoning
request.
The
applicant
prevailed
and
received
Council's
approval.
The
property
is
now
RM
24.
G
We
left
that
hearing
with
the
understanding
that
the
developer
would
abide
by
all
requirements
of
RM
24.
We
base
that
understanding
on
the
following
transcript
of
11
9
hearing
mr.
McLean
II.
Again,
there
are
no
waivers
requested,
because
this
is
not
a
PD.
It
is
not
site
plan
controlled
at
this
time,
so
any
development
would
have
to
comply
with
arm
24.
G
We
are
going
to
be
meeting
all
the
development
codes
and
also
will
have
to
meet
the
height
regulations,
as
established
by
code.
Rm
20
for
a
maximum
of
development
units
could
be
established
on
this
property
if
we
can
meet
the
development
criteria,
but
that
also
includes
meeting
all
the
green
space
requirements,
as
well
as
the
setbacks
and
providing
for
all
on-site
parking,
councilman
Miranda,
your
parking
will
be
on
your
own.
Land
cannot
be
on
this
street
mister
mcleaney,
yes,
sir,
cannot
be
on
the
street.
G
It
has
to
be
on
the
property
and
has
to
provide
for
adequate
backup
space
between
the
edge
of
the
property
property
line
and
the
garage
enclosures
staff
report
on
this
rezoning.
This
is
a
Euclidian
rezoning
request.
Therefore,
no
waivers
are
permitted
as
the
petitioner.
My
interest
in
asking
you
to
overturn
this
decision
is
not
an
attempt
to
be
adversarial.
I
believe
the
block
facing
the
marina
is
a
prime
location
for
improvement.
G
I
am
simply
asking
that
the
developer
comply
with
the
RM
zoning
requirements
and
follow
the
code
with
new
construction
on
a
clear
lot
of
seventeen
thousand
eight
hundred
and
sixty
square
feet.
The
developer
should
design
a
structure
that
conforms
to
code.
That
is
common
sense.
They
knew
the
facts
when
they
made
the
decision
to
pursue
the
development.
All
comments
from
the
zoning
hearing
indicated
that
with
the
plans
we
would
not
be
here
today
if
those
commitments
were
followed.
A
real
concern
was
the
lack
of
transparency
in
the
process.
G
Final
elevations
and
plans
were
not
available
within
Acela
until
long
after
the
original
notice
and
just
days
prior
to
the
decision
letter.
If
elevations
and
site
plans
are
modified
in
such
a
significant
way,
a
new
notice
should
be
required.
In
addition,
it
appears
that
the
developer
seeks
to
develop
a
structure
that
may
be
better
supported
by
a
different
zone.
He
wants
the
height
allowed
by
our
m24
of
up
to
sixty
feet.
However,
does
not
want
to
comply
with
the
setback
requirements,
RM,
16
or
18
would
allow
for
the
development
of
this
project.
G
Up
to
35
feet,
however,
would
not
allow
for
the
height
he
instead
instead
plans
of
42
feet.
It
sets
a
dangerous
precedent
to
allow
the
granting
of
our
m24
and
then
eliminate
without
adequate
justification.
The
requirements
of
that
code,
my
neighbors
and
I,
are
concerned
that
the
increased
size
and
scale
of
this
property
completely
changes
the
character
of
this
block,
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
zoning
codes.
The
rule
book
City
Council
created,
are
intended
to
be
reflections
of
the
needs
of
the
community.
G
Again,
the
site
is
of
sufficient
size
to
allow
the
design
and
development
of
a
townhouse
project
that
adheres
to
code
requirements.
Davis
Islands
is
not
a
historic
district,
so
we
do
not
have
the
protection
of
the
architectural
review
commission.
We
are
therefore
dependent
on
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
zoning
codes
and
look
to
the
city
staff
in
the
City
Council
to
place
great
importance
on
them.
G
G
Limits,
walkers
runners
and
bikers
use
these
streets
for
recreation
and
to
access
the
Sandra
Freedman
tennis
courts,
the
Garden
Club,
the
marina
Roy
Jenkins
pool
and
Little
League
field
and
playground
bearing
is
bearing
Street
is
the
crew
way
by
which
people
access
those
venues
summer
camp
is
held
each
year
and
large
groups
of
children
walk
back
and
forth
from
the
tennis
courts
to
the
pool,
Little,
League
field
and
playground
parking
has
made
this
trek
treacherous.
There
is
real
danger
that
someone
will
be
hit
by
a
car.
I
have
seen
several
close
calls.
G
Tennis
players,
Sandra,
Frieda
and
tennis
courts
have
launched
a
petition
drive
to
ask
the
mayor
in
the
city
council
to
make
parking
enforcement
the
priority,
because
the
garages
for
the
townhouses
are
the
absolute
minimum
size
16
feet
opening
for
two
cars.
It
is
impractical
to
believe
that
all
parking
for
townhomes
will
be
within
those
garages.
This
is
especially
true
assuming
that
the
only
place
to
store
trash
and
recycling
bins
must
be
in
these
garages.
There
is
no
room
for
a
trash
dumpster
on
the
site.
G
There
is
no
provision
for
required
off
street
parking
number
of
off
street
parking
spaces,
section
27,
283
7,
given
the
size
of
the
driveways
in
the
lack
of
space
for
trash
receptacles.
Not
only
will
residents
of
these
townhouses
likely
seek
street
parking,
any
gas
would
be
required
to
the
developer
has
asked
for
a
design
exception
from
30
feet
in
height
to
33
feet
in
height,
these
drawings
clearly
show
a
height
of
42
feet,
as
defined
by
the
code
as
such,
on
a
side
of
seventeen
thousand
eight
hundred
and
sixty
square
feet.
G
There
is
no
reason
that
setback
requirements
cannot
be
met
as
the
drawings
show,
the
top
deck
of
the
penthouse
to
be
42
feet
per
code.
As
explained
to
me,
the
deck
penthouse
should
be
built
12
feet
from
the
setback.
However,
the
elevation
provided
shows
only
9
feet.
10
inches
from
the
side,
setback
I
know
we're
running
short
on
time,
so
I'm
gonna
wrap
up.
So
we
can
continue
in
conclusion,
I
believe
that
the
developer
has
not
met
the
requirements
to
show
adequate
justification
for
the
design
exception.
G
The
residents
of
Columbia,
Drive
and
buried
Street
strongly
believe
that
the
added
density,
limited
parking
and
dangerous
alley
configuration
is
a
hazard
to
public
safety
given
high
pedestrian
bike
and
auto
traffic
and
I
just
do
want
to
show
you
two
more
pictures.
This
is
the
Islander
condominium,
that's
being
completed
on
the
corner
of
Baron
and
Davis,
and
then
this
is
the
narrow
alleyway
between
that
property
and
the
subject
property
that
would
be
developed.
G
When
the
original
zoning
was
approved,
it
was
understood
that
the
RM
24
code
would
be
adhered
to.
It
was
stated
that
no
waivers
would
be
requested
without
adequate
notification
and
with
late
changes
to
the
design
documents
it
appears.
The
process
has
been
compromised.
We
are
also
trying
to
protect
the
character
of
our
neighborhood
I'd,
like
to
ask
you
to
consider
what
you
would
do
if
this
was
your
neighbourhood.
E
S
Given
you
all
the
background
materials
in
my
legal
argument
in
order
to
save
time,
because
I
do
know
that
you
have
to
leave
to
go
to
another
commitment
at
11:30
and
I
am
gonna,
simply
ask
the
architect
to
get
up
and
describe
what
what
his
plans
are
and
what
what
was
the
purpose
behind
filing
for
this
design
exception,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
couple
points
before
I
turned
it
over
to
him.
First
of
all,
this
was
our
Euclidian
zoning
to
RM
24,
which
does
allow
at
a
maximum
height
60
feet.
S
There
was
some
discussion
about
some
other
zoning
classifications
that
would
have
allowed
for
townhomes
at
a
35
feet
at
the
setback
line
for
the
purposes
of
moving
forward.
As
you
all
are
aware,
at
the
time
you
you
would
file
for
a
rezoning,
you
don't
always
know
what
the
plans
are
gonna
end
up
being,
and
you
don't
always
engineer
this
site
in
this
instance
upon
engineering
the
site
and
making
sure
that
they
went
forward
with
the
townhouse
project.
S
That
was
consistent
with
the
area
that
was
part
of
the
community
and
looked
proper
and
well
done
in
the
Davis
Island
community.
The
project
has
been
proposed,
which
has
a
maximum
height
through
the
entire
project.
If
I
believe
it's
35
33
feet
the
areas
that
our
show
were
shown
by
the
petitioner
over
and
above
that
height
are
not
part
of
the
calculation
for
the
determination
of
height.
So
those
are
some
of
the
issues.
I
just
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
raise
with
you
on
the
initial
discussion.
S
I
think
it
is
important
to
put
it
in
the
context
of,
what's
being
requested,
versus
the
idea
that
this
development
does
have
a
maximum
60
foot
height
and
is
surrounded
by
properties
that
can
go
to
33
35.
At
the
setback
line
of
25
feet,
all
the
green
space
has
been
provided
as
required.
The
parking
criteria
has
been
complied
with
and
all
other
criteria
of
the
code.
S
This
was
an
issue
that
came
up
during
the
phase
under
which
the
architect
was
moving
forward
with
plans
in
determining
that
there
were
flood
elevation
issues
that
are
throughout
Davis
Island.
As
one
might
imagine,
I'm
gonna
ask
the
architect
to
go
ahead
and
come
up
and
just
describe
his
plans
and
I'll
save
any
additional
time
for
rebuttal.
Thank
you.
E
P
Sorry,
my
name
is
Michael
Collazo
I
work
with
plan
mark
design,
studio
and
so
really
what
we're
looking
to
do
is
RM
24
allows
us
to
have
nine
units.
We
were
just
looking
to
get
six
in
there
and
our
original
intent
was
to
try
to
get
about
24
feet,
but
because
this
is
not
a
multi-family
structure,
this
is
a
single-family
residential.
Our
setback
went
from
five
feet
to
seven
feet,
so
we
complied
with
that
we
reduced
all
the
units.
Another
important
factor
was
because
of
the
the
design
flood
elevation
puts
us
closer
about
five
feet.
P
As
you
can
imagine,
stairs
and
get
pretty
high
accessibility
becomes
a
challenge,
so
we
wanted
to
design
this
so
that
this
could
meet
accessibility.
The
people
can
can
arrive
at
the
ground
level
that
ground
level
is
not
considered
habitable.
That's
just
really
to
get
you
to
the
elevator
to
stare,
and
it's
really
two
stories
on
top
of
that
reception
area.
P
It
will
be
because
of
the
fact
that
the
design
required
us
to
be
at
the
setback
line
at
the
minimum,
the
seven
feet
that
30-foot
really
became
our
building
height
and
working
with
trust
companies
and
all
the
design
constraints.
We
could
not
meet
the
30-foot.
We
got
it
down
to
just
under
33
feet
by
inches
by
being
a
little
creative
with
it.
But
really
we
look
at
this.
As
a
you
know,
two-story
townhouse
unit
over
a
a
reception
area
that
that's
that's
conditioned
I
mean
that's,
that's
mainly
the
project.
S
S
For
these
types
of
alternative
design
exceptions,
they
used
to
be
called
administrative
variances
to
allow
property
owners
who
go
to
develop
a
property
deal
with
issues
on
the
ground
as
they
as
they
go
in
to
develop
without
having
to
rezone
without
having
to
go
through
a
much
more
formalized
process.
That
is
what
is
easy.
S
This,
the
35-foot
at
the
25
foot
setback,
were
at
the
seven
cent
sides
foot
that
is
the
benefit
for
almost
every
other
property
on
Davis
Island
and
given
the
fact
that
they
were
trying
to
have
a
development
that
fit
the
character
of
the
neighborhood,
she
deemed
it
appropriate,
and
it
is
our
position
that
council
should
deem
inappropriate.
I'll
say
whatever
remaining
time.
I
have
for
rebuttal.
M
E
M
The
record
I'm
Bob,
a
burger
540
Bosphorus
Avenue
I'm
here,
is
owning
chair
for
the
Davis
Island
Civic,
Association
and
I
have
been
sworn
we're
here
to
strongly
request
support
for
the
applicants
request
to
overturn
the
approved
variance
for
this
site.
We
think
the
fat
cases
is
fairly
straightforward.
M
You
know,
there's
strong
developers,
representation
that
they
could
fully
comply
and
no
variances
would
be
sought.
Unique
circumstances.
I,
don't
believe,
are
demonstrated
in
this
instance.
If
we
believe
that
flood
requirements
are
a
unique
circumstance,
then
no
height
requirement
under
code
would
be
enforced
virtually
anywhere
in
the
city
of
Tampa.
It's
a
large
site.
This
isn't
about
height,
it's
about
setback
and
over
densification
of
the
site,
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
the
character
that
we're
trying
to
protect
for
the
island.
M
It
really
is
again
the
setback.
The
upper
floors
also
have
cantilever
that
top
deck
is
occupy
Bowl,
which
is
why
there's
a
stairwell
to
the
top
floor
in
the
parking
situation
as
Kathy
mentioned,
you
know
where
those
dumps
are
gonna
go
on
the
street,
it's
gonna
be
exacerbated.
Safety
could
be
impacted,
so
I
think
there's
a
clear
indication
that
there
is
the
ability,
if
you
will
for
there
to
be
a
significant
negative
impact
in
the
neighborhood
in
the
character
of
the
island.
Now
I
recognize
you
know,
the
Civic
Association
has
no
standing.
M
We
appreciate
being
able
to
speak
to
this
matter,
but
we
do
have
a
large
voice
of
advocate
advocacy
for
for
the
island
in
the
best
interests
of
supporting
our
residents,
for
not
a
historic
district
as
designated,
but
we
are
a
historic
district
in
in
everyone's
mind
and
in
the
character
of
our
neighborhood
that
were
fighting
hard
to
protect.
It
isn't
just
any
neighborhood
and
we
can
only
keep
it
as
it
is.
With
your
help
and
support,
variances
are
required
in
necessary
development.
You
guys
know,
I,
know
that
and
I
appreciate
it.
M
How
hard
staff
works
to
work
with
developers
to
make
these
things
viable,
but
we
look
forward
to
a
new
code
compliant
development,
because,
with
your
help,
variances
have
to
be
warranted,
reasonable,
consistently
applied
and
not
a
code
workaround
that
can
set
an
unfortunate
precedent
as
we
view
this
one.
So
we
strongly
request
your
support
for
an
overturn.
Thank
you
very
much.
D
Good
morning
Council,
my
name
is
Linda
Saul,
Sena
and
I
live
at
157
Biscayne
on
Davis,
Islands
years
ago
decades
ago,
I
wrote
the
Davis
Islands
plan.
More
recently,
I
served
as
a
member
of
City
Council
and
watched
council
recognize
the
unique
and
special
character
of
the
island.
What
is
most
impressive
to
me
is
the
significant
investment
that
the
city
of
Tampa
has
made
on
this
street.
D
It's
it's
very
very
concerning
to
the
neighborhood
that
it
all
fits,
but
you've
already
approved
the
rezoning.
So
that's
a
given
what
we're
asking
you
today
is
to
based
on
the
city's
significant
investment
around
here,
based
on
the
fact
that
you
know
it's
a
tremendously
active
area
that
you
don't
allow
additional
waivers,
which
would
further
compromise
the
safety
of
the
neighborhood
and
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you
very
much
and
if
you
don't
have
time
to
make
a
decision
now,
I
don't
want
you
to
rush
I.
Want
you
to
think
about
this
carefully.
L
Thank
you
a
good
morning,
Debbie's
ammerman,
192,
Corsica,
Street,
Davis,
Island
resident
civics,
Association
board,
member
and
I
have
been
sworn
I
am
here
to
ask
that
new
construction
within
our
community
follow
our
code
other
than
the
fairly
large
assemblage.
There
is
nothing
unusual
about
this
site
which
exceeds
17,000
square
feet
and
is
a
substantially
rectangular
property.
L
The
city's
codes
provide
for
a
number
of
buildable
options,
which
would
not
require
an
exception
or
variance
specifically
the
zoning
districts
identified
as
RM
16
and
RM
18
allow
for
the
construction
of
six
townhomes
on
the
site
additionally
per
table
for
point
two
within
27
156
of
the
code.
The
townhomes
could
reach
a
height
of
35
feet
without
any
reduction
of
yard
setbacks.
L
If
the
33
foot
height
is
really
the
issue,
the
applicant
could
pursue
the
rezoning
of
the
site
to
an
RM
16
or
an
RM
18
and
build
the
units
in
conformity
with
the
code.
The
applicant
also
has
the
building
the
ability
to
build
the
townhomes
within
the
RM
24
zoning
specification,
which
allows
for
a
maximum
height
of
60
feet,
subject
to
the
requirement
that,
for
each
foot
of
building
height
above
30
feet,
the
required
yard
setbacks
well
should
be
increased
by
one
foot
per
Section
27:43.
L
The
height
is
the
vertical
distance
between
the
finished
grade
to
the
highest
point
of
the
structure
that
which
was
illustrated
within
what
was
previously
entered
into
the
record.
The
design
exceptional
decision
letter
was
inconsistent
with
the
code
when
the
structure
height
was
measured
from
the
structure
front
from
the
highest
point,
and
I
respectfully.
Disagree
that
that
structure
on
top
of
the
roof
does
not
does
not
fall
within
a
strictly
stairwell
category.
It
is
part
of
the
structure,
height
calculation.
L
This
error
was
significant
as
the
therefore
excuse
me,
the
yard
setback
at
30
feet
should
be
increased
by
12
feet,
not
3
feet.
The
resulting
structure
is
required
to
be
tiered
in
a
manner
similar
to
a
wedding
cake.
The
tearing
is
extremely
important
as
it
mitigates
the
urban
Canyon
effect
that
would
occur
if
such
standards
were
not
in
place.
L
This
design
exception
is
essentially
a
go
around
which
disguises
the
true
intent
of
the
request,
which
is
to
avoid
a
significant
setback
requirement
under
the
guise
of
a
less
significant
height
exception
way
out
of
line
of
the
specifications
within
our
code.
Please
follow
our
code
overturn
this
decision
and
require
that
the
applicant
develop
their
site
in
conformity
with
the
codes.
L
It's
really
simple
if
the
applicant
wants
townhomes
at
a
33
foot,
height
rezone
to
an
RM,
16
or
18,
if
they
want
townhomes
with
a
42
foot
height
build
within
the
RM
24
zoning,
which
requires
significantly
increased
at
setbacks
at
30
feet.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
and
I
do
have
backup
for
the
record
that
supports
my
statements.
N
E
T
E
N
Fairness
for
both
parties,
I
really
believe
that
all
you
have
to
have
is
one
person,
one
council,
member
on
one
side
of
the
other
and
you're
not
gonna
have
any
any
forum
before
so
for
the
both
the
petitioner
and
the
person.
Who
is
not
the
petition
this
case
that
we
continued
for,
like
mr.
Coyne
said
for
another
week,
so
you
would
have
the
seven
members
and
both
side
would
be
satisfied.
It'd
be
a
more
equitable
situation
for
both
parties.
That's
just
my
opinion.
All
right
quickly,.
S
Julie
Mandel,
we
will
not
object
to
that
continuance.
I
want
to
make
at
the
statement
for
the
record
that
this
petition
has
stayed
during
this
process,
but
given
the
fact
that
we
won't
have
a
full
council
and
I
think
we
all
believe
it's
better
to
have
fairness
in
this
process
that
we
go
ahead
and
and
accede
to
the
continuance
I
would
ask
that
were
as
close
to
the
beginning
of
the
agenda
as
possible
so
that
we
can
move
this
forward.
Thank
you.