►
From YouTube: BOA & Plan Commission Meeting 08 05 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
E
D
The
definition
of
home
occupied
is
any
occupation
which
is
clearly
secondary
to
the
main
use
of
the
premises
as
a
dwelling
and
does
not
change
the
character
thereof
or
have
any
exterior
evidence
of
such
secondary
use
other
than
a
non
illuminated
sign,
not
exceeding
400
square
inches
in
area.
The
occupation
shall
be
carried
on
or
conducted
only
by
the
members
of
a
family
residing
in
the
dwelling.
D
The
applicant
submitted
the
attached
an
attached
written
request,
site
plan
and
floor
plan
which
reflect
compliance
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
terms
of
the
ordinance
section,
21
o
o
to
be
6a
through
H.
The
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
includes
such
things
as
ingress,
egress
of
the
property
off
street
parking
and
loading
screen,
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
area.
D
They
included
a
site
plan
which
was
in
your
agenda
packet,
chapter
20
170
is
home
occupations
and
standards,
Thompson
proposes
to
utilize
575
square
feet
or
14
percent
of
her
single-family
dwelling
for
her
hair
salon
business.
She
has
acknowledged
by
signature
her
assurance
to
comply
with
chapter
20.
170
signage
is
proposed
to
be
limited
to
a
sign
on
the
side
garage
door
as
as
complying
with
ordinance
the
off
street
parking
I'm
going
to
bring
up
her
site
plan.
D
This
is
the
basic
site
plan
of
the
property.
You
saw
the
aerial
view
before.
Ok,
sufficient
area
exists
for
for
legal
off
street
parking
spaces
and
just
a
note
to
be
counted
as
a
legal
off
street
parking
space.
They
must
meet
minimum
size
and
location
and
also
you
cannot
have
to
move
one
car
to
get
another
car
out,
so
sometimes
people
think
they
have
more
parking
space
than
they
do,
but
she
has
at
least
four
parking
spaces.
At
least
two
parking
spaces
off
street
parking
spaces
are
required.
D
Just
for
the
family
chapter
21
65
is
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses.
No
outdoor
storage
of
equipment
or
materials
is
is
suggested
in
this
application
and
no
public
display
of
goods,
but
the
applicant
will
need
to
comply
with
a
section
21
702
of
the
outside
storage
and
display
requirements,
and
there
was
no
issue
there.
D
The
landscape
and
lighting
standards-
chapter
21,
73.
This
property
lacks
for
your
information.
This
property
does
lack
some
required,
Boulevard
trees,
actually
I'm,
not
sure
if
there's
a
tree
on
the
property
at
this
time,
which
is
required
by
ordinance.
These
things
are
required
by
ordinance
to
be
as
part
of
the
development
of
the
site.
D
The
minimum
tree
requirement
is
a
1
tree
per
50
feet
of
frontage.
Ok,
so
if
this
board
decides
that
they
are
generally
in
approval
of
this
applicant
of
this
application,
first
of
all,
they
must
determine
if
the
request
show
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
concerning
chapter
20,
170,
home
occupations
and
standards
in
section
20,
100
200
to
the
specific
rules
governing
conditional
uses
and
then
chapters
as
discussed
above
21,
6321
65
and
20
173.
D
G
H
D
H
E
I
I
I
E
H
E
D
The
applicant
is
christimas,
the
property
address
is
1016.
First
Avenue
Northeast,
the
applicant
seeks
approval
to
operate
a
service
business
beauty
salon
from
her
home
located
in
the
r2,
a
single-family
attached
residential
district
for
section
21,
1804,
21
1603,
one
and
2114
Oh
35,
and
contingent
upon
compliance
with
chapter
20,
170,
home
occupied
and
standards
and
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses,
including,
but
not
limited
to
section
21
Oh
OH
to
b6
a
through
H
staff
finds
that
again
and
I'll
just
read
through
these.
For
this.
D
For
this
application,
home
occupations
is
a
list
of
conditional
use
for
the
r2,
a
single-family
attached
residential
district
/,
21
1804,
21
1603
and
21
40,
no
35
home
occupations
in
accordance
with
chapter
20
170.
The
definition
of
home
occupation
is
any
occupation
which
is
clearly
secondary
to
the
main
use
of
the
premises
as
a
dwelling
and
does
not
change
the
character
thereof
or
have
any
exterior
evidence
of
such
secondary
use
other
than
a
non
illuminated
sign,
not
exceeding
400
square
inches
in
area.
D
This
occupation
shall
be
carried
on
and
conducted
only
by
the
members
of
family
residing
in
the
residing.
In
the
dwelling
the
applicant
submitted
the
attached
written
request,
site
plan
and
floor
plan
which
reflect
complement,
reflect
compliance
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
terms
of
the
ordinance
section.
21
o
o
to
be
6a
through
H.
Specific
girls
governing
individual
conditional
uses
is
about
ingress
and
egress
to
the
property
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening,
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards,
an
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
area.
D
Chapter,
20,
170,
home
occupations
and
standards,
Moss
proposes
to
utilize
336
square
feet
or
12%
of
her
single-family
dwelling
for
her
beauty
salon
business.
She
has
acknowledged
by
signature
her
assurance
to
comply
with
chapter
21
7.
No
signage
is
proposed
at
this
time:
chapter
xxi,
63,
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements
and
engineering
design
standards.
Currently,
there
is
designated
area
only
for
only
one
legal
off
street
parking
space
to
be
counted
as
legal
again.
D
I
reiterate
that
there
is
a
minimum
size
and
location
and
they
have
to
allow
for
the
exit
of
a
vehicle
without
moving
another
vehicle.
So
a
minimum
of
two
off
street
parking
spaces
are
required
just
for
the
single-family
dwelling.
The
principle
use
and
this
board
may
require
more
as
a
condition
of
secondary
uses
such
as
home
occupations,
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
per
2165
and
21700
to
no
outdoor
storage
of
equipment
or
materials
used
in
the
home
occupation
shall
be
permitted.
D
No
public
display
of
goods
shall
be
allowed
on
the
premises
except
inside
the
principal
building,
and
this
is
okay
with
the
applicant.
The
property
is
compliant
with
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
In
this
case,
so
this
board
must
determine
if
the
request
shows
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
concerning
chapter
20,
170,
home
occupations
and
standards,
chapter
21,
o
2,
O,
2,
2,
B
6,
a
through
H
specific
rules
governing
conditional
uses
and
chapters
21,
6321,
65
and
21
73,
which
I
just
went
over
if
generally
endorsed.
D
This
board
may
consider
conditions
of
approval,
such
as
improvement
of
more
legal
designated
off
street
parking
spaces
and/or.
Any
other
conditions
deemed
appropriate
appropriate
for
this
secondary
use.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
in
your
agenda
packet
there
was
a
site.
There
were
actually
two
site
plans
submitted.
D
The
first
one
is
basically
what
exists
right
now.
The
garage
the
detached
garage
will
be
physically
attached
to
the
house
by
a
breezeway,
this
being
the
house.
Here's
the
road
and
she
would
like
to
do
her
business
in
this
and
again
she
meets
the
under
25%
the
second
site
plan.
This
is
the
floor
plan
here
of
the
what
she
proposes
to
do
to
the
garage
currently
the
garage
space.
This
second
site
plan
shows
the
garage
being
relocated
over
here
behind
to
the
south
of
the
house
and
opening
up
some
parking
space.
E
D
E
G
C
K
Like
Casey
Lawrence
owns
at
the
back
that
big
apartment
and
he
has
a
grudge
for
his
stuff
right
there,
so
we
can't
really
get
into
our
back
yard.
So
that's
where
we
came
up
with
number
one
parking
on
the
side
which
I
started
out
home,
doing
hair.
So
I've
been
doing
here
25
years,
so
I
kind
of
want
to
slow
down,
come
home
and
do
like
one
at
a
time
and
right
now,
I
currently
work
in
a
walk-in
salon,
so
I
own
it,
but
it's
just
too
much
I
want
to
retire
back
to
home.
So.
K
G
D
K
D
A
C
G
E
G
K
K
G
K
C
J
J
Gonna
point
out
that
on
the
drawing
it,
don't
really
don't
show
very
good
right
great
there.
As
far
as
the
end
of
the
parking
area,
we're
gonna
make
it
go
back,
probably
right
and
bought
into
there.
So
you
can
back,
say
somebody
parks
in
there.
You
can
back
this
way
and
drive
out
instead
of
trying
to
back
out
on
in
the
first
Avenue
mm-hmm.
So
I
ain't
gonna
be
like
a
cluster,
so.
K
K
J
E
K
D
E
H
Yeah
I
would
say
that
I
will
make
a
motion
to
approve
moving
the
building
behind
the
house
and
then
giving
him
up
to
five
years
to
move
the
building
behind
the
house.
Otherwise
I
think
you
leave
it
where
it's
at
today
with
the
breezeway
and
then
give
them
five
years
to
move
it.
And
then,
if
you
don't
do
it
in
five
years,
you
got
to
come
back
to
the
board.
E
H
K
H
D
E
L
E
E
B
E
L
I
L
L
L
This
amendment
raised
the
maximum
side
wall
from
12
foot
to
16
foot
revised
the
written
consent
percentage
from
100%
of
all
property
owners,
owning
property
immediately
adjacent
to
the
proposed
rezone
to
55%.
Allow
connection
to
sanitary
sewer
leaves.
The
finish
is
for
structures
aesthetics
to
the
building
officials.
Discretion
includes
sidewall
articulation
language
and
includes
included
provisions
regarding
the
maximum
size
of
the
residential
garage
that
it
shall
not
exceed
two
thousand
one
hundred
eighty
square
feet
or
thirty
percent
of
the
lot
area.
L
So
Patrick
Moe
hold
rezone,
does
property
adjacent
to
grouse
Street,
which
is
adjacent
to
an
unimproved
platted
right
away,
being
grouts
grouse
street
with
the
reason
taking
place
in
various
other
landowners
along
the
pheasant
land
and
North
Lake
Drive
wanting
to
gain
access
to
their
properties.
We
are
bringing
this
to
you
all
for
discussion
on
how
to
move
forward.
I,
guess
just
to
start
out
with
some
ordinances
that
pertain
to
this
area
and
trying
to
come
up
with
how
to
move
forward
in
21
6201.
L
L
And
also
how
we
go
about
things
now
when
developments
are
plotted,
we
have
the
development
agreement
which
binds
the
developer
to
improving
the
right
of
ways
and
building
them
to
city
standards
and
stubbing,
and
all
the
infrastructure
and
utilities
which
didn't
get
done
here.
So
it's
just
now
what
we
have
to
I
pulled
up
when
this
property
was
annexed,
it
stated
that
there
will
be
no
direct
access
to
North
Lake
Drive
by
any
of
the
Lots
in
block
one
through
five
and
access
shall
only
be
by
the
designated
streets
on
the
side
plat.
L
So
what
we
have
going
on
there
as
well,
are
private
accesses
onto
private
property,
and
so,
where
there's
actually
a
public
right-of-way
people
aren't
able
to
gain
access
because
there's
trees
in
the
way
and
then
but
they
have
their
own
and
they've
they've
historically
been
there.
So
it's
kind
of
I
mean
do
we
make
those
go
away
and
we
the
designated
access
points
and
improve
them.
So.
L
H
H
L
All
so
I
guess
I
did
I'll
show
you
guys
the
little
site
I
na
of
the
area
that
I
put
together
here,
which
it
also
might
make
you
a
little
sick
because
it
twists
and
everything
so
just
be
cautious
of
that.
It's
a
circle
template
okay.
So
this
is
where
you
enter
pheasant
lane
from
whatever
that
avenue
is
off
of
the
highway
up
by
the
water
tower.
So
what
this
picture
is
showing
is
that
is
looking
to
the
east
and
then
this
is
when
you
turn
on
to
it
and
you're
looking
to
the
south.
L
So
it's
it's
unobstructed,
and
this
is
actually
an
area
where
you
can
drive
now.
This
is
the
Bend
area
of
pheasant
lane,
and
this
is
where
a
residential
garage
was
rezone.
This
property
was
Riis
owned
and
then
a
residential
garage
was
constructed,
and
that
was
built
last
year,
but
access
ones.
It
wasn't
really
an
issue
for
them,
because
pheasant
lane
is
easily
drivable
or
drivable
to
this
area.
So
is.
L
Yep
yeah,
so
that
picture
was
looking
south
west
and
then
this
is
what
it
turns
into
when
you
want
to
go
south
west,
so
you
can't
there's
trees
in
the
way,
and
so
you
can't
keep
continue
so
then
that
would
also
prompt
people
to
go
through
that
private
access,
which
is
also
posted,
private
property
and
whatnot,
but
it's
also
hard
to
turn
around
in
that
area.
This
is
antelope
lane
this
next
picture,
so
this
is
looking
south
towards
North,
Lake
Drive.
I
L
L
C
L
L
L
So
that
picture
that
was
taken
was
here
and
that's
is
where
I
believe
they
vacated
that
right
away
and
then
moved
it
over
to
where
Krauss
currently
exists
and
is
shown
on
this
map.
The
reason
for
vacating
it
and
I
can't
recall
what
year
it
was,
but
it
was
the
contour
of
the
road
or
of
the
land
and
then
where
it
was
just.
It
wasn't
as
visible.
First.
H
L
L
L
And
then
yeah
water
there's
a
fire
hydrant
there
on
pheasant
Lane,
where
it
showed
him
that
red
dot
so
but
it
would
be
quite
the
undertaking,
especially
for
the
fact
that
there's
only
planted
Lots
on
the
south
side.
It
would
be
more
desirable
if
there
were
planted
Lots
on
the
north
side
as
well
to
do
a
full
full
standard
city
street
and
be
able
to
serve
them
with
sewer
and
water,
but
there's
just
a
challenging
area.
So.
H
That's
where
your
stick
is
that
right
there
heads
it's
a
it's
a
private
lot
owned
by
whomever
and
it's
a
zoned
r1
and
it's
been
a
plant,
that's
been
approved
by
this
city
and
now
I
want
to
build
a
house
on
that
r1
lot.
How
do
I
what's
what's
this
process?
How
would
this?
How
does
the
city
react
to
that
request?.
L
Right
now,
we've
just
been
approached
I
mean
we've
been
approached
by
three
different
people
just
about
the
residential
garage
issue
and
they
used
to
not
be
able
to
have
water
and
sewer
connected
to
their
garages.
Because
then
it
I
mean
it
becomes
an
enforcement
issue.
Where
then
they
could
potentially
live
in
their
shed
and
house,
and
but
when,
when
we
amended
the
ordinance,
then
we
allowed
them
to
connect.
So
and
it's
not
even
it's
not
even
the
issue
that
we're
at
right
now,
it's
just.
How
do
we
get
back
to
our
lives.
F
So
did
did
did
was
this
complicated
by
the
fact
that
at
for
the
longest
time,
nobody
ever
thought
that
the
north
side
of
that
road
would
ever
be
developed.
So
that's
why
these
are
G's
and
our
ones
for
grad
purposes
only
were
built
on
the
south
side
of
the
road.
It
seems
to
me
that's
kind
of
wet
with
the
deal
one
letter
John.
L
Well,
they
had
a
master
plan
for
the
whole
area
and
I.
Don't
I,
don't
know
the
history
of
why
it
fell
through
and
why
only
these
Lots
were
plotted
as
r1,
especially
with
not
being
able
to
be
served
with
sewer
and
water,
and
the
water
tower
was
a
known
thing
and
that's
I
think
kind
of
a
reason
why
that
development
didn't
end
up
going
forward.
I.
E
E
L
We
wouldn't
want,
if
I
feel
like.
If
we
move
forward
with
having
clearing
out
the
access
points,
then
the
other
accesses
need
to
go
away
and
I
I,
don't
I
mean
with
direction
I,
don't
think
the
city
would
be
opposed
to
cleaning
out
those
trees,
but
then,
where
we
heard
to
is
some
people
were
uncomfortable
with
allowing
access
or
clearing
the
trees
and
then
letting
them
in
there
and
there's
significant
grade
issues
and
then
bike
trails
as
well,
where
if
people
are
driving
over
it
and
it's
not
improved
at
all,
do
we
want
that
either.
E
H
The
city
explored
a
street
assessment
project
for
pheasant
lane,
because
unless
doc
Howard
wants
to
develop
the
north
side
of
that
pheasant
lane
and
you're
not
gonna,
be
able
to
do
it
on
a
piecemeal
basis.
All
the
individual
landowners
to
construct
even
a
20-foot
road
or
something
on
the
backside
is
that
something
that
staff
has
talked
about
thought
about.
H
L
C
F
L
E
Think
that
would
be
a
little
premature
right
now,
because
I
could've
live
with
a
gravel
access
and
allow
those
people
to
you
know
if
it
slowly
develops
given
waiver
right
to
protest
it
at
some
point
in
time
it
would
have
to
be
upgraded
to
a
you
know,
asphalt
surface
with
curb
and
gutter,
but
just
a
you
know,
even
a
ten
foot
white
gravel
trail
would
be
better.
At
least
they
get
access
to
property
is.
L
H
H
L
So
another
idea
could
be
that
you
obtain
access
easements
over
the
existing
accesses
because
they
are
I
mean
they're,
they're,
drivable
and
they're,
not
like
the
areas
that
are
plaited
right.
Aways
have
significant
great
issues
where
you
can't
even
get
down
from
North
Lake
Drive
to
them,
or
even
from
pheasant
lane.
There
I
mean
they're
just
kind
of
bad
placement.
So
if
the
accesses
that
are
there
are
usable
and
they
could
be
improved
somewhat
to.
L
B
E
L
H
C
H
E
L
H
B
E
L
L
C
L
L
Just
take
some
time
and
look
at
your
schedules:
if
there's
anything
that
you
see
right
away,
I
know
people
planning
a
year
out
is
not
the
norm
so
and
it's
fine.
If
it's
a
last
minute
thing
just
give
us
a
call
and
just
a
heads-up
as
nice.
If
you
can't
make
a
meeting
just
so,
we
can
make
sure
we
always
have
a
quorum.