►
From YouTube: BOA & Plan Comm Mtgs 07 23 2015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
I
would
like
to
just
announce
today,
since
we
have
so
many
in
the
audience,
so
we're
going
to
do
for
your
convenience
as
we're
going
to,
instead
of
having
the
Board
of
Adjustment
meeting.
First
we're
going
to
have
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
first
and
we're
going
to
address
item
four
and
the
planning
committing,
which
is
the
Eastwood's
19th
edition,
which
I
think
is
the
reason
why
most
of
you
are
here.
A
If
we
follow
a
normal
procedure,
we
would
do
the
entire
Board
of
Adjustment
agenda
and
then
we
would
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
and
that
would
be
the
fourth
item
on
the
agenda
and
planning
so
you'd,
be
here
over
an
hour
before
we
address
the
item.
That
I
think
a
lot
of
you
are
here.
For
so
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
call
the
July,
23rd
planet,
Watertown,
City,
Planning,
Commission,
together
and
we'll
ask
for
a
roll
call.
B
B
A
Actually,
should
we
do
number
one
I
suppose
that's
a
and
we'll
move
that
up
to
number
four
up
the
number
one
and
then
approve
the
agenda
with
that
change
and
moving
the
rest
of
them
on
down.
I
have
a
motion
to
do
that.
So,
okay
motion.
Second,
okay,
we
have
four
people,
oh
I'm,
sorry,
all
in
favor
of
moving
that
up
to
number
one
in
the
agenda
say:
aye
anybody
opposed
okay
motion
has
been
approved.
The
agenda
has
been
amended
to
move
number
four
up
to
number
one.
A
Okay.
We
have
today
four
people
on
the
Planning
Commission
that
are
here
and
we
have
several
other
apps
in
which
you
just
heard.
The
Planning
Commission
requires
four
votes
in
favor
of
anything
to
pass.
So
that
would
mean
today
of
this
of
the
members
that
are
here:
you'd
have
to
100
the
cont
you
have
to
have
a
hundred
percent.
You
know
approval
to
see
this
approve
today.
Just
so
you're
aware
of
that,
you'd
have
to
have
all
four
of
us
voting
in
favor
of
your
request.
A
C
Name
is
rod
Young
with
Austin
engineering,
I
think,
due
to
the
absence
of
all
the
some
of
the
members
here
and
I,
think
it'd
be
more
comfortable
to
have
all
of
them
here
to
hear
it
out
fair
quorum
on
this
item,
so
I'm
here
to
withdraw
this,
the
annexation,
zoning
and
platting.
At
this
time
so
I
mean
there
would
be
more
balance
for
everybody.
So
you
know
do
some
public
hearing
for
everybody,
okay,.
A
All
right
and
that's
that's
the
applicants,
decision
and
choice
to
do
that.
He
can
withdraw
it
from
the
agenda
if
he
chooses
and
I
realized.
We
have
many
of
you
here
that
came
for
that
reason.
Only
and
I
appreciate
that,
but
it
understand
why
he's
requesting
that
City
Attorney
we
need
any
direction
or
advice
beyond
that.
No.
D
I
I
think
if
you
acknowledge
the
applicants,
requests
which
are
all
if
rod,
if
that's
what
you're
asking
that
the
let
the
Planning
Commission
that
they
accept
your
request
for
withdrawal
of
your
application.
I
I
think
that
in
times
past,
when
that's
happened,
when
we've
lacked
a
full
full
complement
of
plan.
Commission
members
that
we
then
go
ahead
and
re
advertise
it
at
the
plan.
Commission's
expense
since
you're.
Here
and
all
the
folks
are
here.
But
we
don't
have
the
seven
members
of
the
Planning
Commission
and.
E
C
A
B
G
C
A
Yeah
in
the
meantime,
I'm
just
gonna
make
a
statement,
part
of
its
already
been
stated,
but
that
particular
property
is
bordered
on
three
sides
by
city
property,
if
you
consider
the
highway
being
City
and
then
the
landowner
to
the
north.
So
it's
surrounded
by
city
property
when
that
particular
piece
of
property
was
masked
or
planned
in
2006.
It
is
now
zoned
in
the
master
plan
as
commercial
I.
Don't
know
if
you
all
knew
that
or
not,
but
it
is
commercial,
it's
not
our
one,
its
commercial.
A
It's
already
been
master
planned
that
way,
that's
the
way!
No.
That
would
not
require
us
to
approve
that.
That's
already
been
approved
that
way
back
in
2006,
so
just
so
you're
aware
of
that,
so
they're
downgrading
use
the
commercial
and
then
it's
less
restrictive
for
multiple
family,
and
then
you
go
to
single-family
and
below
that.
So
mr.
young.
C
C
J
A
Now,
at
that
point,
you
may
not
choose
to
bring
all
of
those
Lots
for
all
their
property
and
at
the
same
time
you
only
bring
in
X
number,
however
much
you
want
to,
but
in
a
big
picture
the
master
plan
is
this
is
where
we're
going.
So
that's
where
it's
important
when
you
buy
property,
you
need
to
make
sure
you
know
what
you're
buying
property
next
to,
even
though
it's
not
being
sold
at
that
point,
but
it's
in
a
master
plan.
If
it's
within
you.
K
A
Bordering
property
and
that's
what
you'll
see
all
around
the
city
so
just
so
you're
aware
of
that,
but
okay
I
think
with
with
them,
leaving
it
on
the
agenda
now.
What
we'll
do
then
is
move
ahead
then,
and
we'll
open
up
the
public
hearing
on
item
number,
one
on
the
Watertown
City
Planning,
Commission,
Eastwood's,
19th
edition
the
annexation,
zoning
and
platting.
So
at
any
one
here
to
speak
on
that
behalf.
L
B
B
Here
this
property
right
here
outside
of
the
city
limits
with
our
three
multi-family
residential
zoning,
and
then
they
also
want
that
property
to
be
planted.
As
you
can
see
from
the
picture,
it's
currently
adjacent
to
agricultural
land
on
the
south
and
the
west
sides
are
three
on
the
east
and
it's
adjacent
to
County
on
the
north.
B
A
L
Franken
costello
companies,
we
represent
the
developer
and
the
purchaser
of
the
property,
not
the
current
owner,
just
to
make
that
clear.
So
we
have
we
plan
to
build.
If
approved
a
fifty-four
unit
apartment
complex,
consisting
of
three
buildings,
one
building
will
have
approximately
third
will,
it
will
have
38
units,
and
then
there
will
be
two
eighth
unit,
townhome
buildings,
one
having
three-bedroom
units
and
one
having
two-bedroom
units.
L
These
units
will
be
set
aside
for
individuals
and
families
that
make
60%
or
below
of
the
area
median
income
for
Watertown,
and
so
that
is
what
our
proposal
is.
I
believe
pictures
have
been
shared
with
the
city
as
far
as
what
the
building
will
look
like
and
what
we
have
built.
It
will
be
identical
to
a
complex
that
we
have
in
Sioux
Falls.
L
L
F
B
I
contacted
Jada
Liang
with
the
park
and
asked
him
about
park
dedication,
because
I
know
that
within
this
quarter,
section
Park
has
already
been
dedicated
and
I'll
pull
up
the
master
plan
I'm.
Sorry
it's
hard
to
see,
but
this
this
area
right
here
was
designed
to
be
the
park
dedication,
and
that
was
the
park.
Dedication
for
this
whole
quarter
section
and
that
was
dedicated
to
the
city
in
April
of
2003,
with
Eastwood's.
B
B
F
F
The
city
had
a
meeting
and
I,
don't
know
what
the
outcome
was,
but
if
it's
not
draining
properly
now
the
land
that
we're
talking
about
today,
slopes
that
direction,
so
that
was
just
in
my
opinion
would
probably
increase
your
drainage
problems
and
maybe,
instead
of
having
a
damp
there,
you'll
have
a
realistic
Slough
there
I,
don't
know
what
is
the
developer
planning
on
doing
about
that?
So.
L
When
our
engineers
took
a
look
at
this
site,
you
that's
correct.
It's
going
to
drain
to
that
area
there
and
as
part
of
their
calculation.
If
we
get
approved
by
the
state
which
we
won't
know
until
November
they'll
work
with
the
city
to
work
that
drainage
out
we're
familiar
with
situations
such
as
these,
but
as
far
as
what
what
we
have
talked
with
the
City
Engineer
about
and
how
it
flows
down
through
what
Jeff
had
showed
before
again,
we'll
have
to
do
those
official
calculations
after
we've
been
approved.
This
won't.
L
F
L
M
No
matter
what
is
built
on
this
parcel,
that's
being
proposed
to
be
brought
into
the
city
will
drain
to
that
drainage,
ditch
whether
it
stays
grass
or
whether
it
becomes
paved
for
whatever
purpose
that
we'll
have
to
utilize
this
drainage
basin.
So
we
we
will
evaluate
the
drainage
basin
and
see
what
we
can
do
for
engineering
solutions
to
make
it
better.
But
that
is
a
totally
independent
thought
to
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
So
I
will
say
that
we're
we're
going
to
review
it.
M
F
A
G
Know
John
I
was
not
at
that
meeting
either,
but
I
will
tell
you
the
direction
that
we're
taking
on
that
piece
of
property
now,
because
it
is
an
issue
you
know,
there's
water
standing
up
there,
you
can
see.
You
know
where
it's
where
it's
darker
Brown
at
that
particular
eight
through
there
there's
water
standing
there
and
that
should
not
be
so.
What
we're
planning
on
doing
and
Shane
is
absolutely
correct.
G
We're
looking
at
putting
in
a
actually
plowing
and
drain
tile
through
that
whole
area
from
14th
Avenue
all
the
way
down
to
10th
Avenue,
so
that
it
goes
into
Little
Creek.
At
that
time
we
will
put
that
in
to
a
level-
that's
not
going
to
totally
dry
it
up,
but
it
will
reduce
most
of
the
water
and
then
again,
what
we're
going
to
do
is
plant
different
grasses,
we're
going
to
hopefully
allow
every
landowner.
That's
on
that
south
side
hook
up
to
that
drainage
tile
with
their
sump
pump.
G
I
I
G
Put
dollars
into
the
budget
for
this
next
year
to
be
able
to
put
the
tiling
in
there
and
and
the
land
you
know
for
for
grasses
and
I
believe
there's
other
trees,
I
think
Roger,
Foote
I,
don't
know.
If
he's
here,
Roger
came
up
with
a
plan
on
different
types
of
trees
and
grasses.
We
can
use
in
there
also
okay.
A
N
B
Now
it's
in
the
county
did
B
County
Agricultural.
The
master
plan
originally
had
it
being
planned
as
being
zoned
commercial,
but
currently
it's
not
zoned
within
the
city
at
all.
Once
if
annexed
that
that
then
there'd
be
the
zoning.
So
that's
why
there's
those
are
different
resolutions.
So
if
you
guys
choose
to
recommend
to
the
council
to
annex
it,
you
would
also
recommend
a
zoning
designation
and
the
applicant
is
requesting.
Are
three
zoning
designation,
but
currently
it's
it's
County.
A
L
Is
housing
that
is
built
with
tax
credits,
so
it
is
not
project-based
assistance
subsidized.
What
what
the
tax
credits
do?
Is
they
lower
the
amount
of
home
debt
permanent
loan
debt
that
we
put
on
there?
So
we
can
hold
our
rents
at
lower
levels?
The
rents
will
range
based
on
the
income
area,
median
income
from
Watertown,
the
rents
range
from
three
hundred
and
sixty
eight
dollars
all
the
way
up
to
one
thousand
twenty
two
dollars
currently.
So
that
is
what
we
would
be
restricted
to
in
those
ranges.
A
P
I
just
wanted
to
you
guys
just
approached
my
first
thing
is
that
it
isn't
designated
right
now
it
isn't
its
own
because
it
isn't
in
the
city,
proper
or
city
limits.
I
just
feel
that
there's
already
multifamily
dwellings
that
are
right
next
to
it.
There's
there's
plenty
of
duplexes
and
there's
already
three
current
apartment
buildings
in
this
area.
P
If
you
were
to
go
down
I
counted
yesterday
on
my
way
home
from
10th
Street
or
10th,
Avenue
Northeast
to
14th,
Avenue,
Northeast,
backing
up
the
city
property
and
then
to
the
area
just
to
the
east
of
this,
that
is
still
Cherry
Drive.
There
are
44
single-family
homes
and
there
are
56
already
current
multi-family
dwelling
units,
the
average
for
Watertown
and
the
census
was
18%
for
the
city.
P
We
are
over
50%
already
in
this
small
section
and
add
56,
more
or
54
more
units
that
is
more
than
the
single-family
homes
that
is
going
to
more
than
double
the
multifamily
dwellings.
I
just
feel
as
a
citizen
that
this
is
overextending
this
area.
This
is
an
already
established
development
of
three
hundred
thousand
to
two
to
upper
two
hundred
to
three
hundred
thousand
dollar
houses
and
I
think
that
if
we
were
to
build
more
multi
units
that
it
would
bring
down
our
property
values,
the
School
District
Lincoln
School
is
already
on
a
big
waiting
list.
P
They're
already
over
full
I
know
that
there
are
other
areas
in
town
that
could
be
developed
for
this,
that
aren't
established.
Neighborhoods
I
have
no
problem
with
it
being
annexed
into
the
city
limits.
I
welcome
that
I
just
feel
that
there
should
be
more
r1
and
r2
buffers
to
the
current
are
three
that
are
already
there.
I
understand
that
you
guys
are
saying
that
agricultural
is
a
buffer,
but
it's
my
backyard
I
can
see
across
that
hundred
yards
or
hundred
feet.
P
I
just
think
that
it's
not
necessarily
for
fair
to
the
people
that
already
have
built
their
homes
there.
This
was
my
dream
home
I.
Don't
want
to
have
a
apartment,
building
right
behind
me,
I,
just
you
know
we
built
not
knowing
that
this
was
going
to
be
there,
whether
it
was
a
convenience
store
or
whatever.
Whatever
was
slated
for
it,
it
wasn't
actually
designated
in
the
city
limits
yet
so
any
other
questions.
P
A
E
E
The
only
reason
I
knew
about
this
is
because
I
was
at
the
Monday
night's
City
Council
meeting,
and
the
mayor
mentioned
it
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
and
that
was
my
first
knowledge
that
this
project
was
even
on
the
table
and
all
of
the
landowners
that
I
my
wife
and
I
have
canvassed
the
neighborhood
the
past
few
days
and
there's
not
a
single
landowner.
That
was
aware
that
this
was
proposed
or
coming
down
the
pipeline,
and
there
was
not
a
single
one
in
favor
of
it.
E
In
fact,
when
I
told
them
that
the
plan
is
to
zone
this,
our
three
and
bring
in
government
subsidized,
our
three
multifamily
housing
units
a
lot
of
them
almost
the
universal
response
was
you've
got
to
be
kidding
me
as
Lee
Ann
mentioned
to
the
east,
just
south
of
14th
Avenue.
There
are
three
or
four
already
are
three
buildings
there.
You
put
three
more
of
them
there
and
you
would
have
essentially
seven
in
a
row
along
14th,
Avenue
north.
E
It
mentions
in
city
ordinance
that
one
of
the
stated
goals
of
our
three
multifamily
housing
is
to
provide
necessary
space
for
off
street
parking
of
automobiles.
So
if
you
have
54
units
there
tell
me
where
there
is
going
to
be
off
street
parking
when
14th
Avenue
Northeast
is
a
half
road
with
no
curb
and
gutter
to
the
north,
and
it's
wide
enough
to
get
two
vehicles
down.
If
you
start
parking
vehicles
on
14th,
Avenue
North,
there
you're
gonna
shut
the
road
down
to
traffic
because
it's
not
wide
enough.
E
So
where
are
all
these
people
gonna
park?
That's
a
concern.
I
have
I
was
at
the
special
drainage
meeting
last
month.
It
was
a
two
and
a
half
hour
meeting
very
well,
attended
and
again.
My
house
is
this
one
right
here.
So
when
I
look
out
my
back
window
when
I'm
sitting
at
my
dining
room
table
I
see
this
and
you
asked
about
bringing
up
a
drainage
drainage
map,
that's
really
a
misnomer,
because
there
is
no
drainage,
it's
wet
all
the
time.
I
walked
back
there
after
work
today,
and
there
I've
got
pictures.
E
E
There's
no
grade
change
from
here
to
here
is
flat
this
water
drains
into
this
channel,
and
it's
it's
and
it's
a
haven
for
bugs
and
mosquitoes,
and
it
stinks
and
we've
been
assured
by
the
city
and
I,
was
told
by
Sara
Karen
you
were
there,
Austin
engineering
was
there
at
Clark
engineering.
Was
there
Mike
Danforth?
Was
there
Donna
Roby
was
there?
We
were
told
at
that
meeting.
We
recognize
this
is
a
problem.
We're
gonna
fix
it.
E
E
And
I
would
agree
with
Leanne
the
people
I
talked
to
we're
not
opposed
to
annexation.
Were
it's
a
great
neighborhood.
We
have
a
mixture
of
retirees,
people
that
are
close
to
retiring
young
adults,
raising
families,
it's
a
fabulous
neighborhood
I,
I
love
the
neighborhood
and
and
everybody
that
I've
talked
to
they're,
not
against
annexation.
We
don't
think
that
that
land
should
never
be
developed,
but
we've
got
an
existing
problem
with
drainage.
That's
been
going
on
for
years.
That
has
not
been
solved.
Let's
fix
that
right.
A
E
What's
gonna
go
there,
because
if
you
put
54
units
in
there
with
a
lot
more
roof,
a
lot
more
parking
lot,
a
lot
more
concrete
and
asphalt.
It's
gonna
affect
the
amount
of
drainage
where
that
water
drains
and
like
John
mentioned
I,
think
it
could
take
a
problem
that
exists
now
and
make
it
even
worse.
What.
Q
G
A
A
Commission,
you
know
several
months
ago,
prior
to
the
meeting
with
the
city
was
we
had
concern
with
the
drainage,
because
that
was
brought
up
by
residents
before
and
that's
what
sparked
the
discussion
and
eventually
a
meeting
and
the
plan
developed
to
take
care
of
the
drainage.
So
the
drainage
is
one
issue.
The
the
complex,
the
annexation
and
a
type
of
zoning
it
goes
in
is
another
issue.
Those
are
two
separate
issues
and.
E
Well,
if
you
can
talk
me
or
about
a
plan
for
putting
drain
tile
and
things
in,
but
how
can
how
can
an
engineers
sit
down
and
figure
out
a
plan
that
is
going
to
work
before
they
know
exactly
how
that
project
is
going
to
affect
the
amount
of
drainage
and
we're
at
goals?
You
can't
as
an
engineer,
you
can
speculate
how
this
is
going
to
I'd
hate,
to
see
the
city
put
in
a
bunch
of
money
and
the
city
shouldn't
even
have
to
be
paying
for
this.
G
Mike,
the
city
did
buy
that
property
for
the
simple
reason
for
water
retention.
That's
why
that's
why
the
city
bought
it.
They
bought
that
entire
piece.
There
am
I,
correct
Sarah
when,
when
the
city
bought
the
land,
they
bought
it
for
water
retention.
So
it's
not
all
developers
we
had
planned
on
draining
water
through
there.
That's
my
understanding,
that's
why
they
bought
it.
Lee
well,.
E
G
I
get
it
I
understand
that
I
fully
do
and
I've
been
walking
through.
That
area
got
my
cue
and
I
went
through
there
two
or
three
times
we
had
the
last
city.
Engineer
was
up
there,
walking
with
us
and
and
we
do
have
Shane
Osborn
Shane.
You
can
attest
I
put
this
as
my
highest
priority
to
get
this
done
so
I
have.
G
Aren't
engineers
to
get
this
done
might
I
and
if
it's
at
all
possible,
there's
no
reason
why
we
couldn't
do
it
later.
This
fall.
Those
people
can
come
in
without
equipment
and
plow
that
and
very
easily
it's.
You
know
it's
in
the
budget.
We
can
work
with
our
finance
department
and
slide
those
dollars
into
15.
That's
not
a
huge
issue
in.
E
The
drainage
issue
and
then
I'll,
let
someone
else
talk
here,
but
I
was
talking
to
someone
today.
I
won't
name
them.
They
were
a
city,
employee,
a
city,
employee,
and
they
summed
it
up
perfectly.
They
said
you
know,
I
understand
the
need
for
lower
income,
housing
and
everybody
needs
a
place
to
live
and
I
agree
with
that.
My
neighbors
do
too,
but
he
said
not
here,
I
mean
we've
got
three
hundred
three
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollar
homes
that
are
already
established
in
that
neighborhood.
E
L
Franken
Costello
companies
I'd
like
to
address
just
a
few
of
the
items
that
were
brought
up.
First
of
all,
when
we
develop
apartment
units
and
they're
called
affordable
housing
units,
we
don't
look
for
affordable
housing
locations.
We
look
for
good
locations.
There
are
no
just
good,
affordable
housing
locations
because
usually
they
want
that
they
call
it
that
type
of
housing
by
railroad
tracks
by
industrial.
They
don't
want
it
in
the
good
locations
as
if
it
were
going
to
be
a
market
rate
complex.
L
These
rents
range
up
to
$1,000
you're
talking
about
individuals,
making
16
dollars
an
hour
down
to
$10
an
hour.
So
when
we
talk
about
subsidized
housing,
this
is
not
subsidized
housing
again.
This
is
affordable.
Housing
Watertown
had
a
housing
needs,
study
done
and
it's
crucial
to
add
more
affordable
housing
units
for
people
to
move
into
so
that
they
are
not
paying
all
of
their
income
in
only
30%
of
their
income
to
their
rent.
So
again,
this
is
not
subsidized
housing,
it's
affordable,
housing,
one
of
the
other
items
is
parking
and
we
have.
L
We
have
planned
our
site
plan
and
it's
got
the
established
parking
to
meet
the
needs.
We
don't
we
don't
plan
on
having
any
off
street
parking
because
there
won't
be
any
need
for
it
to
I'm
sorry
on
street
parking,
but
we
also
have
the
green
space.
We
are
putting
in
two
playgrounds
that
we'll
be
similar
to
the
park,
playground
that
is
just
to
the
south
and
that's
what
we're
required
to
do
for
our
properties
that
we
develop
them.
So
I
just
wanted
to
address
that
again.
This
is
a
great
location.
L
That's
by
a
middle
school
and
again
we're
Mike
address.
There
are
other
better
locations
for
this
type
of
housing.
Again
I
would
argue
on
the
other
side.
This
is
a
good
location,
that's
right
next
to
our
3/2
and
then
also
across
the
street,
that
is
undeveloped,
property
multifamily,
buffers
single-family.
M
Jeff,
okay,
thank
you.
Do
you
have
the
photos
or
the
mock-ups
that
we
could
share
with
people,
so
they
can
at
least
see
what
the
view
that
that's
been
shared
with
us
of
the
concept.
I
mean
I.
Think
I.
Think
that
looks
like
a
facility
that
wouldn't
be
expected
for
that
for
the
type
of
housing
that
everybody
expects
us
to
be.
L
L
A
If
we
have
other
questions,
I'd
like
to
ask
you
to
come
forward
because
there
might
be
other
people
that
are
watching
this
on
television
they'd
like
to
hear
the
questions
too.
So
if
you
have
a
question,
that's
fine
just
come
forward
and
we'll
let
you
ask
a
question
and
have
an
answer
for
it
or
let
them
give
you
an
answer
for
it.
L
This
building
will
be
identical
to
the
building
here
that
we
built
in
Sioux
Falls.
We
built
two
buildings,
62
units-
you
see,
one
of
the
playgrounds
there's
another
playground
on
the
other
side
of
the
other
building.
It's
called
an
urban
plan
that
we
got
from
Satara
architects
down
in
Texas
developed
this.
It's
one
two
and
three-bedroom
units
three
bedrooms
are
in
the
corners
and
only
on
the
first
and
second
level
for
families
to
live
above
families
for
noise
and
then
in
the
center
of
one
of
the
buildings.
L
As
you
walk
in,
there
is
a
what
we
call
a
clubhouse
area
with
a
full
kitchen,
the
TV,
the
couches
tables,
two
bathrooms
and
an
office,
and
then
these
are
these:
have
interior
corridors
make
you
feel
like
you're
going
into
your
own
unit
from
the
outside,
even
though
they
are
heated
and
conditioned
spaces.
Here's
the
inside
one
of
the
units.
This
is
a
one-bedroom
unit.
Each
of
the
units
have
all
the
appliances
and
then
also
they
each
unit
includes
a
washer
and
dryer
central
air.
L
We
Energy
Star
certified
this
Energy
Star
certified
every
come
every
unit,
and
here
also
those
cabinets
are
not
black
they're,
a
dark
brown,
but
anyway
for
the
finishes
on
there.
We
also
for
property
management.
All
of
our
applicants
have
to
be
screened.
They
have
to
pass
the
where
crime,
free
housing,
so
criminal
background
check.
L
It's
very
stringent
and
then
also
the
credit
check
history
and
landlord
references
in
order
to
move
into
our
complex
the
units
and
are
inspected
once
a
year
by
the
management
company,
and
then
the
agency's
South
Dakota
housing,
as
well
as
our
banks
and
investors
come
in
once
a
year,
so
those
units
a
unit
could
be
inspected
up
to
four
times
a
year.
Tenants
are
infracted
if
they
are
not
taking
care
of
their
units.
Tenants
are
impacted
for
things
outside
on
the
lawn.
If
we
find
out
that
it's
theirs,
we
have
them
professionally
mowed
their
upkept.
L
We
walk
grounds
for
garbage.
We've
got
I
believe
six
other
complexes
in
and
around
Watertown
and
I
would
I
would
just
take
a
walk
around
those
when
you
drive
by
this
property
here,
we,
it
doesn't
look
like
what
affordable
housing
when
we
were
constructing
these.
We
got
multiple
calls
for
people
over
income
and
asking
if
they
could
buy
one
of
our
condos,
you
nuts
so
again,
we'd
like
it
to
fit
in
the
neighborhood
and
that
it's
going
into
and
again
we
do
professionally
manage
these,
and
we
take
pride
in
that.
You.
F
L
B
L
I
P
L
L
P
A
P
I
P
K
A
K
D
B
A
A
L
Companies,
so
in
my
picture
of
chasing
willows,
they
can't
leave
their
stuff
outside
that
I
mean
they
can
I
shouldn't,
say
south
their
toys,
it's
they.
We
have
bike
racks
and
that's
where
their
bikes
go
is
in
the
bike
racks
so
other
than
that
they're.
They
have
to
go
up
up
into
their
unit
and
we
do
patrol
that
and
so
I'm
just
I'm
addressing
that.
What
does
the
managers
have?
You?
Have
you
seen
our.
A
L
L
A
L
There
are
there's
a
night
where
there's
a
ball.
You
come
the
next
day,
there's
a
ball
that
goes
into
the
office,
so
hopefully
somebody's
looking
for
their
ball,
and
that's
where
it
is
I
mean
that's.
When
the
managers
come
in
the
morning,
they
walk
the
grounds
in
the
morning.
That's
that's
their
job.
That's
what
we
expect
them
to
do
so
again,
I'm
not
saying
that
you're
not
gonna
drive
by
at
seven
o'clock
at
night,
and
there
won't
be
a
ball
laying
out,
but
by
8:15
the
next
morning.
It
probably
won't
be
there.
So
just
okay.
L
L
I
F
L
Next,
we
we
have
sent
a
letter
requesting
a
variance
for
that.
Just
this
is
not
student
housing.
We
can't
typically,
two
working
adults
will
not
qualify
to
live
there,
because
that
income
would
put
them
over
the
60%
of
area
median
income.
It's
typically
a
single
adult
with
children
that
go
into
these
three
bedroom
units.
So
again
we
have
one
two
and
three-bedroom
units
and.
H
A
I
H
F
S
T
S
Thing
I
was
told.
The
other
thing
I
was
told
by
another
developer
is
that
this
neighborhood
was
developed
to
have
apartment
buildings
which,
by
the
way,
the
apartment
buildings
that
are
out
there.
Look
amazing
I,
think
they
do
a
great
job,
I
drove
by
there
like
three
or
four
days,
probably
only
three
days,
because
I
just
found
out
Monday
night
or
Tuesday,
or
whatever
three
mornings
in
a
row
and
one
morning
at
like
whatever
time,
I
leave
for
work.
I
won't
even
tell
you
because
you'll
think
I'm
lazy,
but
no.
I
C
S
Laying
there
like
they
do,
a
wonderful
job,
I
mean
they
do
a
great
job,
keeping
track
of
you
know.
What's
going
on
and
not
leaving
a
bunch
of
junk
Lane
there's
no
bike
racks
I
saw
there
was
just
a
teeny
tiny,
like
two-year-old
bike
sitting
there,
and
then,
when
I
got
home
from
work
it
was
gone.
So
they
don't.
They.
S
K
S
S
I
S
S
A
And
what
seemed
really
important
to
me?
You
know,
as
you
know,
and
I
built
house
doing,
work
with
a
lot
of
people
is.
Did
you
know
what
the
property
was
adjoining?
You
you
know
if
you
bought
a
lot
build
a
house
knowing
that
whatever
was
could
potentially
be
there
someday?
That's
one
thing,
but
if
you
didn't
and
assumed
where
you're
told
or
not
told
I
don't
know,
but
I
think
that's
very
important.
A
S
Was
told
that
would
be
more
than
likely,
it
will
be
because
it
was
the
same
and
owner
that
they
bought
their
Lots
from
will
be
duplexes
or
twin
homes.
So
to
go
from
that
to
apparently
that
who's
gonna
be
a
three-story
apartment.
Building
in
your
backyard
is
a
little
bit
of
a
when
you
can
understand
the
frustration
I
think.
Okay,
thank.
T
A
A
L
L
T
L
T
I'm
not
saying
that's
bad
I'm,
not
I,
applaud
all
the
low-income
housing
that
we
have
in
town
there's
definitely
a
need
for
low-income
housing.
We
all
know
what
some
of
the
jobs
paid.
You
don't
make
a
lot
of
money
most
of
the
jobs
in
town,
and
so
they
need
to
have
a
place
to
live,
but
my
concern
with
it
not
again
I
don't
get
the
vote
I'm,
not
on
the
Commission
for
this.
T
A
L
I
mean
these
people
pay
rent
in
subsidized
projects;
they
don't
have,
they
don't
have
to
pay
rent
their
rent
could
be
zero
or
$25
or
$50.
Here,
there's
some
there's
some
minimum
rent.
If
you
make
so
much
income,
you
have
to
pay.
You
know
it's
three
hundred
ninety
three
dollars.
If
you're
qualified
for
the
sixty
percent,
your
minimum
rent
is
going
to
be
up
to
that
one
thousand
seventeen
dot.
It's
gonna
be
that
rent
that
we
set.
So
it's
not
gonna
be
they're,
not
gonna
pay
$50,
no.
T
N
A
question
yeah,
Joe
and
I
have
a
question
for
you,
I'm.
Looking
at
your
plans
in
the
photographs
of
the
existing
properties,
you
have
that
all
looks
very
nice.
I
guess
my
question
to
you
would
be
considering
water
towns
planning
is
typically
our
one
buffer,
R
2,
R
3,
and
what
you're
proposing
a
requesting
is
going
from
R
1
to
R
3
a
question
you
would
be.
What
is
the
compelling
reason?
Why
there's
be
an
exception
to
condoning
this
as
our
three
well.
L
And
it
was
master
plan
for
commercial,
so
we're
asking
for
really
a
down
zone.
To
our
three
I
mean
this
was
master
plan
for
commercial.
That's
when
we
came
in
and
looked
at
the
parcel
the
developed
the
owner
said:
this
is
commercial
property.
We
can
down
zone
it
to
our
three.
So
again,
there
wouldn't
have
been
a
buffer
between
our
one
to
commercial,
and
then
there
was
our
three
just
directly
east
and.
L
L
Again,
our
one
bedrooms-
I
didn't
go
through
that
for
the
number
of
one
bedrooms,
two
and
three
and
we
added
those
the
eight
units,
the
two
eight
unit,
townhome
buildings,
all
right.
Let
me
grab
my
sheet
here,
I
believe
there's,
eighteen
ones,
twenty
two
or
twenty
twos,
and
then
it
would
be
I
believe
16
threes
is
how
this
works
out
so,
but
typically
again,
that
two-bedroom
unit
and
a
single
person
can
live
in
the
two-bedroom
unit
as
well.
P
Just
wanted
to
address
when
Carrie
had
asked
what
we
thought
it
was
going
to
be.
When
we
moved
in,
we
were
told
that
it
was
more
than
likely
going
to
be
zoned
r2.
It
wasn't
zoned
at
the
time
it
might
have
been
in
the
master
plan,
but
it
still
needs
to
be
annexed
in,
and
you
have
to
consider
your
public
when
you're
annexing
at
it
or.
A
K
York
former
representative
of
Ward
8
and
I
was
there
and
I
still
feel
kind
of
protective
to
this
area,
and
these
folks,
after
representing
them
for
17
years
and
I,
was
on
the
council
when
this
whole
development
first
came
into
being
and
what
was
planned
out
very
carefully.
It's
followed
through
exactly
the
way
it's
supposed
to
be
wonderful,
wonderful
development
up
there
very
expensive
homes,
very
nice
homes,
people
have
taken
interest
in
taking
care
of
their
homes
and
I
think
Leanne
brought
up
part
of
the
best
reason
they
are
saturated.
K
With
multi-family
dwelling
up
there
there's
as
I
look
at
these
apartments
that
Costello's
is
thinking
about
building
beautiful.
They
would
be
a
wonderful
addition
to
some
places
in
town
that
are
very
depressed
and
neighborhoods
would
love
to
see
them
come
in
and
not
necessarily
by
railroad
tracks
and
not
necessarily
in
an
industrial
park.
There's
neighborhoods
that
would
love
to
be
cleaned
up
and
have
an
apartment
like
this
in
it
so
I'm.
K
E
Again,
I'm
in
this
house
right
here,
1279
cherry,
dr
mark
you
mentioned-
and
I
guess
it's
probably
zoning
101
when
you
coordinate
an
ice
transition
in
zoning
are
one
buffer
are
two
buffer
are
three.
I
get
that
my
back
property
line
right
here:
r1
r3,
roughly
100
feet
in
between
with
a
drainage,
ditch
right
now
that
doesn't
drain
and
no
buffer
is
that
is
that
good
planning?
I?
E
Guess
you
have
to
answer
that
question
yourself,
but
if,
if
that
is
the
optimum
way
to
transition
and
Zoning
r1
buffer
are
to
buffer
r3,
this
certainly
doesn't
pass
that
test
at
all
and
again
I'm,
not
anti
development.
You
know,
I
want
Watertown
to
grow,
I
pay
taxes
year,
I
work
here,
I'm
proud
to
live
in
the
community.
E
It's
just
you
try
and
shoehorn
a
project
into
an
existing
neighborhood
when
all
of
these
houses
to
the
west
no
buffer,
and
especially
for
Sean
and
Jessica
myself
and
my
wife
for
Troy
and
Leanne
I
mean
we
basically
have
spent
our
life
savings
buying
these
houses
they're
not
inexpensive
houses.
Our
taxes
are
not
inexpensive,
and
this
is
we
where
we
want
to
set
down
roots
when
we
do
it.
E
V
Billy
DeVries
I
actually
live
in
this
lot
right
here,
it's
vacant
come
on
that
map.
My
question
is
traffic
flow.
As
we
said,
this
is
a
half
Road
here
you
have
now
100
additional
cars
coming
into
this
property.
How
are
they
gonna
be
able
to
handle
the
traffic
here
all
around
here?
These
are
our
kids
ride
bikes,
our
kids
play
you've
now
100
additional
vehicles
coming
in
plus
you
have
their
kids
running
around
riding
bikes
and
all
that.
How
are
we
gonna
handle
that.
M
Well,
14th,
Street
and
19th
Street
are
the
two
major
collector
streets
that
are
designated
for
that
portion
of
the
city,
so
they
will
ultimately
be
built
out
to
the
correct
standards
that
would
accommodate
the
traffic
that
constitutes
a
major
arterial
or
collector,
and
so,
as
that
need
and
demand
reaches
further
east.
We
as
a
city
will
be
designing
those
streets
accordingly
and
whether
or
not
this
complex
is
the
actual
trigger
for
building
that
Street
out,
it
may
very
well
be,
or
it
may
be.
M
V
M
V
M
W
W
W
A
Well,
you
know,
we've
got
those
two
issues:
we've
got
the
drainage
and
then
the
type
of
building
that
goes
in
with
which
comes
from
zoning.
As
far
as
the
area,
you
know,
the
city
has
a
plan
for
that
and
I,
and
that
will
get
taken
care
of
we've
been
assured
by
that
by
the
engineering
office
and
by
the
mayor.
But
I
would
like
to
just
comment
to
that.
Call
it
what
you
want
to,
but
it's
a
wetland.
It's
a
slough
right.
W
A
And
it
held
and
it
held
water,
it
didn't
drain,
it
held
water,
just
like
it
does
today.
You
know
my
daughter
lives
in
Sioux,
Falls
and
South,
and
Louise
and
East
a
little
bit
and
in
the
back
of
their
yard,
is
a
big
wet
land
with
cattails
and
everything
else,
and
those
are
all
over
that
area,
because
those
were
nothing
but
sloughs
at
one
time,
but
they've
had
to
been
maintained
to
hold
water.
A
A
K
E
A
I
D
That
yeah
yeah
and
if
the
Plan
Commission
rejects
the
R
3
application
and
doesn't
vote
to
rezone
the
property
they
vote.
Let's
assume,
let's
presume
they
vote
to
annex
that,
but
they
don't
approve
the
zoning
designation
that
can
still
go
forward
to
the
City
Council,
with
no
affirmative
recommendation
from
this
body,
the
Planning
Commission.
So
it
can
go
forward
to
the
Planning
Commission
when
the
City
Council
is
going
to
be
told,
hey
the
Planning
Commission
was
asked
to
rezone
this
R
3.
D
They
said
no,
but
the
applicant,
if
they're
inclined,
can
still
ask
to
bring
it
forward
to
the
City
Council
and
say:
hey
we'd,
like
you
to
take
a
another
look
at
what
the
Planning
Commission
decided
and
we'd
like
you
to
devote
your
own
your
own
way.
So
the
Planning
Commission
is
simply
a
recommending
body
to
the
City
Council.
So
that's
that's
the
way
it
works
it
any.
M
So
when
we
say
that
our
staff
recommends
that
this
be
approved
for
annexation
and
approve
for
our
three
and
and
all
the
development
pieces,
it's
because
this
proposed
development
generally
meets
the
conditions
that
we
need
to
review.
So
we
have
to
put
our
blinders
on
to
what
the
proposed
housing
is.
I
mean
we
can't
determine
looking
at
this
part
of
the
process,
whether
or
not
that's
low-income
housing
or
a
million
dollar
mansions
going
in
there.
M
Because
really,
let's
be
honest,
if
somebody
that
had
an
obscene
amount
of
money
went
in
there,
they
could
poor
put
in
a
facility.
That
would
be
so
gaudy
that
you'd
all
hate
that
as
well
I
mean
and
concrete
it
out
to
the
limits.
So
so,
as
part
of
our
process,
we
have
to
put
our
values
in
what
the
ordinance
is
in
the
process
says
and
not
take
into
consideration
the
type
of
money
that's
going
to
be,
or
people
that
are
living
there.
M
So
this
this
process
is
a
two-step
thing
and
that's
not
something
that's
on
our
criteria
to
look
at
so
I
I
just
want
you
to
understand
that
from
a
staff
stamp,
we
can't
make
our
recommendations
based
on
whether
that's
low-income
housing
or
the
highest
income
housing
in
town,
okay,
I
just
want
that
to
be
clear
because
I
don't
want
the
punching
bags
come
out
later
and
say
that
the
city
didn't
do
due
process
on
this
issue.
Okay,.
A
A
I
A
I
I
I
W
J
I
X
X
B
A
H
Could
be
like
Road
retail
I,
don't
go
parking
lot,
bank
or
financial
institution
service
establishments?
Probably
you
can
tell
you
their
office
buildings.
Those
are
permitted
uses.
They
can
come
in
to
me
and
I
have
no
reason
to
say
no
to
any
of
them.
Then,
as
conditional
uses,
they
can
come
back
and
basic
conditional
uses
and
prove
use,
but
they
can
put
conditions
on
it.
Car
wash
service
station
hotel,
motel,
bar
tavern,
Casino
restaurant
daycare
facility,
assisted
living
center,
clinic
storage
units,
funerary
services
or
other
uses
in
opinion.
F
X
K
X
On
the
head,
when
it's
the
infrastructure
of
our
area,
our
roads,
we
can't
handle
all
these
extra
cars
extra
people
fourteenth
blowing
in
in
the
winter.
Where
do
we
push
all
that
extra
snow?
It's
just
a
combination
of
things.
So
I
know
you
guys
can't
do
if
r1
or
r2,
but
I
think
that
it
needs
to
be
no
to
the
r3
because
it
does
not
fit
in
our
plan
with
that
buffered
the
r1
to
r2
to
r3.
It
just
does
not
fit
in
that.
So
it's
all,
they
have
to
say,
hey.
A
A
D
So
under
our
code.
If
this
body
today
says
nope
and
they
still
want
to
pursue
the
City
Council
approval,
if
they
move
forward
they're
going
to
need
2/3.
So
that's
out
of
out
of
ten
council
members
they're
going
to
need
a
two-thirds
vote
to
to
have
an
affirmative
annexation
rezoning
in
that.
So,
just
just
so,
you
folks
are
aware
the
applicant
it's
it's
entirely
their
decision,
whether
they
would
want
to
move
forward
after
today,
if
they're
denied,
if
they
do
they'll,
need
a
two-thirds
vote
to
be
approved
at
the
City
Council.
So
everyone's
aware.
A
Okay,
then,
let's
close
the
public
hearing
which
already
asked
for
it
can
I
have
a
motion.
We're
gonna
address
this
in
three
separate
motions:
one's
going
to
be
in
the
annexation.
One
will
be
in
the
zoning
and
want
to
be
in
the
planning.
So,
let's
start
with
annexation,
could
I
have
a
motion
to
I'll.
A
K
A
F
Master
plans
are
good
for
three
years.
This
was
master
plan
in
2006,
so
the
master
plan
is
run
out,
so,
whether
it's
commercial
or
r3,
whatever
that's
out
the
window,
I
believe
there's
our
one
to
the
South
there's
our
one
to
the
west
and
there's
our
one
to
the
southeast
and
I
believe
it
should
be
more
properly
zoned
r2
of
rather
than
r3,
but
I
can't
make
that
motion,
so
I
will
probably
be
voting
no
in.
There
are
three.
N
And
what
in
what
it,
what
it
could
have
been
brought
in
three
years
ago,
I,
don't
think,
is
relevant
today.
I
also
don't
feel
comfortable
with
the
buffer.
The
fact
that
there
is
our
three
to
the
east
of
that
property
I
think
is
too
much
of
a
disconnect
relative
to
the
homeowners
on
the
well
that
spoke
here
today.
That's
that's
a
different
part
of
the
property,
far
enough
away
from
those
homes
that
I,
don't
think
that
should
be
using
is
an.
N
A
I'm,
the
only
one
who
hasn't
spoken,
no
I
would
concur
with
what
each
of
the
rest
of
you
said.
I
I
do
believe,
then,
in
a
master
plan.
You
need
to
have
that
buffer
from
r1
to
the
r3
s.
Even
though
there
is
green
space
between
the
two
with
the
drain
tile,
the
vegetation
will
be
down
you're,
probably
not
going
to
see
a
lot
of
any
kind
of
buffer
other
than
addressed
grassy
area.
A
The
master
plan
is
quite
old
I'm,
not
sure
why
it
was
thought
and
planned
that
way.
Originally,
but
I
think
now
we
have
a
developed
neighborhood.
We
have
an
established
neighborhood,
we
have
houses,
you
know
all
the
way
pretty
much
around
the
west
and
the
south
and
somewhat
on
the
east.
So
I
think
at
this
point,
I'd
have
to
vote
against
tattoos.
I
would.
F
A
What
I
want
to
state
this
and
I
think
you
for
saying
that
John
I'm
glad
you're
looking
at
water,
Tong
and
I
I?
Don't
want
you
to
get
discouraged
at
us
because
we
won't
let
you
do
this
in
this
particular
site,
because
we
do
need
it
in
water
tone.
It's
just
that
at
this
particular
place,
probably
isn't
a
spot
for
it.
Maybe
ten
years
ago
it
would
have
been
and
then
when
people
would
have
bought
those
Lots,
they
would
have
known
that
that's
in
their
backyard,
but
today
it
might
be
a
little
late.
A
D
In
light
of
that,
the
last
vote,
mr.
chairman
I,
think
that
that
that
probably
the
applicant
is
not
going
to
want
to
see
the
property
platted,
because
if
it
is
going
to
be
an
r1
or
r2,
it's
they're
going
to
probably
have
different
lot
size
lot.
Sizes
I'll
defer
to
rod
the
the
applicant,
but
I,
maybe
want
it
plotted
as
a
single
lot.
I
I
don't
know,
but
I
do
think.
We
ought
to
ask
him
whether
he
wants
to
have
the
property
plotted.
No
okay,.
A
A
A
K
A
H
I
H
Application
for
building
permit
number
one
six
two
to
zero,
an
owner
applicant
is
datin
and
Patricia.
Donna
1526
Park,
View
Drive
applicant
was
submitted
requesting
to
reconstruct
a
non-conforming
572
square
foot
22
by
26
foot
on
attached
garage
on
a
fifteen
thousand
nine
hundred.
Seventy
six
plus
square
foot
parcel.
G
H
Basically,
what
this
is
is
he
has
a
garage
here
in
this
position
structure.
You
can
see
right
right
there
right
here,
according
to
our
records
that
was
built
in
1908
his
deteriorate
and
fallen
apart
and
he's
just
wanting
to
rebuild
the
same
building
back
on
the
same
place.
He
doesn't
want
to
pour
new
concrete
and
driveway,
and
everything
else
personally,
I
support
the
okay.
H
A
M
H
A
A
H
H
A
H
F
F
D
F
H
F
I
H
Have
to
continue
on
applicant
application
was
submitted,
requesting
to
enlarge
an
existing
nine
performing
industrial
facility
by
constructing
a
non-conforming
office.
Addition
said,
structure
proposed
to
be
constructed.
Forty
five
point:
nine
feet
from
the
front
north
proper
line
or
a
minimum
of
75
foot
setback
is
required.
Sixteen
point:
oh
five
feet
from
the
side:
east
property
line
where
a
minimum
of
fifteen.
What's
that
back
at
the
point,
if
you
got
this
thing,
there's
a
lot
of
history.
This
has
been
before
the
Board
of
Adjustment
many
times.
This
is
a
legally
non-conforming
building.
H
Every
time
it
has
been
built,
it
was
granted
by
Board
of
Adjustment
position
again
applicant
proposes
to
a
large
and
existing
legal
and
perform
unit
facility
illegally
nine
facility,
located
in
the
I
to
heavy
industrial
district
by
constructing
the
5,000
square
foot.
Two-Story
offices,
addition
of
50
by
50
footprint,
2,500
square
feet
per
floor
with
a
12
by
24
canopy
roughed
entry,
and
we
was
have
received
no
comments
from
anybody
adjacent
pro
or
con.
A
Q
Evening
so
we're
looking
at
adding
on
to
the
northeast
corner
for
additional
office,
spacing
we're
seeing
a
continued
growth
each
and
every
year
in
our
manufacturing
on
a
production,
floor
and
I've
been
with
the
company
21
years,
and
we
have
a
huge
island
in
about
3/4
way
down
from
the
West
that
projects
inside
into
our
into
our
production
area
that
houses
our
office
administration.
They
do
the
accounting
paperwork
and
then,
which
consumes
about
3,300
Square
feet
of
valuable
production
space
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
utilize
and,
conversely,
down
here
on
the
northeast
corner.
Q
Q
Essentially,
we
have
to
walk
about
300
feet
from
the
West
offices.
We
call
down
to
the
sales
office
with
paperwork,
change,
orders
and
stuff
for
production.
For
so,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
to
open
up
or
one
open
up
additional
production
space
we
can
bring
in
additional
jobs,
satisfy
our
customers
that
are
continuing
to
grow,
we're
trying
to
grow
with
them
and
and
create
capacity,
and
likewise
bring
all
our
office
staff
into
one
central
locations
to
minimize
the
amount
of
downtime
and
the
disconnect
we
have
today
and
so
forth.
So
the
area
we
were.
O
Q
Q
Q
N
Would
point
out
that
this
aerial
view
is
a
gives
you
a
good
bird's-eye
view
of
the
offices,
as
they
extend
to
the
north
will
be
in
line
with
the
existing
buildings
that
are
there,
for
example,
the
wire
town
box
buildings
to
the
to
the
east?
Of
that
it
would
be
actually
aligned
with
that
as
your
so
as
you're
driving
down
the
street
would
actually
line
up
with
the
other
buildings.
N
A
Q
Q
N
Thing
I
would
also
point
out
is
even
before
we
decided
to
build
out
to
the
north,
knowing
that
we
would
need
a
variance.
We
did
approach
the
wire
town
box
ownership
and
asked
them
about
purchasing
additional
land,
so
we
could
go
to
the
East
rather
than
the
north
and
they
wanted
to
retain
their
their
property
there.
So
that
kind
of
limited
our
options
as
far
as
where
we
could
go.
I
I
U
N
N
A
Q
A
F
N
N
F
O
D
I
would
defer
to
to
the
engineers
but
I
think
because
there's
a
trail
network
across
the
street
on
the
what
would
be
the
northwest
corner
there.
That's
where
the
the
bike
trail,
the
the
trail
is,
is
there
I,
don't
know
that
there
would
be
plans
and
I
I,
don't
think.
There's
plans
for
for
a
sidewalk
or
trail
network
along
the
ESCO
property.
H
D
M
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
area,
obviously,
but
typically
if,
if
both
sides
of
the
road
are
aren't
developed,
then
that
kind
of
lags
the
development
of
the
upgrading
of
standard
city
roads.
So,
but
ultimately,
if
this
all
these
developments
and
stuff
create
more
traffic,
the
road
will
definitely
be
improved
to
handle
whatever
traffic
is
seen
in
the
area.
So
I
don't
know
that
it's
on
a
short
list
at
this
time.
Okay,.
F
F
F
A
H
Number
162
to
three
conditional
use
requests
owner,
African,
Sandra's
Tatem
address
is
308
and
312.
Fifth
Street
southeast
African
seeds
approval
for
modification
of
a
site
plan
for
a
previously
approved
conditional
use
future
known
as
specialist
past,
known
as
a
special
exception
to
allow
for
the
expansion
of
a
retail
establishment
located
in
the
r2
single-family
attached
residential
district,
perfect
21,
1804,
21,
1603
and
Keynesians
on
compliance
with
the
Board
of
Adjustment
powers
and
duties,
specific
rules
governing
and
against
regulations.
H
H
Various
conditions
have
gone
through
this
stuff,
the
owner
now
in
May.
This
staff
report
finds
that
in
May
the
staff
provides
a
property
owner
because
secure
required
permits
for
property
improvements
being
initiated
without
a
permit
at
308
5th
Street
southeast,
at
which
time
it
was
discover
the
property
on
me.
Sandra
Staten
seeks
to
convert
the
residential
use.
Single-Family
dwelling
into
a
commercial
retail
use
accessory
to
her
adjacent
approved
business
use
house
of
greens,
retail
establishment
to
be
operated
as
one
merge
retail
establishment
facility
prior
to
further
consideration.
H
The
Board
of
Adjustment
must
decide
if
they
indeed
have
the
authority
to
consider
approval
of
the
application
pursuant
to
2100
202
by
definition,
retail
establishment,
as
defined
by
ordinance,
is
neither
a
listed
permitted
nor
conditional
use
in
the
art
2a
district.
However,
it
is
in
the
c1
c3
and
Business
Park
District's
neighborhood
retailed
establishments,
as
defined
by
ordinance,
is
a
listed
permitted
or
conditional
use
in
the
r2
r2
a
are
3
and
c3
by
definition.
H
Neighborhood
retail
establishment
generally
recognized
retail
businesses,
which
supplies
commodities
on
the
premises
for
persons
resided
in
adjacent
residential
areas
such
as,
but
not
limited
to
groceries.
Meat.
Dairy
products
baked
goods
and
other
goods,
other
foods,
drugs,
dry
goods,
clothing
and
notions
or
hardware,
now,
retail
establishment,
his
establishment
engaged
in
selling
products,
goods
or
merchandise
to
the
general
public
for
personal
or
household
consumption
and
establishments
engaged
in
providing
services
or
entertainment
to
the
general
public,
including
convenience
stores,
petroleum
sales,
repair
shops,
indoor,
amusement
taffey
services,
health,
professional,
educational
and
social
services
and
other
miscellaneous
services.
H
H
H
B
H
U
A
A
A
B
D
H
Absolutely-
and
it
was
done-
and
actually
we
had
a
lot
of
calls,
but
nobody
really
specifically
I
mean
I
had
one
specifically.
The
neighbor
to
the
north
was
definitely
against
the
proposition
and
I
heard
rumors
that
maybe
some
of
the
others
were
so
I
was
hoping.
If
there
is
other
people
here
in
opposition
to
it
that
there
they
arrived
I'm
here
in
person
other
than
the
one,
that's
the
only
one
I
can
state
matter-of-factly.
It's
definitely
against.
It
is
a
primary
for
the
north.
Okay.
A
Y
Y
Okay,
well
I'm
gonna
continue
on
the
first
point.
I
would
like
to
bring
up
is
the
fact
that
our
neighborhood
is
zoned
an
R
to
8,
which
is
a
multi-family
dwelling
and
are
and
are
allowed
when
I
purchased,
my
home
I,
understood
to
be
a
resident
in
a
neighborhood.
I
did
not
sign
up
to
be
in
a
business
district.
Y
Y
It's
not
a
paved
road,
nor
is
it
wide
enough
to
get
in
two
cars
through
at
the
same
time,
so
increased
traffic
in
the
area
would
not
benefit
anyone,
especially
with
Dustin
danger
to
children
who
ride
their
bikes
in
the
alley,
as
well
as
for
an
additional
business.
More
parking
would
be
needed
and
also
there's
no
loading
dock,
so
delivery
trucks
that
come
into
the
alley
have
to
either
stay
in
the
middle
of
the
alley,
or
hope
that
her
parking
is
already
open.
Y
Y
This
is
the
original
fence
that
was
up
there
before
she
bought
the
property
after
she
bought
the
property
she
had
taken
down
the
fence.
The
fence
has
been
down
for
two
months
now
and
she's
had
people
in
and
out
of
this
house.
So
therefore,
my
patio
is
right
there,
so
I
have
no
privacy,
I
have
people
going
in
next
door
in
and
out
of
that
house
to
shop
and
tour
the
building
whatever
the
last
thing
is
in
closing
this
home
did
not
have
a
business
in
it.
It
was
a.
Y
Z
And
it
just
hadn't
gotten
home
and
put
inside
the
fence,
but
C
was
coming
to
get
it.
So
that's
not
usually
how
it
is.
I've
done
a
lot
to
fix
the
neighborhood
up
and
I
keep
it
tidy
and
there
isn't
in
any
of
the
other
neighbors
that
we're
going
to
come
and
complain.
They've
all
come
over
and
encouraged
me
and
thanked
me
for
fixing
the
place
up.
I
don't
expect
there
to
be
any
more
traffic
than
there
already
is
I.
Z
Don't
think
my
business
is
going
to
exceed
anything
there's
only
one
till
they
have
to
go
through
my
store
to
get
to
the
other
side.
I
actually
have
more
parking
and
I
don't
get
deliveries
at
my
store
because
I
don't
have
a
loading
dock,
so
my
deliveries
are
brought
out
to
Dakota
finishing
and
then
Jeff
puts
them
in
the
back
of
his
truck
and
brings
them
to
me.
So
it
is
on
a
very
rare
occasion
that
I
get
delivery
made
there
because
I
don't
want
to
pay
the
extra
because
I
don't
have
a
loading
dock.
Z
So
that's
not
an
issue
and
we
do
a
lot
to
maintain
if
there's
extra
snow,
the
neighbors
put
it
on
our
lot.
Jeff
has
come
in
with
this
blower
to
take
and
clean
up
the
mess,
because
everyone
does
Park
in
the
alley.
So
we've
been
very
neighborly
to
people,
including
the
people
to
the
north.
When
they
were
jingling
their
house,
they
used
a
lift
that
we
paid
and
rented
filled
with
gas.
They
use
our
parking
in
the
evenings,
so
we
have
tried
to
be
neighborly
to
everyone,
knowing
that
nobody
has
parking
in
the
evenings.
Z
F
Z
Z
Z
Else
has
any
net
my
other
neighbors
I'm
I'm
I'm,
trying
very
hard
to
accommodate
the
neighborhood
and
I've
been
there
like.
You
said,
since
1992
they've
only
been
there
three
years
so
they're
five.
So
there
was
already
a
my
business
has
been
there
a
long
time
when
they
bought
they
bought.
Knowing
that
I
was
there
operating
a
business
I've
fixed
the
neighborhood
up
wide
I
think
and
spent
a
lot
of
time.
Fixing
a
rundown
house
that
the
plumbing
was
broken
on,
sits
that
vacant
for
six
years.
Z
Z
F
I
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
A
Z
Because
they
came
up
about
this
high,
which
I
didn't
realize
until
I
took
the
fence
down
that
they
had
encroached
on
the
property.
Previously
I
simply
needed.
My
concrete
poured
so
I
poured
the
concrete
and
I
put
a
little
curb
to
hold
back
the
dirt
that
they
had
pushed.
Not
only
did
they
encroach
on
the
fence
and
broke
it,
but
they
also
encroached
on
the
side
of
the
garage
so
and
I'm
I'm
just
trying
to
get
along
okay.
U
U
A
R
A
Z
F
F
A
F
F
F
Zone
cdc2,
so
we
know
no
just
listen
to
what
I
have
to
say.
Please
I
wish
we
could
spots
on
c2
to
make
it
a
legal
business.
We
can't
do
spot
zoning
as
an
art
to
a
it's,
not
really
a
legal
building
or
business,
but
it
is
been
there
for
years
because
a
former
Board
granted
it
so
I
think
our
hands
are
kind
of
tied.
N
N
What
seems
to
me
that
I
can
appreciate
what
landings
are
saying
and
I
think
as
far
as
what
we
can
do
is
put
some
conditions
upon.
You
know
the
approval,
such
as
the
fence,
so
that
at
least
get
tried
to
get
the
properties
back
in
the
condition
they
were
prior
to
you
know
the
fence
coming
down
and
and
and
all
that
I
don't
I,
don't
know
that
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
strong
basis
for
us
to
deny
you
know
the
continuation
of
that
business.
N
U
Did
happen
to
enter
into
Sandy's
business
the
other
day
by
accident,
I
was
doing
Aero,
Education
Foundation
begging
and
happened
to
be
there
and
saw
what's
happening
and
I
think
that
area
is
immensely
improved
in
terms
of
what
she's
doing
cleaning
up
the
Rasmussen
house
and
I
mean
I
like
the
idea.
I
know
that
what
you're
saying
it's
not
a
commercial
area,
but
it
has
been
for
since
92
of
them.
Pardon
me.
A
H
T
A
I
A
I
B
Normally,
this
type
of
plan
administrative
Lea
proved,
as
it's
just
a
lot
way
an
adjustment,
but
according
to
ordinance,
administrative
Platts
can
only
occur
if
there's
five
or
less
Lots
and
since
there's
10
lots
that
are
being
replanted.
It
it's
going
through
the
process
of
going
to
you
guys
and
then
to
council,
but
it's
it
was
originally
plotted
and
June
of
2008.
F
B
B
A
B
O
A
B
The
petitioners
are
requesting
that
this
be
rezoned.
It's
currently
zoned
r1,
single-family
residential.
They
want
it
to
be
rezone,
2rg
residential
garage
district.
As
you
can
see,
it
is
currently
completely
surrounded
by
r1
zoning
and
the
minimum
requirements
for
the
RG
district
are
spelt
out
in
Section
twenty
one
point:
one:
zero,
zero
one
in
chapter
twenty
one
point,
two:
three:
the
ordinances
and
the
petitioners.
B
The
the
one
area
that
there
haven't
met
the
rule
is
that,
according
to
the
twenty
one
point
to
302,
no
area
shall
be
eligible
unless
it
contains
a
minimum
of
one
acre
and
has
300
feet
of
improved
Street
frontage,
and
these
two
Lots
currently
contained
about
0.75
acres.
But
when
we
rezone,
we
include
the
two,
the
midpoint
of
the
adjacent
right
away,
which
would
put
the
area
at
approximately
one
point.
One
one,
a
KERS
and
currently
the
Lots
are
adjacent
to
approximately
two
hundred
and
forty
two
feet
of
improved
right
away.
B
But
if
pheasant
lane,
where
to
get
improved,
it'd,
be
adjacent
to
approximately
three
hundred
and
ninety
seven
feet
of
improved
right
away,
another
requirement
of
the
garage
district,
a
number
two
point:
G
is
they
must
have
a
paved
driveway
and
the
petitioners
would
would
like
to
allow
to
have
a
dirt,
driveway
and
they're
requesting
this,
because
the
pheasant
lane
isn't
improved
and
that's
just
a
dirt
road
right
now.
So
they
don't
want
to
pave
a
driveway
and
then
clip.
B
B
A
B
J
J
Some
time
to
retire
up
here
on
5:10,
North,
Lake,
Drive
and
right
now
we
have
a
cabin
air
and
hopefully
we'll
expand
from
that
to
make
our
residence
so
directly
across
from
that
dennis.
Is
it
my
home
or
more
so
than
my
life
is
to
have
a
garage
there?
I
have
I
have
spoken
with
all
the
landowners
around
it
and
I
think
you
guys
got
copies
and.
J
They
were,
they
were
for
it
and
I
know.
There
was
two
people
on
the
list
that
had
not
signed
a
list,
but
I
did
speak
with
them
afterwards
and
they
are
four
and
I
know.
There's
other
garages
on
that
side
of
the
road,
then
that
doesn't
make
it
that
I
could
get
a
garage
nothing,
but
we
don't
want
to
take
take
away
from
anything
from
the
bike
trail.
We
like
the
bike
trail
we've
improved
our
lot
as
much
as
we
can,
but
all
we
want
is
a
garage
door
with
an
access
off
the
road.
J
U
J
We've
cleared
a
lot
of
those
trees
out
of
there
and
I
know.
If
you
look,
we
have
we've
planted
flowers
and
some
pine
trees,
so
we
kind
of
expect
that
just
to
stay
as
it
is
and
not
really
improve
much
on
that
side
other
than
we
have
right
now
and
that's
just
flowers
and
some
pine
trees.
No,
but
it's
a
lot
nicer
than
it
used
to
look
okay.
I
J
A
J
B
B
I
B
B
J
M
M
I'd
like
to
make
a
couple
comments
from
engineering
standpoint
if
they
choose
not
to
do
the
improved
driveway
at
this
time
and
we'd
like
that
to
be
maybe
a
condition
that
at
such
time
that
pheasant
lane
is
improved,
that
that'd
be
reconsidered
as
a
require.
In
other
words,
if,
if
enough
development
happens
long
there,
that
pheasant
Lane
becomes
a
paved
road
that
the
paved
driveway
should
also
be
a
condition
of
that.
We.
A
F
A
B
Right
during
the
July
6
2015
City
Council
meeting
the
City
Council
initiated
amendment
to
the
zoning
ordinance
modifying
section
21.5
for
1/4,
which
was
building
construction
within
the
gateway
overlay
district.
This
amendment
was
initiated
because
there
was
some
potential
retail
businesses
that
are
considering
building
within
the
overlay
district,
but
would
like
to
construct
their
building
to.
I
B
With
their
franchise
colors
instead
of
the
colors
that
are
earth
tone
which
is
what's
currently
allowed
in
the
gateway
overlay
district
and
then,
whenever
there's
an
overlay
or
whenever
there's
a
amendment
to
title
21,
it
must
come
to
the
Planning
Commission
before
the
City.
Council
can
act
so
on
the
screen
right
now,
I
have
the
changes
shown
and
I'll
read
those
21.5
for
one
for
number
one
says
all
exterior
surfaces
on
any
building
or
structure
shall
be
approved
by
the
building
official,
who
may
refer
any
exterior
surface
requests
to
the
City
Council
for
approval.
B
So
that
was
changed
from
before.
It
said
it
shall
be
earth
in
color
and
then
on
number
two
we
took
out
number
I
know
number
two
we
took
out
point
number
two,
which
is
materials
described
in
this
section,
are
utilized
for
a
minimum
of
70%
of
each
respective
wall
facing
any
front
or
side
setback.
So
those
were
the
the
changes
that
are
being
made
or
requested
to
be
made.
Make
the
recommendation
to
Council
I.
I
I
U
V
U
N
B
D
I
think
the
intention
was
that
that
that,
if
the
building
official
gets
a
request,
he
could
he
could
refer
to
the
City
Council,
because
they're
not
going
to
be
seeking
variance
relief
to
your
tear
point
mark
with
regard
to
Board
of
Adjustment
they're
not
going
to
be
seeking
some
variance
or
or
modification
to
the
to
the
code.
It's
just
Kenny.
The
building
official
would
want
some
cover
from
the
from
the
city
council
saying
this
is
the
request
I've
been
giving
it's
a
it's
an
orange
building,
it's
a
low
or
it's
a
whatever
color.
D
U
No
Zen
has
that
ever
come
to
us,
though
I
don't
think,
there's
any
requests.
It
has
come
to
us,
I,
think
mark.
What
they're
saying
is
that
that
there's
been
some
informal
talk
with
the
mayor
and
others?
Maybe
I
don't
know
exactly
who,
but
what
happens
if
this
would
come
in
and
right
now
they
can't
and
so
I
think
they
are
trying
to
do
the
proper
channels
now
by
bringing
it
here
and
then
ultimately,
if
this
gets
approved
here,
then
the
City
Council
be
glad
to
do
it,
because
I
think
we
know
that.
A
H
They
come
in
as
for
permit
application,
they're
gonna
show
me
the
site
and
everything
else
and
if
I'm
comfortable
with
it
straight
up,
it
stops
right
there.
It's
just
if
it
gets
to
a
point
where
somebody
comes
in
and
they've
got
a
pink
zebra
house
and
whatever
and
I
don't
have
that
comfort
footing.
I
want
a
cya,
you
know
then
I'll
forward
to
the
council,
and
let
them
say
yes,
just
so:
I
don't
get
retribution.
Okay,.