►
From YouTube: VRB 4/12/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
other
city
codes
will
need
to
be
met
if
the
case
is
approved,
your
variance
will
expire
two
years
from
the
date
of
decision.
If
your
case
is
continued,
it
will
be
continued
to
either
next
month's
vrb
board
agenda
or
the
next
available
position
in
an
upcoming
vrb
board
agenda.
If
the
case
is
denied,
you
may
wish
to
have
the
variance
review
board's
decision
appealed
by
the
city
council.
A
B
A
All
right,
let's
vote
everybody
in
favor
of
approval,
say
aye
aye
any
oppose
all
right.
The
minutes
have
been
approved
at
this
time.
I
will
ask
legal
staff
to
confirm
any
whether
there
are
any
ex
parte
communications
or
conflicts.
Yes,
thank
you,
mr.
C
Chair
I'd
just
like
to
ask
the
board
members
if
any
of
them
have
had
any
ex
communications
with
respect
to
any
item
on
the
agenda
this
evening,
harry
none
I'd.
A
B
A
Okay,
well,
then,
let's
go
ahead
and
square
in.
D
B
B
B
And
that
is
what
the
vrs
request
is
for
the
reducing
the
setbacks
from
five
feet
to
zero
feet.
They
have
provided
drawings
of
what
that
pool
enclosure
would
look
like
the
structural
drawings.
B
B
B
B
And
the
board
shall
consider
section
27-80
in
the
decision
regarding
this
very
experience,
request
and
all
the
criteria
that
they
are
in.
If
there
are
any
questions,
staff
will
be
available.
A
F
A
Okay,
you
have
10
minutes,
please
proceed,
you
explained
to
us
the
hardship
and
why
we
can
grant.
F
What
you're
doing
okay
great,
so
we
are
new
to
tampa,
so
we
came
about
two
years
ago
and
we
have
been
homeowners
at
this
particular
address
for
now
a
little
over
a
year,
and
originally
we
bought
the
place.
One
of
the
reasons
why
we
bought
the
place
is
because
it
is
a
salt
water
pool
of
decent
size,
because
my
son
does
suffer
actually
from
the
medical
condition.
F
I'm
sorry
eczema,
and
so
I
did
bring
some
pictures
to
show.
You
know
his
condition
and
you
know
we
believe
that
the
salt
water
actually
does
help
alleviate
his
conditions.
Oh
sorry,
okay,.
B
F
Yeah
so,
for
example,
okay,
that's
good,
so
yeah,
so
the
three
areas
of
his
body
that's
affected
are
his
neck.
His
legs
and
also
nia.
Can
you
change
the
the
other
one
and
his
arms?
F
And
so
and
unfortunately,
one
thing
we
did
not
estimate
properly
is
there's
quite
a
lot
of
mosquitoes
in
our
area
and
also
he's
allergic
to
them.
So
obviously
our
use
of
the
pool
is
quite
limited,
and
so
we
would
like
to
expand
our
ability
to
use
the
pool
specifically
by
my
son,
primarily
by
building
this
pool
cage,
and
so
that
is
the
specific
hardship
that
we
like
to
put
in
front
of
the
variance
board
and
regarding
the
storm
weather.
F
G
F
Mission
is
in
the
back,
so
why
don't?
We
just
show
one
picture,
one
of
them:
okay,
so
that's
the
distance
between
the
the
drain.
I
believe
that's
in
the
storm
weather
drain
memorandum
and
the
pool,
and
so
we
do.
I
do
not
believe-
and
I
also
spoke
with
the
contractors-
that
the
cage
would
actually
impede
the
water
flow
into
the
drain.
Nor
would
it
in
any
way
hinder
the
except
accessibility
to
the
stoneweather
drain.
F
If
this,
if
the
city
needed
access
to
it,
so
you
know
it's
by
definition,
the
cage
you
know
is
not
going
to
expand
upon
the
horizontal
dimensions
of
the
pool,
it's
a
vertical
structure,
so
we
believe
that
there
should
be
no
infringement
on
accessibility
or
water
flow.
A
Okay,
is
there
anything
else
you
wanted
to
share
with
us,
or
does
that
conclude
your
presentation.
F
I
think
that
concludes
my
presentation,
but
I
can
ask
answer
any
questions
about
the
board
members.
If
they
have
any.
A
Okay,
we'll
have
an
opportunity
for
board
questions
in
just
a
second.
If
that
concludes
your
presentation,
let's
see,
if
there's
anyone
in
the
audience
who
wishes
to
speak
about
this
petition,
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
wants
to
talk
about
this
one?
No
all
right,
seeing
none,
I
will
open
it
up
for
board
questions.
Does
anyone
on
the
board
have
any
questions.
H
Looking
at
the
site
plan,
it
looks
like
you
have
a
considerable
amount
of
land
between
the
edge
of
the
pool
and
the
side
yard
and
you're
proposing
to
put
the
screen
all
the
way
up
against
the
fence
on
the
side
yard.
I
assume
that's
because
you
have
pavers
there
already,
but
that's
an
encroachment
on
your
neighbor.
F
B
F
Everyone
within,
I
think,
250
yards.
I
believe
that
was
the
rule,
so
everyone
has
kind
of
mailing
and
also
I
have
posted.
You
know
a
sign
in
front
of
my
house
right
in
by
the
road
next
to
my
mailbox,
which
is
in
clear
view
so
and
also
we
have
not.
You
know
it's
a
pretty
tight-knit
community
on
my
road.
I
have
not
been
approached
yet,
but
I
did
get
a
call
from
a
gentleman
saying
he
was
okay
within
it.
F
So
but
that's
about
it,
but
I
have
not
received
any
objections
from
anyone
after
giving
them
notice-
and
I
did
send
that
out-
I
believe
about
a
month
ago.
H
Okay,
because
my
concern
is
that
a
pool
cage
is
a
tall
structure
and
if
it's
right
up
against
somebody's
property
line,
it
kind
of
it's
kind
of
bordering
on
their
their
space,
and
if
that
neighbor
moves
or
whatever,
then
the
next
owner
and
inherits
that,
because
it's
going
to
stay
with
your
land,
you
know,
regardless
of
who
owns
the
property
and
you
you
seem
to
have
a
few
feet
behind
the
pool
to
the
rear.
H
F
H
F
F
There
an
alley,
no
they're
yeah,
I'm
I'm
it's
neighbors,
okay,
but
there
is.
There
is
plenty
of
space
in
the
rear
of
the
pool
and
to
the
right.
It
is
closer
to
my
neighbor,
but
he
also
you
know.
The
couple
has
a
I'm
sorry
has
a
cage
of
their
own
as
well,
and
ours
will
actually
not
be
as
vertically
high
as
theirs
since
I
think
they
are
sitting
on
a
higher
elevation
and
to
the
left
where
the
storm
weather
drain
is.
F
As
you
saw
from
the
picture
that
I
just
showed
you.
There
is
plenty
of
distance,
I
think,
between
where
the
paver
ends
and
the
fence-
and
I
get
the
I
guess
the
most
important
thing
there
is
that
the
wet
you
know.
Obviously
it
rains
a
lot
in
denver,
as
I
found
out
that
it
will
not
impede
the
draining
the
drainage
of
the
water
and
and-
and
I
think,
that's
pretty
clear
sure
from
the
picture.
F
H
Don't
have
any
concern
of
the
drainage,
then
I
do
have
a
question
for
staff
about
the
site
plan.
It
looks
like
the
property
line
is
several
feet
short
of
the
fence
line.
Is
that
what
you
see
too,
on
the
site
plan.
F
That's
between
my
neighbor
in
the
back.
F
I
believe
that
includes
my
property.
No
I'm
sorry
the
up
to
the
wood
fence.
I
I
believe
it's
my
property.
Is
it?
Am
I
ready.
F
H
H
Then,
okay,
it
looks
like
you've
got
a
number
of
feet
at
least
probably
four
feet
from
the
edge
of
the
spa
to
the
edge
of
the
deck
and
you're
proposing
to
build
the
screen
up
to
match.
The
corner
of
your
house,
which
looks
like
the
house,
is
right
on
the
fence.
Almost.
F
H
F
That
changes
what
I
need
to
do,
because
I
it
is
really
surprising
to
me.
I
did
not
know
that
that
I
mean,
for
all
intents
and
purposes
we
use
it.
We
are
the
fence,
I
thought
was
the
dividing
line,
the
wood
fence-
and
you
know
I
I
don't
know
if
I
need
to
go
and
change
the
the
survey
or
confirm
that
that's
you
know
my
land.
H
H
A
Are
there
any
other
questions
from
the
board
all
right,
seeing
none?
You
have
three
minutes
for
rebuttal,
any
additional
information
or
any
response
that
you
want
to
give
to
anything
that
was
discussed
up
to
this
point
three
minutes.
However,
you
want
to
use
it.
F
I
I
really
guess
I
you
know
you
know
what,
since
I
wasn't
aware
of
the
the
backyard
or
the
rear,
er
situation,
what
I
need
to
do
as
next
steps
to
any,
I
guess
to
allay
any
sort
of
concerns
that
the
board
has
to
allow
this
variance
to
request
to
be
approved.
So
that's
really
the
only
thing
that
I
have,
because
I'm
actually
quite
surprised
that
that's
not
my
land.
Yes,.
A
Well,
nothing
we
can
do
about
that
at
this
time,
but,
okay,
if
there's
nothing
else,
you
want
to
share
all
right,
then
we'll
go
ahead
and
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
from
the
board.
C
Thank
you,
susan
johnsonville's
legal
department.
So
this
is
the
site
plan
that
came
as
part
of
the
storm
water
memo.
So
you
can
see
right
here
to
the
left
really.
C
There
is
the
the
drainage
easement
that
you
can
see
there
in
yellow,
and
so
it
looks
like
there
may
be
in
a
slight
encroachment
already
into
the
decking.
That's
there
you
can
see
in
that
the
green
area
there.
E
C
In
here
that
there
may
already
be
an
encroachment
and
they're
proposing
to
bring
the
screen
all
the
way
out
to
the
edge
of
the
of
the
existing
decking,
which
would
cause
a
further
encroachment
and
so
storm
water
is
opposed
to
that
and
I'm
looking
at
their
portion
of
the
staff
report.
It
says
no
permanent
improvement,
such
as
foundations,
pools
walls
or
buildings,
may
be
constructed
in
any
city,
drainage,
easement
or
right-of-way,
and
they're.
C
Asking
that
the
submitted
plans
be
revised
accordingly
and
there
they
also
state
that
a
hole
will
be
placed
on
the
issuance
of
the
building
permit
until
the
site
and
building
plans
are
revised
so
that
it
shows
the
actual
drainage
easement,
and
it
shows
that
there
are
no
further
encroachments
into
the
existing
drainage.
Easement.
A
C
H
A
Okay,
so
is
there
a
motion
from
the
board
regarding
this
petition.
H
H
And
that
said,
variants
as
condition
be
granted
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
a
necessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
2780
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
is
an
existing
pool,
that
they're
trying
to
enclose
due
to
a
practical
difficulty
and
that
the
rear
yard
encroachment
is
actually
five
feet
short
of
the
fence
line
of
the
yard
and
that
the
side
yard
encroachment
is
in
line
with
the
side
of
the
existing
home.
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion.
Does
anyone
wish
to
discuss
any
peace?
A
No,
all
right,
seeing
none,
let's
go
ahead
and
vote
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
approve,
say:
aye.
All
those
opposed
okay
motion
passes
four
to
one
with
condition.
Thank
you
have
a
good
evening.
B
B
B
B
It
was
reviewed
by
transportation,
found
consistent
and
reviewed
by
right-of-way
and
found
consistent
as
well.
We
have
received
no
letters
of
support
or
objection
for
this
variance
request
from
the
general
public
and
there
are
no
staff
members
that
were
submitted
in
the
determination
of
this
variance
request
before
the
board.
You
shall
consider
section
27-80
the
criteria
for
the
approval
or
the
decision
concerning
the
variance
request
and
staff
be
available.
If
you
have
any
questions.
A
Ms
madhu
was
there
a:
was
there
a
staff
report
for
this
one
that
was.
B
A
Oh
okay,
is
there
anyone
else
who
needs
to
be
sworn
this
evening?
Who
hasn't
been
sworn?
If
you
might
speak?
If
there's
a
chance,
you
might
say
something
tonight:
let's
and
you
haven't
been
sworn:
let's
get
you
sworn
in.
J
Yes,
sir
good
evening,
okay,
my
name
is
adria
sharabini
I
represent
the
the
developer
hgc
design
build.
J
Take
it
away,
I
have
some
images
here.
Hopefully
you
can
see
that.
J
J
Apologies,
I'm
still
getting
used
to
digital
versus
in
person.
So
what
you
see
it's
kind
of
a
repeat
of
what
the
staff
just
mentioned:
the
current
survey
of
the
property
and
the
front
elevation
of
the
structure
on
the
on
the
right
side.
There's
the
garage.
J
As
it
was
mentioned,
the
garage
currently
encroaches
into
the
side
setback
and
our
client
wishes
to
build
on
top
of
the
garage
we're
looking
at
about
about
580
square
feet
of
air-conditioned
space
that
will
be
accessible
from
inside
through
a
staircase
and
the
space
below
the
staircase
will
house
a
pool
bath
that
will
be
accessible
from
the
cage
between
the
property
between
the
garage
wall
and
the
fence.
J
So
what
we're
proposing
is
is
really
just
to
build
on
top
of
the
garage
and
provide
them
with
the
additional
square
footage
that
they're,
hoping
for
we've
taken
liberty
of
providing
elevation
for
this
edition
here,
and
we
try
to
stay
as
consistent
as
possible
with
the
existing
architecture
of
the
house.
A
I
I
J
K
I
have
a
question
for
miss
madhu.
Could
you
repeat
the
inconsistencies
that
natural
resources
had?
There
was
a
couple,
I
think,
and
I
forgot
the
first
few.
A
It
wasn't:
can
you
confirm
that
it
wasn't
attached
by
the
homeowner
the
current
owner
who's
making
the
application?
We
don't
have
that
information,
so
you
don't
know
if
it
was
if
it
was
attached
by
them
or
you
can
confirm.
J
A
Okay,
you're
telling
us
it
was
prior
to
their
acquisition.
Okay
and
the
homeowner
in
the
back
is
shaking
their
head
vociferously
saying
yes,
that's
true.
All
right
is
to
the
extent
that
any
construction
is
going
to
go
forward.
That
may
impact
the
tree.
Are
you
willing
to.
J
Well,
first,
the
trunk,
its
proximity
to
the
foundation
of
the
garage,
okay
and
also
going
back
to
this
image.
How
this
tree,
the
way
the
trunks
are
leaning
both
on
the
neighbor's
side
and
on
the
garage
as
part
of
our
project.
We
would.
We
would
like
to
remove
the
tree.
J
I'm
just
saying
that
would
be
preferable,
but
if
not,
we
would
trim
it
as
best
as
possible
without
impacting
it.
However,
we
feel
removing
any
limbs
would
kind
of
create
an
imbalance
and
the
way
that
the
tree
structure
is
and
would
kind
of
put
the
neighbor
at
risk.
A
Well-
and
that's
kind
of
the
point
of
my
question,
is
I
mean
we
can
we
can
grant
you
that
the
request
to
vest-
and
we
can
grant
you
what
you're
asking
for,
but
what
I'm
saying
is
there
may
be
restrictions
with
natural
resources
as
to
what
you
can
trim
and
can't
trim
from
that
tree,
and
so,
if
we
were
to
place
a
condition
as
to
compliance
with
natural
resources
on
that,
is
that
acceptable?
Is
that
something
that
you.
J
Could
work
with,
I
believe
that
would
be
acceptable.
Yes,
okay,.
A
Okay,
well
with
that,
then
you
have
three
minutes
for
rebuttal
to
address
anything
else
that
you
see
fit
to
address.
J
I
think
at
this
point
I'm
done.
I
appreciate
your
diligence,
I'm
glad
to
answer
any
questions.
All
right.
A
Thank
you
thank
you.
Well
then,
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
from
the
board.
Does
anyone
have
a
motion
that
they'd
like
to
make.
L
That
said
variants
as
conditions
be
granted
based
on
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
hardship
did
not
result
from
the
actions
of
the
applicant.
L
A
B
The
next
case
before
the
board
is
vrb
2240.,
the
property
owners
are
alexandra
russos
and
the
property
is
addressed
at
365
blanca
avenue.
This
is
zone
rs-75
residential
single
family.
The
variant's
request
is
to
reduce
the
wear
yard
setback
from
12
feet
to
1.75
feet
and
reduce
the
eave
to
each
separation
from
10
feet
to
2
feet
and
11
inches,
and
this
is
for
the
construction
of
a
new
garage
and
to
maintain
existing
separation
between
existing
structures.
B
The
code
section
in
reference
is
section
27-156
that
has
the
setback
requirements
for
the
rs75
district,
astrid
five
feet
in
the
front
12
feet
for
the
rear,
15
feet
for
the
corner
and
seven
for
the
side
and
the
minimum
separation
in
the
rs-75
zoning
district
is
10
feet
between
principal
and
accessory
structure.
Measured
e2e.
B
This
is
an
aerial
showing
the
subject
property.
It's
a
corner
lot
in
the
central
tampa
zoning
planning
district
in
the
city
of
tampa-
and
this
is
the
existing
conditions
on
on
the
property.
Currently
there's
an
existing
garage
that
is
currently
detached
and
they
have
two
accessory
structures
currently,
and
this
is
the
proposal
that
that's
where
the
new
garage
would
go.
It
would
be
connected
to
the
existing
single-family
residents
and
then
they
are
also
requesting
to
vest
the
building
separation
between
the
principal
and
the
accessory
structure
in
the
rail.
B
These
are
the
elevations
showing
the
garage
and
the
addition
to
the
existing
single
family
residents.
B
B
We
have
received
no
letters
of
support
or
objection
for
this
variance
request
from
the
general
public
in
the
determination
of
the
variance
request
before
the
board.
This
evening
board
shall
consider
section
27-80
and
the
criteria
for
the
decision
concerning
the
variance
request
before
the
board.
If
you
have
any
questions
I'll
be
available.
M
Good
evening,
I'm
just
loving
the
powerpoint.
This
is
jamie
mayer
representing
the
applicant,
I'm
from
the
law:
firm,
hillward,
henderson,
101,
east
kennedy,
boulevard,
suite
3700
in
tampa,
and
I
have
been
sworn.
M
Okay,
perfect,
so
thank
you
for
the
excellent
presentation
and,
of
course,
I'm
just
going
to
expand
on
this
a
bit.
M
So
in
1995,
a
prior
owner
discovered
when
he
tried
to
pull
a
permit
that
somebody
in
1984
and
even
owner
prior
to
him
had
performed
a
lot
split
that
resulted
in
a
perpetual
zoning
violation
relative
to
the
as-built
conditions
of
the
site.
You
can
see
from
the
historic
aerials
that
there
was
nothing
in
between
the
applicant's
property
and,
as
you
can
see,
all
three
structures
were
there
in
1980
and
through
all
times
relevant,
and
then
this
lot
split
occurred
in
1984
and
a
house
was
built
on
the
lot.
M
A
prior
variance
board
approved
a
variance
for
that
setback
and
the
exact
same
dimensions
that
we're
asking
for
today,
12
feet
to
1.75
feet
to
correct
the
otherwise
perpetual
zoning
violation
that
was
created
likely.
The
eve
to
eve
separation
should
have
been
recognized
during
this
prior
variance,
and
so
we
recognize
that
and
are
raising
it
now
and
seeking
to
have
it
reflected
in
this
request.
M
M
You
already
saw
these
again.
This
is
the
existing
site
layout.
I've
kind
of
got
an
arrow
here,
pointing
to
where
that
closest
point
to
the
boundary
line
is
the
1.75
feet
that
remains
the
same.
The
garage
just
gets
a
little
longer
internally
to
the
site,
but
the
closest
point
does
not
change,
and
it
connects
to
the
primary
structure.
M
M
I
know
you're
all
very
familiar
with
the
variance
criteria,
so
I'm
just
going
to
go
through
them
as
quickly
as
I
can.
This
site
is
burdened
by
a
practical
difficulty
that
is
unique
and
singular.
The
lot
split
in
1984
created
a
permanent
burden
that
has
burdened
owners
already
and
is
burdening
owners
today
and
the
evidence.
Separation
is
also
an
existing
condition
that
even
predates
the
lot
split.
As
is
clear
from
what
I've
said
already.
This
is
not
a
self-created
hardship.
It
was
done
many
years
and
many
owners
ago.
M
This
request
will
not
interfere
with
the
rights
of
others.
The
eve
to
eve
separation
is
completely
internal
to
the
site
and
is
not
going
to
change.
The
new
garage
as
attached
maintains
the
same
setback
as
the
existing
garage
roses
did
speak
with
her
adjacent
neighbor.
Who
is
in
the
lot
that
was
created
by
the
split
and
at
the
time
they
discussed
that
neighbor
did
not
have
an
objection.
I
don't
know
if
she's
here
tonight
or
not,
and
I
believe
a
neighbor
to
the
north
expressed
concerns
about
how
it
might
affect
his
property.
M
It's
consistent
with
the
code
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
This
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
uses,
single-family
residential
homes
with
an
overwhelming
number
of
attached
garages.
And
finally,
this
variance
will
result
in
substantial
justice
being
done
without
a
variance.
No
owner
of
this
site
can
really
make
any
meaningful
improvements
to
the
property
without
triggering
a
need
for
a
variance,
we're
maintaining
the
existing
dimensions
of
the
site.
We're
basically
updating
a
previously
approved
variance
and
we're
not
increasing
the
degree
of
anything
that's
going
on
here.
M
It
will
afford
miss
rose's
rights
that
are
enjoyed
by
her
surrounding
similarly
situated
neighbors
of
having
an
attached
garage,
and
although
this
point
is
not
in
and
of
itself,
a
hardship
of
course,
because
hardships
are,
as
I've
established,
singular
to
the
site.
Miss
rosas
is
a
doctor.
She
works
late
nights.
She
comes
home
at
weird
hours.
She
has
to
walk
from
her
garage
to
her
house.
She
had
to
follow
her
police
report
recently
for
a
break
into
her
car,
and
there
was
a
woman
actually
with
an
armed
attempted
kidnapping
on
her
street.
M
So
again,
although
that,
in
and
of
itself,
I
know,
is
not
a
hardship.
The
this
is
an
operation
of
code
here
it
is
singular
and
unique
to
the
site,
but
this
is
a
very
significant
impact
on
her
quality
of
life.
M
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Does
that
conclude,
your
presentation?
Wonderful,
are
there?
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
wishes
to
speak
about
this
petition
this
evening?
Coming
up,
you
have
three
minutes
to
address
your
issues.
A
E
E
Our
our
concern
is
that
we
would
like
to
see
that
the
eve
to
eve
separation
of
the
new
structure
be
limited
to
seven
feet
as
the
drawing
that
I
was
given
by
the
homeowner.
When
I
met
her
a
couple
weeks
ago,.
A
Okay,
does
that
conclude.
E
G
A
K
A
K
Have
a
question:
could
you
put
the
image
just
showing
the
front
of
the
property
next
to
the
adjacent.
K
This
one,
I
think,
there's
like
another
another
that'll
do
so
so
I'm
looking
at
the
garage
elevation
south
in
the
plan
set.
So
this
is
actually
a
two-story
structure.
Is
that
correct.
M
No,
so
it's
those
are,
the
windows
are
decorative.
It's
so
at
20
feet.
It's
not
that's,
not
a
full
two
stories,
because
it's
15
is
like
the
standard
one
story
so.
K
J
G
K
To
understand
how
this
actually
changes
from
the
street
front,
look
from
the
plan
view.
Everything
looks
about
the
same,
but
when
I
look
at
it
this
section
and
look
at
the
front
of
the
house
and
the
streetscape
it
looks
like
there
are
some
changes.
There's
some
elevation
changes
to
the
garage
itself.
G
K
G
K
That
this
the
look
where
there's
so
much
facade
next
to
the
house,
typically
garages
are
set
back.
You
know
so
there's
like
a
hierarchy
between
house
and
garage
and
now
there's
two
tall
structures
right
next
to
each
other.
It
just
to
me
I
was
wondering
just
the
sense
of
the
streetscape
that
will
now
be
created.
M
I'll
just
show
you
what
he's
drawn
here
so.
M
G
Yeah,
that's
the
exactly
that
that
breezeway
back
there
kind
of
ties
in
what
you
can't
see
in
this
view
is
there's
a
lower
portion
of
the
roof
in
the
back
of
the
house,
so
to
get
all
that
to
connect
and
that's
why
that
height
is
set.
There.
B
G
M
No,
that's
the
only
picture
I
have
unfortunately,
but
again
so
that's
the
projection
is
currently
there
in
gray
and
that's
the
part
that
you're
so
the
higher.
H
M
Yes,
I
actually
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
what
structure
is
being
talked
about
because
it
actually
it's
it's
good
that
this
particular
image
is
on
on
the
screen.
I
don't
know
if
y'all
can
see
it
still,
so
that
part
the
existing
eve
to
eve
separation,
as
he
mentioned
that
two
foot
11
inches,
that's
not
going
to
change,
which
he
said
he
understood
was
grandfathered
or
you
know
really
actually
were
asking
for
to
be
recognized.
M
As
you
know,
of
variance
the
separation
between
the
garage
is
eight
feet,
so
it's
greater
than
seven
feet
between
the
accessory
structure
and
where
the
garage
is
kind
of
moving
backwards
internally
into
the
site.
Does
that?
I
think
that
was
the
question.
H
Could
you
state
your
name
again
and
explain
what
your
your
concern
was.
E
My
name
is
joseph
guayardo
and
with
the
drawings
that
were
presented
to
us,
like
I
said
a
couple
weeks
ago,
at
the
time
that
we
were
talking,
we
were,
we
were
told
it
was
a
one-story
garage
going
in
there.
It
looks
like
this
can
be
a
two-story
garage.
E
The
concern
is
that
at
seven
or
eight
feet
I
was
just
eyeballing
it.
Basically,
I
didn't
pull
out.
Any
measuring
tapes
would
have
any
drawings
to
go
by
we're
just
wanting
the
structure
to
be,
as
shown
to
us
and
represented
by
the
homeowner
as
to
where
they
were
going
to
place.
The
new
construction.
H
E
When
I
say
the
back
side,
the
side
is
closest
to
my
property.
The.
E
We're
talking,
there's,
there's
a
an
out
structure
in
the
corner
of
the
property,
that's
on
their
drawing
yeah
and
the
new
garage
that
separation
there
right
now
it
looks
to
be
10
feet,
except
for
a
little
building.
That's
added
to
the
back
building
which
reduces
it
to
about
eight,
and
I'm
just
ball
parking
these
numbers.
E
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
new
garage
doesn't
go
back
to
the
back
of
their
house,
further
got
it
and
then
it
just
stays
to
where
the
drawing
is
because,
like
I
said,
we
were
told
it
was
a
one-story
and
it
seemed
to
be
a
little
bit.
You
could
say
one
and
a
half
yeah.
H
M
A
M
Well,
I
was,
I
was
going
to
use
my
time
if
we
hadn't
already
discussed
it
to
just
make
sure
I
understood
what
the
neighbors
concerns
were.
Otherwise
I
don't
think
we
have
any
other
additional
comments
to
make
and
again
respectfully
request
approval.
Thank.
A
You
okay,
thank
you
with
that.
I
will
close
the
board
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
motion
from
the
board.
Please.
I
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city's
code,
specifically
that
this
was
not
a
self-inflicted
hardship.
They're
just
trying
to
improve
upon
a
decaying
existing
structure,
they're
also
adding
some
additional
security
for
the
homeowner
through
connecting
it
to
the
existing
building.
I
Yeah
and
it
is
unique
and
singular
to
the
lot
due
to
the
split
that
was
done
back
in
1984.
Otherwise,
this
garage
would
be
perfectly
fine,
as
it
sits.
G
A
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
all
right,
seeing
none,
let's
go
ahead
and
vote
all
those
in
favor
of
motion
to
approve,
say
aye.
All
those
opposed.
Okay
motion
pass.
Your
petition
passes
four
to
one
have
a
great
evening.
G
G
B
All
right,
the
last
case
before
the
board
this
evening
is
vrv2245.
B
The
property
owner
is
oswaldo
rodriguez.
This
is
addressed
at
112
east
emily
street.
This
is
zoned
rs,
50,
residential
single
family
and
the
various
requests
before
the
board
this
evening
is
to
reduce
the
west
side
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
five
feet
for
an
existing
addition
to
a
single-family
residence
and
the
code
section
in
reference
to
section
27-156
that
has
the
setbacks
for
the
rs-50
district
as
20
feet
in
the
front
20
feet
in
the
rear
and
7
feet
on
the
sides.
B
B
This
was
the
original
home
and
here
in
grace,
where
you
have
the
addition
to
the
single
family,
residence
they've
provided
plans
showing
that
addition
and
elevation
showing
what
that
looks
like
this
was
reviewed
by
natural
resources
and
found
inconsistent
with
the
comments
that.
B
They
show
a
side
plan
highlighting
the
addition
area
and
layout
of
the
home
and
that
improvements
cannot
take
place
without
a
protective
raid
protective
radii
of
the
two
grand
trees
on
the
site.
The
productive,
protective
radius
for
the
grand
trees
is
20
feet
from
the
face
of
the
tree
and
that
he
is
available
for
any
questions
should
they
have
them.
B
A
D
A
A
D
D
We
trying
to
improve
our
house,
that's
the
reason
we
put
the
addict
addition
in
our
house.
A
Okay,
you
need
to
explain
to
us
the
hardships
about
your
property
so
that
we
can
understand.
D
A
Is
that
you're
asking
for
I
understand
that
there's
work
done
without
permits.
I
understand
you
want
to
expand
and
have
more
living
space
for
your
family.
You
talked
about
your
109
year
old
home,
which
is
helpful
to
understand.
Can
you
give
us
some
understanding
of
why
the
addition
needs
to
be
where
it
is
how
that
impacts
the
rest
of
the
property?
How
that
impacts,
your
neighbors
things
along
those
lines.
D
And
the
way
this
warehouse
is
sit
on,
the
loss
is
10,
so
reared
of
the
house
in
narrow
the
throne.
G
A
D
D
They
are
no
impact
to
say
for
the
public,
because
is
a
behind
of
the
house,
and
just
I'm
asking
for
to
seven
to
five
feet
to
make
the
addition
more
comfortable.
You
know
putting
the
working
closet
and
laundry
room.
A
Okay,
does
that
conclude
your
presentation?
Yes,
all
right
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
wishes
to
speak
about
this
petition?
Seeing
none
is
there
anyone
on
the
board,
who
would
like
to
ask
question
from
the
petitioner,
okay,
mr
pastor,
miss
rodriguez.
You
may
want
to
come
back
up.
D
H
G
L
Can
you
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
so
you
know,
I
see
that
your
original
house
was
pretty
small
and
it
was
situated
kind
of
on
the
left
side
of
the
lot.
Can
you
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
why
the
addition
was
put,
you
know
where
it
is.
L
Okay,
so
I
see
on
the
site
plan
that
you
know
if
you
were
to
like
take
your
house
and
just
on
the
right-hand
side,
if
you
were
to
take
it
and
just
extend
it
straight
back,
it.
D
D
L
A
I
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
code
that
this
difficulty
is
unique
and
singular
to
this
property
due
to
the
age
of
the
home,
being
very
small,
with
very
small
closets
built
for
its
year.
Additionally,
that,
due
to
the
narrowness
of
the
lot
and
the
location
of
the
driveways,
the
home
has
to
be
pushed
closer
to
that
westerly
boundary
line.
L
K
I
guess
I'm
a
little
confused
why
the
house
is
not
centered
over
the
original
house
lines
and
that's
my
conundrum.
I
understand
looking
at
the
dimensions,
even
if
it
was
aligned,
it
still
probably
wouldn't
meet
the
seven
feet,
but
it'd
probably
be
around
six,
so
I'm
tending
not
to
go
with
it.
Just
for
that
reason
that
maybe
they
could
have
done
a
little
bit
better
to
line
it
up
with
the
house
and
really
make
that
case
for
a
hardship
just
throwing
it
out
there.
A
A
All
right
seeing
none,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor.
So
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
post.
A
And
any
further
business,
oh,
do
we
need
to
elect
a
new
vice
chair
lynne?
Was
our
vice
chair.
A
H
H
G
G
H
H
And
find
out,
but
we
do
need.
C
B
A
All
right
well,
who
wants
to
be
the
vice
chair,.
A
It
means
that
you're,
the
chairman,
it
means
right.
It
means
primarily
that
if
I
don't
show
up,
you
gotta
run
the
meeting,
but
other
than
that
I
don't
think
or
or
if
there's
a
conflict,
and
I
have
to
step
out
for
some
reason
you
would
have
to
step
into
the
chair
position.
A
A
All
right
so
dustin
has
been
nominated.
Mr
pasteur
has
been
nominated,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
pose
all
right.
You're,
the
vice
chair.
A
A
little
bit,
okay,
any
other
business
all
right!