►
From YouTube: BOA & Plan Comm Mtg 01 22 2015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
B
B
D
A
D
D
A
B
The
applicant
seeks
conditional
use
approval
to
operate
a
balloons,
banners
etc.
Business
from
her
least
home,
located
in
the
art
to
a
single-family
attached
residential
district
on
September
15,
2014
property
owner
Travis,
Travis,
MOG
and
tenant
Christy
Ching
were
notified
to
seek
lawful
approval
in
order
to
continue
operating
a
business
at
524
5th
Street
southeast,
where
she
resides
in
the
art
to
a
zone.
B
Single-Family
dwelling
home
occupations
may
be
allowed
in
the
art
to
a
single-family
residential
district
for
city,
zoning
ordinance,
sections,
21,
1804,
21,
1603
and
21
1403,
subject
to
conditions
the
applicant
tenant
proposes
to
utilize
part
of
the
basement.
Less
than
25%
of
the
homes,
2258
square
foot,
living
area
for
business
use
she
has
received
and
will
comply
with
the
ordinance
requirements
for
home
occupations
per
definitions
and
for
chapter
20,
170
and
section
21,
o
o
to
be
6a
through
H.
B
B
According
to
the
applicant
submitted
site
plan,
the
property
has
a
26
foot
driveway
from
the
street
to
the
attached
single
car
garage,
the
minimum
number
of
legal
sized
and
paved
off
street
parking
spaces
required
for
just
the
single-family
dwelling.
The
primary
use
is
to
a
total
of
one
legal
outside
off
street
parking
space
currently
exists
on
the
property.
B
There
is
sufficient
area
to
add
off
street
parking
spaces
over
here
to
the
east
of
the
driveway.
It
is
this
board's
responsibility
to
consider
requiring
additional
compliant
off
street
parking
spaces
as
a
condition
of
secondary
use
approval.
As
far
as
landscaping
lighting
standards,
the
highway
81
has
reduced
the
West
Boulevard,
leaving
only
front
yard
space
for
tree
plantings
to
the
west
of
the
house.
Two
Boulevard
trees
currently
exist
on
the
South
Boulevard.
There
is
no
sidewalk
trail
on
the
South
Boulevard
and
sidewalk
exists
on
the
west.
B
This
board
must
determine
if
the
plan
shows
that'ss
factory
provision
and
arrangement
concerning
the
ordinance
section
sections
identified,
if
endorsed
the
conditions
such
as
more
off
street
parking
spaces,
and/or
fulfillment
of
the
boulevard
infrastructure
requirements
may
be
considered.
I
have
one
note
from
an
adjacent
landowner,
mrs.
Amundson.
She
supports
this
request.
A
B
A
B
A
F
A
B
B
B
F
A
A
H
A
A
J
A
I
A
C
A
I
We
had
we
received
a
petition
requesting
to
rezone
four
Lots
in
the
Willow
Creek
Village
edition
this.
This
addition
went
through
the
preliminary
plan
process
back
in
2013,
with
the
property
adjacent
to
Willow,
Creek
Drive
was
zoned,
c3
and
the
rest
of
the
property
was
owned.
R3
and
the
petitioner
is
requesting
that
this
area
highlighted
in
black,
be
rezoned
to
r1
single-family
residential
units.
I
A
You
with
that
I'll
open
the
public
hearing,
if
anyone's
here,
to
speak
on
behalf
or
against
the
zoning.
The
one
thing
Jeff
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
make
fair
warning
to
them.
To
me:
I,
don't
have
any
problem
going
r1,
it's
kind
of
I
have
bigger
a
bigger
problem
going
from
r3
from
r1
in
an
area,
that's
already
zoned,
but
will
you
warn
him
that
if
we
do,
this
is
r1?
A
If
he
comes
back
in
after
one
of
those
r1
lots
are
sold
and
says
he
wants
to
go
back
to
our
three
we
historically
have
you
know
we
generally
don't
do
that.
You
know
it's
one
of
those
things
that
a
landowner
goes
out
there
and
buys
a
lot
and
once
that
last
lot
isn't
selling
all
of
a
sudden.
They
want
to
go
back
to
a
more
dense
zone.
I
E
J
A
Should
there's
really
not
that
much,
there's
just
that
little
spot
right
there
that
were
they
one
lot
touches
up
against
the
c3.
Everybody
else
is
quite
a
ways
back,
I'd
be
more
concerned
of
r1
Lots
and
what's
his
intention
in
the
r3
I
mean
he
can
put
our
two
twin
homes
in
there
in
an
r3.
If
he
chose
to
also
yeah.
A
C
C
H
A
I
Staff
was
was
asked
to
look
into
the
the
current
fence,
ordinance
and
and
and
revised
it
so
in
a
way
that
it
would
be
more
more
clearer
and
easier
to
understand
right
in
front
of
you,
I
have
the
the
current
ordinance
governing
fences.
It's
it's
very
brief
and
we
in
your
packets
I
sent
what
staff
proposed,
which
goes
more
and
more
in-depth,
more
in
detail
and
helps
clearly
state
when
and
where
fences
are
allowed
and
what
conditions
there
may
be.
A
Just
highlight
the
the
old
one
we
basically
didn't
have
much
of
a
fence
ordinance
and
what
our
concern
has
been
over
the
last
five
years.
It's
probably
this
has
come
up
before
us
before
we've
always
said
we
we
should
tackle
that
fence
ordinance,
because
our
current
ordinance
will
allow
you
to
put
a
seven
foot
fence
up
in
your
front
yard.
We
don't
regulate
as
to
how
much
opaqueness
is
to
weather.
I
You
you
nailed
it
right
on
the
head.
Our
current
ordinance
doesn't
state
anything
about
location,
offense
other
than
it
has
to
be
one
foot
off
of
the
sidewalk
that
what
number
number
two
states,
but
on
our
proposed
we
did.
We
did
limit,
you
know
certain
yards,
the
front
yard
limited
to
four
feet
in
height
and
and
it
had
to
be
no
more
than
30%
opaque.
A
Second
done
letter
a
they're
worried
you
say
to
it:
it
needs
to
be
30%
opaque.
So
that's
a
fence.
We
can
see
through
wrought
iron
fences
things
like
that,
including
the
clear
view
triangle.
So,
if
I'm
gonna
put
a
fence
up
in
my
front
yard,
I
can
go
all
the
way
to
my
corner
as
long
as
it's
at
least
30%
opaque
right.
A
I
A
On
one
thing:
let's
go
back
over
be
side,
yards
and
rear
yards
in
a
side,
yard
and
rear
yard.
It
can
be
up
to
the
lot
line
unless
you're
up
against
an
alley.
Sir,
and
right
now
we
allow
people
to
put
fences
right
on
the
lot
line
up
to
the
lot
line.
There's
there's
one
of
the
questions
people
have
as
well.
What
why
do
we?
Let
them
be
right
on
the
lot
line,
with
an
inch
of
it.
A
D
E
E
A
D
A
A
22
either
got
to
drop
your
friends
down
shorter
fence
that
you
can
that's
opaque
or
you
got
to
back
it
off
the
lot
line,
most
of
the
ones
that
we
see,
that
our
double
frontage
are
up
against
arterial
or
collector
streets
like
19th,
Street
and
I
was
going
to
say,
as
we
go
forward,
give
us
an
example
of
an
of
an
arterial
Street.
That's
the
heavier
that.
I
That's
a
more
dense
Street
than
a
collector,
have
yes
streets,
highway,
212,
highway,
81
and
highway.
20
are
all
arterial
streets
and
then
then
the
next
highest
would
be
the
collector
streets
and
that's
our
19th
and
our
14th
Avenue
and
4th
Avenue
and
streets
like
that
that
they
still
go
from
one
end
of
town
to
the
other
and
get
a
lot
of
traffic
and.
E
D
A
What
it's
designed
most
for
is
that
you
we
don't
want
to
balk
somebody
in
you
know
you
get
you
get
three
Lots
that
are
front
to
backs,
and
then
you
got
a
guy
who
buys
a
lot.
That's
coming
on
to
that
collector
Street
now
he's
got
fences
completely
up
to
the
front
yard
lot
line,
and
most
of
this
we
looked
at
a
few
different
fencing
ordinances,
prayin,
primarily
Sioux
Falls.
You
know
that's
kind
of
what
we
modeled
it
it
off
of
I.
A
Up
north,
you
go
up
near
that
corner
of
14th
Avenue
and
19th
Street,
you
kind
of
got,
is
you?
Is
you
go
south
on
there?
You've
got
some
people
double
lots
that
are
front
to
back,
but
as
you
go
north
on
there,
they're
not
really
double
lots.
There's
single
lots
but
they're
just
long
and
slender
yeah.
I
A
If
you
look
at
the
house
and
the
lower
part
of
the
screen,
that's
an
example
of
a
house.
That's
boxed
in
by
a
fence
on
both
sides.
It's
not
the
most
aesthetic
thing
is
you're
driving
down
those
roads
and
those
those
people
won't
be
required
to
move
those
fences
at
any
time,
but
if
they're
damaged
due
to
due
to
a
catastrophic
catastrophic
event
or
whether
they'd
be
required
to
conform
go
further
north
on
there.
A
This
is
where
we
see
a
lot
of
that
north
of
the
watertower.
Those
lots
front,
see
those
lots
front
the
street
there
and
they
all
have
deep
backyards.
In
a
case
like
that,
they'd
be
that's
a
that's.
A
collector
Street,
so
they'd
be
required.
That
fence
would
have
to
be
ten
feet
off
the
lot
line.
If
it's
seven
feet
tall
or
it
would
have
to
be
lower
and
opaque
they'd
be
seven
feet
off
the
lot.
You.
H
A
I
G
With
that
being
said,
Pat
then
with
with
sidewalks
there
if
they
want
to
put
a
fence,
so
they're
gonna
be
able
to
put
that
sidewalk
there
for
foot,
even
if
they
want
to
put
a
four
foot
just
for
children.
You
know
protection
is
that
gonna
be
able
to
go
right
up
to
that
city
sidewalk,
or
is
there
set
back
for
that
cool
it'd.
E
A
E
A
A
D
H
D
He
wants
to
put
in
a
fence
in
his
backyard.
He
has
to
stay
off.
I
just
want
to
wrap
my
head
around
a
little
bit.
Let's
say
the
guy
on
the
right
there.
He
wants
to
put
up
your
other
right.
He
wants
to
put
in
enough
fence
right
there.
He
has
to
stay
off.
Let's
say
he
wants
a
seven-foot
fence
on
that
corner
lot.
Where
would
he
would
have
to
say
ten
feet
off
of
both
of
them?
Okay,.
E
A
E
H
D
H
E
A
A
K
Thank
You
Luke,
my
first
district
I,
just
you'd,
asked
about
standard
around
and
some
of
the
questions,
a
primary
reason
that
we've
got
the
difference
in
the
front
yard
and
I
think
that
you
guys
are
seeing
it
as
you
go
through.
But
the
main
thing
that
you're
worried
about
is
is
for
one
safety
of
people
walking
on
the
sidewalks
to.
D
K
Of
vehicles
backing
out
of
their
driveway
vehicles
coming
and
passing
by
those
places
and
three
probably
equally
as
important
as
you
know,
definitely
from
the
7
foot
fence
standpoint.
The
4
foot
may
be
a
little
bit
different,
but
you
know
to
make
sure
that
you've
got
fence
that
isn't
the
fortress
like.
We
have
now.
K
Responders
like
to
know
what's
on
the
other
side
of
that
fence,
and
so
if
you've
got
that
ability
to
see
over
the
fence
from
from
where
you're
at
that
helps
now
the
question
you've
got
about.
You
know
the
slats
on
the
side
along
the
on
the
corner
lot.
In
some
cases
it
makes
sense
it
probably
okay,
if
it's
it
would
it
would
make
some
sense
to
argue
that
you
could
have
a
solid
walled
fence
along
say
the
north
side
of
this
particular
lot.
K
But
if
we
move
the
access
closer
to
that
road,
which
is
the
case
in
some
places,
then
it
makes
it
very
difficult
to
be
able
to
see
as
you're
backing
out
into
that
Street
and
vehicles
to
see
you
coming
and
vice-versa.
So
that's
why
you
see
a
lot
of
communities
and
honestly
I
see
a
lot
of
communities,
go
to
30
inches
two
and
a
half
anywhere
from
two
and
a
half
to
three
feet.
K
D
Yeah
I
mean
that's,
that's
just
the
thought
that
I
have
is
the
shorter.
It
is
the
more
the
lesser
Oh
peg.
You
need
it.
I
believe
I
mean
in
that
backyard.
If
he
wants
to
have
a
four
foot
or
even
a
like
36,
you
know
inch
fence,
I,
don't
think
30%
Oh
peg,
you
can
still
see
over
it,
but
if
you
want
to
keep
maybe
the
dog
or
some
of
the
toys
and
all
that
stuff
back
there
and
and
kind
of
cover
a
little
bit
of
it.
A
This
at
this
point,
we're
just
we're
just
in
the
discussion
phase
I'd
like
in
the
next
meeting
to
actually
take
action
on
it,
but
it'd
give
us
some
time
to
look
around
once
you
kind
of
see
it
and
get
your
arms
around
it.
As
you
drive
around
town,
look
at
some
of
the
different
places,
look
at
some
of
the
existing
fences
and
then
say
what
they
would
look
like
if
they
were
differently.
I
Commercial,
we
we
kept
that
at
at
8
feet
in
height,
which
was
what
it
was
before,
and
we
still
allow
barbed
wire
which
was
currently
allowed,
but
we
all
we
added
in
that
the
25-foot
clear
view
triangle
had
to
be
had
to
be
kept
clear.
So
that
way,
you
know
there
wouldn't
block
anyone
in
at
the
the
street
intersections
the.
A
I
have
a
question
for
the
utilities:
I
see
them
back
to
hiding
behind
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
the
boxes,
the
power
boxes.
We
see
guys
fence
them.
We
see
them
you
guys.
A
landowner
is
not
allowed
to
do
certain
thing.
You
have
to
be
able
to
get
so
close
to
that
with
your
stick
right
and
in
that
there's
probably
a
lot
of
examples.
How
do
you
enforce
it
or
is
it
enforced?
L
Mark
Meyer,
Wiarton
utilities,
it's
six
foot
stick
is
what
need
for
pulling
the
boots
off
to
transformers
and
stuff
on
the
inside.
Do
we
really
enforce
it?
No,
we
don't
really
have
that
much
issue
with
it
really
I
mean
one
of
the
biggest
problems
is
if
they
put
the
Box
right
up
or
the
fence
wrap
next
to
the
box,
can't
get
the
Box
open.
That's
one
issue,
but
your.
L
L
M
Mark
to
follow
up
on
Pat's
question
we're
like
around
your
substations
and
your
water
towers.
If
you
look
at
municipal
uses
right
now
is
proposed
in
the
draft,
it
doesn't
indicate
what
the
maximum
height
could
be
around
those
kind
of
facilities.
Do
you
have
a
desired
height
that
you'd
like
to
be
able
to
get
up
to?
Did
you
use
it
in
there
Ken
and
I
missed
it?
It.
A
L
D
A
That's
that's
ten
foot
off,
that's
considered
it!
That's
not
in
your
rear
yard,
in
your
rear
yard!
You'll
be
you
could
be
right
up
on
it
if
it's
your
rear
yard,
it's
a
front
yard
used
as
a
rear
yard.
So
I
mean
it
would
be
you're
you
they
might
consider
it
their
back
yard.
But
it's
someone
else's
front
yard.
The
neighbor's
front
yard
just.
A
H
A
H
E
We
will,
but
we
did
add
into
this
one
where
they
can't
put
a
permanent
type
structure.
Friends,
you
like
the
guy
that
put
the
concrete
wall
fence
up.
That
is
no
longer
allowed.
You
know
utility
easement,
but
if
they
want
to
put
up
a
picket
or
wood
or
something
like
that,
but
they
always
are
told
every
times
if
utility
goes
through
their
chairs
out
your
friends,
that's
not
their
problem.
To
put
it
back,
it's
yours,
but
we
won't
allow
them
to
put
anything
like
a
solid
type
structure
and
pour
a
bunch
of
concrete
anymore.
D
A
A
D
N
Karen
acting
City,
Engineer
I
just
want
to
say,
regardless
of
what
the
ordinance
says
when
we
have
a
project
and
put
a
sewer
storm
pipe
in
an
easement
and
there's
a
fence
there,
taxpayers
are
paying
to
have
that
fence,
removed
repaired
and
reset
we've,
never
torn
a
fence
out
and
said:
okay
guy,
you
shouldn't
put
that
there,
your
problem
I
mean.
Maybe
we
could
legally
do
that,
but
we
don't
we're
spending
tax
dollars
to
put
those
fence.
N
Take
them
out
gently
set
them
somewhere,
safe
fix
them
when
they
get
dinged
up
when
they
do
and
put
them
back
so
I,
don't
like
fences
and
easements
fences.
Don't
belong
and
drainage
easement
at
all,
absolutely
not
they
go
in,
but
they
block
drainage
in
utility
easements.
We
we
get
requests
and
more
and
more
to
put
in
some
drains
in
newer
neighborhoods
that
are
put
in
with
high
ground
water
and
they
like
them
in
the
backyard.
N
A
A
Well,
thank
you.
What
we'll
want
to
do
is
I
would
say
between
now,
and
the
next
mean
just
kind
of
look
around.
The
main.
The
main
part
of
it
is
is
if
it's
in
a
front
yard
setback.
It's
a
four
foot
fence,
30%
opaque.
If
it's
in
a
front
yard
setback,
that's
in
in
arterial
or
a
collector
Street
will
allow
them
to
go
seven
feet
high,
but
they
have
to
sit
it
ten
feet
back.
I'd
say:
take
a
look
at
some
of
them
and
get
an
idea.
So
we
can
decide.
C
E
A
N
H
N
I'd
like
to
let
you
know
that
at
the
last
City
Council
meeting
actually
I
think
it
was
in
a
work
session.
One
of
the
council
men
asked
that
the
plan
Commission
and
staff
revisit
the
r1l
zoning
district,
which
was
proposed
years
ago
and
considered
briefly
and
I,
don't
know
the
history
it
can
be
brought
back
up.
It's
the
r1
l
would
be
a
special
residential
district
at
the
lake
to
allow
for
different
zoning
requirements
at
the
lake
than
we
have
in
town,
proper
and
I
think
it
was
pretty
controversial
at
the
time.
N
N
A
I
would
say
we
could
do
it.
Some
of
the
just
off
the
top
of
your
head.
Some
of
the
areas
I
would
say
of
conflict
that
are
differ
between
the
lake
and
Town
fireworks.
You
can
shoot
fireworks
at
the
like.
You
can't
shoot
fireworks
in
town.
What
else
you
know
habitually
people
will
say?
Well,
you
can't
store
in
your
front
yard,.
F
A
A
Nice
is
when
we
do
it
to
come
out
with
some
of
the
major
conflicts
we
have,
the
the
in
it
would
be
an
enforcement
conflict,
the
things
that
were
the
the
ordinance
that
we
have
there
are
tough
to
enforce,
because
we're
painting
the
Lake
area
that,
with
the
same
brush
that
we
paint
the
end
town
area,
what
can
you
think
of
any
off
the
top
of
your
head?
Fireworks
is
always
a
big
one.
Campfires.
D
N
A
Know
in
our
comprehensive
land
use
plan,
there
is
some
area
where
in
in
the
past,
we
thought
there
wouldn't
be
areas
of
development
out
there,
but
we've
identified
some
areas
in
that
Land
Use
Plan,
where
there
could
be
more
developments
in
there
and
stony
point
being
one
where
you
look
and
go
it's
it's
not
six
Lake
Lots!
It's
you
know
ten
Lake,
Lots
and
30
residential
lots
and
were
dia.
Where
do
you
go
from
city
standards
to
rural
standards?
A
D
N
It
depends
on
the
slope
yeah.
If
you
have
a
steep
lot
that
drops
down
to
the
lake,
you
may
not
have
a
very
long
driveway
that
350
feet
might
be
all
on
the
lake
side
of
your
home
and
no
off
street
parking,
because
you're
actually
gonna
ask
for
a
variance
to
get
closer
to
the
road
than
normal,
so
that
your
house
isn't
perched
out
there
on
a
cliff.
N
H
G
N
Down
if
you're
laying
it
out
in
a
different
way,
you
need
to
consider
that,
because
not
everything's
going
to
be
the
same,
where
you
have
a
flat
area,
yeah
no
problem,
but
if
you've
got
a
road
and
a
down
slope
to
the
water,
that
house
is
going
to
be
close
to
the
road
and
they're
gonna.
Ask
for
a
variance
to
put
it
even
closer
to
the
road,
so
I'm
going
to
be
room
to
park
on
their
driveway.
In
some
cases,
much
less
have
three
or
four
extra
cars
on
their
property
instead
of
on
the
road.
D
K
Get
look
male
with
first
district
again,
the
if
I
remember
correctly,
it
was
a
2006
that
the
non-conforming
lot
study
was
finished
and
that's
what
involved?
The
r2a
zoning
district,
which
we
adopted
as
a
community
at
an
r1,
a
district
which
was
not
adopted
by
the
community,
but
involved
portions
north.
F
K
Was
some
smaller
with
lots
about
80
foot
wide
lots?
You
had
the
r1l
district,
which
was
proposed
through
that,
which
was
because
of
the
50
foot
wide
Lots,
the
front
yard
back
yard
issue
some
of
the
variances
that
were
being
issued
at
the
time
if
I
remember,
right
and
then
a
few
different
commercial
types
of
districts,
I
think
that
and
I
don't
want
to
steer
things
anymore
I'm,
not
all
that
sure
what
had
what
had
prompted
it
but
I
think.
K
Maybe
what
might
make
sense
is
that
it's
my
expectation,
we're
gonna,
be
talking
land-use
plan
next
Wednesday
as
well
over
at
our
first
district
meeting.
Perhaps
after
spending
an
hour
discussing
a
land-use
plan.
If
members
of
the
board
want
to
stick
around,
we
could
dust
off
what
that
district
said
before
and
at
the
very
least
familiarize
yourself
with.
What's
with
what
was
proposed
ten
years
ago
and
go
from
there.
K
I've
got
this
comes
back
to
the
the
Land
Use
Plan
discussion
and
I'll
leave
this
up
to
the
board.
As
far
as
how
long
you'd
like
to
run,
we
had
planned
on
meeting
on
Wednesday
and
at
a
meeting
come
up
here
in
town
at
that
time,
I'm
hoping
that
I
can
have
a
half
an
hour.
Your
time
are
you
willing
to
allow
that
I.
C
A
K
All
right
so,
as
those
are
being
handed
out,
I
remember:
we've
we've
met
on
and
off
here
over
the
course
of
the
last
six
months,
trying
to
work
on
some
policies,
or
at
least
some
areas,
important
points
of
the
land
use
plan
getting
more
into
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
specific
areas
to
develop.
We
expect
to
develop
within
the
community,
starting
on
the
fringe
portions
of
the
community.
That's
why
that
discussion.
The
r1l
is
very
close
to
where
we're
at.
K
If
we
had
only
a
handful
of
Planning
Commission
members
at
attendance,
the
last
meeting
we
had
in
which
we
discussed
most
of
the
area
northwest
of
north
and
west
of
highway
212
and
81.
That's
outside
of
city
limits.
This
time,
I've
got
I've,
got
a
set
of
sheets
together
here,
20
sections,
21
sections.
H
K
Township
range
that
are
south
and
west
of
212
and
81,
and
what
I've
got
here
is
just
the
layout
where
we're
at
today.
What's
going
on
on
the
ground
today
in
these
areas
where
and
how
do
we
expect
these
to
go
in
the
future?
At
the
very
top
of
each
page,
you'll
see
we
identify
what
section
it
is
and
what
township
it's
in
and
this
the
very
first
one
is
section
2a,
compasso,
Township
and
then
you'll
see
at
the
top
I've
got
a
color-coded
key
that
shows
rural
uses
for
the
future.
K
I
K
K
This
is
this,
would
only
have
a
small
portion
of
this
portion
would
be
in
the
planning
area.
91
acres,
not
anticipated
to
have
any
development
right
now.
All
we've
got
is
a
few
houses
in
the
country
that
are
on
lots
of
less
than
35
acres.
You'll
see
that
I've
got
a
category
there
for
existing
land
use,
see
that
existing
land
use.
You
can
see
up
here
and
describe
anything
any
home.
K
That's
on
a
lot
of
less
than
35
acres
outside
of
city
limits
is
classified
as
this
residential
in
the
county
because,
as
a
lot
of
you're
aware,
the
county
requires
a
minimum.
30
5
acre
a
lot
requirement.
So
if
it's
on
a
lot
of
less
than
that,
we're
considering
that
a
residential
setting
as
opposed
to
the
rural
setting
in.
K
To
combine
those
two
together,
the
and
so
again
that
area
is
so
far
out
of
town.
There's
no
utilities
there.
We
don't
expect
anything
develop
that
way.
We
start
heading
east
on
212,
heading
closer
towards
the
lake
and
we
have
shows
the
whole
page.
We
start
heading
east
on
212,
same
story,
nothing
really
expected
to
change
from
where
it's
at
largely
from
a
standpoint
utilities.
There
are
some
residential
rural
residences
that
are
out
there
that
it
had
developed.
The
county's
got
pretty
well
clamp
down
on
the
zoning
district
that
sits
there.
K
H
D
D
K
K
K
K
K
H
K
See
117
acres
used
for
residences
out
there
177
to
remain
rural
without
much
development,
you
can
see,
there's
not
gonna,
be
a
lot
of
change
and
I'm
not
gonna,
spend
a
whole
lot
of
time.
Hashing
over
you
can
see.
There's
not
a
lot
of
residential
use.
There's
a
few
houses
out
here,
but
again
they
all
have
35
acres
to
them.
In
section
6
you
can
see
in
the
in
the
Land
Use
Plan.
K
In
section
6
of
Pelican
Township,
the
keep
going
here,
section
5
again,
there's
nothing
and
this
again
carry
forward
from
the
previous
Land
Use
Plan.
There's
nothing
proposed
or
expected
for
future
development.
In
section
5,
there
is
some
commercially
zoned
property
in
the
county.
In
this
particular
section
you
can
see.
There's
a
couple
of
pieces
use
commercially.
Now
there
are
I
believe
marry
elevator
company.
They
do
some
auger
construction
out.
There
there's
also
some
storage
and
those
red
spots
there
in
the
existing
land
use
and
then
also
the
rooster
bar
is
out.
K
There
tried
hard,
not
to
mention
the
bar
first
before
I
went
to
the
industrial
uses,
then
there's
a
couple
of
residences
out
there
as
well.
You
can
see
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
more
land
dedicated
to
resident
or
commercial
use,
but
for
the
most
part,
remain
the
way
it
is
because
there's
no
utilities
out
there.
J
K
The
section
for
I'm
working
west
to
east
and
then
back
down
section
four
we're
still
heading
east
here,
largely
unchanged
from
the
way
that
sits
today.
That's
what
the
land-use
plan
suggests.
You
can
see
that
there's
a
little
suggestion
there
for
future
residential
land
use
down
on
the
southern
portion,
and
that
is
probably
more
to
rural
capacity,
because
it's
as
of
now
it's
it's
zoned.
It's
already
largely
used
residentially
in
that
area.
You
can
see
this
corresponds
with
this
corner
down
here,
there's
just
one
more
lot.
K
K
We're
going
to
dive
into
that
more
within
this
plan,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we've
tackled
everything
outside
first
before
we
dive
into
that.
That'll
include
that
r1l
discussion.
But
at
this
point
you
can
see
future
land
use
has
identified
the
this
stretch
here
as
commercial
for
the
future,
and
that
actually
shows,
as
that
a
commercial
industrial
mix
is
what
that
shows.
That
is
its
identified.
K
That
way,
because
that's
land
that
was
initially
zoned
commercial
in
the
county
when
the
county
first
adopted
zoning-
and
it's
been
that
way-
it's
not
something
that's
going
to
build
a
change,
so
we're
gonna
have
to
work
together
to
be
able
to
work
with
them.
What
types
of
uses
can
go
in
there
moving
forward
into
the
future,
as
has
been
the
case,
this
hasn't
changed
for
the
last
15-20
since
the
1991
land
use
plan.
K
H
K
Some
existing
manufactured
homes
in
this
area
there's
a
Boren's
addition:
it's
a
combination
of
homes,
looking
for
expansion
of
that
area,
and
then
this
is
cax
addition
which,
at
this
point
is,
is
only
starting
to
develop.
That
would
be
an
area
we
would
anticipate,
will
expand
over
the
planning
period
of
which
would
be
20
years.
We
would
expect
that
to
expand
quite
a
bit.
So
that's
why
you
see
in
this
particular
section
expect
about
200
acres.
K
We
have
200
acres
identified
as
future
residential
land
use,
that's
going
to
be
a
large
area,
that's
going
to
develop
and
that
actually
has
infrastructure
in
it
or
plan
to
go
into
it.
So
that's
prepared
and
ready
for
it.
Yeah
beyond
that.
You
can
see.
What's
going
on
on
the
land
there
now
right
now,
I
guess
the
main
point
that
I
want
to
make
and
I
just
I
wanted
to
emphasize
that
point
about.
K
The
utilities
is
that
that's
been
planned
master
plan,
we've
we've
kind
of
got
a
hand,
we've
got
a
handle
on
roads
and
drainage
and
utilities
throughout
through
the
area.
That's
proposed
to
be
developed
in
that
area.
With
the
exception
of
the
second
tier
of
development,
maybe
at
some
point
in
the
future
and
out
here,
but
those
are
the
types
of
questions
we
need
to
ask
ourselves
as
well
as
we
start
to
see
some
of
these
areas
that
we
know
we
want
to
see
develop
in
the
future.
K
F
K
Move
a
little
bit
farther
east
and
section
two
now
we're
now
east
of
33rd
Street.
You
have
mom
Rd
is
here
now
in
this
loop
here
and
the
REI
building
in
some
of
these
areas.
This
area
here
and
someone
help
me
with
the
zoning-
is
that
industrial
now
or
is
that
commercial.
This
is
industrial
here.
Is
this
also
industrial,
ok,
I?
It's
marked
for
commercial
or
industrial
development
into
the
future
to
allow
either
of
those
types
of
zoning
designations
to
take
hold
there
or
to
to
develop
then
to
the
south.
K
You've
got
identified
residential
development
that
was
actually
in
place
in
the
2004
plan
carried
forward
into
this
plan.
Some
of
you
may
remember:
there
is
a
master
player,
a
preliminary
plan
that
was
approved
five
or
six
years
ago
for
some
large
lot
development
throughout
this
area.
Here
through
the
city,
even
though
that
property
wasn't
annexed
yet
and
then
down
here
is
some
existing
development
with
what's
called
kid,
Olsen's
addition
that's
in
the
county
that
usually
is
an
area
that
I
know.
K
We've
discussed
just
in
preliminary
discussions
about
what
happens
to
that
eventually,
hopefully,
that's
something
that
can
be
absorbed
into
the
city
at
some
point
and
I
know
that
there's
been
discussion
sooner
than
later
about
that
and
those
might
be.
Those
are
things
that
we'll
have
to
have
policies
in
the
plan
about
addressing
this
area.
K
K
K
So
we've
gone
back
now
to
section
9
in
Pelican,
Township,
I'm,
gonna
figure
out,
okay,
so
section
9
would
be
I'm
just
gonna
bring
you
back
to
here.
Section
9
would
be
this
corner.
Here
is
where
this
is
from
section
3.
You
can
see
the
intersection
is
that
a
40-second,
West
I
believe
that's
what
that
is.
That's
Weston!
It's
a
mild
west.
There
future
development
in
that
area.
This
is
a
portion
that
has
changed
from
the
2004
plan
because
in
2004
there
was
nothing
marked
in
this
area.
K
Since
then,
this
development-
this
is
the
news
edition
along
along
the
North
Shore
Lake,
compare
Lake
Pelican,
was
approved
and
has
developed
and
honestly
as
nearly
completely
built
out
identified
as
future
residential
just
so
that
it
continues
to
develop
the
way
that
it
is
don't
have
any.
There
is
nothing
shown
to
the
west
of
that
as
future
development.
There
possibly
could.
But
again,
those
are
the
types
of
things
we'd
rather
have
I,
think
I
think
the
city
would
probably,
rather
have
utilities
run
out
to
it.
D
J
K
F
K
On
that
particular
property,
at
any
point,
aside
from
a
public
use,
we
move
farther
west
into
section
8.
This
is
the
large
lot
development
that
I
was
referencing.
That's
been
approved
in
the
county.
Currently,
this
is
for
reference.
This
is,
and
it's
my
land
three
quarters
to
two
miles
from
city
limits.
It's
over
two
miles
from
what's
developed
within
the
city
right
now,
just
kind
of
give
you
an
idea.
This
particular
property
is
so
that's
how
far
away
we
are
from
development.
There's
not
it.
K
To
be
honest,
there's
not
a
whole
lot
of
expectation
for
for
municipal
or
high
density
development
in
this
area,
so
we're
not
showing
to
encourage
it.
That
doesn't
mean
that
if
someone
comes
in
with
a
plan
that
meets
expectations
of
the
city,
we
can't
doesn't
mean
we
can't
amend
the
future
land
use
math
and
the
same
thing
as
far
as
the
county
goes
to
to
build
to
do
that,
but
that's
just
as
of
now
we're
showing
it
as
as.
D
D
D
K
D
K
Think
that
that's
a
I
think
that's
an
important
thing
that
we
we
probably
need
to.
We
need
to
specify
some
some
some
trigger
mechanisms,
particularly
we
do
have.
We
do
have
policies
in
the
city.
Let's
say
that
if
you're
within
200
feet,
you
hook
up
two
sewer
and
perhaps
we
have
similar
policies
and
as
far
as
the
as
far
as
the
utilities
go
as
well
and
involve
some
some
of
those
types
of
deals.
K
D
May
do
that
at
what
point
I
mean
we're
pretty
developed
out
to
the
news
edition.
Well
at
what
point
did
it
the
utility
just
stopped
I
mean
on
here
I
mean:
where
did
they
stop
and
why
did
they
stop
instead
of
continuing
on
to
was
there
was
their
jump
where
we
missed
them
and
then
they'd
have
redeveloped
in
between
them
or
I
mean
that
we're
pretty
densely
I
mean
pretty
much
developed
up
yeah
developed
up
to
that
area?
Why
did
the
utilities
staffers
or
is
there
a
spot
where
they
all.
K
Start
and
then
I'll
ask
you
mark
to
finish.
Utilities
are
to
here
they
were
to
here
historically
and
then
the
news
edition
developed
at
the
time
that
utilities
were
at
about
this
point.
So
the
news
edition
developed
down
here.
This
is
the
extent
to
where
utilities
were
at
least
water
in
electrical.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
then
KAK's
Edition
came
in
and
now
as
far
as
that
goes
I
as
I
as
I
understand.
K
A
H
K
D
Over
I
mean
the
way
that
are
there
anything
in
the
county
that
are
that
it's
recommended
to
do
for
them.
If
they
eventually
hook
up
I
mean
or
is
it
all,
reconfigured
I
mean
I,
look
at
the
way
compass
Co
was
developed
and-
and
you
know
they
came
in
and
put
sewer
city
sewer
and
water
and
we
absorbed
them
and
I'm,
not
sure,
quite
how
that
worked,
but
I'm
guessing.
If
we
had
something
in
place,
maybe
at
a
time
as
far
as
directions
of
septic
sand,
we.
K
Do
in
the
in
the
county
and
I'll
go
to
the
two
developments,
those
those
the
news
edition
aside.
I'd
have
to
look
at
that
again
to
remember
how
that
was
set
up.
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
the
the
septic
tank
issue
out
there.
That
is,
that's,
got
a
different
zoning
in
the
county.
So
that's
part
of
why
it
kind
of
had
a
an
implied
right
to
be
able
to
develop
it.
K
The
way
that
it
did
with
the
two
residential
developments,
the
Northwoods,
which
is
north
of
town,
this
this
one
that
I
was
just
on
south
west
of
town
or
west
of
town
near
Pelican.
Both
of
those
are
set
up
that
they
are
to
have
sewers
running
toward
the
street
in
a
fashion
that
they
would
be
able
to
be
removed,
a
septic
tank
and
work
into
a
sewer
system.
K
I
thought
the
next
couple
of
sections
I
think
we
can
go
relatively
quickly,
we're
on
the
west
side
of
Lake
Pelican,
that's
a
long
ways
away.
I,
don't
expect
to
see
that
in
my
lifetime
develop
definitely
not
residential
aired.
Nada,
municipal
e,
just
a
couple
of
notes
here.
This
is
probably
more
for
interest,
but
again
that
planning
area
goes
all
the
way
half
mile
west
of
Lake
Pelican.
K
The
reason
that
you
see
is
you'll
go
through
here,
you'll
see
that
that
this
planning
area
won't
typically
stop
on
a
road.
The
idea
is,
is
that
on
this
side
of
the
road
it's
this
way
and
on
this
side
of
the
road?
It's
it's
the
other
way.
It
doesn't
make
that
much
sense.
So,
if
you're
gonna
look
at
one
side,
you
look
at
the
other
side
at
least
an
ad
D
660
feet.
Deep,
so
I
can
even
came
to
see
how
that's
developed
use
obviously
expect
it
to
remain
rural
as
it
sits.
K
You've
got
the
park
here
on
the
south
side,
Pelican
game
in
fish
land.
Some
houses
down
there
again
remain
rural,
as
it
sits
in
section
17.
Now
we're
starting
to
move
our
way
back
to
second
to
towards
city
limits.
This
comes
back
to
some
more
of
the
questions
that
Mike
was
bringing
up
about
about
some
of
the
existing
development.
That's
out
there,
although
this
is
on
the
western
end
of
that,
you
can
see.
K
L
K
City
municipal
gas
is
is
throughout
here,
Haven,
including
this
West
portion.
That's
all
you're.
Looking
at
now,
however,
electric
only
goes
to
the
east
of
this
location,
so
it
wouldn't
serve
this
particular
area
that
we've
got
right
now,
but
again
it
it's
not
anticipated
to
develop.
Any
farther
regulations
that
are
in
place
would
keep
it
where
it
sits.
K
Now,
barring
a
substantial
development
and
I
buy
development,
I
mean
going
through
a
planned
development
process,
moving
straight
east
first
and
looking
you've
got
a
blank
section,
that's
straight
east
of
where
we
were
looking
before
you
can
see.
Here's
15
moving
straight
east
were
south
of
174
Street
I,
think
that
is
again
nothing
going
on
there,
that's
all
owned
as
egg
parcels
right
now,
anyway,
as
I
go
back
to
the
north,
though
here's
their
Haven,
where
that
is
that's
nearly
completely
built
out.
K
There
are
a
couple
of
lots
that
are
held
most
of
the
ones
that
are
owned
in
this
area,
that
don't
have
houses
on
them.
I
believe
are
owned
by
people
who
own
property
on
both
sides
of
it,
so
they're
basically
being
passed
down
at
this
point,
it's
largely
built
out
again,
though,
that's
something
that
has
mr.
Lawrence
had
pointed
out.
K
D
D
K
D
A
From
a
tech,
firm
attacks
from
a
property
tax
standpoint,
the
the
city
doesn't
collect,
they
don't
participate
in
the
property
tax
side
of
it.
It's
more
sales
tax
that
the
city
is
funded
with
in
property
tax,
but
yeah.
The
other
problem
we
have
out
here
is,
if
you
annex
many
got'em
sewer
and
a
lot
of
that
area,
elevation
or
issues,
lift
stations
or
issues
and
distance
that
sewers,
probably
the
most
limiting
thing
that.
H
K
I
and
I
want
to
point
out
too,
is
because
we'll
run
into
this
as
we
go
into
this
in
the
future
as
well,
is
that
you
made
that
point
about
sewer
being
expensive
and
right
now
this
particular
development
Kittleson
x'
addition,
which
is
on
the
north
side
of
Pelican
as
well.
Both
of
those
developments
existed
before
the
county
had
zoning,
and
when
zoning
in
in.
A
K
City
was
in
its
infancy,
even
so
I
mean
it's
got
its
development
right.
It's
there's
really.
The
motivation
is
purely
from
the
standpoint
of
we
want
to
have
a
better.
We
want
a
better
our
situation
for
the
people
living
out
there
and
that's
basically,
it
there's
not
a
lot
of
obligation
as
far
as
I
know,
that
would
force
that
I
I
think
from
that
point,
I
could
keep
going,
but
in
all
reality
my
thought
is:
let's
swing
east
at
our
next
meeting
that.