►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 03142019 part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
B
B
B
D
Good
evening
Council
Jennifer
Malone,
with
their
Planning
Commission
stat,
we
are
on
Davis
Island
within
the
Davis
Island
urban
village,
central
Tampa
planning
district.
This
is
West
Davis
Boulevard,
there's
a
variety
of
housing,
there's
really
a
mix
of
housing
types
on
this
portion
of
West
Davis
Boulevard.
We
have
the
bay
over
here
and
over
here
further
north,
of
course,
is
the
Tampa
General
Hospital
the
adopted
future
land
use
is
residential.
Six
directly
to
the
north
is
a
different
land
use.
D
The
brown
is
residential
35
that
allows
consideration
of
multifamily
as
well
as
other
uses
and
across
the
street
residential
10.
But
this
residential
six
is
a
very
low
density
residential.
It
allows
six
billion
units
per
acre
and
it's
a
different
development
pattern
than
what
we
would
see
right
next
door,
which
is
the
residential
35.
So
it's
it's
expected
to
have
a
different
development
pattern
of
single-family
detached
its
the
development
pattern
of
the
rotation
sticks.
So
we
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
We
just
find
that
this
is
a
compatible
infill
development.
D
The
areas
planned
for
up
to
six
units
per
acre.
We
did
a
density
population
on
the
site
and
it
would
be
an
overall
density
of
three
units
to
the
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
that
residential
six
future.
Ladies
category,
we
found
that
it
would
not
alter
the
character
or
development
pattern
of
the
Davis
Islands
urban
village,
and
we
did
find
that
consistent.
But
if
you
have
any
further
questions,
I
am
available.
Thank
you.
Any.
B
B
Also
for
distribution
just
to
verify
that
you
received
it,
I,
don't
know
if
it
got
in
the
quasi
box
or
not
is
a
packet
of
information
from
the
surrounding
property
owner
for
opposition.
B
So
Jennifer
stated
or
on
Davis
Islands
here
is
this
subject:
property
it's
currently
zoned
rs.75.
The
property
is
approximately
twenty
one
thousand
two
hundred
and
sixty
square
feet.
So
it's
almost
a
half
an
acre.
That's
where
Jennifer
got
the
six
million
units
density
of
six
rolling
units,
an
acre,
it's
about
half
an
acre,
so
there
would
be
a
three
drilling
units
to
the
north
and
across
Davis.
Boulevard
West
is
the
arm
24
zoning
district,
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
is
our
75
and
then
directly
across
the
street.
You
see
Matt
a
little
bit
more.
B
You
can
see
there's
rs.60
zoning,
which
allows
it
a
density
of
generally
10
dueling
units
per
acre,
60s
were
foot
6,000
square
foot,
Lots
and
60
foot
lot
widths
and
then
further
away.
You
have
more
RM
24
zoning
districts
to
plan
developments
and
the
RM
35,
which
is
even
a
higher
intensity.
So
really,
this
lot
is
at
the
very
edge
of
the
rs.75
zoning
district.
B
Whenever
we
do
a
review
of
a
request,
that's
asking
for
a
lot
with
lower
than
the
zoning
standard
that
currently
is
located
it.
We
do
analysis
of
the
surrounding
property,
as
I
just
stated,
this
property
zoned
rs.75.
So
typically
the
lot
width
is
75
feet.
At
least
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
single
family
lots,
one
with
an
existing
house
and
a
newly
created
life
for
one
single
family
house.
B
The
existing
lot
will
is
1,400
square
feet,
but
the
newly
created
lot
will
be
a
little
over
65,000
square
feet:
I'm,
sorry,
65,
linear,
feet
of
width,
so
81
houses
and
lots
were
evaluated
in
the
red
we
map.
These
brown
areas
are,
as
I
said,
multifamily
development,
so
they
were
not
included,
and
then
these
are
our
60
zoning
laws.
So
those
were
not
included
in
the
study
area
because
it's
a
different
criteria
so
of
the
total
of
81
lots.
B
62%
are
equal
to
or
greater
than
75
feet
in
width
and
leaving
a
remaining
68%
less
than
75
feet
width
for
their
all
study
area.
For
the
subject
block,
which
is
this
area,
11
Lots
were
evaluated,
36%
were
greater
than
or
equal
to
75
feet
in
width
and
the
remaining
64%
were
all
less
than
75
feet
wide
and
for
the
subject.
Black-Faced.
There
are
four
Lots
here
and
it's
a
50/50
split
staff
did
not
look
at
the
subject
block
because
again
this
is
multi-family
residential
and
these
are
allowed
to
have
60
foot
wide
thoughts.
B
E
B
This
is
a
existing
accessory
structure.
So,
with
the
new
property
line,
a
new
house
could
be
developed
with
the
existing
accessory
structure
and
then
the
existing
house
will
remain
and
then
code
requires
them
to
have
at
least
two
parking
spaces
on
site.
So
a
new
proposed
accessory
structure
garage
is
proposed
to
go
with
the
existing
house.
So
here's
one
lot
with
a
new
house
and
existing
detached
structure.
Then
the
second
lot
is
the
existing
house
with
a
new
detached
garage.
B
The
only
waiver
that's
being
required
and
requested
is
a
separation
distance
between
a
principal
structure
being
a
house
and
an
accessory
structure
being
garage.
Typically,
the
standard
for
the
rs.75
zoning
district
is
10
feet.
They
are
requesting
that
to
go
down
to
3
feet
because
of
some
of
the
architectural
features
of
the
house.
F
F
B
B
There
are
some
changes
between
first
and
second
reading,
as
reflected
in
the
revised
staff
report,
just
some
binder
changes
to
the
tree
table
and
some
information
on
the
site
plan
based
on
the
development
of
the
DRC
committee,
reviewing
the
land
development
code
and
other
applicable
code
standards
and
the
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
area
for
the
reduced
lot.
Wit
staff
found
this
consistent
with
the
land
development
code,
provided
the
modifications
based
on
their
bios
staff
report
are
approved.
B
G
G
Again,
Gina
Grimes
for
the
record,
with
a
law
firm
of
kill,
Ward,
Henderson,
101,
East,
Kennedy,
Boulevard
and
I'm
here
tonight,
representing
the
property
owner
Florida
pride
homes
incorporated
the
owner
and
president
of
that
corporation
is
Martha
chef,
Lee
she's,
here
with
me
this
evening,
along
with
her
son,
she
purchased
the
property
back
in
2011,
so
she's
lived
there
with
her
son
for
the
past
eight
years.
It's
currently
a
single-family
home
with
an
accessory
structure
and,
as
you
saw
from
the
earlier
photos,
the
home
is
located
lengthwise
across
the
various
Lots.
G
This
piece
of
property
has
four
platted
Lots.
They
were
platted
back
in
1924
by
D
P
Davis
himself.
The
parcel
is
two
hundred
and
four
feet
wide
by
a
hundred
and
fourteen
feet
deep.
So
it
has
twenty
one
thousand
two
hundred
and
sixty
square
feet,
a
half
acre
on
Davis
Island.
It's
a
very
large
lot,
we're
seeking
simply
to
rezone
it
from
RS
75
to
PD
to
do
what
to
allow
two
single-family
detached
homes
we
are
not
in
with
with
accessory
structures.
We
are
not
asking
for
multifamily
I
want
to
make
that
very
clear.
G
The
site
plan
shows
two
proposed
Lots
Mary
went
over
with
you
on
the
configuration
of
those
Lots.
If
you
look
at
this
diagram
right
here,
it
shows
the
configuration
of
a
Lots
a
lot
clearer.
One
lot
is
oversized:
it's
one
hundred
and
thirty
nine
feet,
five
hundred
and
fourteen
feet
and
then
the
second
lot
lot.
Two
is
sixty
five
feet:
five
hundred
and
fourteen
feet.
G
So
the
reason
for
this
PD
is
very
simple:
it's
to
preserve
the
existing
home
and
the
existing
accessory
structure
on
this
half
acre
lot,
because
both
of
those
structures
are
listed
on
the
National
Register.
My
client
has
spent
the
past
eight
years
carefully
renovating
that
home.
While
she
lived
in
it,
because
this
is
being
done
to
address
this
unique
situation,
it
really
is
a
textbook
case
to
justify
utilization
of
a
PD
zoning.
It's
because
of
the
of
the
unique
shape
of
the
Lots.
G
Here's
an
example
of
what
I
mean
and
then
I'll
talk
to
you
about
what
the
ramifications
are.
So
without
a
rezoning.
We
could
divide
this
lot
into
a
75-foot
lot
and
a
125
foot
line.
However,
to
do
so,
as
you
can
see,
it
would
require
us
to
alter
the
existing
structure
and
the
existing
accessory
structure
that
both
again
are
listed
on
the
National
Register,
as
I
mentioned,
my
clients
carefully
renovated
this
structure
over
the
last
eight
years.
G
The
last
thing
she
wants
to
do
is
alter
the
historic
footprint
of
that
building
of
that
structure,
so
she's
proposing
to
create
a
second
light
on
the
site
to
sell
it
as
a
separate,
detached
single-family
home
and,
along
with
it,
will
be
the
accessory
structure
in
the
rear.
That's
the
existing
accessory
structure,
one
of
the
reasons
that
she
wants
to
do.
That
is
because
it's
been
very
expensive
to
renovate
this
over
the
past
past
eight
years,
and
she
would
like
to
sell
off
that
second
lot
to
help
her
fund.
G
G
We
believe
that
the
rezoning
is
appropriate
for
several
different
reasons:
it's
not
only
appropriate
because
it
meets
code,
it's
appropriate
because
it's
a
reasonable
proposal.
It's
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area,
as
you
heard,
from
the
Planning
Commission,
as
well
as
from
the
city
staff,
it's
surrounded
by
property,
that's
more
intense
than
it
is.
This
is
the
subject
property
right
here.
This
property
right
here
has
a
complain,
category
of
r50
and
it
allows
density
eight
times
more
than
what
is
allowed
on
my
clients,
property
right
here.
This
property
right
here
is
our
35.
G
It
can
be
six
times
more
dense
than
my
clients.
Property
right
here
across
the
street
are
ten
it
one
and
a
half
times
more
dense
and
it's
also
developed
with
homes
that
are
smaller.
This
property
is
our
six.
It
allows
the
density
of
six
dwelling
units
per
acre.
How
many
are
we
proposing
we're
proposing
half
of
what
the
comp
plan
allows
we're
proposing
a
density
of
three
dwelling
units
per
acre?
The
zoning
designations
on
the
property
surrounding
property
are
also
similar
and
again.
G
In
addition,
you
have
the
actual
surrounding
development
and
that's
important
to
see
next
door
is
a
vacant
lot
which
is
proposed
as
RM
24.
It's
proposed
right
now
for
townhomes
shortly,
a
short
distance
down
the
street.
You
have
apartments
across
the
street,
you
have
townhouses
and
condos
across
directly
across
the
street.
You
have
the
park
and
then
you
have
this
Rs
60
area
that
has
homes
that
are
comparable
in
size
to
what
we're
proposing
on
this
actual
piece
of
property.
So
again
it's
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area.
G
It's
it's
less
dense
than
what's
allowed,
it's
less
dense
than
the
surrounding
zoning
designations,
and
it's
consistent
with
the
actual
surrounding
development.
The
PD
also
complies
with
the
code
for
the
reasons
that
are
stated
in
the
city
staff
report
and
including
their
lot
study
lot
1,
which
is
the
lot
that
accommodates
the
existing
structure.
As
you
can
see,
it
is
almost
double
on
the
side
that
is
allowed
in
the
art
that's
required
in
the
RS
75
zoning
district.
It's
double
the
minimum
lot
size.
It's
a
139
foot
wide
lot
by
114
feet
deep.
G
G
The
the
staff
report
also
addresses
the
lot
study
and
on
subject
block.
As
you
can
see,
you
have
surrounding
property
that
is
on
the
subject
law.
The
this,
which
includes
both
sides
of
the
block
64%
of
the
lots,
are
smaller
than
the
RS
75
on
the
block
base.
50%
of
the
lots
are
smaller
than
the
RSF
75
and
one
of
the
things
the
staff
considered
in
which
I
argued
just
now
is
that
you
have
to
look
at
the
area
and
the
surrounding
development
staff,
also,
as
they
always
do
in
their
staff.
G
Reports,
conducted
an
analysis
of
the
PD
requirements
that
are
set
forth
and
27
136
and
have
found
that
it
meets
all
of
the
requirements
that
are
applicable
again.
They're,
recognizing
that
this
is
a
unique
situation
and
a
textbook
case
for
why
you
can
why
you
should
use
a
PD,
the
other,
the
other
argument
that
we
have
as
to
why
this
is
a
an
appropriate
rezoning
is
the
original
historic
density
of
this
lot
back
when
Kiki
Davis
plotted
this
as
four
Lots
and
that's
what
this
is
for:
plaited,
Lots.
G
Theoretically,
that's
what
you
would
have
had
what
it
turns
out
that
happened
was
in
1920
or
five.
He
built
the
first
model
home
on
Davis
Island,
and
that
was
it
on
lock
13.
Shortly
thereafter,
the
Florida
real
estate
boom
bust
and
DP
Davis
lost.
The
property
was
subsequently
bought
by
an
engineer,
an
engineering,
firm
Ballinger
who
then
began
to
construct
a
second
model
home
right
next
door.
What
they
ended
up
doing
was
instead
of
constructing
two
separate
model
homes.
G
So
what
we're
proposing
here
was
two
homes
is
certainly
consist
with
the
original
historic
density
and
development
pattern
that
DP
Davis
himself
planned
for
Davis
Island,
also
I'm,
going
to
present
to
you,
and
it's
in
your
package
of
materials
is
a
letter
from
the
Florida
Department
of
State.
What
it
does
is
is
acknowledges
that
we
are
proposing
this
rezoning
and
states
that
the
fact
that
we're
rezoning
the
property
does
not
affect
its
listing
on
the
National
Register,
so
it
has
no
effect
on
the
historical
significance
of
it
now
very
quickly.
G
I
want
to
address
the
neighborhood
opposition
because,
as
you
can
see,
there's
quite
a
few
people
here
and
the
problem
is:
is
social
media?
Basically,
what
I
could
garner
from
what
I
read
on
social
media
is
that
there
is
a
lot
of
misinformation
and
false
rumors
that
were
spread
about
this
property
from
the
outset.
In
fact,
I'm
going
to
read
to
you
some
posts
on
the
on
social
media
from
Greg
Mozilla.
G
He
starts
by
saying-
and
this
is
what
started
on
the
social
media
frenzy-
is
anyone
concerned
about
the
rezoning
for
100
West
Davis
from
residential
to
planned
development,
which
I
assume
means
quote
condos
misinformation?
It's
my
view.
We
don't
want
to
see
any
residential
rezone
for
condos
a
subsequent
post,
and
this
is
probably
my
favorite
one
of
all
of
them
and
that
is
Wayne
Picard
says
I
would
certainly
participate
in
a
rezoning.
G
Another
post
after
several
people
said
wait
a
minute.
We've
looked
at
the
actual
PD
site
plan,
it
doesn't
have
multifamily
in
it.
It
doesn't
allow
what
you're
saying
that
it
allows
the
reason
they're
doing
it
is,
for
the
reasons
I
just
told
you
here
tonight
and
after
several
of
those
posts.
Mr.
mazzello
responded
by
saying
it
was
mentioned
at
the
meeting
that
this
is
most
likely,
a
backdoor
rezoning
request
to
have
the
property
zoned
for
condos
and
then
combined
with
the
condo
project
to
the
north
I
think
we
should
have
two
big
concerns
about
it.
G
Do
you
want
a
condo
project,
and
do
you
want
to
set
a
precedent
for
backdoor
rezoning?
Nothing
could
be
further
from
the
truth.
It's
a
completely
false
statement
and
if,
if
necessary,
we
would
be
willing
to
agree
to
a
condition,
and
you
all
know
what
a
PDF
it
says,
single-family
detached
you
can't
have
multifamily.
We
all
know
that,
but
it
fit
with
the
lay
the
concerns
of
the
neighborhood
we'd
be
more
than
willing
to
add
a
condition
that
says
no
multi-family
is
permitted
on
this
site.
G
Another
concern
that
was
expressed
to
me
by
mr.
Bob
bolt,
who
is
I
believe
in
the
audience
tonight,
is
the
fact
that
the
traffic
was
going
to
potentially
have
to
back
into
the
right-of-way
because
of
the
way
the
property
was
divided
and
in
the
length
of
the
driveways.
He
was
concerned
that
people
would
have
to
back
into
Davis
Islands
West
Davis
Boulevard.
So
what
we
would
be
willing
to
do
is
what
you
see
here.
G
We
would
be
willing,
on
the
new
lot,
to
create
some
sort
of
hammerhead
to
give
the
ability
to
turn
around
on
site
and
then
pull
out
of
the
driveways
in
a
forward
position.
If
that's
that
will
address
or
allay
their
concerns
would
be
happy
to
agree
to
a
change
between
first
and
second
reading.
That
would
show
that
that
hammer
had
another
concern
that
we
heard
expressed
was
with
regard
to
the
height
of
the
structure.
G
The
site
plan
says
40
feet
above
the
design,
flood
elevation,
which,
on
Davis
Island
and
a
lot
of
areas
in
the
city,
is
about
to
change.
What
my
client
was
intending
to
do
was
to
make
sure
she
was
thinking
that
it
was
40
feet
from
the
from
the
the
grade.
Actually,
what
it
should
be
is
35
feet
from
the
design
flood
elevation,
that's
the
same
height
as
what's
allowed
everywhere
else
on
Davis
Island.
The
city
mentioned
that
there
is
a
waiver
being
requested.
G
We'd,
never
included
a
waiver
and
I
was
informed
by
the
Zoning
Department
that
there
would
net
there
would
need
to
be
a
waiver
to
address
the
property.
The
closeness
of
the
of
this
little
bump
out
on
the
historic
structure,
its
proximity
to
the
garage,
it's
supposed
to
be
a
10-foot
separation
between
the
garage
and
the
principal
structure.
There's
only
three
right
here.
That
is,
that
waiver
is
something
I
didn't
realize
we
had
to
have
on
a
site
plan.
I
always
thought
in
the
setbacks
were
as
they're
shown
on
the
site
plan.
G
You
don't
have
call
them
out
a
separate
waivers,
but
we
modified
our
cyclin.
We're
willing
to
include
that
as
a
waiver
and
we've
also
revised
our
our
narrative,
because
an
issue
was
made
that
we
didn't
have
an
accurate
narrative
and
it
didn't
address
the
waiver
again
because
it
was
added
in
late
in
the
process,
so
I'm
going
to
submit
to
counsel
it's
not
your
book.
G
A
copy
of
the
revised
project,
narrative
with
the
written
waiver
justification
and
the
waiver
justification
in
this
case
is
that
in
order
to
have
an
accessory
structure
here,
it's
as
close
to
the
property
line
as
we
can
get
at
three
feet,
it's
almost
eight
feet
from
most
of
the
principal
structure.
It's
just
this
small
little
area
where
it's
three
feet.
If
that
becomes
an
issue
for
council,
would
be
more
than
happy
to
try
to
somehow
address
it
by
making
that
structure
of
slightly
smaller,
so
that
no
waiver
at
all
would
be
required.
G
Your
staff
report
states
that
you
that
there
are
no
objections
at
all
from
any
of
the
staff
which
doesn't
happen
often
and
that
it's
consistent
with
the
land
development
code.
The
Planning
Commission
report
likewise
has
no
objections
at
all
and
finds
it
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
with
that,
we
would
ask
for
Council's
approval
and
I
will
address
any
other
issues
on
during
rebuttal.
Thank.
H
You
I've
got
a
question:
I
mean
I,
understand
the
whole
aspect
of
it,
which
is
you're
right.
There
there's
enough
room
to
make
to
75
foot
frontage
lots
on
here,
but
you
have
the
problem
of
having
a
national
historic
building
in
there.
Now
here's
the
problem
that
I
have,
if
you're,
going
to
split
up
the
way
that
you
have
it
currently
put
in
there,
the
accessory
structure,
which
is
going
to
be
part
of
the
second
lot,
that's
going
to
be
sold.
E
H
H
G
H
G
H
G
F
G
I
H
H
H
G
H
G
That's
why
I'm
confused
you
see
I'm
saying
yes,
I
do
once
a
house
is
listed
once
a
home
is
listed
on
the
National
Register,
it
doesn't
have
local
necessarily
local
protections.
G
However,
what
the
big,
however,
is
that
you
cannot
seek
to
demolish
a
structure
whose,
on
the
National
Register,
without
triggering
a
review
by
the
Historic
Preservation
Commission
and
at
that
review
during
that
review
process,
they
determine
whether
or
not
they
want
to
designate
it
as
a
local,
Historic
Landmark
right
and
if
they
do,
then
they
move
forward
right
then,
and
they
evaluate
whether
it
should
be
designated
as
a
local
historical
in
work
to
give
it
local
protections.
And
then
that
will
come
to
you
to
City
Council
to
make
that
final.
Just.
G
H
G
You
know
what
it's
an
important
question
and
I
want
to
point
out
too
that,
while
my
client
was
not
obligated
to
retain
and
preserve
the
historic
nature
of
this,
because
it's
not
locally
designated
right.
Nonetheless,
she
did
and
went
through
a
painstaking
renovation
of
this
house
without
changing
at
all
and
I
do
have
pictures
of
the
exterior
as
far
as
its
historical
significance.
In
fact,
she
rebuilt
many
of
the
portions
of
it
to
make
it
look
almost
identical
to
what
was
what
was
previously
shown
on
the
National,
Register
and
I.
G
H
J
K
G
H
H
G
L
G
G
G
K
G
A
Anything
further,
okay,
thank
you.
Ma'am!
Now
we
go
to
public
comment.
Each
individual
gets
three
minutes
now
with
everybody
who
is
going
to
speak
this
evening
and
line
up
against
the
wall.
Please
just
so
we
can
have
a
good
idea.
N
Good
evening
gangsters,
my
name
is
dr.:
Malcolm
Klein
I
live
on
94
Baltic
Circle,
which
is
just
around
the
corner
from
the
project
under
discussion.
My
concern
is
primarily
public
safety
issues
around
a
very
complex
multi
traffic
intersection
is
going
to
be
become
much
more
context
if
I
just
point
out.
N
This
is
East
Davis
Boulevard,
which
splits
into
it
says
Davis
below
it.
Splitting
two
E's
day
was
what
about
Western
is
Boulevard
and
then
Baltic
Circle
as
well.
So
this
faith
well,
it's
within
intersection
that
I
live
right
here,
so
coming
off,
Baltic
Circle,
there's
a
merge
plane
and
on
this
merger
lane
there's
going
to
be
four
driveways
individually
right
now,
there's
four,
this
structure,
which
is
yeah,
there's
already
one
drivers,
who's
going
to
add
one
additional
driveway.
This
property
here
is
the
townhouse
project,
which
is
going
to
add
two
driveways.
N
So
today
my
presentation
it'll
be
a
much
more
visual
with
the
video,
but
unfortunate
I
didn't
get
permission
ahead
of
time,
so
I
apologize
so
riding
here
with
my
bicycle.
Coming
down
this
way,
this
actually
no
bicycle
lane
along
Davis,
Davis
Boulevard,
there's
a
bicycle
lane,
starting
at
about
this
point,
yeah
along
with
Davis
Boulevard.
N
So
you
have
traffic
coming
down
where's
Davis
Boulevard,
which
then
gets
joined
by
this
merge
plane
from
from
Baltic
circle,
so
that
what
cyclists
actually
have
to
compete
along
this
place
here,
four
cars
coming
around
this
way
and
four
traffic
coming
around
the
corner
from
Baltic
Circle
now
I'm
going
to
have
to
compete
as
well
with
traffic
on
and
out
of
four
different
driveways.
So
to
me,
this
actually
represents
quite
but
a
significant
hazard
of
magis
for
cyclists,
but
I
should
also
pedestrians
crossing
this
intersection.
N
N
Sent
the
island
over
there
crossing
over
another
two
lanes
and
then
they
actually
to
get
to
the
other
side
of
the
East
Davis
bull
evaluation
and
a
cross
over
four
lanes.
Was
there
an
extremely
complex
intersection,
and
you
know
that
adding
additional
drivers
that
quite
a
significant
additional
risk
to
public
safety.
Thank
you.
Thank.
K
P
P
Good
evening,
I'm
Connie
G
I
live
on
Adalia
on
Davis,
Islands
and
I'm
here
to
talk
about
what
hasn't
been
talked
about,
and
that
is
why
this
should
be
denied.
It
should
be
denied
because
it's
already
a
very
congested
area
and
the
road
design
is
unsafe,
residents
are
being
denied
their
safety
and
their
well-being
in
a
very
high-density.
P
All
these
black
dots
are
all
those
apartments
and
condos
and
townhouses
that
are
already
there.
So
it's
high-density
its
high
volume
traffic
station
251
is
just
south
of
Arbour.
Here's
the
proposed
property
according
to
the
count
of
October
2018,
more
than
10,000
vehicles,
crossed
that
area
on
a
daily
basis.
Now
we
know
it's
more
because
our
exit
vehicles
are
twenty
one
thousand
five
hundred
and
eighty
three
according
to
the
tracking
station
on
the
exit
bridge,
but
we're
going
to
work
with
that.
P
Ten
thousand
right
now
that
occurs
right
where
you
have
a
multi-unit
apartment
building
that
has
29
units,
how
many
cars
30
40
60.
You
have
a
new
condo
being
built
across
the
street
from
this
property
with
12
units,
that's
24
cars.
You
have
a
new
property
that
is
just
north
of
the
property
that
five,
the
five
units
here.
P
Okay,
so
you
have
another
ten
cars
and,
as
has
been
said,
two
more
driveways
and
what's
being
proposed
is
another
two
more
driveways,
and
if
you
can
see
on
this
page
down
here,
you
have
not
only
multi-unit
properties,
you
have
multi-directional
traffic,
you
have
no
safe
crosswalks.
You
have
no
bike
lines.
Bike
lanes.
You
have
a
dangerous
situation,
two
residents
who
are
trying
to
walk
to
the
village
to
support
our
local
economy,
but
there's
a
day,
I
walk
this.
This
is
my
path.
P
P
Are
they
going
to
pull
out
and
use
the
merge
lanes
and
then
they're
going
to
be
in
this
bike
lane
way
down
here
before
they
can
get
over
to
the
west
Davis
Boulevard
or
are
they're
going
to
cut
across
all
four
lanes
which
they're
not
supposed
to
do
because
they're
designated
turning
lanes?
Are
they
going
to
cut
across
to
those
lanes
that
are
trying
to
make
a
right
and
left-hand
turn
to
exhilarate
to
exhibit
the
the
danger
davis
boulevard
in
the
a
street?
P
These
are
all
the
crashes
on
davis
boulevard,
a
hundred
and
ninety
seven
crashes
in
four
years:
nine
fatalities.
We
averaged
almost
one
per
week
in
this
area:
a
streets
and
davis
boulevard.
That's
what
the
crashes
are.
All
the
green
dots
forty
eight
crashes
on
davis
boulevard
in
the
a
section
in
this
section
we're
talking
about
right
here
where
the
property
is
where
there's
West,
Davis
East,
Davis
and
Davis
in
the
B
Street
21
crashes,
on
West
Davis
and
those
B
streets,
east
Davis,
another
13
crashes.
P
We
are
setting
ourselves
up
for
tragedy
and
bad
design.
High
volume
traffic
high,
speeding
traffic,
bad
road
design
in
any
which
way
you
look,
you
can
tell
by
the
direction
and
this
city
can
be
held
liable
and
I
want
to
point
out
something
very
recently:
New
York
City
paid
on
a
negligence
case.
The
plaintiff
was
awarded
twenty
million
dollars
when
the
city
was
held
liable
for
failing
to
redesign
the
streets
that
had
a
history
of
already
being
dangerous.
P
Look
at
the
numbers.
You
have
too
much
traffic
already
on
Davis
Island.
You
have
too
much
bad
design
on
Davis
islands
and
you're,
going
to
add
to
it
by
allowing
for
more
driveways
on
a
basic
one.
Lane
road
doesn't
make
sense
to
me.
I
wouldn't
want
our
city
to
be
held
liable
and
have
to
pay
out
a
lot
of
taxpayer
dollars.
Because
of
that,
the
other
thing
I'd
like
to
remind
you,
our
city
government,
holds
no
greater
responsibility
than
to
provide
for
the
safety
and
well-being
of
each
and
every
resident.
P
P
P
K
My
name
is
John
Chow
and
I
live
at
98th
politic.
Circle
and
I
also
request
that
the
council
denied
this
application
for
rezoning.
I
didn't
realize
that
I
was
home
to
go.
There
was
gonna,
be
a
lot
of
duplication,
so
I'll
try
to
even
cut
down
my
assignments
even
further.
It's
really
one
of
public
and
pedestrian
safety,
as
I
also
echoed
the
prior
comments
about
trying
to
across
Davis
Boulevard
in
this
location
and
addition
of
what
the
addition
could
do.
K
Construction
of
the
multi-unit
structure,
just
north
of
the
proposed
site
again,
that
would
introduce
three
additional
driveways
and
the
geometry
of
the
road,
as
it
splits
into
two
really
do
not
allow
for
good
visualization
by
either
the
driver
of
the
pedestrian
and
I.
Think
that
again
increasing
both
the
density
as
well
as
the
ingress
and
egress
of
vehicles
into
this
merge
lane
is
potentially
dangerous.
The
only
thing
that
I
would
add
is
that
you
know
I've
been
a
trauma
surgeon
for
the
fourth
time
by
General
Hospital.
K
For
the
last
ten
years,
I've
seen
a
lot
of
horrific
accidents
resulting
from
automobile
versus
pedestrian
camper
is
already
in
the
top
five
metropolitan
areas
in
terms
of
pedestrian
deaths
resulting
from
automobiles
and
so
I
fully
agree
that
this
area
is
is
a
not
a
good
one,
and
perhaps
when
it's
been
redesigned
to
support
additional
structures
and
driveways
I'd
be
in
favor
of
this,
but
as
in
terms
of
professionally
and
profession.
Personally,
again
I
request
that
you
deny
this
application.
Thank
you.
Thank.
Q
H
B
P
Evening
my
name
is
Janice
Davis
and
I.
Am
the
president
of
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Association
and
a
23
year
resident
of
Davis
Islands.
Many
of
the
residents
present
tonight's
meeting
attended
dicas
march
meeting,
asking
for
our
support
opposing
the
100
West
Davis
rezoning
dicas
consistent
position
on
these
issues
is
not
to
oppose
development
but
to
hold
firm
in
asking
city
departments
and
the
council
to
follow
the
code
as
a
result
of
the
opposition
from
our
residents,
which
I
must
mention
prior
to
any
of
the
social
media.
They
all
showed
up.
P
Subsequent
to
the
meeting,
a
vote
was
taken
authorizing
the
President
to
provide
written
opposition
to
res
1901.
The
Deacon
board
members
voted
to
oppose
a
rezoning
from
RS
75
to
PD.
The
PD,
if
approved,
will
one
allow
for
two
Lots,
one
of
which
will
be
non-conforming
to
create
potential
traffic
safety
hazards.
Three
be
inconsistent
with
the
lot
requirements
for
an
rs.75
zoning
district
and
for
result
in
improvements
that
are
inconsistent
with
the
code.
The
Deacon
board
continues
to
assert
that
new
development
should
be
consistent
with
the
requirements
outlined
within
the
code.
P
We
believe
that
continual
deviations
from
the
code
will
adversely
impact
the
character
of
the
islands
and,
in
this
instance,
potentially
create
dangerous
situations
for
our
community
and
visitors.
Thank
you
in
advance
for
allowing
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Association
the
opportunity
to
provide
these
comments.
I
would
like
to
have
this
letter
for
the
record,
but
I'd
also
additionally
like
to
underscore
the
following
points.
Dica
is
not
here
to
the
vote
here
to
be
the
voice
of
no
on
every
request.
P
Pd
in
variances
are
necessary
and
appropriate
when
warranted.
As
we've
stated
repeatedly,
Davis
Island
is
under
tremendous
pressure
for
increased
densification,
driven
by
developers
trying
to
make
escalating
land
prices
work
by
cramming
too
much
house
on
too
little
land
dica
is
here
to
work,
to
protect
the
character
of
our
special
community,
the
safety
of
our
residents
and
the
rights
neighbors
withstanding
most
affected
by
this
request.
P
We
believe
this
request,
in
short,
is
an
overreach
using
the
PD
as
a
vehicle
to
work
around
the
code,
resulting
in
once
again
a
request
to
put
too
much
density
on
the
land.
We
believe
the
application
to
be
flawed
and
incomplete
from
the
failure
of
the
applicant
to
list
all
waivers
clearly
and
upfront
to
the
many
inconsistencies
and
the
site
plans
and
elevations
supporting
the
request.
We
believe
staffs
conclusion
of
consistency
of
the
request
with
code
to
be
an
error.
P
K
M
But
it
is
a
part
and
also
of
the
Davis
Islands
business
district
improvements
project,
obviously
having
not
only
a
four-story
townhouse
building
on
96-98
West
Davis,
which
has
already
been
sown,
which
was
already
zoned,
are
in
24
and
was
recently
permitted,
and
now
the
possibility
of
two
additional
buildings
at
25
to
40
feet
in
height
added
to
100,
West
Davis
dramatically
changes
everything,
we've
loved
about
our
home
and
Davis
Islands.
It
doesn't
quite
seem
fair.
M
Considering
we
live
in
our
home,
our
home
is
homestead,
and
the
owner
of
100
West
Davis
is
not
homesteaded
and
lives
on
Harbor
Island,
while
leasing
out
the
home
and
garage
apartment
dwellings,
sometimes
separately
for
long
and
short
term
rentals
as
a
travel
resort
and
for
events
and
parties.
I'm
very
concerned
that
the
site
may,
in
the
future,
become
additional
buildings
to
increase
the
size
of
the
resort
and
rental
property
or
travel
resort.
The
owners
will
seek
to
resume
two
multifamily
is
what
I'm
concerned
about
I'm
asking
you
to
deny.
M
The
application
for
rezoning
are
easy:
1901
at
100,
West,
Davis
from
RS
75
to
PD,
or
any
lot
smaller
than
the
current
zoning
district
of
RS
75
would
allow
today
approximately
74
percent,
including
the
subject
lot
of
the
homes
within
this
zoning
district
are
75
and
within
thirteen
hundred
and
twenty
foot
radius
radius
of
the
lot
are
on
lots:
greater
than
equal
to
75
foot,
width
and
7,500
square
feet.
Therefore,
this
rezoning
would
not
be
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
M
It
violates
all
three
of
the
following
plans
and,
as
a
resident
of
this
neighborhood
I
encourage
the
council
to
follow.
We
imagine
2040
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
policy.
Nine
point
three
point:
eight,
the
Tampa
zoning
atlas
designating
in
this
area
is
Rs
75
and
City.
Code,
section
27
11,
which
states
newly
created
Lots,
must
maintain
the
front
orientation
and
the
historical
precedent
pattern
of
partial
configurations
in
the
neighborhood.
Lots
of
record
may
not
be
reconfigured
in
conflict
with
the
established
pattern
of
the
Lots
within
the
radius
of
1320
feet.
M
I
want
to
ensure
that
the
council
takes
into
account
the
impact
that
rezoning
smaller
than
Rs
75
will
allow
Lots
flooding
will
have
on
the
residents
who
bought
homes
and
moved
here
with
reasonable
expectation
that
the
City
Council
would
enforce
the
RS
75
zoning
district
with
a
minimum
75
foot
width
and
a
minimum
7500
square
foot
lot
air
that
has
been
in
effect
in
the
earth
for
decades.
The
smaller
newly-created
lot
would
not
meet
with
me.
Neither
with
nor
area
comments
of
Rs
75
and
a
larger
lot
will
not
meet
our
75
setback.
M
Requirements
to
ensure
Tampa
and
Davis
Islands
continue
to
be
the
community
in
the
neighborhood
that
citizens
are
proud
to
call
home
and
protect
our
property
values.
Please
deny
the
rezoning
application
for
100
best
Davis
Boulevard.
Please
deny
this
rezoning
following
our
codes.
I
would
like
to
enter
into
the
record
and
attach
documents,
100
West,
Davis,
short-term
rental
information
that
was
pulled
off
the
internet
today,
petitions
to
oppose
the
rezoning
of
the
West
Davis
30
individuals
with
the
250
foot
zone.
M
242
notices
sent
petitions
to
oppose
the
rezoning
of
100,
West,
Davis
or
42
individuals
that
are
in
the
251
foot
plus
area
and
a
report
on
all
parcels
in
the
zoning
district,
RS
75
that
are
in
a
1324,
100
foot,
Davis
100
bus,
Davis,
Boulevard
84%
of
the
128
homes
are
greater
than
or
equal
to
75
feet
and
a
minimum
7,500
square
feet.
The
city
staff
in
their
recommendation
did
the
surrounding
block,
not
the
1320
foot
radius
of
massage.
C
My
name
is
Don
Farley
done,
I
live
in
103
Bermuda
Avenue.
Were
you
two
having
you
correctly
behind
100
West
Davis,
my
wife
and
I
had
lived
there
for
30
years,
my
family,
my
mother
and
father
built
the
house
in
1939
I've,
lived
on
Davis
Island
for
60
years
and
I've
seen
a
lot
of
changes,
especially
an
increase
in
density
in
traffic.
Now
most
nights
I
sit
out
on
my
deck.
I
have
a
cigar
and
a
cocktail.
It's
usually
relatively
peaceful,
but
every
once
in
a
while
there's
a
screech
of
brakes
and
horns
Tooting.
C
C
C
Someday
my
daughter
and
grandson
may
take
over
my
house,
and
hopefully
Davis
Islands
will
still
rank
as
one
of
the
best
neighborhoods
a
proven.
This
rezoning
will
adversely
impact
safety
and
impact
all
of
us
neighbors
of
this
site.
Please
deny
the
rezoning
application
for
100
West
Davis
Boulevard.
This
uncontrollable
growth
must
stop
somewhere
sometime,
let
it
be
now.
Please
stand
up
for
Davis
Islands
and
deny
this
rezoning
and
follow
our
code
code.
Thank
you.
C
C
C
C
The
addition
of
more
dwellings,
currently
being
built
or
planning
to
be
built
will
add
multiple
cars
to
it
daily
on
a
daily
basis
to
the
already
congested
thoroughfare
I'm,
not
opposed
to
growth
of
our
city
and
I,
encourage
it.
However,
increasing
the
traffic
at
an
already
difficult
intersection
is
asking
for
trouble.
C
Other
areas
of
our
city
have
had
to
modify
their
traffic
patterns
on
Bayshore
speed
limits
have
been
lowered,
crosswalk
lights
have
been
installed
and
laid
snare
lanes
narrowed
from
three
to
two.
This
is
in
order
to
make
it
safer
for
all.
Unfortunately,
a
big
part
of
those
changes
were
due
to
fatalities
on
the
road.
I
would
not
want
I
would
not
like
our
Davis
Islands
community
to
have
to
make
similar
changes
in
the
future
for
the
same
reasons
having
increased
traffic
flow
at
that
intersection
is
asking
for
trouble.
C
Thank
you
and
can
be
avoided
by
smart
and
forward-looking
City
Planning.
We
bought
our
home
on
Davis
up.
Okay,
we've
got
our
home
at
Davis,
Islands,
hoping
that
it
would
be
a
safe
community,
I
think
with
this
added
traffic
it
would
not
be
safe
and
I
am
against
it.
As
an
aside
beyond
this,
I
would
just
like
to
say
that
I
find
it
in
a
venue
like
this
inappropriate
to
personally
attack
people
via
social
media.
Thank
you.
E
E
We
have
respected
and
maintained
this
78
year
old
home
for
our
benefit,
but
also
out
of
the
respect
for
our
neighbors.
Our
home
is
on
a
corner
lot
and
for
privacy.
We
installed
and
maintained
a
living
hedge
out
of
respect
for
our
neighbors
in
preparing
to
speak
to
the
council,
I
read
relevant
parts
of
the
imagine:
20
40
tamper,
comprehensive
plan
adopted
by
City
Council
January
7
2016.
If
a
rezoning
requests
like
the
one
before
Council
today
is
approved,
we
can
all
be
certain
that
imagine
2040
will
fall
short
of
reality.
E
The
imagine
plan
describes
life
on
Davis
Island
as
it
as
it
would
become
in
2014.
If
the
objectives
and
policies
enclosed
in
the
plan
come
to
be
in
imagining
Davis
Davis
island
life
in
2014,
there
were
several
points
so
I'm
going
to
discuss
a
few
of
those
one
was
that
the
islands,
unique
history
and
heritage
will
be
embraced
by
residents
and
historic
trust
structures
and
design
elements
are
protected.
Voluntarily.
E
The
proposal
to
carve
a
section
of
the
lot
build
a
40
foot
home
right
against
a
one-story
structure
and
build
a
new
garage
and
driveway
for
the
historic
structure
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
grand
entrance
will
lower
its
attractiveness
in
value
and
place
it
at
risk
for
future
demolition.
I
also
stand
to
voluntarily
protect
the
unique
history
inherent
davus
island,
in
that
it
is
in
the
neighborhood
that
is
safe.
Without
traffic
lights,
increasing
traffic
through
development
decisions
will
eventually
require
traffic
lights
on
Davis
Island.
E
To
control
traffic
and
thereby
the
loss
of
this
unique
characteristic,
another
point
stated
in
2014
Islanders
enjoy
their
traditions
and
celebrations
and
they
strengthen
their
sense
of
community
through
participation.
My
attempt
to
participate
is
supported
by
the
lack
of
detail
or
of
details
to
be
addressed
later
in
this
application
for
rezoning.
E
In
addition,
I
would
like
to
state
that
the
owner
does
not
live
in
the
property
but
rents
it
on
short-term
basis
and
has
installed
a
four
foot
fence
and,
most
importantly,
by
this
application
to
rezone
their
property
for
the
sole
purpose
of
financial
gain,
to
the
detriment
of
the
historic
resident
and
surrounding
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
Thank.
O
Hello,
Greg
Road
here
I
live
at
105
Bermuda
directly
behind
the
property.
I
oppose
this
to
two
primary
reasons:
one
safety,
as
it's
been
pointed
out
over
and
over
the
amount
of
traffic
on
Davis
Island
on
West
Davis,
Boulevard,
east
Davis,
Boulevard
I
walk
my
dogs
every
single
day
several
times
a
day
and
I
choose
the
time.
I
walk
my
dogs
around
the
block
and
take
the
West
Davis
route
because
I'm
fearful
it
there's
that
much
traffic
when
I,
when
I'm
on
that
road
in
the
morning
and
I.
Think
to
myself.
O
O
The
next
biggest
concern
I
have
with
all
of
that
is
the
fact
that
all
of
these
homes,
including
the
townhomes,
but
all
these
new
driveways,
everyone
is
going
to
be
required
to
exit
and
head
south
on
West
Davis
Boulevard.
But
if
they're
going
somewhere
they're
going
to
need
to
be
going
north,
so
they
have
several
options.
They
can
either
take
a
left
on
Danube
and
cross
oncoming
traffic
of
West
Davis,
or
they
can
take
a
right
and
circle
around
on
Bermuda
Avenue
and
try
to
exit
it.
O
O
R
O
It's
a
bad
situation
and
and
the
the
safety
is
a
primary
concern.
The
other
concern
that's
been
expressed
as
with
the
fact
that
it
is
used
as
an
entertainment
venue.
I
live
directly
behind
it,
I
like
to
sit
on
my
Patty
on
smoke,
a
cigar.
The
auxilary
structure
is
two
story,
and
it's
all
glass
facing
my
patio,
so
I
don't
have
privacy
when
that's
being
used
as
a
venue
I'm
concerned
about
what
ultimately
will
happen
with
that
structure
in
the
future
as
well.
D
Good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
linda
saul,
sena
and
I
live
at
157
Biscayne
on
Davis
Islands,
about
three
blocks
away.
In
my
youth,
I
wrote
the
Davis
Islands
plan
for
the
Planning
Commission
I
was
a
young
planner
and
did
some
research
in
1927
Davis
Islands
won
the
American
Planning
Association
award
for
the
best
planned
community.
It
is
unbelievably
thoughtfully
put
together.
You've
got
the
commercial
area,
you've
got
the
offices,
you've
got
multifamily
and
you've
got
single-family.
This
is
the
single-family
area.
Now
this
thing
that
the
more
expensive
single-family
homes
face
west.
D
This
is
on
the
west
side.
The
development
pattern
in
this
area
is
that
an
individual
would
buy
several
Lots
and
create
a
home
and
a
garden
very
frequently.
There
was
an
outbuilding
which
was
a
garage
and
often
relatives
or
staff
lived
on
the
second
level
of
that,
and
that
was
the
original
plan
of
this.
There
are
many
not
tons
but
they're
there
at
least
two
dozen
examples
of
these
original
homes
that
are
still
intact.
The
proposal
for
you
today
violates
the
historic
pattern
of
the
area.
D
The
bifurcation
of
this
lot
into
a
jog
is
really
not
consistent
with
the
historic
pattern
and
it's
really
inappropriate
and
it
does
a
disservice
to
the
rhythm
of
this
portion
of
the
island.
On
another
note,
and,
and
so
speaking
of
somebody
who
knew
the
plan
and
watched
the
rezoning
zand,
this
was
set
aside
as
an
rs.75
area
and,
what's
before
you
today
would
change
that
plan.
That's
that's.
You
know
part
of
the
comp
plan
and
it's
been
adopted.
D
Lastly,
I
have
a
friend
who
had
a
son
who
had
a
bachelor
party
by
inviting
seven
classmates
and
renting
this
property,
the
premise
that
the
person
who
owns
the
property
lives
there
full-time
is
not
valid.
Based
on
my
friends,
son's
bachelor
party
experience.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
and
I
hope.
You'll
continue
to
respect
the
traditional
pattern
of
development
on
data
silence.
Thank.
K
J
J
And
your
name,
please:
oh
I'm,
sorry
Robert,
Bob,
bolt
213
blanca,
43
year
resident
of
davis
island
every
day,
mostly
twice
a
day,
I
Drive
through
the
intersection
that
you've
seen
and
heard
people
talk
about,
I
could
drive
this
thing
in
my
sleep,
I
mean
I,
know
this
traffic
situation
and
I.
Don't
know
that
I
need
to
elaborate
on
that.
Given
the
quality
of
the
presentation.
Today,
a
week
ago
a
bomb
went
off
in
the
form
of
the
staff
report.
J
I
can
only
tell
you
that
I,
you
know
I'm,
not
a
land
use,
zoning
guy,
but
everything
I
know
about
this
subject:
I've
learned
since
that
report
was
issued
and
the
bomb
went
off
because
of
the
finding
of
consistency
when
all
these
issues
are
embedded
in
the
PD
application.
Okay,
so
just
bear
with
me:
I,
don't
know
much
everything
I
know
about
this
subject:
I've
learned
in
the
last
week,
but
here's
what
I
know.
J
The
sense
of
this
is
a
moving
target,
they're
filing
amendment
and
stuff
like
that,
and
this
Grimes
excellent
attorney
was
hired
about
a
month
ago,
and
it's
been
moving
ever
since,
and
I'm
telling
you
it's
been
extremely
difficult
for
a
layman
to
get
his
arms
around
just
exactly
what
we're
dealing
with,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
the
the
staff
report
was
a
shocker
to
all
of
us
and
we
have
rallied
as
fast
as
we
can
to
present
to
you
tonight,
basically
on
one
weeks
or
less
work,
it
took
a
couple
of
days
to
absorb
the
shock.
J
Okay,
the
next
thing
I
looked
I
found
was
this:
are
there
any
waivers
or
variances
associated
with
this
application?
No
okay!
So
go
forward
from
there.
We
were
told
publicly
at
all
notices.
Subsequent
to
this
have
been
issued
accordingly,
no
variances.
But
if
you
read
the
staff
report
and
you
listen
carefully-
there
are
variances,
there's
actually
a
variance
mentioned
in
the
staff
report.
J
J
What
is
going
on
here
so
as
I
learn
my
way
through
this
process,
I
learned
that
if
you
file
a
PD
application,
you
can
to
some
degree
you
can
get
around
some
of
the
various
requirements,
the
stricter
various
requirements
under
the
rationalization
of
the
harmonization
of
the
property
and
all
those
good
concepts
that
are,
unless
you
know
so
well
and
I,
don't.
But
the
point
is
the
PD
I
think
in
this
instance,
as
a
layman
is
being
abused
because
there
are
all
these
implicit
variances
in
there
and
you're
going
to
hear
some
about
that.
J
But
you've
got
lot
size,
a
lot
dimensions
traffic.
All
these
things
that
they're
asking
for
and
there
and
what
I
heard
the
staff
say
earlier
and
I
might
have
misconstrued
this.
But
what
I
heard
is
PD,
no
requests
for
variance
shut
down
them
analysis.
In
other
words,
if
there's,
if
there's
no
requests
official
requests
for
variances,
it
gets
a
different
tact
in
the
eyes
of
the
staff
and
I
would
submit
that
substance
over
form
should
govern
this.
If
you
read
into
this
application,
you
read
the
staff
report,
you
know
it.
J
It
talks
way
too
much
about
variances
when
none
are
requested.
Okay,
the
other
thing
I've
noticed
is
that
when
you
read
the
staff
report,
you
can
visualize
yourself
looking
out
in
the
neighborhood
and
basically
you're
looking
north,
where
the
marisol
is
you're.
Looking
across
the
street
where
the
multi
and
then
you
look
down
toward
the
village
and
that's
one
view
but
I
want
this
council
to
turn
around
like
a
Google
map,
thing
turn
around
and
look
down
the
other
way
and
I
want
you
to
visualize
an
rs.75
domino
there.
J
That's
this
property
and
then
and
look
behind
it
because
there's
a
far
as
the
eye
can
see
you're
going
to
see
rs.75
dominoes,
all
the
way
down
the
full
length
of
West,
Davis
and
then
you're
going
to
take
a
left
and
you're
going
to
go
the
full
length
of
South,
Davis
and
then
you're
going
to
take
another
left
and
come
up
to
the
village
rs.75.
What
happens
if
you
push
that
first
domino
over
okay,
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
is
going
to
be
changed.
Now
we
all
read
the
papers.
J
We
know
what's
going
on
davis
island,
this
notion
that
you
can
make
money
by
subdividing
a
lot.
Frankly,
I'm
not
sure
that
makes
any
sense
these
days.
It
might
have
made
sense
10,
20
years
ago,
these
days,
the
kind
of
buyers
that
are
moving
on
the
Davis
islet
want
Big
Lots,
look
at
the
homes
that
are
being
built.
You
know
that
the
tendency
is
the
want.
The
big
lot
I
question
whether
this
application
makes
me
any
sense,
even
for
the
owner.
Okay.
J
So
basically
our
position
is
that
this
whole
thing
has
come
to
pass
way
too
fast.
There
hasn't
been
adequate
disclosure
regarding
the
real
nature
of
the
application
requesting
variances
and
so
forth.
It's
been
dropped
on
us
seven
days
ago.
It
really
wasn't
until
then
we
knew
the
staff
is
going
to
go
this
direction
and
we
have
been
doing
our
best
to
put
together
a
good
opposition.
J
Thank
you
for,
and
I'm
going
to
say
this
I
personally
love
history,
okay
and
I
can
tell
you
that
the
VP
Davis
jumped
off
that
ship
on
October
20th,
1926,
okay,
and
if
you
we
brought
him
a
Neptune,
hurt
him
up
and
he
came
before
this
council
tonight,
and
he
would
tell
you
please
don't
do
this
to
my
neighborhood.
He
comes
back
from
Coral
Gables.
He
designs,
this
magnificent
structure
that
you
heard
miss
Alsina
described
and
it's
big
streets,
it's
Big
Lots
and
this
particular
property
is
a
nice
property.
J
R
Good
evening
Debbie's
our
Merman
190
to
Corsica
Street,
Davis,
Island
resident
dica
board
member
in
David,
Davis,
Island,
stewardship
committee
member
I've,
been
sworn
I,
know
this
site
well
and
then
access
the
adjacent,
sidewalk
and/or
roadway
most
days
and
often
several
times
in
one
day
on
multiple
occasions,
cars
exiting
the
property
have
not
seen
me
or
others
with
me,
including
my
grandchildren.
My
husband
rides
bikes
in
the
bike
lane
adjacent
to
the
property
countless
times
each
week.
R
Safety
of
the
sidewalk
bike
lane
and
roadway
are
important
to
me
and
I
am
extremely
concerned
that
this
PD
could
compromise
the
safety
of
my
family,
friends
and
other
residents
and
visitors
to
the
island.
The
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
per
Lu
policy.
Eight
point
one
three
point:
three
state's
Planning
development
rezoning
process
is
not
to
be
used
for
the
sole
purpose
of
waiving
the
established
land
development
regulations.
I
am
here
to
ask
that
the
PD
decisions
within
our
community
follow
our
code.
R
I
have
submitted
correspondence
into
the
record
addressing
transportation
and
pedestrian
safety
concerns,
PD
waiver
site
plan,
discrepancies,
project,
narrative
deficiencies,
staff
report,
discrepancies
and
transportation
technical
standards
issues
I
gave
those
to.
Mr.
Shelby
and
I
they
are,
in
the
end,
the
record
site
plan
deficiencies.
You
have
a
marked
up
site
plan
and
it's
on
the
overhead
as
well
and
on
this
big
board,
a
marked
up
site
plan
and
matrix
legend,
which
looks
more
like
this
sorry.
R
And
matrix
legend,
which
reflects
potential
deficiencies
as
reflected
within
the
site
plan
board,
the
applicant
has
failed
to
provide
site
plan
information
required
for
the
code
and
application
requirements.
Since
p,
d--'s
are
tied
to
the
site
plan.
No
approval
should
be
granted
until
these
issues
have
been
addressed
by
staff.
Findings
must
be
shared
with
the
public
in
a
manner
that
allows
an
opportunity
to
review
and
comment
on
the
required
site.
Pan
plan
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
inconsistencies.
R
R
Excuse
me
this.
This
is
PD.
Request
is
essentially
an
overreach
of
the
PD
process,
which
disguises
the
true
intent
of
the
request,
which
is
to
provide
number
one.
The
creation
of
an
irregularly
shaped
lot
inconsistent
with
the
established
development
patterns
within
the
neighborhood
to
allow
for
a
lot
with
dimensional
characteristics,
less
than
required
within
the
code
and
three
allow
for
a
structure
to
be
built
in
conflict
with
the
code
and
numerous
deficiencies
as
enumerated
within
the
marked
up
site
plan.
R
Please
follow
our
code
overturn
this
decision
and
require
that
the
applicant
develop
their
site
in
conformity
with
the
codes
as
lü
policy.
Eight
point,
one
three
three
says:
Planning
development
and
rezoning
process
is
not
to
be
used
for
the
sole
purpose
of
waiving
the
establish
land
development
regulations.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
and
in
the
record,
I
have
submitted
the
marked
up
site
plan,
site
plan,
ledge.
A
S
Good
evening
my
name
is
Greg
mazzello,
my
wife
and
I,
and
my
five
children
live
at
52
Ladoga
we'd
like
to
first.
Thank
you
for
your
service
to
our
city.
We
love
Tampa
and
we
love
Dave,
a
silent,
as
the
requester
has
admitted.
The
request
is
all
about
the
body.
So,
let's
talk
about
money,
I
have
put
together
a
map
of
the
hottest
and
most
rich
real
estate
in
Tampa
and
clearly
and
I
can
scroll.
You
have
a
copy,
this
in
front
of
you.
S
I
can
scroll
all
the
way
north
and
all
the
way
south
and,
as
you
can
see,
Davis
Island
is
one
of
the
two
hottest
richest
and
most
in-demand
pieces
of
real
estate.
So
if
you
want
to
talk
about
the
money
which
this
is
all
about,
and
it
really
isn't
about
the
use
of
the
money,
it's
just
about
the
money.
What
you
have
is
developers
licking
their
chops
and
my
concern
is-
is
that
I
share
all
the
other
concerns,
but
I
also
share
a
concern
that
this
isn't
about
just
one
decision.
S
This
is
about
the
fact
that
one
precedent
can
open
the
door
to
many
more
which
can
accumulate
and
become
law.
So
let's
talk
about
what
am
I
saying
what
I'm
saying
here
is:
if
you
see
the
number
one,
the
number
one
is
the
parcel
in
question:
if
you
agree
to
let
them
build,
let
them
parcel
off
what
would
now
be
considered
a
non-conforming
lot
and
Bill.
What
would
now
be
considered
a
non-conforming
structure,
all
of
the
properties
which
is
to
blocked
in
the
above
on
that
map?
S
It's
all
this
all
of
the
residences
to
Danube
they're,
all
tear
downs.
You
can
go
look
at
them.
They
are
all
tear
down
structures.
So
if
I'm,
a
developer
and
I
know
this
about
the
money,
I
even
understand
they're
admitting
it's
about
the
money.
There's
gonna
be
a
money
chase
for
all
of
those
Lots
to
be
resolved
or
let
other
things
happen
on
them,
because
you
could
open
up
the
door
to
that.
Then
what
happens?
S
I
made
a
map
I'm
Rand
or
McNally,
but
I
made
about
the
best
of
my
ability
of
how
many
tear
downs
are
on
Davis
Island.
Just
judging
by
the
ayat,
you
know,
I
don't
know,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
homes
in
Davis
Island
that
are
50
or
60
years
old,
they're
single-story
units
and
many
of
them
look
to
be
in
disrepair,
etc.
There
are
over
600
tear
downs
on
Davis
Island,
and
so
my
concern
is:
is
that
this
isn't
one
decision?
S
T
S
S
That
is
generally
consistent
with
the
levels
of
district
infrastructure
development
and,
if
you've
ever
tried
to
get
honor
off
this
island,
as
the
density
continues
to
grow,
it's
becoming
increasingly
difficult
in
the
mornings
and
in
the
evening
so
I
oppose
to
this
and
I
asked
you
to
deny
the
request.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
I
Yes,
Perry,
Sullivan
and
I
had
to
come
speak.
My
there's
a
lot
resting
on
me
as
I,
outside
of
looking
at
something
you're
too
close
to
a
project
but
ma'am.
What
do
you
do
for
a
living.
I
Oh
yeah,
but
it's
relevant,
but
a
messenger
reason
I
bet
her
is:
is
the
trips
are
generated
for
down
the
street
and
around
the
corner,
but
no
trip
generation
from
the
house.
She's
working
in
the
house,
she's
not
gonna,
be
going
in
and
out
in
and
out
and
if
she
does,
it
would
be
at
the
time
when
there
won't
be
credit,
because
I
work
for
myself
and
I
don't
go
out
when
it's
crowded
on
the
street.
If
she
didn't
work
for
the
house,
then
it
means
she
leave
8
o'clock.
I
In
the
morning
she
come
back
at
5
o'clock.
I,
don't
see
how
all
of
this
is
causing
this
trouble
for
safety
and
in
the
entire
neighborhood,
because
she
has
a
driveway
centered
on
the
street.
It's
not
her.
It's
not
her
fault,
because
there's
poor
design
Davis
out.
She
had
absolutely
nothing
to
do
with
that.
Okay,
so
I,
don't
understand
that
point.
It's
a
single-family
residence,
there's,
not
gonna,
be
a
lot
of
traffic
going
out
and
it
won't
be
pardon
any
kind
of
safety
issues.
I
can
see
she's
a
honour
of
the
house.
I
She
has
a
vested
interest
and
she
has
not,
like
a
house-
liver,
okay,
she's
spending,
oh
she's
spending,
all
this
money
to
rehab
a
house
to
meet
the
historic.
What
she
didn't
have
to
do:
I
greater
in
79,
an
architect
never
in
construction.
On
my
life,
there's
a
lot
of
extra
money
you
have
to
spend.
You
don't
have
to
do
that,
so
she
has
some
vested
enter.
She
she's
lovely
she's,
doing
she
loves
the
neighborhood
and
she
loves
the
house
she's
in
and
she
just
wants
to
make
it
better.
I
I
You
know
you
got
a
house,
one
inch
of
the
house
is
backing
on
driveway
I,
don't
see
how
that
will
cause
you
to
have
to
reroute
the
entire
neighborhood
the
cause
of
what
she's
doing
all
right
and
all
this
things
about
you
sitting
in
the
backyard
with
a
cigar.
What
does
they
have
to
do
with
this
lady
building
the
house
and
backing
in
and
going
down
on
a
mayor
way?
Okay,
I!
Don't
I,
don't
understand
relevance
in
this.
My
my
mind
is
not
I.
I
G
G
As
far
as
rebuttal,
you
heard
a
lot
of
concerns
about
roadway
safety
that
there's
a
dangerous
situation
in
the
area
that
there
are
adequate
crosswalks
that
there's
already
a
lot
of
traffic
that
there's
poor
roadway
designs,
as
the
last
speaker
just
said,
unfortunately,
for
the
residents
out
there.
That
is
not
something
that
has
been
caused
by
this
project.
Those
are
already
existing
conditions.
So
what
can
we
do
to
address
that
with
this
project?
G
Well,
the
issue
with
the
driveway
we
said
we
would
be
willing
to
add
that
hammerhead
designed
in
order
to
make
sure
that
anybody
that
would
pull
out
on
the
site
would
be
able
to
turn
around
internally
and
then
pull
out
straight
as
opposed
to
backing
off.
But
beyond
that,
there's
really
not
any
more.
We
can
do
as
far
as
the
existing
conditions.
I
will
also
note
that
a
lot
of
people
complained
about
the
traffic
on
West
Davis,
but,
as
mr.
G
G
But
the
other
point
that
I
really
think
is
important
in
it,
and
it's
not
intended
to
be
meant,
as
this
is
what
we're
gonna
do
if
this
rezoning
is
not
approved,
but
I
want
everybody
to
keep
in
mind
that
this.
This
lot
meets
the
requirements
to
have
two
separate
Lots
that
comply
with
the
rs.75.
It
could
be
developed
without
going
through
the
rezoning
process,
but,
as
we've
shown
you,
we
don't
want
to
do
that.
G
You
can
see
from
the
photos
what
links
that
my
client
went
to
to
try
to
renovate
this
structure
and
it's
a
beautiful
home,
and
it
certainly
isn't
something
that
she's
gonna
rent
out
for
bachelor's
bachelor
parties.
She
has
rented
it
out
in
the
past.
She
will.
She
will
be
glad
to
testify
to
that
under
oath.
She
does
not
own
any
other
homes
in
city,
so
it's
not
accurate
that
she
has
a
home
on
Davis
Island
that
she
earned
Harbour
Island
that
she
stays
in.
G
This
is
her
only
home
and
she's
lived
there
for
the
past
eight
years
with
her
son,
the
Davis
ilyich
Civic
Association
brought
up
the
point
that
it
doesn't
comply
with
code.
In
fact,
in
fact,
it
does
pursuant
to
the
staff
report,
they
they
believe
it's
too
much
density,
but
keep
in
mind
the
density.
That's
permitted
on
the
side
of
six
dwelling
units
per
acre
and
we're
proposing
half
of
that.
So
certainly
it
can't
be
too
much
density.
G
G
They
certainly
would
have
enough
time
between
now
and
then
to
address
it,
but
in
the
end,
what
amounts
to
is
the
legal
standard
for
this
application
whenever
it
goes
up
for
review?
There's
three
things:
the
court
looks
at
procedural
due
process.
The
only
procedural
issue
raised
was
the
one
I
just
mentioned
that
has
to
do
with
adequate
time
to
prepare
and
respond
between
now
and
second
reading.
They
will
have
adequate
time
to
do
so.
The
second
standard
of
Courts
going
to
look
at
is
whether
or
not
you
followed
the
essential
requirements
of
law.
G
The
staff
has
given
you
in
their
staff
report,
the
requirements
for
27
136,
the
requirements
for
a
PD,
and
it
said
that
we've
complied
with
all
of
those
requirements
and,
last
but
not
least,
as
competent
and
substantial
evidence
to
support
whatever
decision
you
make.
The
staff
report
alone
by
law
constitutes
constant,
competent
and
substantial
evidence.
The
evidence
and
testimony
that
I've
printed
presented
to
you
related
to
the
comp
plan
related
to
the
zoning
related
to
the
existing
developments
related,
most
importantly,
to
the
historic
preservation
issue
which
is
driving
this
okay.
G
But
I
can
tell
you
one
thing:
that's
not
substantial
and
competent
evidence
and
that's
fear
and
conjecture
and
rumors,
and
we
heard
a
lot
of
concern
about
traffic
safety,
but
nothing
related
or
specifically,
caused
by
this
site,
and
that
is
not
confident
in
substantial
evidence
and
with
that
we
would
have
asked
because
it
does
comply
with
code
and
because
it,
the
staff
supports
it
that
you
would
approve
this
rezoning
request.
Thank
you.
Thank.
F
L
G
T
F
F
G
L
L
Also
heard
you
don't
want
red
light.
We
don't
want
lights
in
our
in
our
in
our
district
in
our
because
it'll
ruin
Davis
island.
Do
you
not
think
those
accidents
are
gonna,
ruin,
Davis,
island
and
though,
and
the
traffic
that's
coming
from
the
residents
they
may
be
coming
off
the
bridge
to
to
work.
They
work
at
Tampa
general.
They
work
at
the
north
end
of
the
of
the
island.
L
So
when
you
talk
about
this,
it
is
something
that
you
know
the
Davis
Island
homeowners
association,
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Association,
should
be
looking
at
very
seriously
as
to
the
residents
the
traffic
to
speed.
That
happens
there
and
I
agree
that
this
this
request,
whether
it's
a
granted
or
not
tonight,
has
will,
in
my
opinion,
not
impact
that
at
all
what
impacts
it
is
the
residents
driving
down
West
Davis
at
speeds
that
they
should
not
be
driving.
A
L
A
C
K
H
Before
we
before,
we
have
a
countermanding
motion,
one
of
the
issues
that
I
have
about
this
more
than
anything
else
is
that,
because
the
uniqueness
of
the
building
itself,
I
have
a
problem
with
the
design
and
how
they're
going
to
and
how
they're
going
to
promote
and
change
it
I.
You
know
the
historical
nature
of
the
home
makes
it
a
little
bit
different
for
me
as
opposed
to
any
other
kind
of
change
in
land
use.
H
But
in
addition,
if
I
recall
correctly,
when
we
did
the
fencing
there
was
some
discussion
about
safety
for
the
children
that
were
at
the
pool
now
that
doesn't
mean
that
there's
an
overarching
problem
with
more
you
know
traffic,
it's
just
as
much
traffic
as
before,
but
you
know
I
remember.
That
was
a
discussion
that
was
made
by
the
applicant
the
first
time.
H
The
way
I
look
at
this
is
that
it
does
change
the
character
of
the
neighborhood,
because
the
uniqueness
of
the
lot
itself
is
different
than
almost
anything
else.
That's
out
there
and
the
way
that
the
platted
facing
of
it
changes
kind
of
the
nature
of
everything
else,
that's
in
there.
So,
for
that
purpose,
I'll
make
a
motion
I'll
make.
Oh
no
I
was
just
making
it
up
okay,
yeah,
and
will
this
fit
yeah?
What
we'll
discuss
it
I
mean
if
you
rather
discuss
it.
H
Matter
either
way
it
doesn't
matter
either
way,
I
mean
for
me,
the
you
know.
The
motion
deals
more
with
the
with
what
the
development
pattern
and
the
character
and
compatibility
and
that's
under
27
136
under
sub
6,
promote
and
encourage
development
where
appropriate
and
location
character
and
compatibility,
and
with
the
surrounding
impacted,
neighborhood
and
built
environment
and
existing
geography.
I,
don't
think
it
meets
those
standards
based
on
the
various
uniqueness
of
the
building
and
the
plot
itself.
H
You
know
that's
what
makes
it
unique
to
me
and
why
I
don't
agree
with
having
to
change
the
development
pattern
as
reflected
in
what
we
see
currently
on
the
aisle
on
that
particular
part
of
the
aisle
that
way,
because
so
many
of
the
other
Lots
around
it
or
75
foot,
frontage
and
and
then,
of
course,
with
the
uniqueness
of
the
property
itself,
meaning
the
building
itself.
I
just
had
I
can't
see
that
that
changed,
making
it
fit
into
the
rest
of
the
the
rest
of
the
development
pattern.
So
that's
what
that
would
be.
L
Is
there
and
that's
not
that's
being
done
as
we
speak,
so
I
don't
understand
the
logic
at
all
when
I
look
at
this
and
I
see,
there's
five
townhouses
next
next
to
it.
So
it
is
it
it
has.
It
already
has
changed
it
already.
Is
there
so
I,
don't
understand
the
the
the
disturbance
to
the
residents,
and
you
know,
as
far
as
the
look
or
the
design.
H
If
I
could
mr.
Payne
it's
singularly
unique,
it's
not
it's.
Not
only
that
if
you
look
at
the
way,
the
development
pattern
is
on
one
side
of
Davis
Boulevard
versus
the
other
side.
My
point
is:
is
that
it,
the
house
itself,
the
property
itself
is
unique
in
that
nature,
that's
my
feeling
about
it.
Based
on
what
I've
been
able
to
read
on
it,
oh
can
I,
you
know.
Obviously
we
can
have
disagreement.
K
K
But
I
do
want
to
clarify
for
the
record
that
that
in
itself
isn't
is
not
a
basis
for
it
section
six
talks
about
promoting
encouraging
development
where
appropriate,
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
impacted,
neighborhood
and
I.
Think
that
that's
what
it's
talking
about
now,
certainly
you
know
you
all:
are
the
ones
who
apply
the
facts
to
the
law,
but
that
section
is
talking
about.
Is
the
particular
property
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area?
I
hope,
I
answered.
L
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Do
we
need
another
motion
to
close.
I
was
okay.
We
have
a
motion
by
councilman
Brandon.
Second,
my
council
minutes
Kyle,
all
in
favor
aye
opposed
okay,.
P
F
Section
27,
136,
subsection
8,
promote
architectural
features
and
elements
which
complement
the
surrounding
community
and
enhance
the
overall
quality
of
the
development
and
elevations
provided
or
of
a
residential
style
that
is
complementary
to
the
surrounding
area.
I
think
the
the
comment
that
I
heard
from
councilman,
Suarez
and
I'm,
not
trying
to
put
words
into
your
mouth,
was
that
this
is
just
a
little
too
cute
by
half
trying
to
carve
out
this
odd-shaped
lot
with
this.
L
A
Q
You
mr.
chairman
I've
heard
many
things
and
for
a
group
of
good
neighbors
who
come
here
for
a
long
period
of
long
day-to-day,
it's
a
quotable
that
they
think
and
they
feel
what
they're
saying
is
correct
and
I
understand
that
very
much.
However,
when
you
look
at
land,
zoning
is
about
the
property
under
the
house,
not
the
property
on
top
of
the
house.
Q
In
other
words,
the
ceiling
is
one
thing,
no
higher
than
35
feet,
and
then
you
have
the
land
in
which
the
house
it's
under
the
property
owner
in
this
case
and
I'm,
not
a
judge
and
I'm,
not
a
lawyer,
it's
and
I
mentioned
I
heard
some
different
things
about
an
appellate
court,
there's
the
other,
which
is
fine,
I,
understand
that
and
and
then
on
zoning
matters.
You
only
look
at
the.
Q
Property
that
meets
the
qualification,
whether
it's
rectangular
square
or
zigzag.
It
meets
the
qualification
of
the
building,
so
they
on
both
sides.
Whoever
buys
that
property
and
built
a
house
I
would
assume
knows
that
the
lab
is
not
squared,
it's
not
rectangular
and
not
you
got
to
be
blind
and
I
just
feel
that
buyer
beware
and
that's
what
you
want
to
buy
and
you're
going
to
built.
Q
I
can
only
solve
the
property
I've
been
here
quite
a
little
bit
of
time
and
if
I
go
back
to
beta
Bay
and
make
sure
a
Boulevard
City
fit
over
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
on
a
piece
of
property
because
we
tried
to
design
the
building
now
the
land.
So
my
experience
tells
me
listen
carefully
vote.
Your
conscience
and
I
may
not
always
be
right.
I
admit
that,
but
be
careful
of
what
may
be
coming.
Thank
you
thank.
H
It's
an
earther
discussion,
I
will
say
mr.
Miranda
you're
right.
They
can
split
this
in
half
now
and
tear
it
on
the
house.
That's
not
what
they're
gonna
do,
though,
that's
why
they're
asking
for
our
permission
to
do
it
the
way
they
want
to
do
it
and
I
understand
where
your
point
is:
okay
and
you're
right,
the
underlying
land,
if
they
want
to
tear
down
the
house
and
make
it
75
and
75,
they
have
more
than
the
right
to
do
it,
but
they're
not
going
to
do
that.
H
L
L
A
A
K
K
B
B
D
D
D
The
subject
site
is
community
mixed-use
35.
This
is
actually
it
says:
community
mixed-use
35
on
the
future
land
use
map,
but
that's
actually
all
right
of
way.
It
just
hasn't
been
corrected
yet,
but
this
is
the
subject
site
and
it
abuts
to
north
40th
street,
and
this
is
residential.
Ten
behind
it,
which
is
a
single-family
detached
to
future
land
use
designation,
night
I
actually
have
oh,
and
it's
also
in
the
university
planning
district,
a
local
evacuation
zone.
D
To
the
north,
sorry,
those
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site
the
white
that
those
are
apartment
buildings
and
before
you
tonight,
I
actually
have
a
Planning,
Commission
inconsistency.
We
did
not
find
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
You
might
recall
that
portage
street
went
through
a
planning
process
and
about
2010
time
frames
through
that
visioning
process
in
that
community
planning
that
we
have
policies
related
to
or
the
street,
within
our
comprehensive
plan
that
were
added
via
text
amendment
as
well
as
there
was
even
a
map
amendment
associated
with
it.
D
D
The
parking
place
in
the
rear
of
the
structure,
and
so
that
was
the
form
that
was
desired
in
this
area
of
the
city,
and
we
found
that
the
plan
development
was
not
meeting
that
for
those
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
That
concludes
our
presentation,
so
it
is
inconsistent
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
B
Samaniego
land
development
coordination
as
I
stated
this
as
a
rezoning
request
for
RM
24
to
PD
for
a
business
professional
office
and
personal
services.
Jennifer
showed
you
an
aerial
of
the
property.
Here
is
a
zoning
map
of
the
property.
You
can
see
that
it's
on
40th
Street.
It
has
double
frontage
on
40th
Street,
as
well
as
Sutton
Place.
The
subject
property
is
in
green
to
the
south
of
it.
These
Lots
are
actually
all
city-owned
right
away.
B
Debate
the
site
is
currently
vacant.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
construct
a
27
I'm,
sorry,
2,000,
720
square
feet,
building
with
a
mixture
of
business,
professional
office
and
personal
service
uses
with
associated
parking.
There
are
four
waivers
being
requested.
The
first
one
is
to
pay
into
the
tree
trust
fund
for
mitigation,
not
located
on
site
to
be
added
between
first
and
second
reading.
B
The
second
waiver
is
to
reduce
the
required
parking
for
1413
spaces,
down
to
nine
that
does
36
percent
reduction
the
applicant
has
agreed
to,
and
it
will
be
noted
on
the
site
plan
that
only
a
portion
of
the
building
could
be
used
for
personal
services,
which
has
a
much
higher
can
count
and
the
remaining
portion
of
the
building
would
be
professional
office,
even
with
that.
It's
still
36%
parking
reduction,
transportation
and
land
development
coordination.
Both
found
this
application
consistent
because
of
parking
waiver
reduction.
B
Similarly
to
reduce
there
is
a
waiver
to
reduce
the
required
used
to
use
buffer
along
the
north.
There's
an
apartment
complex
to
the
north
is
required
a
15-foot
buffer
with
a
CMU
wall,
they're
requesting
to
go
down
to
10
feet
with
the
wooden
fence
and
then
the
last
waiver
is
the
vehicle
use
area
buffer
to
the
south.
B
B
There
are
some
revisions
through
transportation.
Again,
transportation
sounded
inconsistent
because
of
the
parking
Weaver
and
Natural
Resources
had
two
pages
of
revisions
other
than
that,
overall,
with
the
wrong
review
of
compliance,
staff
did
find
this
inconsistent
as
well
because
of
the
large
personal
waiver
at
36%.
I
know
the
applicant
will
make
a
presentation,
but
you
have
any
questions
for
me
at
this
time.
B
K
K
I
The
main
issue
that
that
I'm
I
want
to
address
at
this
point
how
one
startup
is
turning
the
building
sideways.
The
owner
is
definitely
adamant
about
not
doing
that
from
a
practical
standpoint.
It
doesn't
make
any
sense
for
its
advertising.
Now
that
mean
I
have
a
short
side
of
the
building
facing
40.
Street
signage
is
a
direct
function
of
the
square
footage
that
you
have
so
now,
instead
of
a
long
building,
so
I
can
get
all
the
signage
on
it
for
all.
Individual
people
is
in
there.
I'm.
I
I
This
shows
the
ones
I'm
showing
you
the
22
buildings,
which
represent
the
park,
approximately
82
percent
of
the
structures
doubt
footage
being
from
from
the
two
areas
I
mentioned
in
all
of
these
buildings.
They
have
parking
in
the
front
some
wood
built
a
couple
months
ago,
someone
built
maybe
a
year
ago,
but
my
point
is
all
the
way
down
there
quarter.
They
have
parking
in
front
so
I'm
just
asking
some
kind
of
common
sense
to
long.
Allow
my
client
to
do
that.
I
I
The
red
circles
are
in
protective
radius.
You
got
there
for
the
trees,
so
we
have
trees.
We
have
this
huge
tree
on
this
side.
Block
have
trees
here,
trees
on
that
side.
If
you
turn
it
this
way
now
you
still
have
to
stay
away
from
this
tree
on
this
side
and
you're
cutting
it
to
only
place.
You
carry
tension
because
you
can't
have
the
tree
the
tree
barricade
the
treats
the
covers,
can't
have
a
potential
part
in
it,
so
we're
pretty
much
stuck
the
way.
The
light
is
now
so
we're
trying
to
do
best.
I
This
just
shows
the
plan.
What
we're
going
to
comply
with
making
the
barbershop
decided
needs
to
be
for
for
the
personal
services,
and
so
we
cut
that
down
to
meet
the
peripheral
services.
So
we
can
cut
down
the
amount
of
parking
the
person
services
has
the
most
high
demand
for
parking.
So
that's
what
we
made
it
smaller.
The
occupant
is
on
it,
the
barbershops,
don't
have
nine
people
and
then
the
other
side
understand
people
who
don't
know.
I
I
The
way
we
want
to
do
it,
this
is
how
it's
going
to
look
going
now
for
your
street
and
there's
front
elevation.
Okay,
like
I,
said
the
signage
is
a
function
of
the
square
footage
that
you
have
for
the
building
for
the
frontage,
so
we
can
put
playing
signs
delineating
what
the
people
are
on
the
inside
the
building.
I
I
This
is
where
years
now
for
said
jazz
it
up,
I'm
Bob,
shot
he's
been
there
for
I,
mean
years
10
years
before
that
he
was
right
down
the
street
at
his
other
barbershop.
How
long
we
that
10
years,
20
years
he's
vested
in
this
community
so
he's
not
he's
not
a
flipper
he's,
not
a
developer.
He's
gonna
be
here
tomorrow
and
then
going
in
next
name.
Okay,
here's
the
best
attention
in
the
neighborhood
he
loved,
neighborhood,
just
where's
client
telling
us.
So
that's
what
he
wants
to
do
right
now.
I
If
you
look
at
where
he
is
now,
you
can
see
the
little
parking
space
that
you
have
for
the
entire
strip
of
land,
the
restaurants
there
there's
two
restaurants,
the
hooker
lounge,
there's
a
beauty
salon
a
barbershop
and
on
the
sign
area,
which
will
require
much
more
parking
than
what
we
were
going
to
have.
We
went
to
new
building.
H
I
H
Oh,
no,
no
I
know
it
took
a
lot
of
frontage
on
there
and
so
right
now
it
looks
like
and
if
I'm
looking
at
the
plan
right,
I
just
wanna
make
sure
I
have
it
right.
You've
got
40th
Street
there
and
then
you've
got
the
parking
in
the
front
and
what
has
been
requested
by
staff
and
and
by
the
inconsistency
is
that
they
want
to
move
it
up
closer
to
the
to
the
street.
Is
that
what
it
is
I'm
trying
to
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
what
earnest
that
was?
A
I
H
I
H
In
addition,
that
was,
there
was
their
attempt
by
the
staff
or
by
you
to
move
that
move,
that
frontage
up
towards
the
retention
plan,
meaning
the
the
building
itself
shortened
it
and
then
put
the
parking
in
the
back
and
maybe
elongated
it.
On
the
other
side,
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
that
was
try.
I
tried.
H
I
Q
Q
I
Understand
it,
but
but,
like
I
said
earlier,
I've
tried
everything,
I
could
do.
I
tried
different
shapes
on
the
truck
turning
it
and
and
one
one
problem
just
started.
Domino
domino
fail.
Other
promise
how
you
do
something
in
one
area
is
gonna
fetch
something
else.
So
this
is
an
S
or
of
two
evils.
Without
this,
this
is
a
mess
of
two
evils.
In
my
opinion,.
A
Thank
you,
sir.
Anyone
here
for
public
comment
on
item
number,
twelve.
C
The
president
of
the
public
reciving
Association
I've
a
39
year
resident
of
the
neighborhood
and
was,
as
you
know,
our
Civic
Association
was
responsible
for
getting
40th
Street.
Why
did
years
ago,
as
the
presenter
said,
all
the
other
buildings
on
40th
Street
face
40
Street
in
our
meeting
of
our
Civic
Association
of
this
past
Monday,
the
presenters
put
their
plan
for
then
it
was
enthusiastically
endorsed
by
the
membership
of
voted
unanimously
to
come
to
had
be
coming
for
you
and
give
us
given
our
blessing.
This
is
not
a
difficult
problem
to
solve.
C
A
You,
sir
anyone
else
here
for
public
comment
and
item
number
12:
okay,
any
rebuttal
from
the
applicant
any
rebuttal,
sir
mr.
Sullivan,
rebuttal
anything
further.
Okay!
Thank
you.
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
close
by
councilman
Cohen,
a
second
by
Councilman
Maniscalco,
all
in
favor,
any
opposed.
Okay,
I,
don't
know
who
I
was
next
I'll,
just
start
Councilman
Suarez.
Do
you
wish
to
read
item
12,
sir
I.
L
K
B
D
L
D
D
This
is
the
subject
site.
We
have
West
Columbus,
Drive,
I,
believe
there's
a
grocery
and
a
bakery,
and
these
commercial
uses.
M
D
Then
this
is
the
subject
site
and
this
is
North
North
Lincoln
right
here.
These
are
residential
and
these
are
the
commercial
uses
along
West,
Columbus,
Drive
she's
gonna
be
reflected
on
my
future
land
use
map.
The
red
is
community
commercial
35
that
allows
up
to
commercial
intensive
uses.
This
on
the
subject.
Site
is
residential
20,
that's
the
brownish
color,
and
then
it
transitions
in
density
to
residential
10.
As
we
move
south,
we
did
find
this
consistent.
D
The
future
land
use
is
residential
20
that
allows
a
decent
amount
of,
but
that
allows
up
to
20
going
it's
to
the
acre,
the
well
within
what
the
applicant
is
proposing
for
this
plan
development.
We
did
find
that
it
would
be
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
Any.
E
B
B
The
issue
is
that
the
lot
the
overall
lot
is
a
hundred
by
in
nine
to
five,
so
they
cannot
create
250
by
a
hundred
Lots,
because
the
Lots
are
short,
they're
five
feet
short
from
the
hundred
foot
lot
depth.
There
are
no
waivers
being
requested.
So
that's
the
only
issue
now
RS
50
is
the
smallest
euclidean
zoning
district.
We
have
for
single
family
lots.
B
Therefore,
they
have
to
request
a
PD
because
they
can't
meet
the
minimum
lot
area
of
five
thousand
square
feet
because
they're
short
approximately
250
square
foot
each,
so
that
is
the
only
variation
they're
complying
with
all
of
the
RS
15
standard,
setbacks,
height,
etc.
So
the
only
kind
of
difference
between
this
project
and
a
standard,
rs.50
lot
split,
which
City
Council
would
not
see,
is
the
they're
short
a
little
bit
in
the
area,
but
still
within
the
realms
of
allowable
density.
F
K
K
Good
evening,
members
of
the
council
I
think
this
is
gonna,
be
the
easiest
case
in
all
your
you
know
records.
Yes,
my
name
is
Daisy,
oh
no,
it's
gonna
be
my
name
is
Gabriel,
nothing
with
not
representing
and
represented
mr.
Tammy.
No
longer
I
have
turn
off
on
a
customer
of
mine
as
she's
playing
we're
short
by
250
square
feet
for
a
lot
I
think
we
want
to
create
possible
and
I
think.
The
key
thing
here
is
that,
yes,
you
can
see,
as
you
can
see,
if
you
can
see
okay,
this
is
mr.
K
Camillo
Congress
a
lot
within.
Within
that
lot
we
have
six
properties
or
seven
properties
with
the
same
size,
the
same
size
that
he
who
wants
to
create.
If
you
go
the
lot,
bounce
and
south
to
it,
you
have
probably
80%
of
them,
but
if
you
go
to
the
six
blocks
surrounding
about
surrounding,
because
this
is
up
to
the
north
is
just
commercial
you're
going
to
have
the
same
powder
in
the
center
of
the
block
and
then
on
the
sides
on
their
own.
The
very
ends
is
where
you
have
lots.
Q
K
A
Q
A
Opposed
Kate
and
I
guess:
councilman
Cohen!
If
you
don't
mind
handling
item
14,
Thank.
F
You
mr.
chair
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
3304
and
3306
west
st.
joseph
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
RS
50
residential
single-family
to
pd,
planned
development,
residential
single-family
detached
provided.
A
C
D
Center,
from
alone
with
their
Planning
Commission
staff,
we're
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
just
outside
of
the
this
is
the
Hillsborough
River,
and
then
this
is
the
central
business
district
off
to
the
side,
we're
off
of
Kennedy
Boulevard,
it's
the
University
of
Tampa
campus
and
then
I
have
north
Boulevard.
That
runs
right
through
the
middle.
D
This
will
look
familiar
to
you
not
only
because
it's
the
University
of
Tampa,
but
because
we
were
before
you
recently
with
a
future
land
use
map
amendment
on
the
subject
site
so
as
you'll
notice,
there's
a
couple
different
colors
on
the
map,
there's
public
rec,
open
space,
regional
mixed-use,
100,
general
mixed-use,
24,
and
then
the
planning
before
you
was
to
take
all
of
this
to
public
quasi
help
semi
public
that
has
been
transmitted
to
the
Department
of
Economic
Opportunity
per
your
motion
and
it's
being
reviewed
up
in
Tallahassee
as
I
speak.
D
D
B
Hey
Mary
Samaniego
land
development
coordination
with
this
application,
the
University
of
Tampa
is,
has
acquired,
I
believe
or
is
in
the
process
of
requiring
some
additional
lands
focus.
They're
these
great
pieces
are
the
new
lands,
so
they
need
to
be
included
in
the
overall
campus
plan.
So
therefore,
that's
part
of
the
reason
for
the
planned
development
submit.
Oh
that
you
we
have
before
you
the
last
time
this
was
approved.
This
campus
PDA
plan
was
approved
was
in
1501
you'll
note
in
your
staff
report.
B
Per
the
plan
of
development,
no
modifications
are
proposed
for
the
historic
campus
area.
The
total
development
entitlements
include
four
point:
eight
million
square
feet
of
development,
which
includes
a
total
of
six
thousand
beds
previously
they've,
not
twenty.
Eight.
The
2015
plan
was
for
five
thousand
beds,
they're
asking
for
six
thousand
beds
now,
so
that's
an
increase
of
one
thousand
beds.
B
The
next
waiver
that
they're
requesting
is
to
increase
the
maximum
square
footage
maximum
template
setback
allowed
on
Kennedy
Boulevard
for
this
area
in
here
there's
a
grand
oak
tree.
They
need
to
preserve,
which
requires
them
to
have
a
large
protective
radius
that
exceeds
the
maximum
building
setback
for
Kennedy
Boulevard.
So
they're
asking
for
that
waiver
staff
has
no
objections
to
that
to
allow
the
principal
building,
facade
and
functional
pedestrian
entries
of
residential
buildings
to
be
oriented
away
from
Kennedy
Boulevard
and
not
maintained
pedestrian
access
directly
to
public
sidewalks.
B
B
Sorry,
it's
getting
a
little
late,
but
basically
the
development
compliance
staff
found
this
inconsistent
with
the
land
development
code
because
of
this
20%
reduction,
which
equates
to
approximately
1,100
parking
spaces
deficient
I
believe
that
it's
an
issue
of
timing
and
construction,
but
I'll,
let
the
applicant
speak
to
that.
Do
you
have
any
any.
T
Mary
described
the
purpose
of
the
rezoning
accurately.
Another
reason
I
mean
frankly,
as
you
all
are
aware,
the
inner
city
of
Tampa
has
transformed
itself
over
the
last
several
years
under
the
campus
is
totally
different.
It's
a
vibrant,
growing
campus
and
one
of
the
reasons
we're
here
before
you
tonight
is
frankly
to
seek
a
increase
in
the
kaplan
or
enrollment
they're.
Currently
under
the
PDA,
the
cap
is
at
8500.
We
are
at
about
eighty
three
hundred
full-time
students
at
this
point
in
time,
so
we're
asking
that
go
up
to
eleven
thousand.
T
There
are
long-term
plans
in
place
for
the
expansion
of
the
campus,
and
so
this
is
all
part
of
this
process
that
we're
going
through
and
while
we're
here
tonight,
the
parking
waiver
seems
to
be
the
major
issue,
and
so
that's
what
I'm
going
to
focus
my
conversation
on
tonight
and
not
going
to
any
other
detail.
Unless
you
go
up
questions
about
it,
we're
happy
to
answer
any
other
questions
you
might
have
about
the
PDA
request.
We
think
there's
several
unique
factors
that
justify
the
parking
waiver
in
the
circumstance.
T
First,
the
university
has
recently
a
couple
of
years
ago
as
passed,
a
policy
where
freshmen
are
not
allowed
to
have
cars
on
campus
and
there's
no
parking.
They
have
no
parking
privilege
on
campus.
Last
year,
the
entering
class
at
the
University
Tampa
was
2,100
2,100
freshman.
The
parking
ratio
under
the
city
parking
code
is
0.5
parking
spaces
per
student.
If
you
multiply
that,
then
there
are
a
thousand
and
50
spaces
that
are
basically
wiped
off
the
table,
because
the
freshmen
are
not
allowed
to
have
cars
on
campus
any
longer.
T
Also,
a
large
percentage
of
the
students
that
do
not
live
on
campus
live
in
close
proximity
is
again,
as
you
all
are
aware.
A
number
of
multifamily
projects
have
been
approved
in
downtown
and
on
the
west
side
of
the
river.
Recently
you've
got
Altos
Grand
Central,
that's
going
up.
A
large
number
of
students
live
at
the
Barrymore
near
the
Straz.
I
can
see
them
biking
and
walking
to
campus
every
day.
T
You've
got
the
the
Manor
Riverwalk
on
the
west
side,
the
river
at
the
old
Tribune
site.
A
large
number
of
the
students
live
in
these
complexes.
They
live
over
in
the
Bleeker
project
in
Hyde
Park,
so
NoHo
flats,
Aurora,
Post,
Hyde,
Park,
there's
a
number
of
projects
and
also
a
number
of
them.
A
large
number
of
them
live
in
in
Harbor
Island
or
in
the
channel
district.
T
Frankly,
and
all
these
places
are
within
walking
and
biking
distance
and
then,
frankly,
over
the
last
few
years,
really
the
major
transit
need
that
the
university
has
is
not
additional
parking,
but
it's
been
biking
spaces,
and
so
the
university
has
gone
on
a
program
to
increase
the
number
of
biking
spaces
on
campus.
Currently,
the
university
has
400
biking
spaces
existing
on
campus.
T
We're
on
the
periphery
of
the
downtown
area
and,
quite
frankly,
students
are
much
more
likely
to
bike
from
their
apartment
building
in
downtown,
then
white-collar
workers
are
willing
to
bike
to
work.
So
it
really,
it
probably
serves
really
the
University
of
Tampa
much
more
than
it
does
serve
the
central
business
district.
That
policy
also,
you
know,
I,
know
that
transit
options
and
and
has
been
a
big
issue
that
we
faced
as
a
community.
T
T
But
campus
rec
has
a
bunch
of
bikes
that
if
you
have
a
UT
student
ID,
you
can
go
ahead
and
rent
it
for
free
and
you
go
down
to
Publix
or
go
you
go
where
you
need
to
go
also
as
the
that
as
the
handout
suggests,
because
it's
in
it's
close
to
the
central
business
district
and
it's
inside
and
the
downtown
special
district
as
well.
Students
and
faculty
have
access
to
the
Downtowner.
You've
got
two
hard
routes
that
go
to
to
the
campus.
T
You
have
route
30
that
goes
on
Kennedy
Boulevard
that
connects
downtown
to
the
airport,
and
then
you
have
route
7
that
goes
from
downtown
to
Cass,
Street
and
then
up
north
Boulevard.
Also,
the
campus
is
in
close
proximity
to
the
Merritt
Marion
Street
transit
way,
which
is
the
focal
point
of
all
the
Hart
transit
lines,
including
the
Express
and
Express
lines
that
come
in
to
downtown
you
also
the
streetcar
system.
You
have
the
water
taxi.
You
have
coast
bike.
T
The
university
has
a
zip
car
that
that
students
can
use,
so
there
are
a
number
of
different
options
other
than
having
a
car
to
go
to
and
from
campus.
Also
as
part
of
this
PDA
hartline
has
requested,
and
the
universities
agree
to
make
improvements
to
to
Heartland
bus
stops
adjacent
to
camp.
The
campus
on
Kennedy
Boulevard.
T
T
Even
though
the
campus
is
on
the
periphery
downtown,
it's
it's
close
to
everything.
It
is
a
self-contained
campus
in
many
ways
geographically,
and
let
me
point
out
what
I'm
saying-
and
this
I
think
addresses
some
of
the
staff's
concerned-
that
by
granting
a
parking
waiver,
you
may
create
issues
for
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
On
the
east
side,
you've
got
the
Hillsborough
River
in
downtown.
T
There's
really
no
option
for
students
to
park
cars
unless
they
want
to
pay
a
huge
rate
at
the
one
of
the
parking
garages
downtown
or
unless
they
live
in
one
of
the
apartment
buildings
and
they
have
a
right
to
park
here
then,
on
the
south
side,
you've
got
Kennedy
Boulevard
in
a
fairly
heavy
commercial
district.
That
goes
all
the
way
down
to
the
Crosstown
expressway,
where
the
parking
is
really
all
controlled
by
large
business
entities
like
Tampa
general
in
our
internal
on
the
east
side
of
the
campus.
T
You
have
what
is
a
warehouse
district,
primarily
where
the
parking
is
controlled
again
by
the
owners
of
the
warehouses,
and
then
you
have
the
old
Furman
site,
which
is
controlled
by
tgh
and
again,
there's
really
no
opportunity
for
the
parking
to
spill
in
that
area
to
the
north.
You
have
camper
prep
again
they
can't
park
at
Tampa,
prep
and
north
of
that
you've
got
the
Julian
Lane
park
and
they
won't
be
able
to
park
there
either
or
they'll,
be
towed.
T
So
if
you're
living
downtown
or
in
on
the
west
side
of
the
river
or
Harbor
Island
or
even
Channelside,
you're
much
more
likely
frankly,
to
bike
or
walk
to
campus,
because
by
the
time
you're
able
to
find
somewhere
to
park
six
or
seven
blocks
north
bless
the
campus,
and
then
you
have
to
walk
all
the
way
to
plant
Hall,
which
is
another
equivalent
or
six
or
seven
blocks.
Frankly,
once
you
get
on
campus
its,
it
just
doesn't
make
sense.
T
So
we
we
think
that
frankly,
it's
our
traffic
issues
as
a
result
of
this
way,
where
it's
going
to
really
affect
the
University
of
Tampa
and
will
not
spill
over
into
the
neighborhoods,
as
is
a
concern.
The
other
thing
and
and
Mary
mentioned
this
part
of
the
reason
for
this
request
is
the
timing
and
development
the
growth
of
the
University.
Currently
we
have
4165
parking
spaces
with
this
PDA
approval.
T
Hopefully
we
will
probably
increase
that
to
between
42
and
43
hundred,
so
we're
very
close
to
the
point
five
threshold
right
now,
but
the
long-term
plans
to
the
University
there
are
going
to
be
additional
dorms
and
buildings
built.
The
university
has
grown
every
year
for
22
years,
so
the
enrollments
going
to
contain
to
grow.
There
are
plans
ultimately
for
another
large
parking
garage
near
the
pool
area,
but
that's
not
that's,
that's
not
going
to
happen
in
the
immediate
future.
T
This
university
has
been
an
enormous
catalyst
for
redevelopment
along
Kennedy
and
on
the
west
side
of
the
river.
We
don't
think
it's
really
in
the
best
interest
of
either
the
university
or
the
city
to
try
to
halt
development
because
of
the
parking
issue.
Ultimately,
with
the
construction
of
the
parking
garage
and
additional
surfing
surface
parking
lots,
we
probably
will
come
back
up
close
to
that
point
five
threshold,
but
at
this
point
in
time
we're
asking
that
dealer
words
of
0.4
then.
T
T
T
In
fact,
we
are
not
pulling
that
in
at
this
point
in
time,
because
we
wanted
to
be
sensitive
to
the
West
Tampa
overlay
and
we
want
to
work
with
your
staff
in
the
neighborhood
before
we
bring
that
in,
but
we're
going
to
have
to
amend
this
PDA
in
the
not-too-distant
future
and
in
Franklin
the
University
continues
to
evolve.
Its
programs
continue
to
evolve,
so
that
requires
changes
to
the
conditions
to
the
PDA.
T
H
H
C
H
Of
the
22%
of
the
people
that
go
to
school
at
UT
use
the
Downtowner
and
they
come
from
channel
site,
primarily
okay,
even
though
there
is
one
house
in
my
neighborhood
in
Riverside
Heights
that
they
call
the
frat
house,
because
this
weekend
being
st.
Patrick's
Day,
there
were
already
a
lot
of
drunk
people
in
my
neighborhood
and
that's
not
a
usual
thing.
I
just
don't
point
it
out.
T
Well,
the
historic
campus
encompass
a
lot
of
the
riverfront
right,
so
there
really
is
not
much
availability
to
park
cars
near
the
river
in
them
and
also
that's
the
prime
real
estate.
You
don't
want
to
use
that
area
as
in
the
central
business
district.
There's
there's
concerns
about
using
that
for
parking.
It
you
need
so
the
historic
district,
the
historic
portion
of
the
campus
I
mean
it
goes
up
to
the
new
Student
Services
Center
that
just
will
rebuild,
and
then
you
have
the
library.
Then
you've
got
this.
T
T
In
the
way
of
sir,
we
have
acquired
a
surface
parking
lot
on
the
south
side
of
Kennedy
that
we're
incorporating
here
we
are
also
bringing
in
what
is
a
weird
triangular
shape
on
just
on
the
west
side
that
the
CSX
railroad
tracks
that
work
that
we're
going
to
turn
to
the
surface
parking
we're
taking
every
opportunity
that
we
can
to
incorporate
additional
parking
into
the
campus,
but
there
there
is
a
limit
to
what
we
can
do.
Physic
at
this
point
in
time,
I
guess
my
point.
H
And
asking
you
that
is
that,
whether
or
not
there
is
a
way
that
we
can
find
some
alternatives
to
providing
more
parking,
because
I
think
that
you're
landlocked
literally
unless
you
keep
expanding
and
so
you're
gonna,
be
keep
coming
back
here,
like
you
said
in
two
years
to
you
know,
put
more
parking
in
you
know,
there's
got
to
be
a
better
way
of
doing
it.
Yeah.
H
T
I
mean
part
of
the
part
of
the
part
of
the
reason
we
keep
coming
back
is
that
the
university
is
growing
and
it
is
acquiring
land
additional
land
or
for
parking
for
additional
buildings.
For
I
mean
it
is
a.
It
is
an
amazing
story.
Frankly,
I
mean
when
I
first
moved
to
Tampa
the
University
of
Tampa
was
having
problems
financially
and
having
problems
with
keeping
it.
T
T
Where
you
you're
dealing
with
these
issues,
the
university
has
aggressively,
looked
for
additional
land
adjacent
to
it
in
order
to
address
parking,
but
also
to
address
facilities
because,
as
it
grows,
I
mean
they're
they're
plans
for
a
new
Fine
Arts
Center,
there's
going
to
be
new
new
classrooms.
It's
not
just
beds
and
parking.
It's
just
a
lot
of
different
things
going
on
they're,
giving
it
in
and
it's
it's
it's
a
great
story.
Frankly,
in
my
opinion,
but
I
mean
there
are
tensions,
yeah
thanks.
L
Q
Q
L
A
A
A
F
You
very
much
mr.
chairman,
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
401
802
909
and
1005
West
Kennedy
Boulevard
109,
North,
Willow,
Avenue
and
112,
and
115
North
Addison
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
we're
particularly
described
in
section
run
from
zoning
district
classification,
PDA
CGT,
commercial,
general
and
IG
industrial
general
PDA
plan
development,
alternative
college
university,
private,
providing
an
effective
date.
We.
A
H
L
Caffeine-Free
shot
clinic
in
the
Humane
Society
of
Tampa
Bay,
four
dogs
on
April,
the
6th
2019
9:00
a.m.
to
12:00
p.m.
I
mean
yeah
9:00
a.m.
to
12:00
p.m.
River
River
tower
park
at
with
401
East
Bird
Street.
And
if
you
have
any
questions,
eight
one
three,
two,
five,
two,
two
zero,
two
seven
and
it
says
please
announce.