►
From YouTube: BOA & Plan Comm Mtgs 06 18 2015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
You
first
item
on
the
agenda:
is
the
approval
of
the
June
3rd
2015
minutes
in
it
like
a
motion?
A
second
motion
by
mrs.
Johnson
second
by
mr.
McGuire,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
second
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
applicant
Lonnie
Albrecht
permit
number
one
six
one:
five,
five,
six,
a
conditional
use
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
a
storage
building
at
four
four
six
tenth
Avenue
Northeast
used
as
storage
units
in
the
are
three.
B
Applicants
seeks
approval
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
one
864
square
foot,
building
with
to
432
square
foot.
Units
proposed
to
be
used
for
personal
storage
pursuant
to
21
to
double
oo
of
the
zoning
ordinance
contingent
on
compliance
with
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses,
including,
but
not
limited,
limited
to
2100
202
to
b6
a
through
H
storage
units
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
are
three
multifamily
residential
district
421
to
W.
Mnet's
must
be
less
than
or
equal
to
600
square
feet.
I'll
just
bring
this
up.
B
It
does
not
show
off
street
parking
spaces
or
aisles
layout,
but
sufficient
area
exists
and
for
a
personal
storage
unit
he
doesn't
really
need
parking.
There
isn't
any
extra
required,
except
in
front
of
the
doors
per
2165,
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses.
Outside
storage
was
not
indicated
in
his
application
for
chapter
twenty
one:
seventy
three
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
It
does
not
show
the
six
to
seven
Boulevard
trees
for
titles,
five,
eighteen,
twenty
one
and
twenty
four
requirements
for
sidewalk
trail,
curb
gutter
and
subdivision
of
land.
B
The
proposed
parcel
is
a
legally
described
subdivision
of
a
replanted
area
and
lacks
basic
infrastructure
for
new
development,
such
as
curb
gutter,
sidewalk
and
trail
waiver.
A
right
to
protest
is
recommended,
as
this
street
will
undergo
undergo
reconstruction
in
the
near
future.
This
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
2100
202
to
be
six
A
through
H
chapters,
21
63,
2165,
21,
73
and
title
24.
This
parcel
lacks
standard,
Boulevard
and
infrastructure
grass
trees
sidewalk
trail
curb
gutter
requirements
from
which
the
applicant
has
not
requested
variance.
B
B
B
A
E
D
E
F
A
B
Yellow
that
you
see
here
is
flood.
Wait.
We
can't
do
anything,
make
any
kind
of
alterations
in
the
flood
way.
The
red
is
the
the
red
in
the
blue.
Are
flood
zones,
the
red
being
the
the
worse
of
the
two?
It
doesn't
mean
that
there
can
be
no
building
there.
We
just
have
to
build
to
flood
proof
standards.
They.
H
H
B
A
A
A
A
E
E
E
A
Joe,
let's
go
back,
we
have
a
district.
This
is
our
three
multi-family
residential.
It
looks
like
that.
This
is
an
area
that
you
could
put
an
apartment
up
there,
but
due
to
the
elevations
and
in
the
flood
the
flood
zone,
it
would
be
tricky
to
do
it.
We
have
a
garage
district
zoning.
It
requires
the
minimum
length
of
300
feet.
Correct.
A
B
B
A
C
A
Rather
than
rather
than
opening
up
a
Pandora's
box
of
saying
now,
I've
got
an
individually
owned
lot
and
I
want
to
put
a
detached
building
on
it.
For
my
personal
storage,
we
would
have
25
right
behind
us
on
Monday,
for
people
that
want
to
go
on
the
southeast
southwest
side
of
town
and
buy
a
small
lot
put
a
garage
for
their
own
boat
motors
things
like
that.
E
E
Imagine
it's
gonna
have
to
be
probably
foot
higher
than
what
the
land
is.
I
have
to
put
a
lot
and
be
the
same
type
of
fill,
that
paulie's
put
in
I'd,
say:
he's
a
foot
foot
and
a
half
above
yeah,
but
she's
gonna,
tent
I.
Haven't
he
let's
that's
up
there
quite
high,
but
I've
written
that
in
that
house
for
35
years
and
water
has
never
ever
come
that
far.
It.
A
I
F
A
Once
that,
once
that
zonings
there
he'd
be
fine,
the
only
thing
with
that
garage
district
is
what
it's
designed
for
is
parts
of
town
that
really
there's
nothing
better
than
part
of
that
to
get
that,
rezone
is
going
to
require
some
approval
from
the
surrounding
area
in
a
way
to
protect
the
neighbors
and
their
properties.
They'll
look
and
it's
going
to
require
the
approval
of
the
surrounding
area.
A
If,
if
that
goes
through
and
they're
fine
we'll
bring
it
in
we'll
rezone
it
and
then
not
only
can
a
person
put
one
building
there,
you
could
put
multiple
buildings
there
you
could,
they
could
be
sold
individually
to
people
also,
that's
what
it
was
designed
for,
but
I
have
motion
by
mr.
Arnold.
Do
I
have
a
second.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
The
third
item
on
the
agenda
is
Todd
and
Robin
van
Meter
I
seek
a
conditional
use,
hold
on
sexy.
Covariants
permit
number
one
six
one,
five:
four:
it's
a
variance
for
the
reef
from
a
requiring
of
a
zoning
ordinance
to
allow
the
construction
of
a
single-family
dwelling
at
four
four
one:
two,
twenty
eighth
Street
Northwest.
B
Application
was
submitted
requesting
to
construct
a
264
square
foot
addition
onto
a
single-family
dwelling
in
such
a
way
as
to
create
a
nonconformity
specifically
to
attached
garages.
The
application
was
denied
based
on
the
following
ordinance
regulations.
21:03
O
2
prohibits
the
creation
of
non-conformities
and
2110.
Excuse
me,
1,
double
o
2
allows
only
for
one
attached
garage
on
a
lot
of
less
than
one
acre.
B
A
Cut
to
the
chase
on
this
one,
if
you
bring
it
up,
what
they
want
to
do
is
they
want,
looks
like
they
want
to
add
an
addition
onto
the
back
of
their
house,
but
that
addition
becomes
they.
They
currently
have
an
attached
and
a
detached
garage,
but
that
addition,
if
that
additions
within
ten
feet,
if
the
corner,
the
addition
is
within
ten
feet,
the
detached
garage,
the
detached
garage
which
is
detached
now
is
considered
attached.
Even
though
it's
not
really
attached
is
detached.
A
A
So
really
you
see
that
you
see
the
little
12
by
22,
it's
not
attached
to
the
garage,
but
because
it's
so
close
to
the
garage.
We
have
to
pretend
it's
attached
to
the
garage
by
our
code,
but
it's
really
not
attached
it's
detached
and
when
we
have
to
look
at
it
say
well,
there's
others
places
on
this
lot
where
they
could
build,
but
that's
where
they
want
to
build
so
I'll
open
up
the
public
hearing.
If
the
applicants
here,
so
we
can
ask
them
a
few
questions.
C
C
C
A
You
want
to
expand
the
existing
kitchen
and
that's
the
only
place
we
can
put
the
kitchen,
even
though
it
now
makes
your
detached
garage
detached,
and
you
already
have
one
attached
right.
Anybody
have
any
questions
for
well
that
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
asked
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
further
discussion
motion
by
mr.
mr.
Albertson
second
by
mr.
McGuire.
Any
discussion
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries.
B
A
J
A
J
J
A
Not
gonna
add
any
more
people
into
the
house,
it's
just
their
expense,
they're.
Moving
there,
the
outside
wall
of
their
kitchen,
10
feet,
I,
know
I,
don't
see
how
that
would
in
any
way.
You
know
it's
not
like
they're,
adding
a
daycare
there
or
a
business
there
or
there
they're
more
than
likely
wouldn't
be
any
more
traffic
or
activity
there.
I
wouldn't.
J
A
D
K
K
L
C
C
I
L
L
A
You
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
agenda,
but
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
I'd,
like
to
change
item
number
five
from
a
public
hearing
two
to
a
discussion
item,
so
we
like
to
discuss
it
a
little
more
before
we.
We
need
to
really
make
sure
we
wrap
our
arms
around
it
and
know
what
we're
working
with
before
we
move
it
on
to
the
City
Council.
A
That's
our!
That's!
That's
a
ordinance
to
limit
the
amount,
a
lot
coverage
as
far
as
footprint
and
cement.
We
I
think
we
just
need
to
get
our
arms
around
it
and
understand
what
we're
looking
at
before.
We
pass
it
on
to
City
Council.
So,
with
that
I'd
ask
for
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
motion
motion
by
mrs.
Johnson
second
by
mr.
Stein,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
second
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
approval
of
the
minutes
from
May
21st
2015
I
need
a
motion
in
a
second
motion
by
mr.
stone.
A
L
East
was
18th
is
a
preliminary
plan
that
covers
an
area
from
12th
Avenue
North
to
9th
Avenue
north
and
from
25th
Street
East
to
29th
Street
East.
It
has
been
brought
to
you
guys
a
couple
of
times
already.
We've
discussed
it
and
went
through
it
and
I
kind
of
tried
to
hammer
some
things
out
which
we
have.
L
We
have.
The
planning
and
engineering
departments
have
drafted
a
net
resolution,
which
is
you
guys
this
packet?
That
has
a
couple
of
conditions.
I
would
I
just
brought
that
up
to
the
screen.
I
would
like
to
note
that
the
planning
and
engineering
department
would
like
to
strike
number
two
out
of
there.
We
don't
feel
that
that
condition
is
needed.
It
stated
that
the
preliminary
plan
should
be
revised
to
include
more
area.
We
feel
that
their
boundaries
are
clear
and
they
stay
what
they
they
wanted
to
cover
with
that
I'll.
Let
you
guys
discuss
it.
Thank.
D
L
A
L
L
A
For
a
long
time,
you're
gonna
have
one
two
three
four,
five,
six,
seven,
eight
nine
ten
or
eleven
Lots
that
butt
up
against
it,
probably
use
it
as
though
it's
their
own
and
someday
it'll
be
a
road.
Just
just
the
same
thing.
That's
happened,
north
of
where
the
middle
school
is
right.
Now,
there's
people
that
came
in
there
and
said
you
know
I,
never
envisioned
the
road,
but
it's
the
way
the
legal
descriptions
lie.
There's
there's
a
road.
That's
gonna
eventually
move
up
that
direction,
anything
else
that
we'd
covered.
A
F
A
A
F
A
L
L
F
Where
the
next
question
is
I
guess
I'm
on
here
on
the
preliminary
plan,
once
a
preliminary
plan
is
presented
and
it's
approved
and
it
moves
on,
even
though
maybe
they're
only
gonna
do
phase
one
of
it.
My
understanding
in
the
past
I
didn't
know
that
the
preliminary
plan
was
only
good
for
X
number
of
years.
I
thought
once
a
preliminary
plan
was
approved.
That
was
the
pluma
nary
plan.
Now
they
could
change
the
preliminary
plan,
but
it.
How
can
you
explain
that
to
me
a
little
bit.
L
M
A
Your
preliminary
plans
no
longer
a
preliminary
plan
once
those
Lots
are
all
plaited.
They're
plaited
lots
of
record
at
that
time.
So,
okay,
just
the
question
I
had
for
you,
rod
was
I
see:
we've
got
what's
the
expectation
of
how
long
it
would
actually
tell
take
to
do
all
the
Lots
before
they're
all
sold.
You
know,
based
on
their
current
market
conditions
and
the
way
things
have
gone
in
the
last
few
years.
How
long
do
you
think
it
is
till
that
till
you're
to
the
edge
of
the
property?
That's
currently.
M
M
The
way
the
market
is
right
now
as
I
understand
that
there's
not
many
buildable
Lots
within
the
city,
so
there
are
people
anxious
to
get
started.
Building
in
this
area,
I
presume
like
just
take,
for
instance,
the
last
planning
that
was
done
in
this
area
around
Oak
Drive.
All
of
them
lost
your
souls
except
for
one,
and
then
you
take
this
one
here
we're
looking
at
about
28
Lots.
That
may
happen
within
a
year
and
a
half,
so
it
would
be
back
again
doing
the
next
phase,
their
Phase
two
from.
A
A
development
standpoint:
you
know
it
we're
in
June
mid-june
right
now,
I
mean
what
what
I
was
saying
is
is
is
for
some
experience,
for
us
is,
is
a
developer
up
there.
It's
just
an
open
field
right
now
by
the
end
of
the
season.
What
stages
do
you
go
through?
You'll?
Have
the
roads
in
you'll?
Have
them
gravel,
curb
gutter?
No
asphalt.
We
get
that
far
this
year.
It's.
M
A
M
M
C
K
A
M
The
only
thing
that
may
happen
it
that
there's
three
Lots
there
was
four
but
we're
gonna
go
to
three
lives
because
warmed.
A
lot
was
given
up
for
water
quality,
so
we're
gonna
have
three
lights
along
25th
there
the
services
are
in
and
you
do
have
a
paved
Street
right
there.
So
there's
three
Lots
in
that
area
that
building
could
take
place.
A
A
L
With
this
resolution,
we
have
that
same
language
as
before
and
as
item
number
two,
that
the
preliminary
plan
shall
be
revised
to
include
more
area
on
the
planning
and
engineering
department
feels
that
that
condition
can
be
taken
out
and
also
the
engineering
department
wanted
to
add
in
that.
But
they
would
go
with
the
letter
of
assurance
that
a
drainage
easement,
conveying
the
water
from
East
Park
to
Willow
Creek
will
be
filed
with
the
plat.
That
would
be
worked
out
in
the
letter
of
assurance
that
they
agreed
to.
L
D
L
They
were
to
propose
a
new
road
that
would
be
a
change
in
the
preliminary
plan
that
have
to
come
back
to
you.
Well,
what
the
reason
we
wanted
to
take
that
out
is
because
their
preliminary
plan
doesn't
show
the
east
side
of
Willow
Creek,
and
we
don't
feel
that
that's
necessary
at
this
time,
I'm,
currently,
all
the
Lots
that
they
have
do
have
access
and
frontage
to
a
street.
A
A
So
I
need
a
motion
in
a
second
I'll,
take
it
off
the
table
and
a
motion.
A
second
take
it
off
the
table
motion
by
mr.
McGuire
second
by
mr.
Stein,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
we're
off
the
table.
Questions
on
this
one
we,
as
we
talked
through
it
last
time.
We
had
some
questions
on
that
north-south
Road
as
to
what
what
the
status
was
with
the
stoplight
I
saw.
We
got
some,
we
got
a
letter
from
the
d-o-t
did.
A
A
So
you
know
one
of
the
one
of
the
questions
we
had
last
time
is:
what's
going
to
happen
with
those
roads
to
the
north
and
kind
of
part
of
that
as
to
what
was
going
to
go
on
with
those
roads
had
to
do
with
what
was
going
to
happen
to
the
stoplight
on
26th
Street.
At
this
point
right
now,
we've
got.
We've
got
some
information
on
that,
but
we
really
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it.
We
haven't
done
the
preliminary
plan
for
the
road
to
connect
to
Willow
Creek
Drive.
L
A
It's
not
a
straight
shot,
so
it's
really
it'd
be
nice
if
we
had
those
roads
and
we
knew
what
that.
What
that
light
was
what
we
said
last
time
is.
We
were
gonna,
wait
till
June
5th.
Until
we
saw
that
study,
we
waited
for
the
study.
It
finally
got
here
at
4:30.
We
said
if
we
hadn't
heard
anything,
we're
gonna
make
some
decisions
on
it,
and
in
this
case
we
really
don't
have
to
make
a
decision
on
where
what
happens
to
that
road
between
Willow,
Creek,
Drive
and
block
2
of
this
is
that
correct?
M
A
Agreed
66-foot
right
aways,
the
other
question
I
had
was
at
the
intersection.
If
you
go
to
the
left
there
Jeff
to
the
intersection
of
26th,
Street
and
212,
that
was
an
area
where
we
had
a
question
on
the
size
of
that
Street
right
there.
Part
of
it
was
the
the
question
of
who
participates
and
what
what's
the
status
with
the
width
right
there
well.
M
A
M
A
Have
a
standard
given
me
and
I
wanted
to
make
it
in
the
record
that
in
2007
there's
a
master
development
agreement
between
the
all
three
owners
of
the
properties
in
that
area
in
the
city
of
Watertown.
Correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong,
Stan
400
and
was
a
400
feet
or
440
400
feet,
we,
there
was
a
development
agreement
up
there
that
no
intersection
could
be
less
than
400,
and
this
one,
you
said,
is
440
460.
M
A
L
A
M
L
L
L
A
G
M
I
L
Give
you
a
quick
background
on
this.
During
the
May
6th
Board
of
Adjustment
meeting,
the
board
was
asked
to
grant
the
side
yard
setback,
variance
the
board
struggled
with
this
variance
for
two
reasons.
First,
because
of
how
much
light
coverage
the
property
would
have,
and
second
because
of
how
such
a
tall
building
would
be
so
close
to
the
neighboring
property.
L
Currently
the
r3
zone
has
a
maximum
light
coverage
of
80%.
It's
the
only
zone
that
has
that
in
in
this
proposed
draft,
we
put
a
maximum
light
coverage
of
65%
into
the
R
2
and
the
r
2a
and
50%
as
a
maximum
light
coverage
into
the
r1,
and
in
this
draft
we
also
put
in
for
every
3
feet
of
building
height.
There
should
be
1
feet
of
required
setback,
but
this
cannot
reduce
the
minimum
setback,
which
is
already
probably
6
or
9
to
the
zone.
L
L
Because
a
structure
by
definition,
like
I
guess
when
set,
would
be
a
structure
and
that's
not
necessarily
impervious
I
mean
that
they
probably
have
landscaping
that
probably
be
pervious
but
I
in
my
calculations,
I
still
included
stuff
like
that
I
included,
landscaping
and
I.
Don't
know
maybe
I
shouldn't
off,
but
it
just
for
those
examples.
I
did
or
we
do
have
a
definition
for
lot
coverage
in
title
21.
L
A
Know
I
would
I
would
say
the
reason
we
asked
to
look
at.
It
was
with
the
new
parking
regulations
of
being
allowed
to
park
in
a
side
yard.
You
could
you
could
cement
your
side,
yard
and
park
something
there
in
a
in
a
sense,
your
there's
less
room
between
you
and
your
neighbor
when
you
fill
it
with
RVs
boats,
things
like
that,
and
it
you
try
to
get
your
arms
around
exactly
how
much
is
too
much
on
a
piece
of
ground.
A
Makes
it
really
hard
to
enforce
something
if
you
have
to
measure
the
tops
of
every
RV
and
boat
you
know?
But
if
you
look
it's
easy
enough,
if
it's
cement,
you
know
that's
in
the
County
Assessor's
Office
as
far
as
square
footage
of
cement
and
you've
got
square
footage
of
the
structure,
I
mean
you
can
almost
do
that
right
off
the
County
auditors,
yeah.
L
D
A
F
A
A
L
A
Why
don't
you
take
a
look
at
the
ones
you
sent
us
and
send
them
again
without
the
landscaping,
and
then
we'll
make
a
point
before
the
next
meeting
that
we
all
drive
I
told
Dennis
it.
We
just
need
to
jump
in
the
trolley
and
go
around,
but
I.
Don't
think
people
want
us
pulling
in
front
of
their
houses
and
walking
around.
So
if
you
can
get
us,
some
of
those
general
addresses,
maybe
we'll
drive
by
and
look
and
kind
of
from
a
street
view
decide
on
our
own,
whether
or
not
it
it.
A
It
looks
like
too
much
or
not
all
we're
not
trying
to
over
govern
anything
we're
just
trying
to
prevent
too
much
on
a
lot
before
it
happens,
and
then
somebody
you
know
some
of
their
largest
investments.
They
have
is
their
home
and
to
find
out
somebody
next
door
to
you
over
built
and
devalued
what
you
have
that's,
what
we're
trying
to
prevent
I.
F
L
L
F
L
L
H
L
L
So
there
you
know
you'll,
see
ordinances,
that'll,
say
maximum
building
coverage
of
you
know,
35
percent
or
in
that
range,
which
is
a
little
different
than
what
our
ordinance
has.
We
already
had
a
definition
of
light
coverage
that
included
hard
surfaces
in
parking
so
that
it
was
wasn't
quite
apples
to
apples.
C
F
L
H
F
L
And
I,
the
reason
I
know
that
it
was
block
coverage
is
the
way
it
is
is
because
it
was
originally
looked
at
with
the
r3
zone,
which
is
typically
apartments
in
parking
lot,
and
they
wanted
to
count
both
of
those
areas
in
ensuring
that
those
Lots
still
had
green
space.
So
that's
why?
For
the
r3,
for
example,
which
is
already
in
place-
and
it
has
the
80%
that
included
the
parking,
lots
and
everything
that
was
paved
or
structures,
but
with
single-family
residential
you
might
you
make
a
good
point
that
we
don't?
L
Also,
there
was
the
the
three-to-one
ratio.
There
was
one
recommendation
from
the
Planning
Commission
last
one
member
stated
that
they
didn't
like
it,
but
I
didn't
hear
from
anyone
else.
I
just
is
that
something
that
he
has
like
don't
like
want.
It
changed
wanted
out
any
suggestions
or
recommendations.
I.
A
L
F
F
D
F
L
A
A
There's
someone
First
Avenue
to
where
you've
got
an
apartment,
building
built
next
to
a
residence
and
they're.
Never
it
they're,
always
in
the
shade,
because
of
that
building.
Well,
let's
go
on
to
the
next
one,
we'll
continue
to
work
with
the
lot
coverage
item
number
6
plan,
commission
variance
procedure.
L
So
the
the
planning
and
engineering
departments
wanted
to
just
kind
of
clarify
that,
and
it
was
brought
to
you
guys
a
couple
months
ago
and
at
that
meeting
it
didn't
have
any
anything
in
there
saying
that
there
was
a
notice
requirement,
nothing
saying
that
we
had
to
put
it
in
the
paper
or
send
letters
to
adjacent
landowners.
So
so
we
modified
it
to
say
both
of
those
things
that
it
needs
to
be
put
into
the
paper
at
less
than
ten
days
prior
to
the
hearing
and
written
notices
need
to
go
to
the
adjacent
landowners,
Jeff.
A
L
One
of
the
things
that
kind
of
brought
this
up
was
a
plat
the
root
audition
that
had
a
little
bit
of
right
away
and
our
code
states
that
to
plat
right
away-
and
you
know
he
has
to
have
a
preliminary
plan-
you
know-
and
it
was
just
it
was-
staff
felt
that
that
might
have
been
a
good
spot
where
variants
could
have
been
used
to
say
you
know
we're
gonna
variance
the
preliminary
plan,
because
this
is
an
existing
lot.
That
was
already
there
because.
L
A
A
Yeah,
the
question
is
anything:
we
do
at
plan
Commission's
a
recommendation
to
City
Council.
It
goes
to
the
council
for
first
and
second
reading
anything
we
do
at
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
That
does
not
go
to
the
City
Council.
That
goes
to
district
court.
If
they
don't,
if
the
applicant
doesn't
agree
with
us
as.
K
Proposed,
if
you
were
to
grant
the
variance,
no
further
review
would
be
had
by
the
City
Council
to
title
24.
If
you
grant
a
variance
to
whatever
they're
seeking
from
title
24
did
the
City
Council
would
never
hear
it
if
you
don't
grant
the
variance-
and
they
want
audience
with
the
council
this,
so
this
ordinance
would
allow
them
to
go
to
the
council
for
review
of
that
decision.
But
if
you,
if
the
person
or
the
applicant
likes
the
decision
you
make
on
a
variance
to
this
title,
they
don't
have
to
go
to
the
City
Council.
L
You
would
approve
the
variance
not
unless
you
didn't
approve
the
variance
that
it
doesn't
need
to
be
preliminary
planned.
The
the
plat
approval
itself
isn't
a
variance
the
plat
you're
recommending
approval
of
the
plat
and
I
worried
language
might
be
off
here,
but
the
the
plan
would
still
be
approved
by
council
was
the
intent,
but
just
that
the
process
would
be.
You
know
the
variance
on
that
type
of
a
situation
and
I.
A
L
K
Think
if
the
Planning
Commission
is
comfortable
with
the
process
that
that,
if
they,
if
the
city
engineer,
makes
a
decision
and
the
applicant
doesn't
like
it,
that
the
the
applicant
has
the
avenue
to
come
to
the
Planning
Commission,
and
if
the
plan
commission
grants
the
request
of
the
applicant,
nothing
more
needs
to
be
done.
But
and
if
they
don't
like
the
decision,
you
folks
make
they
have
an
appeal
Avenue
to
the
City
Council.
So
if
you're
comfortable
with
that
process,
we
may
have
to
wordsmith
it
so
it's
clear,
but
as
a
matter
of
policy.
A
L
A
It's
it
says
that
variances
must
be
submitted
to
the
Planning
Commission,
but
we
don't
have
a
procedure
for
the
variances.
So
what
we're
doing
is
we're
going
to
approve
well
met,
will
will
vote
on
on
building
a
procedure
to
approve
a
variance
in
front
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
you
guys
will
wordsmith
the
language
of
that
process.
L
A
L
During
the
June
1st
2015
City
Council
meeting
the
City
Council,
initiated
on
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
ordinance
modifying
the
definition
of
the
term
banner.
But
whenever
there's
an
amendment
to
title
21,
it
must
come
before
the
Planning
Commission
before
City
Council
can
take
action
so
because
of
their
initiating
it
I'm.
Bringing
it
to
you
guys
and
then
I'll
take
your
recommendation
back
to
City
Council
and
what
they
wanted
to
do
is
in
the
definition
of
the
term
banner.
K
That's
right:
Jeff
Lee,
the
there
was
a
group
of
folks
that
came
to
I
think
two
council
meetings
ago
and
presented
renderings
of
banners
that
they'd
like
to
that
they'd
like
to
place
all
over
town.
That
say
welcome
to
Watertown
and
having
sat
through
the
the
drafting
of
the
gateway
overlay
district
with
you
folks.
K
A
couple
years
ago,
I
knew
that
banners
were
prohibited
in
the
gateway
overlay
district
and
it
was
maybe
just
a
question
of
semantics,
but
the
the
council
thought
that
those
banners
prospective
a
district
along
Willow,
Creek
Drive
would
look
nice
it'd,
be
a
nice
welcome
to
the
community,
but
technically
they
were
prohibited.
So
they
said
boy
we'd
like
to
have
them
here.
So
if
we
just
have
to
tweak
the
definition
of
banner,
let's
do
it
so
we
can
have
municipal
banners
in
the
gateway
overlay,
district
and.
A
K
A
All
right,
thank
you
all
all
open
the
public
hearing
if
anyone's
here
to
speak
on
behalf
or
against
the
ordinance
revision,
see
none
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion.
A
second
for
discussion
motion
by
mr.
Arnold
say
goodbye,
mrs.
Johnson,
any
other
discussion.
Seeing
none
ask
for
a
photo
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
any
old
business
Jeff.
Any
new
business
I
asked
for
motion
to
adjourn
motion
by
mr.
Stein
Sangamo,
miss
Johnson,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
motion
carries.