►
From YouTube: BOA & PlanCommission Meetings 03 10 2016
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
A
Thank
you
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
February
2000
February
18
2016
minutes
could
I
get
a
motion
in
a
second
motion
by
mr.
Dahle
second
by
mr.
stone
burger
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
second
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
applicant
Ryan
Ryan
wanna
permit
number
one
six,
five,
four:
seven
seeking
a
conditional
use
to
operating
in
home
transfer
print
business
out
of
a
multi-family
dwelling
located
at
303,
first
Avenue
Southwest
apartment
five.
B
A
Before
we
get
going,
I've
talked
to
when
I
saw
this
I
saw
home
occupation
and
a
multi
residential
facility,
which
I
didn't
realize
we
allowed
our
home
occupations
in
the
past
has
always
been
in
a
single-family
residence
and,
as
I
looked
through,
I
thought.
Why
did
they
in
a
way
when
we
wrote
this?
Why
did
we
do
this?
The
reasoning
was:
is
it's?
It's
always
been
designed
for
a
single
family
unit,
not
a
multi-family
unit,
but
we
do
have
many
single
family
units
in
the
are
three
multi-family
zones.
A
So
the
reason
that
our
three
is
opened
up
for
home-based
occupation.
It
wasn't
because
we
encouraged
them
in
a
multi-unit
facility.
It's
because
we
have
single-family
dwellings
in
the
our
three
zone.
I
did
make
a
call
to
chip
over
at
the
fire
department
to
say
what
exactly
where
we
add
on
this
from
the
from
a
fire
standpoint.
What
the
explanation
he
gave
me
is
anytime.
The
usage
changes
in
a
building
that
building
now
has
to
meet
the
current
fire
code,
which
this
building
currently
does
not.
Is
that
still
correct?
A
E
Chip
pretty
much
walked
on
fire
rescue
yeah
when
the
you're
correct
on
that
when
to
use
changes
of
a
building,
you
know
it
has
to
be
brought
to
current
code
and
one
thing
about
the
the
residential
are
to,
which
is
an
apartment.
Multi-Family
dwelling,
it's
the
highest
risk,
80%
of
fatalities
and
loss,
happens
in
these
types
of
occupancy,
so
the
code
is
really
protective
on
trying
to
mix
that
use
up.
F
A
A
Well,
that's,
okay,
if
you're
in
a
single-family
home,
but
if
you're
in
a
six
or
12
unit
apartment
building,
what
would
normally
not
be
intrusive
to
one
you
know
to
you
and
your
own
home
is
very
intrusive
when
you're
in
there
and
that's
kind
of
the
from
this
board
standpoint,
that's
the
thing
we
have
to
think
about
more
of
long-term
than
short-term.
But
that's
just
my
point
on
it.
But
public
hearing
is
open.
If
anyone
wants
to
speak
in
favor
or
against
the
conditional
use.
B
G
Name
is
Glen
wengie
and
I
am
a
vocational
job,
coach
and
I
work
with
Ryan
I
understand
the
sprinkler
system
and
everything,
but
as
far
as
like
the
multi
residential
building,
they
all
are
people
supported
that
live
in
there.
There
is
24/7
care
there.
You
know,
so
it
wouldn't
be.
Like
he's
gonna
be
doing
this,
you
know
on
his
own
and
stuff
like
that.
You
know
be
no
different
than
running
an
iron
and
leaving
the
iron
on
basically
causalities
of
the
big
one.
There's
no
chemicals,
because
we're
not
doing
the
screen
printing
with
him
do.
A
G
You
know
my
supervisor.
The
goal
is
to
make
get
everybody
self-sufficient
and
supporting
themselves.
That's
a
trend,
that's
going
nationwide,
and
this
is
something
that
Ryan
has
basically
dreamed
of
doing
that
coming
up
with
his
own
t-shirt,
sayings
and
imprinting
them.
The
only
thing
is
Ryan
does
need
care,
I
mean
that,
like
you
know,
daily
on
a
daily
basis,
I
mean
his
sister's.
Here
she
probably
tell
you
more,
but
then
I
can,
but
you
know
he's
he's
supported
by
his
family.
G
G
E
Yeah
I
guess
the
concern
is
multifamily
dwellings.
You
know,
like
I,
say
about
80%
of
the
fatalities
and
loss
of
property
happened
in
these
these
these
buildings,
and
you
know
we
we
let
one
building.
Do
this
one
person
do
this,
then
you
know:
do
we
let
all
the
other
multifamily
dwellings
you
know,
have
businesses
in
them.
That's
a
concern
very
much
for
the
fire
department
and.
A
E
B
There's
probably
about
four
or
five
years
back
when
they
required
the
sprinkler
systems
to
be
it
used
to
be
16
or
more,
no
one
down
to
eight
or
more
and
then
by
the
national
quota,
went
down
to
anything,
that's
considered,
multifamily,
that's
three
or
more.
The
state
of
South
Dakota
modified
that
regulation.
A
couple
years
back
to
be
more
than
five
units
must
be
sprinkler
and.
H
A
C
I
Were
just
discussing
here
that
it
wasn't
I
processed
this
and
it
wasn't
clear
to
me
that
it
was
an
actually
it's
an
actual
group
home,
that's
supervised,
24
hours
a
day.
Okay
I
didn't
know
that,
so
it
may
be
something
that
you
might
consider
tabling.
Maybe
we
could
do
a
little
more
research
and
this
might
be
allowed
as
an
accessory
use.
I'm.
A
A
She's,
an
independent
person
just
like
any
other
land
owner
out
there,
and
you
were
in
all
six
apartments
from
her
yes
and
it's
supervised
by
one
year,
people
not
just
his
apartment.
All
six
apartments,
no
different
than
one
of
the
buildings
on
First
Avenue
I
would
I
would
I
would
be
open
to
a
table
on
that.
So
we
can
discuss
it
further
because
it's
we
need
to
look
into
our
code.
You
know
what
we
don't
want
to
have
happen.
A
Is
that
because
we
let
one
multi-unit
facility
have
it
if
all
of
them
are
gonna
be
painted
with
the
same
brush,
but
this
is
a
little
different
if
it's
a
if
it's
a
group
home
which
to
me
is
more
of
a
commercial
like
exposure
man,
we
need
to
find
out
who's
managing
and
how
they're
managing
it-
and
you
know
if
Human
Service
came
in
and
said:
hey
we
do
this.
This
is
our
business,
and
these
people
are
under
our
super
vision
and
they're,
going
to
do
some
things
as
the
way
you're
saying
it.
G
A
G
A
You
be
opposed
if
we
tabled
it
until
our
next
meeting,
so
we
could
take
a
look.
A
little
closer
had
to
like
I
said
what
we
just
don't
want
to
do
is
if
it's,
if
it's
just
an
everyday
apartment,
building,
there's
nothing
that
stops
anyone
from
coming
in
to
operate
a
daycare
out
of
a
two-bedroom
apartment
with
24
units.
This
may
be
a
little
different
and
I
think
we
would
like
to
look
at
it
for.
G
G
No
Pete
when
we
talked
to
voc
rehab
gentlemen.
He
basically
said
you
know
whatever
you
can
do
to
get
it.
You
know
I
mean
basically
to
set
it
up.
You
know
if
we
have
to
rent
a
building
which
it's
it's
more
than
a
hobby
I
mean
it's
something
that
he's
gonna
try
to
make
a
living
off
of,
but
it's
something
that
he
has
wanted
to
do,
and
you
know
then
that's
what
voc
rehab
does
is
helps
fulfill
the
dreams
and
stuff
like
that
and
give
them.
You
know
the
ability
to
do
things
queen.
G
H
H
A
I
think
we'd
use
a
motion
to
table
it,
so
we
can
investigate
it.
A
little
further
I
was
under
the
understanding.
It
was
just
a
standard,
everyday
apartment,
building
that
one
person
that
you
supervised
was
renting
one
of
those
six
apartments.
It's
it's
almost
will
look
into
our
zoning
a
little
bit
to
see
if.
K
A
E
C
A
B
You
bought
did
it
for
me
already
again
the
light
manufactures,
listen
conditionally
used
in
the
C
three
highway:
commercial
district
per
city,
zoning
ordinance,
section.
Twenty
one
point:
two:
eight,
oh
three
fourteen
such
conditional
use
may
be
approved,
subject
to
compliance
with
2100,
202
and
definitions.
In
other
conditions,
borders
made
it
seem
necessary
again
they're.
Just
it's
a
very
light
manufacturing.
It's
a
real
small
I'll.
Let
him
explain.
Another
party
is
but
I.
A
B
L
B
M
B
A
B
E
M
I
A
M
A
M
A
B
B
Garage
considered
attached
because
it's
within
10
feet
for
this
this
room
here
at
that
time,
you
know,
we
noticed
that
there
was
a
big
right
away
and
the
board
had
asked
him
to
go
out
and
try
and
see
if
he
could
get
the
neighbors
to
go
and
go
hoots
with
him
and
and
go
for
a
vacation,
a
part
of
that
property.
Well,
none
of
them
wanted
to
do
any
additional
property
or
any
additional
taxes,
or
anything
else
so
and
now
he's
back
for
the
before
the
board.
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
A
B
B
A
B
B
A
B
B
A
What
do
you
need
us
to
do?
One
on
this?
Do
we
need
to
open
a
public
hearing?
Actually
we
didn't.
We
didn't
public
hearings
already
been
opened
and
closed,
so
we
would
just
need
a
motion
in
a
second
for
a
discussion
to
move
forward
from
there
because
it
hasn't
been
re
notified
to
the
neighbors.
So
we
wouldn't
do
it
as
a
public
hearing
you'd.
A
J
So
so,
to
be
clear,
then,
for
those
of
us
that
were
at
that
meeting
and
for
the
reasons
that
were
just
address
relevant
to
the
set
acts
and
everything
else.
Obviously
the
board
was
not
comfortable
in
granting
a
variance
at
that
point.
Nothing
has
changed
now
other
than
the
applicant
was
not
successful
in
getting
the
property.
You
know
the
surrounding
property
vacated,
rather
than
that
nothing
has
changed
from
from
the
from
the
first
time
that
was
in
front
of
the
board
front
in
front
of
this
board
and.
A
A
A
H
L
F
F
A
B
B
A
B
A
A
E
M
A
D
E
A
Thank
you
first
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
approval
of
the
agenda?
I
need
a
motion
in
a
second
motion
by
mr.
Steiner
Stein
second
by
mr.
stone,
burger
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
a
second
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
approval
of
the
minutes
from
February
4th
2016
I
get
a
motion
motion
by
mr.
Stein?
Thank
you
by
mr.
Hanson.
All
in
favor,
say.
Aye
opposed
motion
carries
third
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
a
wood
subdivision,
plat
Commission
action,
its
resolution
2016?
D
I
have
the
picture
of
the
property
up
on
the
screen.
Currently,
it
is
a
planted
lot.
The
whole
thing
is
plotted
as
lot
nine
of
endres
industrial
addition
and
it's
currently
zoned
I
one
light
industrial
district.
The
lot
is
approximately
one
hundred
and
seven
thousand
square
feet
and
already
has
a
building.
That's
about
10,000
square
feet,
conforming
located
on
it
and
what
the
applicant
would
like
to
do
is
they
would
like
to
split
it
into
two
Lots
approximately,
where
I
drew
this
red
line,
having
a
lot
on
the
east
and
a
lot
on
the
west.
D
Normally
subdivisions
like
this
can
be
done.
Administrative
Lea,
but
in
this
particular
case
we're
bringing
it
to
you
because
the
the
lot
on
the
west
will
be
completely
conforming.
Eighty
thousand
seven
hundred
twenty-eight
square
feet,
but
this
Lots
to
the
east
will
be
below
our
minimum
30,000
square
foot
area
for
the
I
1
zone.
D
It'll
have
a
it'll
have
26,000
832
square
feet
and
since
it
doesn't
meet
our
our
minimum
area,
where
we're
bringing
it
to
you,
the
reason
that
the
applicant
put
the
lot
line
where
he
did
is
there
is
a
20
foot,
wide
utility
easement
that
has
storm
sewer
running
in
it.
So
he
put
that
lot
line
right
on
the
middle
of
that
easement.
So
that's
that's
the
reasoning
for
the
location
of
that
line.
So.
H
D
Ya,
build
on
this
line
would
have
to
be
moved
over
approximately
17
feet
to
be
conforming
lot
and
if
it
was
moved
over
17
feet,
the
the
easement
it
would
be
7
feet
there
wouldn't
be
an
easement,
but
that'd
be
part
of
the
setback
and
then
there'd
be
20
feet.
That
would
be
part
of
the
the
easement.
So
then
it
effectively
it
changes
his.
What
would
normally
be
a
20
foot
side
yard
setback
into
a
27
foot,
side,
yard
setback.
So
that's,
but.
A
D
Yeah,
how
many
I
have
I
have
this
picture
all
open
right
now,
as
we
can
see,
these
dashed
lines
are
the
easement
and
it's
straddling
it
perfectly
in
the
middle
10
feet
of
easement
on
each
side
and
in
order
to
make
lot
to
have
the
required
area,
the
line
would
have
to
be
moved
over
17
feet
so
then,
to
get
to
the
edge
of
this
easement
it'd
be
27
feet,
which
is
7
feet
more
than
our
required
side
yard.
So
so.
D
B
D
A
I
was
talking
about
you
know:
do
we
do
we
like?
Do
we
like
those
lot
lines
to
be
straddled
there?
That
way,
each
person
has
access
to
that
sewer.
If,
if
you
had
a
lot
that
the
sewer
didn't
run
across
and
the
whole
sewer
easement
was
on
your
neighbors,
you
just
can't
reach
in
there
to
get
to
the
sewer
across
his
property.
Kenya.
D
D
A
H
C
Look
Molly,
the
other
option,
I
think
is
what
Mark
was
getting
at.
Is
you
could
extend
that
easement
all
the
way
to
the
west
edge
of
the
property
line?
It
does
get
to
Jeff's
point
about
this
effectively
being
like
a
27
foot
setback,
but
at
least
it's
a
conforming
lot
and
really
we
don't
have
another
reason
to
say
no
to
that
to
say
yes
and.
K
C
C
I
C
A
B
Still
want
enough
easement
beyond
the
sewer
line,
so
with
you
got
to
go
in
there
and
dig
they
got
room,
go,
make
a
trench
and
throw
the
dirt
and
everything
else.
That's
part
of
the
purpose
right
now,
for
it
being
ten
feet,
I
need
to
decide.
So
if
it's
an
actual
construction
easement,
they
got
place
to
put
the
material
without
going
on
the
private
property.
A
A
C
C
D
A
D
A
D
A
With
that
I'll
close,
the
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
mr.
Hanson.
You
guys
must
have
nothing
to
do
on
this
nice
day
say
goodbye
mr.
McGuire
any
other
discussion
on
this.
We
just
don't
get
in
the
habit
of
putting
non-compliant
Lots
if
we
can
help,
but
otherwise
we
get.
Somebody
else
is
gonna
have
to
deal
with
a
25-footer
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
aye
I
didn't
hear
any
one
in
favor,
so
it
was
unanimous
all
right.