![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/4-2yqrfTlNc/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: City Council Work Session 09 05 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
Well,
he's!
Well,
oh
I'm
sorry,
sir!
Go
ahead.
I
got
I
have
a
procedural
question
for
probably
for
you
vince
or
sarah.
B
The
two
items
that
are
on
the
work
session
tonight
also
appear
on
our
regular
agenda
as
a
second
reading.
If
we
end
up
in
our
discussions
the
work
session,
realizing
that
we
want
to
make
some
pretty
substantial
changes-
and
I'm
not
saying
that's
the
case,
but
in
case
it
does-
where
does
that?
Take
us
in
our
regular
council
meeting
when
we
get
to
our
second
room?
Do
we
table
within
and
go
back
to.
C
When
I
was
last
here,
you
can
table
and
move
forward
at
after
you
take
it
off
the
table
at
some
later
point
or
you
can
make
a
decision
based
upon
the
substantive
changes
on
whether
you
want
to
go
forward
on
the
second
reading
or
not
depends
upon
the
level
of
substantive
changes
if
they
are
with
within
what
is
fairly
described
as
the
ballpark
of
the
the
substance
of
the
ordinance,
and
there
isn't
a
major
change,
then
you
can
go
forward,
but
if
there's
a
substantive
major
change
in
the
context
of
the
ordinance,
you
can't
you
should
go
to
the
table
route.
A
So
that
being
the
case,
I
mean
we'll
see
what
happens
at
the
council
meeting.
But
I
was
my
intention
to
give
a
little
more
time
between
the
work
session
and
action,
but
the
way
that
it
we
had
advertised
it
prevented
that
so
we'll
cross
that
bridge
later
tonight.
But
this
is
an
ordinance
which
I
brought
forward,
because
I
think
that
it's
one
that
we
have
many
examples
of
the
ordinance
having
not
been
complied
with
in
the
recent
past
and.
A
A
D
Now
I
didn't
drive
through
every
single
area
looking,
but
I
didn't
even
find
one
in
the
i2
area
the
only
place
where
they're
allowed.
So
you
know
it
has
come
up
in
the
past
and
they've
just
kind
of
slipped
through
the
crack,
because
they
really
didn't
make
a
whole
lot
of
sense.
So
I'm
hoping
as
a
group,
we
decide
that
I
mean
just
to
put
somebody
on
the
back:
that's
not
bad,
but
you
can
go
right
down
to
the
post
office.
D
So
I
mean
then
the
post
office
has
been
here
a
long
time.
So
that's
how
long
and
all
this
is
so.
I
strength
strong
consideration
for
unlimited
and
even
more
than
what
we're
I
propose
as
i1
i2.
I
don't
think
any
commercial
district
should
be.
I
think
we
should
just
need
to
protect
the
residential
areas
in
one
form
or
another.
E
The
only
concern
I
have
and
I've
seen
it
is
where
the
doc
either
being
proposed
or
in
place
as
a
significant
impact
on
the
frontage
road
that
they
have
to
get
to
it.
F
G
Ken
would
we
have
to
put
like
restrictions
back
from
the
road?
Is
that
would
that
take
care
of
that
type
of.
D
D
So
you
got
to
pull
into
your
parking
lot
somehow
and
then
access
your
dock
all
on
your
property
and
not
use
the
public
right-of-way
to
back
in
itself,
so
you're,
not
stopping
in
the
middle
of
the
road
blocking
the
traffic
and
everything
else.
Without
having
to
spell
that
out
and
exactly
well,
you
got
100,
you
must
have
110
feet
or
50
feet
or
whatever.
I
think,
access
to
the
dock
must
be
obtained
off
your
own
public
way
or
private
way.
I
should
say.
E
E
About
if
ken
were
to
add
language
in
there,
that
would
prohibit
the
access
to
loading
docs
from
a
street.
In
other
words,
I
come
in
now
I
gotta
back
up
off
the
street
into
it
or
or
I
gotta
make
a
loop
on
private
property
come
into
the
street
and
go
back
if
he
were
to
come
up
with
some
type
of
language
that
would
prohibit.
That
is
that
significant
enough
that
we
should
delay
the
second
reading,
not
knowing
what
that
language
is
going
to
be.
C
Yes
and
the
reason
why
is
when
you're
talking
about
this
ordinance,
what
we're
talking
about
is
screening
or
not,
screening
allowing
a
second
knot.
Second,
now
what
you're
talking
about
is
actual
egress
and
egress
and
inc
egress
and
ingress,
and
it's
it's
important
to
make
sure
that
that
language
is
accurate
number
one.
So
that
would
be
an
important
reason
for
delay,
but
number
two,
this
one,
the
one
that's
been
proposed,
does
not
address
the
issue
of
ingress
and
egress,
so
it
would
be
a
substantive
difference.
B
Ken
I've
got
a
couple
questions
as
I
want
to
make
sure.
I
understand
this.
As
an
example,
rob
peters
was
here
last
last
meeting
discussing
his
business.
That's
in
an
i1
district,
correct.
B
B
B
D
A
I
would
like
to
add,
after
seeing
how
many
of
these
are
in
commercial
zones
and
that
we
also
have
these
in
business
park
zones.
A
D
On
main
street
on
campus,
if
you
wanted
to
load
but
see,
that's
going
to
be
where
it's
work,
it's
going
to
be
tough.
The
c1
will
be
the
hardest
district
to
get
it
into,
because
you
don't
have
enough
lot
area
to
allow
for
that
transfer
on
your
own
property
to
get
back
into
that
dock
you're
almost
going
to
have
to
be
adjacent
to
an
alley
where
you
could
pull
down
an
alley
and
back
from
the
alley.
D
E
Yeah,
it
would
appear
to
me,
like
those
issues
should
be
looked
at.
How
far
does
it
go
into
the
zones
which
which
zones
does
it
cover?
Logically?
Are
there
situations
that
we
don't
want
it
in
even
within
any
of
those
zones,
and
then
the
the
use
of
of
the
access
back
to
the
docks
in
regards
to.
D
A
D
A
C
C
A
C
A
E
Idea
so
let's
just
look
at
the
timing
of
this,
the
first,
if
we
tabled
it
or
voted
it
down
we're
looking
at
two
weeks
before
the
first
read
again
right.
E
A
We
could
take
it
back
to
the
plan
commission.
It
would
not
affect
the
council
schedule
at
all.
If
we
redo
a
first
reading,
there
could
be
a
plan
commission
consideration
in
between
of
a
revised
ordinance,
which
is
different,
and
the
plan
commission
took
issue
with
what
was
proposed,
but
they
may
not
take
issue.
I
don't
think
they're
just
flat
opposed.
A
E
G
G
G
E
A
Justin
corrected
my
what
I
said
at
the
last
council
meeting
was
that
ordinance
ordinances
to
which
a
an
applicant
takes
issue
can
be
brought
before
you
to
the
council,
who
passed
the
ordinance
to
give
a
variance,
but
he
said
not
in
in
every
case
there
in
some
cases,
so
we
need
vince's
opinion
as
to
whether
or
not
this
is
a
case
where
the
council
could
grant
a
variance.
We
do
have
a
variance
procedure
in
our.
I
don't
know
that
we
we
have
various
procedures
in
various
places
in
our
ordinances.
B
A
C
I
want
to
meet
them.
I
couldn't,
if,
even
if
you
asked
me
to
speak
off
the
top
of
my
head
on
it
yeah,
I
would
have
to
go
through
the
ordinances
just
to
make
sure
my
reading
is
correct
and,
frankly
I
need
to
have
the
question
better
defined.
E
That
that
it
should
be
changed
in
regards
to
the
general
language,
without
some
of
the
other
terms
that
we
talked
about,
then
then
we
could
agree
upon
and
approve
the
ordinance
language.
The
problem
is,
we
don't
know
necessarily
whether
mr
peterson,
the
things
that
we
have
expressed,
concerns
with
that
should
be
added.
We
don't
know
if
that
now
is
included
in
there,
so
that
could
be
exclude.
We
could
be
approving
something
and
then
he
have
a
plan
that
goes
against
some
of
our
concerns
that
that's
the
downside.
E
E
The
concern
I
would
have
with
us
approving
any
kind
of
variance
for
him
would
be
the
process
of
the
board
of
adjustments
is
such
that
people
request
the
variance
they
either
get
it
or
they
don't
get
it
and
the
only
recourse
from
that
is
circuit
court.
They
can't
come
to
the
council
and
say
I
don't
like
the
response
that
they
got
there.
That's
why
I
question
whether
we
can
actually
vary
a
a
condition
that
is
within
our
variances
like
this,
I,
otherwise
you
wouldn't
have
a
need
for
the
board
of
adjustments.
E
They
just
come
to
the
council
all
the
time
they
just
bypass
us.
So
I
question
whether
we
can
do
that,
but
you
know
again,
I'm
I'm
not
vince
or
justin
or
stanton.
So
you
know
it
certainly
should
get
looked
into,
but
I
I
don't
want
to
hold
up
him.
Didn't
he
say
this
fall.
I
think
he
was
generic.
Wasn't
he
yeah.
I
C
C
I
did
you
know
I
when,
when
I
provided
the
the
answer
as
to
it
would
be
nice
to
wrap
everything
up
into
one,
keep
in
mind
that
I'm
not
taking
into
account
the
policy
and
political
issues
like
dan
is
identifying,
and
so
just
based
on
what
I
say
you
you
shouldn't
go
forward
on
just
this.
C
I'm
just
saying
it
would
be
nice
to
wrap
everything
up
into
one,
and
if
we
were
going
to
do
that,
then
we
need
to
go
through
the
process
it.
If
you
wish
to
go
forward
on
this,
you
you
certainly
can,
and
then
we
can
have
a
second
ordinance
that
adds
and
changes
the
additions.
E
E
We
approve
whatever
the
the
conditions
are
today.
Yes,
what's
being
proposed.
Okay,
we
have
some
conditions
that
we
know
we
want
to
add
so
to
ensure
that
the
example
that
we're
talking
about
that
we're
trying
to
accommodate
if
we
can,
which
is
mr
peterson's
need,
then
my
question:
is
it's
important
that
those
conditions
that
we
want
to
get
into
this
with
the
next
go-round
of
of
an
ordinance
change?
E
I
think
it's
important
that
they
be
included
in
mr
peterson's
current
plan.
I
don't
want
to
approve
the
loading
dock
scenario
and
then
not
get
what
we
want
with
the
additional
items.
For
example,
again,
I'm
not
seeing
his
plan.
I
don't
want
his
plan
to
where
he's
going
on
the
road
and
just
backing
in.
We
don't
want
that.
E
C
C
And
that
you
can
have
that
you
can
insert
that
kind
of
language
into
an
ordinance
that
restricts
the
use
of
that
loading
facility.
Now
that
may
create
a
can
of
worms
with
some
other
ordinances,
but
that
would
be
part
of
the
cleanup
for
round
two
and
then
then
it
would
address
the
the
needs
of
mr
peterson.
C
J
J
B
D
Only
a
small
section
of
it
never
in
relation
to
the
whole
lot.
I
just
know
he
wants
to
add
that
bay
on
the
south
side
of
the
property
facing
the
west,
and
I
think
he
has
quite
a
bit
of
setback
there.
Yet,
but
again
it
was
just
one
small
corner
detail,
not
in
relationship
with
the
entire
lot.
I
think
he
will
have
plenty
of
room
to
access
his
without
going
out
into
the
public
way.
D
I
think
he'll
be
able
to
pull
in
and
back
in
there
and
do
that
as
we're
requesting,
and
so
I
think
maybe
a
simple
note.
Just
at
the
end
of
one
and
two,
you
know
in
zones
i1
and
i2
as
long
as
the
party
can
be
accessed
off
of
private
property
or
something
for
this
time
until
we
can
really
get
it
cleaned
up.
E
B
E
E
F
E
That's
my
question:
I
don't
want
to
make
a
big
deal
of
it,
but
I
don't
want
to
find
ourselves
in
10
or
20
or
30
days
from
now
going
dang.
That's
that's
not
what
we
thought.
That's
not
what
we
wanted
and
and
that's
the
danger
of
this.
If
I
knew
that
it
wasn't
going
to
be,
then
I
would
say:
let's
get
it
voted
through.
E
If
that's
what
we
agree
to,
so
he
can
get
going,
make
his
plans
and
if
we
do
that
and
you
review
his
site
plan
and
it's
acceptable
to
you
to
what
we're
talking
about
tonight.
We
should
be
good
to
go
if
it.
If
it
ends
up,
then
we'll
have
to
go
out
on
the
street
and
find
somebody
to
oppose
it.
C
A
D
D
Basically,
the
first
thing
was:
I
had
on
exempt
signs.
This
is
in
21,
80,
14
7..
I
had
construction
signs,
it
says
one
sign
per
contractor
shall
be
allowed
for
a
lot.
This
sign
shall
not
exceed
32
square
feet
near
and
shall
not
have
erected
the
building
from
it
and
shall
not
be
erected
until
a
building
permit
has
been
issued.
A
construction
sign
must
be
removed
within
14
days
after
substantial
completion
of
the
project.
D
We
kind
of
used
that
for
these
guys
to
put
up
these
little
signs
all
over
town
and
the
purpose
of
this
one
is
actually
for
somebody,
that's
doing
a
building
site,
you
know
putting
up
a
whole
new
structure
and
then
they'll
put
a
32
square
foot
sign
out
there.
That
says
you
know
whatever
construction
company
generally
has
got
the
bank's
name
and
the
owner's
name
and
stuff
or
other
thing,
and
we
kind
of
had
use
this
for
the
same
intent
for
these
schindler
guys
to
come
around
and
and
stick
something
in
the
yard
there.
D
D
Yeah,
I'm
not
I'm
not
in
favor,
but
I
was
trying
to
find
something
to
say
yes,
no
or
maybe,
and
so
I'm
just
looking
for
some
clarification
and
and
and
hopefully
that
we're
not
going
to
do
it
under
this.
So.
E
I
don't
understand
a
new
home
or
or
new
windows
in
my
house,
or
new
siding
on
my
house
or
I
got
it
painted
or
somebody
put
new
sidewalk
or
concrete
in
or
I
mean
you
can
we
can
go
on
and
on
and
on.
I
agree
those
guys.
E
D
E
E
You
know,
I
think,
when
you're
building
a
house-
and
it
says
cash
way
or
whatever
it
says
on
there
when
the
house
is
done
and
your
part
of
the
project's
done
it
goes
away
now.
That's
only
one
of
what
I
assume
are
the
exempt
signs
that
you're
going
to
talk
about.
D
G
D
K
E
D
Be
allowed
to
stay
for
14
days
that
they
could
do
it
14
days
after
the
project
was
done
based
on
this
loose
interpretation
of
this
ordinance
and
that's
why
I'm
looking
for
this
kind
of
direction
and
clarification
so
that
we
can
have
a
firm
study
and
when
we
go
out
and
tell
these
people?
This
is
what
it
is.
This
is
what
it
is
so.
E
D
Hopefully
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
this
one,
the
one
we're
talking
about
now
is
just
an
interpretation
and-
and
I
understand
I
think,
as
long
as
everybody's-
in
kind
of
an
agreement
and
nobody's
against
that
issue
and
only
be
allowed
time
or
period.
I
think
we're
fine
there.
I
don't
think
we
need
anything
more
than
that,
but
I
am
hoping
for
comment.
D
If
somebody
doesn't,
then
the
next
item
is
any
on-premise
portable
sandwich
board
sign
less
than
10
square
feet
in
area
may
remain
on
display
to
the
public
only
during
the
business
hours
we
want
to
add
and
must
be
a
minimum
of
10
feet
from
any
brownie
property
line
again
that
keeps
those
from
this
is
in
80
14.
D
Typically,
it's
just
a
little
bifold
sign.
It's
like
a
on.
D
D
Is
this,
but
with
a
commercial
message
to
clarify
that
and
try
to
get
rid
of
some
of
those
other
signs
that
are
happening
under
the
current
ordinance
as
subjected,
there's
gonna,
be
a
lot
of
signs
that
are
gonna,
become
prohibited,
that
you're
going
to
see
around
the
gas
stations
in
other
areas
and
sticking
out
in
the
boulevard.
D
D
Well,
no,
I
guess
this
doesn't
clarify
if
what's
getting
any
on-premise
portable
standard
word
sign,
yeah,
though
it
probably
should
be
limited
to
it.
Yeah.
E
For
business
well,
so
I
build-
and
let's
just
use,
for
example,
down
on
first
avenue,
where
they've
got
the
the
gas
or
the
car
wash
there,
and
then
you've
got
two
little
mini
malls
there.
I
think,
there's
like
seven
businesses
in
there
yeah
we
could
have
and
that's
a
pretty
short
area.
We
could
have
seven
banners
in
there.
The
way
it's
written
today
correct
if
they
could
find.
K
E
D
D
I
was
researching
some
of
the
other
communities
and
one
thing
I
come
up
with
that
says:
the
garage
or
yard
or
rumory
sales
signs
not
larger
than
two
feet
by
two
feet:
four
square
feet
to
be
displayed
only
on
private
property
for
no
more
than
four
days
in
any
six
month
period
are
permitted.
Such
signs
shall
remove
the
day
following
the
sale,
one
for
zoning
landed
in
residential
districts.
D
L
D
Well,
right
now
we're
silent
on
the
issue,
so
we
don't
have
any
jurisdiction
over
it
at
all.
Unless
we
do
pass
and
say
decide
for
sure
that
nothing's
allowed
in
the
right
of
way,
I
did
send
out
a
survey
and
I'm
sorry
I
did
get
out
late
late
last
week
with
it.
D
So
I
only
got
four
replies
back
on
it,
but
all
four
of
the
communities
that
responded
aberdeen
here
in
yankton
and
peers
do
not
allow
any
political
signs
for
sale
signs
or
rummage
sales
signs
or
anything
else
to
be
in
their
public
right
away.
Nobody
called
back
informed
me
back
that
they
were
allowed
just
fyi,
but
that's
one
of
the
other
topics.
E
Part
of
the
challenge
you
have
with
that
is
when
somebody
lives
back
four
blocks
from
a
main
street,
then
every
corner
and
every
block
has
one
for
blocks
to
get
you
to
that,
then
rummage
sale
and,
on
my
personal
note,
is
I
end
up
with
a
lot
of
them
in
my
front
yard
that
nobody
ever
asks,
and
I
think
that's
wrong
that
that
they
are
placed
there.
So
I
go
take
them.
E
I
never
had
anybody
come
get
them
so,
but
I
think
again
it's
I
don't
personally
have
a
problem
with
them,
but.
B
I
I
would
be
in
favor
of
banning
her
from
the
public
right
away.
I
remember
when
I
campaigned
two
years
ago.
I
was
very
cognizant
of
where
I
put
my
campaign
signs
and
I
made
darn
sure
that
I
did
not
put
a
mini
public
right
away
and
I
don't
think
that's
too
much
to
to
expect
in
general
of
people
that
put
out
those
kinds
of
signs.
D
Well,
in
21
80
26
the
restrictions
of
signs
located
in
the
public
right-of-way.
Excuse
me
our
current
ordinance
does
not
allow
it.
So
I
mean
it's:
we've
been
loose
and
lacks
on
it,
because
we've
never
had
the
full
support
to
to
enforce
it,
which
we're
looking
for
now.
If
that's
what
the
channel
we
want
to
take
or
do
we
want
to
modify
it
to
allow
certain
things
to
be
there
or
not.
D
D
Correct
the
other
thing
is
allowed
is
like
on
main
street.
We
have
awning
signs
and
stuff
like
that.
The
awnings
are
allowed
to
go
over
the
public,
sidewalk
and
you're
allowed
to
even
put
a
sign
underneath
them
on
like
main
street,
and
then,
of
course,
our
area
identification
signs
either
by
us
or
the
state
there's
allowed
in
the
public
right
away.
A
G
E
B
E
Because
I
don't
want
a
realtor
sign,
because
I've
seen
some
of
them
now
there's
one
of
the
realty
companies
that
it's
like
two
or
three
times
the
height
of
a
normal
real
estate
sign.
Well
now
you
got
problems
because
you
do
have
potential
danger
of
visibility
and
such
so.
I
think
we
need
to
create,
establish
a
standard
sign
size,
the
maximum
one
that
could
be
in
the
right
of
way,
and
then
that
goes.
E
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
political
signs,
the
little
ones
now,
if
you're
gonna
have
a
great
big
four
by
eight,
then
it
can't
be
in
the
right
of
way.
You
know
it
needs
to
be
someplace
else,
realty
signs.
If
we
come
up
with
signs,
I
don't
problem.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
roaming.
Shell
signs.
I.
E
L
L
G
A
I
mean
I,
I
don't
disagree
with
any
of
it.
I
just
think
that
you
should
say
what
you
want
and
enforce
it,
and
if,
if
you're,
if
you're,
okay
with
the
status
quo,
which
is
everybody
puts
signs
in
the
boulevard
in
the
right-of-way
they
put
realtor
signs,
they
put
political
signs
of
any
size,
then
spell
that
out
that
they're
allowed
in
the
right
way.
If,
if
you're,
only
okay
with
the
small
ones
say
maximum
size
can't.
G
E
Well,
adam:
well,
I
think
when
it
comes
to
political
science,
I'm
with
john,
I
think
that
should
be
smaller
than
that,
because
a
lot
of
people
don't
have
one
in
their
yard.
They
got
this
one
for
senate
this
one
for
mayor
this
one
for
council
this
one
for
whatever
the
you
know,
the
the
ballot
issue
is,
and
so
you
can
have
a
multitude
of
those
things
in
somebody's
yard
and
if
they
are
literally
all
the
size
of
a
a
real
estate
sign,
that's
pretty
large
one
is
not
a
problem.
E
G
L
H
Like
to
comment
just
a
little
bit,
I
I
know
we're
talking
about
the
comfort
level
of
any
sign.
Let's
call
it
whether
it's
whatever
type
being
in
the
boulevard-
and
I
would
lobby
for
caution
and
allowing
signs
in
the
boulevard
from
a
multiple
noted
point
of
view.
H
Okay,
you
allow
them
in
the
right
of
way
so
they're
going
to
be
properly
positioned
in
certain
conditions,
but
in
my
career
I
have
seen
them
propped
up
against
fire.
Hydrants
I've
seen
them
fasten
the
stop
signs
every
light
pole
along
a
block,
so
they're
not
only
just
occupying
grass
base
they're,
also
starting
to
infringe
on
other
utilities.
H
So
once
you
cross
the
sidewalk
it's
a
free-for-all,
and
now
whether
we
get
complaints
or
not,
that's
a
different
story.
It's
a
matter
of
how
much
public
intrusion
do
you
start
with
and
allow
to
continue
to
happen
most
of
the
communities.
I've
worked
for,
do,
ban
signs
from
the
boulevard
and,
yes,
it
is
a
pain
in
the
hump
to
try
to
enforce
it.
But
I
have
seen
where
signs
are
collected
on
a
friday
afternoon.
A
E
E
G
G
L
L
L
E
I
mean
we've
done
that
before,
where
we've
set
up
a
matrix
or
whatever
and
just
said,
here's
what
they
are
you
know,
and
so
that
you
could
deal
with
both
sign
and
quantity,
on
something
like
that.
H
I
An
a
I've
never
heard
a
complaint
about
any
of
them.
People
just
go
with
it,
so
I
wouldn't
get
to
me.
It
wouldn't
bother
if
we
didn't
deal
with
that,
but
I
think
the
sign
size
is
a
big
deal,
but
especially
in
the
residential
but
the
rest
of
them.
I
think
they
they've
gone
along
very
well
without
having
any
other
restriction.
E
Well,
if
we
can
get
through
the
various
types
of
issues,
then,
and
and
then
maybe
our
first,
our
first,
which
is
this-
is
probably
the
hundredth
version
of
this
sign
code
that
we've
had
I'll
call
it
the
first
one,
the
next
one.
You
know
if
we
find
that
the
whole
right-of-way
issue
becomes
an
issue
once
we
make
these
modifications,
then
we'll
be
back
here
with
some
type
of
language
to
deal
with
that
issue.
But
if
it's
not
an
issue,
then
don't
make
it
one.
D
D
E
And
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that.
I
really
don't
I
I'm
okay
with
that.
I
again
it
all
comes
down
to
now.
I
saw
one
today
and
I
actually
have
a
picture
some
pictures,
but
it's
a
corner
lot,
but
they
got
one
in
the
front
and
one
right
on
the
corner.
So
if
you're
coming
on
that
corner,
you
know
technically,
it
should
be
down
farther.
On
the
other
side.
E
Unless
you're
in
a
low
car
yeah,
but
as
far
as
the
idea
of
one
on
each
frontage,
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that.
As
long
as
the
size
is
controlled,
location
is
controlled.
M
L
A
L
D
D
Three
square
feet:
yeah.
I
did
one
two,
I'm
sorry,
yeah
put
them
up
again
with
back
to
the
banners
that
does
not
exist,
24
square
feet,
two
one
or
more
streets,
not
more
than
two
banners
will
be
allowed.
Not
no
more
than
one
banner
will
be
allowed
for
to
face
any
street
or
public
way.
Again.
24
squares
is
securely
fence,
and
I
guess,
if
everyone's
pretty
good
on
that,
just
wanted
to
enforce
it,
as
it
is
right.
E
E
I
I
want
to
share
some
pictures
that
that
I
took
today-
and
this
is
I'm
actually
I'm
stopped
at
the
stoplight,
but
I'm
looking
to
the
south
on
highway
81
at
the
corner
of
on
the
cowboy
property,
okay.
E
What
you
have
to
the
left
are
the
two
big
signs
that
for
the
property
itself,
but
then
you've
got
a
banner
right
there,
and
now
this
one
just
showed
up.
That's
a
temporary
thing.
I
don't
know
it's
a
barn
dance
and
then
they
sell
some
of
their
items
out
there,
deer
shacks
and
then
going
to
the
south.
There's
three
beer
banners.
E
So
anyway,
that
the
whole
thing
right
away
again
I'll
go
back
to
it.
The
problem
isn't
any
one
of
those
items,
but
we
got
a
dozen
of
them
out
there
and
they
all
add
up-
and
it
looks
like
heck-
can't
go
to
a
different
picture
here.
It
is
from
the
different
angle,
so
you
come
into
watertown
and
by
golly
you
know
we
sell
beer
and
then
you
can
take
it
to
your
deer,
shack.
D
E
Okay,
truckload
sale.
If
you
look
to
the
left,
you
can't
see
it
there's
one
of
those
flag
things.
What
do
you
call
them?
Those
feather
flags
and
actually
right
behind
this
there's
another
one,
so
click
the
next
picture
and
then
also
on
their
their
sign
up
there.
It
says
they're
having
a
mattress
sale,
click
the
next
one,
there's
the
other
feather
sign
so
by
golly
you're,
not
gonna.
If
you
need
a
mattress,
you
know
right
where
to
go
right
there
again,
that's
a
problem.
What
is
it
okay?
D
E
E
Okay,
you
got
two
here
on
the
left-hand
side.
You
got
a
banner
on
that
little
white
building,
that's
a
portable
building,
go
to
the
right
or
do
the
next
picture
he's
got
that
great
big
one.
We
got
a
state,
fair
sale
and
then
he's
got
a
little
one
to
the
right
of
that
or
down
below
it
whatever
it
is
now
go
to
the
next
one
and
out
on
212
he's
got
that
one
and
then
look
down
farther
right.
There
he's
got
another
big
one.
E
You've
got
seven
signs
for
one
hot
tub
sale.
I
think
we're
scared.
I
think
it's
a
little
excess.
Here's
one
where
you've
got
that
this
is
the
one
I
was
telling
you
about.
That's
got
the
two
signs
on
the
one
property
for
sale
and
one
says
cell
pending
is
and
has
had
that
on
there,
but
this
one's
right
by
the
fire
hydrant.
E
I
don't
know
that,
but
I
don't
want
it
there,
even
if
there's
only
one
allowed,
that's
not
the
place
for
it,
but
to
me,
if
you're
going
to
have
it
there,
it
should
be
on
literally
on
the
sides,
the
two
sides-
and
I
don't
have
a
and
then
there's
a
zillion
of
these
pictures.
If
you
want
to
see
them,
there's
that
that's
been
there
forever
go
to
the
next
one.
That
one's
been
like
that
for
weeks.
E
E
Now
go
to
the
next
one.
Now
here
we've
got
a
realty
company
that
until
just
two
days
ago,
was
advertising
some
micro
grooming,
not
exactly
sure
what
that
is.
That's
something
do
your
eyelashes
or
something
it's
just
constant.
It's
just
you
just
go
and
go
and
go
and
and
they're
everywhere
and
again
any
one
of
them
is
not
the
problem.
E
E
Nope
there
were
six,
I
got
the
picture,
there's
six
pictures
or
six
of
them.
That
said,
we
deliver
and
three
or
four
were
on
their
property
and
two
on
the
property
to
the
west
of
them.
And
then
there
was
a
georgia,
peaches
or
something
colorado,
peaches,
a
head,
sweet
corn,
a
head
and
then
across
the
street
was
the
the
place
with
all
their
signs.
And
then
you
get
down
farther.
It's
just
continuous.
D
A
B
E
B
I'm
not
I'm
not
disagreeing
with
you
necessarily,
but
that
we've
been
at
this
for
what
a
year
and
a
half
we've
had
what
nine
meetings
of
which
half
of
those
are
open
to
the
public.
I
don't
know
what
kind
of
attendance
we
got
from
the
public.
I
guess
my
question
is:
would
we
keep
beating
away
at
this?
Are
we
going
to
come
up
with
anything
different
or
better?
At
the
end
of
the
day,.
E
E
E
So
I
think
it
needs
more
work,
not
I
think,
from
the
primary
issue.
Glenn
I've
been.
I
was
nine
years
on
plan
commission
six
years
on
this,
and
and
so
in
15
years
we've
been
working
on
sign,
ordinance
language
because
it
happened
all
the
time
and
my
guess
is
when
I'm
dead
and
gone
we'll
still
be
talking
about
it.
E
But
somehow
we
got
to
get
this
thing
put
to
bed
and
I
agree
with
the
mayor:
look,
let's
get
something
that
we
want
and
need,
and
then
we
enforce
it
and
we
move
on,
but
right
now
not
only
do
we
not
enforce
it,
but
we
we
have
stuff.
We
know
we
want.
We
have
stuff.
We
know
we
don't
want.
E
You
know
somewhere
along
the
line.
We
just
gotta
draw
a
line
because
we
can
talk
about
these
flag,
feather
flags,
it'll,
be
something
else
tomorrow
and
you
know
again.
I
don't
disagree
that
that
they're
good
marketing
tools,
but
should
our
whole
community
go
through
the
pains
of
putting
up
with
all
this
stuff
all
the
time,
and
that
represents
what
our
community
looks
like.
E
D
G
I
K
D
E
How
do
we
eliminate
that
excess
and,
unfortunately,
what
that
often
means
is
tight
restrictions
on
the
ordinance,
because
that's
the
only
way
you
can
do
it,
because
it's
on
a
per
property
basis-
and
you
know
I'm
I'm
the
same
way.
I'm
I'm
with
sarah,
and
I
said
we
can't
if
we
can't
or
don't
have
the
guts
to
pass
something
and
then
enforce
it
then
take
the
thing
off
the
books
and
let
the
chips
fall
where
they
may,
but
if
we
can
get
something,
that's
reasonable
and
we're
committed
to
enforcing
it.
D
Well,
this
is
what
we
have
before
you
have
a
good
first
step,
though
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
work
going
in
here,
a
lot
of
revisions,
a
lot
of
tightening
up
of
a
lot
of
things,
and
I
realize
that,
possibly
with
the
addendum
of
the
political
and
rental
signs
being
added
in
there.
I
think
what
you
have
on
before
you
is
a
good
start.
D
H
H
D
D
D
F
K
D
F
Can't
that
fall
with
under
our
rv
and
stuff
seriously,
you
have
to
have
a
place
for
them
with
your
rv
parking
and
stuff.
E
A
E
E
E
E
E
A
E
K
H
The
images
I'm
about
to
show
you
are
somewhat
dated
now
I
mean
this
project
has
advanced
well
beyond,
where
we're
at
just
that,
for
those
people
that
don't
have
time
to
drive
out
and
look
at
it.
This
is
the
new
storm
shelter
that's
being
built
out
on
the
anza
soccer
complex
and,
as
you
can
tell,
the
main
portion
of
the
building's
been
erected
here
looks
it's
starting.
To
look
great,
I
mean
I
like
the
colors
that
we
chose.
H
The
burnish
block
are
looking
pretty
sharp,
so
the
building's
pretty
much
up
this
is
the
bathroom
walls
are
up
on
the
interior.
H
Doing
some
work
door
frames
haven't
arrived
yet,
but
that's
some
of
the
last
work,
that's
still
remaining
is,
is
the
frame
and
fixture
work.
This
is
a
shot
at
the
roof.
This
roof
now
has
been
completely
covered
with
its
finished
layer
of
concrete
and
working
looking
quite
different
than
this
photo,
so
that's
about
where
we're
at,
and
we
expect
to
be
wrapping
this
up
by
the
end
of
september.
If
all
the
hardware
shows
up
so
just
kind
of
give
you
an
idea
where
that
project's
at.
B
K
H
Testing
my
memory,
but
the
overall
project
was
around
240
to
250
000
and
the
city's
portion
of
that,
I
believe,
was
in
the
70
to
75
000
range.
I
I
don't
remember
the
exact
numbers,
but
that
was
about
the
percentage
that
it
shook
out
and
I
know
it's
an
expensive
building,
but
it's
built
for
a
specific
service
and
you
know
you
don't
build
a
stormworthy
shelter
without
spending
a
little
bit
of
money
to
make
sure
that
the
people
that
are
in
it
are
safe.
So.
B
H
Right
we
changed
some
of
the
fixtures
and
took
some
benches
and
different
things
out
of
the
interior
that
we
can
always
add
later.
If
we
get
more
funding
or
want
to
change
the
use
of
the
building
slightly,
I
mean
we
talked
about
making
it
a
dual
purpose:
building
at
some
point,
if,
if
it
works
into
the
scheme
of
things,
but.