►
Description
To speak / participate in the meeting:
https://www.toaks.org/departments/city-clerk/boards-commissions/planning-commission/planning-commission-agenda
Thousand Oaks Planning Commission Meeting - 1/9/23
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
E
B
None
there
are
none.
Okay,
then
we
can
move
on
to
the
consent.
Calendar
item
number
six.
This
is
the
minutes
of
the
December
5th
2022
Planning
Commission
meeting.
Are
there
any
comments?
Do
we
any
of
my
fellow
Commissioners
have
any
comments
or
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
calendar?
Commissioner?.
E
2022-70828-Z
to
allow
a
zone
change
from
PL
Public
public,
quasi
and
institutional
lands
and
Facilities
to
rpd-12u
residential
plan
development
and
find
that
the
project
is
exempt
from
the
California
Environmental
Quality
act.
Sql
under
Section
15061b3
Common
Sense
exemption
of
the
SQL
guidelines
located
at
3020
Crescent
Way.
The
applicant
is.
H
As
the
clerk
mentioned,
the
request
is
to
allow
a
zone
change
from
PL
to
RPD
12u
for
a
property
located
at
3020
Crescent
Way
foreign
for
the
Planning
Commission
tonight,
because
per
section
9-4.2914
of
the
Thousand
Oaks
Municipal
Code
requires
that
the
Planning
Commission
make
a
recommendation
to
city
council
for
all
proposed
zone
change.
Applications.
H
This
is
the
aerial
photograph
photograph
of
the
property
from
earlier
this
year.
Actually,
when
the
previous
owner
occupied
the
site,
the
subject
property
is
located
in
the
Hampshire
Road
West
model
neighborhood,
which
is
located
north
of
the
101
Freeway
West
of
Hampshire,
Road
and
south
of
Thousand
Oaks
Boulevard
at
the
front
of
the
property
crust
faces
Crescent
way
and
the
rear
actually
a
butts,
an
alley
that
runs
parallel
to
Crescent
Way.
H
H
The
subject
property
was
originally
developed
in
1958,
with
a
696
square
foot
single
family
home
on
the
5600
square
foot
lot
in
a
residential
neighborhood
for
many
years.
The
previous
owner,
which
was
Mana
Food
Bank,
operated
from
within
the
existing
residence
as
an
accessory
use
as
mana's
needs
for
services
grew
and
the
use
of
the
property
was
no
longer
residential
city
council
approved
a
zone
change
for
the
property
in
1988
to
PL,
which
allows
for
institutional
and
miscellaneous
uses
in
2022.
H
In
reviewing
his
own
change,
staff
looks
at
the
site
and
the
surrounding
uses
to
make
sure
that
the
pros
to
make
sure
that
the
proposed
zone
is
compatible.
This
slide
shows
the
subject
site
on
the
city's
zoning
map.
It's
in
the
middle
of
the
screen
in
a
shaded
blue,
which
corresponds
to
PL,
which
allows
for
the
institutional
uses,
but
does
not
actually
allow
for
residential
use.
H
Staffa
also
looks
at
the
general
plan
and
the
land
use
designations
of
the
subject
site
and
surrounding
properties.
This
is
a
portion
of
the
existing
land
use
map
of
the
general
plan.
The
property
is
outlined
in
white,
the
subject
site
and
the
properties
to
the
west,
south
and
east,
which
are
colored
well.
That's
kind
of
a
dark,
yellow,
almost
green
on
the
screen
have
a
general
plan.
Language
designation
of
medium
density,
residential
which
is
intended
for
residential
uses.
The
properties
immediate
to
the
north
have
a
general
plan.
H
H
And
lastly,
we
evaluate
the
California
Environmental
Quality
act,
which
is
sequa
in
this
case,
since
the
proposed
zone
change
will
align
with
a
will
align
with
the
general
plan.
Land
use,
designation
and
the
proposed
project
does
not
include
any
changes
to
the
site
or
improvements
to
the
site.
It
can
be
seen
with
certainty
that
the
proposed
zone
change
will
not
have
a
significant
effect
on
the
on
the
environment.
Therefore,
staff
has
determined
that
the
project
is
exempt
from
SQL
pursuant
to
section
15061
B3.
H
F
H
Not
following
when
the
public
hearing
notices
went
out
when
the
sign
went
up,
I
received
two
phone
calls
one
from
a
neighbor
asking
what
the
12u
meant
as
part
of
the
zoning
designation
and
then
another
from
a
nearby
property
owner
who
believed
that
there
would
be
changes
to
the
project
and
wanted
to
see
see
plans.
But
since
there
are
no
changes
to
the
site,
there
are
no
plans
to
view.
F
E
B
I
I
I
Besides
the
traffic,
the
congestion,
lineup,
writing
frustration,
so
these
were
all
the
issues
that
we
as
owners
were
basically
dealing
with
until
we
just
heard
about
moving
at
the
relocation
of
Mana
to
its
new
location
because
of
our
past
relationship
with
the
owners,
they
suggested
that
we
basically
consider
buying
it,
which
we
did
and
we
are
happy
about
it.
However,
we
had
no
idea
the
process
of
reverting
it
back
to
what
it
was
always
as
a
residential
confirming
to
all
the
other
neighbors
would
be
so
complicated
and.
B
I
Of
this
documentation,
that's
correct,
except
I,
just
need
to
elaborate
that
our
intent
for
use
of
that
property
just
maintaining
the
exact
structure,
except
for
updating
it's
been
very
old.
You
know
construction
and
having
it
ready
for
our
daughter
who's
graduating
from
college.
Later.
Congratulations.
B
B
D
This
seems
logical
makes
sense.
This
is
an
island
of
a
public
institutional
land
in
the
midst
of
a
residential
neighborhood.
I
understand
why
it
was
done
to
begin
with,
to
provide
Manna
with
a
place
to
actually
operate
within
the
legal
bounds
of
the
general
plan,
etc,
etc.
But
now
that
they're
gone
and
these
nice
people
would
like
to
have
their
daughter
live
in
a
house
in
a
residential
neighborhood.
This
certainly
makes
sense.
F
I'll
share
in
my
intent
to
approve
the
motion.
I
just
want
to
say
to
your
applicant
I
appreciate
the
long
process.
Hopefully
you
can
appreciate.
We
have
to
go
through
this
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
covered
and
to
make
sure
everybody
is
protected,
but
hopefully
you
can
see
we
we
care
about
the
process
process
of
what
you've
gone
through
and
again,
I.
Congratulations
and
I
hope
your
daughter
uses
the
property
well.
C
B
G
We
do
have
on
January
10th
tomorrow
night,
the
city
council
meeting
there'll
be
a
Community
Development,
Department
update,
which
will
be
interesting
to
watch
about
our
work
program
coming
up
and
what
we
accomplished
this
last
year.
Of
course,
you
were
a
big
part
of
that,
but
we'll
be
briefing
the
Council
on
that
that
on
January
24th
there'll
be
two
pelvic
hearings.
One
is
Municipal
Code
Amendment
on
the
column
barrier
which
you're
familiar
with
and
on
the
Crescent
Way
item.
We
just
heard
this
evening.
G
It'll
also
be
a
departmental
report
regarding
outdoor
dining
permits
policy.
Whether
the
council
wants
to
amend
the
code
change
that
on
item
10B
items
of
the
upcoming
Planning
Commission.
There
are
no
items
scheduled
for
January
23rd
on
February
13th,
the
final
Commission
of
a
public
hearing
regarding
a
general
planned
Amendment
for
a
land
use
change
at
Rancho,
Canada,
Boulevard,
Corporate,
Center,
Drive
and
1500
pachina,
Circle
or
residential
Apartments.