►
From YouTube: BOA & Plan Comm Mtg 03 19 2015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
A
You
first
item
on
the
agenda:
is
the
approval
of
the
March
4th
2015
minutes
and
hit
a
motion
in
a
second
motion
by
mr.
McGuire
saying?
Well,
mr.
Lawrence,
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
second
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
Natalie
Nelson
conditional
use
permit
one
five,
nine
four
five:
four
six
conditional
use
approval
to
operate
a
dog
kennel
from
her
home
at
1111
third
Street
northeast
again.
C
This
conditional
use
request,
advocacies
conditional
use
approval
to
operate
a
dog
kennel
from
her
home,
located
at
in
the
Arwen
single-family
residential
district
for
conditional
uses,
2114
no
three,
five
home
occupations
and
contingent
upon
compliance
with
chapter
20,
170,
home
occupation
stands
and
specific
rules
governing
to
18
2015
the
property
owner
nabi
Nelson
was
notified
to
seek
a
lawful
approval
in
order
to
continue
operating
a
dog
breeding
selling
kennel
business
at
111
third
Street
northeast
or
she
read,
resides
in
the
heroines.
The
own
single-family
dwelling
kennel
is
a
listed
conditional.
C
C
One
of
the
things
that
was
stated
in
her
letter
was
her
that
she
was
certified
by
the
USDA
license
status
and,
and
that
apparently
has
been
temporary
polled
and
it's
contingent
upon
her
getting
approval
from
the
city
than
they
will.
According
to
mrs.
Nelson,
reinstate
her
USDA
license
requirements.
Yes,
so
approved
I
would
like
it
to
be
in
condition
that
USDA
license
is.
A
E
D
C
D
D
C
G
D
Yeah
they
come
every
year,
yes,
well.
The
man
that
comes
and
inspects
me
owns
two
of
my
dogs.
They're
little
tiny,
your
keys.
They
only
weight
to
balance
I.
Have
my
website
pictures
there
and
the
comments
of
people
made
on
my
website
about
the
dogs
they
purchased
from
me.
These
are
cloudy,
there's
an
AKC.
If
I
would
go
somewhere
and
I
would
die,
you
could
identify
every
one
of
them,
they're
all
microchips,
the
mothers
with
their
puppies
in
their
pens.
Your
registration
is
above
the
pen.
F
D
D
D
D
D
I'm
yorkshire
terriers,
it's
not
required
to
have
them
outside,
because
they're
little
tiny
dogs
and
I
would
have
had
my
license
on
Thursday.
She
was
coming
out
to
give
it
to
me
when
she
called
and
I
had
to
come
in
from
the
board.
She
told
me
well,
why
should
I
I'm
not
gonna,
give
you
a
license
unless
you
get
approved
by
the
board,
just
as
if
you
get
approved
by
the
board,
call
me
I'll
come
out
and
give
you
a
license.
Her
name
is
Amy
I've.
G
D
G
D
Been
last
January,
they
passed
a
new
law,
but
if
you
have
more
than
four
breeder
females,
then
you
have
to
have
a
USDA
license
or
to
ship
your
puppies.
A
lot
of
my
puppies.
Most
of
my
puppies
are
shipped
through
our
Watertown
airport
or
through
Sioux
Falls
Airport
I
only
had
two
people
pick
up
puppies
last
year,
so
most
of
them
100%
of
my
business,
is
on
the
computer,
and
so
now
this
new
law
states
to
ship
them
I
have
to
have
a
USDA
license.
So
they'll
come
out.
D
You
know
she
was
coming
this
Thursday,
so
I
thought
well.
I
have
my
license
when
she
talked
to
you.
She
said
well,
just
call
me
when
you
get
done
with
your
meeting.
If
you're
approved,
we
have
no
problem,
giving
you
your
license.
These
aren't
big
dogs.
I
mean
you
can
ask
my
neighbors
they've
been
in
my
home.
My
home
is
spotless.
You
wouldn't
even
know
I
owned
a
dog.
If
you
walked
in
my
home.
It
does
not
smell
whatsoever.
K
D
K
D
L
M
N
D
D
F
D
Know
I
got
a
letter,
yeah
I
I,
think
I
know
how
it
was
brought
up.
There
was
a
lady
in
the
county,
okay
and
she
had
which
was
really
bad.
Okay,
she
had
a
bunch
of
dogs
in
their
garage.
They
were
freezing
no
heat
not
being
taken
care
of
and
when
she
wasn't
spoken
from
the
county
she
said
well
now
he
Nelson
has
dogs.
Well,
then,
all
of
a
sudden
I
got
a
letter.
So
I
think
that's
where
it
came
from
I,
don't
know
where
it
came
from.
D
I
I
A
Also
on
a
conditional
use,
we
can
add
any
conditions
we
want
in
there,
including
that
they
have
to
come
back
and
we
make
them
come
back
and
renew
the
conditional
use.
Normally
it's
upon
change
of
ownership
and
things
like
that,
but
can
we
can
we
allow
the
conditional
use
for
only
a
set
period
of
time?
So,
if
the
what
we
see
now
looks
very
well-kept,
but
what
if
it
goes?
What
if
mrs.
Nelson
gets
old
and
can't
take
care
of
them
and
all
of
a
sudden,
it
goes
south
and.
A
D
H
F
F
It
not
come
before
the
board.
I
presume
that
most
people
driving
by
your
house
would
not
know
that
there's
a
dog
kennel
or
that
you're
breeding
dogs
there,
but
and
again
I,
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
the
board
will
consider
or
not,
but
it
does.
It
does
not
seem
to
be
very
invasive
in
the
neighborhood.
Thank.
D
A
A
G
If
there's
some
way,
we
can
do
some
sort
of
a
timed
conditional
use,
so
we
can
keep
an
eye
on
this.
I
also
do
think
it's
probably
a
breed
specific
thing.
Small
breed
large
breed
I
mean
there's,
there's
a
difference
between
Saint
Bernards
and
Yorkies
I.
Think
in
my
opinion,
so
that's
just
my
feeling
on
it.
Can.
A
A
person
limit
the
number
you
know
we'd
have
to
change
the
motion
to
you
know
to
make
it
part
of
the
conditions
that
they
re
address
the
board
at
every
say
every
two
years,
every
three
years,
whatever
it
is,
we
also
would
have
the
option
of
limiting
the
number
of
dogs
there.
We
currently
limit
by
three,
but
to
have
sixteen.
D
A
D
G
A
D
D
A
One
that
the
one
thing
is
it's
a
conditional
use,
which
means
everyone
comes
in
in
before
us
on
it.
So
we
could
look
and
say
you
know,
the
question
is,
can
you
straight-faced
say
they're
little
bitty
dogs,
they
don't
go
outside.
My
fear
was,
is
when
we
say:
okay,
we
agree
they
don't
go
outside,
but
could
that
be
used
against
us
that
that's
inhumane
and
now
we
have
to
let
them
outside
and
then
they
get
outdoor
runs
and
now
they're
outside,
but
I.
G
D
G
A
So
what
I
have
is
a
motion
on
the
table
by
mr.
Lawrence.
It
says
the
number
of
adult
dogs
cannot
exceed
16.
We
will
reinforce
board
every
two
years
to
so
we
can
reevaluate
the
conditional
use
and
you
must
carry
a
USDA
license
anything
else.
Any
other
discussion,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
roll
call.
Please.
C
Staff
finds
there's
currently
a
fully
compliant
structure.
Single-Family
dwelling
sitting
on
a
substandard
parcel
those
standard
for
the
neighborhood
located
in
the
air
one
single-family
district.
There
is
possible
sufficient
buildable
area
from
this
parcel
to
construct
a
compliant
11
foot
wide
did
addition
resulting
in
a
23
foot
wide
attached
garage
instead
of
talking
26
without
variances.
This
has
been
public
notice
to
all
public
notice.
Requirements
have
been
met.
The
adjacent
neighbor
to
the
north
has
contacted
us.
I
had
to
say
that
she
has
no
issues
with
her
neighbor
building
the
garage
and
supports
his
request.
A
A
C
A
C
A
A
I
Drove
by
that
area
and
some
of
the
houses
and
areas
are
really
close
together
in
this
particular
case,
he's
there's
a
big
span
between
the
two
houses
and
two,
so
the
direction
he's
gonna
add
on
to
14
feet.
It's
it's
bigger.
The
space
between
the
two
houses
is
larger
than
most
of
the
other
properties
along
that
stretch.
If
that
makes
you
tell.
A
Me
about
Ken
as
far
as
the
peaks
on
it
as
when
the
water
and
snow
runs
off
that
roof.
Is
it
gonna?
Is
it
going
to
move
toward
the
neighbors
or
will
it
move
toward
the
the
drainage
be
the
same
as
what
it
currently
is?
We
don't
want
to
make
sure
we're
not
putting
water
on
it.
When
we
get
that
close,
we
don't
want
to
put
water
on
the
neighbors
lot.
O
O
C
C
C
A
Q
Q
A
M
I
think
anybody
would
say
it's
nicer
to
have
26,
but
when
you're
limited
on
space
you
know
years
ago
a
24
foot,
white
Dodge
was
was
adequate,
so
you
can
still
get
two
doors
in
a
24
foot
garage.
You
have
to
put
your
side
door
on
the
side
to
come
out.
You're
not
going
to
get
a
side
to
our
passage
door
coming
out.
M
A
M
M
G
I
A
Hate
to
ask
him
to
go
one
foot
less
because
I
know
you're
wasting
material
and
you're
looking
go.
I
know
it's
I
know
it's
4.2
feet.
So
it's
a
three
foot
variance
how
much
I'm
at
room.
Can
you
pull
up
and
see
how
much
room
we
have
from
where
the
edge
of
his
garage
will
be
to
where
the
neighbor
is
and
I.
C
K
A
G
M
A
A
I
do
think
if,
in
the
motion,
if
we
approve
it,
we
do
need
to
make
sure
there's
rain
gutters
that
move
the
water
away
from
the
neighbours
site.
Anyone
have
any
other
questions
for
mr.
fillable.
Anyone
else
here
speak
on
behalf
for
against
the
variance
that'll
close.
The
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion.
H
M
A
Second
by
mr.
Arnold
any
other
discussion,
seeing
none
of
us
for
a
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carries
fourth
item
on
the
agenda.
Matt
Nelson
parents
are
building
permit
number
one
five,
nine
five
three
appeals
the
terms
of
construction
of
a
non-conforming
garage
and
a
single-family
dwelling
role
located
in
our
one
zone.
C
This
is
currently
a
fully
compliant
structure.
Single-Family
dwelling
setting
in
the
compliant
parcel
looking
at
the
area,
one
single-family
residential
district
at
the
lake
there's
sufficient
billable
area,
15,000
538
square
feet
on
this
parcel
to
construct
and
attached,
or
detached
accessory
structures
without
variance
the
parcel
lack
standard
infrastructure
requirements.
The
applicant
has
not
requested
variation
from
any
unfulfilled
requirements.
If
application
is
dorste
the
board
we
consider
fulfillment
or
on
of
unfilled
requirements
or
waiver
right
to
protest,
all
public
notice
requirements
have
been
made
met.
A
With
that
Allah
open
public
hearing,
if
anyone's
here
to
speak
on
behalf
or
against
this
I'm
familiar
with
this
one,
it's
down
the
road
from
my
house,
I
Drive
by
there
all
the
time.
This
is
kind
of
a
funny
deal
this.
This
is
one
of
the
roads
when
you're
out
at
Lake,
Camp,
Eska
anytime,
a
road,
a
County
Road
dumps
into
the
lake.
It's
it's
public
access
that
that
puts
him
on
a
corner.
A
You
know-
and
that's
where
he's
run
into
his
variances
he's
plenty
he's
more
than
nine
feet
from
the
property
line,
but
because
he's
considered
a
double
front
yard
as
to
having
two
front
yards
like
he
lives
on
a
corner,
he's
required
to
be
25
feet
back
from
that
property
line.
It's
a
completely
unimproved
road!
There's!
No
there's
no
yeah!
That's
a
farthest
thing
from
a
corner.
I've
ever
seen,
it's
really
a
basically
it's
a
side
yard,
and
this
in
that
access
down
there
acts
more
like
a
side
yard
owned
by
I.
A
Don't
know
the
county,
the
city,
the
state,
whoever
that
may
be,
but
boy
do
have
to
be
25
feet
off
that
there's
many
of
these
around
the
lake
and
when
you
you,
you
don't
know,
you
don't
see
him
unless
you're
looking
for
them,
because
they
look
like
their
people's
yards.
Most
of
them
have
grass
and
trees
and
shrubs
and
they're.
Actually,
public
access
points
that
the
city
county
state
isn't
interested
in
vacating,
correct.
A
C
A
A
But
anyway,
this
is,
this
is
one
of
those,
and
the
other
thing,
too,
is,
if
you
notice
this
is
Arizona
Avenue.
This
is
an
area
we've
talked
about
in
our
comprehensive
land
use
plan
where
we
have
see
the
single
stall
garages
across
the
road.
That's
what
we
talked
about
last
week,
we're
not
all
of
that
property
across
the
road
is
owned
by
an
adjacent
landowner
in
the
structure,
but
just
for
your
just
for
a
point
of
reference
we've.
This
is
an
area
we
see,
often
as
mr.
Nelson
here
yeah.
S
C
A
G
A
C
The
property
is
also
subject
to
compliance
with
off
street
parking
landscape
lighting
requirements
which
will
be
fulfilled.
This
parcel
is
in
the
process
of
preliminary
planning,
after
which
it
can
be
replanted.
The
board
must
determine
if
the
plan
shows
satisfactory
provisions
and
arrangement
concerning
the
ordinance
sections
identified
above.
C
A
Again,
this
is
a
conditional
use.
We
decide
whether
this
is
an
appropriate
place
based
on
the
ground
and
the
location
for
a
recreational
facility
owned
by
the
city.
We
have
the
preliminary
plan
for
this
coming
in
the
next
meeting,
where
we
can
take
a
look
at
the
roads
and
streets
and
structures,
and
things
like
that
meets
all
setbacks.
All
the
way
around.
Yes,
with
that
I'll
open
the
public
hearing,
if
anyone's
here
to
speak
on
behalf
or
against
the
conditional
use,
anyone
have
any
questions
for
anyone
on
it.
A
E
C
They've,
come
in
and
they've
rearranged
this
and
they're
getting
ready
to
do
the
curb
and
gutter
and
everything
else
work.
The
only
thing
is
that
we're
back
here
asking
about
this.
This
is
actually
Jensen,
Avenue
I
know
it
doesn't
show
up
very
well
here
and
Jensen
Avenue
was
intended
to
be
replaced
at
the
time
when
they
were
gonna.
C
Do
this
concurrent
with
that,
while
Justin
Andrew
has
been
pushed
back
a
few
years,
so
the
only
thing
we're
asking
right
now
is
that
the
curb
and
gutter
in
long
Jenson
Avenue
not
requirement
to
put
that
in
now
well,
making
the
driveways
we'll
have
the
parking
will
have
the
grass
everything
else.
The
only
thing
is:
is
you
just
want
to
omit
putting
in
the
curb
and
gutter
at
this
time
until
it
falls
into
the
street?
This
is
discussion
between
Sarah
and
myself,
and
we
both
concurred
that
this
is
a
reasonable
request
to
make
curb.
G
G
A
A
T
T
P
A
By
mr.
Arnold
second
say
goodbye
mr.
Lawrence,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
motion
carries
second
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
approval
of
the
minutes
from
the
February
19th
2015
board,
meeting
motion
by
mr.
Lawrence
second
by
mrs.
Johnson,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
third
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
Road
addition,
the
annexation,
zoning
and
platting
three
separate
resolutions?
Thank
you.
T
All
right,
as
you
guys
remember
last
year,
about
June,
this
property
came
in
and
requested
to
be
annexed
and
zoned
c3
highway
commercial.
That
request
was
granted,
but
the
question
was
asked:
why
did
they
only
annex
to
the
their
property
line
which
cut
a
building
in
half
and
the
reason
at
the
time
was
well?
That
was
all
they
owned.
They
didn't
own
the
property
farther
south.
T
A
N
A
P
A
You
with
that
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
any
other
questions
as
for
a
motion
and
second
for
discussion
motion
by
mr.
Dahle
second,
second
by
mr.
Lawrence
any
discussion-
and
this
is
for
the
annexation
resolution.
201
5-0
for
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carries
next
item.
Is
the
zoning
of
of
it
resolution
201,
5-0,
5.
T
A
That
I'll
open
the
public
hearing,
if
anyone's
here
to
speak
on
behalf
or
against
the
new
zoning,
seeing
none
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion,
a
second
motion
by
mr.
stone
barter
second,
by
mrs.
Johnson.
Any
discussion
on
the
zoning
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
planning.
Do
we
vote
on
the
planning?
Yes,.
T
G
A
T
T
T
This
plant
will
bisect
lot
one
of
service
addition
addition
all
time,
mininum
plats
will
need
to
be
approved
by
the
South
Dakota
real
estate,
commission
and
a
master
deed
will
need
to
be
prepared,
spelling
out
the
uses
of
the
common
area
of
the
parking
areas,
maintenance
of
the
common
areas
etc.
Stuff,
like
that
is.
A
T
T
A
T
T
A
T
H
A
condominium
well
because,
when
I
read,
we
don't
have
a
definition
for
condominium
partner
ordinances.
Joining
we
have
is
a
condominium
and
that's
multi-unit.
Residential
structures
and
I
would
hate
to
see
any
kind
of
an
apartment
in
this
contractor
shop
area,
so
I'm
confused
when
he
calls
it
a
condominium
plot.
I.
L
Luke
moly
first
District,
the
the
question
about
the
condominium.
Plat
is
a
reference
essentially
to
state
law,
state
law,
references
condominium,
plats
as
to
how
they
are
and
how
they
go
forward.
The
the
portion
about
the
was
the
real
estate
agreement
that
has
to
be
on
file,
that's
a
condition
through
state
law
that
they've
got
to
go
through
going
through,
because
I've
worked
with
a
few
of
these
types
of
things
before
and
actually
here
in
Watertown
I
worked
with
one
with
I
was
serving
as
zoning
officer
here
as
well.
L
But
again,
condominium
plat
is
is
a
type
of
a
plat
through
state
law
is
where
it
comes
from,
and
then
you
guys
handle
it
as
a
form
of
a
plat.
The
portion
that
Jeff
was
referring
to
you
did
have
a
similar
process.
The
differences
as
like
Jeff
had
said
that
was
a
plan
development
that
was
just
the
type
of
plat.
If
I
remember
right,
did
you
that.
L
E
L
N
H
T
N
U
G
U
Like
to
add
that
we
are
not
requiring
this
plat
people
do
condos
all
the
time
where
they
have
numerous
people
owning
a
building
and
each
person
owns
a
unit
in
it
and
it's
not
platted
per
se.
With
a
map
like
the
one.
That's
in
your
packet,
that's
recorded
at
the
courthouse.
It's
just
done
with
an
agreement
with
the
sellers
and
by.
A
My
legal
description,
I
legal
description,
yeah
most
of
them,
you
see
a
couple
of
the
ones
I
looked
at
the
Lots.
The
legal
description
includes
their
slice
of
the
parking
lot
and
front
and
back
of
the
building.
This
is
probably
a
lot
cleaner,
as
far
as
us
being
have
having
the
ability
to
make
sure
that
the
place
is
clean.
All.
M
K
T
A
It
would
be
different
based
on
every
building
some
buildings
that
are
condo.
Doubt.
Let's
say
you
have
a
restaurant
in
one
they'd
probably
have
their
own
water
service,
but
I
suppose
every
building
would
be
a
little
different
and
that's
something
that
should
we
look.
Is
that
something
Sara
that
we
would
incorporate
in
our
I
mean.
E
A
U
E
U
A
T
We
this
is
for
this
area
here
and
we
we
received
concept
plans
a
few
months
ago
and
we
reviewed
those
both
at
the
Planning
Commission
level
and
as
the
design
review
team,
we
reviewed
them.
We
made
comments
and
then
the
developer
updated
those
plans.
You
know
a
little
bit
and
they've
provided
the
plans
of
the
developers
here.
Next
to
me,
if
you
ask
him
anything
or
I
can
go
through
our
list
or,
however,
you
want
me
to
handle
this.
A
Let's
do
it
this
way,
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
then
we'll
open
the
public
I
think
we
talked
a
little
bit
then
open
the
public
hearing.
So
it's
the
public
knows
what
we're
looking
at,
because
it's
it's
stony
point
spent
a
little
bit
of
a
moving
target
for
the
last
six
months.
Why
don't
you
bring
up
the
give
us
a
further
out
view
and
I'll
bring.
T
T
A
That
one
right
there,
some
of
the
in
we've,
got
a
new
resolution
that
was
handed
out
before
the
meeting.
There
was
19
items
on
the
resolution
that
we
wanted
to
address,
as
we
went
in
there
to
make
sure
that
it
was
there
that
the
first
thing
that
most
of
us
saw
is
that
the
road
when
this
first
came
to
us
with
the
northern
point
of
that
point
put
on
there,
it
was
under
everyone's
understanding.
A
A
Now
the
developers
talked
to
us
earlier
today
that
that
is
part
of
the
first
phase,
one
of
the
other
items
of
contention
that
we're
out
there
is
there's
a
404
permit
pending
in
place
with
the
Corps
of
Engineers
I,
believe
on
the
on
the
left
side
of
your
map
right
there,
where
that
road
goes
will
be
dictated
by
whether
or
not
that
404
permit
comes
through,
and
the
developer
has
agreed
what
what
our
fear
was.
A
My
fear
personally
and
I
know
Dennis
Arnold
had
spoke
to
him
earlier-
is
that
what
our
fear
was
is
that
Road
wouldn't
be
put
in
yet
those
Lots
to
the
north
would
be
developed
and
we
have
an
easement.
If
you
show
the
easement
right
there,
there's
a
small
road,
an
easement
road
right
there,
where
a
few
of
the
Lots
up
there
have
access
to
that
easement.
What
we
didn't
want
to
do
is
add
15,
more
Lots
and
use
of
that
easement.
The
developer
is
agreed
to
put
in
that
road
temporarily.
A
It
will
be
a
gravel,
hardpack,
gravel
road
maintained
by
heat
by
he
and
the
Association
there
until
that
404
permit
is
either
approved
or
disapproved,
and
then
that
road
will
be
put
in
at
that
time.
It
doesn't
make
any
sense
for
us
to
to
not
allow
him
to
move
forward
while
he
waits
and
it
also
doesn't.
We
don't
want
him
to
put
a
road
where
it
inevitably
wouldn't
belong.
A
The
other
area
of
contention
that
we
had
last
time
we
talked
about
this
was
the
road
widths
where
we
gonna
do
ditches
and
swales
or
curb
and
gutter,
and
we
worked
through
some
of
that
today
and
we'll
get
to
that
later,
and
the
other
one
was
the
drainage
as
to
where
the
drainage
is
going
to
go.
Is
it
going
to
sit
on
the
right
away?
Will
there
be
quality
I,
don't
want
to
say
devices
but
quality
control
for
that
and
in
all
of
those,
as
we
hash
through
them.
A
Earlier
today,
the
developers
agreed
to
the
conditions
that
the
city
is
asked
with
that
I'll
open
the
public
hearing.
What
I
don't
want
to
do
is
to
get
into
discussions
of
things
that
aren't
are
out
of
our
context
or
out
of
our
jurisdiction
like
whether
you're
gonna
trench
and
where
you're
gonna
fill
that
that's
a
quarry
issue.
That's
a
stage
game
fish
and
parks
issue,
and
if
what
we're
looking
at
here
is
the
assumption
that
he
got
all
the
permits
that
he
needs.
A
If
he
doesn't
get
all
the
permits
that
he
needs,
then
we
come
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
then
we'll
have
some
we'll
definitely
have
some
modifications
on
to
where
that
road
will
go
in
how
it
will
work.
But
with
that
I'll
open
the
public
hearing.
If
anyone
is
here
to
speak
on
behalf
or
against
the
preliminary
plan
as
we
go
through
the
preliminary
plan.
V
Obviously,
our
number
one
concern
is
what
I
would
consider
the
liquid
Lots
on
the
west
side
of
the
development
through
the
wetland?
You
know
you
mentioned
the
404
permit
earlier.
The
404
permit
is
a
corps
of
engineer,
permit
that
will
come
before
game
fish
and
parks
and
be
reviewed
by
us,
and
we
there
say:
yes,
we
recommend
approval
or
no,
we
do
not
recommend
approval
at
this
point.
We
would
not
recommend
approval
for
the
404
permit.
That's
that's
in
place,
basically
because
of
the
fill
into
the
wetland,
adjacent
lake
and
Pesce.
V
Our
number
one
reason
for
being
against
this
is
there's
only
a
couple
remaining
suitable
areas
on
lake
in
Pesce
that
provides
spawning
sites
for
bluegill,
crappie
and
perch
and
other
game
fish
in
lake
and
Pesce.
This
this
wetland
is
also
we
feel
very
important
area
for
rearing
habitat
of
all
games
species,
including
walleye,
perch,
bluegill,
crappie
and
others.
V
Wetlands,
like
this
are,
we
feel,
are
very
important
in
water
quality.
Many
pollutants
and
nutrients
are
often
absorbed
in
cattail
settings
like
this
and
trapped
with
the
wetland
vegetation.
This
in
turn
reduces
the
chance
of
LG
blooms
and
other
events
that
we
don't
like
on
lakum
pesky
and
none
of
the
residents
on
campus
go
lake
and
that
also,
in
turn,
helps
prevent
fish
die-offs,
both
in
the
winter
extremes
and
the
summer
extremes
you
can
get
fish
die-offs
because
of
algae
blooms
in
the
summer
as
well.
V
One
thing
we
view
on
this
is
this:
is
a
natural
lake
in
in
South,
Dakota
and
and
whenever
a
shoreline
to
a
natural
body
of
water
or
lake
is
altered
to
meet
into
something
that
it
wasn't.
We
see
a
lot
of
negative
effects,
some
moment
that
come
in
mind
or
severe
erosion
both
summer
and
winter,
flooding
situations
in
siltation.
V
There's,
no
doubt
that
this
channel
that
could
be
created
here
in
the
plan
is
going
to
eventually
silt
in,
and
that
just
ends
up
being
a
problem
for
not
only
the
lake
but
also
for
for
who
would
have
been
on
the
Lots
there.
Obviously,
the
reason
they
want
them
Lots
theirs-
is
to
have
access
to
the
lake,
and
if
it's
tilted
in,
we
have
a
problem.
V
This
map
doesn't
show
the
ordinary
high
water
mark
and
I
would
have
to
get
a
meandering
map
to
explain
this,
but
basically
what
what
that
does
is
says
that
the
Lots
currently
proposed
on
the
west
side
of
this
development
would
require
this
permit
and,
as
it
is
proposed
at
this
time,
we
would
not
approve
that
permit.
So,
in
closing,
I'd
just
like
to
say
game,
fish
and
parks
is
not
opposed
development
to
the
Stoney
Point
area.
We're
just
very
concerned
about
the
elimination
of
wetland.
V
A
You
Ray
I
should
state
to
that.
The
404
permitted
area
is
in
phase
3
and
phase
2
of
this
project.
What
we're
look
at
today
is
phase
1,
which
is
the
the
northern
Lots
and
some
interior
Lots.
If
you
can
point
on
up
there,
Jeff
phase
one
is
the
the
Lots
on
the
lake
to
the
north
and
then
some
interior,
Lots
and
the
reason
the
developer
put
in
the
second
phase,
those
southern
Lots
and
in
the
third
phase
the
fill
Lots
is
because
he
knew
we
would
be
waiting
for
the
404
permit.
A
The
one
thing
we
did
talk
to
him
about
is:
can
you
actually
get
that
Road
in
there
without
disturbing
those
wetlands
and
they
feel
there?
They
feel
that
they
can
and
if
they
can't
they're
willing
to
move
that
Road
to
the
west,
I
would
say
to
the
closer
to
the
cul-de-sac.
They
they
have.
Some
conceptual
plans,
I
believe
Bob
as
to
what
you
would
do
with
that
Road.
If
the
road
can't
go
there
where
they
would
like
to
put
that
road,
so
anyone
else
have
here
to
speak
on
behalf
or
against
this
I.
A
G
A
It
that
the
404
will
definitely
supersede
where
that
road
will
go
if
the
404
doesn't
go
through
and
again
that's
another
body
that
makes
those
decisions,
but
we
make
the
decisions
our
is
when
they
plant
this
are.
The
lot
lies
the
lot
lines
right
as
the
sidewalks
right.
You
know,
I,
don't
think
we're
in
position
to
say
yes
or
no
on
on
the
whole
thing,
but
I
see
someone
else
serious,
but.
R
A
I,
don't
think
so,
I
think
the
the
the
developer
can't
put
a
road
in
there,
a
temporary
road
right
now
and
if
the
404
doesn't
go
through,
then
his
permanent
Road
will
move,
and
this
should
all
happen
within
a
short
period
of
time.
Once
you
start
selling
lots
and
developing
Lots
up
there,
people
aren't
going
to
be
content
to
drive
on
a
gravel.
M
T
A
X
My
name
is
Doug
Alvin
I'm,
with
a
camp
Pesce
chapter
the
Isaac,
Walton
League
and
there's
also
there's
quite
a
few
members
of
the
Isaac
Walton
League
in
a
room
here
today
and
I'm
just
here
to
express
that
we
have
serious
concerns
and
would
oppose
any
development
of
that
that
large
wetland
that
red
also
talked
about
east
of
the
Hidden
Valley.
If
that
was
done,
I
think
you'd
have
very
negative
effects
on
Lake
Camp
Pesce
with
a
fish
spawning
fish,
habitat
water
quality,
water,
storage,
wildlife,
habitat
and
I.
N
X
Y
U
I
thought
it
was
on
the
red
line:
is
the
ordinary
high
water
mark
and
I'll
turn
off
the
wetland
map
for
a
sec
here?
The
yellow
lines
are
the
proposed
lot
lines,
so
this
is
dry
land
and
this
is
fill.
This
is
dry.
This
is
fill
and
the
wetland
matches
fairly
close
to
the
wetland
map
was
drawn
before
GIS
was
invented.
I
think
the
red
line
was
drawn
based
on
aerial
photography,
contours
developed
in
2000
and
then
double
checked
against
the
contours
developed
with
another
aerial
photography
done
in
2007,
so
I'm
fairly,
confident
of
it.
H
U
A
When
they
fill
for
that
road,
none
of
that
fill
can
go
into
that
wetland
if
they
don't
get
their
404.
If
you
look
well
we're
talking
about
mostly
today
is
the
I
would
say
the
is
it
a
north-south
Road
there
that's
going
right
and
left
there
if
we're
going.
No,
the
road
that
the
other
Road
that
goes
right
there
we're
actually
talking
the
phase.
One
is
everything
north
of
that
toward
that
toward
the
point?
I
guess
you'd
say
is
the
north
side?
A
H
A
M
Just
explained
the
southern
road
when
it
became
necessary
for
mr.
Drake
to
get
access
into
his
property
and
it
was
not
possible
from
the
east
there's
no
other
way
to
get
into
there.
So
that's
we
take
that
back
to
last
summer
and
the
discussions.
My
concern
in
my
development
was
the
integrity
of
what
I've
started.
That
was
a
concern
and
I
was
also
concerned
about
the
homeowners
who
live
have
already
bought.
M
Lots
I
wanted
to
make
sure
number
one
that
anybody
that
bought
a
lot
build
a
house
that
all
of
a
sudden
they've
been
assuming
and
knew
all
along
that
someday,
they'd,
probably
be
a
house
beside
them.
So
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
now,
all
of
a
sudden,
those
people
didn't
all
of
a
sudden
become
a
corner
lot.
So
they're
still
gonna
have
a
house
beside
them.
M
So
once
you
take
the
road
out
of
there,
there's
still
you
know,
100
foot
I,
think
roughly
a
hundred
foot
I
do
my
math
real
quick,
but
there's
a
hundred
foot
of
a
100
foot
white
lot
on
both
sides
of
the
road,
as
it
goes
back
in
back
into
the
wetland
or
the
pond
that
I've
been
working
on
there.
That
particular
pond
was
determined
to
be
non-jurisdictional,
so
at
that
point,
I
could
have
filled
the
pond
or
or
dug
the
pond.
M
Deeper
and
I
had
no
interest
in
filling
it,
because
because
I
wanted
to
keep
wildlife
and
want
to
put
some
fish
in
it,
which
I
did
last
summer
and
so
forth,
and
so
on
so
I've
started
that
now
what
will
happen?
They're
gonna
have
to
get
through
the
corner
there
of
mr.
cat
keys
lot
and
my
pond
that
I've
done
and
what
the
developer
has
assured
me
is
that
they'll
have
to
restructure
that
western
side
of
the
pond
a
little
bit
and
then
brought
that
for
me
and
then
get
back
in
I.
M
M
A
I
think
so,
because
what
we're
planning
on
is
a
hard
surface
road
that
comes
off
a
hard
surface
Road
and
goes
up
correct
and
then
and
then
it
will
go
to
a
I,
would
say
an
improved
Road,
an
on
asphalt
road
until
the
404
is
determined
as
exactly
where
that
road
will
be.
We
don't
want
to.
We
don't
want
to
put
a
road
and
then
have
to
move
it
later.
M
When
I
started,
my
development
I
was
required
to
do
certain
things
which,
looking
back
on
it
I,
think
the
road
Prairie
Hills
Avenue
is
wider
than
it
needs
to
be,
and
at
the
time
I
didn't
like
to
make
it
didn't
want
to
make
it
that
wide
and
I
also
would
not
have
preferred
curb
and
gutter
on
it.
But
that's
what
I
was
required
to
do.
M
I
wanted
more
of
a
rural
setting,
but
since
it's
all
started
that
way
for
the
integrity
of
my
development,
as
that
Road
leaves
Prairie
Hills
and
starts
up
to
the
north
I
have
requested,
and
the
developers
have
agreed
to
put
curb
and
gutter
and
sidewalks
on
that
road
as
it
heads
north
into
his
properties,
so
that
when
you
go
through
Prairie
Hills,
it's
still
going
to
continue
to
look
the
same.
Even
though,
as
we
talk
get
deeper
into
this.
M
A
And
part
of
the
reasoning
was
is
why
this
southern
road
was
so
important
was
the
easement
that
comes
off
South
Lake
Drive.
There
is
only
a
20
foot
easement
if
I,
if
I,
if
I'm
correct,
when
I
was
20
or
20
to
21,
it
was
a
20
foot,
easement
which
isn't
big
enough
to
put
any
roads
and
that
easement
in
the
future
will
be
for
an
emergency
use.
Only
that
that's
why
we
worked
so
hard
to
get
that
road
out
of
the
south
and
not
move
it
into
Phase
two
or
phase
three.
Z
Property
my
concern
is,
they
may
may
be
in
jeopardy
at
this
time
when
they're
proposing
Lots
I
am
also
concerned
about
the
back
road
that
they
call
Williams
Drive.
If
that
turns
into
a
road,
am
I
obligated
to
pay
for
half
of
the
road
that
was
there
and
I'm
also
concerned
about
the
drainage
in
the
area,
because
my
land
is
lower?
Well,
I.
Z
Z
A
Can
addressed
a
couple
of
those
as
one
on
Williams
Drive,
the
annex?
Actually
Williams
Drive
only
extends
to
the
edge
of
the
of
the
developers
property
lines.
So
there's
no
intention
for
Williams
Drive
to
go
across
your
property.
That
would
require
you
to
participate
that
in
that,
at
all.
As
far
as
the
easement
that
goes
across
there,
it
was
when
it
first
came.
A
Yeah
the
whole
concept
is
get
all
the
traffic
off
there
and
make
that
so
it's
just
purely
it's
the
one
side
of
it
in
a
perfect
world,
I'd
like
to
get
rid
of
that
easement
altogether,
but
the
city
won't.
Let
us
get
rid
of
that
easement
altogether,
because
if
we
have
a
fire
or
an
issue
down
on
the
southern
end
of
that
road,
there's
no
escape
for
anybody
to
the
north
say
a
tornado
comes
through
and
causes
damage
there.
A
We
have
all
those
people
trapped
to
the
north,
so
that
easement
well,
that
should
actually
be
used
less
to
the
form
of
emergency
use
only
and
the
southern
access
be
in
there
as
far
as
drainage.
The
question
was:
would
would
you
be
with
the
drainage
load
be
more
or
less,
and
they
assured
us
today
that
currently
there's
six
and
a
half
acres
of
land
that
drains
across
your
property
Condit.
M
That's
the
road
yesterday
when
I
was
over
there
and
you
and
I
drove
back
there,
the
concerns
that
you
and
that
the
concerns
that
you
had
with
with
your
existing
driveway
and
actually
resisting
driveways
on
the
neighbor's
property
now
and
you're
concerned.
If
a
road
went
through
there
and
so
forth
and
so
on,
what
what
the
developers
have
agreed
to
do
is
we
met
today
as
they're
not
going
to
develop
that
road?
No,
so
there
won't
be
a
road
there,
so
the
road
on
the
north
will
just
stop
at
your
property
line.
J
P
Z
A
And
we
don't,
we
don't
want
to
really
wreck
the
aesthetics
of
that
driveway
that
road,
it's
it's
not
big
enough
to
really
serve
the
purposes.
You
can't
get
two
vehicles
on
it
and
rather
than
going
through
the
process
of
improving
that
road
to
the
maximum
ability
of
that,
easement
still
wouldn't
give
us
what
they
actually
need
for
the
load.
That's
up
there.
M
E
Just
want
to
basically
reiterate
what
red
said
as
far
as
the
fisheries
concerned
in
there
I
start
moved
here
in
1980
and
at
the
time
Gary
and
Mike
and
I
went
through
the
eggs
Walton
Lake.
We
used
that
Bay
Area
for
stocking
a
whole
lot
of
crappies
and
that
still
continues
to
be
probably
the
only
place
on
that
whole
lake
that
has
crappies
production
and
whatever
happens
with
development
on
there
and
and
you
got
to
realize.
I
read
the
paper
tonight
and
competi
is
a
focal
point
for
Watertown.
A
A
All
right,
Bob
and
rod
you're
ready
to
come
up
and
go
through
the.
What
we
have
in
resolution.
25
are
201
201,
5-8,
there's
19
points
of
contention
in
a
resolution
when
we
approve
alert
resolution,
that's
kind
of
the
de
docx,
the
document
that
they're
going
to
develop
by
we've
all
seen
it.
We
probably
all
talk
to
different
people
as
to
the
different
aspects
of
it.
We
all
have
our
own
thoughts
on
what's
in
there,
but
I'll
just
take
them
step-by-step.
First,
the
first
part.
A
The
first
point
is
the
property
shall
be
plaited
within
three
years
that
standard
operating
procedure
by
the
city
developers
don't
have
any
I'll.
Just
basically
have
you
guys
say
not
yay
or
a
nay,
yes
or
no
or
he
understand,
and
so
point
one
hasn't
been
an
issue
whatsoever
that
it
gets
platted
within
three
years.
If
it's
not
within
three
years,
we
come
back
and
revisit
to
see
why
it
hasn't
been
plowed
and
what's
going
on
yeah
item
two
I'm
gonna
read
it
as
its
stated.
A
Stony
point
drive
shall
be
installed
from
Prairie
Hills
Avenue,
as
we
talked
about
to
connect
to
Lots
one
and
two,
a
stony
point,
second
edition,
with
the
first
phase
of
the
development.
The
developer
must
agree
to
maintain
and
provide
snow
removal
on
any
gravel
streets
as
private
streets.
Basically
saying
these
are
private
streets,
and
generally
once
the
street
is
fully
developed
its
to
the
city
standards,
it's
turned
over
to
the
city
for
maintenance
and
out
and
control
they'll
agree
to
maintain
and
provide
snow
removal
on
any
gravel
streets
as
private
streets.
A
Until
such
time,
the
streets
are
paved
and
accepted
by
the
city.
All
dead-end
roads
will
have
turnarounds
constructed
in
accordance
with
the
adopted
international
fire
code.
That's
basically
so
that
we
can
get
emergency
vehicles
in
and
out
of
there
unless
something's
changed
they've
agreed
that
they
understand
it.
As
that
road
moves,
north
they're,
gonna
put
it
in
there
and
they'll,
maintain
it
and
in
a
normal
developer,
can't
wait
to
give
it
to
the
city,
because
that
means
the
first
snow
after
we
get
it,
we
move
it
instead
of
him,
so
I
don't
think.
A
The
third
item
is
something
a
few
board.
Members
may
have
something
to
say
about
it's:
the
street
right
away:
they've
agreed
to
put
a
sixty
six
foot
right
away
in
there,
including
twenty
six
feet
of
asphalt
with
a
gently
sloping
parking
areas
on
both
sides
of
it.
The
question
is:
is
many
cases
we
say
we
want
sixty
six
feet.
Oh
right
away,
we
want
38
foot
roads
with
curb
and
gutter.
A
O
A
The
sidewalks
will
do
we
address
sidewalks
trail
in
here
anywhere
or
not
yes,
okay,
we'll
get
to
that.
So
we
won't
say,
but
in
that
66
foot
right
away,
the
contention
is
and
I
know
some
guys
will
have
something
to
say
as
how
big
a
road
is
big
enough.
Denis
manche
mentioned
earlier,
he
put
a
38
foot
road
in
which
he
thought
was
too
big.
He
and
I
sat
on
it
earlier
this
morning
and
went
and.
N
A
H
26
is
still
too
small,
even
in
our
ordinance.
We
do
have
a
definite
definition
of
a
private
road
and
that's
28,
and
this
isn't
supposed
to
be
a
private
road.
It's
supposed
to
be
a
public
road,
it's
gonna
access,
commercial
areas
and
I.
The
minimum
vote
that
I
could
live
with
would
be
30-foot
and
that
would
allow
for
parking
on
one
side.
W
A
Kind
of
something
we
didn't
want
to
see
is
no
parking
signs
on
a
residential
street
that
there
will
be
occasional
people
park
out
there.
I
too,
wanted
felt
more
comfortable
with
a
larger
Street.
Once
I
saw
that
there
will
be
enough
room
on
each
shoulder
for
a
car
to
park,
maybe
two
feet
onto
the
asphalt
and
that
there
would
be
a
gentle
slope,
not
not
a
slope
that
when
you
park
there
and
your
wife
gets
out,
she
takes
a
10-foot
tumble
down
into
the
ditch.
You
know
and
I.
Guess
there
there's
it
at
some
point.
A
You
have
to
hope
that
someone
who
puts
millions
of
dollars
into
a
development
is
not
gonna,
go
on
the
cheap
and
make
it
look
bad.
You
know
and
I
believe
that
that's
this
case
here,
where
you
look
and
go
it's
in
their
best
interest
to
make
the
ingress
and
egress
out
of
this
area,
I
think
to
make
you
want
to
build
a
half
a
million
dollar
house
up
there.
M
My
concern
John
from
the
very
beginning
to
is
a
22
foot
wide
street
and
when
I
got
my
certified
letter,
like
everybody
else,
first
thing
I
did
is
I
went
out
at
a
measured
palm
Pesce
Drive
and
the
width
of
the
asphalt
in
Pampas
could
rise,
22
feet
and
went
over
and
measured.
My
call
to
sac,
which
I
thought
I
knew.
There
is
double
checked
it
now.
That's
that's.
Probably
only
gonna
have
three
or
four
houses
on
it,
so
it's
totally
different.
It's
not
a
main
artery,
but
that's
20.
M
That's
22
feet
asphalt
and
the
curve
goes
beyond
that.
So
I
think
by
him
going
to
26
will
allow
parking
and,
as
we
talked
today
with
a
66
foot
right
away
with
26
foot
of
asphalt,
you've
got
40
feet
left
you
divide
40
feet
by
2,
that's
20!
Normally
you
have
a
13
foot
Boulevard
to
the
back
of
the
sidewalk.
M
In
this
case,
you'll
have
20
feet,
so
you've
got
7
more
feet
on
each
side
and,
as
we
talked
today
and
met
that
will
allow
that
grade
off
of
the
asphalt
to
be
fairly
flat
and
then
a
slight
ditch
going
down
and
coming
up
and
leveling
out
where
the
sidewalk
is
in
that
20
feet
and
talking
with
the
engineers
it
sounds
like
that,
will
all
should
all
fit
together
and
work.
You.
H
G
A
We
talked
about
that's
standard
in
residential.
There
are
two
commercial
Lots
up
on
there
and
we
had
a
discussion
in
the
developer
had
a
discussion,
as
should
we
should
we
have
more
more
as
always
better
but
more
is
always
more
expensive
to
and
and
the
thought
was
hopefully
the
the
commercial
exposure
up.
There
isn't
to
the
point,
and
it's
it's
a
smaller
percentage
of
land
use
up
there
that
we
could.
We
could
make
the
3-inch
asphalt
in
the
nine
inch
base
work
like
we
do
in
most
residential
area.
M
I
think
what
you
have
to
consider
on
the
developer
side,
if
we
like
to
see
larger
Lots,
you
know
we
can
have
smaller
Lots
up
there
and
he
could
take
every
one
of
those
Lots
and
divide
it
by
four
and
make
four
out
of
one
the
same
thing
that
I
could
have
done.
But
what
you
end
up
with,
which
you
get
your
infrastructure
cost
so
high,
it
doesn't
pay
to
do
it
and
a
good
example
of
what
I've
got
down
there.
M
You
know
you
cannot
multiply
your
sale
price
before
or
even
by
three
or
even
by
two
and
sell
a
lot
and
recoup
your
costs
on
it.
So
if
you,
if
we
want
larger
Lots
in
the
city
where
you
can
have
some
green
space
and
things
around
you're,
gonna
have
to
make
some
concessions
somewhere
along
the
line
or
it
doesn't
pay
a
developer
to
go
and
do
it.
If
I
went
back
11
years,
there's
no
way.
I
would
start
Prairie
Hills
because
it
does
not
pay
to
do
it.
A
The
thing
is,
it's
a
beautiful
area,
it's
one
of
the
nicest
areas
and
you
know
I,
know
developers
will
say
it's
my
stuff
I'll,
do
it
if
I
want.
Why
are
you
in
it,
but
we
want
as
a
community.
We
want
it
to
be
done
properly.
Number
five
honk
potty
circle
be
allowed
to
have
a
cul-de-sac
with
a
50-foot
radius.
I
believe
we're
all.
Ok
with
that.
H
A
Item
number
6,
the
center
planning
I
island
that
was
shown
at
home
potty,
wouldn't
be
allowed.
The
garbage
turnaround,
trucks
and
developers
didn't
have
an
issue.
It's
been
in
less
money
in
there.
The
idea
where
that
was
just
something
different.
You
know
something
that
was
in
there.
I
see
rod
kind
of
still
really
want
what
she
would
have
wish.
We
wouldn't
get
in
your
business.
So
much
it
item
number
seven.
The
developer
has
the
option
of,
and
this
is
going
back
to
our
sidewalks
I'll
read
it
as
its
stated.
A
The
developer
has
the
option
of
installing
a
10-foot
wide
asphalt
trail
or
a
4-foot
wide
sidewalk
adjacent
to
all
a
lot
sidewalks
would
be
constructed
at
the
time
of
the
building
permits
are
issued.
That's
when
the
Lots
are
sold
and
built
on,
but
the
trail
will
be
installed
at
the
time.
The
road
options
chosen.
W
A
Correct
and
what
is
we
hashed
through
that?
What
we
said
was
he's
going
to
run
a
trail?
Not
it's
not
going
to
be
a
wide
road.
It's
going
to
be
a
separate
trail.
Instead
of
sidewalks
on
both
sides,
he's
going
to
put
a
10
foot
wide
trail
on
one
side
and
it
will
be
installed
at
the
time
of
the
road,
whereas
we
wouldn't
have
complete
sidewalks
up
in
there
for
15
years,
we'd
have
sidewalks
that
start
and
stop
and
start
and
stop
as
homes
are
built.
A
trail
would
be
nice.
A
W
A
The
same
time
that
the
road
goes
to
you
know,
and
we
thought
from
an
aesthetic
standpoint.
It
would
be
kind
of
neat
I
mean
that's
a
walking
trail.
That
goes
all
the
way
from
Prairie
Hills
up
around
the
top
of
Stoney
Point
and
back
down
to
Prairie
Hills,
whereas
we
could
have
had
sidewalks
on
one
side
or
the
other
variable
walking
through
gravel
dirt
mud
to
get
to
the
next
sidewalk
to
the
next.
G
N
G
K
W
Is
we
talked
with
Dennis
about
possible
option
or
even
doing
that
on
his
property,
where
he'd
come
up
on
his
trail
and
then
come
on
up
here
along
the
road,
and
then
we
might
actually
come
down
between
these
two
properties?
There's
a
lot
of
trees
and
that
type
of
thing
and
then
come
down
and
connect
with
with
these
other
lots
and.
A
Part
of
that
was
to
his
is,
if
he,
if
he
came
down
in
between
the
commercial
lot
in
the
back
end
of
those
residential
Lots,
he's
staying
off
the
property
line
too,
which
is
kind
of
nice
to
the
the
adjacent
neighbors
and
it
would.
It
would
be
a
bit
of
a
buffer
between
the
back
of
the
residential
and
commercial
Lots
I.
M
Suggested
that
the
trail
go
on
the
east
side
of
the
road,
it's
a
big
deal.
I
just
thought
it
might
be
less
intrusive
at
this
point,
if
it
was
on
the
east
side
and
then
it
goes
up
to
the
pond
too,
and
could
connect
with
anything
I'd
have
there
and
then
go
on
up
into
his
property,
but
I
guess
that's
all
to
be
disgusted
item.
A
Number
eight
was
no
plot
will
be
recorded
until
the
park.
Dedication
requirements
been
met
with
the
satisfaction
of
the
park
board.
The
park
board
is
said
earlier
in
the
January
that
they,
like
Park
dedication
up
there,
there's
some
questions
as
to
whether
we're
too
far
in
the
process
today
to
dedicate
Park
or
not
that's
something
that
will
get
hashed
out
between
the
developer
in
the
city,
fair
enough.
A
The
developer
is
required
to
obtain
the
South
Dakota
Dean
Dean
DENR
stormwater.
Permit
that
standard.
They
understand
that
no
planning
of
Lots
fill
permit,
dredging
or
building
permits
will
be
allowed
to
block
lot
block
one
Lots
ten,
seven
through
ten,
until
the
US
Corps
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
South
decane
fishing
parks
have
issued
permits
which
would
allow
to
the
certain
lot
sizes.
That's
what
we
talked
about
earlier,
that
404
permit
down
on
the
bottom.
A
We're
not
going
to
do
anything
down
there
until
that
game,
fish
and
parks
in
the
Corps
says
yay
or
nay,
item
number
eleven,
no,
no
Platina,
Lots
fill
permits.
Dredging
building
will
be
allowed
within
block
four
until
the
US
Army
Corps
same
thing.
That's
the
one!
That's
closer
over
to
pond
Pesce
and
again
that's
in
the
later
phase
of
this
project.
A
A
G
W
U
I
wanted
it
to
be
I
just
think
it
should
be
clear
to
the
property
owner
of
the
easement
that
this
easement
is
there
forever
for
everything
that
develops
up
there,
not
just
for
a
few
homes
there.
This
is
a
fully
developed
subdivision
at
some
point
which
will
have
emergency
access.
That
means
that
routes
that
roads
going
to
be
plowed
during
the
winter.
It's
going
to
be
maintained
in
its
state.
It's
a
small
road,
but
it
has
to
be
there
so
that
emergency
vehicles
can
get
in
and
out.
That's.
A
U
If
the
property
owner
said
no,
my
easement
doesn't
serve
commercial
development.
That's
not
part
of
the
deal.
You're
done,
you
can't
use
it
anymore
than
the
city
has
people
living
up
there
that
don't
have
emergency
access
and
that's
not
okay,
that
this
development
absolutely
needs
to
have
that
easement
and
without
it
this
development
can't
happen
within
our
rules,
because
we
need
an
secondary
route
out
unless
there's
another
one
flatted
somewhere
else
and
I
was
just
a
little
bit
uncomfortable
with
the
way
that
the
easement
was.
M
A
M
K
It
is
but
my
question
getting
back
to
when
Conda
was
up
here
it.
It
kind
of
bothered
me
when
we're
gonna
be
selling
what
seven
Lots
or
whatever
before
the
road
is
brought
up,
know
the.
W
U
K
K
K
W
W
G
Y
A
Y
G
Y
Y
A
Right
item
number
14:
the
developer
will
be
responsible
for
maintaining
the
gravel
road
described
in
item
13
above
in
all
private
gravel
roads,
so
the
safe
access
is
ensured
at
all
times
during
all
seasons.
The
city
isn't
in
the
in
the
business
of
accepting
gravel
roads
and
most
developers
understand
that
they'll
turn
that
road
over
to
the
city
when
it
meets
city
specs,
and
they
generally
can't
wait
to
do
that.
A
Item
number
15
water
will
not
be
allowed
to
flow
off
the
site
on
to
neighboring
properties
without
first
passing
through
water
to
water,
quantity
control
facilities
and
the
engineering
developers
understand
that
yes,
I
know
number
16
water
quality
control
facilities
will
be
designed
in
accordance
with
the
city's
approved
post
construction.
Bp
BMP
manual
I
understand
that
item
17
water,
water
quality
and
quantity
controls
must
be
constructed
with
recorded
easements
outside
the
Republic
right
away.
A
A
Easements
will
be
obtained
in
channels
constructed
by
the
developer.
To
contain
safe
and
safely
contain
the
contain
convey
the
hundred-year
developed
flow
rates
from
the
site
to
the
receiving
water
body
water
body
prior
to
recording
any
plat.
They
understood
that
that's
a
standard
operating
procedure
in
in
developing
item
number
19
easements
adequate
to
contain
the
hundred-year
water
surface
level
and
all
ditches
will
be
required
to
be
plaited
if
the
water
surface
extends
on
a
private
property
and
they
understood
that
anything
else.
We
missed
Bob.
H
A
A
H
H
A
H
A
It
was
annexed
in
in
1977,
we
didn't
annex
it
in
recently,
it
was
annexed
in
in
77,
and
the
developer
feels
that
the
park
dedication
should
have
happened
at
that
time.
The
city
feels
that
we
could
get
a
second
shot
at
it
now
and
we
agreed
to
disagree
and
and
let
the
legal
people
look
at
that
fair
enough.
K
I'm
still
not
comfortable
with
that,
with
that
commercial
hot
up
there
and
you
yeah,
and
to
your
ease
you
rezone
that
to
r1,
then
then
I'll
be
happy.
I
like
the
idea
of
the
are
the
the
commercial
up
there
don't
get
me
wrong.
I!
Think
it's
a
great
idea,
but
with
a
commercial
light
you're
going
to
have
commercial
traffic,
so
I
think
we
need
to
accommodate
the
width
of
roads
are
you're
going
to
you
know
it's
just
a
it's.
E
W
K
W
A
So,
to
the
point
we're
at
now
is:
is
we've
got
the
preliminary
plan
ahead
of
us
we've
kind
of
looked
through
it?
We've
hashed
through
it
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
points
on
this
and
in
a
perfect
world
with
with
endless
dollars,
we
would
do
lots
of
different,
but
so
here
we
said
these
are
the
19
points
in
the
resolution
to
me,
the
the
the
the
deal-breakers
where
that
road
has
to
come
in
from
the
south.
We
have
to
address
the
drainage
as
to
where
it's
going
to
go.
A
U
Like
to
add,
before
you
take
in
any
action
on
this
to
point
out
the
things
that
are
different
from
what
we
address
in
the
code
and
specifically
the
road
width,
we
do
say
all
roads
must
be
local
roads
must
be
38
feet
and
if
you
approve
this
with
26
feet,
with
not
underground
drainage,
no
curb
and
gutter,
but
open
ditches.
That
are
you
willing
to
do
that
from
now
on
with
every
development?
Or
is
there
something
different
about
this
one?
U
A
N
A
One
is
a
rural
section,
I
would
say
most
of
these
Lots
is
I.
Looked
at
the
mac
estates
that
we'll
see
next
north
of
the
rec
center
versus
these.
These
Lots
are
two
to
three
times
that
size
and
you
can
kind
of
take
a
look
at,
in
my
opinion,
the
density
of
the
number
of
vehicles
that
are
moving
in
and
out
of
there
when
you
have
smaller
Lots
in
a
residential
neighborhood
inside
this,
the
proper
city
limits
of
Watertown,
you
probably
do
have
more
trash.
A
U
Thing
that
we've
haven't
done
as
long
as
I've
been
here
is
ever
permit
a
road,
private
or
public
to
go
to
be
gravelled,
and
that
has
water
quality
impacts.
So
your
decision
to
allow
private
gravel
streets
is
counter
to
our
code.
It
does
say
that
private
streets
need
to
be
at
least
28
feet
wide
and
hard
surface,
so
you're
making
that
decision
in
conflict
with
our
ordinance.
M
M
U
A
U
M
U
M
U
K
M
M
M
P
U
M
A
When
do
you
expect
that
what
we're
going
back
to
this
is
is
number
two
where
it
says
the
developer
must
agree
to
maintain
and
provide
snow
removal
on
the
gravel
streets
at
the
time
that
the
until
such
time
the
streets
are
paved
and
accepted,
we
can
put
three
years:
I
mean
I,
look
at
it.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
before
those
aren't
cheap
lots
that
are
up
there
and
the
people
who
are
buying
those
Lots
and
building
there
they're
going
to
demand
a
road
as
soon
as
possible.
O
W
N
M
O
M
W
W
O
Tell
you
more
you're
dealing
with
the
federal
government
there
so
and
just
the
advertisement
it's
going
to
take
120
days,
but
they
also
got
to
go
through
the
internal
office
reviews
and
things
like
that
beforehand
before
they
present
it
for
advertising
for
public
input
and
other
agencies.
So
so
the
four
four
is
gonna
take
some
time
and
that's.
Why
was
put
into
phased?
You.
A
W
W
W
W
Actually,
they
say
that
you
know
major
rainy
event
that
water
control
is
better
without
color,
curb
and
gutter,
because
that
tends
to
funnel
things
and
do
whatever
but
I
guess
the
real
reason
for
it
is
I
think
it
just
looks.
It
looks
more
like
a
rural
setting
more
like
what
you'd
expect
to
be
at
the
lake,
not
having
the
curb
and
gutter,
not
having
that
sort
of
thing
we're
already
talking
about.
You
know
plenty
of
other
expenses
in
this
thing
that
it's
not
the
expense
side
of
it.
K
P
O
This
is
in
Green,
Bay
Wisconsin,
and
you
know
this
is
just
one
area
yeah.
They
have
a
lot
of
curb
and
gutter
too,
but
you
can
see
the
residences
on
the
side
there
so,
but
this
is
just
like
a
narrow
road.
It's
like
22
feet.
But
yet,
if
you
look
on
the
side
there,
there
is
some
gentle
swales
on
the
side
there.
For
that
part
of
it's
gravel
than
the
rest
of
its
grass
I
mean
that's
just
one.
A
W
N
K
W
W
A
G
A
A
N
A
A
E
P
W
M
W
N
K
G
K
T
N
A
M
A
T
As
you
know,
the
city
bought
property
where
the
Watertown
Community
Center
is
gonna,
go
and
you
recently
just
granted
them
a
variance
and
one
of
the
processes
and
a
development
is
when,
when
a
property
is
bought
and
annexed
into
the
city
needs
to
be
used
to
be
preliminary
planned,
and
you
guys
directed
the
staff
to
work
on
a
preliminary
plan
for
this
area.
We've
created
this
preliminary
plan.
We
brought
it
to
you
as
a
concept
plan
last
month
and
made
a
few
changes
since
then,
and-
and
now
it's
it's
here
today
as
a
preliminary
plan.
T
L
A
Take
a
look
at
the
conditions
on
there
just
like
we
did
on
the
last
one.
The
question
I
have
on
this
Jeff
it's.
This
is
a
little
all.
How
would
you
say,
unorthodox
that
the
city
master
plans
property
they
don't
own,
but
we've
always
asked
to
get
a
general
idea.
What's
going
on
up
there,
the
question
I
had
is
go
down
to
the
the
drainage
area.
There
was
the
park.
Dedication
on
that
top
corner,
that
pitcher.
T
A
T
A
That
quadrant
up
the
right,
I
believe
I
believe
when
Parks
looked
at
that
they
thought
that
area.
There
made
sense
for
a
part,
because
it
was
kind
of
between
to
two
developments.
It
was
on
the
further
away
from
the
middle
school
and
the
question
is
zoning
of
it
when,
when
we
go
through
this
resolution,
we're
not
actually
making
zoning
determination.
T
A
A
N
U
I
would
like
to
just
clarify
for
the
record
why
the
city's
doing
this.
We
took
a
parent
parcel
which
I'm
gonna
call
Mac
estate
edition
lot
two
and
we
broke
it
into
two
pieces.
One
would
be
rec
center
and
two,
the
rest
and
my
interpretation
of
our
code
is
that
when
you
subdivide
land
in
that
way,
you
should
be
doing
a
preliminary
plan
and
there
had
never
been
one
done
on
this
and
and
we're
the
developer
in
this
situation,
and
so
it's
our
responsibility
to
do
it.
U
If
the
owner
wants
to
do
it,
the
owner
can
do
it,
but
certainly
the
developer
should
do
it
at
the
developers,
expense-
and
we
are
the
developer
in
this
case,
so
not
that
we're
going
to
go
all
over
town
and
do
this,
but
in
this
particular
case
I
think
we'd
be
breaking
our
own
rules.
If
we
didn't
do
this,
and
so
this
enables
us
to
administrative
leap,
lat,
the
rec
center
addition
so
or
whatever
we're
going
to
call
it
Mac
estate,
third
edition
or
second
edition
in
compliance
with
our
own
regulations.
U
So
we're
not
asking
someone
else
to
do
something
that
we
aren't
willing
to
do
ourselves,
and
in
this
case
the
rec
center
in
the
middle
school
are
in
a
different
drainage
basin
than
the
rest
of
the
addition.
Hosanna
Church
is
also
in
the
Robie
Creek
drainage
basin,
but
everything
in
color
there
pretty
much
drains
to
a
different
watershed,
and
we
haven't
completed
the
drainage
analysis
of
that.
The
drainage
analysis
is
done
for
the
part
we
want
to
plat
for
our
community
center
or
the
rec
center.
U
That
has
already
been
analyzed
and
detention
ponds
are
already
built.
Water
quality
facilities
are
already
in
place
for
that,
and
we
also
have
a
grading
plan
in
place
already
for
that
addition.
So
this
is
just
kind
of
filling
in
the
rest
of
the
holes
to
make
it
complete
so
that
we
have
a
client
I
can
issue
an
administrative
plat
for
the
community
center
edition
in
complete
compliance
with
our
regulations,
and
then
we
can
take
the
rest
of
it
further
if
we
want
to
or
if
mr.
U
Oris
wants
to
do
that
on
his
own
as
his
property
I
think
he's
already
looking
at
doing
it
through
his
own
private
engineer,
and
it
may
look
like
this,
it
might
look
like
something
completely
different.
There's
a
thousand
ways
to
do
this
right.
There
isn't
only
one
right
way.
This
is
just
a
suggestion,
but
if
some,
if
you
approve
this
and
someone
wants
to
plat
a
part
of
it
and
they
match
it,
I
can
issue
an
administrative
plat
and
it
can
be
very
quickly
approved
and
ready
for
construction.
So
that's
a
benefit.
Yes,.
H
A
A
E
A
A
F
U
A
U
N
A
B
B
A
B
Sarah
had
called
me
a
couple
times
and
I'm
kind
of
busy
so
I,
you
know
I
never
had
any
input
into
this
plan
that
she
did.
You
know
well
in
the
meantime,
I
kind
of
got
an
idea
I.
Maybe
you
should
start
looking
into
it,
so
I
contacted
rod,
Austin,
engineering
and-
and
he
started
looking
into
it.
Something
for
me,
but
I
really
haven't
got
a
whole
lot
to
add
other
than
in
this
plan.
Is
there
any
commercial
lots
or
well.
A
A
A
B
A
I,
you
know,
as
in
Rhonda,
made
the
statement
of
boy.
If
this
is
a
place
of
interest
where
a
lot
of
people
go,
we've
got
a
lot
of
schools
there.
Where
do
they
go
to
eat,
maybe
there'll
be
a
restaurant
or
something
that
will
go
up
further
north
on
that
corner
up
there
and
that's
why
I
think
it's
a
great
thing
that
the
city
does
this
just
says:
hey
it's
laid
out.
This
is
what
it
can
look
like.
A
B
Different
than
that
from
what
we
think
we
want
and
and
of
course
Sarah
is
completely
right-
you've
got
to
know
where
your
major
roads
are.
When
you
start
this
deal
so
I'm
not
I'm,
not
complaining
about
any
of
that
at
all,
and
there
was
a
couple
of
points
there
I
think.
When
we
did
contract
with
the
city,
there
was
going
to
be
storm,
sewer.
U
D
B
A
You
know
the
other
thing
it's
interesting,
while
you're
here
we
talked
from
a
park
board
standpoint
is:
can
you
bring
that
down
shrink
it
down
just
a
little
bit
for
us?
You
know
one
thing:
it's
nice
that
a
developer
comes
in
and
talks
to
us
because
from
I
know,
the
park
board
has
said
when
we
see
a
quarter,
a
land
like
that
we'd
like
to
be
proactive
and
work
with
the
developer
and
say
this
is
where
we
want
the
park
to
be.
A
A
B
A
A
P
A
Fictional-
it's
not
quite
as
fictional,
but
it
to
get
an
idea
what
it
could
look
like,
so
that
when
people
talk
about
it
we
can
say
yeah.
We
know
we're
generally,
where
the
roads
you
know.
18Th
has
always
been
a
road
of
contention
for
this
board,
because
we've
said
when
people
drop
kids
off
at
that
school
we'd
like
him
to
come
all
the
way
to
18th
and
19th
and
drop
back
down
to
alleviate
some
congestion
there,
but
the
faster
that
area
gets
developed.
The
more
happy
a
lot
of
people
will
be.
AA
My
name
is
Michael
leg.
I
live
in
Northridge.
My
concerns
are
the
road
placement
of
the
road
is
good.
How
close
it
will
be
to
my
property
lane
for
my
backyard,
as
he
had
stated,
with
the
congestion
of
the
school
Oh
Pete.
That's
gonna,
be
a
heavy
high-traffic
area
with
kids
and
other
things
going
on
in
my
backyard.
That
is
a
huge
concern
of
mine.
Can.
AA
AA
U
Those
are
really
important
concerns
to
address
and
glad
you
said
it.
I
would
like
to
explain
that
the
city
has
a
comprehensive
plan
with
a
major
street
network
already
adopted,
and
some
of
these
streets
were
already
adopted
in
the
major
street
plan.
So
we
we
generally
already
have
section
line
right-of-way
along
every
section
line,
and
then
our
comprehensive
plan
breaks
every
section
into
quarters
and
those
quarter
lines
also
have
collector
roads
on
them.
AA
U
It's
it's
completely
market
driven
and-
and
we
aren't,
we
aren't,
encouraging
or
discouraging
anything
here-
we're
just
laying
out
a
possibility,
mainly
this.
What
this
plan
does
is.
It
shows
how
people
can
get
from
within
the
subdivision
to
the
collector
routes
which
surround
it.
So
our
comprehensive
plan
has
the
routes
already
identified
on
the
bottom,
the
top
and
the
left
and
the
right.
Those
were
the
Givens
that
we
started
with
and
then
how
do
you
get
from
the
middle
to
those
roads?
U
That's
what
we
were
looking
at
here,
but
every
now
and
then
we
come
across
a
place
where
we
can't
put
a
collector
out
where
we
thought
we
were
going
to
for
some
reason,
and
so
it's
always
good
to
hear.
We
draw
those
in
a
massive
scale.
We
aren't
looking
on
foot
at
each
place
where
they're
just
lines
on
paper,
and
so
sometimes
it
doesn't
work
out
and
if
there's
a
reason
it
doesn't
work
out.
We
want
to
know
as
soon
as
possible
in.
A
AA
AA
AA
A
AA
U
Know,
but
we
do
have
space
that
there's
a
Boulevard
area
which
is
generally
10
or
15
feet
wide
could
be
20
and
the
sidewalk
can
go
anywhere
in
there.
We
like
to
keep
it
as
far
away
from
the
road
as
possible,
so
that
when
we
remove
the
snow,
it
doesn't
pile
up,
give
give
you
big
ice
chunks
on
the
sidewalk.
Well,.
N
A
AA
A
T
Scroll
to
our
Street
section
layout,
that
Street
is
a
minor
collector
as
Sara's
mentioned,
which
they
typically
have
a
75-foot
of
right
away,
south,
where
the
school
was
put
in
at
80
foot
of
right
away.
But
here's
the
typical
section
that
we
had
drawn
for
that
area.
It
shows
the
approximately
40
feet
of
pavement
and
then,
of
course,
curb
and
gutter
and
then
there's
approximately
10
feet
of
grass
before
the
five
foot
sidewalk
and
there's
a
1/4
of
a
foot
to
the
property
line.
U
U
But
it
may
not.
That
is
a
good
little
spot
right.
That's
generally,
where
you
put
the
detention
and
the
detention
isn't
going
to
make
it
worse.
For
you,
it's
going
to
make
it
better
and
control
it.
It
would
be
nearby
because
it's
closed
over
there
by
11th
Street,
but
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
city-owned
piece
of
land,
that's
maintained
and
there
won't
be
a
lot
of
traffic
there
from
that
and
possibly
even
a
park.
So
there's
trade-offs.
T
A
H
A
T
T
Mistake
an
be
administrative
Lea
proved,
then
we
can,
you
know,
just
approve
them
without
bringing
them
to
you,
but
we
looked
and
we
figured
out.
Condo
plat
would
never
be
able
to
be
administrative,
Lea
proved
because
it
doesn't
meet
our
subdivision
because
all
the
Lots
are
smaller
than
then
what's
required.
You
know
that
we
had
units
on
that
platter
earlier
today
that
we're
only
1,800
square
feet.
Where
you
know
in
the
eye
one
zone,
we
always
required
20,000
square
feet.
T
U
A
T
U
We
say
we
say
in
our
subdivision
ordinance
that
a
person
can
get
a
variance
from
the
subdivision
procedures
through
the
plan
commission
following
the
procedures
set
forth
in
the
ordinance,
and
then
there
are
no
procedures
set
forward
in
the
ordinance.
We
do
have
variance
procedures
for
building
in
our
zoning
ordinance,
which
are
completely
inappropriate
when
you're
talking
about
planning
so
I
think
that
the
route
addition
would
have
been
a
perfect
situation
for
a
variance,
but
we
don't
have
a
process
for
that.
So
I
couldn't
take
it
through
that.
U
A
S
U
Plan
it
subdivision
is
what
I'm
talking
about
and
we
have
forms
for
asking
for
variances
and
we
never
use
them,
but
we
have
them
ready
to
go
so
that
I'd
like
to
do
that,
because
then
the
developer
is
telling
you
right
up
front
instead
of
us
having
to
pour
through
their
plans
where,
where
are
they
asking
for
variances?
We
right
now
have
to
sleuth
it
out.
They'll,
give
us
a
plan,
they
aren't
telling
us
whether
it
meets
a
code
or
not.
We
have
to
fear
that
out
on
our
own
on.
U
J
N
Y
U
U
Be
fair
and
uniform
and
we
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do,
but
we
know
what
we
have
to
do
and
we
just
want
to
get
it
done
sooner
or
later.
Anybody.