►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 02142019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
President
miranda
here
vieira
and
reddit
all
right
can
we
get
emotional
open
in
public
here.
So
we
got
emotional
emotion
from
mr
manukau,
so
I'm
batman
surrender
all
in
favor
that
emotion,
say
hi
all
right
all
right.
We
got
it
one
through
ten.
If
you're
going
to
speak
on
any
of
those
items,
please
stand
and
be
sworn
in.
C
D
Leading
council
members,
david
haye,
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
I
have
been
sworn
we
start
the
evening
off
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically
the
tampa
heights
neighborhood
there
is
transit
within
that
area,
the
metro,
rapid
route,
1
and
route
6
all
service
the
site.
The
property
is
not
within
an
evacuation
zone
and
robo's
park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
to
the
subject
fight
on
to
the
aerial
the
subject
site
is
right
here.
This
is
east
emily
street.
This
is
robles
park
to
the
south.
D
Of
course,
interstate
275,
further
to
the
east,
you've
got
the
robles
park,
village
apartment,
complex
kind
of
to
the
north
and
west
of
the
subject
site.
The
area
is
predominantly
single-family
detached
away
from
that
development.
There
is
some
duplexes
scattered
throughout
in
some
older
multi-family.
D
D
The
applicant
is
requesting
approval
through
this
rezoning
petition
to
allow
construction
of
that
congregate
living
facility.
It
is
the
intent
of
the
city's
plan
to
provide
housing
opportunities
for
the
elderly,
disabled
and
other
special
classes
of
persons
and
other
groups
protected
by
the
american
disabilities
act
in
single,
multiple,
a
congregate
living
facilities.
D
Campus
comprehensive
plan
also
through
development
incentives,
the
the
develop
incentivizes,
the
development
of
congregate
living
facilities
throughout
the
city
of
tampa
overall
staff
found
the
proposed
rezoning
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan,
and
that
concludes
our
presentation.
C
Mary
san
diego
again
for
the
record:
here's
the
subject
property
in
green.
It
kind
of
it
creates
like
its
own
small
block,
in
effect,
here's
central
avenue,
emily
street
avon
and
then
also
small
james
street,
to
the
noise,
and,
as
I
stated,
this
is
going
to
be
a
congregate
living
facility.
There
are
two
existing
structures
on
site
that
will
be
rehabilitated
to
facilitate
the
use,
and
then
one
of
the
structures
will
be
added
onto
here's
one
of
the
existing
structures
that
will
be
rehabilitated.
C
C
This
is
the
pink
house
that
we
saw
in
the
pictures
that
will
be
used
for
some
of
the
the
beds
and
some
of
the
facility
here
is
the
other
multiple
story,
building
that
we
saw
that
would
be
added
on
to
and
the
whole
thing
will
work
kind
of
like
as
a
campus,
so
both
buildings,
the
larger
building
in
the
existing
building,
will
facilitate
the
maximum
150
beds
that
they
were
proposing.
The
entire
site
is
0.8
acres.
It
is
a
plan
development.
The
only
use
they
are
proposing
is
congregate.
C
Living
facility
large
group
care.
There
are
no
waivers
being
requested
as
part
of
this
application.
C
There
are
some
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
that
staff
is
recommending
for
natural,
I'm
sorry
for
solid
waste
and
land
development
coordination.
Overall
staff
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
land
development
code.
With
those
modifications
several
days
after
the
staff
report
came
out,
the
applicant
notified
me
that
they
had
been
working
with
the
neighborhood
association
and
they
had
come
to
some
agreements
to
changes
to
the
site
plan.
C
So
the
applicant
will
make
his
presentation
and
then
anticipate
make
asking
for
a
continuance
per
month
to
incorporate
some
of
those
elements
that
they
had
agreed
upon
with
the
neighborhood
association
into
a
revised
cyberplan.
But
we
wanted
to
open
up
for
public
comment
today.
E
E
Joseph
berkelmeyer
for
the
developer,
the
applicant
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
developer.
E
As
ms
san
diego
stated,
we
came
to
an
agreement
tuesday
with
the
civic
association,
I'm
sure
they're
going
to
get
up
and
speak
some
presidents
here
as
to
what
changes
they
were
requesting
to
the
site
plan
in
accommodation
to
those
requests.
We
have
to
make
some
major
changes
in
the
site
plan
which
we'll
go
back
to
staff
and
we'll
see
you
back
in
march.
E
I'm
really
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
before
or
after
public
comment.
A
E
Yes,
stat
staff
is
required
based
on
the
type
of
changes
we're
making
that
they're
going
to
require
30
days
to
review
this
changes
the
site
plan,
so
we
will
be
continued
post
public
comment
to.
C
F
If
I
could,
before
before,
we
hear
from
the
public,
what
are
the
proposed
changes
that
have
been
brought
forth
and
so
that
we
make
sure
that
what
they're
gonna
tell
us
is
an
agreement
with
what
you're
telling
us.
E
So
the
two
major
changes
are
the
setbacks
as
currently
displayed
and
we're
gonna
have
to
run
those
back
through
staff
because
we're
not
sure
if
those
are
compliant
with
code
sure.
But
that's
what
they're
asking
for-
and
we
said
we
do
that
if
subject
to
staff
review
and
a
reduction
in
the
density
of
the
two
primary
changes
to
the
site
plan
itself,
87
beds
will
be
the
reduction
in
density
from
the
prior
request
of
150,
with
commensurate
changes
to
the
parking
plan.
Okay
and
then
the
other
piece.
E
That's
not
a
change
to
the
site
plan,
but
it's
an
agreement
between
the
association
and
developer
is
the
developer
is
willing
to
comply
from
an
appearance
standpoint
with
the
tampa
heights.
Historic
guidelines
that
are
promulgated
for
the
historic
part
of
the
district
he's
going
to
make
the
facades
elevations.
Those
type
of
things
comply
with
historic
standards.
A
Right
anyone
in
public,
we
should
speak
on
item
number,
one.
G
Good
afternoon
owen,
young
3407
jefferson
street
tampa
florida
as
a
proud
resident
of
tampa
heights
community
for
over
35
years.
We
have
major
concerns
with
the
property
development
located
at
414
418
emily
street.
In
tampa
heights,
there
was
an
agreement
of
modification
while
noble
falls,
short
of
the
expectation
as
residents
of
the
north
side
of
tampa
heights.
The
agreement
of
modification
was
sent
by
the
tampa
heights
civic
association
to
the
developer.
G
The
park
is
located
across
the
street
from
the
facility.
The
park
is
used
as
a
recreation
outlet
for
many
of
our
community
members,
and
we
in
which
we
welcome.
However,
it
often
causes
major
traffic
congestion
around
the
park.
What
happens
when
there's
a
medical
emergency
and
a
first
responder
cannot
access
the
entrance
to
the
facility
in
a
timely
manner.
G
Oftentimes,
there
are
police
helicopters
patrolling
the
area
in
the
wee
hours
of
the
morning,
sometimes
flying
for
hours
in
between
the
am
hours
of
12
and
4.
In
the
morning,
the
sound
and
vibration
from
the
helicopters
can
be
felt
through
our
homes.
What
does
that
say
for
this
facility
for
our
elderly
and
our
veterans?
G
G
G
G
H
Justin
rickey
tampa
heights
civic
association.
President.
My
address
is
103
east
26th
avenue
tampa
florida
33603.
H
When
we
are
charting
our
destinations
for
the
future,
we
oftentimes
use
past
experiences
as
guides
to
know
where
we
have
been
what
has
been
done
and
what
knowledge
from
past
learnings
we
may
use
to
help
us
mold
the
future,
I'm
the
belief
that
this
thought
process
is
applicable
when
you
look
at
a
neighborhood
and
how
you
envision
its
future
development
as
a
resident
as
a
decade-long
resident
of
tampa
heights.
I've
been
through
the
metamorphosis
that
has
taken
place
in
our
neighborhood.
Our
riverfront
cra
has
been
transformative
and
had
an
exponential
impact
on
our
community
development.
H
The
forward
thinking,
ideas
and
movement
towards
something
that
pushes
not
just
our
neighborhood,
but
our
city
as
a
whole
to
new
levels
is
what
we
should
aspire
to
achieve.
We
all
remember
what
the
riverfront
looked
like
before
the
cra.
That's
where
we
were
our
future
today
looks
dramatically
different
as
a
neighborhood
civic
association.
We
we
feel
like
this
should
be
the
way
we
look
at
all
developments
across
our
entire
community,
not
just
along
our
riverfront.
H
We
want
to
be
inspired.
We
want
to
see
signs
of
innovation,
signs
of
advancement
signs
of
moving
and
progressing
towards
a
vision
that
makes
people
want
to
choose
tampa
heights
as
a
place
to
live,
work
and
play
when
the
developer
of
this
project
came
before
us.
We
know
that
this
is
somewhere
we
have
been
before
is
neither
neither
progressive
or
new.
The
project
developer
is
seeking
to
put
into
place,
has
been
attempted
in
tampa
heights
before
we
are
here
again
and
is
not
for
lack
of
better
for
better
terms.
H
Breaking
the
mold.
The
civic
association
understands
that
there
is
no
jurisprudence
for
rejecting
the
developer's
plan.
The
developer
has
taken
the
initiative
to
meet
with
us
as
a
community
and
has
asked
us
for
input
in
regards
to
what
we,
what
would
make
their
project
amenable
for
our
community
as
a
neighborhood
association.
This
was
appreciated.
H
H
I
would
also
like
to
use
this
opportunity
to
share
the
opinion
that
tampa
heights
is
in
dire
need
of
some
type
of
form-based
or
transit-oriented
development
code
that
can
help
guide
developers
of
the
future.
The
longer
we
wait
for
this
guidance,
the
more
these
issues
will
continue
to
dominate
your
docket.
Meanwhile,
we
jeopardize
capitalizing
on
opportunities
to
create
world-class
neighborhoods
for
our
children
to
inherit.
I
appreciate
your
time,
wisdom
and
consideration
these
matters.
Thank
you.
B
B
Now
when
I
first
came
and
did
a
site
survey
and
looked
at
the
looked
at
the
lot
as
they
were,
building
and
looking
at
all
the
options
they
had,
I
had
made
some
critiques
and
some
options
to
help
the
applicant's
doing
his
very
best
to
meet
everybody's
requests,
but
I'm
just
here
on
behalf
to
push
for
the
build,
because
it
could
definitely
help
the
veterans
in
the
area
being
a
service
disabled
veteran.
I
know
what
it's
like
to
need
all
of
these
requests
and
help
to
go
to
the
va.
B
I
Good
evening
board,
my
name
is
casey
bowick,
I'm,
the
ceo
of
the
tampa
bay,
black
chamber
of
commerce,
3302,
north
jefferson,
street
and
the
chamber
is
here
today
in
support
of
the
project
that
is
going
on
over
is
going
to
be
going
on
over
on
emily
over
there,
because
we
feel-
and
we
have
discussed
this-
that
something
of
this
sort
is
needed
in
the
area
for
the
seniors
for
the
veterans
to
be
housed
somewhere,
where
they
can
be
instead
of
being
way
out
somewhere.
I
They
can
be
closer
to
their
families
and
things
and
and
and
what
they
they
spoke
about
about
the
the
yard
and
everything
and
stuff.
I
When
things
get
done
around
there,
I'm
sure
the
the
yard
will
be
kept,
clean
and
and
everything
and
and
stuff-
and
we
are
here
today
to
support
this
and
to
approve
this
as
far
as
the
chamber
goes,
and
we
would
like
for
the
board
to
consider
approving
this
and
supporting
this,
because
this
once
again
is
something
that
is
valuably
needed
for
our
seniors
and
for
the
veterans
that
are
coming
out
and
and
that
are
out
and
to
be
taken
care
of.
I
In
that
sense,
and
with
that
I
say
to
you
good
evening
and
to
continue
having
a
wonderful
thank,
valentine
and
remember
learning
from
the
past
to
create
the
future,
may
god
bless.
A
G
Sir
good
evening,
my
name
is
shane
thorson,
I'm
a
local
businessman,
a
former
professional
athlete
who
is
now
very
involved
in
the
athletic
field
here
in
the
tampa
bay
area.
The
purpose
for
my
visit
here
today
is
not
so
much
to
push
for
the
push
for
the
location,
but
to
actually
push
for
veterans.
G
G
G
K
K
K
L
Good
afternoon,
thank
you
for
another
opportunity
to
come
before
you,
I'm
linda
young,
green,
and
I
live
at
3406
north
avon
avenue,
there's
nobody
who
has
spoken
to
you
so
far
that
lives
as
close
to
this
facility,
as
I
have
for
almost
40
years,
because
of
being
there
as
long
as
we
have,
I
could
tell
you
what
the
history
is.
Someone
mentioned
about
past
experiences
being
an
occasional
feature.
L
L
L
A
L
Okay,
we
didn't
know
that
we
had,
we
thought
we
handed
it
in
after
I
started
speaking,
but
that's
what
we're
dealing
down
on
the
north
side
of
tampa
heights.
You
can't
add
150
beds
in
less
than
an
acre
to
another
era
that
has
35
acres
of
over
a
thousand
public
housing.
What
fairness
is
that
we
gotta
improve
all
of
our
neighborhood.
We
talk
about
the
we
talk
about
the
hole
in
the
donut
and
that's
what's
happening
in
north
tampa
heights.
Please
don't
approve
this.
I
I
J
J
J
J
E
I
can
very
briefly
give
you
the
background
that
we
met
originally
with
the
civic
association
we'd
reached
out
to
them
when
this
project
came
up
and
we
filed
for
the
pd
met
with
him
three
times
since
december,
the
applicant
developer
had
written
a
very
long
letter
explaining
what
he
was
trying
to
do.
What
he
was
trying
to
get
accomplished
with
a
lot
of
the
details
of
the
project
to
include
some
of
the
bed
counts,
some
of
the
requirements.
E
You
know
the
the
requirements
of
akka
with
the
state
as
far
as
density
those
type
of
things
and
has
reached
out
three
times
since
then
to
meet
with
them
and
thus
the
agreement
that
we've
come
to
with
the
civic
association.
I
know
mr
ricky
had
said
the
agreement.
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
be
enforceable,
it's
up
to
the
city
attorney,
obviously,
but
the
developer
fully
intends
to
comply
with
the
commitments
that
he's
made.
That's
why
we're
you
know
here
tonight
and
I'm
happy
to
put
that
into
the
record,
if
need
be
so.
Okay.
F
If
I
could
chair
so
since
we're
going
to
go
to
continuance
anyway,
we're
going
to
have
to
come
back
and
it's
going
to
be
a
piece
and
there
are
going
to
be
requirements
that
are
part
of
any
kind
of
pd
that
comes
forward.
I
think
the
discussion
and
the
issue
was
that
there
may
have
been
people
from
the
the
the
association
that
represented
the
southern
part
of
the
association,
not
the
northern
part.
F
I
think
that
was
part
of
the
issue
and
I'm
not
sure
if
miss
green
young
had
known
about
the
reduction
of
of
the
the
homes,
or
I
mean
excuse
me,
the
the
beds
and
whether
or
not
that
was
you
know
talked
about
at
that
time.
If
it
was
with
mr
ricky,
who
was
representing
the
the
other
part
of
the
association,
that's
the
only
confusing
part
I've
got
on
all
this.
I
mean
because
we're
hearing
we're
hearing
from
two
different
community
leaders
that
we
know-
and
we
have
two
different.
F
E
Yes,
sir,
totally
agree.
Miss
green
is
a
member
at
large
of
the
executive
committee
of
the
tampa
civic
association.
She
was
at
the
meeting.
She
was
at
the
meeting
for
all
the
discussions
certainly
eligible
to
voice
her
opinion,
which
I'm
quite
sure
she
did
when
we
were
not
in
the
room
and
again
it's
a
matter
of
the
history,
doesn't
necessarily
dictate
the
future,
which
I
get
her
concerns.
E
I
think
mr
mohammed
gets
her
concerns
and
mrs
fragdory
gets
her
concerns
and
that's
what
we're
looking
to
address
by
reaching
out
to
them,
saying
hey,
look
we're
willing
to
comply
willing
to
do
make
something
work.
I
had
asked
a
number
of
times
during
those
meetings
as
to
exactly
what
they
wanted
there.
If
they
didn't
want
to
assist
living
facility,
what
we
were
given
an
option
of
was
multi-family
with
the
current
situation
in
that
area.
The
multi-family
rents
will
not
support
the
development
of
the
facilities
as
they
want
to
see
them.
E
F
Yeah
I
I
would.
I
would
make
the
suggestion
that,
after
seeing
some
of
the
feedback
that
you
make
sure
you
you
do
meet
with
with
her
and
some
of
the
members
of
the
people
that
live
in
that
particular
part
of
tampa
heights
to
understand
what
what's
going
on,
you
know
go
the
extra
mile,
because
it's
always
important.
F
Obviously,
if
you're
going
to
come
back
here
in
a
month,
it
I
think,
would
help
you
understand
what
some
of
the
concerns
are
and
I'm
not
sure
what
the
plan
is
going
to
look
like
when
it
comes
back.
That's
up
to
you
and
and
then
we'll
make
a
decision
based
on
whatever
you
come
back
to
us
with
so
with
that
chair.
F
Unless
there's
anything
else,
I
want
to
make
sure,
though,
that
are
we
going
to
have
any
additional
ability
for
folks
to
speak
at
the
next
hearing,
since
it's
going
to
be
a
brand
new,
a
brand
new
plan.
B
They
could
speak
to
the
changes
of
council's
pleasure.
They
can
speak
to.
You
could
give
them
a
another
opportunity,
but
they
certainly
have
the
right
to
speak
to
any
changes
that
are
brought
back
for
council's
consideration.
F
Yeah,
I
I'd
wish
that
we
would
give
abroad
leeway
only
because
we
we
have
a
completely
different
plan
that
was
brought
to
us
whole
and
brand
new
to
us.
It
would
you
know
we
didn't
know
that
this
was
going
to
be
brought
up
before
the
continuance,
so
hopefully
that
I'm
not
sure
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
the
neighborhood
knows
too
and
whether
or
not
we
have
the
ability
to
have
them
send
out
another
notice
or
not
so.
F
B
E
To
do
so
and
to
your
point,
we've
been
more
than
happy
to
reach
out
and
again,
the
executive
committee
is
the
way
we've
reached
out.
Mr
big
guru
is
offered
to
show
up
at
the
general
meeting
of
the
neighborhood
association,
so
we're
certainly
willing
to
work
for
the
community
to
try
to
make
as
many
accommodations
as
we
can
within
a
responsible
development
process.
A
All
right,
so
any
other
comments.
Questions
from
before
we
separate
motion
from
listening,
loretta
all
right.
N
Miranda's
motion
chairman:
I
move
that
we
continue
this
meeting
to
march
14th,
but
six
o'clock
of
the
year
29th
second.
A
Well,
I
got
a
motion
from
mr
miranda,
I'm
saying:
I'm
gonna
buy
mr
corn
and
a
further
discussion
on
the
motion.
C
D
Good
evening,
council
members,
david
haye,
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
I
have
been
sworn
we
moved
down
to
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
for
this
next
case.
More
specifically,
the
port
tampa
city
neighborhood,
since
it
is
down
there,
it
is
within
the
coastal
high
hazard
area,
there's
also
transit
down
there.
Hearts
route
17
serves
that
portion
of
the
city,
since
it
is
in
the
coastal
high
hazard
area.
It
is
a
in
an
evacuation
zone.
D
On
to
an
aerial
here's,
the
subject
site-
this
is
a
zoomed
out.
Mary
will
probably
have
a
closer
in.
You
can
see
this
street
pattern.
This
portion
of
kissimmee
that
the
street
is
on
is
mostly
vacant
on
the
west
side
and
mostly
duplexes
and
multi-family
on
the
west
side,
and
this
is
commerce
street
heading
up
and
then
up
toward
west
shore.
This
right
here
is
the
port
tampa
library
building,
but
you
can
see.
D
Port
tampa
has
been
filling
in
with
a
lot
of
single-family
news,
single-family
detached
south
of
the
subject
site
and
also
this
site.
This
right
here
is
the
west
shore
elementary
school.
Just
to
give
you
some
context
onto
the
future,
land
use
map
it's
hard
to
see,
but
the
subject
site
and
all
that
kind
of
pink
color
lavender,
I
guess,
is
the
community
mixed
use,
35.
D
D
and,
and
then
this
area
is
all
that
single
family
detached
under
the
residential
tent.
Your
planning,
commission
staff
has
looked
at
it.
The
plan
encourages
the
development
and
redevelopment
of
new
houses
on
vacant,
infill
or
underutilized
lands.
At
present,
the
parcel
is
vacant
and
undeveloped
proposed
rezoning
is
deemed
appropriate.
Infill
development
under
that
community
mixed
use,
35
future
land
use
category.
D
D
C
You
mary's
san
diego
for
the
record.
The
subject
property
is
in
green.
As
you
can
see,
it
is
in
the
commercial
general
zoning
district.
C
As
david
stated,
this
is
an
area
that
was
industrial.
However,
they
did
a
comprehensive
plan
amendment
to
convert
it
out
of
the
industrial
land
use
category
in
the
community
mixed
use.
35..
Now
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
change
the
property
from
commercial
general
zoning
over
to.
J
C
50
to
allow
for
single-family
detached
residential
development
here
is
the
subject
property.
It's
currently
vacant
property
decided
and
residential
development
with
some
apartments
across
the
street
and
single-family
houses.
So
there's
a
mix
of
residential
development
already
occurring
in
the
immediate
area.
The
subject
property
is
a
little
over
ten
thousand
square
feet
per
the
rs
50
zoning
standards.
Each
lot
would
have
to
be
50
by
100
and
5
000
square
feet.
C
And
any
development
that
was
to
occur
would
be
required
to
comply
with
the
rs50
zoning
standards.
This
is
euclidean
rezoning,
so
there's
no
waivers
allowed
and
there's
no
site
plan
to
submit
the
development
review.
Compliance
staff
found
this
consistent
with
the
land
development
code.
A
All
right,
a
question
from
council
applicant.
J
P
Good
evening
my
name
is
callie
dunno,
I'm
with
the
port,
tampa
civic
port,
tampa
civic
association
for
this
particular
resort.
We
do
ask
that
you
consider
keeping
it
commercial
general.
There
are
a
couple
other
commercial
general
lots
around
the
port
tampa
area,
where
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
rezone
them
as
residential,
but
this
one
is
also
around
an
area
where
there
are
some
other
commercial
facilities
there.
A
lot
of
them
are
boat
storage
places
and,
as
pointed
out
on
the
map,
the
library
is
close.
There.
P
Port
tampa
does
continue
to
be
filled
in
with
both
residential
housing
and
a
lot
of
apartments
as
we
gain
more
people
and
citizens
we're.
We
don't
have
businesses
to
go
to.
We
are
forced
up
north,
where
it's
also
infilling
with
a
lot
of
people,
there's
a
lot
of
change
around
tampa,
which
we
support,
but
we
would
like
to
keep
some
of
our
businesses
down
there
import
tampa
so
that
our
quality
of
life
remains
consistent
with
everyone
else
coming
in
there's,
like
I
said,
there's
a
lot
of
development
down
there
and
we
support
that.
P
O
Hello
city
council,
my
name
is
jeffrey
natopsky.
I
am
the
new
president
of
the
gandy
civic
association,
I'm
following
in
al
stenson's
footsteps.
Much
like
al
got
involved,
I'm
going
to
get
involved
as
well.
Mr
toth,
on
on
your
plan
for
mccoy,
I'm
going
to
ask
city
council
to
consider-
I
don't
know
the
appropriate
terminology,
but
push
this
back
or
to
give
us
some
more
time
for
the
developer
to
meet
with
the
neighborhood
civic
associations.
O
I
am
not
sure
if
you
had
a
chance
to
do
that
yet
and
I'll
make
sure
you
know
we
talk.
Here's
the
situation,
development,
good
apartments,
town
homes,
condos,
I'm
indifferent,
I'm
a
marine
corps
veteran,
I'm
also
a
real
estate
broker.
So
I
understand
the
development
of
the
neighborhoods
here's
the
problem.
O
I
live
down
in
a
neighborhood.
If
I'm
hungry,
I
have
nowhere
to
eat.
If
I
want
to
go,
buy
something
there's
nowhere
to
shop.
We
are
developing
south
afghani
at
a
rapid
rate,
which
is
great,
more
taxable
income.
The
neighborhood
looks
better,
however,
for
instance
nick
who
nick
crews,
who
owns
big
race
fish
camp.
O
He
wants
to
open
up
another
location
in
south
of
gained
even
on
the
west
side
of
dale
mary
there's
nowhere
to
do
it
up
and
down
west
shore,
there's
only
a
few
remaining
parcels
in
which
we
might
have
an
opportunity
to
bring
some
restaurants
in.
We
might
have
the
opportunity
to
put
some
shopping
in.
We
have
tens
of
thousands
of
folks
who
are
living
in
the
area.
However,
we
don't
have
any
small
businesses
for
these.
These
these
citizens
to
you,
know,
go
into
what
I'm
going
to
ask
the
mr
tathan.
You
know
city
council.
O
If
perhaps
there
is
an
alternative
for
a
mixed
use
on
this
parcel.
Maybe
we
can
have
a
little
bit
of
shopping.
Maybe
we
can
have
some
places
for
the
small
businesses,
the
entrepreneurs
to
be
able
to
come
in
and
and
have
something
to
do
with
their
neighborhood.
The
issue
is
a
lot
of
folks
are
upset
about
the
development.
I'm
not.
I
think
it's
great
for
the
neighborhood,
I'm
upset
that
we
don't
have
anywhere
to
eat.
We
don't
have
anywhere
to
go
and
shop
and
spend
our
money.
What
apartments
do
for
neighborhoods?
O
O
We
don't
have
anywhere
for
these
businesses
to
get
created
nowhere
for
them
to
get
established.
So
my
request
on
behalf
of
the
gandhi,
civic
association
cali's,
spoke
on
behalf
of
the
port
camp.
Pacific
association,
is
to
perhaps
delay
or
give
us
some
more
time
for
mr
toff,
the
developer
of
this
project,
to
meet
what
the
appropriate
civic
associations
in
the
neighborhood
to
see.
If
we
can't,
you
know,
come
to
some
common
ground-
and
you
know
put
something
together-
that
benefits
everybody
in
the
neighborhood.
A
O
A
All
right
anyone
else
wish
to
speak
on
item
number.
Two.
You
got
a
question.
Okay,
the
applicant.
You
got
time
to
respond.
You
can
respond
to
what
you
heard
here
tonight.
J
I'm
the
applicant-
and
I
really
don't
know
how
to
respond,
because
we
residential
builder
builders
in
the
same
area
across
the
street
residential
area.
There
is
no
one
store,
nothing
like
that.
So
if
the
folks
need
more
time
to
talk,
we
can
do
that,
but
I
don't
think
we're
going
to
change
our
request.
J
J
To
we
had
to
send
out
what
city
required
notice
to
the
civic
association,
we
didn't
get
anything
back.
I
got
few
phone
calls
I
answered
from
from
residents
around
the
area,
but
nothing
else.
F
All
right,
mr
thomas
you're,
going
to
you're
going
to
put
a
single
family
home
there
is
that
what
it
is,
or
actually
that's
going
to
be
two.
F
Would
you
be
willing
to
meet
with
the
homeowner
association,
especially
since
now
they've
said
that
they
have
some
other
suggestions?
Would
you
be
willing
to
do
that,
but
see
we
can't
tell
you
what
to
do.
You
can
ask
us
for
a
continuance
in
order
for
you
to
go
talk
to
them
and
then
come
back
at
a
different
date.
That's
up
to
you.
J
F
Okay,
the
reason
why
I
ask
you
is
that
if
you,
if
you
don't
sometimes
when
we
vote,
it
doesn't
go
your
way
and
then
you
won't
be
able
to
get
you
know
a
change
or
if
you
make
a
decision
to
go
forward
and
maybe
you
meet
with
the
neighborhood,
sometimes
you
get
something
that
is
workable.
Now
again,
that's
up
to
you
as
to
what
you
want
to
do.
You've
heard
what
the
neighborhoods
had
to
say
and
they
had
some
different
suggestions.
F
J
J
F
Okay,
all
right
would
you
be
willing
to
come
back
if
I
could
get
a
date
from
march
14th
also,
can
you
come.
B
F
Yeah
that'd
be
fine,
that'd,
be
fine,
so
sir,
we
will
continue
it
and
you
will
come
back
on
the
28th.
Please
make
sure
you
talk
to
them
since
you've
asked
for
this
continuance
and
then
you
can
come
back
here
at
that
time.
All
right.
A
But
when
he
first
responded,
he
said
even
if
he
met
with
them,
he
saw
no
changes
going
to
be
made
right
again.
F
A
You,
okay,
entertain
a
motion.
J
He
might
get
involved
in
in
the
discussion.
Yes,.
F
Terrific
all
right
I'll
make
the
motion
that
the
continue
this
until
march
28th,
I
believe
at
6,
00
p.m.
A
All
right,
I
got
a
motion
from
this
warriors
talking
about
mr
miranda
to
continue
this
to
march
28th,
all
the
time
that
motion
say
hi.
B
F
A
C
D
Good
evening,
council
members,
david
haye,
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
I
have
been
sworn
we're
still
in
that
the
south
tampa
planning
district
again,
the
port
tampa
city
neighborhood.
There
is
transit
like
the
last
one,
it's
about
a
quarter
of
a
mile
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site,
just
like
the
other
one.
It's
in
the
level
a
evacuation
zone
and
the
closest
public
recreational
facilities
southwest
port
tampa
park
located
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site.
D
This
is
a
little
further
south
than
the
last
one.
This
is
the
subject
site
right
here.
A
lot
of
this
is
undeveloped.
A
lot
of
this
is
city-owned
property.
This
is
a
part
of
the
park
just
to
the
north
west
of
the
subject
site
this.
These
tanks
to
the
south,
that's
mcdill
air
force
base
and
the
boundary
for
the
base
there,
but
you
can
see
the
area
is
predominantly
single-family
detached.
We
also
have
some
new
development
occurring
further
to
the
east.
D
Here's
the
future
land
use
map
it's
hard
to
see,
but
the
subject
site
is
that
residential
tens,
similar
to
that
tan
color
all
around
there
is
some
scattered
undeveloped,
light
industrial
parcels.
All
down
in
this
area,
but
this
area
has
been
trending,
there's
been
numerous
plant
amendments
down
here,
bringing
it
to
that
residential
10
site.
The
blue
is
the
public
quasi
public
associated
with
mcdill
air
force
base.
D
D
This
site,
the
request
to
rezone
the
subject
site
from
that
adopted
industrial
general
zoning
district,
which
was
the
old
zoning
to
the
residential
single
family
50.
This
will
allow
for
comparable
and
compatible
infield
development
in
this
southern
portion
of
port
tampa
city
neighborhood,
the
proposed
rezoning
is
deemed
appropriate
infill
development
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use
category.
D
The
proposed
rezoning
would
not
alter
the
character
of
the
the
physical
development
pattern
of
this
portion
of
south
o'brien
street.
The
existing
average
density
for
residential
parcels
fronting
this
block
of
south
o'brien
street
with
a
residential
10
future
land
use,
designation
and
excluding
the
subject
site
is
8.72
units
per
acre.
If
the
applicant,
through
this
rezoning
to
rs
50,
creates
two
developer
lots,
it
would
create
a
density
of
nine
dwelling
units
per
acre
on
the
subject
site
this
portion
of
south
o'brien
street
and
the
potential
for
two
developer.
D
Lots
on
the
subject
site
is
comparable
and
compatible.
The
property
is
in
the
coastal
high
hazard
area,
so
the
applicant
would
need
to
ensure,
through
the
city
that
the
shelter
demands
are
met
and
any
mitigation
is
provided
and
based
on
those
considerations,
planning.
Commission
staff
finds
the
proposed
rezoning
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
Thank
you.
C
C
This
is
an
area
of
the
plan
development
that
was
approved
last
year.
The
relatively
large
plan
development
for
the
infill
residential
construction,
there's
the
subject
property
currently
vacant
and
unused
is
across
the
street.
That's
the
infrastructure
and
basic
construction
site
clearance
occurring
for
that
larger
pd
across
o'brien.
C
Here's
some
of
the
canals
that
serve
the
area
and
then
single
family
houses
are
on
the
remaining
lots
again
they're
requesting
it
to
rezone
to
rs
50
as
a
residential
infill
project.
C
As
david
indicated,
this
property
is
zone,
industrial
general,
but
it
is
sat
vacant
and
not
used
for
industrial
projects
for
decades,
and
so
it
seems
appropriate
to
transition
it
over
to
what
the
existing
established
character
of
the
surrounding
area,
which
is
residential,
so
the
applicant's
requesting
to
go
to
rs,
50
single-family
residential
for
a
maximum
of
two
lots
on
the
10
000
square
feet.
Any
development
that
was
to
occur
would
be
required
to
comply
with
the
rs50
zoning
standards
and
the
development
review
and
compliance
staff
found
this
consistent
with
the
land
development
code.
J
O
Hi
jeffrey
natopsky
again,
this
particular
redevelopment
rezoning
is
not
in
the
gandhi,
civic
association's
district.
So
I'm
coming
here
as
a
private
citizen,
I
support
the
idea
of
it.
I
think
it's
good
to
transition
away
from
the
industrial
vacant
lands
we
have
to
put
in
some
nice
new
homes,
so
I'm
in
support
of
it.
I
guess
my
only
request
would
be
you
know,
building
something
in
there
that
would
maintain
like
the
structure
kind
of
the
characteristic
of
the
neighborhood.
So
you
know
what
kind
of
house
you
put
on
there.
O
A
Move
the
plug
all
right.
We
got
a
motion
closed
from
mr
miranda
sampling
by
this
amanda
scalpel.
I
want
to
pay
that
motion
to
say
hi
all
right
opposed.
Mr
soiree,
would
you
read
number
three.
F
Thank
you
chair.
I
present
an
ordinance
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
7701,
south
o'brien
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
ig
industrial
general
to
rs,
50,
residential
single
family,
providing
an
effective
day
all
right.
H
B
Motion
carried
with
capeen
be
an
abstinent
vote
second
reading
and
adoption
to
be
held
on
march
7
2019
at
9
30
a.m.
A
All
right,
let
me
make
a
quick
announcement.
The
council
has
need
to
go
in
and
recess
for
10
minutes
to
take
care
of
a
matter
of
importance
and
we
will
be
in
recess
for
10
minutes
and
we'll
be.
A
C
Mary
san
diego
item
number
number
four
is
rez
18
1
23.
It's
a
rezoning
request
for
2502
west
fig
at
street
from
rm
16
to
arm
18.
D
Leaving
council
council
members
david
haye
planning,
commission
staff,
I
have
been
sworn:
we
moved
back
up
to
the
central
tampa
planning
district
for
this
next
case.
More
specifically,
the
west
tampa
urban
village,
the
subject
site.
The
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
vila
brother
park,
which
is
0.17
miles
to
the
north.
There
is
a
transit
provided
down
on
kennedy,
boulevard
to
the
south
of
the
subject
site.
The
subject
site
is
in
the
level
d
evacuation
zone
onto
the
aerial.
This
is
the
zoomed
out.
One
mary
will
have
a
closer
in
one.
D
The
subject
site
is
right
here.
This
is
north
champania,
avenue
and
west
fig.
The
area
has
a
mixture
of
single-family
detached
and
town
homes
in
it.
This
is
the
villa
brothers
park,
and
this
is
the
brian
glazier
jewish
community
center.
Then
you've
got
kennedy
boulevard
to
the
south
with
all
that
commercial
and
stuff
down
there
on
to
the
future
land
use
map
the
subject
site
and
all
the
properties
surrounding
it.
In
that
brown
are
the
residential
20..
The
density
goes
down
when
you
move
west
of
havana
avenue
down
to
residential
10.
D
to
the
east.
This
pink
is
all
the
community
mixed
use:
35,
that's
the
jewish
community
center.
It
gets
more
intense
as
you
go
up,
howard
avenue
into
the
cc35
future
land
use
category
and
then
to
the
south.
This
kind
of
lavender
color
on
kennedy
is
the
urban
mixed
use.
60
future
land
use
category
planning
commission's
staff.
D
The
request
is
to
rezone
to
that
residential
multifamily
18..
We
found
that
it
would
not
have
any
adverse
impacts
on
properties
adjacent
to
the
site.
D
Let's
see
it's
within
that
west
tampa
urban
village,
the
area
of
the
city
which
has
been
identified
in
the
comprehensive
plan
seeks
to
to
direct
the
greatest
share
of
growth.
It
provides
the
diverse
housing
opportunities
within
the
city
of
tampa
the
urban
villages,
and
this
project
would
allow
for
additional
infill
in
an
appropriate
area,
so
based
on
those
considerations,
planning,
commission
staff
finds
the
proposed
rezoning
consistent
with
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
Thank
you.
C
C
Several
area
they've
already
been
some
rezonings
kind
of
in
the
area
for
the
slight
increase,
which
is
allowable,
increasing
density,
which
is
allowable
in
the
arts,
wanted
land
use
category
based
on
the
lot
size.
It's
a
little
over
10
500
square
feet.
If
the
rezoning
would
be
approved
for
rm18,
a
total
of
four
dwelling
units
could
theoretically
be
developed
on
this
property.
C
Again,
if
this
property
were
to
be
rezoned,
all
development
would
have
to
comply
with
the
standard
zoning
provisions
for
the
rm18
zoning
district.
There
is
no
sites
plan
to
submit
and
there
are
no
waivers.
The
development
review
and
compliance
staff
found
this
consistent
with
the
land
development
code.
M
M
We
will
have
to
meet
the
code,
compliance
issues
regarding
setbacks
and
lot
size
development.
Things
like
that,
as
well
as
the
west
tampa
overlay
district
guidelines,
both
the
city
and
the
planning
commission
staff
have
found
it
to
be
consistent
with
their
codes
and
their
review
criteria.
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
have.
The
lot
is
a
10
518
square
feet
and,
as
the
staff
has
pointed
out,
it
would
allow
for
the
consideration
of
four
units
to
be
developed
on
this
property.
I'd
respectfully
request
your
permission
and
to
go
forward
and
your
approval
all.
Q
Hi
my
first
time
so
I'm
a
rookie,
I
live
at
2,
506
west
fig.
My
name
is
joyly
and
I
didn't
get
a
notice.
I
just
saw
the
sign
next
door
to
the
property
while
when
they
were
explaining,
they
said
it's
a
mix
of
single-family
homes
and
townhomes,
but
a
lot
of
those
townhomes
are
probably
fairly
recent.
Q
When
I
was
looking
to
buy
my
first
home,
which
I
did
10
years
ago,
I
was
looking
for
a
particular
school
district,
but
one
that
I
could
afford
and
I
found
fig
and
what
I
love
is
that,
while
it
is
flavorful
in
people
is
flavorful
in
architecture,
they
were
all
single
family
homes.
It
was
really
just
very
nice
to
see
all
the
diversity
in
all
areas
I'm
not,
nor
is
it
in
my
is.
Nor
should
I
try
to
block
progress.
That
is
not
at
all
what
this
is
about.
Q
Q
My
concern
is
those
are
I'm
guessing
the
16
room
16
because
of
the
three
bedroom
is
that
there
would
be
adequate
parking,
the
things
that
I
think
maybe
could
be
addressed
here.
I
can't
change
the
landscape.
It's
changing.
You
know
we
were
all
pretty
single
stories
now.
Things
are
going
up
to
look
very
different,
but
I
digress
they
they
have.
It
looks
like
across
the
street
what
I
hope
would
be
adequate
parking,
because
if
there's
three
bedrooms
and
they're
renting,
they
could
possibly
be.
You
know:
students.
Q
There
are
some
ut
students
that
have
rented
some
of
the
bungalows
next
to
us
and
things.
That's
fine
parking
just
would
be
an
issue.
It's
a
it's
a,
not
the
widest
street
and
if
you're
parking
in
the
street,
especially
on
a
corner,
it
could
be
a
real
safety
issue.
So
my
concern
would
be
that
there
would
be
adequate
parking
built
in
on
the
property
like
it
appears
at
2411.
Q
Q
Good
good
good,
okay,
like
I
said
novice
but
the
other
one
is
there-
are
12
bedrooms
on
the
other
one,
so
I'm
guessing
at
least
12
there.
So
as
long
as
there's
adequate
parking
there,
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
something
that
maybe
can
be
addressed,
maybe
can't,
but
I
would
hope
that
it
would
be
part
of
the
plan
to
actually
have
adequate
parking
available
on
the
site
itself.
Like
I
said
it
is
at
a
corner
and
the
streets
are
narrow
and
if
there's
parking
on
the
street
it
could
definitely
be
a
safety
hazard.
A
Times
nine
trees,
your
time
is
up.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right.
Anyone
else
what
you
speak
when
I
adam
number,
four,
all
right
african.
M
Yes,
sir,
to
address
the
comments
that
the
neighbor
indicated
she
had
concerns
about.
Typically,
you
have
to
have
a
two-car
garage
and
you
have
to
have
space
in
the
in
the
driveway
for
two
additional
cars,
because
you
have
to
meet
the
technical
standards
for
transportation
for
the
backup
space.
M
So
each
one
of
these
will
have
to
comply
with
the
code
and
there
can't
be
any
waivers
for
storm
water,
and
if
there
are
tree
issues
to
be
addressed,
we
have
to
go
through
the
natural
resources
department
and
meet
the
code
requirements
for
them
as
well,
and
that
includes
any
removal
and
replacement
of
trees
on
the
site.
So
they
will
all
have
to
be
addressed
in
the
permitting
process
and
you
can't
build
anything
without
without
addressing
the
transportation,
the
storm
water
and
the
tree
and
natural
resources
tree
code.
M
A
B
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
cherry
move.
An
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
2502
west
fig
street,
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rm16
residential
multi-family
to
rm18
residential
multi-family,
providing
an
effective
date.
D
Good
evening,
council
members,
david
haye
again
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
I
have
been
sworn.
We
moved
back
down
to
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
for
this
next
case.
More
specifically,
the
ballast
point
neighborhood
the
subject:
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
skyview
park,
which
is
about
420
feet
southwest
of
the
site.
D
There
is
transit
down
in
that
end
of
the
city
at
dale
mayberry
in
inner
bay,
and
then
it
is
within
a
level
a
evacuation
zone,
which
also
means
that
it's
in
the
coastal
high
hazard
area
on
the
aerial
again
the
zoomed
out
one.
This
is
the
subject
site
right
here.
This
is
south
third
street.
It
dead
ends
into
the
pavilion's
apartment,
complex
down
there
on
mcdill.
D
You
could
see.
The
majority
of
this
area
is
all
single-family
detached,
except
for
the
apartment
community.
A
across
this
is
mcdill
inner
bay.
This
is
skyview
park
and
then
this
is
actually
the
elap
property
down
in
south
tampa.
D
On
to
the
future
land
use
map,
the
subject
site
and
all
the
properties
on
south
third
street
and
the
surrounding
area-
in
that
I
guess
tan
color
is
residential
10..
It
gets
a
little
more
dense
as
you
move
toward
mcdill.
The
properties
on
mcdill
are
a
residential
20..
These
this
represents
the
green
represents
the
recreation
open
space
skyview
park
and
the
e-lap,
and
then
the
commercial
area
is
located
at
inner
bay
and
mcdill.
D
D
Policies
it
would
it
the
site,
since
it
is
a
larger
site
than
what
is
currently
found
in
that
portion
of
that
neighborhood.
It
is
underutilized
under
that
residential
tent,
and
this
would
bring
the
density
more
in
compliance
to
the
development
pattern
around
it.
It
is
within
that
coastal
high
acid
area,
as
stated
previously
and
the
applicant,
should
work
with
the
city
and
ensuring
that
any
mitigation
that's
required
for
shelter
space
is
handled
and
based
on
all
that
planning.
Commission
staff
finds
the
rezoning
request
consistent
with
the
tampa
conference
plan.
Thank.
C
You
mary's
san
diego
for
the
record.
This
is
a
resetting
request.
It's
the
euclidean
rezoning
request
from
rs-60
to
rs50
to
allow
for
the
ultimate
creation
of
two
single-family
lots
based
on
the
ice
50
zoning
standards.
C
Whenever
we
do
this
type
of
analysis,
we
look
at
the
development
pattern
of
the
surrounding
area.
This
is
all
already.
This
area
is
not
considered
it's
rs50
already.
This
is
a
commercial
area,
and
this
is
all
multi-family
or
townhome
developments.
So
really
I
just
looked
at
this
immediate
area
of
the
total
of
36
lots
that
were
in
the
study
area.
58
were
larger
than
60
feet
or
equal
to
or
larger
than
60
feet
wide
of
the
subject.
M
If
you
noticed
on
the
on
the
map
that
mary
showed
you
just
a
minute
ago,
the
two
properties
immediately
to
the
north
and
all
the
properties
directly
across
the
street
from
from
this
requested
rezoning,
are
all
50-foot
lots
and
the
ones
that
further
south
you
have
town
houses.
You
have
commercial
properties
and
and
a
huge
tract
of
land
immediately
to
the
north,
which
is
all
50-foot
lots.
M
This
area
has
undergone
a
great
deal
of
of
new
investment
and
infill
development
and,
as
you
may
recall,
both
the
planning,
commission
and
the
city
requirements
are
that
you
can
only
do
that
where
you
have
existing
utilities
for
water,
sewer,
transportation,
schools
and
we've
met
all
that
criteria.
So
I
would
respectfully
request
your
approval.
A
All
right
any
questions
for
the
applicant
all
right,
anyone
in
the
public,
what's
your
speak
on
out
of
number
five
second
got
most.
B
A
C
B
A
D
D
Here
we
have
an
aerial,
the
subject
site.
You
can
see
south
of
broadway,
it's
almost
all
industrial
in
nature.
There
is
some
commercial
along
broadway
and
then
you
go
into
unincorporated
county
further
off
of
this
portion
of
broadway
there's
a
mix
of
uses
and
and
stuff
in
the
county,
but
the
city
is
predominantly
all
industrial.
D
D
It
the
land
use
is
heavy
industrial.
It's
consistent
with
that
underlying
future
land
use
category.
The
zoning
this
portion
of
east
broadway
is
developed
primarily
with
those
industrial
uses,
so
the
use
would
be
comparable
and
compatible.
The
campus
comprehensive
plan
supports
the
intensification
of
its
industrial
warehousing
and
distribution
facilities.
D
The
industrial
areas
in
the
city
must
be
preserved
and
intensified
to
strengthen
tampa's
role
as
a
regional
economic
center
rezoning
the
subject
site
to
an
industrial,
heavy
zoning
district
furthers
this
policy
direction
and
the
comprehensive
plan
approving
the
request
would
stimulate
growth
in
the
industrial
sector
of
the
area
and
is
consistent
with
the
comp
plan
and
based
on
that.
All
that
considerations.
The
staff
recommends
to
you
this
evening
that
this
was
consistent
with
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
Thank
you.
C
Here
is
an
ariel
of
the
subject.
Property.
As
you
can
see,
it's
it's
an
industrial
use
here
is
the
zoning
map,
as
you
can
see
the
subject
properties
in
green
and
there
is
a
swath
of
commercial
intensive
zoning.
That's
currently
along
broadway
avenue,
the
subject
property
is
split
between
the
northern
half
is
commercial
intensive
and
the
southern
half
is
hub
industrial.
C
C
If
this
property
were
to
be
completely
rezoned
to
cover
the
entire
heavy
industrial
zoning
district,
all
activity
would
have
to
comply
with
that
zoning
district
standards.
There's
no
site
plan
to
submit
and
no
waivers
and
the
development
review
and
compliance
staff
found
this
consistent
with
the
land
development.
A
R
Good
evening
kevin
really
100
south
ashley
drive
here
for
the
applicant.
I
have
a
presentation
to
submit.
R
R
This
rezoning
is
contiguous
with
the
heavy
industrial
to
the
south
and
the
neighboring
uses
are
compatible
and
the
heavy
industrial
use
would
actually
be
more
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
in
the
future
language
map.
R
R
I
think
important
for
this
application
is
to
look
at
the
neighboring
uses.
This
is
across
broadway
to
the
north.
Clearly
very
heavy
industrial
and
lots
of
open
storage
and
industrial
uses
to
the
east,
some
open
space
and
then
a
commercial
gas
station.
R
To
the
west,
some
more
industrial
and
then
some
commercial
uses
on
the
north
side
of
broadway
and
then
here
on
the
south
side
of
broadway.
The
neighboring
property
is
also
open.
Storage
and
industrial
use.
R
And
quickly,
the
the
property
itself,
the
area
we've
already
shown.
But
if
you
can
see
the
property
itself,
the
stacking
right
now
is
done
to
the
back
of
the
property
there
and
limits
the
amount
of
space
available
to
the
applicant
to
use
the
property.
R
So,
to
get
to
the
purpose
of
the
application
here
is
primarily
stacking
height.
The
applicant
runs
a
pallet
business.
A
portion
of
that
business
is
brokering
pallets.
Another
portion
is
repairing
or
recycling,
the
pallets
cannot
be
repaired
and,
depending
on
the
current
state
of
the
business,
there
could
be
a
lot
of
inventory
on
site
or
minimal
inventory.
When
there's
a
lot
of
inventory,
the
height
for
stacking
is
limited
to
six
feet
and
six
feet,
obviously
not
very
high,
and
that
limits
the
the
applicant's
space
to
functionally
use
the
northern
part
of
the
property.
R
This
is
true
in
all
zoning
districts,
except
for
heavy
industrial
in
the
heavy
industrial
district.
The
land
development
code
allows
for
higher
stacking
heights,
depending
on
setbacks
and
buffering.
It
could
be
as
high
as
40
feet,
but
typically
it
would
be
somewhere
in
the
10
to
20
foot
range
in
justification.
R
But
more
importantly,
the
comprehensive
plan
set
this
out
to
be
a
heavy
industrial
area
and
the
land
development
code
encourages
heavy
industrial
in
those
areas
that
the
comprehensive
plan
has
set
out
for
heavy
industrial
and
uses
in
heavy
industrial
are
meant
to
be
those
uses
that
are
not
compatible
with
primary
commercial,
institutional
and
residential
uses,
and
since
the
primary
reason
that
the
applicant
seeks
this
is
to
be
able
to
stack
and
stacking
is
only
allowed
in
heavy
industrial
zoning
that
seems
to
comply
with
the
land
development
code.
R
I
don't
need
to
put
up
the
other
slides.
This
is
consistent
and
recommended
by
staff
and
the
planning
commission
and
we
respect
the
request
approval.
Are
there
any
questions.
A
B
C
D
Even
council
members,
david
haye
planning
commission
staff
at
the
max
driver,
I
have
been
sworn
we're
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically,
the
channel
district
urban
village
area
is
within
the
city's
central
business
district
periphery
that
allows
additional
density
above
the
rme
100.
east
kennedy.
Boulevard
is
a
transit
emphasis
corridor
and
a
small
portion
of
the
subject
site
is
within
the
coastal
high
hazard
area.
D
The
majority
of
the
site
is
in
a
level
b,
evacuation
zone.
The
nearest
transit
is
at
that's
bus
at
kennedy
and
north
12th
street.
It's
also
within
proximity
to
the
streetcar
line
on
to
the
aerial.
D
Channel
side
drive:
this
is
the
grand
central
development
there's
the
crosstown
union
station,
the
area
we're
all
familiar
with
it.
It's
a
lot
of
multi-family
in
that
particular
area
on
to
the
future.
Land
use
map
the
subject
site
and
all
this
kind
of
reddish
color,
is
that
regional,
mixed
use,
100
the
most
intensive
category
outside
of
downtown
there's,
still
some
scattered
heavy
industrial
parcels
on
the
north
side
of
the
channel
district.
D
D
The
applicant
is
requesting
approval
in
this
petition
to
convert
3150
square
feet
of
loading
dock
space
into
office
space.
The
request
is
part
of
a
rezoning
for
the
grand
central
project
in
which
it
has
a
mix
already
of
residential
offices
commercial
uses.
Originally,
there
was
supposed
to
be
a
grocery
store
also
within
that
development.
However,
the
anchor
tenant
for
that
grocery
store
did
not
locate
in
grand
central
complex
as
plan.
Therefore,
the
applicant
is
requesting
for
approval
to
convert
the
loading
docks
that
were
designed
for
that
grocery
store
into
office.
Space
planning.
D
Commission
staff
includes
that
approving
the
applicant's
request
will
be
compatible
with
the
mixture
of
uses
found
not
only
within
the
development
but
within
the
surrounding
area,
and
based
on
that
planning.
Commission
staff
recommends
to
you
this
evening
that
this
be
found
consistent
with
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
C
As
david
stated,
this
is
the
grand
central
existing
development.
The
only
thing
that's
proposing
to
change
is
two
of
the
loading
docks
will
be
converted
into
a
little
over
3
100
square
feet
of
office
space.
Nothing
else
is
proposed
to
change
with
the
site.
It's
cd2,
it
came
before
you
several
years
ago.
It's
back
again.
C
The
only
reason
why
it's
back
before
you
today
is
because
they
have
to
ask
for
one
additional
waiver
than
beyond
the
waivers
that
were
previously
approved
to
reduce
the
total
off-street
loading
spaces
for
the
entire
development
from
five
spaces.
Down
to
three,
the
elimination
of
those
two
loading
spaces
will
be
where
the
new
office
suites
will
be.
Here
is
the
subject
property.
As
david
said,
it's
in
the
channel
side
district
with
a
smattering
of
different
uses
that
have
already
occurred
there
here
is
the
site
plan
existing
channel
side
development.
C
The
only
thing
that
is
changing
is
these:
two
loading
spaces
which
the
applicant
will
state
aren't
used
will
be
converted
to
additional
office
space
and
again
the
reason
why
we're
before
you
is
to
get
that
waiver.
There
are
a
couple
small
changes
between
first
and
second
reading,
that
you'll
see
in
your
the
revision
sheet
of
the
staff
report.
C
That
I'll
remind
you
to
make
as
part
of
your
motion
overall,
the
development
review
compliance
staff
did
find
this
inconsistent
through
transportation
because
of
the
waiver
to
the
loading
birth
going
down
from
five
to
three
other
than
that.
If
it
is
pleasure
to
approve
the
pledge
of
counsel
to
approve
this
amendment
again,
there
are
visions
between
first
and
second.
N
C
B
Goody
good
evening,
council
andy
may
it's
gray,
robinson
401,
east
jackson,
street.
I
have
been
sworn
and
councilman
miranda
you're
you're,
exactly
correct.
The
intended
use
was
that,
hopefully,
a
grocery
store
is
going
to
come
to
this
parcel.
It
did
not
that's
the
bad
news.
The
good
news
is,
it
is
coming
across
the
street
and
it's
going
in
there.
So
at
the
time
there
were
dedicated
bays
that
would
allow
18,
wheelers
large
truck,
and
you
know,
horse
and.
B
Don't
don't
allow
residents
to
move
in
and
out
because
there's,
inter
their
structural
interference
between
those
bays
and
where
they
would
have
to
get
to
to
move
in
and
out
of
units,
so
essentially
the
intended
use
change.
As
a
result,
we
had
space
there
that
was
originally
designed
for
that
intended
use
which
now
cannot
be
used.
B
So
we're
asking
y'all's
approval
to
convert
that
into
additional
office.
B
A
N
Chairman
chairman
move
item
number
seven
problem:
number
rec,
18-125
orders
b,
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
order,
rejoining
property
in
general
vicinity,
1120
and
11.
Excuse
me:
1208
east
kennedy,
boulevard
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
describing
section
one
from
zoning.
District
classification,
cd2
channel
district
to
cd
to
general
district,
providing
an
effective
date
got.
A
A
motion
from
mr
miranda
senator
seth
obama-
to
be
here
all
in
favor
to
say,
hi
all
right.
B
C
Mary's
san
maniego
rec
1903
for
the
property
located
at
720
west
columbus
drive
from
rs
60
to
plan
development
for
attack,
single-family
residential.
D
Good
evening
council
members,
david
haye,
with
defining
commission
staff,
I
have
been
sworn
we're
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
for
this
next
case.
More
specifically,
the
ridgewood
park
neighborhood,
the
closest
public
transit
stop,
is
located
approximately
250
feet
to
the
west
along
west
columbus
drive
and
that
stop
is
served
by
heart
route
15.,
which
connects
the
subject
site
to
west
shore
and
the
east
tampa
area,
and
also
the
net
park
transfer
center.
D
The
subject
site
is
located
within
the
level
c
evacuation
zone
and
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
phillips
park
is
located
approximately
250
feet,
walking
distance
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site
on
to
the
aerial.
This
is
the
zoomed
out.
One
mary
will
have
a
more
zoomed
in
this
map.
There's
a
slight
error
in
it.
It's
only
this
parcel.
It
does
not
include
the
parcel
right
at
the
corner,
they're
correcting
that
at
the
back
of
the
pc,
but
to
the
south
and
to
the
west
of
this
subject
site.
D
It's
all
single
family
detached,
maybe
one
or
two
older
duplexes,
but
predominantly
single
family
detached
this
is
directly
south.
There's
a
convenience
store
with
a
little
shopping,
plaza.
They're
turning
they're
installing
gas
pumps
at
that
corner,
but
this
is
a
little
note
of
light
commercial
activity
occurring
also
to
the
south.
You
can
see
the
heights
project.
This
is
the
pearl
down
there
and,
of
course,
the
river
to
the
west
on
to
the
future
land
use
map.
D
Again,
it's
only
this
parcel
that
parcel
and
all
the
parcels
to
the
west
and
south
are
all
that
residential
ten
immediately
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site
in
this
area.
That's
that
community
mixed
use,
35
similar
to
what's
found
really
to
the
north
and
to
the
west,
to
the
east
of
this
intersection.
D
D
The
city's
comprehensive
plan
encourages
the
development
of
a
variety
of
housing
types
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
present
and
future
projected
population.
The
subject
site
is
located
along
west
columbus
drive,
which
is
classified
as
an
arterial
roadway.
The
site
is
also
adjacent
to
those
commercial
uses,
as
described
previously,
staff
finds
that
the
request
for
semi-attached
multi-family
units
is
consistent
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern.
Typically
single-family
attached
residential
uses
are
not
permitted
in
areas
designated
as
residential
10.
D
However,
land
use
policy
9.3.5
allows
for
consideration
of
single-family
attached
residential
development
when
located
to
the
periphery
of
an
established,
single-family
neighborhood,
similar
to
a
site
like
this.
That's
right
next
to
commercial
uses.
The
comprehensive
plan
is
also
supportive
of
residential
infill
within
proximity
to
transit,
employment
and
recreational
amenities.
D
The
subject
site
is
within
proximity
to
transit,
service
and
and
employment,
centers,
downtown
and
phillips
park
for
the
recreation
proposed
rezoning
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
long
range
development
patterns
expected
in
this
portion
of
the
ridgewood
park
neighborhood
and
will
provide
for
an
appropriate
transition
of
intensity
between
the
commercial
uses
at
the
intersection
of
north
boulevard
in
west
columbus
and
the
single-family
detached
development
to
the
south
and
west
of
the
subject
site.
Based
on
those
considerations,
planning,
commission
staff
finds
a
proposed
plan
development
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
imagine
2040
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
C
Mary
san
mandiego
land
development
coordination
here
is
the
subject.
Property
is
currently
in
the
rs-60
zoning
district
they're,
requesting
a
plan
development
for
three
town
homes
which
are
attached
single-family
residential.
As
david
stated,
this
is
kind
of
on
the
very
edge
of
this
larger
subdivision.
C
Currently,
the
subject
property
is
currently
vacant.
This
is
what
the
applicant
is
proposing.
Three
town
homes
facing
columbus
drives
with
the
sidewalks
leading
up
to
columbus
and
the
required
parking
in
the
back
as
well
as
within
garages.
There
are
a
number
of
trees
on
site
that
will
be
preserved.
C
With
this
pd
site
plan,
there
are
no
waivers
being
requested
so
they're
in
full
compliance
with
the
standard
code
provisions
for
this
type
of
development.
There
are
some
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
that
are
required
by
staff.
I
will
make
one
note
for
the
record
on
the
revision
page,
which
is
sheet
nine.
I'm
sorry,
page,
nine
of
the
staff
report,
the
first
bullet
of
transportation
regarding
the
calculation
for
guest
parking.
That
amendment
needs
to
be
stricken.
C
So
if
you
approve
this
applications,
staff
would
recommend
saying
with
the
revision
sheet
as
amended
by
mary
san
diego
other
than
that
I
know
the
applicant
will
discuss
the
case.
There
are
minor
changes
between
first
and
second
reading,
but
again
with
no
waivers
the
land
development
or
I'm
sorry.
The
development
review
compliance
staff
found
this
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
F
Question
chair
that
same
parking
requirement
is
also
on
bullet
number.
Three
that
should
be
also
restricted.
I
want
to
make
sure
it's
on
page
two
but
bullet
number
three
under
general
requirements.
F
J
J
J
There
you
go
so
it's
an
infill,
a
lot
very
small
lot
with
the
residential
10
land
use
category
we're
proposing
three
attached
townhome
single
family
units.
We've
talked
with
a
few
of
the
neighbors.
I
think
we
have
their
full
support,
probably
judging
by
the
fact
that
no
one
else
is
here
and
with
that.
O
K
Hi,
my
name
is
tony
monk.
I
live
at
2507
north
glenwood
we're
the
immediate
neighbor
to
the
west,
and
I've
also
can
speak
on
behalf
of
the
neighborhood.
We
did
communicate
about
the
meeting
tonight
and
shared
the
documents
that
the
developer
provided
and
none
of
our
neighbors
in
our
association.
Our
local
group
issued
any
comments,
so
there
were
no
objections
or
complaints
as
the
immediate
neighbor
we're
generally
supportive
of
the
development
it's
better
than
a
vacant
lot
as
an
urban
designer.
K
That's
the
bear
trap
you
step
in
you
know
your
neighbor
was
an
urban
designer.
It's
not
great
urban
design
for
the
city
of
tampa
we're
not
going
to
create
vibrant
walkable,
equitable
communities
at
three
to
four
parking
spaces
per
unit.
There's
just
a
lot
of
land
given
to
parking
it
could
be
denser.
Of
course
we
can't
force
a
developer
to
do
something
denser,
and
I
agree
with
what
david
said
and
what
mary
said.
K
The
folks
who
are
going
to
live
here
are
going
to
want
to
live
here
because
they
can
walk
the
armature
works
in
the
heights
and
all
that
there's
only
so
many
venics
and
heights
and
midtown
developments
to
go
around.
We
have
to
start
making
some
hay
no
container.
We
have
to
start
making
some
hay
on
these
smaller
developments.
K
How
can
we
make
more
use
out
of
our
land
if
we
keep
designing
for
cars,
we're
going
to
keep
getting
cars
if
we
design
for
people
we're
going
to
get
higher
quality
neighborhoods
and
we're
going
to
have
opportunities?
I
see
on
this
site
where,
behind
it
you
have
to
address.
You
know
the
nicer
neighborhoods
they're
going
to
be
on
the
street.
Have
your
presence
on
the
street
there's
all
this
space
on
the
back
of
the
property?
K
That's
where
you
can
put
affordable
housing,
smaller
units,
you
can
really
meet
the
land,
use
the
comp
plan
objectives
of
having
a
variety
of
housing,
so
we're
generally
supported
if
we
have
any
technical
concerns,
we'll
take
those
up
with
staff.
I
think
that
anything
that
we
might
be
concerned
about
can
certainly
be
addressed
and
in
the
quick
view
I
saw
of
the
updated
plan.
They've
already
addressed
some
of
our
concerns,
so
we're
generally
pleased
they've
reached
out
to
us.
We
just
see
a
little
more
progress
from
our
city
and
from
our
comp
plan.
Thank
you.
A
Anyone
else
we
should
speak
on
item
number,
eight
petition
petition.
You
want,
you
have
a
chance
to
respond.
Yeah.
J
For
the
record
time,
axi,
we
are
limited
by
the
residential
10
land
use
category.
The
maximum
number
of
units
that
we
can
put
on
this
property
is
three,
so
we
actually
have
a
lot
of
open
space
on
this
property.
We'd,
certainly
love
to
put
more
if
we
could,
but
three
fit
nicely,
and
three
is
of
course
are
consist-
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
future
land
use
plan.
Thank.
N
A
A
I
got
a
motion
from
this
miranda.
Second
balance:
man.
I
think
that
movement
all
right,
mr
vr,
would
you
read
them
to
me.
I
A
Referenced
revision
sheet;
secondly,
okay:
we
got
a
motion
from
mr
pr
second
manuscript.
C
D
Good
evening
council
members,
david
haye,
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
I
have
been
sworn
we're
instilling
that
central
tampa
planning
district,
more
specifically
the
courier
city,
oscar
wanna,.
D
There
we
go
these.
Those
two
transit
stops
are
located
within
two
tenths
of
a
mile
from
the
subject
site:
the
closest
public
recreation
facility.
It's
within
1
200
feet,
it's
hyde
park
and
the
subject
site
with
is
within
a
level
c
evacuation
zone
on
to
the
aerial.
D
Here's
the
subject
site
we're
all
familiar
with
this
area.
There's
a
lot
of
town
home
development
occurring.
There's
not
many
single-family
detached
units
left
in
here.
This
is
the
soho
post
soho
square.
This
is
the
winn-dixie
down
on
swann.
This
is
howard.
This
is
westland.
Of
course,
this
is
the
selman
you
have
armenia
further
to
the
west,
and
mary
will
have
a
probably
a
blow
up
of
that
area.
D
Here
we
have
the
future
land
use
map
the
subject
site
and
all
these
properties
in
the
brown
are
their
residential
35
immediately
to
the
west
parcels
fronting
along
howard
avenue
are
the
community
mixed
use.
35
the
bright
red
is
the
cc35
and
then
the
green
is
the
public
recreation
open
space.
The
yellow,
of
course,
is
res
6,
and
then
you
also
get
a
pocket
of
res
50
actually
over
at
the
other
post
apartments
over
near
the
selman
crosstown.
D
The
proposed
project
is
an
area
with
a
mixture
of
housing
types
and
styles.
The
city's
comprehensive
plan
encourages
the
development
and
retention
of
a
variety
of
housing
types
to
meet
the
needs
of
its
present
and
future
populations.
D
Typically,
when
placing
units
entrances
on
the
side
of
the
structure,
a
sidewalk
is
provided
which
connects
to
the
public
sidewalk
along
an
adjacent
public
right-of-way,
the
sidewalk
provided
on
the
proposed
site
plan
does
not
connect
to
the
public
sidewalk
instead
connecting
to
unit
one
and
four's
driveway
to
comply
with
comprehensive
plan
policy
planning.
Commission
staff
would
recommend
that
the
internal
sidewalk
be
adjusted
between
first
and
second
reading
to
connect
to
the
public
sidewalk
along
west.
D
South
westland
avenue,
and
not
to
the
other
units
driveways
the
existing
density
with
one
residential
unit
on
the
subject
site
is
5.5
units
per
acre.
If
the
rezoning
is
approved,
the
applicant
could
build
a
maximum
of
four
residential
units
on
site
and
the
proposed
density
would
increase
to
22.2
units
per
acre.
D
This
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
future
land
use
designation
of
residential
35,
which
allows
an
overall
density
of
up
to
35
units
per
acre.
It
is
also
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern.
Currently,
parcels
adjacent
to
south
westland
avenue
between
west
horatio
street
and
west
deland
street
are
built
at
an
overall
density
of
30.9
units
per
acre
proposed.
Four
single-family
attached
residential
units
would
be
of
a
similar
form,
height
and
scale
of
the
surrounding
residential
uses,
and
would
not
alter
the
character
or
physical
development
pattern
of
this
portion
of
the
courier
city.
D
C
You
thank
you
mary's
san,
diego
land
development
coordination,
here's
the
subject
property.
It
is
in
green
we're
in
that
courier
osceola
area.
The
existing
zoning
is
rm16
they're,
asking
for
planned
development
to
develop
four
townhome
units.
As
you
can
see,
and
as
I
know
all
of
you
familiar,
this
area
has
seen
a
series
of
rezonings
to
convert
the
historic
single
family
neighborhood
over
to
allow
for
townhome
and
apartment
developments.
C
Here
is
the
site
plan.
The
applicant
is
proposing
two
of
the
units
will
face
westland.
The
other
two
will
face
the
required
improved
alleyway.
C
I
did
discuss
the
sidewalk
situation
with
mr
haye
prior
to
issuing
the
staff
report
and
I
have
made
a
requirement
that,
for
as
an
example,
these
are
mirror
images
for
this
door.
The
sidewalk
will
go
like
this,
and
then
his
concern
was
that
you
have
to
walk
through
the
driveway
to
get
to
the
public
sidewalk.
C
I've
made
it
on
the
revision
sheet,
a
requirement
that
between
first
and
second
reading,
they
show
a
sidewalk
connection
in
this
area,
as
well
as
in
this
area,
to
connect
the
front
doors
all
the
way
to
a
public
sidewalk
without
having
to
traverse
through
someone
else's
driveway.
So
that's
already
been
incorporated
into
the
revision
sheet
other
revisions
or
just
a
couple
minor
technical
calculations
from
land
development.
All
the
other
departments
found
it
consistent
with
the
land
development
code
and
had
no
further
revisions.
B
F
Thank
you
chair.
I
present
an
ordinance
for
first
reading
consideration
and
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
503,
south
westland
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
district
classification,
rm16
residential
multi-family
to
pd,
planned
development,
residential
multifamily,
providing
an
effective
date
and
including
the
revisions.
As
stated
by
staff
concerning
the
sidewalks,
I
got.
B
D
Uses
good
evening,
council
members,
david
haye
again
with
your
planning
commission
staff.
Our
last
case
we
end
up
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district,
more
specifically
the
bonaire
neighborhood,
the
subject
site.
There
is
public
transit
within
the
area
parts
route
36
serves
the
area
on
south
del
maybery
and
the
subject
site
is
within
a
level
c
evacuation
zone
on
to
the
aerial
here's
the
subject
site.
D
This
is
a
zeal
and
here's
heim's,
it's
west
of
heims
this
it's
hard
to
see
with
this
ariel,
but
there's
a
lot
of
small
little
offices
along
the
stretch
of
a
zeal
and
then
right
behind
them.
They're
single
family
detached
both
to
the
north
and
south.
This
is
dale
mabery.
D
D
D
It
leads
out
to
the
community
mixed
use,
35
found
along
in
this
lavender
color
out
on
south
del
mayberry,
and
then,
if
you
continue
further
east
down
azeal,
the
multi-family
in
this
brown
is
res
35
and
again
more
community
mixed
use,
35
out
on
henderson
avenue
kennedy's
to
the
further
to
the
north,
with
the
umu
60..
D
The
applicant
is
requesting
approval
through
this
rezoning
petition
to
modify
a
vacant
residential
building
to
allow
for
medical
business
and
professional
office
under
and
r01
uses
in
the
building
the
proposed
uses
in
the
building
would
not
have
any
negative
impacts
on
existing
residential
uses
adjacent
to
the
site.
Additionally,
the
medical
business,
the
medical
office
requested
by
the
applicant
in
the
building
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
uses
and
development
pattern
along
this
portion
of
west
azeel
street,
and
since
it
is
in
our
20,
the
subject
site
does
meet
commercial
locational
criteria
for
non-residential
uses.
D
M
C
Thank
you,
mary
san,
diego
land
development
coordination.
Before
I
get
started,
I've
amended
staff
report.
C
The
subject.
Property
is
currently
r01
on
west
of
zeal
street.
It's
a
block
off
of
south
sterling
avenue,
as
david
said,
there's
a
kind
of
a
smattering
of
small
office
buildings
that
are
kind
of
residential
in
character
and
scale.
The
subject
the
applicant
is
proposing
all
r01
uses,
including
medical
office.
C
C
Here
are
the
building
elevations,
so
you
can
see
the
building
at
different
elevations
and
then
there
would
be
some
parking
underneath
it,
as
shown
here
as
far
as
bumpers
and
waivers
they're,
asking
for
a
waiver
to
the
north
used
to
use
buffer
from
15
feet
with
a
six
foot
high
wall
to
six
feet
with
a
seven
foot,
high
vinyl
fence.
C
Similarly,
on
the
east
side,
they're
asking
for
instead
of
a
15
foot,
I'm
sorry
15
foot
buffer
with
a
six
foot
high
wall,
they're
asking
for
a
five
foot
buffer
with
a
six
foot
high
vinyl
fence.
They
have
thought
that
was
appropriate.
C
As
far
as
the
changes
when
the
staff
report
went
out,
the
applicant
was
proposing
the
entire
site
was
to
be
allowed
for
consideration
for
medical
office.
This
resulted
in
a
31
percent
parking
reduction
which
staffed
being
land,
development
and
transportation.
Both
found
inconsistent
after
the
staff
report
came
out
the
applicant
approached
staff
and
said
what,
if
we
reduced
the
percentage
of
medical
office
in
the
building
to
50,
that
is
reflected
in
this
amended
staff
report.
C
So
only
a
maximum
50
of
the
building
can
be
used
for
medical
office,
and
the
remaining
50
percent
would
be
for
business
professional
office.
This
results
in
instead
of
a
31
percent
parking
reduction
waiver
down
to
only
an
eight
percent
parking
reduction
waiver
which,
in
practical
terms,
are
required.
37
spots.
There
would
be
waving
it
down
to
34..
C
C
C
C
So
basically,
overall
the
project
seems
consistent,
however,
because
of
the
technical
waiver
to
parking
in
association
with
the
medical
office.
Use,
land,
development
and
transportation
did
find
this
inconsistent.
B
Rob
schuler
we,
I
have
not
been
sworn.
B
Ralph
schuler
jv,
architect,
1719
north
howard.
I
am
the
we
are
the
authorized
agent
so
in
in
drc.
We
we
had
some
discussions
and
that's
how
we
kind
of
got
confused
on
what
what
to
ask
for
on
on
on
what
we
wanted
to
provide
in
way
of
parking
and
or
the
use
the
primary
use
is
going
to
be.
For
mr
valiente,
his
office
on
the
third
floor
he's
a
an
accountant.
He
will
occupy
the
entire
third
floor,
so
there
will
be
no
medical
on
the
third
floor
and
the
second
floor
is
vacant.
B
B
This
is
a
rendering
of
what
we're
going
to
propose
again.
The
first
floor
is
really
just
parking.
It
was
very,
very
small
lobby
in
the
corner
here
then
the
whole.
The
entire
second
floor
would
be
currently
an
unknown
use,
and
then
the
third
floor
is
going
to
be
mr
valiante's
office
professional
office
space.
B
We
think
we
have
an
attractive
project.
We
think
it
fits
within
the
the
the
development
standards
of
of
the
neighborhood,
and
I
think
zeal
is
going
to
continue
to
to
mature
into
a
professional
office
corridor,
and
we
think
this
would
be
a
great
contributing
part
to
the
neighborhood
yeah
I'll.
Take
questions.
B
Is
this
being
built
right
next
door
to
the
beauty
salon?
Yes,
yes,
actually
we
have
to
have
some
of
those
owners
here
today.
D
A
All
right,
you
know
the
questions
from
council,
anyone
in
the
public
speaking
out
of
number
10.
Second,
we
got
a
motion
from
mr
miranda
talking
about
this
coping
all
to
pay.
That
motion
say
I'm
all
right,
all
right
going!
Mr
coin,
with.
B
N
B
B
A
B
His
name
is
candidoliano
candido
and
my
name
is
robert
yanderella.
Thank
you
and
we're
the
owners
of
sierra
lamancion
right
next
door
and
we're
very
pleased
to
have
this
building
going
off.
It's
going
to
add
value
and
aesthetically
going
to
raise
the
look
of
the
zeal.
There
are
other
buildings
on
new
zealand
as
well.
That
I
think,
has
freshened
up
our
the
look
of
it
and
I
feel
it's
going
to
be
a
valuable
asset
to
our
property
as
well.
O
B
A
A
A
motion
from
mr
clinton
second
obamacare
in
the
discussion,
emotion,
always
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,.
C
L
N
N
Okay,
chairman
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
accommodation
to
the
winners
of
the
american
legion
annual
or
rhetorical
contest
at
various
posts.
These
students
are
competing
by
demonstrating
the
keen
interest
and
appreciation
for
the
constitution
of
the
united
states.
This
accommodation
would
be
presented
in
the
evening
meeting
at
february.
28
2019.
N
A
N
A
D
A
All
right
emotional
motion
from
miss
coping
second
bye,
mr
manuscript,
all
in
favor,
say
all
right,
both
all
right.
All.