►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 03102020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
E
A
A
I'll
take
just
a
few
minutes
to
review
tonight's
procedures.
Cases
will
be
called
in
the
order
that
they
appear
on
the
agenda
when
your
case
number
and
the
applicants
name
are
called.
Please
stand
an
either
aisle
to
the
side
of
the
room.
To
acknowledge
that
you
are
here,
staff
will
then
give
a
brief
introduction
to
the
board
of
each
application.
A
When
you
approach
the
podium,
please
speak
into
the
microphone
and
state
your
name
address
and
if
you've
been
sworn
in,
the
applicant
and
or
their
agent
will
have
10
minutes
to
give
testimony
present
witnesses
and
documentation
as
a
part
of
their
presentation.
This
is
your
time
to
present
all
of
your
your
evidence.
Anyone
in
the
audience
wishing
to
speak
in
support
of
or
in
opposition
to
the
application
will
then
have
three
minutes
each
after
that.
The
board
may
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
regarding
the
application.
A
Finally,
the
applicant
will
have
an
additional
five
minutes
for
a
rebuttal
if
needed.
The
time
periods,
as
stated,
will
be
kept
by
the
chair.
Any
information
such
as
pictures
or
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted
as
a
part
of
your
petition,
and
you
intend
to
present
at
this
hearing
tonight
for
consideration
in
support
of
your
petition,
must
be
individually
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board.
After
acceptance
by
the
board,
you
must
submit
the
item
to
staff
for
it
to
be
entered
and
made
a
part
of
the
permanent
record.
A
The
board
bases
its
decision
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
which
is
presented
this
evening
and
which
meets
the
criteria
required
by
the
city
Code
of
Ordinances.
The
variance
granted
by
the
board
will
be
only
for
what
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
will
be
compliant
with
any
terms
and
conditions
stated
in
the
approval
by
the
board.
You
must
have
four
votes
for
the
variance
to
be
approved
if
an
insufficient
vote
is
obtained.
The
case
shall
be
automatically
carried
over
for
the
consideration
of
the
board's
next
meeting.
A
A
If
your
case
is
continued,
it
will
be
continued
to
either
the
April
14th
meeting.
Are
we
open
still
for
that?
Okay,
all
right
or
the
month
following
on
May
12th
for
the
public
hearing
gates?
If
you
wish
to
appeal
the
variance
review
review
Board's
decision
to
the
City
Council,
you
must
file
a
petition
for
review
of
a
board
decision
within
10
business
days
of
the
decision.
If
your
variance
is
granted,
you
will
not
be
able
to
pull
any
permits
until
after
the
10-day
appeal
period
has
passed.
A
D
D
D
F
A
E
E
Also,
if
any
of
the
board
members
have
had
any
ex
parte
communications,
if
you've
had
any
contact
with
members
of
the
public
or
the
applicant
about
any
of
the
items
on
tonight's
agenda,
now
would
be
the
time
to
disclose
those
communications
or,
if
you
received
any
email
or
written
communications,
now
would
be
the
time
to
submit
a
copy
into
the
record
say:
none
I
turn
it
over
to
you.
Mr.
chairman,
thank.
A
D
D
If
you
remember
this
case
was
took
your
suggestions
to
look
at
what
was
presented.
Initially,
you
asked
her
to
go
back
and
investigate
if
there
can
be
some
alterations
to
help
her
with
her
request.
They
did
look
into
that
and
that
is
why
they
have
a
new
request
before
you
tonight
she
did
Reno
tiss.
So
the
request
for
this
evening
is
also
involving
chapter
and
section
27
156.
D
D
I'm
going
to
show
you
the
plan
that
she
originally
presented
and
then
the
modified
plan,
so
this
was
the
original
plan
on
from
December
tenth
hearing
again
the
side
yard
here,
where
this
was
connected
by
a
roof
across
here
and
the
accessory
structure,
which
is
now
called
the
six.
She
reduced
the
primary
setbacks.
Primarily,
she
changed
her
request.
D
G
H
H
H
H
Very
licensed
professional
and
I
feel
confident
that
everything
gonna
be
in
order,
because,
by
talking
to
the
this
professional
in
ten
minutes,
I
knew
he
was
talking
about
that
when
I
purchased
the
place
in
207
part
of
this
roof.
When
you
go
in
to
the
back
of
the
house,
it
was
built,
it
was
ready
building.
It
wasn't
built
correctly.
H
H
A
H
A
H
H
A
G
H
H
H
H
C
Was
the
edge
of
the
shed
the
one
that's
closest
to
the
back
side
of
your
property?
Was
it
always
in
that
location,
or
did
you
expand
closer.
H
H
C
C
D
A
D
C
D
H
H
C
H
H
A
A
H
A
B
A
A
B
Be
granted
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
confident
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
a
necessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five-part
shift
criteria
set
forth
in
Section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
an
existing
shed
was
rebuilt
by
an
unlicensed
contractor
and
does
not
meet
code,
and
the
applicant
has
presented
alternate
plans
to
better
comply
with
the
code
in
a
manner
more
compliant
for
an
accessory
structure.
B
A
H
A
G
H
A
You're
here
tonight,
on
that
part,
you
were
asking
for
a
setback
relief
to
one
foot
which
we
approved-
okay,
but
how
it's
built
is
gonna,
be
between
the
building
department
and
your
licensed
contractor
and
you.
So
if
it
wasn't
built
to
code,
it'll
have
to
be
rebuilt,
but
you
can
build
it
within
a
foot
of
the
side
yard.
A
G
D
The
case
sections
under
review
tonight
is
27
156.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
north
side
yard
setback
from
7
feet,
2
0
feet.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
best
existing
conditions
on
the
north
side
of
the
structure.
The
project
has
been
cited
for
violations
of
the
setback
under
Code
sections,
Tod,
sorry
code
case
co,
d,
1900,
0,
1,
5,
2
5,
the
property
is
zoned,
RS
50
and
the
hilbert
county
property.
Appraiser's
information
is
included
in
their
packet
right
away
and
natural
resources
found
at
consistent.
Zoning
found
at
inconsistent.
D
D
D
G
K
K
K
K
The
home
is
currently
rented
in
an
annual
lease
and
I'm
requesting
the
variance
so
I
don't
have
to
remove
the
addition
to
the
home,
as
that
would
be
exceptional
financial
hardship
and
I.
Don't
really
have
much
other
to
present
and
what
Roberta
presented
I
have
the
survey
here,
but
I
believe
you
guys
have
those
already.
L
A
A
B
K
K
Believe
so
I
think
there's
some
two
one's
a
little
bit
in
general.
The
same
square
footage
I
believe
it's
not
an
overly
large
house
for
the
area.
There's
one
across
the
street.
That's
a
newer
home,
that's
probably
close
to
3,000
square
feet,
but
I
think
all
the
others
are
in
that
same
area
and
man
I
had
something
I.
H
D
K
G
K
K
L
F
K
H
K
I
have
a
another
property
that
I'm
trying
to
sell
and
they
won't
allow
the
sale
to
go
through
because
of
the
variance
on
this
house.
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
it
is
approved
and
all
that
how
how
does
that
timewise
happen?
We're
just
closing
the
end
of
the
week.
So
I
was
wondering
if
anyone
had
any
I.
E
A
C
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
applicant
has
not
made
any
modifications
to
the
location
of
any
the
buildings
on
the
property
that
it
was
acquired
in
this.
In
this
exact
condition
in
2012,
there
was
a
survey
showing
the
location
of
buildings
in
2011
that
the
neighbors
have
not
objected
and
have
lived
with
this
condition,
since
at
least
2011,
and
probably
prior
to
that.
J
C
A
D
D
Okay,
BRB
20,
0
0
0
0
20
address
is
2801
West
Angeline
Street
Code
section
under
review
tonight
is
27
156.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
1.5
feet.
The
west
side
yard
setback
from
7
feet
to
2
feet,
and
this
is
where
the
existing
accessory
structure,
which
exceeds
750
square
feet,
and
that
is
the
reason
why
they're
asking
for
the
primary
setback
we
don't
know
again:
27
156
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
12
and
a
half
feet.
D
The
West
Sider
have
sat
back
from
7
feet
to
3
feet
and
increased
the
allowable
overhang
along
the
front
facade
from
3
feet
to
4
feet
for
the
existing
primary
structure.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
best
existing
conditions
of
the
detached
accessory
structure
and
proposing
an
addition
and
remodeling
to
the
primary
structure.
The
property
is
zoned,
RS
50
and
the
property
appraiser's
information
is
included
in
the
package,
which
is
here
right
away
and
natural
resource
resources
found
at
consisting
zoning
found
it
inconsistent.
D
D
D
Give
you
those
numbers
a
little
bit
so
again.
This
is
the
front
of
the
house,
and
this
is
the
setback
request
up
to
12
feet
five.
This
will
be
this
side
of
the
house.
Again,
it's
just
existing.
This
is
the
accessory
structure
in
the
back,
which
is
existing,
the
side
yard
setback.
They
are
doing
some
additional
deck
and
additional
deck
across
here
and
some
walls
here,
but
they
are
within
the
setbacks.
The
overhang
would
be
here
across
the
front
door
again
by
right.
They
can
have
an
overhang
which
overhangs
into
the
setback
three
feet.
D
C
D
L
D
A
G
M
My
father-in-law
was
diagnosed
with
stage
four
cancer,
my
father
with
MS,
following
that
my
mother-in-law
with
cancer,
following
that
my
mom
with
diabetes,
following
that
my
uncle
with
epilepsy
and
another
uncle
with
cancer
all
laid
out
in
chronological
order
in
the
hardship
letter
that
was
provided
so
as
sad
as
all
that
is,
that
is
what
has
kept
us
from
building.
So
we
were
granted
by
this
board
in
15.
M
Those
series
of
events
started
to
unfold
in
16
which
slowed
us
down
financially.
We
had
a
lot
of
support
that
we
had
to
provide
and
we
were
with
a
different
builder
than
we
are
with
now
when
we
had
recovered
from
those
things
and
learned
our
full
variance
was
in
the
hands
or
the
care
of
the
Builder
25
or
30
year
history.
M
This
person
had
in
the
city
building
when
we
went
to
the
table
September
26
to
close
on
our
loan.
Literally
that
day,
the
Builder
backed
out
on
the
project
citing
health
issues,
so
the
next
day,
I
kind
of
had
an
aha
moment
that
I
have
no
paperwork
on
permits
or
anything
so
I
had
to
track
down
the
permanent
company,
which
I
did
to
find
out
that
our
variance
had
expired
six
days
prior.
So
here
we
are
starting
all
over
again
due
to
the
financial
setbacks.
M
We
reduce
the
size
of
the
home,
and
so
what
we're
coming
with
over
all
is
a
request
for
a
smaller
home.
That's
been
approved.
We
are
asking
for
best
the
accessory
structure,
which
is
from
1941
1942
I,
believe
was
there
when
we
bought
the
home,
the
main
home
was
built
in
1928,
and
so
again
our
requests
to
the
existing
remodel.
Is
that
yes,
the
setbacks
as
listed?
Are
there
but
we're
going
back
on
the
same
lines?
M
The
eaves
from
the
primary
residence
to
the
accessory
structure
would
be
five
feet,
which
I
believe
is
the
proper
code
minimum
for
Inc
to
Eve
on
the
finished
property,
if
approved
the
home
currently
of
a
four
person
family
living
in
a
to
one
and
a
half.
So
this
would
extend
the
plans
of
the
home
to
be
a
four
four
and
a
half
which
is
consistent
with
that
neighborhood
and
the
size
homes
in
that
neighborhood
in
terms
of
aesthetics,
we're
keeping
a
bungalow
style.
So
again
it
fits
in
with
the
neighborhood
and
the
front.
M
A
A
G
G
B
A
G
P
P
H
A
M
E
G
A
M
M
H
B
B
G
G
A
G
C
L
C
Add
just
one
little
thing
to
that:
maybe
an
addendum
to
that
to
suggest
that
the
existing
main
home
structure
was
built
in
1928
and
that
the
accessory
structure
was
built
in
1942
and
that
there
was
no
there's
been
no
changes
to
the
portions
that
are
being
requested
for
the
setback.
And
if
that
his
identity
was
okay
with
you
all
second
day,.
L
G
D
D
D
Plans
again,
there's
a
swan
Avenue
here.
It's
one
circle,
science.
This
is
the
location
where
the
trailer
is
parked
currently
existing
structure,
and
you
can
see
those
several
large
trees
in
the
area
I'm
going
to
kind
of
give
you
the
section
of
the
code
which
we're
talking
about
tonight,
again:
27
280
3.11
regarding
vehicle
parking
and
so
we're
looking
at
subsection,
a
subsection
5a
which
talks
about
the
trailer.
So
there
are
some
options
for
when
a
trailer
is
this
large.
D
However,
she,
the
code
section,
does
say
a
trailer
at
a
certain
distance
or
a
certain
length
could
be
considered,
okay
or
administratively
granted.
However,
this
trailer
exceeds
that
so
she's
going
to
explain
that
a
little
bit
size
of
the
trailer.
But
you
see
down
here.
If
the
trailer
was
26
feet,
she
would
be
able
to
have
an
administrative
variants
versus
coming
into
a
full-blown
variance.
D
C
Yeah
I
don't
know
where
to
direct
this
question,
whether
it
goes
to
legal
or
to
you,
miss
me
Carrie,
but
I'm,
trying
to
figure
out
the
the
goal
of
this
section
it.
The
rule
is
that
it
can't
go
a
certain
distance
beyond
the
front
of
the
house,
but
if
the
trailer
doesn't
impede
traffic,
if
it
doesn't
impede
sidewalks,
if
it
doesn't
encroach
a
certain
distance
to
the
edge
of
the
property,
do
you
know
how
that
works?
Yes,.
D
C
C
D
C
D
A
J
J
A
E
A
A
Well,
yeah
I
thought
we
had
heard
cases
in
the
past
that
had
recreational
vehicles
and
I'm,
assuming
this
meets
the
definition
of
that.
Maybe
it
doesn't
is
it
does?
It
is
an
RV,
a
recreational
vehicle
RV.
Yes,
yes,
it
is
correct.
Okay,
so
it
it
right.
Now
the
ordinance
says
you
can't
park
a
recreational
vehicle
on
your
driveway
in
the
front
yard.
If.
M
A
If
it's
of
a
certain
size
Friday
has
to
meet
these
requirements,
which
well
this
and
I
haven't
read
this
whole
ordinance
tonight,
but
it
talks
about
parking
inside
yards
and
rear
yards
and
because
this
appears
to
be
parked
on
a
side
yard
partially
extending
into
the
front
yard.
That's
why
they're
here?
That
is
correct,
okay,
so,
but
my
question
is
if
the
whole
thing
were
brought
into
the
front
yard
on
the
driveway
the
code,
the
ordinance
would
not
allow
that
is
that
correct.
That
is
correct.
Okay,.
N
G
A
I
P
P
P
We
have
on
that
side
behind
the
trailer
we
have
fencing
a
big
tree,
pool
equipment,
water,
softener
and
a
pool
screen
patio
and
the
air
conditioner
unit.
All
of
within
that
same
sign
within
about
12
feet.
On
the
west
side,
our
sewer
line
runs
from
the
backyard
under
the
fence
and
along
the
driveway
edge
to
the
streets.
We
have
a
will
and
our
sprinkler
valve
boxes,
fencing
and
concrete
greenhouse
which
make
the
area
unusable
on
the
east.
P
On
the
west
side,
if
you
need
the
situation,
I'm
in
now
is
a
result
of
the
growth
in
the
neighborhood.
Since
1954
my
parents
built
the
house,
our
neighbor,
that
was
on
the
east
side
of
us,
while
I
was
growing
up,
sold
their
house
in
the
mid
80s
and
four
houses
were
put
up
next
to
mine
on
60-foot
Lots,
rather
than
the
75
that
is
allowed
now,
which
means
that
house
is
quite
close
to
my
house.
P
Back
then,
the
the
setbacks
were
different,
we're
very
back
or
59
feet
from
the
street
I'm
I'm,
sorry
or
60
53
feet
from
the
sidewalk
and
the
present
setback
is
25
feet
from
the
sidewalk.
So
the
newer
houses
have
a
setback
much
closer
to
the
street
and
then
look
on
those
pictures
you
can
see
where
we
set
way
back
in
the
driveway,
because
the
residence
is
older
than
surrounding
houses
and
that
sets
X
word
greater
back.
P
The
trailer
is
currently
parked
in
the
only
feasible
area
where
the
tongue
of
the
trailer
is
still
set
back
from
the
sidewalk
at
53
feet.
It's
behind
the
neighbors
fence
at
49
feet
from
the
sidewalk
and
behind
the
front
wall
in
the
neighbor's
house
at
26
feet
we
purchased
the
half
the
trailer
in
2012
and
it's
been
parked
in
its
current
location
since
2013
that
can
be
verified
on
this
street
views
on
Google
Google
sees
me.
P
I
Okay,
this
is
just
gives
a
good
general
view
of
the
front
yard
and
I
guess
the
perspective
of
our
house,
they're
here
in
the
in
the
middle
or
to
the
left
of
the
photograph
and
then
the
the
trailer
in
the
house
on
the
east.
There
that's
most
affected
by
this
request
for
the
variance,
and
then
this
one
just
shows
a
little
bit
closer
view
of
that
this.
I
This
one
is
shows
the
six
feet
distance
between
their
fence
in
the
trailer,
and
then
this
shows
that
this
is
fairly
close
to
our
house
on
this
side
as
well,
the
corner
yeah.
This
is
a
very
back
corner
of
the
house
and
then
the
pool
patio
is
right.
That
starts
right
there
at
that
corner,
and
then
this
is
this
area
juts
out
and
then
this.
This
is
the
facade
that
then
we're
talking
about
juts
out
another
five
feet.
I
As
you
go
further
east
to
the
house,
you
can
see
that
on
this
one
kind
of
where
this
this
brick
wall,
half
wall,
is
there
that's
another,
there's
a
little
little
five-foot
porch
there
that
comes
out,
and
then
this
is
just
a
photograph
showing
or
two
photographs.
This
is
looking
east
to
show
that
the
house,
it
is
a
house-
that's
that's-
that
much
ahead
of
the
tongue
of
the
trailer
which
is
right
about
here
and
then
the
house
on
the
west
side.
I
Also
this
the
front
of
it
is
right
out
here,
as
you
can
see,
so
that
it's
the
the
weakness
of
it
is
that
that,
since
everything
else
has
moved
forwards,
we're
in
a
little
pocket,
that's
setback
and
when
the
house
was
built
and
the
pool
was
added
in
the
fifties
and
sixties
that
all
of
the
equipment
around
the
house
and
everything
was
was
set
back
farther
so
that
it
makes
it
just
not
feasible
to
try
and
move
the
trailer
back
on
on
either
side.
Really.
I
I
I
I
I
G
I
The
other,
looking
at
the
at
the
code,
the
ordinance,
what
we,
what
we
were
looking
at.
We
were
reviewing
it
this
morning
again
because
of
the
I.
Don't
know
we
hadn't
read
it
in
a
month
or
so,
since
we
filed
just
we're
going
over
it,
but
what
we
noticed
was
under
b5v
if
it's
not
feasible
to
park
a
vehicle
craft
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
subs
subsection
a
then
it
gives
certain
things
that
you
all
can
make
an
administrative
whatever
just
had
before
anyway.
A
P
A
O
O
O
O
The
fact
of
the
matter
is,
it
doesn't
block
any
of
their
windows,
but
it
looks
right
out
the
side
of
my
window
of
my
family
room.
I,
look
right
at
the
side
of
this
thing,
I'm,
not
sure
why
they've
never
applied
for
a
variance
in
the
past,
but
the
fact
is,
it
has
been
sitting
there.
I
didn't
understand
that
this
was
a
code
violation
as
soon
as
I
found
out
it
was
I
felt
like
I
was
going
to
come
here.
O
I
also
think
with
hurricane
around
here,
it's
like
having
a
mobile
home
sitting
next
to
you
and
I,
don't
think
it
from
a
safety
standpoint,
it's
great
that
it
sits
there.
Anybody
else
who
had
anything
this
size
would
be
parking,
it
I
guess
in
an
RV
park
or
store
in
it
if
it
was
a
boat.
In
my
opinion,
there's
been
no
hardship.
That's
been
identified
here
for
this
property.
There's
no
legitimate
reason
that
I
should
have
to
live
next
door
to
an
RV,
especially
one
of
this
size.
O
I,
don't
see
any
hardship
and
there's
a
code
for
a
reason.
Let
me
just
show
you
a
few
pictures,
because
I
don't
think
what
they
showed
you
with
the
drawing
is
actually
really
depict.
They
show
you
in
the
drawing
like
this
thing
comes
all
the
way
back
to
where
this
juts
out
you
can
see
it.
Doesn't
they
also
tell
you
there's
a
fence:
the
fence
is
completely
rotted
and
they
say
there's
a
fig
tree,
this
fig
tree,
it's
about
as
dead
there's
any
tree
that
you
can
see.
There's
the
fig
tree.
O
O
A
C
D
F
C
C
Okay,
so,
let's
assume
that
the
neighbors
are
built
to
the
setback
and
that
this
applicant
decided
that
it
wanted
to
knock
that
they
wanted
to
knock
down
their
house
and
build
their
house
up
to
the
legal
setback
that
they're
permitted
to
to
build
to
if
they
left
their
trailer
in
the
same
location
and
built
the
house
forward.
Would
they
comply
with
this
with
this
ordinance.
C
C
D
C
C
E
C
L
D
A
L
D
L
C
Feldon,
a
follow-up
question,
cuz
I,
think
I
think
miss
Walker
was
asking
a
great
question
and
I
think
this
is
actually
a
legal
question
again
who
determines
whether
a
whether
it's
feasible
or
not,
to
meet
under
under
Section
a
who
makes
that
determination
about
feasibility?
Is
that
something
that
has
happened
already.
E
L
L
C
C
You
did
a
wonderful
job
explaining
this
by
the
way
appreciate
that,
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
explain
a
little
bit
about
a
the
hardship
as
to
why
it
needs
to
be
where
you're
parking,
as
opposed
to
making
some
modifications
moving
things
back
there.
You
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
fence
about
the
tree
about
the
other
equipment.
I
know
you
spent
a
good
amount
of
time
on
that
during
your
presentation,
but
your
neighbor
came
up
and
showed
some
photos
that
suggested
that
the
fig
tree
is
dead,
that
there's
problems
with
defense.
C
P
That
area
right
behind
the
trailer
we
have
the
air
conditioner,
the
water
softener,
the
pool
filter,
the
motor,
all
the
underground
stuff.
That
goes
with
the
pool,
the
pool
patio
screen
and
the
big
tree.
That
is
not
dead,
but
it
is,
he
did
take
pictures
in
the
winter.
All
fig
trees
lose
their
leaves
in
the
winter,
and
it
is
just
now
popping
out.
Please
still
still
produces
big
something
my
father
planted
sixty-five
years
ago
and
I
just
don't
feel
like
I
want
to
cut
that
down
to
park
it
anywhere
else.
P
There
isn't
one
I
explained
on
the
other
side
of
the
Westside
I've
got
the
sewer
that
runs
from
the
backyard
I've
got
my
well
there
I
have
my
all
my
sprinkler
valve
boxes
and
I
have
a
greenhouse,
a
concrete
greenhouse
that
won't.
Allow
me
to
pull
it
into
the
backyard
anyway,
but
I
can't
run
over
any
of
that.
The
other
equipment
yeah.
P
C
I
I
Couple
of
other
things
too,
though,
we
did
go
to
trim
that
fig
tree
a
few
days
ago
and
ended
up
taking
off
the
branch.
That's
still
one
that,
when
the
branch
fell
still
had
more
buds
on
it,
you
know.
So
we
stopped
and
said.
Well,
let's
let
it
butt
out
and
see:
what's
gonna
grow
and
what's
dead
and
then
we'll
trim,
it
turn
the
dead
stuff
off,
but
not
that
the
what's
still
alive.
I
Another
thing
I
wanted
to
say
about
the
not
seeing
the
trailer
outside
of
our
windows
when
there
are
two
bedrooms
right
there
on
that
side
of
the
house,
both
of
those
those
windows
that
you
saw
in
the
other
pictures
that
mr.
Boies
show
were
bedroom
windows
and
since
the
the
that
neighbors
at
the
neighbor's
house
there
was
built
in
the
in
the
mid-80s.
I
We've
we've
had
to
keep
well
we've
Jill's
mom
was
there
before,
but
we
moved
in
in
1991
and
and
and
we
always
keep
the
shades
drawn
in
there,
because
the
house
is
right,
there,
you
can.
The
balcony
to
the
bedroom.
Upstairs
looks
right
into
those
bedrooms
and
we
we
don't
even
open
those
windows
anymore,
except
to
crack
the
shade
during
the
daytime
and
a
little
bit
of
light
in
because
it's
just
so
visible.
The
inside
of
the
house
is
so
visible
from
the
from
the,
especially
from
the
second
floor
of
the
neighbor's
house.
G
A
D
A
A
Me,
let
me
read
it
to
you
and
maybe
I'm
totally
misunderstanding
it.
It
says
it
shall
be
parked
or
stored,
no
closer
to
the
front
property
line
than
that
portion
of
the
front
facade
of
the
principal
structure,
which
is
the
farthest
distance
from
the
front
property
line.
So
oh,
it's
5a!
Excuse
me,
it's
the
second
I
guess
so.
A
Distance
from
the
front
property
line
refers
to
on
the
site
plan,
because
for
me
it's
important
to
know
because
I'm,
even
though
I've
heard
testimony
about
why
they
can't
park
it
on
the
west
side,
I'm
still
looking
at
the
west
side
as
a
potential
place,
but
I
want
to
understand
the
definition
of
5a.
Can
you
help.
D
A
D
A
D
A
Even
though
the
house
jogs
back
and
has
a
side
wall
and
goes
back
what
looks
like
about
ten
feet,
or
so
it
then
comes
back
over
and
that
short
wall
faces
the
street.
So
you're,
saying
you're,
saying
this
entire
trailer
for
the
site
plan
is
in
front
of
that
defined,
front
facade
or
is
a
portion
of
it
only
in
front,
because
that's
the
testimony
we're
hearing
from
the
applicant.
A
D
A
All
right,
so,
even
if
the
trailer
were
parked
on
the
other
side
of
the
house,
that's
the
line
that
you
would
draw
or
extend
across
and
and
measure
from,
okay,
all
right
because
I'm
trying
to
understand.
If,
if
the
other
issues,
they
testified,
hardships
issues,
sewer
line
greenhouse
weren't
there
could
they
park
there
and
help
themselves,
but
it
doesn't
sound
like
it.
D
A
G
I
E
I
may
respond
actually
to
the
conversation
about
the
applicability
of
5a
or
five,
be
the
variance
that's
been
noticed
for
consideration
tonight
is
with
regard
to
subsection,
a
5a.
That
is
the
variant
that
is
the
section
that
they
are
seeking.
A
variance
from
with
regard
to
be
the
feasibility.
I
will
note
that
in
b5
it
requires
the
length
of
the
vehicle
to
be
no
more
than
26
feet.
G
Now
they
do
on
for
the
statement
is
the
vehicle
may
only
be
parked
within
the
front
yard,
on
an
existing
driveway
area
which
was
designed
and
intended
to
right,
ingress
and
egress
of
vehicular
traffic
from
the
street
I
looked
at
this,
you
have
a
gravel
drive,
did
circular
and
then
extends
up
on
the
west
side,
I
guess
to
the
carport
the
thing,
but
that's
just
grass,
that
it's
sitting
on
I
mean
even
the
picture
shows
just
sitting
on
grass.
Well,
the
driveway
is,
is
here
and
it's
over
here,
nothing.
A
I
I
G
G
A
I
E
Or
not,
is
to
your
benefit,
to
request
a
continuance,
Andry
notice
what
I
would
submit.
However,
everybody
keeps
focusing
on
subsection,
5
B,
but
5
B
is
applicable
it.
The
length
of
the
vehicle
is
no
more
than
26
feet.
The
testimony
provided
consistently
during
this
evenings
hearing
is
that
the
vehicle
is
34
feet
in
length,
so
I
submit
that
that
section
is
not
applicable.
B
G
I
D
That
is
our
understanding
of
the
code
that
they
are
to
say
they
can't
park
per
this
section.
It
does
reference
five
feet
down
here
and
that's
where
your
play
is.
Why
we're
here
tonight
is
because
of
five
days.
That's
my
opinion
and
hopes
that
we
had
asked
a
question
in
regards
to
feasibility
feasibility
of
the
fine.
If
you
saw
the
asterisk
under
feasibility,
feasibility
is
defined
to
you.
P
And
again,
the
only
other
point
that
I'd
like
to
make
is
if
I
were
to
get
a
26
foot,
another
prayer,
a
26
foot
I,
would
not
be
required
to
back
it
up.
As
far
as
I
had
it
backed
up
now,
I'm
only
I'm
only
out
25
feet
in
front
of
the
facade,
as
opposed
to
a
26-foot
trailer
I'm
allowed
to
I'd
like
to
just
not
I'd
like
to
just
ask
for
the
variance
with
extra
extra
feet
as
opposed
to
having
to
go
get
another
trailer.
G
A
E
Roberto
made
curry
and
Kamaria
pedis,
Michael
and
Eric.
Cotton
was
on
the
phone.
We
discussed
the
history
of
this
section
and
it
was
when
the
application
first
came
in
and
and
Eric
cotton
had
actually
met
with
Kathy
Coyle
before
she
left
to
discuss
this,
and
it
was
staffs
interpretation
of
the
code
that,
because
of
the
location
of
the
trailer
not
being
within
the
zoning
front
yard,
regardless
of
where
the
principal
structure
is
located.
E
But
when
you
look
at
the
zoning
district
and
where
your
front
line
is
allowed
to
be,
and
the
trailer
was
behind
that,
because
the
location
it
was
their
recommendation
that
they
sake
of
variance
through
5a
as
opposed
to
five
feet.
So
that's
how
we
arrived
at
this
point.
I
will
say
this
is
old
language
because
it
refers
to
the
Board
of
adjustments
Authority
and
not
the
variance
review,
board's,
Authority
and
I
I.
Think
probably
staff
is
going
to
be
recommending
that
we
clarify.
A
E
E
A
I
C
I
know
I
know
it
is
preferable
to
start
with
emotion
but
I
think
discussion.
Some
discussion
warranted
first
I
just
wanted
to
talk
about
my
my
perception
of
this
and
thought.
I
was
fairly
clear
when
I
ask
the
questions
it
seems
like
this
is
this
is
an
applicant
that's
getting
caught
up
in
a
technical,
a
technical
hardship
here,
because
their
house,
if
they
had
knocked
it
down
and
built
their
house,
you
know
you
know
rectangle
and
built
it
up
closer.
C
Thank
you
parking
exactly
where
they're
parking
it
and-
and
your
question
was
an
interesting
one.
Mr.
Brown,
because
you
asked
about
the
oddly
shaped
house
which
to
me
feels
a
whole
lot
like
an
oddly
shaped
property,
which
is
a
classic
definition
of
hard
shape
that
we
grant
all
the
time,
and
so
with
that
in
mind,
I'm
I'm,
in
favor
of
supporting.
A
C
G
A
A
If
they
add
it
on
just
to
the
front
of
the
house
that
we
talked
about
earlier
and
came
out
to
a
point
per
5a,
where
no
more
than
one-third
of
that
recreational
vehicle
stuck
past
it,
they
would
meet
5a.
So
they
don't
have
to
knock
the
house
down,
they
could
just
add
onto
the
front
of
their
house
and
I.
Don't
that's
not
that's!
Not
our
purview
I'm,
just
saying
that
it's
not
even
as
bad
as
knocking
your
eyes.
Okay,.
C
All
right,
so
I
would
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
vr
be
20-22
for
property
located
at
four
four
one.
Five
west
swan
circle
north
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
to
continue
parking,
a
34-foot,
trailer
RV
in
the
current
location
at
the
east
side,
front
yard,
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
based
upon
the
applicant,
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
C
This
would
not
be
an
issue
before
us
so
considering
that,
as
well
as
the
inability
to
park
this
vehicle
further
back
as
the
residents
is
currently
situated,
based
upon
structural
based
upon
sewage
lines
and
existing
trees,
fences,
patios
and
concrete
greenhouses
things,
the
applicant
has
met
the
hardships.
Alright.
A
D
Hey
Roberta
meeting
design
and
development
coordination,
the
address
is
4102
West
Corona
streets
code.
Section
under
review
this
evening
is
27
156.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
18
feet.
The
African
is
proposing
an
addition
in
the
model
of
existing
single-family
residence.
The
property
is
zoned
RS,
50,
60,
RS,
60
and
Hill
for
County
property.
Appraiser
information
right
away,
Natural
Resources
has
found
it
consistent
transportation
consistent
with
conditions.
D
L
D
D
D
D
In
the
hardship
they
stated
these
properties,
the
weight
reads
that
sounds
like
each
of
these
properties
had
a
variance.
There
is
no
variance
on
a
record
for
any
of
these
properties,
and
most
of
the
properties
were
built
in
1947,
I
have
a
one
or
two,
and
forty-eight
and
I
have
at
least
three
of
them
built
in
1950.
D
I
have
some
one
built
in
1993,
one
built
in
2007,
and
one
built
in
2016.
The
record
I
could
find
for
2016
was
four
four.
Oh
one,
five
Corona,
which
states
reduction
of
seven
feet
again
the
permit
pulled
for
that
it
was
to
meet
the
criteria
at
25
feet.
So
we
just
wanted
to
clarify
could
clarify
those
that
want
to
make
sure
that
the
applicant
he
could
present
how
we
measure
maybe
measure
those
items
or
clarify
how
you
came
to
those
dimensions.
A
Yes,
I
do
it's
rs.60
and
by
right
in
an
Rs
60,
an
applicant
can
ask
for
a
front
yard
setback
reduction
of
an
open
porch,
but
not
because
a
portion
of
their
addition
proposed
addition
is
enclosed.
That
extends
the
front
of
the
primary
structure.
I
get
that,
but
if
they
were
only
doing
the
porch,
they
could
come
to
the
board
and
ask
for
up
to
what
7
feet
for
8
feet.
Ok-
and
this
is
a
7
yeah.
This
is
set.
Okay,
all
right.
That
was
my
question.
N
4102
West,
Roma,
Street
and
I
have
been
sworn
in
okay
good
evening,
so
I'm
requesting
this
front
yard
setback
be
moved
from
25
feet
to
18
feet
to
support
a
home
addition
about
8
years
ago,
my
family
moved
from
Robins
Air
Force
Base
to
MacDill
Air
Force
Base,
where
I
work
and
we
purchased
this
structure
as
it
is
what
we
didn't
know
as
about
a
month.
After
closing,
we
were
pregnant
with
our
third
dog.
N
So
for
that
reason,
and
several
others
that
I
won't
extend
this
hearing
for
we,
the
home,
is
just
no
longer
tenable
or
sooner.
So.
We
need
to
do
this
about
a
600
square
foot
addition
that
miss
Roberta
discussed
earlier.
So
we
need
to
convert
our
3-bedroom
2bath
home
into
a
4-bedroom
3-bath
home
and
to
minimize
any
impact
on
adjoining
neighbors
like
what
was
previously
stated.
N
But
due
to
the
configuration
which
I'll
discuss
in
a
moment,
we
do
need
to
extend
one
portion
of
it.
Seven
feet
over
the
current
setback,
so
I
think
it's
a
fair
point.
As
we've
mentioned
early,
this
area
is
zoned
rs.60,
but
this
lot
has
always
been
50
55
feet
wide,
but
again
it
was
predates
the
current
code.
So
so
I
would
say
you
know
by
purchasing
that
13
feet,
extending
the
lot
or
widening
it
to
68
feet.
I
think
we've
already
improved
the
neighborhood
by
you
know
bringing
this
lot
into
conformance.
N
The
unique
and
hardships
and
practical
difficulties
requiring
those
variants
are
due
to
the
conditions
of
the
existing
structure
and
the
existing
layout
of
the
structure.
So
approximately
90%
of
the
addition
will
be,
in
conformance
with
all
setbacks.
However,
the
small
portion
requires
the
variance,
so
we
hired
two
architects
over
time.
We've
had
time
to
work
through
this
and
we've
explored
multiple
options
in
an
attempt
to
avoid
needing
any
variance
as
fun
as
it
is,
and
but
due
to
the
layout
of
the
existing
structure
and
available
land.
N
So
more
specifically,
in
order
to
gain
access
to
the
new
piece
of
construction.
An
access
hallway
has
to
be
constructed
through
the
portion
of
one
bedroom
and
through
one
closet
which
results
in
that
bedroom,
being
negated,
loss
of
closet
and
as
well
as
the
exterior
structure,
consuming
that
entire
exterior
wall,
which
means
there's
no
window,
there's
no
more
fire
escape.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we
maintain
fire
safety.
So.
N
N
All
we
can
really
do
as
residents
is
just
look
at
the
view
from
the
road
from
the
centerline
of
the
street,
and
so
what
we
did
is
just
measured
from
that
center
line,
just
so
that
you
guys
could
have
an
understanding
of
how
the
sight
lines
down
Corona
or
San
Luis
or
two
cone.
You
know
in
our
general
neighborhood
flow,
so
we
obviously
don't
have
access
to
various
records
or
anything
of
that
nature.
It
was
really
just
to
say
that
it's
a
reduction
in
that
distance
from
the
street
through
the
front
dog.
N
Furthermore,
we
would
have
preferred
you
know
actually
a
10-foot
variance,
because
that
would
have
given
us
an
extra
space
to
add
some
some
features
for
our
growing
family.
However,
we
really
took
a
hard
look
at
the
floor
plan
in
the
layout
and
really
tried
to
minimize
it
minimize
the
impact
as
much
as
possible,
and
we
we
sort
of
hit
rock
bottom
at
7
feet.
N
The
hardships
and
practical
difficulties
are
really
not
due
to
any
actions
by
us
as
homeowners,
but
again
due
to
the
existing
structure
and
placement
on
the
lot.
The
current
structure
was
built
in
1950
and
is
existing
as
we
purchased
it
eight
years
ago.
So
we
have
investigated
multiple
other
solutions
with
experts
and
we
found
that
any
other
course
of
action
would
really
be
substantially
more
burdensome
and
unreasonable.
So,
additionally,
the
variance
if
granted,
should
not
interfere
with
or
injure
the
health,
safety
or
welfare
of
the
surrounding
properties.
N
As
it
stated,
we
made
good-faith
effort
to
purchase
land
to
make
sure
that
we
did
not
have
to
request
any
side,
yard
variance
and
I
also
have
signed
statements
from
all
the
homeowners.
In
my
immediate
area
again
with
the
250
radius
map,
I
went
door-to-door
to
try
to
contact
speak
with
them.
Briefed
them
on
the
site
plan
show
them
what
our
aspects
was
and
trying
to
go
in
with
their
support,
so
I'll
enter
it
into
the
record.
I
have
20
I
think
approximately
20
signatures
here,
everyone
that
I
could
get
a
hold
of.
N
N
And
this
approval
of
this
variance
will
allow
us
to
not
only
make
a
positive
investment
and
improving
the
functionality
and
livability
of
our
home,
but
also
at
the
curb
appeal
and
charm
of
the
structure,
to
the
benefit
of
the
entire
neighborhood.
So
I
believe
we
have
submitted
a
reasonable
site
plan
that
resolves
our
unique
hardships
and
increases
the
value
of
not
only
our
home,
but
the
community
in
the
neighborhood
and.
N
And
the
one
last
piece
I'd
like
to
point
out
is
in
the
photos
that
were
shown
to
you
earlier.
You
see,
there's
a
very
large
shrub.
Some
of
them
are
20
30
feet
high
those
shrubs
those
hedgerows
extend
in
some
places,
13
feet
beyond
the
front
of
the
home
towards
the
street.
All
of
that
would
be
removed
and
again
we're
asking
for
the
7
feet
to
allow
for
that
structure
to
be
added,
so
we
so
again
removing
the
existing
shrubbery
and
all
that
place
in
the
home.
N
N
No,
we
did.
We
we've
submitted
the
floor
plan
as
you've
seen
it
here,
see
any
of
the
other
ones
again
resulted
in
rooms
that
were
well
below
that,
what's
customary
to
the
neighborhood,
so
you
would
start
getting
into
very
small
rooms
or
there's
nowhere
to
put
closets,
and
then
we
also
considered
potentially
a
second-story
but
the,
but
again
the
experts
going
through
our
current
home.
It's
not
structurally
sound
where
it
can
support.
The
second-story
would
require
extensive
modification
and
this
home
addition.
N
B
B
The
shape
of
the
walk-in
closet
might
become
squarer,
but
you
probably
would
have
the
exact
same
number
of
square
feet
that
you're
proposing
I
just
I.
Don't
you
know
the
reason
I
asked
for
alternate
plans?
We
often
ask
for
that
to
see
what
doesn't
work
in
my
mind,
I
see
a
plan
that
can
maintain
the
front
of
the
house
as
it
is
today
and
give
you
every
single
square
foot
you're
asking
for
with
the
same
hallway
connection
and
everything.
So
did
they
look
at
that.
N
B
N
B
N
N
Because
two-foot
crawl
space
to
slab
something
that
happened
prior
to
us
purchasing
the
home
and
that
runs
right
through
here
divided
this
way.
The
other
piece
is:
is
there
is
a
window
existing
window
here
in
the
master
bathroom
mm-hmm?
If
we
slide
this
structure
back,
it's
not
just
the
closet
that
gets
removed,
you
have
no
there's
no
window
in
the
bathroom
and
the
bathroom
cannot
be
extended
or
utilized
in
that
way.
N
So
again,
that's
why
we
cut
it
in
here
again
trying
to
minimize
any
addition,
but
sliding
this
back
alters
windows
as
well
as
the
access
here,
and
it
brings
this
step-down
foundation
piece
into
the
center
of
this
room.
So
for
cost
purposes
and
again
trying
to
again
do
the
right
thing
and
minimize
the
impact
on
us
as
homeowners.
N
H
N
N
N
G
The
variance
request
for
case
VRB
2033
for
property,
located
at
for
102
West,
Elm
Street
Tampa
Florida,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
in
the
front
yard,
from
25
to
825
feet
to
18
feet,
section
27,
156,
with
an
encroachment,
Rives
and
gutters
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
of
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
five
criteria,
hardships
that
forth
in
the
section
27
88
of
the
city
code.
G
C
D
D
D
D
Various
map
properties
located
here
Dickens
is
located
along
this
way.
Homer
Avenue
goes
here
and
it
turns
into
Dundee.
This
is
unusual,
shape,
piece
of
property.
The
historical
front
would
be
here
with
the
address,
but
we
have
deemed
it
as
the
front
here
her
zoning
is
the
front
is
here,
which
means
the
rear
is
here
side
yards
here.
D
D
A
A
D
D
I
D
I
D
G
N
B
G
So
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
with
you
tonight
we're
here,
as
you
heard,
to
ask
for
a
variance
for
a
reduction
of
our
rear
yard,
from
a
20
foot,
setback
to
a
7,
foot,
setback
and
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
put
this
back
on
and,
as
you
heard
roberta
kindly
mentioned,
we
have
an
unusual
shaped
lot.
It's
a
peninsular
shape.
We
have
two.
G
N
N
G
We
have
a
drawing
of
the
proposed
screen
and
porch
edition
and
you
can
see
the
typical
20
foot
setback
in
this
shaded
area,
which
goes
into
the
very
fun
of
the
screen
and
porch.
But
again
the
one
corner
that
I
guess
is
the
most
concern.
Is
the
seven
foot
three
inch
to
the
point,
the
apex
of
our
two
guys
right
so.
G
Neighbor,
be
we
have
spoken
to
both
of
our
neighbors,
their
side
yards
are,
are
the
neighboring
parts
of
our
home,
so
neighbor
be
side,
yard
faces
our
home
and
they
were
a
side.
Yard
faces
are
home
and
they're
both
unhappy
with
it.
We've
been
talking
about
it
for
three
years
trying
to
get
up
the
gumption
to
to
do
another
addition
or
an
addition
at
all.
We
also.
N
N
Where
I've
written
neighbor
a
that's,
that's
their
their
side
yard
would
about
here.
So
it'd
be
like
as
if
you
had
a
rectangular
lots
that
were
next
to
each
other,
so
side
to
side
and
the
same
thing
for
neighbor.
Be
that
side
of
their
house,
because
their
front
yard
is
up
here
along
Homer,
and
so
that
will
be
their
their
side
yard
as
well.
G
A
A
A
D
A
D
G
D
A
E
A
E
A
E
A
G
B
D
D
D
And
again,
why
is
that
an
issue?
Because
this
is
the
site
plan
proposed
and
he's
asking
for
a
six-foot
variance
which
would
encroach
into
that
easement?
Okay?
So
that's
why
right
away
has
found
an
inconsistent
right
away
would
be
at.
We
would
be
asking
for
the
plan
to
be
revised.
Now
its
resources
has
found
it
consistent.
The
zoning
has
found
it
inconsistent
again,
concurring
with
the
zoning
review
or
the
right
away
with
you.
Sorry.
D
D
D
So
we've
asked
them
to
revise
the
site
plan
and
present
that
to
you
this
evening
and
also
to
maybe
shorten
up
what
he's
got
going
on
with
his
pool,
because,
again,
that
is
in
with
the
easement
also,
he
must
maintain
25%
green
space
for
the
life
of
the
property.
He
is.
We've
asked
them
to
present
a
revised
site
plan
to
hopefully
reflect
all
those
three
conditions.
D
B
A
D
Because,
let's
say
you
granted
the
variance
okay
and
it
increases
the
showing
the
pool
and
everything
that
stuck
has
going
on
in
the
site
plan.
We
were
afraid
that
we
were
afraid
that
granting
this
variance
may
trigger
something
else
that
they
couldn't
comply
with
so
the
time
the
permitting
it
would
have
created
a
problem,
and
they
may
be
back
here
before
you.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
applicant
understood
that-
and
we
counseled
the
applicant
to
have
something
ready
for
us
tonight.
D
A
D
A
D
D
A
F
F
F
This
addition
would
be
forced
to
build
an
accessory
structure
and
we
are
zoned
rs.75,
which
puts
us
in
a
ten
foot
buffer
from
the
existing
structure
to
what
would
be
the
accessory
structure
and
then
we're
limited
also
by
that
sudden
half
but
easement,
so
that
severely
constricts.
What
we
would
hope
to
do,
which
is
to
build
an
outdoor
living
area
and
an
outdoor
kitchen
to
go
along
with
the
pool
and
to
just
continue
on
just
well
I
get
to
the
impervious
in
the
pervious
and
the
green
space
stuff.
F
F
Get
a
little
bit
closer
and
you
see
that
certainly
isn't
within
20
feet,
there's
another
property
again,
these
are
all
within
our
neighborhood,
and
so
what
I'm
asking
here
isn't
really?
It
would
be
more
to
conform
with
what's
existing
in
the
neighborhood
to
in
certain
respects.
Also,
we
have
I
have
spoken
to
our
immediately
adjacent
neighbors
and
briault
neighbors
I
do
have
two
letters
from
my
the
adjacent
neighbors
I'd
like
to
enter
into
the
record
and
support
for
barbarians.
F
F
Yeah
I
think
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is,
and
let
me
just
go
back
to
I'm
sorry,
the
green
space
and
the
impervious
pervious.
We
have
submit
the
permit
for
the
pool
it's
going
through
permitting
right
now
and
as
part
of
that
submission
of
permit
you
know,
the
pool
company
is
required
to
certify
what
the
green
space
is
and
what
the
impervious
pervious
is,
and
the
green
space
and
you
gotta
have
a
minimum.
F
25%
I
have
a
believe
we're
at
thirty
three
point:
three
four
percent,
so
we
will
be
above
that
twenty
five
percent,
the
pervious,
will
be
over
the
six
fifty
percent.
But
again
that
goes
to
your
point,
mr.
chairman,
that
is
the
for
a
of
the
the
stormwater
as
to
how
we
mitigate
that
and
so
I'm.
Not
sure
that
really
factors
into
your
decision,
but
I
did
want
to
point
that
out.
His
staff
did
what's
kind
enough
to
bring
that
up
to
us
that
may
come
up
in
this
hearing
and
I
did
appreciate
it.
F
It
allowed
me
the
chance
to
address
that
for
the
pool
company
and
make
sure
we
were
fully
in
compliance
and
I
think
we're
pretty
close
on
the
pool
permit,
and
so
you
know,
if,
if
you
don't
grant
this
variance
I
think
it
leaves
us
in
a
bind
because
but
that
existing
utility
easement
and
the
but
buffer
we
are
very
much
restricted
as
to
building
an
accessory
structure
and
and
I.
Think
that's
I.
Think
that's
really
it
honestly
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
A
F
F
Think
you
guys
are
the
one
thing
I
would
point
out
is
also
when
we,
if
we
were
able
to
build
this
structure,
it
will
be
at
the
same
level
of
the
deck
of
our
existing
will
night
is
cold
12
inches
off
the
ground.
This
would
be
a
step
down
to
the
pull
deck.
So
it's
not
going
to
be
elevated,
won't
look
likewise
from
the
rear,
neighbors.
You
won't
be
able
to
see.
You
know
you
won't
be
looking
at
us
walking
around
the
deck
or
anything
like
that,
so
it
will
be
on
the
ground
level.
F
A
L
A
L
So
we
love
our
neighborhood
for
many
reasons,
most
of
all,
because
we
have
privacy
and
we
have
lots
that
afford
us
that
privacy,
and
so
we
are
concerned
that
if
we
go
from
a
20
foot
setback
behind
us
to
six
feet,
that
is
not
only
encroaching
on
our
privacy.
But
we
are
very
concerned
about
drainage.
That
is
really
a
primary
concern.
We
live
in
a
flood
zone.
L
So
in
addition
to
my
husband,
Mike
and
I
that
live
at
45
10,
we've
got
Robert
and
Julie
watts
at
40508,
Conrad
and
Kimberly
Johnson
at
45,
14
and
Joe
and
Mary
Helen
show
Laura
that
are
for
506
South,
Korean
crafts,
and
none
of
them
could
be
here
tonight.
So
Jojo
Laura
also
wrote
a
letter
that
Dee
would
like
submitted.
L
You
can
read
what
he
had
written,
but
the
variance
as
requested
will
substantially
interfere
with
the
welfare
of
other
properties
that
would
be
affected
by
the
allowance
of
this
variance,
and
that
I
would
ask
that
you
ask
him
to
explain
what
the
Barret,
what
the
hardship
is
when
he
has
a
perfectly
normal
lot.
He
just
built
this
house
two
years
ago,
3,900
square
feet
large
house
to
be
able
to
host
people
and
I
think
his
variance
with
asking
for
and
extensions
that
he
could
host
large
amounts
of
people.
So
with
that
I
will.
L
A
P
C
C
C
F
C
F
Just
basically
an
existing,
you
know
blowpipe,
but
on.
F
F
Guess
we
could
I
mean
they
just
think
honestly,
I
thought
it
was
nicholae
better
to
put
it
towards
the
rear
of
the
property.
Just
because
then
you,
because
what
were
the
other
part
of
this
is
our
living
room
is
going
to
get
opened
up
to
a
slider,
and
so
you
have
the
kitchen
right
outside
the
slider.
F
C
F
Just
like
a
point
out
I
mean
we.
We
have
52
feet
of
width
of
our
problem:
real
property
in
the
backyard.
All
we're
asking
here
is
14
foot,
seven
inches
of
coverage,
structure
of
the
52
feet,
width,
wise
and
so
and
and
again
there
are
other
structures
within
our
neighborhood
that
that
do
have
these
encroachments
upon
career
setbacks.
That
I
can't
speak
to
variance
or
no
variance.
So
this
would
be
more,
in
conformance
with
the
characteristics
of
the
neighborhood
to
address
I,
guess
and
my
mom
rebuttal.
No.
D
A
But
it's
attached
I
guess
for
someone
on
staff,
maybe
of
Roberta
I'm.
Sorry,
we've
heard
we've
heard
that
that
he
cannot
go
into
the
utility
easement.
Is
that
a
legal
document
that
says
that
or
what?
What
establishes
that
and
the
only
reason
I'm
asking
there's
an
existing
block
wall
that
is
in
the
easement,
don't
know
haven't
heard
any
testimony
is,
if
that's
a
subdivision
wall
or
private
property
wall
or
if
it's
his
wall
or
any
of
that,
but
I'm
just
curious.
P
A
F
F
D
D
D
D
A
I
mean
because
it
has
bearing
on
the
discussion
about
the
hardship
and
you
know
I-
don't
want
to
be
thinking
one
thing
when
legally
he
may
be,
and
I
I
don't
want
to
go
down.
The
path
of
he's
got
to
ask
permission.
I
don't
want
to
do
that
tonight,
but
if
you
know
for
a
fact,
he
cannot
without
asking
for
permission
that.
D
D
A
B
B
A
B
B
A
A
A
D
D
A
F
F
Also,
we
had
some
email
correspondence,
they
were
concerned
about
visually.
They
would
be
able
to
see
our
structure
or
but
I,
don't
believe.
That's
really
a
concern
either,
because
the
way
their
property
sits
in
this
I
have
a
couple
of
pictures
here.
The
property
is
essentially
a
corner
lot
and
what
we
are
proposing.
F
So
here's
their
property
behind
these
palm
trees
and
these
trees
is
their
carport.
The
rear
yard
is
actually
way
over
here,
and
so
it's
it's
really
anything
we
do.
Shouldn't
interfere
at
all
with
their
property
and
I
just
want
to
make
that
clear
that
the
actual
property
that
will
I
would
think
be
most
affected.
Is
the
property
to
their
left
right
here.
G
B
I'll
just
say
that
the
the
concern
from
the
neighbors
about
the
encroachment-
really
it's
not
a
concern
of
mine
because
they
can
build
it
there
anyway.
However,
in
terms
of
hardship
of
the
property,
practical
difficulty
of
the
property
etc,
I
don't
see
a
reason
that
it
needs
to
be
connected
all
the
way
in
this
fourteen
and
a
half
foot
width.
So
if
we
denied
this,
he
could
build
a
fourteen
point.
B
L
B
B
Well,
just
tell
me
if
I'm
wrong,
this
thinking,
I
think
the
easements
are
relevant,
because
if
the
Eastman
wasn't
there
and
they
said
well,
we
could
go
build
three
feet
from
the
rear
property
line.
It
would
have
to
be
disconnected
by
then
feet
still,
which
they
can
still
do
so.
I
think
that's
irrelevant,
because
if
you're
going
to
use
the
easement
argument,
then
you
are
by
default,
saying
that
it
would
be
an
accessory
disconnected
stroke.
No
because
if
it's
a
primary
structure
the
easement
does
not
come
into
play.
It.
C
Does
because
what
they're
saying
is
that
they
could
have
a
bigger,
they
could
have
a
bigger
piece
of.
They
could
have
a
bigger
accessory
structure
by
building
it
closer.
They
could
go
up
to
the
ten
feet
right,
and
so
they
could
expand
the
size,
but
by
being
constrained
by
the
easement
you're
shrinking
what
they
can
build
out
in
that
area,
so
they're
trying
to
expand
closer
to
to
the
main
structure,
and
then
they
run
up
against
the
the
abutment.
The
distances
between
main
strap,
that's
true,
so
it
limits
them.
B
A
C
C
A
A
G
B
The
various
requests
for
case
BRB
2026
for
the
property
located
at
44
11
Westbrook,
would
drive
for
reduction
in
the
rear
yard
from
20
feet
to
6
feet.
Encroachment
of
using
gutters
be
denied
due
to
the
failure
of
the
petitioner
to
meet
his
burden,
approved
to
provide
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
of
this
public
hearing
of
a
necessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
Section,
2080
2780
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
property
is
relatively
standard,
although
maybe
under
sized.
A
E
E
A
A
A
L
That
variance
that
the
variance
request
for
case
BRB,
20
26
for
the
property
located
at
4,
4,
1,
1,
West
Brook,
would
drive
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
revised
site
plan.
Excuse
me
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
in
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
8.3
feet
with
encroachment
8.2
feet
with
encroachment
for
use
and
gutters,
based
upon
the
applicants
presenting
incompetent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
L
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27
80
of
the
city
code.
More
specifically
that
the
alleged
hardship
is
unique
and
singular
to
this
property,
because
an
easement
located
in
the
rear
of
the
structure
prohibits
the
ability
of
the
applicant
to
construct
an
accessory
structure
within
the
setbacks
that
would
otherwise
be
applicable
to
this
property
and
is
in
harmony
with
and
serves
the
general
intent
of
the
city
code
as
multiple
other
houses
in
the
neighborhood
have
pools
and
similar
accessory
structures.
A
second.
G
A
I
D
Sign
has
allowed
for
code
with
four
additional
building
signs
within
the
allowable
sinus
area
for
a
new
tenant
properties,
own
CI,
commercial,
intensives,
Hillsborough,
County,
property,
appraiser
information
is
included
in
the
record,
and
I
will
show
you
that
right
away,
he
finds
it
consistent
and
Zoning
finds
it
inconsistent,
and
this
is
the
property
card
large
parcel
on
Hillsborough
Avenue.
It
consists
of
several
buildings.
D
Aerial
map
again
large
parcel
here
the
building
for
is
here
and
the
tenant
space
is
proximally
located
here.
This
is
Hillsborough
Avenue
and
the
surrounding
properties
are
Espeon
again,
the
photos
are
a
portion
of
the
property
as
it
depicts
to
the
tenant.
This
is
the
coming
into
the
main
drive
looking
at
the
proposed
test
space.
D
D
D
The
additional
signs
would
be
comprised
of
this
language
and
per
our
signage
code.
This
is
how
it
is
being
presented
as
meeting
these
square
footage.
Again
we
box
around
the
square
footage
and
come
up
with
that
total.
So
that
is
the
total
that
applicant
has
presented
that
it
exceeds
the
allowable
again.
His
allowable
is
from
this
distance
to
this
distance
of
the
tenant
space
we
x
1.25
come
up
with
a
figure.
A
C
D
J
A
J
J
The
official
name
is
CRP
two
Horizon
Park
LLC.
This
is
the
The
Horizon
Park
Shopping
Center,
built
in
1971.
At
the
time
the
shopping
center
was
built,
the
city
of
Tampa
sign
code,
restricted
the
maximum
allowable
area
to
2
square
feet
per
foot,
and
it
was
reduced
at
night
in
2009
to
the
1.25
square
feet.
I
wanted
to
show
the
hardship
that
the
application
presents.
I
wish
to
show
it
to
graphically.
J
So
you
can
understand
it
a
little
easier
but
first
to
use
the
same
graphic
that
Roberta
showed
this
survey,
but
because
it
was
this
distance
right
here,
you
probably
have
one
yourself
for
individuals:
440
foot
setback
from
the
right-of-way,
the
South
right
of
a
line
of
Hillsborough
Avenue
to
the
facade
440
feet,
and
this
is
a
typical
commercial
up
in
which
the
sign
code
was
developed
to
address
the
most
common,
the
the
most
typical
setback
in
our
in
our
city.
So
they
would
have
the
visibility,
the
wave
funding
opportunities,
the
identification
so
forth.
J
So,
as
mentioned
in
the
and
shown
here
graphically,
the
typical
building
is
typically
80
feet,
set
back
from
the
street.
There's
an
8
foot,
minimum
landscape
buffer,
this
required
in
all
properties.
Next
to
the
vehicle
area,
a
60,
2
foot,
wide
double
loaded
parking
lot
and
then
a
can
to
12
foot
sidewalk
landscaping,
allowing
access
around
the
building
to
the
building
and
so
forth.
So
that
means
80
feet.
So
this
property
is,
the
facade,
is
five
and
a
half
times
greater
than
the
distances
that
were
normal
in
the
creation
of
the
sign
code.
J
Clearly,
a
hardship,
it's
a
special
circumstance,
and
this
variance
allowing
a
larger
maximum
sign
area
is
a
little
deceiving
because,
as
Roberta
mentioned,
the
sign
code
requires
100.
Otherwise,
one
sign.
So
she
drew
the
the
thing
which
means
that
all
the
voids
in
the
area
are
are
calculated.
But
if
we
just
calculated,
they
get
the
exact
square
feet
of
all.
Five
signs
cons,
home
Plus,
which
is
their
major
one
in
the
middle.
But
this
episode
is
even
better
and
then
we
add
to
it.
J
J
The
void
in
the
middle
that
is
causing
this
this
creation,
the
requirement
for
the
variance,
because
the
the
code
allows
one
side
per
frontage
wall
facing
street,
and
that's
why
we're
here
to
seek
redress
to
that.
This
all
five
of
the
points
that
are
required.
The
findings
of
fact
are
can
be
shown
to
be
positive
in
this
signage
I
talked
about
that
the
hardship
with
the
the
great
5.5
times,
the
normal
viewing
distance
number
to
the
hardship.
Practical
difficulty
does
not
result
in
the
actions
of
the
applicant.
J
The
applicant
is
a
new
tenant
seeking
retail
viability
and
success
in
this
existing
yet
challenged
retail
strip
center
built
in
1971.
When
the
center
was
built,
the
Tampa
sign
code
allowed
2
square
feet
as
I
mentioned
and
reduced.
So
every
every
time,
these
ordinances
and
and
they
always
going
to
be
constricting,
reducing
the
maximum
allowable
sign
area.
Every
time
the
city
reduces
this,
there
is,
and
then
another
hardship
or
the
hardship
is
increased
number
3.
J
If
granted,
the
signed
variance
will
not
substantially
interfere
with
or
injure
the
health
safety
welfare
of
others
whose
property
would
be
affected
by
the
allowance
of
this
variance.
In
fact,
the
safety
and
the
way
funding
requirements
of
the
public
will
be
enhanced
by
this
variance,
but
the
traffic
along
heals,
a
borough
is,
is
very
fast.
J
The
purpose
of
the
sign
code
was
established
to
promote
health
safety
and
well
forever
citizens.
This
is
section
25,
289,
a
purpose,
but
also
to
provide
regulations
that
were
effective
and
flexible
in
discouraging
visual
blight,
yet
enhancing
visual
access
and
identification
for
effective
emergency
response
regulations
promote
signs
that
are
attractive
and
contribute
to
the
economic
value
of
tourism,
visitation
and
permanent
economic
growth
and
accomplish
that
by
regulating
the
size
and
location
of
signs.
J
The
variance
will
result
in
substantial
justice
being
done,
considering
both
the
public
benefits
intended
to
be
secured
by
the
sign
code
and
the
individual
hardships,
practical
and
economic
viability,
difficulties
that
what
we
suffered
due
to
a
failure
of
the
board
to
grant
this.
Bearing
so
your
question
about
how
other
variance
has
been
granted.
Yes,
they
have
I
I.
Think
the
sign
this
time
here
that
wasn't
visible
when
you
took
your
photographs
this
week.
But
when
I
took
the
photographs
two
months
ago,
Babies
R
Us
is
the
tenant
space
that
used
to
occupy.
A
O
A
J
G
A
My
my
only
question
is
why
why
do
the
four
words
have
to
be
spread
out?
Why
can't
they
be
brought
closer
together
and
made?
You
know
you
know
smaller
square
footage
area.
What
does
it?
The
pictures
you
showed
of
the
other
tenant
signs,
they're
all
pretty
much
centered
on
the
space,
there's
no
attempt
to
stretch
them
out.
Why?
Why
is
this.
J
Tenant
special,
the
products
and
the
items
that
they
sell
in
this,
these
point
of
sale
signs
are
crucial
to
furniture
stores
and
and
also
public
stores,
other
types
of
stores,
because
they
want
to
be
able
to
display
what
range
of
products
they
have.
Then,
unfortunately,
they
are
all
big-box
stores
and
they
always
they're
told
by
their
architects
that
you
need
to
balance
and
have
proportion
and
ratios
that
are
comfortable
for
the
public
to
look
at
so
they
always
spread
these
out,
which
causes
the
square
footage
to
be
increased.
J
A
Know
I
told
Lee,
understand
I'm
just
looking
at
the
photograph
with
D
and
DS
discounts
and
they
have
ladies
kids,
men
shoes
home
all
directly
below
so.
In
other
words,
they
made
their
central
sign
area
smaller
and
they
still
got
all
the
words
in
so
I'm.
Just
trying
to
understand
why
it's
important
for
that
and
what's
the
hardship
for
making
it
wider
as
opposed
to
bringing
it
all
in
one
Center.
J
Well,
the
heart,
the
heart
shape
is
because
the
distance
is
so
great
from
the
viewing
the
viewing
distance
from
the
public
right
away
and
that's
the
regulation
for
all
sign
codes.
It
is
based
from
view
of
the
from
the
public
right
away.
They
want
to
increase
the
science
as
large
as
they
can,
so
they
can
be
seen
from
the
public
right
away.
A
A
B
B
A
G
Substantial
evidence
in
the
record,
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship,
practical
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27
80
and
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
particular
business
is
set
significantly
away
from
the
main
road.
There
are
some
buildings
in
front
of
it
also.
J
A
G
A
Just
want
to
say
it's,
it's
been
an
honor.
It
is
a
privilege
to
be
able
to
serve
the
city
of
Tampa,
especially
in
a
position
like
this
hope.
You
all
know
that,
which
I'm
sure
you
do
I
learned
a
lot
from
staff
and
I
even
learned
from
board
members
new
and
and
older
ones.
There
were
some
very
prominent
people
that
have
come
through
my
tenure
I'm,
not
using
this
as
a
springboard
run
for
office
yeah.
Not
not
once
did
I
mention
my
company
named
Sterling,
Bay
Holmes.