►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council PM 07182019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
B
Wilson
is
not
here
tonight
her
his
family,
correct,
right,
just
making
sure
okay
good!
Thank
you.
Okay,
we
will
begin
with
public
hearings,
may
have
a
motion
open
public
hearings.
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
by
Councilman
escapo,
a
second
by
Councilman
Miranda,
all
in
favor
any
opposed.
Okay.
We
have
gotten
a
request
to
move
the
Davis
I
love,
one
which
is
number.
Where
is
this
ad
number
10
up
to
number
one?
Lots
of
council
I'm
the
minimal
today?
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
by
I.
Guess,
first
cut
your
this.
B
B
C
B
D
B
E
Good
evening
dinner
from
Bologna
their
Planning
Commission
staff,
this
is
located
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district.
It's
within
the
Davis
Island
urban
village.
It
is
also
within
the
coastal,
high
hazard
area
and
the
evacuation
zone.
A
there's
transit
at
the
Tampa
General
Hospital
served
by
route
19
aerial,
so
we
are
on
Davis
Boulevard.
E
We
have
a
number
of
facilities,
the
portion
that
the
hospital-
this
is
tennis
courts
and
the
base
and
activity
center
over
here.
This
is
right
across
the
street
from
the
marisol,
which
is
a
historic
structure.
As
you
know,
as
we
move
down
Davis
Davis
Boulevard,
it
is
one
of
the
more
intensive
areas
of
the
island
which
is
reflected
on
the
future
land
use
map.
So
the
future
land
use
of
this
subject
site
is
residential
35
right
across
the
street,
which
is
the
merits.
No
that's
a
little
higher.
E
It's
a
residential
83,
a
little
bit
larger,
more
intensive
and
scale.
So
as
we
move
down
Davis
Boulevard,
we
have
residential
35.
The
orange
is
residential
10,
that's
providing
that
transition
as
we
move
away
from
Davis
Boulevard
and
then,
as
we
get
closer
to
the
water.
That
yellow
is
residential.
Six,
that's
a
very
low
intensive
future
land
use
category,
so
it
it's
higher
along
Davis
Boulevard
allows
for
more
residents,
Welling
unit,
more
options
for
residential,
and
it
decreases
as
we
move
away
from
Davis
both
are
down
in
intensity.
E
The
green
is
recreational
open
space
and
that's
from
a
lot
of
those
pieces
that
I
described
earlier
are
located
on
now.
Planning
Commission
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
This
little
Wow
consideration
of
maximum
of
6
million
units
on
the
subject
site
that
is
below
than
what
they
can
build
under
their
future
category.
They
say
they
could
have
more
units
under
their
future.
E
Ladies
category,
but
they're
not
on
this
is
urban
and
character,
and
the
comprehensive
plan
does
promote
a
more
urban
style
of
development
pattern
within
these
Central
City
neighborhoods,
as
well
as
the
fact
that
it
is
within
an
identified
urban
village,
and
we
have
specific
policy
direction
on
the
urban
villages,
and
this
is
supporting
that.
So
we
did
find
this
consistent
as
well
as
our
policies
on
increasing
residential
options
for
campus
population
and
providing
a
diversity
of
multi-family
residential
options.
D
D
Lee
14
years
ago,
for
townhomes
and
to
the
south
is
another
planned
development
for
multi-family
that
was
approved
two
years
ago.
The
process
Benares
all
seven
story
building
and
then
on.
The
east
side
is
single-family
houses
that
front
on
Columbia
Drive
here
is
a
photographic
tour
of
the
zoning
area.
Here
is
the
septic
property
in
the
corner
of
bearing
and
Davis
Boulevard.
D
D
D
The
applicants
representative
will
go
in
much
more
detail
about
the
actual
proposal,
but
briefly
again,
it's
on
the
northeast
corner
of
burying
and
east
Davis
Boulevard.
One
way
ingress
will
be
on
forbearing
street
and
then
egress
will
lead
off
of
Davis
Boulevard.
The
applicant
has
requested
to
push
the
building,
so
the
ground-floor
is
at
a
five
foot
setback
along
the
corner
yard,
which
is
Davis,
and
then
the
upper
stories
will
be
of
zero
foot
setback.
D
Similarly,
the
minimum
first
floor
setback
on
the
front
yard,
which
is
bearing
Street,
is
five
and
the
upper
storeys
being
at
zero
foot.
Then,
at
the
north
the
upper
storeys
will
be
at
a
19
foot
setback
and
then
the
East,
a
16
foot
setback,
the
maximum
height
of
the
building
would
be
58
feet
to
the
type
of
proof.
D
The
applicant
is
proposing
six
dwelling
units
total
as
Bennifer
set
it
under
there
are
35.
They
could
ask
for
additional
dwelling
units.
However,
they
did
not
they're
proposing
six
maximum.
A
total
of
fourteen
parking
spaces
based
on
our
calculations
are
required.
They
are
providing
19,
so
they're
over
parked
by
five
parking
spaces.
They
are
confined
with
all
of
the
green
space
requirements
for
both
the
parking
lot
driveway,
as
well
as
multi-family
green
space
requirements.
D
There
are
some
minor
changes
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading,
which
is
standard
for
a
PD
development
from
land
development
coordination,
which
is
found
on
page
2
of
your
staff
report.
Transportation
just
has
one
change
about
the
sidewalk
through
the
side,
extensions
showing
in
the
right
of
way,
and
those
are
the
only
changes
that
are
required
typically
again
on
page
three
of
your
staff
report.
If
they
were
to
fully
develop
under
the
art,
35
land-use
category
they'd
be
eligible
for
13
total
dwelling
units.
D
The
applicant
is
proposing
six
based
on
the
site
design.
There
are
no
waivers
required
or
requested
with
this
application,
so
they're
completely
uncombined
with
the
development
criteria
of
the
city
of
Tampa
zoning
code.
Basically,
the
PD
is
to
provide
alternative
setbacks
which
is
legally
allowable
under
the
Penal
process.
D
F
G
H
G
G
F
F
They're
working
yes,
okay
and
laid
out
the
project
we
have
some
design
challenges
in
spoiler.
With
some
semi-active
explain
to
me,
I
will
pay
for
the
problem.
The
design
challenges
are
as
follows:
Davis
Boulevard,
before
the
split
at
the
apex,
there's
an
arterial
road,
the
west
side
bearing
on
the
South
is
a
local
there's.
F
Residents,
multi-family
residential
to
the
north
single-family
residential
to
the
east,
was
unique
about
the
site
in
his
the
pole,
start
of
PD
rezoning,
Zizza
maintenance,
barriers
of
the
front
yard,
not
Davis
Boulevard.
So
in
an
RM
24
zoning
district,
which
is
big,
fenced
existing
system,
the
building
would
lay
out
as
follows:
Barry
would
be
25
foot,
front
yard,
Davis.
F
F
We
want
to
avoid
having
bearing
being
the
major
intersection.
So
what
do
you
do
about
marrying
again,
you
prepare
a
PG
site
plan
and
what
happens
is
you
bring
the
building
south
and
you
bring
the
building
west?
What
do
you
accomplish?
You
provide
a
24
foot
yard
setback
to
the
north
19
feet
above
grade,
so
it's
24
feet
at
that
grade.
F
You
provide
21
feet
for
this
neighborhood
on
the
east
side
and
you
push
the
set
backs
towards
Davis
Boulevard,
the
arterial
as
closest
5
feet,
in
line
with
the
building
to
the
north,
with
San
Diego
showed
you
that
building
in
line
with
the
building
to
the
south,
and
then
you
provide
a
yard
on
bearing
Street,
which
measures
five
feet.
What.
F
Accomplish
you
create
a
circular
pattern?
One
way
of
traffic
that
enters
on
bearing
comes
into
the
parking
garage
comes
into
the
parking
garage
exit,
the
parking
garage
EGIS.
The
parking
garage
comes
into
the
circular
driveway
exits
on
davis
boulevard.
You
avoid
the
traffic
constriction
at
bearing
and
west
and
davis
boulevard.
You
also
create
xix
parking
spaces
instead
of
14
parking
spaces.
So
you
avoid
the
blinding
effect
of
people
parking
on
side
streets
on
Columbia
Drive
on
Davis
Boulevard.
You
get
them
in
the
building
where
they
need
to
be
parking.
So
you
have
design.
F
G
F
F
F
G
F
G
F
F
F
G
F
Okay,
that's
yeah,
excellent!
Okay.
This
is
a
an
elevation
study
that
says
mike
is
prepared
in
to
orient
you.
You
are
standing
on
west
you're,
standing
on
each
Davis
you're,
looking
east
here's,
the
20
foot,
wide
setback
for
the
exit;
driveway;
here's
a
5
foot
setback
on
the
front,
here's
Barry!
This
is
the
building
we've
designed
and
you
see
the
balconies
extending
from
the
building
and
then
this
other
study
is
now
you're,
standing
on
Barron
and
you're.
F
22:21
foot
setback
Michael
prepared
a
similar
study
for
the
arm
24
and
the
1
to
1
after
30
feet,
and
this
is
what
you
get
you
get
now:
I'm
back
on:
Davis
Boulevard,
I'm,
looking
east
here's,
the
exit
driveway,
which
doesn't
function
anymore,
because
it's
too
narrow
at
20
feet
for
code,
here's
the
front
yard
at
25
feet
according
to
our
24
and
then
looking
south
from
bearing
on
Davis
Boulevard
by
right,
7
feet
along
Davis
Boulevard
by
right,
7
feet
in
the
rear
I'm.
On
the
side,
now,
what.
F
In
the
arm
or
study
you
get
full
access
because
you
don't
have
enough
room
to
do
the
circular
driveway,
so
full
access
on
Davis,
Boulevard,
full
axle
so
very
extreme.
Now
you
create
the
hazardous
use
of
Barrett
Street,
which
also
allows
more
cut
through
traffic
into
the
neighborhood.
Our
study,
you
can't
control
where
people
are
coming
from
in
traffic,
but
you
can
control
how
they
leave
so
we're
controlling
how
they
leave
we're
gonna
come
this
way.
We're
gonna
encourage
this
traffic
movement
left
turn
left
turn,
but
always
an
exit.
F
In
the
staff
report
that
was
prepared,
the
findings
are
consistent
and,
as
you
probably
saw
this
morning,
you've
seen
this
summary
sheet
from
the
staff.
All
consistent,
no
inconsistencies.
The
San
Diego's
mentioned
some
site
plan
revisions
that
she's
requested
for
us
to
prepare.
Those
are
all
acceptable
and
they're
noted
in
the
staff
report.
I.
F
F
Think,
what's
most
important
is
conclusion
number
six
on
page
four,
the
finding
is
the
subject:
property
is
currently
zoned
residential
multiple
family
would
allow
for
nine
dwelling
units
we're
designing
for
six.
The
surrounding
area
includes
planned
developments,
residential
single-family
and
attack,
multifamily
multi-family,
armed
35
and
single-family
residential.
This
very
important-
and
this
comes
up
in
the
planning
commission's
report.
The
property
is
located
in
the
Davis
Islands
urban
village
in
urban
villages
to
adjust
to
address
traffic
congestion.
F
F
You'll
see
maintain
minimal
front
set
back
to
building
heights
and
recesses
within
comparable
range
and
street
tree
to
provide
a
sense
of
vertical
enclosure
on
the
streets,
compatible
development
of
redevelopment
to
sustain
stable,
neighborhoods
and
ensure
the
social
economic,
health
of
the
city.
These
are
objectives.
What's
very
telling
is
the
staff
analysis
that
this
will
allow
for
compatible
infill
within
an
area
that
is
plan
for
development
for
up
to
35
units
per
acre?
F
There's
also
finding
about
this
neighborhood
and
the
finding
that
the
comprehensive
plan
promotes
a
more
urban
style
development
pattern
within
the
Central
City
neighborhoods,
especially
along
the
city's
arterial
Davis
boulevards
in
arterial
and
collector
corridors
within
the
city's
urban
villages.
Parking
will
be
provided
within
a
structured
internal
garage
that
will
be
integrated
into
the
overall
structure.
The
building
will
be
pedestrian
oriented.
F
That's
the
buzzword
these
days
with
the
main
lobby
being
provided
along
Davis
Boulevard,
as
is
the
Mirasol,
as
is
the
building
to
the
north,
as
is
the
booming
for
the
West,
totally
compatible
with
the
existing
development
pattern
in
the
neighborhood
and
with
the
arms
the
r35
plan.
Category
finally,
is
a
finding
of
the
Planning
Commission
staff
is
the
proposed
development
overall
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
uses
and
furthers
many
of
the
policies
and
objectives
for
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
F
F
F
That
brings
us
full
circle
and
what
we
analyzed
in
the
studies
of
the
our
m24
plant
Academy
at
Parkland
tourism
and
in
the
PD
solution.
And
to
summarize
for
you,
we
were
challenged
by
a
front
yard
old,
bearing
Street.
We
were
challenged
by
keeping
traffic
centered
on
the
site
and
partners
that
are
on
the
side
and
we're
challenged
by
neighborhoods
in
the
East
neighborhoods
in
the
south
and
how
to
best,
address
their
concerns
and
prepare
a
plan
that
says
it
to
the
neighborhood,
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
with
chapter
27.
F
M
We've
you've,
probably
seen
from
our
quasi
box
we've,
been
inundated
with
emails
about
this
and
there's
a
line
of
people
up
there.
You're
gonna
have
a
chance
to
rebut
whatever
they
say
at
the
end,
but
just
before
they
speak,
could
you
address
any
of
those
issues?
Why?
Why
is
there
so
much
opposition
to
this
I.
F
Think
there's
a
misunderstanding:
that
Davis
Boulevard
at
the
front
yard
I've
read
the
I,
read
the
letters
and
they
repeatedly
repeatedly
repeatedly
state
that
there's
a
freight
yard
orientation
of
Davis
Boulevard.
It
is
not
in
the
arm.
24
zoning
district.
The
front
yard
would
be
that
as
it
may
is
bearing
and
we're
bound
to
be
25
feet
from
that
front
yard.
That
was
the
design
challenge.
So
that's
that's
a
problem
in
this
business
where
you
have
in
an
unusual
lot.
That's
the
problem
was
the
frontage.
F
F
G
F
G
A
G
N
O
G
A
G
Of
the
immediate
surrounding
neighbors,
the
immediate
neighbor
to
the
east,
the
houses
for
sale,
so
we
have
not
been
in
touch
with
them.
The
project
to
the
north
is
a
multi-family
townhouse
project
of
about
the
same
height.
We
have
not
been
in
touch
with
that
immediate.
No,
so
there's
only
one
home
on
the
correct.
A
D
D
D
D
Okay,
so
there's
Davis-
and
this
is
variance.
The
shorter
of
the
two
streets
is
always
your
front
yard
from
setback
purposes.
So
this
would
be
your
front
yard
setback,
which
is
the
twenty
five,
and
then
this
would
be
your
corner
yard,
which
another
are
in
twenty
four
would
be
seven
now
your
front
and
door
does
not
have
to
face
your
front
yard,
but
for
purposes
only
the
front
yard
on
a
corner
is
always
the
shorter.
G
D
B
F
I
want
to,
if
that's
fine
I
have
so
giving
it
a
minute
thought
that
exchange
has
prompted
me
to
bring
something
else.
Go
ahead
on
the
front
yard
issue
that
Davis
island
Civic
Association
put
a
letter
in
the
record
and
they
say
and
I've
underlined
this
front
yard
orientation
the
proposed
site
plan.
F
Let
me
back
up
the
clear
established
historical
pattern
of
this
site.
A
proposed
site
plan
depict
front
yard
orientation
at
Davis.
Boulevard,
that's
wrong
has
shown
the
applicant
is
proposed
in
the
front
yard
on
Baron,
which
is
right.
That's
what
we're
doing
correctly
as
such
the
site
play
must
be
modified
to
meet
front
yard
requirements
of
the
code.
We
are
we're
not
requesting
a
waiver.
F
What's
more
important,
is
they
they
write
this
language
out
of
27
to
62
that
says
front
building
yard
means
yard
adjacent
to
that
wall
of
the
building,
which
contains
the
main
exterior
entrance
to
the
lobby,
we're
individual
units.
If
you
go
to
27
162
C,
that
is
orientation
of
front
yards
in
multi
building
projects,
so
you
have
on
a
farming
project
or
townhouses.
That's
the
orientation
of
the
front
yard
within
the
square.
Has
nothing
to
do
with
this
project?
It's
totally
wrong.
F
F
Burton
Mulford
I
expect
he'll
speak
to
you
this
evening,
but
his
letter
is
basically
concerned
about
traffic
on
Baron
and
Davis
Boulevard,
which
is
precisely
the
risk
issue
that
we
wanted
address
in
this
site.
Plan
I
had
several
close
calls.
Trying
to
turn
right
on
Davis
Boulevard
during
the
morning
commute
to
work
I've
attached
a
photo
which
shows
a
limited
view
of
Davis
Boulevard
northbound,
while
trying
to
enter
from
very
street.
B
F
B
You,
sir
okay,
now
we
go
to
public
comment.
If
you
heard
a
public
comment
and
I'm
number
10,
please
come
forward
at
this
time.
Each
person
gets
three
minutes.
Please
state
your
name
before
speaking.
I
don't
want
it.
So
we
get
a
good
idea
of
how
many
folks
are
here
to
speak
tonight.
If
you're
here
to
speak
tonight
on
item
number,
can
you
please
raise
your
hand?
Okay,
so
there's
a
couple.
B
I
would
ask
that
if
you're
planning
on
speaking
to
go
ahead
and
line
up
over
there,
you
know
what
we
can
do
on
both
sides
of
the
room
and
then
waking
out
one
from
each
side
just
go
just
so
that
we
have
a
good
number
on
the
countdown.
So
if
you
hear
the
speak
and
if
you're
able
to
stand,
please
go
ahead
and
stand
and
get
in
line.
A
N
A
A
Okay
now
mind:
you
account
like
members
of
the
audience
that,
when
you
assign
one
Speaker
waiver
form
you're
only
permitted
to
sign
one
speaker
way
reform
to
give
up
your
three
minutes
each
time.
Each
person
who
signs
of
Speaker
waiver
form
contributes
one
minute
to
the
speaker's
time.
Please
make
sure
you
don't
feel
submit
your
name
on
more
than
one
speaker
waiver
for
the
address
of
somebody
at
41,
barring.
What
is
the
name
please?
A
What
is
the
last
sorry
Hamrick?
Okay
Fred
starts
with
an
F
at
82.
Something
Drive
is
that
Columbia
Drive?
What
is
the
name
Fred?
What's
the
last
thing
far
as
anagen
Thank,
You
Katy
marques,
please
thank
you
and
Burton
Mumford
speaking
you're
speaking,
so
that
you
get
the
three
minutes
and
you
have
one
two,
three,
four:
five,
six
seven
names
for
a
total
of
ten
minutes.
Thank
you.
P
Hello,
my
name
is
Bert
Mulford,
my
husband
and
I
live
at
41
baring
Street
next
door
to
the
proposed
development
and
I
wanted
to
correct
the
record.
There
are
two
homes
directly
adjacent
to
the
proposed
development
and
we
do
have
our
house
for
sale,
but
we're
still
living
there.
The
Florida
Trust
for
Historic
Preservation
hosted
an
architectural
tour
that
showcased
the
Rose
anagen
house,
along
with
our
house,
has
a
classic
example
of
historic
residences
on
Davis
Islands.
The
Florida
Trust
is
an
organization
whose
mission
includes
the
safeguarding
of
the
historic
and
cultural
fabric
of
communities.
P
Additionally,
the
organization
promotes
community
input
in
the
policy
making
process.
With
that
in
mind
here,
we
are
before
you
being
given
an
opportunity
to
participate.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
Robert
we
Lodge
of
the
Sarasota
school
of
architecture
created
our
house
for
mr.
and
mrs.
John
Gaytan
in
1963
Albert
Alphonso
senior,
who
had
just
emigrated
with
his
family
from
Havana,
was
architect
in
charge.
P
The
end
result
was
one
of
the
most
unique
critically
acclaimed
mid-century
modern
houses
in
Florida,
my
husband,
Dean
and
I
feel
like
we
are
the
caretakers
of
the
Gaytan
house
both
indoors
and
outdoors.
It's
become
very
important
for
us
to
protect
our
home
and
surrounding
neighbor
neighborhoods
integrity.
We
feel
honored
to
live
here.
Accordingly.
It
is
ours
instability
to
ensure
that
single-family
home
rights
are
protected.
P
It's
of
utmost
importance
to
our
neighborhood
that
developers
respect
and
follow
code.
It
is
my
opinion
that
this
plan
development,
rezoning
application,
has
a
main
purpose
of
bypassing
code,
so
that
bigger
condos
over
4,000
square
feet
can
be
constructed.
That
ban
would
be
feasible
if
the
RM,
24
setback
and
hike
criteria
were
applied.
The
proposed
project
discounts
the
interests
of
neighboring
property
owners
by
pursuing
workaround
to
build
a
massive
structure.
Disregard
of
code
is
becoming
more
and
more
frequent
in
our
neighborhoods.
There
is
no
specific
hardship
that
would
justify
a
rezoning.
P
Comparing
85
Davis
to
the
rezoning
of
91
Davis
would
be
an
apples
to
oranges,
comparison,
a
significant
difference
between
the
two
or
that
85
Davis
borders,
single-family
homes,
whereas
91
Davis
borders,
multi-family
homes.
It
is
vital
to
the
well-being
of
our
community
that
the
rezoning
process
shall
not
be
used
for
the
purpose
of
waiving
current
land
development
regulations
respectively.
I'm
strongly
opposed
to
the
application
of
rezoning.
The
proposed
design
is
a
colossal
structure
which
is
contrary
to
open
space.
It
undermines
Davis,
Islands
spirit,
complexion
character
with
its
58
foot,
height
and
reduced
setbacks.
P
The
application
to
rezone
creates
a
platform
to
improperly
change
the
land
development
code.
The
staff
report
of
the
development
committee
fails
to
illustrate
that
the
project
violates
and
contradicts
various
land-use
policies
and
objectives,
for
example,
objective
one
point
to
create
inspired
urban
design
while
respecting
Tampa's,
human-scale,
unique
history,
aesthetics
and
cyntha.
Community
identity,
Davis,
Islands,
Community
Plan
reflects
the
charm
of
our
islands,
which
promotes
an
ongoing
mix
of
housing
that
allows
affordable
options
for
residents.
P
Have
laid
the
fours
anagen
house,
which
is
adjacent
to
the
property
proposed
to
the
current
Islander,
which
has
the
same
height
as
a
proposed
development.
So
this
really
shows
how
bulky
the
overall
project
would
be.
Put
it
up
against
single-family
homes
to
approve
a
site
plan
would
diminish
the
very
character
and
essence
of
the
adjacent
houses.
With
respect
to
unique
history,
six
of
the
most
historic
houses
on
Davis
Islands
are
on
the
block
of
Columbia
directly
adjacent
to
the
proposed
development.
P
Another
example
is
policy.
One
two
three
relate
new
buildings
and
development
to
the
context
of
the
neighborhood.
The
project
lacks
the
appropriate
context
and
proportion
relating
to
this
part
of
the
Davis
Islands
neighborhood.
The
oversized
structure
lacks
additional
setbacks
once
it
tight,
surpasses
30
feet
or
the
so
called
wedding
cake,
tiered
effect,
which
is
critical
to
limit
extensive
massing.
This
is
a
really
big
concern
of
ours.
The
wedding
cake,
tier
component
of
setbacks
is
vital
to
safeguard
the
rights
of
neighboring
property
owners.
It
limits
the
excessive
massing
of
a
structure.
P
The
project
is
not
well-suited
for
slow
keishon
and
is
not
compatible
with
the
adjacent
residences.
Another
example
policy
938,
it's
the
intent
of
a
city
that
developmental
prospects
shall
be
minimally
disruptive
to
adjacent
areas.
This
proposed
structure
would
overwhelm
our
properties,
encroaching
backyard
privacy,
reducing
open
base
and
undermining
sustainability.
P
The
entrance
driveway
to
the
project
will
border
our
homes.
Currently
the
porch.
That
portion
of
the
lot
is
a
passive
passive
space
where
there
is
no
through
a
traffic
contiguous
to
the
back
side
or
houses,
service,
trucks,
residents
and
guests
will
be
driving
alongside
our
kitchen
dining
room
and
outdoor
living
spaces.
P
If
this
project
is
approved
policy,
nine
point
four
point:
one
encourage
higher
density,
multifamily
development,
while
including
measures
which
minimize
the
appearance
of
bulk
a
massing
comparison
of
85,
Davis
Boulevard
with
91
Davis
or
the
Islander,
and
the
Marisol
shows
that
85
Davis
has
the
greatest
massing
ratio.
Two
point:
one
versus
one
point:
nine
for
91,
Davis
and
one
point
one
for
the
Mirasol,
so
I
have
an
aerial
shot
of
the
properties
that
I
use
in
the
massing
ratio
and,
as
you
can
see,
the
Islander
is
this
structure
here,
which
you
can
see
is
massive.
P
The
proposed
project
is
here
at
85,
Davis
and
the
Mirasol
is
here:
B
result
has
a
lot
of
land
surrounding
it
and
it
also
has
the
water,
so
the
mass
ratio
is
significantly
less
for
that
and
then
I've
got
this
massing
comparison
matrix
where
you
take
the
overall
lot
size
and
you
put
the
building
area
divide
that
by
the
lot
size
and
you
come
up
with
this
ratio.
So
this
proposed
projects
going
to
have
the
highest
mass
ratio
of
those
three
comparisons.
P
This
is
especially
distressing
since
85
Davis
is
adjacent
as
to
single-family
homes,
which
are
both
recognized
by
the
Florida
trust
for
their
historic
preservation
as
significant
architectural,
a
policy
nine
point,
five
point:
one
protect
low-density
single-family
areas
that
provide
residents
with
privacy
and
open
spaces.
This
project
would
infringe
upon
adjacent
properties
by
diminishing
the
neighborhood
privacy
and
the
Saint
sense
of
space
policy.
Nine
point
seven
point:
four:
to
maintain
a
consistent
and
appealing
character.
New
structures
are
compatible
with
existing
properties
in
terms
of
scale,
open
space
and
setback.
P
So
when
the
rezoning
of
the
Islander
was
approved
in
2016,
there
were
no
golf
carts
on
the
street,
no
scooters
on
the
sidewalks
and
no
bike
trails
that
is
now
changed
which
magnifies
the
importance
of
having
clear,
peripheral
views
of
our
streets
bearing
Street
is
the
gateway
and
pass
through
that
connects
Davis
Boulevard
with
the
marina
tennis
courts,
Garden,
Club,
baseball
field
and
swimming
pool.
My
neighbors
and
I
are
very
concerned
that
the
views
of
drivers
would
be
obstructed.
P
A
P
I've
got
one
last
photo
for
the
record,
and
this
is
a
photo
of
the
intersection.
Very
is
the
horizontal
Davis
Boulevard
is
a
vertical
and,
as
you
can
see,
with
the
reduced
setback
of
the
Islander,
you
have
to
stick
your
nose
out
from
the
car
to
see
around
the
blind
curve.
There's
a
blind
curve
on
Davis
Boulevard.
That
is
impaired
because
of
the
height
of
that
building
and
the
current
building
at
85
Davis
is
going
to
have
less
setback
with
the
project
than
it
does
now.
So
that's
certainly
a
concern
of
all
of
us
here.
P
G
L
A
Mister
Viator's
I've
got
something
for
you,
Viator,
okay,
mister
Viator
has
one
two
three,
four,
five,
six,
seven,
eight
mister
Viator.
You
don't
count.
You
get
two
three
minutes,
please
state.
Your
presence,
please
make
your
presence
known.
Malcolm
starts
with
a
kk
l
er
as
I
say
that
correctly,
okay
Zelda
starts
with
a
Z
94
Baltic.
What
is
the
name?
Please?
A
J
H
J
Presumed
Columbia
driver
very
concerned
with
the
above
reference
PD,
if
approved
I
submitted,
the
development
would
be
incompatible
with
the
historic
100%
single-family
neighborhood,
located
to
the
rear
of
this
proposed
development,
as
Bert
mentioned,
there's
two
significant
homes
right
up
next
to
it,
the
Gaytan
home,
which
he's
the
owner
of
and
the
firs
anagen
home,
which
has
been
a
lovely
maintained
and
restored
Mediterranean
Revival
home
from
the
20s
there's.
Actually
a
Mediterranean
Revival
homes
original
to
the
island.
J
Any
hardship
under
RM
24,
it's
a
pretty
significant
zoning
category
and
there's
tremendous
opportunities
to
develop
in
that.
You
realize
that
there
are
setbacks
required,
but
it's
a
a
very
generous
zoning
category.
We
we
feel
because
of
this
massing.
We
don't
think
it's
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
land
development
code
or
with
the
imagine
2040
2040,
Tampa,
Tampa,
Comprehensive
Plan.
J
We
believe
the
city
of
Tampa
did
not
properly
or
adequately
consider
the
purpose
for
the
site
plan
control
rezoning
and
therefore
we
believe
that
the
proposed
rezoning
is
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa,
the
purpose
but
I
not
requiring
the
petitioner
maintain
the
standard
technical
requirement
of
the
wedding
cake
sect
that
rule
whereby,
for
every
one
foot
in
height
in
excess
of
30
feet,
the
new
building
must
setback
one
additional
foot.
The
city
is
not
providing
careful
consideration
of
potential
adverse
impacts
to
the
surrounding
impacted,
single-family
name
on
Columbia
Drive.
J
The
purpose
section
27:36
purpose
promote
the
efficient,
sustainable
use
of
land
and
infrastructure,
with
careful
consideration,
potential
adverse
impacts,
natural
elements
surrounding
impacted,
neighborhoods
forces.
Specifically,
we
do
not
agree
with
the
conclusion
that
the
site
plan
associated
elevations
provide
the
mechanism
for
ensuring
that
the
proposed
development
will
relate
to
the
site
and
the
surrounding
built
environment,
as
required
in
Section,
27
36.
J
Regards
to
the
petitioner
and
Planning
Commission,
there's
often
reference
made
to
the
merits
all
being
seven
stories,
the
mere
assaults,
seven
stories,
but
it
sets
it.
It
comes
down
to
three
levels
on
the
north
and
the
south,
there's
actually
a
setback
of
120
feet
between
the
three-story
wing
on
the
south
and
165
feet
on
the
North.
The
entire
site
is
only
120
feet
deep
on
the
subject
property
we're
discussing
tonight.
J
The
issue
with
the
Hillsborough
County
City,
County,
Planning
Commission,
is
context
and
more
specifically,
the
Hillsborough
County
Planning
Commission
did
not
properly
or
adequately
apply
city
design,
goals,
objectives
policy,
specifically
the
Planning
Commission,
not
adequately
considered
policy.
Nine
point:
three,
eight,
nine
point:
four
one:
an
objective:
nine
point:
six,
nine
point:
three:
eight
specifically
by
not
addressing
how
the
massing
of
the
proposed
development
overwhelms
the
jason
single-family
residential,
the
Planning
Commission
did
not
adequately
address
the
negative
impacts
and
the
physical
development
patterns
and
address
any
mitigation
of
this
negative
impact.
J
On
the
neighbors
nine
point:
four:
by
not
addressing
April
force,
workforce
apartment
rental
units
for
six
residential
condos,
the
Planning
Commission
did
not
evaluate
the
reduction
in
residential
units.
These
existing
apartments
have
been
very
attractive
to
the
local
workforce.
In
many
instances,
work
at
Tampa,
General,
Hospital
or
other
nearby
employers
and
I
reported
the
opportunity
to
walk
to
work.
J
Nine
point
four
one
by
not
addressing
whether
the
largest
scale
structure
would
maintain
the
livability
in
our
community,
including
measures
which
minimize
appearances
of
bulk
is
evident.
The
Planning
Commission
did
not
adequately
apply
city
design,
goals,
objectives
and
policies,
specifically
in
9.41,
accommodate
larger
scale
structures,
while
maintaining
the
livability
of
these
communities,
including
measures
which
minimize
the
appearance
of
ball.
J
Looking
at
the
historic
nature
of
Davis
Island
in
the
original
planning
house
of
Florence,
we
believe
is
a
perfect
example
of
how
setbacks
should
and
the
adjoining
properties
should
relate
to
the
single-family
residential.
As
you
can
see,
it's
two
stories
at
the
back
and
then
stair-step
up
very
similar
to
the
wedding
cake
requirement.
Under
the
current
zoning.
J
Petitioners
proposed
plan
disregards
several
major
setback
requirements,
but
the
grade
level
and
upper
levels
with
additional
wedding
cake
setbacks
to
exacerbate
the
setbacks
issue.
Further,
the
petitioners
proposing
a
balconies
and
reef
extend
over
the
grade
level
setbacks.
This
would
allow
the
petitioner
to
develop
the
site
substantially
greater
density
than
would
be
allowed
under
the
arm
24
and
return.
The
petition
disregard
these
required
setbacks,
which
will
allow
the
additional
density
petitioners
offering
no
mitigation
at
all
to
the
single-family
residence
at
the
rear.
J
The
overriding
sense
from
the
neighbors
is
the
petitioners
completely
in
concerted
in
how
the
developments
massing
will
completely
overwhelm
the
single-family
residence
in
the
rear
just
quickly.
Here's
some
of
the
homes
I'm
going
to
be
a
drive.
A
lot
of
us
in
most
all
of
us
spend
a
lot
of
time
trying
to
maintain
a
great
Street,
Food
City.
J
We
think
an
example
of
something
was
developed
in
our
m-24
in
the
last
development
cycle
was
Villa
del
Mar,
councilman,
Dingell
felt
or
even
are
very
influential
and
helping
to
get
to
a
proper
solution
to
this
development.
Also
bill
ability,
an
NGO
which
is
directly
behind
the
single-family
residence.
Also,
this
is
a
forty
to
forty
foot
structure
and
again
it's
an
opportunity
to
do
something
arm
24
or
a
PD,
which
again
relates
more
effectively
to
the
single-family
residents
to
more
effectively-
and
you
know,
will
communicate
this
wedding
cake
scenario.
J
The
petitioner
provided
to
the
city
which
can
be
seen
in
black
and
white
and
that's
what
would
be
required
under
RM
24.
What
we
did
is
had
our
architect
over
leg,
read
on
that,
to
show
you
what
additional
massing
and
scale
they're
putting
on
plan.
That
is
the
condition
which
is
overwhelming
the
single
neighbors
to
the
rear.
J
You've
also
done
massing
studies
just
to
show
you
kind
of
what
happens
with
this
mass
in
the
three
different
locations,
depending
on
where
in
the
front
of
the
street
is
the
first
one
on
page.
14
shows
you
with
the
front
being.
If
it
was
based
on
arm,
24
could
be
set
back,
25
feet
in
the
front
20
in
the
rear
and
7
on
the
sides,
and
you
can
see
what
that
wedding
cake
would
look
like
if
they
lived
up
to
the
requirements
and
their
arm
24.
J
If
the
front
was
on
page
15,
it
shows
what
the
wedding
cake
would
look
like
if
the
front
was
225
feet
on
Davis
and
the
sides
were
bearing
in
next
Villa
de
venecia
and
the
last
one
is
effectively
what
is
being
proposed
and
again,
if
there
is
some
understanding
that
the
city
would
like
to
have
more
of
a
new
urban.
It's
kind
of
development
pattern
for
me
formed
a
zoning.
J
If
one
you
know
wants
to
agree
with
that,
but
at
least
they
should
still
honor
the
requirements
and
provide
some
relief
to
the
neighbors
from
the
rare
on
page
17.
We
kind
of
just
show
you
what
that
block
and
massing
looks
like
currently,
and
this
does
not
reflect
any
of
the
balconies
or
the
overhangs
and
then
the
last
page.
It's
just
a
blown-up
version
of
what
that
wedding
cake
should
look
like
under
the
RM
24.
J
B
G
J
J
You
know
I
gonna
deal
with
the
zoning
code.
John
Randolph
I
mean
I,
considered
John,
you
know
actually
a
good
friend,
nice
land
news
folks
around
town
I,
don't
like
to
put
that
as
anything
like
to
find
either
ways
to
work
with
developers,
or
you
know,
work
with
them
to
the
point
where
it
makes
sense.
J
So
very
seldom
do
I
usually
say
no,
but
I
think
this
is
really
inappropriate
and
and
by
not,
you
know,
dressing
that
that
wedding
cake
scenario,
that's
so
very
clearly
in
the
code
when
we
have
property
rights-
and
that
comes
with
the
you
know,
fundable
rights
and
one
of
them
is
to
enjoy
your
property.
That's
one
of
your
rights
and
I
have
no
problem.
My
neighbors
have
no
problems.
This
developer,
developing
this
site
to
the
full
opportunity
that
they
can
to
maximize
value
for
themselves.
J
J
G
F
A
G
To
speak
to
the
credentials
of
the
person
offering
it
it's
a
pretty
professional
presentation,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
it
gets
in
the
record
appropriately
labeled
and
just
for
your
benefit.
Mr.
Bopp
or
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
label.
This
as
neighbors
exhibit
one
and
give
it
to
the
clerk
for
the
record
when
I'm
done
with
it,
but
just
just
to
back
up
a
little
bit.
You
mentioned
you're
in
real
estate.
Do
you
do
commercial,
real
estate,
commercial.
J
G
J
A
Q
Hi,
my
name
is
Janice
Davis
I
am
the
president
of
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Association,
and
a
24
year
resident
of
Davis
Islands
dicus
stands
in
strong
opposition
to
this
rezoning
request
from
RM
24
to
PD
for
the
property
at
85
Davis
Boulevard.
Our
position
on
these
matters
is
consistent.
We
do
not
oppose
development
but
hold
firm
and
asking
city
departments
and
the
council
to
follow
the
code.
Q
We
shared
this
point
of
view
with
the
property
owners
for
this
request
and
her
attorney
when
they
met
with
our
dicas
zoning
committee
and
asked
if
they
revisit
the
plan,
and
they
did
not.
As
we've
stated
repeatedly,
Davis
Islands
is
under
tremendous
pressure
for
increased
densification,
driven
by
developers
trying
to
make
escalating
land
prices
work
by
adding
too
much
house
or
building
on
too
little
land.
Q
Dica
is
here
to
work
and
protect
the
character
of
our
special
community,
the
safety
of
our
residents
and
the
rights
of
neighbors
with
standing
who
are
most
affected
by
this
request.
We
believe
this
request,
in
short,
is
an
overreach
using
the
PD
as
a
vehicle
to
work
around
the
code,
Davis
Boulevard,
and
particularly
this
block
that
backs
up
to
beautiful
single-family
homes
that
face
the
Sandra
Freedman
tennis
courts,
the
Garden
Club,
the
marina,
the
ball
field
and
historic
pool
must
follow
the
height
and
setbacks
that
exist
in
the
current
code.
Q
Approval
of
this
rezoning
sets
a
dangerous
precedent
for
the
older
properties
between
barring
and
Arbor,
allowing
for
this
height
will
completely
and
permanently
change.
The
main
thoroughfare
on
our
island
I
asked
you
to
respectfully
not
to
allow
that
simply
stated.
This
design
is
too
massive
for
the
law.
It
pushes
its
structure
to
the
sidewalks
on
Davis
Boulevard
and
bearing
and
it's
upper
storeys
cantilever
out,
even
beyond
that,
presenting
a
hazard
for
drivers
and
pedestrians
alike.
Q
As
stated,
it
is
already
difficult
to
turn
from
bearing
to
Davis
because
of
the
Islanders
condominium
mass,
and
this
building
is
it's
replica
of
that.
It
is
short-sighted
of
the
city
to
approve
this
rezoning
on
a
busy
street
that
does
not
yet
have
bicycle
lanes
on
that
particular
area
and
certainly
does
not
accommodate
golf
carts.
I
know
our
wonderful
scooters
should
the
city
require
a
future
bus
cutouts
for
public
transportation
at
or
near
this
site.
The
option
would
not
be
available
if
this
project
is
approved.
Q
We
also
take
great
pride
in
the
economic
diversity
of
our
neighborhood
and
want
housing
that
accommodates
neighbors
at
all
levels
of
income,
nurses,
students,
firefighters,
law
enforcement,
as
well
as
trade
workers
who
helped
to
run
our
city
respectfully
on
behalf
of
our
Davis
Islands
community.
I.
Ask
you
to
deny
this
learning
request.
Thank
you.
N
I
Can
start
thank
you.
Debbie's
Merman,
190
to
Corsica,
Street
and
I
have
been
sworn.
The
proposed
development
is
huge
and
way
outside
the
scale
contemplated
within
the
land
development
code.
When
reviewing
this
application,
it
is
important
to
keep
in
mind
that
this
development
may
be
built
in
an
RM
24
zoning
district
without
any
waivers,
variances
exceptions
or
APD's.
The
developer
just
needs
a
bigger
site.
The
design
challenges
mentioned
to
you
tonight
were
never
addressed
in
the
application
or
in
the
project
narrative
the
project.
The
problem
with
this
is
not.
I
The
problem
is
not
with
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
or
the
land
development
code.
The
developer's
problem
is
self-imposed,
as
they
are
just
trying
to
build.
Something
about
is
too
big
for
the
site.
If
they
want
to
build
this
structure
in
an
hour
and
24
zoning
district,
they
can
they
just
need
a
bigger
site.
Now
this
development
is
substantially
similar.
291
Davis,
which
is
currently
under
construction,
was
a
Peruvian
PD
zoning,
in
spite
of
neighborhood
opposition.
Referring
to
this
photo
91
Davis
is
here,
85
Davis
is
here,
and
the
Mirasol
is
here.
I
We
all
recognize
that
decisions
that
seem
appropriate
when
rendered
made
in
hindsight
be
inappropriate
based
on
additional
information
regarding
the
facts
and
circumstances.
We
believe
hindsight
has
demonstrated
that
the
rezoning
for
91
Davis
was
inappropriate
and
out
of
character
with
the
neighborhood
I
have
introduced
four
letters
into
the
record
addressing
or
providing
one
historical
information
regarding
ninety
one
day,
that's
demonstrating
the
neighbors
pleas
to
denied
a
development,
as
it
would
be
too
large
for
the
site
and
incompatible
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
I
Two
comments
to
the
current
staff
report,
with
specific
references
demonstrating,
the
request
is
inconsistent
with
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
and
land
development
code,
three
addressing
massing
determination
and
concerns,
which
are
clearly
apparent
via
visual
evidence
and
analytical
data
for
correspondence,
demonstrating
with
a
lot
determination.
It's
inconsistent
with
the
land
development
code
and
establish
historical
pattern.
Please
recognize
that
our
community
is
not
opposed
to
redevelopment.
We
only
ask
that
decisions
follow
the
code
deviating
from
the
code,
takes
rights
from
certain
residents
and
gives
them
to
others.
I
I
I
I'm
up
I've
been
in
the
real
estate
business
in
Florida
since
1993
my
real
estate
career
started,
probably
in
1984
I'm
a
registered
municipal
advisor
for
the
Housing
Finance
Authority
in
a
major
County
in
South
Florida
I've
been
an
affordable
housing
in
Florida,
since
1993
I
read
codes
and
I
all
the
time
and
I
have
developed
side
skin
tint.
Thank.
B
R
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Phyllis
Fleming
I'm,
the
chair
of
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Association
stewardship
committee,
and
my
address
is
105
Chesapeake
Avenue
on
Davis
Islands,
the
Davis
Islands
community
plan
was
approved
by
Tampa
City
Council
in
November
of
2007
2007
I
respectfully
disagree
with
staff
recommendation
to
approve
this
request
and
I.
Ask
that
you
deny
it
for
the
following
reasons:
the
mass
of
this
PD
is
out
of
character
for
and
encroaches
on,
the
adjoining
development
nearby.
If
permitted,
it
will
reiterate
the
obtrusive
and
overbuilt
design
standard
of
91
datas.
R
This
is
a
massive
footprint
for
just
six
units
and
it
has
many
design
deficiencies.
Most
flagrant
among
these
deficiencies
is
the
drastic
increase,
pervious
surface
area.
This
issue,
in
addition
to
those
raised
by
other
islands
residents,
conflict
with
the
Davis
islands
community
plan,
as
well
as
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
Davis
Islands,
is
designated
as
an
urban
village,
specifically
page
44
of
the
comp
plan
states.
Some
urban
villages
may
see
substantial
growth
and
change
eg
Channel
district,
because
that
is
what
is
called
for
in
their
secondary
plans.
R
Other
urban
villages
will
see
only
modest
change
because
their
secondary
plans
don't
call
for
a
lot
of
growth
and
change,
eg,
Davis
Islands
and
Hyde
Park.
The
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
also
has
an
entire
neighborhood
element
devoted
to
goals,
objectives
and
policies
for
neighborhoods
and
community
plans.
R
Any
objective
1.3
engage
neighborhood
residents
and
organizations
and
collaborative
out
efforts
to
share
information
solve
problems
and
plan
for
the
future.
Our
community
plan
states.
The
islands
community
has
a
pleasant
scale,
a
village
center,
as
one
would
expect,
with
a
small
town
buildings
oriented
to
the
street
and
design
for
pedestrians.
Buildings
are
predominantly
low,
scaled
in
height
and
oriented
to
the
sidewalk,
multifamily
dwellings
and
townhomes
are
part
of
the
housing
mix,
but
are
limited
and
attractively
designed
and
planned
to
blend
in
with
islands
and
encourage
the
social
interact.
Thank.
R
Credentials
are
I
retired,
as
the
director
of
business
retention
and
expansion
for
the
Tampa
Hillsborough
EDC.
Previously
I
was
a
planner
for
the
Planning
Commission
and
Hillsborough
County
I've
served
on
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Association,
as
well
as
the
stewardship
committee
for
the
neighborhood
plan.
I
worked
tirelessly
to
try
to
have
the
community
plan
approved,
which
was
approved
in
2007
as
I
mentioned,
and
second
and
seconded
by
you,
council,
amending
Felder,
at
which
time
you
called
our
community
plan,
a
vision
for
the
future
and
I
just
like
to
say
the
future
is
now
and.
R
B
M
So
you
taught
us
today
about
compliments,
substantial
legal,
sorry,
we're
getting
tired
here
evidence
a
couple.
People
have
talked
about
the
Davis
Island
plan,
which
is
it
so
we
have
a
comprehensive
plan.
We
have
the
zoning
and
then
we
have
the
Davis
Island
plan
is
anything
that
conflicts
with
the
Davis
Island
plan?
Is
that
competent,
substantial
evidence
or
not.
C
M
C
R
C
E
Did
fantastic
I
would
just
like
to
clarify
that
their
plan
is
incorporated
into
the
Comprehensive
Plan
as
information
to
read
about
what
the
community
vision
is,
but
it
was
my
understanding
that
it
was
approved
by
resolution
and
there's
no
specific
policy
direction
for
Davis
Island.
The
Seminole
Heights
has
very
specific
policy
directions
for
that
area
of
the
city
in
the
plan,
and
that
is
not
the
case
in
Davis
Island,
but
again
it
is
in
an
urban
village
and
we
have
specific
policy
direction
for
urban
villages
and
those
are
included
in
the
report.
E
N
Okay,
good
evening,
my
name
is
dawn.
Green
I
live
at
62,
Columbia
Drive
next
to
Ward
via
tour
with
my
wife,
Nell,
a
Tampa
native,
raise
your
hand,
Mill
Robinson,
High,
School
I
could
have
gone
there,
except
at
the
time
it
would
have
been
a
long
commute
from
Brooklyn
I'm,
a
published
historian,
I
taught
at
HCC
Ybor
for
many
years,
which
is
why
I
wanted
to
speak
tonight
and
may
and
perhaps
take
a
slightly
different
perspective
on
this
situation,
where
possible,
I
like
to
view
things
from
a
historical
perspective.
N
How
does
a
particular
development
of
any
kind
fit
in
within
a
historical
trend?
Strange
as
it
may
seem
what
I
see
in
this
project
at
85?
Davis
is
an
issue.
We
hear
a
lot
about
these
days,
that
is
about
the
1%,
getting
more
of
the
goodies
than
the
rest
of
us
and
often
at
our
expense,
and
that
is
how
I
see
this
project
I
believe.
N
N
It's
a
perfectly
fine
building
the
way
it
is
now
with
lots
of
grass
and
open
space
and
grateful
working
people
if
they
want
to
tear
down
and
replace
it
with
a
building
for
the
rich.
That
is
their
right,
but
it
should
be
within
the
current
established
code
of
height
and
setbacks
that
is
appropriate
for
the
neighborhood.
We
don't
want
a
Home
Depot.
We
want
a
wedding
cake
if
they
want
to
develop
that
property
within
the
established
code,
but
like
the
1%
who
are
accumulating
most
of
the
wealth.
That
is
not
good
enough
for
these
people.
N
They
want
the
city
of
Tampa
to
allow
them
to
create
a
massive
Incredible
Hulk
that
would
loom
over
nearby
homes,
and
that
would
be
detrimental
to
neighborhood
values
and
aesthetics,
while
they
profit,
and
they
want
you
to
collude
with
them
in
this
project
and
most
definitely
there
is
no
hardship
here.
So
we
ask
you
to
please
reject
their
proposal.
Thank
you.
Thank.
S
Good
evening
Tampa
City
Council
members.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
address
you
tonight.
My
name
is
Christine
Durr
and
I'm.
A
17-year
resident
of
Davis
Island
I
live
in
this
house.
It's
78,
Columbia
I
lived
there
with
my
husband
and
my
family.
I
am
here
to
speak
in
opposition
to
this
project
and
I
live
by
the
way.
I
live
right
next
to
the
FAR's
Anakin's
and
then
the
four
Diegans
are
right.
S
Next
to
the
Gaytan
house,
you
heard
Burt
earlier
and
I
would
like
to
use
my
time
to
read
a
letter
from
Carol
Gaytan
and
it
says
dear
Tampa,
City
Council,
my
name
is
Carol
Guyton
and
I
lived
at
41
bearing
Street
from
1963
to
2013.
My
husband
John
attended
many
City
Council
meetings.
While
we
lived
on
Davis
Island,
he
served
several
terms
as
president
of
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Association.
S
He
was
a
vigorous
advocate
for
maintaining
the
charm
character
and
spirit
of
this
unique
and
diverse
neighborhood
Jones
Saul
Gloria
Russo
and
John
spent
many
evenings
meeting
in
our
living
room
to
discuss
how
to
protect
the
integrity
and
character
of
Davis
Island.
He
and
I
were
especially
concerned
about
the
desire
of
developers
to
rezone
with
the
purpose
of
circumventing
setback
rules.
Consequently,
the
rights
of
the
surrounding
property
owners
would
be
infringed.
The
preservation
of
healthy,
open
space
is
very
much
the
ambience
and
complexion
of
Davis
Island.
S
The
massive
scale
of
the
requested
development
is
contrary
to
open
space.
If
the
request
is
granted,
the
reduced
setback
of
the
building
will
make
it
more
difficult,
difficult
for
drivers
to
turn
onto
Davis
Boulevard
from
bearing
Street
because
of
their
more
obstructed
view
with
extraordinary
respect
to
the
Tampa
City
Council.
My
husband
John
would
be
steadfastly
opposed
to
the
oversized
and
towering
proposed
development.
S
Likewise,
I
am
firmly
opposed
to
the
request
for
rezoning
are
easy:
19
50,
located
at
85
Davis,
Boulevard,
Sincerely,
Yours,
Carol
Guyton,
and
with
my
remaining
time
I
would
like
to
address
some
remarks
that
the
petitioner
made
that
somehow
all
of
us
that
are
here
speaking
in
opposition
to
this
project
are
somehow
misunderstood
or
misinformed,
or
we
just
don't
understand.
We
do
understand.
That's
why
we're
here.
Thank
you
very
much
question.
G
S
S
S
G
In
in
looking
at
their
elevations
and
the
mass
of
the
proposed
project
and
I
believe
you're,
an
attorney
as
I
recall,
do
you
have
any
information
factual
information
as
related
to
those
I,
was
pointing
out
those
terraces
that
are
shown
on
the
elevations,
how
they,
how
they
would
interact
with
your
backyard?
Well,.
S
R
Hello,
I'm
Patricia,
Megan,
Lee
I
live
at
43:10,
West
San
Juan
street
in
Tampa.
That's
in
Virginia,
Park
I've
lived
there
for
30
years
and
I'm.
Also
the
secretary
of
the
Virginia
Park
Neighborhood
Association
I
would
like
to
remind
each
of
you
of
campaign
promises
made
to
listen
to
campus
neighborhoods
and
with
that
I
would
now
like
to
read
a
letter
sent
by
the
Virginia
Park
Neighborhood
Association
president
Thomas
Connolly
to
the
City
Council
on
July
17th
of
this
year.
R
Dear
city
council,
I
am
writing
in
opposition
to
the
rezoning
of
res
1950,
located
at
85
Davis
Boulevard
as
a
president
of
a
Neighborhood
Association
facing
similar
challenges
with
developers
looking
to
circumvent
the
existing
zoning
requirements
by
seeking
rezoning
to
a
PD
I
join
with
my
Davis
Island
neighbors
to
fight
this
massive
structure
that
will
not
comply
with
the
RM
24
setback
regulations.
Excuse
me,
requirements
have
stated
in
the
official
schedule
of
district
regulations.
R
It
has
become
apparent
that
many
developers
are
not
using
the
PD
plan.
Development
as
it
is
intended
and
as
it
is
stated,
quote
developments
that
are
characterized
by
unique
conditions
or
situations
which
other
zoning
districts
cannot
accommodate,
including,
but
not
specifically,
limited
to
unusual
physical
or
environmental
features,
transportation,
access,
etc
and
quote.
The
applicant
has
not
stated
any
unique
conditions
or
situations
that
the
current
are
and
24
requirements
do
not
allow.
The
applicant
is
using
the
PD
to
overcome
the
required
setbacks
that
are
not
a
unique
condition
or
situation.
R
These
types
of
rezoning
request
should
not
be
considered
unless
they
meet
the
requirements
stipulated
in
27
156
and
should
be
denied
at
the
pre-application
counseling
phase
with
the
land
development
coordination
vision.
The
PD
petition
is
also
in
counterfeit
contravention
of
imagine
2040
Tampa's
comprehensive
plan,
which
states
quote
limit
the
use
of
planned
development
district
rezoning
petitions
to
allow
development
consistent
with
future
land
use
designation,
but
not
otherwise,
permitted
by
current
zoning
districts.
R
Unquote,
the
current
RM
24
allows
up
to
nine
to
welding
units,
so
a
PD
is
not
needed,
warranted
or
allowed
if
the
requirements
and
guidance
of
Tampa
city
code
and
imagine
2040
are
enforced.
Please
deny
this
petition
for
not
complying
with
the
requirements
or
intent
of
city
code
and
imagine
2040,
since
it
does
not
quote,
promote
and
encourage
development
were
appropriated,
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
impact
to
the
neighborhood.
Thank.
B
L
Hi,
my
name
is
Caroline
Bennett
I
am
on
the
Executive
Board
of
the
Virginia
Park
Neighborhood
Association,
our
president
Tom
Connolly,
couldn't
be
here
tonight.
I
am
here
to
speak
in
opposition
of
this
rezoning,
my
father-in-law
owned
a
construction
company
in
New
York
now
I
was
born
in
Florida
and
we
native
Floridian.
We
hate
it
when
people
from
up
north
it
north.
We
did
it
disobey.
L
Now
I
apologize,
I'm,
a
southerner
I
can't
do
a
New
York
accent,
no
matter
how
hard
I
try
but
the
point
is
they
get
this
right
and
we
get
it
wrong
in
New,
York
and
also
here,
I'd
like
to
add
the
buyer
has
a
legal
responsibility
to
know
what
they
can
and
can't
do
with
a
property
when
they
buy
it
up.
There,
people
buy
the
property
that
will
fit
their
plans
and
they
make
their
plans
to
fit
the
property.
My
mother-in-law
on
0.92
acres.
L
When
the
builders
told
city
council,
they
wanted
to
rewrite
the
tree
code.
The
main
reason
they
cited
was
predictability
and
consistency.
They
wanted
to
be
able
to
look
at
a
lot
and
know
what
they
could
do
with
it
and
not
waste
their
valuable
trying
time
trying
to
get
variances
well,
I
agree
with
them
all
of
this
leniency
and
subjectivity,
and
special
consideration
and
constant
exceptions,
waste
everybody's
times
and
time
and
resources,
especially
the
cities.
I,
look
at
all
of
this
and
I
hear
a
giant
sucking
sound.
L
L
Is
it
here
to
the
law,
adhere
to
the
big
picture,
long
term
professional
planning
of
this
city
that
laid
out
zoning
and
codes
as
a
parent
if
I
went
into
the
grocery
store
and
my
child
threw
a
fit
for
some
candy
and
I
gave
in
because
I
was
exhausted
or
frazzled
and
I
didn't
have
the
strength
to
stand
up
to
them.
I
was
guaranteeing
a
full
blown
hissy
fit
the
next
ten
times.
I
went
to
the
store
in
New
York
they're,
like
the
good
parent
who,
when
they
set
the
ground
rules,
they
mean
it.
L
So
when
they
go
into
that
store,
they
don't
waste
all
that
energy
fighting
hissy
fits
so
I'm
asking
you
to
be
that
good,
responsible
parent
and
follow
the
law.
If
the
law
is
wrong,
the
right
thing
to
do
is
to
change
it.
Don't
circumvent
it.
One
exception
at
a
time
governing
by
exception
is
the
poorest
way
to
government.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very.
S
Good
evening,
I'm
Carol,
hangin'
and
I
reside
at
56
Columbia
it's
about
halfway
between
Arbor
and
burying
on
Columbia
lived
there
for
three
years
prior
to
that.
For
two
years,
I
lived
in
an
apartment
at
69,
Davis
Boulevard,
which
is
north
of
where
this
is
pretty
being
proposed.
Now
2014
or
2015
I
can't
remember
which
year,
but
in
July
we
had
four
or
five
straight
days
of
rain
and
out
of
my
second-story
apartment,
I
witnessed
people
kayaking
down
towards
the
intersection
of
Bering
and
Davis.
S
S
Tampa
has
not
taken
steps
to
mitigate
the
drainage
and,
in
fact,
by
continuing
to
allow
permit
variances
to
our
existing
zoning
structures
has
taken
up
more
land.
We
have
two
houses
going
in
three
three
doors
down
from
me
on
a
lot
where
it'll
be
three
houses
where
one
house
used
to
stand
so
I
did
some
homework.
I'll,
be
brief.
S
One
inch
of
rain
on
one
acre
of
land
equals
27,000,
154,
gallons
or
113.
Tons
of
rain
water,
deciduous
trees,
prevent
flooding
by
retaining
water
on
the
branches
and
believes,
and
they
absorbed
between
50
and
80
gallons
of
water
into
the
roots.
Non
deciduous
trees
can
absorb
500
gallons
in
a
one
inch
frame
for
our
block.
This
block
has
already
lost
seven
large
trees
and
the
permeable
surface
is
being
covered
by
construction.
S
Okay.
This
will
be
if
this
building
is
allowed
to
be
to
be
built,
there
will
be
an
additional
three
hundred
or
three
million
cubic
inches
of
runoff
rain
in
one
rain
fall
anyone
who's
gone
down.
Columbia
knows
that
there
are
standing
puddles
already
between
the
corner
of
bearing
and
up
about
five
houses.
The
land
between
the
Davis
bike,
I,
say
besides
garden
center.
Thank.
C
C
We
are
within
the
250
foot
radius
and
therefore
have
standing
we're
proud
that
our
home,
one
of
the
first
five
built
on
Davis
Islands,
has
received
an
award
from
the
National
Trust
for
Historic
Preservation
and,
as
you
heard
from
Burt,
we
have
hosted
the
National
Trust,
the
Florida
National
Trust
for
Historic
Preservation
during
their
annual
conference
and
both
of
our
houses,
because
they
felt
that
they
were
so
representative
of
the
best
examples
of
preservation
in
the
area.
When
we
bought
our
home,
we
recognized
that
development
would
occur
on
the
block
behind
us.
C
We
reviewed
the
code
with
our
realtor
and
made
the
decision
to
buy,
with
the
full
expectation
that
we
were
protected
by
the
zoning
and
by
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
which
carefully
outlines
development
standards,
as
each
of
you
know
better
than
anyone.
There
is
a
real
concern
in
our
neighborhoods
that
the
rights
of
homeowners
are
being
eroded
by
Delap
developers,
short-term
profits
in
their
desire
to
squeeze
as
much
square
footage
as
they
can
on
Lots
that
were
never
envisioned
for
that
scale.
C
Also,
neither
the
owner
nor
the
developer
had
the
courtesy
to
reach
out
to
those
of
us
directly
and
significantly
impacted
by
this
rezoning
to
discuss
the
issue.
I've
attended
enough
of
these
hearings
to
know
that
Council
expects
developers
to
work
with
the
neighbors.
Instead,
this
process
has
been
compromised
by
using
this
hearing
as
a
mechanism
to
force
a
vote
on
an
issue
that
dramatically
impacts
our
lives.
What's
the
hurry,
why
isn't
there
a
requirement
that
residents
and
homeowners
be
engaged
in
the
process
before
you
are
asked
to
arbitrate?
C
Look
I
was
going
to
show
you
the
picture,
but
you
took
a
message,
but
that
was
my
house
that
was
juxtaposed
to
the
58
foot
structure.
All
privacy
is
lost
to
us.
That's
within
20
feet
of
our
house.
Our
homes
value
is
no
doubt
diminished
and
all
because
the
owner
and
developer
wish
to
maximize
profits.
The
owner
has
every
right
to
build
a
new
structure
that
conforms
with
the
code.
It
will
be
larger
than
what
is
there
now
that's
understood.
C
What
I
can
understand
is
that
the
city
would
allow
this
circumvention
of
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
policy.
It
stands
in
stark
contrast
to
the
Davis
Island
community
plan.
I
also
just
wanted
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Mary
because
she's
fielded
so
many
calls
and
she's
been
so
gracious
and
I
really
appreciate
it.
Thank
You.
C
G
C
I
C
G
C
G
G
C
You
know
when
ninety-one
Davis
was
built.
The
understanding
was
that
that
block
north
of
us
was
always
intended
to
be
multifamily.
That
was
the
intention.
It's
going
to
be
that
block
in
front
of
the
marina
is
going
to
be
developed.
It's
a
beautiful
block
for
development.
Our
block
is
very
different.
The
front
of
Columbia
Drive
is
all
single-family
homes,
and
six
of
them
are
the
moat.
There
are
historic
homes
and
so
to
suggest
that
that
structure
means
this
structure
ought
to
be
supported.
C
To
me
is
is
absolutely
incorrect
and
actually
you
and
councilman
Miranda
were
helpful
to
our
block
when
Villa
Valencia
was
built
because
that
was
held
at
40
feet,
and
so,
even
though
it
was
it
was
big,
and
you
know
we
all
you
you,
you
not
only
held
it
at
40
feet,
but
you
required
the
developer
to
break
up
the
mass,
so
it's
different
building
stuff
and
so
we've
been
able
to
plant
foliage
and
do
a
very
good
job
of
screen.
This
is
18
feet
higher
than
that.
D
B
A
G
O
O
First,
given
the
interest
in
this
matter,
let
me
underscore
we
did
endeavor
to
limit
comment
and
it
tried
to
be
efficient
with
your
time
and
again.
We
appreciate
your
pace
and
patience,
but
we
could
align
people
out
the
door
because
of
the
passion
and
what
you've
heard
this
evening.
The
frustration
involving
these
requests
for
PDS
and
zoning
workarounds
our
code
is
far
from
perfect
I,
don't
wear
a
red
shirt.
O
O
O
O
There
are
many
details
here
that
warrant
denial
and
I'm,
proud
of
everyone
that
spoke
this
evening
and
the
passion
and
the
and
the
specifics
that
they
brought
to
the
table,
but
the
absence
of
appropriate
setbacks,
the
impact
on
adjacent
neighbors
with
rights
and
what
we're
doing
to
the
east
Davis
right
of
way.
How
long
did
we
battle
to
try
and
come
up
with
a
design
for
East
Davis
roadway
improvements
at
every
intersection?
O
It
was
oh,
we
don't
have
enough
right
away
once
you
give
it
up,
you
never
give
it
back
and
the
determination
that
East
Davis
is
a
side
yard
and
warrants
being
right
up
against
the
sidewalk.
You
know
when,
when
we
move
towards
significant
densification
with
the
SPP
development
down,
what
did
we
do?
We
wouldn't
be
on
code
for
setback.
We
went
beyond
code
for
pedestrian
safety
and
safes
and
Complete
Streets
to
make
sure
that
those
corridors
worked
in
an
urban
environment
and
guess
what
we
also
did
it
in
an
urban
setting.
O
We
have
good
examples
of
great
design
that
have
been
referenced
tonight.
Unfortunately,
most
of
them
are
historical
Marisol
beautiful
example.
The
work
that
was
done
to
make
Villa
del
Mar
what
it
is
as
you
drive
by
it,
there's
front
yards,
there's:
foil,
foilage,
there's
trees.
If
you
looked
at
this
site
plan,
it's
pretty
barren,
it's
right
up
against
these
Davis
on
the
one
frontage
and
on
the
back,
it's
leering
at
our
neighbors,
with
increased
traffic
on
either
side
impacting
those
neighbors.
O
O
This
one
seems
pretty
straightforward
complex
as
it
is,
so
there
is
no
public
purpose.
There
is
no
unique
condition
that
warrants
this
PD,
just
bad
historical
precedent
that
staff
referenced
and
relied
on
in
their
report.
Please
take
the
lead,
set
a
new
precedent
and
design
deny
this
request.
Thank.
O
I
would
humbly
consider
myself
a
master
commercial
developer,
I
led
Tremmel,
crow
company
for
20
years
for
the
state
of
Florida
and
throughout
the
southeast,
I've
developed
over
a
billion
dollars
worth
of
commercial
real
estate
over
20
million
square
feet
before
leaving
and
joining
mr.
vinick's
venture,
which
I
led
for
four
years
through
the
assemblage
and
master
planning
I'm
a
commercial
broker
mortgage
broker
and
a
LEED
AP.
Thank
you,
sir
councilman.
M
Was
my
first
question,
my
second
question:
I'm
legal.
Stop
me
if
I
can't
ask
this,
but
you
are
the
zoning
chance
or
the
Neighborhood
Association,
and
you
helped
organize
the
testimony
tonight
and
I
think
because
of
your
background,
you
also
know
what
what
we
need
to
hear
or
what
we're
able
to
use
from
what
was
said
tonight.
But
what?
What
would
be
your
quick
summary
of
the
competent
substantial
evidence
that
you
all
presented
tonight
for.
O
Student
foremost,
there
are
no
demonstrated
unique
circumstances,
as
required
by
code.
That
to
me
is
compelling
on
its
face
and
alone
by
its
face.
Second,
is,
as
you
heard
this
evening,
the
inconsistency
if
you
will,
with
the
data
file
up
and
I
and
I,
understand
the
limitations
of
how
its
embraced
in
in
the
comprehensive
plan
but
and
in
thirdly-
and
perhaps
most
importantly,
is
the
clear
negative
impact
on
existing
ownership,
property
rights.
O
Imagine
and
I
rode
my
bike
endlessly
around
the
site
this
morning,
imagine
being
next
door
to
that
and
thinking
of
trying
to
barbecue
in
the
backyard
with
three
tiers
of
terraces
staring
down
through
your
through
your
backyard
window.
It's
you
look
on
east
Davis
and
you
say:
oh,
what's
one
more
in
the
middle,
we
did
these
two,
but
the
character
of
what's
occurring
on
the
street
behind
is
compellingly
different
and
those
property
owners
are
sick,
nificantly
negatively
impacted,
plus
it's
poor
urban
design,
they're
giving
up
East
Davis
right
of
way
that
we
should
never
surrender.
O
C
C
Do
but
that's
okay,
so
wait.
The
applicant
has
an
opportunity
to
sure
about
anything.
I
heard
a
lot
of
testimony
about
uniqueness,
exceptions,
variances
things
of
that
nature.
This
is
not
a
variant
standard;
it
would
violate
the
essential
requirements
of
them
all
for
you
to
apply
that
standard.
The
standard
that
you
must
apply
is
whether
or
not
the
applicant
has
demonstrated,
but
they
are
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
If
they
have
met
that
burden,
then
you
have
to
look
for
other
testimony
in
the
record
about
damage
to
the
public,
health,
safety
or
general
welfare.
C
Again,
your
standard
is
competence.
Central
evidence
and,
in
addition,
we
have
in
our
code,
are
provisions
regarding
the
purpose
of
a
planned
development
district
that
is
relevant
and
that
is
that
is
relevant
to
the
essential
requirements
of
law
that
is
found
on
pages
3,
&
4
of
the
staff
report.
You
may
refer
to
those
a
detractor
motion
and
with
respect
to
the
comprehensive
plan
and
consistency
with
that
I
heard
some
comprehensive
plan
policies
conference
this
evening.
You
may
certainly
rely
on
those.
You
should
not
rely
on
the
Davis
Islands
plan,
as
we
mentioned
earlier.
C
C
F
Want
to
to
begin
by
reading
and
finding
and
the
Planning
Commission's
report
on
page
four,
the
proposed
rezoning
would
allow
consideration
of
a
maximum
of
six
dwelling
units
on
the
subject
site
and
an
overall
density
of
fifteen
units
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
residential
35,
which
is
35
units
per
acre
use
designation.
The
PD
will
be
in
similar
form,
height
and
scale
of
surrounding
residential
users
found
along
Davis
Boulevard.
F
This
proposal
will
not
alter
the
character
of
development
pattern
of
Davis
Islands
urban
village
we're
armed
24.
The
neighborhood
opposition
is
an
RS
60
zoning
district.
The
toughest
rezoning
you'll
ever
do
is
a
rezoning
that
comes
against
a
different
changing
district,
so
we
have
a
changing
district
in
the
RM
24
code.
Barring
is
the
front
yard
25
feet,
there's
no
change
in
it.
West
the
Davis
Boulevard
side
is
7
feet
and
the
other
side
that's
been
talked
about
all
evening
is
7
feet.
F
F
The
storm
water
is
going
to
be
vaulted
underneath,
so
that
should
not
be
a
big
issue.
The
Planning
Commission
report
and
the
zoning
administrative
report
should
not
be
given
short
shrift.
They
are
following
direction
of
a
new
urbanism
of
efficient
uses
of
land.
Less
greens
is
less
water
adjacent
to
urban
villages
like
Davis
Island,
better
traffic
management
that
create
a
pedestrian
village
concept.
And
how
do
you
all
do
that?
You
have
to
do
that
through
a
PD
rezoning
to
make
the
project
as
efficient
as
possible,
especially
with
a
25-foot
front
yard
on
Bourbon
Street.
F
With
all
of
that
said
this
evening,
we
respectfully
quest
the
continuance
of
the
project
for
60
days.
We've
gotten
clear
message
that
massing
is
the
issue.
I
haven't
heard.
Testimony
on
traffic
I
haven't
heard
testimony
on
trees,
I
haven't
heard
testimony
stormwater
we've
resolved
that
with
stormwater
retention.
We
have
a
massing
issue,
albe
it
at
21,
feet,
setback
and
a
24
foot
setback.
When
you
can
be
at
7
feet
all
day
long
by
right.
F
You
can
do
the
stair
step
under
RM
24,
but
we
can
also
put
amenities
on
those
terraces
swimming
pools.
Outdoor
bars,
music,
you
name
it.
This
is
a
totally
enclosed
residential
project.
So
if
you
do
the
step
back,
you're
going
to
get
outdoor
activity
as
of
right
under
the
arm,
24,
so
I
want
everyone
to
be
clearly
aware
of
that
is
out
there.
We
want
to
take
some
time.
Mike
wants
to
get
the
drawing
board
out.
We
can
do
some
more
revisions
and
do
some
some
some
more
elevations
and
I
respectfully
request
that
continuance.
F
B
F
Of
the
property
for
30
days,
I
mailed
notices
to
all
required
folks
within
250
feet.
I
met
with
mr.
Albert
when
a
somber
man
and
my
client
Maria
colfur
at
the
tennis
court.
So
we
did
meet
with
representatives
of
dica,
we'll
meet
with
them
again
come
one.
Come
all
we'd
like
to
do
another
site
plan
and
bring
it
to
them,
and
then
that
would
probably
require
another
meeting
with
Mary
staff
and
then,
within
that
timeframe,
I
think
it
might
take
about
60
days.
I'd
like
to
leave
you
one
anecdote.
F
A
Mr.
Brando,
that
was
that
was
in
my
mind,
to
kind
of
put
that
out
there
for
you,
but
being
the
smart
attorney.
You
are
like
to
thank
you
for
for
asking
that
I
think
that's
very
noble,
I
think
the
residents
of
the
day
was
either.
They
should
be
very
appreciative
of
that
being
that
the
new
laws
have
changed
and
we're
under
a
different
type
of
guidelines
and
scrutiny
right
now,
with
laws
applied
now.
Even
these
issues,
so
I
want
to
commend
you
for
putting
that
out
there
and
finding
the
olive
branch
Thank
You.
G
I'm
not
thrilled
about
the
continuous
requests,
I
think
councils,
probably
ins
houses,
pretty
much.
Have
it
as
a
matter
of
right.
You
know,
I
mean
was
the
will
still
vote
on
it,
but
it
doesn't
throw
me
mr.
grand
off
many
years
ago,
I
thought
about
a
process
and
I.
Think
the
nice
lady
from
Virginia
Park
alluded
to
this
I
thought
about
a
process
for
pd's
that
would
actually
mandate
right.
G
F
G
F
Pre
but
I
want
I,
want
you
to
know
mr.
Dane
fella
that
before
we
sent
the
notices,
my
client
Maria
colfur
sent
a
request
to
meet
to
the
Davis
Island
Civic
Association,
with
the
site
plan,
has
prepared
pre
notice
and
did
not
get
a
response
until
several
other
reminder,
emails
to
which
created
the
meeting
that
we
had
with
mr.
avert
or
Amazon
worries.
So
we
started
the
process
and
it
took
a
while
for
them
to
come
around
meet
with
us
and
we
would
have
met.
We
met
with
two
people.
B
B
M
We
can't
design
your
building,
but
any
kind
of
dialog
would
be
great
so
that,
ideally
you
know
we
I've
seen
in
cases
like
this
that
60
days
later,
the
neighborhood
comes
back
and
says
they're
in
favor
of
it,
and
that
would
be
an
ideal
situation.
So
with
that
anyway,
I
would
barring
legal
counsel
I
would
make
a
motion
that
we
accept
the
offer
to
we.
Okay,.
A
Of
Mike
before
we
do
that
sir
I
inquire
as
to
an
exact
date
and
time
mr.
grand
off
September
19th
is
less
than
60
days.
The
next
night
meeting
after
that
would
be
October.
10Th.
Excuse
me
all
right:
September
12th
would
be
a
night
meeting
or
October
10th
at
6:00
p.m.
which
would
give
you
sufficient
time.
I.
A
A
F
D
A
The
purposes
there
will
be
no
just
for
the
purposes
of
public
admits
to
grand
off.
Yes,
this
for
the
purposes
of
public,
there
will
be
no
additional
notice
sent
out
regarding
this
date
of
continuance.
So
please
make
note
of
it
that
the
motion
is
to
grant
the
request
for
the
date
of
October
10th
2019
at
6
p.m.
mr.
chairman,
okay,.
B
B
B
B
R
D
J
E
Similar
if
you're
planning,
commission
staff,
this
is
located
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
level,
D
evacuation
zone
apart
route,
15
and
8
service
subject:
site
I'm
gonna
show
an
aerial
we're
eats
of
Broadway.
Sorry
south
of
East
Broadway.
Excuse
me
so
south
of
East
Broadway
at
North,
59th
Street.
This
is
a
pretty
intensive
corridor.
We
have
some
truck
repair
operations
going
on
right
here,
along
Broadway
Avenue.
We
have
more
truck
storage
down
to
the
south.
E
It's
a
it's
a
pretty
intense
it
part
of
the
city
so,
and
that
is
reflected
on
the
future
land
use
map.
So
the
future
land
east
of
the
subject
site
is
transitional.
Use
24,
that
is
this
pinkish
salmon
color
to
the
south,
is
on
a
long
run.
59Th
Street!
This
is
light
industrial.
The
transitional
use.
24
is
a
unique
blend
use
category
in
that
it
allows
areas
on.
E
It
was
primarily
placed
in
areas
in
the
city
that
developed
prior
to
Planning
and
Zoning,
so
it
can
allow
everything
from
some
industrial
uses
under
the
zoning
code
to
single-family
detached
homes,
so
in
this
area
on
staff,
usually
takes
a
look
at
what's
around
it
it.
How
it's
transitioning,
what
would
be
compatible
in
all
analysis,
so
we
did
find
that
this
was
consistent
based
on
the
surrounding
developments
had
earn.
E
D
Here's
a
zoning
map
of
the
Civic
properties
in
green.
As
you
can
see,
on
Broadway
Avenue,
it
is
already
commercial
intensive
within
these
boundaries.
This
is
industrial
general
further
to
the
east
and
then
a
large
area
of
industrial
general
to
the
west,
and
then
it
continues
on
actually
south
of
the
property
on
the
north
and
south
side
of
tenth
Street
and
then
there's
a
romaine
pocket
of
single-family
in
the
RS
60
and
the
RS
50
zoning
district.
The
subject
properties
currently
zoned
RS
50
and
again
reminder
they're
requesting
to
go
to
commercial
intensity.
D
D
D
And
then
directly
on
the
corner
of
59th
and
Broadway,
a
warehousing
use.
This
is
the
Euclidean
rezoning
on
the
site
is
a
thirty
two
thousand
five
hundred
fifty
square
feet.
It
means
the
dimensional
and
area
requirements
for
the
commercial
intensive
zoning
district.
All
zoning
development
that
were
to
occur
if
the
rezoning
is
approved
would
have
to
comply
with
a
commercial
incentive,
setbacks
and
use
table
I,
provided
the
commercial
incentive
permitted
uses
in
your
staff
report
for
review.
D
D
G
D
D
A
D
G
G
There's
a
myriad
of
uses,
sir
two
things:
two
things:
cancer
me
a
little
bit
one.
You
showed
us
two
or
three
or
three
or
four
single-family
homes
across
the
street
in
the
RS
50
zone,
they're
directly
across
the
street,
including
one
house,
one
house
that
looking
at
the
aerial,
looks
like
a
pretty
nice
house
with
a
swimming
pool
and
that's
what
I
think.
G
D
D
H
Thank
you
Mary
steam
council.
My
name
is
Oscar
agio
I'm,
the
property
owner
and
I
also
own
the
property
right
next
door.
At
the
corner
of
brought
into
the
ninth
Street,
we've
been
in
that
corner
since
2005
we
bought
the
property,
my58
17,
East
Broadway,
maybe
five
or
six
years
ago.
What
we're
really
looking
to
do
is
expand
our
existing
business
into
this
new
lot
that
we
purchased
four
or
five
years
ago
as
well.
We
have
a
semi
truck
operation.
You
know
there
are
about
70
75
80
feet
long.
H
They
take
some
space
to
turn.
My
current
space
that
I've
got
is
3/4
of
an
acre.
You
know
you
put
two
or
three
trucks
in
there
and
it's
already
a
little
hard
to
turn.
I
just
want
a
little
bit
more
space
to
you
know
be
able
to
put
my
stuff
there
I'm,
not
looking
to
start
a
new
restaurant
or
a
daycare.
Just
you
know
additional
parking
for
my
existing
business.
You
know
if
you
look
at
the
map.
The
existing
area
is
very
heavily
commercial
on
the
same
street
I
own.
H
The
corner
lot
on
the
very
far
corner
is
another
trucking
company
there
wouldn't
be
any
additional
traffic
that
isn't
already
going
on.
You
know,
behind
these
commercial
in
front
of
me,
is
commercial
across
the
street
is
on
my
tractor
supply
company
that
sells
parts.
For
you
know
diesel,
equipment
and
stuff
like
that
I
feel
like
this.
Application
is
pretty
consistent
with
what
the
area
supports,
and
you
know,
we've
been
there
for
a
long
time
since
2005
we've
never
had
any
complaints
from
any
of
the
neighbors
any
noise,
complaints
or
anything
of
the
sort.
H
B
B
M
Ordinance
to
be
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
file
are
easy,
1943,
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
and
the
general
presenting
of
2012
north
59th
Street
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
and
more
particularly
described
as
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs.50
sinc,
residential
single-family,
2ci
commercial,
intensive,
providing
an
effective
date.
We.
G
Just
a
friendly
friendly
amendment,
perhaps
to
the
motion
based
upon
our
little
education
this
morning
at
the
top
of
the
page
under
approvals
of
Euclidean
rezoning
anyway,
I
would
suggest
that
the
petitioners
met
its
burden
approved
to
provide
providing
complan
substantial
evidence
that
the
rezoning
is
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan,
specifically
that
the
new
zoning
category
is
consistent
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area.
Based
upon
the
facts
of
staff
report
and
the
presentation
we
heard
from
the
petitioner.
B
G
D
Excuse
me,
sir:
when
was
the
second
reading
no.
A
B
C
H
B
D
E
Jennifer
Malone
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff.
This
is
located
in
the
West
or
planning
district
evacuation
zone.
B
heart
route
30
serves
the
subject
site
Charles,
B
Williams
Park
is
located
about
one
block
east
of
the
subject:
site
I'll
show
an
aerial
Kennedy
Boulevard
is
located
to
the
south,
and
I
have
the
interstate
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site.
This
is
fig
and
North
Hubert.
This
is
the
Adagio
multifamily
development
I
also
have
more
multifamily
to
the
south,
there's
a
scattering
of
some
single-family
homes,
but
this
is
generally
transitioning.
E
A
very
transitional
area
of
the
city
works
for
tours
on
multifamily
development
pattern,
which
is
reflected
in
the
future
languages.
The
future
land
uses
residential
20.
That
is
a
transitional
category.
We
seek
that
category
in
areas
to
provide
a
transition
of
a
single
residential
density,
the
never
residential
35
to
the
south,
which
is
a
little
bit
more
in
title.
We
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
plan.
This.
E
D
D
You
can
see
various
reasonings
over
the
last
several
decades
to
higher
intensity,
then
the
standard,
rs.50
or
r1
under
the
previous
code
in
this
area,
the
applicant
is
requesting
any
reasoning
to
RM
18,
a
new
rezoning
that
would
be
proved
they
would
have
to
comply
with
all
the
standard
zoning
standards
for
the
RM
18
zoning
district,
at
least
the
dimensional
criteria,
for
that
so
is
owning.
Here's
will
go
up
and
down
this
spot,
a
fig
here's,
the
circuit
property,
a
detached
house
going
west,
a
detached
house
further
to
the
west.
D
D
A
Good
evening,
Council
Steve
michaleen
we're
requesting
that
Disko
from
an
RS
52
RM
18,
as
the
staff
has
pointed
out
from
both
the
Planning
Commission
on
the
city,
zoning
staff
that
they
found
this
to
be
consistent
with
their
rules,
guidelines,
policies
and
objectives.
This
is
a
residential
20
which
is
anticipated.
If
you
have
higher
density,
it's
been
transitioning
toward
a
more
dense
development.
A
A
A
B
G
The
zoning
that's
in
that
area
and
I.
Remember
it
all
too
well,
because
15
16
years
ago,
when
I
first
started
at
Council,
this
whole
area
was
pretty
much
ours.
50S
and
the
PD
started
in
the
arms.
The
arm,
sixteenths
and
rm8
teams
began,
and
now
it's
quite
different
and
back
then
we
heard
neighborhood
opposition,
and
now
we
don't
I,
think
anybody
has
left
their
neighborhood.
It's
kind
of
given
up,
which
is
fine.
I
mean
it's
not
fine,
but
it's
I,
guess
it's.
G
It
is
but
anyway,
my
point
if
my
question
is
from
a
planning
perspective.
This
looks
like
what
somebody
once
described
to
me
is
the
definition
of
spot
zoning
and
and
I'm
just
wondering
in
the
big
picture.
Wouldn't
we
be
better
off
at
some
point
in
time
of
doing
a
comprehensive
rezoning
of
that
neighborhood
to
recognize
where,
where
that
it
is
transitioning
and
it's
gone,
and
it's
done
and
it's
just
multifamily
instead
of
doing
this
continued
spot
zoning,
which
is
expensive
to
mr.
McLean
ease
comments
and
perhaps
a
waste
of
everybody's
resources.
D
G
D
B
A
4311
was
fixed
reading
city
of
Tampa,
Florida
decrease
traffic
on
section
one
enjoining
districts,
classification
or
as
50
residential
single-family,
RM
18
presidential
multifamily,
providing
an
effective
date.
My
opinion,
the
petitioner,
has
met
all
competent
completed
evidence
according
to
the
rezoning
it's
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
into
city
ordinances.
A
B
B
D
E
Jenna
from
lumen
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
this
is
an
essential
tampa
planning
district
evacuation
zone,
II
heart
route,
eight
serve
subject
site
and
that
provides
connections
from
the
subject
site
to
downtown
Tampa
in
the
Brandon
area.
We're
back
on
East
Broadway
Avenue,
just
to
the
north,
along
North,
49th
Street,.
E
These
adopted
future
land
use
is
community
commercial
35.
That's
the
red
that
allows
consideration
of
a
commercial
intensive
zoning
district
to
the
south
is
the
gray
that's
light
industrial,
so
I'm
an
apple
on
East
Broadway.
That's
that's!
Pretty
intense
future
land-use
category
to
the
north
is
residential
20,
that's
the
brown,
and
then
we
have
community
mixed-use
35
in
the
paint.
E
So
this
is
providing
a
transition
as
we
move
away
from
East
Broadway
Avenue
to
allow
less
intense
uses
to
the
north
that
we
did
find
that
commercial
intensive
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area
and
it
is
allowed
for
consideration
under
this
feature.
Ladies
category-
and
that
concludes
my
overview.
Thank
you.
D
Near
Samaniego
again,
this
is
a
rezoning
request
to
go
from
RM
16,
which
you
can
multifamily
zoning
district
commercial
intensive
use,
it's
a
good
property
again
we're
over
in
the
East
Broadway
area.
It's
industrial
general
on
both
sides
Broadway-
and
this
section
there's
offensive
in
this
area
here-
is
a
search
of
property
that
they
would
just
be
extending
this
commercial
incentive
zoning
district
into
this
area.
D
D
Here's
two
shots
of
the
subject:
property
taken
from
49
to
the
north
is
a
single-family
house
further
to
the
north
on
a
caddy
corner
across
the
street.
Up
10th
Avenue
is
a
place
that
religious
assembly
coming
back
towards
the
subject.
Property
across
the
street
is
a
vacant
lot
and
some
single-family
houses.
A
A
A
A
We
ourselves
have
cleaned
up
the
property
due
not
only
to
the
homeless
people,
but
because
of
the
illegal
dumping
we
clean
the
property
up
numerous
times
over
the
years
city
of
Tampa
has
went
in
code
enforcement
has
went
in
on
at
least
four
different
occasions
and
cleaned
up
the
the
makeshift
tents
and
stuff
that
they
have
that's
to
the
city's
expense
is.
What
we
are
proposing
to
do
is
is
to
put
up
a
six-foot.
A
Well,
we
have
stemmed
some
of
the
illegal
dumping
by
putting
up
a
6-foot
chain
link
fence,
but
still
in
there
that's
not
keeping
the
homeless
people
out.
It
is
keeping
some
of
the
some
of
the
dumping
off
of
the
property.
So
we
just
feel
like
that.
If
we
could
develop
it
into
a
commercial
piece
of
property
that
it's
going
to
solve,
not
only
our
problems
with
the
with
us
having
to
keep
constantly
cleaning
up,
but
for
the
city
and
a
half
keep
coming
out
and
Manning
up.
So.
B
H
You
very
much
mr.
chairman
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
and
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
jump
acidity
of
2002
north
49th
Street
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
will
particularly
this
pride
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
RM
16,
presidential
multifamily,
family,
to
commercial
intents
of
CI,
providing
an
effective
date
and.
H
B
H
D
I'm
so
sorry,
I
was
talking
to
the
previous
applicant.
Explain
the
process
to
her
Mary
Samaniego
are
easy:
1948
rezoning
request
from
RS
52,
commercial,
general,
oh
I'm,
sorry,
Rs,
50
and
plan
development
to
commercial
general
for
the
property
located
at
50
401
north
from
Avenue
and
1526
West
Mohawk
Avenue.
E
E
They
have
a
Wawa
gas
station
down
here.
This
is
the
river
it
is
out
of
frame,
but
if
you
just
keep
on
going
just
a
little
bit,
you'll
hit
the
hose
for
a
river.
We
have
commercial
uses
along
West,
Hills,
Borough
Avenue
and
then,
as
we
move
north
away
from
Hillsboro,
that
they
do
transition
to
these
residential
uses.
Oh
and
then
this
is
the
church.
The
South
the
future
lead
uses
community
makes
these
35.
That's
the
pink
I
have
community
commercial
35
in
the
red.
This
is
residential,
20
and
then
residential
ten
to
the
north.
E
It's
that
orange
color.
We
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
The
future
land
use
so
in
community
mixed-use
35
allows
commercial
general
uses,
and
we
did
find
that
this
would
be
compatible
info
development
in
an
area
that
is
planned
for
these
types
of
uses
and
since
it
is
putting
request,
we
just
asked
fit,
and
we
understand
that
the
applicant
will
meet
all
the
crib
requirements.
Thank
you.
D
Here
is
the
subject
property
in
green
and
this
area.
As
you
can
see,
the
subject
property
is
currently
the
majority
of
which
is
so
in
planned
developments.
This
is
a
plan
development
that
was
approved
in
1995
Z
95
38
for
beef
over
here
in
single-family
residential
uses.
That
plan
was
was
developed.
The
applicant
is
now
wanting
to
redevelop
the
entire
site
under
the
cg
zoning
district,
so
the
existing
zoning
that
would
be
removed
as
the
plan
development
and
then
there's
a
small
strip
of
Rs
50
in
this
location.
D
Again,
any
development
that
was
to
occur
on
this
commercial
general
zoning
district
would
have
to
comply
with
all
standard
zoning
districts,
including
setbacks
and
buffering
requirements
from
those
single-family
houses
across
the
street.
Saying
that
the
development
review
of
compliance
stuff
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
city
of
template,
land
development
code.
N
N
N
N
Where
you
can
see
we
are
going,
even
though
this
is
an
idiom
rezoning,
any
deviation
from
the
code
will
be
brought
to
you
at
a
later
date.
We
already
have
a
site
plan
that
I
would
like
to
I
like
to
show
to
you
to
show
that
we
are
planning
to
put
our
responsible
development
on
this
corner.
It's
an
infill
redevelopment
will
comply
with
minimum
parking,
will
provide
a
responsible
drainage
and
will
meet
all
the
setbacks
and
buffers
that
will
be
required
by
Delano
chemical.
B
D
B
B
K
Yes,
good
evening,
members
of
the
City
Council
and
everyone
present
today
my
name
is
Henry
Kramer
I'm,
the
president
of
River
Bend,
Civic
Association,
which
is
the
neighborhood
that
entertains
or
this
subject,
property
warehouses,
the
subject
property
I
should
say
mr.
dink
Felder
walked
through
an
s
and
said
apologized
first
for
the
long
session,
but
then
also
said
I
hope
you
learned
something
and
we
learned
something.
K
I
know
I
have
learned
something
and
what's
going
on
here
tonight,
we
came
here
tonight
hoping
to
learn
a
lot
and
we
now
learned
a
little
bit
more
about
what's
planned
for
this,
this
O'reilly's
store.
This
was
not
part
of
what
we
said
and
I
guess
you
addressed
that
there
would
be
future
hearings
on
this
as
to
what
the
development
would
be
myself.
I
was
raised
in
Tampa
since
1966.
K
So
that's
why
I
in
an
effort
to
learn
I'm,
not
quite
sure,
just
cuz
as
it
was
coming
up,
I
heard
that
secondary
comment
being
made.
Natalie
I
wasn't
quite
sure
what
was
happening
there,
because
we
came
in
here
tonight
to
try
to
find
out
not
only
just
procedurally
like
we
learned
in
the
in
the
first
session,
but
here
additionally,
then,
for
this
particular
item.
All
we
knew
was
there
was
a
rezoning
request.
We
had
no
idea
that
was
to
come.
K
A
K
D
H
K
Thank
you
yes,
so
this
is
a
matter
that
we
were
trying
to
get
a
better
understanding
of,
and
so,
as
representatives
of
the
Neighborhood
Association,
we've
tried
to
get
our
arms
around
this
and
and
and
so
myself,
having
grown
up
in
Tampa
and
I've,
lived
in
certain
different
neighborhoods
Hyde
Park
Seminole
Heights
in
West
Tampa
all
when
they
were
not
revitalized
or
not
yet
revitalized.
Those
neighborhoods
were
characterized
by
a
lack
of
attention:
lack
of
policing,
a
lack
of
code
enforcement
and
a
general
sense
that
the
property
owners
owners
could
do
whatever
they
wanted.
K
The
turnarounds
that
took
place
in
those
neighborhoods
came
due
to
diligent
efforts
of
concerned,
citizen,
Rhee
and
government,
along
with
the
growth
and
redevelopment
plans
of
the
city,
I've
lived
in
River
Bend
since
2010,
and
it's
a
different
neighborhood
in
many
regards.
We
have
the
very
name.
River
Bend
lends
you
or
makes
you
understand
that
it's
a
little
different
from
a
typical
layout.
We
have
a
South
Bend,
we
have
a
North
Bend
and
we
have
the
middle
Bend,
some
call
it
the
lower
triangle
in
the
upper
triangle.
K
K
Albany
is
our
West
boundary
Rome
runs
right
through
the
neighborhood
and
on
Rome
and
throughout
our
apartments
and
mobile
home
parks
that
appear
to
be
at
the
end
of
their
life
expectancy.
We
envision
a
lot
of
change
their
life,
we're
pro
development
and
we're
pro
revitalization,
and
especially
on
the
Roman
Hillsborough
corridors,
but
we've
seen
limited
success
and
even
and
even
additional
problematic
conditions
in
the
new
development
in
the
5900
block.
The
Rome
retention
pond
was
built
to
drain
to
the
river
as
an
offset
for
a
grandiose
development
elsewhere.
K
It
was
not
an
enhancement,
only
a
trade-off
for
mitigation
of
pollution
of
the
river
at
the
new
site.
This
pond
still
does
not
function
and
as
per
Swift
mud
standards
and
is
not
properly
maintained
and,
in
short,
is
not
improving.
Tampa
heights,
our
neighborhood
or
the
river
we've
got
two
newer
developments
on
Hillsborough.
K
Very
near
this
subject:
a
family
dollar
and
this
may
all
not
seem
appropriate,
given
what
we're
trying
to
entertain,
but
I
just
want
to
point
that
we're
trying
to
be
a
neighborhood
on
the
rise
and
there's
a
Family
Dollar
Store,
that's
very
new,
but
there's
a
lot
of
illegal
dumping
taking
place
there.
The
folks
there
can't
use
their
own
dumpster,
so
they've
put
the
trash
out
by
the
side
of
the
building
and
that
creates
a
fire
hazard.
K
There's
an
autozone
store
that
with
a
sign
that
prohibits
work
on
the
premises,
however
used
oil
is
dumped
into
the
containers
on
the
dumpsters
and
then
those
are
put
together
in
the
dumpster
collected
and
squashed
on
Mohawk
and
there's
an
oil
spill
and
Mohawk
that
goes
into
the
ditch
and
then
into
the
river.
I,
won't
say
anything
about
O'reilly,
I,
guess
because
we're
not
entertaining
that
tonight.
K
But
what
we
want
to
say
is
that
there's
commercial,
occupancies
they're,
not
that
are
not
being
properly
managed
and
addressed,
there's
immediately
east
of
the
property
on
those
bro
there's
two
automobile
facilities,
one's
got,
tire
storage
out
there,
that's
open
storage
that
shouldn't
be,
and
the
other
appears
to
be
selling
cars.
Now
we've
talked
to
the
the
folks
at
code
enforcement,
a
neighbor,
empowerment,
Neighborhood
Empowerment,
and
we
pledged
to
work
together
with
them
on
these
issues
to
help
out.
K
But
the
roam:
Hillsboro
piece
is
prime
commercial
real
estate
and
there
should
be
many
takers
for
this
property,
not
just
an
O'reilly
store.
There
could
be
many
others,
it's
a
it's.
A
major
intersection.
Rome
is
a
major
thoroughfare
through
the
city
or
through
our
neighborhood,
rather
its
primary
and
secondary.
It
has
the
thank
you.
So
do
I
have
two
minutes
now
or.
H
Good
evening
my
name's
Kevin
Hearne
I'm
also
a
Riverbend
resident
and
a
member
of
the
board
and
Hank's
a
tough
act
to
follow,
but
just
to
continue
a
little
bit.
What
he
was
saying
that
that
intersection
of
Rome
and
Hillsboro
is
a
major
component
of
our
community
and
it
gets
very
backed
up
certain
times
of
the
day
and
I'm
not
here,
to
express
opposition
to
this
zoning
proposition,
but
to
express
concern
that
we
need
more
information
of
what's
going
here.
H
I
understand
now
that
this
is
not
a
hearing
to
approve
O'reilly
Auto
Parts,
we
only
heard
of
rumor
of
O'reilly
and
we
are
for
responsible
development
right
now.
It's
a
blighted
corner
and
it's
pretty
substantial
in
size.
Four
acres
I
mean
that
could
have
quite
an
impact
on
our
community,
especially
as
narrow
as
Rome
that
Rome
intersection
is
single
lane
with
no
turn
arrow.
So
it's
you're
having
to
risk
your
life
to
try
to
make
a
left
turn
basically
to
get
your
turn
and
I
just
wanted
to
see.
B
G
The
confusion
continues
a
little
bit
so
what
we're
being
asked
to
approve
tonight
on
the
not
on
the
Hillsborough
lots,
but
on
the
back
lot
up
on
Mohawk.
Okay,
is
we
call
it
a
Euclidian
zoning?
It
doesn't
matter,
but
basically
it's
to
approve
a
CG
zoning,
commercial
general.
It's
a
very
broad
category,
there's
three
or
four
pages
of
possible
uses
in
our
code
for
commercial
general,
it's
less
intensive
than
commercial
intensive,
which
is
we
approved
a
few
CI
zonings
prior
to
this
one,
commercial
general
has
I
think
marry
retail.
G
You
know,
that's
that's
what
they're
that's
what
he
was
referring
to
his
retail,
but
it
has
a
lot
of
possible
uses
in
our
code.
It's
a
very
it's
a
generic
category
of
commercial
general.
So
if
you
go
up
and
down
a
lot
of
our
major
boulevards,
including
Hillsborough
you'll,
find
a
lot
of
zonings
at
commercial
general
with
that
said
once
if
we
approve
the
cg
zoning
that
they're
looking
for
and
if
he
decided
to
combine
it
with
the
southern
parcels,
they
would
never
come
back
here
again.
There
would
be
no.
G
It
wouldn't
necessarily
require
a
site
plan,
a
sites
plan,
specific
zoning
because
they
already
have
the
zoning
they're.
Looking
for
according
to
what
the
gentleman
said,
but
the
bottom
line
is:
there's
no
guarantees
on
what
could
go
there.
The
only
guarantee
is,
is
they
have
a
possibility
of
30
different
30
different
things
on
four
pages
of
what
could
go
there?
Okay,
so
the
even
though
I'm
not
questioning
the
gentleman's
character
or
anything
else.
G
Can't
speak
for
what
position
you
should
take,
but
I'm
just
saying
that
there's
no
guarantees
and
that's
why
Mary
spoke
accurately
when
he
showed
the
picture
of
O'reilly
and
spoke
to
O'reilly
and
spoke
to
the
consolidation
to
Hillsborough.
None
of
that
is
guaranteed
in
this
process
today
and-
and
it's
very
very
unlikely
that
this
council
would
ever
see
that
project
again
because
they
don't
have
to
come
to
us.
They
just
go
to
start
pulling
permits
as
long
as
they
meet
the
CG
requirements.
Okay,
thanks
for
that
clarification.
A
A
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Frank
Rocco
I
lived
in
the
neighborhood
and
I
am
the
vice
president
of
River
Bend,
Civic,
Association
and
I.
Much
prefer
the
CG
over
CI
or
anything
else
that
would
allow
more
industrial
use
to
the
property.
Our
concern
in
the
neighborhood
was
just
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
the
project,
even
though
it
could
be
used
for
any
use
under
the
CG.
A
Our
problem
is
is
that
our
code
enforcement
office
is
so
overworked
that
they
cannot
really
police
the
properties
and
that's
why
we're
trying
to
be
more
cautious
about
accepting
any
kind
of
zoning
that
comes
through?
What
is
there
is
blighted
and
any
type
of
major
improvement
would
be
a
nice
addition
to
the
neighborhood
but
we'd
like
to
know
about
transportation,
stormwater
and
those
type
of
things.
What
kind
of
what
kind
of
improvements
is
a
city
going
to
allow
to
go
into
that
property
for
the
transportation
of
stormwater
and
things
like
that?
A
T
Okay,
I
do
thank
you
well
good
evening,
commissioners
and
staff.
Thank
you
for
the
time
and
consideration
tonight.
My
name
is
Jean
Callahan
I
am
a
owner
and
I
reside
in
and
Riverbend
I
have
major
concerns
about
you
approving
this
zoning,
especially
after
we
have
now
learned
that
there
may
not
be
another
opportunity
to
be
able
to
voice
our
opinions.
Our
neighborhood
I
I
have
lived
around
the
world
and
chose
to
move
back
to
Tampa
because
I
loved
it
I
went
to
college
here
and
came
back
and
I've
invested
heavily
in
real
estate.
T
Not
only
in
this
neighborhood
Seminole
Heights
years
ago
and
I
love
Tampa
and
what
I'm
seeing
in
our
neighborhood
is.
We
are
becoming
slighted
all
the
time.
I
think
Hank
referred
I,
don't
want
to
get
off
track,
but
we
were
hoodwinked
into
getting
that
wonderful.
You
know
dry
retention,
pond
or
dry
pond.
That
is
always
wet.
That
has
never
been
resolved
to
this
date.
I,
don't
want
to
see
this
again.
I
don't
want
to
see,
especially
if
you've
ever
been
on
hills
born
in
Rome
and
tried
to
make
a
left
turn.
T
We
don't
even
have
a
traffic
light
with
a
signal
attorney
in
signal
to
turn
there.
It's
kind
of
crazy
right,
I,
don't
know
how
many
accidents
happen.
Rome
Avenue
needs
to
be
paved.
We've
been
requesting
that
asking
that
nothing
seems
to
get
done.
You
know
we
had
a
storm
drain
break,
they
redid
the
street.
They
decided
not
to
even
pay
that
my
my
own
car
has
had
problems
just
going
across
that,
but
that's
getting
off
track.
T
I
really
think
that
I,
if
we
don't
have
an
opportunity
to
address
these
things,
when
will
we
and
I
don't
have
an
objection
and
all
to
development,
I
believe
in
development,
I
believe
in
and
building
a
community,
but
I,
don't
know
how
we
can
do
that
when
we
continually
are
slighted
and
I.
Think
approving
this.
You
know
you
know,
then,
all
of
a
sudden
we
get
a
nice
hole,
riley's
god
forbid
a
chick-fil-a.
You
know
you
know
our.
T
We
don't
have
the
capacity
for
the
traffic
we've
done:
traffic
studies
on
Rome
Avenue
in
the
past,
when
there
was
other
developments
that
we're
gonna
be
done,
and
we
just
don't
have
it
so
I.
You
know
I
hope
somebody
who
is
responsible
who
cares
about
the
community
will
reach
out
to
us
and
I.
Ask
that
perhaps
we
could
have
a
60-day
delay.
O
N
Yes,
Hollis
and
I
already
spoke,
representing
I'm
the
agent
representing
the
property
owner
and
developer
I
I
was
taking
my
notes
listening
to
the
three
gentleman
and
a
lady
that
were
speaking
about
the
you
know,
the
rezoning
case
and
the
property
and
the
retail
project
that
we
are
proposing
and
I
see
concerns
about
drainage
and
traffic
in
adjacent
ponds
and
dumpsters.
But
my
understanding
is
this
is
not
for
discussion
here.
So
I
will
be
happy
to
provide
all
the
information
they
require.
The
request
site
plans
elevations
anything
at
this
point,
I
like
to.
H
A
Yeah,
do
you
guys
have
any
questions?
Any
questions
for
the
excuse
me
I.
I
A
A
A
Right
but
I
understand
because
the
contracts
have
been
signed.
I
would
assume
the
the
contract
from
the
land
hasn't
been
signed
to
the
contract,
for
the
do
variety
to
take
the
spot.
I
can't
tell
you
what
it
was
that
I
saw,
but
what
I
saw
is
that
a
contract
for
that
to
go
there?
Yes,
sir,
that's
why
I
have
to.
N
The
Hollis
agent
and
representing
the
owner
and
developer
I'm,
not
sure
if
this
is
this,
could
be
considered
part
of
the
testimony.
But
in
our
proposal
we
will
have
a
six
foot
six
feet:
a
screen
wall
along
yes,
along
Mohawk,
Avenue
that
he
will
screen
the
entire
property
from
the
neighbor
neighbors
living
across
the
street
on
Mohawk
company,
because
that's
one
of
the
things
that
I
like
to
say
directly
to
them.
So
they
they
know
that
we
are
gonna,
try
to
be
the
best
neighbors.
No,
we
came.
B
G
D
D
G
B
E
Good
evening,
council
members
to
their
friend
malone
with
your
fine
equations
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district,
also
within
the
West
Tampa
urban
village,
the
substation
site
use
accessible
transit,
five
route
30,
which
runs
along
Kennedy
Boulevard
and
that
Christmas
subject,
site
I'll
show
an
aerial,
it's
a
small
site,
it's
pretty
skinny,
so
to
speak.
Here's
West
North
East
tree
and
North
Oregon
Avenue.
This
is
a
the
Walmart.
That's
along
Kennedy
Boulevard,
the
the
neighborhood
Robert.
This
is
actually
a
portion
of
the
University
of
Tampa,
the
CSX
railroad
tracks.
E
E
The
future
lazy
is
general
mix
usefully
for
that's
another
feature,
ladies
category,
that
we've
placed
in
areas
that
developed
prior
to
Planning
and
Zoning.
So
it
does
allow
for
a
variety
of
uses.
This
area
is
definitely
transitioning
more
towards
that
residential
and
not
so
much
the
light
industrial
types
of
uses
that
may
be.
It
once
was
40
some
odd
years
ago
when
we
were
creating
this
plan,
but
but
the
plan
had
always
envisioned
this
area
as
transitioning,
not
exactly
sure
how.
E
E
To
residents
with
20,
which
allows
these
townhomes
and
multi-family
development
can
we
did
find
this
request
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
development
pattern,
and
we
did
find
that
it
would
be
consistent
with
that
continuing
trend
for
this
area,
which
the
West
Tampa
urban
village,
which
is
transitioning
this
way,
and
that
concludes
our
presentation.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
Very
simony
a
go
planning,
just
fun
design
and
development
coordination
as
I
say
that
this
is
a
plan.
Development
is
currently
zoned
industrial
general.
So
this
is.
This
is
a
unique
case.
So
this
is
a
lot
of
record.
So
it's
it's
a
legal
lot
of
record.
That's
totally
developable.
However,
it's
only
25
feet
wide
and
2507
2575
square
feet.
So
it's
a
very
small
lot.
It's
currently
zoned
industrial
general.
You
cannot
have
or
develop
a
house
in
industrials
in
general
zoning
district,
because
typically
single-family
residential
uses
aren't
compatible
with
industrial
uses.
D
So
then
the
question
is:
will
you
need
to
rezone
it
to
a
zoning
district
that
allows
you
to
build
a
single-family
house?
There
is
when
one
reads
owns
a
property
to
a
certain
zoning
district.
It
has
to
meet
those
dimensional
standards.
The
smallest
dimensional
standard
zoning
district
we
have
in
this
area
of
the
city
of
Tampa
is
rs.50,
which
a
lot
has
to
be
50
feet
wide
and
5000
square
feet,
so
it's
impossible
to
rezone
this
property
to
the
rs.50
zoning
district.
D
So
by
default,
we're
coming
in
with
the
planned
development
to
develop
one
house
on
this
property.
The
property
is
currently
vacant
and
you
can
see
those
RS
50
to
the
north.
There
were
similar
sized
houses
on
half
Lots
I'll,
show
you
in
a
minute
and
then
there's
an
existing
kind
of
industrial
warehouse
used
across
I'm,
sorry
next
door
to
it
facing
Oregon
and
then
that
utj
parking.
So
here
this
is
the
subject
property
between
my
fingers
here.
So
that's
the
twenty
five
foot
wide
lot
to
the
west
is
the
graphics
warehouse
use.
D
D
D
They
met
the
architectural
centers
that
comply
with
all
of
the
west
sample
overlay
standards.
The
only
standard
that
they
are
need,
a
waiver
from
is
the
required
backup,
distance,
they're
required
to
have
two
parking
spaces
and
then
the
last
parking
space
must
have
a
24
foot,
backup
distance,
there's
simply
not
enough
space
to
get
the
required
parking
plus
they
required
backup
spaces
into
the
alley.
D
There
are
some
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
for
land
development
again
just
a
typo
and
clarification
now
for
resources
for
green
space
calculations,
and
then
natural
resources
did
find
this.
It
consisted
because
of
that
backup,
waiver
request
and
they
did
have
some
changes
between
first
and
second
reading.
So
overall,
that
of
my
review
of
compliant
stuff
did
find
this
inconsistent
because
of
the
waiver
to
the
backup
distance.
Should
it
be
the
pleasure
council
I
do
remind
you
to
make
sure
that
you
approve
the
PD
with
the
revisions
between
first
and
second
reading.
Any
questions.
G
G
D
There
are
lots
of
those
are
lots
of
records,
sir,
so
the
West
Champa
overlay
says
and
I
included
it
in
your
staff
report
in
West
AMPA.
If
you
are
a
lot
that
was
created
before
January
1st
2004
you're
considered
a
lot
of
record
and
your
developable,
but
you
have
to
be
in
a
zoning
district
that
allows
for
single-family
houses.
So,
unfortunately,
this
property
is.
D
G
D
D
Correct,
yes,
those
are
like
developing
lots
of
record,
so
the
lot
its
conforming
for
the
clause
of
what
Stampa
and
the
zoning
district
allows
the
use.
This
is
developed
as
a
lot
of
record,
but
the
use
of
they're
requesting
is
not
allowed
in
IG
zoning
district
so
there
to
go
to
his
owning
district.
That
allows
for
a
single-family
house.
I
Good
evening
council,
my
name
is
Lynette
glass
I'm,
the
community
development
manager
at
Habitat
for
Humanity
here
in
Hillsborough,
County
I'm
here
representing
Itza
that
meets
ax
Rovira.
The
applicant,
who
also
works
with
habitat
habitat,
received
a
donation
of
this
property,
and
so
of
course,
we
looked
at
what
we
could
do
to
build
a
house
on
the
property.
I
Obviously,
as
you've
seen
it's
a
very
narrow
lot,
so
we
thought
we
would
try
something
new,
which
is
try
to
go
to
a
tiny
home
concept,
and
what
we're
looking
at
doing
is
what
we're
calling
a
Veterans
cottage
we're
hoping
to
include
this
in
our
veterans
bill
this
year,
which
means
that
on
Veterans
Day
we
will
be
adding
trusses
to
the
house.
If
the
project
does
move
forward,
we
do
need
that
waiver,
though
included,
as
staff,
stated
included
in
the
request
that
we're
making
and
if
you
have
any
questions
I'm
here
responding.
Thank
you.
B
C
G
Say
that
the
petitioner
is
met
its
burden
approved
by
competent,
substantial
evidence,
the
development
as
condition
insurance,
I
plan,
this
condition
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
IG
uess
will
not
allow
residential
structure.
The
PD
is
the
only
way
to
go,
and
also
the
proposed
development,
efficient,
sustainable
use
of
land
infrastructure,
allowing
integration
of
different
land
uses
in
this
area.