►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 02 06 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
That
I
would
think
you
look
for
that
to
grow
slowly
and
just
an
example.
They're
doing
a
brand
new
Veterans
Cemetery
over
in
Minnesota,
and
they
said
that
in
order
to
build
a
cemetery,
the
VA
builds
it.
It
would
have
to
last
20
years
and
naval
and
they
got
a
lot
of
more
veterans
over
there
because
of
the
population,
but
they
only
have
40
acres
set
aside
for
that.
I.
C
Guess
I've
got
I've
got
a
couple
of
comments.
First
of
all,
I
am
a
veteran,
so
I
really
appreciate
where
this
is
coming
from
I'm
fully
supporting
a
fully
support
the
the
process
you're
going
through.
But
this
letter
does
concern
me
I
mean
it
says
that
and
I
guess
I
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
we
as
a
city
are
committing
ourselves
to
because
says
we'll
provide
in-kind
support
for
the
construction
maintenance.
C
Ocation
of
the
cemetery
I
mean
as
a
member
of
the
council,
not
seeing
any
kind
of
numbers
or
knowing
what
our
commitments
going
to
be
going
forward.
I
can't
support
this
letter.
I
mean
I
realize
it
sounds
like
it's
something
you
need
to
move
forward,
but
I
want
to
have
a
some
idea.
What
we
have
city
are
committing
ourselves
to
before
we
approve
this
I.
B
Think
the
good
thing
about
I
guess
the
cemetery
in
that
probably
the
maximum
data
that
would
be
required
out.
There
would
be
a
half
a
million
dollars
now.
I
know
when
you
start
talking
some
of
your
projects
locally.
Here
is
a
city
and
city
council
and
spending
eight
years
on
a
fair
sized
project.
You
don't
get
it
done
for
a
half
a
million
dollars.
You.
D
D
Concern
but,
as
you
know,
as
you
were,
there
I
believe
when
I
asked
the
governor,
if
he
would
support
it,
you
know,
and
his
biggest
concern
was
maintenance
and
I
think
that
you
know
with
a
perpetual
maintenance
on
it.
We
just
we
really
need
to
and
to
understand
what
the
cost
would
be
and
I
know
that
reason.
E
D
Hugh
and
Nancy
at
the
state
level
that
was
their
concerns
also,
is
that
you
know
we
really
don't
have
those
numbers
and
I
think
I
think
it
would
really
be
good
if
we,
if
we
were
able
to
to
get
a
better
handle
and
kind
of,
have
that
that
understanding
and
get
that
down
on
paper.
What
will
we
expect
the
operating
cost
to
be
well,
we
would
expect
them
to
be
every
year
and
every
year
and
every
year,
because.
D
There
that's
the
questions.
Yeah
I!
Don't
think
that
that's
too
hard
to
come
up
with
and
I
would
suggest
that
we
get
that
done
right
away.
You
know
that
we
have
that
you've
got
a
lot
of
smart
people
that
you're
dealing
with
their
own
to
turn
this
over
to
somebody
that
works
with
numbers
and
get
that
that
operating
budget
out
there.
For
us,
that
would
really
help
us
out
of
time.
Mayor.
G
Wouldn't
it
it
seemed
Glenn
I
agree
with
you.
I
I
got
that
same
sense
there,
but
wouldn't
it
seem
from
a
council
standpoint,
the
more
appropriate
manner
in
which
to
address
this
is
in
the
budget
cycle
that
we're
going
to
be
coming
up
with
where
we
look
at
our
long-term
capital.
We
look
at
at
what
are,
as
we
start
to
take
a
look
at
what
our
operational
requirements
are.
Wouldn't
that
be
the
time
you.
D
Would
financially
and
I
think
that's
what
I
mentioned
early
on
is
that
you
know
17
would
not
be
a
year
that
we
could
do
this,
but
18
to
go
through
that
whole
budget
cycle
Shelley
and
I
are
working
on
budget
already
as
we're
speaking,
you
know
different
things,
so
it
has
to
go
through
that
process
of
budgeting.
That's
where,
if
we
had
this
operating
expense
that
that
you
can
tie
into
the
budget,
we
really
really
need
something
like
that.
G
D
G
D
H
All
good
points
question
I
have
is
is
there
seems
to
be
a
sense
of
urgency
for
the
letter
of
support,
so
there
might
be
two
steps
here.
All
good
points
in
the
budget
I
agree
with
those.
If
we
were
to
strike
that
last
sentence
of
the
second
paragraph
is:
does
that
suffice
for
the
short
term
objective,
I.
F
D
D
Agreement
with
that,
you
know
the
cemetery
is
to
get
the
local
ordinance
change
would
not
be
a
problem.
I
think
what
we're
looking
at
is
the
after
the
word
and
you
know
to
provide
in
beautification
I
think
then
they
would
be
willing
to
to
move
forward
on
this,
because
I
do
think
you
guys
have
been
talking
about
an
endowment
fund
that
you
can
get
to
help
with
the
perpetual
care.
Also
I
know
that
there's
there's
gentleman
in
the
audience
that
are
willing
to
donate
fencing
and
things
like
that.
D
C
I
Just
as
an
informational
point
with
regard
to
our
ordinances,
we
do
have
in
there
obviously
cemeteries
Mount
Hope
and
the
Catholic
cemetery,
but
there
is
a
third
option:
a
3rd
cemetery
that
could
be
put
within
city
limits,
that
being
for
mother
of
god
monastery.
So
there's
already
in
ordinance,
optional
Cemetery
that
could
be
brought
in
if
it
were
created.
So
there's
a
model
that
we
could
potentially
look
at
there
with
Cemetery
falling
into
a
similar
category.
J
H
J
B
B
We
have
over
2,100
veterans
in
Coddington
County
and
that
that
twelve
million
that
is
spent
by
the
VA
doesn't
affect
what
I
spent
that's.
In
addition,
what
I
spent
hearing
and
so
we're
in
in
estimating
several
million
dollars
that
the
veterans
spend
and
create
sales
tax
through
that
and
were
looking
at
I
really
looking
at
about
eighteen
thousand,
ten
percent
of
what
my
whole
cost
in
a
relationship
to
the
acreage
of
Mount
Hope
versus
five
acres
here
and.
A
It
all
depends
on
how
you
read
that
letter.
Dennis
I
mean
you
agree
with
what
the
other
gentlemen
are
talking
about
in
that
last
sentence,
but
it
does
not
really
I
mean
when
you
read
it
says,
to
revise
local
ordinance,
provide
in-kind
support
for
the
construction
maintenance
beautification
of
the
cemetery.
It's
not
saying
that
we're
going
to
provide
all
of
it
is
just
saying
we're
going
to
provide
in-kind
support.
So
it's
not
really
locking
us
into
a
certain
we're
committing
to
provide
in-kind,
support,
we're
not
committing
to
100%
of
anything.
A
B
J
J
H
G
Swells
numbers
later
Donna,
I,
think
putting
the
period
there
and
not
adding
anything
is
is
effective
because
if
you
look
at
the
first
part
of
that
that
paragraph
talks
about
the
city,
strong
support
for
the
concept-
and
that's
really
I-
think
that's
where
we're
at
and
Lou
of,
the
lack
of
a
truly
a
documented
overall
plan
that
deals
with
financials
deals
with
everything
else,
bringing
it
into
the
process
of
budgeting.
Do
we
support
the
concept?
Well,
I.
Think
the
concept
is
fine.
K
G
That
would
enable
these
gentlemen
to
go
out
and
and
start
fundraising
and
start
doing
grants
or
whatever
it
is
to
do
it.
But
but
it's
gonna
have
to
take
a
look
at
both
the
overall
construction
of
it
and
if
it's
time
phased
whatever
it
is.
But
then
we're
gonna
have
to
take
a
look
at
that
if
it,
if
there's
capital
involvement
from
the
city
in
the
budget
process-
and
we
look
at
where
those
dollars
fit
within
our
operational
capabilities,
I.
K
Period
great,
you
know
because
the
budget
part
can
come
in,
but
if
you
have
the
letter
that
says
the
city
is
ready
to
support.
This
doesn't
really
say
a
lot
easier
to
go
out
and
ask
somebody
for
money
than
you
say.
Well,
you
know
we
don't
know
if
the
city
will
even
report
it.
But
would
you
give
us
some
money
for
this
and
I
think
we're
right
on
track
to
get
that
letter
going
ASAP
right.
E
B
That
way,
yeah
and
I
would
go
along
with
that,
and
then,
for
instance,
if
we
raise
more
money,
we
we
have
a
goal
of
the
race
under
four
hundred
thousand,
some
through
the
VA,
possibly
some
through
the
state
and
and
locally,
and
and
if
we
don't
make
up
with
our
commitment
to
it.
Well,
then
you
guys
wouldn't
be
committed
into
anything
either,
because
we
haven't
gone
ahead
with
a
project
or.
B
D
D
A
B
F
Just
one
more
question:
yeah
after
receiving
the
letter
of
intent
at
a
later
time
after
we
fulfill
some
of
our
financial
obligations
to
this,
perhaps
there
can
be
an
agreement
made
for
the
in-kind
support,
so
not
at
this
juncture,
but
at
a
later
time
and
maybe
to
be
included
in
the
2018
budget.
I
think.
D
F
D
Moving
on
we'll
go
to
number
four:
it's
an
application
for
a
temporary
location,
transfer
of
eternal
retail,
on
sale,
liquor
license
owned
by
Zeus,
incorporated
doing
business
as
2nd
Street
Station
as
follows:
a
for
the
period
of
4
p.m.
February
17th
of
2017
to
12
a.m.
February,
18th
of
2017
from
15
second
Street
Southwest
to
19:10
West
camp.
At
this
time,
I
will
open
the
public
hearing.
If
there's
anyone
that
speak,
wants
to
speak
in
favor
of
or
against
this.
This
is
your
opportunity.
D
D
D
D
Know
where
it's
being
apologized
for
that
might
because
I
thought
we
were
going
to
do
that.
You
know
I'll,
follow
up
on
that
and
make
sure
it's
there
in
the
future.
For
us
it
does
have
on
there.
Zeus
a
temporary
license
tells
us
where,
but
it
doesn't
tell
us
what,
for
so,
it'd
be
really
easy.
Yeah
it'll
be
really
easy
to
do
that
and
now
make
sure
that's
done
the
future.
D
Any
other
questions
any
not
I
look
for
counsel
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carried
be
on
the
same
part
here
for
the
period
after
12:01
a.m.
February,
18th
of
2017
from
1910
West
Kemp
to
15-second
Street
Southwest.
This
is
transferring
the
license
passed.
So
what
I
will
do
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
again.
If
there's
anyone
wants
to
speak
in
favor
of
or
against
this.
This
is
your
opportunity
here.
You
none
I
will
close
the
public
hearing.
I
will
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion.
Some.
D
H
D
D
D
Hearing
none
if
there
are
no
other
questions,
I'll
look
for
counsel
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
number
six
ordinance,
number
16,
2
9
and
many
in
the
second
or
I'm
sorry,
the
section
14.0
7:04
regarding
inspection
of
Dutch
elm
disease
infections.
This
is
a
second
reading.
I'll
look
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
purposes:
motion
by
Bruce,
second,
by
Beth
Justin.
You
want
to
take
that
on
for
us,
certainly
we'll.
I
E
I
A
comprehensive
revision
to
title
14,
which
is
indicated
in
the
revised
title
in
the
ordinance
which
you
can
see
in
your
packet
there.
The
changes
are
meant
to
provide
clarity
to
what
the
forestry
superintendent
is
able
to
do
in
order
to
respond
to
diseases.
It
empowers
the
City
Council
to
be
able
to
add
diseases
in
the
future,
and
currently
there
are
two
diseases
that
are
fatal.
I
D
Questions
for
Justin
on
this
hearing,
none
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
thanks.
Justin
number
7
second
reading
of
ordinance,
number
17
2:01
amending
chapter
21,
point
7
0,
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown
regarding
home
occupations.
At
this
time,
I
will
open
the
public
hearing.
If
there's
anyone
wants
to
speak
in
favor
of
or
against
this
hearing,
none
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
I'll
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
Bruce
second,
by
Mike
Justin.
I
Do
mayor
this
ordinance,
as
you
recall,
was
brought
up
at
a
work
session
here,
no
a
while
back,
and
that
then
was
handled
because
it's
an
amendment
to
title
21
by
the
plane,
Commission
and
received
their
recommendation.
So
it
is
now
before
you
substantially
the
same
form
as
it's
been
presented
throughout.
The
genesis
of
this
concept
was
the
mayor.
I
G
G
I
Way
the
definition
reads
in
chapter
21
90:
is
the
occupation
shall
be
carried
on
or
conducted
only
by
members
of
a
family
residing
in
the
dwelling?
So
because
we
don't
provide
any
further
definition
like
saying
nuclear
or
extended.
I
would
say
that
if
they
are
related
by
blood
or
by
legal
by
a
legal
relationship
there,
that
would
establish
a
family
relationship
that
if
they
live
in
the
dwelling,
that
would
then
be
sufficient
to
meet
our
home
occupations.
Definition.
That's
just
sort
of
a
shotgun
response
to
your
question,
but.
G
I
H
H
D
Make
a
motion
to
proof
I
gave
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
already,
so
I
will
look
for
counsel
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries.
Thank
you
number.
Eight
ordinance
number.
Seventy!
No!
For
many
section,
ten
point:
zero:
two
zero:
two
of
the
revised
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Watertown
to
clarify
procedure
for
modification
variances
to
the
fire
code.
I
Sir,
so
this
is
the
second
the
this
ordinance
here
is
merely
a
housecleaning
measure.
You
know
the
chief
chief
Krantz
was
kind
enough
to
come
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
substantively.
Really.
What
this
is
meant
to
do
is
provide
what
is,
in
essence,
a
variance
procedure
specific
to
our
fire
code.
Oh
will
do
sorry
about
that.
So
this
is
a
variance
procedure
for
our
fire
code
and
what
we
had
in
there
before
was
language.
That
was
not
clear.
G
D
Has
been
a
real
progress,
because,
when
Justin
came
on,
board,
he's
actually
literally
gone
through
each
and
every
ordinance
and
has
looked
and
seen
if
the,
if
there's
other
areas
in
the
ordinance
that
are
kind
of
the
same
thing
that
we
need
to
eliminate
some.
We
need
her
to
bring
this
up
to
date.
When,
when
you
started
going
through
all
the
fire
ordinances,
then
he's
got
the
chief
that's
on
board.
They
went
through
each
and
every
one
individually
and
and
when
they
see
changes
like
this,
that's
why
they're
bringing
this
in
front
of
us
no.
D
I
I
would
I
would
just
clarify
one
point
to
the
nature
of
a
variance
is
very
fact
dependent,
and
it
is
only
impacting
a
particular
situation,
a
unique
situation.
The
the
way
the
language
reads
in
here
is
that
it
has
to
be
a
very
unique
situation
where
it
modification
would
not
lessen
health
life
and
fire
safety
requirements,
but
it
needs
to
be
tweaked
because
of
some.
You
know
very
specific,
factual
situation,
where
the
rules
just
don't
apply
in
the
spirit
of
the
moment.
I
Is
that
fair
to
say,
chief,
the
chief
Krantz
can
certainly
comment
further,
but
that
last
sentence
there.
The
particulars
of
such
modification
when
granted
or
allowed
and
the
decision
of
the
fire
chief
thereon,
shall
be
entered
upon.
The
record
of
the
department
and
a
signed
copy
shall
be
furnished
the
applicant,
so
the
variance
if
you
will
would
be
signed
off
by
the
chief
would
apply
only
to
that
very
particular
circumstance
and
would
be
stored
there.
But
the
general
international
fire
code
would
still
apply
to
everybody
else.
Right.
D
I
L
On
this
particular
one,
that's
that's
exactly
how
it
would
work
if,
if
there's
a
variance
that
would
need
to
be
done
within
that
would
not
seem
practical
with
this
particular
ordinance,
then
it
would
would
go
through
this
process
and
be
brought
to
us
by
by
either
the
owner
of
the
property
or
through
an
inspection
or
or
a
question
or
concern
if
they're
meetin.
So.
I
G
L
How
that
works
is,
is
the
International
Fire
koval
upgrade
and
adopt
a
new
or
a
new
section,
every
two
to
three
years.
I
think
it
is
so
then,
then
what
we
would
do
is
to
adopt
our
city
ordinance,
the
International
fire
cooled
ordinances
to
comply
with
the
new
updated
series,
so
we
don't
have
to
go
through
the
whole
whole
thing
we
just
about
that.
G
Until
addition,
when
that
happens,
then
that
change
to
the
new
fire
code
comes
to
the
council
for
as
an
ordinance
change
to
accept
that
yes,
okay,
second
question
I
had
and
then
I'm
going
to
be
done.
What,
if
I
have
one
that
is
seeking
a
variance
and
I?
Don't
get
my
variance?
Is
there
a
system
in
here
for
appeal
in
any
manner
like
we
do
have
on
any
of
our
other
variance
requests
systems.
L
You
know
that's
I'm,
not
real
sure
on
that,
as
far
as
that
might
be
more
of
a
fire
prevention
question,
but
I
believe
if
they
they
don't
agree
with,
don't
get
their
variance
or
don't
agree
with
what
we're
stating
I
think
they
could
probably
run
it
through
one
of
the
other
committees
would
that
be
correct.
Er.
L
D
D
Okay,
any
other
questions.
Hearing
none
I
will
look
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
thank
you
nemurenai
and
a
resolution
correct
in
the
legal
description
in
resolution
number
16
3,
which
vacated
a
public
right
away
alley
and
the
JAF
monk's
subdivision
resolution
number
17,
2,
0,
3
I,
don't
mean
to
giggle
and
that,
but
it's
just
kind
of
crazy
how
this
happened.
D
I
I
Really
it
amounts
to
a
corrective
deed
if
you
will
for
a
vacation
or
the
corrective
deed
equivalent
here,
because
this
resolution
would
simply
correct
the
legal
description
of
what
was
vacated
previously
now,
why
it
can
do
that
and
not
go
through
the
same
long
process.
Fully
involved
process
of
a
vacation
is
because
all
due
process
requirements
were
fulfilled
in
that
previous
petitioning
process,
and
so
what
happened
here
was
essentially,
everybody
was
on
notice
as
to
what
was
to
be
vacated.
That
was
made
clear
in
the
visual
depiction.
I
The
only
thing
that
was
not
correct,
exactly
was
the
legal
description,
and
it
was
something
that
didn't
get
caught
until
the
county
took
a
look
at
the
documentation
here
in
January.
So
what
this
resolution
does
is
it
proposes
to
make
sure
that
that
language
is
accurate
and
the
reason
why
wasn't
accurate
to
begin
with
was
because
you're
talking
a
plat
of
development
from
the
1800's
handwritten,
which
was
a
replay
to
begin
with.
So
there
was
already
a
second
set
of
lines
on
it,
trying
to
make
heads
or
tails
out
of
it
was
tough.
I
So
because,
again,
the
due
process
requirements
were
met
because
the
two
parties
involved
in
this,
the
ones
that
stand
to
take
from
the
land
that
was
vacated
were
the
only
two
parties
that
were
involved
in
the
petition.
This
should
be
able
to
be
adequately
addressed
by
this
corrective
resolution.
The
one
thing
I
would
ask
from
the
council
is
leave
to
amend
the
title.
It
says
J,
F
monks
subdivision
in
the
title,
the
subdivision,
as
is
noted
in
the
corrected
legal
description,
is
simply
monks
subdivision.
So
I
would
ask
for
the
council's
consideration
there.
D
On
this
hearing,
none
I
will
look
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
10,
a
resolution,
re-establishing
a
moratorium
on
receiving
applications
for
off-premise
science
within
the
city
of
Watertown
resolution
number
17-0.
For
this
time,
I
look
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion.
D
I
You
mayor,
so
this
resolution
is
in
many
ways
a
substantive
copy
of
what
was
originally
adopted
by
the
City
Council
back
in
early
2016.
At
that
time,
the
City
Council
was
looking
at
my
understanding,
a
way
of
updating
the
sign
code
ordinance
here
in
in
zoning
ordinance
entitled
21
and
in
anticipation
of
the
work
of
the
sign
code
committee,
the
thought
was
to
hold
off
on
sign
off
premise:
sign
applications.
D
J
So
difficult
seriously
seriously,
what
happened
was
we
changed
from
the
original
intent
for
change
was
very
minor
compared
to
what
came
about
once
we
saw
that
Gilbert
Arizona
ruling.
Then
then
it
was
decided
that
we
would
change.
We
would
look
at
changing
the
whole
ordinates
to
fit
that
court
case
so
that
we
were,
you
know,
compliant
with
federal
regulations
in
the
federal
courts.
So
that's
kind
of
what
put
this
thing
in
a
tailspin
for
a
long
time
and
I
and
I
will
say:
I,
don't
know
that
we
are
that
close.
J
D
And
I
don't
disagree
that
we
need
to
get
the
public
involved,
but
I
would
like
to
say
we
need
to
come
to
grips
with
it
ourselves
before
we
bring
the
public
in
to
show
them
a
product
that
we
feel
is
workable.
So
I
I
think
that
it's
a
good
point
to
get
this
here,
stretched
out
six
months.
I
believe
we
can
get
it
done
if.
A
D
D
G
While
you're
writing
yourself,
a
note
can
I
I
can
either
deal
with
it
an
old
business
sir,
but
it
does
relate
to
this
and
so
point
that
rani
medius,
it's
my
understanding.
When
we
put
this
moratorium
in
place,
it
actually
expired
before
it
was
brought
back
to
us
for
reconsideration
of
extending.
That
is
that
correct?
That
is.
G
What
I
want
to
use
termination
of
an
expiration
of
a
moratorium
so
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
make
a
decision
of
to
expand
it
or
to
let
it
lapse,
because
a
lapse
can
create
a
problem
for
us
and
I
just
think
as
far
as
any
moratorium
that
we
do
standard
procedure
must
be,
it
has
to
come
back
to
us
to
consider
as
a
council
prior
to
it
expiring,
I
think
I,
don't
know
where
if
we
have
a
procedure
that
deals
with
moratoriums
or
what.
But
that
really
should
be
standard
procedure
for
if.
I
A
I
know
there's
a
lot
more
that
came
into
this
after
the
fact.
Evidently,
I
didn't
I
wasn't
or
something
that
happened
and
wherever
you
get
just
write
up
an
Arizona
or
whatever,
whatever
it
was,
but
I
think
we
owe
it
to
the
taxpayers
to
put
on
a
a
moratorium
for
reality.
Timeframe
put
it
that
way,
I
mean
this.
Is
this.
You
know
when
we
originally
put
this
on
I
think
we
were
talking
two
months
we're
already
past
a
year
and
now
we're
talking
another
six
months.
A
D
I
I
My
understanding,
knowing
vaguely
the
history
of
it
is
that
this
land
was
purchased
by
the
city
and
an
anticipation
of
a
water
retention
proposal,
and
since
then
it
has
been
leased
out
essentially
as
grazing
land,
and
the
land
itself
is
bounded
by
trees.
It's
pretty
good
in
that
sense,
doesn't
have
a
source
of
water
located
on
the
premises,
but
it
is
also
quite
small
for
grazing
land
in
terms
of
it
being
sort
of
a
postage
stamp
there.
I
So
a
MS
Nelson
has
you
know,
had
a
lease
with
the
city.
Now,
for
a
number
of
years,
she's
asked
to
again
lease
this
land
in
consultation
with
the
mayor.
The
price
has
increased
from
an
annual
rent
of
$300.
R350
I
believe,
is
what
it
was
Mayor
to
a
amount
here
of
425
dollars,
so
a
substantial
increase.
I
There
have
also
ensured
that,
in
the
obligations
of
less
see
that
requirements
to
maintain
fence
to
engage
in
sustainable
grazing
method,
methods
and
and
other
requirements
are
included
in
the
explicit
terms,
Ms
Nelson
has
signed
off
on
these
these
terms,
and
so
this
lease
agreement
would
be
for
three
years.
There
was
not
a
public
hearing
for
this
particular
lease
because
it
fell
under
the
annual
dollar
amount
requirement.
So
one.
D
Of
the
things
just
to
be
clear,
there's
no
water
on
the
property.
You
know
for
a
few
head
of
cattle
that
she
has
up
there.
She
does
have
to
bring
water
to
them.
So
it's
not
the
the
greatest
of
property
weeds.
Also,
she
has
to
keep
the
weeds
down
so
they
are
sprayed.
So
we
don't
have
to
do
that
either.
So
there
are.
Some
benefits
was
to
have
somebody
up
there.
Meriter.
G
M
D
H
Two
quick
points
just
I
think
any
lease
should
have
noticed
periods
in
it.
You
hit
reference
notice,
but
it
isn't
30-day
notice,
60-day
notice
and
I
think
there
ought
to
be
something
and
then
just
so.
Both
parties
have
time
to
react
on
that
and
the
second
point
is
under
the
notice
section:
number
nine
there's
a
term
I'm
not
familiar
with
I'm
hoping
there's
a
typo,
because
I've
never
heard
of
it
before
that.
The
certified
mail,
comma
re,
h1
m,
that's
great.
H
C
D
E
D
Carried
number
12
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
professional
service
agreement
with
RS
architects
for
the
Watertown
community,
safe
room,
aka
tornado
shelter
project
in
the
amount
of
$19,000
I'll.
Look
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
on
this
wishing
my
best.
Second,
by
Mike,
you
got
any
questions
on
this
they're
working
on
the
safe
house.
Community,
safe
house,
safe
room,
tornado.
C
H
D
Any
questions
here
not
now
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carried.
Thank
you
number
13
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
letter
of
intent
to
convey
the
Watertown
School
District
number
14
for
a
portion
of
the
Watertown
rec
center
within
three
months
time.
Well,
July.
Look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
on
this
push
by
Randy.
Second,
by
Dan
Justin.
You
want
to
give
them
a
little
idea
of
what
what's
going
on
here.
Yes,.
I
I
Essentially,
the
school
district
is
looking
at
more
developed
plans
going
in
and
checking
to
see
what
they
can
do
to
potentially
use
this
space.
They
want
to
get
in
there
sooner
rather
than
later.
So
what
they
asked
of
the
city
is
some
sort
of
formal
indication
as
to
whether
or
not
the
city
would
be
willing
to
allow
them
or
provide
some
indication
of
the
city's
willingness
to
convey
this
portion
depicted
in
Exhibit
A
to
the
school
district.
As
noted
in
this
letter,
the
particularly
GLE
description
is
support.
I
Well,
it
is
a
description
for
the
surrounding
area,
but
what
is
labeled
Exhibit
A
is
specific
to
the
particular
structures
that
they
want
to
gain
access
to,
and
and
so
by
this
letter,
the
council
would
be
conveying
its
its
plan
to
within
the
next
three
months,
convey
by
resolution
this
particular
portion
of
the
water
town
recreational
center
to
the
school
district.
What
I've
asked
is
as
consideration
for
this
grant,
that
the
school
district
sign
an
indemnification
and
hold
harmless
agreement
that
can
be
found
on
the
second
page.
I
I
have
verified
with
their
legal
counsel,
as
well
as
with
mr.
homn,
that
this
language
is
acceptable,
and
so
what
this
language
would
do
is
survive.
The
termination
of
the
letter
of
intent
and
the
transfer
of
the
above
described
premises.
So
it
would
convey
protection,
legal
protection
well
after
the
transfers
envisioned.
So
with
that,
if
you
have
any
particular
questions,
I'm
happy
to
answer
them.
Okay,.
G
Would
we
have
the
right
to
take
those
things?
For
example,
I,
don't
know:
what's
all
in
that
boiler
room
well
we're
gonna,
have
or
not
boiler
room
the
pool
area,
whatever
that
the
system's
room,
don't
know
if
there's
anything
in
there
that
maybe
is
a
bad
value
as
a
a
you
know,
backup
for
the
outdoor
pool
or
something
for
the
new
facility
or
starting
blocks
that
are
there
that
some
other
community
might
look
to
buy.
Or
do
we
forgo
any
possibility
that
with
this
as
it's
signed,
oh
you.
N
D
D
G
D
Correct
the
inside,
not
the
building
itself,
the
inside
of
it.
They
didn't
want
to
take
the
bill,
they
don't
get
it
yeah
I'd
sell
no
building
yeah
and
then
you
know
they
are
going
to
be
knocking
out.
The
walls.
I
mean
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
when
I
said
the
inside
is
at
the
that
side
of
the
building
is
that,
where
we're
conveying
the
whole
thing,
I
I.
I
Don't
have
any
indication
as
to
it
not
including
the
structure
itself.
I
guess,
that's
the
the
confusing
part
is
the
manner
in
which
the
parking
lot
surrounding
the
school
is
owned,
because
that
has
been
carved
up
and
repackaged
and
but
that's
a
separate
issue,
because
the
building
at
least
a
portion
of
the
building
is
on
its
own
lot.
And
then
we
have
other
portions
of
the
building,
not
at
issue
here
which
are
on
different
Lots.
P
D
Right,
yes,
that
is
correct.
Okay,
that's
right!
Any
other
questions.
Hearing
none
I
will
look
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
I've
had
a
lot
of
calls
on
this.
You
know
ever
since
the
public
has
seen
they're
going
to
do
the
tennis
courts
at
say
a
real
positive
thing
right
now,
there's
a
lot
of
people
heading
to
Sioux,
Falls
and
we're
in
and
Payan
dollars
to
go
down.
There
we
met
just
will
have
them
up
here
at
the
school.
D
So
it's
it's
a
real
good
deal,
so
number
14
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
enter
a
purchase
agreement
with
the
Watertown
development
company
to
convey
approximately
three
point:
five,
one
acres
of
property
for
economic
development.
This
is
what
I
was
showing
you
today,
folks.
Is
it
still
up
there?
Do
you
still
have
that
one
that
shows
that
3.5
you
gave
it
back
to
me.
D
D
Shot
here
shows
a
three
point:
five
one
acres,
so
what
I
want
to
do
is
I'm
gonna,
get
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
purposes
on
this
one
here
motion
by
Mike,
second,
by
Dan
and
for
discussion
purposes
on
this.
What
they're
doing
is
they're,
they
are
actually
buying
the
3.5
1
in
that
section
number
31,
it's
at
17,500
dollars
per
acre
3000
dollars
of
each
acre
will
go
towards
the
fund
at
the
wire
or
the
foundation
office.
D
The
foundation
office
uses
that
for
drug
dogs
and
things
such
as
that
that
was
part
of
the
enders
agreement
when
he
first
took
it
on
so
we're.
Looking
at
doing
this
he's
got.
There
is
a
little
stipulation
in
this
whole
thing
that
says:
Wade
would
have
to
build
this
within
24
months.
He
has
to
have
some
type
of
an
agreement
that
he
starts
building.
Now
there
is
a
lot
up
and
number
11
over
there.
D
You
can
see
in
the
top
left
I
think
I
wrote
a
little
note
on
the
very
top
that
was
purchased
in
2007.
It
still
doesn't
have
anything
built
on.
It
still
has
a
24
month
agreement,
as
we
have
in
this
one,
but
they're
able
to
come
in
and
kind
of
get
that
expanded
upon,
and
they
can.
They
can
spread
that
out
a
little
bit.
D
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
with
the
24
month
process
on
that
we
don't
really
want
people
to
come
in
and
buy
these
pieces
of
property
and
then
speculate
that
they're
going
to
now
turn
back
and
sell
this
thing
for
$20,000
an
acre,
so
it
gives
us
right
over
first
refusal
if
they
ever
do
want
to
sell
the
property
which
we
have
been
offered
at
another
time
on
other
properties
out
there
and
have
turned
them
down.
So
that
being
said,
have
you
got
any
questions
on
this
piece
of
property?
This
would
be
a
good
deal.
D
D
Yeah,
currently
we
we
have
a
port-o-potty
business
that
is
going
to
be
putting
their
porta-potties
out
there.
They'll
have
the
whole
side
where
you
have
a
lot
32
29
29
is
owned
by
the
utilities.
There
will
be
fencing
going
up
across
29th
across
the
north
side,
behind
Walmart
and
again
coming
down
in
front
of
that
other
business,
that's
to
the
east,
but
but
they're
currently
looking
at
that,
there
will
be
no
cleaning
of
the
facilities
out
there.
They,
when
they're,
moved
out
on
to
this
lot,
they'll
be
clean
and
ready
to
go.
D
His
business
currently
is
mainly
in
the
Northeast
South
Dakota,
it's
it's
kind
of
from
the
brookings
area,
all
the
way
up
into
Milbank
up
in
to
Sisseton
and
you
east
and
west.
In
that
same
same
area.
That's
what
he's
looking
at
there
will
be
some
storage
up
there
when
he
gets
his
building
in
there.
He'll
have
enough
storage
inside
to
keep
them
in.
D
Understand
that
right
up
in
the
up
in
the
boxy
Levin,
it's
I
can't
think
of
his
first
name.
Lock,
Wow
Darrin
Lockwood
owns
that
and
he
bought
that
with
the
intent
to
build
a
building,
and
it's
just
never
built
anything,
has
come
in
numerous
times
and
asked
for
an
extension
on
the
24
months.
That
piece
of
property
is
for
sale.
Darrin
has
come
to
the
city
and
to
the
development
company
has
asked
us
to
purchase
that
back
from
him,
and
we
have
at
this
particular
time,
told
him
no
we're
not
interested
in
buying.
D
C
D
Development
company
actually
owns
his
piece
of
property
and
we're
sounded
to
wait.
I
can't
think
of
his
last
name,
but
Wade
is
actually
buying
us
all
from
the
development
company.
We
will
share
in
any
of
the
proceeds
on
the
land
to
the
city
of
Watertown.
Now
the
land
proceeds
come
in
5050.
They
also
have
50
cents
per
acre.
I.
Think
it's
about
77,000
worth
per
square
foot
about
77,000
dollars
that
will
come
directly
to
the
city
without
a
cost
share,
because
that
is
for
infrastructure
that
we
had
put
in
place
mayor.
D
I
Keeping
with
the
the
last
agreement
here
I
wanted
to
ask
the
council's
consideration
for
an
amendment
to
the
purchase
agreement
just
to
encompass
what
is
the
understanding
of
WDC
the
city
and
all
parties
involved,
which
is
that
the
and
this
would
be
on
page
2
of
the
agreement.
The
red
underlined
versions
here
encompass,
what's
being
suggested
to
be
changed.
All
it
is
is
providing
that
the
items
that
are
to
be
taken
out
before
the
full
amount
is
remitted
to
w
DC
and
to
the
city
are
to
come
out
of
the
sale
of
the
land.
I
D
O
O
D
O
The
old
lore
is
a
2004
Toro
and
Todd
did
some
checking
on
what
the
allowance
would
be
for
that
as
far
as
the
kradin,
and
that
we
was
hoping
it
would
be
greater
than
a
thousand
dollars,
and
it
only
came
in
at
five
or
six
hundred
dollars.
So
just
felt
there
was
a
little
greater
value
in
keeping
that
and
using
that
on
a
roller
with
the
roller
and
using
it
on
the
course
as
well.
G
O
This
we
have
more
existing
14
blade
greens
more
now,
and
this
will
give
us
two
that
when
we
look
at
the
yellow
and
red
course
for
tournament
play
and
that
type
of
thing,
when
those
greens
get
mowed
in
the
morning,
they're
going
to
be
mowed
the
same
way
that
the
players
to
our
course
are
going
to
have
the
same
conditions
when
the
switch
from
course.
To
course,.
D
Okay,
of
course,
yeah
any
questions
here,
not
I'll.
Look
for
counsel
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries.
Thank
you
thanks
Jay.
Thank
you.
Number
16
consideration
of
bids
received
for
to
three-quarter-ton
pickups
for
the
solid
waste
department.
I,
look
for
a
motion
as
second
without
discussion
that
mic
start
on
that
for
us
yeah,
that's
I,
get
a
motion
by
Mike
and
second
by
bill
Mike.
If
you'd
go
ahead
and
okay.
N
N
Were
opened
on
January
18th
for
these
two
new
three-quarter-ton
four-wheel
drive
pickups
two
bids
were
received
both
visible
from
Watertown
Ford
Chrysler.
The
low
bid
that
meets
the
specification
from
Watertown
Ford
Chrysler
is
in
the
amount
of
twenty
eight
thousand
eight
hundred
and
ninety
three
dollars
per
pickup
or
a
fifty
seven
thousand
seven
hundred
eighty
six
dollars
for
two
new
ram,
2500
and
the
trucks
were
bid
without
trained
in
both
used
units
will
be
transferred
to
the
street
department.
D
D
N
Is
were
open
on
January
18
for
solid
waste,
95
Gail
containers
three
bids
were
received
a
little
bit
that
meets
the
specification
from
northern
trucks.
Equipment
of
Sioux
Falls
is
for
the
Cascade
I
can't
icon
96
container
when
we
bought
several
times
over
the
years
and
the
amount
of
the
bid
is
forty,
seven
dollars
of
69
cents
per
container,
so
we'd
like
to
recommend
a
war.
This
bid
to
northern
truck
equipment
for
the
cascade
container
for
forty
seven
dollars
of
69
cents
per
container
delivered
to
Watertown,
and
this
is
54
cents
per
container
less.
N
D
D
The
21st
as
Monday
is
President's
Day
same
thing
with
garbage
pickup
garbage
pickup
will
not
occur
on
Monday
am
I,
correct,
Mike
it'll
happen
on
Tuesday
of
the
21st,
so
does
any
other
old
for
me,
yeah
it'll
be
it'll,
be
picked
up
on
the
Friday
before,
for
the
garbage
I
think
that's
working
on
very
well,
no
any
any
old
business.
You
guys
need
to
discuss
quick
update.
M
Okay,
so
what
we
need
to
do
is
get
our
committee
together
and
kind
of
finalize
our
scope
of
what
we
want
to
attempt
up.
There.
I
have
run
some
preliminary
ideas
past
the
core
and
they've.
Given
me
some
ideas
of
what
what
we
can
and
can't
do
as
far
as
approaching
the
project
in
the
problem
and
I'm
not
sure
it
it'll
become
a
council
decision
as
to
what
how
big
a
project
we
want
to
make
it
or
what
we
can
get
done
so.
G
M
Every
year
we've
had
a
$200,000
a
budget
item
for
work
in
drainage
waste
this
year.
I
am
asking
we're
going
to
ask
from
finance
office
to
roll
over
the
2016
budget
to
include
that
with
the
2017
budget.
So
we
actually
will
have
a
two-year
allotment
for
that
money,
so
that
becomes
more
realistic
to
complete
a
project.
$200,000
probably
wouldn't
get
this
project
built.
So
that's
part
of
the
budgeting
issue
as
well.
K
M
So
the
Corps
has
determined
that
that
the
cherry
I
call
it
cherry
creek
in
area,
but
that
is
a
tributary
to
Willow
Creek.
So
any
wetlands
associated
with
the
drainage
way
through
there
are
protected
wetlands
and
would
need
to
be
mitigated
if
we're
going
to
impact
them
so
that
that's
a
major
scope
change
to
a
project
in
that
vicinity.
So
that's
what
we
need
to
discuss
and
and
decide
what
direction
we
want
to
go
with
that
project.
A.
G
Couple
things
mayor,
Don,
I'm
glad
you
brought
that
up,
because
that
was
one
of
my
points
said:
I
was
going
to
bring
up
as
well,
but
I
don't
know
mayor
if
you
want
to
share
what
the
tentative
opening
date
would
be
for
the
it'll
in
very
tentative,
as
we
said
today
for
the
community
center
and
then
secondly,
I
know,
there's
been
some
additional
discussion
now
again
publicly
about
the
mall
parking
lot
and
I
haven't
heard
anything
out
of
that
now
for
several
months.
Just
curious,
where
that's
at
interesting.
D
I'll,
take
the
second
latter
one
first
here
the
mall
parking
lot
interesting
enough.
I
did
get
a
call
from
a
message
from
Scott.
Snicker
I
believe
is
his
name
from
the
mall.
He
he
wants
to
meet.
I
believe
I
have
a
meeting
with
him
Wednesday
afternoon
when
we,
when
we
get
back
from
Pier,
so
we
will
be
opening
some
more
discussions
with
them.
I
think
that
both
both
parties,
the
city
and
the
mall,
really
need
to
get
something
accomplished
and
I
think
that
they're
open
to
discussing
I
think
we
need
to.
D
We
need
to
be
open
to
discussing
some
things,
so
that's
going
to
move
forward
here
and
I
think
it's
going
to
move
forward
faster
than
then
then
I
had
anticipated
here
just
recently,
so
that
will
be
coming
in
front
of
you
shortly
opening
date
on
the
on
the
prairie
Lakes
Wellness
Center.
Currently,
what
we're
looking
at
right
now
is
to
have
some,
oh
I,
think
it
stores
that
we're
going
to
have
tours
up
there
on
March,
the
18th
and
March.
The
19th
will
be
holding
tours
from
12
o'clock
to
5
o'clock
every
day.
D
That's
a
Saturday
and
Sunday
of
March
March,
18
and
19.
Once
we
have
those
tours
completed,
we
will
be
having
a
hopefully
the
opening
date.
Grand
opening
will
have
a
ribbon-cutting
on
the
20th
of
March
that
morning
and
at
that
particular
time
as
soon
as
the
ribbon
cutting
is
done,
it'll
be
open
for
business,
so
great
facility,
you
guys
and
I
wish
I
had
I'm
mad
at
Jack,
telling
that
if
you
see
him
up
there
tomorrow,
he
was
supposed
to
send
me
the
video
of
you
coming
down
the
slide.
I
would.
G
D
People
are
gonna,
love
it
up.
There
I
did
want
to
bring
up
one
more
item
for
for
water
issue.
That
was
brought
to
my
attention
that
you'll
need
to
to
take
a
look
at
on
romy
Creek
to
the
north.
Up
there
on
7th,
8th,
Avenue
6th,
7th
and
8th
we've
made
bigger
culverts
up
there.
We
were
pushing
water
through
faster
than
we
had
in
the
past
Shane.
D
Okay,
so
what's
happened
is
that
now
this
water
is
coming
in
faster
up
there
and
going
down
faster.
Our
culverts
are
a
little
bit
undersized
as
the
further
you
get
down,
which
is
creating
a
more
of
a
retention
pond,
just
a
little
bit
up
north
of
say,
third
and
fourth
Avenue
over
there,
which
in
turn
is
going
into
people's
garages,
and
we
need
to
address
that.
We
need
to
look
at
it
and
see
if
we
can
move
some
of
them
since
we've
created
faster
water
up
and
slowed
it
down.
We
need
to
look
at
that.
E
D
D
A
Going
to
bring
up
one
thing-
hopefully
you're
not
going
to
reach
down
there
and
slap
me,
but
the
people
from
retail
strategies
will
be
here
with
boots
on
the
ground
on
Wednesday
and
Thursday
I.
Believe
there's
going
to
be
three
of
them
here.
They're
gonna
be
doing
inventory
of
basically
inventory
the
city
as
far
as
properties
in
what
we
have
for
retail,
and
so
it's
it's
I
asked
to
have
lunch
with
them.
They
said
they
don't
have
time
in
two
days
to
have
lunch,
so
they
are
planning
on
staying
pretty
busy.
D
There
so
perfect
I
would
also
like
to
mention
I.
Don't
think
many
of
you
came
I,
don't
think
I
mentioned
about
Shelley,
getting
a
pie
interface
then
I.
Do
you
guys
I-I,
don't
have
a
video
of
it,
but
I
got
to
tell
you
you
know
with
the
with
the
united
way.
It
was
just
a
great,
a
great
meeting
that
we
had
and
Shelley
and
I
both
got
a
pie
on
our
face.
It
just
happened
that
it
wasn't
city
employees
that
through
it,
maybe
that's
a
good
thing.
D
K
K
D
Kind
of
taking
it
in
baby
steps,
we've
had
a
meeting
when
you
were
at
the
meeting
the
other
night
and
we
kind
of
were
looking
to
see
what
Storm
Lake
Iowa
was
doing
with
the
water.
It's
it's
a
huge
undertaking
to
do
that.
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
we
have
the
right
person,
that's
kind
of
being
looking
at
different
ideas
for
the
lake
and
that's
Roger,
foot,
Roger,
loves,
Lake
and
Roger
had
been
very
involved
in
all
these
things.
D
P
Mayor,
if
I
could
just
want
the
notes
tonight
in
advance
a
little
bit
who
have
a
luncheon
coming
up
that
I'm
not
going
to
be
running
and
so
I
want
the
people
or
B
to
think
about
who
might
be
interested
in
stepping
forward
and
to
stop
up
City
Hall
and
get
rid
of
information
or
certainly
call
me
great
work.
Great
group
of
people
here
to
work
with
so,
and
you
won't
be
sorry
that
you've
gone
through
the
experience.
I
can
tell
you
that.
D
Thanks
bill,
we'll
miss
ya
I'd,
also
like
to
mention
we
lost
another
another
pillar
of
our
community
of
the
Sunday
morning.
Judge
Bradshaw,
he's
going
to
be
missed,
he's
just
a
great
guy
to
be
around
I
was
just
shocked
when
I
seen
that
at
just
saw
him
a
week
or
so
ago,
and
just
a
wonderful
man
and
the
Bradshaw
family.
You
have
our
condolences
and
I
I
want.
You
know
we're
thinking
about
you
anything
else.