►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 07182019 part 3
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
Jennifer
Malone
is
your
Planning
Commission
staff.
This
is
located
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
within
the
East
Tampa
urban
village.
It's
not
within
the
evacuation
zone,
heart
routes,
12:30,
1:00
and
5:00
serve
the
subject.
Site
marries.
If
I'm,
if
you
don't
mind
of
the
I,
would
be
I'll
just
give
like
a
brief
history.
We
reviewed
this
and
it
was
a
PD.
D
South
of
Martin
Luther,
King,
jr.
Boulevard,
that's
a
couple
of
variety
of
parcels
that
the
church
were
the
place
of
religious
assembly.
It's
putting
into
one
PD,
it's
mostly
residential
in
this
area,
as
well
as
some
commercial
uses
along
North,
29th
Street.
So
then
we
have
three
future
land-use
categories.
On
the
subject
site
we
have
community
community
makes
use
35,
community
commercial,
35
and
then
residential
20,
which
is
usually
which
is
basically
all
used.
The
residents
are
24
their
parking
and
retention,
which
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
D
So
we
did
find
this
consistent
again
again
on
the
PD.
The
applicant
has
proposed
several
crosswalks
and
sidewalks
creating
safe
access
and
entrances
to
the
building
for
there
for
their
churchgoers.
So
we
did
find
that
consistent
as
well
as
consistent
with
the
policy
direction
of
the
East
Tampa
urban
village,
which
creates
wants
to
produce
a
high
quality
built
environment
that
respects
Tampa's,
unique
history,
and
then
we
did
by
this
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
I,
conclude
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
C
C
C
C
C
Part
of
the
approval
in
2016
was
a
large
80-foot
front
yard
setback
because
of
this
Grand
tree,
one
of
the
criteria
within
the
code
of
a
plan
development
can
be
changed
administratively
if
certain,
if
there's
certain
criteria,
called
substantial
change
by
carry
out
line
in
the
code.
One
of
the
criteria
is
that
you
cannot
change
perimeter
setbacks.
So
after
the
2016
approval,
it
was
determined
that
this
much
of
a
radius
for
this
grand
tree
was
not
necessary.
So
it
certainly
could
have
been
reduced
that
this
was
an
unnecessary
setback.
C
So
finding
that
information
out
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
new
plan
where
they're
increasing
the
square
footage
of
the
sanctuary
proposed
to
be
constructed.
It
does
not
increase
the
capacity
as
far
as
total
seats
or
any
other
requirements,
but
now
they're,
increasing
the
size
of
the
church,
decreasing
the
setback
and
still
providing
an
adequate
protective
radius
for
that
grande
tree
per
the
city
of
Tampa
Natural
Resources
Department.
C
Everything
else
remains
the
same
you'll
see
in
your
staff
report.
I've
listed,
the
core
original
still
applicable
waivers
that
were
granted
per
are
easy
1672.
The
new
proposal
does
not
have
any
additional
waivers
saying
that
that
vulnerable
compliant
staff
has
found.
This
is
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
land
development
code.
Again
there
are
some
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
for
data
that
needs
clarified
on
the
site
plan.
So
please
include
that
in
your
motion
revision
sheets,
if
you
have
any
questions
for
me,
any.
E
E
C
C
Nothing
specific,
no,
not
the
natural
resource
report,
but
natural
resources
did
a
review
and
it
was
determined
that
that
large
of
a
and
eighty
feet
protective
radiuses
was
not
acquired.
That's
it.
So
they
did
a
really
you
agent
of
the
grand
tree
and
determined
that
a
smaller
protective
radius
would
still
adequately
protect
the
tree.
I
heard.
E
You
say
that,
but
I
assume
the
tree
didn't
shrink,
so
I
was
just
trying
to
figure
out
what
changed
that
in
our
code.
Change
that
are
protective
criteria,
change,
state
law,
change,
I,
don't
know
no.
C
C
E
C
Let
the
applicant
speak
to
that,
but
that's
my
understanding,
yes,
that
they
asked
it
Natural
Resources
Department
to
do
every
evaluation
on
the
tree,
see
what
is
the
minimum
protective
radius.
It
was
determined
that
they
could
get
a
significant
amount
of
additional
square
footage
for
their
building.
However,
they
ran
into
a
perimeter
set
back
problem,
and
that
is
what
required
them
to
come
before
you
tonight.
Natural.
B
Essentially,
the
same
diagram
is
the
Americas
in
it.
We
did
not
ask
for
a
t4
radius.
There
was
a
mandate
on
us
from
natural
resources
that
not
only
an
8-foot
radius,
yet
even
asked
to
put
bullets
around,
so
we
can
definitely
stay
out
of
it.
They
asked
for
an
arborist,
we
did
not
report
and
still
the
neighborhood
to
reduce
that
any
come
around
again.
Good
clothes.
Good
construction
through
had
a
second
arborist.
He
went
back
to
and
they
decided
well
well.
Maybe
it
is
a
little
excessive.
B
A
Questions
from
counsel
for
the
petitioner:
okay:
let's
go
to
public
comment
for
item
number:
nine:
will
you
finisher?
No,
yes,
okay,
just
making
sure
is
anyone
here
to
comment
on
item
number,
nine
and
so
please
come
forward.
We
have
a
motion
to
close.
We
have
a
motion
to
close
by
councilman
minutes,
Kokua
second,
by
Councilman
Goodes,
all
in
favor
any
opposed
councilman
Carlson.
Do
you
mind,
sir?
Taking
item
number.
F
Where
are
easy,
1947
ordnance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
three
eight
one,
four
comma,
three,
eight
three
one
and
three:
nine
one
for
North,
29th,
Street,
comma
2,
631,
East,
32nd,
Avenue,
comma,
two,
six,
one,
six
comma,
two,
six
one,
eight,
two,
six,
two
one:
two:
nine
and
two:
nine
one:
five
East
dr.
Martin,
Luther,
King,
jr.
A
B
C
D
It's
located
on
the
southwest
Lind
Avenue.
This
is
West
azile
Street,
and
then
this
is
South
Howard
Avenue.
It
is
back
roll
close
to
all
these
great
establishments
on
South,
Howard
Avenue.
Think
world
appears
up
here
a
lot
of
commercial
activity
over
there
and
so
over
on
this
side
of
the
aerial.
This
is
a
lot
of
multifamily
development.
A
lot
of
those
attached
homes
that
we've
seen,
which
is
reflected
on
the
future,
leaves
you
snap,
the
future.
The
adopted
future
land
uses
residential
35.
D
D
The
there
is
a
policy
that
encourages
and
I'm
and
Mary,
and
the
applicant
I'm
sure
will
speak
to
this,
but
I'll
speak
on
the
Planning
Commission's
policy
and
and
Hobby
out
how
how
we
felt
that
the
applicant
met
that
policy.
There's
a
policy
in
the
Comprehensive
Plan
that
encourages
multifamily
developments
to
have
the
front
doors
facing
the
sidewalk
or
public
right
of
way,
and
not
the
alley
that
the
alley
heads
behind
the
development
the
applicant
has
proposed
doors
on
the
side
with
with
a
sidewalk
connection
and
the
Planning
Commission
in
reviewing
this
and
reading.
D
Our
policy
has
found
that
to
be
a
reasonable
alternative
and
that
they
have
met
the
intent
of
the
policy,
and
that
is
our
staffs
view
and
interpretation
of
that
policy.
We
worked
with
the
applicant
on
this,
and,
and
we
agreed
that
this
was
a
this-
was
a
good
way
to
reach
the
intent
of
that
policy.
So
with
that
being
said,
we
did
find
it
consistent.
It
meets
our
policies
under
the
multifamily
residential
areas,
about
increasing
the
diversity,
improve
the
sustainability
of
multifamily
residential
areas
they're
within
their
density.
They
would
act
on
once
again.
C
Here's
San
Diego
here's
the
zoning
map
as
a
subject
property,
it's
in
green
again,
as
we
saw
a
somewhat
similar,
true
project
we
had
earlier
this
evening.
This
is
an
area
of
transition
over
to
the
higher
density
residential
as
envisioned
by
the
city
of
Tampa
conference
at
plan.
C
This
look.
Your
property
currently
has
a
single-family
dwelling
way
back
and
took
a
lot
directly
to
the
south.
It's
a
series
townhomes
about
the
street
or
more
townhomes
and
then
introduced
first
with
some
single-family
houses.
This
is
a
townhome,
a
quad
flex,
development
with
an
internal
courtyard
and
then
a
single-family
house
up
and
down
both
sides
of
the
street.
C
C
As
far
as
waivers
requested,
the
code
requires
that
all
units
must
face
at
public
right-of-way
and
the
coast
specifically
says
not
including
alleyways
or
rear
or
side
yards.
These
front
doors
on
these
two
units
face
a
public
right
away.
However,
for
the
two
rear
units,
their
front
doors
face
side
yards,
so
that
is
a
waiver
request
that
is
required
to
be
approved
by
City
Council,
which
city
staff
spun
inconsistent,
and
the
second
waiver
is
to
reduce
the
parking
from
nine
spaces
to
eight.
C
Then
the
last
way
where
that
they're
requesting
from
standards
applicable
standards
in
the
land
Bella
code
is
to
reduce
the
required
multi-family
green
space
from
350
square
feet
per
dwelling
unit
to
208
per
unit,
which
is
an
overall
deficit
of
567
square
feet,
and
they
would
have
to
pay
into
the
current
rate
into
the
district
in
lieu
a
time
of
permitting
I
know.
The
applicant
will
speak
to
this.
If
this
is
approved,
planning
design
and
develop
coordination
has
several
modifications
between
first
and
second
reading.
C
C
Transportation
again,
like
I,
said,
find
it
inconsistent,
do
do
the
parking
reduction,
they
do
have
some
changes
between
1st
and
2nd
reading
as
well.
So
overall,
the
DeVaughn
review
for
client
staff
did
find
this
inconsistent.
Please
refer
to
your
findings
in
the
staff
report
related
to
transportation,
finding
a
big
consistency
for
parking
reduction,
as
well
as
planning
design
and
development
coordination
inconsistent
finding
due
to
the
rear
unit
door,
placement.
G
G
This
is
a
view
looking
down
the
alley,
we're
required
to
have
a
20-foot
paved
alley
for
the
fire
department's
requirements
and
also
to
accommodate
the
backing
space.
This
is
the
adjacent
property
at
407
Westland,
and
you
can
see
the
doors
actually
face
the
alley
they
don't
they
don't
face
this
the
front,
the
other
side
of
the
front.
These
are
all
rear
pictures.
This
is
409.
These
are.
This
is
going
south.
This
is
every
every
property
southward
to
the
next
block
and
you
see
the
doors
and
the
and
the
garage
is
there.
G
What
we've
proposed
to
do-
and
this
really
is
a
design
element
that
we've
worked
out.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
to
the
Planning,
Commission
and
city
staff.
It
is,
it
is
a
compromised
position,
but
I
believe
it
meets
the
spirit
of
the
code
on
Westland.
We
have
the
two
doors
fronting
on
Westland
the
two
rear
units
unit,
two
and
three-
the
doorways
are
here
and
here
and
they're
connected
with
a
sidewalk.
G
That
goes
all
the
way
from
the
alley
all
the
way
out
to
Westland,
then
to
make
that
connectivity
occur
and
make
the
addressing
simpler
and
I
met
with
the
fire
marshal
about
this,
and
they
were
satisfied
that
this
was
a
reasonable
solution.
We
have
our
archway
entries
on
Westland
that
identify
the
unit
numbers
so
that
when
you're
driving
down
and
you're
trying
to
find
a
unit,
you
you
can
find
it
here
and
here
on
each
of
the
sides
and
those
are
not.
Those
are
in
addition
to
the
other
doorways
that
are
in
the
front.
G
G
We
we've
noted
that
this
backs
up
to
the
commercial
district
on
Howard
and
that's
a
commercial
serving
alley
which
is
which
is
very
active
and
heavily
news.
It's
an
underutilized
lot.
The
code
encourages
infill
development
and
actually,
as
as
I
said,
this
is
consistent
with
all
of
the
other
development
all
surrounding
there.
G
It's
I
think
you
know
I'll
be
happy
to
suspend
my
presentation,
but
we've
met
the
spirit
of
the
code
and
they're,
not
allowing
us
to
count
the
parking
in
the
in
the
driveway
which
they
used
to
in
the
past,
but
we
still
need
those
waivers
to
meet
the
code.
So
specifically,
we
need
the
green
space
waiver,
the
one
parking
space
waiver
and
the
access
waiver
of
the
location
waiver
for
the
doorway
to
be
on
the
sides.
A
A
D
H
To
rejoining
property
of
general
7405,
south
Westland
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
Florida,
more
particulars
for
a
bisexual
one
from
zoning
districts,
classification
or
m16
residential
multifamily,
PD
plan
development,
residential
multifamily,
providing
an
effective
date.
The
petitioner
has
met
the
burden
of
proof
and
is
confident
that
all
the
evidence
assisting
along
with
the
information
given
to
the
fire
department,
where
the
addresses
would
be
located
so
they
can
be
identified
and
the
parking
waiver
of
one
and.
A
B
E
I'd,
like
a
report
back
from
our
planning
staff
on
the
possibility
of
feasibility
of
the
two
things
number
one,
an
area
wide
rezoning
for
the
West
Shore
Palms
area-
that's
one!
That's
where
we
discussed
earlier
than
the
I
called
it
spot
zoning,
but
awful
Louis
and
Manhattan.
That
area
out
there
and
and
number
two
for
the
staff
to
come
back
in
60
days
to
discuss
the
possibility
of
an
overlay
for
a
Davis
Island.
B
B
A
E
A
H
Commission
I
make
a
motion
to
set
a
plan
amendment
adopted
hearing
for
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan;
amendment
number
19:
oh
nine,
in
the
temp,
a
comprehensive
plan,
amendment
1910
and
a
plan
amendment
transmittal
hearing
for
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
19th
a
show
to
temper
comprehensive
plan;
19,
oh
seven,
eight
through
he
and
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
number.
Nineteen,
oh
eight
on
the
evening
of
September
twenty
six.
Ninety
nineteen
at
5:01
p.m.
second.
A
With
regards
to
people,
I
guess:
I
I
would
talk
to
you
about
her
privately,
but
since
it
was
brought
out,
but
I
can't-
and
this
is
probably
the
best
time
to
bring
it
up
since
no
one's
here-
I'm
just
being
very
frank,
because
if
we
can
speak
openly,
were
you
referring
sure
to
two
speakers
or
to
let
people
in
public
comment
correct?
Okay?
What
is
your
thoughts.
E
On
that
I
just
thought
in
the
past
that
the
gavel
has
come
down.
When
people
started
yelling
at
us
mm-hmm,
they
could
say
pretty
much
what
they
want
as
long
as
they're,
not
obscene
or
vulgar.
Perhaps
but
just
the
yelling
and
I
was
hoping
it
would
sort
of
ease
up,
but
it
hasn't
seemed
to
ease
those
icons,
one
yeah,
so
it's
so
anyway
that
I
didn't
mean
to
make
it
a
big
deal.
But.
A
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
your
thoughts.
I
again,
it's
a
very
reasonable
position.
Mr.
Shelby
are
there
any?
Is
there
anything
that
would
preclude
us?
I
know
that
our
our
past
chair,
councilman,
Riddick
I,
had
some
items
that
were
to
be
read
before
public
comment.
I
set
aside
those
just
for
my
own
reasons.
Is
there
anything
that
precludes
us
from
putting
rules
as
to
of
volume
count
the.
B
B
A
In
the
challenge
with
that
is,
if
we
do
it
for
one
person,
you
have
to
do
it
for
everybody
universally
trust
me
to
quote
our:
what
is
it
gosh,
an
entire
41st
president
I
feel
your
pain
on
that
trustee,
but
but
it's
something
that
we
can
certainly
take
into
account,
but
it's
certainly
well
taken
councilman
dick
felt.
Yes,
definitely.