![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/ydvv-nGJevQ/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: BOA SignBOA PlanCommission Mtgs 06 23 2016
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
D
A
A
All
in
favor,
say
aye.
All
opposed
motion
passed
item
number
two
applicant
glacier:
Lakes
Energy
seeks
conditional
use
approval
to
operate
a
rail
loop
and
tank
facility
with
storage
of
ethanol,
petroleum-based
products
at
1332,
tenth
Street
Southwest,
located
in
an
eye
to
heavy
industrial
district
jewel.
C
2103
o26
be,
however,
the
distillation
and
petroleum
products
terminal
are
listed
as
conditional
uses
for
the
I
to
heavy
industrial
district.
A
permit
is
required
from
the
Board
of
Adjustment
for
the
storage
of
petroleum
products
for
sale
or
commercial
use
per
chapter
xxi
5.0
for
the
following
rules,
requirements
and
standards
of
the
ordinance
are
to
be
considered
for
approval.
Applicants
submitted
a
site
plan
which
reflects
or
does
not
reflect
these
regulations.
C
Section
21,
Oh,
OH,
B
6,
a
through
H,
requires
that
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
is
made
concerning
ingress
and
egress
to
the
property
off
street
parking
and
loading,
refuse
and
service
areas,
utilities,
screening
and
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space,
and
that
there
is
general
compatibility
with
adjacent
properties.
Section
21,
v,
double
O,
4
2a
states
that
the
product
the
property
is
in
the
zone,
B
aquifer
Protection,
District,
the
siting
of
new
or
expansion
of
existing
commercial
and
industrial
establishments
which
handle
use
or
store
potential
groundwater.
C
Sanitary
sewer
system,
section
21,
v,
double
O
5
states
that
storage
of
petroleum
products
in
quantity
quantities
exceeding
100
gallons
at
one
locality
in
one
tank
or
series
of
tanks
must
meet
South,
Dakota
Department
of
Environment
and
Natural
Resources
standards
and
may
be
required
to
have
a
secondary
containment
system
where
it
is
deemed
Ness
by
the
City
Engineer
chapter
21
63
is
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements.
A
parking
layout
was
not
shown
on
this
site
plan,
but
sufficient
area
exists.
C
Chapter
21,
65
is
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses,
outside
storage,
and/or
display
of
materials,
equipment,
etc
was
not
indicated
in
this
application.
Chapter
21,
73,
landscape
and
lighting
standards,
parking
lot,
layout,
lighting,
Boulevard
and
infrastructure
requirements,
etc
were
not
shown
on
this
site
plan
and
the
i2
zone
is
exempt
from
the
interior
tree
requirement,
chapter
21,
80
signs
and
outdoor
advertising.
The
signage
was
not
addressed
in
the
application.
A
E
E
F
E
G
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
chairman
board
members.
Yes,
we
do
have
numerous
permits
that
we've
already
obtained
with
these
stormwater
people.
We
our
permits,
we
already
have
our
groundwater,
permit
surface
water
permit
in
our
ground
storage
tank
permit.
All
of
those
are
incorporated
where
you're
talking
about
secondary
containment,
the
requirements
that
must
be
met
by
the
state
we
make.
We
will
be
exceeding
those
requirements.
G
A
H
If
they
meet
the
requirements
for
the
containment
system
by
state
statute,
the
state
requirements
were
we're.
Fine
with
that
and
there's
other
things
on
here
that
that
they'll
complete
as
they
go
forward
like
the
driveway
permit
and
the
site
where
their
building
is
well,
we'll
get
more
drawings.
But
as
far
as
this
part
of
the
application
we're
fine
with
that.
J
Have
one
comment
that
like
you're
saying
as
they
go
ahead,
they'll
probably
be
a
little
office
building
and
some
parking
lots
and
all
that
other
stuff?
It's
not
my
intent
to
bring
every
one
of
those
little
things
back
to
you
guys
as
long
as
it's
meeting
the
city
code
and
standard,
and
it's
not
a
controversial
item
or
just
going
to
be
passing
as
long
as
we
go
along.
Okay,.
A
A
Okay,
all
in
favor
of
the
motion
say:
aye
all
opposed.
Okay
motion,
passed
item
number
3,
Troy,
bhindi
applicant,
seeks
conditional
use
approval
and
concurrently
appeals
the
terms
of
the
ordinance
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
a
compliant
addition
onto
an
existing
non-conforming
retail
building
at
505
and
507
arrow
Avenue,
located
in
a
c3,
Highway
commercial
district
and
additionally
seeks
approval
for
the
operation
of
a
video
lottery
machines
and
the
expansion
of
the
original
area
allowed
for
the
sale
and
serving
and
the
consumption
of
alcoholic
beverages.
You
Joe.
Would
you
like
to
elaborate
on
that.
C
Yes,
staff
finds
that
bar
or
tavern
and
casino
or
gambling
establishment
are
listed,
conditional
uses
for
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district
for
section
twenty
one,
twenty
eight,
oh
three,
three
and
twenty
one.
Twenty
eight,
oh
three.
Four
currently
there
exists
on
this
parcel
illegal
non-conforming,
3,000,
square-foot,
commercial
building
and
a
three
hundred
and
twelve
square
foot
accessory,
store,
sure
a
floor
plan
of
the
proposed
addition
was
submitted
showing
the
layout
of
seven
video
lottery
machines.
The
following
rules,
requirements
and
standards
of
the
ordinance
are
to
be
considered
for
approval.
C
Section
21,
Oh,
OH,
v6,
a
through
H,
requires
that
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
is
made
concerning
ingress,
egress
off
street
parking
and
loading
refuse
and
service
areas,
utilities,
screening,
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space,
and
that
there
is
general
compatibility
with
adjacent
properties,
section
21,
o
102
location.
The
premises
must
be
more
than
100
yards,
measured
by
the
regular
and
usual
path
of
travel
for
any
from
any
door
or
exit
of
any
church,
school
boys
or
girls,
club
or
community
sponsored
recreation
center.
C
With
exceptions,
the
c1
and
c3
zone
have
exceptions
if
they
were
there.
First,
so
to
speak,
chapter
21,
sixty-three
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements.
They
are
indicating
that
there
are
29
off
street
parking
spaces
in
the
north
parking
area.
This
parking
area
here
is
not
paved.
They
are
adding
this
lot.
8
to
this
parcel,
which
has
gone
through
conditional
use
in
the
past
chapter
21,
65,
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses
outside
display
was
not
indicated
in
the
application
chapter,
21,
73,
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
C
It
does
not
show
six
Boulevard
trees,
chapter
21,
80
signs
and
outdoor
advertising
see
written
request.
The
signage
specifics
were
not
addressed.
It
just
mentioned
that
signage
will
exist.
Title
24,
subdivision
of
land
applicant
agrees
to
a
development
agreement
in
lieu
of
replanting,
thus
creating
a
compliant
c3
zone
parcel.
Currently
this
parcel
here
which
existed
before
with
without
the
addition
of
this,
was
a
substandard
c3
parcel.
Now
this
will
make
this
a
compliant
c3
parcel
the
previously
identified.
C
Excuse
me,
this
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arranged
has
been
made
concerning
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
and
the
previously
identified
chapters.
This
parcel
lacks
standard,
Boulevard
and
infrastructure
requirements,
and
if
application
is
endorsed,
this
board
may
consider
fulfillment
of
any
and
all
those
requirements
in
conjunction
with
any
structural
improvements
authorized
by
building
permit.
A
D
I've
got
nothing
to
add
just
if
you
got
any
questions
for
me.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you.
I'll
try
to
go
ahead,
so
any
of
the
board
members
have
questions
are.
C
F
D
F
D
D
A
J
He's
basically
asking
you
for
variance
right
now
because
he's
adding
onto
a
non-conforming
structure
and
he's
adding
a
legal
conform
in
addition,
under
a
non-conforming
structure,
but
its
commercial,
which
you've
done
forgiven
me
the
power
to
do
that
on
my
own,
and
he's
also
asking
for
us
to
bless
that
north
lot
to
make
sure
that
can
be
expended
to
which
I'll
have
to
go
to
City
Council
and
get
the
final
approval
for
that
part
of
it.
But
he
wants
your
guys's
blessing
too.
Okay,
I!
Don't
want
this
to
be
my
entire
apostle.
D
J
A
A
Okay,
hearing
none
and
board
has
no
more
questions.
I
think
at
that
point,
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
ask
for
a
motion
motion
by
John's
second
by
Mark
any
discussion
by
the
board,
more
questions.
Okay,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
all
opposed
okay
motion
passed
item
number
four
applicants,
Jeff
and
Sandy's
get
my
glasses
off.
C
Staff
finds
these
these
findings.
Neighborhood
retail
establishments,
as
defined
by
ordinance,
is
a
listed
permit.
Permitted
or
conditional
use
in
the
are
2
are
2
AR,
3
and
NC
2
districts,
while
retail
retail
establishments,
as
defined
by
ordinance,
is
neither
a
listed
permitted
nor
conditional
use
in
the
art
to
a
single-family
attached
resident
residential
district.
It
is
in
the
C
1
C,
3
and
VP
districts.
Nevertheless,
the
Board
of
Adjustment
granted
conditional
use
approval
to
allow
this
retail
establishment
in
the
r2
a
zone
on
July
23rd
of
2015.
C
C
Approximately
the
site
plan
provided
an
additional
staff
notes
and
pictures
that
were
in
your
agenda
packet
reflect
compliance
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
requirements
of
the
ordinance
section,
21
o
202
to
v6
a
through
H
requires
that
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
is
made
concerning
ingress,
egress
off
street
parking
and
loading
refuse
and
service
areas,
utilities,
screening,
buffing,
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space,
and
that
there
is
general
compatibility
with
adjacent
properties.
Chapter
twenty
one,
sixty
three
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements
and
engineering
design
standards.
C
The
alley
is
used
to
access
customer
parking
paving
of
the
alley
may
be
considered
as
a
condition
chapter.
Twenty
one,
sixty
five
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses
outside
displays
of
merchandise
is
permitted
and
outside
storage
may
be
with
approved
screening
chapter
twenty
one.
Seventy
three
landscape
and
lighting
standards,
lighting
and
dumpster
screening
was
not
addressed
either
in
the
letter
or
the
site
plan
minimally
parking
lot.
Screening
from
adjacent
residential
used
property
shall
be
provided.
C
The
screen
fence
to
the
north
between
this
building
here
and
the
north
neighbor
has
yet
to
be
finished,
as
required
by
the
last
application.
Signage
was
not
addressed.
This
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
and
the
provisions
identified
just
identified.
This
parcel
lacks
standard
Boulevard
requirements.
If
application
is
endorsed,
this
board
may
consider
requiring
full
fulfillment
of
the
lacking
Boulevard
requirements.
And/Or
any
other
conditions
of
approval
deemed
necessary,
such
as
limiting
outside
storage,
displays
parking,
paving
alley,
screening,
etc.
A
A
C
A
It,
what
exactly
did
we
require
refresh
our
memories
on
that
when
we
approved
that
last
time,
because
I
know
there
was
the
reason
I'm
bringing
this
up?
There
was
some
discussion
with
didn't
go
without
controversy.
Last
time
when
we
approved
it
so
I'm,
just
wanting
you
to
clarify
what
was
required
and
what's
been
completed,
maybe
everything's
been
completed,
but
I.
C
C
C
This
is
one
of
those
structures.
This
is
the
fence.
The
the
last
I
saw
it
anyway.
This
is
the
the
front
Street
side,
and
this
is
looking
from
the
alley
it
cuts
off
here,
just
instead
of
running
the
full
length
of
the
property.
Here
are
the
minutes
from
that
last
meeting,
July
23rd
2015.
It
says
to
approve
with
screening
fence
along
their
north
property
line.
C
K
Okay,
so
the
front
yard
is
used
for
nothing.
The
front
door
is
never
used
and
I'm
just
struggling
with
Lowe's
to
get
the
rest
of
my
fence
ordered
they
were.
It
was
backordered.
I
may
end
up
going
with
a
different
fence
that
doesn't
match,
but
I
don't
think
that
the
front
yard
was
required
to
be
fenced
in
and
then,
if
you'll
notice,
the
back
of
their
house
has
never
been
cited.
K
I'm
looking
at
Tyvek
going
on
for
years
and
the
the
fence
that
was
there
previous
to
me,
buying
the
property
they
leveled
their
property
about
this
high
and
knocked
the
existing
fence
over.
So
I
probably
would
never
even
had
to
replace
the
fence
had
that
not
been
done,
and
then
at
the
expense
to
me
of
putting
a
retaining
wall
in
to
retain
the
dirt
that
they
leveled
against
the
fence,
they
also
loved
it.
K
It
leveled
it
against
a
building
that
was
beside
the
garage,
so
I
had
to
tear
that
building
out
I,
don't
get
deliveries
at
my
store.
I,
don't
have
a
forklift,
so
they
don't
come
there
to
me.
They
go
to
my
husband's
place
and
then
it's
brought
over
and
a
pickup
into
the
side
yard
box
by
box.
So
I
don't
get
semis
once
in
a
while
UPS
truck.
K
If
it's
a
small
delivery
in
the
back
there,
where
the
garages
that's
because
they
leveled
everything
against
the
existing
building,
so
I
had
to
pull
it
out
and
then
the
eaves
on
their
garage
come
down
and
are
buried
under
the
ground
and
the
water
shoots
at
my
garage
and
that's
never
been
corrected.
So
I,
don't
know
with
this.
I
have
a
few
things,
leaning
there,
but
it's
fenced
off,
but
that
whole
mess
is
their
property
and,
like
I,
said
I'm
waiting
for
the
rest
of
the
fence
and
I've
been
dealing
with
Lowe's
and
I
said.
K
All
dirt,
that's
I
have
a
fence,
a
chunk
of
a
fence
and
a
few
doors
leaning,
but
that
hole
all
that
mess
is
the
mess
that
they
created
when
they
leveled
there.
They
they
built
their
properties
so
high,
and
then
they
didn't
have
anyone
anything
to
do
with
the
dirt.
So
they
level
it
against
the
fence
that
was
existing
and
knocked
the
fence
over,
and
then
they
leveled
it
against
the
building
that
was
there
and
I'm
serious.
K
It
was
this
high
and
they
used
the
existing
building
to
use
as
their
retaining
wall,
which
I've
looked
up.
The
line
you
have
the
right
to
raise
your
property
to
a
level
that
benefits
you,
but
with
that
right
comes
the
responsibility
to
build
and
maintain
a
wall
that
benefits
you
and
that's
the
law,
and
it's
never
been
built
when
I
took
the
fence
down.
K
L
L
C
The
last
time
they
went
through
the
board
on
July
20
July
of
last
year.
This
was
added
this.
This
used
to
be
a
house
used
to
be
a
single-family
dwelling,
was
added
to
this
as
one
big
facility.
So
there's
now
two
commercial
retail
buildings
on
a
large
lot
here,
and
so
this
really
shouldn't
say
house
a,
but
that's
how
the
site
plan
showed
up
thee.
They
they
were
built
as
houses
and
then
this
structure
here
is
this
one.
C
K
No
shed
there
I'm,
not
sure
what
I
mean
there's
no
building
there,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
that
has
a
picture
of,
but
the
other
one
they
I
had
a
building
permit,
and
so,
when
they
came,
the
gals
came
from
the
city
to
do
my
revaluation.
They
said
what
are
you
putting
here
and
I
said
his
shed
and
she
said:
oh
well,
you
have
a
building
permit,
so
that
will
cover
that
shed
being
moved
in.
K
A
C
K
E
K
J
K
K
K
K
K
J
F
K
K
Been
there
since
1994,
so
I
can
tell
you,
Terry
ran
built,
it
he's
been
dead
forever
and
rezone
the
duplex.
Next
to
me,
we
had
to
get
a
building.
Permit.
I
have
no
idea
why
it
wouldn't
show
up
there,
but
seriously.
I
did
not
just
build
that
shed
it's
a
permanent
building
and
it
was
built
in
1994,
I.
K
A
K
Doesn't
exist
so
that's
what
I'm
just
confused
about
that
little
red
one!
There's
not
nothing!
There!
You
walk
through
the
courtyard
and
there's
doors
I
have
on
the
fence,
but
there's
no
building
in
there.
No,
there
isn't
a
pill
team
there.
You
know
you're
all
welcome
to
come.
Look.
There
is
not
a
building
there.
So.
K
K
Do
the
front
to
do
the
front
continue
the
front
they
were,
it
was
backordered,
and
so
then
they
sent
me
one
in
the
fall
when
we
went
to
open
it
this
spring
to
put
front
part
up
which
I
don't
think
I'm
obligated
to
put
the
front
up
but
I.
Don't
nobody
ever
said
that
I
had
to
they
don't
use
the
front
yard?
The
front
yard
isn't
used
just
the
back
where
customers
come
in,
they
go
in
the
back
door.
That's
all
been
completed
along
the
whole
thing
side
of
the
house.
I
bought.
K
A
K
A
K
K
E
A
K
Use
the
backyard
and
that's
where
my
customers
do
going.
I,
don't
use
the
front
yard.
It's
it's
bolted
shut.
The
front
yard
is
not
used,
they
have
to
come
through
the
house
of
dreams
to
get
to
the
other
store
and
there's
a
side
door.
So
nobody
uses
the
front
sidewalk.
The
front
steps
are
not
used.
The
back
is
used.
K
K
Except
a
little
bit
in
the
front
yard,
and
that's
because
I
am
that
Lowe's
backordered
12
sections
of
fence
when
I
got
it
12
were
short
and
I
have
been
working
on
it.
Trying
to
get
it
like
I
said:
I
may
have
to
just
completely
change
and
put
a
different
style
fence
and
they
won't
match,
but
I've
I've
seriously
been
trying
my
hardest
to
get
it.
I
can
give
you
phone
numbers,
show
you
notes
everything.
It's
not.
A
That's
addressing
when
we
get
into
making
a
motion
here,
let's
address
the
fence
and
give
give
the
city
can
some
clarification
of
where
that
fence
needs
to
stop.
We
can
we
talk
about
that
in
the
next
action
here,
but
now
the
fence
was
one
thing.
What's
the
other
thing
we're
acting
on
just
declare
the
buildings
is
that
correct.
C
Conditional
use
coming
back
to
this
is
the
addition
that
they
are
proposing
and,
along
with
any
kind
of
unless
you
set,
you
know
stipulate
in
your
in
your
motion.
What
you're
doing
is
accepting
or
not
accepting
changes
to
this
site
plan,
which
it
would
include
this
addition
and
these
accessory
structures
there,
though,
but
it's
right
here.
K
A
K
A
Talk
about
the
addition,
first
we're
looking
at
adding
that
addition
on
to
our
house
around
to
a
place
of
business.
Okay,
that's
part
of
it
and
then
the
the
debatable
thing
is
the
structures
where
we're
approving
or
not
approving
those
structures
and
sandy
says
one
of
the
structures
is
not
there
and
the
city
says
the
structure.
Is
there
so
well.
J
J
K
You've
got
holes
with
a
roof
on,
but
it's
not
it's
a
plastic.
It's
a
piece
of
plastic
see-through,
so
the
vines
would
grow
I
just
but
when
I
put
my
addition
on-
and
it
was,
it
was
in
my
my
addition.
When
I
add
it
onto
the
side,
I
did
it
on
the
side
there
and
I
just
came
out
so
that
customers
wouldn't
get
wet
and
is.
A
K
J
J
K
F
J
The
last
time
you
guys
took
it
before
the
board,
you
actually
kind
of
gave
her
the
conditional
used
to
run
this
as
a
retail
property
there
and
under
the
guidelines
of
the
repro
property,
you're
not
limited
to
the
number
of
structures
you're
gonna
have
on
commercial.
This
is
residential,
but
again,
like
I
said
she
came
back.
She
did
this.
She
asked
for
conditional
use
last
time
which
was
granted
by
the
board,
and
the
site
plan
has
proposed
at
that
time
was
granted
as
it
was
so
for
me.
B
K
I,
don't
have
any
storage
under
house
of
dreams
and
I
need
a
bigger
counter
space,
so
that
is
just
gonna
simply
bump
me
out
and
obviously
have
a
lobbyist
coming.
So
I'm
I've
been
here
33
years,
I'm
trying
to
be
a
little
competitive,
hopefully
and
I
need
storage
and
a
bigger
counter
area.
So
then
I
will
be
able
to
pull
in
and
unload
and
go
into
a
basement,
because
the
old
house
has
not
decent
storage
and
then
hopefully,
I
can
take
the
three
little
one
is
Christmas.
A
Sandy
and
you
do
have
your
property-
doesn't
look
very
nice
and
what
you've
done
to
those
two
houses
and
fix
them
up.
They
look,
they
do
look
very
nice
and
notices
were
sent
out
a
year
going.
There
was
some
opposition
by
one
of
your
neighbors,
but
I
guess
this
year,
when
notices
went
out,
there
was
no
opposition,
no,
but
nobody
has
come
and
as
just
well
maybe
I'm
correct,
maybe
I'm
not
correcting
what
I
just
said.
Give
you
a
chance
to
speak
in
a
minute,
but
notices
have
gone
out.
A
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
L
L
M
M
A
A
Sandy,
let's
and
Jeff
you're
here
too,
but
but
the
when
you
built
the
fence
and
the
hole
is
referring
to
or
the
dirt
or
whatever.
Would
you
mind
coming
up
here,
Jeff?
Is
that
something
that
can
be
remedied
pretty
easily
between
the
two
of
you
I
mean
it
doesn't
sound
like
the
neighbor
has
any
objection
as
to
what's
being
requested
today,
other
than
you.
He
would
like
to
have
a
little
more
privacy
and
you'd
like
to
have
a
whole
field
in
his
yard.
O
O
So
when
we
pulled
the
old
fence
out
because
it
was
tipping
over
the
posts
were
broke,
ended
up,
leaving
a
chunk
of
dirt
there,
because
his
land
now
we
poured
a
concrete
wall
to
hold
back
some
of
the
dirt,
but
his
dirt
is
still
this
much
higher
than
our
concrete
wall
because
he
filled
in
so
much
and
there's
an
easy
way
to
do
it.
All
we
got
to
do
is
lay
some
paver
blocks
down
in
there
to
hold
his
lawn
back,
but
he
can't
really
put
dirt
in
there.
O
Gonna
work
with
him
on
it,
but
I
just
left
it
lay
because
he
hasn't
been.
Then
we
talked
but
I
just
thought
I
would
let
it
lay
for
now.
I
was
gonna,
mention
it
to
him
one
day
that
he
could
actually
take
some
retaining
wall
block
from
Menards
or
wherever
and
put
it
up
against
our
curb
that
we
poured
to
hold
the
lawn
back.
O
A
M
A
M
A
M
F
M
M
O
O
P
O
A
J
J
J
A
Well:
okay,
but
realistically
a
nine
and
a
half
foot
high
offence
is
a
high
offense.
It's
gonna
be
difficult
to
maintain
that
and
keep
it
straight
and
everything
else
do
you
need
a
nine
and
a
half
foot
fenced
for
the
whole
length
or
just
where
your
patio
is,
where
you
sit
and
have
breakfast?
Is
it
just
a
small
area?
There
were.
M
A
M
E
Q
Understand
that
the
board
here
is
trying
to
accommodate
and
facilitate
some
sort
of
agreement
and
I
appreciate
that,
but
it's
not
within
the
city's
purview
to
resolve
a
dispute
between
neighbors,
that's
like
if
a
tree
grows
over
and
to
the
other
side
it's
between
the
neighbor
neighbor,
so
the
requirement
of
the
fence.
Yes,
how
it
was
put
in
and
problems,
that's
neighbor
neighbor.
A
F
F
Like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
building
permit
as
long
as
the
statins
get
building
permits
documented
for
all
their
accessory
structures
that
they
currently
have
on
their
pro-grade
as
long
as
they
raise
defense
to
the
top
of
the
existing
posts.
Oh
I,
by
the
back
patio
area
of
the
neighbor
and
have
that
done
by
October
1st.
A
A
O
A
R
A
N
J
A
B
A
A
O
O
To
keep
it
natural
just
like
the
rest
of
the
fence,
so
it
all
looks
the
same.
That's
why
we've
been
waiting
for
the
other
fence
from
Lowe's
and
been
having
troubles
with
that.
So
it
all
looks
same.
You
know
in
an
alleged
case,
I
feel
as
pain.
Yes,
I
can
raise
I
left
the
posts
up
there
and
I
just
had
a
feeling
and
I
left
him
up
there
and
then
Jill
told
me:
there's
a
restriction
on
how
high
a
fence
could
be
well.
F
F
F
O
J
A
M
K
I
just
wanted
that
to
come
around
with
the
gate
now,
they'll
be
used
for
people,
but
in
future,
if
it
goes
back
to
residential
but
I,
just
don't
want
people
walking
by
in
the
highway.
I
have
that
in
between
the
two
houses
in
the
to
have
outdoor
stuff.
My
garden
stuff
is
in
there
and
I:
don't
want
people
to
be
able
to
just
go
through
and
go
into
it.
So
that
was
my
idea
to
come
all
the
way
around
and
then
you
could
walk
off
through
there.
Well.
F
K
K
K
J
J
A
K
K
F
A
Would
require
variance
to
bring
it
all
the
way
in
across
the
front
back
in
and
fence
your
whole
front
yard.
It
was
a
six
foot
high
fence
like
that
now
I,
don't
I,
don't
recall
and
I,
don't
believe
that
we
approved
all
of
that
last
time.
If
you
want
that
you'd
have
to
bring
that
back
to
us
as
a
request
to
finish
that
front
part.
That's
why
I
understand
that?
Well,.
J
J
See
the
permit
that
was
issued
for
the
fence.
I
can't
recall
a
spend
a
year
ago
that
wasn't
the
contentious
issue
at
the
time.
I,
don't
remember
it,
but
I'm
not
saying
we
didn't
do
it
and
if
and
if,
if
the
permit
was
permit,
a
six-foot
fence
can
go
all
the
way
out
to
within
one
foot
of
the
property
line
across
the
front.
I.
Just
don't
think
it's
very
aesthetically
appealing
but
I,
don't
remember
one
way
or
the
other,
and
we
didn't
happen
to
pull
that
up
for
this
conversation.
J
A
J
A
A
C
Clarify
it
right
here
in
the
history
of
the
property
we
had
in
the
the
fence,
part
was
was
done
on
the
permit
for
the
last
conditional
use,
so
it
was
whatever
was
in
the
minutes.
There
is
not
an
additional
fence
permit,
because
this
is
the
entire
history
that
I've
got
here
of
building
permits,
so
what
we
did
and
what
we
traditionally
do
is
when
a
conditional
use
comes
before
you
and
there's
a
condition
such
as
this
fence.
We
just
add
it
to
that.
A
B
J
F
F
Q
Q
Q
J
A
N
P
N
N
J
A
F
J
A
B
F
N
B
A
N
A
N
B
Q
Q
So
if
you
want
to-
or
I
should
say
from
the
house
on
the
north
property
line,
two
of
what
is
it
a
foot
from
the
sidewalk,
so
that
section
right
now
is
not
approved
because
you
made
this
second
motion,
so
you
could
make
a
motion
now
just
saying
that
you
want
that
four
foot
section
to
continue
so
that
along
the
entire
north
property
line,
there
would
be
a
fence
and
you
could
put
a
height
restriction
on
that
part.
That's
toward
the
front
of
the
yard,
the
one
that
they
would
want
to
run
along
the
sidewalk.
N
Q
J
More
little
clarification!
Well,
you
did
agree
that
the
fence
right
now
in
the
backyard
stops
at
the
building
and
ties
back
into
that
garage.
The
neighbor
was
happy
with
it
they're
happy
with
it
I'm
happy
with
that
too
so
correct.
So,
although
it
says
North
properly
and
it
does
actually
stop
at
the
garage
I'm
not
going
for
the
back,
but
that's
what
you
guys
agreed
I
just
wanted.
N
But
I
want
to
be
clear
what
if
they
want
to
take
that
fence
up
to
the
one
for
the
sidewalk,
just
because
the
neighbor
doesn't
really
care,
for
you
guys
approve
that
at
one
time,
maybe
they
want
that
to
go
up
there.
They
do
want
to
go
up
there,
so
you
guys
are
telling
them
they
can't.
When
not
too
long
ago,
you
told
him
they
could
that's.
N
A
J
H
L
P
A
F
F
J
N
S
A
A
J
J
O
Just
FYI
six
foot
all
the
way
acrost,
because
it's
already
coming
across
that
way,
rather
than
that,
try
and
cut
it
down
or
trying
to
redesign
another
fence
at
four
foot.
You
know
past
the
houses
and
Larry
like
he
said
he
don't
really
care
about
it.
He
just
don't
wouldn't
want
it
at
six
foot.
Thank.
N
A
We
voted
on.
We
voted
on
on
John's
motion
and
that
pass
correct.
Now
you
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
down
to
allow
offense
from
the
front
of
the
house
on
the
north
property
line
to
one
foot
from
the
sidewalk,
but
a
reduce
it
to
four
feet.
That
was
your
motion.
That's
the
one
we
have
to
act
on
now
or
amend
it.
I
make
a
motion
that
we
amend.
A
F
A
M
A
A
Let's
vote
again,
this
clerk
make
the
record
clear:
okay,
okay,
restate
the
motion,
which
was
the
first
motion
John.
Do
you
remember
well
enough
to
restate
it,
or
does
everybody
know
well
enough,
just
to
vote?
Okay,
all
in
favor
of
that
first
motion
of
John
made
say:
aye
aye
all
opposed
okay,
so
it
is
approved
all
of
your
accessory
structures.
Your
addition,
that's
all
approved,
except.
J
R
A
J
A
A
A
A
Do.
I
have
a
second
mark.
All
in
favor
of
approving
the
minutes
say:
aye
all
opposed.
Okay.
The
minutes
are
approved.
Item
number
two
on
the
agenda:
hometown
Properties
LLC
signed
permit
number.
Fourteen.
Fifty
nine
appeals
the
following
requirements
of
the
sign
ordinance
as
it
replies
as
it
applies
to
the
property
located
at
23.
15,
ninth
Avenue
Northwest
right.
J
J
T
J
J
F
T
T
J
T
Ready
we'll
be
back
further
because
it's
already
a
wider
easement
from
the
state
there.
It's
just
that
when
we
put
the
sign
it
starts
getting
so
deep
into
the
property
where
we
want
to
build
the
houses
that
10
feet
is
gonna,
make
it
a
tougher
corner
to
get
around
with
the
house
mover
and
everything
else.
So
when
we
got
out
there
market
out
there.
Actually,
when
we
ordered
the
sign
that
we
we
didn't
know,
there
was
an
issue
with
the
10
feet
and
then
and
then
only
fighting
that
out
we're
ready
to
get
the
permit.
T
A
Out
there
and
looked
at
that
site
and
if
you
stand
west
of
where
the
sign
will
go
where
the
proposed
stakes
are
in
the
ground,
the
sign
lines
up
directly
with
what
they
just
said,
all
the
signs
going
to
the
east
with
the
State
Building
and
the
motel,
and
all
that
they
lat
is
up
with
that.
And
this
is
an
eye.
A
You
know
it's
an
eye
property,
but
it's
being
used
with
us
with
a
commercial
district
I
mean
that's
the
type
of
business,
that's
going
into
a
commercial
as
commercial,
not
industrial,
so
I
would
think
I,
don't
see
an
issue
at
all
with
that
sign,
going
right
on
the
property
line,
like
all
the
others
in
the
commercial
area.
So
no.
F
F
F
F
J
A
J
T
J
Do
have
another
party
that
did
the
adjacent
landowner
to
the
west.
Here
did
come
before
me
and
he
actually
has
a
document
that
says
that
they
hold
a
50-foot
access
easement
across
the
entire
front
of
this
property.
From
this
point
at
this
point,
so
any
decision
you
make
today
might
have
to
be
tabled
until
this
resolution
could
be
resolved
by
Bill
in.
S
T
We
find
out,
as
of
Monday
the
title
of
search,
didn't
they
didn't
find
it,
but
his
deed
says
he
has
a
50-foot
easement
all
the
way
across
the
front
of
that
up
and
no
title
insurance
is
going
to
have
to
straighten
this
out,
because
I
would
have
never
bought
the
property
and
give
up
50
feet
all
the
way
across.
Third.
B
A
B
T
This
is
resolved
that
we
don't
have
to
delay
even
longer,
if
it
says,
obviously
didn't
delay
some
things
either
way,
I
think
the
whatever
happens
with
all
this
thing,
he's
kind
of
landlocked
in
that
piece
of
property,
so
he's
going
to
fight
to
maintain
something
but
I'm
assuming
when
that
easement
was
done.
There
was
never
an
entranceway
there
when
they
gave
him
that
now
there
is
he's,
got
no
purpose
of
heaven
and
he's
been
going
all
the
way
across
the
front
of
that
property.
But
that's
gonna
have
to
be
title.
T
V
T
A
T
They
bought
that
in
71
and
that,
on
their
deed,
their
deed
says
they
have
an
easement
to
this
property
on
our
property.
Nothing
was
ever
recorded
in
the
property
that
we
bought
has
been
sold.
I
know,
I
asked
the
person
we
bought
it
from
and
they
had
bought
it
from
somebody
else.
So
I
don't
know
how
many
iterations
of
sales
have
gone
on
in
our
property.
I
haven't
dug
into
that,
and
quite
honestly,
at
this
point,
I'm
to
entitle
insurance
figure
it
out.
T
You
know,
but
in
the
meantime
here
I
guess,
I'm
saying
we
probably
don't
go
ahead
with
doing
it
on
the
sign
and
tell
us
result,
but
I
don't
want
to
that,
takes
whatever
like
the
time.
I
don't
want
to
have
to
wait
another
month
or
two
to
come
back
and
have
to
deal
with
the
wait
for
the
sign
they
could
whenever
that
time
is
so
well.
J
A
U
A
riot
Lam
speaking
I
represent
Larry
our
stead,
and
this
information
just
came
to
light
on
Monday.
As
a
result
of
this
signage,
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to
review
it,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
mr.
Issa,
it's
not
going
to
just
stand
still
for
you,
putting
our
authorizes
sign
on
property
that
he
has
knees
before
here's
an
easement
all
the
way
across
or
50
feet.
Now
we're
working
with
Bill
and
we're
talking
with
him
trying
to
resolve
it,
but
I,
don't
think
you
can
go
ahead.
A
U
P
U
T
T
N
T
Vote
on
it
in
that
basis,
I
just
didn't
want
to
just
drop
this
and
then
have
to
come
back
and
go
through
the
whole
process
and
wait
for
another
meeting
which
might
be
another
60
days
or
something.
So
if
what
cabling
does
is
say
next
time,
you
can
vote
on,
I
did
do
I,
guess
I
would
I
would
guess.
I
would
like
to
have
some
feeling
whether
I
need
to
come
back
to
discuss.
If
the
feeling
is
that
goes
away,
there's
not
a
problem
with
the
sign,
then
you
guys
can
just
vote
on
them.
N
A
A
U
T
I'm,
okay,
with
that
Dennis
from
the
stand
point
I,
don't
want
to
create
any
animosity
with
the
other
people
as
long
as
they're
all
willing
to
work
with
me
and
this
thing
in
it
again:
it's
it's
a
title
insurance
problem.
They
got
to
fix
it.
I'm,
not
gonna
I'm,
not
going
to
spend
time
and
money
to
fight
about
this.
They
got
to
get
it
fixed.
Whatever
they
got
to
do,
but
I
mean
I
can
see
a
number
of
resolution
and
one
is
the
driveway.
T
According
to
their
easement,
which,
obviously,
if
I,
if
it's
up
to
me,
I'm
going
to
contest,
but
it
whatever,
if
that
easement
is
granted,
it
goes
all
the
way
across
here
who
in
the
world
is
gonna,
want
to
drive
all
the
way
across
there
when
they
got
an
entranceway
over
here
anyway,
I
mean
I,
wouldn't
buy
that
piece
of
property
and
have
to
drive
all
the
way
across
so
most.
If
anything
happens,
we
already
have
an
entrance
and
it
gets
an
easement
to
the
rest
of
this
way.
T
Here
the
thing
is
right:
now:
I,
don't
you
know
I,
don't
have
any
idea
whether
there're
Stead's
willing
to
negotiate
on
that
and
then
quite
he's.
Not
up
to
me
to
negotiate
was
immense.
The
title
company's
problem
to
figure
out,
but
I
just
want
at
this
point
in
time.
I
just
want
to
not
have
to
start
the
whole
process
over
I.
Want
you
guys
to
tell
me
yeah
we're
okay
with
this,
but
get
it
settled.
That's
fine!
I'm!
Okay,
with
that,
it's
gonna
get
settled.
T
F
P
I
T
F
A
A
A
P
P
A
We're
not
approving
the
sign,
all
we're
proving
as
a
zero
setback
or
a
10-foot
setback.
That's
all
we're
being
asked
to
look
at
today
now
bill
takes
a
risk
and
puts
the
sign
up,
and
if
we
approved
at
a
zero
setback,
he
takes
a
risk
to
put
the
sign
up
in
a
week
or
two
years
or
six
months.
It
has
to
come
down.
That's
that's
his
problem,
not
ours.
That's.
I
All
I'm,
saying
I
do
have
something
to
say
here:
I,
thank
you
for
the
second
here.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
your
ordinance.
Your
ordinance
does
have
a
section
that
says
that
you
can't
get
a
building
permit
over
an
easement
and
so
I
guess.
My
point
is
the
action
in
front
of
you
today
is
a
variance
from
the
10-foot
setback
requirement.
B
I
To
but
he
should
have
to
come
back
to
build
over
an
easement
that
would
be
there.
So
the
point
is:
is
it
if
you
acted
on
that
on
that
10-foot
setback,
variance
he'd
still
have
to
come
back
if
it
remained
in
an
easement,
if
they
figure
out
how
to
handle
the
easement
in
the
intermediary
ax,
then
the
variance
you
granted
is
fine
and
he
can
get
his
building
permit.
Did
that
make
sense.
F
T
A
But
Kenny
you're,
making
an
interpretation
at
the
title
company
did
not
make
you're
saying
your
interpretation
from
what
you're
hearing
and
it
might
be
right.
It
might
not
be
but
but
you're
superseding
what
the
title
company
has
already
determined.
Now.
Maybe
they
made
an
error?
Maybe
they
didn't,
but
that'll
have
to
be
decided.
T
I
I
Q
V
T
Obviously,
if
these
months
there
I
got
a
problem
that
that's
going
to
get
resolved,
I
mean
I,
can
I
don't
know
of
a
number
of
possibilities
on
that.
But
today
that
there
is
no
resolution
to
that
today
and
if
I'm
interpreting,
what
Luke
saying
is
that
if
you
say
yeah
go
ahead,
we'll
give
grant
you
the
the
variance
that
doesn't
mean
I
can
do
the
sign
anyway,
because
we
got
to
get
the
easement
thing
resolved.
But
then,
if
the
easement
goes
away,
then
it's
done
it's
already
been
approved.
Is
that
what
you're
saying
that's.
I
I
might
today,
the
setback
is
10
feet,
so
if
he
applied
for
a
building
permit
to
be
12
feet
from
the
front
yard,
we'd
still
have
this
issue
about
the
easement
correct,
and
so
the
point
is,
if
you
relax,
the
setback.
You've
still
got
the
issue
of
the
easement.
So
so
again,
there
are
two
roadblocks
here
that
he's
facing
to
build
it:
zero
feet
from
the
property
line.
One
is
the
issue
of
the
10-foot
setback.
The
other
is
the
issue
of
building
over
an
easement
and
you're
right
I
mean
it
is.
E
P
I
B
Q
F
A
V
T
A
T
R
R
B
J
A
I
want
to
make
it
I'm
not
taking
sides
with
ray
or
bill
all
I'm
saying
it
I,
don't
think
that's
our
place
to
determine
if
an
unrecorded,
easement
42
years
old,
with
a
title
company
made
one
decision,
and
now
the
attorneys
are
saying
something
different
I.
Don't
think!
That's
us
to
determine
that!
That's
somebody
besides
this
board,
it's
all
I'm
saying.
U
A
O
P
A
R
A
A
I
I
I
H
Correct
we
did.
That
was
our
final
determination.
We
successfully
retraced
the
surveying
data
on
both
sides
of
the
roadway.
We
started
with
research
on
the
south
side
of
the
road
for
the
Prairie
Lakes
Golf
Course
addition
perfected.
Those
pin
locations
then
found
enough
pins
on
the
north
side
of
the
road.
To
corroborate
that
the
two
surveys
appeared
to
be
aligned
well
enough
to
make
a
determination
on
this
vacation.
So
we
did
that.
H
H
So
based
upon
our
research,
we
believe
that
if
we
proceed
to
vacate
the
18
feet,
that
all
the
roadway
and
all
the
utilities
along
the
roadway
would
remain
in
the
road
right
away
and
then
the
other
thing
that
this
will
do
is
it
will
pull
all
the
encroachments
on
the
public
right
away.
It
cleans
up
out
of
the
public
right
away.
It
does
successfully
get
all
10
structures
out
of
the
right
away,
which
which
was
our
goal
all
along.
H
The
gravel
road
is
just
out
of
the
view
of
this
drawing
but
okay
right
right,
here's
the
intersection
to
the
west
side.
This
is
a
I,
don't
remember
what
the
name
of
this
road
is,
but
it
is
a
public
road
and
essentially
we
got
signatures
from
for
every
property,
starting
at
that
intersection
over
to
this
property
right
here,
I
believe,
is
the
last
one
and.
H
That
was
where
the
majority
of
the
encroachments
were
identified
in
the
right-of-way
out
of
the
15
properties
of
approximately
ten
of
them
had
an
encroachment
in
the
right-of-way,
and
so
we
came.
What
came
to
us
was
to
vacate
the
right
away
on
one
of
the
15
properties,
but
when
we
identified
that
multiple
properties
had
an
encroachment,
we
wanted
to
uniformly
try
to
see
if
we
could
take
care
of
all
of
them,
rather
than
do
it
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
because
that's
a
poor
way
to
manager
right
away,
and
so
you.
T
H
H
Then,
at
the
ends
of
these
the
right
of
way,
it
goes
back
to
something
more
normal,
and
so
we
didn't
look
beyond
those
locations,
but
we
may
be
faced
with
this
type
of
decision
in
the
future
when
somebody
else
along
the
lake
finds
that
they
have
a
an
issue,
but
certainly
we
don't
want
to
ignore
those
issues.
If
we
can
we
it's
our
intent
to
clean
them
up,
okay,.
A
A
I
The
request
here
is
to
vacate
a
portion
of
an
alley
it's
between
4th
and
3rd
Street
Northwest,
just
north
of
7th
Avenue.
This
is
on
what
is
currently
the
eastern
edge
of
the
parking
lot,
a
for
Prairie
Lakes
hospital
in
that
area.
The
request
is
to
vacate
most
of
that
alley
way.
At
the
present
time.
Typically,
we
will
see
the
full
vacation
of
an
alley
at
one
time.
I
In
this
particular
case,
there
was
a
closing
on
one
of
the
properties
that
was
holding
this
last
portion
of
that
vacation
up,
so
that
is
to
vacate
the
remaining
gap-toothed
into
here.
Petition
will
be
forthcoming,
but
at
any
rate,
the
petition
is
to
vacate
that
portion
of
the
alley
there's
been
work
to
make
sure
that
any
utilities
would
be
would
be
handled
and
appropriately
managed
in
that
area.
So
there's
no
more
information
to
followup
with,
and
let's
have
you
any
questions,
the.
A
I
F
F
I
H
Not
water
mean
it's
there's
some
gas
services,
electric
services,
telephone
services
all
go
up
that
alley
to
serve
the
properties
that
previously
existed
and
the
property
that's
in
the
purchase
agreement.
So
essentially,
if,
if
the
purchase
agreement
is
finalized,
there
is
no
build
buildings
to
provide
service
to
going
in
the
future,
so
the
utilities
would
all
just
be
relocated
or
or
demolished
out
of
that
alley.