►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 12102019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
B
A
In
attendance
this
evening
are
Jarod
Simpson
assistant
city
attorney,
let's
see
leshawna
doc
and
Brett
Burks
of
the
land,
development
coordination
and
I
Brian
Knox
of
natural
resources,
and
we
have
no
transportation
people
here
as
well
as
Roberta
meet
curry
with
land
development.
I
will
take
just
a
few
minutes
to
review
tonight's
procedures.
Cases
will
be
called
in
the
order
that
they
appear
on
the
agenda
when
your
case
number
in
the
applicants
name
are
called.
Please
stand
an
either
aisle
to
the
side
of
the
room.
A
To
acknowledge
that
you
are
here,
staff
will
then
give
a
brief
introduction
to
the
board
of
each
application.
When
you
approach
the
podium,
please
speak
into
the
microphone
is
state
your
name
address
and
if
you
have
been
sworn
in,
the
applicant
and/or,
their
agent
will
have
ten
minutes
to
give
testimony
present
witnesses
and
documentation
as
a
part
of
their
presentation.
This
is
your
time
to
present
all
of
your
evidence,
and
you
want
any
audience
wishing
to
speak
in
support
of
or
in
opposition
to.
The
application
will
then
have
three
minutes
each
after
that.
A
The
board
may
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
regarding
the
applications.
Finally,
the
applicant
will
have
an
additional
five
minutes
for
rebuttal
if
needed.
The
time
periods,
as
stated,
will
be
kept
by
me.
The
chair,
any
information
such
as
pictures
or
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted
as
a
part
of
your
petition,
and
you
intend
to
present
it
at
this
hearing
for
consideration
in
support
of
your
petition,
must
be
individually
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board.
A
After
acceptance
by
the
board,
you
must
submit
the
item
to
staff
for
it
to
be
entered
and
made
a
part
of
the
permanent
record.
The
board
bases
its
decision
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
which
has
presented
this
evening
and
which
meets
the
criteria
required
by
the
city's
Code
of
Ordinances.
The
variance
granted
by
the
board
will
be
only
for
what
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
will
be
compliant
with
any
terms
and
conditions
stated
in
the
approval
by
the
board.
A
You
must
have
four
votes
for
the
variance
to
be
approved
if
an
insufficient
vote
is
obtained.
The
case
shall
be
automatically
carried
over
for
consideration
of
the
board's
next
meeting.
If
approved,
your
variance
will
expire
two
years
from
today's
date.
All
other
city
codes
will
need
to
be
met.
If
your
case
is
continued,
it
will
be
continued
to
either
the
January
14th
or
the
February
11th
public
hearing
dates.
A
We
have
okay,
all
right.
If
you
wish
to
appeal
the
variance
review
Board's
decision
to
the
City
Council,
you
must
file
a
petition
for
review
of
a
board
decision
within
ten
business
days
of
the
decision.
If
your
variance
is
granted,
you
will
not
be
able
to
pull
any
permits
until
after
the
10-day
appeal
period
has
passed.
Your
cooperation
will
help
ensure
that
this
meeting
runs
smoothly
and
will
be
greatly
appreciated
before
we
begin
the
first
case,
is
there
any
business
regarding
the
agenda
that
staff
would
like
to
address.
F
A
G
You
mr.
chair
I
would
ask
the
members
of
the
board,
if
they've
had
any
ex
parte
communications
that
wouldn't
include
written
or
verbal
communications
regarding
any
matters
that
are
coming
before
the
board
this
evening.
If
you've
had
any
verbal
communications,
I
would
ask
that
you
disclose
the
sum
and
substance
of
the
communications
when
and
where
they
occurred
and
with
whom
the
the
conversation
occurred
and
if
they
are
written,
communications
I
would
ask
that
they
be
disclosed
and
filed
into
the
record.
G
G
It's
not
a
statutory
conflict
because
there's
no
pecuniary
interest
there,
but
we
I
would
ask
that
you,
just
when
that
case
is
called
that
you
just
stepped
down
and
then
mr.
chair,
as
for
the
business
that
was
brought
up
by
staff,
that
rules
of
procedure
do
require
a
motion
and
affirmative
vote
by
the
majority
of
members
present
to
alter
the
order
of
business
from
what
is
on
the
agenda.
Would.
G
A
A
H
A
A
A
A
F
F
No
okay
also,
we
do
have
a
Spanish
interpreter
here
for
the
cases
that
will
need
interpretation.
So
can
we
have
a
little
rules
on
how
that
works?
I
think
the
Spanish
interpreter
needs
to
know
how
how
the
rules
are
supposed
to
work
for
him
and
the
cases
also
in
regards
to
your
agendas
for
the
following
month:
I
do
have
about
eight
cases
for
January
and
eight
cases
for
February.
G
Chairman
there
aren't
any
Express
rules
in
the
rules
of
procedure
addressing
translators.
It
would
be
my
advice
and
I've
handed
at
a
sample
translators
oath,
which
basically
states
that
the
translator
will
swear
to
translate
accurately
from
English
to
Spanish
in
Spanish
to
English,
so
the
clerk
will
place
the
translator
under
oath
to
accurately
translate,
and
then
we
would
just
ask
that
the
translator
stand
next
to
the
person
that
is
in
need
of
the
translation
and
and
I
would
just
ask
that
the
board
members
speak
slowly
and
recognize
that
the
translation
process
does
need
to
occur.
G
A
G
G
I
G
If
ma'am
well,
if
you
could,
if
she
could
just
stand
to
the
side
here
and
then
you
as
Miss
Mead,
makes
her
presentation,
you
just
translate
what
miss
meat
is
saying
and
it
at
when
it's
her
time
to
speak,
she'll
be
recognized
by
the
chair.
So
at
this
time
miss
mieze
gonna,
make
her
presentation.
You'll
translate
the
presentation
to
her
and
then,
when
that's
concluded,
it'll
be
time
for
her
to
make
her
presentation.
F
I
F
I
F
F
D
F
Right
again,
the
Hillsboro
County
property
appraiser
documents
are
included
in
the
records
for
your
reference,
so
that
you
can
see
when
the
property
was
built
when
the
property
was
purchased
or
taken
possession
of
by
the
current
owner
and
when
additions,
or
maybe
some
items
in
question
tonight
under
review.
Okay.
So
that's
for
your
reference.
This.
F
F
I
K
K
K
K
I
F
F
A
K
K
K
K
K
And
it's
just
re
use
them.
Well,
my
daughter
chimera
about
20
years
she's
been
married,
20
years
and
I
asked
her
I
said:
do
you
remember,
and
she
said
she
said
at
least
15
to
20
years
that
I've
been
married?
They
haven't
used
that
before
and
it's
all
black
you
know
and
the
reason
had
that
the
reason
I
had
that
that
a
screen
forged
for
the
home,
because
we
like
to
barbecue
and
we
just
can
sit
out
there.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
I
call
animal
control
all
about
the
dogs,
because
my
granddaughter
won't
go
outside.
You
know
I
will
later
or
afraid
or
the
dogs.
You
know,
and
they
say
you
they
don't
they
don't
do
anything.
I
can
do
anything,
but
you
know
I
like
to
enjoy
my
yard.
Do
you
know
neither
Ohio
they
don't
we
hardly.
We
don't
go
out
back
there.
You
know
anyway,.
I
K
But
I
want
what
I
want
to
do
is
maintain.
You
know
the
DRD
porch
in
the
screen
and
again,
because,
if
not
right
now,
because
it
cost
me
for
defending
to
dump
all
the
wood
and
the
screens,
you
know
a
truckload
of
stuff.
You
know
to
take
it
to
the
paper
to
be
taken
to
the
dump
and
I
had
to
pay
somebody
to
take
it
all
out.
Do
you
know
how
to
pay?
Have
it
or
take
them
apart,
I'm
72,
my
husband,
Sadie
years
old.
K
K
You
know
any
they're
dirty
look.
Another
loan
I
got
up
one
morning,
you
know,
and
for
45
years
I
haven't
been,
you
know,
I
get
I,
get
up,
you're
not
go
out
in
front
of
my
boy.
You
know
I
open
the
door,
I
can't
for
45
years,
I,
never
see
the
corner
of
Bougainville
and
21st.
Street
I
can't
see
it
right.
This
is
now.
K
This
is
because
I
went
in
there
and
you
know
done
I'm
sorry,
you
know,
but
I
got
upset
and
I
went
ahead
and
cut
about
three
feet
off
over
their
property
and
the
grass
was
about
waist-high.
Maybe
she
have
problems
they
can't
afford
to
have
somebody
cut
the
grass
I'm
maintaining
it?
You
know
people
could
say
you.
J
A
D
Name
is
Captain
James.
My
address
is
Finn
409
North
21st
Street,
my
had
been
sworn
in.
I've
lived
in
the
house
next
door
to
her
since
1959.
When
my
parents
purchased
the
house,
it's
a
single-family
house
I,
don't
think
they
should
be
permitted
to
build
any
of
any
enclosures
that
closer
to
my
property
line.
I
know
they
have
only
the
flat
roof
extended
out
to
approximately
one
foot
and
the
properties
I
know
which
they
did
without
a
permit
when
they
pathetic.
When
you,
even
with
the
roof
of
the
roof,
wasn't
an
original
roof.
D
They
already
keep
attaching
things
to
my
fence,
causing
my
fence
to
pull
and
say
one
of
their
tenants
has
tried
to
put
their
wash
on
my
fence
to
let
it
dry.
This
area
is
zoned
a
one-family
home,
but
they
have
closed
in
their
carport
added
it
on
to
it
without
a
permit
and
they
rent
it
out.
They
haven't
rented
continuously
all
year
round.
D
They
park
in
front
of
my
house,
my
flower
bed,
that
they
was
showing
that
had
hedge
up
there
to
his
well-trimmed
I,
come
home
one
day
and
they
hired
someone
to
come
and
tear
that
out
my
hedge
completely
out
about
10
to
20
feet
over
into
my
yard.
They
were
pulling
all
of
my
flowers
in
that
Florida.
They
took
every
one
of
them
out
now,
I,
don't
know,
then
they've
already
poured
cement
without
a
permit
from
their
driveway
over
to
approximate
foot
from
the
property
line.
A
D
D
Doris
Jones
10
409,
North,
21st
Street,
yes,
I've
been
sworn
okay,
it's
true
they're
runners.
They
come
and
go
all
times
of
the
night.
Anybody
it
sleeps
those
two
in
bedrooms
that
they're
constantly
awakened
by
the
going
coming
and
going
all
the
time
there
are
renters
they
don't
park
in
front
of
their
house
like
they
should
or
in
the
driveway.
They
come
over
and
park
in
front
of
our
house.
So
they're
coming
and
going
in
front
of
our
house
all
night
long
all
day
long.
D
D
They
don't
care
and
she
says
it's
because
she
can't
breathe
or
or
she
can't
get
through
there
to
get
in
the
backyard
with
the
fence,
with
her
build
up
when
it's
build
up
that
way,
she
couldn't
get
in
her
backyard
anyway
and
she
can't
go
through
our
backyard
to
get
to
it
and
as
far
as
the
chickens
and
the
dogs,
it's
not
even
our
chickens
and
our
dogs.
It's
the
neighbors.
D
B
The
application
you
submitted
for
variance
there
are
five
hardship
criteria
that
we
are
bound
to
make.
Our
judgment
based
upon
I
did
not
hear
any
of
those
address
there
in
relation
to
the
nature
of
the
property
and
your
structure
on
the
property,
they
don't
typically
apply
to
things
occurring
on
neighbors
properties,
although
they
potentially
could
all
we
can
base
our
decision
on
as
those
five
criteria
I
did
not
hear
those
address.
B
K
K
B
K
I
K
A
A
L
C
Your
neighbors
in
a
negative
way
your
neighbors
have
said
it
does,
but
but
other
criteria
are
that,
as
mr.
pastor
said,
the
the
reason
why,
based
upon
this
property,
it
needs
to
be
in
this
location.
So
the
question
that
we're
asking
is,
if
you
want
a
place
to
grill
and
you
want
a
place-
that's
screened
in
is
there
any
reason
you
couldn't
put
that
place
in
the
backyard
other
than
you
had
some
concrete,
and
you
thought
this:
okay.
K
C
The
backyard
you
have
a
shed
in
the
back
god.
K
How
do
you
think
of
it?
Yeah
we
go
had
I
would
have
save
all
these
problems,
but
the
thing
is
I
when
I
go
outside
I
go
to
the
backyard
you
know
or
we
do
have
a
barbecue
in
the
backyard
when
it
starts
getting
dark.
But
you
know
there's
nothing
but
mosquitoes
and
you
know
I,
don't
know
I
when
the
the
co
valuation
guy
came,
I
told
him
and
he
said
well,
you
know
I
can
go
back
there.
K
A
D
E
E
K
E
K
K
K
K
K
A
K
I
I,
really,
you
know
said
you
know
that
they
have
come
here
lying
at
least
you
know,
I,
try,
I,
try
to
be
truthful
and
honest.
I
did
do
bad.
You
know,
I
went
either,
not
God
not
15-20
feet
like
this
I
3
feet
right
by
right
up
to
the
way,
she's
got
that
pond
and
I.
You
know:
I
went
ahead
and
I
had
this
guy
are
paid
in
$120
to
you
know.
K
K
K
K
You
know
she
complained,
she
had
the
policeman
come
out
there
and
he
told
her.
You
know
not
to
call
him
for
that,
because
she
she
called
them
to
call
the
police
and
complain.
I,
don't
know
Jimmy,
she
made
it.
She
that's
when
she
made
the
complain
with
that.
You
know
because
I
cut
yeah,
they
were
it
wasn't
even
flowers,
you
know,
I
mean
they
just
if
you
go
through
the
front
of
the
house.
It's
all
you
see
with
the
work.
I
A
B
Move
that
variance
request
for
case
vrb
1994
for
the
property
located
at
105
a1
North
21st
Street
for
reduction
in
the
side
yard
from
7
feet
to
1
feet
with
encroachment
of
Ethan
gutters.
We
denied,
due
to
the
failure
of
the
petitioner
to
meet
his
burden
of
proof
and
provide
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
Ana,
necessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
as
set
forth
in
Section
27
80
of
the
city
code.
A
C
Want
to
briefly
say,
I
agree
with
the
motion
and
it
should
be
denied
because
it
does
not
meet
the
hardship
criteria
when,
when
it's
unfortunate
that
we
have
neighbors
who
are
having
challenges
and
to
the
extent
that
there
are
violations
of
various
codes
or
things
like
that
on
city
property,
they
can
be
reported.
If
there
are
problems
with
water
retention
on
a
property.
Those
things
can
be
dealt
with
through
the
city.
C
A
K
A
F
I
F
F
Reduce
the
building
separation
from
5
feet,
2
0
feet
applicant,
is
seeking
to
vest
the
existing
conditions
along
the
rear
and
side
yards,
which
was
an
addition
built
by
the
current
property
owner.
The
property
is
owned,
Aris
50
and
the
Hillsborough
County
property
appraiser
information
is
in
the
record
for
your
review
right
away.
Transportation
has
found
it
consistent
transportation
is
found
and
consistent
with
conditions.
Zoning
has
found
it
inconsistent.
I
F
F
F
Okay,
again
the
property
appraiser
record,
or
your
review
basically
says
when
their
property
was
built
and
any
when
the
property
was
purchased
and
any
work
thereafter
is
shown,
variance,
review
plan
property
is
outlined
here
in
red.
It
is
bordered
by
highest
tree
and
MacDill
north
MacDill.
The
surrounding
property,
is
zoned.
F
F
Site
plan
is
again
MacDill
Avenue
is
here.
North
Medill
Hyatt
is
here:
okay,
yeah
business
team
structure.
How's
the
front
of
the
house
is
here
on
makann
north
MacDill,
even
though
the
front
yard
is
here
on
high
end
for
zoning
code,
side
yard
is
here
on
north
MacDill.
For
zoning
code,
rear
yard
is
here
side
yard
for
the
dot
reduction
is
here.
F
F
They
are
here
which
support
the
roof
of
the
carport
and
by
measuring,
and
he
dated
the
plan
and
updated
the
plan.
For
me,
the
other
day
they
measure
one
and
a
half
feet
for
the
property
line.
So
that's
what
we're
asking
for
that
side
yard
to
be
actually
one
and
a
half
feet
versus
zero
feet.
It
would
also
capture.
What's
here,
the
EFD
separation
has
to
do
with
these
structures
back
here.
F
F
A
M
F
F
F
M
F
M
M
N
G
I
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
D
N
This
is
a
picture
of
the
side
of
the
house,
which
is
I,
believe
high
off
the
street.
There's
not
no
regulations
made
to
it,
so
he
wants
to
know
if
there's
anything
that
we
can
make
better
and
shutter.
Let
me
lick
I'm
sorry
get
apartment
to
stay
like
that,
so
you
just
want
to
see.
There's
anything
we
can
do
about
it.
M
M
M
G
Mr.
chairman
I
on
that
on
that
point,
I
would
just
ask
that,
to
the
extent
that
it's
different
that
the
applicant
at
this
time,
if
we
have
a
site
plan
staff,
has
a
site
plan
that
the
applicant
could
write
those
dimensions
on
to
the
site
plan.
Then
that
be
entered
in
to
the
record
as
the
one
that
the
board
relies
on
in
its
decision.
Okay,.
N
M
A
B
B
I
M
B
B
F
F
High
across
here,
so
the
zoning
law,
the
way
is
set
up
is
the
smallest
dimension
facing
the
street
is
the
front
yard
by
zoning
definition.
This
is
a
corner
yard
because
it
faces
the
street
and
it's
the
side
or
we
call
it
a
corner
yard.
The
rear
yard
is
here
opposite
the
zoning
front
yard.
This
is
the
side
yard.
I
I
A
I
A
N
N
A
M
D
I
M
A
I
A
N
A
F
A
N
A
A
A
M
I
A
M
I
I
M
M
N
N
A
N
I
I
C
N
C
N
C
I
C
C
I
C
I
I
I
C
I
C
I
Never
been
yeah
eight
nine
years
old,
okay,.
I
C
M
F
A
A
N
I
I
I
A
D
D
N
D
A
I
A
H
A
B
I
I
I
N
C
D
C
C
If,
let's
say
you
asked
for
this
before
permits,
what
would
what
would
we
agree
to
do
and
the
question
is:
would
we
agree
to
allow
you
to
build
this
close
to
the
property
line,
and
if
we
would,
you
have
to
explain
to
us
why
that
why
we
should
do
that
based
upon
the
criteria?
That's
in
the
application.
It
speaks
about
hardship
and
when
we
say
hardship
from
a
legal
standpoint,
we
don't
mean
it
it.
C
N
Pile
of
it's
different
measurements,
but
when
you,
the
one
is
saying,
is
that
he
built
it
in
the
back
because
he
don't
want
it
like.
Go
all
the
people,
because
you
stand
like
in
front
of
our
house
like
it's,
the
big
bag,
the
big
Magnum
area
and
the
one-bite
higher.
So
you
don't
want
to.
You
know,
build
there,
because
that
would
bother.
C
B
So
the
burden
on
this
board
is
that
it's
not
just
about
this
house.
If,
if
we
were
to
approve
a
variance
for
this
house,
that
means
that,
for
the
rest
of
time,
this
property,
whoever
owns
this
property
in
the
future,
could
build
to
those
lines,
some
other
building
so
to
say
to
put
it
closer
to
the
neighbors,
because
it's
less
burdensome
than
the
road,
it's
more
burdensome
to
those
neighbors,
and
by
approving
this
encroachment
closer
to
the
neighbors
houses,
we
would
be
approving
it
for
all
future
owners.
B
B
Which
is
why
it's
a
much
bigger
issue,
because
it's
for
its
for
a
long
term
commitment
and
it
will
affect
all
future
neighbors
that
may
not
live
there
today,
but
may
live
there
in
the
future,
and
I
can
see
from
this
photo.
That's
on
the
board
right
now
that
the
homes
are
the
roof
lines
are
very
close
together.
The
reason
for
setbacks
is
to
prevent
the
spread
of
fire
in
the
event
that
one
of
these
houses
catches
fire.
The
separation.
N
N
M
N
N
B
Purpose
is
that
setbacks
are
there
for
everybody's
safety
of
neighborhoods,
and
that's
how
you
know
in
the
old
days
neighborhoods
old
towns
would
burn
down.
So
that's
the
purpose
of
the
setbacks,
and
so
by
approving
this
we
would
be
approving
with
that
land
for
all
the
years
to
come,
that
anybody
could
build
to
this
line.
Regardless
of
what
the
neighbors
say
and
that's
why?
It's
a
that's.
Why
there's
a
burden
of
the
five
criteria
that
we're
asking
to
see
if
there's
a
reason
that
this
property
requires
that
addition
to
be
in
that
location?
B
It
appears
from
this
site
plan
that
this
addition
could
have
been
done
on
the
MacDill
side
within
the
setbacks.
It
appears
that
way,
but
we
haven't
heard
anything
about
that
or
why
it
has
to
be
here.
I
understand
you
said,
because
it's
less
burdensome
to
put
it
in
those
locations,
but
I
would
say
it's
probably
more
burdensome
to
the
two
properties
that
it
is
now
closer
to.
M
M
M
A
I
I
N
M
A
N
I
N
A
I
N
N
Our
party
used
to
kind
of
have
to
come
over
here
and
oh
this
issue,
but,
like
I
said,
we
were
not
aware
and
I
understand,
so
he
just
has
come
to
see.
If
there's
any
way
we
can
make
this.
You
know
a
little
bit
better
and
you
guys
can
help
us
to
try
to
accommodate
by
your
guidelines
and
things
like
that.
N
A
E
E
E
A
G
E
E
Made
at
the
various
requests
for
case
VRB
19106
for
the
property
located
at
five
106
north
MacDill
avenue
for
a
reduction
in
the
building
separation
from
five
to
zero
for
an
accessory
accessory
structure.
Section
27,
156
and
27
to
90
be
denied
due
to
the
failure
of
the
petitioner
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof
to
provide
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public.
Hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
are
practically
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
Section
27.
A
I
I
I
N
I
M
B
Our
criteria,
we
just
haven't-
heard
any
hardship
criteria.
We
heard
hardships
of
family
growth
and
wanting
to
expand
the
house.
We
have
not
heard
any
hardships
in
relation
to
the
property
and
I
don't
feel
like.
We
have
anything
that
justifies
us
to
approve
a
violation
of
this
magnitude
with
such
little
backing
of
the
hardship
we're
supposed
to
now.
City
Council
might
be
more
open
to
please
of
other
types
of
hardship,
but
that
is
not
our
latitude
to
do
so.
A
A
We
heard
very
little
testimony
as
to
how
this
thing
was
constructed
and
there's
maybe
a
high
likelihood
that
once
he
understands
what
he's
got
to
do,
to
bring
it
up
to
current
code
might
result
and
some
substantial
changes
anyway,
but
our
job
is
to
give
the
setback
that
goes
with
the
land
forever
and
I
agree
with
you.
We
haven't
heard
guardship
criteria
met,
especially
in
an
RS
50
location,
on
what
appears
to
be
two
or
three
lot
size
and,
unfortunately,
the
decisions
that
the
applicant
made
to
move
forward
without
a
permit
were
his
own
doing.
A
G
A
I
F
I
I
D
F
Property
is
zoned
RS
50
and
the
Hillsborough
County
property.
Appraiser
information
is
included
in
the
record
for
your
review
and
staff
right
away
transportation.
Natural
resources
have
found
it
consistent.
Zoning
has
got
an
inconsistent
staff
requires
the
expired
permits
to
be
reopened
before
the
addition
in
the
rear
and
obtain
all
inspections
and
certificate
of
occupancy.
F
F
I
F
I
I
B
F
A
J
I
I
O
I
A
A
I
I
I
I
O
I
I
C
I
O
I
I
I
B
I
I
I
B
O
I
B
I'm
trying
to
determine
is
if
there
was
a
proved
plan
for
this
project
at
some
point,
whether
or
not
it
finished
that
would
indicate
that
the
city
approved
this
construction
at
some
point
and
while
the
permit
isn't
closed
out
and
that's
not
a
final
action,
it
does
indicate
to
us
that
she
had
the
right
to
start
that
construction
and
could
be
something
that's
pertinent
to
us.
But
what
I'm
not
getting
from
my
question
is
whether
or
not
this
building
that
was
built
matches
the
plan
that
was
originally
permitted
and.
O
I
O
A
A
A
I
F
A
F
F
I
O
O
O
A
A
O
I
O
O
A
I
I
G
Just
want
to
clarify
for
you
that,
when
in
your
translation
were
what
we
need
you
to
do
is
to
translate
his
verbatim
as
best
you
can.
Okay,
what
is
being
said
by
the
board
to
the
applicant
verbatim
as
best
you
can
and
then
what
she
says
translated
back
verbatim
to
us
as
best
you
can
don't
paraphrase
or
try
to
explain
it
for
her,
but
just
verbatim
as
best
as
best
you.
A
D
D
A
A
I
D
If
it
is
necessary
to
have
this
room
in
the
same
shape,
it
doesn't
look
like
there's
my
two:
we
can
figure
it
so
that
it
would
fit
within
the
boundaries
here.
So
perhaps
that's
something
that
we
should
consider
new
ingredients
in
this
variant
and
and
also
you
know
some
of
the
discussion
and
the
previous
variance
has
involved.
I
guess
the
the
extent
to
which
we
requested
variants,
I
guess
didn't
comply
with
the
current
zoning
code
and
I.
Don't
feel
that
this
one
is
quite
as
non-conforming
as
some
of
the
other.
You
know
this
evening.
A
Okay,
well,
we
have
to
base
our
decision
solely
on
each
case
separately,
so
we
know
because
of
whatever
was
decided,
then
not
just
tonight's
cases,
but
even
previous
cases
that
you
may
have
knowledge
ever
been
involved
in.
We
have
to
make
our
decisions
based
on
the
testimony
that
was
given
tonight,
the
applicant
estate
addthis.
She
can
move
the
above-ground
pool,
so
that
could
be
bifurcated
if
the
board
were
so
inclined.
I
I
didn't
hear
hardly
any
good
testimony
on
the
hardships.
A
A
However,
I
somewhat
agree
with
the
fact
that,
because
it
is
a
an
85
foot,
wide
home
site
or
a
lot,
that
the
encroachment
is
not
very
egregious
compared
to
the
size
of
things.
However,
I
think
I
understood
the
applicant
to
say
that
she
wants
to
abide
by
the
laws
and
we
tried
to
communicate
to
her
that
that
would
require
she
take
approximately
ten
feet
off
of
this
addition
and
again.
G
I
G
I
G
G
I
G
I
G
C
I
I
C
O
O
O
A
D
C
E
I
A
I
A
I
A
G
D
D
A
E
Reduction
in
the
rear
yard
setback
from
twenty
to
ten
to
vest,
in
addition
to
the
main
structure
based
upon
the
applicant
presented
top
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
of
practical
difficulty
when
senator
by
part
shipping
to
recess
it
was
an
official
2011
of
the
city
code
specified
that,
due
to
her
son's
health
issues,
she
need
additional
place
for
for
this.
She
is
a
need
for
the
additional
properties
in
laws.
D
A
E
A
D
A
A
I
G
A
G
D
D
B
Request
for
Casey
BRB
19
108
for
the
property
located
at
30305
west
Abdulla
Street
for
a
reduction
in
the
rear
yard
from
20
feet
to
10
feet
for
the
best
thing
of
existing
conditions,
with
encroachment
of
using
others
be
denied
due
to
the
failure
of
petitioner
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof
to
provide
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
had
the
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth.
Section
27a
T
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
no.
I
D
A
A
G
G
I
I
I
A
F
The
code
section
in
question
tonight
is
27
156
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
a
side
yard
setback
from
7
feet
to
1
feet,
introduced
to
the
rear
yard,
setback
from
20
feet
to
4
foot
6
inches
and
reduce
the
evening
of
separation
from
5
feet
to
0
feet.
Applicant
is
seeking
to
best
existing
condition
of
primary
and
accessory
structure
connected
by
route.
Petitions
property
is
owned,
RS
50
and
the
health
of
our
county
property.
Appraiser
information
is
included
in
the
record
for
review
right
away
transportation
and
not
to
recess.
F
F
F
F
F
J
A
F
J
Had
it
said
in
my
problem
and
I
called
a
handyman
that
did
it
worked
for
me
two
three
years
ago
he
had
on
insurance,
he
had
a
license.
His
name
is
Danny
low
Venga
when
I
called
him
in
I
said
everything
is
in
order.
You
say
in
order,
so
the
I
asked
him
do
I
take
get
the
permit
or
you
get
the
permit.
He
said,
no,
you
don't
need
a
permit
because
you
had
an
in
the
chair,
then.
J
We'll
leave
I
had
an
existing
rule
since
2007
and
hiding
in
addition
to
the
room
winning
it
was
somebody
else
to
did
it.
My
friend,
Lee
I
asked
him.
This
is
hanging
over
too
much,
so
he
could
he
caught
up
on
food.
He
said
when
we
finished
then
I
do
it
all
so
is
pending
for
him
to
finish
it.
When
I
call
him
back
to
see
this,
he
said:
wait
till
you
go
to
the
city
to
see
if
you
finish
it,
but
we
have
to
turn
down.
J
J
A
A
A
J
Years
old,
a
lot
of
energy
but
I
had
to
get
another
job
to
be
able
to
pay
for
the
loan
that
I
took
with
Home
Depot
and
with
a
credit
card,
and
that
is
tremendous
in
the
which
I
will
continue
on
to
I
paid
off
the
handyman
I
called
him
and
I
said
listen
inspector
was
here,
you
need
to
come
over
and
follow
through
with
me.
He
used
very
nasty
words,
filthy
language
and
hang
up
on
me.
J
L
J
B
F
B
O
B
B
A
F
J
F
A
J
J
J
C
Think
it's
important
to
make
one
comment
on
the
front
which
I
said
before,
which
is
so
the
applicant
hears
it
that
there
are
potential
legal
remedies
that
you
could
consider
and
I
would
recommend
you
talk
to
a
lawyer.
You
might
be
able
to
help
you
in
in
some
discussions
with
this
handyman
who
told
you
one
thing
took
your
money
to
do
something
and
left
you
in
this
position.
J
L
L
C
But
I'm
just
saying
in
terms
of
your
remedies,
it's
something
you
should
consider
looking
forward.
I
know:
Mr
Brown
is
a
contractor
and
he
sees
sometimes
other
contractors
who
might
not
act
in
their
clients,
best
interests
and
it's
something
to
consider.
I,
don't
have
any
comments
about
the
edge
tool.
I
just
thought
that
was
important
things.
Okay,.
B
Out
I
think
Mr,
curry
helped
clarify
is
if,
if
we
didn't
have
this
massive
roof
structure,
then
we'd
be
talking
about
inches,
of
variance
for
building
separation
and
inches
of
site
setback
versus
20
feet
to
four
and
a
half
feet
and
seven
feet
to
one
foot.
But
we
can't
solve
that
here,
because
you'd
have
to
read
notice
for
that
and
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
reno
tiss
and
substantially
change
it
to
continue
what
you
can
write.
C
Could
we
approve
a
separation,
a
reduction
in
separation,
because
she's
noticed
for
five
to
zero
in
separation?
So
if
we
approved
a
reduction
of
less
than
that
on
the
separation
alone?
Yeah,
then,
after
that,
after
that
issue
is
dealt
with,
she
could
remedy
the
remainder
of
this
situation
with
roof
issues
and
essentially
come
into
compliance.
We
might
even
approve
a
minor,
a
lesser
side
reduction
as
well
to
address
this
corner
of
the
north
part.
B
B
C
B
A
A
B
For
has
been
noticed,
nobody
came
to
disputed.
What
we're
talking
about
is
the
potential
for
doing
something
that
has
less
than
what
was
notice
for
and
doesn't
change
the
footprint
of
any
building
that
exists
today.
So
my
question
is:
how
can
we
help
her
get
there
through
our
procedure?
That
does
not
require
her
to
pay
four
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
and
wait
another
three
or
four
months,
I'll
open
that
up
to
counsel
I.
Think
Brett's
proposed
an
idea
that
could
work.
B
C
G
Am
and
that
the
discussion
is
all
I,
don't
have
any
issues
that
mr.
patch
store
has
as
you're,
correct
and
you're
and
what
you
said
the
own,
the
only
thing
I
would
add,
is
that
I
don't
know
that
we've
had
a
whole
lot
of
testimony
tonight
about
the
feasibility
of
actually
removing
the
roof,
and
the
board
is
sort
of
the
discussion
that
you're
having
is
is
contingent
on
that
actually
being
a
feasible
possibility.
G
A
A
A
Be
a
little
harder,
but
if
that's
doable
you
can
certainly
move
the
pose
or
edit
the
site
plan
indicates:
are
12
inches
in
another
1
foot
5
inches.
If
2
foot
5
is
the
magic
number
a
whole
lot
easier
and
she
could
remove
it
all
because
of
the
reasons
that
you
just
mentioned.
Construction,
don't
know
if
the
board
is
I'd
like
to
hear
from
other
board
members,
if
that's
something
that
they
would.
D
G
Mean
it's
it's
a
good
question
and
I.
Don't
know
the
answer
to
that,
and
that
may
be
something
else
to
to
clarify
to
make
sure
that
everyone
understands
that
once
the
roof
is
removed,
it
creates
a
new
setback
to
be
applied
and
I
don't
know
if
that,
if
the
reduction
of
that
would
be
less
or
not,
and
it
would
be
something
I
would
need
to
research
to
have
a
firm
answer
on
it's.
A
J
A
J
A
Based
on
everything,
you
just
heard
come
back
with
another
plan
or
idea
that
you
think
we
can
approve
where
it
can't
guarantee
anything
tonight.
Based
on
what
you
heard.
But
there
was
a
general
discussion
that
there
could
be
some
some
something
in
between
what
you
asked
for
tonight
and
whatever
you're
gonna
come
back
and
ask
for
that's
less
of
a
setback
reduction
and
it
entails.
J
J
J
J
E
E
E
J
A
D
D
C
D
F
Code
section
of
question:
9
is
27
290.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
3
feet
to
1
point
6
feet
and
reduce
the
west
side
yard
setback
from
3
feet
to
6
inches
due
to
existing
conditions
of
accessory
structure
applicant
is
seeking
to
vest
existing
conditions
of
accessory
structure.
The
property
has
earned
RS
50
and
the
Hillsborough
County
property.
Appraiser
information
is
included
for
your
reference.
We
do
also
have
some
other
information
that
is
included
in
your
packet.
F
F
F
F
F
F
L
L
L
This
project
started
some
time
ago
and
I'm
gonna
go
through
the
property
history
records
first
and
just
give
you
a
basic
overview.
The
the
property
was
originally
developed
in
1967
and
it
included
and
I've
looked
for
the
designation
for
the
for
the
accessory
structure
that
was
enclosed
and
portion
of
it
was
open.
L
The
property
was
cited
by
code
enforcement
for
having
an
illegal
accessory
structure,
and
they
assumed
at
that
time
that
it
was
encroaching
over
into
the
neighbor's
property
and
I
can
tell
you
that
it
we
had
a
survey
done
and
an
after
examination
of
the
survey.
It
is
clear
that
the
the
wall
that
acts
as
a
as
a
rear
wall
to
the
accessory
structure
and
the
roof
overhang
we're
not
encroaching
onto
the
property
adjacent
to
it.
I've
outlined
here
in
the
yellow,
the
accessory
wall.
L
That
extends
all
the
way
down
to
the
property
line
in
the
front,
and
then
this
wall
becomes
the
decide,
the
rear
wall
of
the
accessory
structure
and
the
addition
that
was
made
to
the
front
side
and
I'm
going
to
go
through
the
dimensions
of
that.
Basically,
they
had
the
roof
rebuilt
and
the
rear
setback
was
not
changed,
so
the
rear
setback
was
an
existing
condition
and
the
side
setback
for
the
accessory
structure
was
existing
up
to
about
six
or
seven
feet.
From
from
where
you
see
it,
you
see
that
covered
concrete
here.
L
L
This
is
a
diagram
that
shows
you
the
roof
overhang
and
when,
when
he
was
told
that
his
roof
was
overhanging
onto
this
adjacent
property,
he
actually
cut
off
a
section
of
the
roof
overhang
here,
so
that
now
lines
up
directly
with
the
wall.
Even
though
his
property
line
is
six
inches
over
on
the
other
side
of
the
wall,
and
you
can
see
what
he
had
previously
was
was
a
balanced
group
line.
L
L
So
what
what
was
added
and
I
have
diagrams,
showing
the
portion
that
was
added
versus
a
portion
that
was
was
not
that
was
existing,
so
the
existing
shed
was
completely
enclosed
and
up
to
about
six
or
seven
feet
here
was
was
previously
constructed
in
1967,
and
then
this
portion
down
here
with
what
was
added
and
he
used
the
existing
wall
as
the
back
of
this
area.
The
this
is
open
on
this
side
and
it's
open
on
this
side
and
I'll
show
you
pictures
of
that.
L
L
A
L
We
go
zoom
back
out
of
that
right.
This
mainspring
wall
was
used
as
the
back
wall
of
the
it
was
an
open
area,
and
then
this
portion
from
the
top
of
the
wall
to
the
bottom
of
this
area,
where
the
roof
was
added,
is
supporting
that
lowland.
It
was
all
built
in
the
same
manner.
It's
supported
correctly.
It's
it's
has
a
correct
foundation
and
all
of
the
supporting
members
that
were
required.
L
L
L
This
shows
you,
this
red
line
is
an
approximation
of
where
the
property
line
is,
and
it
shows
you
where
the
the
roof
was
cut
off
out.
He
only
did
that
because
he
was
told
that
his
roof
extended
on
the
other
people's
property
and,
as
it
turned
out
when
we
had
the
survey
done,
it
didn't,
did
not
impact
the
other
property
and
did
not
encroach
on
them
at
all,
but
we
went
through
that
exercise.
L
This
is
the
section
that
we're
talking
about
where
the
the
red
line
is
or
the
approximation
of
which
portion
was
added,
and
this
is
a
view
looking
to
the
to
the
west.
This
column
used
to
be
would
not
that
exact
column,
but
a
column
used
to
be
right
about
where
that
red
line
is,
and
then
this
is
an
open
view
of
of
the
area.
This
existed
all
of
this
roof
and
this
area
over
here
existed
since
1967.
This
was
added
in
2018
now
mr.
L
Ruiz
is
a
practicing
dentist
and
his
dentists
clientele
is
mostly
older,
spanish-speaking
individuals
and
he
underwent
surgery
for
repairing
a
rotor
cuff
problem
and
was
not
able
to
practice
his
dentistry
and
was
told
that
he
had
to
engage
in
regular
and
free
and
frequent
rehabilitation.
And
so
that
was
the
place
where,
where
he
has
an
open
rehabilitation
area
with
exercise
equipment,
that's
specific
to
rehabbing.
His
rotor,
cuff
I
have
two
letters.
One
letter
is
already
in
your
package:
October
8
from
dr.
L
Rodriguez,
indicating
that
he's
a
68
year
old,
male
who's,
a
patient
in
his
office
for
the
last
12
years
and
as
you're
aware,
dr.
Ruiz
is
a
dentist
who
underwent
right
shoulder
surgery
requiring
long-term
rehabilitation
consisting
of
physical
therapy
and
occupational
therapy
in
order
to
maintain
full
function
of
his
extreme
and
fully
dexterity
of
his
hand.
These
functions
are
crucial
and
performing
his
profession,
and
the
patient
has
been
made
aware
that
it's
imperative
for
him
to
continue
the
rehabilitation
and
wishes
to
continue
to
perform
as
profession
in
years
to
come.
L
L
We
can
answer
that
question
if
they
ask
us
anyway.
His
hardship
is
that
he
has
to
undergo
a
regular
rehabilitation.
He
used
the
existing
wall,
he
didn't
build
a
new
wall,
he
did
attach
it
to
a
roof
and
he
did
add
approximately
about
a
6
by
12
foot
area
to
what
was
previously
already
existing
in
that
in
that
area.
So
we're
respectfully
requesting
an
approval.
We
believe
the
hardship
was
not
created
by
him.
He
has
a
medical
problem.
L
His
daughter
has
a
law
office
immediately
adjacent
to
it
and
she
has
to
maintain
some
watchful
care
over
him
and
that
process
the
code
we
we
have
not
impacted
anybody
adversely
in
this
respect
and
the
comprehensive
plan
doesn't
speak
to
punishing
someone
who
has
a
medical
condition
that
requires
additional
treatment.
He
used
the
existing
development
and
the
existing
structures.
He
didn't
build
them
new,
he
simply
added
on
to
them,
and
the
percentage
of
the
add-on
was
I'd
say
it
was
less
than
20%.
Okay,.
A
C
Mr.
Phil
mr.
McLean
the
photographs
that
you
showed
the
existing
looked
pretty
new
you're
saying,
but
for
the
the
yeah
yeah,
that's
a
great
shot,
that's
exactly
what
I'm
talking
about.
So
the
back
portion
of
this
shed
looks
pretty
new
you're,
saying
everything,
but
for
the
extension
of
the
roof
from
that
look
red
line
forward
that
all
existed
prior
and
it
was
just
just
in
addition,
this
way,
no,
no
new
construction,
no.
L
A
L
L
L
L
D
L
Didn't
affect
it
wasn't
related
to
the
accessory
structure.
I
was
looking
for
that.
I
was
hoping
that
maybe
it
was,
it
was
included
in
that,
but
it
wasn't,
but
the
city,
the
city
staff,
did
comment
in
there
that
they
had
no
objection
and
it
was
minimal.
That's
in
your
report,
I
found
that,
on
one
of
the
other
pages.
A
H
H
A
D
L
B
L
F
F
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
construct
an
enclosed
elevator
hoist
way
on
the
side
of
the
house.
The
property
is
owned,
RS
100
and
the
property
appraiser's
information
is
included
for
your
information
right
away.
Stormwater.
Sorry,
right
away
that
it
consistent
stormwater
found
an
inconsistent,
but
we
feel
that
that
ruling
really
has
to
be
at
the
other
side
of
the
house
and
not
the
side
of
the
house
where
the
hoistway
is
located.
So
it
may
not
have
any
bearing
on
what
you're.
Looking
at
tonight
transportation
ain't
consistent
with
conditions
and
that's
the
resources
is.