►
From YouTube: Council Meeting 06 05 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Let's
pray,
Lord
God,
we
thank
you
for
summer
weather
for
the
way
that
lifts
our
spirits,
and
that
makes
us
ready
for
some
relaxing
time
in
the
weeks
and
months
ahead.
Thank
you
for
the
community
that
you
placed
us
in.
We
thank
you
that
you
call
us
to
serve
the
people
that
you
place
us
with.
So
we're
glad
to
be
here
tonight
as
representatives
of
people
who
have
chosen
us
to
serve
them
and
serve.
You
give
us
courage
to
serve
well
and
wisely.
We
pray
in
Jesus
name
and
all
the
people
say.
Amen.
D
A
A
You
Shelley
at
this
time,
I'll
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
approval
of
the
consent
agenda
motion
by
Randy
second,
by
by
Bruce
any
questions
concerns
changes.
Hearing,
none,
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
two
approve
the
agenda.
Look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
a
foolish.
E
A
Motion
by
Glen
second,
by
Bruce,
any
questions,
changes,
hearing,
none,
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
three:
first
reading
ordinance
number
17
to
6
a
minyan
zoning
district
boundaries
by
Valley
View
addition
to
our
one
single-family
residential
district,
our
two
single-family
attached
residential
district
in
our
three
multi-family
residential
district
Shane.
If
you
want
to
attack
the
list
one
for
us,
this
is
a
first
reading
guys.
So
there's
no
action
taken
correct.
F
Thank
You
mayor
this
will
actually
come
to
you
as
a
second
reading
at
the
next
council
meeting
and
that
at
that
time,
you'll
take
action
on
both
annexation
and
zoning,
so
the
zoning
is
a
two-part
ordinance.
This
is
the
first
reading
of
the
zoning
looking
at
the
drawing
on
my
screen.
The
area
in
yellow
is
phase.
F
One
of
the
valley
view
addition,
the
Highland
estates
addition
is
not
the
current
name
that
will
be
annexed
into
the
city,
and
then
this
map
here
shows
the
correct
name,
value
view
first
edition
and
all
the
red
is
zoned
r1
the
light
blue
zone
r2
and
the
lighter
blue
is
on
our
three.
So
if
there's
any
questions
this.
E
F
H
F
B
H
F
F
F
I
F
E
F
F
G
Would
you
just
pass
on
the
Planning
Commission
next
time
they
go
through
this?
That
there's
obviously
some
concerns
from
us.
At
least
a
few
of
us
on
that
there's
really
no
transition
between
r3
and
R
1
then
just
pass
it
on
and
make
sure
they're.
Looking
at
that,
then
I'd
be
curious
to
see
what
they
say
to
it.
A
Okay,
well
thanks
Shane
I'm,
going
to
move
on
to
number
four.
First,
three
important
is
number
17
2
in
many
sections,
18
point
zero
one
zero
one
and
twenty
one
point:
six:
five
zero
want
to
exempt
contractors,
trailers,
shipping
trailers
and
moving
trailers
from
certain
parking
provisions
and
Justin.
If
you
want
to
take
those
for
us,
be.
L
Happy
to
mayor,
thank
you.
You
may
recall
counsel
that
at
the
last
meeting
we
dealt
with
this
particular
ordinance
and
again
it's
before
you
on
the
first
reading
and
for
that
I
apologize.
There
was
a
another
parking
provision,
that's
being
brought
forth
by
bike
and
vehicles.
What
that
is
specific
to
Lake
Camp
ESCA.
That
ordinance
draft
will
be
before
the
plane
commission
here
this
coming
Thursday,
but
it
was
in
the
process
of
reviewing
that
ordinance
proposed
ordinance
that
I
came
across.
L
Another
provision
wherein,
on
street
parking
was
regulated
by
the
draft
and
I
figured
that
well.
If
we
have
an
ordinance
vehicle
outstanding
that
talks
about
you
know
on
street
parking
regulations,
the
need
to
change
1801,
oh
one,
to
reflect
on
street
parking
regulations
that
it
made
sense
to
take
that
language
and
get
it
into
the
right
ordinance
that
being
1801,
oh
one.
So
now
this
is
as
a
substantive
change
between
what
would
be
the
first
and
second
reading.
It
is
back
before
you
as
a
first
reading
for
your
consideration.
L
G
M
L
A
L
So
nevertheless,
you
know
in
talking
to
some
folks
here
internally
and
in
in
response
to
this
concerned.
Citizen
I
brought
before
you
today,
language
that
would
appear
to
address
this
issue
with
the
defining
of
a
nuisance
as
depositing
a
water
from
the
sump
hose
onto
the
asphalted
surface
of
the
public
street.
L
Now,
obviously,
looking
at
the
request
for
council
action
memo
I'd,
provided
there
are
some
important
considerations
to
make
here
which
include
you
know.
The
empirical
evidence
of
some
poses
depositing
water
on
the
streets
causing
breakups
in
asphalt
roads
that
you
know,
city
staff
was
unable
to
empirically
prove
necessarily,
but
it
stands
to
reason
that
water
regularly
placed
on
asphalt
could
potentially
cause
breakup.
The
other
concern
might
be
potential
costs
that
are
sustained
by
homeowners
as
a
result
of
having
to
redirect
that
hose
to
deposit
onto
the
concrete
curb.
G
Comment
on
the
street
I
live
in
the
house,
I
bought.
We
had
this
very
issue,
though
the
stumps
that
were
shooting
straight
out
would
erode
the
road
and
they
just
redid
our
street
here
year,
so
go
I
did
put
an
elbow
on
mines,
cheap,
easy
to
do.
It
makes
a
big
difference
so
when
I
saw
this
potential
thing
come
up
and
read
through
it
it
actually
it's
not
a
big
deal,
but
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
because
I've
seen
that
exact
the
erosion
take
place,
it.
A
L
You
mayor
this
particular
ordinance
concept
arose
out
of
a
design
review
team
meeting.
There
were
discussions
between
city
staff
on
you
know
certain
easements
how
they
were
depicted
on
the
the
platted
documentation
that
we
had
before
us
or
the
the
the
plans
that
were
before
us,
and
there
was
a
conversation
about
easements
being
depicted
not
being
depicted
and
one
of
the
staff
mentioned
the
utility
easements.
How
we
generally
require
that
there
be
five-foot
easements
on
lot
lines
shared
with
other
Lots,
not
necessarily
adjacent
to
a
right-of-way
and
in
going
through
and
looking
at
the
ordinances.
L
I
couldn't
necessarily
find
a
specific
reference
to
that
and
bringing
that
out
to
the
review
team
meeting.
There
was
discussion
about
well.
This
is
generally
a
requirement
asked
of
developers
and
developers
have
responded
in
kind
and
it
has
been
included
in
our
in
in
development
plans.
So
be
that
as
it
may,
this
ordinance
would
take
that
administrative
requirement
and
place
it
in
ordinance
so
that
it
is,
you
know
in
our
code
as
being
a
requirement.
That's
what
the
change
to
subpart
3
sub
C
would
do.
L
Then,
there's
a
clarification
as
to
the
how
the
the
the
width
of
the
easement
is
measured
and
then
how
it
should
be
dafuk
depicted.
Excuse
me
unofficial
plans,
because
that
was
another
concern
of
the
design
review
team,
folks
that
in
a
lot
of
instances,
these
plans
will
depict
in
notation
in
certification.
In
writing.
L
If
you
will
that
these
easements
are
of
a
certain
width
and
while
that's
helpful,
it
isn't
necessarily
helpful
to
a
relative
novice
to
development
documents,
so
instead
this
ordinance
places
as
a
requirement
that
you
actually
visually
depict
where
these
easements
are
located
on
each
lot
in
the
development
plans,
so
that
it
is
readily
apparent
to
a
novice
when
it
comes
to
property
documents.
The
fifth
provision,
then,
is
the
other
substantive
item.
L
You
know
upgrades
if
you
will
to
their
Lots
that
they
place
within
utility
easements
that
have
generally
been
tolerated
at
sufferance.
That's
the
language
used
in
here
at
sufferance.
It
is
not
something
that
municipal
utilities
necessarily
would
condone,
but
at
the
same
time
the
municipal
utilities
recognizes
that
people
have
fences,
people
have
gardens.
At
the
same
time,
municipal
utilities
sometimes
needs
to
get
to
the
conduit
buried
in
these
utility
easements,
and
so
what
this
language
does
is
codify.
L
What
is
the
practice
of
municipal
utilities
and
other
utilities,
which
is
you
can
have
some
of
these
otherwise
obstructions
in
the
easement?
But
if
work
needs
to
be
done
on
the
conduit,
it'll
need
to
be
removed
to
get
to
that
that
work,
if
necessary,
and
the
utilities
are
not
responsible
for
putting
it
back
to
where
it
was.
A
Thanks
Justin
move
on
number
seven:
first
reading
of
ordinance,
number
17
3-0
amending
portions
of
chapter
11,
point
zero,
seven
to
declare
tallgrass
a
public
nuisance
and
allow
for
a
remedy.
I
think
this
is
something
that
has
been
needed
for
a
long
time
so
Justin
all
that
you
I'll.
Let
you
take
this
and
can
explain
what
our
process
was
in
the
past.
L
All
we
need
is
for
a
reasonable
person
to
look
at
a
lawn
and
say
that
does
not
meet.
You
know
the
cleanliness,
neatness
and
good
taste
of
a
particular
neighborhood
standard
which,
if
a
lawns
really
bad
I,
mean
it
meets
that
relatively
easy,
but
it
it
helps
to
have
a
more
definite
standard.
That's
what
this
ordinance
is
designed
to
do.
Moreover,
this
ordinance
piggybacks
off
of
our
existing
frame
for
dealing
with
noxious
vegetation,
which
is
something
that's
defined
by
the
state
I
mean
we're
talking
the
bad
hombres.
L
If
you
will
of
weeds
your
Canadian,
thistle
and
whatnot,
we
generally
don't
have
a
huge
problem
of
that
in
the
city,
so
instead,
what
we've
done
is
we've
attached
per
these
revisions
to
1107,
twelve
etc.
The
concern
about
grass
tall
grass,
specifically
grass,
that
is
over
eight
inches
in
height
or
excuse
me
that
is
eight
inches
in
height
and
over
with
that
being
defined
as
noxious
vegetation.
L
So,
ultimately,
this
is
just
taking
what
we
have
solidifying
it
clearly
defining
the
eight
inch
height
as
being
a
noxious
as
being
a
nuisance
of
public
nuisance
and
also
I
would
add
that
it
clarifies
in
1107
sixteen
certain
notice
provisions
that
are
important
to
have
whenever
there
is
any
sort
of
assessment
that
could
come
as
a
result
of
failure
to
abate.
So
I
can
take
any
questions.
A
L
That's
a
great
question
mayor.
The
notice
provided
in
this
provision
is
of
three
parts,
the
first
being
publication
notice
broadly
to
the
entire
community.
So
at
the
beginning
of
the
growing
season
at
the
beginning
of
the
year,
saying
spring
I
think
the
this
statement
here.
That's
it's
April
15th
by
April
15th
of
each
year.
There
would
be
a
notice
published
by
the
city
to
put
everybody
on
notice
of
this
ordinance
that
you
know
tall
grasses
over
eight
inches.
L
If
they,
then
don't
follow
up
and
take
care
of
this
that
that
situation
within
a
certain
period
of
time,
the
city's
final
notice
would
be
provided
by
mailing,
and
that
would
then
provide
the
third
form
of
notice
second
form
of
personal
notice
and
based
upon
the
way
that
similar
provisions
in
ordinance
have
been
treated
throughout
the
United
States.
That
would
meet
the
due
process.
Requirements
for
grass-cutting
violation.
K
Joe
we've
had
problems
with
this.
In
the
past
there
was
a
lot
of
the
properties
were
vacant
and
trying
to
find
out
some
Bank
and
then
some
other
bank
and
and
so
I
know
Jim
had
a
problem
and
he
had
ones
he
couldn't
go
in
and
do
anything
because
he
couldn't
actually
make
contact
he'll
who's,
suppose
alone
or
was
do
we
have
any
remedy.
Do
that?
That's.
L
A
difficult
one,
councilman
I
mean
it's
a
reflection
of
many
things,
national
and
state
politically
involved,
but
you
know
for
our
purposes.
The
best
we
can
do
is
follow
up
with
whomever
is
the
owner
of
record
and
if
that's
difficult
to
find,
you
know
we'll
we'll
go
with
the
last
owner
of
record.
That
we
can.
That
we
can
find
generally
is,
is
my
understanding
and
you
know
it's
up
to
them,
then,
once
we
go
through
and
provide
them
with
due
process
to
be
able
to
say
no,
we
no
longer
own
this
place.
L
I
mean
the
the
assess.
The
assessment
process
to
my
understanding
is
a
lien
on
the
property,
so
one
way
or
the
other
if
it
gets
to
the
assessment
stage
where
it
goes
on
the
roll
and
it
comes
before
you
and
you
as
a
body,
decide
whether
or
not
you
know
the
the
property
was
properly
assessed,
then
it
becomes
a
lien
on
the
property
and
stays
with
it
so
one
way
or
the
other.
If
that
property
ever
comes
back
and
is
sold,
it
will
be
dealt
with.
K
L
The
the
protocol
will
be
to
try
to
find
whomever
the
owner
is
I
mean
obviously
at
a
certain
point.
If
we
don't
receive
a
response
back,
then
that's
you
know,
per
general
due
process,
I
mean
that's
a
default
effectively
right,
so
you
know,
then
the
property
would
get
assessed
and
we
wait
until
that
property
would
be
transacted
and
and
that
that
assessment
would
continue
on
with
with
that
property.
It
would
be
something
that
would
have
to
be
satisfied.
So
just.
K
I
L
Actually,
the
way
that
this
reads
is
that
you
provide
by
mail
to
the
landowner
and
occupant
by
notice,
attached
or
affixed
to
the
property
and
then
the
general
notice,
and
that
is
the
extent
of
the
notice
requirement,
because
by
that
time
the
understanding
is
that
you,
as
the
landowner
are
put
on
notice.
You
know
so.
J
What's
the
timeframe
from
the
time
that
we've
determined
is
8
inches
or
greater
to
the
time
that
we
can
step
in
and
Mull
there's
some
properties
that
I
see
right
now.
Are
it's
ridiculous?
What
what
what
is
existing
there
and
it
would
certainly
appear
like
we
kind
of
have
our
hands
tied
right
now.
So
what
with
your
proposed
change?
What
is
the
time
frame
assuming
there
is
no
no
due
process
involvement
right
where
they
want
to
challenge
the
the
action.
L
So
the
way
ordinance
currently
reads
in
1106,
1107
16
sub
1,
is
that
once
notice
is
provided,
they
have
5
days
after
the
giving
of
such
notice.
Now,
depending
upon
how
can
and
code
enforcement
wants
to
handle
this,
that
notice
could
be
provided
that
personal
notice
of
us
fixing
the
notice
to
the
property
as
well
as
sending
it
by
mail
could
be
done
almost
simultaneously
and
in
which
case
the
service
would
be
affected.
L
When
you
put
the
notice
in
the
mailbox
when
you
fix
it
to
the
property,
once
all
of
that
notice
is
provided,
there
would
be
five
days.
There'd
be
five
days
to
address
the
issue
and
if
it
isn't
addressed
within
those
five
days,
after
all,
three
notice
forms
of
notice
have
been
exhausted.
Then
the
city
is
allowed
to
abate
and.
L
What
is
required
is
a
publication
notice
and
keep
in
mind.
This
is
like,
on
a
case
by
case
basis
by
case
basis,
yeah
and
in
keep
in
mind.
This
is
for
noxious
vegetation
and
overhanging
tree
limbs.
So
what
what
we
do
is
we?
We
don't
actually
have
the
due
process
for
the
code.
Violation
for
grass
spelled
out
specifically
in
ordinance.
We
we
take
what's
provided
here
as
a
due
process
for
noxious
weeds
to
my
understanding,
and
ken
can
certainly
clarify
for
me,
but
and
then
we
act
accordingly,
just
by
borrowing
that
provision
Justin.
D
L
This
provision
would
read
that
if
the
dandelions
reach
eight
inches
tall
that
we
can
deal
with
it,
I
know
yeah
yeah.
So
you
know
that's
that's
kind
of
where
it
comes
into
play,
I
mean
there's.
There
are
obvious.
Other
weeds
I
mean
dandelions,
are
concerned,
they're
starting
to
die
off
a
bit
as
we
get
further
on
into
the
season.
There
aren't
quite
as
many
it
appears,
but
obviously
it's
still
a
valid
concern.
L
You
know
what
I've
seen
from
provisions
throughout
the
country
has
and
the
international
property
management
code.
That's
where
substantially
a
lot
of
this
definition
of
of
what
noxious
vegetation
means
it's
taken
from
there.
There
isn't
any
specific
provision
for
dandelions.
I
I
did
not
see
that
in
my
survey.
So
it's
not
widespread,
that's
not
to
say
it's
not
out
there,
but
you
know
I
can
speak
from
personal
experience.
L
Dandelions
were
difficult
for
me
to
control
even
with
my
my
broadleaf
killer,
so
I
guess
the
question
would
be:
is
it
dandelions
or
is
it
the
tallness
of
grass?
That's
really
a
public
nuisance.
You
know,
that's
it's
a
fair
point
either
way
and
it's
something
that
could
be.
You
know
changed
in
here
if
the
council
feels
so
inclined
Justin.
L
This
point:
it's
like
any
code
enforcement
violations
really
councilman
and
that
would
include
members
of
the
public.
You
know
our
code
enforcement
officer
who's
out
driving
around
and
you
know
between
here
and,
and
you
know
their
destination,
they
spot
something.
That's
quite
obvious.
I
mean,
generally
speaking,
the
city
responds
to
code
enforcement
violations
by
public
complaint.
We
just
don't
have
the
manpower
to
be
able
to.
You
know,
go
out
and
search
these
things
out.
So
just.
A
Made
you
have
on
our
website
report
a
concern
so
I
I
know,
we've
been
getting
those
those
concerns
and
all
the
time
we
can
say
we
will
be
moving
down
a
little
further
for
code
enforcement
tonight
because
right
now,
as
we
speak,
we
don't
have
anything
and
I
just
wanted
to
touch
base
on
that.
One
more
thing
that
I'd
like
to
add
when.
A
L
A
A
L
In
you
know,
to
that
end,
if
the
council
were
to
suggest
that
you
know
that
would
because
it
would
be
a
change
suggested
at
this
meeting,
not
one
that
occurs
between
first
and
second
reading,
then
you
know
this
wouldn't
have
to
come
up
as
a
first
reading
again.
So
if
that's
the
the
thought
of
the
body
I
can
I
can
make,
that
change
is
the.
J
L
It
is,
it
is
because
what
that
the
provision
in
1107
16
sub
2,
sub
1
and
sub
2
that
talks
about
the
the
notices
sub
1
refers
to
the
notice
the
3
notices
that
are
provided
with
the
violation
itself.
Sub
2
then
talks
about
the
notice.
Well,
actually,
pardon
me
that
would
be
1107
18
talks
about
the
special
assessment
process
that
receives
its
own
notice
provision.
L
So
your
act
actually
providing
two
levels
of
due
process,
one
for
the
violation
to
allow
the
party
to
contend
that
they
aren't
in
violation
for
whatever
reason
to
dress
it
on
their
own
before
they
come
into
violation.
And
then
the
second
level
is
the
city
comes
in,
performs
the
work
and
then
they're
placed
on
the
assessment
role,
and
when
the
assessment
role
comes
before
you
it's
at
a
public
hearing
where
they
are
given
notice
and
the
ability
to
be
heard
whether
or
not
they
should
be
on
the
assessment
role.
So.
L
L
Also,
a
good
question:
councilman
I:
initially
we
we've
seen
a
lot
of
10
and
and
then
there
was
a
recognition
of
what
10
actually
looked
like,
and
there
was
some
discussion
about
bringing
that
down
to
8.
For
that
reason
internally,
but
really
it
was
sort
of
a
broad
summary
or
a
broad
survey.
If
you,
if
you
will
of
what
everybody
else
is
doing,
I
would
say
the
consensus.
Has
it
between
8
and
10,
maybe
more
so
10
but
I.
M
L
Mean
that
that's
kind
of
the
thought
councilmen
with
the
the
public
notice,
as
well
as
the
the
mailed
notice,
as
well
as
the
the
property
notice.
If
you
know
one
of
those,
should
put
the
property
owner
on
notice
as
to
the
fact
that
there's
this
potential
for
a
violation
out
there,
if
you
have
a
landlord,
that's
absentee
I
mean
that's
ultimately
a
risk
that
they
take
for,
not
being
you
know
at
least
viewing
their
property
on
a
semi-regular
basis.
L
But
more
importantly,
you
know
if
this
is
something
that
they
ultimately
get
assessed
on,
and
it
is
their
you
know,
say
conveyed
in
a
lease
document
that,
though
the
lessee
was
to
take
care
of
the
grass,
then
the
fact
that
the
assessment
was
levied
on
the
homeowner
would
potentially
allow
that
homeowner
then
to
be
able
to
obtain
that
that
that
money
from
or
that
costs
from
the
lessee.
This.
L
A
They
again,
we
couldn't
specify
I,
think
we're
gonna
move
on
from
this
grass
right
now.
If
you
have,
questions
in
between
I
would
not
hesitate
to
give
Justin
a
call
and
kind
of
run
things
through
you,
okay,
so
we're
gonna
move
on
to
number
eight
Michelle.
You
want
to
come
on.
Okay,
perfect
consideration
of
resolution
number
seventeen
fourteen
authorizing
election
of
at
large
Commissioner
of
the
Watertown
Coddington
County,
Regional,
Rail,
Road,
Authority
and
we'll
have
Justin
handle
this
one,
but
I
want
everybody
to
to
see
your
smiling
face.
Michelle
Thank.
L
You
mayor
this
matter
was
brought
up
at
the
last
meeting
of
the
Watertown
Cottington,
counting
Regional
Rail
Authority,
and
many
of
you
might
not
know
that
it
in
fact
exists
in
the
general
public.
What
its
purpose
is
is
essentially
to
manage,
and,
in
theory
at
least
operate
the
rail
spur
that
exists
down
there
near
gles
facilities.
There
and
G
le
has
invested
a
great
deal
of
funds
and
infrastructure
down
there
on
a
rail
loop.
That
loop
connects
to
the
main
rail
line
via
this
spur
that
the
Watertown
Cottington
County
Regional
Rail
Authority
owns.
L
So
to
that
end
we
received
mr.
sires
resignation
and
this
in
instead
the
Watertown
Coddington
County
Regional
Rail
Authority
suggested
that,
given
the
role
that
WDC
Watertown
Development
Company
plays
in
helping
to
act
as
staff
for
the
Coddington
County
Regional
Rail
Authority
that
Michelle
casick,
who
is
our
main
contact
with
WDC,
be
considered
for
that
all
at-large
spot.
So
that's
what
this
resolution
is
so.
J
L
Their
purpose,
their
a
statutory
body,
they
are
sort
of
the
sovereign
extension
of
the
state
for
that
particular
rail.
That
rail
is
public
rail,
that
small
spur
stretch
is
public
rail
and
so
Cottington
County
and
the
city
of
Watertown
entered
into
an
agreement
to
create
this
Authority
decade
and
a
half
ago,
and
since
that
time
there
hasn't
been
much
activity
associated
with
this
body
because
of
the
small
amount
of
property.
That's
involved
right.
L
So
what
the
body
is
supposed
to
do
is
to
manage,
maintain
and
should
there
be
any
need
to
expand
or
to
operate
it
as
a
going
concern
to
develop
resources
to
that
end,
to
develop
to
to
hire
staff
to
do
it,
we
haven't
done
that
I.
The
authority
actually
has
the
ability,
with
the
consent
of
the
City
Council
and
the
County
Commission
to
levy
taxes.
I
mean
that
that
is
a
provision
in
state
statute.
It's
never
been
done.
L
A
E
A
J
A
Resolution
of
attempt
to
enter
to
a
lease
agreement
with
Van
Osten
Preston
and
Todd
Fleming
for
Halon
at
the
Watertown
Regional
Airport
at
this
time,
I
think
just
before
I
get
too
far
into
this
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
get
a
motion
a
second
and
now
I'll.
Let
you
go
through
it.
Okay
area,
discussion,
motion
by
Bruce,
like
second
by
Glen,
go
ahead.
Justin.
L
Thank
You
mayor
I,
you
may
not
have
seen
this
particular
type
of
animal
before
and
then
obviously
we
don't
have
the
agreement
before
you
today
and
that's
for
a
good
reason.
You
know
in
looking
at
improving
procedures
and
taking
a
very
risk-averse,
legally
conservative
stance
when
it
comes
to
our
procedures.
This
was
one
thing
that
came
up
in
review:
state
law,
specifically
SD,
CL,
9,
12
5.2,
provides
for
specific
public
hearing
requirements,
notice
requirements
with
regard
to
certain
lease
agreements
to
private
entities
of
city
property.
L
Those
lease
agreements
that
are
greater
than
$500
and
of
a
term
of
greater
than
120
days
fall
into
this
category
of
requiring
a
public
hearing
and
generally
in
the
past.
The
way
that
we've
we've
handled
this
is
to
provide
a
resolution
of
intent
at
the
time
of
the
approval
or
the
authorization
of
the
agreement.
Basically,
the
resolution
authorizing
the
agreement
was
one
in
the
same
with
the
resolution
of
intent,
and
that
is
how
some
cities
handle
it
in
the
state
of
South
Dakota.
A
G
L
L
You
know
to
my
understanding,
have
been
the
ones
on
this
Lee
for
quite
some
time
and
the
reason
why
the
the
Fleming's
are
you
know
and
you'd
have
to
talk
to
Todd,
particularly
on
this
one
I
think
for
some
of
the
details,
but
from
my
understanding
there
are
additional
FAA
requirements
regarding
training
for
hang
faa
regulated
land
which
they
have
gone
through,
and
we
aren't
aware
of
any
other
folks
in
the
area
who
have
gone
through
similar
training
so
and
the
terms
that
they
provided
for
this
particular
leases.
You
will
see
next
next
time.
L
A
L
A
Trying
to
do
that
sharing
the
bounty
on
all
our
properties.
You
know
to
this,
who
kind
of
help
them
out
a
little
bit
so
I
do
have
a
motion,
a
second
on
the
floor.
If
there's
no
other
questions,
I'll
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
10
resolution
of
intent
to
enter
into
a
lease
agreement
with
one
vision
to
lease
property
at
the
Watertown
Regional
Airport,
as
our
fixed
based
operator.
This
is
an
exciting
thing.
A
L
You
mayor
this
particular
lease
involves
mostly
ground
specifically
ground
below
certain
buildings,
as
well
as
parking
lot
space.
If
you
can
envision
we're
talking
sort
of
the
southeastern
portion
of
the
buildings,
if
you
will
of
the
airport
property
or
the
eastern
portion,
that's
what
we're
talking
about
here.
The
agreement
that
you'll
see
next
time
will
have
a
visual
depiction
of
it.
We'll
provide
a
breakdown
of
what
the
rates
are
for
each
piece
of
property.
A
So
I
do
have
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
floor:
either
I'll
go
through
and
look
for
council
action,
it's
just
one
second,
and
then
afterwards,
I'll
give
it
a
little
explanation
of
what's
going
on
so
at
this
time,
I
will
ask
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carried
I
just
want
to
touch
base
a
little
bit
on
one
vision.
So
you
all
understand
this
is
a
company
out
of
Sioux
City
Iowa
that
currently
has
a
fixed
base
operation
there.
A
They
have
agreements
with
with
Frontier
Airlines,
Delta,
Air
Lines,
of
course,
also
with
aerodynamics
that
is
flying
in
and
out
of
Watertown.
This
company
is
bringing
in
they'll,
probably
have
between
7
to
8
new
mechanics
on
site
that
will
strictly
be
working
on
on
large
I.
Think
they're
called
Airbus
320s
Learjets
things
such
as
that
that
will
be
flying
in
on
a
consistent
basis.
Their
operation
in
Sioux,
City
Iowa,
is
too
busy
right.
Now
they
don't
have
the
space
and
Watertown
is,
is
exactly
where
they
want
to.
They
look
at
our
city.
A
How
we've
been
been
moving
forward
on
everything
they
loved?
The
idea
of
the
new
runway
that's
coming
in,
it's
all
going
to
be
prepared
for
them.
One
of
the
reasons
why
we
continually
upgrade
our
Airport
is
reasons
for
this.
They
are
also
talking
charter
airlines
that
will
go
through
the
winter
time
that
I
think
will
be
exciting
for
us
they're.
A
Also
looking
at
a
fueling
station
that
will
go
out
there
that
people
can
pull
up
with
their
Lear
Jets
or
whatever
equipment
they're
flying
in
and
fuel
it
up
on
site,
swipe
your
credit
card
fill
the
tank
and
go
so.
This
is
exciting
for
Watertown,
and
this
is
just
I
think
kind
of
the
just
the
start
of
something
very,
very
big
for
the
airport
out
there
Mary.
G
A
They
love
this
they're
excited
for
that.
Actually
what's
happening.
Right
now
is
Adi
is
when
they
come
up
here
and
they
have
an
issue
they
fly.
These
people
in
from
Sioux
City
Iowa,
are
ready
to
fix
the
airplanes
they're.
Also
looking
at
it'll,
be
very,
very
shortly,
they'll
be
coming
to
you
and
talking
about
more
space
that
they
need
to
build
a
hang
or
large
enough
to
to
hold
these
aircraft
that
they're
going
to
be
working
on
so
they're.
Looking
at
many
thousands
of
square
feet,
that'll
be
exciting
for
us
and.
L
L
It
goes
to
what
a
fixed-base
operator
is,
and
a
number
of
folks,
maybe
in
the
general
public,
might
not
know,
but
really
they're
kind
of
a
one-stop
shop
I
mean
they
provide
fueling
services,
tie-down
services,
aircraft,
rental
maintenance,
engines,
propellers
jet
engines,
what-have-you
flight
instruction,
so
they
do
run
the
full
of
full
gamut
of
services.
Yeah.
A
And
we've
had
Mike
Carney
involved
in
the
conversations
and
they're
very
excited
about
bringing
this
in.
They
have
certified
instructor
pilots
at
La,
Ti,
which
these
firms
can
use,
and
it's
going
to
be
very,
very
good.
It's
a
real
positive
for
water
tongue.
So
we
have
a
motion.
A
second
that's
all
been
taken
care
of
right
on
that
particular
and
I
tend
to
ramble
on
that
one.
It's
exciting
for
us.
So
a
number
11
consideration
of
a
full
time
code
enforcement
officer
in
the
building
service
department
to
replace
the
vacant
part-time
court
enforcement
offers
position.
A
I
N
As
you
all
know,
we
lost
her
mm,
our
current
code
enforcement
officer.
He
was
a
part-time
employed
forest.
He
worked
19
hours
a
week.
He
was
in
there
roughly
at
1275
an
hour
I
think
you
pretty
much
all
agree
that
we
could
probably
use
a
full-time
person
in
that
position.
So
we've
put
together
a
proposal,
dad
went
in
there
and
I
sorry,
you
know,
but
today
was
without
Jim
being
around
for
a
little
bit.
We
kind
of
got
behind
a
little
bit
on
the
grass
ball
and
stuff
I.
N
Think
we
got
it
back,
get
it
now
and
we're
gonna
have
made
a
lot
of
good
contacts,
a
lot
of
people
and
a
lot
of
them
that
followed
up
just
on
the
first
card
notice,
which
is
good.
But
then
we
still
got
those
ones
that
you
got
to
go
out
and
find
the
people
so
getting
the
full-time
person
in
there
to
follow
up
on
that
and
create
the
database
to
know
where
that
stuff's
at
and
a
quick
hurry
will
be
a
good
thing.
N
D
I've
had
a
little
conversation
with
you
about
grade
four
is
that
is
that
a
high
enough
grade
for
this
position,
meaning
there's
those
are
not
easy
jobs?
You
know
what
I
don't
know
exactly
I'm,
not
sure
what
great
for
is,
but
I
have
an
idea,
and
it
seems
like
this.
Maybe
this
might
be
qualified
for
a
higher
grade
level
than
grade
four
and
I
don't
mean
to
tell
the
new
guys
what
to
do,
but
it
it
seems
like
with
Aberdeen
having
four
of
these
people
and
we're
moving
up
to
one
I.
D
D
C
Me
just
just
before
we
get
too
crazy
here.
There
is
a
process
that
we
do
go
through.
Every
new
job
description
gets
graded,
using
12
or
13
different
criteria,
and
it's
the
same
for
every
job
description
based
on
the
level
of
experience,
schooling,
that
type
of
thing
and
it
we
did
go
through
that
grading
process
and
it
did
great
out
at
a
grade
4,
which
is
where
the
budget
is
sitting
so
I
mean
there's
a
we
didn't
just
kind
of
come
up
with
it
or
look
at
other
similar
jobs.
C
I
mean
we
did
go
through
that
same
grading
process
that
we
do
for
every
job
within
within
the
city,
and
it
came
out
at
that
grade
four
level,
so
it
gets
hard
to
justify
to
put
it
up
just
just
because
you
know
we
try
to
keep
that
equitable
within
all
the
other
jobs
within
in
the
city
in
that
same
grading.
So
I
guess
that's
why
it's
sitting
where
it's
sitting
and
if
there's
extreme
difficulty
in
finding
a
person
or
we
don't
get
any
job
offers
I.
C
C
C
From
what
was
estimated
based
on
the
grade
for
and
then
we
also
always
aim
high
at
the
health
insurance,
we
always
estimate
that
somebody's
going
to
take
family
coverage
if
they
would
do
that
based
on
what
was
budgeted.
What
had
been
previously
were
about
40
$3,200
short
between
the
part-time
and
full-time,
so
that
will
have
to
be
supplemented
at
the
end
of
the
year,
either
through
contingency
or
through
just
the
general
fund.
Unallocated
fund
balance.
So.
J
M
N
General,
we
do
snow
removal,
grass
removal
garbage
junk,
even
though
we
report
on
and
pass
cars
over
to
the
police
department
when
that
comes
about.
Typically,
it's
almost
anything
that
anybody's
gonna
come
up
with
the
overhanging
tree
process
or
squatters
on
land
or
whatever
the
case
may
be,
I
mean
they
go
through
their
office
first
and
they'll
bend
it
out
to
wherever
it
goes
if
they
can't
take
it
with
themselves.
So.
N
It's
not
law
related.
That's
that's
general!
Why?
Like
abandoned
cars,
even
though
we
come
to
us
first
and
we
defend
it
through
our
office,
but
that
would
get
passed
on
the
police
department
because
they're
the
only
one
that
can
actually
write
a
citation.
We
can't,
even
if
something
comes
up
like
a
wood,
pile
or
scrap
pile
or
rodents,
or
something
like
that.
We
still
vet
it
through
our
office
first,
but
you
would
have
to
go
to
the
police
department.
Dag,
have
an
actual
ticket
Road
on
itself.
N
What
Horsemen
of
that?
Guy?
Only
in
the
Supplemental
area
type
thing
and
the
back
up
to
the
other
duties
of
the
other
thing,
but
in
general
he
would
not
be
doing
building
inspections
or
anything
like
that.
I
mean
we
kind
of
cross
train
within
our
department,
so
we
can
all
kind
of
fill
up
if
someone's
gone
sick
or
whatever
the
your
vacation
somewhat.
You
know
and
everybody's
doing
even
I
love
that
no
I
wouldn't
Nick
primary
response.
Thank.
I
J
This
I
think
that
this
has
been
it's
probably
way
past.
Due
I
saw
one
thing
that
we
periodically
hear
from
people
and,
as
is
the
frustration
that
comes
with
non
enforcement
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
take
a
look
at
where
we're
gonna
get
those
funds
and
I
think
we
need
to
search
out
this
individual
and
I
would
suggest
that
we
do
go
with
the
full-time
position.
I.
I
Would
say
that
you
know
Jim
did
an
excellent
job
for
the
hours
he
was
allowed,
but
Jim
was
basically
reactive
and
not
proactive
and
I'm.
Not
saying
is
if
he
started
it's
tomorrow
with
a
full-time
person
that
they
would
be
able
to
be
proactive
right
away
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
catching
up
to
do.
But
that's
you
know:
I've
been
an
opponent
of
making
this
full-time
job
for
the
last
four
years.
So
I
think
it's
time
that
we
do
it.
So,
okay,.
A
So,
just
to
be
clear,
of
course,
you
know
that
it's
not
a
budgeted
item
and
you're
going
to
be
voting
on
something
that
will
come
to
you
later
that
Shelly's
going
to
need
dollars,
transfer
it
over
onto
this.
So
at
this
time,
I
look
for
a
motion
is
second
I've
got
that
I'm
sorry
I'm,
just
looking
for
a
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
A
Number
12
consideration
a
change
order,
number
one
to
the
contract
with
great
construction
for
the
storm
shelter
project
decreasing
the
contract
amount,
twenty
six
thousand
six
hundred
and
twenty
three
dollars
this
time.
I'll
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion,
we'll
turn
it
over
to
Shane
Bush
by
Mike.
Second,
by
Glen
Shane,
you
go
ahead.
Thank.
F
You
mayor,
as
you
recall,
we
awarded
the
contract
to
create
construction
at
the
May
15
meeting.
The
amount
of
their
bid
was
two
hundred
and
forty
six
thousand
eight
hundred
dollars,
which
was
ten
percent
higher
than
our
engineer's
estimate,
which
was
two
hundred
and
twenty
four
thousand
five
hundred
and
twenty
eight
dollars.
When
we
brought
that
to
you
for
award,
we
explained
that
we
were
going
to
reach
out
and
work
on
a
change
order
that
would
reduce
the
amount
of
the
contract
through
our
architect.
F
We
were
able
to
do
that
and
the
result
is
a
deed
reduction
change
order
in
the
amount
of
twenty
six
thousand
six
hundred
and
twenty
three
dollars.
What
does
that
do
to
our
overall
project?
It
brings
the
project
cost
down
to
two
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
177,
with
the
FEMA
grant
that
the
fire
department
was
able
to
obtain
that
reduces
the
cost
of
the
city
to
fifty
one
thousand,
seven,
eighty
one
which
is
exactly
about
where
we
wanted
to
be
so
with
that
I,
would
recommend
that
we
approve
this
change
order
and
build
a
building.
A
Questions
for
Shane
on
this
none:
okay,
hearing,
none,
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
13
consideration
of
bids
received
for
the
skate
park
project
I'm,
going
to
look
for
a
motion.
A
second
for
discussion
purposes,
push
by
Bruce,
second,
by
Brad
Shane.
If
you'll
take
this
again.
Okay,.
F
Thank
You
mayor
this
is
our
second
bid
for
this
project.
The
first
bid.
You
recall
we
got
a
bit
of
two
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
from
Evergreen
skate
parks
out
of
Stevensville
Montana
that
exceeded
our
expectations
by
a
considerable
amount.
So
at
that
time
we
chose
to
rebid
the
project.
We
did
change
the
project,
scope
to
include
city
staff,
doing
certain
items
such
as
removal
of
the
existing
asphalt
surfacing,
providing
the
required
fill
material,
which
is
estimated
at
1,000
yards,
providing
topsoil,
material
and
finishing
the
landscaping
and
seating
for
the
project.
F
It's
still
a
little
bit
higher
than
we'd
like
to
see
our
adjusted
estimate
was
two
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
so
we're
really
in
the
ballpark
there
that
and
then
there's
ongoing
fundraising.
So
we
don't
know
exactly
where
at
we're.
Looking
at.
Without
all
the
fundraising
completed,
our
budgeting
process
would
fall
about
twenty
five
thousand
short
of
the
bid.
F
So
if
approval
is
sought
here,
the
council
would
be
committing
to
the
two
full
225
thousand.
Once
the
fundraising
is
completed,
we
would
know
what
the
final
dollar
amount
possibly
would
be
as
a
commitment
for
to
the
city
above
what
we
have
budgeted
now
that
may
be
zero.
If
they
fundraise
enough,
we
may
we
may
cover
the
full
twenty
five
thousand.
F
I,
it's
hard
for
me
to
equate
our
man-hours
to
that,
because
you
know
I,
don't
know
what
we
charge
for
equipment.
I,
don't
know
what
everybody
gets
paid
per
hour.
So
what
I
did
as
I
looked
at
that
from
if
we
had
to
buy
them,
buy
the
stuff?
What
what
we
think
that
that
would
cost
us?
And
in
my
memo
I
I
said
it
estimated
cost
for
was
twenty
thousand
dollars
for
the
asphalt
removal.
Fifteen
thousand
for
the
fill
and
three
thousand
for
topsoil
and
two
thousand
for
landscaping.
F
I
think
that
those
numbers
are
a
little
bit
high,
especially
considering
we
already
own
the
materials
like
the
thousand
yards
of
fill.
We
have
that
dirt.
We
just
need
to
haul
it
to
the
site.
So
that's
a
fairly
conservative
estimate
of
about
forty
thousand
and
it's
actually
not
going
to
cost
us
the
forty
thousand,
because
again
we
own
the
material,
it's
just
a
matter
of
hauling
it
and
placing
it
so
I
think
we've
done
the
best
that
we
can
and
trying
to
get
this
project
within
reach.
It.
J
J
A
Can
speak
to
that
Shane
the
project,
literally
from
the
very
very
beginning
it
has
grown
and
and
what
has
grown
is
the
the
bowl.
There
was
not
a
bowl
put
in
the
original
and
set
of
plans
and
the
skaters,
including
Brad
Brad,
Carter
literally
said
we
have
to
have
a
ball.
If
you're
gonna
have
a
skatepark,
you
got
to
have
a
bowl,
that's
where
the
additional
cost
came
in
and
moved
this
project
higher.
A
F
The
s
yes,
what
they've
raised
so
far?
We've
got
right
around
200,000,
maybe
a
little
bit
more
than
that
if
they
went
to
get
their
final
total
at
the
bank,
but
we're
real
close
to
two
hundred
thousand
or
exceeding
in
most
likely
exceeding
it.
Now,
because
that
that
this
information
is
a
couple
weeks
old,
I,
guess:
I'll
summarize
this
I'm
not
gonna,
make
a
recommendation
either
way,
I
mean
it's.
You
guys
can
do
what
you
like.
With
with
the
project.
F
There's
two
things:
we
don't
do
scape
projects.
So
when
we
go
into
the
wind
end
of
the
project.
Originally
we
probably
didn't
know
what
a
realistic
budget
might
be
for
a
facility
this
size.
So
I
don't
want
to
squash
the
numbers
too
much
because
we
might
have
the
biggest
bargain
we
can
possibly
get
for
a
skatepark
I
I
can't
concrete
verify
that.
F
But
we've
done
our
best
effort
with
what
plans
were
provided
to
the
City
Council
and
we
vetted
that
out
all
the
skatepark
designers
and
builders
around
the
area-
and
this
is
our
best
effort
and
we're
$25,000
short
I-
think
if
you
really
want
to
build
a
new
skate
park
and
and
vacate
the
old
one.
This
may
be
your
best
opportunity.
I,
don't
know
that
these
projects
ever
get
cheaper.
They
always
seem
to
get
more
expensive.
The
longer
you
wait,
Shane.
I
E
Tee
in
speaking
with
one
of
the
major
fundraisers
today,
I'm
they're,
aware
that
there's
about
a
twenty-five
thousand
dollar
shortfall
and
they're
very
hopeful
that
is
going
to
be
able
to
made
up
by
efforts
that
they
are
doing
in
their
in
now
I.
You
know,
I
can't
commit
anybody
to
that,
but
they're
very
hopeful
that
they're
aware
the
shortfall
and
they
feel
that
will
be
minute.
F
Week,
just
to
give
them
a
plug
their
most
recent
fundraising
thing
is
a
raffle.
It's
a
pretty
good
price
regiment
that
they
have.
You
know
includes
large
screen,
TVs
and
various
other
things
that
it
would
be
well
worth
winning
and
that
that
I
don't
know
what
the
data
the
raffle
is
coming
up
in
the
next
couple
weeks.
But
but
their
goal
was
to
spit
sell.
H
F
J
F
A
Liability
I
think
it's
kind
of
a
detriment
that
it's
fenced
in
there's
citizen
has
a
nice
Park
Perkins
has
a
nice
park,
none
of
those
are
fenced
in
and
it's
just
much
easier
for
the
kids
to
access,
because
I
know
like
Ryan,
you
guys
are
called
all
the
time.
You
know.
Can
you
open
it
up?
Can
you
do
this
and
do
that
and
I
think
it
just
makes
a
lot
of
sense
davit,
oh,
so
everybody
could
use
it
at
anytime.
A
M
J
C
J
A
F
You
mayor,
this
is
a
project
out
the
wastewater
treatment
facilities
to
replace
the
laboratory,
and
that
sounds
like
an
odd
term,
but
basically
they're
stripping
all
the
cabinet's
out
of
it
all
of
the
upgrading
lighting,
they're,
even
I,
think
talking
about
replacing
the
ceiling.
Tiles
I
mean
it's
pretty
much
stripping
out
the
laboratory
and
bringing
it
back
up
to
code.
It's
it's
old.
It's
been
well
used
and
needed
in
need
some
work.
F
So
with
that
we
hired
HR
Green,
incorporated
to
design
it
and
provide
us
plans
and
and
help
us
with
the
bidding
we
received
bids
on
May
23rd.
There
were
four
bids
received.
Engineer's
estimate
was
one
hundred
and
sixty
three
thousand.
The
low
bid
was
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
and
sixty
one
thousand,
sixty
nine
dollars
from
pkg
Contracting
incorporated
of
Fargo
North
Dakota.
That
contractor
happens
to
also
be
the
current
contractor
for
the
digester
rehabilitation
project,
so
we
feel
that
it's
going
to
be
very
beneficial
to
the
city.
A
C
F
Discussions
with
dunnock
brothers
about
allowing
rap
which
is
recycled,
asphalt,
products
into
into
a
mix
and
they
have
offered
a
$4
deduct
for
this
overlay
in
the
mall
and
they've
also
offered
it
for
the
Jackson
Park
parking
lot
project.
If
we
decide
to
go
forward
with
it
and
the
trail
that's
associated
with
the
Jackson
Park.
So
with
that
I
mean
I,
did
that's
I
think
at
$2,700
deduct
on
the
mall
too,
so
we're
kind
of
bringing
the
cost
down
on
that,
and
not
that
you
need
that.
F
I'm,
not
gonna,
ask
for
action
tonight,
but
I
mean
I.
If
the
council
would
like
to
give
me
direction
on
proceeding,
negotiating
the
Jackson
Park
and
the
bike
trail
separately
later
on
that
we
appreciated,
but
that's
that's
where
I'm
at
and
there.
These
are
nice
experimental
projects,
because
they're
not
big
but
yet
they're
big
enough
to
probably
see
some
performance
issues
and
see
how
that
works.
So
just
some
food
for
thought
so.
J
F
F
So
part
of
it
is
initial
right
away.
You
want
to
look
at
see
what
how
the
consistency
of
the
mix
is
when
it
goes
down
when
it's
hot,
when
it's
pliable,
you
want
to
make
sure
that
it
looks
like
basketball
pavement
that
you
would
want
without
any
divots
any
holes.
You
know
the
texture
and
that
kind
of
stuff
and
then
kind
of
monitor
how
the
densities
are
achieved
with
when
they
roll
it.
That's
to
two
things
and
then
really
we
just
kind
of
get.
We
do
have
to
watch
and
monitor
performance.
F
It's
at
some
point
which
does
take
more
than
a
year
or
two
I
mean.
But
if
we
liked
how
the
consistency
of
it
went
out,
then
what
we
would
probably
do
is
propose
a
project
next
year
that
was
a
little
bit
larger
and
try
a
try
it
on
a
strip
strip
of
roadway
so
to
speak
and
then
and
then
go
from
there.
But
I
will
tell
you
that
all
state
governments
in
this
region,
South,
Dakota,
Iowa
Minnesota,
allow
rap
in
their
and
their
roadways.
F
F
E
Mayor
I've
got
a
quick
update.
You
may
recall,
I
think
was
the
second
April
meeting
we
contracted
with
Ryan
query
from
GPS
Great
Plains
sponsorship
to
look
at
the
Wellness
Center.
As
far
as
what
sort
of
revenue
raising
options
we
may
have
out,
there
he's
been
gathering
information
working
with
a
number
of
a
staff
here
with
in
Watertown,
and
we
are
having
a
meeting.
Some
of
you
were
in
going
to
be
attending
that
tomorrow
for
his
preliminary
presentation
of
his
work
today.
So
just
a
quick
update
as
far
as
where
we
are
on
that
very.
A
Good
I
also
Brenda.
If
you
want
to
come
up
under
new
business,
we
had
this
discussion
in
our
work
session
about
the
building
that
they
want
to
go
out
by
our
field
house.
The
county
does:
do
you
recall
that
the
storage
building?
We
don't
really
have
anything
in
in
stone?
Yet
we
don't
have
a
lease
agreement,
that's
put
in
place.
We
have
the
lease
agreement
which
basically
just
got
done
for
us
today
between
Justin
and
the
district
attorney
state's
attorney
Patrick,
McKenna
state's
attorney
I'm.
Sorry,
they
got
the
lease
agreement
done.
A
We
couldn't
get
it
on
the
agenda
because
of
time
element,
but
what
the
county
is
looking
for.
You
guys
is
the
confidence
level
that
they
can
start
working
on
there.
Their
County
people
are
going
to
be
doing
a
lot
of
the
earth
work.
The
dirt
work
around
the
area
they
need
to
get
started
only
because
they're
gonna
be
b.
Chip
ceiling,
I
believe,
is
what
you
said:
correct.
A
K
L
Yeah,
the
the
lease
agreement
reads
currently,
where
that
southeast
corner
of
the
the
the
rec
center
property
there
is,
and
it's
a
north-south
orientation
for
the
building.
So
that
gives
you
an
idea.
The
the
way
that
the
the
lease
reads
right
now
is
indemnification
comprehensive
for
the
city
from
the
county.
The
city
would
then
indemnify
the
county
for
ingress
and
egress,
which
we
control
the
means
of
effectively
by
having
the
parking
lot
owning
the
parking
lot
and
the
entrances
to
the
parking
lot
immediately
to
the
north.
L
J
L
Only
item
that
required
a
little
bit
I
mean
it
was
the
legal
description
for
the
property
itself,
because
it
was
a
subdivision
with
very
a
lot
of
tiny
Lots
and
at
the
same
time,
we
had
to
provide
an
easement
for
ingress
and
egress
for
the
county
to
get
to
the
building.
So
that
also
required
a
sophisticated
legal
description.
But
we
had
our
brain
trust
here
on
second
floor
and
with
the
county
come
up
with
what
we
was
a
very
accurate
legal
description.
So
no
I'm,
very
confident
that.
K
I
M
E
A
E
Everybody
probably
got
this
when
they
should
have
gotten
with
the
utility
stuff,
or
here
recently
I
guess,
part
of
and
what
it
is.
It's
the
water
quality
report.
As
you
know,
every
year
the
EPA
takes
look
at
water
here
in
Watertown,
and
the
owners
I
bring
it
to
your
attention.
Now
is
that,
a
year
ago
there
were
some
issues
with
something
called
tri
hello,
methane,
THM
whatever
it
is
that
they
were
put
on
notice
that
needed
to
be
rectified.
Well,
that
has
been
taken
care
of.