►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 7-13-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
From
legal
we
have
kamaria
pettis
mackel
from
development
coordination.
We
have
anastasia,
barnes
and
eileen
rosario
from
natural
resources.
We
have
owen
williamson.
Maybe
no
do
we
have
anyone
from
oh
steve,
I
easter
eister,
all
right.
I
always
guessed
that
wrong
and
from
transportation,
jonathan
scott.
A
There
are
some
procedural
rules
that
you
need
to
follow
due
to
the
covet
19
pandemic.
Do
we
still
have
these
procedural
rules
in
place
for
covid?
Yes,
yes,
okay,
due
to
cover
19
pandemic,
please
adhere
to
safe
social
distancing
as
set
within
the
room.
Please
maintain
wearing
facial
masks
at
all
times
when
your
case
number
and
petitioner's
name
is
called.
A
All
other
persons
or
participants
wishing
to
speak,
will
have
three
minutes
and
then
the
petitioner
will
have
an
additional
three
minutes
for
a
bottle
if
needed.
The
time
periods,
as
stated
will
be
kept
by
the
board.
Any
information
such
as
pictures
or
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted.
As
part
of
your
petition-
and
you
intend
to
present
at
this
hearing
for
consideration
in
support
of
your
petition-
must
be
individually
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board.
A
After
acceptance
by
the
board,
you
must
submit
the
item
to
staff
for
it
to
be
entered
and
made
part
of
permanent
record
the
board
base
decision
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
which
is
presented
and
which
meets
the
criteria
required
by
the
city's
code
of
it
ordinances,
please
be
sure
to
clearly
state
your
hardship
criteria.
During
your
presentation,
a
majority
of
the
board
is
needed
to
approve
your
variance.
A
A
variance
granted
by
the
board
will
only
be
for
what
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
will
be
in
compliance
with
any
terms
and
conditions.
As
stated
in
the
approval
by
the
board,
all
other
city
codes
will
need
to
be
met
if
the
case
is
approved,
your
variance
will
expire
two
years
before
the
date
of
decision
two
years
from
the
date
of
the
decision.
If
the
case
is
continued
will
be
continued
to
either
the
next
month's
vrb
board
agenda
or
the
next
available
position
on
an
upcoming
vrb
board
agenda.
A
If
the
case
is
denied,
you
may
wish
to
have
the
variance
review
board's
decision
reviewed
by
the
city
council.
You
must
file
a
petition
for
review
of
the
board's
decision
within
10
business
days
of
the
written
decision.
You
will
not
be
able
to
pull
any
permits
until
after
the
10
days.
Review
period
has
passed
your
cooperation
and
ensuring
that
this
meeting
is
run
smoothly
is
greatly
appreciated.
A
Can
I
have
a
motion
from
one
of
the
board
members
to
approve
last
month's
meeting
minutes?
Please
so.
C
A
For
a
second
second,
all
right,
we
have
motion
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
hand
and
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed.
No
all
right
motion
passes
all
right
at
this
time.
I
will
ask
legal
staff
to
please
confirm
whether
there
are
any
ex
party
communications
or
any
conflicts
among
any
board
members.
A
I
will
I'll
do
this
for
both
of
these
for
vrb
21-80.
I
have
been
told
so
it's
been
communicated
to
me
that
one
of
my
colleagues
is
an
agent
on
this
on
this
petition
and
I
will
therefore
be
recusing
myself
from
vrb
21-80.
F
And
just
for
the
record,
you
did
fill
out
the
the
disclosure
form
and
I
did
file
hand
that
to
the
clerk
who
will
be
putting
that
with
the
record.
Thank
you
correct.
Any
other
board
members
have
any
ex
parte
communications
or
now
at
this
time
anyone
have
any
conflicts
of
interest
regarding
any
of
the
items
that
are
listed
on
the
agenda.
A
All
right
at
this
time,
I
would
ask
staff
to
please
conduct
the
swearing-in
and
for
members
of
the
audience.
If
there
is
a
chance
that
you
might
speak
tonight,
any
possible
chance
that
you
might
come
up
to
the
microphone
and
have
say
a
few
words.
Please
stand
up
and
be
your
right.
F
And
that's
vrb
2183
the
request
from
the
applicant
or
the
agent
is
to
move
this
case
to
the
august
10
2021
public
hearing
at
6
30..
If
there
could
just
be
a
motion
regarding
that.
A
Okay,
can
we
have
a
motion
please
to
continue
the
hearing
to
august
10th.
G
D
A
A
Okay,
does
that
bring
us
to
vrv
21
20-69.
H
Good
evening,
anesthesia
barns
with
development
coordination,
the
first
application
you're
seeing
tonight
is
vrb
2069.
The
applicant
and
agent
is
james
montjoy.
The
property
owner
is
jose
la
puente.
The
property
address
is
5805
south
gordon
avenue.
The
current
zoning
is
rs60
and
the
request
is
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
4
feet
and
reduce
the
side
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
5.5
feet
to
accommodate
a
new
accessory
structure
in
accordance
with
section
27
156
and
27
290..
H
This
is
an
aerial
view,
with
the
surrounding,
with
the
subject
property
and
surrounding
can.
I
H
A
Have
okay
is
that
all
the
spines.
H
H
Just
you
also
received
a
letter
of
support
for
vrb
2069.
J
A
J
Tonight,
before
the
board,
we
present
our
variants
for
the
site
address
of
5805
south
gordon
avenue
it's
located
in
south
tampa
near
bayshore
and
the
bay
mr
lapuntay
has
owned
this
house
for
quite
some
time.
The
original
architect
of
the
project
was
peter.
Peter
tagliari
was
the
architect
who
also
designed
the
accessory
structure
back
in
2009.
J
The
purpose
of
this
variance
is
that
we
need
to
have
the
setback
from
seven
to
five
feet
in
the
rear,
and
then
the
side
yard
set
back
to
5.5
feet
due
to
the
fact
that
the
existing
structure
that
is
located
at
the
house
of
the
two-car
garage-
that's
there
is
severely
damaged
by
termites,
but
also
the
hardship
is
based
upon
the
client's
mother,
whose
husband
is
in
a
alf
living
facility
and
there's
a
substantial
chance
that
she's
going
to
need
to
move
into
the
residence
which
mr
pintoy
has
a
bedroom
that
he
wants
to
move
his
mother
in
which
he
uses
as
an
office.
J
K
J
There
it
is,
the
existing
structure
currently
has
a
staircase,
that's
going
up
to
the
roof
deck,
but
they
want
to
turn
that
roof
deck
into
the
accessory
structure.
For
the
house.
We
have
to
move
the
staircase,
we're
going
to
demo
the
existing
building
and
then
construct
this
new
122
square
feet.
Approximately
existing
structure
at
the
existing.
J
I
guess
I
was
I
was
going
to
solicit.
If
you
have
any
questions
for
me
right
now,
I
can
go
deeper.
A
Okay,
well,
our
our
you
get
10
minutes
to
present.
We
don't
get
to
ask
questions
until
after
any
members
of
the
audience
may
have
spoken
if
any,
and
then
you
would
get
a
rebuttal.
Okay.
During
that
question
and
answer
period,
we
can.
We
can
have
those
questions,
but
you
have
six
and
a
half
more
minutes.
J
J
Granting
of
the
veterans
will
meet
with
all
detailed
hardships
above
and
will
create
a
separate
but
separate
office
space,
but
able
to
maintain
the
mother
in
the
house
safely,
and
so
it
will
be
in
harmony
with
the
general
intent
of
the
purpose,
as
well
as
the
goals
and
objectives
and
policies
of
both
the
city
comprehensive
plan
and
this
chapter.
This
requested
to
increase
the
square
footage
to
about
1122
and
also
the
height
to
20,
to
20
feet
will
accommodate
everything
that
the
owner
needs
on
site
for
that
new
structure.
A
That
completes
that
completes
your
presentation
all
right.
Well,
let's
see,
if
there's
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
make
any
comments?
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
to
this
petition
nope,
seeing
none
all
right?
Are
there
any
I'll
open
it
up
for
board
questions
or
comments?
C
J
Well,
it's
going
to
move
no
technically
it's
going
to
move
two
feet
forward
in
the
driveway,
so
that
it
accommodates
that's
that
5.5,
with
the
staircase
being
in
that
5.5
setback.
If
the
staircase
was
at
the
original
location,
we
would
not.
We
will
be
over
the
setback
so
now,
creating
that
that
move
with
the
structure
two
feet
so
that
we
have
that
5.5,
then
that
accommodates
the
design
to
what
the
variance
is
looking
for.
C
So
it's
it's
reducing
the
degree
of
variance
over
what
it
is
today
right,
okay
and
then,
of
course,
you're
adding
a
story
to
it,
but
the
footprint
is
the
same
size,
so
two
feet
right:
further
away
from
the
from
the
fence
line
from
the
property
line.
Okay,
correct!
All
right,
that's
my
question!.
G
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
for
staff.
Maybe
so
I
see
on
our
like
notice
that
it's
a
variance
to
reduce
the
setbacks.
Is
it
also
a
variance
to
increase
the
height
of
the
accessory
structure.
H
H
G
H
G
J
A
A
Okay,
all
right:
well
then,
we
appreciate
it.
Let's
close
up
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
or
comments
if
necessary,
but
it
looks
like
mr
pasteur
is
ready
to
roll.
C
C
I
move
that
the
variance
requests
are
case.
Vrb
2069
for
the
property
located
at
5805,
south
gordon
avenue
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
the
public
hearing
for
reduction,
the
rear
yard
set
back
from
20
feet
to
4
feet
in
reduction
in
the
side,
yard,
setback
from
seven
feet
to
five
and
a
half
feet
to
accommodate
a
new
rebuild
of
an
accessory
structure,
with
an
encroachment
for
eaves
and
gutters
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
of
this
public
hearing
of
a
necessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
C
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
2780
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
is
an
existing
structure,
that's
being
rebuilt
due
to
damage
and
the
size
of
the
footprint
is
the
same,
and
the
structure
will
be
moved
further
away
from
the
property
line.
Therefore,
reducing
the
degree
of
variance
needed.
L
A
A
H
Anesthesia
barns
the
next
case
before
you
is
2127,
the
applicant
and
property
owner
is
noah
trunklin
and
the
agent
is
david
wright.
The
property
address
is
695
geneva
place,
the
zoning
is
rs
60
and
the
request
is
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
5
feet.
As
you
know,
this
case
came
before
you
and
only
a
portion
was
approved,
and
so
this
is
the
portion.
That's
going
to
be
heard
again
as
a
result
of
a
thai
vote.
A
M
Thank
you,
wright
with
tsp
companies,
po
box
1016
tampa
florida
33601,
I'm
the
agent,
and
this
is
the
applicant
noah
trincline,
so
we'll
both
probably
be
giving
you
a
little
bit
of
testimony
tonight
I
haven't
sworn.
Thank
you.
Basically,
the
as
ms
barnes
explained,
the
this
variance
request
included
a
couple
of
variances.
One
of
them
was
approved
last
month,
we're
back
here
for
the
rear,
ed
we've
revised
our
hardship
criteria,
responses
and
I'm
going
to
just
go
through
those
before
you
for
number
one.
M
The
two-car
garage
site
plan
location
and
spacing
creates
the
need
to
encroach
15
feet
into
the
20-foot
rear
yard
setback
which
effectively
functions
as
a
side
yard.
Additionally,
due
to
fema
regulations
being
applied
to
the
new
proposed
residential
structure
finished
floor
elevation,
the
proposed
site
plans
layout
is
utilizing
a
transitional,
open
space
connection
between
the
main
residential
structure
and
the
garage
guest
suite
structure,
portions
of
the
residence
to
serve
both
as
a
finished
floor.
M
The
variance
if
granted,
will
not
substantially
interfere
with
or
injure
the
health,
safety
or
welfare
of
others,
whose
property
would
be
affected
by
allowance
of
the
variance
as
applicants
lot
rear
yard,
which
effectively
functions
as
a
side
yard,
has
only
one
primary
a
budding
lot
to
the
north.
So
the
budding
lots
structure
has
also
utilized
its
adjoining
rear
yard
as
a
side
yard
from
a
setback
perspective.
Creating
a
harmonious
set
of
compatible
abutting
setbacks
additionally
said
adjoining
lot.
M
M
The
additional
15-foot
encroachment
into
the
rear
yard
setback
which
effectively
functions
as
a
side
yard,
does
not
compromise
the
intent
of
the
chapter
or
plan
or
the
maintaining
of
the
quality
of
life
in
the
city.
If
approved,
the
reduced
yard,
setback
will
still
provide
an
equivalent
side,
yard
setback
and
will
continue
to
protect
the
health,
safety,
welfare
and
general
well-being
of
the
citizens
of
the
city,
as
well
as
being
consistent
and
compatible
with
the
adjoining
northern
property.
M
The
allowance
of
the
variants
requested
will
result
in
substantial
justice
being
done,
considering
both
the
public
benefits
intended
to
be
secured
by
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
chapter
and
the
individual
hardships
that
will
be
suffered
by
a
failure
to
grant
this
variance
as
detailed
in
the
responses
above.
A
reasonable
use
of
the
property
can
be
achieved
with
the
approval
of
this
variance
request.
N
A
Property,
fair
enough:
okay,
let's,
if
that
completes
your
presentation,
I'll,
go
ahead
and
open
it
up
to
see
if
anyone
in
the
audience
wants
to
comment
on
this
application,
anyone
no
all
right.
Let's
open
it
up
for
board
questions.
A
A
Okay,
well
then,
let's
move
it
back,
we'll
close
a
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
or
any
comment
from
the.
E
E
All
right
move
that
the
variance
requests
for
case
vrb,
21
27
for
the
property
located
at
695.
E
ginny
the
place
be
granted,
is
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
here
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
in
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
four
feet.
Hi
guys!
Excuse
me
five,
oh
excuse
me
reading
above
sorry
reduce
rare
yard
setback
from
20
to
five
for
the
construction
of
a
new
single
family
development
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
E
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
2780
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
being
a
corner
lot
and
being
a
corner
lot
it.
Let
me
try
and
read
it
being
a
corn.
A
lot
there
were
there
is.
There
is
hardship
in
the
development
of
a
corner
lot
and
I
think
the
applicant
certainly
adequately
displayed
that
they
had
done
all
they
could
to
satisfy
all
of
the
practical
criteria
that
the
code
had
enforced.
A
A
All
right
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
let's
go
ahead
and
vote
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
all
that's
posed,
okay,
one,
two,
three,
four,
all
right!
Unfortunately,
your
motion
does
not
pass.
You
have
10
days,
10
business
days
from
the
written
decision
to
challenge
it
with
the
city
council.
If
you
should.
M
The
action
this
book
this
has
been
voted
on,
so
we
have
to
go
to
council
or
file
a
new
application
for
that
area.
Okay,.
A
A
H
Good
evening,
anastasia
barnes,
this
case
before
you
is
2147.
the
applicant
and
agent-
is
alan
doms.
The
property
owner
is
benjamin
goodson.
The
address
is
2606
north
ridgewood
avenue.
The
current
zoning
is
rs
50
and
the
request
is
to
reduce
the
south
side
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
three
feet:
six
inches
in
accordance
with
section
27
156,
to
build
a
residential
addition
to
a
single
family
dwelling.
A
N
N
Sworn
sorry,
so
this
property
is
a
very
unique
property
similar.
I
guess
in
the
last
previous
case,
because
it
is
a
corner
lot,
but
it's
it's
an
odd
corner
lot
because
it's
triangular,
so
it
really
has
no
no
rear
property
line,
and
you
know
in
in
this
area
in
riverside
heights,
you
know
a
lot
of
these
streets
like
charter
and
which
richmond
some
other
streets
go
at
angles,
so
it
sort
of
creates
these
odd
shaped
lots.
N
N
So
so
it
definitely
is
unique
and
singular
this
lot
and
on
the
because
of
the
property
configuration
you
know
this.
This
is
really
the
rear
setback.
This
the
driveway
is
on
this
side,
so
if
they
ever
want
to
do
like
a
detached
accessory
building
or
garage
really,
the
only
opportunity
is
to
do
it
in
this
area,
so
it
wasn't
feasible
to
do
an
addition
on
the
over
the
existing
house,
just
because
it's
a
small
thousand
square
foot
house
two
bedrooms
and
a
really
small
office
up
front.
N
There's
this
one
little
corner
right
here,
where
we're
over
the
property
line
and
just
to
kind
of
help.
You
understand
that
we're
doing
the
minimal
possible.
As
I
said,
this
is
a
two
bedroom
with
an
office.
One
of
the
bedrooms
is
going
to
be
converted
to
a
laundry
utility
room
because
the
house
doesn't
have
a
laundry
utility
room
right
now.
It's
a
stacked
wash
and
dryer
in
the
kitchen
and
there's
really
no
master
suite.
I
do
a
lot
of
projects
on
historic
homes
and
the
the
most
common
thing
is.
N
People
are
adding
a
master
suite
to
their
home,
and
this
is
really
the
only
opportunity
to
do
it.
So
the
existing
bedroom
that
was
here
gets
converted
to
a
laundry
utility
room
and
then
like
a
little
foyer
or
auntie
sham
that
goes
into
the
master
bedroom
area
up
here,
a
little
bay
window
up
front
to
kind
of
break
up
the
addition
from
the
existing
and
then
and
then
a
relatively
small
master
bath.
And
then
again
you
can
see
the
corner
there.
O
N
Is
is
encroaching
on
the
setback
so
again
you
know
with
the
criteria
one
or
hardship
one.
It's
just
you
know
it's
definitely
unique
and
singular,
and
it's
not.
N
This
kind
of
problem
is
not
in
common
with
a
lot
of
adjacent
properties
and
then
the
obviously
because
of
the
configuration
a
lot,
the
hardship
is
not
the
result
of
any
actions
by
the
applicant
and
then
the
variants.
N
The
the
variants
will
allow
the
addition
of
a
modest
size,
bedroom
and
bathroom
in
a
neighborhood
where
most
of
the
homes
can
accommodate
this
type
of
addition,
without
a
variance,
the
variance
would
provide
relief
and
substantial
justice
and
allow
the
hardships
and
practical
difficulties
to
be
addressed.
So
with
that,
I
conclude
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
A
Terrific,
thank
you
very
much.
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
petition
all
right,
seeing
none
open
it
up
for
board
questions
if
any
going
once
going
twice
all
right,
you
have
three
minutes
for
a
bottle.
Okay,.
A
That
thank
you.
Okay,
let's
open
it
up
for
motion.
C
C
The
granite
is
depicted
on
the
site
plant
presented
the
public
hearing
for
reduction
in
the
side,
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
three
and
a
half
feet,
with
encroachment
for
eaves
and
gutters,
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
2780
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
lot
is
unique
and
singular.
A
H
Brb
2150
is
for
italia,
talo
mara.
The
agent
is
todd
brittenhard,
the
property
address
is
522
5223
south
puritan
avenue.
The
current
zoning
is
rs-60
and
the
request
is
to
produce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
12
feet
in
accordance
with
section
27156,
to
build
a
residential
addition
to
an
existing
single-family
residence.
H
P
F
D
Q
P
P
The
home
is
unique
in
the
fact
that
it's
surrounded
by
oak
trees
and
the
big
oak
trees
branches
go
over
the
top
of
the
property.
The
owner
is
a
sheriff's
deputy
and
he's
been
in
the
property,
his
second
generation
in
his
property
and
his
family
has.
He
has
three
children
in
there
and
he
needs
to
add
additional
living
space.
The
ability
to
go
up
would
be
extremely
costly
and
also
would
require
some
variance
for
trees.
P
So
this
property
line,
the
back
of
these
property
kind
of
backs
up
to
dumpsters,
there's
the
korean
restaurant
to
the
to
the
left.
Actually,
it's
up
for
sale
right
now,
but
those
are
commercial
properties
that
are
utilized
and
the
whole
intent
of
this
is
the
keeping
with
original
10
of
the
structure
was
for
a
family
residence.
So
adding
this
master
bedroom
addition
to
the
back
of
the
property
would
give
them
ample
space.
P
The
current
owners
have
a
teenage
daughter
and
two
young
children
and
adding
a
master
bed
on
this
side
would
give
him
a
split
floor
plan
a
little
privacy.
We
would
not
interfere
with
any
trees.
We
would
not
be
encroaching
really
into
any
other
neighbors,
because
the
both
property
lines
and
on
the
side
setback
and
the
back
rear
setback.
As
we
see
this
are
commercial
properties.
P
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
Does
that
conclude
your
presentation
this
evening?
Yes,
sir,
all
right
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
presentation,
seeing
none
I'll
open
it
up,
board
questions
any
questions.
D
I
have
a
quick
question
in
looking
at
the
design
you
went
back
instead
of
following
the
side
of
the
house
or
following
the
the
back
of
the
house,
because
of
a
tree.
Is
that
what
I'm
understanding
there's.
P
Trees
on
there's
an
easement
back
there,
there's
trees
on
both
sides
and
the
trees
in
the
front
yard
is
a
giant
oak
tree
that
has
the
branches
that
go
over
the
single
story
home.
This
is
in
the
fema
flood
zone,
and
so
the
tree
is
much
much
lower
than
what
it
would
be,
nor
the
home
is
lower
than
what
it
is
and
the
branches
extend
over
it.
So,
yes,
we
went
back
on
the
back
part,
there's
an
existing
kind
of
bonus
room
there
that
we're
going
to
extend
and
make
it
into
a
master
bedroom.
D
Okay,
so
so
the
tree
would
go
over
the
main
residence,
which
is
why
you
can't
just
push
back
the
bulk
of
it.
Just
extend
the
rectangle.
That's.
P
The
bulk
in
the
in
the
middle,
actually
that's
where
all
the
plumbing
and
clean
out
valves
and
everything
else
that
would
require
us
to
do
some
more
in
additional
costing
that,
as
I
mentioned,
it
was
a
sheriff
deputies
who
were
trying
to
confine
ourselves
with
budgetary
concerns,
and
this
was
the
simplest
way
to
have
additional
without
having
to
reroute
a
bunch
of
plumbing.
P
A
P
The
only
say
is,
I
would
request
that
the
board
hopefully
approve
this,
because
it
would
really
help
out
another
member
of
the
community
who's,
a
sheriff
deputy
working
at
limited
budget,
and
he
can't
afford
really
to
to
move
anywhere
else
in
the
south
tampa
community
to
keep
his
kids
the
same
school
district.
So
this
was
the
one
viable
option.
We
had
many
different
proposals
to
him
and
his
family.
This
was
the
one
we
thought
would
fit
within
his
budget
and
also
had
the
least
impact
to
the
environment
of
the
trees.
G
Miss
hertek,
I
thought
that
you
may.
That
was
like
a
good
question.
I
had
the
same
question
because
it
does
look
like
you
know.
If
you
kind
of
rotated
the
the
proposed
extension
kind
of
sideways
that
maybe
it
could
still
fit
within
the
setbacks
of
the
property,
you
know
without
the
need
for
a
variance.
G
I
you
know,
I'm
inclined
to
approve
this
and
I'll
make
a
motion
in
just
a
second,
but
because
I
think
if
you
were
to
turn
it,
you
know
this
is
a
uniquely
shaped
property
and
I
think
that
there's
a
chance
that
you
butt
up
against
the
setbacks
on
the
on
the
side
of
the
property,
so
I'm
yep,
together
with
the
other
hardship
criteria
that
I'll
mention
you
know,
I'm
I'm
okay
with
this
this
variant.
So
with
that,
I
move
that
variance
request
for
case
vrb.
G
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
property
is
uniquely
shaped
and
as
such,
there
is
less
building
room
than
would
otherwise
be
available
on
a
property
within
the
zoning
district.
Additionally,
it
will
not
the
this
variance
if
granted
will
not
substantially
interfere
with
the
health,
safety
or
welfare
of
those
who
would
be
affected
by
the
variants,
because
the
adjacent
properties
are
commercial
in
nature,
and
there
is
a
tree
buffer
between
this
property
and
the
rear
property.
That
would
be
most.
C
A
A
H
The
next
application,
for
you
is
2153,
the
property
is
located
at
7102
north
40th
street.
The
agent
is
elizabeth
morales.
The
current
zoning
is
cg
commercial
general.
The
request
is
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
10
feet
to
1
feet,
9
inches
to
allow
an
attached
canopy
for
a
commercial
business
and
the
prior
cases.
There
is
a
current
code
case,
1934-25
that
was
opened
in
2019
for
the
covered
structure,
and
so
that
is
cited.
H
This
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
property
with
surrounding
zoning,
and
this
is
a
2019
street
view
of
the
canopy
in
question,
and
this
is
the
site
plan
that
was
provided
in
your
packet
as
well,
showing
where
it's
going
to
the
existing
building
is
going
to
have
have
to
be
partially
removed
because
currently
is
in
the
right-of-way
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
A
Okay
applicant,
please
state
your
name,
your
address
and
confirm
that
you've
been
sworn.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Let's
get
you
sworn
in
and
if
there's
anyone
else
in
the
audience
who
hasn't
been
sworn,
please
stan
we'll
swear
you
in
now.
At
this.
I
I
I
I
I
believe
that
the
1.9
was
measured
at
the
corner.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
don't
quote
me
on
that,
but
that's
what
I
was
told
by
the
the
officer
who
initially
came
to
do
the
inspection.
I
However,
we
are
here
to
tell
you
guys,
whatever
we
need
to
do
to
come
into
compliance.
That
would
allow
us
to
keep
some
kind
of
space,
so
we
can
protect
our
workers
and
be
able
to
continue
to
provide
jobs,
and
you
know,
businesses
for
the
city
of
tampa
will
be
more
than
welcome
to.
I
A
Well,
welcome
to
the
variance
board.
Yes,
sir,
do
you
have
anything
you
wanted
to
contribute?
You
still
have
some
time.
L
Know
we're
working
outside
you
know
and
it's
very
hot.
You
know
we
cannot
live.
You
know
with
no
cannabi,
you
know,
except
we
in
florida.
You
know
and
rain
too
much.
You
know
five
minutes,
20
minutes
rain.
You
know
the
canopy
that
you
protect
us
even
is
not
keep
the
water
go
inside
the
shop
yeah.
At
least
you
know
you
keep
me
safe,
you
know
for
lighting,
you
know
safe
for
rain.
You
know,
customers
not
run.
L
You
know
because
iran,
you
know
that's
the
best
thing
and
I'm
trying
always
keep
my
property
around
the
neighbor
clean.
I
cut
the
glass
you
know,
keep
it
looks
nice
because
every
neighbor
is
heavy,
because
when
you
see
the
shop
always
on
the
cleaning,
I
keep
people
cut.
The
glass,
you
know
make
sure
you
go.
Some
employment
turn
around,
make
sure
no
garbage.
No
nothing
keep
the
fence
clean.
You
know
always
pressure
wash
you
know
around
the
property
to
keep.
A
I
Yes-
and
we
actually
asked
the
previous
owner
who
had
built
the
fence-
and
he
wouldn't
give
us
any
numbers
except
the
number
of
the
people
that
created
a
survey.
So
we
actually
contacted
the
people
that
created
a
survey
and
they
redid
the
survey
for
us.
So
that
was
the
only
trace
back
that
we
were
able
to
do.
C
I
It's
because
of
the
position
of
the
picture,
but
if
you
look
at
the
area,
you
can
see
that
the
property
is
wider
and
then
it
comes
to
the
slim
part
yeah
towards
the
end,
and
it
was
because
I
believe
when
they
redid
the
40th
street.
They
cut
part
of
it,
and
this
is
the
reason
that
the
property
is
slanted.
C
H
H
G
I
have
two
quick
follow-up
questions.
The
first
one
is.
You
said
that
there
was
a
taking
of
40th
street.
I'm
sorry
nor
north
40
yeah,
but
not
north
41st-
is
that.
I
G
Fair
enough
and
then
second
just
for
the
record,
you
know
this
is
this-
is
a
triangular
shaped
property,
which
seems
a
little
bit
unique
and
based
on
the
on
the
aerial
that
we've
got,
it
doesn't
look
like.
There
are
other
properties
in
the
area
that
are
shaped
like
this.
A
Okay,
if
you
need
it,
you
have
a
few
more
minutes
to
present
anything
else
that
you
need
to
say
if
you
feel
like
any
of
the
questions
raised,
anything
that
you
need
to
respond
to.
You
have
a
couple
minutes
to
do
that
now,.
I
A
A
H
Yes
yeah,
so
so
the
site
plan
submitted
shows
that
partial
removal
and
it
will
need
to
be
partially
removed.
So
it's
out
of
the
right-of-way
so
that
that's,
if
you
approve
or
deny
it
that's
what
you
were
approving
or
denying
no
portion
can
be
within
the
right-of-way.
I
C
So
I
think
to
be
more
clear,
the
question
is,
you
know,
you're
not
supposed
to
be
within
10
feet
of
the
property
line
and
you're,
obviously
up
right
up
to
the
property
line.
There's
nothing.
This
board
can
do
to
grant
encroachment
into
the
actual
city
property
over
your
property
line,
so
one
way
or
another
that'll
have
to
be
removed
back
to
the
property
line.
What
you're
asking
us
is
for
the
right
to
encroach
into
that
10
feet
up
to
the
property
line.
If.
C
A
All
right
did
you
have
any
other
comments,
anything
else
you
need
to
talk
about.
No,
we
do
not
all
right
great
well
with
that,
then
we
will
go
ahead
and
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion.
L
L
A
H
Anesthesia
barnes,
the
next
case
before
you
is
vrb
2154,
the
property
owner
is
james
song
and
eric
newcomer
and
the
applicant
is
bruno
ganan.
The
subject
address
is
202
north
manhattan
avenue
unit.
Two.
The
current
zoning
is
rm18
residential
multi-family.
The
request
is
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
15
feet
to
seven
feet.
Seven
inches
reduce
the
side.
North
yard
set
back
from
seven
feet
to
six
feet
eleven
inches
and
reduce
the
set
side.
H
H
A
All
right,
terrific
applicant,
if
you
would
please
state
your
name,
your
address
and
confirm
you've
been
sworn.
L
L
We
didn't
know
at
the
time
we
purchased
the
property
that
you
know
that
it's
something
like
this
would
be
required
to
to
put
a
pearl
up
in
the
backyard.
A
That's
okay!
All
right
did
you
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
size
of
the
property,
so
we
understand-
because
you
mentioned
that
you
were
talking
about
the
use
of
the
front
to
back
how?
How
wide
is
your
property.
L
It
is
28
feet
wide,
so
it's
a
so
the
so
the
property
type
or
the
construction
type
is
a
townhouse,
which
is
why
the
the
space
is
utilized.
The
way
that
it
is,
you
know,
with
other
homes
in
the
area,
they're
much
shorter,
that
don't
go
as
far
back
as
these
town
homes
do.
L
A
Okay,
all
right
well,
does
that
conclude.
A
A
Okay,
I'll
go
ahead
and
open
it
up
for
any
questions
or
comments
from
the
audience.
Anyone
in
the
audience
have
any
comments
on
this
petition
all
right,
seeing
none.
I
will
open
it
up
for
questions
from
the
board.
E
L
G
To
clarify-
and
maybe
this
is
miss
barnes
question,
so
the
these
setbacks
are
sorry.
This
variance
is
required
because
the
percola
is
not
going
to
be
directly
attached
to
the
principal
residence.
Is
that.
H
Right,
it
is
directly
attached
to
the
open
porch.
So
that's
that's
what
he's
requesting,
I
believe
I
know
I
can't
remember.
I.
O
H
Know
if
there
was
if
it
was
ever
detached,
but
I
don't
want
to
get
to
hypotheticals
so
it
these
are.
The
setbacks
required
for
an
attached
pergola.
H
R
A
Okay,
any
other
questions,
no
seeing
none.
You
have
three
minutes
for
a
bottle
if.
D
It
will
go
faster
if
you
do
them
all,
but
I
moved
at
the
variance
request
for
case
vrb
21-54
for
property
located
at
202
north
manhattan
avenue.
I'm
sorry!
Thank
you.
D
I
moved
at
the
variance
request
for
case
vrb
case
21-54,
located
at
202
north
manhattan
avenue
unit
number
two,
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduced
rear
yard
setback
from
fifteen
feet
to
seven
feet:
seven
inches
a
reduced
side,
north
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
six
feet,
11
inches,
a
reduction
in
the
side,
south
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
four
feet:
seven
inches
with
an
encroachment
for
the
eaves
and
gutters,
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
pergola
never
be
enclosed.
D
That
said
variants
as
conditioned
be
granted
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
for
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
is
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
attached,
how
that
the
narrow
lot
and
the
deep
depth
of
the
residence
does
not
allow
for
additional
space
in
the
back
yard.
E
A
H
H
H
H
A
O
Sure
my
name
is
jennifer
ronaberger.
My
address
is
51
meadows
drive,
boynton
beach,
florida
33436
and
yes,
I
have
been
sworn
in.
Thank
you.
Oh
okay.
I
know
I
don't
speak
loud
enough.
Okay,
we
are
asking
for
two
additional
wall
signs
for
a
chase
bank
that
is
here
now.
Actually
the
building
is
built.
So
it's
not
just
that
construction
site,
that's
there
anymore.
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
if
possible?
O
So
the
addition
is
for
two
additional
wall
signs
that
do
that
does
match
the
one
that
we're
going
to
be
proposing
on
the
front
elevation,
which
is
the
south.
So
if
it's
possible
I'd
like
to
go
through
each
one,
each
page,
so
the
first
one
is
the
site
plan.
So
can
we
flip
to
the
next
one?
Please?
Oh,
do
you
want
me
to
do
it?
I
don't
know:
okay
yeah,
just
like
that.
H
Okay,
sure
do
you
have
your
own
little
packet,
so
I
don't
know
which
slide
you
want
to
see
next
right
here.
O
O
If
just
go
to
the
next
slide,
I
can
tell
you:
this
is
fine.
This
is
the
south
elevation.
This
is
the
elevation
that
faces
east
fowler,
that's
the
one
that
is
allowed
by
straight
code.
Each
of
the
signs
that
we're
asking
for
tonight
is
going
to
be
36.9
square
feet.
So
this
is
regular
standard
chase,
low
profile,
individual
illuminated
channel
letters.
So
if
you
could
just
go
to
the
next
slide
for
me,
okay,
this
is
the
west
elevation.
This
west
elevation
the
way
that
the
building
is
oriented
because
of
the
shape
of
the
property.
O
This
west
elevation
faces
the
dry
vial
into
the
shopping
center.
The
shopping
center
is
the
university
collection
shopping
center.
So
this
this
is
the
front
of
the
building
where
this
is
the
only
entrance
and
it
faces
that
direction.
That's
why
we're
asking
for
a
sign
to
match
the
front
to
be
on
this
elevation
straight
up
notification
that
you
know
that
you're
going
into
the
bank?
Okay,
so
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
the
next
slide.
This
is
the
east
elevation,
we're
looking
to
have
a
sign
on
this
side
as
well.
O
O
It's
going
to
be
drive-through
lanes
for
the
drive-through
bank,
so
that's
what's
going
to
be
here
also,
the
other
part
of
it.
There
is
an
existing
multi-tenant
shopping
center
sign
that
is
right.
Next
to
this
location,
there's
the
chile's
building.
Are
you
guys
familiar
with
the
area
at
all
by
chance?
No
okay,
there
is
the
chile's
building,
which
is
right
next
door
right
in
between
the
chile's
building
and
this
new
chase
bank.
There
is
a
very
large
multi-tenant
free
standing
sign.
O
O
So
that's
pretty
much
it
that's!
What
we're
asking
for
again
we're
looking
for
uniformity,
the
way
that
chase
does
their
buildings
they're
really
looking
for
brand
consistency,
we
don't
want
to
have
different
size
signs
all
over
the
place.
We're
really
looking
for
a
nice,
clean
slick.
Look
I
just
went
past
this
building.
It's
absolutely
gorgeous
the
materials
are
high
end
and
it's
very,
very
nice,
so
we're
hoping
that
you
would
please
allow
us
to
have
the
two
additional
signs
that
we're
asking
for.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'm
here
to
answer.
A
All
right,
I
guess
that
concludes
your
presentation.
Yes,
sir,
all
right,
thank
you.
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
application,
seeing
none
I'll
open
it
up
for
board
questions.
O
Sure
the
building
frontage
code
is
1.25
square
feet
for
every
linear
foot
of
building
frontage.
Our
building
frontage
is
42
feet
in
length,
so
1.25
comes
out
to
the
53.,
so
we're
asking
for
the
two
additional.
So
I'm
actually
asking
for
an
additional
57
so
36.9
times
3
is
the
110,
but
really
you
take
that
57
off
the
53
off
you
come
out
to
57.
O
C
O
And
sides
of
that
they
do
there's
right
in
that
shopping
center
alone.
There's
right
in
that
shopping
center
alone.
There's
multiple
tenants
that
have
two
signs:
okay,.
O
A
O
O
F
E
O
F
If
the
applicant
is
stating
on
the
record
that
they
would
accept
that
condition,
if
it's
a
part
of
the
motion,
then
you
could
proceed
that
way
and
if
the
applicant
acknowledges.
B
I
just
wanted
to
just
you
know
the
having
the
signs
on
all
sides
makes
sense,
especially
if
there's
not
the
you
know
freestanding
sign.
I
was
just
trying
to
figure
out
why
the
size
needed
to
be
so
big.
I
didn't
quite
understand
that
hardship
so
much
as
you
know
the
having
the
number
of
signs
required
to
bring
that
up.
A
G
Ahead,
sorry,
so
I
I'm
inclined
to
approve
this
variance,
but
I
am
not
inclined
to
offer
an
approval
with
conditions.
I
I
don't
see
a
need
to
require
that
this
applicant
waive
the
right
to
install
a
monument
sign
in
the
future.
G
F
Kamaria
pettis
mackel
from
the
city
attorney's
office,
yes,
avariance
does
run
with
the
land.
So
please
keep
that
in
mind
and
if
someone
would
like
to,
I
don't
know,
miss
johnson.
Are
you
comfortable
making
a
motion
on
this
one
or
do
you
want
to
save
another
one.
A
All
right
do
we
have
someone
who
would
like
to
make
motion.
D
I
actually
feel
the
opposite
that
I
would
not
be
willing
to
approve
it
without
the
condition
of
the
monument
sign
just
because
I
feel
like
it
is
too
much
sign,
but
if
they're
willing
to
take
away
that
monument
to
I
mean
I
understand
the
need
to
have
three
signs,
I
just
don't
understand
the
need
for
twice
as
much
square
footage.
I.
G
My
thinking,
which
is
that
you
know
east
fowler,
is
a
really
busy
road.
You
know
there
are
lots
of
multi-tenant
like
kind
of
out
parcels
and
strip
centers,
and
so,
as
far
as
like
directional
and
weight
and
like
way
finding
signage,
I
think
that
on
fowler
you
know
for
better
or
worse
that
a
lot
of
signage
is
necessary.
C
A
Would
would
the
if
they
change
the
signage
I
mean
if
yes,
so,
if
it's
a
chase
bank
and
the
new
tenant
comes
in
and
it's
a
chase
bank,
they
can
utilize
the
same
signage,
but
if
they
take
those
signs
down
and
they
go
to
put
up
new
signs,
that's
different
site
plan.
Is
it
not.
O
F
A
A
C
A
I
completely
understand
that
I
wasn't
sure
if,
because
they're
changing
the
signage
we've
had
instances
where
they
take
the
signs
down
that
you
know
they
want
to
change
out
their
sign
and
put
in
a
new
light
box
or
something
like
that,
and
we
need
to
go
in
and
approve
it
because
they're
putting
in
a
new
light
box
or
they're
they're.
Taking
the
signs.
C
A
From
from
a
comment
standpoint,
I
would,
I
would
agree
with
miss
decker
on
this
one
that
you
know.
I
don't
know
that
I
would
nest.
I
would
necessitate
the
condition
because
I
don't
really
care.
I
agree.
It's
the
same
exact
condition
for
a
bank
of
america
or
a
chick-fil-a,
that's
occupying
this
space,
so
if
they
need
the
same
signage,
I
would
be
okay
with
that.
A
D
G
But
what
is
being
asked
here
is
that
the
city
code
doesn't
allow
for
like
signage
on
it,
doesn't
account
for
the
fact
that
buildings
for
safety
and
directional
purposes
should
have
signs
on
the
east
and
the
west
side.
The
sign
the
the
code
is
based
on
the
width
of
the
building
frontage
on
one
road.
D
A
All
right:
well,
let's
I
guess
we
can
hash
out
the
motion
and
see
where
it
goes
so.
A
G
I
would
like
to
make
a
commission.
I
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
vrb
21-72
for
property,
located
at
2792
east
fowler
avenue
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
an
increase
in
the
allowable
building,
sign
surface
area
from
53.32
square
feet
to
110.7
square
feet
based
on
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
G
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
variants
will
not
substantially
interfere
with
the
or
injure
the
health
safety
or
welfare
of
those
that
would
be
affected
by
the
variants,
because
the
property
is
located
in
a
commercial
area
with
lots
of
other
signage
and
in
fact
the
signage
on
the
east
and
the
west.
Elevations
will
result
in
additional
safety
measures
being
taken,
because
public
traveling,
east
and
west
on
fowler
will
be
able
to
more
easily
find
and
locate
the
building.
C
Yeah
I
do
want
to
vote.
I
just
couldn't
decide.
A
H
H
H
This
is
option,
one,
which
is
the
option.
It's
my
understanding
that
they
wanted
to
move
forward
with
option
two
option:
three
and
another
another
picture
of
the
subject:
property
and
the
standard
for
variance
review
for
tree
removal,
section,
27,
284.2.5
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
L
L
My
wife
and
I
have
owned
the
property
for
about
32
years
this
tree,
it's
not
on
the
property
line,
it's
about
six
or
eight
feet
into
the
property
and
it's
hard
to
see
on
the
photos,
but
the
entire
canopy
leans
over
the
into
about
half
of
the
property,
and
I
it
seems
impractical
or
poss-
are
really
impossible
to
build
a
two-story
home
on
this
property
with
the
way
the
tree
is
situated,
you'd
have
to
remove
really
almost
the
entire
canopy
to
put
a
home
here
to
comply
with
the
existing
height
requirements
under
the
flood
rules
and
and
the
setbacks.
L
L
It's
it's
impractical
and
it
doesn't
allow
us
to
put
a
normal
sized
house
there.
I
think,
from
a
practical
standpoint,
the
the
tree
needs
to
be
removed
in
order
for
us
to
put
a
a
single
family
home
that
will
comply
with
all
the
existing
setbacks,
because
I
don't
to.
I
don't
want
any
variances
of
the
setbacks.
I,
like
the
setbacks,
and
I'm
also
I've
heard
that
the
city
sometimes
will
require
replanting,
which
I'm
willing
to
do
that,
and
I
actually
want
to
do
that.
L
Q
Another
issue
too:
even
if
we
created
this
same
house,
you
can
see
in
the
picture
that
we're
all
looking
at
how
the
the
low
hanging
canopy
is
going
to
be
encroached
even
with
a
single
story
house,
because
now
we
have
the
fema
floodplain
elevation.
That's
been
increased
recently
you're
going
to
be
around
seven
feet
from
the
first
floor,
elevation
plus
whatever
you
do
for
seconds
or
first
story
plus
roof
you're
gonna
be
right
into
the
canopy
anyway.
So
it's
that
there's
a
major
issue
with
even
even
recreating
the
same
house.
We
have
there
now.
Q
L
A
Seeing
none,
I
will
open
the
did.
You
have
something.
Q
A
One
that
you
know
that's
not
the
one
that
we
received
is
that
in
I.
Q
Think
there's
one
erroneously
loaded
in
there
from
somebody
else
and
then
we
had
one
that
was
uploaded
from
april
newman
and
joshua.
Muhammad
jason.
Q
A
Q
A
B
H
B
Have
you
considered
the
natural
resources
response
here
that
for
the
option
number
three,
they
believe
that
you
could
still
keep
the
grand
tree
viable.
L
A
Let's,
actually,
let's
go
ahead
and
hear
from
the
stress
from
that.
K
K
H
A
40
percent
reduction
would
allow
the
rear
yard
set
back
to
be
12
feet
by
right,
so
for
preserving
that
tree.
A
And
again,
mr
eistro,
I
I'm
sorry
given
your
exercise
this
evening
and
if
option
three
would
still
be
a
two-story
house.
A
You
believe
that
the
impact
to
the
canopy
spread
to
the
limbs
would
be
would
be
acceptable.
K
L
L
L
I
I
this
tree
is
the
way
that
this
tree
sits.
I
I
I've
had
to
deal
with
this
tree
for
30
years.
It
is
not
an
attribute
to
this
property
or
the
neighborhood.
L
Q
Yeah
we
originally
showed
taking
the
two
smaller
trees
out
in
the
front
yard.
We
can.
We
can
keep
the
garage
on
the
north
side,
get
rid
of
the
grand
tree,
we're
talking
about
and
then
keep
the
two
smaller
oaks
in
the
front
yard.
C
C
L
C
There's
plenty
of
houses
where
their
entire
backyard
is
a
pool,
so
I
mean
to
say
that
it's
it's
not
practical,
it
is
the
use,
would
be
a
pool,
it
wouldn't
be
a
yard
and
in
return
you
would
get
a
much
larger
front
yard.
So
I'm
not
saying
you
need
to
do
that.
I'm
just
saying
that
to
say
that
it's
it's
not
practical,
it
absolutely
is
we've
seen
it
done.
I've
seen
it
done
and
you
pick
up
that
footage
on
the
front
side.
Of
course.
Q
Understand
that
when
the
whole
poll
issue
came
up
in
sliding
the
house
back,
we
we
didn't
think
about
encroaching
on
the
back
property,
the
property
setback
we
thought
about
staying
within
the
set
within
the
within
the
setback
requirements.
L
Q
N
Q
Q
Basically,
if
we
get
rid
of
the
tree,
leave
the
garage
on
the
north
side
minimize
the
front
driveway,
we
can
keep
these
two
trees.
We
originally
talked
about
getting
rid
of.
Now
we
have
plenty
of
backyard.
We
have
a
nice
space
for
green
space
back
here
green
space
for
trees.
What
have
you
and
we're
not
encouraging
any
of
the
property
setbacks.
Q
No,
no
because
the
whole
thing
with
the
encroach
on
the
setback
didn't
come
up
too
late.
Last
week,.
A
Yeah
and
you'll
need
to,
if
you
want
us
to
consider,
rely
upon
this
you'll
need
to
obviously
include
that
document
and
give
it
in
to
city
staff.
A
Questions,
okay,
see
no
other
questions,
you
have
three
minutes
for
rebuttal,
should
you
choose
or
should
you
need
it.
L
A
Did
you
have
any
rebuttal
or
anything
you
want
anything
else?
You
wanted
to
add.
Q
Just
want
to
reiterate
the
point
that
we're
considering
we're
talking
about
two-story
house.
However,
if
we
did
do
a
one-story
house,
you
still
have
an
extreme
height
on
the
first
story:
roof
because
the
the
seven
foot
floor,
elevation
above
grade
plus
the
second
plus
the
first
story,
plus
the
roof.
So
this
isn't
just
replacing
like
kind.
A
E
I
think
they
proved
their
case.
I
think
it's
impractical
to
shift
with
the
way
davis
island
is
right
now
to
show
the
house
back
to
a
12
foot,
rear
backyard,
considering
the
kind
of
size
and
the
value
that
that
house
is
going
to
be
worth
when
it's
done
limits
the
limits,
the
homeowner
conditions,
the
homeowner,
the
future
value
of
that
house,
because
that
backyard
is
so
impossible
and
practical
and
simply
by
having
a
larger
front
yard.
E
I
don't
know
anybody
in
this
town
that
utilizes
their
front
yard
for
anything
other
than
decorative
landscape
and
parking
cars,
so
I
think
they
certainly
adequately
tried
to
move
around.
I
know
I've
been
a
short
timer
on
this
committee,
but
I
know
that
we
have
certainly
approved
removal
of
grand
trees,
camari
pettis,
mackel.
F
From
the
city
attorney's
office,
every
case
is.
E
Just
singular
and
individual
okay,
so
I'll
recant
that
but
yes,
I
think
they've
proven
their
case
and
they
certainly
made
alternatives,
and
I
think
the
builder
is
bringing
a
very
good
point
that
I
don't
think
people
in
realize
to
the
extent
that
how's
the
shape
that
housing
is
going
to
take.
Now
that
the
new
fema
regulations
are
going
to
take
effect
and
you're
going
to
have
a
house
who's.
Next
to
that
oak
tree,
you're
you're
going
to
be
standing
on
the
ground
floor.
E
Those
limbs
aren't
going
to
be
above
you
they're,
going
to
be
at
your
eye
level
or
low.
It's
it's
just
not
a
practical
and
then
to
knife
that
tree
like
that
and
cut
it
like
a
slice
when,
naturally
those
trees
grow
in
circumference
regions,
you're
just
setting
them
up
for
a
problem
where
there's
going
to
be
a
storm
and
they
have
that
legally
available
to
them
too.
E
Ma'am,
yes,
sir,
excuse
me
yes,
sir,
I
would
all
right
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
vrb.
E
The
right
one
2173
for
property
located
at
108
here
on
avenue,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
removal
of
a
grand
tree
with
an
encroachment
for
eaves
and
gutters,
based
on
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record.
At
this
public
hearing
of
an.
E
27
excuse
me
set
forth
in
section
27
284
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
applicant
has
given
adequate
weight
to
trying
and
relocate
a
new
construction
home
to
avoid
having
to
deal
with
this
tree,
and
I
think
he
showed
adequate
hardship
that
they've
made
every
every
effort
to
try
and
reclo
relocate
the
house
to
accommodate
the
hou,
the
the
positioning
of
the
new
house,
and
I
just
don't
don't
think
it's
impractical.
I
think
it's
impractical.
G
I'll
second
with,
if
I
can
make
an
amendment
to
the
motion
just
to
like
flag
the
fact
that
we
heard
testimony
that
a
reduction
in
the
rear
yard
setback
would
result
in
the
house
being,
I
think,
13
to
15
feet
away
from
the
tree.
But
we
have
an
arborist
report
that
indicates
that
the
two-story
house
would
need
to
be
20
feet
away
from
the
tree
in
order
to
to
preserve
that
tree.
L
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
as
amended:
let's
go
ahead
and
vote
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
all
is
posed.
H
H
A
All
right
good
evening,
please
state
your
name,
your
address
and
confirm
that
you've
been
sworn.
T
My
name
is
benjamin
david.
I
live
at
3606
western
ellis
circle,
tampa
florida
33629,
I
have
been
sworn
in.
I
am
the
property
owner
along
with
my
wife.
We
are
requesting
the
enclosure
of
our
front
porch.
T
We
purchased
this
house
in
2016.
It
was
new
construction
at
the
time
we
did
not
design
it,
but
I
have
an
image
here.
I'm
not
sure
if
I
need
to
submit
this
or
I
can
put
it
up
okay.
So
this
gives
you
a
good
idea
of
the
porch.
Our
front
porch
is
formed,
sort
of
an
l,
shape,
there's
a
front
door,
and
then
this
back
piece
here
that
kind
of
goes
back
into
the
house.
T
T
We
are
expecting
our
family
to
grow
next
year,
which
is
exciting.
On
the
flip
side
of
that,
my
mother-in-law
who
lives
in
central
florida
became
a
widow
recently
she's
becoming
it's
becoming
difficult
for
her
to
to
remain
by
herself.
So
we're
expecting
to
bring
her
in
the
house
as
well
under
our
current
setup,
we're
using
bedrooms
for
offices,
but
our
intent
is
to
convert
this
backs
part
of
the
patio
into
an
office
space
for
us
to
make
room
for
for
the
additions
to
the
family.
T
A
Okay.
That
concludes
your
presentation.
Yes,
all
right,
let's
ask
if
there
are
any
any
audience
members
if
there's
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
comment
on
this
application,
anyone
nope,
okay,
let's
open
it
up
for
questions.
D
I
have
a
question:
that's
probably
semantical,
but
I'm
looking
at
a
site
plan
here,
and
this
actually
shows
three
walls,
not
two
walls,
because
it
wants
to
bump
out
a
little
bit.
Is
that
still
the
case
or
are
you
still
are
you
planning
on
making
it.
T
No,
it
would
bump
out,
I
believe,
it's
about
a
foot
and
a
half
with
the
addition
of
the
door
and
making
it
an
office
space.
We
wanted
a
little
more
room,
you
know
for
a
desk
and
a
chair
and
a
door,
so
it
wouldn't
all
jam
into
itself,
so
it
would
come
out
so
two
and
a
quarter
wall.
I
guess.
D
Okay
but
question
for
staff,
I'm
assuming
that's
still
within
the
setbacks
and
crabbing.
A
C
T
H
C
Okay,
so
that's
what
he's
noticed
for-
and
I
guess
he
could
go
up
to
that
far
but
he's
asking
for
less
than
that
here-
I'm
not
sure,
ms
pettis,
if
we
need
to
address
that
or
not
he's
not
asking
for
17
feet,
he's
asking
for
less
you're
only.
E
F
Yeah
so
since
this
is
a
site
plan,
specific
approval,
if
you
could
just
whatever
motion
is
made,
if
they
could
address,
what's
asked
for
on
the
site
plan.
C
C
C
Or
something
yeah,
but
either
way
just
wanted
to
clarify
that.
F
L
T
Our
variance
request,
as
stated,
was
to
reduce
from
25
feet
to
to
17
feet
to
enclose
the
porch.
However,
I
I
do
need
to
to
say
that
the
plans
were
never
submitted
to
the
column
line
and
we
took
our
direction
from
the
city
to
request
that
17-foot
setback.
F
H
Anastasia
barnes,
so
in
email
correspondence
I
did
confirm
the
17
feet
because
originally
it
was
less
and
it
was
my
understanding
that
the
these
were
just
preliminary
plans
that
they
weren't
final
plans.
H
C
The
yeah,
the
reason
that's
important
to
us
is
what
you've
noticed
for
is
that
you
can
build
all
the
way
out
to
the
front
of
your
porch
right.
That's
a
very
different
appearance
for
us,
the
columns
versus
wall,
and
so
we
would
need
to
know
what
you
actually
intend
to
do
and
probably
build
the
motion
around
that
sure,
because
it's
very
different.
The
two
outcomes.
T
Sure
understood
understood,
so
our
request
would
not
be
to
to
the
porch.
I
guess
it
would
be
two
to
21
feet,
21
feet,
yeah.
A
Sure,
okay,
okay,
are
there
any
further
questions
for
the
applicant
all
right,
seeing
none!
You
have
three
minutes.
T
Yes,
we
we
are,
should
I
restate
everything.
A
Okay,
so
you
have
three
minutes
for
rebuttal
to
say
anything
else
you
feel
is
necessary.
A
Okay,
well,
when,
with
that,
I
will
open
it
up.
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
motion
or
board
discussion
if
necessary,.
C
A
move
that
variance
request
for
case
vrb
2074,
located
at
3606
2174
located
at
3606
west
renelli
circle,
be
granted.
It's
depicted
on
the
site
plan
and
presented
the
public
hearing
for
reduction
in
the
front
yard,
from
25
feet
to
20
feet
with
encroachment
of
eaves
and
gutters,
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
confident
and
substantial
evidence,
and
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
a
necessary
hardship
of
practical
difficulty.
C
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
2780
of
the
city
code.
Specifically
that
there's
a
practical
need
to
expand.
They
had
a
design
exception
for
the
porch
and
would
like
to
build
out
onto
part
of
that
porch
without
affecting
the
front
facade
of
the
house
per
the
site
plan
that
was
submitted.
A
Let's
take
a
vote,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye.
Okay,
all
right,
we
have
all
those
posts.
Okay
motion
passes
five
to
one
thank.
A
H
Anesthesia
barnes
the
next
case
before
you
is
vrv
2177.
The
applicant
is
dan
drayton,
the
agent
thomas
hall
and
the
property
owners
monica
and
john
weir.
The
property
address
is
4213
north
riverview
avenue.
The
current
zoning
is
rs
50
residential
single
family
and
the
request
is
to
remove
a
grand
oak
tree
to
construct
a
single
family
dwelling.
H
This
is
the
survey
submitted
by
the
applicant.
H
Here
is
a
current
street
view
of
the
vacant
property
and
again
section
27284.2.5
is
what
the
standard
for
the
variance
review
board
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
A
A
A
Let's
hold
on
for
just
a
moment
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
square.
These
applicants.
E
I
P
F
L
A
You
all
right
welcome.
Now
you
can
state
your
name,
your
address
and
confirm
that
you've
just
been
sworn.
J
J
J
We
had
a
meeting
there
me
and
mr
drain
had
a
meeting
there
with
owen
williamson,
and
during
that
time
we
looked
at
five
six
different
ways
to
try
to
save
the
tree.
We
looked
at
moving
the
home
turning
the
home,
moving
it
forwards,
moving
it
backwards.
We
also
looked
at
having
a
setback
to
get
the
home
within
two
to
three
feet
of
the
tree,
but
in
doing
that
we
would
have
to
take
over
half
the
canopy
the
tree
canopy.
J
Once
we
realized
we
couldn't
do
that
without
affecting
the
tree
or
even
if
we
did
build
it
and
even
built
put
in
a
piers
where
you
could
build
from
peer-to-peer
to
put
to
try
to
build
over
the
top
of
the
root
plate.
We
realized
even
doing
that
within
two
years.
It
would
kill
the
tree.
So
when
it
was
all
said
and
done,
we
had
no
practical
way
to
save
the
tree
and
still
build
a
home.
A
All
right
does
that
conclude
your
presentation.
Q
The
only
thing
I
might
add
is
it
is
a
very
narrow
width.
What
lot
it's
only
50
foot
wide.
We
have
seven
foot
setbacks
on
either
side.
We
attempted
to
try
to
move
the
house
over
two
feet,
bring
it
over
to
a
five
foot
setback
by
doing
so,
it
really
does
not.
If
you
look
at
the
presentations
that
were
presented,
it
really
doesn't
get
us
away
from
the
root
system
of
the
tree,
nor
the
canopy.
Q
Q
Oh
okay?
If
you
can
see
the
canopy
radius
that
I've
drawn
on
the
site
plant
from
the
center
of
the
tree
moving
the
home
around
on
this
50-foot
wide
lot
makes
it
nearly
impossible
to
try
to
get
away
from
it.
J
A
Do
does
that
conclude
your
presentation?
Yes,
sir
all
right,
I
appreciate
it.
Let's
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
split
speak
on
this
application.
A
All
right,
seeing
none
I've
had
very
little
audience
participation
this
evening.
Let's,
let's
open
it
up
for
board
questions.
D
I
just
had
one
quick
question:
you
and
you
can't
go
closer
to
the
water
because
of
the
wetland
setback
correct.
Is
that
that's
correct,
that
is
at
a
fifth
30
30
feet:
30
foot,
step
back
35
feet,
35
feet!
Okay,
thank
you.
B
Q
E
A
Indeed,
okay,
thank
you
all
right
with
that,
we'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
or
discussion
from
the
board.
Please.
G
I
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
vrb
21-77
for
property,
located
at
4213
north
riverview
avenue
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
removal
of
a
grand
tree
based
upon
the
petitioner
meeting
the
burden
of
proof
with
regard
to
the
six
factors
for
determining
tree
removal,
as
set
forth
in
section
27-284,
0.2.5
sub,
f,
sub
4
of
the
city
code
for
granting
tree
removal.
Specifically
that
the
evidence
provided
in
the
record
showed
that
the
proposed
buildings
cannot
be
reasonably
reconfigured.
G
R
A
A
A
All
right.
We
have
reached
27-80
and
I
will
recuse
myself
for
this
application.
A
L
L
Q
D
Okay,
so
this
is
case
vrb
21-80.
Are
the
petitioners
present?
Yes,
yes,
we
are.
Okay.
Can
we
do
staff
report?
Please.
H
Yes,
so
anastasia
barnes,
with
development
coordination,
vrb
2180,
is
for
1203
west
charter
street.
The
applicant
is
eric
pinaco
and
the
property
owner
is
pain-free
development
llc.
The
current
zoning
is
rs-60
residential
single-family.
H
H
This
is
the
subject
tree
in
question,
and
this
is
the
site
plan
showing
the
or
the
proposed
floor
plan,
as
well
as
removal
and
existing
trees
to
remain
and
staff
is
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
L
Q
D
C
Free
development,
I'm
the
owner
of
the
property
and
I
reside
at
one
three,
seven
one
one
springer
lane
in.
D
C
I'm
toliver
payne
address
20314
mid-court
loots
with
hop
construction.
S
S
S
Well-
and
the
point
is
I
want
to
emphasize-
this-
is
a
tree-
a
60
inch
dbh
grand
oak
on
the
street
side
that
we
wish
to
keep
all
right.
So
one
of
the
main
things
we
want
to
emphasize
in
this
application
is
the
grandest
oak
on
the
lot
is
going
to
stay.
The
idea
of
this
is
to
put
a
house
behind
this
tree,
a
two-story
home
four
thousand
square
foot
home
behind
this
tree.
S
S
S
It
really
takes
up
a
lot
more
space
on
the
on
the
critical
route
zone
again
looking
from
now
the
east
side
towards
1205
charter
street,
which
is
in
the
background,
the
again
the
tree
in
question,
which
they
measured
at
49
dbh,
we
have
a
44
due
to
a
mr
federica
said:
there
was
a
flare
in
the
diameter
of
the
tree,
but
at
any
rate,
a
grand
tree
is
a
grand
tree,
we're
not
worried
about
between
44
and
49
what
it
is
next
thanks-
and
this
is
from
the
north
end
of
the
lot
you
can
see
how
central
this
tree
is
to
the
lot.
S
That's
that's
charter
street.
My
vehicle
happens
to
be
in
the
on
the
right
side
of
the
photograph,
but
that's
charter
street.
So
it's
almost
it's
not
in
the
dead
center,
but
it's
it's
encroaching
on
on
the
dead
center
of
the
lot
and
that's
all
I
want
to
show
from
those
I'd
like
to
switch
to
the
elmo.
F
Can
can
the
booth
switch
to
the
doc
cam.
S
Okay,
well,
mr
federica
graded,
this
treat
good
failing
potential
low,
a
c7.
He
measured
it.
I
think
I
think
the
staff
had
a
b,
so
there's
some
deviation
there
they
had
49,
we
had
44.,
but
it's
you
know
it's
a
substantial
grand.
Oh,
we
recognize
that
and
we're
not
really
disputing
the
health
of
the
tree.
It's
the
location
that
causes
the
problem,
and
this
will
become
more
apparent
now.
S
So
in
this
situation,
you
can
see
the
canopy,
the
grand
tree
oak
zone
and
the
critical
root
zone
for
the
tree
question
and
also
the
front
tree
60
dbh
tree
street
number,
two
or
three
which
we
wish
to
save,
but
you
can
see
how
it
dominates
the
central
part
of
the
lot
and
there's
a
lot
of
what
mr
federico
referred
to
as
a
lion's
tail,
because
of
the
two
years
and
years
decades
of
pruning
it
away
from
the
from
the
neighbor's
home
it
it's
spread
out
to
the
west
and
it's
not
in
balance,
and
there
is
a
wind
event
risk
with
this
particular
setup.
S
So
we
have
some
example
site
plans
to
try
to
show
you
how
we
did
try
to
reconfigure
this
home
to
this
lot.
We
we
did
make
an
effort
even
with
a
tree
so
central
to
the
lot.
S
So
obviously,
there's
your
more
a
more
standard
elevation,
even
trying
to
cheat
to
the
setback
you're
still
in
you're,
still
well
within
the
critical
road
zone.
Of
course,
that's
not
going
to
work!
That's
a
4,
000
square
foot
home
pruning
of
the
limbs
would
result
in
40
of
the
canopy
being
lost.
S
That's
just
not
a
workable
solution,
so
we
kept
looking
at
it
kept
moving
move
to
the
back,
get
away
from
the
60
dbh
tree
in
the
front,
try
to
work
with
the
yard
and
house
as
it
is,
but
as
you
see,
we
keep
moving
back
we're
still.
This
tree
is
still
so
central
to
the
lot
that
the
critical
root
zone
and
the
grand
tree
root
zone,
which
goes
out
20
feet,
is
still
heavily
impaired
by
this
by
any
construction
on
this
lot,
so
we
kept
going.
S
S
So
this
footprint
won't
work,
so
we
went
to
the
extreme,
which
is
really
not
what
this
process
process
meant,
as
I
understand
it,
to
save
the
tree,
if
at
all
possible,
without
creating
an
absurdity,
but
we
created
an
absurdity.
Anyway,
we
drew
one
up
where
okay,
we've
got
the
tree
out.
We've
got
a
hallway
of
a
home
up
the
western
inside
the
western
setback
of
the
lock
using
the
27
60
design,
exception,
setback
relief
and
you
have
the
grand
tree
up
front.
S
That's
going
to
be
craned
out
next
to
it
in
a
couple
of
years,
and
that's
really
not
helping
anybody.
It's
not
helping
the
tree
ordinance,
it's
not
helping
the
city.
Our
main
goal
is
to
protect
that
big
60
dbh
tree
up
front
and
have
it
as
an
amenity
of
the
city
and
amenity
to
the
home,
and
that's
all
I
have.
D
F
Mario
from
the
city
attorney's
office,
in
our
in
the
staff
reports,
there's
an
arborist
report
from
david
reilly.
Are
you
relying
on?
Is
I
heard
you
say,
ricky
pedrica
was
there
an
additional
report
that
he
provided
for
you.
S
I
just
wanted
to.
I.
F
S
F
S
Yes,
okay,
like
if
the
board
would
like
I'd,
be
happy
to
hand
out
paper
copies.
What
happened?
Is
it
didn't
come
together
until
the
night
but
the
yesterday,
and
so
I
was
able
to
upload
it
to
a
cella,
but
I
wasn't
able
to
get
with
cttv
and
upload
it
into
the
system.
So
we'd
have
a
powerpoint
and
everything.
F
D
Okay,
thank
you
and
just
make
sure
she
gets
a
copy.
The
staff
gets
a
copy,
so
we
can
put
it
into
record.
So
are
you
finished
with
your
presentation
for
for
great
well
before
that?
If
there's
anyone
that
wishes
to
speak
on
this,
if
you
all
could
just
step
back
and
let
the
people
want
to
speak
speak
that
would
be
great
come
on
up.
N
N
N
Place
these,
I
think,
yeah.
I
do
remember
how
to
do
this.
That's
the
subject
property.
I
want
to
give
you
some
idea
of
the
canopy
that
surrounds
it
at
the
time
and
the
existing
character
of
the
neighborhood
is
a
significantly
tree-lined
neighborhood,
which
is
why
it's
popular
I
next
want
to
show-
and
this
will
be
viewed
from
the
east
of
my
property
1202
west
coral
street
for
purpose
over
here
would
be
the
subject
property
where
I'm
pointing
to
over.
Here
on
the
left,
we
have
five
mature
grand
oaks
in
our
backyard.
N
They
are
all
co-dependent,
as
is
all
of
these
together
operating
together.
The
grand
oaks
that
go
also
to
my
neighbor's
yard,
todd
henry
who's
gonna,
who
has
a
written
submission
that
he's
also
in
opposition
to
and
I'm
going
to,
try
to
hurry
through,
because
I
realize
appreciate
with
three
minutes:
I
have
a
very
limited
portion
of
time.
N
This
is
looking
from
the
front
at
the
properties.
I
do
appreciate
the
clarification
because
I
am
familiar
with
the
seller.
I
would
have
liked
to
have
the
opportunity
to
review
items
that
were
only
recently
uploaded.
It
was
also
not
clear
that
they
are
only
seeking
removal
of
one
tree
if
the
board
does
grant
this.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
absolutely
clear,
because
I
will
say
also
the
way
the
property's
been
gone
about.
N
It
seems
like
there
has
not
been
concern
for
the
root
structure
of
the
existing
trees
on
there
and
that
they
may
have
already
been
damaged,
but
I
just
want
to
point
to
the
fact
that
we
will
be
adversely
affected
and
I
am
relying
upon
the
city
of
tampa's
tree
canopy
and
urban
forest
analysis.
C
N
Okay,
energy
conservation
also
deterioration,
lack
of
wind
mitigation.
This
will
make
us
far
more
vulnerable
to
wind
storms.
So
the
last
thing
with
my
remaining
time,
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
make
sure
and
have
these
submitted
to
the
record.
I
have
seven
separate
neighbor
submissions
here
that
they
want
to
be
also
considered
an
opposition.
N
That's
todd,
henry
who's,
next
door
that
is,
and
and
I'd
like
to
place
them
all
in
the
record
as
well.
D
Us
pull
it
down
a
little
bit:
okay,
yep
and
then
we'll
give
a
chance
for
each
of
us
to
read
it,
and
then
we
can
go
to
the
next
one.
N
N
No
other
way
other
way.
Sorry,
two
pages,
all
together.
N
F
Just
for
clarification,
so
that
the
applicant
knows
who
the
letters
of
opposition
are
from
it's.
N
N
L
L
D
It's
we
have
a
different
seven
okay
and
I
I
believe
we
have
a
copy
of
that
for
people.
C
L
One
of
the
items
was
that
this
hardship
can't
be
created
by
the
applicant,
where,
in
fact,
this
the
applicant
created
this
hardship
when
he
created
when
he
got
the
variance
last
fall
to
separate
this
property
into
two
separate
parcels,
the
blank,
the
empty
yard
and
the
one
with
the
house
on
it.
L
So
it
was
created
by
the
applicant,
and
this
is
a
self-created
hardship.
So
I
I
don't
see
how
it
could
be
approved.
One
of
the
items
that
was
mentioned
earlier
was
that
the
city
trigger
said
that
the
roots
were
damaged
for
this
tray.
L
The
roots
probably
are
damaged
for
this
tree,
as
well
as
the
66
inch
diameter
grand
tree,
because
the
developer
has
been
driving
heavy
equipment
over
these
routes
without
any
protection
to
take
down
part
of
the
existing
house
that
exists
on
the
adjacent
property
they
spent
weeks
driving
over
over
these
tree
roots.
So
obviously
that
has
an
impact.
There
were
no
protective
barriers
placed
around
the
trees
nor
anything
put
down
to
protect
the
roots.
L
One
of
the
things
in
in
looking
at
the
proposed
house
to
be
built.
I
don't
see
how
it's
going
to
be
possible
to
build
that
house
without
impacting
the
roots
of
the
66
inch
tree
in
the
front
because
of
the
20
foot
diameter
barrier,
that's
needed
to
be
placed
around
that
tree
20
feet
from
the
edge
of
the
trunk.
L
L
To
be
removed,
that
is
an
over
12
inch
diameter
tree,
which
is
which
is
a
protected
tree,
and
there
was
no
mention
of
that
whatsoever.
Everyone
in
the
neighborhood
is
watching
this.
We
all
have
grand
oaks
and
we've
all
been
denied
at
some
point
in
time.
The
ability
to
even
trim
our
trees,
one
of
our
neighbors,
has
a
limb
that
was
literally
resting
on
the
roof
of
this
house,
and
the
city
would
not
let
him
trim
that
tray.
Take
that
limb
off.
L
B
Hi
there
I
have
been
sworn.
My
name
is
marianne
foyo
and
my
address
is
1202
west
coral
street
and
my
home
is
directly
behind
the
property
in
question.
I'm
going
to
rapidly
go
through
my
presentation,
I'd
like
to
just
give
you
a
percep
perspective
about
how
the
citizens
of
rsh
are
feeling
riverside
heights
and
specifically,
the
neighbors
that
surround
this
property.
B
First
off
I'd
like
to
say
that
my
house
has
been
impacted
by
the
taking
down
of
a
huge
grand
oak
to
the
west,
to
the
east
and
to
the
north.
If
this
one
comes
down,
that'll
be
the
fourth
grand
coming
down
to
the
south.
Okay,
everyone
in
rsh
has
experienced
this
and
everybody
is
upset
and
when
I
say
everybody,
I'm
going
to
just
mention
14
people
right
now
the
ones
right
around
us.
B
But
it
is
a
big
problem
for
riverside
heights,
because
the
lots
are
so
large
and
the
houses
are
so
small,
they're
being
split
for
redevelopment,
which
is
fine,
but
that
means
that
there's
a
higher
percentage
of
trees
coming
out,
and
that
means
that
a
higher
percentage
of
our
canopy
is
being
affected.
So
the
negative
impacts
are
are
impacting
us.
B
The
hardships
are
on
us,
the
neighbors
and
I'm
going
to
go
through
what
those
hardships
are
right
now
that,
in
talking
with
my
neighbors
in
some
of
the
letters
that
were
submitted
today
in
mr
terry,
who
was
just
up
here
speaking
talking
to
his
four
neighbors
that
surround
his
house,
which
abut
the
property
in
question,
we
have
seven
of
the
immediate
neighbors
and
six
of
rsh
neighbors
to
go
by
and
in
sharing
what
I'm
about
to
share
with
you,
everybody's
upset
because
of
the
fact
that
the
weather
is
changing
and
storms
are
growing
stronger.
B
The
winds
are
growing
stronger.
These
trees
help
with
the
wind
they
protect
our
homes
and
they
protect
our
roofs,
believe
it
or
not.
The
flooding.
These
trees
hold
the
soil.
Okay,
they're,
like
huge
anchors
in
the
neighborhood
that
we
live
in,
and
we
are
right
along
the
river
and
we
are
along
a
flood
plain.
My
this
tree
faces
the
river
it
faces.
B
The
house
and
right
in
back
of
the
house,
is
the
river,
so
it's
directly
across
from
the
river
I
that
tree
would
protect
my
property,
the
neighbor
to
the
east
and
the
west
property
as
well.
It
would
retain
the
soil
in
in
the
event
of
a
flooding
event,
and
also
in
these
microbursts
that
we're
getting
where
you
see
four
six,
eight
ten
inches
of
rain,
dropping
these
trees
all
trees,
but
these
trees,
the
big
trees
that
are
disappearing
rapidly
from
our
neighborhood,
would
help
with
that
would
protect.
B
B
Taken
down
the
grand
tree
that
was
taken
down
to
the
east
of
my
house
now
the
morning
sun
comes
directly
onto
my
house.
My
home
is
much
warmer.
My
cooling
bills
to
cool
the
house
have
gone
up
to
heat.
The
house
have
gone
up.
It
has
an
impact
on
us
and
all
of
the
people
that
I'm
talking
about
referencing,
the
seven
and
the
six
they're
experiencing
the
same
thing
thing
whether
it's
the
tree
next
door,
the
tree
in
back
of
them
or
the
tree.
B
B
D
Yes,
I
still
have
the
letters
I'm
sorry.
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
quickly
go
through
them,
but
board
questions.
Any
questions
from
the
board.
C
I
have
a
few
procedurally
for
miss
barnes.
The
lot
split
would
have
been
approved
by
city
council,
correct.
H
No,
so
the
formal
decision
that
was
approved
in
2020
was
approved
by
the
zoning
administrator
at
that
time.
All
right.
F
C
So,
mr
icer,
I'm
still
learning
the
new
tree
code
yeah
this
tree's
in
the
dead
center
of
a
lot.
How
did
the
new
code
not
manage
this
tree?
Why?
Why
is
it
here.
K
C
K
C
C
C
C
D
C
K
C
B
H
S
Thank
you
just
some
quick
points.
There
was
a
note
about
what
we
did
or
didn't
upload
to
a
seller.
We
did
upload
everything.
We've
shown
you
dslr.
Prior
to
today.
S
I
check
a
cella
every
day
when
I
do
these
applications
or
handle
anything
in
front
of
a
city
board
or
group,
and
there
were
no
letters
there
because
they
were
brought
in
at
the
last
minute.
I
have
not
been
able
to
read
them.
I'm
sure
that
the
both
the
property
owner
and
my
client
would
have
been
happy
to
meet
with
the
neighbors
and
explain
what
they
were
going
to
do.
S
I
know
one
neighbor
came
across
the
street
and
spoke
to
the
property
owner
and
said
oh
you're
tearing
down
that
tree
and
they
didn't
even
understand
which
tree
was
coming
down
so
had
we
had
that
correspondence
earlier,
we
could
have
had
a
dialogue,
but
we
didn't
it
was
dropped
in
tonight,
for
I
think
strategic
reasons,
but
that's
just
my
my
point
of
view
also.
I
just
want
to
point
out.
They
said:
oh
well,
the
work
somehow,
even
though
it's
a
different
set
of
factors
that
were
somehow
coming
to
the
situation.
S
This
neighborhood
was
planted
in
1911.,
I'm
just
using
this
as
for
rebuttal,
and
you
can
certainly
have
it,
but
the
lots
in
question
are
here
at
the
corner
of
what
charter
and
what
used
to
be
arlington.
S
S
I
I
don't
see
how
and
I'm
not
an
appraiser.
I
don't
see
how
leaving
the
lot
vacant
instead
of
building
a
4,
000
foot
high
quality
home,
is
going
to
how
those
two
alternatives.
I
think
the
4
000
foot
high
quality
home
within
the
within
the
region
of
these
other
homes,
with
the
preservation
of
the
60
inch
dbh
tree
on
charter
street,
is
going
to
raise
their
home
values,
not
depreciate
them.
So
with
that,
I
include
my
rebuttal
everything
you'd
like
to
say.
D
Thank
you,
oh
yeah,
they're.
Sorry,
we
were
just
passing
them
through.
C
The
the
comment
you
made
about
the
plats
your
I
wanted
to
clarify
what
you're
saying
is
that
the
lot
split
as
we
call
it,
was
splitting
it
back
to
the
original
two
plats,
that's
correct,
so
the
the
lot
that
we're
looking
at
was
intended
to
be
a
lot,
although
not
actually
used
in
that
manner
until
now,
but
that
was
the
original
size
of
that
lot.
Intention
that's
correct!
Okay,.
D
Thank
you,
okay,
we're
going
to
close
the
public
hearing
and
I
am
open
to
a
motion
or
board
discussion.
C
I'd
just
like
to
say
for
the
concerned,
neighbors
that
we
are
looking
at
this
property
individually
as
an
individual
piece
of
property,
and
the
split
is
not
part
of
our
jurisdiction
and
that
the
tree
criteria
is
different
than
a
regular
variance
criteria
and
there's
there's
more
criteria
for
trees.
And
they
actually
allow
us
and
expect
us
to
consider
the
financial
impacts
of
the
decision,
which
is
not
part
of
a
regular
variance.
But
it
is
part
of
a
tree
case
which
was
one
of
the
points
they
made
and.
C
The
this
tree
is
in
the
exact
center
of
the
lot.
I
mean
I'm
the
only
architect
on
the
board,
but
it's
very
impractical
to
build
a
functional
home
with
a
tree
covering
canopy
most
of
the
center
of
the
lot
and
expect
to
get
your
value
out
of
it,
which
is
part
of
the
criteria
for
this
type
of
variance.
G
Just
a
couple
other
points
of
clarification,
mr
pester
is
right
that
we
cannot
consider
or
sorry
that
we
considered
the
the
cost
to
use
alternative
methods,
but
one
thing
that
we
don't
consider
is
the
cost
of
removing
the
trees
to
other.
You
know,
properties
in
the
neighborhood,
so
we're
you
know,
based
on
the
factors
that
we
have
to
consider.
We
can't
consider
the
fact
that
you
know
that
removing
trees
may
or
may
not
increase
or
decrease
the
prop.
You
know
the
neighbor's
property
value.
G
The
other
thing
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
was
there
were
some
issues
raised
about
the
root
damage
to
you
know
by
with
heavy
equipment
going
over
the
property?
Again,
that's
not
something
that
we
consider,
but
I
understand
that
there
are
probably
other
avenues
for
those
concerns
to
be
raised.
G
B
To
make
a
quick
comment
to
the
neighbors
that
this
is
a
difficult
situation
with
a
platted
property
for
development
with
a
tree
in
the
center,
but
I
did
appreciate
the
efforts
of
them
saving
at
least
the
tree
in
the
front
of
the
property
and
in
the
back
they're.
Also
with
tree
removal.
There
are
required
mitigation
requirements
that
don't
go
away
for
this
as
well.
So
so
I
wanted
to
say.
G
E
E
A
A
All
right,
we've
still
got
a
couple
more
cases
this
evening.
So
we're
going
to
move
things
right
along
miss
barnes.
Would
you
do
us
the
honor
of
introducing
vrb
2185?
Please.
H
H
The
alternative
site
plan
and
the
existing
tree
plan
again
section
27
284.25,
is
the
review
for
grantree
removal
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
You
might.
A
Have
all
right
is
the
applicant
here
come
on
up,
please
state
your
name,
your
address
and
confirm
for
us
that
you've
been
sworn.
D
G
Presentation
good
evening,
my
name
is
angela
rober.
I
am
going
to
put
this
on.
Let
me
know
if
it
shows
up.
G
Okay,
this
is
an
application
for
a
grand
tree
removal.
There's
no
question
that
regarding
the
health
of
the
tree,
the
issue
is
the
placement
of
the
tree,
where
it's
located
on
the
lot
and
whether
the
reasonable
reconfiguration
standards
apply.
G
G
The
first
option
would
be
still
a
two-story
home,
and
the
footprint
of
the
building
itself
is
reduced
to
accommodate
the
critical
root
zone.
However,
as
you
can
see
by
the
green
boundary,
that
is
the
depiction
of
the
canopy
and
the
tree,
the
two-story
structure
would
conflict
with
that
canopy.
So
we
went
to
another
reconfiguration
option.
G
G
G
G
G
There's
a
grand
tree
that
has
been
rendered
hazardous
due
to
the
impacts
of
the
construction
activity.
The
proposed
building
is
within
the
allowed
setbacks.
It
meets
all
standards
for
the
district
and
so
moving
to
you
move
next
to
whether
there's
a
reasonable
reconfiguration
that
would
save
the
tree,
and
in
this
case
there
is
no
reasonable
reconfiguration.
G
G
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
any
members
of
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
petition?
B
Questions
have
a
question
for
natural
resources
in
regards
to
the
site
plan
number
three:
with
this
tree
having
a
root
and
trunk
rated
a
and
branch
structure,
twigs
foliage
c,
do
you
see
that
this
third
option
would
be
rendered
hazardous.
K
So
I
think
with
any
of
these,
please.
F
Take
your
state,
your
name
for
the
record.
A
G
Because
that
question
was
asked
I'm
going
to
refer
back
to
this
photo
it's
in
your
packet
of
course,
and
it
does
show
that
the
limbs
are
all
you
know
very
close
to
the
roof
of
the
existing
structure.
F
Kamari
pettis
mackel
from
the
city
attorney's
office,
just
to
clarify
for
the
record
for
the
members
of
the
public.
There
are
two
letters
of
opposition
that
the
board
did
receive
and
just
for
the
record
they're
from
nadine
mcpherson
and
beth
oysten
o-s-I-a-s-o-n.
G
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much
all
done
bye.
Thank
you.
I
will
now
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
or
discussion
from
the
board.
C
C
H
Anesthesia
barnes,
the
next
application
before
you
is
2187,
the
applicant
agent
property
owner
is
michael
by
barn.
Sorry,
the
property
address
is
2909
west
cedillo
street
and
the
current
zoning
is
rs
50
residential
single
family.
H
The
request
is
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet,
15
feet
and
reduce
the
side
yard
east
setback
from
seven
feet
to
five
feet:
three
inches
to
construct
an
addition
to
a
single
family
dwelling
before
you
was
an
aerial
of
the
subject,
property
and
surrounding
zoning.
As
you
can
see
residential
in
nature,
this
is
a
view
from
the
street
of
the
subject:
property
and
the
site
plan
submitted
with
the
edition
and
project
proposed
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
A
R
Thank
you
guys,
we'll
try
to
be
quick.
My
name
is
michael
byrne.
This
is
my
fiance
miriam
addition.
She
lives
at
the
residence
with
me.
We
have
been
sworn
address
well
address
2909,
west
cto
street,
tampa
florida,
336
29..
That's
why
I
got
her.
R
First
off,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
all
your
help
so
nice
to
meet
you
in
person.
It's
our
first
time
doing
this.
We
this
is
our
starter
home,
so
we
bought
it
back
in
august
in
2020.
it
was
built
in
1936.
R
So
in
looking
at
it
we've
kind
of
thought
we
wanted
to
try
and
add
a
master
bedroom
to
it
to
make
up
for
some
of
that
lost
base,
and
in
doing
so
we're
requesting
this
variance
to
have
the
setback
from
pretty
much
as
minimum
as
possible
from
20
feet
to
15
feet
from
the
rear
setback,
to
give
us
a
modest,
a
master
bedroom,
but
still
allowing
us
enough
room
in
the
side
yard
of
the
property
to
give
us
adequate
space
to
use
the
yard,
there's
also
a
setback
on
the
side,
but
it's
just
a
continuation
of
the
current
property
line
with
the
current
house.
R
So
that's
from
7
feet
to
5.3
feet.
This
is
going
to
help
us
not
only
from
a
master
bedroom
but
also
closet
space
in
that
space.
So
it's
going
to
give
us,
hopefully
some
more
some
more
room
and
hopefully
in
the
future,
for
a
growing
family
with
another
bedroom,
not
to
mention
since
covid.
I
now
work
from
home
so
to
hopefully
give
us
an
office
in
one
of
the
two
current
guest
bedrooms.
R
It's
only
going
to
be
a
one-story
addition,
we're
not
looking
to
go
two
stories,
you'll
see
on
the
site
plan,
there's
two
one
big
laurel
oak
and
then
another
tree.
I
don't
know
what
type
it
is,
but
pretty
close
to
the
side.
So
if
we
were
going
to
go
up
with
a
two-story
house,
we
definitely
have
to
cut
those
back
if
not
potentially
remove
them
one's
definitely
on
our
property,
but
the
other
kind
of
splits
right
down
the
property
line
with
our
neighbor.
R
R
G
A
Great
and
you'll
just
provide
those
to
city
staff
so
that
they
can
keep
them
in
the
record.
R
G
Presentation
a
lot
of
the
other
like
so
our
home
is
original
to
the
neighborhood,
which
I
really
like
a
lot
of
the
other
houses
they've
been
torn
down,
and
these
big
like
mega
houses
that
are
two-story.
You
know
5
000
square
foot,
we're
not
looking
to
do
that.
We
just
want
to
basically
make
it
functional
and
kind
of
be
like
equivalent
to
other
houses
in
the
neighborhood.
So
hopefully
that
helps
too.
A
Thank
you
for
folks
who
who
are
doing
this
for
the
first
time.
You
did
a
really
good
job.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right.
If
that
concludes
your
presentation,
let's
check
and
see,
if
there's
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
this
evening,
I'm
going
to
say
no
so
we'll
open
it
up
for
any
questions
from
the
board.
Any
questions
from
the
board.
C
R
R
We'd
actually
probably
have
because
this
is
kind
of
the
living
space
of
the
house,
which
is
really
cool
for
one
of
these
older
houses.
You
can
kind
of
walk
in
and
see
almost
through
the
whole
living
space,
and
then
the
sleeping
I
mean
these
are
the
two
bedrooms,
so
we'd
keep
kind
of
the
bedrooms
and
then
open
up
that
backspace
to
have
kind
of
a
healthcare.
C
D
A
I
got
you
all
right,
you
have
if
there's
no
other
questions
from
the
board
and
it
doesn't
look
like
there
are.
You
have
three
minutes
if
you
need
any
time
for
a
bottle,
nope.
A
Okay,
mr
tech,
I'll
recognize
you
because
it
looks
like
you're
ready
to
go.
D
Yes,
I
moved
at
the
variance
request
for
case
vrb
21-87
for
property
located
at
2909
west
sidios
street,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
that
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduced,
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
15
feet.
A
reduced
side
yard
setback
along
the
east
property
line
from
seven
feet
to
five
feet,
three
inches
with
an
encroachment
for
eaves
and
gutters,
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
D
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
codes,
specifically
that
the
trees
on
the
side
of
the
house
prevent
them
from
going
up
and
that
the
east
property
line
side,
yard
setback
will
simply
be
following.
The
setback
for
the
rest
of
the
main.
C
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion.
We
have
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye
aye.
All
that's
posed
all
right.
Your
motion
is
proof.
Thank.
A
You
have
a
great
evening,
you
too
any
other
business
from
city
staff.