►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council PM 01172019 part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
D
E
F
Councilperson
more
illegal
Department.
This
also
went
to
the
CRA
this
morning.
This
is
a
development
agreement
that
coincides
with
the
area
wide
rezoning.
You
just
move
forward.
As
I
mentioned,
there
is
a
substitute
that
has
been
sent
to
the
clerk's
office.
It's
just
to
recognize
that
change
scheduled
for
the
transportation
and
the
ownership
and
maintenance
agreement.
So
it's
incorporated
and
everything
agrees
with
one
another
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions
regarding
us.
F
Twenty-Four
inch
or
larger
tree
that
would
otherwise
it's
one
of
the
species
that
would,
in
the
future,
qualify
us
brand
we've
also
added
definition
for
tree
removal
zone
eligible
Lots.
Those
are
the
Lots
that
will
be
eligible
for
the
tree
removal
zone,
as
well
as
the
new
automatic
setback
reductions.
F
Thank
you.
The
definition
has
a
exception
for
the
Parkland
estates,
which
we
discussed
on
the
December
6
item.
Parkland
estates
has
a
state
law
that
makes
them
very
unique
in
terms
of
application
of
these
various
code
provisions,
so
we
felt
that
they
could
be
accepted
safely
from
these
provisions,
and
that
is
included
in
this
draft.
G
G
F
B
H
B
H
I
Good
evening,
council
members
Jennifer
Malone
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff.
This
is
located
in
the
University
planning
district.
It
is
served
by
there's
a
bus,
stop
approximately
250
feet
away
at
this
corner
right
here.
It's
an
evacuation
zone
D.
This
is
the
aerial
it's
located
along
Hillsborough
Avenue.
There's
a
wall
wall
right
across
the
street.
I
This
is
a
storage
facility,
so
there's
a
great
commercial
presence
along
Hillsborough
Avenue
already
and
the
adopted
future
land
uses
community
commercial
35,
which
is
that
red
that
we
see
along
Hillsborough
Avenue
and
to
move
north
from
the
subject
site.
This
is
residential,
20
and
then
residential
10,
providing
that
transition
staff
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
as
CG
is
an
allowable
use
for
allowable
zoning
districts
in
that
community,
commercial
35,
and
this
is
a
long
promotional
corridor.
We
found
that
it
would
be
comparable
and
compatible.
H
As
I
stated,
Mary
Samaniego,
this
is
an
application
to
rezone
the
property
from
commercial
general
and
RS
50
to
commercial
general.
The
subject
property
is
in
green.
It's
on
West
shows
for
Avenue
and
it
but
backs
up
against
West
Mohawk
Avenue.
It
actually
currently
has
split
zoning,
so
the
southern
half
is
already
commercial
general.
The
northern
half
is
in
the
RS
50
zoning
district
they're
wanting
to
have
the
entire
property,
so
in
commercial
Jena.
In
order
to
use
the
entire
property
for
commercial
general
uses.
H
This
is
across
the
street,
the
Wawa
to
the
east,
further
to
the
east
and
then
back
next
door
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
Property
is
you
can
see?
These
are
a
series:
it's
a
commercial
corridor,
another
commercial
use.
This
is
the
subject
property
the
back
of
it
from
Mohawk,
and
then
these
are
the
residential
houses
that
face
the
back
of
the
property
along
Mohawk.
H
As
I
stated,
this
is
Euclidean
rezoning
district,
so
there
are
no
waivers
or
set
plans
to
approve
tonight.
Any
development
that
was
to
happen
on
this
property
would
have
to
comply
with
all
C
G's
standards,
as
well
as
all
development
standards
found
in
chapter
27
and
applicable
sections
of
the
city
of
Tampa
code.
The
overall
property
is
a
little
over
half
an
acre,
it's
about
five
Lots
down
from
the
intersection
of
West
Hillsborough
Avenue
and
what
s
Rome
Avenue
intersection,
and
it
has
115
feet
of
lot
width
both
on
Hillsborough
and
no
Hodge.
H
H
H
J
A
H
I
Jennifer
Malone
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff.
This
is
in
South
Tampa.
It's
an
evacuation
zone,
beach
gaston
park,
it's
our
closest
public
recreational
facility
and
we
have
a
heart
route
that
connects
subjects
downtown
tampa.
This
is
the
subject
site
right
here.
This
is
Anderson
Avenue,
it's
just
south
of
inner
Bay
and
then
yourself
show
me.
Every
highway
I
have
a
Circle
K
on
the
corner
and
the
Dollar
General
and
the
vicinity.
And
then
these
are
single
family
detached
place.
I
There's
the
future.
Ladies.
They
adopted
future
languages
residential
ten
along
South
O'leary
highway.
We
have
that
community
commercial
35.
That's
that
tank
representing
the
commercial
uses.
This
is
recreational
open
space
which
is
I,
believe
cats
to
park
the
east
of
the
sister
site,
and
there
are
some
light
industrial
uses
to
the
south.
That's
that
great
color
staff
did
fine.
That's
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
The
residential
ten
allows
for
those
10
rolling
minutes
per
acres
as
the
density.
I
If
this
request
is
approved
today,
the
subject
site
would
be
at
an
overall
density
of
six
point:
nine
units
per
acre.
We
did
find
that
this
would
be
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern
and
compatible
with
that
future
language
underlying
occasionally
resizing
nation.
Thank
you.
H
H
So
here's
your
subject
property.
These
are
all
taken
from
the
street.
This
is
a
3611
it's
to
the
east,
further
to
the
east.
Now
we
cross
the
street
or
coming
back
towards
the
subject
property,
you
can
see
the
spacing
of
the
houses
between
each
other
still
across
the
street
single-family
houses.
Then
this
is
to
the
west
of
the
property
and
then
next
door
directly
to
the
west.
H
Whenever
we
have
a
rezoning
request
to
go
from
RS
60
RS
5000
the
development
pattern
in
the
immediate
area
for
this
study,
the
red
or
commercial
Lots,
so
those
were
not
included
and
then
the
yellow
color,
a
townhome.
So
those
weren't
included
in
this
overall
study,
a
total
of
112
Lots,
were
analyzed,
27
of
which
are
equal
to
or
greater
than
60
foot
wide
locks,
leaving
73
or
a
majority
of
wedge
less
than
60
feet
wide
of
the
subject
block,
which
is
this
Blagh?
H
There
are
41
lots.
22
of
which
are
60
feet
wide
or
greater,
and
then
remains
78
percent
or
less
than
60
feet
wide
for
the
subject
bought
face,
which
is
this
northern
side
of
Andersen
Avenue.
There
are
21,
total
Lots,
19
of
which
are
60
feet
wide
or
wider,
and
the
remaining
81%
is
less
than
60
feet
wide
and
then
for
this
block,
the
3600
block
being
the
block
face
as
well
as
across
the
street.
H
H
The
total
lot
is
12,500
square
feet
and
it
is
100
feet
wide.
So,
if
approved
with
the
Rs
50
zoning
district,
it
could
be
split
into
two
Lots.
This
is
the
occluding
rezoning,
so
there's
no
site
finder
review
and
no
waivers
to
consider
any.
There
are
no
additional
comments
from
the
development
review
compliant
stuff.
Any
development
that
we're
do
Khurram.
This
property
would
have
to
comply
with
all
applicable
zoning
standards
of
the
Rs
50
zoning
district.
L
Good
evening
counsel,
Steve
McClean
IAM,
representing
karina
s,
who's
the
petitioner
on
this
project.
Basically,
this
restores
the
1946
original
plat
that
were
50-foot
Lots
and
in
this
case
it
will
allow
for
the
redevelopment
of
these
two.
These
two
particular
Lots
were
requesting
and
there
will
be
no
waivers
because
it's
Euclidian
zoning
and,
as
the
staff
has
pointed
out
in
all
four
categories,
including
block
face
area.
L
The
street
frontage
are
all
in
excess
of
50
foot
development
like
70,
say
I,
think
70%
are
all
developed
in
50
foot
configurations.
This
lies
between
Dale,
Mabry
and
hyams,
just
south
of
enter
Bay
Boulevard
and
the
area
has
experienced
a
great
deal
of
infill
and
redevelopment
recently.
So
basically,
the
staff
is
recommending
that
this
is
consistent
on
both
the
planning
committee
and
then
the
city
staff
and
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
for
you
regarding
this
project.
But
we
respectfully
request
your
approval.
B
M
E
I
I
I'm
not
great
at
pronouncing
the
street
name,
but
this
here
it
is
right
here.
I'd
also
have
South
Pines,
Avenue
and
West
beta
Bay
Boulevard
to
the
south,
and
this
is
the
subject
site.
This
is
a
church,
the
south,
along
with
a
debate
Boulevard,
and
we
also
have
some
commercial
uses
in
this
area.
This
portion
of
the
street.
We
have
some
attached
townhomes
some
duplexes
kind
of
a
mix
of
those
residential
types
which
is
reflected
on
our
future
land
use
map.
I
It's
residential
20,
which
allows
for
that
medium
density,
residential
to
the
north,
that
oranges,
residential
Ted
I
have
community
makes
use
35
along
West,
beta,
Bay,
Boulevard,
and
then
the
yellow
is
residential.
Six,
the
residential
1t
category
does
provide
for
that
sensitive
transition
between
this
residential
10
and
the
community
commercial
35,
as
we
move
north
from
West
Bay
to
Bay
Boulevard,
and
this
breeze
request
is
within
that
intent
of
that
residential
20.
Keeping
with
that
medium
density
residential
category.
So
we
did
find
this
consistent.
I
H
H
Because
of
the
size
of
the
light,
it's
only
0.11
acres
and
they
currently
have
two
dwelling
units
on
the
site,
they're
below
the
acreage
that
they
need
to
have
two
conforming.
The
the
second
unit
is
non-conforming
and
further
non-conforming
chapter
they're
severely
limited
on
what
they
can
do
to
that
second
unit.
They
can't
expand
it.
They
can't
enlarge
it.
They
can
only
do
basic
repairs
with
the
RM
18
zoning
district.
H
H
H
G
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
chair,
I
read
and
present
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
3511,
west
and
vibrato
street
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
RM
16,
residential
multi-family,
2rm,
18,
residential
multifamily,
providing
an
effective
date.
B
H
I
Jennifer
Malone,
if
you're
planning
a
mission
staff,
this
is
going
to
look
very
familiar.
This
came
before
you
is
a
comprehensive
plan
amendment.
It
was
part
of
the
February
28
day
cycle,
I,
believe
it
came
before
you
last
June.
It's
on
North
Campus,
Street,
it's
about
a
block
away
from
North
Florida
Avenue.
This
is
a
Home
Depot
parking
lot.
I
These
are
commercial
uses
right
here
and
then
residential
uses
they
move
away
from
it.
It
is
located
in
the
university
planning
district,
the
evacuation
zone
E
on
your
future
land
use
map.
We
have.
The
community
makes
use
35,
which
is
that
Home
Depot
parking
lot
I
pointed
out
earlier
community
commercial
35.
This
is
residential
20
as
part
of
the
request
that
was
before
you
let
last
year
this
block
was
changed
to
the
residential
20
future
land
use
designations.
I
That's
now
the
adopted
future
land
use
of
the
subject
site
and
then,
as
we
move
further
its
ret
it
transitions
that
residential
10,
so
staff
did
find
this
request.
Consistent.
We
did
find
that
this
provides
a
logical
transition
and
density
as
we
move
away
from
where
Florida
Avenue.
It's
still
that
medium
density
residential
district,
so
we
did
find
that
it
would
be
consistent,
comparable
and
compatible
with
those
surrounding
uses
and
I
am
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
H
Very
San
Diego
here
is
the
zoning
map
pacific
properties
in
green.
As
you
can
see,
it's
in
a
large
area
of
the
artist
fifty
zoning
district
and
then
it
goes
to
commercial
intensive
along
Florida
Avenue.
This
Jennifer
stated
this
went
through
this
portion
of
the
block
went
through
a
comprehensive
plan
amendment
to
change
the
future
land-use
start
at
twenty,
which
allows
consideration
of
multi-family
density
and
zoning
districts.
The
current
property
is
a
house
and
then
behind
it
is
a
semi
detached
structure,
equalling
three
total
dwelling
units
that
are
all
legal,
not
legal,
non-conforming.
H
Again
like
the
last
case,
when
is
structure
and
reduce
illegal
non-conforming,
this
is
the
property
owners
are
limited
as
to
what
can
be
done
with
that
use
and
or
structures.
If
this
rezoning
were
to
be
approved
to
RM
eighteen,
they
have
are
allowed
to
have
two
dwelling
units
total
the
existing
house
will
remain
and
then
the
semi
detached
structure
and
the
back
will
be
converted
into
it.
That's
tied
into
one
dwelling
unit
leaving
to
tilt
toward
total
dwelling
units
on
the
site.
H
H
All
single-family
houses,
there's
no
site
plan
review
and
no
waivers.
If
the
rezoning
were
to
be
approved,
they
would
have
to
comply
with
all
our
m18
zoning
standards.
There
are
no
additional
comments
from
staff
and
the
developer
view
you
can
find
stamp
out
and
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
Code
of
Ordinances.
Getting
questions
for
me.
F
B
B
B
H
I
Jennifer
balloon
at
their
clinic
mission
staff.
This
is
located
in
central
Tampa.
Three
transit
routes
are
the
subject
site
connecting
it
because
I
the
investigations
we're
at
West,
Berkeley,
thir,
King,
jr.
Boulevard
to
the
north,
is
st.
Joseph's
Hospital
as
well
as
this
parcels
that
I
don't
know
my
directions
tonight
to
the
west,
and
then
this
is
the
subject
site
right
here.
There's
a
variety
of
medical
office
uses
along
this
corridor
of
Western
art,
Luther,
King,
jr.
Boulevard.
I
It's
reflected
on
the
future
land
use
map.
The
blue
is
public
cuz.
If
that's
the
public
uses
of
the
hospital,
this
is
community,
makes
use
35
resident
ill
20
to
the
south
and
then
that
resident
of
10
we're
seeing
that
transition
density
as
it
moves
south
commercial
general
is
an
allowable
zoning
district
in
this
area.
I'm
staff
found
no
concerns
with
this
request
to
given
the
development
pattern
and
what's
surrounding
the
area,
so
that
is
our
finding
and
I
am
about
10
questions.
Thank
you.
H
Mary
Samaniego
for
the
record.
Here's
a
zoning
map
with
the
surrounding
area,
the
subject
properties
in
green,
it's
sewn
office
professional
across
the
street
is
st.
Joseph's
Hospital,
which
is
office
professional
one
and
on
either
side
of
the
property
to
the
east.
End
to
the
west
is
already
the
commercial
general
zoning
district
for
which
the
applicant
is
requesting.
Cg
zoning
for
themselves,
south
of
the
property,
is
residential
office,
and
then
it
starts
on
the
south
side
of
Virginia
starts
transitioning
and
adjust
up
some
medical
office
uses
and
residential.
H
There
are
two
separate
addresses
as
part
of
this
singular
rezoning
request.
This
is
28
14
and
28.
Twelve
existing
medical
uses
to
the
east
as
a
mid
express
across
the
street
is
st.
Joseph's
Hospital
currently
under
construction,
obviously,
and
then
to
the
west.
Is
a
checkers
restaurant
with
the
construction
worker
from
st.
Joseph's
having
lunch.
H
The
total
properties
0.87
agers,
if
this
property,
the
profit
existing
uses,
were
developed
in
1960
1976.
If
the
property
was
to
be
rezone
to
commercial
general,
they
would
have
to
comply
with
all
the
commercial
generals
or
district
zoning
standards.
They
meet
the
minimum
lot
size
minimott
areas
for
the
commercial
general
zoning
district
to
be
developed
together
or
separately.
City
staff
had
no
further
questions
or
concerns
with
this
application
and
the
development
review
required
stuff
done
it
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
Court
of
ordinances.
Do
you
have
any
specific
questions?
Any.
F
Good
evening
my
name
is
Tara
Tedrow
I'm,
an
attorney
at
lounge,
drastic
2,
&
5,
north
Eola,
Drive
Orlando
Florida.
Here
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner.
We
appreciate
staffs
assistance
with
this
rezoning
request.
Staff
has
found
it
to
be
consistent
with
your
land
development
code,
as
well
as
with
your
comprehensive
plan.
We
agree
with
the
findings
of
your
staff
or
requesting
no
waivers
today,
and
we
actually
received
an
unsolicited
letter
of
support
from
a
neighboring
property
owner
at
2
8:08
West
Martin
Luther
King
jr.
Boulevard.
F
F
It's
interesting
because
currently
there
is
a
pharmacy
on
the
site,
but
if
you
look
at
your
use
table
a
pharmacy
under
the
Opie's
owning
has
to
be
an
accessory
use,
so
you
know
to
bring
it
in
line
with
what
the
current
code
would
allow,
since
these
were
built
a
really
long
time
ago
and
to
give
some
options
for
marketability
of
the
property.
We
found
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
in
the
area
that
the
cg
zoning
would
be
the
best
option
for
the
site.
Okay,.
D
F
D
B
C
Yes,
sir
mr.
chair,
move
and
ordinance
being
presented
for
eating
consideration,
oranges,
rezoning
property
and
general
vicinity
of
28
12
and
28
14
West,
dr.
Martin,
Luther
King,
jr.
Boulevard
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
Florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
opie
office,
professional
2cg,
commercial
general,
providing
an
effective
date.
H
I
Commission
staff:
this
is
in
the
South
Tampa
planning
district.
It
is
within
a
coastal
high
hazard
area
and
evacuation
zone.
A
court
Champa
part
and
the
port
campus
community
center
are
about
0.2
miles
the
East.
That's
a
public
recreational
facility
and
heart
route.
17
provides
transit
to
the
subject
site
I'm.
Here's
where
it's
located,
we're
at
Southwest
short
at
the
corner
of
South,
West,
Shore,
Boulevard
and
West
McCoy
Street
directly
to
the
north
is
a
multi-family
development,
some
of
multi-family
development
further
north
in
this
direction,
the
subject
site.
I
These
are
CSX
tracks
right
here,
and
this
is
a
portion
of
Port
Tampa
part
to
the
south.
The
adopted
future
land-use
is
transitional,
use
24.
That's
the
salmon
color
in
this
area.
The
apartments
to
the
north
were
developed
into
that
same
future.
Land-Use
category.
This
is
a
subject
site
right
here.
They
also
have
residential
20
residential
35
residential
10
in
the
area.
This
is
the
park.
It's
recreational
open
space.
I
We
did
find
this
consistent.
The
traditional
use,
24
is
a
unique
category.
It
was
originally
placed
in
areas
of
the
city
that
didn't
have
an
identifiable
development
pattern.
However,
in
this
immediate
surrounding
area,
especially
in
South,
Tampa
staff
has
found
that
parcels
with
this
designation
are
being
redeveloped
for
moderate
density,
residential
such
as
that
parcel
to
the
north.
It
has
the
same
future
land
use
category,
so
we
did
find
that
this
would
be
consistent
with
the
with
the
underlying
future
land
use
and
the
surrounding
development
pattern.
I
But
the
224
is
a
unique
category
that
allows
for
a
lot
of
different
zoning
districts,
which
we've
seen
in
other
areas
of
the
city,
but
we
did
find
that
it
was
comparable
and
compatible
and
consistent
with
that
policy
direction
that
also
encourages
utilizing
vacant
land
so
further,
the
preferences
of
Tampa's
out
for
the
housing
for
its
future
residents
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
H
Very
San
Diego
here
is
the
zoning
map
for
the
subject.
Property
is
in
green.
As
you
can
see.
It's
part
of
a
larger
plan
development.
The
larger
plan
development
was
approved
in
2011.
It
was
Casey
1146
for
multifamily
development
and
then
this
portion
was
slated
to
be
commercial
and
retail,
the
property's
currently
vacant
and
it's
been
vacant
since
2011.
So
the
property
owners
are
wanting
to
convert
this
piece
to
multifamily.
Actually,
two
single-family
attached
to
kind
of
close
out
the
entire
development
for
residential
purposes.
H
This
is
the
apartment
developments
that
again
was
the
initial
larger
phase
of
the
2011
plan
developments
you're,
showing
the
gates.
This
is
all
taken
from
McCoy
across
McCoy,
some
open
storage
and
a
single-family
house,
and
then
on
the
corner,
the
opposite
corner
of
West,
Shore
and
McCoy
some
residential
units.
H
H
They're
requesting
a
total,
a
total
of
23
drawing
units
which
is
allowable
under
their
current
future
land
use
designation
series
of
buildings.
There's
four,
sir
there's
five
in
this
building
five
in
this
for
five
and
four,
they
are
asking
for
a
number
of
waivers
and
I
kind
of
walked
it
one
of
those
they're
asking
for
one
hundred
percent
tree
reduction,
because
they're
an
acre
all
properties,
an
acre
or
larger,
requires
you
to
maintain
50
percent
of
the
existing
trees.
H
They're
asking
for
a
waiver
to
remove
all
existing
trees
staff
is
not
in
support
of
this
waiver.
We
build.
The
applicant
could
have
designed
a
project
to
retain
some
of
the
existing
trees
on
site
they're,
also
asking
to
pay
into
the
trees
trust
fund
for
a
section
13
165
D
because
of
the
limited
space
they
have
for
the
mitigation
and
the
required
tree
planting
very
try
to.
They
are
required
to
replace
the
trees
that
are
moving
as
well
as
to
put
in
some
parking
lot
trees
and
landscaping
for
the
project
itself.
H
There's
very
limited
green
space
left
on
the
property.
These
are
sidewalks.
These
are
sidewalks
to
the
doors
Silvan
green
space.
You
have
are
kind
of
limited
areas
that
would
not
meet
the
protective
radii
requirement
for
new
plantings.
Do
that
they're
asking
for
waiver
to
pay
into
the
tree?
Trust
fund
for
trees,
not
mitigated
on-site,
the
third
waiver
and
they
have
a
total
seven
waivers
for
this
application.
H
Third
waiver:
there's
a
code
provision
for
building
separation
based
on
the
height
of
the
buildings
and
the
lengths
of
the
buildings
and
there's
a
formula
that
we
use
that's
built
into
the
code.
The
height
of
these
buildings
are
proposing
there's
35
feet
because
of
the
calculations.
These
buildings
are
all
kind
of
too
close
to
each
other
through
the
exact
numbers,
but
buildings
two
and
five
are
supposed
to
be
twenty
three
and
a
half
feet.
They're
only
20
feet
apart.
Two
and
four
are
supposed
to
be
23
and
a
half
the
only
20
feet
apart.
H
So
basically
there's
a
waiver
request
kind
of
to
allow
for
those
buildings
to
be
close
to
the
fourth
waiver.
Is
a
section
27
to
eighty
two
point:
nine:
to
allow
the
front
doors
of
these
buildings
to
not
face
a
right-of-way
again,
we
have
west
shore
over
here
and
then
mccoy
down
here.
These
units
obvious
mccoy,
these
face
west
shore
with
the
front
doors,
but
these
units,
the
front
doors,
actually
face
the
rear.
The
properties
are
actually
faced
with
the
existing
apartment
buildings,
so
that
requires
another
waiver.
H
They're
asking
for
a
waiver
from
27
to
83
12
to
reduce
the
drive
aisle
from
24
and
24
feet
to
20
feet.
I
believe
it
is
in
this
area
here
and
there's
a
20
foot
drive
out
here,
but
they
have
recessed
the
garage
door,
so
I
believe
that
they
needed
in
that
location
to
redo
another
waiver
27
to
85,
to
reduce
the
vehicle
use
area
race-based
requirement
because
of
the
amount
of
internal
drive,
aisles
and
parking
they're
required
to
have
1673
square
feet
of
green
space
and
only
providing
1293
square
feet
of
green
space.
H
So
if
that
way
were
to
be
approved,
they'd
have
to
pay
into
the
green
space
fund
for
district
6,
and
the
last
waiver
is
to
reduce
the
vu.
A
green
space
buffer
from
3
feet
to
1
foot
along
the
north
property
line
again
subject
to
the
field,
lieu
payment
for
district
6
they're
required
to
be
3
feet,
they're
only
measure
about
one
foot
there.
H
If
approved,
there
are
changes
that
staff
is
recommending
to
clean
up
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
rating
land
developments,
land
development
because
of
the
nature
and
the
number
of
waivers
they're
requesting
and
given
the
site
is
vacant.
Land
development
did
find
this
inconsistent.
Natural
resources
also
found
it
inconsistent
because
of
exceeding
the
50%
tree,
removal
asking
to
remove
all
trees
on
site.
H
And
those
are
all
the
changes
between
first
and
second
reading.
Overall,
the
developer
review
compliance
staff
found
it
inconsistent
again:
reference
to
transportation,
Ford
Ravel,
with
natural
resources
and
land
development
due
to
tree
preservation
and
green
space
provision.
In
the
event,
City
Council
approves
the
waivers.
H
G
G
H
So
this
is
the
larger
benefit
Jennifer
your
area,
please.
So
this
is
the
overall
PD
that
was
first
approved
to
no.7
and
then
revised
in
2011
I
believe
that
Thanks
it
was
kind
of
broken
up
into
two
sections.
This
section
was
always
supposed
to
be
multi-family,
and
then
this
section
was
going
to
have
residential
and
retail
uses.
I'm,
sorry,
restaurants
and
retail
uses
as
allowable
uses
and
I
know.
P
Good
evening
maybe
counts
a
lot
ROI
measure
I'm
an
engineer
and
a
planner
with
WRA
engineering
representing
weekly
homes,
we're
looking
to
develop
23
townhomes
on
this
acre
line.
This
is
the
reason
why
our
front
we're
in
front
of
you
here
and
to
make
that
switch
from
the
restaurant
use
to
the
residential
was
beyond
the
administrative
discretion
of
staff,
and
so
a
PD
is
required.
P
And
staff
staff
went
through
you
Jason
use,
is
you
have
the
you?
Have
the
the
Jefferson
townhomes
to
the
north,
which
is
at
24
units
per
acre,
and
we
have
23
units
per
acre?
There's
higher
densities,
suburban
residential
across
the
street,
to
the
south
of
us
is
currently
a
open
storage.
However,
there's
some
commercial
intensive,
some
CI
and
also
to
you,
24
to
the
south
of
us.
P
My
point
here
is-
is
note
that
there
is
no
shopping
or
retail
in
the
direct
proximity
of
this
parcel
also
note
that
the
trees
along
this
parcel
are
all
along
the
western
and
southern
boundary.
You
know
this
parcel
was
master
planned
to
be
you
know,
a
commercial
use,
so
it
was
masqueraded
or
clear-cut
and
has
been
in
its
current
state,
basically
an
exam
acre
pasture,
essentially
for
seven
years.
P
The
kind
of
point
of
my
presentation
is
that
we
feel
our
tonne
townhome
project
is
gonna.
Add
a
complimentary
alternative
housing
choice
to
the
area:
well,
not
adding
an
additional
burden
to
the
area's
infrastructure.
I
just
have
some
statements
to
make
that
discussion
initially
when
I
say
that
we're
adding
another
housing
choice,
I'm
referring
to
adding
townhomes
in
an
area
here
where
you
have,
you
have
an
apartment
choice.
You
have
you
know
high
density,
suburban
to
the
north,
a
little
lower
density,
suburban.
Now
we're
also
adding
townhomes
into
that
residential
mix.
P
The
concept
of
having
diverse
housing
options
is
discussed
in
the
Planning
Commission's
analysis
of
our
site,
and
then
analysis
did
yield
compliance
to
they're
there
to
the
planning
to
the
excuse
me
Planning
Commission's
analysis.
What
I'm
talking
about
infrastructure
are
not
over
not
burdening
the
infrastructure.
You
know
I,
think
of
think
of
the
main
pain
points
you
know
within
the
city
think
truck
traffic
congestion,
parking,
stormwater,
okay
in
terms
of
traffic,
a
3500
square
foot,
restaurant,
which
is
a
typical
size
for
a
chain
restaurant
and
Outback
yeah,
something
like
that.
P
23
child
homes
generates
about
134
daily
trips,
and,
if
you,
if
you
look
at
a
peak
hour,
comparison,
a
restaurant
of
that
size,
3
a.m.
peak
trips,
kind
of
figures,
ours
would
generate
10.
So
a
little
more
in
the
morning,
but
in
the
evening
3,500
square
foot
restaurant
generates
26
peak
p.m.
trips.
Ours
generates
12.
My
point
there
is:
you
know:
traffic
is
about
a
wash.
It
could
be
argue,
maybe
we're
lessening
traffic
with
this
proposal.
But
it's
it's
about
a
wash
parking.
P
We
meet
the
city
criteria
for
parking,
two-car
garages.
We
meet
the
requisite
amount
of
guest
spaces
and
then
stormwater
drainage
issues.
This
site,
the
apartments
and
this
site
was
master
planned
for
development.
So
there's
we're
gonna
tap
in
to
their
stormwater
vault
system,
there's
currently
an
inlet
and
a
pipe
and
a
stub
to
this
site.
So
there
will
be
no
off-site
drainage
coming
off
our
site
into
any
into
any
I'll
fall,
except
where
it's
currently
planned.
So
my
point
here
is
that
we're
putting
23
townhomes
in
place
of
a
restaurant.
P
P
We
are
asking
for
several
waivers
clearly
clearly
and
just
a
base
discussion
on
that.
Our
request
is
based
on
the
assertion.
Our
project
is
in
harmony
with
the
overall
character
of
this
area.
You
talk
about
tree
removal
and
green
space.
Again
looking
at
the
perimeter
of
this
site,
the
trees
are
more
or
less
along
the
right-of-way,
and
so
we
will
be
removing
those
trees,
several
which
are
cabbage
palms
or
some
pretty
nice
pines.
Unfortunately,
you
know
we'd
have
to
remove
those
staff
is
indicated
that
our
mitigation
would
be
13
inch
trees.
P
P
P
P
P
So
the
the
drive
aisle
with
the
drive
aisle
width
is
20
feet
throughout
the
site.
However,
between
the
garage
door
and
the
drive
aisle
there's
a
three-foot
apron,
so
someone
who's
pulling
in
or
puller
backing
out,
has
23
feet
of
space
and
if
you
actually
measured
it
to
garage
door
to
garage
door,
there's
26
feet.
I'd
also
point
out
the
20
feet
to
10
foot
lanes
is
a
very
common
roadway
width
for
local
roads.
P
P
Transportations,
excuse
me
I'm,
sorry,
so
transportation
objection
is
correct.
However,
we
fee,
we
feel
we
meet
that
regarding
building
separation.
Indeed,
between
buildings,
2
&
3
are
10
feet.
Apart
by
this
cat
weather
City
formula,
they
have
to
be
a
little
over
14
feet:
buildings,
2,
&,
5,
&,
2,
&
4
should
be
about
23
and
a
half
feet
apart.
I
believe
they're.
P
P
Something
that
we
have
done
upon
kind
of
discussion
with
city
staff,
so
you
look
at
this
this
area
down
here
where
the
sidewalks,
the
entrances
of
the
front
doors,
goes
directly
to
the
sidewalk
you're
kind
of
a
rowhouse
feel,
and
we
took
out
the
perimeter
sidewalk
a
lot
of
McCoy,
so
those
particular
units
you
kind
of
walk
right
out.
You
have
a
little
bit
of
a
front
yard
and
then
you
kind
of
take
some
steps
right
down
to
this
kind
of
that
that
urban
kind
of
row
house
feel
along
McCoy.
P
You
know
we
think
that
adds
a
little
bit
of
character,
a
little
bit
of
difference
to
the
area.
So,
basically,
in
conclusion
that
we
feel
we're
providing
a
townhome
project
which,
which
complements
the
area
provides
alternative
housing,
has
a
unique
design
feature
with
that
with
that
one
section
of
row
house
and
does
not
create
an
adverse
impact
to
the
area
infrastructure.
D
P
D
D
As
a
restaurant,
okay
and
so
the
decision
to
go
with
23
townhomes
I'm,
you
know
when
you
go
from
one
type
of
use
on
a
master
plan
to
something
really
completely
different,
based
on
the
fact
that
the
restaurant
was
probably
going
to
serve
the
larger
project
for
the
most
part
and
the
rest
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
and
especially
since
this
particular
neighborhood
is
getting
a
lot
more
people.
Moving
in.
Why?
Why
the
change
now
into
a
into
townhomes
as
opposed
to
what
was
there
previously?
You.
P
D
You
all
were
doing
this
plan.
Was
there
any
thought
into
reducing
the
number
of
townhome
units
to
allow
for
some
of
the
green
space
and
some
of
the
other
mitigations
that
you
have
to
provide
anyway
because
of
the
the
green
spaces,
the
the
trees
I
mean
frankly
based
on
the
the
aerial
of
the
previous
PD
and
what
had
built
out?
There's
not
a
lot
of
green
space
at
all.
In
that
entire
project.
P
P
So
we
did
meet
the
green
space
requirement
for
the
general
green
space.
Is
the
vehicular
use
requirement
we're
a
little
shy
on,
but
it's
just
you
know
sure
the
client,
my
clients,
trying
to
you
know,
do
the
best
you
can
and
again
we
feel
we're
in
keeping
with
that
the
green
space
in
the
character
of
the
area.
Okay,
thank
you.
Q
K
The
same
lines
you
have
received
almost
a
four-star
general
3,
3
departments
that
you
were
inconsistent,
you're
asking
for
seven
waivers
and
I
understand
the
shortages.
You
say:
I'm
350
square
foot
of
an
acre,
then
you
say:
I'm
four
feet
short
of
a
24
foot
driver
file
which
this
room
is
about.
I'd,
say
26,
27
foot
at
the
widest,
not
between
the
columns
and
so
I'm
trying
to
guess.
And
then
you
said
well,
you
got
the
sidewalk
and
the
entryway
and
how
does
a
code
require
that
to
be
countered
or
just
a
street
itself?.
K
I'm
not
against
projects,
but
then
you
want
a
hundred
percent
tree
removal.
That's
correct
and
please
you're
gonna
interrupt
me
at
any
time
because
I'm
not
perfect
when
I
say
these
things,
sometimes
I
error,
and
so
it's
just
to
me,
as
mr.
Schwarz
were
saying,
I
understand
the
development
I
understand
what's
happening
there.
You
know
for
a
long
time
that
had
been
forgotten
and
then
it
was
recognized
15
20
years
ago.
His
continued
be
recognized
and
I'm
appreciative
of
that,
but
the
24
to
an
acre.
It
depends
what
the
acre
looks
like.
K
K
P
Question,
sir,
you
know
in
regards
speaking
of
sidewalk
and
in
the
drive
aisle
width
there's
no
way
we're
having
cars
driving
over
sidewalk
no
way.
What
the
point
was
is
that
you
have
a
garage
like
a
garage
door
and
then
a
three-foot
apron
and
then
the
drive
line
and
then
another
three-foot
apron
and
so
and
so
what
it's
nothing
to
the.
Q
K
Q
K
G
Sir
yeah
I
don't
want
to
beat
a
dead
horse,
but
I
have
a
couple
problems
with
this.
First
of
all,
when
this
PD
was
originally
done,
it
was
done
as
part
of
a
larger
project
and
we
all
balanced
everything
when
we
do
it
so
to
come
back
later
and
carve
out
a
piece
for
a
change
affects
the
decision
making
over
the
whole
so
right
away
that
elevates
this
I
think
to
a
higher
standard
of
scrutiny.
G
G
You
can't
make
it
work
because
you're
asking
for
seven
waivers,
you're
you're
busting
through
all
the
setbacks,
you're
putting
the
building's
closer
together
than
they're
supposed
to
be
and
you're
removing
100%
of
the
trees,
and
so
one
of
the
themes
that
I
see
here
from
the
staff
is
that
they
think
some
of
these
things
could
be
mitigated.
If
the
site
were
designed
differently,
then
I
think
the
final
thing
is,
you
know
the
the
comment
about
the
lack
of
demand
for
the
rest,
Terron
I
think
is
subjective.
G
P
P
R
Hello,
I'm
Tom,
Vento,
4701,
Ingram,
Street,
Port
Tampa,
also
the
president
of
the
Civic
Association
I'm
not
very
prepared
tonight,
I've
been
pretty
ill
lately
and
coming
back,
but
one
of
the
things
is
the
gentleman
said:
there's
no
shopping
or
retail
or
restaurants
in
the
area.
That's
exactly
why
that
PD
was
made
back
in
the
in
the
day
in
2007,
of
course,
the
market
conditions
after
2007,
that
was
the
we're
in
the
bubble,
burst
2008.
R
We
can't
drive
through
you
recapture
a
lot
of
the
traffic
by
not
having
people
having
to
drive
to
Gandy
to
go
to
use
a
restaurant
or
retail
whatever,
but
mainly
it
was
restaurant
as
what
it
was
for.
In
fact,
there
was
something
about
it
was
going
to
be
a
sit-down
restaurant.
It
would
I,
don't
even
know
if
that's
written
in
the
plan
or
not,
if
that
ever
got
through
there
in
2011
they
actually
crowded
the
apartments
towards
the
road.
I
wasn't
involved
at
the
time
closer
to
the
road
setbacks.
Some
I
guess
waivers.
R
You
would
say
so.
That's
the
history
of
it.
The
history
was
we
work
with
the
owner
to
try
to
get
some
land.
That
was
going
to
be
that
somebody
was
going
to
eventually
develop
as
a
restaurant
to
serve
the
neighborhood.
We
in
our
part
of
the
that
corner
of
the
city
we
we
have
to
drive
north
through
dense,
more
dense
or
more
dense
areas
to
get
to
get.
R
N
Good
evening
Kelly
denna
with
Port
Tampa
and
to
echo
kind
of
what
Tom
said
there
is
no
retail
restaurants
there
right
now,
but
there's
definitely
a
need
for
one,
and
this
was
decided
back
then
and
as
councilman
Cohen
said
since
then
there
has
been
more
development
and
it
continues
to
grow.
We
do
have
townhomes
and
additional
townhomes
were
recently
built
with
the
marina
district
which
is
getting
completed.
There
are
also
apartment
buildings
across
the
street,
from
the
marina
district
that
are
getting
completed.
N
There
is
land
just
southwest
of
this
vacant
lot
and
it's
zoned
and
approved
for
444,
more
apartment
units
and
Lennar
is
building
single-family
homes
just
south
of
this
172
of
them.
So
we're
going
to
continue
to
grow
and
add
more
people
that
could
service
this
restaurant
if
it
stays
zoned
that
way
so,
I
just
respectfully
asked
for
you
to
consider
keeping
it
zoned,
as
it
was
decided
back
when
it
was
made.
P
Thank
you
know
having
having
heard
public
input
and
the
council
I
would
ask
the
council
consider
a
motion.
Continue
this
and
working
through
some
of
the
comments.
Not
only
that
we've
heard,
but
through
staff
analysis,
you're,
gonna,
move
for
a
continuance
to
help
us
get
this
site
more
to
compliance
and
reduce
the
waivers
and.
D
You
know
mr.
maser,
if
you
know,
based
on
some
of
the
comments
that
myself
and
my
colleagues
have
made
and
what
the
neighborhood
has
said.
You
may
want
to
go
back
to
your
client
and
work
with
them.
I
would
suggest
meeting
with
them
to
talk
about
some
of
the
issues
and
how
this
can
be
come
a
more.
You
know,
successful
project
for
you,
so
I
will
make
that
motion
to
continue
if
you're
done
masseur
with
anywhere
okay.
K
H
Miss
MEA
go
I
wanted
to
speak
about
the
continuance.
I
am
recommending
that
we
continue
to
February
28th,
which
is
an
alcohol
night.
That
would
give
stop
enough
time.
That
would
give
the
applicant
enough
time
to
fully
reconsider
a
site
plan,
get
it
together,
give
it
to
staff
and
give
step
adequate
time
and
code
required
time
to
do
a
thorough
review
of
it.
I
feel
like
February.
14Th
would
not
be
enough
time
grease.
H
N
G
B
I
Jennifer
Malone
user
clinic
missing
staff.
This
is
located
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
for
a
hundred
feet
to
the
east
of
the
transit,
stop
serving
part
Route,
one
which
runs
along
North,
Florida
Avenue,
it's
an
evacuation
zone,
II
River,
crest
Park,
is
about
3100
feets
in
the
northwest,
and
that
proposes
public
recreational
facility.
I'm
gonna
show
an
aerial.
I
This
is
North
Florida,
Avenue,
West,
Ginny's,
Street,
here's
the
subject
site
and
North
Highland
Avenue,
it's
in
the
Seminole
Heights
urban
village.
This
is
the
blind
tiger
cafe
actually
on
this
parcel
right
here.
We
also
have
some
car
lots
along
this
portion
of
North
Florida
Avenue
and
then
the
single-family,
the
adopted
future
land
use
is
residential.
I
This
rezoning
will
allow
for
the
and
I'm
variable
go
further
into
detail
about
this,
but
staff
reviewed
this
rezoning
and
we
did
find
that
it
would
allow
for
the
adaptive
reuse
of
this
existing
structure
for
this
for
residential
purpose,
which
is
supported
by
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
I'm
gonna
cite
land
use
policy.
Nine
point
two
point:
five
and
five
point
one
point:
seven:
this
will
recognize
that
unique
development
pattern
in
the
Seminole
Heights
urban
village
and
it
is
compatible
with
the
long-range
pattern
that
the
comprehensive
plan
has
identified
for
this
area.
I
We
did
find
that
this
would
be
the
the
Comprehensive
Plan
supports
adaptive,
reuse
of
these
structures.
The
is
gonna,
be
comparable
compatible
and
especially
with
those
two
policies
that
I
cited,
which
are
also
in
our
report.
It
follows
about
that
policy
guidance
and
then
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
long-term
vision
of
these
urban
villages,
especially
that
adaptive
reuse
for
residential
development,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
H
Mary
cemani
I
go
for
the
record,
we're
in
Seminole
Heights
now,
and
the
special
semi
hide
zoning
district.
This
specific
site,
which
is
in
green,
is
in
the
Seminole
Heights
residential,
which
is
the
single-family
zoning
district.
For
some
of
the
heights,
the
existing
building
on
site
was
just
site
which
is
transition
in
the
pictures.
Here's
the
existing
building
on
site
it
was
constructed
in
1924,
and
the
last
use
of
the
property
was
an
appliance
repair
shop
there.
H
The
applicants
are
executing
the
adopter,
be
used
policy
to
retain
the
existing
structure,
but
to
use
it
for
residential
purposes.
They're
asking
for
eight
total
I
believe
eight
total
dwelling
units
or
multifamily.
This
is
the
side
lot
of
the
subject
property
where
the
parking
lot
I'll
go
and
I'll
show
you
in
a
second
surrounding
their
property
of
single-family
houses.
This
is
directly
to
the
east
that
planned
development
for
a
lot
split
further
to
the
east
across
the
street.
H
H
H
Multi-Family
8
dwelling
units
in
that
building
they
are
providing
parking,
5,
/
Q
spaces
along
the
west
property
line,
part
of
the
Seminole
Heights
parking
code,
you're
allowed
to
count
a
number
of
motorcycle
parkings
as
an
equivalent
to
one
car
personal
space,
as
well
as
there's
a
trade
off
for
a
series
of
bicycle
parking
spaces.
They
can
also
count
for
a
car
parking
space.
So
for
this
development
based
on
the
Seminole
Heights
code,
there's
eight
parking
spaces
required.
H
H
The
next
few
waivers
have
to
do
with
Sona
Heights
specific
code.
The
code
says
the
is
a
bill
to
line
four
of
forty
feet
based
on
the
development
pattern.
The
averaging
on
the
Lots,
the
house
to
the
east
is
set
relatively
far
back.
This
house
is
set
relatively
close
to
the
West.
You
have
to
take
an
average
to
those
two
seviche
this
bill
to
line.
However,
we
are
doing
with
an
existing
building,
so
it
does
not
meet
the
40-foot
bill.
H
Similarly,
the
code
says
that
parking
has
to
be
behind
the
bill
to
line
in
order
to
get
as
much
vehicular
parking
on
site
as
possible.
They're
asking
for
a
waiver
to
have
a
portion
of
this
parking
space
forward,
the
building
line
and
then
the
last
waiver
that
they
are
requesting,
which
is
the
4th
27
1113
e
to
the
Western
property
line,
because
this
development
is
up
against
the
parking
is
up
against
a
single-family.
H
A
Good
evening,
I
assume
our
P
p.m.
consulting
group
I'm
in
here
on
behalf
of
petitioners,
for
the
owners
Niki
and
Steven
kotor.
They
are
a
long-term
residents
of
Seminole
Heights
and
some
of
the
major
pioneers
in
the
development
of
a
lot
of
the
adaptive
reuse
of
a
lot
of
buildings.
Some
of
the
property
we're
talking
about
today,
as
shown
just
by
staff,
is
this
site
right
here
and
it's
it's
a
long
floor.
A
This
is
the
back
of
the
buildings
along
Florida
Avenue,
the
building
under
the
adaptive
reuse,
these
of
historic
structures
we're
not
allowed
to
expand
the
building
or
change
it,
so
the
building
is
where
the
building
is,
and
it's
not
going
to
get
any
smaller
or
any
larger
when
it
gets
redone.
So
that
is
really
what
is
triggered.
A
A
lot
of
a
need
for
the
waivers
and
very
discussed
is
trying
to
bring
a
very
old
constructivist,
both
very
the
site
that
was
constructed
a
long
time
ago
into
compliance
with
today's
regulations,
and
obviously
they
were
very,
very
different
70
years
ago
than
they
are
today.
So
we're
doing
the
best
we
can
to
bring
this
into
compliance.
The
building
was
built,
Court
has
historically
always
used
as
an
industrial
building.
A
A
They
have
cleaned
the
site
up
well
there,
since
after
purchasing
it-
and
they
have-
we
don't
know
whose
car
that
is
by
the
way
it
was
just
on
the
property.
When
we
going
over
to
take
pictures
but
they've
taken
all
the
trash
off
the
site.
There
was
a
lot
of
debris
back
here
that
they've
cleaned
out
and
cleaned
the
building
up
to
the
you
know
as
a
holding
facility
holding
for
the
time
being.
This
is
posed
rendering
of
what
it
should
look
like
everything
at
the
end.
A
Once
again,
we
can't
change
the
building
in
terms
of
adding
on
to
it
or
anything
can
only
renovate
it,
but
this
would
be
the
parking
and
some
green
space
in
front
of
it.
We
think
it'd
be
a
great
improvement
to
the
situation.
That's
out
there
now
it
would
be
furthering
the
provisions
of
the
Seminole
Heights
vision
plan
that
was
adopted
in
the
Comprehensive
Plan
B,
furthering
your
ability
to
provide
more
affordable
housing
in
Seminole
Heights
and
fill
housing.
A
This
would
be
structured
to
target
more
young
professionals,
teachers,
people
of
that
and
that
income
bracket,
who
would
might
need
can't
afford
to
buy
their
own
home
yet,
but
there's
a
real
shortage
of
moderately
priced
I'm,
affordable
I,
don't
mean
section
8
housing,
I'm
talking
about
moderately
priced
private
sector
housing.
So
it's
an
opportunity
to
do
this.
The
Couture's
have
done
several
of
these
I
have
going
to
hand
you
in
a
series
of
some
handouts.
One
is
just
I'll
go
through
them
with
you.
A
Now
one
is
the
face
book
statement
of
support
from
the
7-zip
Association
and
I'm,
not
sure,
if
anyone's
here,
to
speak
in
support
or
opposition
tonight,
but
this
was
posted
pictures
of
before
and
after
the
building,
a
brief
biography
of
the
Co
tours
pointing
out
the
things
they've
done
in
Seminole
Heights.
They
are
long,
lifelong
residents
of
Tampa
and
been
in
Seminole
Heights,
almost
20
years
and
also
I've,
provided
you
a
some
pictures
of
the
other
apartments
that
they
have
rehabbed
in
the
in
the
area
that
are
all
that
same
size,
scale.
A
L
B
J
J
There
are
required
eight
spaces
only
there
will
only
be
able
to
provide
four
plus
a
handicapped
space,
meaning
that
four
to
16
cars
will
have
to
occupy
the
street
at
any.
Given
time.
Increasing
cars
causes
two
major
issues:
more
traffic
on
what
is
now
a
quiet
street
accidents
and
injury
to
children.
We
have
three
of
our
own,
who
may
be
hiding
or
crossing
the
street.
Additionally,
this
street
has
no
sidewalks,
so
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
guys
noticed
that
in
the
rendering.
J
J
And
lastly,
this
is
a
non-conforming
use,
because
the
lot
size
is
too
small
for
eight
units
effectively
putting
the
responsibility
of
the
homeowners
that
live
on
that
block
for
dealing
with
the
car
situation.
That
will
become
a
problem
when
we
have
8
residents,
possibly
16
residents
with
cars.
I
respect
I
respectfully
request
that
the
zoning
be
denied.
R
Good
evening
my
name
is
Duke.
Mansell
I
live
at
109,
West
Genesee,
as
you
mentioned,
per
the
city
code
at
111,
West
Tennessee.
The
street
is
inconsistent
with
the
city
code
for
the
parking
requirements.
This
is
a
small
quiet,
Street
of
families.
A
new
building
is
to
be
an
eight
tenant
unit.
Already
there
are
not
enough
spaces
for
the
tenants
that
will
be
living
there,
which
means
they
will
be
parking
on
the
street
and
on
our
neighbor's
property.
R
Additionally,
there
is
a
waiver
request
to
reduce
the
number
of
spaces
to
five,
as
you
heard
already
way
too
limited
for
the
number
of
tenants
that
will
be
living
here
and
assume
that
at
least
half
of
the
tenants
would
just
decide
to
ride
both
bikes
and
motorcycles
everywhere
they
travel.
Additionally,
it
is
highly
unlikely
that
every
unit
will
have
a
sole
resident.
R
It
is
very
likely
that
girlfriend's,
boyfriend's
spouses,
family
friends,
will
be
living
in
these
units
that
balloons
a
number
of
new
cars
in
the
street
to
16-plus
effectively
doubling
the
number
of
cars
and
traffic
on
the
street.
This
will
absolutely
require
the
new
tenants
to
park
on
the
yards
and
on
the
streets
of
the
neighbors.
These
changes
will
effectively
make
this
one-way
street,
as
no
two
cars
will
be
able
to
pass.
At
the
same
time,
this
was
slow
traffic.
Invite
the
neighborhood
got
worse
and
make
the
street
more
dangerous.
Studies
on
traffic
engineering
are
abundant.
R
Dentist
the
limited
parking
the
property
has
who
will
be
blamed
when
Shaun
has
hit
their
neighborhood.
This
is
a
serious
question
that
needs
to
be
asked,
and
this
will
be
irreversible
once
the
decision
is
made
by
City
Council
that
their
own
codes
already
find
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
needs
of
the
tenants
and
the
people
living
there.
This
I
have
here
is
an
image,
and
this
was
taken.
R
R
You
don't
mind
sorry,
this
is
the
same
road
on
New
Year's,
Eve
directly
in
front
of
that
building.
So
if
you
count
the
five
or-
and
you
know
for
they
have
with
the
handicapped-
that's
five,
six,
seven,
eight
nine
ten
eleven,
so
you'd
have
to
do
12,
13,
14
15
even
get
close,
so
this
would
be
a
more
correct
image
of
what
the
rendering
showed
we
know.
Cars
parked
on
the
street
and
effectively
making
every
night
on
our
street
New
Year's
Eve.
Thank
you.
I.
C
Jordan
Miller
4406
North
Suwannee
Avenue
I'm,
here
to
request
that
council
support
this
project,
grant
waivers
and
allow
the
rezoning
the
property
owner
much
like
myself
are
longtime
residents
of
Seminole
Heights
and
have
many
projects
to
put
that
point
to
their
ability
to
take
adaptive,
reuse
projects
that
historically
lack
adequate
parking
and
make
them
using
it.
I
I
see
this.
C
What
the
petitioner
and
the
African
are
looking
to
do
is
solving
far
more
problems
and
it's
creating
that
property
having
been
a
resident,
assimil
Heights
since
2001
I
Drive
by
that
property
every
day,
sometimes
many
times
a
day
and
commercial
vehicles
coming
on
and
off
that
property.
If,
if
the
property
were
left
to
to
function,
the
way
that
it
has
historically
far
more
dangerous
to
the
neighborhood
I
live
one
block
on
the
other
side
of
Florida
Avenue
from
that
property,
I
drive
through
there
every
day,
I
ride
my
bike
down
that
street
to
the
park.
C
With
my
son
many
times
a
week,
I
just
see
this
moving
much
closer
to
a
direction
that
is
better
for
the
neighborhood
is
better
for
the
block
park
street
parking.
It's
it's
a
constant
battle
in
Seminole,
Heights
I
have
random
strangers
a
park
in
front
of
my
house.
Legally,
that's
that's
just
a
reality.
It's
been
a
reality
since
I've
lived
here,
it
was
a
reality
long
before
I
lived
here.
I,
don't
think
this
project
is
going
to
be
inducing
that
problem
I.
C
Think
if
anything,
these
property
owners
have
a
tendency
to
try
and
do
alternative
ways.
Tenants
could
commute
Katrien,
you
know
get
to
and
from
work,
there's
a
number
of
new
businesses
and
popping
up
at
simul
heights.
In
the
last
couple
years,
where
you
have
a
number
of
employees
that
are
not
that
don't
drive
cars,
they
ride
bikes,
they
walk,
they
take
the
bus.
This
is
a
to
me.
C
N
We
have
no
multi-unit
family
properties
on
my
street
and
parking
is
an
issue
and
that's
with
everybody
having
their
own
driveway
just
because
a
family
guess
that's
for
things.
We
can't
pass
two
cars.
At
the
same
time,
the
neighbor's
car
has
been
backed
into
there's
constantly
arguments
over
parking,
so
I
respectfully
request
that
you
can
either
request.
A
You
I'm
just
a
few
brief
comments,
certainly,
as
one
of
the
speakers
pointed
out
commercial
vehicles
that
are
on
the
site
when
we,
when
they
purchased
it,
and
that
would
remain
on
this
side
if
it
remains
in
an
industrial
use,
would
be
far
more
dangerous
and
congested
for
the
neighborhood
than
single-family
then
having
cars
from
having
one
parking
space
short
of
what's
required.
Once
again,
this
site
is
just
a
Florida
Avenue,
it's
right
along
a
major
bus
route
that
goes
downtown
and
it
also
goes
to
USF.
A
We
have
bicycle
and
motorcycle
parking
in
addition
to
the
parking
spaces.
I
have
some
pictures
of
some
of
the
streets
around
here,
and
you
can
see
that
people
you
know
parking
is
and
I
checked
with
the
city
and
parking
on
this.
This
is
not.
This
is
Street
over,
but
it
has.
It
shows
that
there's
parking
on
the
street
and
it's
not
causing
a
problem
we
had
he
is
parked
on
street
parking
on
Genesee
is
perfectly
legal.
A
If
we
were,
if
we
had
eight
spaces
and
we
had
company,
we
could
still
talk
on
Genesee
Street
legally,
and
it
wouldn't
be
an
issue.
I
mean
it's
just:
what's
allowed
anybody
can
park
on
it?
There
are
also
similar
several
similar
projects
throughout
in
Seminole
Heights
and
High
Park,
whether
it's
been
retrofitting
small
non-conforming
uses
into
small
apartments
next
to
single-family
residential
and
it
doesn't
have
to
seem
to
have
been
problematic.
I,
don't
know
where
the
cars
came
from
that
musi
photo
because
it
wasn't
the
co
tours
and
they're
having
a
party.
A
It
was
like
the
building
was
unoccupied,
so
I,
don't
know
where
they
must,
since
people
in
the
neighborhood
going
to
other
parties
parking
in
there.
That
would
also
be
eliminated
if
there
was
an
apartment
building
there
and
we
had
a
parking
lot
and
everything
done
the
way
it's
supposed
to.
Instead,
this
free
range
parking
situation
will
of
it
alone.
A
So
once
again,
we
respectfully
request
that
you
take
into
consideration
the
fact
that
we
are
reusing
an
industrial
building
and
turning
into
a
small
multi-family
building
right
off,
Florida
Avenue,
two
decks
three
doors
down
and
I
think
the
far
better
use
of
the
property
and
it's
much
more.
Keeping
the
provisional
Seminole
Heights
is
and
has
been
adopted
by
the
community,
and
that
is
one
answer
for
the
question
to
have.
B
G
G
H
Marry
Samaniego
the
built
into
the
Seminole
Heights
code,
which
I
believe
was
adopted.
Maybe
2010-2011
was
the
allowance
for
what
they
call
parking
offsets
and
that
was
built
into
the
code
to
allow
for
alternatives
to
use
standard
vehicular
parking
for
it,
some
on
Ohio's.
So
this
is
the
only
part
of
the
city
where
you
can
do
this
so
instead
of
having
a
standard
vehicle
of
parking
spaces,
if
you
provide
I
think
it's
like
six
biking
bike
parking
slots,
that's
the
equivalent
to
one
vehicular
parking
spot,
a
bicycles
pad
parking
can
count
as
one
vehicular
spot.
H
So
the
Seminole
Heights
code,
built
into
the
language,
is
the
allowed
to
trade
off
for
standard
parking.
Spaces
for
alternative
transportation
means
parking.
So
that's
not
a
waiver
or
anything
that
you
have
to
ask
special
approval
for
that's
just
alternative
parking
styles
for
alternative
transportations.
For
this.
H
D
D
A
The
reason
we
did,
that
is
to
keep
the
price
of
the
rent
affordable
if
there's
less
for
units
and
all
that
you
have
to
charge
per
unit
and
then
it's
taking
them
out
of
the
market
they're
trying
to
look
they're
trying
to
ensure
it's
really
just
done.
It's
an
economic
issue
at
that
point,
so
they're
trying
to
make
them
affordable
and
large
enough
to
be
comfortable
to
live
in
one
bedroom
only.
A
I
was
there
I
went
by
and
looked
at
all
the
streets
around.
It
enacted
parking
situation.
You
know
it
wasn't
like
six
o'clock
at
night
where
everybody
was
home.
It
was
baffling
what
thirty
five
o'clock
in
the
afternoon-
and
there
was
nobody
parked
on
this
street
at
all.
At
the
time,
I
mean
they.
Maybe
after
7
o'clock
at
night
they
may
be
Karthik.
There
was
nobody
there
at
all
on
the
street
yeah.
D
N
At
least
you
know
decent
parking,
a
parking
lot
and
sprucing
up
the
property,
which
I
think
would
enhance
the
neighborhood
edges
a
you
know
to
me.
It
doesn't
make
sense
to
deny
this
project.
I
mean
it's
a
tremendous
difference
from
what
it
was.
It's
essentially
a
historical
building,
it's
very
unique
architecture.
I
would
say
it's
not
your
typical
residential,
but
you
know
I,
think
it's
I
think
it's
great.
It
would
be
a
plus.
B
I
I
It's
on
a
zeal.
I
know
you
can't
see
the
street
name,
but
this
is
Westland
Avenue
right
here
and
then
I
have
stop
Howard
Avenue.
So
this
portion
of
South
Howard
has
a
variety
of
restaurants
and
some
night
entertainment,
and
then
we
have
a
decent
amount
of
the
multi-family
as
we
move
as
you
move
away
from
South
Howard
Avenue,
which
is
open,
then
Platt
streets
in
the
north,
which
is
reflected
owner
future
land
use
map.
I
I
This
was
we
support
this
request
before
you
today.
We
also
support
the
design
of
the
subject
site
and
on
the
plan
development
how
the
pedestrian
entrances
are
oriented,
because
we
do
have
some
a
policy
in
the
comprehensive
thing
that
speaks
to
that
having
that
entrance
facing
that
public
right-of-way.
So
we
the
comprehensive
plan
to
support
them
and,
what's
before
you
today,
and
we
do
find
that
this
went
further.
I
H
Okay,
so
we
are
down
on
a
zeal
on
Westland
here's
the
zoning
map,
as
you
can
see,
the
property
is
in
green
and
is
currently
zoned
residential
office.
As
you
know,
we
we
see
a
project
in
this
area
every
several
months
over
a
significant
amount
of
time.
This
area
has
transitioned
over
to
higher
density
per
the
Comprehensive
Plan
designation
on
policy
direction.
H
This,
let
me
show
you
where
I'm
going
here
so
I'm
gonna
do
I'm,
just
gonna
kind
of
look
at
all
of
these
structures
in
this
node.
So
here's
the
subject:
property
from
azile.
Here's
the
subject-
property
from
Westland
directly
to
the
south
of
the
subject.
Property
on
Westland
is
a
single-family
house.
I
believe
across
Westland
is
a
townhome
development.
That's
within
a
PD
across
a
co
is
another
multi-unit,
develop
residential
developments.
There's
a
single-family
house
gear
on
the
corner
of
azile
and
Albany
and
then
directly
to
the
east
of
the
circular.
H
H
To
will
have
the
hip
feeler
access
to
a
Zeile,
one
will
be
on
off
of
Westland
and
then
the
fourth
unit
will
come
off
of
the
alley.
They
are
meeting
all
applicable
codes
requirements,
except
for
one.
They
need
a
waiver
to
section
13,
165
D,
to
allow
payment
and
Louvre
to
the
city
tree
trust
fund
for
trees,
not
mitigated
on
site.
They
were
trying
to
have
11
replacement
trees,
there's
not
adequate
space
to
plant
all
of
their
replacement
trees
on
site,
so
they'll
have
to
pay
some
into
the
tree
trust
fund.
H
H
There
are
some
changes
between
1st
and
2nd
reading
from
land
development
coordination.
Only.
There
were
no
further
comments
from
any
of
the
other
departments
and
overall,
the
de
Beaune
view
and
compliance
staff
found
this
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
Code
of
Ordinances.
Should
it
be
the
pleasure
of
counsels
to
grant
the
waiver,
please
ensure
that
you
include
the
revision
chute
in
your
motion,
any
questions
Nicholas.
B
L
Good
evening
Matthew
Campo
Campo
engineering,
1725
East
5th
Avenue.
This
particular
request
is
fairly
straightforward.
It's
you
know
this
particular
lock
configuration
being
on
the
end.
You
got
alleys
on
size
on
all
sides
obviously
allows
for
and
we
have
to
card
two-car
parking
in
every
driveway
and
we've
seen
some
of
the
other
projects
we've
brought
before
you
they're
much
tighter
than
this.
So
this
provides
much
greater
green
space
and
opportunity.
I
really
don't
have
anything
specific
I'll
get
in
to
them
is
gonna
save
for
questions.
I
think
this
is
pretty
straightforward
and
I'm
available.
M
Good
evening
my
name
is
Kendra:
I
live
at
109,
South,
Western,
Avenue
I'm,
the
vice
president
of
the
Soho
neighborhood
association
and
I'm,
a
Pope.
Our
neighborhood
is
opposed
to
this
development.
At
this
corner
of
Westland
and
the
zeal
the
following
photos
will
illustrate
the
develop
developer
weekly
homes
and
it's
a
built-in
ability
to
control
soil,
runoff
and
the
inability
of
the
Tampa
code
enforcement
department
to
handle
the
problem.
M
Now
this
is
located
at
401,
south
Melville.
This
photo
was
taken,
November
3rd
2018
at
like
9:45
in
the
morning
and
here's
another
picture
of
the
same
area
and
notice
all
the
runoff
in
the
street.
It's
the
whole
side
button.
You
can't
even
get
down
that
sidewalk,
and
this
is
what
happens
with
this
development,
and
this
is
going
to
happen
with
this
property,
because
it's
another
property,
that's
elevated
and
when
it's
all
evaded
and
you
take
and
dis
put
the
fabric
that
we
use
for
controlling
soil
erosion.
M
Now
the
code,
the
code
changes
need
to
be
rethought,
I'm,
I'm
pret,
with
that
we
presently
recognize
the
development
of
and
closed
property
within
a
fabric
material
to
control
soil
runoff.
The
present
way
of
containing
saw
runoff
is
like
handing
a
man
of
a
roll
of
saran
wrap
and
telling
the
man
to
use
this
as
a
condom.
M
All
property
facing
a
street
should
have
sand
eggs
to
control
the
soil
runoff.
We
need
to
update
our
code
regulations
for
controlling
runoff
we're
living
in
the
21st
century
and
were
playing
like
we're
back
in
the
fourth
century.
You
can't
even
control
runoff.
You
think
a
piece
of
plastic
is
gonna,
stop
sand
from
running
into
the
street.
M
That's
what
we've
had
for
for
the
four
months
once
they
get
that
first
structure
built
the
concrete
structure,
the
first
level,
then
they
bring
in
the
wood
for
the
second
and
the
third
level,
and
that's
when
that's
when
that
all
that
block
of
fabric
is
tearing
down
and
there's
nothing
put
in
place
of
it
and
we
need
to
have
we
need
what
do
we
we're
filling
our
sewers
with
sand
from
this
developer?
And
this
isn't
this
isn't
what
we
want
in
a
neighborhood.
B
D
D
M
D
Q
M
M
Well,
there's
no
issues
with
this
as
far
they
did
problem
is.
Is
this
is
an
elevated
piece
of
land
and
you're
gonna
have
the
same
problem?
We're
gonna
have
the
same
problem
begun
and
I'm
saying
to
you.
What
are
you
gonna
do
about
it
right?
Are
you
gonna,
do
anything?
Are
you
gonna
change
this
code?
Are
you
gonna,
get
cordon
code
enforcement
to
to
take
and
do
the
job
they've
been
hired
to.
D
B
L
Thank
you.
Obviously,
this
is
a
construction
management
issue.
Yes,
Matthew
Campo
Camp
for
engineering
again,
this
is
the
construction
management
issue
actually
I'm
aware
of
these
photos,
I've
seen
as
I
met
with
them.
This
gentleman
after
a
previous
hearing
and
I
did
take
this
information
back
to
the
developer,
to
make
sure
they're
aware
of
you
know,
responsibilities
with
respect
to
you.
B
K
You,
chairman
foul
number,
are
you
see
a
teen
117
going
on
for
first
reading
consideration:
northern
fries
learning
farmer
and
gentlemen
sending
to
2108
West
Region
City,
Tampa
Florida,
more
particularly
scribed?
In
section
one
from
zoning
districts,
classification,
our
old
residential
offers,
a
PD
plan,
development,
residential
single-family.
B
H
Mary
Samaniego
tonight
the
last
item
on
tonight's
agenda
is
our
easy
1882.
It's
a
rezoning
request
from
Seminole
Heights,
residential
and
Seminole
Heights
commercial,
intensive,
Seminole
Heights,
planned
development
for
multi-family,
residential
and
business
professional
office
for
properties
located
at
9:08,
east
berne,
streets,
63,
0,
7,
north
nebraska
street
and
9:05
north
east
north
street.
I
Jennifer
Maloney
of
your
Planning
Commission
staff-
this
is
an
essential
Tampa
planning
district
is
also
within
the
Seminole
Heights
urban
village.
It's
not
within
an
evacuation
zone.
Mcdowell
apartment,
the
closest
public
recreational
facility,
three-part
routes
serve
the
area
connecting
the
site
to
downtown
Tampa
University
Area,
Transit
Center,
as
well
as
other
destinations.
It
is
located
at
this
is
a
Nebraska
Avenue
I
have
interstate
275
over
here.
I
This
portion
of
Nebraska
Avenue
from
an
aerial
commercial
uses,
a
lot
of
car
dealerships,
there's
one
to
the
south,
and
then
these
single-family
detached
as
we
move
away
from
Nebraska
Avenue.
One
thing
I
do
want
to
point
out
is
that
the
site
has
two
future
land
use
categories,
so
it
does
have
a
future
land
use
category
of
a
community
commercial
35,
a
community
mixed-use
35,
the
entire
site.
I
So,
while
there
might
be
uses
on
here,
I
believe
that
there
was
a
single-family
home
located
right
about
here
that
underlying
future
land
use
was
community,
makes
she's
35,
allowing
for
a
variety
of
uses
with
that
that
carried
with
that
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
designation,
so
they
also
have
some
residential
ten.
Is
that
orange?
We
have
residential
twenty
in
the
area
as
well,
and
then
the
community
commercial
35
is
that
red
which
allows
for
commercial,
intensive
and
commercial
general
uses.
The
proposal
before
you
today
is
for
mixed-use
development.
I
We
did
find
that
it
would
be
consistent,
because
this
is
a
long,
a
mixed-use
corridor.
It's
within
mixed
use,
feature
land
use
categories,
it's
along
a
transit
emphasis
corridor
defined
by
the
comprehensive
plan
which
is
north
to
Brassica
Avenue.
So
the
comprehensive
plan
encourages
a
lot
of
growth
in
these
areas,
as
well
as
within
these
urban
villages,
and
it
is
within
a
Seminole
Heights
urban
villages.
It
also
include
these
developed
of
development
and
retention
of
a
diversity
of
multi-family
housing
types
to
meet
the
needs
of
its
present
and
future
population.
I
H
Here's
the
subject
property
in
agreeing
it's
under
brisk
Avenue
bound
by
the
North
by
East,
no
East
North
Street
and
to
the
south
by
east
berne,
Street.
The
western
half
of
the
property
is
already
in
this
Sona
Heights
commercial
intensive
zoning
districts,
for
which
the
majority
of
the
this
section
of
the
Nebraska
corridor
is
some
nice
commercial
intensive.
The
eastern
portion
is
in
the
seminoles
residential
land
zoning
district,
Rogers
Jennifer
stated
it
is
in
the
commercial
35
land
use
category
which
envisions
higher
intensity
and
a
mix
of
uses.
H
Let's
take
a
tour
of
the
property,
will
kind
of
look
at
the
property
from
all
sides
as
well
as
some
adjoining
pieces
here
is
the
subject
property
for
Nebraska.
It
was
a
car
dealership,
I
think
some
folks
are
doing
some
detailing
on
the
site.
Now
this
is
a
look
down
Nebraska
from
the
septic
property.
You
can
see
kind
of
generally,
where
this
property
line
is
the
existing
sidewalk,
the
recovery
area
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
video
filler
traffic.
H
H
The
Seminole
Heights
residential
portion
of
the
property
that
I
just
showed
you
to
the
east
is
occupied
by
the
single-family
house
on
fern
Street
that
will
be
demolished
with
the
application
tip
approved
and
then
on
the
north
east
north
side
of
the
property.
This
is
the
back
of
the
law
where
it's
currently
vacant
with
some
existing
trees
and
then
here
it's
going
towards
Nebraska
the
subject
property
from
North
Street.
This
is
looking
down:
North
Street
towards
Nebraska
Avenue.
Here's,
the
subject
property.
Here's
an
adjoining
you!
H
So
you
can
kind
of
see
how
wide
the
existing
North
Street
is.
They're
planning
on
proposing
their
driveway
cut
generally
in
this
location
and
the
only
access
they
can
have
to
this
site
is
from
East
North
Street
Florida
Department
of
Transportation
denied
them
access
to
Nebraska
Avenue
here
is
a
property
directly
to
the
north
of
this
application
site.
Interestingly
I
believe
last
year,
this
was
a
rezoning
application
that
you
read.
H
H
Where
this
is
an
intersection
with
fern
and
ninth
Street,
here's
the
subject-
property
and
it
kind
of-
does
occur,
an
s-curve
like
this
and
then
there's
also
a
street
going
down
to
the
south
for
this
kind
of
intersection
and
then
across
the
street
on
Nebraska.
As
you
all
know,
a
myriad
of
office
and
retail
and
vehicle
sales
uses
I'll
go
briefly
into
the
site
plan
and
I'm
sure
the
applicants
will
go
in
more
detail.
H
Okay,
so
this
side
is
approximately
one
point:
nine
seven
acres
as
I
said
it:
it's
an
old
car
dealership
in
a
single-family
house.
They
are
proposing
to
construct
approximately
113
741
square
feet
a
four-story
building
within
that
building.
There
will
be
112
dwelling
units
in
apartment,
style
and
1220
square
feet
of
business
professional
office
for
separate
use.
So
this
is
a
vertically
integrated
use
development,
there's
business
professionals,
space
for
lease
and
then
there'll
be
a
hundred
and
twelve
residential
units.
The
building
is
funded
like
a
you
and
then
there's
surface
parking.
H
There
are
some
parking
and
let
me
correct
mess
up.
Then
there
is
also
majority
of
surface
parking,
but
there
are
also
some
individual
parking
garages
along
the
perimeter
of
the
internal
courtyard
of
the
building.
These
setbacks
are
10
from
the
north.
Ten
from
the
south
east
is
15
feet
and
west
is
10
feet.
The
maximum
height
is
45
feet
which
is
conducive
to
the
Euclidean
zoning
districts
of
C
G
and
C
I.
H
A
total
of
131
parking
spaces
are
required
and
are
be
provided
with
the
foot
note
that
some
of
the
required
parking
again
when
Seminole
Heights
Elvis.
We
reviewed
from
the
previous
case
through
a
combination
of
standard
parking
spaces
and
then
the
10%
allowance
for
bicycle
parking
and
then
B
another
10%
allowance
motorcycle
parking
spaces,
but
per
code.
All
the
parking
requirements
are
met.
H
Because
they
are
in
the
community,
mixed-use
35
land
use
categories
was
the
community
commercial
35
they're
allowed
Florida
area
ratio
of
one
point
of
one
straight
by
right.
They
can
they're
electing
to
go
up
to.
They
could
go
up
gone
up
to
one
point:
five,
because
their
sites
over
0.35
acres,
they're
fronting
on
arterial
road
and
they
have
vertically
integrated
mix
of
uses.
H
There
are
three
waivers
requested
besides
1.9
seven
acres
again,
because
I
don't
a
cur
standard.
Current
farming
is
you're
required
to
maintain
50
percent
of
the
trees
they're
asking
for
a
waiver
to
section
13
45
for
a
to
reduce
the
required
tree
preservation
for
a
non
wooded
lot
from
50
percent
retain
to
13
percent
retained.
H
Similarly,
because
of
the
limited
amount
of
green
space
on
the
property
they're
asking
for
to
allow
for
came
in
into
the
tree,
trust
fund
for
the
mitigation
trees,
again
they're
required
to
plant
trees
as
part
of
the
development
with
surface
parking,
so
there
are
standard
landscaping
they
have
to
put
in
and
then
they
also
have
to
mitigate
all
the
trees
that
they're
removing
mitigate
means,
planting
new
trees,
those
design
up
space
to
plan
all
those
trees.
So
they're
asking
for
that
waiver
to
section
13
165
to
pay
into
the
tree
trust
fund,
the
navigation
trees.
H
The
third
and
final
waiver
is
just
a
technical
waiver.
They're
required
to
have
a
six-foot
got
distance
for
these
parking
spaces.
They
only
have
two
feet
in
this
location
as
well
as
this,
so
that's
a
technical
waiver
request
for
backup
distance
from
six
beats
two
feet
in
this
instances.
Transportation
did
not
have
does
not
have
any
objections
to
that
waiver
request
who
are
growver
all
natural
resources
and
low
land
development
has
found
this
inconsistent
because
of
the
the
tree
preservation
and
the
planting
allowing
mitigation
to
be
paid
into
the
tree.
H
H
If
this
were
to
be
approved,
land
development
has
a
series
of
changes
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading.
Just
miscellaneous
notes
to
be
added
urban
design
did
find
this
consistent,
but
they
do
have
I'm
a
couple
changes
between
first
and
second
reading,
but
overall,
with
the
Seminole
Heights
design
code,
the
urban
design
team
did
find
a
consistent
transportation.
Just
has
one
note
that
needs
to
be
added.
They
found
a
consistent
and
then,
as
I
said
it
Natural
Resources
did
find
it
inconsistent.
H
Yep,
okay,
other
than
that
the
developer,
video
and
compliance
stuff
did
find
it
in
consistent
again
because
of
Natural
Resources
land
development,
with
the
waiver
requested
to
tree
preservation
as
well
as
not
being
able
to
mitigate
all
their
trees
on
site.
If
you
approve
the
application
again,
I
remind
you
to
include
the
revision
sheet
in
motion.
O
Good
evening,
mr.
chairman
members,
the
City,
Council
and
council,
my
name
is
John
grande
off
and
my
address
is
suite
3700,
the
Bank
of
America
Plaza,
and
this
evening
I
have
the
pleasure
of
representing
mill,
house,
development
and
I'm
joined
by
several
professionals
who
have
contributed
to
this
excellent
design
that
we're
going
to
present
to
you
this
evening
and
those
professors
who
Jordan
Woodruff
of
mill
house
and
everyone.
Please
raise
their
hands.
He
can
be
identified
and
Michael
mintzberg.
Our
engineer
is
dr.
Greg
Roth.
Our
architects
is
mr.
O
O
O
O
Few
things
want
to
point
out
is
the
retention
will
be
vaulted
on
the
project
and
also
the
green
space
vehicular
youth
green
space,
which
is
another
term
for
green
space,
for
the
parking
will
be
six
thousand
nine
hundred
and
eighty-five
square
feet,
which
is
20
percent
of
the
site,
is
required.
6900
we're
providing
seven
thousand
ninety
square
feet
of
green
space
at
twenty-one
percent
of
the
site,
as
required
by
the
code.
O
We're
exceeding
code
at
that
point
we're
complying
with
parking
so
to
be
compliant
with
parking
and
exceeding
green
space
is
quite
an
engineering
feat
and
also
I'll
mention
to
you
that
we're
saving
the
great
grand
trees
on
the
project,
which
Greg
will
point
out
when
he
does
his
brief
presentation,
we're
paying
the
transportation
mitigation
fee,
and
these
waivers
are
minor,
considering
the
site
constrictions
and
what
we'd
laid
out
on
the
project
Greg.
If
you
come
forward,
please
and
point
out
a
few
points
on
the
project.
We
have
the
handheld.
C
N
For
the
record,
Gregory
Roth
with
polar
engineering
addresses
three
eight
two
zero
north
Dale,
Boulevard
and
I
have
been
sworn
in.
The
civil
engineer
on
the
project
Mary
already
did
a
phenomenal
job
and
mr.
Randolph
summed
it
up.
So
they
pretty
much
got
my
job
for
me,
but
kind
of
do
a
walk-around
of
the
site
to
highlight
some
of
the
design
constraints
that
we
had
number
one
was
building
placement
within
the
Seminole
Heights
district.
We
are
required
to
build
up
to
the
roadway.
N
This
property
has
three
right
aways
on
three
of
the
sides
of
their
adjacent
to
so
we
have
a
10-foot
bill
to
zone
that
a
minimum
percentage
that
the
building
has
to
abide
by
to
build
up
to
that.
So
that
requires
that
the
building
is
gonna,
be
all
the
way
to
the
west
against
Nebraska
Avenue.
As
Mary
has
mentioned,
we
actually
after
meeting
with
FDOT
and
City
Tampa
Transportation
Department,
found
that
the
access
to
north
street
was
going
to
be
our
primary
access
point.
The
only
access
point
that
this
site
would
receive.
N
N
But
after
meeting
on
site
with
the
National
Resources
Department
on
two
separate
occasions,
as
well
as
significant
amount
of
coordination
with
landscape,
architect,
consultants,
an
arborist
consultant,
we
have
found
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
save
that
and
work
around
that
tree
and
be
able
to
preserve
it.
One
of
the
other
items
that
makes
it
a
little
bit
challenging
for
access
as
well
as
to
save
the
tree
is
the
fact
that
we
have
approximately
six
feet
of
fall
across
the
site
from
the
east
to
the
west
of
Nebraska.
N
So
it
makes
it
challenging
to
preserve
trees
along
the
east
from
property
line,
while
we're
trying
to
tie
back
to
existing
grade,
which
is
why
we
weren't
able
to
typically
in
that
eight-foot
landscape
buffer.
We
have
an
opportunity
to
preserve
more
trees
in
order
to
get
a
higher
percentage.
Unfortunately,
due
to
that
grade
back,
we
are
not
provided
that
opportunity
of
note
within
that
eight-foot
landscape
buffer
as
well
there's
a
six-foot
wall
which
the
code
and
provides
that
then
hands
buffer
from
the
residential
to
the
east.
N
As
noted,
we
are
meeting
the
parking
code
and
vo
a
green
space
and
we
do
have
a
loading
zone
which
will
provide
access
and
loading
unloading
for
move-ins
as
well
as
deliveries.
That's
in
the
nutshell,
we're
here
for
any
questions
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Jay
Silverman
from
dwell
architecture
to
talk
about
the
pretty
part
of
the
site.
The
building.
S
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Greg
good
evening,
J
Silverman
12
design,
studio,
36:55,
Brookside,
Parkway,
Atlanta,
three,
zero,
zero,
two
two!
Well
what
we
did
I'll
just
briefly
design
describe
our
design
approach.
We
we
oriented
the
development
towards
the
surrounding
streets,
it's
a
four
stories:
mixed-use
development
and
the
and
the
development
is
designed
so
that
so
that
the
mass
of
the
development
is
facing
the
busy
street
and
and
the
development
tapers
off
towards
the
residential
neighborhood.
S
The
design
of
the
building
is
to
reflect
the
emergent
nature
of
Nebraska.
It's
got
a
contemporary
expression
that
responds
to
to
the
commercial
nature
nature
of
Nebraska,
but
we
actually
took
traditional
materials
like
siding
and
masonry
and
and
wood
and
use
them
in
and
innovative
way
to
give
the
building
a
contemporary
expression
rather
than
trying
to
to
mimic
the
traditional
architecture
of
that
of
the
historic
neighborhood
behind
the
site.
So
that's
that's
our
general
direction.
S
We,
the
mix
of
residential
units,
is
primarily
one-bedroom
and
studio
apartments,
it's
about
70,
75
percent
studios
and
one
bedrooms,
and
and
so
that
that
aides
with
any
concerns
about
the
parking
and
and
as
you
as
you
heard,
the
parking
meets
the
zoning
requirements
and,
like
I,
said
what
we
try
to
do.
As
far
as
color
palette,
we
were
looking
at
cleaning
contemporary,
but
a
warm
palette
introducing,
like
I,
said
soft
materials
like
the
wood
to
make
the
building
design
friendly.
F
Hi
good
evening,
Jordan
Woodruff
with
Milhouse
and
the
developer
of
the
project,
I
just
wanted
to
finish
this
up
really
quickly.
By
saying
that
we're
really
excited
to
invest
in
Nebraska
Avenue,
we
have
a
project
on
Florida
Avenue
about
a
half
a
mile
away
height,
which
actually
just
opened
a
few
weeks
ago,
and
it's
going
really
well
we're
excited
to
bring
some
activity
and
investment
to
Nebraska
Avenue,
especially
to
an
underutilized
site.
F
Over
the
past
two
months,
I've
been
working
with
neighborhood
residents
and
talking
with
them,
we
had
a
neighborhood
meeting
on
December
12th
and
we're
excited
to
be
have
our
second
project
in
Seminole
Heights.
The
the
final
thing
that
I
just
wanted
to
mention
was
that
the
plan
is
to
start
construction
this
summer,
and
then
it
would
be
about
a
15
month,
construction
period.
So
thank
you.
O
O
The
couple
things
I
want
to
mention
in
the
Planning
Commission
report,
which
I
think
is
instructive,
particularly
when
you
have
a
redevelopment
like
Seminole
Heights.
If
you
go
into
the
report,
it
says
that
this
community
commercial
35
is
appropriate
for
intensive
medium,
medium
density,
horizontal
and
vertical
mixed-use.
That's
exactly
what
we're
doing.
They
include
retail
general
commercial
service
office
and
residential
uses
on
page
3
of
Ms
Malone's
report.
O
They
talked
about
mixed
use
corridors
and
that
is
that
is
Nebraska
Avenue
and
to
give
you
some
historical
perspective
of
Nebraska
v
I
think
it's
important
to
realize
that
at
one
time,
Nebraska
Avenue
was
a
main
thoroughfare
into
Tampa.
Along
with
Florida
Avenue
interstate
75
was
built
and
Nebraska
Avenue
was
vanquished.
It
went
into
urban
blight.
It
is
what
have
you've
seen
on
Nebraska
Avenue
for
many
years
from
downtown,
virtually
to
Fowler,
Avenue
and
beyond.
That
was
caused
by
the
interstate
75.
O
O
There's
closeness
to
the
urban
core,
where
there's
good
uses
good
restaurants,
transportation
facilities,
heartline
serve
Nebraska
Avenue,
it's
a
40
for
our
thoroughfare,
regulated
by
Florida
d-o-t,
so
I
submit
to
you
that
they've
come
full
circle.
This
neighbor
has
come
full
circle,
Milhouse
specializes
in
urban
infill.
This
is
what
they
do.
They
did
the
project
called
height,
h,
ite,
which
Jordan
mentioned
to
you
on
the
corner
of
Florida
Avenue
in
Idlewild.
That's
come
out
of
the
ground
and
it's
it's
leasing
up.
So
this
is
this
is
the
scenario.
This
is
the
historic
perspective.
O
O
The
finding
continues-
and
it
says
on
nine
point,
six
point:
four:
we're
to
balance
the
objective:
to
increase
opportunities
for
new
housing
development,
to
ensure
adequate
housing
for
Tampa's
residents
in
the
equally
important
goal
of
ensuring
that
the
development
is
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
character.
We
have
done
that
in
this
design.
We've
done
that
in
this
site
plan
that
was
prepared
by
bowler
and
by
twelve,
then
the
staff
analysis.
O
The
applicant
plans
to
develop
114
multifamily
units
on
the
parcel
furthering
one
of
the
plans,
multi
development,
multifamily
development
policies-
that
is
the
objective.
That
is
the
vision
as
a
vision
of
Seminole
Heights.
Jordans
company
is
following
that
vision
from
bringing
this
project
to
you
this
evening.
With
respect
to
request
your
approval.
G
G
About
this
project,
and
one
of
the
themes
is
from
people
who
say
they
are
supporting
they're
in
support
of
the
project
generally,
but
they
object
to
it
being
done
as
a
PD
as
opposed
to
within
the
regular
zoning
process.
So
I
guess
my
question
is
what
it
would
be
different.
What
is
different
about
going
for
a
PV
versus
doing
this
within
the
regular
zoning
and
I
recognize?
You
have
a
split
zoning
on
the
lot
so
that
that
complicates
your
ability
to
conform.
O
O
In
order
to
address
transit
issues
and
to
get
people
out
of
cars
and
using
more
mass
transit
and
one
day
we'll
get
to
mass
transit,
the
comp
plan
encourages
a
higher
FA
are
the
1.5
FA
are
will
built
we're
building
at
a
1.35
F?
They
are
but
an
encouraged
to
incentivize
a
developer.
To
do
that
he
has
to
do
a
PD.
That
way,
you
have
the
control
of
the
project.
Do
the
PD
process
so
to
gain
the
higher
FA
are
the
trade-off?
Is
you
have
to
do
a
PD?
O
F
I
add
one
more
thing
about
the
PD
that
Jordan
would
drop
with
my
house.
Our
intent
was
to
go
Euclidean
zoning
and
we
actually
submitted
for
that
originally
and
then,
within
speaking
with
Natural
Resources
and
meeting
with
them
on
site,
we
found
out
that
we
would
not
be
able
to
retain
the
50
percent
tree
retention
because
it's
a
it's
a
little
confusing
of
what
trees
qualified
towards
the
50
percent,
and
so
we
did
meet
with
them
on
site
twice
and
after
meeting
with
them.
We
thought
we
realized.
I
Blown
with
the
Planning
Commission
by
right
in
the
community
commercial
35
future
land-use
category
and
the
community
makes
use
of
feature
35
future
land-use
categories.
Your
a
lot
of
1.0
far2
get
the
bonus.
You
have
to
do
a
PD
and
they're,
proposing
I
believe
of
1.3.
So
if
you
ask
the
question,
what
could
you
have
without
the
PD?
It
would
be
a
1.0,
f
AR,
which
is
really
just
that's
calculated
the
square
footage
of
the
subject
site.
I
So
it's
a
it
is
hard
to
get
density
and
it
is
hard
to
get
the
vertical
mixed
use
development
utilizing
that
by
right,
if
they
are
and
they
meet
the
requirements
to
have
that
up
to
the
1.3.
Because
in
the
comprehensive
plan
you
have
to
be
on
an
arterial,
you
have
to
have
more
than
two
uses
and
your
site
has
to
be
0.33
acres
to
utilize
that
so
not
every
community
makes
you
35
can
have
the
1.3
without
paying
into
the
bonus
Thank
You.
O
T
We've
made
a
incursion
homeowner
at
6205,
North,
ninth
Street.
There
are
exactly
two
houses
between
me
and
the
proposed
project.
Great
project
looks
cool
nowhere,
but
highway
41
should
it
be.
There
I
grew
up
in
a
large
park
right
across
the
river
when
I
moved
back
to
Tampa
from
Atlanta
in
Chicago
I
wanted
to
be
on
US
Highway
41.
This
is
Peachtree
Road
in
Atlanta
Georgia.
T
41
is
because
of
the
express
bus
route.
I
have
a
stack
of
bus
passes
in
my
desk
waiting
to
be
used.
My
husband
works
out
at
Hidden
River,
so
the
Express
bus
actually
can
drop
him
off
at
his
front
door.
There
he's
never
taken
the
bus
one
time
so
I
would
appreciate
it.
If
we
let
go
of
this
myth
of
people
using
public
transit
in
Tampa
I'm,
a
millennial
I
want
to
use
it
I
use.
T
As
much
as
I
can,
but
it's
just
not
happening
and
I,
don't
think
that
it
will
happen
to
the
extent
that
we've
designed
in
with
these
motorcycles
and
these
bicycle
spots,
to
compensate
for
parking.
So
that's
why
I'm
here
I
think
that
they're
setting
up
our
neighborhood
for
failure
I
want
to
be
along
this
artery.
I
want
to
have
density,
but
I
also
want
my
neighborhood
not
to
be
overwhelmed
with
cars
and
I.
T
Don't
appreciate
people
coming
and
saying
you
know
how
great
this
is
gonna
be
for
my
neighborhood
cuz
I,
like
my
neighborhood,
you
know
so
I
want
you
to
I,
want
progress,
but
I
don't
want
progress
for
progress
sake,
so
yeah,
as
also
during
our
meeting
with
Oceana
Jordan,
made
it
clear
that
they're
wrong
to
waivers.
She
said
it
many
times
only
two
waivers
line,
two
waivers
now
we're
talking
about
three
waivers,
so
maybe
that
can
be.
T
You
know
flushed
out
and
made
more
clear
to
us,
but
these
folks
are
the
experts
in
what
they
call
two-tier
cities,
so
I'm
hoping
they
can
help
us
understand
like
what
the
true
occupancy
is
going
to
be
of
these
buildings
and
their
experiences
and
their
other
cities
like.
What
are
you
seeing
how
many
units
are
being
occupied
by
more
than
one
resident?
You
know
you're
distributing
the
parking
passes
for
these
places.
How
many
people
are
you
going
over
you
the
limits?
T
It
sounds
like
you're
that
older
sibling,
whose
parents
have
just
told
them
to
please
stop
touching
your
brother,
and
so
you
stick
your
hand
away
from
their
face
and
say:
I'm,
not
touching
you
I'm,
not
touching
you
I'm,
not
touching
you
30
seconds
left
I,
don't
know,
I
think
that,
with
the
commercial
intents
that
they
have
right
now
do
with
it.
What
you
will
for
us
to
change
the
rules
in
the
middle
of
the
game
would
be
unfair,
but
you
are
asking
to
expand
into
our
neighborhood.
T
L
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Tim
key
ports.
I
live
at
404,
East,
Idlewild,
Avenue,
3,
3,
604
mall,
so
the
president,
the
old
Seminole
Heights
neighborhood
association
to
prepare
for
tonight.
Several
the
upcoming
speakers
met
with
local
developers,
a
local
land
use
attorney
and
a
local
architect.
We
also
assisted
mill
house
in
holding
the
well
attended
neighborhood
public
meeting
on
December
12.
We
place
multiple
updates
online
to
gather
resident
member
input.
We
have
several
other
folks
speaking
so
I'll
just
provide
a
simple
overview.
L
A
copy
of
this
material
was
provided
to
bike
councilmen
Maniscalco
as
aide
to
counsel
attorney
mr.
shelving
for
distribution.
Hopefully
you
all
have
a
copy
of
that
in
front
of
you,
so
I
am
gonna.
Let
the
other
speakers
get
into
greater
detail.
Specifically,
we
do
support
as
a
Neighborhood
Association
the
mill
house
project,
but
we
recommend
additional
retail
on
the
ground
floor.
There
was
many
many
comments
about.
This
is
a
mixed-use
development.
The
reality
is,
there
is
one
office.
L
L
We
would
be
supportive
of
the
trees.
Majority
of
the
trees
on
the
project
are
invasive
species.
So
our
feeling
is
as
a
neighborhood.
We
would
be
willing
to
work
with
Milhouse,
but
we
would
like
to
stick
with
the
CI,
which
is
already
in
the
2014
plan,
as
adopted
by
City
Council
on
January
7
2016
I'd,
also
like
to
point
out
another
suggestion
to
prevent
the
hundred
and
twelve
residents
that
would
be
moving
into
this
apartment
complex
from
coming
into
the
neighborhood.
We
did
go
door-to-door.
L
These
are
the
addresses
we
pulled
these
residents
and
we
would
recommend
that
fern
Street
be
closed,
that
the
entry
and
exit
of
the
property
be
moved
from
north
street
to
fern
Street
and
closed
at
the
Red
Vine
there.
This
way
it
would
allow
the
apartment
residents
to
come
in
and
out
off
Nebraska.
It
would
prevent
those
apartment
dwellers
from
going
into
the
neighborhood
and
trying
to
park
along
the
street.
Again
we
tried
to
get
a
very
good
sampling
of
the
residents.
L
J
Hi,
my
name
is
Lynn
hurtak.
I
live
at
five
four
five.
Ninety
one
for
north
campus
street
I
am
the
land
use
chair
for
ultimate
Heights,
neighborhood
association
and
a
trustee
on
the
board.
We
opposed
the
project
the
PD
portion
of
the
project,
because
it
allows
Milhouse
to
circumvent
too
many
requirements
of
the
accepted
Seminole
Heights
commercial,
intensive
district.
It's
a
workable
zoning
for
the
project.
If
it
is
allowed,
you
will
set
a
negative
precedence
while
diminishing
the
intent
in
the
enforceability
of
the
prevalent
code.
J
Tampa
city
code
is
a
set
of
rules
by
which
we
collectively
agree
to
follow
as
a
resident
and
business
owners
of
the
city.
The
Tampa
city
code
is
established
under
the
authority
of
City
Council
and
it
is
council's
responsibility
to
ensure
the
enforcement
of
that
code
for
the
public
good.
When
considering
whether
to
circumvent
established
rules
in
the
city
code,
a
strong
argument
must
be
made
that
the
circumvention
would
be
the
for
the
benefit
of
City
residents.
In
this
circumstance,
no
such
argument
exists.
J
Everything
the
developer
wishes
to
do
can
be
done
through
a
CI
zoning
which
matches
the
front
properties
current
zoning.
We
would
also
again
be
happy
to
work
with
them
through
waivers.
We
support
several
of
them
like
the
garbage
trees.
Things
like
that,
but
the
CI
designation
also
does
require
three
uses,
and
they
only
want
to
put
a
really
small
1,200
square
foot
office.
J
So
in
order
to
benefit
forward
to
get
that
CI,
they
need
to
add
three
uses,
so
maybe
a
restaurant
or
something
to
that
nature,
and
that
that's
what
I
feel
is
the
biggest
difference
again.
I
could
be
wrong,
but
three
point:
seven
percent
of
the
entire
two
acre
parcel
for
business
use
is
not
a
mixture
project.
Q
I'm
with
life
I
live
at
1408,
East
Hannah
I
live
less
than
a
10-minute
walk
from
the
site
and
own
a
real
estate
office
on
Nebraska
members
of
council.
For
years,
many
of
us
in
some
of
the
Heights
spent
countless
hours
on
the
Vision
Plan
informed
by
zoning.
There
were
areas
where
the
city
staff
proposed
changes
on
some
residential
parcels
that
would
move
to
a
more
intensified
juice.
The
neighborhood
opposed
every
one
of
them
for
more
than
a
quarter
century
I'm
killing.
Q
All
these
days,
I
have
been
coming
before
you
and
your
predecessors
to
advocate,
protect
or
enhance
the
quality
of
life
in
Seminole
Heights.
We
have
a
lot
of
change
in
Seminole
Heights,
a
lot
that
has
been
clustered
on
Florida
Avenue
in
the
vicinity
of
the
first
Millhouse
project.
The
city
is
repeating
the
same
mistakes
that
has
been
made
in
other
parts
of
the
city.
At
this
point,
the
approved
developments,
businesses
and
locations
has
a
real-world
parking
deficit
of
about
200
parking
spaces.
Tonight
Milhouse
is
looking
to
rezone
the
two
residential
parcels
to
a
PD.
Q
Some
say
that
the
parcel
should
be
rezone
to
sh
CI,
or
this
project
to
force
conformance
is
Omaha's
plan.
My
focus
tonight
is
a
compromise
to
the
traffic
and
parking
fiction
being
offered
for
this
project.
We
in
the
neighborhood
must
live
in
the
real
world.
114
spaces
for
112
apartments
is
fiction.
In
fact,
just
a
week
ago,
this
body
approved
a
projects
that
not
situated
in
our
neighborhood
of
single
family
that
was
not
situated
in
neighborhood
of
single-family
homes
that
had
1.5
parking
spaces
per
unit.
This
is
at
1.01.
Q
The
neighborhood
around
there
will
bear
the
burden.
I've
walked,
North
Street
I've
walked,
fern
I've
walked
my
sidewalk
gene
talking
to
neighbors
I
went
on
fern
with
Tim
who
spoke
earlier.
Our
streets
are
narrow,
they
lack
curbs,
there's
and
the
city
doesn't
have
the
funds
to
give
us
the
curbs
on
those
streets
of
people.
We
have
to
live
there,
I'm
proposing
the
closure,
which
Tim
had
mentioned
earlier
about
closing
9th
Street
at
fern.
How
do
you
make
this
thing?
Work?
Oh,
okay,
the
had
virtually
universal
support
amongst
everybody.
Q
It
takes
the
traffic
off
of
North
Street,
which,
when,
if
traffic
backs
up
on
the
North
Street
going
out
to
Nebraska
they're
going
to
start
cutting
through
the
neighborhood,
we
have
elderly
folks.
We
have
folks
with
children,
they
cannot
use
a
sidewalk
because
we
don't
have
any
industry
to
narrow
I
spoken
with
Jordan
from
Mill
House
about
this
and
I
have
an
email
for
her.
That
I
could
submit
that
I'm
not
talking
out
of
turn.
That
said,
they
would
not
oppose
that,
but
that
would
have
to
be
something
that
the
city
would
have
to
approve.
L
Good
evening,
Patrick
Thorpe,
allegedly
1:01,
three
East
Gene
Street
I,
found
a
couple
of
the
comments
made
this
evening
a
little
bit
misleading
about
the
miss
the
mixed
use
nature
of
this
project.
It's
been
stated
already
that
there
is
minimal
office
space
being
provided.
One
of
the
bigger
things
is
that
mr.
Randolph
stated
there's
horizontal
mixed
use
in
this
development
and
there
is
very
little
horizontal
mix
use
and
no
vertical
mix
use
that
I
can
see
by
the
plans.
So
I
disagree
with
the
fact
that
this
is
actually
going
to
improve
the
mixed
use.
L
Intention
of
the
neighborhood
in
the
future
land
use.
The
2040
plan
indicates
that
there
should
be
pedestrian
oriented
uses
such
as
outdoor
cafes
and
within
the
current
plan.
There
is
no
showing
of
that
so
once
again
failing
to
meet
the
the
mixed
use
guide
moving
forward,
if
the
property
did
actually
have
three
uses,
as
they
stated
that
there's
only
two
currently,
then
the
current
zoning
code
would
actually
allow
for
additional
parking
offsets.
L
L
Hi
Ralph
Carbone,
three-two-one,
West,
Rio,
Vista,
Court
I,
live
in
the
neighborhood
I'm.
A
member
of
OSHA
I
did
send
an
email
to
all
of
y'all,
but
I
changed
the
wording
because
I
completely
agree
with
this
project,
having
grown
up
in
Tampa
and
living
in
Seminole
Heights
for
ten
years,
who
would
have
ever
thought
a
company
like
mill
house
would
invest
over
ten
million
dollars
into
a
project
or
Nebraska
Avenue,
especially
that
layer
of
Nebraska
Avenue
they're
asked
they've.
They
are
one
company
that
comes
into
town.
They
follow
the
guidelines.
L
They've
looked
at
the
Vision
Plan
they've
gone
by
the
guidelines,
and
that
is
in
CI
by
the
way
is
a
commercial
intensive
use
which
that's
why
there
are
car
Lots
all
along
Nebraska
Avenue,
because
you
have
to
have
that
commercial
intensive
use.
That
is
why
people
will
bring
restaurants
and
retail
into
the
air.
There
was
opposition
to
their
project
on
Florida
Avenue.
A
lot
of
the
neighbors
are
saying
that
traffic
is
going
to
be
tear
a
lot
of
neighbors
says,
though
it's
not
gonna
do
anything
for
the
home
values.
L
A
lot
of
neighbors
said:
oh,
it's
not
gonna
bring
restaurants.
Well,
you
can
walk
around
on
Florida,
Avenue
and
I.
Do
all
the
time
I
ride
my
scooter,
I'm
you
and
get
him
a
car
in
the
in
the
in
the
up
in
the
weekends
and
I'm
able
to
go
to
bodega
I'm
able
to
go
to
Madison
Heights
I'm
able
to
go
to
the
front
porch.
So
maybe
in
all
the
other
places
that
are
coming
into
the
neighborhood
I
would
love
to
see
the
same
thing
happening
along
Nebraska
Avenue
right
now.
L
L
There's
a
few
oak
trees
that
have
that
have
lived
through
the
damage,
but,
frankly,
I
think
they've
done
everything
possible
to
attain
that
now,
I,
you
know
if
they
could
I'm
sure
they
would
put
retail,
but
the
reality
is
you
have
to
have
the
density
and
the
any
of
the
the
ability
for
people
to
come
enjoy
that
retail
they're
putting
a
retail
space
in
there.
That's
required
that
meets
the
guidelines,
they're
doing
everything
within
the
the
codes
and
the
guidelines
that
we've
given
to
them.
So
I
don't
see
why
we
would
be
opposing
this
project.
L
That
literally,
is
going
to
change
the
face
of
Nebraska
Avenue
north
of
Hana
Avenue,
and
any
of
you
can
go
right
now
and
drive
down
that
street
and
you'll
see
what
I'm
talking
about
so
I
strongly
recommend
that
you
guys
approve
this.
You
know
I
respect.
All
of
you
voted
for
most
of
you,
but
but
I
just
believed
that
this
is
something
that
we're
looking
a
gift
horse
in
the
house.
These
guys
are
putting
their
money
where
their
mouth
is.
They've
already
invested
over
ten
million
dollars
on
Florida
Avenue
and
see
what's
happening
there.
L
J
I'm
Angie
Britain
with
the
Eva
Claire
Corporation
6401,
North,
Nebraska,
Avenue
I
own
the
property
immediately
to
the
north
of
this
property,
and
the
only
thing
that
I
object
about
this
project
is
that
it
was
put
last
on
your
docket
this
evening,
other
than
that
I'm
very
much
in
support
of
the
project
I
every
day.
I
look.
J
That
is,
that
is
my
neighbor,
and
to
see
the
rendering
and
the
vitality
that
this
is
going
to
bring
to
the
neighborhood
is
very,
very
exciting.
I'm
a
small
business
owner
I've
I've
had
to
comply
with
a
lot
of
the
regulations
of
the
city
and
zoning
that
was
unforeseen
to
me,
including
widening
my
sidewalk
on
Nebraska
to
ten
feet
and
I'm,
really
excited
about
having
professionals
and
Millennials
walk
on
that
Sidewalk,
rather
than
the
prostitutes
and
the
drug
dealers.
So
I
really
hope
that
you
will
support
this
project
as
well.
Thank
you.
L
You
know
my
name
is
Doyle
Wellman
I
live
at
10:28,
firm,
I,
the
pleasure
of
meeting
Tim
and
rip
the
other
evening,
I
think
my
wife
myself.
We
completely
understand
and
support
the
development
in
the
area.
We
have
seen
what
they've
done
in
Florida
and
it's
fantastic,
pushing
out
some
of
these
other
businesses
that
aren't
so
desirable,
I
think
the
our
greatest
concern
with
the
changes
that
are
happening
in
that
area
and
in
our
community
is
the
flow
of
traffic.
L
We
walked
out
dogs
on
the
street.
There's
a
gentleman,
a
few
houses
down
a
use
of
a
guide
dog.
We
have
no
sidewalks,
there's
constant
young
families.
Bicycles,
just
no
means
of
pedestrians
to
move
around
through
there,
so
mm-hmm
I,
just
we're
concerned
about
the
overflow
parking,
Tim's
idea
and
bricks
idea.
I
guess
I,
don't
know
where
it
originated.
From
of
a
closing
off
Vernon.
Ninth
Street
from
what
I've
seen
looks
like
a
pretty
viable
option.
It's
gonna
help
cut
down
that
traffic
on
north
people
already
do
cut
through.
L
If
you
get
backed
up
on
a
hand
on
the
afternoon,
you
can't
get
onto
Nebraska,
so
people
are
shooting
through
you
know,
and
some
of
these
cross
street
trying
to
get
to
it,
but
again,
fantastic
I,
think
it's
a
great
great
development
and
just
in
considerations
just
need
to
be
given
for
some
of
the
flow
of
traffic
and
issues
that
it
may
cause
with
some
pedestrians.
So
thank
you.
J
We're
taking
notice
of
work,
but
when
we
went
through
our
years
of
workshops
at
Horne
base
owning
that
property
was
actually
one
of
the
ones
that
we
did
a
test
case
on.
This
is
the
design
it's
close
to
what
we
came
out
with
as
far
as
with
the
art.
So
when
he
talks
about
the
emerging
design
along
Nebraska
Avenue,
this
is
the
first
really
big
new
project
along
the
brass
cabinet.
So,
as
far
as
it
matching
the
fabric
of
your
neighborhood,
it
doesn't
it's.
There
cookie
cutter,
a
template
that
they
use
in
other
places.
J
So
at
some
point,
if
we
can
come
back
to
revisiting,
we
were
the
first
form
based
owning
to
go
through.
If
we
can
revisit
the
urban
design
for
our
corridors,
they
are
gateways
to
the
neighborhood,
and
one
of
the
major
complaints
that
you
always
hear
is
that
the
ugliness
and
the
blight
in
Florida
and
Nebraska
don't
match
our
neighborhoods.
So
if
we
can
come
up
with
something
that
better
reflects
the
neighborhood
and
creates
a
unified
fabric
like
other
communities
across
the
u.s.
J
deal,
also
to
call
this
mixed-use,
this
bottom
is
all
retail
on
what
we
had
proposed
and
what
the
city
is
looking
forward.
What
urban
redevelopment
is
looking
forward
to
is
more
mixed
use
to
have
barely
the
size
of
an
apartment
be
called
mixed-use.
I,
almost
sorry
not
to
have
my
chair
on
that
one
and
the
discussion
about
fern
was
one
I
know:
I
brought
it
forward
on
one
of
our
chats
online.
It
does
a
little
jig.
J
If
you
all
can
close
off
fern,
then
the
major
complaint,
a
lot
of
neighborhoods,
are
facing
right
now,
with
the
urban
redevelopment
is
cut
through
traffic.
Why
create
a
problem
that
can
be
avoided
from
the
get-go
you're,
already
working
with
the
vision
zero
with
several
of
our
neighborhoods
throughout
the
city
as
well
to
try
to
do
something
ethreal
if
you
close
off
burn
and
make
that
their
exit
instead
of
North?
J
There
is
zero
opportunity
to
cut
through
into
the
neighborhood
and
that
effectively
closes
that
off,
and
this
portion
of
Cemil
Heights
is
one
of
the
lesser
traveled
areas,
one
of
the
more
quiet
neighborhoods.
This
would
be
a
huge
impact
on
them
with
the
cut
through
to
15th,
because
as
soon
as
you
see,
five
cars
lined
up
at
Nebraska
you're
going
to
be
hooking
her
right
on
north
and
heading
over
to
15th
the
PD.
If
they
were
going
according
to
code,
they
wouldn't
need
PD,
so
I
support.
J
N
N
I've
looked
at
the
plans
for
this
project
and
I
went
online
and
look
at
Mill
house
as
a
company
and
what
they've
done
in
other
cities
and
got
a
better
idea
of
what
the
interiors
that
their
properties
are
like
and
the
renovations
they
brought
to
other
neighborhoods
are
when
were
in
need
of
renewal.
Like
our
stretch
of
Nebraska
Avenue
is
I
think
it
would
be
a
very
good
project
for
our
stretch
to
stretch
on
grass
cabinet
I,
fully
support
it
I'm
hearing.
N
N
Good
evening,
everyone,
my
name,
is
Laurie
Allen
and
I
live
at
916
East
North
Street
directly.
Behind
this
proposed
project,
I
want
to
start
out
by
saying
I
have
no
problem
with
the
project
at
all.
I
think
it's
a
great
building,
I
think
it's
a
good
addition
to
our
neighborhood
and
I'm.
Not
gonna
beat
a
dead
horse.
We
all
know
the
problems
parking
it.
One
space
per
unit
is
not
enough.
N
I
know
myself
I'm
a
single
person
I
own
two
cars,
as
do
most
of
my
neighbors,
so
one
vehicle
spark
parking
space
per
unit
that
leaves
a
shortfall
of
at
least
a
hundred
parking
spaces
needed.
That's
the
reality.
That's
just
the
way
it
is.
You
can
say
you're
going
to
take
public
transportation
you're
going
to
ride
bikes.
The
reality
is
that's
years
in
the
future
I.
N
This
newest
idea
of
closing
fern
Street
I,
just
heard
of
that
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
moved
the
entrance
over.
There
are
currently
three
existing
driveways
on
fern
Street
that
when
I
spoke
with
Jonathan
Scott
from
the
Department
of
Transportation,
he
assured
me
there
was
no
problem
with
using
any
one
of
those
driveways.
So
moving
the
drive
over
to
fern,
Street
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
that
would
keep
the
traffic
out
of
the
neighborhood,
which
is
the
big
concern.
N
You
know
we
have
a
lot
of
elderly
neighbors
I
have
one
lady
that
lives
across
the
street.
For
me
every
morning,
it's
7
o'clock.
In
the
morning,
91
years
old,
she
gets
out
with
her
Walker
and
walks
down
that
street.
Now
she
doesn't
go
far.
She
only
goes
like
a
block
or
so,
but
that's
her
enjoyment
if
you
start
having
all
that
cut
through
traffic
back
through
the
neighborhood
she's,
not
gonna
be
able
to
do
that
anymore
because
there
are
no
sidewalks
planned
in
our
future.
It'd
be
great,
but
there
just
isn't
the
trees.
N
You
know
I
think
that
that
really
needs
to
be
relooked
at
maybe
move
some
medians
around,
because
there
are
several
Oaks,
mature,
Oaks
30
to
50
years
old
and
the
already
commercial
area
there
beautiful
trees,
beautifully
Mae,
there's
no
reason
to
take
those
trees
out
when
they
could
just
shift
a
few
parking
mediums
like
I,
say
I'm
I'm
I'm
in
favor
of
the
project,
but
it
needs
tweaking.
It
needs
work.
N
N
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Michael
mintzberg
with
sight
real
estate,
1925
East
6th
Avenue
in
Ybor,
City
I'm,
been
working
with
no
house
on
this
project
and
I've
worked
on
a
handful
of
projects
with
them
in
the
past.
Some
that
have
come
in
front
of
this
council
before
I
Milhouse
has
a
reputation
of
being
a
high
quality
developer,
as
you
heard
from
many
of
the
neighbors
who
even
would
like
to
see
changes
in
the
project
as
the
project
in
Florida
Avenue
was
under
construction.
N
N
Some
people
don't-
and
this
gives
that
option,
and
just
like
in
areas
that
have
other
apartments.
When
you
give
people
that
option,
then
they
start
to
grow.
They
want
to
have
a
family,
they
want
a
bigger
house.
It
increases
the
value
of
homes
around
it.
Secondly,
when
we
open
or
when
I
was
open,
the
project
on
Florida
Avenue
since
then,
they've
been
under
construction.
Three
new
restaurants
opened
up
there,
Mandarin
heights,
C
house
and
bodega
part
of
the
reason
they
moved.
There
was
because
no
house
put
almost
100
apartments
right
across
the
street.
N
You
know
it's
really
a
challenging
city
logistical
issue,
because
how
else
do
you
get
to
the
FA
our
bonus?
If
you
don't,
if
you
can't
go
through
a
PD
which
is
actually
part
of
the
Vision
Plan,
a
PD
is
in
the
Vision
Plan,
just
like
any
other
zoning
category
in
the
Vision
Plan,
so
I
think
that
it's
a
difficult.
Thank
you
very
much.
F
Bowdre
from
the
house,
our
intent
was
to
rezone
the
back
parcel
with
an
SH
CI,
but
the
tree
returned
retention
requirement
did
prevent
us
from
doing
so
when
you
have
a
waiver.
That
is
what
requires
you
to
go
to
the
PD,
and
that
is
the
waiver
that
required
us.
I
will
say
that
at
the
meeting
we
just
I
just
found
out
about
one
of
the
waivers,
which
is
a
transportation
waiver.
F
Last
week
when
the
staff
report
came
out,
and
so
that
is
why
it
is
inconsistent
with
what
I
said
at
the
neighborhood
meeting,
as
one
gentleman
pointed
out,
so
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
one
thing
that
I
just
I
met
with
our
leasing
staff
on-site
at
our
other
project,
which
is
down
the
street
on
Florida
Avenue.
Right
now
we
have
and
again
I
know
this
is
a
small
sample,
but
it
was
promising
that
we
have
20
leases
there
right
now
and
actually
only
15
cars.
F
So
far
with
parking
passes
on
the
property
we,
in
speaking
with
the
neighbors.
We
understood
that
moving
access
from
north
to
fern
was
very
important
and
it
is
something
that
we
have
been
working
on
and
we're
very
open
to.
We
just
weren't
able
to
make
it
feasible.
If,
if
you
don't
mind,
I'm
gonna
use
this,
we
actually
had
the
the
access
point
on
fern
first
and
then
in
doing
more
research
on
the
site.
F
There
was
the
grand
tree
at
that
southeast
corner
that
we
are
trying
to
save,
and
so
that
was
the
reason
for
moving
it
to
north.
We
also
were
asked
to
move
it
further
in
towards
Nebraska,
and
we
weren't
able
to
accommodate
that.
Because
of
thank
you,
we
weren't
able
to
accommodate
that
because
of
grading
right
around
here
and
then,
as
you
get
closer
to
Nebraska,
there
are
requirements
for
F
because
it
is
a
state
road
Nebraska
for
how
far
the
the
access
or
curb
cuts
have
to
be
from
the
state
road.
F
And
then
there
was
a
comment
about
trying
to
move
the
access
to
fern
here
and
there
was
concerns
of
site
visibility
and
safety,
because
this
is
an
s-curve
which
is
furn
right
here,
and
so
you
wouldn't
have
the
adequate
visibility
there.
So
I
I'm,
sorry
that
you
couldn't
see
that
this
is
where
it
was.
We
were
asked
to
try
to
move
it
to
here,
but
there
is
an
S
curve
which
is
furn
that
goes
like
this,
and
so
that
work
that
reduce
visibility.
G
G
H
H
H
N
Jonathan
Scott
transition
planning
transportation
would
not
probably
want
to
shut
down.
The
road
was
promote
connectivity
and
so
forth.
I,
don't
think
that's
a
good
idea.
I
mean
there's,
other
options
can
be
explored
that
would
have
to
be
like
Ray
were
saying,
would
explored
and
studied.
You
know
a
traffic
study
might
be
redone
or
whatever.
That's
could
take
up
to
30
days
to
look
at.
D
D
H
D
H
D
D
Think
I
think
I
can
figure
out
that
you've
probably
wanted
Vegas
more
than
we
have
actually
gotten
approval
from
F
dot.
To
do
these
types
of
things
and,
as
you
know,
there's
been
plenty
of
projects
that
I've
seen
that
I
voted
against,
primarily
because
of
the
the
access
from
them
from
the
main
street,
as
opposed
to
the
neighborhood
street,
and
you
know
this
is
you
know
here
you
go
I.
Think
mr.
D
I
think
that
parking
is
going
to
be
an
issue,
but
at
the
same
time,
I
do
think
that
that
access
point
is
a
big
sticking
point
I'm
glad
to
see
the
neighbors
came
here
and
had
alternatives
as
opposed
to
being
against
a
project
wholeheartedly,
and
but
this
is
a
this
is
something
that's.
Gonna
have
to
be
fixed
at
some
point,
because
we
keep
going
round
and
round
with
F
dot
and
I.
D
H
Mean
I
think
professionally.
It
comes
down
to
dueling
policies.
The
city
has
a
code
requirement
that
they
want
to
reduce
commercial
driver
cuts
on
the
local
streets.
However,
F
do
T's
position.
Is
they
want
to
reduce
driveways
onto
their
arterial
and
collector
roads
to
cuz?
It
impedes
the
flow
of
traffic
yeah.
D
K
O
N
I
just
want
to
reframe
what
City
Council's
consideration
is
before
you,
because
I
know
that
there
has
been
proposed
an
alternative,
but
what
City
Council
has
to
consider
is
a
proposal.
That's
put
in
front
of
you
and
the
access
points
that
they
have
and
that
they
have
legal
access
rights
to
city
council
doesn't
have
the
authority
to
halt
this
project
and
close
a
road
and
then
have
them
come
back.
So
you
council
has
to
evaluate
what
they
have
before
you.
N
That
doesn't
mean
you
have
to
approve
it,
but
you
have
to
evaluate
whether
or
not
the
proposal
as
it
has
been
presented,
meets
the
requirements
in
your
comprehensive
plan
and
your
land,
development
regulations
and
I
wanted
to
make
one
more
point,
because
there's
been
a
lot
of
concerns
about
the
precedent
of
a
plan,
development
and,
frankly,
the
City
Council,
not
the
City
Council,
a
prior
City
Council
denied
every
zoning
based
upon
the
negative
effects
of
the
precedent
of
having
a
PD
and
we
lost.
So
that's
not
a
viable
one.
N
The
question
again
is
whether
or
not
this
particular
PD
serves.
The
purpose
of
the
PD
has
stated
in
the
site
plan
it's
all
listed
out
and
evaluated
by
your
staff,
and
you
all,
of
course,
have
the
final
evaluation
as
well
as
whether
the
applicant
has
met
their
burden
to
show
that
they
are
entitled
to
the
way.
Those
criteria
also
yourself.
D
D
Know
obviously,
when
somebody
brings
up
testimony
before
us,
we
have
to
take
into
consideration
the
testimony
that
they
have.
Obviously
we
did
not
know
someone
was
going
to
present
an
alternative
plan
and
the
questions
that
I
asked
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
to
make
the
record
clear
is
based
on
the
the
evidence
that
was
presented
by
the
public
and
not
for
any
other
reason
and.
O
Yes,
mr.
chairman
John
Randolph
on
the
bottle,
I
want
to
so
quickly.
Mr.
fuller
lives.
Mr.
fuller,
this
property,
a
couple
of
things
I,
want
to
remind
you
of
we
hit.
We've
met
the
parking
code,
so
we've
met
the
parking
code.
Yes,
we
have
the
offsets
that
is
part
of
the
Vision
Plan
of
some
old
heights.
I'll
leave
you
with
two
things
in
the
development
of
cities:
restaurants,
shops,
personal
services,
follow
the
rooftops.
If
you
build
the
residences,
the
commercial
support
will
come
after
that.
O
It's
like
the
cowbell
coming
down
on
the
on
the
on
the
on
the
cow
coming
down
the
valley,
the
cowbell
leads
the
rest
of
the
cows
down
the
valley.
The
second
thing
I
leave
you
with
is
when
I
went
to
post
this
property.
I
visited
this
property.
Four
times
walked
all
around
this
neighborhood.
When
I
posted
the
sign
on
the
property.
A
gentleman
stopped
me
in
the
front
he
was
on
a
bicycle.
He
says
what
are
you
doing
is
well
I'm.
Putting
up
a
sign.
O
There's
gonna
be
a
hearing
here
in
December
which,
before
we
continue
and
that
here
we're
going
to
consider,
put
an
apartment
building
here
he
says
really
says
we
could
really
use
that
get
all
this.
You
know
what
off
to
the
street
and
besides
I
need
a
job.
Are
they
going
to
be
hiring
us,
as
they
sure
will
so
when
are
they
gonna
hire
us
as
well?
I
think
we're
going
to
start
in
the
second
quarter
of
the
year,
that'll
be
a
he
says.
Once
you
come
back
and
they'd
like
to
talk
to
wait.
B
B
E
E
D
B
D
B
C
None
just
obviously
to
everybody
a
meaningful
Reverend,
Martin,
Luther,
King
Day
on
I,
guess
Monday.
We
have
the
parade,
but
beforehand
some
folks
were
going
to
be
seeking
just
in
case
if
anybody
from
council
or
anybody
in
the
wonderful
crowd
on
television
watching
this
tonight
wishes
to
help
some
activists
we're
going
to
help
gather
signatures
beforehand
for
a
constitutional
amendment
for
Medicaid
expansion,
which,
in
helping
your
fellow
man
and
women
I,
think
affirms
the
values
of
our
Reverend
King.
That's
it.