►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 02112020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
In
attendance
this
evening,
our
assistant
city
attorney,
Kate
Wells
and
from
land
development
we
have
Roberta
Mead,
curry
and
from
natural
resources,
Brian
Knox
and
Brett
Burks,
and
from
transportation,
Jonathan
Scott
I'll
take
just
a
few
minutes
to
review
tonight's
procedures.
Cases
will
be
called
in
the
order
that
they
appear
on
the
agenda
when
your
case
number
and
the
applicants
name
are
called,
please
stand
in
either
aisle
to
the
side
of
the
room.
To
acknowledge
that
you
are
here,
staff
will
then
give
a
brief
introduction
to
the
board
of
each
application.
A
When
you
approach
the
podium,
please
speak
into
the
microphone
and
state
your
name
address
and
if
you've
been
sworn
in,
you'll
hear
me
say
this
9
times
tonight,
the
applicant
and/or,
their
agent
will
have
ten
minutes
to
give
testimony
present
witnesses
and
documentation
as
a
part
of
their
presentation.
This
is
your
time
to
present
all
of
your
evidence.
Anyone
any
audience
wishing
to
speak
and
support
up
or
in
opposition
to
the
application
will
then
have
three
minutes
each
after
that.
The
board
may
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
regarding
the
application.
A
Finally,
the
applicant
will
have
an
additional
five
minutes
for
a
rebuttal
if
needed,
the
time
periods.
This
statement
will
be
kept
by
the
chair.
Any
information
such
as
pictures
of
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted
as
a
part
of
your
petition,
and
you
intend
to
present
at
this
hearing
for
consideration
and
supported
your
petition-
must
be
individually
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board
after
acceptance
by
the
board,
but
you
must
submit
the
item
to
staff
for
it
to
be
entered
and
made
a
part
of
the
permanent
record.
A
The
board
bases
its
decision
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
which
has
presented
this
evening
and
which
meets
the
criteria
required
by
the
city's
Code
of
Ordinances.
The
variance
granted
by
the
board
will
be
only
for
what
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
will
be
compliant
with
any
terms
and
conditions
stated
in
the
approval
by
the
board.
You
must
have
four
votes
for
the
variance
to
be
approved
if
an
insufficient
vote
is
obtained,
the
case
will
be
automatically
carried
over
for
consideration
at
the
board's
next
meeting.
A
If
approved,
your
variance
will
expire
two
years
from
today's
date.
All
other
city
codes
will
need
to
be
met
and
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
we
could
have
cases
tonight
where
there
may
only
be
five
or
four
board
members
voting.
So
we'll
remind
you
of
that.
If
that's
the
case
when
your
application
comes
up,
if
your
case
is
continued,
it
will
be
continued
to
either
the
March
10th
or
April
14th
public
hearing
dates.
Are
we
good
on
those
Roberta?
A
E
E
E
A
Okay,
if
you
wish
to
appeal
in
the
variance
review,
Board's
decision
to
City
Council,
you
must
file
a
petition
for
a
review
of
a
board
decision
within
10
business
days
of
the
decision.
If
your
variance
is
granted,
you
will
not
be
able
to
pull
any
permits
until
after
the
10-day
appeal
period
has
passed.
Your
cooperation
will
ensure
that
this
meeting
runs
smoothly
and
will
be
greatly
appreciated
before
we
begin
the
first
case,
is
there
any
business
regarding
the
agenda
that
staff
would
like
to
address
your
good?
Ok,
thank
you.
F
Mr.
chairman,
at
this
time,
I
would
like
to
ask
the
members
of
the
board
if
they've
had
any
ex
parte
communications
with
anyone
that
will
be
appearing
before
them
this
evening
or
on
any
matters
that
are
scheduled
this
evening.
If
those
communications
were
verbal,
please
disclose
the
sum
and
substance
of
the
communication
and
and
who
you
spoke
with.
If
in
writing,
if
you
could
submit
a
copy
of
those
written
communications
for
the
record
so
see,
none
I
think
we're
good
to
go.
A
E
F
D
A
A
F
Have
a
quorum
under
your
under
the
V
Arby's
rules
of
procedure.
If
we
only
have
board
for
board
members
available
to
hear
the
case
and
take
action
on
it,
the
applicant
as
of
right
may
request
a
continuance.
If
that
request
is
made,
then
this
item
would
be
continued
for
two
months
out,
so
we'd
be
looking
at
the
April.
A
H
D
A
D
A
D
A
I
D
I
A
D
E
D
E
10
feet
applicant
is
seeking
to
vest
existing
conditions
of
primary
structure
due
to
a
lot
split
and
the
condition
set
forward
in
formal
decision.
Fdn
1987,
the
formal
decision
is
attached
to
your
record
and
your
four-year
review
and
the
conditions
are
outlined.
The
property
is
zoned,
RS
50
and
the
Hillsborough
County
property.
Appraiser
information
is
included
in
your
record.
E
E
E
Again,
the
original
Lots
or
the
original
lot
was
with
this
property.
Here
this
portion
was
split
off
and
the
existing
houses
remaining
there
for
the
lot
front
is
now
here
with
the
existing
house
sitting
here:
corner
yard,
side,
yard,
rear
yard,
oops
so
by
nature
of
the
house
remaining
the
compliance
to
meet
the
front
yard
setback
for
RS
50
was
20
feet
because
they're
keeping
the
existing
house
at
no,
it
doesn't
meet
that
okay.
So
that's
why
they're
here
asking
for
the
variance
have
no
further
information
entered
into
the
record
I'm
here
for
questions,
seeing.
J
20:07
the
others
is
15:13
is
anona
avenue
we
would
like
to
let
you
know.
This
is
no
as
a
result
of
a
code.
Violation
is
as
a
result,
for
a
condition
for
a
formal
decision
to
split
the
lot,
and
we
were
like
the
variance
to
be
granted.
It's
only
well.
We
were
gonna,
be
able
to
build
a
new
single-family
residential
and
increase
the
jobs
on
the
area
and
build
a
new
single-family
house
for
a
new
comment.
I
would
like
to
thank
you.
A
J
J
Hardship
is
we'll
be
able
to
do
if
their
real
setback
it
would.
It
would
be
20-foot,
but
do
it
to
an
existing
part
of
the
house.
That
is
there
and
we
don't
want
to
demolish
stuff
with
a
garage
of
the
house.
So
we
are
here
as
a
result
from
Sony
as
a
condition
to
split
the
lot
to
build
on
the
and
the
edge
I
just
and
a
lot
any
single-family
residential.
A
J
J
The
only
difference
gonna
be
they
reduced
on
the
front
setback
from
twenty
to
ten.
The
lot
is
sunny
rs.50
and
the
setback
is
twenty
on
the
front
to
any
other
back
on
seven
on
the
sides
and
the
lot
that
we
split
that
we
are
trying
to
have
the
intent
to
build
a
single-family
house
is
is
okay.
With
the
zoning
regulations,
we
had
the
we
build,
a
house
gonna
have
the
twenty
in
the
front.
Twenty.
In
the
background,
seven
on
the
side,
okay,.
A
A
A
D
A
D
D
L
I'll
make
a
motion
I
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
BRB
20-7
for
property
located
at
1/5,
1/3
east
Venona
avenue
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan.
A
public
hearing
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
10
feet
with
the
encouragement
for
eaves
and
gutters
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public.
F
H
L
An
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
when
considering
the
fire,
5
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
lot
split
has
changed.
The
positioning
of
the
front
side
Galatz
such
that
the
new
front
lot
front
yard
was
previously
the
side
yard.
The
house
is
remaining
on
the
property
and.
A
L
E
E
E
The
applicant
is
seeking
a
new
business
which
requires
change
of
use,
change
of
intensity
and
change
of
occupancy
applicant
is
in
process
of
remodeling
and
upgrading
existing
building
to
a
new
business
which
requires
permits
project
has
been
cited
under
a
code
enforcement
case,
CMP
20,
3,
5,
9
and
code
enforcement
case
20
148,
the
property
is
zoned,
CI
commercial,
intensive,
the
Hillsborough,
County
property
appraiser's
information
was
contained
in
the
record
for
the
difference
right
away
has
found
that
consistent
transportation
has
found
an
inconsistent
natural
resources.
Consistent
so
mean
inconsistent.
E
E
E
A
M
Thank
you.
Mr.
chair
members,
my
name
is
Jim
Porter
I'm,
an
attorney
with
the
a
Kerman
law
firm
for
our
one
East
Jackson
I
have
been
sworn
I'm
here
tonight
representing
the
applicant.
If
I
could
briefly
go
over
sort
of
orienting,
you
again
to
the
property
and
just
highlighting
a
few
points,
I'm
sort
of
supplementing
what
Roberta's
said.
M
This
is
the
property
here.
It's
a
small
triangular-shaped
piece
of
property,
Platt
Street,
Dakota,
railroad
tracks
and
crosstown.
What
I
wanted
to
highlight,
or
a
couple
of
things.
This
is
a
dead-end
Road
here,
Dakota's
dead-end
that
uses
in
the
immediate
area
of
both
self
storage
across
plat
Street
is
self
storage
and
across
Dakota
self
storage.
This
is
the
use
across
plat.
M
This
is
the
use
across
Dakota.
Why
that's
important
those
are
both
passive
uses
that
have
adequate
parking.
They
don't
generate
parking
like
a
normal
business
with
like
a
restaurant
or
other
types
of
commercial
use.
There
are
two
buildings
on
the
property
this
was
built
in
1944
and
the
other
piece
of
Roberta
mentioned
where
the
auto
body
repair
function
is
being
used
was
built
in
1960.
You
may
recall
for
members
that
this
property
had
was
used
for
a
very
long
time
as
a
furniture,
restoration
business,
and
it
was
there
for
over
50
years.
M
It's
always
been
sort
of
a
commercial
use.
Again.
Decoteau
is
a
dead
end
that
you
can
see
here.
I
want
to
go
through
the
criteria
of
the
variance.
This
is
a
situation
where
we
technically
need
a
variance,
even
though
there
is
parking
on
site,
as
you
can
see,
the
bays
each
of
the
four
bays
each
kind
of
parking
spaces
according
to
your
code,
and
there
are
parking
spaces
in
front
of
this
property.
M
However,
because
those
parking
spaces
back
out
onto
Dakota,
they
back
out
onto
a
right
away,
they
cannot
be
counted
as
parking
spaces
per
your
code,
so
there
are
parking
spaces
on
site.
They
can't
be
counted.
That's
why
we're
asking
for
a
variance
when
ten
required
parking
spaces
down
to
zero
I
worked
with
staff
on
having
some
of
them
count
and
having
a
lesser
variance,
but
the
advice
was
we
can't
count
those
spaces
so
that
we
need
to
seek
the
variance
for
the
entire
parking
spaces.
M
I
will
note
that
there
are
parking
spaces
also
on
Platte
Street
and
again,
if
you
are
familiar
with
that
section
of
Platte,
because
the
businesses
nearby
are
self
storage,
they
aren't
the
restaurant
or
the
bars
further
down
that
way
on
plat.
So
there's
there's
plenty
of
parking,
but
they're
just
not
allowed
to
be
counted,
which
is
why
we're
here
I
want
to
go
through
the
variance
criteria
of
one
by
one.
We
are.
We
do
need
this
variance
because
of
the
unique
hardships
of
the
property.
M
The
property
has
been
a
commercial
piece
of
property
for
over
50
years.
It's
a
strength,
triangular
shape.
Part
of
the
property
was
taken
when
the
sallman
went
in
and
so
they're
left
with
not
a
lot
of
room
to
navigate
there.
The
property
location
given
the
dead-end
street
and
the
Selman
and
the
railroad
track
is
something
that
is
unique
to
this
property.
M
The
configuration
of
the
building
and
the
property
where
existing
the
applicant
didn't
create
the
situation.
Again,
it's
been
a
longtime
business
there
and
it's
CI,
it's
a
very
intensive
commercial
use,
and
this
is
a
good
use
for
it.
There,
the
property
configuration
was
there
and
created
in
part
by
the
taking
for
the
crosstown
and
the
immediate
uses
in
the
area
are
self
storage
and
they
are
adequately
parked
and,
as
I
said
earlier,
they
don't
generate
a
lot
of
parking
needs,
and
so
no
one
is
going
to
be
harmed
in
the
immediate
area.
M
By
allowing
this
variance
to
take
place,
there
won't
be
spillover
parking
into
the
self
storage
areas
and
the
parking
on
site
is
existing,
just
not
allowed
to
be
counted.
The
property
has
been
a
viable
business
for
over
50
years,
and
it's
a
good
use
for
this
particular
piece
of
property.
Given
the
railroad
tracks
down
the
dead-end
and
the
other
uses
their
of
auto
body.
Repair
shop
is
a
good
use.
The
other
piece
of
that,
the
actual
this
use
that's
important
to
recognize
is
because
of
the
nature
of
the
business.
M
Customers
dropped
their
cars
off
and
leave,
and
then
they
they
are
worked
on
and
they
come
back.
So
there's
not
a
need
for
again.
What
for
a
restaurant
use,
for
instance,
where
you're
going
to
have
customers
coming
throughout
the
day,
are
the
hours
of
operation
or
8:00
to
5:00,
so
it
wouldn't
compete
with
any
other
of
the
uses
further
down
on
Howard
again.
Finally,
this
is
a
been
a
viable
business
and
this
is
a
suitable
spot
for
it.
The
property
is
them
commercial
and
has
been
for
very
long
time.
M
The
particular
loop
uses
a
perfect
fit.
The
immediate
area
is
self
stored
without
equipped
parking
again,
there
are
actual
spaces
on
site
that
can't
be
counted
technically,
but
that
you're
not
going
we're
not
going
to
be
creating
a
problem.
We're
not
aware
of
any
opposition
to
this,
and
we
would
respectfully
ask
legal
I
would
like
to
submit
these
photographs
into
the
record
if
that's
acceptable
to
the
board.
M
A
L
M
D
This
business
have
any
agreements
with
the
two
self-storage
businesses
that
they're
allowed
to
use
their
parking
lots
for
their
business.
No,
so
it
orange
self-storage
place
whatever
that
is
besides
one
day.
They
don't
want
you
there.
They
can
just
put
a
fence
around
it
and
you
can't
park.
There
am
I,
correct,
correct.
M
D
M
Not
and
as
long
we're,
not
counting
those
that
was
not
part
of
my
argument
that
we
would
count
those
spaces.
My
only
point
in
referencing
the
Self
Storage
is
they
do
have
they
have
adequate
parking
for
their
use
and
we
would
not
be
impacting
them
by
a
lot
of
this
variance
would
not
be
impacting
it,
but
we're
not
counting
on
using
those
spaces.
As
part
of
our
argument
at
all,
we
don't
tend
to.
A
M
K
M
M
We
had
just
for
your
record,
we
did
this,
but
we
had
intended
to
go
forward
in
December,
so
we
had
noticed
this
earlier.
We
kept
working
with
staff
until
we
got
to
this
point,
so
it's
been
out
there
for
quite
a
while.
Both
posted
and
written
notice,
mailed
notice
and
we
haven't
received
any
sort
of
objections
to
it.
E
Show
when
I
clarify
I
guess
maybe
what
the
applicant
is
trying
to
say.
This
is
where
he
would
have
the
repair,
bays
and
the
drawings
that
were
seen.
He
has
for
repair
base
here
for
garage
door,
openings
so
again
for
each
repair,
Bay
required
two
parking
spaces,
so
he
would
have
one
two
three
four
parking
spaces
in
this
building
on
his
property
boundary.
E
E
And
the
reason
why
you're
asking
for
the
conditions,
this
structure
here
again
for
right,
aways
review,
they
asked
for
that
structure
to
be
removed
along
with
the
fence,
because,
as
you
can
see,
it
isn't
sitting
right
away
and
maybe
in
a
portion
of
the
CSX
railroad
right
away,
okay
and
any
in
anything,
that
else
is
encroaching
into
CSX
right
away.
We
need
that
to
be
removed
at
time
of
permitting
or
show
on
their
plans
at
time
of
her
meeting
they
do
have
to
obtain
permits.
E
They
will
need,
like
we
said
this
change
of
use,
change
of
intensity
set
of
permits
done
and
then
what
we're
seeing
out
there
is.
There
are
some
impacts
into
the
neighborhood
where
we
are
seeing
parking
and
the
right
away
parking
this
txx
right
away
and
parking
on
the
street
if
they're
dropping
off
the
vehicles,
we're
wondering
where
they're
dropping
them
off
at
so
three
and
four
are
kind
of
addressing
what
we're
already
seeing
as
impacts
to
the
neighborhoods
and
parking
in
the
right
away
and
I.
Think
this
one.
E
A
E
E
B
E
A
H
N
H
I
made
some
quiet
little
streets,
I
mean
it's
they're
doing
their
best
to
comply,
I
mean
they
do
have
some
parking
like.
He
was
saying
you
can't
count
them.
So
it's
a
unique
circumstance.
I,
don't
really
see
an
overflow
problem
to
the
neighborhood
nearby
thing,
but
it's
transportation
would
still
have
an
objection
just
for
any
kind
of
parking
waiver
requested
right
and.
G
A
A
H
A
It's
been
testified
that
this
is
an
auto
body.
Repair
kind
of
shot.
I
can
ask
the
applicant
the
question
I'm,
looking
at
the
pictures
of
all
the
cars
that
are
parked
there
and
they
all
look
to
be
fairly
expensive
cars,
whether
they're,
new
or
used,
if
you're,
if
you're,
not
at
the
mic.
Please
don't
comment
if
you
so
mr.
Scott
before
you
didn't
mean
for
you
to
get
away.
A
A
You,
mr.
Porter,
this
board
does
hear
various
requests
for
things
like
fencing
around
auto
shops,
I'm
trying
to
get
my
head
around
the
business
use
and
that's
not
what
we
do
we're
it's
not
up
to
us
to
say
you
can
have
that
business
or
you
can't,
but
I
just
don't
understand
how
someone
drops
off
their
Mercedes
and
it's
parked
in
the
open
like
this.
Can
you
shed
some
light
on
that?
Well,.
M
A
couple
things
one
yeah
and
I
might
have
the
applicant
come
up
and
address
that,
but
I
mean
that
is
sort
of
a
business
issue,
not
a
variance
issue.
This
is
the
conditions
we're
just
presented
to
be
tonight.
I
was
unaware
they
were
going
to
be
on
so
I'm
trying
to
process
them.
I
agree
with
mr.
Paz
you're.
The
issues
with
things
that
are
in
the
right-of-way
are
really
not
before
the
board.
Tonight
we
are
working
through
our
permitting
issues
and
they've
gone
in
for
a
change
of
use.
M
M
Again,
I
would
just
ask
the
board
to
really
focus
on
the
various
requests
for
the
parking
and
we're
happy
to
be
helpful
with
that.
But
it
is
you
know
it's
the
responsibility
applicant
to
make
sure
the
cars
are
safe.
They
put
their
luck
there
right.
Can
you
adjust
the
security
of
how
you
deal
with
that.
H
Coker
I
have
been
sworn
in.
It's
1500,
West
Platte,
even
though
there's
a
lot
of
different
addresses
in
there
we're
not
a
body
shop,
though
we're
repair
shop,
your
repairs
and
most
of
the
cars
are
coming
and
going
quick.
Okay,
some
cars
are
disabled,
that
we
move
around
I.
Think
some
of
those
pictures
are
cars
that
we're
in
the
middle
pull
them
out
park
them
the
ones
at
the
end,
they're
leaving.
C
A
There's
all
kinds
of
testimony
and
documentation
that
you're
in
the
right
away,
regardless
of
even
if
you
had
ten
spots
gotcha,
it
looks
like
you'd
still
be
parking
in
the
right-of-way,
which
you
haven't
a
right
to
do.
I,
don't
think
that's
been
testified
that
you
don't
even
Transportation
acknowledge
the
Platte
Street
has
someone
on
street
parking
but
I'm
just
I'm
curious.
Are
there
cars
left
out
overnight
in
this
operation
in
the
parking
spots,
but
not
in
the
street.
H
A
L
L
M
I
think,
as
the
owner
of
Senator
cooker
said,
the
cars
are
kind
of
there
and
then
they
go
there
and
I'm
not
sure
when
the
photograph
was
taken,
I
submitted
photographs
that
shows
something
different
I
think
it's
just
the
nature
of
the
uses.
The
cars
come
in
and
out
throughout
the
day
and
I.
Don't
know
that
there's
a
typical
day
with
that,
like
that.
B
H
M
E
I
O
H
D
H
M
I'm,
just
very
briefly
board
members,
I
think
the
quite
that
discussion
was
very
good
one
tonight.
This
is
sort
of
a
different
type
of
use.
We
are
going
through
the
permitting
process
we're
trying
to
address
some
of
the
issues
that
staff
raised
in
order
to
get
the
permits
properly
done.
We
need
to
have
the
parking
situation
resolved
because
of
the
situation
of
the
of
the
way
the
property
is
has
developed
over
the
years
with
the
Crosstown,
with
the
one-way
street
and
with
the
shape
of
the
property.
We're
really
limited
as
to
what
we
can
do.
M
The
use
itself
is
a
good
use
for
the
property
part,
no
matter
what
goes
there,
what
kind
of
commercial
use
is
going
there
you're
going
to
have
a
parking
issue
of
all
the
things
that
could
go
there.
This
is
probably
the
best
use
because
of
the
nature
of
the
use
with
cars
being
dropped
off
and
coming
in
and
out.
So
we
will
work
through
the
other
issues
that
are
raised
by
staff
with
the
right-of-way,
and
we
respectfully
ask
for
your
approval.
M
A
I
So
one
of
my
first
thoughts
is
that
if
we
decide
to
approve
this
variance,
I
think
that
it
should
be
on
the
condition
every
model
requires
that
they
comply
with
the
parking
I.
Think
one
of
the
concerns.
If
they
do
a
complete
teardown,
then
they're
not
required
to
have
any
parking
at
all.
Then
you
that
could
potentially
present
a
problem
moving
forward.
I,
don't.
D
F
The
board
were
to
improve
the
variance
that
is
before
you.
It
would
be
tied
to
this
site
plan
this
use
if
they
were
going
to
go
through
another
change
of
use
process
if
they
were
remodeling.
If
the
footprint
changes,
I
would
expect
that
that
would
trigger
another
review,
so
this
would
be
limited
just
to
the
conditions
as
they
exist
today.
I
would
caution
against
granting
any
conditions
that
are
intended
to
impact
future
development.
If
that
would
be
addressed
at
that
point
in
the
future.
All
right
thank.
C
L
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
Section,
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
is
an
oddly
shaped
property,
a
small
triangle-shaped
property
resulting
from
a
taking
back
when
the
Crosstown
was
installed
that
the
property
is
bordered
by
a
dead-end
street
and
a
railway,
and
that
there
are
on-site
parking
spaces
that
do
not
count.
We
have
eight
onsite
parking
spaces
that
don't
count
per
the
city's
regulations.
However,
those
parking
spaces
all
back
out
onto
a
dead-end
street
and
because
of
that
I
feel
that
it
meets
the
hardship
criteria.
H
A
Right
we
have
a
motion
for
approval
by
mr.
Feldman
in
a
second
by
mr.
pastor.
The
only
comment
I
want
to
make
is
that,
unlike
a
auto
repair
shop,
where
you
could
have
obviously
some
cars
on
the
street
overnight,
a
furniture
repair
shop
they're
not
going
to
leave
the
furniture
outside
and
everybody
goes
home
at
night
and
there
are
no
cars
on
the
street.
So
I
don't
know
how
this
would
be
less
intense,
as
we
heard
testimony
wise
I
that
didn't
make
sense
to
me,
but
saying
that
I
don't
have
a
problem
approving
this
myself.
L
E
E
The
case
the
code
on
Road
section
under
review
tonight
is
27
290.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
corner
yard
from
17
to
2.
Feet,
reduce
the
rear
yard
from
3
feet
to
7
inches
for
accessory
structure,
number
1
and
reduce
the
east
side,
yard
setback
or
3
feet
to
8
inches
for
accessory
structure.
Number
2.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
setbacks
for
existing
storage
sheds
in
the
rear
yard,
variance
with
best
the
existing
conditions
of
the
shed.
The
property
is
owned,
RS
50
and
the
property
appraiser's
information
is
contained.
E
E
A
P
P
P
But
it
was
significantly
reduced
our
enjoyment
of
our
property.
If
we
and
our
storage
to
take
these
structures
away,
there
are
some
very
substantial
structures.
Very
they're,
not
whimsy
is
that
it
word
they're,
not
frail
structures
they're
substantially.
We
use
them
a
lot
and
they
are
there.
I,
don't
want
to
say
electrified
there.
P
A
A
P
A
P
A
A
A
P
P
H
P
P
A
P
P
P
P
P
A
B
D
O
D
D
F
Q
A
F
E
Okay,
Roberta
McCurry
planning
design
development
coordination.
I
have
this
horn.
The
address
is
60
to
30
inter
Bay
Boulevard.
The
code
section
under
review
tonight
is
27
156.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
side
yard
setbacks
from
7
feet
to
5
feet
for
all
newly
created
Lots
proposed.
Her
formal
decision,
20-30
for
which
was
recently
approved
by
the
gentleman
and
I
do
have
a
copy
of
this,
for
your
record.
I
will
give
that
to
you
soon.
E
Yeah
begin
is
seeking
to
create
new
Lots
and
build
new
single-family
homes.
The
variance
for
the
loss
are
as
follows
due
to
the
how
the
drawings
were
depicted
to
us.
So
this
is
how
we
are
have
written
it
up.
Personal,
a
applicant
seeks
to
reduce
the
eastern
side
yard
from
7
feet
to
5
feet.
Side
yard
along
the
western
boundary
will
remain
at
7
feet.
E
Parcel
B
applicant
seeks
to
reduce
the
eastern
and
western
side
yards
from
7
feet
to
5
feet,
parcel
C
same
situation.
Both
side
yards
will
be
reduced
from
7
feet
to
5
feet.
Parcel
D
applicant
seeks
to
reduce
the
western
side
yard
from
7
feet
to
5
feet
side
you're
on
a
side
yard
along
the
eastern
boundary.
We
will
remain
at
7
feet.
Applicant
is
seeking,
has
applied
for
a
formal
decision
and
is
approved
as
a
recently.
E
E
E
G
For
us
absolutely
Brian,
Knox
natural
resources,
I
have
this
one
end.
Natural
resources
found
the
proposed
request
and
consistent
for
the
following
reasons:
the
applicant
has
not
submitted
an
accurate
tree
survey
or
a
tree
table.
The
submitted
site
plan
did
not
include
the
required
tree
survey
overlay
and
per
Section
27
to
84
three-point
150.
At
least
50%
of
the
trees
must
be
retained
on
the
parcel
one
acre
or
greater.
This
parcel
is
considered
to
be
one
acre
are
over
an
acre,
and
so
by
that
right,
50%
of
the
trees
must
be
retained.
A
N
N
N
We
have
an
extremely
irregular
lot
shape,
as
the
staff
pointed
out.
We
rezone
this
in
October
of
2019,
and
then
we
filed
for
this
variance
in
in
June
of
2019
and
we're
just
now
getting
to
you
because
of
staff
issues
that
concerns
how
we
identified
these
parcels
and
the
formal
decision
that
we
applied
for
and
was
approved.
N
This
lot
is
a
hundred
and
fifty
five
feet
on
one
side,
two
hundred
and
twelve
feet
on
the
other
side,
and
then
this
is
two
to
12.
This
is
268
and
depth.
This
is
325
and
depth
and
382
in
depth
that
results
in
a
9,000
square.
Foot
lot
here
and
11,000
square
foot
lot
here.
14,000
square
foot
lot
here
in
17,000
square
feet
so
respectively,
and
this
is
more
than
three
times
a
lot
size
requirement.
N
This
is
more
than
two
times
this
is
two
times
and
this
a
little
less
than
two
times
a
lot
size
required
for
RS
rs.50,
because
these
Lots
are
so
narrow
and
so
deep.
We
need
relief
on
these
interior
side
setbacks
and,
as
I
said,
we
were
trying
to
protect
the
outside
property
owners.
This
is
Circle
C
ranch
which
is
not
developed.
It's
a
wide-open,
recreation
area
and
child
care
childcare
center.
They
just
recently
installed
new
water
and
sewer
lines
all
up
and
down
at
our
bay
bolivars.
N
This
has
been
designated
as
one
of
the
principal
infill
and
redevelopment
areas
for
South,
Tampa
and
part
of
this
development
is
in
response
to
MacDill
Air
Force
Base
begging
for
housing
for
its
its
personnel.
So
we're
responding
to
a
lot
of
different
pressures
here.
What
we
agreed
to
with
staff
and
I
can
I
can
read
to
you
our
our
letter
of
commitment,
if
I
didn't
give
you
my
last
copy.
N
N
It's
fine
I
know
what
it
is
that
we've
agreed
to
an
updated
tree
survey
and
that
will
occur
prior
to
planting
and
then
what
we
asked
for
was
the
ability
to
shift
each
of
these
housing
footprints
to
minimize
any
impact
that
it
might
have
on
trees.
So
Natural
Resources
will
have
the
ultimate
decision
to
make,
and
so,
if
we
slide
this
tree
back,
I
mean
this
house
back
as
long
as
we
maintain
the
front
and
rear
yard
setback.
N
So
we're
not
asking
to
waive
those,
but
we
are
asking
to
stay
to
waive
the
the
interior
side,
yard
setbacks
and
shifting
these
back
and
forward
to
position
them
correctly
to
save
the
trees
is
a
is
a
commitment
we
made.
We've
also
indicated
to
them
that
there
was
a.
It
was
not
even
possible
for
us
to
remove
more
than
50%
of
the
trees.
There's
only
one
grand
tree-
and
it
has
way
back
here
in
this
corner
of
this
lot
and
we're
not
gonna
come
anywhere
near
that
one.
N
So
if
we
have
to
come
back
to
the
very
board,
you
know
that's
something
we'll
do,
but
it's
not.
It's
not
anticipated
that
we
would
end
up
doing
that.
I,
don't
see
if
there's
anything
else,
I
left
off
the
building
footprint
maybe
moved
rear
words
to
minimize
the
impact
of
trees,
we'll
have
to
meet
all
that
are
applicable
city
of
Tampa
codes
and
I.
N
N
N
The
I
say
where
was
I
going
each
of
the
Lots
are
unique
in
terms
of
their
links,
I
mean
I,
don't
think
I've
seen
a
lot.
This
narrow
and
this
deep
over
300
feet
deep
and
quite
a
while,
and
that
also
provides
a
lot
of
open
and
green
space.
All
of
the
accesses
will
be
off
of
interval,
but
what
you
which
we
could
have
done
was
to
shift
hotels
us
so
that
they
were
stacked
and
then
put
a
roadway
in
which
you
know
it.
Just
it
just
didn't
make
any
sense.
N
N
N
I,
don't
think
it
was
designed
to
deny
the
ability
to
develop
these
Lots
in
a
reasonable
manner
and
it's
not
over
building,
because
it's
surrounded
by
RS
50
properties
that
you
know
basically
have
the
same
development
criteria
that
we're
proposing
here
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
I
mean
it's.
We
we
have
NAR
tad
and
you're,
not
adversely
impacting
any
off-site
properties
and
we've
taken
measures
to
preserve
the
side,
yard
setbacks
where
it
does
abut
an
additional
property
owner.
So
we
respectfully
request
your
approval
and
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
All.
A
L
F
Has
provided
the
board
with
the
proposed
condition
that
would
address
that
ability
to
shift
typically
when
the
variance
Review
Board
approves
the
variance
is
limited
to
the
site
plan
and
there's
not
that
ability
to
move
it
around.
This
is
you
know,
a
novel
approach
to
allow
this
to
move
forward.
He
just
recently
received
the
formal
determination
letter
allowing
his
client
to
create
the
four
individual
Lots.
F
L
Mean
I
see
that
he's
got
that
realistically,
the
issue
is
the
the
setback
separation
between
locks
right.
So
that's
seven.
Five,
so
he's
got
it
set
such
that
you
can
basically
slide
these
houses
up
and
down
and
as
long
as
they
meet
that
setback
as
as
drawn
on
this
plan
that
would
work,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it
seems
logical,
it
seems
like
it.
It
could
work.
F
If
this
variance
is
approved
for
each
of
the
four
Lots
that
it
would
not
trigger
the
need
for
any
other
variances
and
he's
not
requesting
any
other
variances,
one
item
that
was
discussed
was
whether
or
not
because
the
location
of
the
proposed
homes
and
the
trees
would
you
be
triggering
the
need
for
a
variance
from
that.
Fifty
percent
threshold
that
you're
required
to
maintain
on
any
property
that's
greater
than
an
acre
they've
committed
to
not
needing
that
waiver.
F
The
other
alternative
is
to
if
the
board
is
inclined
to
grant
the
variance,
because
he's
met
the
hardship
criteria
to
not
include
this
condition.
That
would
allow
that
flexibility
at
the
time
of
permitting
and
in
the
events
that
they
need
any
other
variances.
They
would
have
to
come
back
before
you,
so
I
think
they're
trying
to
avoid
that
situation
in
the
event
that
the
location
of
the
proposed
homes
would
impact
more
than
50
percent
of
the
trees
I'm
uncomfortable
with
the
approach
here.
F
L
Emerges
reason
sir
I've
heard
your
concerns
at
the
start
of
this
presentation
and
it
sounded
like
what
you
were
saying.
Is
we
really
didn't
have
enough
information
at
this
time
and
you
were
concerned
that,
because
of
that
lack
in
print
information,
there
could
be
other
triggers.
Did.
Did
the
applicants
conditions
as
they've
expressed
them,
satisfy
that
your
concerns
said
something
that
you're
okay
with?
If.
G
N
This
is
language
that
we've
discussed
with
Kathy
Beth
over
the
last
several
days
and
I
developed.
It
sent
it
to
her
talk
to
her
again
today,
and
there
was
there
was
no
objection
to
that
language
going
forward.
As
long
as
we
understand
that,
there's
a
burden
on
us
that,
if
it
in
the
future,
we
know
or
the
staff
says,
hey
look
you
need
another
variance,
then
we'll
have
to
notice
for
that
and
come
back
in.
N
So
so
we're
comfortable
moving
forward
at
our
risk
and
in
our
own
jeopardy
and,
like
I
said
we
we
sat
down
and,
as
I
said
as
recently
as
this
afternoon
and
talked
to
Kathy
about
it,
I
gave
them
copies
of
what
the
proposed
language
was.
Two
days
ago,
and
and
so
it's
been
at
a
sort
of
a
solution
in
motion
and
trying
to
figure
out
how,
because
our
apparently
our
tree
survey
doesn't
reflect
all
the
trees
and
that's
why
we
said
we're
going
to
come
back
with
a
revised
tree
survey.
N
So
we
can
more
carefully
plan
exactly
where
that
positioning
of
the
homes
are.
It
won't
affect
the
side,
yard
setbacks,
but
it
will
affect
potentially
the
rear,
but
but
not
to
the
point
where
we
need
another
variance
for
that.
So
we
were
trying
to
cross
all
the
t's
and
dot
all
the
eyes
in
a
in
a
unique
manner,
and
also
satisfying
Natural
Resources
that
we
weren't
going
to
adversely
impact
a
significant
number
of
trees.
Yeah.
L
And
I
see
that
and
I
think
it's
a
good
approach
to
trying
to
address
these
issues.
The
only
thing
I
wanted
to
check
with
you
on
was
there's
no
language
in
here
about
the
fifth
in
when
I
say
here,
I
mean
your
eleven
condition.
Language
I'll
be
happy
to
add
it
well
I
just
I,
don't
know
that
you
need
to
because
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we've
got
it
on
the
record.
It
sounded
like
it
was,
but
the
50%
of
the
tree
issue
is
you're
saying
you
will
not
assume
that
that
issue.
N
Sir
that's
correct
and
we
we
commit
to
not
triggering
that
and,
as
I
said,
the
burden
is
on
upon
us
and
if
we
do
trigger
that,
unfortunately,
we
will
be
back
in
front
of
you,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
enough
room.
These
lots
are
very,
very
deep,
and
that
gives
us
a
lot
of
leeway
on
how
to
position
the
homes.
C
N
Livability
and
the
the
ability
of
having
a
product
that's
going
to
fit
on
these
Lots
and
also
have
we
have
the
the
interior
sides
with
the
utilities
and
things
like
that:
I
mean
I,
guess
it's
technically
possible
yeah,
but
the
product
itself.
You
know
when
you
start
building
and
on
Lots
like
these,
that
are
very,
very
expensive.
It's
very
difficult
to
get
a
livable
space,
that's
going
to
work,
these
are
about
2,500
square
Flint
homes
and
that
doesn't
that
that's
the
garage
and
other
things.
So
it's
it's
a
very
narrow
product.
If
I
I.
C
N
N
A
F
A
A
F
We
had
that
conversation
with
mr.
mikulina
a
couple
of
months
ago
and
suggested
that
he
go
through
the
planning
process.
He
explained
the
difficulty
that
they
would
have
to
do
that
and
the
cost
involved
not
knowing
how
they
could
ultimately
be
developed.
So
he
chose
to
go
through
the
request
for
a
formal
determination
letter
which
he
received
from
mr.
cotton.
F
It
was
dated
February
3rd
recognizing
the
ability
to
establish
these
four
Lots
as
they
meet
the
minimum
lot
requirements
and
with
requirements
for
the
Rs
50
zoning
district,
so
that
they
have
chosen
this
path
of
rezoning
to
Rs
50
requesting
a
formal
determination
letter
recognize
these
four
Lots
and
appear
before
the
VRB
seeking
these
variances,
and
this
is
a
fluid
concept
and
we're
trying
to
accommodate
being
able
to
move
this
forward
right.
If
the
Board
finds
that
mr.
F
mcleaney
has
bet
the
hardship
criteria
for
each
of
the
four
laws,
and
if,
if
you
feel
that
the
hardship
has
been
met
with
the
condition
that
has
been
proposed,
it
would
limit
the
approval
to
the
depth
or
length
of
the
proposed
structure.
That
would
not
be
moved
it
because,
typically,
when
you're
approving
a
variance
it's
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan,
you
don't
get
to
move
structures
around.
F
You
don't
get
to
increase
the
extent
of
the
variance
being
approved,
so
I
would
submit
to
the
board
that
if
they
were
to
lengthen
the
home,
you
are
increasing
and
going
beyond
the
variance
that
would
have
otherwise
been
approved.
The
the
only
ability
is
to
move
that
home
further
back
from
the
front
yard
setback
in
order
to
preserve
whatever
trees
are
determined
to
be
appropriate
for
preservation
by
Natural,
Resources,
okay,.
A
N
A
J
N
N
N
Somebody
under
the
bus,
it
was
an
oversight,
and
you
know
quite
honestly,
the
staff
has
been
working
with
us
diligently
to
try
to
figure
out
and
sort
it
out
and
that's
why
we
have
some
unique
provisions
here
on
this
variance
and
and
I
hate
to
bring
that
to
you,
but
but
it
it
required
a
lot
of
thinking
on
a
lot
of
people's
parts
to
to
come
back
with
something
that
might
work.
Okay,.
A
And
the
only
reason
I
bring
up
the
whole
PD
concept
is
legal.
Is
that
if,
if
these
aren't
legal
lots
yet
because
they're
not
planted
I
mean
to
me,
this
is
clearly
a
self-created
hardship
on
a
larger
piece
of
property
being
subdivided,
but
there
hasn't
been
something
I
did
yet
legally
so
I'm
hearing
you
say
it's
okay
to
make
a
decision
on
this,
even
though
we
don't
have
lots
yeah.
Is
that
correct?
There.
Q
A
F
With
the
letter
that
was
issued
by
Eric
cotton,
it
recognizes
the
four
parcels
as
described
by
mr.
mcleaney.
It
recognizes
that
they
have
a
minimum
of
50
feet
and
width.
It
identifies
the
total
square
footage
of
each
one
and
I
believe.
At
the
end,
there
is
a
requirement
that
they
go
through
the
planning
process.
If
you
could
confirm
that
for
me,
yes,.
N
That's
accurate,
there's
also
a
legal
description.
That's
attached
to
each
one
of
these
Lots,
so
it's
not
the
formal
decision
is
linked
to
you
know
the
legal
description.
So
it's
not
we're
not
trying
to
switch
things
around
here.
It's
just
a
matter
of
of
how,
in
terms
of
the
timeline,
how
you
go
through
each
of
the
remaining
processes,
but
we
will
have
to
jump
through
those
hoops
at
plotting
and
again
that
permitting
and
there's
no
attempt
here
to
kind
of
trick
the
board
and
no.
A
A
F
We've
we've
been
working
through
those
issues,
but
I
will
say
on
the
fourth
page
of
mr.
katan's
letter.
It
does
say
the
property
must
comply
with
the
city
of
Tampa
subdivision
regulations.
If
mr.
McLean
ease
client
were
to
come
back
and
divide
this
further,
so
that
we're
not
looking
at
four
Lots
we're
looking
at
five
or
more,
then
these
variances
would
go
away
because
these
variances
would
be
limited
to
these
four
laws.
As
shown
on.
A
N
We've
discussed
this
if
you,
unless
you
have
more
questions
for
me,
like
I,
said
you
asked
one
question
about
in
one
respect:
it's
a
one
acre
parcel
and
in
others
it's
for
individual
parcels.
We've
we've
been
back
and
forth
on
that
issue
for
weeks
and
weeks,
and
so
finally,
we
just
said
you
know:
five
will
do
it
in
the
most
economical
way
in
agreeing
with
the
staff
in
some
respects.
N
A
B
B
B
What
we've
got
now
our
little
PI
shape
and
slivered
size
lots
that
are
useless,
so
you
can
make
it
one
big
lot,
they'd
still
be
here
with
an
irregular
lot
or
you
can
make
it
ours
50
and
try
and
get
four
houses
in
trying
to
comply
with
ours.
50
dictates
the
slanted
front
yard
and
therefore
the
width
issue
to
get
a
standard,
35
foot,
wide
house,
etc,
etc.
So
on
and
so
forth,
you
can
do
it
as
a
PD
it'll.
Look
similar
to
this
I
think.
B
That's
all
irrelevant,
really
the
question
of
the
condition
to
slide
it
and
all
that,
certainly
something
we
need
to
discuss.
I've
no
issue
with
it
makes
total
sense
if
they're
not
encroaching
in
the
front
or
the
rear.
Then
what
do
we
care?
It's
really
the
issue.
Five
foot
versus
a
seven
foot
side
yard
the
people
that
buy
these
homes
will
know
that
when
they
buy
it,
the
neighbors
that
neighbor
these
properties
are
gonna
have
their
seven
feet.
So
they're
not
encroached.
So
I,
don't
think
it's
a
big
issue.
C
C
L
Even
though
they're
there
cutting
someone
into
that
side
setback,
but-
and-
and
that
was
the
point
that
that
made
me
comfortable
with
it
as
well-
was
you're,
not
you're,
not
hitting
the
neighbors
that
are
there,
you're
only
hitting
the
people
that
are
buying
in
and
you
can
buy
into
a
zero
lot
line.
You
know
you
can
buy
into
those
things
all
day
long.
They
can
exist
as
long
as
you
know
what
you're
getting
and
you're
not
taking
some.
You
know
pushing
up
against
some
neighbor.
That
was
there
to
me.
That's
okay!
L
It's
almost
like
you
you're
getting
a
subdivision
and
you're
saying:
okay!
This
is
the
way
all
these
houses
are
gonna,
be
people
are
gonna,
have
the
opportunity
to
buy
or
not
buy,
they
don't
want
to
buy
them.
They're
just
gonna
sit
there
and
they're,
not
gonna,
sell
yeah,
but
I
mean
I
I.
That's
the
way,
I
look
at
it.
I
think
you
made
a
good
point.
I
just
see
it
more
impactful.
The
other
way
you.
B
I
A
I'll
just
make
a
brief
statement.
My
violin
reservation
was
answered
because
if
we
approve
this
they're
legally
bound
by
the
legal
descriptions
and
I
do
have
a
little
bit
of
concern
about
the
self
credit
part
of
what
you
said,
I
don't
disagree
with
that,
but
the
same
condition
might
occur
if
they
went
a
different
zoning
route,
but
at
the
same
time,
they'd
be
answering
all
these
other
questions
in
one
fell
swoop.
It's
a
very
time-consuming
and
costly
method,
so
I
kind
of
take
this
as
unique.
Obviously,
the
the
property
is
not
unique
is
not
unique.
I
A
It's
it's
unique,
an
area
your
honor
about
that.
So
you
know
they
do
literally
meet
the
minimum
standards
for
RS
50
with
the
way
they're
configured
so
I.
Don't
you
know
because
of
that
and
the
fact
they're
bound
by
a
legal
description.
I
just
wanted
everybody
to
understand
that
they
were
in
fact
made
bound
by
the
square
footage
of
each
foot
footprint,
which
only
only
gives
them
the
flexibility
of
sliding
these
forwards
and
backwards.
So
that's
what
they
want.
B
However,
the
location
of
those
footprints
may
move
so
as
they
do
not
encroach
upon
the
front,
rear
yard
setbacks
or
any
further
into
the
side
yard
setbacks
than
what
is
being
proposed
with
this
variance
and
that
they
will
stay
below
50%
of
reduction
in
trees.
As
worked
out
with
natural
resources.
That
said,
variances
condition
be
granted
based
upon
the
and
presenting
confident,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
of
this
public
hearing
of
a
necessary
hardship.
B
A
practical
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
art
shift
criteria
set
forth
in
Section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
is
currently
for
highly
irregular,
shaped
Lots
or
one
irregular
shaped
lot.
Depending
on
you.
Look
at
it
for
proposing
to
create
for
rs.50
Lots,
which
are
still
regularly
shaped
in
length
and
in
the
angle
of
the
front
yard,
which
creates
a
narrower
than
50
foot
lot
and
who's,
asking
for
relief
in
the
side
yard
setback
only
to
the
property's
internal
to
the
development.
B
A
F
A
N
Thank
you
very
much
for
I,
appreciate
your
understanding
enough
reviewing
this
unique
solution
to
this
problem
and
also
like
to
thank
the
staff
for
working
with
us.
It's
been
it's
been
a
long
path,
so
thank
you
very
much.
E
Harbor
to
me,
curry,
planning
they're,
all
in
the
design,
coordination
that
have
a
swarm.
The
address
is
35
14,
wife's
Barcelona
Avenue.
The
code
section
in
question
tonight
is
27
156.
The
African
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
east
side
during
setback
from
7
feet
to
4
foot
10
applicant
is
seeking
to
construct
to
a
second-story
two-story
addition
atop,
the
existing
primary
structure.
E
The
property
is
no
bar
is
50
and
the
Hillsborough
County
property
appraiser
information
was
included
information.
Second,
there
is
also
a
tree
consultation
permit,
tre,
1604,
4,
0,
4,
3
5
tree
removal,
a
pruning
permit
included
the
free
reference.
Its
natural
resources
is
here
to
add
some
additional
comments
and
their
report
is
included
in
their
packet
as
well.
E
G
Very
not
Natural
Resources.
The
applicant
is
requesting
the
side
yard
setback
from
East
the
east
side
from
7
feet
to
4
feet,
10
inches
to
add
a
second
story
to
the
existing
home.
On
the
west
side,
there
is
a
48
inch
off-site
grand
tree
with
the
average
canopy
spread
of
60
feet,
and
it
was
rated
as
d9,
and
so
the
applicant
was
proposed
is
proposing
to
build
a
two-story
addition,
approximately
20
feet
from
that
tree.
The
proposed
two-story
addition
required
two
large
diameter
limbs
to
be
removed.
G
They
were
proposed
to
be
removed
under
HB
1159.
They,
the
company,
that
they
hired
misinterpreted
the
rule
that
claimed
right
to
to
prune
a
grand
tree
without
a
permit.
The
company
was
not
a
certified
company,
they
weren't
certified
by
the
International
Society
of
AB
or
a
culture
which
means
they
were
not
in
compliance
with
the
rule
of
HB
11:59,
and
by
that
the
applicant
was
subjected
to
a
triple
permit
fee
for
their
site
for
pruning
a
tree
with
permit
just
to
give
you
some
reference
for
that
for
the
the
tree
on
the
west
side.
G
There
are
several
limbs
that
are
still
on
the
tree
that
are
completely
dead,
that
the
company
chose
not
to
remove
here
are
some
other
pictures
of
the
tree
once
again,
there's
the
limb
that
goes
out
into
the
right-of-way
that
was
not
removed.
Here's
a
better
picture
of
it.
Thank
you,
and
these
are
the
places
that
were
made
afterwards.
A
A
F
L
F
L
G
G
L
D
D
L
D
F
H
H
This
is
uploaded
on
the
Excel
web
site
already,
but
the
house
was
constructed
in
1947
I
purchased
the
house
in
2018.
The
house
is
set
towards
the
east
to
allow
for
a
driveway
on
the
west
side
of
the
property.
That's
how
it
was
originally
constructed,
I'm
simply
requesting
to
build
on
the
existing
walls
that
are
there
so
I'm
proposing
to
maintain
the
East
yard
setback.
I,
sent
the
letters
to
all
neighbors
and
discussed
with
neighbors
on
both
sides,
east
and
us
specifically
walk
them
through
my
tent
and
my
plan.
H
H
H
I,
don't
as
far
as
any
other
hardships
I
would
just
increased
the
cost
of
the
renovation.
I
purchased
the
property
and
trying
to
create
additional
bedrooms.
Upstairs
it's
a
small
home
has
two
bedrooms
under
roof.
Currently,
as
my
family
grows,
the
additional
bedrooms
are
going
to
be
necessary
to
make
it
a
suitable
long
and
it
would
add
quite
a
bit
of
cost
to
move
foundations
and
not
simply
keep
the
existing
walls
where
they
are.
D
A
B
N
B
D
F
D
A
A
B
Remove
the
variance
request
for
case
of
er
B
2011
for
the
property
located
at
3514
West
Barcelona
Avenue,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
public
hearing
for
reduction
in
the
East
Side
yard,
setback
from
seven
feet
to
four
feet.
Ten
inches
for
the
encroachment
reviews
and
gutters
based
upon
the
applicant
presented
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
and
the
necessary
hardship
of
practical
difficulty.
B
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
Section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
there's
an
existing
structure,
he
would
like
to
expand
vertically.
The
walls
that
exist
today
will
remain.
The
encroachment
being
requested
is
the
encroachment
today,
except
for
the
additional
vertical
encroachment.
He
testified
that
both
neighbors
are
an
agreement,
and
we
heard
no
opposition.
The
practical
difficulty
would
be
moving
the
home
to
meet.
This
setback
is
not
practicable.
D
H
E
Okay,
Roberta
meet
curry
planning,
design
and
development
coordination.
I
have
been
sworn.
The
address
is
24
17,
Thrace
Street,
the
code
section
under
review
this
evening.
This
27
156,
the
applicant,
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
2
feet
due
to
an
irregular
shaped
log.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
construct
a
two-story
single-family
residence
applicant,
received
a
formal
decision
regarding
the
council.
E
And
I
have
that
formal
decision
here
Brianna
got
the
number
wrong.
It's
a
formal
decision,
fdn
19
104,
which
was
issued
in
October,
2nd
2019
property
is
Asuna
Dara's
50
and
the
Hillsborough
County
property
appraiser's
information
is
included
in
for
your
reference
right
away,
has
found
a
consistent
transportation
has
found
it
consistent
with
conditions
and
Joanie
has
found
an
inconsistent
position.
E
E
E
E
A
A
A
E
A
O
O
What's
hat,
what
happened
from
my
understanding
is
that
back
in
before
1955
family
owned
it
an
aunt
wanted
to
live
there,
so
they
subdivided
this
little
square
and
put
a
small
little
apartment
or
something
for
her
on
there
before
zoning
I
guess
came
in
with
all
the
regulations
and
that's
how
I
got
divided,
but
since
1955
to
a
current
date,
it's
been
owned
by
different
people.
So
therefore
it
is
a
I
guess,
conforming
lot,
I'm,
not
sure
if
that's
the
right
terminology
or
not,
but
I
went
with
Erik
cotton.
O
He
told
me
that
everything
is
fine
with
it
and
I
can
move
forward
with
the
variance,
because
different
owners
have
owned
that
lawns
and
it
was
never
owned
by
the
same
person.
They
should
have
then
joined
the
properties
together,
but
because
it's
owned
by
different
people,
it
was
never
joints
which
brought
us
here
today.
O
Diana
those
Judas
is
interested
in
purchasing.
The
property
has
already
made
an
agreement
with
Sherry's
huan'er
to
sell
the
property.
Carmen
muñoz
owns
four
other
pieces
of
property
in
this
neighborhood
within
a
five
mile
radius.
She
is
the
owner
of
multiple
properties,
I'm,
not
sure
how
she
acquired
this
property.
She
told
me
that
she
bought
it
for
$100
or
her
aunt
gave
it
to
her.
She
told
me
two
different
stories
in
two
different
conversations
and
that
she'll
never
release
it
because
it
was
a
family
piece
of
property,
I've
heard
from
other
people.
O
That
is
true
that
she
did
buy
for
$100
and
she's
holding
on
to
it,
hoping
to
get
the
rest
of
it
from
Cherise
water.
There's
a
few
issues
with
it,
which
I'll
get
into
in
just
a
little
bit
Dianna's.
She
is
a
single
mom,
two
children,
one
in
college,
one
getting
ready
to
go
to
college.
She
wants
to
build
a
home
to
be
able
to
have
her
family
there.
The
reason
why
she
wants
to
move
there
is
because
my
parents
live
two
blocks
away
from
there.
O
They're,
really
elderly
and
I
want
to
move
there
also
to
go
ahead,
so
we're
gonna.
Do
it
together
to
be
close
to
my
parents
to
help
them
in
their
elder
years
and
do
the
day-to-day
operations
of
taking
care
of
them?
The
house
taking
on
places
go
play
still
and
stuff.
So
when
we
were
looking,
we
first
we're
looking
at
South
Tampa,
where
we
grew
up.
We
both
went
to
plan
high
school
and
everything
is
way
too
expensive
over
there
and
in
the
West
hamp
area
way
too
expensive.
O
We
were
gonna
which
she
stated
we
want
to
build
a
single-family
home
on
there.
We
know
that,
because
of
the
flood
zone
in
that
area,
that
we
have
to
elevate
the
home
and
all
that
other
stuff,
we've
done
a
lot
of
research
on
that.
So
we
have
something
in
mind
that
we
want.
We
don't
have
a
site
plan
or
anything
yet,
because
we
don't
know
if
we
can
acquire
the
property
or
build
on
it
because
of
this
small
cutout
in
the
back.
O
The
small
cutout
is
giving
us
only
right
now,
currently
a
20
foot
foot
footprint
to
build
on
which
is
not
even
a
double-wide
trailer
length.
So
therefore
we're
wanting
to
see
if
we
could
put
something
that's
going
to
be
at
least
40
feet
deep
by
35
wide
to
keep
all
the
setbacks,
20
20
on
the
extended
part.
O
Our
hope
is
that
if
we
get
the
variance,
I've
already
offered
Carmen
money-
and
she
turned
me
down
and
said
that
she
wants
to
keep
it
and
she
wants
to
get
the
rest
of
the
property
and
I
said
well.
Sherry
I'll
sell
it
to
you
for
60
grand.
If
you
want
and
she's
not
willing
to
pay
anything
forward,
so
I
said:
okay
well,
I'll
give
you
five
thousand
for
that
little
square.
She
said
no,
so
we've
gone
back
and
forth.
O
With
her
keeping
that
property
we've
been
told
that
that
property
doesn't
even
get
charged
taxes,
because
there's
not
enough
square
footage
on
that
land.
He
hasn't
paid
a
lick
of
taxes,
property
taxes,
because
it's
not
even
big
enough
for
I,
guess
the
city
to
charge
taxes.
That's
if
you
look
at
the
tax
records.
I
know
this
guy's
got
his
face.
But
if
you
look
at
the
tax
record,
she
hasn't
paid
taxes
since
she's
owned
the
property.
There's
not
enough
millet.
O
For
my
two,
what
I'm
told
not
enough
square
footage
to
charge
a
millage
rate
on
it?
So,
therefore,
nothing
can
be
done
on.
Nothing
can
be
built
on
it
when
she
saw
us
starting
the
process
of
trying
to
acquire
this
property
and
acquire
of
the
property
and
began
to
look
into
knocking
down
the
house
and
building
on
it,
she
put
up
a
fence
to
designate
her
square
property
there.
So
basically
we're
just
looking
to
build
a
finger,
single-family
home
and
live
on
it.
O
If
she
wants
to
work
a
deal
with
us
later
on
for
us
to
purchase
that
property
we're
more
than
happy
to
buy
it,
if
not
we're
more
than
happy
with
her
and
keeping
that
back
a
little
piece
there
and
us
having
the
rest
of
the
property,
if
you
guys
grant
us
a
variance,
the
current
owner,
sherice
water
is
not
healthy.
At
this
point.
O
The
reason
why
we're
here
today
is
taking
so
long
to
get
here,
because
what
I
did
want
to
sign
the
paperwork
necessary
to
get
a
variance
she
was
in
the
hospital
for
a
month.
We
couldn't
get
the
papers
signed
up
and
notarized
when
she
got
out
of
the
hospital.
Obviously
we
got
that
done
and
now
we're
here
today
she
got
the
property
from
her
significant
other
years
ago.
O
O
She
was
thinking
that
she
was
going
to
some
kind
of
an
asset.
Instead,
she
got
a
lot
of
problems.
The
problems
that
came
along
with
that
property
or
such
that
code
enforcement
finds
20,
II.
Think
it's!
Let
me
look
at
my
paperwork:
real,
quick,
eighteen
thousand,
one
hundred
dollars
for
one
code
enforcement,
fine,
another
one
for
eight
thousand:
seven
hundred
fifty
$55
code
enforcement,
fines,
I
contacted
the
city
of
Tampa,
attorneys
and
I
got
in
a
stop
a
letter
with
a
settlement
agreement
of
three
thousand
twenty
dollars
that
Diana
and
I
will
both
pay.
O
If
you
guys
grant
us
the
variance,
we
will
pay
it.
If
not
we're
running
from
the
property,
the
code
enforcement
has
also
now
condemned
the
home
and
because
the
house
has
been
vacant
for
two
years,
animals
were
in
there
and
I
hate
to
say
about
drug
addicts
were
in
there
and
stuff
like
that.
So
what
I
did
was
as
the
agent
and
permission
with
the
owner,
sherry
Swan,
er
I
went
in
there
and
I
cleaned
up
all
the
property
cut.
O
The
grass
took
up
all
that
they
were
bottles
and
sinks
and
tires
and
couches
and
everything
I
got
pictures.
If
you
guys
want
to
see
it
and
I
cleaned
it
all
up
cut
all
the
grass,
not
even
though,
if
we're
gonna
own
the
property
or
not
got
lawyers
involved
to
make
sure
that
we
were
gonna,
be
safe
and
all
of
this
long
story
short.
So
that
way
there
would
be
no
more
code,
enforcement's
enforced
or
added
to
already.
O
So
we
can
minimize
our
cost
in
all
of
this,
but
anyway,
we've
negotiated
down
to
three
thousand
dollars
on
that
code.
Enforcement
was
his
name
woloson
Wallis
Nelson
I've,
been
as
close
contact
with
him.
I
told
him
that
if
I
get
the
variance
that
we
will
knock
down
the
house
immediately
and
go
through
the
process
of
demolition
to
clear
the
property
and
get
it
all
cleaned
up.
In
addition
to
that,
there
are
other
issues.
O
Let's
see
here,
property
taxes
are
currently
do.
Cherie
have
the
money,
Diana
and
I
also
agreed.
If
we
get
the
variance
that
we
will
pay
the
property
taxes
immediately.
As
soon
as
we
know,
we
get
granted
the
variance
to
clear
up
the
property
taxes
that
are
due
this
year.
There's
nothing
in
the
rears
that
are
owed.
She
didn't
pay
him
last
year
for
my
understanding,
through
talking
through
several
people,
as
well
as
neighbors
carmen
muñoz,
who
does
on
that
little
square
in
the
back.
O
There's
nothing
she
can
do
with
the
property,
but
she
did
take
the
prior
owner
who
quit
claim
deed
it
to
Sherry,
which
was
Doug
Adkins
to
court
to
try
to
get
that
property
from
him
years
ago
and
it
was
thrown
out.
It
was
a
frivolous
case
that
she
was
trying
to
acquire
that
property.
This
is
all
hearsay,
though.
Don't
I
wasn't
there.
This
is
what
I've
been
told.
So
if
diana
has
granted,
the
variance
and
I
am
brought
in
along
with
it
as
her
partner,
we
plan
on
building
a
single-family
home
with
a
bonus
room.
O
The
structure
that
we
plan
on
building
is
about
40
feet,
deep
35
wide
to
keep
all
of
the
setbacks
in
line.
The
only
thing
that
we're
hoping
is
that,
once
if
we
get
granted
the
per
the
setback,
then
that
we
can
also
acquire
that
second
piece
of
property,
then
I
guess
you
have
to
rezone
it
I'm,
not
sure
what
has
to
be
done
but
make
it
all
back
one
again
and
that's
our
hopes
so
I'm
open
at
this
point
to
any
questions.
If
you
guys
have
any
questions
or
I
can
show
you
documents
and
pictures.
A
O
The
I'm,
sorry
I
suppose
answer
yeah,
no
yeah
the
property
that
Shari
slaughter
owns
that
we're
interested
in
purchasing
I,
don't
know
if
you
could
see
it
in
the
in
the
plot
surveyor
in
that
in
it
it's
a
it's
a
50
by
95
and
then
2029
across
the
back
and
33
towards
the
front
is
a
little
square.
That
leaves
us
20
all
the
way
to
the
95
side,
and
then
it
cuts
us
down
to
I.
Think
it's
65
from
this
from
our
property
line
to
carbon
Munoz's
property.
O
O
O
C
L
C
E
E
A
E
D
E
A
A
A
O
O
O
So
basically
we
said
40
because
of
this
footprint
and
yet
no
we're
not
tied
to
that,
but
we're
in
hopes
that
if
we
do
get
two
feet
to
her
line-
and
she
can't
do
nothing
with
it-
whether
we
are
get
the
variance
or
not,
she
can
do
nothing
with
that
property.
But
if
she
holds
that
property-
and
nobody
can
do
anything
with
the
other
piece
of
property,
then
she
has
kind
of
a
foothold
on
dictating
what
happens
to
the
rest
of
it.
I
feel
like
if
we
can
get
this
variance
granted.
O
If
you
guys
want
to
say
three
feet
or
5
feet,
we're
fine
with
that,
we'll
just
have
to
remodel
home
or
redesign
the
home,
but
if
we
do
get
close
to
her
I
think
that
maybe
she'll
concede
and
say
hey.
You
know:
I
can't
do
nothing
with
this
property
and
we
want
you
to
have
it
kind
of
this
situation.
That's
what
I'm,
hoping
and
I
don't
mean
to
be
rude
when
I
say
us
at
all,
but
we're
younger
and
I.
O
Think
she's,
older
and
I
mean
I,
know
she's,
older
and
her
age,
so
I
mean
there's
going
to
come
a
time
where
she
won't
own
that
property
anymore,
anything
to
go
to
a
an
heir
or
somebody
else
and
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
then
get
that
property
in
the
future
possibly
and
make
it
one
lot
for
us.
Okay,
well,.
A
A
A
O
O
O
N
A
D
A
D
H
A
A
O
E
To
meet
curry
planning
design
development
coordination,
the
address
is
three
thousand
three
west
base
view
avenue.
The
code
section
under
review
this
evening
is
27.
156
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
a
Frontera
setback,
25
feet
to
10
feet.
Nine
applicant
is
seeking
to
remodel
and
extend
an
existing
existing
front.
Porch
the
property
is
owned,
are
a
60
and
the
Hillsborough
County
property.
Appraiser's
information
is
contained
in
your
packet
right
away.
Transportation
and
natural
resources
has
find
that
consistent.
That's
a
resources
head
consistent
with
conditions,
Dhoni
has
done
it
inconsistent.
E
E
So
rs.60
the
existing
setback
is
25
feet,
so
the
the
existing
house
was
built
in
front
of
that
with
their
porch
extension.
Mr.
here
so
they're
adding
on
this
pieces,
these
additional
portions
here
they
would
technically
be
able
to
come
before
you
under
a
different
provision
and
they
could
which
allows
for
front
yard
projections
which
would
be
allowed
to
have
an
8
foot
front
foot
setback.
However,
they
didn't
even
meet
the
way
the
house
was
built.
They
had
to
be
here.
They
had
to
be
before
you.
D
Q
Evening,
I
wanted
to
concur
generally
with
what
Roberta's
said
and
I
just
wanted
to
add
some
additional
information,
some
background
about
the
house
and
also
just
elaborate
on
our
hardship
statement
in
the
application.
So,
as
far
as
background,
my
husband
and
I
have
owned
Bayview
Avenue
for
about
six
and
a
half
years
now
we
lived
there
with
my
toddler
son.
C
Q
Rescue
dog,
the
home,
was
quite
a
mess
when
we
purchased
it.
It's
a
1925
house
and
we
purchased
it
in
2013,
so
we
fixed
it
up
over
time.
We
love
the
home.
We
love
the
neighborhood.
We
have
great
neighbors,
including
Ted
and
Carol
Connor,
who
submitted
that
email
in
support
of
this
areas
and
they
live
right
across
the
street
from
our
house,
so
they
stare
at
our
house
on
a
daily
basis.
Q
The
one
item
that
is
really
an
eyesore
is
the
small
and
crooked
front
porch,
which,
as
I'll
speak
about
later
and
as
I
mentioned
in
our
hardship
application,
it
seems
a
little
unsafe.
It's
crooked,
it's
built
on
different
height
blocks,
and
so
it's
our
dream
to
put
a
proper
1920s
front
porch
onto
the
house,
one
that
adds
more
curb
appeal
and
is
also
more
architectural,
appropriate
to
the
Craftsman
style
of
home.
So,
basically,
we'd
like
to
vest
the
existing
front
porch,
as
Roberta
showed
on
the
site
plan
which
I
can
but
on
the
site
plan.
Q
So
as
far
as
elaborating
on
our
hardship,
hardship
statement,
I
would
like
to
just
show
you
a
few
other
things.
I,
don't
know
if
you
guys
are
gonna,
be
able
to
see
this
here,
but
these
are
some
doodles
I
want
to
show
you.
Can
I
zoom
this
out
there
we
go
and
I
prepared
packets
for
everyone.
I
guess
I
can
give
one
later
to
add
to
the
record,
but
I'll
go
ahead
and
do
this
here
on
the
projector.
But
you
can
see
these
doodles
here
are
all
over
the
front.
Porch.
Q
We
don't
know
what
this
is.
If
it's
glue
or
something
that
the
prior
owners
did,
here's
another
picture,
we've
tried
to
grind
them
off.
We
had
a
professional
come
and
try
to
grind
them
off
of
the
concrete,
but
they
never
came
off
and
we
just
painted
over
them
and
we've
left
them
for
a
while,
but
that's
something
that's
unique
to
our
front.
Porch
I
haven't
seen
any
other
front
porch
in
our
neighborhood
with
these
strange
doodles.
So
that's
just
one
little
detail
that
I
wanted
to
point
out.
Q
I
also
wanted
to
point
out
just
some
other
houses
on
our
street.
We
have
a
variety
of
homes
on
our
street
as
I
stayed
in
my
application,
historic
homes
and
contemporary
homes,
but
here's
just
an
example
of
one
historic
and
one
contemporary
home,
both
that
have
front
porches
that
seem
to
suit
the
scale
of
the
home
better.
This
is
a
historic
home
here
and,
as
you
see,
our
new
front,
porch
will
be
somewhat
similar.
Our
house
is
different
than
this
house,
but
our
new
front
porch
will
be
a
little
similar.
Q
In
addition,
I
wanted
to
mention
that,
in
our
hardship,
I
noted
that
this
front
porch
that
is
on
our
home,
was
on
it
when
we
purchased
it,
it's
not
something
that
we
made
it's
not
of
our
own
doing,
and
so
this
is
a
photo
I
wanted
to
enter
into
the
record
of
the
house
when
we
purchased
it
in
2013.
So
you
can
see
that
the
the
same
porch
is
on
there.
I
also
wanted
to
as
I
mention
the
porch
is
crooked,
and
you
can
see
here.
Here's
just
some
examples
of
these.
Q
Q
And
here's
one
that's
2
inches
here
and
here's
another
one:
that's
over
2
inches
in
height,
so
that's
something
that
I
didn't
mention
in
my
initial
application
package.
All
right,
I
may
have
mentioned
it,
but
I
didn't
provide
the
photos
and
then
also
I
just
wanted
to
you
guys
have
the
aerial
views
and
the
site
plan
in
your
packet
and
in
my
application
packet,
but
I
wanted
to
provide
you
with
a
rendering.
Q
L
L
L
Q
Q
A
L
If
we
condition
it
as
unenclosed,
it
means
that
it's
gonna
basically
stay
a
porch,
as
opposed
to
because
remember
we're
giving
them
the
right
to
to
build
up
to
this
line.
And
yes,
it's
it's
based
upon
the
site
plan.
But
if,
if
it
wasn't
condition
is
something
closed
later
on
somewhere
down,
the
line,
walls
sometimes
find
their
ways
out.
She.
B
C
I
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
VRB
2018,
located
at
three
zero
zero.
Three
West
Bay
View
Avenue,
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
in
the
front
yard,
setback
from
25
feet
to
10
foot
9
inches
to
remodel
and
extend
the
front
porch
with
the
following
conditions
that
it
remain
an
open,
porch.
D
C
All
sides-
and
that
said,
variances
conditions
be
granted
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
Section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
they
want
to
just
extend
their
passports.
D
A
E
Hey
everybody
me
Career
Planning
design,
development
coordination
yeah.
This
is
61
Ladoga.
A
venir
Code
section
in
review
tonight
is
27
to
90.3.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
corner.
/
5
yard
setback
from
15
feet
depending
applicant
is
seeking
to
stall
in
ground
pool
and
spa
applicant
received
a
tree
removal
and
cleaning
permit
/
tre
19
117
for
the
grand
tree
that
you
might
see
in
some
of
the
plans
or
in
photographs.
The
property
is
zoned
rs.75
and
Hillsboro.
County
property,
appraisers
information.
E
E
A
I've
got
a
couple
of
questions
for
Berta.
The
the
15-foot
requirement
is
based
on
a
primary
structure,
not
accessory
structure,
correct
the.
E
E
A
G
A
A
G
A
G
H
A
A
K
K
As
we've
talked
about
I'm
looping
to
to
build
a
pool,
we've
gone
through,
went
part
of
the
permitting
process.
We've
already
been
granted
that
their
permit
to
to
build
the
walls
and
the
pool
deck
you're.
Removing
the
driveway
over
a
little
bit
I've
got
this
pretty
fancy.
Little
thing
here
that
y'all
are
probably
holding
so
can
y'all
see
else
else.
Fine,
you
don't
need
this.
It's.
K
So
one
thing
that
I've
had
to
do
is
I've
had
to
move
the
driveway
over
to
the
right
in
order
to
allow
enough
room
for
the
for
the
pool,
but
before
I
really
get
into
the
hardship
and
so
forth.
I
want
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background
about
the
house.
The
house
is
a
1928
house.
It
was
one
of
the
first
houses
that
were
built
on
Davis
Island.
In
fact,
it
was
mr.
Davis's
model
home.
It
was
called
the
the
Tribune
home,
which
is
it's
just
pretty
cool.
K
It's
only
had
three
owners
since
1928
the
other
third
owner
previous
two
had
been
there
for
40
and
50
years.
It's
a
it's,
a
very
unique
home
and
one
that
when
I
purchased
it
was
that
there
were
two
offers.
One
was
my
offer
which
my
intent
was
to
to
renovate
remodel
the
home.
The
other
was
to
knock
it
down.
It's
beautiful
homes
should
not
be
knocked
down,
so
everything
that
I'm
hoping
to
do
is
in
keeping
with
the
architecture
of
a
1928
type
home.
K
K
The
Home
has
a
detached
garage,
that's
connected
to
the
to
the
main
house
via
breezeway,
and
it's
not
a
typical
home
that
will
have
a
front
entry
garage
or
a
or
a
side
entry
garage,
because
it
is
at
the
rear
property
line.
The
driveway
leading
into
the
garage
has
to
run
the
length
of
the
the
rear
of
the
property,
obviously,
with
them
I'm
not
not
able
to
place
a
pool
in
the
backyard
cuz
really
have
a
backyard
so
that
that's
that's
my
hardship.
K
What
what
we're
asking
for,
according
to
according
to
this
plan
and
according
to
the
permit
that
I
have
in
hand
is
the
only
area?
That's
that's
affected
by
this
permit
is
a
hot
tub,
/
spa
area,
every
every
everything
else
in
the
planets
either
already
been
the
permits
already
been
approved,
or
it's
the
pool
that
that
set
outside
of
the
the
setback
area.
With
that
I
look
to
see
what
we're
talking
about
in
terms
of
square
feet
for
the
hot
tub.
K
That's
really
all
this
comes
down
to,
and
it
comes
down
to
about
fifty
two
point:
six
eight
square
feet
to
put
some
numerical
numbers
on
that.
Fifty
two
point:
six
eight
square
feet
is
about
half
the
size
of
a
Toyota,
Camry
I
went
out
and
measured
one
today,
it's
also
smaller
than
the
size
of
a
queen-size
comforter.
So
we're
not
talking
about
a
whole
lot
of
space,
which
is
what
I'm
needing
in
order
to
obtain
the
spirits.
A
E
So
this
is
section
27
point
227
to
92.3
swimming
pools.
So
if
you
see
this
paragraph
here
and
if
you
read
the
last
line
a
rear
lot
line,
let's
see
pull
shall
be
located
a
minimum
five
feet
from
any
side
or
rear
lot
line
and
no
closer
to
the
corner
lot
line.
Then
the
corner
yard
setback
established
in
27
156,
so
the
courtyard
setback
for
a
lot
that's
zone,
27,
75,
okay,
so
which
is
the
same
same
as.
A
K
And
that
that's
that's
one
thing
that
that
is
very
important
to
me
is
is
to
build
a
pool
and
a
spa.
If
this
is
approved,
that's
that's!
In
keeping
with
the
house
it's
something
that
I
want
proportionate
to
the
house.
It's
is
something
where,
with
a
1928
house,
that's
been
meticulously
maintained,
it's
important
that
you
get
it
right
the
first
time.
D
D
K
D
K
A
B
So
I
generally
think
people
should
be
able
to
do
what
they
like
with
their
property
within
reason,
and
certainly,
if
you've
got
space
to
add
a
pool.
That's
a
reasonable
thing
to
do.
But
you
know
our
job
ears
look
for
the
hardship
that
exists
on
the
property
and
it
didn't
surprise
me
when
Miss
Meade
said
that
there's
no
exception
on
the
corner
yard,
because
that's
the
one
yard
that's
pushing
up
against
the
road
closest
to
a
road.
Of
course
the
front
yard
faces
a
road
as
well,
but
it's
a
lot
further
away.
B
So
it's
not
surprising
to
me
that
they
don't
want
buildings
or
pools
getting
closer
to
a
side,
road
yard.
So
you
know
the
idea
of
of
what's
a
reasonable
layout
or
size
is
subjective
to
everybody.
But
my
question
would
be
you
know:
does
the
pool
have
to
be
as
big
as
it
is?
You
already
address
the
location
of
the
spa
I'm
looking
for
something
on
this
property
that
would
dictate
the
need
for
a
pool
to
be
as
large
as
it
is
or
laid
out
in
the
way
that
it
is
I
know.
B
B
B
K
If,
if
I,
if
I
could
have
done
that,
and
if,
if
I
felt
that
it
was,
it
would
be
in
keeping
with
the
proportion
of
the
property
in
the
area
with
which
the
the
pool
is
located,
I
certainly
would
have
done
that
these.
These
are
all
things
that
I've
thought
about.
What
long
and
hard
before
I
got
here,
I'm
not
going
into
a
a
project
of
this
magnitude
without
really
thinking
things
through.
K
What
what
one
of
the
challenges
is
that,
if
you
take
the,
if
you
take
the
spa
and
you
just-
and
you
say,
okay,
what
we're
just
gonna
we're
gonna
push
it
in
or
we're
gonna
make
the
pool
that
much
smaller.
One
of
the
problem
set
that
you
run
into
is,
if
you
run
into
what
we
can
make
the
depth
of
the
pool
the
these
are
all
things
that
I've
learned
as
I've
gone
through
the
process.
K
K
My
thought
of
you
know
doing
everything
that
that's
in
keeping
with
the
ridiculous
proportional.
The
the
property
I
also
want
a
little
bit
deeper
pool.
I
don't
want
a
six-foot
pool,
which
is
basically
what
that
would
create.
I've
got
a
nine-year-old
son
that
no
matter,
if
no
matter
how
many
times
I
say,
don't
dive
into
the
pool.
That's
what
9
year
olds
do
they're
going
to
dive
in
the
pool
and
I
don't
want
them
diving
into
a
pool.
That's
that's
three
feet
in
the
shallow
end,
which
more
or
less
is
what
that
may
create.
K
If
we
have
to
put
push
this
push
this
in
a
little
bit,
yeah
other
few
things
that
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
is
on
the
on
the
vacuum,
where
the
wall
is
you're,
not
going
to
be
able
to
see
the
hot
tub
from
the
street
magician
aliy,
all
the
neighbors
got
a
great
relationship
with
all
the
neighbors.
None
of
it
no
but
neighbors
had
had
an
issue
with
with
any
of
this.
K
I
went
out
of
my
way
to
go
and
meet
personally
with
with
every
one
of
them
talked
with
them
about
the
talk
with
them
about
the
plan
walked
them
through.
What
the
plan
meant,
what
it
would
it
meant
to
them
to
what
the
project
was
going
to
look
like
upon
completion,
just
a
lot
of
miscellaneous
concerns
that
that
they
may
have.
One
thing
that
I
know:
they've
appreciated
is
the
the
transformation
of
the
house
over
the
last
two
years.
K
Certainly
you
can
look
in
before-and-after
pictures,
the
pictures
of
the
exterior
the
house
alone
when
I
bought
the
house
in
favor
of
2018
versus
what
would
they
look?
Look
like
now.
You
know
it's
my
intent
just
to
continue
to
improve
the
property
and
I'm
afraid
if
I
made
the
pool
a
little
bit
smaller,
it's
going
to
be
disproportionate
and
it's
not
going
to
be
in
keeping
with
what
I
feel
the
pool
should
be
like
on
a
property
like
that.
K
You
know
on
a
on
a
much
smaller
lot,
keeping
your
mind
be
kept
because
the
the
light
is
is
there's
almost
a
double
lot:
I'd
hate
to
put
a
little
bitty,
skinny,
narrow
pool
on
such
a
large
lot,
given
the
fat,
but
that's
the
only
location
that
I
can
put
it
where
the
garage
is
and
where
the
driveway
is
really
limits
me
on
on,
where
I
can
put
it
otherwise,
I
I
do
something
else
again.
I've
talked
I've
thought
about
this.
A
lot
I've
talked
to
the
architect
and
did
this.
D
D
D
Substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
then
at
this
public
hearing
of
a
necessary
hardship
of
practical
difficulty,
inserting
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
Section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
there
is
no
other
place
on
this
property
for
them
to
place,
pools
the
the
semi
detached
garage.
And
then
your
regular.
B
C
B
Now,
discussion,
dee
I
think
the
Spock
could
be
placed
on
the
west
side
and
the
pool
ship
to
the
east
and
you'd
have
the
exact
same
pool
with
the
depths
required
and
you
get
the
jet
pressure
because
it'd
be
closer
to
the
pool
equipment.
That's
just
one
of
the
several
options.
I
see
I,
don't
see
a
compelling
reason
that
we
would
project
closer
to
the
road
to
make
a
pool
of
this
size
with
this
layout
when
there
appears
to
be
plenty
of
deck
space
to
work
on
this
plan,
I.
I
Perhaps
just
one
comment,
so
I
think
that
one
of
the
I
guess
hardships
that
the
applicant
runs
into
is
that
this
is
a
corner
lot
and
had
this
not
been
a
corner
a
lot,
my
understanding
is
that
this
design
would
be.
A
L
Well,
since
you've
raced
that
issue
and
given
the
objections
that
I've
seen
I
will
I
will
voice
my
opinion
on
this
I
agree
with
Miss
Walker
that
what
we
have
is
a
corner
lot
that
ends
up
getting
squeezed.
I,
also
agree
that
there
are
other
ways
to
situate
to
design
this
pool
that
could
work
within
current
setbacks.
I
don't
like
to
get
into
the
business
of
redesigning
people's
projects.
L
It's
not
really
my
intent
to
say
well,
I
would
do
it
this
way
or
I
would
do
it
that
way,
their
property
I
was
the
way
they
want
to
do
it.
If
provided
we,
we
can
accept
the
fact
that
there
are
hardships.
This
one
is
not
a
hardship
case.
It's
more
of
a
practical
difficulty
situation.
You've
got
a
existing
layout
of
a
home.
You've
got
the
driveway,
you
know,
which
is
going
to
be
modified
to
some
degree
just
to
just
to
make
this
pool
fed.