►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 08082019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
A
You
for
that
councilman!
Thank
you.
Okay,
let's
go
ahead
and
begin
with
so
I
have
a
motion
open
public.
Sorry,
we
have
a
motion
by
Councilman,
Maniscalco,
I,
believe
a
second
by
Councilman
Goods,
all
in
favor
all
right
any
opposed.
Okay,
we
begin
with
number
one
and
before
councilman
citro
you
indicated
there
were
I
believe
you
have
to
exempt
yourself.
No.
D
E
Chairman
good
evening,
LaShawn
doc,
so
any
designing
development
coordination.
If
I
made
counsel
I'd
like
to
do
a
little
housekeeping
and
clear
up
the
agenda
there,
a
couple
of
items
that
cannot
be
heard
this
evening
item
number
six
is
our
easy
1956.
That
item
cannot
be
heard.
No
affidavit
was
filed.
Motion.
E
E
A
E
A
A
A
A
You
we
have
a
motion
from
Councilman
Citra
with
second
councilman:
that's
Kafka,
all
in
favor
aye
any
opposed!
Thank
you,
sir
okay,
and
before
we
begin
I
was
reminded.
Let's
have
everyone
please,
if
you're
gonna
be
speaking
here
today,
please
stand
up,
raise
your
right
hand
stand
up
if
you're
able
to
do
so
and
prepare
to
be
sworn
in.
E
In
chairman
council
on
dock
planning,
design
and
development
coordination,
I
just
would
like
to
mention
on
item
four
items:
four
and
five.
Actually
what
should
be
open
together?
Historically,
if
there's
a
rezoning
and
a
vacating,
we
would
open
those
two
items.
At
the
same
time,
I
hear
both
cases
together
for
consideration.
So
when
we
get
to
item
four
staff,
what
advise
that
council
may
want
to
open
item
five,
all
something.
Thank
you,
okay
and
item.
One
council
is
file.
Number
are
easy.
1955.
E
G
Good
evening,
council
members
Jennifer
Malone,
if
you're
planning
to
see
staff.
This
is
in
the
West
Shore
planning,
perfect
the
closest
public
recreational
recreational
facilities
of
Charles
V
Williams
Park,
which
is
about
two
blocks
to
the
south
of
the
subject
site
part
bus
30
serves
as
subject
site
as
well,
and
it
is
in
a
level
B
evacuation
zone.
This
is
in
the
West
or
Palms
neighborhood
we're
just
south
of
the
I-275
ramp.
G
The
West
Shore
mall
is
about
two
blocks
to
the
east,
so
it's
just
not
a
frame
that
way.
I
have
north
Hubert
and
West
Carbon
Street.
This
is
an
area
that
has
definitely
transitioned
towards
more
of
those
multifamily
developments.
We've
seen
several
of
them.
I
have
townhouses,
basically
all
on
the
block
and
a
few
remaining
simple
family
homes
in
the
area,
but
these
are
also
multifamily
to
the
south
as
well,
which
is
gonna,
be
reflected
on
your
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
residential
20.
G
That's
that
darker
Brown
that's
pretty
much
throughout
the
whole
site,
and
then
we
have
a
residential
35
to
the
south,
which
is
a
little
bit
more
of
an
inconsistency
family
and
then
that
residential
ten.
This
is
a
single-family
detached,
and
this
is
an
SMU
six,
which
we
don't
see
too
much
in
this
area.
G
The
city,
that's
typically
north
of
Fowler,
but
as
we
have
the
body
Nexus,
so
one
of
those
you
know,
one
of
the
principal
objectives
of
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
is
to
ensure
that
we
have
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
to
meet
the
needs,
preferences
and
financial
capabilities
of
campus
households.
The
proposed
rezoning
will
furthers
its
objective
by
allowing
more
of
those
units
on
the
subject
site
in
an
area
that
is
planned
for
the
multifamily
up
to
2000
units
to
the
acre,
and
this
is
definitely
transitioning
in
that
direction.
Overall,
you
have
any
questions
I'm
available.
E
Councillor
Sean
dock
planning,
design
and
development
coordination,
so
the
requests
before
you
is
for
our
m18
residential
multiple
family
is
from
rs.50
residential
single-family.
This
is
a
Euclidean
rezoning.
Therefore,
no
waivers
are
requested
at
the
time
of
permitting
all
Cult
requirements
must
be
met
under
this
zoning.
The
lot
area
for
the
subject-
property
is
twenty
one
thousand
and
six
hundred
square
feet.
E
This
is
an
aerial
of
the
site
and
just
to
orient
you
on
the
map,
this
is
Carmen
Street.
This
is
Louis
avenues
and
just
north
is
the
interstate.
So
this
is
the
property
identified
in
red
with
the
red
dotted
line
and
this
property
is
surrounded.
It
has
rs.50
zonings,
north
and
east
and
then
also
there's
a
PD,
that's
located
to
the
west
of
residential
multi-family
and
located
further
east
along
Louis,
and
this
is
the
zoning
map.
The
property
is
identified
here
with
the
green
stripe.
This
is
Carmen
Street.
This
is
Louis
Avenue.
E
E
E
E
E
B
Evening,
Council
Steve
Michael
any
as
you'll
note
that
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
city
staff
have
both
found
this
petition
to
be
consistent.
I
refer
you
to
is
probably
the
most
important
document
that
we
have
regarding
this
petition,
which
clearly
demonstrates
that
this
our
subject
properties
are
surrounded
by
multifamily.
There's
one
single
family
left
here
and
a
couple
down
here
when
the
interstate
was
widened
and
they
took
out
almost
two
blocks
of
houses
in
front
of
there.
B
We
anticipate
meeting
all
of
the
codes,
as
the
staff
has
pointed
out,
if
there
are
any
exceptions
to
that,
they'll
have
to
go
through
a
different
process
through
a
variance
or
some
such
as
that,
but
we
have
to
meet
the
code
as
it's
submitted
and
we
are
respectfully
requesting
your
approval
there.
There
were
no
letters
or
phone
calls
received
regarding
this
petition
of
any
concern
or
objection.
A
Thank
you,
sir.
Anything.
Further,
no
sir
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Any
questions
from
Council,
okay
being
known,
we
move
to
public
comment.
Is
anybody
here
to
publicly
comment
and
item
number
one?
If
so,
please
come
forward,
may
I
have
a
motion
to
close.
We
have
a
motion
enclosed
by
councilmember
and
a
second
by
council
Maniscalco,
all
in
favor
any
opposed
councilman
Carlson.
Are
you
comfortable,
sir
reading
item
number
one.
F
Thank
you,
council,
also
for
your
assistance
tonight,
assistant
city
attorney
Kristen
Mora
has
provided
for
you
the
sample
motions
under
rezoning
motions
and
also
highlighted
in
yellow
review
of
site
plan.
Zoning
districts
that
doesn't
apply
for
now,
but
if
you
can
just
with
regard
to
including
rezoning,
include
the
language
that
is
on
the
the
sheet
in
front
of
you,
if
you
can,
for
the
purposes
of
the
record,
do.
F
C
A
E
G
Jennifer
Malone
again
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff.
This
is
in
the
South
Tampa
planning
district.
It
is
located
in
a
level
C
evacuation
zone.
Corona
Park
is
the
closest
public
recreational
facilities,
heart
route,
19
and
36
serve
the
subject
site.
This
is
in
the
promising
a
neighborhood
might
look
familiar
because
it
came
before
you
as
our
easy
1915,
under
a
different
request
for
from
on
the
request
that
time
is
for
our
on
18
zoning
district
on
council
that
approved
that
so
they're
back
before
you
with
an
RS
50
requests.
G
This
is
a
mixture
street
with
the
types
of
housing
which
it's
going
to
be
reflected
on
the
future
land
use
map.
I
do
know
right
here.
This
is
the
multifamily,
but
then
there's
also
some
single-family
detached
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
the
pattern
represents
that
mixture.
The
blue
is
through
at
the
Roosevelt
Elementary
School,
that's
public,
and
then
the
orange
is
residential.
Ten,
which
is
this
family
detached,
and
the
brown
color
is
residential
20,
which
allows
considerations
as
multifamily
uses.
G
So
the
street
itself
does
have
some
different
future
land
uses
which
which
provides
for
that
that
mixture
of
housing
picks
that
we
feel
on
that
Street.
But
we
did
find
this
consistent,
while
residential
20
future
land
use
designation
does
allow
for
more
density.
It
also
allows
it
also
allows
consideration
of
this
RS
50
zoning
district,
so
we
did
find
it
consistent.
The
street
we
found
was
developed
at
an
overall
density
for
the
subject
site.
G
E
Council,
the
Sean
dot
planning,
design
and
development
coordination
and
council.
This
request
for
rs.50
residential
single-family
zone
is
a
euclidean
request.
So
therefore,
no
waivers
are
requested.
All
standards
must
be
met
at
the
time
of
permitting
the
current
requests
were
for
the
subject
site.
It
consists
of
Lots
one
and
two
of
blood.
72
of
Palma
Ceia
Park
on
the
site
was
originally
one
zoning
parcel
with
the
total
lot
area
of
ten
thousand
square
feet.
The
property
is
now
two
single
plaited
Lots,
each
measuring
50
by
a
hundred
feet.
E
The
property
is
currently
vacant
and
this
is
an
aerial
of
the
site.
So
this
is
the
site
that's
identified
at
bred,
San
Juan.
This
is
San
Juan
Street.
This
is
Ferdinand
Avenue,
that's
to
the
east,
to
orient
you
on
the
site,
so
this
site
is
surrounded
with
our
speedy
zoning
to
the
south.
There's
some
pockets
bar
is
busy
to
the
north
and
northwest
of
the
site
and
to
the
east,
and
our
m16
is
surrounding.
E
E
E
E
In
Council,
on
page
three
of
the
staff
report,
staff
has
provided
the
analysis
for
the
areas,
so
the
Palma
Ceia
subdivision
it
was
originally
planted
in
1913,
with
lots.
Fifty
feet
in
width
and
100
feet
in
death.
The
resub
division
consists
of
four
blocks
and
18
Lots.
This
subject
parcel
is
located
on
block
72
of
the
subdivision
on
Lots
one
and
two,
so
the
applicant
would
reestablish
the
original
plan
at
Lots
to
create
two
buildable
Lots.
The
DRC
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
request
consistent
with
applicable
land
development
regulations
and
I'm
available.
B
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Bob
st.
Pierre
I'm
here
representing
the
applicant,
as
shown
both
land
development
and
the
Planning
Commission
have
found
the
rezoning
to
be
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
code
ordinances,
as
well
as
provisions
of
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
I'm,
respectfully
asking
that
the
council
moves
forward
with
this
recommendation.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'm
happy
to
address
them.
Thank.
H
B
A
I
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
Jack,
Rodriguez,
32:18,
West,
San,
Juan
Tampa,
dear
members
of
council
of
the
Palma
Ceia
neighborhood
association,
is
in
support
of
this
rezoning
request.
We
always
encourage
development
of
single-family
detached
houses.
By
this
we
mean
one
lot:
one
house:
this
developer
has
been
responsive
to
our
input
and
requesting
the
rs.15
a
zonie
category.
There
is
Rs
50
zoning
directly
behind
the
property
and
make
a
perfect
addition.
Again.
We
support
the
rezoning
petition
respectfully
submitted
Kimberly
de
Gant's
president
I'd,
like
to
submit
that
to
the
record,
along
with
a.
I
As
stated,
the
subdivision
is
was
developed
in
the
in
the
Florida
land
boom
and
all
the
Lots
in
there
are
all
5500
the
existing
zoning
behind
it
is
Rs
50.
If
you
go
down
there,
there's
narrow
streets,
you
immediately
get
a
feeling
you're
in
an
old
and
sustaining
neighborhood
Tampa
neighborhood.
The
request
for
two
single-family
detached
houses
will
be
a
welcome
addition
to
the
neighborhood.
The
neighborhood
is
primarily
single-family.
I
The
market
and
the
market
is
saying
that
the
neighborhood
is
a
perfect
location
for
single-family
detached
housing.
The
request
will
be
a
great
addition
to
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
The
neighborhood
association
is
in
support.
I
urge
you
to
move
up,
approve
this
petition
based
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence,
as
provided
in
the
Comprehensive
Plan
land
use
policy.
Nine
point:
five
point
to
maintain
the
character
of
single-family
residential
areas,
land
use
policy,
nine
point:
five
point:
four:
maintain
the
current
density
and
character
of
the
existing
single-family
neighborhood.
Thank.
H
I
A
J
Chairman
move
phone
number
are
easy
19-5.
Eight,
an
order
is
being
presented
for
first
reconsideration
on
orders,
rezoning,
proper
and
Jennifer
Cynthia
3302
3304,
San,
Juan
Street
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
Florida,
more
particularly
for
having
section
one
from
zoning,
district
classification
or
m16
residential
multifamily
to
rs.50
residential
single-family,
providing
interfaith
the
petitioner
and
has
met
the
burden
of
proof
to
be
competent,
substantial
evidence
that
the
development
and
conditions
shown
on
the
site
plan
is
consistent.
A
B
E
G
Good
evening,
general
alone,
with
your
Planning
Commission,
this
is
in
the
West
Shore
planning
district,
as
well
as
the
West
Shore
employment
center.
The
closest
transit
stop
is
about
1,600
feet
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site.
It's
served
by
to
Route
7
and
36.
It's
within
a
level
ii,
evacuation
zone.
G
It's
on
west
Ohio
Avenue,
and
this
is
Manhattan
Avenue.
This
is
Air
Cargo
Road.
This
is
all
airport
operations
right
here.
I
do
have
some
multifamily
to
the
south,
and
then
this
is
right
here,
I
believe
some
jail
operations
for
an
juvenile
center,
so
we're
kind
of
a
mixture
of
types
of
housing.
Here
between
the
detached
and
multi-family,
which
is
reflected
on
the
future
land
use
map.
G
All
the
blue
is
public,
that's
either
the
airport
operations
or
that
detention
center
up
here
we
have
residential
20
community
commercial
35
to
the
south,
which
is
the
red.
The
subject
site
is
residential
20.
They
are
requesting
the
commercial
neighborhood
zoning
district
that
is
allowable
if
the
property
meets
the
locational
criteria
that
is
set
out
in
our
comprehensive
plan,
so
it
can
be
considered
in
the
residential
20
district
if
they
need
to
the
criteria
in
the
plan.
G
Part
of
that
criteria
is
asking
that
the
commercial
use
have
direct
access
on
roadway,
it's
classified
as
an
arterial
or
a
collector.
The
access
on
this
road
for
this
site
is
on
a
local
street
on
west
ohio,
not
on
air
cargo
Road
and
it
directly
interfaces
a
residential
home.
So
the
Planning
Commission
found
that
that
was
not
meeting
the
policy
direction.
That
was
not
Mina
locational
criteria.
We
cite
how
the
comprehensive
plan
promotes
the
protection
of
the
city's
neighborhoods.
G
We
found
that
the
proposed
rezoning
was
not
sensitive
to
the
existing
residential
development
located
across
West,
Ohio
and
I'll,
say
at
land
use
policies.
Nine
point
two
point:
one
nine
point
two
point
two
and
then
15
point
two
point
one
overall,
although
this
is
Oh
use,
can
be
considered
under
this
future
land-use
categories.
We
did
find
that
the
access
point
was
in
conflict
with
the
policy
direction
regarding
for
mitigating,
for
potential
impacts
to
resent
the
development,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation
and
I
am
available
for
any
questions.
Thank.
A
G
E
H
H
G
Are
cargo
right
right
and
the
report
we
did
find
that
there
wasn't
any
evidence
presented
in
the
application
to
Planning
Commission
staff.
You
know
this
was
discussed
at
the
pre-application
meeting.
There
might
be
concerns
I,
don't
have
any
evidence
that
I've
seen
that
would
prohibit
that
happening,
but
I
can
hand
it
over
to
the
transportation
engineer
as
well.
E
Coordination,
I'm
councilman
just
to
give
a
bit
of
history
on
this
roadway
time
segment.
So
I
don't
know
if
you're
familiar
at
all
with
this
segment
of
air
cargo
rule.
But
what
happened
is
historically,
this
roadway
used
to
run
the
way
that
this
yellow
line
is
running
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
see
that
yellow
line
for
the
parts
of
line,
so
air
cargo
rolled
years
ago
ran
straight
and
then
it
curved
over
mm-hmm.
B
E
At
some
point,
the
city
did
improvements
in
curve,
the
right-of-way
and
align
that
road
segment
and
add
it
dis
landscaping,
and
they
took
away
the
curb
cut
because
this
location
had
access
somewhere
around
here
in
this
location,
on
Air
Cargo
road.
So
when
the
city
did
the
improvements
they
removed,
that
curb
cut,
put
a
curb
there.
They
removed
the
existing
Drive.
That
was
there
at
the
time,
and
so
that
left
these
two
access
points.
E
So
there's
one
of
two
things
to
consider
with
this
applicant:
they
must
be
able
to
access
their
property,
so
the
city
must
be
able
to
grant
them
access.
If
the
city
took
away
the
access,
the
applicant
still
has
the
right
to
access
their
property.
So
these
are
the
two
existing
points
that
are
located
on
Ohio.
You
can
see
that
this
one
is
within
the
property
line
within
the
property
boundary.
This
access
point
is
actually
in
the
right-of-way
okay,
so.
B
E
Applicant
doesn't
have
to
install
a
curb
cut
here
to
access
their
property,
because
this
was
taken
from
them
when
they
go
to
permitting
they
can
have.
They
can
use
these
two.
It's
access
points.
Normally
it
would
be
a
waiver
say
they
came
through
with
the
PD
a
planned
development
that
would
be
a
waiver
to
access
Ohio.
H
H
B
K
F
H
It's
just
kind
of
a
strange
situation
because
you
know
looking
at
that
building
is
that
looks
like
it's
been
a
commercial
building,
not
an
RM
16
right,
so
he's
had
a
commercial
use
there
as
a
non-conforming
use
on
an
RM
16.
So
now
he
wants
to
turn
it
to
a
conforming
use
in
terms
of
being
commercial
neighborhood,
correct.
H
E
J
F
H
E
E
E
E
Was
the
finding
of
consistent
for
this
request
a
finding
of
consistent?
Yes,
so
the
property,
so
the
applicant
is
requesting
a
commercial
neighborhood,
the
CN
zoning
designation,
the
subject
property
has
the
one
storage
structure
on
the
site.
It
contains
approximately
fifteen
thousand
six
hundred
and
seventy
eight
square
feet.
This
site
has
historically
been
used
for
assembly
uses.
So,
as
you
mentioned,
councilman
Dean
Felder,
it
hasn't
been
used
as
residential.
Historically,
that
structure
has
been
there.
E
The
subject
lot
area
contains
139
thousand
and
four
hundred
square
feet,
so
it
is
a
pretty
considerable
lot.
So
this
is
the
lot
this
here
in
red
and
this
is
Ohio
Avenue,
and
this
is
Air
Cargo
roll,
which
we've
been
discussing
this
roadway,
never
network
does
not
go
through
out
on
site.
This
is
all
with
it,
and
then
this
is
the
next
residential
here
and
then
to
the
north.
Are
the
two
residential?
So
there's
IG
zoning
this
to
the
northwest
on
the
arm.
16
is
north
and
east
of
the
site.
E
E
E
E
This
is
that
residential,
that's
north
across
the
street,
coming
back
east.
That's
the
residential
south
of
the
site.
Is
the
vacant
lot.
So
this
is
the
vacant
lot
in
the
site.
It's
located
here
on
the
left
side
outside
of
the
frame
of
the
picture.
This
is
west
of
the
site
across
air
cargo
and
that's
another
view
across
Air,
Cargo
Road.
E
E
J
J
B
A
B
They
have
a
to
wicked,
not
and
South
out
of
us
us
they
have
a
bunch
of
their
what
they
call
it
commercial,
the
businesses
there
as
the
course
of
the
use
other
part
and
other
commercial
and
then
some
what
the
east
side
of
us
had
a
some
residential
property
behind
us.
So
the
request
changes,
location.
B
A
J
A
D
Thank
you,
chair,
I,
move
and
ordnance
are
easy.
19
desk,
60
or
Nesby
percentage
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
44
50
West
Ohio
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
warped
eclis,
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
RM
16,
residential
multi-family,
2cn
commercial
neighborhood,
providing
effective
date,
as
the
petitioner
has
met
the
burden
of
proof
to
provide
competent,
substantial
evidence
that
the
rezoning
it's
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
H
Yeah
I'm,
you
know
I
think
we
all
like
to
give
deference
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
good
stuff
they
send
to
us
with
their
with
their
wisdom,
but
in
this
case
I
think
the
property.
The
property
has
been
there
as
commercial
for
a
long
time.
I
think
the
residents
the
residences
around
there
have
to
be.
You
know
very
used
to
intense
abuses
around
them
right
next
to
the
single-family
residence
is
a
industrial
general.
In
addition
to
the
commercial
uses,
is
a
lot
of
commercial
uses
around
there
as
well
as
industrial
uses.
H
A
B
E
E
Planning
design
and
development
coordination
council
item
five
is
our
easy
19:24.
This
is
for
the
property
located
at
1603
North
Florida
Avenue.
The
request
is
from
RM
24
and
CI
commercial
intensive
to
PD
plan
development
for
the
use
of
business,
professional
office
and
professional
residential
treatment
facility.
The
applicant
is
being
represented
by
a
truly
partner.
G
Good
evening,
Council
I
will
go
ahead
with
Planning
Commission's
finding
on
the
rezoning
aspect
of
this.
This
is
in
Tampa
Heights
within
the
Tampa
Heights
urban
village.
It's
not
located
within
the
evacuation
zone.
It's
adjacent
to
our
transit,
stop
which
connect
search,
I,
heart
valve
and
one
I
have
an
aerial,
you're,
probably
familiar
with
this
site.
G
If
you've
ever
driven
north
on
Florida
Avenue,
it's
the
Salvation
Army
site
I
have
the
Rialto
Theatre
and
the
hall
on
fragrant
over
here
and
the
Tampa
Heights
uses,
and
then
some
general
commercial
uses
along
North,
Florida
Avenue,
and
some
residential
over
here
is
reflected
by
the
future
land
use
map.
It
does
have
two
future
land
uses.
The
red
is
community
commercial
35
that
allows
up
to
commute
that
allows
on
consideration
of
commercial
general
commercial
intensive
uses.
G
The
dark
brown
is
residential
83,
it's
a
pretty
intensive
residential
future
land
use
category
and
then
that
sliver
of
purple
is
your
regional,
mixed-use
100,
which
is
very
intensive,
and
that's
where
all
that
intensive
Tampa
Heights
development
is
all
in
that
regional
makes
use
100.
You
did
find
this
consistent
inconsistent
for
the
record
inconsistent.
G
Neighborhood
policy,
any
policy
1.7.2
states
that
the
comprehensive
plan
should
seek
to
support
the
standards
and
the
land
development
regulations
that
addresses
the
location
and
excessive
concentration
of
these
types
of
uses,
such
as
crew
claims
and
treatment
facilities.
The
land
development
code
does
require
a
certain
distance
requirement
between
these
and
as
per
the
land
development
code
staffs
and
the
port.
This
did
not
meet
that
business
department.
So
for
the
policy
you
know
we're
not
meeting
that
policy
seeking
to
provide
for
that.
G
Moving
away
from
that
excessive
concentration,
the
comprehensive
plan
does
have
numerous
policies
that
address
the
need
to
provide
housing,
opportunities
for
the
homeless
and
the
disabled.
However,
as
I
stated
before
that
distance
apartment
has
not
been
met
and
therefore
that
policy
has
not
been
met,
so
the
proposed
PD
would
result
in
an
increase
of
beds
for
the
neighborhood
and
we
found
that
it
would
be
an
excess
of
concentration,
which
is
exactly
what
the
policy
and
the
policy
1.7.2
seeks
to
avoid.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
B
Applicants
requesting
to
vacate
a
t-shape
dolly
align
north
of
Henderson
Avenue,
south
of
7th
Avenue
east
of
Florida,
Avenue
and
west
of
Morgan
Street
distance
properties,
cross-hatched
in
red
I'm.
Subject:
alleys
highlighted
in
yellow
to
7th
Avenue
to
the
north
Morgan
to
the
east,
Florida
to
the
west
and
Henderson
to
the
south.
The
north
south
valley
is
16
feet
wide
east/west
Allen
he's
15
feet
wide.
The
north
south
valley
is
gated
at
both
ends.
The
east-west
Ali
has
gated
at
the
Morgan
walked
off
by
fence.
B
Actually,
the
north-south
alleys
improved
east/west
alley
is
mainly
grass
or
unimproved.
Until
you
get
to
right
about
here
is
paved.
Neither
one
of
the
this
sub
Sally
is
not
an
overlay
district
or
historic.
District
proposed
vacating
process,
880
300
square
feet
and
it
comes
out
of
the
plan
of
Tampa
hide
subdivision,
which
was
plaited
in
1890.
B
Here's
the
plat
subject,
alleys
highlighted
in
yellow
green
alleys
are
still
open.
The
red
alleys
have
been
previously
vacated
a
broader
view.
1/2
mile
area,
all
the
alleys
highlighted
in
red
have
been
vacated
to
open.
Subject:
alleys
in
yellow
I've
got
a
couple
pictures.
This
is
north-south
alleyway.
Looking
north
from
Henderson
Avenue.
B
B
Avenue
this
is
the
applicants
properly
looking
west
from
Morgan
Street,
and
this
is
the
applicants
property
looking
south
from
7th
Avenue,
and
this
is
what
the
abutting
owner
property-
that's
not
including
the
vacant.
That's
looking
west
from
Morgan
Street
staff
has
no
objections
to
the
bakery
requests.
As
long
as
the
easements
are
reserved
in
the
zoning
applications
of
sodium
associated
with
this
vacating
is
contingent
upon
the
baking
yet
approved
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
If
not
all
right,
we
have
any
questions.
H
D
E
And
I'm,
sorry,
with
this
request
counsel,
there
are
six
waivers
requested.
The
first
two
waivers
requested
for
this
PD
are
relating
to
the
special
use
criteria
under
27
132.
They
are
related
to
the
distance
requirement,
so
the
first
flavor
is
the
distance
from
the
professional
residential
facility
from
2,000
feet
to
75
feet.
The
second
waiver
request
is
to
decrease
the
distance
from
a
congregate
living
facility
from
1,200
feet
to
392
feet.
E
The
council
I
just
wanted
to
briefly
explain
the
difference
between
the
professional
residential
facility
and
the
congregate
living
facility
on
the
zoning
code
defines
the
two
uses,
so
the
professional
residential
facility,
actually
in
addition
to
providing
and
lodging,
can
provide
certain
medical
services
therapeutic
care,
those
types
of
services,
counseling
services,
the
congregate
facility,
provides
lodging
and
then
assistance
with
personal
services.
So
no
medical
services
are
provided
with
a
congregate
facility.
E
E
27:23
point
fifteen
to
allow
loading
to
occur
and
more
than
one
continuous
maneuver
in
the
right-of-way
and
then
a
waiver
to
section
27
to
eighty
five
is
to
reduce
the
required
vehicle
use
area
buffer
from
the
north
from
eight
feet
to
one
feet
with
payment
in
lieu.
At
the
time
of
permitting
so
council.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
read
on
to
allow
for
business,
professional
office,
use
and
professional
residential
treatment
facility
uses
with
a
hundred
and
seventy
two
bits
per
post
and
that
in
the
unit
there
is
an
existing
building.
E
So
the
applicant
is
proposing
that
use
the
existing
building
10,000
square
feet
of
that
existing
building
for
business,
professional
office
use
and
they're,
proposing
a
used
to
professional
on
treatment
facility
with
172
beds
in
the
remaining
twenty
eight
thousand
and
two
hundred
square
feet
within
that
building.
So
the
property
owner
is
Salvation
Army
and
they
have
a
transient
housing
use
which
has
been
determined
to
be
comparable
with
zoning
for
zoning
purposes
to
a
professional
residential
treatment
facility.
It
is
located
at
1514,
North,
Florida
Avenue.
It
has
a
hundred
and
forty
five
beds,
which
we
did.
E
Research
on
it
was
unlicensed
by
the
state.
The
property
owner
intends
on
selling
that
property
and
moving
those
existing
beds
to
the
location
and
under
this
request,
which
is
1603,
North
Florida
Avenue.
So
due
to
the
proposed
waivers,
the
applicant
is
elected
to
processes
if
PD
a
planned
development
with
the
special
use
to
review
criteria
remaining
applicable
because
for
the
use
of
the
professional
residential
facility,
it
is
it
required
specially
used
to
approval.
E
E
This
is
the
Zoning
Atlas.
So
this
is
the
property
identified
in
the
green
stripe.
This
is
7th
Avenue.
This
is
Florida
Avenue.
So
the
request
this
area
to
the
west
and
the
north
and
to
the
south
has
CI
zoning
commercial,
intensive
zoning
and
then
the
areas
to
the
east
of
the
site
in
the
East
half
of
the
site
is
in
the
armed
24th
only
district.
E
This
is
the
site
plan
that
was
submitted
with
the
request,
so
the
property
line
is
outlined
in
yellow
the
property
boundary
in
yellow.
So
this
is
7th
Avenue.
This
is
Florida
Avenue,
and
this
is
Henderson,
so
this
site
proposes
access,
vehicular
access
from
Henderson
and
also
from
7th
Avenue
parking
is
proposed
along
the
north
in
the
east
side
of
the
site,
and
this
is
the
structure
that
exists
this
on
site
currently.
E
And
counsel
the
DRC
staff
has
reviewed
the
request
and
finds
the
request
inconsistent
with
the
protocol
city
of
Tampa
land
development
regulations.
Please
refer
to
the
findings
for
the
transportation
and
they
are
related
to
the
waivers
which
are
transportation
related
was
their
finding
of
inconsistent
and
also
within
the
report.
There's
information
provided
from
planning,
design
and
development
coordination
regarding
their
finding
of
inconsistent,
and
this
is
regarding
the
distant
separation
requirement
and
you'll
find
on
page
four,
the
report-
that's
transportations,
finding
of
inconsistent.
E
There
are
also
site
plan
modifications
requested
and
there
are
minor
notes
to
be
added
to
the
site
plan
from
transportation.
On
page
five
of
the
staff
report,
there's
natural
resources
comments
and
those
are
regarding
on
site
plan
modifications
to
be
added
between
first
and
second
reading
and
also
at
the
bottom
of
page.
Five
counsel
you'll
see
the
criteria,
the
regulations
for
special
uses
under
section
27,
132,
and
also
what
we
provided
for.
E
You
is
on
page
six
or
the
staff
report,
the
definition
section
under
section
27
43
in
the
zoning
code
and
it's
the
definition
for
professional
residential
facility
and
then
you'll
find
the
other
findings.
Of
fact,
on
pages
six
through
nine
on
the
staff
report,
if
counsel
just
if
you
should
decide
to
approve
this
request
this
evening
site
plan,
modifications
are
required
between
first
and
second
reading.
What
do
you
have
any
questions?
Thank.
E
Yes,
so
planning
design
and
development
coordination
so
especially
used
they're,
specially
used
criteria
within
the
code
and
they're
found
on
a
27
132
and
for
the
uses
of
the
professional
residential
facility,
also
for
a
congregate
living
facility.
There
are
certain
standards
and
regulations
that
we
met
and
especially
as
criteria.
One
of
them
is
the
distant
separation,
so
within
the
cold
under
27
132
for
professional
residential
facility,
with
just
under
the
request.
This
evening
you
required
the
distance
of
2,000
feet
between
uses
Thank.
N
Good
evening,
true
partner,
400
North
has
to
drive
a
little
bit
of
housekeeping
if
it's
okay,
I'm
going
to
open
up
address
the
vacating
first,
since
the
vacating,
if
vacated,
will
be
a
part
of
the
PD,
it's
a
little
bit
backwards,
but
kind
of
feel
legally
need
to
do
that.
First
again,
true
Gardner
400
North
has
to
drive
it's
it's
my
pleasure
to
represent
Salvation
Army
I'm
humbled
to
be
able
to
represent
not
just
their
Board
of
Directors,
but
their
dynamic
and
energetic
area
commander.
N
Who
was
spot-on
on
all
that
the
leading
resource
said.
Absolutely
homelessness
is
something
that
can
be
solved
and
when
you
think
about
it,
the
number
one
thing
that
you've
got
to
do,
first
and
foremost,
is
provide
just
the
basic
shelter
over
somebody's
head
and
then
from
there
you
can
start
to
determine.
Is
there
a
substance,
abuse
problem?
Is
there
a
mental
health
problem
but
first
and
foremost
is
providing
just
that
basic
need
of
shelter
and
that's
what
Salvation
Army
does
and
that
they
do
it
better
than
anybody.
N
So
again,
it's
monitor
to
represent
them,
as
it
relates
to
the
vacating
I
could
I'm
going
to
put
back
up
a
little
bit
of
clear
map.
This
is
7th
Avenue
on
the
North
Florida
on
the
west
and
then
so.
This
is
Salvation
Army's
property.
What
we
were
going
to
originally
do
is
this
alley
actually
cuts
through
the
middle
of
their
property.
They
are
the
only
user
of
that.
So
initially,
all
we
were
going
to
do
was
vacate
the
north
south
portion,
but
the
city
has
a
provision
where
they
don't
want
you
to
create
a
dead-end.
N
So,
as
a
result,
we
were
requested
to
vacate
the
east
west
portion,
which
Salvation
Army
owns
on
the
south
side
and
then
I
believe
somebody
asked
the
question
on
the
north
side,
which
the
st.
Joseph's
Hospital
they've
also
been
advised
that
this
request
and
are
supportive
of
it
and
I
always
go
back
to
2011.
N
When
chip
Fletcher
was
City.
Attorney
Julia
Mandel
wrote
this
Niva
legal
memo
talking
about
the
justifications
for
the
city
to
use
when
they
go
about
a
vacating
petition
and
I've
highlighted
I.
Think,
what's
the
pertinent
part,
sufficient
public
interest
to
justify
fake,
aiding
the
street
would
be
for
the
purposes
of
relieving
the
public
from
the
cost
of
maintaining
a
street
or
highway?
That
is
no
longer
useful
or
convenient
to
the
public,
for
example,
vacating
the
street
or
alley
used
by
only
a
few
members
of
the
public,
and
in
this
instance,
this
east/west
portion
is
Jimmy.
N
N
This
is
going
to
talk
about
the
overall
meaning
of
this,
but
if
I
could
just
to
walk
you
through
so
Florida
Avenue
running
north-south,
the
subject
property
is
this
l-shaped
property
here,
but
Salvation
Army
owns
this
property
here,
as
well
as
this
property
to
the
north
and
then,
lastly,
immediately
catty-corner
to
the
1603
building,
which
is
what
I'll
be
reformed.
Referring
to
as
the
subject
property
is
this
building
here,
which
is
currently
the
red
shield
Lodge.
So
what
this
effort
is
is
to
dispose
of
this
asset,
this
asset,
which
are
currently
on
the
market.
N
Then
this
is
the
existing
red
shield
Lodge.
It
currently
has
145
beds.
It
will
be
closed
down
once
the
renovations
occur
at
1603,
and
but
the
problem
in
the
inconsistencies
that
we're
having
with
staff,
which
I
totally
understand,
are
they're
forcing
the
situation
to
be
looked
at
myopically.
The
only
way
to
do
what
would
need
to
be
done
under
the
code
would
be
to
close
this
operation
and
then
get
this
operation.
Do
the
improvements
and
then
move.
O
N
N
In
but
as
we
know,
life
doesn't
exist
that
way,
and
so
what
they're
trying
to
do
is
go
ahead.
Get
the
approval
for
this
do
the
renovations.
At
that
time
the
residents
would
move
from
the
existing
Reggio
lodge
and
to
1603,
and
then
that
asset
would
be
disposed
of,
consolidating
all
operations
into
this
block
right
here.
So
that's
just
the
general
overview
of
what
it
is.
That's
happening
and
I
think
the
best
way
for
me
to
spend
my
limited
time,
which
will
help
with
the
justifications
of
this,
is
to
address
the
waivers.
N
Waiver,
one
is
to
decrease
the
distance
or
professional
residential
facility
from
2,000
feet
to
75
feet
again
with
this.
The
sole
reason
that
that
we're
tripping
this
waiver
is
the
75
feet
is
the
distance
from
1603
to
the
existing
Reggio
Lodge
so,
but
for
the
desire
to
keep
this
operation
going.
While
these
renovations
are
occurring,
that
waiver
wouldn't
be
needed.
N
Then
waiver
number
two
to
decrease
the
distance
from
a
congregate
living
facility
from
1200
feet.
The
392
feet
on
this
one.
Not
only
is
it
that
same
argument
and
just
as
a
frame
of
reference
slightly
off
the
screen
north
of
Oak.
His
palm
is
the
Baptist
tower.
That
is
the
congregate
living
facility
being
referenced
here.
N
N
Thirdly,
to
reduce
the
required
number
of
parking
spaces
from
48
to
39.
This
again
is
for
a
present
professional
residential
true
facility.
What's
unique
about
this
is
we're
serving
the
homeless
and
the
homeless
don't
drive,
but
on
top
of
that,
we're
also
we've
got
10,000
square
feet
of
office
said
a
way,
we're
double
counting
the
parking
because
we're
required
to
park
it
3.3
for
the
office.
N
On
this
one
get
to
orient,
you
Florida
have
any
running
north-south
7th
Avenue
to
the
north
and
then
Henderson
running
here.
So
currently,
there
is
a
curb
cut
on
Florida
Avenue.
This
is
the
existing
building
right
here
on
Florida
Avenue
FDOT
demanded
that
that
access
be
removed
forcing
us
to
one
of
these
access
points
which
already
exists.
Secondly,
and
working
with
the
Tampa
Hyde
Civic
Association,
they
are
trying
to
eliminate
current
cups
of
curb
cuts
on
Florida
and
then.
N
Finally,
as
Keith
will
speak
to
the
desire
is
to
run
the
streetcar
along
floor
to
having
it
running
north-south,
and
so
the
more
the
Florida
Avenue
can
be
cleaned
up
and
access
points
eliminated
the
better
and
but
again
that
forces
us
to
use
the
local
Street,
which
is
seventh
here
and
then
coming
out
on
Henderson.
But
those
access
points
already
exist,
the
number
5
to
allow
loading
to
occur
and
more
than
one
continuous
maneuver,
and
to
allow
maneuvering
in
the
right-of-way
get
back
to
the
site
plan
on
it.
N
This
refers
to
there's
a
loading
dock,
which
is
also
in
existence
right
here.
The
way
that
this
site
has
been
designed,
though,
is
on
the
north
side,
which
is
the
heavy
traffic
for
trash
collection.
It
is
internal,
and
so
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
solid
waste
collection
and
only
to
do
with
this
one
little
loading
area
right
there,
which
is
already
in
operation
and
then
finally,
the
last
waiver
to
reduce
the
vehicle
use
area
buffer
area
to
the
north
from
8
feet
to
one
foot
with
payment
alluded
to
at
time
of
permitting
again.
N
This
is
an
existing
condition.
This
is
only
relates
to
the
north
parking
lot
in
this
area
here
this
parking
lot
exists
and
there
is
a
1
foot
separation
currently
between
the
northern
end
of
the
parking
lot
in
the
property
line.
So
that's
an
existing
condition
that
we're
asking
for
a
waiver
from
so,
if
my
hoping
going
through,
that
is
that
you
see
the
what
the
waivers
are
and
why
it
is
that
we
need
them.
Many
are
existing
conditions.
Others
are
primarily
due
to
the
fact
of
wanting
to
keep
the
operations
going
while
the
renovation
occurs.
N
We
did
try
through
a
condition
which
we'd
worked
on
with
the
Tampa
Heights
Civic
Association,
to
have
a
condition
of
zoning
which
would
require,
in
order
for
us
to
be
able
to
get
our
certificate
of
occupancy
at
the
end
of
construction
for
1603
Florida.
In
order
to
do
that,
the
operation
that
Reggio
Lodge
would
have
to
cease
existence,
unfortunately,
and
but
rightfully
the
city
attorney
staff
is
not
allowing
us
to
have
that
condition
because
it
impacts
another
property.
That's
not
the
subject
of
the
rezoning,
as
I
mentioned.
N
And
then
finally,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
just
the
level
of
community
outreach
on
this
I
believe
we've
had
in
excess
of
20
meetings
with
Tim
Hite,
civic
associations,
neighbor
neighboring
property
owners
and
stakeholders
in
the
area.
These
uses
aren't
always
the
easiest
abuses
a
lot
of
times.
This
would
inspire
a
packed
house,
but
I
think
we've
got
a
high
level
of
support.
H
N
A
Q
Penza
council,
thanks
for
having
here
I'm
captain
Andy
Miller
I'm,
the
area
commander
for
the
Salvation
Army
in
camp
in
Hillsborough
County
thanks
for
hearing
our
case
here
today,
as
I,
walked
to
City
Council
City
Hall
I
walked
right
by
a
green
sign,
historical
marker
on
your
property.
That
says
right
here.
In
1893,
this
Salvation
Army
began
with
captain
Wilbur,
Hall
and
Captain
Fred
Weller
you'll,
be
glad
to
know
I'm
not
here,
to
claim
any
ownership
of
this
building
or
this
property,
so
we're
glad
to
be
able
to
have
opportunity
to
dress
shoes.
Q
We've
been
in
town
serving
for
a
hundred
and
twenty
six
years
and
the
Salvation
Army
just
began
one
hundred
fifty-four
years
ago.
So
we
came
to
Tampa
relatively
soon
into
our
history,
and
our
mission
is
remain
consistent
to
preach
the
gospel
of
Jesus
Christ
and
meet
human
needs
in
his
name
without
discrimination.
We've
been
in
our
same
area
for
about
that
same
amount
of
time.
Our
first
building
was
on
Tampa
Street
and
then
we've
been
in
the
same
general
area
right
there
on
Florida
for
since
the
1960s.
Q
So
we're
really
excited
to
be
able
tell
you
just
briefly
about
what's
been
happening
from
a
programmatic
and
operational
standpoint,
so
you
can
understand.
What's
going
on,
as
you
know,
Tampa
Heights
has
changed,
champa
Heights
has
grown
evolved
and
we,
the
Salvation
Army,
have
changed
and
grown
with
that
neighborhood.
You
might
remember,
I
know
you
all
have
been
in
town
longer
than
me.
There
was
a
time
where
the
Salvation
Army
we
weren't,
using
really
what
the
Salvation
Army
would
consider
the
best
practices
for
our
emergency
sheltering
no
to
that.
Q
This
is
the
very
distinct
ministry
the
Salvation
Army
has
in
our
community.
Nobody
else
does
emergency
sheltering
for
single
men
and
women.
When
I
arrived,
my
wife
arrived
and
she's
back
here
with
my
three
kids
as
well.
We
realized
that
we
were
duplicating
services
of
other
programs
in
town,
so,
for
instance,
metropolitan
ministries
was
doing
a
variety
of
family
housing.
We
closed
are
sheltering
on
1603,
the
building.
That's
in
that
we're
talking
about
tonight
and
we
concentrated
then
on
our
sheltering
for
single
men
and
women.
What
we
did
is
we
eliminated,
but
Bob
Lupton,
dr.
Q
Bob,
Laughlin,
calls
toxic
charity
practices
instead,
opera
and
said
started
to
incorporate
concepts
of
from
the
book
when
helping
hurts
and
really
the
best
practices
for
housing
and
also
in
homeless
sheltering
so
what
we've
been
able
to
do,
then,
is
we
stopped
all
public
feeding?
You
might
notice
that
Henderson
and
on
Florida
they're
significantly
less
people
who
are
they're
hanging
out
in
that
block.
Q
We,
instead
our
focus
on
the
hundred
and
twenty
people
who
are
staying
in
the
read,
show
lodge
and
if
we
were
able
to
get
a
magic
wand
and
we
can
move
into
a
refurbished
1603
building.
Today
we
would
only
house
one
hundred
and
twenty
people,
because
what
we've
done
at
that
building
is:
we've
shifted
our
operation
and
here's
how
we've
shift
their
operation.
You
might
remember
their
time
where
there
used
to
be
a
line
of
people
who
had
line
up
on
Florida
Avenue.
That
does
not
exist
anymore.
Q
You
might
remember
a
time
where
people
have
to
line
would
leave
the
building
at
7:00
a.m.
we
also
have,
for
a
period
of
time
served
lunch
to
five
hundred
people.
Well,
we've
stopped
those
practices
instead
become
a
24-hour
shelter,
so
that
our
main
goal
is
to
help
people
who
have
a
desire
to
get
out
of
homelessness
to
take
the
capacity
that
we
believe
God
has
given
them
to
be
able
to
use
that,
so
they
can
indeed
step
out
of
homelessness.
Q
What
we're
trying
to
do,
then,
is
take
our
red
shield,
Lodge
in
1926
1926,
Holsinger,
building
and
moved
all
of
our
operation
into
our
16:03
facility,
which
will
then
could
be
completely
renovated
and
we'll
be
able
to
serve
our
community
better
if
we're
able
to
get
into
that
building.
I
think
it
will
be
better
for
everybody
from
the
perspective
of
what's
going
to
happen
in
our
community.
One
of
the
interesting
things
too,
that
happens
is
that
all
the
economic
development
in
Tampa
Heights.
Q
I
would
guess
that
today
we
had
15
people
who
work
in
an
armored
worked,
another
half
a
dozen
or
so
that
are
working
at
the
hall
and
then,
if
we
have
people
downtown,
we
have
people
who
are
working
downtown
as
well
and
they're,
giving
these
entry-level
jobs
that
we
have
in
our
area,
and
this
is
helping
us,
of
course,
in
our
community
to
do
better.
So
what
we've
been
able
to
do?
We
Bale
clean
up
some
of
the
the
people
who
are
eating
on
the
street.
Q
We
try
to
even
help
people
one
well
intentioned
church
groups
that
come
down
and
serve
on
the
street
to
try
and
have
an
avenue
for
them
to
serve
at
our
shelter
by
them,
helping
the
folks
who
have
decided
to
move
from
the
street
to
their
feet.
So
this
is
just
an
overview
of
what
we
hope
to
do.
I
think
this
will
be
a
great
improvement.
Q
L
Good
evening,
Council
Keith
skirmishers,
6:55,
North,
Franklin
urban
designer
and
community
planner
with
Kim
Leghorn
we're
here
in
support
of
this
for
multiple
reasons.
As
you
are
all
aware
aware,
our
urban
core
is
is
shifting
expanding
our
edges
are
becoming
more
of
a
part
of
that
core,
and
this
is
the
area
that
that
is
receiving
that
benefit,
as
the
core
expands
traditionally
I
think
the
interstate
was
kind
of
what
everybody
considered
the
edge
of
downtown.
It's
it's
moving
into
the
northern
areas
of
the
community.
L
Unfortunately,
as
staff
has
identified-
and
rightly
so-
we
got
a
little
bit
of
a
chicken
and
egg
or
you
know
musical
chairs
situation
here
in
the
sense
that
we
have
to
be
able
to
rezone
this
property,
get
it
up
and
going
expand
its
capacity
to
take
in
the
residents
in
the
red
shield
and
then
allow
that
property
to
be
come
on
to
come
online,
which
I'm
quite
certain.
Knowing
that
building-
and
you
all
have
seen
it
a
very
grand
building,
actually
contributing
to
the
overall
neighborhood
and
it
will
be
brought
into
use
very
quickly.
L
We
think
thereafter,
so
in
looking
at
again
how
the
the
Church
of
the
Salvation
Army
has
continued
to
evolve,
the
evolution
of
the
city.
The
idea
that
we
will
have
a
streetcar
would
be
running
up
through
this
area
in
some
time
soon.
Hopefully,
the
opportunity
for
those
that
are
residing
there
to
have
further
expansion
of
their
ability
to
find
work.
I
dare
to
say
it's,
probably
not
exactly
what
was
thought
of,
but
this
is
workforce.
L
Housing
right
now
for
people
to
allow
to
get
on
their
feet
start
to
earn
a
little
bit
of
a
wage
and
move
up
through
their
life,
so
I'm
here
to
answer
any
other
questions,
but
I
would
look
grand
that
you
would
take
a
look
at
this
understand
how
this
area
is
transitioning,
and
this
is
just
part
of
that
transition.
So,
thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
N
This
when
the
residents
could
move
over,
even
though
it's
not
on
the
market,
red
shield
or
Salvation
Army
has
already
received
an
unsolicited
offer
for
it,
and
but
as
soon
as
these
details
were
worked
out,
it'll
it'll
be
on
the
market
just
as
the
sites
to
the
north
and
to
the
south
already
on
the
market.
So
with
that
I'll
close
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and.
Q
With
that
I
mean
we
see,
opening
up
those
properties
in
north
property.
Our
South
warehouse
property
is
being
able
to
contribute
to
economic
development
of
the
neighborhood
to
this
opportunity.
Hopefully
I,
don't
know
if
you'd
see
this
as
trustees
of
the
city
of
getting
more
tax
dollars
on
your
rolls
more
tax
income,
and
this
would
be
a
great
opportunity
for
us
to
be
contribute
to
that.
So
we're
excited
to
mention
that
sorry
Truitt,
if
I,
cut
you
off
too
soon.
Q
There
just
mention
one
of
the
things
453
people
last
year
moved
into
permanent
housing
from
our
red
shell,
Lodge
and
I
think
that
we
be
able
to
better
if
we
have
a
better
facility-
and
you
all
are
welcome
to
come
with
me
any
time
and
serve
a
meal.
You're
welcome
to
come
and
walk
through
our
shelter,
we'd
love
for
you
to
come
and
see
what
God
is
doing
through
the
Salvation
Army.
A
O
O
The
area
is
growing
and
they're
getting
jobs
and
how
much
it
works
and
those
places
down.
That
means
that
something
is
coming
about
good
for
those
folks
who
want
to
strive
for
better.
So
I
was
a
fool
of
what
you
do
with
the
Salvation
Army
and
you
keep
on
doing
what
you're
doing,
because
we
are
in
crisis
or
homelessness
situation
and
I
know
just
a
little
bit
above
that
our
Ybor
area
BB,
where
people
are
very,
very
adamant
about
the
homeless
situation.
H
R
R
Are
one
mind,
so
the
city
cannot
force
the
other
facility
to
close,
because
it
is
on
a
property
that
is
not
a
part
of
this
particular
rezoning.
I
would
note
that
council
could
take
no
to
the
fact
that
this
is
the
same
applicant
as
that
other
property,
so
this
is
more
of
even
if
they
did
not
close.
That
other
facility
would
be
more
in
the
nature
of
an
expansion
of
the
facility
is
what
I'm
hearing
from
the
testimony
than
a
whole
new
facility.
R
So
that
is
a
distinction
from
what
you
normally
see
when
you
see
a
distance
waiver
requirement,
but
unfortunately
we
are
not
able
to
enforce
it.
There
may
be
enforcement
options
for
the
neighborhood,
but
that
would
be
outside
of
your
purview
and
outside
of
your
consideration
in
this
particular
hearing.
H
It
might
be
semantics
because
I
do
believe
them
and
I
know
I,
know
various
folks,
including
Captain
Miller,
and,
of
course
it's
the
Salvation,
Army
and
they've
done
great
work
for
you
know
more
than
a
hundred
years,
but
you
basically
the
letter
as
nice
as
it
is,
is
not
really
enforceable
and
I
say
that's
more
for
precedent
to
in
regard
to
other
folks
who
might
try
and
give
us
letters
like
this,
so
you're
saying
it's
not
really
enforceable.
The
only
thing
I
wonder
about
is
when
people
get
up
in
front
of
us
and
swear.
H
R
R
A
A
N
It
the
only
I
hear
you
not,
certainly
not
here,
to
perjure
myself
and
I
believe
captain
Miller
is
either,
but
on
top
of
that
there
is
trust
and
verify.
As
you
said,
there's
also
the
financial
aspects
of
this
I'm
happy
to
get
captain
any
up
to
up
here.
To
testify
to
that,
which
is
simply
the
Salvation
Army
has
no
desire
nor
the
monetary
means
to
operate
these
two
facilities.
So
really
the
work
and
the
money
that's
needed
to
renovate
1603
is
contingent
upon
their
ability
to
not
only
sell
the
parcels
that
are
currently
being
marketed.
Q
Just
add
that
kept
getting
to
Miller
1603
North
Florida.
Three
years
ago
we
were
housing,
a
hundred
more
people
than
we
are
today.
We
downsize
we
eliminated
50
positions.
We've
now
had
our
first
two
years
of
living
in
the
black,
financially
there's
no
chance
that
we
could
accommodate
it.
Like
believe
me,
I
have
members
my
board
behind
me.
There's
no
way
that
we'll
be
able
to
sustain
those
two
types
of
programs.
We've
been
through
a
strategic
plan.
We've
been
through
a
mission
planning
study,
significant
studies
that
have
led
us
to
a
place.
A
You
very
much,
sir.
We
appreciate
it.
Okay,
next
move
onward
to
public
comment
for
item
numbers,
items
number
four
and
five
regarding
the
Salvation
Army.
If
you
are
here
to
publicly
comment-
and
you
are
able
to
stand
up,
please
do
so
and
how
many
folks
are
here,
gonna
comment:
if
you
could
raise
your
hands
one,
two:
okay,
I
guess
one
two
three.
P
P
When
I
first
moved
into
that
area,
it
was
myself
robertson,
billiards
at
the
far
end
of
franklin
street
and
oceanic
market,
at
the
other,
and
all
of
the
buildings
were
vacant
and
a
sizable
number
of
homeless
population.
We
all
recognized
the
homeless
population
and
that
something
needs
to
be
done.
We,
the
commercial
property
owners
and
business
owners,
have
really
gone
out
on
the
limb
with
that
area
financially
and
have
sunk
large
sums
of
money
trying
to
reject
Rifai
that
area
and
we
are
seeing
that
change
take
place.
P
Last
year
alone,
City
Council
and
the
Downtown
Partnership
asked
us
to
be
a
part
of
the
new
special
services
district
and
we
agreed
to
that
so
that
we
are
now
part
of
I.
Think
when
we
look
at
rezoning
request,
we
have
to
look
at
the
big
picture
and
where
a
neighborhood
is
moving
and
I'm,
not
so
sure
that
this
is
in
the
best
interest
of
that
neighborhood
and
of
Tampa
Heights
I'm,
not
hearing
Tampa
Heights
here
as
a
whole,
endorsing
this
whole
concept.
P
What
we're
requesting
here,
not
we,
what
Salvation
Army
is
requesting
here,
is
for
a
PD
rezoning
for
a
professional
residential
treatment
facility.
Now
what
we
have
to
bear
in
mind
is
that
is
all
inclusive.
That's
alcohol,
substance,
abuse
medical
treatment.
I
mean
this.
This
is
a
big
thing.
It's
not
just
saying.
Okay,
we
want
to
house
some
homeless
people.
This
is
bringing
more
problems
into
the
area
that
we're
already
struggling
with
and
have
been
not
for
years,
but
for
decades.
P
So
I
I'm
questioning
the
whole
concept
in
the
budget
of
taking
a
building
that
currently
has
40
beds
in
it
and
we're
going
to
quadruple
that
requirement
and
I
understand
about
the
reduction
in
the
parking.
If
you
allow
them
to
increase
the
beds
to
that,
many
because
I'm
sure
95%
of
those
people
don't
have
motorised
vehicles,
but
then
again,
if
we're
going
to
allow
a
special
Services
District
to
start
increasing
intensity
for
this
kind
of
care.
I
have
concerns.
Thank.
S
Esteemed
councilmen,
my
name
is
Maureen
arrow
I
too
AM
in
a
property
owner
in
the
neighborhood
through
my
entity,
a
to
LLC
I
own,
the
properties
at
1701
and
1702
North
Franklin
Street
directly
across
from
the
red
shield
and
down
the
street
from
the
property
in
question.
I
came
to
voice
my
support
for
this
project,
I
believe
in
the
power
of
redevelopment
to
shape
communities
and
I
believe
in
progress.
Not
perfection.
S
My
tenant,
we
pay
$35,000
in
ad
valorem
taxes.
It
has
gone
up.
300%,
since
my
purchase
into
2014,
we
currently
spent
$13,000
a
year
with
the
city
on
solid
waste.
My
tenant
has
six
million
dollars
in
sales
for
his
first
year,
which
is
all
subject
to
sales
tax
for
the
state
he
hires
49
employees
each
have
an
average
salary
of
$22,000.
His
payroll
last
year
was
over
a
million
dollars.
S
A
T
T
What
happened
in
reality
is
that
$7,
a
bed
was
charged
by
the
Salvation
Army
and
there's
some
matching
funds
that
come
from
the
government.
Make
no
mistake
about
it.
It's
a
money-making
operation.
These
guys
know
how
to
make
money
and
behind
the
scenes,
if
they
do
it
within
good
intentions.
That's
the
altruism.
The
reality
is
how
we
live
in
our
neighborhood,
those
people
that
don't
have
$7
Panhandle.
T
Over
the
years,
we've
had
things
from
our
cars
that
were
broken
into
tried
to
be
sold
back
to
us
for
the
same
seven
dollars
on
and
on.
It's
just
goes
on
and
on
I
resent
the
inference
that
the
example
Heights
Civic
Association
is
completely
behind
this,
as
it
has
been
somewhat
subtly
presented,
I'm
sure
if
you
polled
the
Tampa
Heights
Civic
Association
you'd
get
a
more
real
one
feel
of
that
situation.
T
This
will
make
the
largest
homeless
facility
on
the
west
coast
of
Florida
and
to
put
that
in
a
neighborhood,
that's
already
suffered
with
it
for
40
to
50
years
and
change
the
zoning
from
1,200
feet
to
390
feet
and
go
through
all
these
gyrations.
Why
don't
we
just
let
it
lie
where
it
is
I
think
the
Salvation
Army
will
sell
all
these
properties
for
a
good
sum
of
money
and
and
go
on
somewhere
and
give
us
a
little
blue
sky.
T
We've
been
suffering,
you
wouldn't
even
couldn't
even
imagine
some
of
the
things
I've
seen
and
happened
to
our
lives
and
businesses
there
there's
fights
you
know
they
try
hard
but
they're.
The
last
business
there
that
has
a
barbed-wire
fence
around
it,
so
they
know
their
own
customers.
You
know,
there's
no,
there's
no
offences
anywhere
else.
T
They've
stopped
all
the
public
feeding
that
was
good.
It
is
it
time
for
the
cities
to
be
consistent
and
it's
been
stated
that
it
isn't
consistent
with
current
laws.
I,
don't
think
we
should
change
those
and
there's
not
good
to
push
these
numbers
around
they're
there
for
a
reason
and
I
believe
if
we
okay.
S
A
T
Yeah,
that
was
one
of
my
questions.
I'm
really
nervous
about
this,
because
I've
seen
what
the
reality
is,
and
the
altruism
and
I
highly
urge
you
guys
cuz.
There
are
some
people
they're
supposed
to
be
here:
mr.
Cass,
Schuler,
Cass
and
Schuler
and
whatnot.
There
believe
me
they're,
watching
closely
and
I
think
we
I
think
we
should
just
stick
with
the
laws
and
the
zoning
regulations
that
we
have
and
let
the
chips
fall
where
they
may.
Thank.
A
N
Absolutely
again
true,
Gardner
forehead
and
worth
Lee
Drive,
just
taking
it.
This
comments
which
I
appreciate
both
their
statements
as
well
as
their
passion,
but
as
far
as
mr.
Johnson's,
on
this
not
being
in
the
best
interest
of
the
community,
I,
really
think
when
you
take
a
broader
view
of
this
and
you
look
at
the
assets
that
will
go
back
for
redevelopment
as
opposed
to
being
owned
by
Salvation
Army,
further
the
consolidation
into
one
location,
which
will
be
secured,
as
opposed
to
spread
out
that
that
is
simply
just
incorrect
in
all
due
respect.
N
Secondly,
mr.
Johnson
throughout
the
number
of
40
beds,
and
just
to
clarify
that
1603,
with
especially
he's
to
approval
that
I
showed
you
was
granted
40
beds
through
that
the
existing
Reggio
lodge
has
145
beds.
Add
those
two
locations
together,
your
185,
what
we're
proposing
again
with
forcing
you
guys
to
take
the
leap
of
faith
that
we're
going
to
do
what
we
say
is
a
max
of
172
beds.
So
it's
actually
a
net
reduction
Andy
used
the
term
or
use
the
number
120
people
currently
being
served
at
red
shield
lodge.
N
That
is
what
they
would
like
to
also
service
at
1603.
The
172
number
is
the
maximum
capacity
given
a
freeze,
a
hurricane
or
some
other
natural
disaster.
Their
ultimate
goal
would
be
to
serve
zero,
but
when
you
look
at
those
numbers,
I
do
think
it's
important.
He
raised
the
number
of
the
40
if
you
take
that
and
add
it
to
the
145
that
are
currently
being
served,
it's
185
and
we're
having
in
that
reduction
to
172.
N
Q
Thank
you
very
much.
Captain
Andy
Miller
1603
North
Florida
glad
to
addressing
these
concerns.
Of
course
we
appreciate
the
passion
that
comes
from
are
the
people
who
dissented
from
this
idea
in
general
and
we've
worked,
we've
worked
hard
and
I'll
say:
I
could
have
done
better
with
the
businesses.
I've
worked
really
hard
with
Tampa
Heights
Civic,
Association
and
I've
been
at
their
meetings
and
board
meetings
regularly,
and
it
wasn't
until
recently
that
I
realized
that
I
need
to
be
closer
connected
here.
I
did
try
to
visit.
Robertson's
I
talked
to
a
Lana.
Q
The
gentlemen's
folks,
daughter,
I,
did
have
a
great
conversation
of
Michael
Cass
who's,
not
opposing
us,
and
he
yeah
after
a
conversation
to
find
out
what
we're
doing
is
an
opposing
us.
So
I
did
speak
with
mr.
Karl
as
well.
Can't
remember
your
last
name
at
this
point,
but
here's
what
we
have
also
just
just
so
you
know
there
is
no
longer
seven
dollars
a
night
that
was
stopped
as
soon
as
I
arrived.
We
do
not
charge
anybody
to
come
in.
Isn't
him?
Excuse
me,
sir?
Q
A
Q
I'm
aware
that
there
were
years
of
operation
where
the
Salvation
Army
used
an
older
model
of
sheltering
and
that
can't
that
was
even
up
to
that
time.
I
arrived
when
I
arrived,
I
realized.
We
were
not
using
best
practices,
and
so
we
now
have.
We
stopped
that
that
amount.
We
do
not
charge
anything
to
people
come
occasionally
we
have
people
when
they
left
and
gotten
a
job
and
come
back.
They
actually
want
to
pay
pay.
Something
make
a
donation
to
us.
It's
a
little
bit
different.
Q
Here's
what
I
want
you
to
know
clearly
for
me:
nothing
changes
within
our
operation.
We
just
want
to
use
the
the
same
operation
that
we
have
going
on
in
the
red
shield,
Lodge
right
now,
which
doesn't
require
any
sort
of
licensing
from
the
state.
Instead,
we
want
to
do
that
exact
same
service,
which
is
making
a
great
impact
in
our
community
in
the
1603
building.
That
is
our
primary
desire.
Q
We
won't
be
doing
drug
treatment,
we'll
just
do
be
doing
our
basic
case
management
that
helps
people
get
from
the
street
to
their
feet
and
get
into
permanent
housing
and
that's
ultimately,
our
goal.
I
want
to
do
also
another
corrective
I
know
that
there's
another
facility
that
offers
more
sheltering
because
it's
another
Salvation
Army's
facility
in
Saint
Pete,
which
has
more
than
250
people
saying
night.
So
it's
not
exactly
accurate.
The
West
code
would
be
the
largest
in
the
West
Coast,
because
I
know
I'm
new
at
Tampa,
but
I
still
think
st.
N
Again
true
Gardner,
just
in
closing
I
know
we're
asking
you
guys
to
take
a
leap
of
faith
and
just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
support,
we
did
our
own
research
into
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
there
are
a
couple
of
provisions
that
apply.
This
is
the
the
housing
section
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and,
if
I
may,
what
it
states
and
the
preamble
is
new.
New
construction
has
increased
the
housing
stock
in
Tampa.
N
There
are
multiple
policies
that
you
can
really
read
into,
but
two
that
I
think
really
address
it
squarely,
which
is
policy
1.1.11,
promote
the
preservation
and
development
of
a
sufficient
supply
of
housing,
affordable
to
extremely
low
income,
individuals
and
households
with
children
in
order
to
reduce
or
prevent
homelessness,
and
then
policy
of
one
point.
One
point:
twelve
provide
opportunities
throughout
the
city
for
emergency
shelters
and
transitional
housing
for
people
who
are
homeless
and
that's
what
I
believe
we're
doing
again.
We're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Sure
the
last
one
I
read
is
policy.
H
H
If
they're
volunteering
that
that's
the
proposed
use
just
beds,
no
treatment.
Is
that
already
a
condition
on
the
PD?
Or
can
it
be
a
voluntary
condition
on
the
PD
and
I'm
not
necessarily
concerned
again
about
the
Salvation
Army
and
the
veracity
of
what
captain
Miller
had
to
say?
But
if
they
sold
the
building
to
another
treatment
provider,
then
they
could
take
advantage
of
that
and
we'd
have
a
different
situation.
H
E
Councilman
LaShawn
dot,
planning,
design
and
development
coordination,
so
the
use
of
professional
residential
facility
encompasses
logic.
So
what
we
look
at
is
their
overall
use,
so
the
applicant
has
stated
they
will
provide,
lodging
and
they're
also
providing
other
services
and
that
all
falls
under
the
use
of
professional
residential
facility.
If
they
did
not
provide
those
other
services
which
are
kind
of
medically
related,
then
they
could
fall
under
the
facility
designation
right.
H
So
then,
my
question,
perhaps
to
legal,
then
is
okay.
They've
got
a
set
of
uses.
This
is
the
best
category
that
we
can
find
for
them
in
terms
of
PD
professional
residential
treatment
facility.
It's
the
best
category.
We've
got
in
terms
of
what
they're
proposing
but
can
based
upon
their
testimony.
Can
we
carve
out
some
uses
with
additional
condition
on
the
PD?
He
said
he
said
he
doesn't
want
to
do
alcohol
treatment
on
at
the
location
or
drugs
I
assume
drug
treatment
at
the
location.
If
that's
what
they're
volunteering
do?
Why?
R
Is
not
a
distinction
that
can
be
made
a
lodging
facility
at
congregate,
living
facility
or
a
professional
residential
facility?
Are
the
only
that
for
a
myriad
of
reasons,
but
perhaps
most
on
point
our
code
definitions
to
be
used
in
any
conditions
that
we
place
on
uses,
so
it
has
to
be
a
code
use
and
those
individual
uses
are
not
defined
in
our
code.
Our
code
only
speaks
to
a
professional
residential
facility
or
a
congregate
living
facility.
So
those
are
the
only
distinctions
or
uses
that
could
be
listed
in
this
particular
he's.
H
R
Have
great
flexibility
on
PDS,
however,
the
uses
that
are
listed
on
a
site
plan
must
be
or
must
be
interpreted,
to
be
uses
that
are
listed
in
the
land
development
code.
You
cannot
create
a
brand
new
use,
for
example,
it
can't
be
martini
bar,
that's
not
an
allowed
use,
it
has
to
say
you
know
bar
or
you
know
what
have
you.
It
has
to
be
a
use
that
is
listed
or
that
is
defined
in
our
code.
H
R
Used
limitation,
the
only
use
limitation
that
our
zoning
office
can
apply
is
a
use
that
is
defined
in
our
code.
That
is
the
only
thing
that
is
listed
in
27
156,
the
table
there.
That
is
the
only
thing
that
is
defined.
That
is
the
only
thing
that
they
can
enforce,
is
a
use
that's
listed
in
our
code.
They
can't
then
peel
back
and
into
those
individual
specifics
of
the
use.
R
Could
you
could
make
additional
definitions
for
your
code
through
land
development
regulations?
In
this
particular
instance,
different
types
of
lodging
facilities,
different
types
of
congregate
care
facilities
is
not
a
legal
distinction
that
we
are
allowed
to
make.
That
is
federal
law.
We
have
to
treat
them
all
the
same.
O
It
wasn't
goods
when
I
look
at
mr.
Gardiner's
last.
Memo
ran
on
there
with
some
statues
on
there
when
it
dealt
with
providing
shelter
for
homeless
individuals.
How
does
that
fear
in
that?
Because
I'm
hearing
different
usages,
when
he
presents
to
me
on
this
scan
here,
he's
presenting
something
else
so
I'm
getting
a
little
confused
to
you
when
we
talk
about
the
uses
of
coves,
but
yet
we
talk
about
we're,
providing
shelter
for
homeless
folks
providing
shelter
for
individuals
in
need.
O
So
how
do
we
wait
it
because
I'm
getting
a
little
confused
when
we
talk
about
Conklin
living
matakohe
and
now
he
shows
me
homeless.
Isn't
a
statute
there?
How
does
that
tie
in
or
how
do
we
define?
What
is
really
gonna?
Be
the
use
because
to
me,
if
you're
not
doing
he's,
he's
he's
defining
it
as
will
be
used
as
a
homeless,
shelter
or
emergency
shelter
for
homeless
people.
R
So
I
don't
believe
we
have
a
homeless,
shelter
definition
in
our
lana
bellman
code,
so
that
is
not
a
separate
distinction
that
we
could
make.
I
would
also
say
that
in
general
in
the
law,
if
people
are
living
in
groups
of
unrelated
individuals,
the
reasons
why
they're
living
in
groups
of
unrelated
of
unrelated
individuals
is
not
a
question
that
we
are
allowed
to
ask.
We
must
treat
them
all
the
same.
R
So
if
a
group
of
ten
homeless
people
are
living
together
that
is
treated
the
same
as
a
group
of
ten
older
people
that
are
living
together
is
treated
the
same
as
a
group
of
older
people
or
people
that
are
living
together
for
various
reasons,
the
only
question
we're
asking
is
how
many
of
those
people
are
going
to
live
there.
It's
the
only
question
we're
allowed
to
ask,
and
that's
that's
the
distinction
that's
made
in
our
code.
There
is
a
further
distinction
for
whether
services
are
being
provided
and
I.
R
A
J
E
When
it
comes
to
providing
shelter
and
housing
there
uses
that
are
defined
within
the
zoning
code,
so
if
the
applicant
is
providing
housing,
we
have
dwellings
or
definitions
within
the
code,
so
either
their
dwellings
and
they're
providing
housing
units
of
whether
it's
residential
multifamily
dwellings
they
could
provide
if
they
so
desired.
But
when
you
add
the
additional
services
that
are
offered
through
the
Salvation
Army,
that
puts
it
into
a
different
category
and
typically
the
occupant
is
obtaining
some
type
of
state
license
to
go
along
with
that.
E
A
You
anyone
else
questions
okay,
I
I
just
wanted
to
briefly
comment
on
something
that
I
noticed
and
in
terms
of
I
guess:
a
distinction
on
services
that
we're
being
asked
to
make
by
certain
individuals,
etc,
etc.
You
know,
when
you
look
at
the
Tampa
Heights
area.
What's
happened,
I
always
see
a
distinction
between
redevelopment
and
reinvestment.
Redevelopment
seeks
to
chariot
redevelopment,
seeks
to
essentially
change
the
character
of
a
neighborhood
reinvestment
seeks
to
make
investments
in
the
neighborhood
and
put
the
people
who
live
there.
First,
I
I
see
this
as
part
of
reinvestment.
A
There's
there's
a
lot
of
businesses
here
that
serve
a
lot
of
folks
who
have
a
lot
of
money
prospectively
to
give
there's
the
business
of
something
that's
close
to
my
heart:
the
business
of
law,
where
people
pay
attorneys
three
400,
maybe
even
more
dollars
an
hour
for
legal
services.
There's
the
business
of
Education
Stetson
college
of
law,
where
you
pay
a
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
to
get
a
chance
to
pass
the
Florida
Bar
and
become
an
attorney
there's
the
business
of
food
where
you
pay
$20
to
have
a
plate
of
food.
A
There's
the
business
of
coffee,
where
you
pay
sometimes
up
to
what
our
minimum
wages
an
hour
to
have
a
latte.
Well,
a
Salvation
Army
is
in
the
business
of
compassion
and
I
used
to
term
business.
I
don't
mean
for
profit
or
anything
like
that.
They're
in
the
business
of
people
of
putting
people
first,
that
is
to
me
a
liberally
stated.
A
business
quote.
A
Unquote,
I
don't
mean
in
terms
of
a
profit,
just
an
endeavor,
an
endeavor
that
is
entitled
to
deference
in
any
kind
of
a
community
and
to
ask
us
to
make
such
in
my
respectful
opinion
of
frivolous
distinction
based
upon
what
is
frankly,
a
faith-based
endeavor
by
this
organization.
It's
just
not
something
that
I
must
can
agree
with
respectfully.
So
just
something
I
wanted
to
comment
on.
Thank
you
may
have
a
motion
to
close.
J
A
B
So
I
have
an
ordinance
papers
enter
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
vacating
closing
discontinuing
and
abandoning
alleyway
right-of-way
line
was
to
for
a
veneer,
beat
seventh
Avenue
north
of
East
Henderson
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
those
broke
County,
Hillsborough,
County
Florida
the
same
being
more
fully
described
in
section
one
here:
I'm
subject
to
certain
easement
reservations,
company
conditions
and
restrictions
more
particularly
set
forth.
Herein
provide
an
effective
date,
I
believe
that
the
petitioner
has
met
its
burden
of
proof
to
provide
competent
and
substantial
evidence
that
this
is
consistent.
Second,.
M
B
O
Portents
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration,
it
ordnance
resilient
property
in
the
gentleman
city
of
1603,
North,
Florida
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tama
floor
and
more
particular
described
in
section
one
from
selling
district
specifications,
ci
commercial
intention
and
rm20
for
residential
multifamily
to
PD
plan
development,
business
and
professional
officer
and
professional
residential
treatment
facility
providing
effective
date.
Second,
we
have
a.
O
All
right,
I'm
over
Lawrence
and
direct
provision,
show
a
revision
sheet
made
made
by,
as
the
petition
has
met,
the
burden
of
proof
provide
competent
and
substantial
evidence
that
the
development
initial
condition
and
shown
on
the
site
plan
is
constantly
covered.
As
a
plan
and
city
cope
suitably
that
designed
the
purpose
development
is
unique
and
therefore
was
in
need
of
waivers.
O
A
O
B
A
E
A
G
Apologize
all
right.
This
is
also
an
essential
Tampa
planning
district,
it's
also
in
Tampa
Heights.
So
for
a
moment,
I
thought
I
had
the
wrong
report
up
here.
It's
also
within
the
Tampa
village.
Heart
route,
seven
serves
a
subject
site
and
it's
also
the
evacuation
zone
D.
This
is
a
request,
as
LaShawn
stated,
for
a
PD
that
would
allow
a
professional
office
on
this
site,
but
we
have
North
Boulevard
to
the
north.
G
G
Predominantly
the
area
is
residential.
10,
that's
Thorne's,
but
the
such
excited
itself
is
residential
20,
it's
a
little
hard
to
tell
because
it's
such
a
small
site
and
we
have
the
the
number
over
it.
But
it's
it's
residential
20!
It's
that
darker
brown.
It's
the
same
thing
that's
present
to
the
south.
This
is
the
public.
That's
the
elementary
school
that
I
pointed
out
earlier,
so
office
uses
are,
can
be
considered
under
the
residential
twenty
future.
Land-Use
category,
if
those
meets
the
locational
criteria
and
the
Comprehensive
Plan,
we
did
find
that
this
met
the
locational
criteria.
G
G
G
Lastly,
the
planned
development
is
proposing
vehicular
access
from
an
alleyway
which
is
encouraged
by
the
comprehensive
plan,
land
use
policy
15.3
point
to
call
the
Comprehensive
Plan
also
encourages
redevelopment
projects
and
urban
villages
that
contribute
to
the
mixed-use
nature
of
the
village
and
its
traditional
livable
community,
which
would
include
commercial,
neighborhood,
commercial
and
these
offices.
So
we
did
find
that
this
would
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
neighborhood
and
it
would
be
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern
and
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
That
concludes
our
presentation.
Any
questions.
E
Councillor
Sean
Dogg
planning,
design
and
development
coordination
Council.
There
is
a
correction
I'd
like
to
make
on
the
staff
report
regarding
the
date
of
the
site
plan.
That's
listed,
it
has
April
22nd
2019,
but
the
revised
site
plan
was
submitted
on
June,
24
2019,
so
that
date,
correction
is
needed.
On
the
record
this,
this
application
requests
a
total
of
three
waivers.
One
is
to
reduce
the
required
parking
from
four
spaces
to
three
spaces.
The
other
waivers
to
27
to
83
point
12,
is
to
allow
the
reduction
in
the
drive.
E
Our
width
from
24
feet
to
19
feet
and
the
third
waiver
is
to
27
to
84
is
to
reduce
the
required
buffer
from
15
feet,
with
a
six-foot
masonry
wall
to
three
feet
on
the
south
and
five
feet
on
the
east.
So
the
request
is
the
total
lot
area
for
the
property
is
approximately
4,800
square
feet.
This
site
is
located
east
of
North,
Hobart,
south
or
west
west
street
in
north
of
West
Plaza
place.
The
subject.
Property
property
currently
contains
a
residential
use.
E
The
structure
consists
of
1333
square
feet
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
and
requesting
the
use
of
a
business
professional
office.
The
request
is
proposing
to
utilize
the
existing
structure
and
maintaining
that
building
footprint
with
access
from
the
alley
on
site.
So
this
is
an
aerial
of
the
site.
E
E
This
is
the
property
identified
in
the
green
striping,
so
this
is
North
Boulevard.
This
is
West
Street,
so
this
property
has
the
residential
office,
the
Arnold
zoning,
to
the
north
and
to
the
west
and
to
the
east
into
the
south.
It
has
two
zoning
of
the
Rs
50
zoning,
as
you
see
it,
a
couple
of
Pisa
PD
to
the
north
and
then
a
residential
office
further
south,
and
this
is
a
picture
of
the
site
on
Boulevard,
that's
the
front
of
the
site
and
then
heading
north.
This
is
north
of
the
site.
E
E
This
is
east
of
the
site.
This
is
on
wizzrobe.
This
is
another
single-family
residential
east
of
the
site,
also
on
withdrawal,
another
single-family
residential
coming
back
around
this
is
south
of
the
site.
This
is
the
vacant
lot.
This
is
on
Boulevard
and
this
is
west
of
the
site,
which
is
a
commercial
use,
and
this
is
across
Boulevard
to
the
west.
E
So
this
is
Boulevard,
that's
located
on
the
left
side
of
this
picture,
so
this
is
the
main
entryway
for
pedestrians.
This
is
the
structure
itself
and
this
is
the
parking
which
would
be
accessed
from
the
alley,
and
these
are
today
at
the
180,
a
space
and
the
additional
two
parking
spaces
located
on
site
and
the
development
review.
Compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
request.
E
Finder
requests
inconsistent
with
city
of
Tampa
land
development
code,
the
inconsistent
finding
is
related
to
the
transportation
waivers
that
are
requested
for
the
site
and
within
the
staff
report,
council
you'll
find
on
page
2
transportations
finding
of
inconsistent
regarding
those
waivers.
There
are
site
plan
modifications
requested
also
between
1st
and
2nd
readings.
Should
council
decide
to
approve
this
request
this
evening
and
you'll
see
those
listed
within
the
staff
report
also
under
planning
and
design
and
development
coordination.
Natural
Resources
has
also
requested
site
plan
modifications
and
they
have
a
finding
of
consistent
and
I'm
available.
K
I'm,
an
attorney
in
Tampa
been
practicing
for
20
years
and
my
hope
is
to
get
approval
for
this.
The
the
lot
itself
is
rather
narrow,
so
I
do
need
a
waiver
for
the
parking
from
4
down
to
3
and
I'm
certainly
happy
to
do
whatever
I
need
to
to
make
this
work.
I
live
literally
four
blocks
away:
I
moved
to
Riverside
Heights,
which
is
quite
a
budding
Tampa
Heights,
so,
like
I,
said
I'm
willing
to
do
what
I
can
to
meet
whatever
whatever
the
city
is
looking
for
right
to
the
north
of
this
property.
K
Is
a
law
office
I
can't
think
of
his
name
right
now,
but
he
does
workers
comp.
That's
not
a
competing
area
that
I
practice,
but
it's
literally
right
next
door
on
North
Boulevard
I
can
tell
you.
There
is
a
lot
of
traffic
on
North
Boulevard
even
at
night,
and
we
were
running
a
short
term
and
the
complaints
BOE.
The
one
complaint
we
always
got
was
that
front
bedroom.
K
A
A
Changes.
Thank
you,
sir.
Anyone
here
to
publicly
comment
on
item
number
seven
is
so
please
come
forward
at
this
time.
Three
minutes
we
have
a
motion
to
close
by
councilman
Miranda,
a
second
by
Councilman
Goods,
all
in
favor
any
opposed
it's
councilman
Carlson.
Are
you
comfortable,
sir?
Taking
item
number
or
seventh.
C
C
R
Good
evening
to
get
in
council
Kristen
Maura
legal
department
just
for
your
general
information,
this
was
previously
brought
to
City
Council
and
it
was
the
subject
of
a
statutory
procedure
procedure
known
as
the
Bert
Harris
Act.
There
was
a
recommendation
from
the
magistrate
in
that
Bert
Harris
proceedings
to
approve
this.
It
came
back
to
City
Council
and
was
not
approved
so
I
have
that
history.
R
I
can
explain
further
as
we
go
through
the
process,
but
I
did
want
to
give
you
that
history
that
this
was
previously
requested
went
through
the
court
Harris
process.
There
is
a
special
magistrate
recommendations
for
approval,
but
it
was
not
a
prequel
City
Council,
so
that
is
the
history
and
that
happened
in
2017.
E
Council
deshaun
planning,
design
and
development
coordination
and
council
item
number.
Nine
is
our
easy
1963.
This
is
a
new
application
that
is
presented
to
you
this
evening.
This
is
for
9:10
south
sterling
Avenue.
The
request
is
from
rs.75
residential
single-family
to
PD
planned
development
for
residential
single-family
on
development.
The
applicant
is
Gaylord
is
Jason
Landau.
G
Jennifer
Malone,
with
your
signing
Commission
staff,
we're
going
to
be
a
South
Tampa
planning
district.
For
this
case,
this
is
located
in
the
Gulf
View
neighborhood.
The
closest
public
transit
stop
is
located
about
0.2
miles
away
to
the
west,
along
South,
dome,
Avery,
Highway,
part
route,
19
and
36
surface.
Subject:
site
it's
within
a
level
D
evacuation
zone,
the
Carl
Dickinson
Tennis
Center,
is
located
about
a
half
mile
away
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site.
The
predominant
surrounding
area
is
single-family,
detached
residential
with
the
commercial
uses
along
South
domain
highway.
G
So
the
subject
site
is
outlined
in
purple.
It's
along
South
sterling
Avenue.
We
can
see
some
I
know
it's
hard
with
the
tree
coverage,
but
those
are
single-family.
Detached
homes
see
some
pools
in
the
areal.
This
is
the
right
scorm,
a
house
along
south
dale
mabry
highway.
This
is
a
plaza
with
a
bank.
This
is
the
country,
the
Palma,
Ceia,
Country,
Club
golf
course
to
the
South
adopted
future
land
use
of
the
subject.
Site
is
residential
six
that
is
less
intensive
than
residential
ten.
It
allows
six
Doyle
units
to
the
acre.
G
It's
it's
single-family
detached
they're,
not
consideration
of
anything
else
in
this
category.
As
you
can
see,
it's
predominantly
this
neighborhood
there
is
a
cold
ASEC
across
the
street.
This
is
residential
20.
It
provides
that
transition,
because
this
is
the
community
makes
these
35,
which
allows
commercial
along
south
dale
mabry
highway.
So
there's
a
little
bit
of
that
tradition
transition,
but
the
whole
neighborhood
reserve
is
residential.
Six.
The
green
is
the
the
golf
course
to
the
south.
G
It's
wrecked,
open-face
is
the
future
ladies
category,
so
the
proposed
rezoning
in
front
of
you
today
would
allow
for
consideration
of
two
single-family
residences,
the
overall
density
for
this
parcel.
If
we
put
two
single
family
residences
on
it
would
be
five
point.
Two
six
units
per
acre
you
can
have
up
to
six
is
the
overall
density
allowed,
so
they
are
within
that
and
they're
meeting
that
future
land-use
category
density.
G
As
you
know,
a
principle
objective
of
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
is
to
ensure
that
there
is
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
available
to
meet
the
needs
and
preferences
of
the
city's
population.
And
then
this
would
increase
the
number
of
residential
units
on
the
property
which
would
meet
that
objective
and
the
comprehensive
plan.
So
Planning
Commission
didn't
have
any.
E
Council
on
planning
design
and
development
coordination,
with
this
request,
this
PD
request
for
residential
single-family
detached,
and
there
are
no
waivers
with
this
PD.
The
property
contains
a
total
of
sixteen
thousand
and
five
hundred
square
feet.
So
this
is
part
of
like
three
block
28
of
the
revised
map
of
Southland
subdivision.
This
property
is
located
south
of
Del
Mabry,
highway,
west
of
South,
x,
Avenue
and
south
of
West
Watrous
Avenue
east
of
South
Sterling
on
the
east
side
of
us,
a
sterling
Avenue.
E
So
on
the
plan
which
I'll
put
up
for
you
on
the
elmo,
so
this
is
sterling
Street.
This
is
the
property
under
the
request
which
is
outlined
in
red,
so
just
to
orient
you
so
a
lot
a
has
been
identified
as
the
northern
lot,
so
that
lot
would
contain
a
wealth
of
60
feet
in
width
and
it
would
contain
a
depth
of
one
hundred
and
thirty
seven
point
five
feet
and
then
lot
B,
which
is
identified
here.
This
southern
lot
would
contain
the
same
width
of
60
feet
and
the
depth
at
130
7.5
feet.
E
So
this
is
located
within
an
rs.75
zoning
district
council
and
in
our
75
zone
you
will
be
required
normally
to
have
a
men
with
of
75
feet.
A
frontage,
and
these
two
Lots
requested
would
have
a
frontage
of
60
feet
each.
So
that
is
why
this
the
PD
is
required
and
I
have
also
an
aerial
of
the
site.
So
this
is
sterling
Avenue.
This
is
Waris
Avenue
located
here,
and
this
is
the
site
this
outlined
in
red.
So,
as
you
can
see,
this
site
is
surrounded
with
single-family
residential
development.
E
E
E
E
In
Council,
on
page
three
of
the
staff
report,
you'll
find
the
staff
finding
so
the
DRC
staff
reviewed
the
request
and
at
a
finding
of
inconsistent
they're
relating
to
natural
resources,
findings
and
also
relating
to
planning
design
and
development
coordination
finding
of
inconsistent-
and
this
is
related
to
comp
plan
policy.
Nine
point
three
point:
eight,
you
will
know
within
the
fight
plan.
E
What
I
have
listed
is
that
the
revised
map
of
Southland
subdivision
it
was
originally
plaited
in
1915,
with
lots
that
buried
in
with
from
three
hundred
to
three
hundred
and
seven
feet,
it
buried
inland
from
three
hundred
to
three
hundred
and
five
feet.
The
overall
subdivision
included
forty
nine
blocks
located
in
between
Manhattan
Avenue
to
Himes,
Avenue
and
Swan
Avenue
to
San
Jose.
The
subject
property
is
located
on
block
twenty-eight
of
the
subdivision.
It's
on
a
portion
of
Lot
three.
E
The
subject
applicant
seeks
to
create
two
buildable
Lots,
so
with
the
overall
analysis
on
our
conforming
map
that
we
have
here.
So
this
this
is
the
subject:
property
that's
outlined
in
black.
This
is
sterling
Avenue.
This
is
fortress
Avenue,
so
taking
the
distance
for
the
study
area
and
looking
at
the
current
zoning
of
the
RS
75
in
the
area.
E
What
we
did
was
took
the
analysis.
It
was
a
total
of
114
lots
that
were
included
in
the
analysis.
I'm
also
included
in
the
analysis,
were
blocks
to
the
south,
which
are
part
of
the
Gulf
View
Estates
revised
subdivision.
So
it
actually
includes
another
subdivision,
some
of
the
Lots
that
are
within
this
analysis
area.
So
this
subdivision
I'm
in
the
area
south
of
Neptune,
it
was
originally
planted
in
1942,
with
lots,
they're
buried
in
with
from
54.5
feet
to
315
feet.
E
Only
eight
of
the
49
Lots
within
that
subdivision
were
60
feet
or
less
and
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
Sterling
and
San
Miguel.
The
remaining
41
Lots
within
that
subdivision
range
from
75
feet
to
315
feet
and
30
Lots
or
more
than
50%,
were
planted
at
75%
and
remain
developed
with
that
pattern.
So,
overall,
at
the
hundred
and
fourteen
lots
that
were
developed,
40
of
the
Lots
have
been
developed
with
the
minimum
lot.
E
E
Seven
other
Lots
have
been
developed
with
the
width
between
60
to
64
feet.
Seven
of
the
Lots
have
been
developed
between
50
to
54
feet.
Six
of
the
Lots
were
developed
with
the
width
of
65
to
69
feet.
One
lot
is
developed
at
the
woods
between
70
and
74
feet
and
one
at
a
width
of
34
feet
or
less
so
within
the
subject
blocks.
E
To
do
a
further
analysis.
There
are
11
parcels
within
the
block
so
of
the
eleven.
A
hundred
percent
of
those
Lots
have
been
developed
at
a
width
of
75
feet
or
greater,
and
now
those
are
the
areas
on
the
map
which
are
painting
dark,
red
and
red.
The
width
of
the
lights
on
the
subject
block
range
from
78
feet
to
125
feet
with
six
of
the
11
lights.
E
At
a
hundred
feet
or
greater
and
four
at
eighty
feet
of
Greater,
so
there's
only
one
78
foot
lot,
which
is
located
on
the
southwest
corner
of
the
block.
So,
given
that
analysis
staff
finds
the
proposed
configuration
of
the
260
foot
Lots
in
the
center
of
the
block
is
inconsistent
with
the
development
pattern
of
the
subject
block
in
the
block
face,
as
well
as
the
overall
development
pattern
of
the
area.
Also
counsel
Brian
Knox
is
here
with
natural
resources.
E
O
R
Should
be
a
pre,
correct,
correct
Kerstin
were
a
legal
department.
Yes,
there
was
an
application.
I
think
it
was
initially
for
a
Euclidian
zoning
district,
but
it
was
amended
to
a
PD
and
there
was
a
full
request
for
relief
hearing
on
it,
and
there
was
a
recommendation
from
the
special
magistrate
for
City
Council
to
approve
that
that
was
up
for
hearing
and
prenta
City
Council,
the
City
Council
denied
the
application
again
I.
O
R
R
Legally,
this
is
a
closed
application.
I
mention
it
because
the
applicant
did
bring
out
the
fact
that
this
previous
process
had
occurred.
So
when
is
City
Council
to
understand
fully
what
had
happened
in
that
particular
process,
but
this
process
is
closed.
This
is
a
brand-new
application,
and
so
you
will
hear
this
application
the
same
as
any
other
rezoning
application
that
comes
before
you,
okay,.
K
K
K
So
we
asked
the
applicant
to
staked
a
lot.
The
lot
was
staked
and
at
the
time
the
lot
was
statement
went
out.
It
was
determined
that
to
build
on
lot
B,
what
is
proposed
was
not
possible.
So
there
was
a
20-foot
protected
radius
around
the
tree,
as
shown
here
that
20
foot
is
the
minimum
allowed
distance
for
a
grand
tree.
However,
lots
lot
bees
house
was
proposed
as
a
two-story
home
and
with
that
an
excessive
amount
of
canopy
would
be
removed,
ultimately
leading
to
the
tree
being
removed.
K
So
as
we
determinate,
the
lot
was
not
buildable.
We
asked
the
applicant
to
try
to
reconfigure
it
a
lot
build
or
try
another
alternative
design
to
build
or
consider
an
alternative
measure
for
getting
the
lot
order.
The
house
you're
proposing
on
lot
B,
and
so
with
that
we
had
some
concerns
about
whether
or
not
he
could
build
the
house
at
one
story
as
well.
K
There
are
additional
concerns
on
a
lot.
Those
concerns
involved,
the
driveway.
The
driveway
requires
a
minimum
20
foot
radius
from
the
34
inch
tree.
That's
shown
here
on
lot,
B,
there's
a
heavy
amount
of
encroachment
there,
and
with
that,
we
still
we
weren't
able
to
come
to
a
decision
on
that
and
make
and
come
to
a
you
know
a
solid
conclusion
on
whether
or
not
you
can
put
a
driveway
that
close
to
that
tree
as
well.
K
N
P
D
R
Here
at
this
evening
to
talk
about
the
proposed
development
of
the
slot-
one
distinction
that
happens
in
this
case.
That
does
not
necessarily
happen.
In
other
cases,
they
are
asking
for
permission
to
build
two
Lots.
They
are
not
currently
allowed
that
by
the
zoning,
so
they
do
have
to
rezone
in
order
to
have
two
locks.
D
Yes,
my
point
is:
is
that
the
trees
that
are
going
to
be
affected?
It's
gonna
have
to
be
permitting
and
they
would
have
to
go
through
some
other,
whether
it
be
VRB
or
another
thing
to
make
sure
that
those
trees
can
either
be
cut
down
paid
for
mitigation
or
whatever,
but
we're
just
here
on
the
PD
I
understand.
R
A
D
A
I
J
J
E
S
M
Sterling
Avenue
he's
one
block
he's
to
tell
me,
which
is
one
of
busiest
highways
in
the
city.
When
I
had
to
do
the
notice
everybody
250
feet
around
I
had
a
notify
property
owners
on
Dale
Mabry.
That's
how
close
I
am.
Ok,
I
also
had
to
notify
people
having
50
foot
wide
Lots
I
can
see
50
foot
Lots
directly
from
my
front
door
directly
across
the
street
from
my
house
are
seven
Lots.
None
of
them
are
75
feet
wide,
even
though
we
have
the
same
zoning.
M
None
of
them
have
75
feet
wide,
they're,
all
less
than
that
as
little
as
60
feet,
and
none
of
those
seven
Lots
have
even
near
75
hundred
square
feet.
Now.
Remember:
I've
got
eight
thousand
two
hundred
fifty
square
feet
and
the
requirement
is
only
75
hundred,
so
I
got
way
more
land
than
what
is
required.
I'm,
basically
shy
the
front
footage
but
directly
across
the
street
is
an
identical
situation
and
if
one
of
those
houses
burnt
down
tonight,
they
would
not
be
back
in
front
of
the
council.
They
can
pull
permits
immediately.
M
I
went
around
to
all
the
neighbors
I
have
31
letters
signed
by
neighbors,
including
every
neighbor
in
the
900
block
of
sterling
across
the
street.
My
side
of
the
street
up
and
down
the
street
have
all
signs
saying
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
rezone
nine-tenths
trillion
Tampa
Florida
through
369
to
to
residential
single-family
Lots.
The
neighbors
wanted,
including
neighbors
on
Franklin
Avenue.
Behind
me,
the
guy
right
behind
the
sign.
The
neighborhood
wants
it
to
address
the
situation
with
the
trees.
M
Until
we
have
an
architect,
if
you
look
at
the
plan,
I
mean
you
can.
The
footprint
of
the
tree
comes
out
of
the
the
building
envelope.
Okay,
I've
talked
to
Brian,
it's
totally
feasible.
You
could
build
a
two-story
in
the
front
two-story
in
the
back
with
a
one-story
connector,
there's
multiple
ways
to
get
around
it
and
work
with
the
tree,
but
I'm
thinking
it.
It's
most
advisable
once
we
have
an
architect
and
they
work
around
the
tree.
They
can
work
with
Brian
and
work
it
out.
M
M
F
M
If
you
want
to
go
further
down
the
street
in
the
1000
block,
I'm
denied
her
block
in
the
1000
block.
1042
South
sterling
is
54
feet
wide
same
side
of
the
street.
Just
down
further
10
40
saw
sterling
60
feet
line
10
38
60
feet
wide
1036
60
feet
wide,
so
we're
not
really
breaking
new
ground.
We've
got
this
down.
The
street
I've
got
60
foot
Lots
right
across
the
street
with
less
square
footage.
A
Thank
you,
sir.
Any
questions
from
Council
for
the
applicant
okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
Next
move.
The
public
comment
on
item
number.
Nine.
If
anyone
is
here
to
comment
in
item
number
nine,
please
come
forward
three
minutes
every
each
person
and
am
I
reading
the
room
right.
There's
two
people
to
comment:
oh
go
ahead,
sir,
and
please
state
your
name.
O
F
I
Had
sent
an
email
to
all
council
members
last
week
and
I'm
circulating
that
coffee
again,
if
you
have
it
so
you
have
it
in
front
of
you
and
it
was
a
to
the
camp
members.
Last
Thursday
I
sent
it
and
as
the
Gulf
View
Associated
Miller
Dietrich
I'm,
the
president
of
the
Gulf
Coast
civic
association,
eighty-eight
years
the
Gulf
beef
Civic
Association
has
been
in
business
and
I'm.
I
The
first
male
president,
so
I
may
not
be
the
next
Coffee
Association
member
I'm
writing
in
opposition
to
the
rezoning
request
located
at
19
sterling,
the
current
zoning
we
talked
about
here.
You
had
a
lot
of
information
on
this
and
we
can
go
around
and
find
out
lot
sizes
until
we're
blue
in
the
face,
but
that
west
side
of
sterling
all
up
and
down
there.
If
we
open
this
Pandora's
box
and
start
putting
double
lot
dividing
up
lawson
263.
This
thing
is
a
60-foot
lot
and
then
you
have
four
cars
there.
I
Instead
of
two
and
the
traffic
there
were
about
400
yards
north
of
the
plant
high
school's
parking
lot,
and
so
we
had
to
put
speed
tables
in
there.
It's
just
getting
over
developed
everywhere,
so
so
I've
already
we've
already
talked
about
the
trees,
but
upon
reviewing
the
City
Council
zoning
document
under
planned
development.
It's
apparent
that
this
plan
does
not
be
either
of
the
two
requirements
outlined
under
PD
number.
I
One
are
characterized
by
unique
conditions
or
situations
which
other
zoning
districts
cannot
accommodate,
including,
but
specifically
not
limited
to
unusual
physical
or
environmental
features,
transportation,
access,
etc
or
number
two
include
a
mixture
of
appropriate
land
uses
which
may
not
be
otherwise
be
permitted
in
other
districts.
So
we
this
same.
We've
already
mentioned
this
property
was
disapproved
by
City
Council
unanimously
in
November,
ninth
in
2017,
the
magistrate
issue
I'm
not
going
to
decide
of
that,
but
council
disapproved
it
once
and
then
I
had
to
come
before
you
again
and
he
disapproved
it.
I
I
received
an
email
from
mr.
Landau
he's
saying
in
reaching
out
to
you
in
the
Gulf
Peters
Neighborhood
Association
determined
if
there
any
questions
or
concerns.
You
would
like
me
to
answer.
Address.
I
wrote
back
to
him
and
I
said
what
are
your
plans
for
the
property
other
than
subdividing?
This
answer
was
I
have
not
really
considered
future
plans.
I
thought
it
would
be
most
prudent
to
wait
and
cross
that
bridge
when
I
get
to
it.
I
So
I
just
think
this
pd
definition
here
is
not
is
not
being
met
and
these
residents
around
them,
especially
we'd
like
to
prevent
future
rezoning,
just
as
I
say,
will
happen.
I
can
tell
you
real
quickly,
certainly
in
any
area
that
doesn't
that
trees,
especially
so
obviously
I,
knew
the
tree
area
was
there.
We
saw
that
but
I
don't
know
where
that
goes
on
a
PD,
but
I
just
think.
I
J
My
name
is
Frank
mill,
you
are
a
junior
I
live
at
10:20
south
sterling
Avenue,
my
wife
and
I
bought
9
10
20
South
sterling
Avenue
in
1997.
We
are
on
the
block
south
of
Neptune
on
the
same
side
of
the
street.
I
speak
in
opposition
to
the
rezoning.
I
did
some
homework
myself
today
going
online.
Looking
at
the
paperwork
and
I'm
gonna,
try
not
to
replay
around
that's
been
gone
through
a
retic
but
I
had
posed
this
question.
J
J
It's
a
different
council
so,
from
the
petitioners
point
of
view
having
been
turned
down
twice,
why
not
come
back
a
third
time?
There's
some
new
folks
up
there
and
you
operate
in
a
quasi-judicial
capacity
here
and
you're
not
bound
by
the
law
of
the
case,
so
to
speak,
but
on
the
other
hand,
I
think
you
have
to
ask
yourselves
if
this
City
Council
turned
it
down
twice
and
there's
not
a
speck
of
new
information
or
anything
different
about
this
petition
the
third
time.
What
does
it
say
about
us
if
we
just
decide?
J
Okay,
three's
a
charm?
From
the
petitioners
point
of
view,
nothing
has
changed
since
you
have
turned
it
I'm,
not
even
getting
into
at
this
point.
The
well
articulated
objections
to
this
rezoning.
Do
you
have
that
and
you
have
that
analysis
by
your
staff,
which
speaks
for
itself
and
I?
Don't
know
that
I
could
articulate
it
a
whole
lot
better
than
they
did
or
as
this.
J
If,
in
fact,
you
chose
to
grant
this
petition
now,
you
would
start
that
process
by
which
any
number
of
other
properties
on
that
block
could
similarly
seek
rezoning.
I
mean
at
the
end
of
the
day.
What
you
have
here
is
a
property
owner
who
simply
seeks
in
his
own
that
financial
interested.
You
know,
I
can't
progressed
the
gentleman
his
own
best
financial
interest,
to
jam,
to
houses
and
to
to
small
lots
and
he's
been
told
no
twice
and
the
question
becomes.
Will
a
new
newly
constituted
City
Council
come
to
his
rescue?
Thank.
A
M
M
M
M
In
the
idea
that
I'm
waiting
for
another
group
to
be
elected,
the
truth
is
after
it
happened
last
time
when
I
was
turned
down,
I
had
to
go
back
to
Wisconsin,
take
care
of
my
father.
I've
been
up
there
for
a
little
over
two
years.
I
came
back
down
and
that's
why
I'm
back
at
it
I
mean
you
know
I,
it's
not
that
I
waited
for
a
new
console
or
anything
like
that.
I
was
out
of
town.
M
M
Well,
other
than
the
situation
with
the
tree
once
again,
I
think
after
the
fact,
once
we
have
an
architect
see
if
they
can't
work
around
the
tree,
I
mean
we
have
to
go
through
a
whole
permit
process
anyway,
main
site
plans
all
the
rest
of
it,
so
I'm,
assuming
that
when
we
get
that
point,
the
architect
can
deal
with
it
and
work
around
it.
That
way.
H
H
Has
the
development
has
the
petitioner
identified
where
the
tree
is
then
shown
this
20
foot
radius
then
carved
around
then
carved
around
it
and
therefore,
if
we
approve
this
PD,
they
would
be
absolutely
prohibited
from
building
outside
of
that
building
envelope.
Regardless
of
what
happens
to
the
tree.
R
R
H
They're
not
even
referencing
the
tree
as
a
condition
of
why
they're
carving
that
I
mean
it
might
be,
perhaps
something
we
could
conclude
based,
but
they're,
not
tying
it
to
that
they're.
They
have
voluntarily
carved
out
that
envelope.
So
unless
they
came
in
for
an
amendment
to
the
PD
I,
don't
know
how
they
build.
R
I
can't
say
that
I
have
ever
been
posed
this
question,
but
things
I
love
about
this
job.
This
would
ultimately
be
a
question
for
the
Zoning
Administrator
I
believe
about
whether
or
not
they
are
limited
to
that
building
envelope.
I
think
there
is
an
excellent
argument
that
they
are
but
standing
here
today.
I
can't
tell
you
exactly
what
the
Zoning
Administrator
would
conclude.
It
would
ultimately
be
her
interpretation.
R
Council
could
impose
a
condition
stating
that
the
setbacks
will
be,
as
shown
on
the
site
plan,
building
envelope
line
something
along
those
lines
too,
which
would
then
be
a
council
condition
and
it
was
limited
to
that
and
then
they
would
have
to
do
some
sort
of
amendment
process,
be
it
a
determination
of
a
nonce.
Well,
it
would
be
a
council
condition.
They
would
have
to
come
back
in
paris'
I
mean
if
they
were
going
to
expand
in
that
area.
Yes,.
H
Even
even
though
I
agree
with
Councilman
Sutro
that
we're
not
here
specifically
on
approving
or
not
approving
the
tree
correct,
but
under
the
under
the
revised
state
law,
if
they
had
a
different
arborist
other
than
ours
or
our
verse
says
it's
a
healthy
tree
and
if
he
came
up
with
an
arborist
who
says
that
trees
dying
and
all
he
has
to
do
is
sign
his
name
to
that
one
page.
Then
they
can
take
it
out
without
a
permit
or
anything.
And
so
that's
the
bad
news.
R
Yes
and
again,
without
the
zone
administrator
here,
to
make
a
final
determination
but
difficult
for
me
to
tell
you
unassailably.
But
yes,
they
have
shown
a
building
envelope,
they're
in
very
specific
terms.
It
has
carved
out
for
the
tree
and
that
may
not
ultimately
correlate
with
how
close
Natural
Resources
may
allow
them
to
come
to
the
tree
as
well
so
they're,
putting
a
little
bit
of
a
risk
here,
also
to
not
give
themselves
wiggle
room
to
work
with
Natural
Resources
about
what
that.
M
H
M
H
M
P
M
M
M
K
Excuse
me
I
just
wanted
to
put
a
little
bit
of
information
out
there
for
in
terms
of
the
process.
He
would
have
to
go
and
name
if
I
may,
oh
sorry,
Brian
doc,
snapping
resources.
So
in
order
to
propose
the
tree
for
removal,
he
would
have
to
have
stated
it
on
his
plan
as
a
waiver
request
or
given
that
he
that's
not
done.
If
this
plan
moves
forward,
he
would
have
to
go
to
the
variance
review
board.
K
H
M
H
H
M
H
If
you
want
I
think
there's
other
ways
to
be
more
creative,
and
do
this
perhaps
a
huge
if
you
hold
back
a
spurt,
continuance,
went
to
an
architect
actually
drew
in
how
to
smaller
homes
might
fit
on
these
Lots.
Then
maybe
that
could
make
the
neighborhood
a
little
happier
as
opposed
to
you
know,
big
two-story.
D
K
The
driveway
would
have
to
be
reconfigured.
I
can't
really
speak
on
the
driveway
with
being
reduced,
but
I
can
speak
on
behalf
of
the
requirements
that
you
require
for
it
a
protected
radius
and
relation
to
the
driveway.
This
is
a
34
inch
tree
that
requires
a
minimum
20
foot
radius.
You
can
encroach
5
feet
into
that
protected
radius
with
pervious
material.
So
if
this
dry
with
15
feet
away
from
this
tree
and
five
feet
of
that
drive,
one
was
pervious.
This
travel
would
be
fine
with
natural
resources
and.
O
A
A
Not
no
I'm
saying,
in
other
words
you
you've,
you've,
asked
us
in
terms
of
what
the
council
would
wish
to
see,
etc.
With
regards
to
the
management
of
your
case,
that's
that's
in
your
hands
and
I'm
asking
to
you
just
just
at
a
deference
to
you
as
the
applicant.
Do
you
want
to
take
two
minutes,
a
two
minute
recess
for
you
to
think
about
it
before
we
close,
because
once
we
close
it's
closed,
can
we
take
a
quick
poll.
F
Petitioner
has
the
last
word:
I
just
want
to
direct
your
attention
to
the
purpose
what
you
have
before
you
is
an
application,
a
petition
for
a
planned
development.
It
is
a
site
plan,
controlled
development
and
by
so
doing
you
are
able
to
not
have
to
comply
with
the
requirements
of
Euclidian
zoning.
Your
Code
section,
27
126,
which
was
provided
provided
to
you
previously,
has
exactly
the
purposes
of
why
someone
ought
to
be
granted
a
site
plan
control,
rezoning,
and
that
is
for
the
purpose,
particularly
knowing
exactly
what
is
before
you
of
what
is
planned.
F
Hence
the
name
planned
development,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
Council
when
you
do
way
the
confident,
substantial
evidence
that
you've
been
provided.
You
apply
the
nine
different
prescribed
from
why
you
would
grant
a
plan
development
and
make
your
decision
based
on
whatever
evidence
that
you
heard
tonight
here.
Thank
you
any
last
words.
F
A
Sure
do
you
need
to
take
a
two-minute
break
sir,
do
you
want
to
speak
further
I'll,
give
you
an
extra
minute
if
you
wish
to
speak
before.
B
A
A
M
M
F
No
sir,
but
we
do
need
to
announce
these
date
and
time
and
that
the
public
should
be
aware
that
a
date
of
continuance
as
I
understand
it
right
now
is
November
14th
of
2019
at
6:00
p.m.
but
there
will
be
no
further
notice
other
than
tonight's
notice.
You
will
get
no
other
notice
of
the
date
of
the
continuance,
so
I
suggest
that
anybody
who
wishes
to
appear
on
this
case
take
note
of
the
fact
that
it's
being
continued.
Thank
you,
sir.
Yes,.
A
A
H
A
N
O
A
F
A
A
D
I
have
two:
as
some
of
us
may
know,
we
have
another
group
of
champions
in
our
city
and
therefore
I'd
like
to
invite
the
South
Tampa
softball
team.
Did
you
celebrate
their
win
in
the
Junior
League
championship
to
be
set,
be
presented
here
at
Council
during
our
evening
session
on
August
29th
I
would
like
to
present
the
team
as
a
whole
accommodation
and
the
players
as
well.
We.
F
F
D
And
even
though
Super
Bowl
is
two
years
away,
we
have
to
start
figuring
out
how
we
can
combat
human
trafficking.
During
that
event,
I
would
move
that
the
council
schedule
a
workshop
in
February,
27th,
2020
and
I
would
like
to
discuss
how
we
will
be
prepared
to
prevent
human
trafficking,
the
issues
and
the
consequences
related
to
the
setup
and
the
host
the
2021
Superbowl
I
would
like
to
invite
other
agencies
such
as
Hillsborough,
County,
Sheriff's,
Office,
County,
Commission
staff,
TPD,
Tampa,
Sports,
Authority
and
any
other
agencies
my
office
will
handle.
D
A
Have
a
second
okay,
councilman
Goods,
okay
in
a
very
good
motion,
I
know
was
it.
Last
year
we
passed
an
ordinance
dealing
with
massage
parlors
and
some
of
the
apparent
abuse
and
parent
trafficking
issues
that
go
there,
and-
and
this
is
a
very
important
issue.
So
thank
you
for
that.
We
have
motion
by
Councilman
Citra,
a
second
by
Councilman
Goodes,
all
in
favor
any
opposed
anything
further.
J
Thank
You
chairman
that
request
of
the
Planning
Commission
like
to
make
a
motion
to
set
a
plan:
amendment
adoption
here
for
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan,
amendment
19-3
Tampa,
comprehensive
plan,
number
19.
No
five
and
E
2019
forty-seven
aka
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
19
hold
six
for
the
evening
of
September
26
at
5:01
p.m.
failure
2019.
B
C
Three
quick
things
so
I.
Could
you
all
know
that
that
there
is
have
to
be
careful
of
my
words?
There
is
an
issue
that
is
out
there
that
pits
the
First
Amendment
against
the
Second
Amendment
that
we're
not
allowed
to
discuss.
There
is
a.
There
are
thirty
cities
that
have
joined
in
a
in
litigation
to
try
to
undo
state
law
regarding
that
issue,
st.
Pete
as
an
example
as
being
one
of
them,
and
many
constituents
have
asked
us
to
join
in.
C
In
addition
to
that
issue,
though,
the
same
law
firm,
which
represents
the
city
of
West
End,
plus
these
other
thirty
cities,
is
looking
to
create
a
consortium
of
cities
that
will
file
lawsuit
regarding
the
preemption
on
trees,
and
my
constituency
in
particular,
is
very
concerned
about
the
preemption
on
trees
and
how
it
will
affect
us
that
lawsuit
has
not
been
filed,
but
we
could
potentially
be
a
part
of
it.
I've
asked
Marty
and
he
said
the
the
city
attorney.
C
C
A
F
F
C
A
F
F
A
C
The
last
the
last
thing
in
hopefully
she's
not
still
looking
anymore
but
Peggy
land
is
who
a
lot
of
I
think
we
all
know
is
having
a
birthday
soon,
although
she
doesn't
like
to
celebrate
it
and
I've
been
asked
to
not
by
her
but
by
her
friends,
to
pass
some
kind
of
resolution,
I'd
like
to
bring
that
back
next
time.
I
don't
have
one
today,
but
I
thought
she
would
I
thought
she
might
actually
be
here
tonight
is.
B
F
C
C
A
A
C
H
I
net
just
reminded
me:
water
department
is
looking
to
present
what
a
community
water
was
awards
to
two
folks
in
town
who
are
using
florida-friendly
landscaping
principles
and
we
want
to
honor
them.
The
water
department
is
requesting
agenda
item
October,
3rd
and
the
recipients
are
Karen
Taylor
of
Hampton
Terrace
and
in
go
blur
of
Tampa
Heights
October
3rd.
If.
H
H
F
F
A
You,
sir
fine
okay,
we
have
a
motion
by
councilman
dink,
Felder
I'm,
the
second
event
that
second
might
go
up:
councilman
Miranda,
all
in
favor,
any
opposed
anything
further.
Sir.
Thank
you.
Okay,
and
just
and
very
briefly,
if
I
may
tonight
is
the
last
night
of
Duane
who
Duane
you're
moving
to,
did
you
say
hided.
A
A
Thank
you.
We
really
appreciate
all
your
hard
work.
I
mean
that,
thank
you
so
much
and
then
just
very
briefly.
Lastly,
last
week
I
had
motioned
on
I
think
I
said
it
was
a
motion
on
a
tu
and
commendations
for
employee
of
the
month
for
that
unit.
I'll
be
meeting
up
with
some
folks
from
8:00
to
you
to
kind
of
plan
that
out
we're
planning
on
having
October,
3rd
and
I.
Think
that
was
part
of
my
first
let
my
motion
as
the
date
for
that.
But
what
I
would
ask
council
members
to
do
is.
A
Is
you
all
know?
We
always
have
an
its
councilman
thing,
Felder
mentioned
when
it
did
the
motion
that
for
police
and
fire
we
always
have
members
of
the
community
come
and
give
a
presence
and
and
whatnot
into
an
obviously
we're
gonna
solicit.
Those
individuals
I
would
fully
expect
that
every
last
one
of
them
would
honor
those
who
you
know,
take
the
trash
out
every
day,
etc,
etc.
A
But
just
if
there's
any
other
group
or
business
that
you
all
know
extra,
just
please
reach
out
to
them,
because
I
want
to
give
these
folks
the
bountiful
appreciation
that
God
knows
they
deserve.
Okay,
so
I
may
have
a
motion
to
receive
and
file.
We
have
a
motion
by
Councilman
Miranda,
second
by
Councilman
desk
alcohol
in
favor
any
opposed.
Thank
you
adjourned.