►
From YouTube: BOA & PlanCommission Meetings 02 04 2016
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
B
A
Like
to
make
a
make
a
note
that
in
the
in
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
the
number
of
votes
you
need
for
passing
vote
is
five
five
of
one
two,
three,
four,
five,
six,
seven,
sorry
Dan,
don't
vote
again
get
your
popcorn
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
January
7th
2016
minutes
and
a
motion.
A
second
make.
A
motion
motion
by
mr.
McGuire
second
by
mr.
Dahle,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
applicant
applicant
Teresa
angles.
B
Application
for
building
permit
number
one
652
application
was
submitted
and
requesting
to
alter
an
existing
non-conforming
936
square
foot
26
by
36
on
attached
garage.
Such
structure
proposed
to
be
repositioned
or
a
portion
removed
so
as
to
be
located
not
closer
than
three
feet
from
the
rear
east
property
line.
B
When
nine
feet
is
required
in
1995,
Doug
and
Teresa
singles
were
issued
a
building
permit
at
six
eight
four
one
for
a
compliant
864
square
foot
24
by
36,
an
attached
garage
to
be
constructed
ten
feet
from
the
north
and
ten
feet
in
the
south
proper
lines.
However,
the
building
was
repositioned
and
encroaching
3.5
feet
over
the
East
River
property
line
into
the
public
right
away
due
to
financing
purposes.
Therese
Ingalls
and
comes
now
to
the
board
requesting
to
alter
the
structure.
They
move
a
proportion
of
or
reposition
to
satisfy
the
financer.
Currently,
the
comply.
B
Entire
one's
own
parcel
consists
of
a
single-family
dwelling
which
is
attached.
308,
square-foot,
single
garage
and
non-conforming
I
attach
triple
garage,
and
the
utility
should
there's
a
total
of
seven
seven
thousand
three.
Ninety
two
square
feet:
the
legal
billable
area
on
this
parcel
available
for
accessory
structures,
of
which
two
thousand
one
hundred
forty
six
square
feet.
Twenty
nine
percent
is
occupied
by
a
primary
structure
house
with
attached
garage.
B
B
B
So
we've
requested
that
the
garage
be
moved
to
a
minimum
of
not
less
than
three
feet
from
the
property
line
and
whether
they
push
the
garage
over
or
they
cut
it
off.
We
don't
care
how
they
do
it.
The
three
feet
is
just
to
verify,
because
that's
a
footprint
elevation
to
make
sure,
with
the
minimum
amount
necessary
to
make
it
onto
their
property,
but
that'll
legally
make
sure
that
the
overhang
and
every
all
parts
of
the
garage
is
out
in
their
property.
Alright,.
A
D
A
B
A
So
the
question
of
what
to
you
Stanton
would
be
I.
Think
you're
we
are.
We
can
give
you
a
variance,
that's
what
we're
here
to
do.
We
can
legally.
We
can
only
variance
you
to
the
lot
line.
We
don't
have
the
authority
to
variance
into
the
public
right
away
stand
the
question
to
you
would
be:
can
you've
a
I
think
what
you're
asking
for
is?
Would
we
vacate
the
piece
of
ground
underneath
the
building
and
when
I
checked
earlier,
it
was
something
that
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
vacate
a
specific
footprint
under
that
building.
E
F
And
I,
don't
mark
I,
see
mark
Meyer
in
the
back
I,
don't
know
what
kind
of
utility
easement
sir
in
that
alley,
but
typically
those
alleys
are
there
because
utility
says
has
set
up
their
infrastructure
in
the
alleys
and
that's
why
they
exist.
I
I
think
there'd
be
resistance
from
utilities
to
allow
any
permanent
structures
to
to
be
placed
upon
an
existing
platted
easement
for
utilities.
That's
probably
why
mark
do
you
know?
Are
there
utilities
in
that
alley.
A
A
What
would
happen?
The
biggest
part
of
the
reason
is,
if
we
vacate
it
just
under
that
building
and
then
it
burned
down
see
what
would
happen
is
if
we
variants
it
to
the
lot
line
or
to
the
three
feet
like
you're
asking
for
and
then
it
burns
down.
Ten
years
from
now,
when
you
come
back
in
for
your
building,
permit
they're
gonna
ask
you
to
build
it
in
accordance
with
our
with
our
ordinance,
which
might
be
a
little
further
over,
but
that's
after
a
substantial
damage.
A
C
F
Happened
in
limited
circumstances
around
the
city,
I
can
give
you
an
example
and
and
I
think
maybe
a
predate
Shane
our
city
engineer,
but
over
near
6th
Street,
Circle
Association
you've
probably
seen
that
monument
sign
just
on
a
newer
side
of
fourth
across
from
Watertown
iron
in
metal.
There's
a
monument
sign
that
lets
people
know
this
is
the
6th
Street
circle
home
owners
area
and
that
sign
is
clearly
located
in
the
public
right-of-way.
F
They
were
given
an
encroachment,
the
ability
to
encroach
into
public
right
away
because
it's
larger
than
everyone
agrees
it
needs
to
be,
but
rather
than
vacate
the
right-of-way.
The
city
said
we're
going
to
hang
on
to
the
right-of-way,
but
will
allow
an
encroachment
permit
for
it
to
be
there.
The
same
is
true
south
on
Broadway.
It's
that
the
the
realty
place
and
the
law
firm
on
the
east
side
of
Broadway.
Just
before
you
get
to
212
the
there's,
the
Robie
firm
and
then
there's
a
property
real
estate
business
there
that
sign.
F
F
So
there
have
been
limited
circumstances
where
the
city's
allowed
encroachments
to
exist
in
the
public
right-of-way,
but
it's
only
because
it
it
wasn't
causing
it
wasn't
interfering
with
anything
I,
don't
know
the
status
of
this
alley
and
that's
why
marks
come
up
to
the
podium
to
answer
that
question?
Well,.
C
G
B
B
C
B
B
B
B
A
The
original
one
had
the
had
the
the
cars
entering
from
the
alley
and
had
it
away
it's
for
some
point
in
time.
During
the
construction
of
it,
they
chose
to
move.
It
turn
the
doors
from
face
in
the
alley
to
north
south,
and
in
doing
so
my
assumption
is
somebody
eyeballed
the
concrete
thinking.
It
was
a
12
foot
alley
and
they
were
4
feet
off,
but
it
or
a
20
foot
alley
and
they
were
12
foot
alley
and
they're
four
feet
off
to
find
out.
It
was
a
the
other
way
around.
A
They
thought
it
was
12
foot,
it
was
actually
20,
so
they
ended
up
being
3
feet
and
instead
of
right
on
the
lot
line
when
they
did
the
cement.
Somebody
said
it's
a
12
foot
alley.
You
were
gonna
line
you
up
right
with
these
guys,
but
it
was
a
20
foot
alley
because,
on
the
south
side
of
the
block,
it's
a
12
foot
alley
on
the
north
end.
It's
funny.
B
A
See
at
some
point
they
decide
instead
of
building
like
that,
they
turn
to
sideways
and
came
put
it
right
on
the
lot
line
where
they
thought
the
lot
line
was
in
fact
they
ended
up
putting
it
three
and
a
half
feet
outside
a
lot.
They
thought
they
were
six
inches
in.
They
were
three
and
a
half
out
who.
A
E
I
The
way
it's
turned
now,
but
you
know
back
in
95,
you
know
things
were
a
lot
different.
If
you,
if
you
wanted
to
make
a
change,
you
called
up.
Darwin
said
this
is
what
I
want
to
do?
You
know
talk
about
it.
Give
the
a
yay
or
nay
and
I
mean
that's
what
you
go
ahead
with
I
mean
it's
the
same
reason
that
the
garage
across
the
alley
is
built
right
on
the
ends
up
right
on
the
line.
I
mean
I
mean
it's
been
that
way
since
1995,
it's
never
been
an
issue.
I
A
A
Here's
I
don't
want
to
argue
with
it,
but
here's
the
deal
is
the
mortgagee,
the
person
who's
buying
it.
The
mortgagee
wants
clear
right
of
property
under
the
all
of
those
buildings.
The
city
says.
In
order
to
do
that,
we
need
more
than
a
variance.
We
need
a
vacation
of
the
property
under
that
and
there's
utilities
under
there,
and
if
we
give
a
vacation
we've
now,
given
them
that
property
into
perpetuity,
you
can't
unring
that
Bell
and
if
it
burns
down,
there's
an
agreement
that
they're
going
to
give
it
back
to
us.
A
You
can't
there's
an
agreement
can't
be
drawn
up.
It
doesn't
exist,
so
the
city
doesn't
I
thought.
Well,
we
give
them
a
variance
in
the
City.
Council
I
even
went
as
far
as
said.
If
the
building
official
says
we
know
it's
in
the
public
right
away,
we're
okay
with
it.
If
it
burns
down,
you
got
to
move
it.
The
lien
holder
wasn't
okay
with
that,
so
we
there's
not
a
whole
lot.
We
can
do
based.
H
H
A
I
think
it's
an
honest
mistake
that
hey
we're
gonna
move
the
building,
I,
think
somebody
just
mismeasured
where
the
building
needed
to
be
I
think
they
thought
it
was
a
12-foot
alley
all
the
way
through
it's
really
a
20-foot
alley.
So
thinking
you
were
six
inches
inside
your
property
line.
You
actually
in
all
actuality,
were
three
and
a
half
feet
outside
it.
So
here
we
said:
go
on
what
can
we
do
to
help
them?
A
F
A
J
K
A
What's
in
front
of
us
today
is
a
3-foot
variance
from
the
from
the
property
line,
and
we
can
act
on
that.
If
you
want
to
pursue
the
vacation
and
like
we
said
that
it
sets
a
precedence
and
the
reason
the
cities
generally
unlikely
to
give
a
vacation,
as
they
now
gave
you
that
property
and
we
can't
ever
get
it
back
without
negotiating
with
you
at
a
later
date.
And
then
everybody
up
and
down.
There's
gonna
want
to
vacate
that
same
amount
of
property,
north
and
south
of
you,
but.
A
O
Mark
Meyer
wires
own
utilities,
various
utilities
in
Ally
now
as
far
as
our
gas
or
electric,
none
of
them
are
underneath
that
garage
there
to
the
east
of
the
garage,
but
I
know
communication
and
everything
is
in
that
alley.
It's
just
I,
don't
know.
If
anything
is
underneath
it
or
not.
I
know
ours
isn't.
A
A
A
All
right
we
can,
we
can
give
them
a
three
three-foot
variant
and
with
a
recommendation
that
they
work
with
city
staff
to
see
if,
if
a
vacation
is
something
that
that
we
have,
the
appetite
for
the
city
has
the
appetite
for
I'm.
Not
a
little
different
vacations
are
much
different
than
we're,
not
not
much
different
than
a
variance
I.
M
A
A
M
A
A
I
A
B
B
B
This
compliant.
Our
one
zone
parcel
consists
of
a
conforming
single-family
dwelling
with
attached,
520
5.6
double
garage.
The
parcel
lacks
standard
boulevard
infrastructure
requirements,
boulevard
tree
sidewalk
if
application
is
endorsed
aboard,
may
consider
for
finland
of
all
or
any
of
those
requirements
in
conjunction
with
any
structural
improvements
authorized
by
the
building
from
it.
D
A
B
B
P
A
P
P
We
have
enough
room,
but
the
problem
is
I'd,
be
a
really
short
place
to
work
on
a
car
things
like
that,
and
so
by
going
further
out
and
putting
a
third
stall
on
the
actual
front
of
the
house.
That
would
give
us
an
update
to
have
a
shop
in
the
back.
I
currently
am
a
shop
teacher
and
so
do
a
lot
of
hands-on
stuff
and
got
a
car
project
I'd
like
to
work
on
with
my
boys,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at
my
wife
thinks
she
needs
to
park
in
the
garage
in
the
winter.
M
B
M
A
M
B
B
A
One
of
those
where
we
got
a
double
front
yard
he's
got
it.
It's
used
as
a
side
yard,
which
normally
would
have
a
nine
foot
setback.
But
it's
got
a
25
foot
setback
because
it's
legally
a
front
yard
because
you're
on
a
corner
we
run
into
those
corners.
Those
corner
Lots,
look
big,
but
when
you
see
the
setbacks,
they're
not
actually
quite
as
usable
as
they
look
as
you
drive
by
and.
P
B
A
O
A
M
G
Live
directly
to
the
soffit
Mike
Knowles
at
1184,
Crestview
Drive,
so
I'm,
probably
the
most
impact
of
any
of
the
any
of
the
neighbors
in
the
area
there
and
I'm
adamantly
opposed
to
this
proposition
here
he's
talking
about
a
garage
that
is
about
roughly
2,000
square
feet.
Approximately
40
foot
wide
54
feet
long.
That
will
come
back
within
9
feet
of
our
property
line,
which
I
understand.
L
G
Is
within
within
code,
but
I
do
have
a
serious
concern
about
him
going
to
the
west
there
and
encroaching
on
the
on
the
lot
line
there.
The
the
traffic
on
crassly
Drive
there
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
see
anybody
coming
westbound
on
12th
Avenue
there
and
I
see
people
all
the
time
that
go
through
that
intersection
entirely.
G
C
L
A
B
A
G
G
B
B
A
G
A
We
do
see
times
where,
where
there's
the
garages
can
be
made,
we
see
in
a
lot
of
places
where
garages
look
like
home
windows
and
things
like
that.
You
can't
tell
if
it's
a
side
of
a
garage
or
at
the
site
of
a
house,
do
we
have
any
other
shots
of
the
back
or
the
sides
as
to
where
the
windows
are
in
that
new
girl?
A
A
A
A
A
A
Q
A
By
mr.
Arnold,
second
by
mr.
stone,
burger
all
in
favor,
say,
aye
opposed
motion
carries
second
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
approval
of
the
minutes
from
January
7th
2016?
Can
a
new
motion?
A
second
motion
by
mr.
McGuire
second
by
mr.
Dahle,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
motion
carries
third
item
on
the
agenda?
Is
the
South
Broadway
vacation.
Q
The
petitioners
collect
energy
is
the
owner
of
of
these
three
properties
that
are
adjacent
to
or
all
the
properties
that
are
adjacent
to
it
and
background
on
this.
The
petitioner
is
requesting
that
South
Broadway
Street
be
vacated
from
the
southern
edge
of
Hesco,
which
is
right
here
to
the
north
edge
of
the
southern
bypass.
Q
Q
It
currently
has
1
railroad
crossing
right
here,
and
one
bridge
right
here
also
there's
been
four
traffic
counts
that
have
been
done,
one
in
2005,
one
in
2011,
2012
and
2015,
and
those
counts
show
that
well
in
2005
there
was
nineteen
hundred
and
ninety-four
vehicles
per
day
in
2011,
there's
mm
33
vehicles
per
day
in
2012.
There
was
nineteen
hundred
and
eighty-eight
vehicles
today
and
then
in
2015
there
was
only
eleven
hundred
and
thirty-nine
vehicles
per
day,
and
that
was
a
result
of
the
southern
bypass
being
constructed
in
2012.
Q
Also,
we
we
contacted
municipal
utilities
and
I
have
a
email
here
from
from
mark
Meyer
that
summarized
states
that
they're
ok
with
the
vacation,
but
they
would
like
the
right
way
to
remain
as
an
easement
as
they
do
have
utilities.
They
have
a
water
main
and
overhead
electric
along
there,
and
the
email
also
says
that
they
had
a
meeting
with
that
ethanol
personnel
and
they
don't
believe
that
the
easement
would
interfere
with
their
plans.
So
there
sounds
like
the
as
long
as
it
was
an
easement.
Q
A
R
A
That's
what
we're
have
to
think
of
today
to
look
and
go
I
know
the
ethanol
plant
would
like
this
to
expand
and
develop,
but
we're
looking
more
on
a
broader
side
to
say
we
have
a
bypass
on
one
side.
What
are
we
doing
with
the
highways?
You
know
it's
more
of
moving
traffic.
Is
this
still
the
collector
street
that
it
used
to
be,
or
are
we
trying
to
move
traffic
another
spots
and.
A
The
council
looks
to
us
as
to
basically
do
the
heavy
lifting
as
to
whether
or
not
we
think
it's
something
that
the
city
still
is
useful
for
the
city
and
something
that
that
holds
us
wait
for
what
we
put
in
it
in
time
and
money.
Well,
that
the
public
public
hearing
is
open.
If
anyone
wants
to
speak
on
behalf
of
it.
Q
S
H
H
A
The
one
thing
Jim
I
would
be
interested
in
as
you
go
through.
If
you
can
point
out,
is
I
was
on
the
board
years
back
when
we
first
started,
and
it
was
said
that
there
won't
be
a
train
crossing
it
at
peak
times
like
noon
and
5:00,
but
I,
don't
think
there's
as
much
control
of
that
as
we'd
hoped
there
was
because
there
are
train
crossings
to
12:00
at
noon
and
5:00,
and
how
this
would
I'd
like
my
interest,
was.
How
is
this
going
to
impact
the
traffic
on
212?
S
In
a
less
we've
got
a
couple
of
slides
here
that
will
illustrate
that
and
we
can
even
narrow
it
down,
of
course,
we're
basing
the
information
on
our
minor
facility.
So
you
know
it's
always
going
to
be
different
with
these
unit
trains,
but
I
think
you'll
be
interested
to
see
what
we
have
as
far
as
statistics
from
miner.
So
let's.
S
Unit
train
is
a
96
car
unit
and
the
difference
between
a
unit
train
and
a
single
car
manifest
is
what
we
call
our
water
or
single
car
shipper.
Is
our
water
town
plant
the
cars
that
that
leave
here
they
go
to
Wilmer
and
they
might
someone
might
be
bound
for
Denver.
Some
might
be
bound
for
to
Seattle
Tacoma.
Some
might
be
bound
for
Albuquerque
and
other
points.
They
all
get
separated
at
some
point,
maybe
in
Willmar
somewhere
else,
and
then
they
get
shipped.
They
sit
there
and
then
they
get
shipped
at
the
appropriate
time.
S
A
unit
train
will
start
in
Watertown
and
will
continue
on
its
path
until
it
reaches
its
destination.
In
many
cases,
without
stopping
or
with
minimal
stoppage.
What
they
do
is
they
leave
the
96
car
trains
intact,
and
a
common
shipping
point
for
us
is
going
to
be
Houston
or
Dallas
or
LA
and
it'll
be
the
larger
areas
in
most
cases
or
a
port
and
they'll
leave
that
train
intact,
they'll
unload
it
quicker
it
caught
turns
around.
It
comes
right
back
and
in
in
route.
S
S
S
S
Okay,
the
role
of
transportation
and
our
business
is
important.
The
ethanol
industry
is
high
volume,
low
margin,
we're
a
price
taker.
We
cannot
store
product
out
there.
We've
we've
got
storage
tanks,
but
typically
we
have
five
days
of
production
storage.
We
got
to
get
it
out
of
here.
There
is
no
no
opportunity
for
us
to
sit
there
and
build
up
storage
and
continue
to
produce
without
shipping
this
product
out
of
here.
So
that
explains
why
we
need
to
two
services
per
week
with
our
current
situation.
S
Transportation
efficiency
is
critical
and
the
Burlington
Northern
Rail
rate
Railway
realizes
this
and
works
hard
to
develop
these
efficiencies
throughout
its
system.
Here's
a
statement
of
support
for
this
project
from
John
Miller
who's,
a
VP
of
the
egg
products
group
to
Mayor
Thorson.
These
are
actual
quotes
from
that
letter.
The
efficiencies
of
unit
train
operations
can
strengthen
competitiveness,
as
we
mentioned
shipment
times
can
be
cut
in
half
in
today's
competitive
economy.
Market
access
is
enhanced
by
unit
train
capability,
because
many
customer
destinations
call
for
this
capacity,
especially
export
markets.
S
Here's
kind
of
a
slide
that
you,
you
know
you
had
a
little
bit
of
aberration
in
2011,
but
it
really
shows
the
upward
trend
of
what
we
see
in
the
ethanol
exporting
arena.
You
can
see
that
it
continues
to
be
a
bigger
part
of
our
industry's
business
and
Watertown
is
being
left
out
of
this,
this
graphic
so
putting
it
simply,
it's
all
about
efficiency
and
market
access,
and
we
believe
everybody
comes
away
with
wins
from
this
project.
S
Certainly
the
BNSF
wins
and
I.
Think
rail
service
is
important
to
Watertown
I.
Think
glacial
lakes.
Energy
is
very
important
to
rail
service
in
Watertown.
We
probably
I,
don't
know
the
exact
number,
but
I
would
I
would
say
we're
close
to
95%
of
the
shipping
volume
that
leaves
Watertown
South
Dakota,
and
without
that
volume
you
know
they
they
would
need
to
look
at
there
they're
either
the
shipping
rates
would
be
much
much
higher
or
they
would.
You
know
to
maintain
that
line.
S
S
We
think
the
city
is
a
winner
and
I,
but
you
know
touched
on
this
a
little
bit,
but
your
some
of
the
things
that
we
think
the
the
city
would
benefit
from
the
general
public.
This
is
something
that
you
know.
You
asked
mr.
chairman
about
this
earlier,
and
so
we
want
to
go
into
this
a
little
bit
more,
but
we
certainly
think
the
general
public
will
come
out
on
top
on
this
on
this
project
and
here's
what
mr.
S
S
Well,
I
won't
guarantee
that
they
won't
happen
but
I.
Let's
let
me
get
through
the
next
couple
of
slides
and
we'll,
let's,
let's
revisit
that
issue
less
overall,
train
time
at
grade
crossings
can
benefit
commuters
and
other
surface
street
street
traffic
and
here's
a
schematic
of
the
of
the
of
the
design.
If
you
look,
you
know,
I'll
use
this
pointer
here.
Here's
two
twelve
right
up
here.
S
So,
let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
these
crossings.
The
current
situation
is,
as
I
mentioned,
where
a
signal
car
facility
we
get
serviced
twice
per
week
and
we
just
called
the
the
local
train
master.
Who
was
on
his
way
in
the
town
today,
and
we
asked
him
the
question
when
you
bring
service
in
on
a
Tuesday
or
a
Friday.
How
many
times
do
you
cross
to
12?
S
He
said
four
to
five,
so
that's
four
to
five:
every
time
they
come
to
town
or
eight
to
ten
per
week.
Well,
if
you
take
that
over
a
month's
course,
you've
got
thirty
to
forty
crossing
events
on
to
twelve
and
basically
what
happens
is
and
we've
all
been
there
you're
sitting
in
212
at
212
at
the
crossing
and
the
train
is
headed
north
and
you're.
S
S
So
the
unit
train,
the
loops,
are
caret
capable
of
holding
an
entire
train
trains,
pull
in
with
minimal
interruptions.
That's
part
of
the
concept
and
they
leave
with
minimal
interruptions
they
hook
and
go.
They
hook
up
in
our
loop
they'll
take
off
and
if
we're
sitting
there,
we're
gonna
sit
there
for
96
cars,
but
they'll
keep
moving.
They
won't
do
this
jockeying
back
and
forth.
Once
they're
gone,
they're
gone
so
they're,
based
on
what
we
see
in
Mynaa,
there
will
be
approximately
twelve
crossing
events
per
month
from.
S
S
44
persons
during
the
middle
of
the
night,
and
and
it's
interesting
because
these
things
come
and
I've
got
that
the
actual
times
they
come
in
at
all
times.
They
leave
at
all
times,
they'll
come
in
at
1:00
in
the
morning
so
and
these
are
only
our
ethanol
unit,
trains.
Our
DDG
units
would
look
very
similar
to
this.
There's
no
distinction
times
for
an
ethanol
train
in
a
in
a
DDG
unit,
so
I
hope,
I've
answered
your
question.
We've
gone
from
30
to
40
per
month
down
to
12.
L
Interruptions
so
if
I'm
understanding
you
Jim
the
reduction
in
the
train
traffic
across
highway
212
is
because
of
the
elimination
of
the
staging
thing.
You're
talking
about
they're
still
gonna,
the
Train
will
still
cross
212,
as
it
arrives
to
across
to
12
leaves,
but
the
staging
that
you're
talking
about
that
would
be
eliminated
by
virtue
of
the
loop.
Is
that.
S
It
would
yes
the
other
thing
that
we
we
know
to
be
true
as
right
now
the
service
is
usually
during
the
week.
Some
of
these
unit
trains
do
arrive
and
and
in
a
I'm
not
sure
if
they
depart
they
depart
on
Saturday
I'm,
not
sure
if
they
depart
on
Sunday,
but
you
will
get
some
weekend
mixture
in
there
too.
So
you
know
it's
it's
much
more
random.
It's
not
this!
Well!
I'm
late
for
work
or
I'm
gonna
run
here
at
noon
hour.
Here's
the
train
sitting
there,
it's
it's!
S
Okay,
so
as
part
of
this
project,
we've
become
aware
of
really
a
number
of
issues
and
what
we
hope
to
kind
of
inform
the
committee
of
what
we're
doing
to
address
these
issues.
Potential
issue
number
one
we're
working
with
affected
businesses:
businesses
we've
reached
out
to
litter,
River
City
we're
trying
to
develop
a
diversification
and
promotion
plan
with
them.
They
currently
do
not
have
what
we
call
blender
pumps.
We
would
love
that
they
there's
a
program
out
there
in
the
governor's
office
of
economic
development.
S
We
would
love
for
them
to
take
advantage
of
that
program
and
that
way
we
could
use
that
location
as
a
means
to
promote
hey.
They
have
blender
pumps,
they
have
higher
blends
of
ethanol,
go
visit,
Little,
River,
City
and
we've
got
that
with
a
number
of
folks
in
town
that
have
blender
pumps,
so
we
would
make
that
available
to
them.
S
We
were
made
aware
of
Hesco
egress,
a
situation
in
case
of
emergency
I've
been
working
with
Jeff
Heinrich
on
that
and
I
think.
We've
resolved
that
around
the
perimeter
of
these
tracks
and
there's
gonna
be
one
large
loop
for
tracks
on
that
loop.
There's
a
13
foot
wide
access,
road
or
service
road
in
the
in
the
case
of
high
water
or
some
issue
that
developed
we
would
in
emergency.
We
would
give
Hesco
access
to
that
that
road,
either
via
the
lock
gate
or
a
remote
control
or
something
so
he
could.
S
He
and
his
business
could
can
continue
at
least
on
a
temporary
basis,
and-
and
you
know
he
I
met
with
him
this
past
week
and
he
seems
amenable
to
that
solution.
I
do
have
an
email
from
of
support
from
Dakota
bodies
back
in
oh
I,
think
the
first
time
we
came
before
City
Council
and
essentially
mr.
ort
house
of
Dakota
body,
said
you
know
if
it
helps
you
out
we're
all
for
it.
We've
got
a
great
relationship
with
Dakota
bodies.
We,
you
know,
there's,
there's
we're
neighbors.
S
We
work
together
when
we
can,
on
certain
things,
potential
issue.
Number
two
is
working
to
address
flood
concerns.
Excuse
me
we're
working
on
a
zero
rise,
designation
and
in
our
eyes
that's
what
it
needs
to
be.
It
needs
to
be
zero
rise
or
better.
It
can't
be
more
restrictive
than
what
we
have
now.
We
do
have
a
waterway
through
the
middle,
designed
as
it
is
right
now
we
have
a
waterway
through
the
middle
of
the
property,
which
follows
the
lowest
elevations
and
there's
box
culverts
under
each
of
the
tracks.
S
I'll
show
you
that
here
in
a
minute-
and
we
have
FEMA
approval
as
pending
potential
issue,
number
three
we're
working
to
address
bridge
concerns.
We
have
a
lower
cost
option
in
front
of
the
city
engineer's
office
and
in
the
mayor's
office
other
than
the
one
point.
Six
million
dollar
complete
replacement.
We,
but
we
again
when
they've
been
working
with
us
in
engineering
on
that
they
are
the
ones
that
had
wait,
limited
the
bridge
and-
and
so
we
do
have
an
option
in
front
of
the
city
engineer.
S
This.
This
option
would
eliminate
weight
limits
and
allow
Hesco
to
have
unlimited
service
across
that
bridge.
Potential
issue
number
four:
we're
working
to
minimize
environmental
impact.
I
do
plan
a
visit
with
the
NRCS
I
haven't
been
up
there
yet
and
I've
been
up
there
for
a
while,
but
I
guess
the
last
time.
I
was
up
there
when
we
first
started
this
process.
I
wanted
to
understand
wetlands
a
little
bit
and
I
knew
quickly
found
out
we'd
be
going
through
wetlands.
S
The
plan
has
wetland
mitigation
built
into
it.
We've
I've
sent
a
message
to
the
mayor's
office.
A
couple
of
weeks
ago,
I
had
heard
that
the
city
was
interested
in
established
in
a
wetland
Bank,
so
we're
exploring
some
possibilities
of
that
on
this
property,
and
you
know
really
there's
some
tilled
ground
back
there
in
that
loop.
I,
don't
know
that
we
have
any
interest
in
trying
to
lease
that
out.
We
would
like
to
minimize
the
activity
inside
that
loop
as
much
as
possible.
S
A
You
Jim
I
got
some
questions
for
you
Shane
and
the
the
O.
The
public
hearing
is
still
open.
If
any
one
I
also
like
to
come
up
and
speak
with
it
Shane
when
it
comes
to,
can
you
Joe
yeah
there
you
go
Jeff.
Can
you
kind
of
show
us
you
know
I
like
to
tackle
the
flood
side
of
it
once
from
the
city
side
as
to
what
control
facilities
are
in
there
now
and
what's
going
to
be
there
when
they're
finished
biggest
concern
would
be?
A
K
What
their
plan
is
to
do
they've,
design
or
they're
engineers
designed
a
path
for
the
water
inside
the
track,
so
it
it
allows
water
to
continue
to
pass
through
the
over
the
whole
interior
portion
of
that,
if
need
be,
and
the
Lords
of
once
the
waters
in
there
can
flow
out
as
wide
as
it
ever
did
before
the
rails.
In.
K
A
K
N
What's
the
timeline
on
that,
you
know
the
bridge
you
were
talking
about
that
it
can
be
Hesco
appropriate
and
not
truck
limit
appropriate.
What
would
the
timeline
be
to
get
that,
so
that
is
a
major
factor
for
Hesco
that
they,
as
initially
they
said
they
couldn't
use
that
bridge
because
of
the
weight
limit.
So
what
would
the
timeline
be
there?
Certainly
before
Jim
would
get
started
on
this?
Well.
K
We
don't
have
a
exact
timeline
identified
yet,
but
first
thing
that
has
to
happen
is
out
of
these
public
hearings
that
we're
having
right
now
is,
if
we're
going
to
go
forward
with
a
vacation
or
something,
then
that
changes
the
level
of
need
for
that
bridge
that
operates
near
Hesco
right
now.
That
bridge
is
weight
rated
at
a
lower
level
of
service
than
a
full
legal
truck.
So
right
now,
ESCO
is
operating
by
eunuch,
utilizing
the
route
to
the
south
and
getting
on
the
bypass.
K
So
if
we
proceed
with
this
project,
we'll
have
to
identify
the
level
of
service
that
the
bridge
would
be
reconstructed
at
on
the
north
end,
and
that's
certainly
not
going
to
be
something
that
happens
in
a
matter
of
a
month
or
something
like
that.
It's
still
going
to
be
take
some
time.
There
hasn't
even
been
anything
other
than
a
preliminary
engineering
evaluation.
As
far
as
what
the
potential
levels
of
service
are,
what
the
estimated
costs
are.
S
Water
way,
if
you
can
see
that
there
are
three
large
box
culverts
under
the
tracks
here
and
here,
and
so
the
waterway
does
make
its
way
through
the
middle
of
the
property.
This
is
the
flood
way
line,
so
you
can
see
nicely
that
you
know
water
in
a
high
water
event
and
I'm,
not
an
engineer,
but
I
would
presume
it'll
make
its
way
through
down
the
river
as
it
did
before
and
then
also
come
through
here,
and
so
we're
designing
this
with.
D
S
In
mind
so
project
impact
our
project
timeline
right
here.
This
is
this:
is
our
our
goals.
I
know
they're
aggressive,
but
we
want
to
try
to
get
this
thing
in
the
use,
at
least
by
the
end
of
next
year,
in
compliance
with
the
Chairman's
request,
we'll
kind
of
skip
over
these
slides.
But
you
know
it's
really
all
about
efficiency
for
us
and
competitiveness,
and
certainly
I'll
leave
this
slide
up
there.
If
there's
any
other
questions.
Thank.
A
A
K
Well,
it
certainly
functions.
Obviously
it's
taking
about
1,100
vehicles
a
day
across
it,
so
it
can
maintain
that
level
of
service
as
far
as
overall
service
versus
expense
I
mean
this
is
a
fairly
expensive
segment
of
road
in
our
system,
because
it
does
have
a
bridge
on
the
north
end
and
it
has
a
box
culvert
bridge
on
the
south
end
both
which
have
been
or
in
our
short
term,
planning
to
be
replaced.
K
If
the
level,
if
the
road
is
going
to
be
maintained,
there's
going
to
be
Newbridge
at
the
north
end
and
if
we
design
it
for
the
level
of
service
that
we
currently
have
that's
a
1.6
million
dollar
repair-
and
you
know
we
have
a
probably
a
half
a
million
or
dollar
repair
on
the
box
cover
at
the
south
end.
So
and
really
all
this
segment
does
is
allows
people
to
travel
across
the
land.
A
So
I'll
make
a
statement
say
if
we
put
our
plan.
Commission
hats
on
our
Planning
and
Zoning
adds
we
as
a
zoning
board
in
a
Planning
Board.
We
we
design
the
arterial
streets
that
collect
your
streets
to
move
traffic
since
we've
got
the
bypass
built
and
with
the
new
construction
in
the
development.
That's
going
to
happen
on
212.
This
is
basically
considered
a
shortcut.
It's
correct
because.
A
A
We
in
in
retrospect
we
look
back
and
say
now
with
all
the
new
development.
This
is
kind
of
the
shortcut,
that's
correct,
so
we
have
to
decide
as
a
board
whether
it's
something
that
we
want
to
continue
to
maintain
as
a
shortcut.
But
the
one
thing
I
do
want
to
make
sure
is
that
we're
not
adversely
affecting
any
businesses
specifically
Hesco
to
make
sure
that
if
we,
if
we
vacate
the
property
that
we
don't
abandon
Hesco
in
that
bridge
because
their
only
access
in
as
the
Northbridge
correct.
K
E
H
Can't
answer
for
sure,
but
most
of
their
heavy
traffic
probably
has
gone
south
for
quite
a
few
years,
and
now,
with
the
new,
with
that
new
bypass,
it's
probably
all
gone
south
and
I
were
going
to
force
at
all
north
and
that's
kind
of
a
sharp
intersection
error.
Those
trucks
gonna
be
able
to
make
that
corner.
If
you
looked
at
that
intersection
with.
J
H
K
And
I've
been
looking
at
that
with
DoD,
because
that's
the
first
segment
of
212
they're
gonna
reconfigure-
or
you
know
here
in
the
next
3-4
years-
and
we've
talked
about
that
too-
and
we're
gonna
maintain
the
turning
radiuses
for
a
full
length
truck
so
that
we
don't
bottleneck
that
and
and
of
course,
the
traffic
counts
going
to
south
and
coming
out
of
there
from
the
north
will
be
greatly
reduced.
So
there'll
be
less
conflicts
with
other
vehicles
in
that
intersection
from
the
south
as
well.
So.
L
K
S
A
D
N
A
M
K
K
S
F
Just
so
we're
clear
the
cotton
County
Regional
Rail
Authority
met
a
couple
months
ago
with
the
with
one
of
the
items
in
front
of
it,
and
mr.
Jim
sits
on
that
board.
He's
one
of
the
voting
members
of
the
Coddington
Regional
Rail
Authority.
One
of
the
items
that
was
in
front
of
them
was
consideration
of
whether
or
not
they
wanted
to
take
ownership
of
the
rail
spur.
Because
currently
the
city
owns
the
rail
spur
and
it
is
it's
there.
F
It
exists
by
virtue
of
a
track
access
agreement
that
Burlington
Northern
has
granted
to
the
city
of
Watertown
that
the
the
cotton
County
Regional
Rail
Authority
has
the
legal
authority
to
own
rail
Spurs
like
that.
If
they
want
to,
but
it
was
presented
to
the
board
and
they
decided
that
they
didn't
need
to
or
want
to
own
it,
they
can
still
see
clone
monies
from
the
state
railroad
Authority,
so
they
didn't,
they
didn't
see
any
need
to
own
it.
So
currently
the
city
of
Watertown
owns
that
that
rail
spur
we
are
still
the
owner.
F
A
U
I'm
rock
McGilvery
I'm
part
owner
in
Little,
River
City,
as
Jim
said,
they
have
discussed
some
of
the
potential
things
we
could
do,
but
we
are
seriously
concerned
with
the
traffic
impact
I
realized.
Once
the
bypass
was
built.
It
went
from
two
thousand
to
a
thousand
cars,
but
if
you
were
that
business
in
the
corner,
that
thousand
cars
matters
or
1,100
nod
cars,
there's
plenty
of
business
from
Dakota
bodies,
south
Pelican
residents
and
I
know
it's
minor,
but
you
know
how
many,
how
many
people
come
from
the
South
had
access
downtown
through
Bart?
D
Girl
key
chip
Prima's,
walked
on
Fire
Department
this
this
development
or
track
planning.
It's
not
going
to
affect
our
response,
and
when
bonus
to
this
is
there,
they
store
a
lot
of
tanks,
downtown
track
cars,
paint
cars
and,
with
this
new
round
spur
it'll,
be
they
won't
be
storing
those
cars
downtown
anymore
and
that's
a
that's
a
bonus
for
Public
Safety.
R
R
Make
Davis
on
the
way
in
on
this
just
a
little
bit,
because
I
carried
a
petition
to
keep
the
police
station
downtown
to
try,
keep
Watertown
viable
and
if
we
keep
closing
streets,
I
mean
I,
know
we're
gonna
close
First
Avenue,
because
we
sold
that
out
to
the
railroad
and
I.
Don't
know
if
these
guys
can
split
those
unit
trains
so
that
they
can
keep
that
access
open
while
they're
waiting
to
move
it
out.
I,
don't
I
know
nothing
about
that.
I
only
thing
I
know
is
I.
R
A
S
Well,
we're
kind
of
taking
the
marching
orders
from
the
Burlington
Northern
here
and
they
they
have
indicated
that
they
do
not
want
the
trains
split
of
that
like
that
they
would
actually
be
split
twice
and
their
concept
again.
Coming
back
to
the
efficiency
aspect,
their
concept
is
hook
up,
charge
up
the
air
brakes
and
go,
and
so,
when
you
start
to
introduce
all
these,
these
other
types
of.
S
What-Ifs
they
start
to
drag
their
feet.
You
know,
unfortunately,
I
wish
there
was
another
way.
I
wish.
We
had
a
little
more
influence
over
the
Burlington
Northern,
but
we
don't
and
they
are
our
only
railroad
and
we
kind
of
do
what
they
tell
us
to
do
and
I
think
both
from
a
business
and
from
a
community.
That
might
be
the
way
it
is.
Thank.
A
You
anything
else
in
the
public
with
that
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion.
The
one
thing
I
want
to
make
notes.
Since
it's
been
a
while,
since
we
started
talking
about
it,
the
two
things
that
I
probably
need
to
be
added
with
emotion
is
with
the
bridge
reconstruction
to
accommodate
Hesco
and
with
an
utility
easement
for
municipal
utilities.
If
we
vacate
that
road
we're
going
to
need,
a
utility
easement
for
the
utilities
is
asked
for
an
easement,
so
I'll
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion.
A
H
H
A
question
and
I'm
not
sure
who
it
before
maybe
it's
more
than
a
comment
and
a
question
but
I
know
it
seems,
like
you
know,
you're
really
going
out
of
the
way
to
accommodate
testicle,
and
you
heard
the
comments
from
Little
River
City
here
it'd
be
nice.
If
you
could
get
in
a
little
more
dialogue
with
them
and
see
if,
if
and
what,
if,
there's
anything
that
we
could
do
because
it
will
take,
we
all
know
it
will
take
traffic
away
from
their
front
of
their
business.
H
S
Oil
under
pumps,
yeah,
I,
think
a
couple
of
things
and,
first
of
all,
I
guess
I
want
to
just
my
own
perception
and
I.
Don't
want
this
to
come
across
the
wrong
way.
There
are
successful
convenience
stores
in
town
that
are
not
on
a
major
intersection
and
that
little
River
City
was
in
business
prior
to
Dakota
bodies
being
there.
So
that
aside,
we
are
working
with
them
and
we
really
you
know:
we've
we've
I,
think
we've
bent
over
backwards,
trying
to
get
them
into
this
state
program.
S
S
You
know
where
we
would
maybe
spell
out
some
various
promotions
and
various
things
that
we
would
do
to
try
to
drive
some
of
some
of
our
shareholders,
some
of
our
general
public.
That
supports
us
in
all
that
direction,
as
we
do
with
the
other.
Businesses
that
have
the
ethanol
pumps
absolutely
would
be
all
in
favor
of
that
we,
our
goal
is
really
to
try
to
help
them
diversify.
S
A
You
you
know,
one
thing,
I
have
to
say
is
it:
it
gets
hard
as
a
community
and
a
planning
board.
You
try
to
be
progressive
and
you
try
to
adapt.
But
it's
always
it's
always
tough.
When
you
put
a
new
stretch
of
road
in
somewhere
and
in
the
driving
habits,
change,
there's
many
cases,
you
don't
think
about
those
good
old
businesses
that
have
been
there
forever
and
now
people
are,
but
it's
just
kind
of
growing
pains
of
a
community
when
you,
when.
G
A
Q
A
Q
A
Can
I
can
do
it
there?
There's
there's
been
a
Supreme
Court
decision
in
regard
to
signage
as
to
whether
or
not
you
can
govern
the
I
would
say,
content
or
the
message
of
a
sign
and
in
our
ordinance
first
district
felt
that
we
were
governing
the
message
of
our
signs
by
referring
to
them
as
on
or
off
premises
and
using
different
different
different
regulations
for
on
and
off
or
in
their
opinion
illegal.
So
there's
a
committee
that's
put
together
I'm
on
it,
Tim's
on
it.
A
couple
to.
A
Honor
they're
just
going
to
go
through
it
and
then
they'll
they'll
go
through
that
make
their
recommendations
of
any
changes,
bring
it
to
us.
So
we'll
all
see
it
and
then
we'll
get
to
flush
it
out
and
see
what
we
want
to
do
and
what
we
don't
want
to
do.
They
meet
we
meet
once
a
week.
We're
gonna
try
to
have
it
done
by
March.
I
believe.
Wasn't
that
the
date
that.
T
This
is
a
business
okay,
down
Highway
20,
how
many
people
are
around
the
members
are
aware
of
this
business,
but
we
had
sent
a
letter,
an
initial
letter
to
this
business
back
in
November,
till
November,
I,
think
and
and
I
got
got
zero
response.
Then
we
sent
a
certified
letter
in
December
got
zero
response
and
it
was
in
regards
to
their
signage
on
their
property.
As
you
can
see,
three
bill.
T
Three:
three
banners
on
this
side,
multiple
flags,
things
of
that
nature-
and
this
here
was
their
biggest
reason
for
it
was
this
on
on
license
not
on
license.
Excuse
me,
permitted
sign
that
sign
has
since
been
pulled
back
to
the
rear
of
the
property
and
is
no
longer
out
there.
So
we
didn't
get
a
response,
but
we
got
some
compliance
out
of
them,
but
the
reason
we're
kind
of
here
is
is
these
flags
are
obviously
very
different
states
of
disrepair.
T
They
have
a
lot
of
signage.
That's
not
technically
legal
they're
allowed
one
banner
on
the
building
and
one
freestanding
banner
on
the
property.
They
have
multiple.
They
have
three
on
that
side
and
I.
Think
there's
a
couple
on
this
side.
You
can't
necessarily
see
in
the
pictures
and
all
the
flags
need
to
be.
The
flags
are
allowed,
but
they
need
to
be
kept
in
repair,
so
I
guess
really.
T
What
we're
here
for
is
is
a
recommendation
or
a
buy-in,
maybe
as
the
retract
word
of
how
aggressively
we
want
to
pursue
these
kind
of
things
around
town.
This
is
an
example
and
there's
a
few,
maybe
a
few
other
ones.
If
anybody
wants
to
point
them
out,
they
sure
welcome.
But
what
do
we
do
with
something
like
this
awesome
in.
A
A
Look
and
go
if
we,
if
we
put
in
ordinance
together,
we're
90
percent
of
the
people,
aren't
in
compliance.
We
got
to
relook
at
our
ordinance,
but
if
we
put
it,
you
know
if
I
was
a
business
owner
and
I
am
and
you
drive
down,
and
somebody
is
not
paying
attention
to
the
ordinance
or
just
blew
it
off.
It's
not
fair
to
those
that
are
you
know.
There's
businesses
across
the
street
one
is
a
sub
shop
and
things
like
that
right.
L
Now
should
they
do
that
right
and
to
speak
to
your
point,
Pat
I
think
what
you're
getting
at
is
is
I.
Think
this
this
board
would
be
all
in
favor
of
supporting
enforcing
these.
But
all
right,
you
know
is
this:
is
this
individual
business
being
singled
out
as
one
as
one
of
two
or
two
or
three
or
four
violators,
or
is
you
know
just
this?
The
worst
case
example
and
that's
why
it's
come
up
on
the
radar,
but
there's
many
businesses,
perhaps
that
aren't
in
compliance.
T
We
have
we
have
a
little
bit.
Here's
one
of
these.
We
call
them
feather
banners
of
weather,
that's
what
they're
called
or
not
I've
had
and
refer
to
me
by
companies
as
that,
as
such
they're
gray,
I
would
say
at
best
in
the
ordinance
presently
on
what
whether
they're
allowed
or
disallowed
write
them
as
a
banner.
Do
you
count
them
as
a
flag?
Do
you
count
them
as
what
do
you
count?
Ament.
A
T
T
A
H
C
T
M
I'd
like
to
make
a
comment
on
your
question
about:
should
you
pursue
this
or
not?
We
do
have
an
ordinance
on
the
books
that
they
work
very
hard
and
long
on
I
think
we
should
have
forced
that
ordinance
if
we're
not
going
to
enforce
the
ordinance,
there's
no
sense
having
one
but
there's
a
lot
of
businesses
out
there
that
are
in
compliance,
and
we
owe
it
to
those
businesses
to
bring
everyone
into
compliance.