►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 03142019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Except
okay:
I
wanted
to
acknowledge
a
memory
request
by
councilman
Suarez
requesting
the
tree.
Ordinance
I
didn't
be
moved
from
the
last
item
to
number
two
I
had
spoken
with
miss
Kurt
about
that,
and
she
had
suggested
that
we,
since
it
was
noticed
at
six
o'clock,
to
move
it
to
six,
which
could
make
it
three
or
four
but
moved
up.
Nevertheless,
is
that
a
minimal?
Thank
you,
sir.
Okay.
First
we
begin
at
5:30
for
someone
from
the
administration
on
air
quality.
C
Good
evening,
Council
I
know
see
a
wind
from
the
Department
of
logistics
and
asset
management
and
I
was
asked
to
come
in
to
report
on
you
about
the
status
of
the
air
quality
and
here
in
Old,
City
Hall,
as
well
as
the
relocation
time
line
for
staffing
staff
and
council
meetings.
And,
finally,
the
work
being
done
on
the
building.
I
will
report
on
both
the
air
quality
and
the
work
that's
being
done,
and
my
chucklin
from
the
contract
administration
department
will
report
on
the
relocation
time
on
the
timeline
case.
C
In
terms
of
the
status
of
the
indoor
air
quality
I'm,
going
to
start
by
giving
a
timeline
of
what
has
happened
over
the
last
several
years
in
January
of
2017,
the
indoor
air
quality
testing
was
conducted
due
to
dust
being
in
the
buildings.
If
you
recall,
during
that
time,
we
were
doing
the
renovation
of
the
envelope
of
the
building
and
we
were
getting
complaints
for
both
dust
and
noise
and
that's
when
we
did
the
first
indoor
air
quality
testing.
C
C
We
needed
to
see
where
we
were
in
terms
of
the
pressure
in
the
building.
The
air
handlers
were
installed
to
create
a
positive
pressure
in
the
building
to
this
with
humidity
control
and
to
keep
the
moisture
out
at
that
one.
In
time
there
were
elevated
results
detected
now.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
understand
that
the
elevated
results
were
results
that
were
higher
than
the
ones
that
were
previously
detected.
However,
they
were
not
elevated
to
the
point
that
to
exceeding
industry
standard
thresholds
of
particulars
in
the
air-
yes,.
D
C
In
the
air
and
then
sample,
we
did
spot
sampling
so
both
of
those
what
we
had
what
we
thought
about
in
terms
of
what
could
possibly
cause
this
is
that
we
did
notice.
There
are
moisture
coming
into
the
building.
We've
noticed
on
more
than
one
occasion
that
there
are
windows
that
are
left
that
are
up
in
certain
areas
of
the
building
and
that
causes
the
moisture
and
rain
or
whatever
to
come
in,
and
it
settles
in.
C
D
D
A
A
D
D
D
C
E
C
E
Tell
you
it's
something
years
ago,
I
flew
to
Europe
on
an
airline.
I'm,
not
gonna,
talk
about
coach
and
it
was
I'm
five
foot
four
and
my
knees
were
hitting
the
seat
in
front
of
me.
Okay,
the
whole
trip,
I
wrote,
the
airline
and
I
said
Mardis
travel
better
than
an
S.
They
wrote
back,
that's
the
industry
industry
standard.
So
every
time
I
hear
industry
standard.
My
ears
perk
up
well.
C
E
C
C
When,
when
we
found
that
they
were
elevated
air
areas
or
elevated
amount,
we
did
have
a
licensed
contractor
to
come
in
and
to
remediate
the
whole
area
remediate
every
area,
and
then
we
did
the
testing
afterwards
and
after
we
did
the
testing,
we
have
not
found
any
additional
increase
in
particular,
or
anything
like
that
in.
If.
C
D
C
D
C
D
C
D
C
C
The
next
area
that
or
the
thing
you
wanted
us
to
report
on
was
what's
the
status
of
the
upcoming
projects.
The
complete
renovation
of
Old
City
Hall
has
always
been
planned
to
be
conducted
in
three
phases.
The
first
phase
was
to
the
window
replacement.
We
did
that
the
second
flake
face
was
the
exterior
envelope
and
now
the
third
phase
that
we're
planning
for
is
the
upgrades
to
the
electrical
system,
the
McCain
system,
into
the
plumbing.
C
E
D
G
D
D
C
E
C
A
C
H
Good
evening
Council,
Mike,
chucker
and
contract
administration
department
I
want
to
just
go
over
a
notional
timeline
for
the
phase
3
portion
of
the
work.
That's
gonna
be
done
in
city
hotel,
so
the
the
request
for
qualifications
for
phase
3
for
the
old
city
hall
improvement,
design-build
project,
the
the
request
for
qualifications
will
be
posted
the
end
of
this
month.
So
from
that
stage
on
end
of
April
or
into
March,
we'll
look
to
do
short
listing
the
firms
that
present
then
we'll
shortlist
them
and
to
have
presentations.
H
Looking
at
then
mid,
June
timeframe,
mid
June
of
2019
after
the
mayor
makes
his
selection
of
the
firm.
We
expect
to
see
that
in
front
of
City
Council
in
late
August
of
2019
and
subsequently
about
a
month
after
that
and
late
September,
we'll
start
to
notice
proceed
to
the
selected
firm
to
begin
the
design
process.
H
So
we
anticipate
the
design
to
take
about
seven
months
for
design
and
development
of
the
guaranteed
maximum
price,
and
we
expect
to
bring
that
to
City
Council
early
May
of
2020
and
then
early
June
of
2020.
We
expect
notice
proceed
to
begin
construction
of
that
phase.
Three
portion
so
as
far
as
any
relocation,
we
don't
have
any
details
of
that.
We
know
that
at
this
point
it
will
be
beyond
June
of
2020
and
then
we'll
get
some
more
details
on
how
that
would
be
phased.
I
Understanding
is
that
the
reason
that
this
issue
came
up
is
because
there
were
concerns
about
the
air
quality
in
the
building
and
whether
or
not
people
were
gonna
need
to
be
moving
out,
and
while
I
heard
that
there
was
nothing
related
to
particulates.
There
was
this
comment
made
about
mold,
and
is
there
a
mold
problem
in
the
building.
E
Yes,
there's
a
mold
problem
because
in
our
office
they
came
in
and
the
paint
on
the
wall.
The
mold
was
coming
and
peeling
the
paint
off
and
they
came
in
scraped
it
whatever
they
did,
and
he
had
it
in
four
places
like
that,
and
it
was
like
that
forever
and
we
complained
about
it.
Nobody
did
anything
until
now,
nothing
so,
yes,
there
is
a
problem
with
mold.
I
would
say.
D
D
K
D
So
it's
a
specialized
type
of
construction
because
of
the
age
of
the
building,
the
kind
of
construction
materials
that
are
used.
You
know,
there's
lots
of
nooks
and
crannies
and
other
things
that
are
part
of
this.
My
guess
is
based
on
some
of
the
antidotal
evidence
that
we
have
not
necessarily
into
mitigation.
D
Excuse
me
not
based
on
the
air
quality
studies
that
have
been
done,
that
we
may
have
trapped
some
old
mold
in
here
for
some
live
spores
in
here
after
we
sealed
the
building,
that's
a
guess
of
mine,
because
I'm
not
an
expert
on
building
or
anything
else,
but
the
proofs
in
the
pudding
we
just
mentioned
about
mr.
Vieira's
office
that
was
soaked
through
okay
and
then
also
miss
cappings
office,
which
has
got,
has
got
growing.
Mold
and
I
will
say
my
office
too.
We
had
we
had
kind
of
a
traveling
mold
problem
too.
D
It's
it
becomes
an
issue
as
to
whether
or
not
we
actually
sealed
the
building
properly
or
we
sealed
it
properly,
but
we
sealed
in
the
bat
stuff
and
that's
why
I'm
getting
that.
I
think
that
we
may
have
an
issue
there
and
as
part
of
the
contract
that
was
first,
that
was
first
put
in
place.
Is
there
a
way
that
that
contractor
either
guarantees
or
make
sure
that
before
he
can
be
certified
of
completing
the
job
that
there's
no
issues
concerning
these?
D
H
For
the
for
the
exterior
portion
of
the
work
that
was
done
here,
that
was
just
that
as
an
arc
actual
restoration
of
the
the
exterior
facility.
Now
there
were
lots
of
gaps
and
holes
in
this
building
of
being
as
old
as
it
was,
and
so
that
was
sealed
up,
but
it
was
there's
no
exterior
sealant
applied
to
the
building.
It
still
has
its
force
enough
for
breathing
and
that's
how
these
buildings
were
designed
back
in
1915,
and
that's
right.
That
was,
the
purpose
of
our
exterior
renovation
project
was
restored
to
the
original
1915.
H
D
And
so
that
begs
the
question
that,
if
we're,
if
we're
restoring
it
back
to
1915
level-
and
we
might
have
some
issues
with
mold
or
what
other
kind
of
particulates
that
are
in
the
air,
how
do
we
solve
that
problem,
making
it
okay
for
modern
standards,
but
still
keeping
the
exterior?
You
know
as
nice
and
beautiful
as
it
is
so
I
think.
The
question
is:
is
that
as
that
is
that
part
of
the
contract
that
we
entered
into
in
order
to
refurbish
the
ability?
D
Because
you
want
the
outside
to
look
great,
which
it
does
looks
terrific?
But
if
the
inside,
for
some
reason,
we've
either
trapped?
Something
or
something
has
not
been
changed
to
make
it
a
functional
building.
So
we
don't
have
these
issues.
Is
there
something
contractually
that
says
that
they
have
to
maintain
either
a
higher
standard
or
a
different
standard
or
or
maybe
it
has
nothing
in
the
contract?
I,
don't
know
no.
H
Sir,
there
is
nothing
in
the
contract
regarding
air
quality
inside
the
building
date.
What
they
did
is
they
definitely
improved
on
it
by
sealing
the
building
up
as
which
which
what
they
did
part
of
this
phase.
Three
portion
of
it
includes
an
exterior
sealant.
Now
the
reason
that
wasn't
part
of
the
original
exterior
they
looked
at
it,
they
discussed
it
to
the
exterior,
but
this
is
a
national
landmark
building
and
there
are
some
concerns
of
sealant
being
applied
that
causes
discoloration
over
time.
H
But
it
sounds
like
at
this
point:
they
maybe
they
found
there's
a
product
out
there
that
can
be
applied
that
will
seal
the
building,
and
we
have
that
as
part
of
the
scope
in
this
phase,
three
portion.
Okay,
so
that,
along
with
sealing
building
along
with
the
rest
of
the
HVAC
plumbing
electrical
to
complete
theme,
so.
D
D
H
D
One
last
question
along
these
lines:
so
is
there
anything
that
is
done,
anteriorly
to
seal,
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
have
some
of
the
moisture
and
other
particulates
that
might
come
from
the
outside
that
might
cause
some
issues
for
people
inside
here?
Is
that
what
this
phase
3
is
going
to
handle?
Yes,.
H
D
A
E
E
Now
the
other
thing,
when
you
bring
it
up
that
we
moved
out
while
it
was
the
only
time
we
moved
out
was
when
the
windows
were
being
done,
because
we
were
in
our
offices
when
they
were
piling
dust
and
banging
on
the
walls
and
stuff
was
falling
from
the
ceiling.
We
were
in
our
offices.
How
many
months
was
there
yeah?
It
happened
in
here.
It
was
so
all
the
stuff
that
was
in
there
was
falling
on
us
and
I
had
a
cough
I.
Think.
E
E
2017,
so
as
far
back
as
two
years
ago,
I
was
complaining
about
the
air
quality
in
here,
because
it
it
kept
my
eyes
water
and
my
car
and
I
was
coughing.
It
was
in
my
sinuses.
It
was
coughing,
so
we
you
know
when
you
say
they
moved
to
stop.
They
moved
us
out
with
the
windows,
not
when
they
were
banging
on
the
walls.
Knocking
everything
down
on
us,
so
I
want
to
make
that
clear.
Also,
I
I,
don't
know.
If
I
need
to
make
this
emotion,
we're
gonna
be
getting
a
report.
E
E
D
A
H
Believe
they'll,
probably
some
relocation
we're
just
unsure
how,
because
once
we
get
the
teams
in
place
after
they're
selected,
we'll
have
to
see
what
their
plan
is.
We
anticipate
this
being
a
one-year
construction
effort.
We
don't
know
what
we
don't
know
at
this
point.
We
have
to
see
what
their
plan
is
and
how
the
design
will
lay
out
to
see
what
the
timeframe
will
be
for
relocating
people.
Rumor.
L
D
H
A
D
A
A
A
J
M
Evil
Department
I
am
here
in
lieu
of
Kristen
Mora,
who
has
been
handling
this
for
a
long
time.
At
this
point,
she
unfortunately,
is
admitted
into
the
hospital
right
now
she
wanted
me
to
let
you
know
that
she
would
have
done
anything
to
be
here
and
I
could
attest
to
that,
because
I
had
to
tell
her
to
leave
today,
but
I
am
here
with
the
substitute
ordinance.
This
is
the
substitute
that
is
reflective
of
City
Council's
last
motion
to
make
the
changes
and
send
it
over
to
the
Planning
Commission.
M
This
is
a
substitute
excuse
me
because
it
was
changed
to
add
in
the
recommendation
from
the
Planning
Commission,
which
happened
on
Monday,
to
add
the
exhibit
of
the
tree
matrix,
which
is
Exhibit
A,
which
you've
been
talking
about
throughout
this
period
of
time,
and
there
were
some
cross
references
that
were
not
originally
caught,
so
there
are
no
substantive
changes,
I'm
sorry
I'm
having
trouble
breathing
as
well.
Yes,
sir,
it's
nothing.
E
M
This
this
did
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
on
Monday.
It
had
a
unanimous
recommendation
of
approval.
I
was
not
at
the
Planning
Commission,
but
I
was
advised
that
there
were
no
objections
at
that
time
at
the
Planning
Commission.
It
is
for
you
for
first
reading
and
it
is
appropriate
to
read
it
tonight
if
you
feel
that's
appropriate.
M
D
A
D
M
D
M
A
M
D
M
A
A
M
Then
you
could
direct
those
changes
between
first
and
second
reading,
depending
upon
what
they
are
in,
assuming
that
they're
not
major
substantive
changes
that
would
require
it
to
go
back
to
the
Planning,
Commission
and
I.
Do
also
want
to
remind
City
Council
that
you
have
already
enacted
ordinances
that
are
I
believe
set
to
go
well.
I
know
they're
set
to
go
into
effect
in
April
I,
believe
it's
April,
17th,
I'm,
sorry,
if
I'm
off
by
a
couple
days,
but
that's
what
my
memory
says.
M
A
D
Okay,
I
present
a
substitute
ordinance
for
first
reading,
consideration
and
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
relating
to
comprehensive
changes
to
the
city's
tree
and
landscaping.
Regulations
set
forth
in
chapters
13
landscaping,
tree
removal
and
site
clearing,
16
parks
and
recreation,
19,
property
maintenance
and
structural
standards,
22
streets
and
sidewalks
and
27
owning
and
land
development.
Repealing
and
reserving
chapter
13
landscaping,
tree
removal
and
site
clearing
amending
section,
16
86
tree
trust
fund
established
amending
section
19.
D
Four
point:
one
point:
three:
other
exemptions:
creating
section
27
two.
Eighty
four
point:
one
point:
four
non-conforming
landscape
areas
due
to
governmental
acquisition,
section
27
to
84.2
permits
in
general
tree
protection
during
construction
inspections,
creating
section
27,
80,
4.2.1
permit
for
site
clearing
application
required,
documentation,
inspections,
creating
section
27,
280,
4.2.2
permit
for
landscaping
and
tree
planting
activities
as
part
of
a
building
permit
application
required,
documentation,
inspections,
creating
section
27,
284,
point
2
point
3
permit
for
tree
pruning
application
standards
and
criteria
for
decision
required,
documentation
and
inspections.
D
Creating
section
27,
84.2
point
for
permit
for
protected
tree
removal;
application
required
documentation,
standards
and
criteria
for
decision
inspections,
petition
for
review,
creating
section
27,
284
point
two
point:
five
permit
for
grand
tree
removal
application
required
documentation,
standards
and
criteria
for
decision
inspections,
petition
for
review,
creating
section,
27,
2,
8.
Four
point:
two
point:
six
tree
planting:
permit
procedures,
requirements,
inspections,
creating
section
27,
two.
D
Eighty
four
point:
two
point:
seven
emergency
work,
creating
section
27,
two
84.3
tree
preservation,
planting
landscaped
area
requirements;
creating
section
27,
284,
point
three
point:
one:
landscape
and
tree
planting
standards,
tree
preservation,
retention
standards,
creating
section
27,
two.
Eighty
four
point:
three
point:
two
tree
planning
requirements,
tree
mate,
matrix
irrigation,
creating
section
27,
two.
Eighty
four
point:
three
point:
three
landscaped
area
and
tree
planting
requirements;
creating
section
27,
two.
D
Eighty
four
point:
three
point:
four
landscaped
area
calculation
and
payment
general
procedure;
creating
section
27,
280,
4.4,
tree
mitigation
method,
requirements,
creating
section,
27,
280,
4.4.1,
tree
mitigation
calculations,
creating
section
27,
280,
4.4.2
tree
planting,
permit
for
mitigation,
trees,
repealing
and
replacing
section
27
285
enforcement
authority
penalties,
remedies,
repealing,
section,
27,
85.1,
landscape
and
tree
planning
standards,
repealing
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinances
and
conflict
there
with
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
date.
We.
F
Want
to
make
clear
for
obviously
Council
understands
this,
but
also
for
the
public's
understanding,
and
also
that
it's
clear
for
the
record
that
what
you've
just
read
is
a
legislative
matter.
It
is
not
a
quasi-judicial
matter,
so,
as
such,
it
is
treated
differently.
Frankly,
the
opportunity
to
be
heard
at
this
is
this
motion
tonight
moves
it
forward
to
a
second
reading
and
adoption
public
hearing,
at
which
time
the
public
will
be
given
the
opportunity
to
speak.
F
F
D
D
A
B
A
A
D
N
I
won't
give
a
full
presentation,
since
you
saw
that
last
time
this
was
a
continued
item.
It's
a
comprehensive
plan
amendment
from
light
industrial
to
community
commercial
35
on
Rowlett
Park
Drive.
The
Planning
Commission
did
find
this
consistent
I
used
to
have
that
resolution
available.
If
you
would
like
to
see
it,
but
it
should
also
be
in
the
packet
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank.
J
Mr.
chairman
Todd
Pressman
200,
so
in
a
second
Avenue
South
in
st.
Petersburg
I
made
the
staff
and
citizens
aware
that
we
were
coming
tonight
to
ask
for
a
continuance.
As
you
know,
I
proudly
represent
hope,
Street
and
the
iyo
Baptist
Church
will
have
a
decade's
long,
tremendous
history
of
charitable
support
of
our
community.
J
Additionally,
all
the
plans
have
to
go
through
board
trustees
and
directors,
so
they
have
really
just
barely
begun
to
put
that
puzzle
together.
So
our
main
goal
is
to
work
with
the
citizens.
Clearly,
they
gave
us
a
direction
that
we
all
do
want
to
work
towards.
I
am
confident.
I
think
that
we
can
do
that,
but
at
this
time
there
is
no
PD
plan
and
we
believe
in
six
months
we
should
be
looking
forward
with
a
very
good
plan
that
we
will
work
hard
towards
and
expect
and
I
expect
but
hopeless.
It
is
well
supported.
D
J
A
O
Right,
there's
there's
two
provisions
in
this
continuance.
One
is
the
land
use
provision
and
the
other
was
the
rezoning
provision.
I've
exchanged
several
emails
with
mr.
Pressman
and
copied
you
as
council
members
on
that
the
land
use
amendment
could
go
forward
if
they
would
define
the
residential
area.
The
remainder
of
that
property
could
be
developed
exactly
as
he's
proposing
with
his
warehouse
without
having
to
encumber
the
whole
property
for
red
for
potential
residential
development.
We
have
encouraged
him
to
do
that.
O
We
reached
out
and
talked
to
the
city
staff
and
they've
indicated
to
me
that,
if
it
is
less
than
one
acre
of
property
and
I
have
suggested
point,
eight
five
acres
along
the
southeastern
corner
of
the
property
be
designated
that
they
could
move
forward
with
the
land
use
amendment
as
quickly
as
they
can
get
you
a
legal
description.
So
we
don't
have
any
problem
with
continuing
the
zoning
portion
for
six
months.
O
As
you
know,
the
other
property
owners-
and
there
are
other
people
to
speak
on
this
we'd
strongly
recommend
that
you
shorten
the
time
frame
on
the
land
use
portion
and
not
to
and
not
the
zoning
portion.
If
he
wants
six
months
to
develop
a
plan,
that's
fine!
He
can
go
forward
right
now
with
his
land
use
section
if
he
gave
you
a
legal
description.
I've
confirmed
that
with
a
city
legal
department
with
a
Planning
Commission
and
when
the
city
staff
and
what
happens
with
that
is,
it
doesn't
have
to
go
to
DCA.
O
O
D
O
Go
through,
we
have
to
go
through
this
whole
presentation
again,
if
you
continue
the
land-use
section
for
six
months,
but
but
if
he
wants
to
do
it
that
way,
it's
to
his
benefit
to
reduce
it
to
less
than
one
acre.
It
saves
him
another
two
or
three
months
in
review
time
going
to
kadhi
CA
and
then
coming
back,
we've
actually
requested.
You
consider
the
land
use
portion
not
being
continued
for
six
months.
K
P
D
Want
to
continue
the
land-use
portion,
we
want
to
make
sure
we
get
this
right.
We
don't
want
to
know
what
your
opinion
is
as
to
what
he
should
be
doing
right
he's
gonna
have
to
make
a
decision
based
on
his
would
not
like
it
continued
for
six
months.
I
got
it
no.
Regardless
of
what
happens,
though
mr.
McLean
II
I,
think
you
understand
that
this
council,
as
it
is,
will
not
be
looking
at
I,
understand
ax.
So
the
timing.
O
D
J
I
G
M
D
D
P
O
N
F
Yes,
counsel,
just
for
your
consideration
six
months,
requests
for
continuances
are
very
rare
and,
in
those
instances
being
at
such
a
long
length
of
time,
counsel
has
taken
the
opportunity
to
inquire
of
the
petitioner,
whether
they
be
willing
to
Reno
tiss,
to
put
the
public
on
notice
somewhere
down
the
road.
So
that
might
be
something
counsel.
They
want
to
inquire
of
mr.
precedent.
If
counsel
would
consider
his
request
a
wise.
P
J
This
is
a
big
undertaking
for
the
group.
They've
never
done
this
before
they
had
to
find
an
engineer.
They
have
to
get
even
a
preliminary
plan
through
their
group,
so
we
knew
we
were
gonna.
Ask
for
continuance.
I
did
reach
out
to
the
community
I
reached
out,
killed,
Seminole
Heights
that
Kami's
with
talk
to
them
or
emailed
them
myself.
Once
we
have
a
plan,
we
will
be
inclusive
with
everyone,
but
I
don't
want
the
council
have
any
any
impression
from
anyone
that
we're
working
towards
a
different
regard.
J
We
have
not
been
in
touch
with
the
neighbors,
because
that's
not
the
case.
This
is
a
great
organization.
It
does
take
a
long
time.
You
will
know
for
one
of
these
planets
from
scratch.
We
could
end
up
with
a
huge
wetland
one
area
and
have
to
work
around
that
just
as
one
example,
so
I
think
you
all
understand
that,
but
we
are
here
for
the
folks
who
spoke
to
work
with
the
neighbors.
We
have
that
goal.
We
want
to
work
towards
that
goal
and
we
will
be
inclusive.
That's
all.
Thank
you.
Any.
G
Chairman
from
what
I've
heard
from
both
sides,
I
remember
that
hearing
some
time
back
where
there
was
a
little
of
something
and
the
neighborhood
wanted
more
of
that.
Little
of
something
there
wanted
more
residential
and
from
what
I'm
hearing
it
might
come
back
one
way
or
the
other
either
to
satisfy
what
was
said
in
the
earlier
debate
on
the
previous
hearing
that
we
had,
or
maybe
they
won't
have
enough
residential
for
what
I'm
asking
both
sides
to
do.
Even
though
it's
one
side
is
a
presentation,
the
other
side
is
either
accept
the
inter.
G
Not
accepting
was
coming
and
I
would
like
to
just
say
that
think
before
you
start
drawing
what
the
neighborhood
looks
like
today
and
what
it's
going
to
look
like
tomorrow,
and
what
it's
going
to
look
like
forever.
So
I'd
like
to
make
that
clear,
right
choice
to
those
that
are
doing
those
plans
that
that
neighborhood
is
very
sustainable
to
the
city
of
Tampa,
and
we
like
to
keep
it
that
way.
A
Well
said,
anyone
else,
no
I
and
I
and
I'm
glad
to
see
that
there
is
at
least
that
we'll
see
how
council
acts
on
it,
but
it
requests
because
this
is
you
know,
standing
aside
from
any
legal
pronouncements,
we
may
have
a
very
worthy
endeavor
by
a
big
community
partner
that
this
city
and
larger
area
has
and
improving
our
community,
so
I'm
glad
to
see
and
I
hope
that
there's
a
dialogue
and
community
engagement,
which
is
what
Idlewild
knows
how
to
do.
Certainly:
okay.
What's
the
pleasure
of
council.
D
N
E
D
A
B
F
G
A
P
Now,
okay,
so
just
to
reef,
clarify,
meri,
Samaniego
band
development
coordination
just
to
clarify
the
agenda
for
the
public
items
number
six.
Ten
and
thirteen
did
not
perfect
notice,
so
they
cannot
be
heard
tonight
and
so
the
first
item
I
yes,
sir,
those
were
all
miss
noticed
and
they
cannot
be
heard
tonight.
So
item
number
four
is
our
easy
night
to.
P
P
J
M
D
N
D
B
P
N
N
This
is
north
of
West.
Columbus,
Drive
and
I
will
show
the
future
land
use
map.
The
future
land
use
is
residential
20.
This
is
that
public,
which
is
the
elementary
school.
That's
the
blue
and
then
the
orange
is
that
residential
10,
which
is
more
of
a
single-family,
detached
future
land
use
category.
N
The
requests
for
the
residential
multi-family
18
zoning
district
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
that
residential
20
feature
land
use
category,
and
that
is
the
type
of
development
that
is
encouraged
by
the
Comprehensive
Plan
in
these
areas.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I
am
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
P
Okay,
Mary
Samaniego,
mente,
filme
coordination,
Jennifer
showed
you
a
aerial,
and
the
conference
of
planned
land
use
designation
for
the
property.
Here's
the
zoning
map
of
the
surrounding
area,
the
septic
properties
in
green.
It
is
owned,
REO
residential
office
and
RS
50,
which
is
a
single
family,
developed
single-family,
detached
zoning
lot.
The
property
is
currently
vacant.
P
This
overall
areas
are
as
50
and
then
along
North
Boulevard.
You
know
some
PD's
another
ro
a
PD
and
then
the
RM
16.
The
applicants
wanting
this
property
to
go
to
the
RM
18
as
Jennifer
described
for
the
land
use
category.
This
is
in
an
area
that
is
contains
detached
single-family
houses,
but
is
slated
and
their
policy
guidance
to
increase
the
density
in
this
area
for
2012
units
per
acre
in
general.
So
the
RM
18
is
a
laudable
consideration
of
a
zoning
district.
P
Within
that
art,
20
land
use
and,
like
I
said,
the
property
is
vacant,
those
are
and
16
to
the
South.
This
is
a
Clinton
rezoning
request,
so
there's
no
site
plan
or
waiver
to
review
and
approve.
So,
if
approved,
any
development
would
have
to
comply
with
all
standards
and
the
RM
18
zoning
district.
The
development
review
and
compliance
staff
bottom
is
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampere
Code
of
Ordinances.
Thank.
A
M
A
I
Please
thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
chair
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
2807
north
boulevard
and
five
1/8
west
plaza
place
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning,
district
classification,
ro
residential
office
and
rs.50
residential
single-family
to
RM
18
residential
multifamily,
providing
an
effective
second.
We.
B
N
Johnny,
from
alone
with
your
Planning
Commission,
this
is
in
the
central
Tampa
Planning.
Sorry,
South,
Tampa
planning
district.
Excuse
me
a
level
C
evacuation
zone.
Corona
Park
is
located
about
a
half
mile
to
the
south
and
it
does
have
part
service
routes.
19
and
36
serve
the
subject
site.
We
are
south
of
West
Bay
to
Bay
Boulevard,
and
then
you
can
kind
of
see
a
little
bit
of
the
expressway
over
here.
I
have
West
San
Juan,
south
Ferdinand
Avenue,
there's
definitely
a
mixture
of
uses.
N
This
is
a
elementary
school
to
the
south.
There's
a
mix
of
housing
types
in
this
area,
some
multifamily
and
single-family
detached,
which
is
reflected
on
our
future
land
use
map.
The
designation
is
residential
xx.
There
is
some
residential
ten
in
the
neighborhood
that
that's
the
school
I
pointed
out.
That
blue
is
the
for
the
public,
quasi
public
future
land
use
designation.
The
comprehensive
plan
does
seek
to
provide
diverse
housing
opportunities
for
campus
growing
for
future
population.
It
encourages
effectively
utilizing
this
underutilized
land
for
higher
density
housing.
This
would
be
consistent.
N
P
P
Here
is
the
subject:
property
currently
vacant,
here's
the
property
to
the
west,
at
3306,
San,
Juan,
cross,
San,
Juan
bacon
on
the
corner,
then
across
the
street,
on
Ferdinand
here
and
then
there's
single-family
houses
and
on
this
side
of
the
block.
This
is
Euclidean
rezoning
request,
so
there
is
no
site
plan
or
waivers
to
review.
Any
of
any
development
that
was
to
occur
would
have
to
completely
comply
with
all
basic
code
requirements
of
the
land,
development
code
and
other
applicable
code
sections.
P
B
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Bob
st.
Pierre
I'm
representing
the
applicant,
as
shown
both
land
development
and
the
Planning
Commission
have
found
the
rezoning
to
be
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
Code
of
Ordinances,
as
well
as
the
provisions
of
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
I'm,
respectfully
asking
the
council
to
move
forward
with
this
recommendation
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
A
S
Good
evening,
council
I'm
Kim
D
Anse,
the
president
of
the
Palma
Ceia
Neighborhood
Association
I'm
here
tonight,
because
the
Neighborhood
Association
opposes
this
rezoning.
We
had
a
house
directly
across
the
street
that
she
pointed
out
was
vacant
and
actually
has
a
lot.
Their
house
on
it
three
years
ago
come
and
want
to
do
the
same
thing
and
we
stood
up
here
trying
to
deny
it.
We
have
fought
hard
to
not
have
quadruplex
new
quadruplex
in
our
neighborhood.
We
feel
it
doesn't
go
with
the
look
and
feel
that
we
want
in
our
neighborhood.
S
We
also
are
concerned,
you
take
one
house
and
you
knock
it
down
that
potentially
had
two
adult
drivers
there.
You
want
to
put
a
house
that
has
that's
a
quadruplex
that
could
have
eight
people
or
eight
cars
there.
Where
are
all
these
cars
going
to
park?
Where
are
all
these
cars
going
to
start
driving
on
the
RV
oder,
overcrowded
roads?
There's
no
sidewalks,
there's
a
school
very
close
by.
We
just
do
not
feel
that
this
is
appropriate
to
rezone.
S
G
Good
evening
my
name
is
Scott
price
I'm,
a
homeowner
and
a
resident
at
3312,
West,
San,
Juan,
Street
and
I'm,
representing
the
other
single-family
home
owners
on
the
block,
I'd
like
to
submit
a
letter
to
the
council
this
evening
as
a
resident
on
San,
Juan,
Street
I,
fully
understand
the
impact
and
the
issues
that
the
above
rezoning
request
supposed
to
our
street.
Over
the
years
we've
witnessed
several
homes
being
built
on
our
street,
as
our
neighborhood
Tabor
continues
to
grow.
G
However,
these
new
constructions
have
torn
down
a
single-family
home
and
built
a
new
single-family
home
in
its
place.
This
is
different.
At
present,
we
currently
have
six
multi-unit
buildings
on
our
small
street
in
South
Tampa,
due
to
the
growth
and
lack
of
parking
space
on
the
street,
we're
faced
with
tight
and
overcrowded
parking,
which
also
leads
to
increased
traffic,
our
kids
not
being
able
to
play
safely
in
the
streets.
Homeowners
car
is
being
hit.
G
Mine's
been
hit
three
times
for
the
record,
no
space
to
clear
the
street
for
drivers
passing
through
as
well
as
our
local,
elementary
school
Roosevelt
of
being
reaching
max
capacity.
The
above
rezoning
request
would
allow
for
four
townhomes.
It
used
to
be
a
single-family
home.
It
does
not
consider
the
impact
daily
live
daily,
living
to
the
current
residents
whatsoever.
We
welcome
new
families
and
homeowners
into
the
neighborhood,
but
only
those
that
have
our
best
interest
in
mind.
G
We
respectfully
ask
that
you
take
into
consideration
the
people
who
live
on
the
street
and
how
it
would
negatively
impact
our
day-to-day
living
when
making
your
decision
on
rezoning,
3302,
West,
San,
Juan,
Street
I
have
a
letter
from
myself
and
some
are
seven
other
homeowners
on
the
street.
I
would
have
three
more,
but
they
were
on
vacation.
G
D
I'm
Jack
brought
home
sorry
miss
Rodriguez
is
miss
Cathy
long
here.
If
you
could
raise
your
hand.
Thank
you.
Ma'am
miss
read
us
sky
yeah.
Thank
you,
ma'am
Bob,
Atkins
or
barb
Atkins.
Thank
you
up.
Is
it
Bob
I
can't
see
you
Bob,
but
soon
it's
pop
and
then
miss
miss
or
mr.
Friedman
miss
Friedman.
Mr.
Friedman,
are
they
outside
there.
D
F
D
D
A
F
T
I'm
Jack
Rodriguez
I
live
at
3218,
West
San
Juan,
a
couple
of
houses
over
from
the
subject
property
Palma
Ceia
Park
was
a
subdivision
was
planted
in
the
20s
during
the
boom
with
5000
square
foot,
Lots,
it's
dotted
with
Mediterranean
and
brick
apartments.
There's
not
been
a
duplex
built
in
the
neighborhood
in
over
20
30
years.
Since
1989
there's
not
been
a
rezoning
approved
in
the
neighborhood
since
2002,
and
that
was
a
PD
rezoning.
T
The
neighborhood
was
reclassified
to
RM
16
in
1989
arms
16
provided
and
recognized
the
area's
5,000
square
foot
Lots
and
prohibits
duplexes
City
Council
recognized
this
issue
and
changed
the
requirements
so
duplexes
and
townhouses
could
not
be
built
unless
they
had
more
than
5,000
square
feet.
It's
obvious
and
most
important
that
it
was
the
intent
of
council.
This
new
zoning
made
all
apartments
duplexes
and
townhouses
in
the
neighborhood
legal
non-conforming.
They
are
all
on
5,000
square
foot
Lots.
The
construction
timeline
on
the
duplexes
and
townhouses
are
all
built
before
1989.
T
The
rezoning
--zz
were
an
accommodation
to
the
property
owners
to
protect
their
investment
and
private
property
rights.
All
redevelopment
in
the
neighborhood
has
been
single-family
housing
there's
not
been
one
duplex
built.
As
I
said,
the
area
is
dotted
with
RS
50
and
Rs
60
zoning.
There
is
Rs
50
adjacent
to
the
rear
of
the
subject.
Property
transportation
didn't
go
out
there,
otherwise
that
they
would
recognize
that
they
would
see
the
narrow
streets
filled
with
cars.
It's
like
driving
from
one
side
of
the
street
to
the
other.
T
To
get
down
the
street
emergency
vehicles
had
to
come
to
my
house
three
months
ago
and
barely
didn't
make
it
there's
also
an
old
stucco
apartment
building
immediately
across
from
this
site.
It's
cars
are
parked
all
along
the
front
of
the
right
away.
In
addition-
and
this
is
important-
the
north
side
of
San
Juan
has
City
no
parking
signs,
as
well
as
the
east
and
west
side
of
Ferdinand,
which
both
streets
join
this
site.
T
The
Planning
Commission's
report
looks
at
what
has
been
built
prior
to
1989.
It
recognizes
old,
duplexes
and
multifamily
development.
They
have
ignored
current
development
since
there
has
not
been
duplex
or
multifamily
development
built
in
over
30
years.
They
have
not
looked
at
current
development
trends.
Over
100
single-family
detached
homes
have
been
built
in
this
immediate
neighborhood.
In
the
past
five
years.
The
Planning
Commission
should,
with
your
Direction,
update
its
outdated
plan
based
on
current
market
conditions.
T
The
request
is
a
spot
zoning.
This
approval
will
set
a
president
for
duplex
rezoning
request.
It
will
open
the
floodgates
for
request
to
rezoning
to
RM
18
for
additional
duplexes.
The
duplexes
in
the
area
have
been
grandfathered
in
and
if
torn
down
or
destroyed
will
not
be
able
to
be
rebuilt,
council
denied
a
rezoning
request
directly
across
the
street
from
this
site
and
2016.
T
T
The
many
of
the
structures
were
built
to
the
RM
zoning
classification,
the
duplexes
and
multifamily
units
are
in
the
minority
and
our
legal
non-conforming
I
researched
houses
in
the
immediate
neighborhood.
There
have
been
100
single-family,
detached
homes
built
in
this
immediate
neighborhood
in
the
last
five
years,
no
duplexes.
There
are
also
eight
single-family
houses
currently
under
construction
in
the
immediate
neighbourhood
that
calculates
out
to
be
about
770
million
dollars
of
investment
in
our
neighborhood
I've
practiced
real
estate.
For
over
forty
seven
years,
the
petitioner
paid
the
average
price
for
single-family
detached
lot.
T
T
Okay,
so
why
should
you
deny?
Because
the
RM
16
recognizes
existing
single-family
and
multi-family
development?
All
Lots
in
the
neighborhood
are
planted
5,000
square
feet.
You
all
recognized
the
issue
and
did
away
with
our
to
zoning.
When
you
read
zone
the
area
in
1989,
there
are
parking
issues
along
the
street.
T
T
B
The
bottom
line
is
staff
and
the
Planning
Commission
have
found
this
to
be
consistent
and
where
the
city
wants
to
go
just
a
few
things,
one
we
get
up
transportation
out
there
and
that's
a
something.
That's
holding
us
back
little
butt
about
what
we
want
to
do
based
on
their
recommendations.
So
we
did
have
transportation
out
there.
B
I
B
D
D
D
B
D
K
Q
K
R
D
J
A
D
A
G
M
I
D
Any
of
us,
if
I
could
I
I,
think
you
know
if
you
look
under
our
line,
use
objective,
2.1
regulating
the
levels
of
building
intensity
according
to
standards
and
mr.
Miranda
just
pointed
out
the
RMF
18,
there's,
not
a
designation
that
other
than
previously
that
was
grandfathered
in
from
previous
years
is
not
not
available.
M
It
is
appropriate
to
base
your
approval.
Let
me
step
take
a
step
back
Rebecca
Curt
legal
department.
Everything
has
to
be
consistent
with
a
comprehensive
plan.
The
comprehensive
plan
is
adopted
by
ordinance.
Therefore,
I
think
it
meets
both
the
requirement
that
all
development
has
to
be
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
the
state
statute.
That
says
that
you
have
to
cite
a
specific
code
to
deny
it
based
upon
the
comprehend
plan.
So
the
short
answer
is
yes.
You
can
cite
to
the
country
that.
D
Was
it
I
wasn't
sure?
Secondly,
land
use
policy.
Two
point:
one
point:
two
use
of
limited
land
resources
more
efficiently
pursue
a
development
pattern.
This
is
where
we're
at
that
is
more
economically
sound.
This
development
panic
pattern
is
not
more.
I
can
make
them
economically
sound
that
encourage
the
kinds
of
info
development
that
is
part
of
the
the
development
pattern
in
this
particular
neighborhood
and
see
here,
and
that
a
lot
land
use
subjective,
nine
point
three
compatible
development
and
redevelopment
to
sustain
stable,
neighborhoods
and
ensure
the
social
and
economic
health
of
the
city.
G
D
D
T
P
N
Jennifer
Malone
with
your
Planning
Commission,
since
this
was
continued
and
I
gave
a
full
presentation.
Last
time.
I
will
repeat
myself:
I'll
just
remind
you
where
this
is
and
what
the
land
use
allows.
It
is
located
on
South,
West
Shore.
It
is
immediately
south
of
a
larger
multifamily
development
that
was
developed
within
the
last
10
years,
I
believe
directly
to
the
north,
and
then
the
future
land
use
is
transitional.
Use
24,
which
allows
a
variety
of
uses
and
allows
residential
allows
commercial.
It
even
allows
a
little
bit
of
industrial
in
this
area.
N
This
is
identified
especially
in
this
area
as
really
transitioning
towards
these
residential
uses.
So
we
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
each
submit
all-
and
that
concludes
my
presentation,
but
I
am
available
to
answer
any
questions
about
that
future
land
use
category
or
about
those
policies.
Thank
you.
Ma'am.
P
Thank
you,
Mary
Samaniego
land
development
coordination
is
Jennifer's
say
that
this
was
a
continued
application
from
the
January
17
2019
McCarron
City
Council
made
a
motion.
The
original
application
was
for
plan
development
for
multi-family
residential
with
subsequent
seven
waivers
staff,
found
it
inconsistent
because
of
the
amount
and
nature
of
all
the
waivers,
and
it
was
staffs
belief
that
the
applicant
could
revise
the
plan
and
by
moving
the
buildings
and
perhaps
losing
one
dwelling
in
it.
P
They
could
significantly
reduce
the
amount
of
waivers
the
developer
in
this
instance
to
accept
his
advice
but
lost
one
welling
unit
and,
as
a
result,
has
gone
from
seven
waivers
down
to
two.
The
two
waivers
are
to
reduce
the
tree
preservation
from
50
percent
to
zero
and
for
the
entries
of
buildings,
2
and
3
to
face
the
north
and
not
a
public
right-of-way.
All
other
provisions
of
the
land,
development
code
and
applicable
other
city
of
Tampa
code
of
ordinance
requirements
have
been
met.
P
22
townhomes
there
are
some
changes
between
1st
and
2nd
reading.
If
this
application
is
approved,
just
minor
changes
to
some
of
the
data
on
the
site
plan
for
our
land,
development
and
natural
resources
and
transportation,
but
all
three
departments
and
the
rest
of
the
development
review
and
compliance
staff
found
is
consistent
with
the
land
development
code,
provided
those
revisions
are
made.
Thank.
R
Good
evening,
council
members
Roy
measure
WR
WR,
a
engineering
for
two
6-0
West
line
ball
Avenue
I'm
a
planner
in
an
engineer
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
Oh,
why
we?
Why
we
are
here
is:
is
the
council
was
gracious
enough
to
grant
us
a
continuance
so
that
we
could
indeed
kind
of
huddle
with
staff
and
with
our
clients
see
we
could
improve
the
site
plan
and
bring
it
into
consistency?
We
have
indeed
done
that
as
staff
indicated,
the
area
the
zoning
for
the
area
is
tu
24.
R
We
are
proposing
22
units
now
on
the
one
acre
land
one
acre
parcel,
so
we
are
in
compliance
with
the
the
area.
Zoning
just
to
show
you
a
view
of
what
the
site
looks
like
and
a
concern
that
the
staff
had
was
we're.
Also
taking
down.
You
know
all
the
trees
on
the
site,
no
question
about
it,
the
site.
This
is
what
it
looks
like.
This
is
looking
east
toward
West
Shore
Boulevard.
R
The
site
was
master
plan
and
mass
graded
with
the
intent
of
developing
a
restaurant,
and
so
we're
proposing
to
put
22
units
as
opposed
to
a
restaurant
and
so
the
trees.
On
the
site
itself
have
been
mass
grade
and
have
been
removed.
There
are
some
trees
around
the
perimeter
which
we
are
proposing
to
remove.
This
is
just
a
glance
of
what
they
look
like.
This
is
a
long
West,
Shore
Boulevard.
R
This
is
about
a
hundred
yards
further
north.
That's
a
Jefferson,
Street
Apartments
I.
Our
landscaping
will
look
very
similar
again.
What
is
what
has
changed
is
that
we
have
dropped
a
unit.
We
have
altered
our
green
space
and
in
fact
we
have
enough
green
space.
Now
is
that
we
will
be
planting
all
of
our
mitigation
trees
on
site,
so
tree
for
tree
were
actually
planting
more
trees
than
we
are
removing
another
concern
was
was
traffic,
this
trip
generation-
and
this
is
from
the
ite.
R
There
is
standard
trip
generation
software,
comparing
a
3500
square
foot
restaurant
with
22
townhomes.
The
first
column
in
the
blue
is
the
daily
trips
created
by
a
3,500
square
foot
restaurant,
the
daily
trips
for
an
orange
there
are
from
22
townhomes.
Clearly
you
can
see
the
total
daily
trips
greatly
reduced
by
what
we
are
proposing,
the
a.m.
peak
for
the
restaurant.
You
could
be
over
a
restaurant
in
the
morning,
not
as
much
traffic.
R
You
could
see
it's
three
versus
ten
in
the
evening
26
trips
for
a
restaurant
12,
for
what
we
are
proposing
so
in
terms
of
daily
trips
p.m.
peak
hour
trip
we're
feeling
we're
actually
taking
a
few
trips
off
the
road
by
proposing
22
townhomes,
as
opposed
to
the
restaurant
that
is
currently
zoned,
for
we
remain
in
compliance
with
green
space
with
parking
we
are
now
compliant
with
building
separation.
We
are
now
also
again
come.
We
can
plant
more
trees
on
a
one-for-one
basis
than
we
actually
took
down.
R
R
Another
another
concern
was
really.
Our
question
was,
you
know,
was
about
a
restaurant.
Why
are
you
choosing
townhomes
instead
of
pursuing
a
restaurant
and
in
my
discussion,
was
about
the
marketability
of
that
so
I'm
going
to
allow
my
colleague,
Martin
frame,
to
come
and
discuss
that
very
point
with
you.
G
This
property
has
been
marketed
for
more
than
a
year
and
a
half
on
those
two
years
now
and
it's
been
marketed
to
all
the
restaurant
owners
and
users
in
the
area
it's
been
taken
to
ICSC,
which
is
the
large
retail
conference.
That's
held
twice
a
year
and
they've
not
gotten
any
traction
with
any
kind
of
restaurant
users
on
this
site.
There
simply
is
not
enough
traffic
to
support
a
restaurant
user.
G
So
I
think
that
the
the
use
for
townhomes
is
consistent
from
a
planning
standpoint.
Next
door
we
have
three-story
apartments
will
be
building
three-story,
townhomes
right
next
door.
There
immediately
adjacent
driving
down
a
rush,
or
it
will
be
from
a
visual
standpoint,
look
very
similar
to
what's
written
in
the
minute
area
and
its
regards
to
traffic.
As
Roy
mentioned,
it's
actually
going
to
be
a
reduced
traffic
load
compared
to
what
a
restaurant
news
would
be
today.
So
there's
any
specific
questions
happy
to
answer
those
any.
D
Okay,
you
know
one
of
the
issues
that
came
up
that
first
and
I'm,
trying
to
remember
this
I'm
pretty
sure
I
remember
there
was
a
discussion
from
the
neighborhood
about
the
use
for
a
restaurant
I
mean
obviously
when
the
first
PD
came
through.
That
was
the
idea
behind
it
was
that
it
was
going
to
be
there
now.
What
has
happened
since
2011
all
the
way
she
could
speak
to,
because
she
probably
has
better
ideas
than
I
do
what's
happened
between
2011
and
now
is
actually
we've
increased.
D
The
number
of
people
that
are
down
in
that
area,
which,
in
my
mind
and
I'm,
not
a
market
expert
which
seemed
like
there
would
be
more
customers
there
than
when
they
first
originally
devised.
An
idea
for
retail
and
one
of
the
discussion
items
that
were
done
at
the
last
meeting
was
that
they
desperately
would
like
to
see
and
would
like
to
continue
along
that
path
of
having
a
restaurant.
Now
are
you
you
and
I
want
to
make
sure
I
get
this
right
because
you're
mr.
your
risk,
you're,
not
mr.
Eilers
I'm
mr.
D
G
G
D
And
the
Jefferson
apartment
group
is
the
one
that
is
adjacent
to
this
particular
property.
They
built
the
apartments
right
next
door.
Yes,
sir
okay,
so
but
he
wasn't
involved
in
that
other
parcel
to
say:
hey
you're,
making
a
huge
mistake.
Why
are
you
doing
retail
here?
You
guys
are
you're
really
off
the
mark.
Well,.
D
D
A
D
Just
wanna
make
sure
because
I'm
a
little
confused
about
this,
because
obviously
you
had
somebody
that
was
originally
involved
in
it.
It
went
in
as
including
the
restaurant.
Okay
now
he's
saying,
I
never
liked
that
idea,
but
I'm
still
involved
with
in
this
in
this,
and
this
deal
and
telling
you
now
it's
a
good
idea
to
do
the
other
thing
now
he
may
have
told
the
other
group
originally
that
hey.
It
was
a
bad
idea,
but
we
don't
know
we
just
know
by
his
letter.
Well.
G
D
G
N
Tampa
I'm,
the
president
of
the
Civic
Association
of
Port,
Tampa
and
I,
appreciate
you
remembering
the
history
of
the
transaction,
so
I
won't
go
into
that
again.
The
community
would
like
you
to
consider
keeping
the
lot
zoned
specifically
for
the
restaurant,
there's
a
huge
lack
of
it
in
the
area
right
now,
while
the
addition
of
residences
and
people
continues
to
take
place.
N
It's
just
not
something
that
David
Weekley
does
so
it's
not
a
part
of
their
business
model,
so
we
realize
we
understand
why
it's
not
something
that
they
specifically
are
going
to
consider,
as
these
proposals
continue
to
come
up,
though
I
hope
that
you'll
consider
the
large
amount
of
development
coming
to
port
Tampa
and
the
number
of
people
and
vehicles
being
added
to
the
area.
While
you,
you
also
alluded
to
this
already.
The
area
might
not
have
supported
the
restaurant
before,
but
it
is
certainly
growing
at
a
rapid
rate
and
will
continue
to
support
one.
M
I
know
City
Council
knows
this,
but
just
for
record
purposes:
I
just
want
to
remind
city
council
and
the
audience
that
the
property
doesn't
have
the
burden
to
show
whether
or
not
that
there
is
an
economic
need
or
not
an
economic
need
for
their
project.
It's
strictly
a
land-use
question.
That's
before
you
tonight,
so
I
know
that
the
issue
was
brought
up
before
and
a
lot
of
issues
get
brought
up
and
I'd,
but
since
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
it
tonight,
I
just
wanted
to
remind
city
council
for
the
record
I.
M
L
M
M
Gonna
say
it's
building,
but
the
Southie
I
just
wanted
to
make
it
clear
for
the
record
that
City
Council
has
to
vote
this
up
or
down,
based
upon
your
already
adopted
comprehensive
plan
and
land
development
regulations
and
not
on
whether
or
not
there's
an
economic
need
or
not
an
economic
need
for
the
project.
Well,.
D
M
Is
completely
appropriate
to
you
to
ask
about
what
the
current
land
designation
is
and
what
that
PD
is
I,
wasn't
meaning
to
say
that
the
questions
weren't
appropriate
I
just
meant
for
the
final
deliberation.
When
you're.
Looking
upon
what
you're
supposed
to
weigh
your
decision,
it
needs
to
be
the
comprehensive
plan
and,
during.
D
G
At
this
time,
the
site
itself,
I
think
lends
itself
towards
this
use,
and
the
zoning
that
we're
asking
for
is
we're
not
asking
for
a
change
of
zoning
category,
we're
simply
asking
for
a
change
of
use
within
the
existing
zoning
category.
So
I
think
that's
important
to
understand
that
we're
not
trying
to
rezone
the
property
to
a
higher
density,
or
anything
like
that.
We
were
well
within
the
right
at
the
TU
24
to
ask
for
the
single-family
attached
at
swellings
that
we're
looking
to
those.
Thank
you.
Thank.
E
A
F
P
N
N
N
N
N
We
did
find
this
consistent
with
that
policy
that
speaks
to
those
facilities
because
they
are
they
and
I'm,
quoting
the
policy
here
they
may
be
considered
in
any
Land
Use
Plan
category
the
permit
presidential
uses,
so
it
is
appropriate
here
it's
comparable
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern
and
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I.
Thank
you.
Any.
P
Mss
ADA:
this
is
a
continuation
from
last
month
scenario:
I'll
have
the
applicant
speak
in
more
detail
about
it,
but
basically
the
key
min
is
150
bed
hunger
get
living
facility
in
two
buildings
that
are
being
remodeled.
There's
a
lot
of
public
input
about
the
nature
of
the
use
and
the
design
of
the
site.
P
This
current
plan
is
asking
for
no
waivers.
It
is
a
PD,
but
there
are
no
waivers
being
requested
and
the
development
review
found
staff
found
it
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
land
development
code,
provided
there
are
changes
made
between
first
and
second
reading,
just
some
minor
typos
from
land
development
coordination,
all
the
other
perk
departments
didn't
have
any
changes
between
first
and
second
readings.
Give
any
questions
for
me
any.
J
J
Beiber
Kumar
for
representing
the
developers
the
applicant.
We
provide
a
large
amount
of
information
by
email
for
the
council,
for
consideration,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
about
that.
If
you've
had
time
to
review
it,
I'm
gonna
review
just
a
couple
of
positive
highlights
of
the
project
which
is
not
included
in
that
information
city
staff,
as
Mary
said,
did
find
the
we
were
totally
consistent.
We
have
met
with
the
Tampa
heights
of
exertion
board
every
month
since
December.
In
discussions
on
this,
the
developer
has
met
with
them
as
well.
J
He
signed
an
agreement
complying
with
all
their
requests
as
far
as
site
changes
and
accommodations.
One
of
those
was
to
design
the
exterior
of
the
building
such
that
it
complies
with
the
Tampa
Heights
historic
district
guidelines,
even
though
it's
not
in
the
Tampa
historic
district
and
that's
not
required
little
history
for
one
for
each
demo,
he
was
under
a
City
demolition
orders
of
public
nuisance
in
an
unsafe
structure
three
years
ago
since
purchasing
the
property
in
August
of
2016,
mr.
J
big
Dory,
who
was
the
developer
and
secured
the
property
in
the
building
and
stabilize
the
structure
which
one
of
his
folks
will
show
some
pictures
of
that
in
the
short
walk
he
purchases
for
180
Stanley
Street
a
year
ago
and
commenced
with
the
assisted
living
facility,
which
is
the
intent
and
that's
been
documented.
In
the
agreement.
J
It
appears
at
this
point
his
investment
so
far
is
about
$325,000
and
stabilizing
the
structure
and
improving
the
facilities
he
put
on
hold
when
he
went
to
the
PD
to
wait
for
the
zoning
to
be
completed.
He
expects
the
anticipated
renovation
costs
of
the
two
current
structures
to
be
about
another
three
hundred
three
hundred
thirty
thousand
dollars.
Someone
in
that
ballpark,
the
total
see
the
addition
is
gonna,
be
about
1.25
million
for
the
new
structure
and
once
completed
expect
to
have
about
25
folks
on
staff.
I,
don't
really
have
any
other
comments
at
this
time.
D
Was
the
last
thing
that
you
said
any
question
any
question
of
counsel
yeah?
Thank
you
now.
I
know
that
there
have
been
some
people
that
have
walked
in
and
previously,
if
you
are
planning
on
speaking
on
item
number,
eight
through
15
and
you
are
in
the
room
and
you
have
not
been
sworn
in,
please
stand
and
be
sworn
Wayne.
If
you
could.
B
D
G
Justin
Ricci,
president
of
the
Tampa
Heights
Civic
Association,
my
address
is
1:03
East
26th,
Avenue,
Tampa,
Florida,
three,
three,
six,
zero,
three
I'm,
not
sure.
Mr.
Brickell
Meyer
submitted
the
agreement
we
have
between
the
Civic
Association
and
the
developer.
We
have
over
T,
biased
agreement,
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
this
but
may
submit
this
for
absolute
record.
G
G
It's
probably
gonna
be
something
down
the
road
that
we're
gonna
have
to
deal
with
like
a
lot
of
these
other
institutions
that
we
end
up
having
to
deal
with
and
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
know,
I
have
to
do
what's,
and
this
is
again
my
personal
feelings,
not
the
position
of
the
Civic
Association
I
gave
you
that
already
this
is
mine
as
a
resident
of
Tampa
Heights
I'm
not
enthused
about
it.
I,
don't
like
it
I,
don't
think
it's
gonna
fit
the
future.
Use
of
that
I
know.
G
There's
what
your
your
staff
say,
but
I,
don't
think
it
will
fit.
What
is
going
to
be
the
future
of
that
area?
That
area
is
seen
enough
play
seen
enough
struggle.
It's
seen
enough.
Poverty
and
I
just
want
to
say
you
know.
Last
meeting
we
had
a
parade
of
people
come
up
here
that
were
veterans
and
it
made
it
seem
like
this
was
a
veteran's
facility.
It's
not
I
want
to
be
clear
about
that,
and
I
also
want
to
say
that
the
environment,
as
you,
gentlemen,
all
probably
know,
around
robles
Park,
is
not
exceptionally
safe.
G
Still
right
during
the
serial-killer
time,
when
I
think
one
of
the
one
times
where
one
of
the
gentlemen
shot
six
people
in
one
night
were
shot
in
Robles
Park
six
and
you
want
to
open
an
al
F
here
for
people
that
can't
care
for
themselves.
I,
don't
think
it's
appropriate
at
the
moment,
and
nor
do
I
think
that
we
it's
something
else
that
we
need
to
bear
the
burden
up
and
that's
my
own
personal
outlook.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
sure.
Next.
D
C
D
C
So,
thank
you
again.
I
live
of
anyone
that
closest
to
this.
This
facility,
I'm,
one
of
the
closest
neighbors,
have
lived
in
that
area
for
a
long
time.
Over
the
years
we
have
spent
many
many
hours
many
many
days
and
ongoing
efforts
in
order
to
develop
all
of
Tampa
Heights.
One
of
the
things
that
I
have
often
said
here
is
that
the
North
Area
should
be
equitable
to
the
South
area.
We
have
great
development,
that's
happening
on
the
South
area.
We
have
our
CRA.
We
have
our
economic
engine,
that's
happening
on
the
South
area.
C
We
have
new
houses,
new
facilities,
that
new
buildings
that
are
coming
in
restoring
over
all
of
our
old
buildings
north
tampa
heights.
Around
robles
Park,
is
one
of
the
most
vulnerable
parts
of
our
community.
We've
been
working
for
a
long
time
with
the
housing
development
to
help
improve
that
area.
Housing.
The
housing
complex,
has
35
acres
with
over
a
thousand
people
living
in
that
area.
We
have
a
beautiful
park
that
we
are
very
proud
of
in
that
area.
Brick
streets,
narrow
streets,
all
the
houses
that
are
around
the
park
are
single-family
houses.
C
Now
we've
been
asking
for
for
the
zoning
form-based
zoning
for
a
long
time.
We
haven't
gotten
it
if
we
had
that,
we
believe
that
we,
the
residents,
would
have
put
into
that
what
we
actually
desire
for
that
specific
area,
but
this
would
be
the
only
facility
around
a
park
that
has
all
single
family
residents.
Our
president
talked
a
little
bit
about
what
we
deal
with
on
an
ongoing
basis.
C
Helicopters
are
hanging
over
our
houses
every
night
monitoring
that
area.
This
is
not
an
area
to
not
only
raise
the
number
that
was
there
many
years
ago,
when
we
finally
got
that
facility.
What
that
was
another
same
as
this
they're
putting
it
that
only
had
I
think
19
residents
at
that
time,
changing
that
to
up
to
87
residents
right
next
to
the
public
housing
in
an
area.
That's
a
small,
such
a
small
area
that
when
there
is
an
event
at
the
park,
we
are
prepared
because
we
can't
get
our
vehicles
in
that's
that
area.
C
If
you
have
any
emergency
on
at
this
facility
with
87
residents
who
need
help,
there
will
be
a
problem.
Many
of
the
other
facilities
like
this
that
we
have
done
research
on
are
not
within
a
residential
unco
like
we
have
there.
Many
of
them
are
on
commercial
paths.
This
is
not
what
we
desire
for
this
for
our
area.
Tampa
Heights
is
overburdened
with
these
facilities.
C
We
are
let
we're
just
over
a
mile
of
the
neighborhood
and
add
another
87
folks
who
need
assisted
living
in
an
area
that
already
has
all
the
challenging
challenges
that
we
have
and
the
fight
that
we've
been
going
doing
for
years
and
years
and
years.
This
is
taking
us
backwards,
rather
than
looking
forward
to
see
what
would
be
best
for
our
area.
Thank
you.
I
sent
my
letter
with
some
of
my
other
comments,
so
please
consider
that
councilman.
A
G
M
F
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Aaron
Barnes
I
live
at
53,
1836
Avenue
circle,
West
apartment
2,
Bradenton,
Florida,
3,
4,
2,
0
9
I've
been
working
very
closely
with
the
applicant
as
a
consultant
to
help
make
this
revolutionary
change,
as
some
have
expressed
that
they
worry
about
the
location
and
the
current
conditions
of
the
properties.
Now,
if
what
they
say
is
true,
and
they
say
that
the
police
are
out
there
constantly
and
they
have
emergency
response
all
the
time,
wouldn't
that
dictate
that
it's
time
for
a
change,
wouldn't
it
make
more
sense.
F
It's
getting
assisted
living
facility
out
in
the
area.
Every
day
people
are
growing
older.
Everybody
needs
this
and
I,
don't
know
if
you've
been
looking
at
the
location
lately,
but
every
single
one
of
these
assisted
living
facilities
has
a
wait
list
of
longer
than
a
year
now,
I've
got
a
little
bit
of
talking
points,
I'm
a
little
nervous.
That
last
time
we
had
a
public
outreach.
Add
a
little
bit
of
trouble.
Stumbling
so
bear
with
me.
So
I
have
some
photographs.
O
F
This
is
a
prior
to
the
reconstruction
and
the
revitalization
of
the
structure.
Obviously,
as
you
can
see,
it
was
kind
of
an
eyesore.
They
had
been
working
on
revitalizing
the
structure
to
meet
within
the
historic
standards
which
they
expressed
was
not
required,
but
again
the
applicant
is
doing
everything
in
their
power
to
make
it
so
that
way,
everybody
can
come
together
and
make
this
happen.
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
D
J
Want
to
follow
up
answer
any
final
questions
and
make
couple
points
based
on
some
of
the
comments.
Miss
Lina
young
Green
said
that
the
area
is
overrun
with
these
facilities.
There's
ten
als
and
all
three
three
6:02
and
603,
providing
a
total
of
150
beds.
There's
three
Aoife's
and
tamp
Heights
providing
76
beds.
Sixty
of
those
beds
are
in
palmed,
Baptist
the
hydrogen's
Tower.
Those
bet
those
beds
at
$3,500
a
month.
J
So
to
say
the
neighborhood
is
over
on
the
assisted
living
facilities
is
imputing,
something
that's
not
it's
not
factually
correct
and
they're
imputing
a
lot
of
the
other
Congress
living
facilities,
which
applicants
made
clear
that
he's
not
doing
a
homeless,
shelter
or
anything
else
he's
doing
the
assisted
living
facility
and
the
problems
they've
had
with
some
of
the
other
facilities.
I
totally
agree
it's
problem,
but
that's
not
what
the
applicant?
That's
not
what
the
developers
planning
on
doing
so.
There's
want
to
make
that
clear
for
council.
We
did
that
as
well
in
our
letter
communication.
J
D
J
Dealt
with
the
executive
board
at
the
Tampa
Heights
Civic
Association,
okay,
we
met
with
them
every
month
and
a
couple
of
times
with
individuals,
mr.
Mohammed
or
mr.
big
door.
He
met
with
Miss
green
we've
met
with
mr.
Ricky
separately
and,
as
he
was
the
incoming
president
to
get
his
guidances
we're
trying
to
make
accommodate
the
requests
of
the
Civic
Association
has
the
representatives
of
the
neighborhood
okay.
D
B
D
Okay,
yeah:
here's
here's
my
problem,
sir
I
just
want
you
to
know
you
have
someone
who
is
presenting
an
agreement
supposedly
between
you
and
the
in
the
Association
who
disagrees
where
the
do
disagrees.
He
said
that
he
has
I,
don't
think
you
liked
it
too
much
based
on
what
he
said
so
I'm
curious,
who
made
up
that
decision
that
he
presented
to
us
I
know
he's
involved
with
the
Executive
Board.
So
that's
why
I
was
a
little
confused
that
you
know
there
wasn't
somebody
who
said
well.
We
made
an
agreement.
J
Typically,
so
let
me
see
if
I
can
do
my
best
to
explain
and
restore
akise
absence
right.
He
is
the
president
of
the
Tampa
Executive
Board
right,
so
there's
a
Tampa
Civic
Association.
That
is
a
group
of
it's
a
neighborhood
association
group,
I'm,
very
familiar
with
them:
yeah,
okay
and
so
there's
a
number
of
folks
that
sit
on
the
Executive
Board
and
he
is
president
mr.
green
is
the
is
a
member
at
large
and
there's
another
number
of
members.
J
J
D
A
G
A
G
G
G
D
G
D
And
you
know
miss
Miranda
if
I
could
to
one
of
the
things
that
happens.
Is
that
whenever
you
have
one
of
those
agreements
and
we've
had
them
before,
and
people
have
come
up
here
and
they
said
well,
we've
grudgingly
agreed
to
it
based
on
certain
conditions,
but
we
didn't
even
have
any
one
seemed
to
be
in
favor
of
it.
That
was
from
that
board
and
that's
what
I
was
a
little
bit
confused
about,
because.
G
E
B
P
N
D
A
N
N
Adopted
future
land-use
of
the
subject
site
is
residential
20,
that
is
on
Mullen
Avenue.
It
is
also
seen
on
the
adopted
future
land
use
map
on
Morrison
to
the
south
is
the
blue,
that's
public,
that
is
the
school
I
pointed
out
earlier.
That's
Grady
elementary
school,
but
all
of
that
Brown
is
the
residential
20.
We
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
based
on
the
interestingly
induced
nature
of
the
site.
I
did
a
little
bit
of
digging
and
I
found
our
preliminary
sub-sector
plan
from
1979.
N
This
is
the
approximate
location
of
the
site.
It
was
designated
low,
medium
density,
residential
back
then
the
yellow
is
low
density,
residential,
the
low
medium
density,
residential
land
use,
designation
back
in
1979
had
the
same
density
as
the
residential
20
today.
So
this
has
a
very
long
history
of
being
adopted
on
the
subject
site,
so
we
did
find
it
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
We
have
numerous
policies
about
about
promoting
different
housing
types
within
the
city
of
Tampa,
where
they're
compatible
on
this
purpose.
N
This
helps
with
our
campus
growing
population
providing
housing
for
the
population
out.
You
know
projected
out
to
2040,
which
is
what
our
comprehensive
plan
does
so
based
on
those
policies
and
the
adopted
future
land
use
in
the
history
of
the
subject
site.
We
did
find
it
consistent,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
The.
P
Mary
Samaniego
land
development
coordination
for
this
applications,
I
city
staff,
has
received
quite
a
few
letters
of
opposition
I
believe
that
they've
been
sent
also
to
City
Council
members,
but
I
was
not
clear.
Some
were
some
work,
so
I
wanted
to
clarify.
Make
sure
that
the
record
is
clear,
so
I
made
copies
for
the
city
attorney
the
clerk
and
20
council
members.
There's
approximately
50
letters
in
here.
P
T
P
This
is
church.
This
is
Morrison,
there's
a
school
to
the
south,
there's
a
Catholic
school
to
the
far
east
across
Church.
Here's
the
subject:
property
in
green.
It's
currently
zoned
rs.60
as
well
as
our
the
majority
of
the
surrounding
property,
is
also
our
sixty.
The
property
to
the
south
is
a
duplex
in
the
RM
12
zoning
district
and
then
catty-corner
from
the
site
is
an
existing
RM
12
zoning
district.
P
P
P
Here
is
catty-corner
from
the
property,
a
single-family
house
at
four
thousand
one
across
the
street,
I'm
Eleanor
single-family
house,
continuing
to
the
east,
single-family
houses
and
then
directly
behind
the
property.
Again
in
that
RM
12
zoning
district
is
a
duplex
because
you
can
see
the
two
doors
here.
P
P
When
this
original
application
came
forward
to
staff,
they
had
all
four
of
the
driveways
and
all
four
the
buildings
facing
grady
in
an
effort
to
try
to
be
more
compatible
with
the
existing
single-family
development
pattern.
In
the
area
we
strongly
suggested
in
the
developer
agreed
to
rotate.
So
two
units
are
facing
this
way
and
two
units
are
facing
on
Mullen
Avenue.
P
P
The
only
waiver
that's
being
required
or
requested
is
to
section
13,
165
d2
contribute
to
the
trust
fund
for
mitigation
trees.
This
site
plan
meets
all
other
applicable
zoning
standards
and
again,
as
Jennifer
stated
as
Jennifer
stated
and
I
tried
to
stay
just
for
the
public,
because
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
members
of
the
public
that
wrote
in
to
staff
and
I
think
so
it's
clear
this
block
the
block
next
to
it
and
the
block
further
to
the
west
have
been
in
the
multi-family
residential
land
use
categories
since
at
least
the
1970s.
P
So
these
blocks
have
always
been
slated
for
increased
density.
I
believe
these
are
the
only
two
rezoning
that
are
back
reoccurred,
so
the
developer,
the
applicant
in
this
instance,
is
wanting
to
invoke
the
allowances
within
the
are
twenty
land
use
category
to
increase
the
intensity
as
envisioned
by
the
comprehensive
plan?
P
There's
been
some
discussion,
I've
had
with
the
public
about
the
compatibility
issue
with
zoning
and
land
use.
There
are
two
approaches
that
you
can
take,
and
this
is
how
I
explain
it
to
the
public.
You
can
have
a
existing
development
pattern
that
the
city
wants
to
maintain.
So
you
put
a
land-use
category
in
that
area,
so
that
pattern
will
maintain.
The
other
approach
is
that
you
can
have
an
existing
development
pattern
that
you
want
to
transition
to
a
different
development
pattern.
P
So
you
change
the
Landy's
category,
so
this
area
has
been
single-family
residential
in
the
distant
past,
but
a
higher
intensity
language
category
was
placed
on
it
in
an
effort
for
the
single-family
houses,
be
removed
and
increased
intensity
residential
development
to
occur.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
me
at
this
time?
Any.
N
N
G
You
read
better
than
I
do
hey,
but
no
I
worked
for
many
years
in
that
3825
Henderson
Boulevard,
so
I
remember
going
through
Grady
when
there
was
no
traffic.
When
there
was
one
little
you
know,
stop
sign,
I,
remember
the
post
office
on
Henderson
vitamin
shop
and
all
that's
gone
now.
I.
Remember
all
that.
I
know
exactly
what
the
area
and.
N
K
Good
evening,
Council
I'm
David
Nikki,
the
engineer
and
planner
with
capital
design
and
engineering
responsible
for
development
of
this
project
on
39:16
West,
Mullan
Avenue
capital
design
is
an
info
design
and
developer
company
in
Tampa
area
specializing
in
multifamily
development.
The
proposed
project
will
consist
of
four
luxury
townhomes
in
its
with
upscale,
exterior
and
interior
finishes,
which
referring
to
comps
and
values,
will
be
an
equal
or
greater
and
price
per
square
feet
value
of
the
homes
in
the
neighborhood.
As
planning
just
mentioned,
the
property
is
located
right.
K
K
K
When
we
first
started
to
design
this
project,
we
went
through
a
few
round
of
reviews
with
the
city
staff
and
we
narrowed
down
the
building.
We
increased
the
the
setbacks,
the
the
back
yards,
the
front
driveways.
We
rotated
the
two
of
the
units
to
face
Mullen,
so
it
would
look
in
harmony
and
in
place
with
the
with
the
neighbourhood
based
on
the
land
use
99.1
to
which
incurred
line,
use
policy.
Nine
point
one
point:
two,
which
encourages
sensitive
design
and
site
planning.
K
We
waited
all
our
effort
to
basically
cover
this
policy
and
we
may
we
may
we
forgot
the
comment
of
consistency
from
from
the
staff
as
well.
We
believe
that
this
design
would
be
in
harmony
with
the
with
the
duplexes
in
the
area
and
also
with
adjacent
property
and
houses
neighboring
next-door.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
this
is.
K
K
Land
use
policy,
1.2
18
talks
about
promoting
harmony
in
the
visual
relationship
and
transition
between
new
and
older
buildings,
and
that's
what
we
have
tried
to
cover
within
our
design.
We
have
met
all
the
city
criteria,
including
zoning
planning,
transportation,
water,
sewer
and
stormwater,
and
we
feel
we
are
aligned
with
the
city
goals
to
increase
density.
We
strongly
believe
that
this
project,
we
will
add
value
to
to
the
neighborhood
increase
the
diversity
of
infill
development,
increase
the
tax
base
promote
economic
growth,
which
results
in
improvement
of
our
Road
aging
infrastructure,
sewer
and
water
systems.
K
A
Nothing
further
I'm
from
you
know:
okay,
thank
you.
Okay,
now
we're
gonna,
take
public
comments
on
item
number,
nine
yeah
and
now
how
many
folks
here,
within
this
room
plan
on
speaking
this
evening,
if
you
could
raise
your
hands?
Okay,
okay,
so
well,
let's
go
to
begin.
Each
speaker
has
up
to
three
minutes
unless,
if
you
have
permission
from
other
people
to
take
your
time
well,
we
would
all
ask.
Is
that
to
not
be
I,
guess
overly
repetitive,
and
your
three
minutes
are
your
maximum
entitlement
generally.
D
A
D
F
Chairman
mr.
reality,
I
pronounce
your
name
correctly.
Yes,
he
has
a
full
sheet
here
of
names
on
the
speaker
waiver
form,
but
he's
up
to
allowed
up
to
seven,
so
I'm
gonna
call
them
an
order.
Please
acknowledge
if
you're
here
and
you're,
going
to
waive
your
opportunity
to
speak
Joanne,
Ledo,
Thank,
You,
Suzanne
Schwartz.
Thank
you.
Lien
Paulie,
Thank,
You,
Laurie,
Samson,
Samson,
Thank,
You,
Krista,
curry.
A
thank.
Are
you
going
to
speak?
Okay,
Brittany
Johnson?
Thank
you
and
Margaret
drumstick.
L
Good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
Kevin
Riley
I'm,
representing
a
number
of
the
property
owners
in
the
area.
As
you
can
see
from
the
time,
I
was
given
I
work
for
a
club,
stun
bar
100
South,
actually
Drive
Tampa
Florida.
We
do
appreciate
the
staff
recommendation
and
understand
that
staff
approvals
based
on
some
of
the
provisions
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
However,
there
are
a
number
of
provisions
in
the
Comprehensive
Plan
which
this
plan
development
would
not
meet,
and
there
are
a
number
of
provisions
in
the
code
that
this
plan
is
inconsistent
with.
L
So
starting
specifically
here,
there's
no
substantial
competent
evidence
in
the
staffs
report
that
the
plan
meets
the
certain
provisions,
the
comprehensive
plan
and
that
it
should
be
a
plan.
Development
by
sea,
including
and
rezoning
and
that'll,
be
a
significant
part
of
my
presentation.
There's
also
no
substantial
combat
evidence
that
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
existing
trending
development
patterns
and
that's
what
we're
going
to
show,
starting
with
some
of
the
provisions,
the
comprehensive
plan
and
I'm
going
to
go
over
these
rather
quickly
because
they
are
a
little
bit
repetitive
in
what
they
cover.
L
But
the
comprehensive
plan
which
the
council
noted
earlier
in
voting
down
a
similar
application
I
encourages
higher
density
that
is
compatible
with
surrounding
character.
I'm
gonna
switch
to
a
visual
here,
while
I
discussed
this.
This
is
the
for
block
area,
and
this
here
represents
the
area
on
the
comprehensive
plan
that
allows
a
higher
density,
the
new
used
to
be
incompatible
with
the
existing
character,
because
the
existing
character,
a
single
family,
the
vast
majority.
So
every
house
marked
here
in
blue,
was
built
in
1948
I,
then
for
a
60
year
period.
L
The
only
change
in
any
of
these
structures
were
the
two
orange
ones,
so
we
had
a
60
year
period
with
essentially
no
development.
Now
all
of
these
red
structures
are
structures
that
were
built
in
the
last
ten
years.
So
after
60
years
of
no
development,
the
trend
in
the
last
ten
years
has
been
to
build
single-family
homes.
That's
the
development
pattern
that
we
have
in
the
area
and
all
of
those
are
single-family
homes.
Additionally,
the
row
of
duplexes
that
the
applicant
relies
on
to
say
that
this
is
a
multi-family
area.
L
The
duplexes
with
say
two
zonings
are
a
legal
non-conforming,
as
the
zoning
doesn't
support
that
anymore
and
additionally,
most
I
shouldn't
say
thatis
incorrect.
Not
most
forty-three
percent
have
been
converted
of
single-family,
so
the
trend
has
been
away
from
those
duplexes.
Those
duplexes
have
been
slowly
converting
to
single-family
uses.
So
the
development
pattern
in
the
comp
plan
is
inconsistent
with
development
planner
pattern
that
exists
there.
L
L
L
Moving
on
with
other
provisions
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan
that
are
inconsistent,
we're
supposed
to
be
minimally
disruptive
to
the
existing
trend
of
development.
What
we
have
here
is
a
turnout
development
that
is
going
that
is
already
single-family
and
whatever
multi
families
in
the
area
is
trending
toward
single-family,
and
then
the
existing
areas
are
predominantly
occupied
by
multifamily,
that
is
in
land
use
policy.
L
Nine
point
six
point:
three,
so
multifamily
is
supposed
to
be
developed
where
multifamily
exists
and
the
idea
that
the
duplexes
to
the
south
are
what
we're
basing
this
on
is
just
inaccurate,
because
those
are
being
changed
away
from
duplexes
to
single-family
homes
and
the
single
family
is
being
transitioned
out
of
the
area.
So
it
is
inconsistent
with
the
current
pattern.
Development
and
inconsistent
with
the
multifamily
trend
in
the
area.
L
The
Comprehensive
Plan
also
asked
that
the
development
create
transitions
and
development
intensity,
so
this
would
be
where
we
have
a
density
increasing
slowly
as
you
go
in
and
if
we
switch
back
to
the
map
I
showed
earlier.
This
would
be
a
more
intense
toning
instead
of
branching
out
with
a
similar
intensity
and
then
increasing
the
intensity.
Slowly,
it's
going
to
be
more
intense
than
everything
around
it,
including
the
area.
That's
already
been
up,
zoned
to
a
more
dense
use.
L
Additionally
and
I'll
touch
on
this
in
a
minute
when
we
talk
about
the
land
development
code,
but
the
compatibility
with
single-family
development
when
multifamily
is
developed,
we're
supposed
to
develop
that
in
a
way
that's
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
in
this
plan
exceeds
the
setback
limits
for
single-family
character,
understandably
they're
not
trying
to
do
single-family,
but
additionally,
it
exceeds
the
setback
of
like
zoning
designations,
so
arm
12
and
arm
16.
Their
setbacks
don't
comply
with
that.
L
So
essentially,
a
PD
is
being
used
to
try
and
get
around
other
provisions
of
the
land
development
code
and
additionally,
it
avoids
a
transitional
city
lane
use
policy
973
because
is
an
island
of
more
dense
use.
If
it's
approved
real
quick
just
a
couple
other
visuals,
these
duplexes
keep
coming
up.
That's
one
of
the
duplexes
here's
another
duplex.
L
L
Alright,
moving
on
to
the
land
development
code,
the
purpose
of
a
plan
development
I'm
going
to
paraphrase
here-
is
to
allow
development
on
a
lot
that
has
a
unique
characteristic
where
other
zoning
districts
can
not
accommodate.
So
this
development
violates
this
provision
of
the
land
development
code.
There
are
no
physical
environmental
features
that
would
require
a
PD.
There
are
no
transportation
issues
that
require
a
PD
there's,
no
access
issues
that
require
a
PD.
Additionally,
other
zoning
districts
can't
accommodate.
If
you
ignore
setbacks,
this
exact
development
would
work
in
an
RM
16.
L
Zoning
are
Euclidean
rezoning,
so
the
land
development
code
says
that
you
should
develop
as
a
Euclidian
rezoning
because
it
would
fit
inside
that
zoning
designation
and
then
what
you're
supposed
to
do
is
fit
within
the
setbacks.
If
they
were
to
do
this
development
in
an
RM
16,
they
would
have
to
come
and
try
and
get
a
variance,
because
it's
not
going
to
meet
the
setback
requirements
for
I'm
16,
so
by
doing
a
PD
they're,
avoiding
that
and
it's
violating
land
development
Co,
because
the
purpose
of
a
PD
is
not
met
here
in
any
capacity
there's.
L
It's
worth
noting
that
a
mixture
of
uses
is
also
there.
I
have
that
on
the
slide,
but
we're
not
mixing
any
uses
here
to
explain
a
little
bit
more.
What
I'm,
talking
about
with
the
with
the
comparable
zoning
districts,
so
RM
16,
allows
for
dwelling
units
would
allow
for
dwelling
units
on
a
similarly
sized
lot
and
if
they
were
to
develop
with
our
m16,
it
would
require
a
25-foot
front
setback
and
a
15-foot
back
yard
setback.
Now
the
you
see
on
the
right.
L
The
plan
here
has
a
15-foot
front
setback
and
a
7-foot
back
yard
setback.
Now
it
does
have
three
additional
feet
in
the
corner,
but
the
the
PD
here,
if
approved,
would
essentially
be
a
way
of
getting
around
a
variance.
Where
are
you
kidding
and
rezoning
would
work
and
then
also
for
densities?
The
I
don't
have
our
m16
on
here,
but
to
the
north,
the
east
and
the
west.
You
have
one
Dylan:
u
dwelling
unit
per
lot
for
6,000
square
feet
for
dwelling
unit.
L
What
you
have
to
the
South,
that
is
an
RM
12,
is
36
a
hundred
square
feet
per
dwelling
unit,
and
then
this
would
actually
be
even
more
intense
than
that
at
27:52.
So
we're
talking
about
a
development,
that's
more
intense
than
anything
around
it
we're
talking
development
that
should
be
done
through
ru,
cluding
and
rezoning
and
we're
talking
about
a
development.
That's
inconsistent
with
the
development
pattern.
L
There's
also
a
number
of
issues
with
trees
that
I'm
gonna
brush
over
because
they
they
can
be
corrected,
but
it
is
worth
pointing
out
that
our
code
in
Tampa
is
very,
very
in-depth
with
trees,
the
tree
table
on
the
site
plan
and
the
original
comments
from
staff,
or
that
some
of
the
trees
should
remain.
The
applicant
then
tried
to
save
one
tree
and
that
tree
was
then
told
by
staff.
It
has
to
be
removed
because
there's
not
enough
space
for
it.
The
tree
table
would
actually
give
them.
L
No
critic
is
the
only
tree
on
the
entire
property
that
will
remain
is
in
the
right-of-way
and
it'll.
Have
the
debit
table
have
to
be
increased
to
15
and
when
you
add
the
vehicle
use
area
there
have
to
do
22
plantings,
they
don't
have
any
space
to
do
that,
so
they
do
require
a
waiver
to
pay
into
the
mitigation
bank
for
trees.
L
Now
the
council
is
obviously
allowed
to
give
that
waiver,
but
this
is
just
an
extreme
example
where
that
that
request
would
be
sort
of
the
maximum
that
you
could
request,
because
they're
only
say
the
only
tree,
they're
saving
is
in
the
right-of-way,
where
they
can't
build.
In
some
we
request
the
council
deny
because
it's
inconsistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
It
violates
the
land
development
code
and
it's
inconsistent
with
the
area
hi
both
placement
provisions
of
the
surrounding
properties.
Thank
you.
Thank.
I
Good
evening
my
name
is
Mark:
Ilyich
I
live
at
39,
14
West
Mullan,
with
my
wife
and
our
six
children.
It's
my
oldest
daughter,
Gwen.
One
good
has
come
from
this
application.
We've
had
an
expert
lesson
in
civics
for
our
children,
some
of
whom
have
now
created
the
City
Council
cry
room
you'll
see
patio.
I
My
eldest
is
very
excited
because
our
house
was
just
on
TV
during
mr.
Nicole
ease,
presentation
and
I.
Think
what
was
interesting
about
his
presentation
is,
if
you
look
at
the
front
of
his
design
at
the
front
of
our
home,
they
do
look
sort
of
similar
only
insofar
as
a
playing
card
and
the
edge
of
a
brick
looks
very
similar
right
when
you
turn
them
to
the
side,
though
they
look
a
lot
different.
I
Here's
his
elevation
if
I
could
use
this
and-
and
here
is
the
front
of
the
elevation
that
you
saw-
it
was
much
prettier
in
his
picture,
but
this
is
the
side
that
faces
our
home
and
it
goes
15
feet
in
front
of
our
home.
All
the
way
to
the
back
land
line
and
I
can
tell
you.
There
is
a
two-story
playhouse
right
here
with
a
nice
slide
and
a
trampoline
right
here
and
I
counted
11
windows
watching
my
six
children
play
in
the
backyard.
I
We
have
shared
many
of
the
concerns
all
of
our
neighbors
share,
but
prayin
and
honestly,
the
city,
the
city,
can't
stay
the
same
forever.
I
grew
up
in
this
neighborhood
I,
remember
the
post
office,
two
councilmen,
Miranda
and
and
and
my
son-
is
that
type
of
a
little
league
right
now,
because
he
wouldn't
come
to
City
Council
because
he
had
to
catch
using
the
glove
I
play
with
right.
I
get
it.
We
can't
stay
the
same,
but
this
is.
This
is
a
drastic
change
and
we
brought
our
family
back
to
this
neighborhood.
I
So
they
could
walk
to
Christ
the
King,
so
they
could
walk
and
play
in
the
streets
that
I
played
in
when
I
was
a
kid.
They
can
walk
to
my
dad's
house
on
zeller
Street,
but
also
because
these
are
the
last
big
backyard
Lots
in
South,
Tampa
and
and
candidly
when
you
have
six
children.
Have
you
have
heard
them
while
we've
been
sitting
here,
you
have
to
be
able
to
say,
go
outside
and
play
right
and
and
that's
a
great
benefit
of
our
lot
and
I.
I
A
D
R
A
B
F
B
Are
you
thank
you?
I
am
an
architect.
I
am
a
professor
at
USF
school
of
community
design.
So
this
is,
you
know,
part
of
my
neighborhood,
where
my
kids
play
and
I
just
want
to
point
out
that,
in
addition
to
everything
that
has
been
said
it
you
know
me
half
of
my
presentation,
but
in
this
particular
image
you
can
see
that
we
have.
You
know
all
types
of
our
m-16
arms
is
seen
over
here:
I'm.
Sixteen,
which
means
that
we
have
a
neighborhood
that
is
well
gentrified.
B
It's
not
like
we're
trying
to
make
people
to
come
from
any
other
place
and
be
a
part
of
our
neighborhood.
This
is
an
island
is
being
proposed
and
with
that,
it's
really
gonna
bring
a
lot
of
developers.
You're
multiplying
times
for
the
ability
of
developers
say.
Oh
I
want
a
piece
of
that
cake
for
sure.
As
an
architect,
I
get
approached
endless
times.
Can
you
maximize
my
profit,
I'll,
say
sure
as
long
as
I
meet
the
criteria
of
the
code
and
will
meet
that
standard,
we'll
do
the
best
that
we
can.
B
This
is
not
what
that
is,
and
it's
not
just
because
my
neighborhood
and
I
just
want
things
in
another
place.
We
want
arms
esteem,
we
want
density,
the
city
needs
density,
we
need,
we
need
the
tax
dollars
so
I
get
it
it
I'm,
not
against
development.
I
am
NOT.
I
might
might
my
entire
livelihood
depends
a
well-thought-out
development,
but
there's
one
thing
that
hasn't
been
brought
up,
but
about
two
years
ago
we
had
just
a
magnificent
train.
B
Our
house
got
flooded
all
the
way
up
to
one
foot
and
my
house
is
in
the
highest
site
of
of
Swan
state
in
here.
This
is
reported
street
flooding
from
Co
tempest
website,
and
it's
it's
showing
very
clearly
that
we
have
all
kinds
of
floating
all
around
here.
We
all
are
very
familiar.
It's
you
know
all
the
news
people
will
come
down
to
this
corner.
You
know
saying
hey
we're
flying.
This
is
extremely
close
to
that
area,
which
means
that
we're
not
meeting
that
requirement.
B
We
have
all
the
kids
from
the
neighborhood
will
gather
around
Grady
and
including
my
kids,
my
wife
and
I
sometimes
will
walk
all
the
way
to
Grady,
and
what
will
happening
here
is
that
we
will
have
now
two
sidewalks
and
another
two
sidewalks,
but
this
is
just
the
first
development
once
that
happens
in
that
street
it'll
continue
to
happen
all
throughout
Grady
and
I
was
touch
spreading
like
a
finger.
We
don't
want
a
bad
development.
Lastly,
just
for
everybody
does
that
elevation
is
extremely
ugly.
F
Mr.
Patterson
has
a
long
list
of
the
first
seven
names
I'll
call
off
and
just
if
you
can
actually
was
good,
when
people
called
out
that
I
could
hear
them.
Carol,
Haggerty,
Carol,
Haggerty,
oh
I'm,
sorry,
Thank,
You,
Zach
Newark.
Thank
you,
Frank
Ciara,
Thank,
You,
Cassandra,
Paulie,
Thank,
You,
Danielle,
Chia
vel.
Oh
did
I
say
that
correctly:
sick
arell,
oh
I'm,
sorry,
Thank,
You,
Tracey
singleton!
Thank
you
and
Greg
covin.
Q
Thank
you
very
much,
City
Council
your
time.
My
name
is
James.
Patterson
I
reside
at
four
1:08
West
Cleveland
Street,
approximately
nine
blocks
north
of
this
neighborhood
and
Swann
Estates
is
my
neighborhood.
It
is
my
home
I'm,
also
a
qualified
certified
land
planner
with
an
AICP
designation.
This
is
what
I
do
for
a
living
and
so
that,
when
I
saw
the
variance
it
was
very
concerned,
my
youngest
child
walked
this
way
to
Grady.
We
walked
as
a
family.
This
way
to
Grady
Elementary.
Q
This
is
an
extreme
overbilled.
I
would
ask
that
you
denied
this
on
the
grounds
of
many
of
the
things
that
sort
of
been
said,
I'll,
try
not
to
repeat.
What's
already
been
said,
to
respect
your
time.
I
would
like
to
remind
the
council
that
simply
a
future
and
land-use
component
does
not
automatically
guarantee
a
permit
a
biddle
permit
ability.
So
as
we
go
through
this
you'll
see
in
your
copy.
Q
The
original
comprehensive
plan
that
Miss
Malone
spoke
of
earlier
showed
two
blocks
that
were
zoned,
that
a
future
land
use
that
allowed
multifamily
I
would
present
to
you
that
this
is
not
the
typical
pattern
to
do.
Multifamily
development,
our
future
land
use
the
duplex
is
in
this
area,
were
pre-existing
prior
to
any
land
uses
being
placed
in
the
city
of
Tampa.
The
only
reason
that
these
three
blocks
were
zoned
are
had
a
future
land
use
of
multifamily
was
the
pre-existence
of
1,500
square
foot
duplexes
along
the
north
side
of
Morrison.
I
spoke
to
mr.
Q
hey
David,
hey
earlier
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
regarding
this,
and
he
even
was
surprised
that
the
south
side
of
Mullen
was
had
a
future
land
use.
There
was
multifamily
every
structure
in
these
three
block.
Radius
between
Church
and
Louis,
in
between
Morrison
and
Mullen,
were
all
constructed
between
1948
and
1949.
So,
prior
to
the
comprehensive
plan,
ever
being,
first
admitted
there
were
single-family
homes
along
the
entire
south
side
of
Mullen
had
already
been
built
out
for
every
eight
homes
on
Mullen
there
are
seven
homes
for
existing
duplexes
on
Morrison.
Q
I
would
like
to
point
out.
This
is
the
future
land-use
plan.
The
area
here
in
red
is
the
three
blocks
that
I'm
speaking
about
typical
planning
practices
which
are
utilized
today
would
not
have
designated
3
into
n
res
20
FL
u-blox
bifurcating,
an
existing
res
10
single-family
detached
neighborhood,
the
fo.
Q
It's
not
automatic,
it
still
needs
to
be
approved
and,
and
it
doesn't
even
meet
the
requirements
of
any
other
zoning
has
been.
It
has
been
previously
presented,
and
so
David
Haye
actually
suggested
to
me
that
if
the
neighborhood
is
against
this
and
against
any
future
development,
you
can
actually
propose
a
comp
plan
amendment
if
the
neighborhood
is
unanimous
and
and
and
property
by
property
could
request
that
their
their
properties
be
down
planned
and
that's
exactly
what
we've
started.
Q
I
have
26
of
the
properties
already
committed
I've
not
been
able
to
reach
the
rest
of
the
45
homes.
There's
the
existing
structure,
that's
being
proposed,
there's
a
home,
that's
being
built
right
now
it
does
not
have
a
new
owner.
Yet
there's
a
home,
that's
been
in
in
court
for
a
long
time,
due
to
a
very
unfortunate
accident,
are
the
remaining
42
homes.
I
have
26
already
committed
on
paper
with
signature.
Saying
please
help
me
down
plan
my
home
when
I
express
the
desire
to
do
this.
He
was
you
animus.
That
is
the
mob.
Q
That's
right
now,
which
is
another
reason
why
I
would
ask
you
to
withhold
this
and
deny
this
to
give
us
the
opportunity
to
down
plan
these
three
blocks.
As
far
as
the
staff
report
comments,
I'm
going
to
quickly
go
through
these
you've
got
these.
As
as
page
six
of
your
report
page
four,
the
staff
report,
sections
27
136,
the
purpose
states
what
the
purpose
that
we're
here
and
the
purpose
that
you
would
come
before.
Q
You
item
number
one
under
that
it
says:
promote
the
efficient,
sustainable
use
of
land
infrastructure,
with
careful
consideration
of
potential
adverse
impacts
to
on-site
natural
elements
surrounding
the
impact.
Neighborhoods
staff
hasn't
commented
on
any
of
those
under
their
adverse
impact.
All
the
trees
will
be
removed
as
you've
heard
prior.
Another
adverse
impact
is
that
the
intersection
floods
every
single
time
it
rains
I'd
like
to
put
this
before
you.
This
is
a
picture.
Q
This
is
a
picture
of
looking
southeast
from
the
intersection
at
the
side
yard
or
the
west
side
of
this
property.
This
is
right.
This
is,
after
a
morning
rain
a
couple
of
hours
after
morning
rain
just
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
Not
only
is
the
street
flooded
but
you'll
see
right
here,
the
side
yard,
the
pervious
area
of
this
site
is
also
has
standing
water
of
several
inches
any
time
it
rains.
This
entire
intersection
goes
underwater
and
even
the
pervious
areas
hold
water
because
the
groundwater
table
is
so
high.
Q
Here
is
another
picture
of
the
intersection
right
after
a
rain.
This
is
the
subject.
Property
here
and
I
propose
one
more
picture
showing
his
variant
sign:
the
entire
frontage
of
his
property.
All
the
way
across
the
street
is
ankle-deep
water
hours
after
the
rain.
This
is
a
huge
problem
at
this
intersection.
Adding
four
driveways
will
not
contribute
to
this.
Adding
a
5,700
square
foot
footprint
of
a
house
even
proposed
with
the
proposed
on-site
underground
storm
drainage
system
to
withhold
a
half
inch
of
rain.
Q
The
city
of
Tampa's
stormwater
technical
report
actually
calls
this
you'll
see
this
on
page
8
of
your
report.
It
actually
is
considered
a
commercial
under
the
stormwater
technical
standards
because
of
the
enormous
size.
It
also
says
that
pervious
pavers,
which
are
labeled
on
this
existing
site
plan
right
now
or
are
not
allowed
to
be
considered
for
stormwater
management.
Now
the
plan
does
provide
for
provide
for
that
and
an
underground
storm
water
pipe
that
is
perforated,
but
the
existing
pavers
will
not
be
permitted
for
storm
water
management.
Q
Any
developer
that
doesn't
have
to
put
pervious
pavers,
won't
they're,
too
expensive,
and
so
now
we've
got
four
two-car
driveways
going
onto
the
street.
That's
already
inundated
and
it's
already
flooded.
On
page
nine
you'll
see
the
item
two
on
page
four
and
five
of
the
staff
report
allow
the
integration
of
different
uses
of
land
use.
We've
already
heard
this.
Q
The
proposed
heated
square
footage
of
this
one
structure
will
be
over
ten
thousand
square
feet
in
the
dwelling
unit.
The
maximum
allowable
in
our
sixty
is
six
thousand
square
feet
of
heated
space.
If
that's
what's
considered
the
dwelling
unit,
I've
put
the
definitions
out
of
the
code
there.
For
you,
the
largest
home
in
the
area,
is
still
under
six
thousand
square
feet,
with
the
majority
of
the
homes
being
between
1,500
and
3,000
square
feet.
This
is
a
ten
thousand
square
foot
structure
that
is
excluding
of
the
garages
approximately
ten
thousand
feet.
Mr.
Q
high
legs
house
to
the
east
is
3321
square
feet.
The
home
across
the
street
1,500
square
feet,
the
home
across
the
street,
to
the
west
are
to
the
south
1564
square
feet
and
the
home
across
to
the
west
2200
square
feet.
Since
the
year
2013
homes
have
been
constructed
on
Mullen
new
homes
and
nine
new
homes
been
constructed
on
Morrison,
with
the
three
within
this
three
block
section
that
has
the
future
land
use
of
res
20.
Q
I'd
like
to
point
out
these
pictures
here
about
ten
years
ago
and
I
know
my
time
is
running
short
about
ten
years
ago
at
the
corner
of
Mullen.
Excuse
me
of
Morrison
and
Louis
this
side
yard
here
this.
This
lot
here
was
proposed
to
be
split
into
two,
and
there
were
two
enormous
homes
that
were
erected
side-by-side.
Those
homes
never
were
completed
and
those
homes
were
torn
down
and
a
new
property
owner
built
a
luxury
home
on
there.
Q
Thank
goodness,
the
enormity
of
this
structure
absolutely
looks
out
of
place
in
this
neighborhood
and
if
you
see
you
looking
further
down,
if
you've
ever
played
Monopoly-
and
you
got
that
one
person
that
puts
a
hotel,
you
hate
him
and
that's
what
that's
what
is
happening
if
you
put
these
two
structures
together,
the
structure
that
missing
mister
nukui
is
proposing
is
two
feet
longer
than
the
both
of
those
structures
combined
and
fourteen
feet
wider
on
a
lot
that
is
seven
feet
narrower.
It's
absolutely
inappropriate
for
this
neighborhood
page.
Q
Five
of
the
staff
report
encourage
flexible
development,
reduces
transportation,
needs,
conserves
energy
and
maximizes
the
and
preserves
the
natural
resources
it
fails
to
reduce
the
transportation
needs.
It
multiplies
it
times.
Four
fails
to
conserve
energy
multiplies
at
times
for
the
proposal
fails
and
maximizing
the
preservation
of
natural
resources.
As
you've
already
heard,
all
seven
on-site
trees
have
been
proposed,
then
we'll
need
to
come
down.
In
addition,
there
are
three
existing
trees
in
the
right-of-way
that
will
have
to
come
down
to
accommodate
for
the
driveways.
Q
Only
one
tree
out
of
fourteen
trees
or
thirteen
trees
will
remain
it's
it's.
If
I
did
the
math
right
eleven
trees
in
the
key
characteristics
within
the
comprehensive
plan
of
r10
and
r20,
it's
listed
for
both
r10
and
r20
that
the
street
tree
canopy
provides
for
shade
and
enhances
neighborhood
character
and
identity.
That's
a
goal
of
the
future
land-use
having
every
one
of
these
trees
took
taken
down
is
preposterous.
Q
The
proposed
infill
is
not
consistent.
There
have
been
four
single-family
homes
built
on
Morrison
in
place
of
duplexes.
There's
been
four
additional
duplexes
that
have
been
transferred
to
single-family
homes
by
removing
the
center
wall.
It
is
not
an
infill
trend
to
have
higher
density
in
that
area.
The
density
is
actually
being
reduced.
Q
I'd
like
to
point
out
one
other
thing.
As
far
as
waivers,
it
says
that
the
individual
hardships,
the
last
item,
staffs
thing
on
staffs
report,
said
that
the
individual
hardships
will
be
suffered
as
a
failure
of
council
to
grant
a
waiver.
I
would
remind
you
that
there
are
no
hardships.
That
will
be
something
in
fact
said.
The
City
Council
under
the
variance
Review
Board,
says
that
a
hardship
you
know
practical
difficulty
does
not
result
from
the
actions
of
the
applicant.
A
self-created,
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
shall
not
justify
a
variance.
Q
F
S
Good
evening,
council,
men
and
women,
my
name
is
Mara
Rosen
and
I
live
at
3
908
West
Mullan
Avenue.
From
the
moment
I
received
notice.
I
have
been
working
to
prevent
this
from
destroying
the
character
of
our
neighborhood
and
causing
issues
with
infrastructure,
flooding
and
pedestrian
safety.
I
have
a
petition
with
393
signatures
per
year.
Review
I,
along
with
our
community,
are
vehemently
opposed
with
all
due
respect.
I
fundamentally
disagree
with
the
staff
report
that
this
rezoning
should
be
approved.
There
is
credible
and
substantial
evidence
that
this
application
should
be
denied.
S
It
is
not
in
conforming
or
agreement
with
section
27
136
item
six
of
the
tampa
municipal
city
code
and
therefore
it
should
be
denied
to
benefit
others.
I
will
quote
from
item
six.
This
rezoning
should
quote,
promote
and
encourage
development
where
appropriate
and
location
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
impacted,
neighborhood
built
environment.
An
existing
geography,
end
quote
it
does
none
of
the
above.
It
is
inappropriate
in
location,
Mullen
Avenue
consists
of
100%
single-family
detached
homes.
This
is
too
deep
into
the
neighborhood.
S
Other
developments
of
more
than
two
units
in
Swann
estates
are
located
no
further
west
of
Church,
Avenue
or
south
of
Cleveland
Street.
It
would
be
entirely
out
of
place
just
because
this
development
can
be
considered
does
not
mean
that
it
should
be
allowed.
It
is
not
consistent,
complimentary,
compatible
or
appropriate
in
character
and
is
incompatible
with
the
surrounding
impacted
neighborhood
built
environment
and
existing
geography.
Small
duplexes,
on
Morrison
Avenue
to
the
south
should
not
be
used
as
a
basis
of
comparison
of
character.
S
The
duplex
directly
behind
this
site
is
three
nine
one,
three
Morrison
it
is
approximately
1500
square
feet
and
one-story
similar
in
size
to
both
older
single-family
homes
and
duplexes.
In
the
immediate
area,
the
proposed
building,
as
James
said,
is
significantly
larger.
All
that
tube
duplexes
are
zoned
rs.60
and
many
have
been
converted
to
single-family
homes
or
new
homes
have
been
constructed
on
the
property's
homes
on
mullen
have
a
setback
of
25
feet.
S
S
S
They
don't
live
on
the
street,
and
so
therefore
they
cannot
have
the
same
awareness
of
issues
that
occur
in
our
dependent
upon
whether
or
time
of
day,
including
flooding,
vehicular
and
pedestrian
traffic.
This
rezoning
will
cause
significant
issues
with
these
things.
I
respectfully
request
that
you
deny
this
application
to
maintain
the
character
of
our
neighborhood
and
quality
of
life
of
citizens
I.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
thoughtful
consideration
of
this
request.
I
will
yield
my
time.
Thank
you.
So
much
thank.
O
Evening
Council,
my
name
is
michael
chen
golly.
I
live
at
four
thousand
eight
West
Mullan
about
four
houses.
Away
from
this
proposed
structure,
I've
lived
in
Tampa,
my
wife
and
I.
All
of
our
adult
lives.
We
raised
three
children.
Here
we
came
from
Beach
Park
when
we
finally
cut
all
of
our
children
out
of
the
house
over
to
Mullin
about
the
little
three-bedroom
one-bath
house,
we
still
have
room
in
the
house
and
where
kids
want
to
visit
us
long
as
they
don't
try
to
stay.
O
What
I
would
like
you
to
consider
confessed
not
to
reading
the
comprehensive
plan,
I
hope
somewhere
buried
within
there
is
a
clause
for
common
sense.
Anybody
who
would
want
to
increase
the
density
in
this
particular
area
has
to
be
out
of
their
living
minds
with
all
due
respect.
The
Morrison
every
morning
at
8
o'clock,
7:30
8
o'clock
is
a
parking
lot
as
the
cars
lined
up
to
release.
O
Sir
kids,
you
know
I've
talked
them
off
with
school,
the
same
thing
from
1:30
to
3
from
the
front
of
Grady
all
the
way
almost
down
the
Loess
cars
sit
there
to
get
to
earth
a
park,
and
then
they
go
one
by
one.
You
have
Christ
the
King
on
the
other
block
in
the
other
direction.
You
still
have
the
post
office
there.
You
have
the
little
league
ball
and
spring
seasons,
the
tennis
courts.
O
You
have
the
play
field
of
Christ,
the
King,
where
there's
all
the
soccer
going
on
it's
busy
busy
busy,
there's
cars
there
all
the
times,
traffic,
morcÃn
and
church
right
all
the
time.
No,
the
important
thing
and
what
I'm
here
to
talk
about
is
Grady.
When
you
walk
down
Grady
7:30
every
morning,
I
walk
north
to
get
up.
2
patches
plays.
Do
you
some
breakfast
there's
a
flood
of
children
coming
down
Grady?
O
That's
the
filter,
Grady
Avenue
right
there,
where
they
get
to
the
safety
of
that
crosswalk
in
that
crossing
guard
over
there.
The
other
crosswalk
is
on
Morrison
I'm.
Sorry
I'm
Mullen
crossing
over
Church
to
get
to
Christ
the
King.
So
you
have
a
flood
of
kids,
funneling
and
filtering
right
past
this
structure.
Every
morning
you
have
8
cars
coming
out,
I
guarantee
it
probably
be
more
like
10
to
12.
O
Ok,
you
know
backing
out
of
the
driveway
they're
going
to
have
to
plant
some
trees
so
comforting
so
strees
are
going
to
be
in
the
setback.
The
trees
are
going
to
be
blocking
their
view,
they're
going
to
be
cutting
in
a
coffee
reading,
folks,
in
a
hurry
to
get
to
work,
they're
gonna
back
out
of
that
Street
I
forgot
to
mention
the
little
kids.
You
saw
them
riding
their
bikes
down
the
street
because
the
kids
are
on
a
sidewalk
right.
All
the
sudden.
The
cars
backs
out.
Whap.
O
Ok,
we're
going
to
here
we're
going
to
know
it
we're
going
to
hear
the
screams
of
the
parents,
we're
going
to
see
the
flashing
lights.
The
sirens
we're
going
to
hear
that
you
might
hear
it
on
the
evening
news.
Ok,
I
read
about
newspaper,
but
that's
what
we're
dealing
with
it's
a
foolhardy
dangerous
proposition
to
increase
that
amount
of
cars
on
that
corner
as
under
the
current
conditions
with
the
school
children.
It's
going
to
be
a
disaster
and
I
hope
you
please
please
consider
that
I'm
begging
thank.
S
Good
evening,
I'm,
margarita
Lopez
I
live
at
twenty
thirty
nine
eighteen
west
one
my
child
attended
Grady.
Just
my
concerns
are
today
the
schools
that
are
there
that
we
already
mentioned
Christ
the
King
and
Gradius
school
is
already
at
capacity
as
well
as
the
two
parks
and
further
even
further
down.
We
have
Swan
it's
one
circle
Park
as
well.
The
bottom
line
is
I,
see
a
lot
of
pedestrian
traffic
as
well
as
children
on
bikes
and
scooters.
Not
all
the
streets
have
sidewalks,
some
of
them
do
some
of
the
sidewalks
or
a
little
bit
uneven.
S
So
I
see
children
going
off
the
sidewalk
to
write
their
scooter
or
bike
onto
the
street,
so
the
bottom
line
is
that
that
pedestrian
traffic
remains
as
it
is,
with
a
lot
of
children.
Trader
Joe's
hasn't
really
improved
the
situation.
As
you
know,
that's
a
concern.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
cars.
I
see
a
lot
of
people
speeding
and
being
that
I'm
so
close
to
the
corner
of
Grady
and
Swann,
and
the
bridled
Swan
I
see
tremendous
amount
of
traffic
volume
traffic,
avoiding
Trader
Joe's
if
they
exit
out
Swan,
headed
eastbound.
S
C
Hi,
my
name
is
Suzanne
Keyes
and
I
live
at
four
two
one:
zero
La
Palma
Court,
however,
I
lived
up
40:14
Moen
Avenue
for
22
years
and
raised
my
children.
There,
I
sold
my
single-family
1200
square
foot
home
to
a
builder
who
knocked
down
the
home
and
built
a
two-story
3,400
square
foot
home
there.
There
are
many
new
single-family
homes
on
mullen
Inman,
McKay,
Morrison
Swann,
the
whole
area.
Also,
there
are
many
older
single-family
homes
built
in
the
1950s
that
have
been
renovated,
added
on
to
you
over
the
years
and
are
charming
and
beautiful.
C
Both
the
newer
and
older
single-family
homes
work
on
all
these
blocks
and
blend
very
well.
The
consistent
factor
is
that
they
are
all
single-family
homes,
new
and
old
together
and
it
works.
Townhouses
do
not
and
will
never
have
a
place
in
this
immediate
area.
They
don't
fit
well
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
I
am
also
a
realtor
with
Coldwell
Banker
and
have
sold
four
houses
on
Mullen.
C
Avenue
buyers
want
to
live
in
this
area
because
of
the
large
lots,
the
ability
to
build
a
big
house
or
have
a
big
backyard
and
put
in
a
pool
I
currently
have
a
house
listed
at
4012
Mullin
Avenue.
Due
to
this
proposal
on
the
table,
I've
had
to
disclose
the
issue
at
hand
to
potential
buyers.
They
all
want
to
go
running
all
the
buyers
who
have
come
to
see
my
listing
at
4112
Mullen
have
stated
they
do
not
want
to
live
in
a
block
with
townhouses.
C
They
have
specifically
said
they
only
want
to
live
in
a
neighborhood
with
other
single-family
homes,
which
is
why
they
are
considering
their
area
to
begin
with,
I
reached
out
to
four
of
the
builders
I
work
with
on
a
regular
basis
who
have
built
homes
on
Mullen,
Avenue
or
in
the
immediate
area,
and
here's
what
they
had
to
say
number
one
I'm
certain
every
resident
would
be
in
opposition.
This
won't
work
there.
That
proposal
is
certainly
not
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
3.
C
The
property
appraiser
map
clearly
shows
that
all
Lots
are
large,
single-family
detached
Lots
for
being
a
builder
I'm,
okay
with
multifamily
structures,
but
that
townhouse
proposal
definitely
does
not
belong
on
Mullen
or
any
on
that
corner
or
any
divided
Lots
on
that
corner.
My
professional
opinion
is
that
no
matter
how
upscale
or
how
much
money
this
builder
pours
into
the
townhouses,
it
will
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
neighborhood.
It
will
not
bring
up
the
value
of
the
neighborhood.
They
will
look
crammed
into
the
lot
and
look
horrible.
C
It
will
definitely
bring
the
property
value
down
for
every
other
owner
who
surrounds
it.
Although
there
are
still
some
duplexes
left
on
Morrison,
it's
important
to
note
that
many
of
them
have
been
converted.
Like
other
people
have
said,
it's
just
saying:
it's
single
family
homes,
beautiful
homes,
I
might
add,
or
builders,
have
replaced
them
with
single
family
homes
which
have
brought
the
value
in
the
neighborhood
several
years
back.
C
There
was
a
duplex
on
the
corner
of
41
Morrison
and
the
owner
at
that
time
wanted
to
divide
the
lot
and
build
two
homes
facing
Clarke
city
council
at
that
time.
This
was
years
ago,
but
I
watched
it
denied
the
request
and
subsequently
the
owner
moved
and
the
next
owner
turned
it
into
a
single-family
home
I
opposed
the
townhouses
or
any
division
of
that
lot,
and
respectfully
ask
that
you
deny
this
request.
It
is
important
to
the
existing
owners
of
us
and
read
that
the
neighborhood
maintains
its
character.
Thank
you.
Thank.
G
My
name's
Harvey
Bruno
I
live
at
39:10
West
Mullan
three
houses
down
from
this
bounced
Raza
tee
here
that
we're
gonna
try
to
pass
through
or
not
pass
through,
so
I
beg
of
you
to
not
pass
it.
This
home
that
we're
in
was
purchased
by
my
father-in-law
in
1948.
He
was
a
serviceman
until
Air
Force
Base.
He
raised
four
kids,
three
nurses
and
one
teacher.
He
died
again
if
he
saw
what's
happening
now
on
this
street.
We
can't
have
this.
G
T
Q
Hi,
my
name
is
sue
Lashley
Thomas
I
am
here
on
behalf
of
the
Builder.
I
am
also
a
realtor
representing
him.
I
want
to
give
you
a
picture.
This
is
the
house
in
question.
Is
it
up
there?
That's
the
house
that
we're
talking
about
I've
done
a
little
bit
of
work
with
this
builder.
As
far
as
townhomes
go
he's,
building
a
couple
off
of
Cleveland.
What
we're
looking
to
do
and
we
went,
walked
and
talked
to
a
bunch
of
the
neighbors
I
know.
A
lot
of
the
people
in
here
probably
seen
me
out.
Q
There
are
14
duplexes
directly
behind
on
Morrison
on
this
street.
What
he's
looking
to
do
we're
trying
to
find
living
for
people?
That's
affordable,
luxury
townhomes
that
are
in
a
price
range
where
people
can
afford
to
buy,
have
their
families
I
would
rather
have
a
nice
looking
townhome
like
this
next
to
me
and
have
my
children
out
there
looking
at
it,
then
I
would
rather
have
them.
Q
Looking
at
this
every
single
day,
the
Builder
is
not
trying
to
cause
any
hardship
on
anyone
we're
going
to
where
he's
planning
on
putting
sidewalks
in
there,
so
that
the
children
don't
have
to
walk
around
the
corner
like
they
do
right
now.
We
want
to
make
it
easier
and
not
cause
any
hardship
on
anybody
in
there
whatsoever.
Q
As
far
as
two
facing
one
direction
and
two
facing
the
other
you're
talking
about
on
average
four
cars
on
each
side
for
a
family
that
has
six
family
members,
that's
six
vehicles
for
one
you're,
talking
to
two
car
garages
plus
space
to
be
able
to
park
your
cars
and
two
to
four
cars
in
there,
you're
not
going
to
cause
any
street
parking
any
havoc
they
are
you're.
Gonna
have
sidewalks
in
for
the
kids
to
walk
around
as
far
as
people
backing
out.
Well,
that
could
happen
in
any
neighborhood.
Q
I
hope
everyone
use
this
caution
when
they
back
out
we're
just
trying
to
improve
the
neighborhood
I
did
a
survey
on
the
neighborhood
there's
a
lot
of
investors,
a
lot
of
investment
homes
on
that
there's
a
lot
of
renter's
that
live
on
that
street.
As
well,
I
walked
both
Mullen
and
Morrison,
tried
to
knock
on
a
lot
of
the
doors
and
talked
to
a
lot
of
the
people
trying
to
make
it
along
with
the
Builder,
to
make
it
so
that
everybody
would
make
this
a
smooth
transaction
and
not
cause
hardship
on
anyone.
Q
I
appreciate
your
time.
I
hope
that
you
look
at
the
big
picture
and
also
there
is
a
lot
of
families
moving
into
the
Tampa
Bay
area
and
to
have
housing
for
everyone.
Unfortunately,
we
can't
stop
people
from
coming
to
Tampa
I
like
them,
but
you
know
we
want
to
have
nice
homes
for
them
to
live
in
we're
not
looking
at
putting
small
little
low-end
stuff
we're
looking
at
putting
two
nice
luxury
townhomes
on
each
side
and
I.
Think,
in
my
honest
opinion
that
they
will
fit
in
with
the
community.
I
appreciate
it.
D
C
D
Q
D
Q
O
Q
We
had
a
three-car
garage,
I,
think
garages
that
we
had
a
three-car
garage.
The
townhomes
at
the
end
of
the
street
were
the
problem
and
they
made
it
abundantly
clear.
It
was
a
gorgeous
house
loved
it.
So,
when
I
look
at
this
yeah,
it
concerns
me,
I
have
three
properties:
I
only
do
a
handful
a
year.
So
if
I
doing
something
like
this
was
to
have
the
same
problem,
I
head
on
Baskonia
I'm,
not
a
business
for
good.
Q
If
I
have
to
sit
on
these
for
a
year
watching
these
things
go
down
and
hundreds
of
subs
would
be
affected,
I'd
be
affected
and
I
think
that
you
know
hits
me
at
home,
but
you
know
that
that's
that's
just
bad
news,
and
the
first
thing
if
this
goes
through
that's
happening,
is
every
property
with
a
block
of
that
place?
Is
gonna
drop
sixty
eighty
thousand
dollars
I
promise
you
because
I
wouldn't
pay
for
it
to
hit
the
prices
they're
worth
now.
Q
I
would
love
to
have
this
corner
lot
in
a
location
like
that
and
do
a
nice
single-family
residence
that
somebody
would
like
the
one
at
forty
101
Mullins
just
about
complete
and
I've
had
a
lot
of
positive
feedback.
I
hope
we've
done
a
nice
job
for
this
neighborhood
I.
Don't
think
that
this
is
necessary.
I
think
it's
out
of
place.
It's
a
single-family
residence
Street,
the
one!
That's
that
the
closest
duplex
to
it
behind
it
was.
You
know
that
was
from
1948.
Q
It's
not
that
it's
not
what's
current,
but
you
know,
aside
from
the
fact
that
it
would
currently
hurt
every
single
family
residence
in
the
area,
because
they
would
have
a
harder
time
selling
their
house
it
would.
It
would
probably
knock
down
the
property
values
and
the
tax
rolls,
and
then
it's
going
to
encourage
every
builder
in
the
region
to
run
in
and
try
to
do
the
same
thing
and
hurt
all
the
other
single-family
residence
in
the
area.
That's
right.
O
Lady
Senate
Council,
my
name's
Tom
Connelly
I've,
been
sworn
in
I
resided,
38:23,
West,
palmira,
Avenue
and
I'm.
The
president
of
the
Virginia
Park
Neighborhood
Association
I'm,
asking
that
the
City
Council
deny
this
petition,
whereas
118-124
for
39:16
West
Mullan
on
the
basis
that
it
doesn't
support
Tampa
code,
section,
27,
136
sub
6
that
it
does
not
promote
and
encourage
development
where
appropriate
in
location,
character,
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
impacted,
neighborhoods
built
environment
and
existing
geography.
The
current
zoning
designation
for
this
neighborhood
is
rs.60
single-family
detached,
and
this
can
be
seen
on
the
map.
O
The
there
are
only
two
parcels
that
are
not
zoned
the
rs.60,
the
RM
12
in
the
corners
there.
The
non-conforming
properties
cited
by
the
Hillsborough
Planning
Commission
should
not
be
used
as
a
fact
to
support
the
consistent
finding.
Since
several
of
these
non-conforming
properties,
the
duplexes
that
have
been
mentioned
beforehand
are
no
longer
duplexes
but
have
been
made
into
single-family
structures
and
therefore,
in
compliance
with
the
rs.60
zoning
does
for
the
Swan
estates.
I.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
urge
that
you
deny
this
petition.
Thank
you,
sir.
Next.
A
O
O
O
T
G
My
name's
Caroline
Bennett
I'm,
a
lifelong
resident
of
South
Tampa
I'm,
the
chairperson
of
the
variance
and
Lane
Development
Committee
of
Virginia
Park
I'll,
try
to
be
quick
on
page
14
of
the
2040
comprehensive
plan.
It
says
that
South
Tampa
has
limited
growth
opportunities,
because
environmental
qualities
will
be
compromised
by
increased
urbanization,
limit,
there's
limited
access
to
transportation
facilities
which
would
reduce,
which
would
be
inefficient
to
improve
limit,
limited
opportunities
to
create
more
community
facilities,
open
spaces
or
services
to
meet
meet
increased
demand,
it's
unstable
and
its
flood
prone
land.
G
This
is
in
the
comprehensive
plan
for
its
saying
in
the
30-year
period
from
2010
our
2010
to
2040.
They
want
ninety
seven
and
thirty
five
new
people
residents
in
South
Tampa.
So
my
question
is
from
2020
to
ten
to
2019.
How
many
do
we
have?
Is
there
anybody
who
can
answer
that
question
because
it
just
seems
to
me
if
the
Tampa's
own
plan
is
saying
this
is
the
number
that
South
Tampa
can
support
they're,
saying
it's
very
limited
and
this
is
it
we're
two-thirds
of
the
way
there?
G
How
many
permits
have
been
approved,
how
many
condos,
how
many
apartments?
How
many
duplexes,
how
many
quadruplex
is,
how
many
Lots
splits
how
many
residences
have
been
built
in
the
19
years?
How
many
people
does
this?
Do
they
say
one
person
per
resident
for
people
per
resident,
I'm
sure
they
have
a
number?
There
should
be
some
way
of
looking
at
what
has
already
been
approved
for
South
Tampa
and
saying
how
close
we
are
to
that
goal.
What,
if
we're
over
that
goal?
I
mean
I,
believe
it's
possible.
G
I
live
there
I
see
the
growth
I,
see
the
thousands
of
units
that
have
been
created
in
South
Tampa
in
the
last
19
years.
We
could
already
be
at
the
goal
we
could
be
over
the
goal.
Who
here
can
tell
me
the
answer
to
that
question?
Probably
it's
not
being
kept
track
of
the
way
it
needs
to
be,
particularly
since
we're
coming
so
close
to
the
end.
I
think
this
is
something
that
needs
to
be
looked
at.
I
ask
you
to
deny
this
until
we
have
more
information
to
show
that
it's
actually
needed.
Thank
you.
G
A
N
Evening,
I'm
here
to
bring
you
a
new
perspective:
I
am
a
new
resident
to
Tampa
area.
My
name
is
a
leader,
Lyons,
sorry
I
hail
here
from
Panama
City
Florida
and
as
we
sit
in
this
room,
you
are
all
concerned
about
your
neighborhood.
You
know
new
developer
coming
in
it's
beautiful
I,
get
that
sorry
I
get
that
it's
wonderful,
but
what
the
Builder
is
proposing,
isn't
just
a
townhome.
It's
a
place
to
sustain
what
is
coming.
N
We're
already
here,
we're
talking
about
building
these
homes,
and
it's
really
hard
for
me
to
stand
up
here
and
comprehend
that
where
I
just
came
from
there
are
no
homes
and
then
we
should
all
be
thankful
that
we
really
are
even
in
this
situation
and
as
citizens,
we
have
the
opportunity
to
speak
up
and
sit
about
it
and
speak
up
about
it.
I
I
would
like
to
clarify.
I
have
not
been
paid
to
stand
here
at
all
by
any
means:
I'm
not
commissioned.
N
I
am
in
the
industry
for
sure,
but
I
have
done
a
few
open
houses
and
some
of
the
applicants
homes
and
they
are
townhomes,
but
they
feel
like
single
residential
homes.
They
are
private,
they
are
eco-friendly
and
all
I'm
saying
is
that
we
are
coming,
and
that
part
of
the
reason
is
why
I'm
here
is
because
Tampa
is
growing,
whether
you
like
it
or
not,
it's
it's
coming
and
what
he's
proposing
isn't
far
off
from
what's
already
here.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
P
Mary
Samaniego
land
development
coordination
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
some
of
the
things
that
were
said
to
make
sure
that
the
record
was
straight.
There
are
no
variance
as
being
requested.
This
isn't
a
variance
application.
It's
a
rezoning
application
within
the
PD
rezoning
application
process.
You're
allowed
to
ask
for
waivers
as
part
of
that
request
based
on
site
conditions.
P
K
K
There
is
no
sidewalk.
So
if,
if
I
have
my
kid
in
the
neighborhood
we'll
be
happy
to
have
added
sidewalk
and
my
kid
go
to
the
to
Grady,
Elementary
I'm
gonna
use
a
sidewalk
to
go
back
home
because
I
walked
in
a
burr
hood
I've,
seen
kids
that
go
on
the
street.
There's
absolutely
no
sidewalk
on
Mullen,
so
I'd
like
to
have
something
that
the
kids
would
actually
get
away
from
the
street
and
walk
walk
on
the
sidewalks.
K
Parking
issue-
and
we
have
answered
this
with
transportation
department
of
the
city.
They
are
required
to
to
parking
for
each
unit
and
a
quarter
for
guests
park
in
which
totals
of
nine
parking.
For
for
this
development,
we
have
have
a
setback
of
eighteen
feet
from
the
from
the
where
the
building
stars
and
that
eighteen
feet
will
allow
three
more
access
parking.
K
When
you
compare
with
the
required
so
and
also
when
you
look
at
the
the
the
the
length,
the
distance
that
we
have
from
the
building
up
to
the
edge
of
pavement,
we
have
thirty
and
thirty
eight
feet
and
the
north,
and
we
have
34
feet
which
an
average
car
length
is
about
fifteen
fifteen
and
a
half
feet,
and
we
will
if,
for
example,
one
of
the
residents
have
guests,
we
do.
They
could
accommodate
two
car
in
the
garage
plus
four
more
cars
for
each
unit,
and
there
is
a
clear
line
of
science
and
I.
K
Finally-
and
we
have
gone
through
this
with
with
the
city
and
in
terms
of
safety
of
the
kids
or
maybe
have
an
accident-
they
have
looked
at
it
through
several
rounds
in
terms
of
storm
water
and
flooding
issue.
We
have
calculated
that
we
could
have
idiot
system
or
underground
vault
or
you
know,
but
any
of
these
technologies
can
be
addressed
when
when
when
we
are
in
the
permitting
process,
but
we
have
found
that
that
it
is
possible
to
mitigate
all
the
storm
water
issues
on
this
development.
K
Regarding
the
median
and
arms
16
or
18
zoning.
That
was
mentioned
when
we
started
designing
this
project
with
a
look,
we
came
up
with
the
idea
of
even
having
three
story
and
have
have
a
less
footprint
in
the
area,
and
that
was
also
brought
up.
But
the
issue
with
free
story
again
is:
it
was
non
harmonic
with
the
neighbors.
You
know
everybody's
talking
about
you
know
in
an
oddball
what
we
wanted
to
do.
K
A
A
I
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
deny
this
application
and
I'm
gonna
base
that
on
a
couple
of
different
policies,
both
from
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
from
the
land
development
code,
land
use
policy.
Nine
point
one
point
two,
which
is
to
encourage
sensitive
design
and
site
planning
in
urban
neighborhoods
that
mitigates
the
scale
of
larger
buildings
through
careful
use
of
building
massing
setbacks,
facade
articulation,
fenestration,
varied
parapets
and
roof
planes
and
pedestrian
scaled
architectural
detail.
I
There
is
definitely,
in
my
view,
excessive
setbacks,
setback
waivers
that
that
would
not
be
available
unless
it
was
under
the
PD.
I
would
also
say
that
the
size
and
scale
of
the
proposed
development
is
out
of
character
with
the
resident
neighborhood
leonie's
policy.
Nine
point
three
point:
eight:
it
is
the
intent
of
the
city
that
new
residential
redevelopment
projects
shall
be
minimally
disruptive
to
adjacent
areas.
I
To
achieve
this,
the
city
shall
assess
the
potential
positive
and
negative
impacts
of
residential
development
projects
on
the
physical
development
pattern
and
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
require
mitigation
of
negative
off-site
impacts.
Section
27
136
item
six
of
the
Tampa
Municipal
Code
says
that
rezoning
should
promote
and
encourage
development
where
appropriate
and
location
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
impacted,
neighborhoods
built
environment
and
existing
geography.
I
We've
heard
substantive
and
competent
evidence
tonight
that
the
proposed
development
is
not
appropriate
in
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounded
impacting
neighborhood,
as
well
as
the
directly
impacted
surrounding
houses
and
then
finally,
I
would
just
mention
that
the
waiver,
which
is
to
contribute
to
the
tree
trust
fund
for
mitigation,
doesn't
point
out
that
actually
it's
the
effective
removal
of
every
single
tree
on
the
property.
Okay,.
D
If
I,
if
I
could
chair,
we
have
a
motion.
A
second
could
I
add
to
that
land
use
the
objective,
nine
point:
three:
the
development
is
not
compatible
or
the
redevelopment
is
not
compatible
to
sustain
the
stable
neighborhoods,
ensure
the
social
and
economic
health
of
the
city
and
land
use
policy.
Nine
point
three
point:
five,
which
generally
the
location
of
single-family
attached
housing
units
shall
be
limited
to
the
periphery
of
established
single-family
detached
neighborhoods.