►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 8 6 2018
Description
Agenda Items include Ordinance No. 18-07 and 18-14 as well as Resolution No. 18-34. Also included is a two-year Airline Transportation System lease agreement with Aerodynamics, Inc.
B
As
we
come
to
you
this
evening,
we're
so
thankful
for
your
presence
in
this
place,
as
we
gather
together
as
your
people.
We
recognize
that
all
the
blessings
that
we
have
in
such
a
great
community's
water
town
is
because
of
you.
It's
also
because
of
the
common
bond
we
share
of
his
love
for
this
community
Lord,
even
in
differences
of
opinions
and
different
of
visions.
We
all
hold
this
same
unique
thing
and
that
we
care
about
this
place
that
we
call
home
so
I.
B
Thank
you,
God
as
we
come
together
for
unity
for
understanding
and
Lord.
You
say
in
your
word
that
if
we
ask
of
wisdom,
you'd
give
it
to
us
freely.
We
thank
you
for
wisdom
and
we
thank
you
for
this
mutual
care
and
concern
even
a
love
for
this
community
for
each
other,
we're
mindful
Lord
God
as
these
summer
days
slipping
quickly
away
and
turning
into
a
school
season.
We
thank
you
for
the
safety
that
you've
given
us,
god
I.
B
Thank
you
for
those
that
you've
provided
to
watch
over
us,
those
in
our
Police
Department
law
enforcement,
dispatchers
and
Sheriff's
Department,
but
also
Lord,
for
here
in
the
presence
now
with
our
firefighters,
paramedics
and
EMTs
Lord.
Where
would
we
be
without
them,
and
we
know
that
you've
called
them
to
such
a
task,
and
it's
a
great
honor
here
tonight
to
be
a
part
of
this.
B
This
accomplishment,
as
we
recognize
they're
receiving
this
I,
owe
a
soul,
a
certification,
it's
a
lot
of
work
and
it's
a
lot
of
care
and
concern
that
goes
into
us
for
this.
This
desire
to
become
the
best
that
they
can
be,
and
so
we
thank
you
for
those
with
such
a
heart
and
such
a
care
God.
We
ask
your
hand
on
the
whole
meeting
tonight
and
we
think,
if
you're,
all
your
blessings,
we
thank
you
again
for
this
great
city
of
Watertown
for
its
in
Jesus
name,
we
pray,
amen.
B
D
E
A
You,
the
first
item
on
the
agenda,
is
approval
of
the
consent
agenda.
Is
there
a
motion?
Second
for
approval,
move
moved
by
Bueller
and
second
by
Y,
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
2
is
the
public
comment
period,
and
this
is
the
point
in
time
which
we
allow
people
to
come
forward
and
state
a
concern
about
anything
that
isn't
on
the
agenda.
A
We
do
have
a
public
hearing
tonight
and
I
presume
that
many
of
the
people
in
the
room
are
here
for
that
public
hearing.
If
you're
here
for
another
reason
and
you'd
like
to
make
a
comment,
this
is
the
time
please
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and
the
microphone
see.
None
I'll
move
on
item
number
3
is
approval
of
the
agenda
and
before
I
do
that
I
would
like
to
first
remove
item
number
13.
A
Is
there
a
motion?
Second
for
approval,
as
amended
well
by
Bill?
How
are
second
by
Mantee
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye?
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
4
is
presentation
of
insurance
service
organization,
ISO
report
for
Watertown,
Fire
Rescue.
F
And
also
we
have
Scott
Jung
blood
battalion
chief,
also
Chris
and
ulnar.
These.
These
are
one
of
our
chief
officers
and
also
Chris's.
Honor
is
old
committee
along
with
Scott
McMahon,
as
will
attest
here
in
a
little
bit.
The
dispatching
is
a
part
of
our
ISO,
so
we
invited
him
here
as
well.
We
also
invited
two
utilities,
I,
don't
think
they're
able
to
be
present,
but
we
invited
them
as
well
just
to
to
come
and
share
this
with
us,
but
they
weren't
unable
to
attend.
So
they
also
play
a
big
part
of
this.
F
So
thank
you
for
having
us
here
tonight,
mayor
and
council.
It's
a
great
honor
and
privilege
to
to
be
here
and
to
share
this
acknowledgement
with
us.
We've
been
working
on
this
for
about
eight
months
off
and
on
it's
a
correct,
quite
a
process,
and
we
did
a
short
presentation
just
to
to
kind
of
go
through
it
a
little
bit,
but
we
just
received
word
that
we
will
be
going
to
class
two
on
September
1st
of
2018
moving
from
a
class
three.
F
This
emblem
that
you
have
up
here
in
front
of
us
was
an
approved
emblem
from
the
ISO
itself
that
we're
we're
gonna
honor
this
this
great
acknowledgment
by
by
placing
this
emblem
on
our
on
our
fire
trucks
throughout
the
city.
So
so,
with
that
being
said,
I
think
we'll
start
the
presentation
I
will
try
and
keep
it
short
I.
F
G
H
Okay,
so
basically,
we
wanted
to
just
kind
of
give
you
a
knowledge
about
what
is
Insurance
Service
office.
Basically,
its
ISO
collects
and
evaluates
information
from
communities
in
the
United
States
on
their
structure,
fire
suppression
capabilities.
The
data
is
analyzed
using
our
fire
suppression
rating
schedule
and
then
a
public
protection
classification
grade
is
assigned
to
the
community.
The
surveys
are
conducted
whenever
there
appears
that
there
is
a
possibility
of
a
PPC
change.
As
such,
the
PPC
program
provides
important,
up-to-date
information
about
the
fire
protection
services
throughout
the
entire
country.
H
Now
how
the
score
impacts
our
community,
the
PPC,
does
a
community
is
investment
in
fire
mitigation
is
a
proven
and
a
reliable
predictor
of
a
future
fire
losses.
So
the
statistical
data
on
insurance
losses
bears
out
the
relationship
between
excellent
fire
protection
as
measured
by
the
PPC
program
and
low
fire
losses.
So
insurance
companies
use
PPC
information
for
marketing
underwriting
and
to
help
establish
fire,
fair
premiums
for
homeowners
and
commercial
fire
insurances
in
general.
H
The
price
of
a
fire
insurance
in
a
community
with
a
good
PPC
grade
is
substantially
lower
than
a
community
with
a
poor
PPC
grade
accounting.
All
other
factors
are
equal.
Now,
just
a
little
bit
about
that.
Some
of
you
probably
gonna,
go
ask
the
question:
how
does
it
get
impact
me
here
locally
in
Watertown?
Well,
I
can
tell
you
this
I've
done
enough
research
over
the
last
couple
months
and
over
the
last
couple
weeks
exact
on
that
question,
and
it's
it's
basically
something
that
you'll
have
to
do.
H
You'll
have
to
contact
your
insurance
agent
here
locally
here
or
I'll
contact
your
individual
on
your
own,
that
does
your
underwriters,
free,
insurance
and
they'll,
maybe
be
able
to
tell
you
that,
for
example,
Aberdeen
just
went
to
a
class
3
with
an
ex-teammate
class
within
the
last
year
and
I
visited
with
a
couple
of
the
chief
officers
up
there.
They
stated
that
they've
seen
some
substantial
changes
in
their
insurance
premiums
for
homeowners
and
commercial
businesses.
Mckinney
Texas
is
a
city
of
about
a
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
people.
H
They
just
recently
changed
from
a
class
three
to
a
class
two
three
years
ago.
They
did
a
study
a
year
after
that
and
they
determined
that
there
was
11.5
percent
reduction
in
commercial
insurances
from
a
3
to
a
2.
It
resulted
in
about
five
million
dollars
of
savings
and
insurance
premiums
and
premiums
in
that
community.
So
it
is
a
substantial
number
when
it
comes
to
the
ISO
score.
H
Okay,
so
we
talked
about
a
little
history
of
our
department
when
it
comes
to
ISO.
Previously
before
2011,
we
were
at
class
five
and
we
did
an
audit
evaluation
in
2012.
We
were
a
low
excuse
me,
a
high
class
five
and
we
moved
to
a
low
class
three
in
2013.
We
determined
that
we
needed
to
do
a
research
committee
for
our
department
identify
what
impacts
the
ISO
scoring
and
we
identified
some
areas
that
we
could
improve
on
and
the
committee
was
was
started.
H
A
H
How
does
it
work
basically
in
a
nutshell,
when
we
talk
about
the
public
protection
classification
scoring
matrix
a
class
one,
obviously
is
you
have
to
get
a
score
of
90%
or
better
class
to
where
we're
at
we've
scored
an
eighty
one
point:
nine
nine.
So
we
have
a
low
class
too,
but
we
did
make
the
class
2
rating
and
you
can
see
there's
10
different
ratings,
so
maybe
all
the
way
down
to
class
10
and
it's
between
zero
and
ten
and
typically
speaking,
those
are
going
to
be.
H
Probably
your
volunteer
agencies
that
score
those
were
fun
reflectively.
So
we
talked
about
some
of
the
scoring
that's
out
there
across
country
wide
and
there's
many
of
them.
Thousands
of
fire
departments
that
are
scored
by
the
ISO
class,
one
you
can
see,
has
a
241
class.
Two
has
300
xmu
1324
as
such
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
all
of
them,
but
you
can
kind
of
see
the
the
chart
here
that
identifies
the
different
types
of
ISO
fire
departments
across
the
nation.
H
So
we
talked
about
some
of
the
data
when
it
comes
to
the
ISO.
We
basically
look
at
where
we
scored
at,
as
you
can
see,
being
one
of
thirteen
hundred
and
twenty
four
across
the
nation
is
quite
the
honor
for
the
city
of
Watertown
South
Dakota
Kearney
had
currently
has
two
class.
What
would
be
will
become
the
third
one,
obviously
and
there's
one
class
one
in
our
state
as
well,
and
one
piece
of
data
that
I
thought
was
really
interesting.
H
That
impacts
our
department
is
89
of
all
structure
fires
that
the
city
of
Watertown,
Fire
Rescue,
responds
to
is
contained
to
a
room
and
content,
and
that's
pretty
significant
when
it
comes
to
protection
of
our
overall
objectives
for
our
department.
Overall
objectives
for
our
department
is
life
safety
incident,
stabilization
and
property
preservation,
and
ultimately
most
people
don't
know.
H
But
when
you
have
a
fire,
it's
a
significant
impact
to
those
people
that
lose
those,
though
their
belongings
and
our
guys
do
such
a
great
job
when
they
get
on
scene
to
do
to
save
everything
they
possibly
can
and
when
you
can
contain
it
to
89%
of
a
room
of
content.
That
speaks
volumes
of
our
fire
department
and
we're
really
proud
of
that.
That.
F
H
Now
we
talk
about
the
scoring
matrix,
there's
three
categories:
that
the
insurance
organization
does.
Their
evaluation
audit
on
one
of
them
is
emergency
communication.
It's
a
score
of
10
points
out
of
100
fire
department's
scoring
is
50
points
and
water-supply
is
40
points.
There
is
a
bonus
program
that
just
started
here
in
the
last
couple
years
in
their
evaluation
process,
and
they
give
us
bonus
points
for
fire
prevention,
fire
investigation
and
also
public
education
out
there
as
well.
H
Now,
here
is
our
score
that
reflects
the
public
protection
classification.
This
was
basically
the
summary
of
our
score.
As
you
could
see
in
communications,
they
have
emergency
reporting,
they
have
telecommunicators
and
they
also
have
their
dispatch
circuits
and
look
how
awesome
they
scored.
They
got
a
nine
point,
eight
four
out
of
out
of
ten,
which
is
fantastic
or
actually
a
nine
point.
Eight
six,
the
fire
department's
scoring
process
is
a
little
bit
different.
It
basically
derives
from
engine
companies.
H
It
comes
down
to
rescue
pumpers
pumpers,
you
know
capacity
and,
just
speaking
on
the
the
first
two,
their
engine
companies,
it
identifies
how
many
engine
companies
we
have.
As
you
can
see,
we
scored
quite
well
on
that
one
we
get
into
reserve
pumpers.
We
did
pretty
well
in
that
one.
We
got
a
point
for
three
and
what
they
did
there
is.
They
actually
gave
us
credit
for
engine
two,
because
we're
gonna
be
receiving
our
new
truck
I.
H
Don't
know
if
you
guys
on
that
in
August
here
and
they
were
able
to
grade
us
out
just
a
little
bit
higher
with
that
and
as
you
can
see
getting
that
81
point,
nine
nine
that
point
four
three
was
actually
a
significant
score
for
us
and
then
you
get
into
just
a
couple
other
ones.
Here
we
look
at
deployment
and
company
personnel.
H
We
have
to
come
up
with
about
two
hundred
eighty
hours
of
training
annually
for
every
firefighter
and
that's
some
point
sometimes
difficult
to
attain,
but
it
derives
from
company
training
facility
training
hosts
our
training
officer.
Training
has
met,
training,
use
our
training.
So
it's
a
different
number
of
hats
that
the
staff
at
their
department
have
to
get
to
that
training
piece.
H
But
we
scored
quite
well
on
that
one
as
well,
and
if
you
look
at
it,
we
scored
basically
net
thirty
five
out
of
fifty
range
in
our
fire
department,
score
get
down
to
the
water
supply,
and
obviously
this
is
impacted
by
your
utilities.
They
did
quite
well
of
thirty
seven
out
of
fifty
and
it
identifies
hydrants
identifies
you
know
the
supply
for
the
the
hydrants
and
then
also
the
host
the
hydrant
testing.
That
goes
along
with
that
as
well.
So,
overall
we
scored
an
81
point,
nine
nine
out
of
a
hundred
points.
H
E
F
I
just
have
one
comment
on
the
training:
the
seven-point
for
two
out
of
nine.
That's
specifically,
it's
a
lot
of
documentation
of
our
training.
We
do
a
lot
of
training,
we
weren't
very
good
at
data
entry
and
getting
making
sure
we're
collecting
all
of
our
training
hours.
I
still
think,
we've
got
a
little
ways
to
go,
but
what
my
point
is
the
vision
that
we
had
as
a
department
as
a
community
and
the
help
of
the
City
Council.
F
We
were
able
to
build
that
nice
training
center
out
there
and
we've
done
some
some
nice
additions
to
it.
We
had
the
community
behind
us
and
we
we
just
got
the
burn
tower
up
and
running,
and
what
a
great
asset
for
our
department
to
be
able
to
go
out
and
train
with
light
fires
and
stuff
and
and
I'd
like
to
thank
the
community
and
the
council
for
your
support
on
that
project,
because
that's
that's
why
we
got
27.4
two
out
of
nine,
so.
H
And
one
other
piece
that
I'll
touch
on
is
our
data
management.
A
couple
of
individuals
up
here
sit
in
our
advisory
committee.
I.
Think
some
of
you
seen
some
of
our
software
that
we
have
that's
a
really
great
tool
to
be
able
to
identify
the
shortcomings
in
and
also
the
the
areas
that
we're,
maybe
a
little
strong
in
as
well.
So
it's
important
to
be
able
to
share
that
data
with
everybody
in
our
council.
H
Okay,
this
kind
of
just
shows
how
we
deploy
to
a
fire
scene.
This
would
be
just
a
standard,
2,000
square
foot,
family
dwelling
home
and
when
we
arrived
on
scene,
the
the
NFPA
1710
wants
us
to
have
a
Engine
Company
there
within
four
minutes
or
240
seconds,
and
the
initial
alarm
assignment
basically
means
that
within
eight
minutes
or
four
hundred
and
eighty
seconds
they'd
like
us
to
have
X
amount
of
people,
as
you
can
see
here,
15
well,
that's
kind
of
where
we
fell
down
glen
on
the
company
personnel
and
deployment.
H
We
are
a
little
short
in
those
areas
and
will
continue
to
be
short,
probably
for
you
know
a
couple
years
to
come
yet,
but
those
are
areas
that
are
being
addressed
through
budgeting
and
through
business
plans
for
staffing.
So
those
are
something
that
we
continue
to
work
on
and
it's
a
challenge
to
to
meet
those
budgets
obviously
are
gonna,
be
the
biggest
issue
with
those
things.
But,
as
you
can
see,
it
takes
a
lot
of
people
to
have
a
clean
and
safe
fire
ground
when
it
comes
to
protecting
our
community.
I
H
F
I
think
I
think
it's
the
next
slide
might
help
out
with
some
of
that.
This
is
this
is
station.
One.
Is
that
correct,
yes,
downtown
station,
so
you
can
see
in
the
red
dot
centers
station
one
and
the
the
gold,
if
you
will
colors,
aren't
the
greatest,
but
gold
is
zero
to
one
point:
five
miles
street
miles
street
miles:
yes,
that's
driving
miles
and
then
the
yellow
is
1.5
to
2.5
miles.
F
The
red
is
2.5
to
5
miles
and
what
we,
those
are.
Those
red
areas
are
some
of
the
areas
that
we
look
at
that
we're
having
the
longer
response
times
on
our
climate
and
stuff.
So
we
also
notice
a
lot
of
growth
out.
You
know
industrial
parks
and
stuff
out
there.
We
got
some
red
areas
and
I
want
to
say
we
don't
have
that
exactly
in
front
of
us,
but
you're
talking
about
a
811
minute
response
to
a
lot
of
those
red
areas
out
towards
the
interstate
from
Station
one
pheasant.
H
Ridge
industrials,
probably
in
that
ten
to
eleven
minute
mark
as
far
as
time
out
in
that
area
station
to
just
kind
of
shows
it
a
little
more
in
detail
when
it
comes
to
where
the
red
is
I
apologize.
The
colors
are
not
coming
out
here
as
well
as
we'd
like
it
to,
but
the
station
two
is.
The
orange
gold
like
Doug
said:
is
that
that
zero
to
1.5
red
is
xep?
Yellow
is
supposed
to
be
the
1.5
to
2.5
anything
they're
after
is
two
point.
H
Five
two
five
and
anything
in
the
black
area
is
gonna,
be
in
that
file.
Five
mile
response
area
I'd
like
to
thank
first
District,
eight.
They
actually
put
these
together
for
us.
They
work
well
with
us.
We
do
a
lot
of
work
with
them
and
you
collaborate
with
a
lot
of
different
things,
they're,
actually
putting
a
station
three
area
up
for
us
as
well
to
determine
what
the
street
mileage
is
for
us,
an
area
that
we
have
kind
of
I.
H
So
with
that
I'll,
just
kind
of
show
you
kind
of
where
we're
heading
at
and
in
the
future.
Obviously,
in
our
long
term
planning
we
have
a
fire
station
in
2023
that
we've
been
looking
at.
This
is
kind
of
where
we
are
gonna
put
a
stake
in
a
ground
at
some
point.
Obviously,
there's
still
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
for
our
station,
a
committee
that
we
have
at
this
station
for
research
as
far
as
identifying
it
as
you
guys
can
see
or
Station
three
is
going
to
be
at
I.
H
Don't
can't
really
point
that
to
it,
but
I
think
most
of
you
guys
can
see
it's
on
the
east
side
of
the
city.
There
it's
about
two
blocks
or
block
and
a
half
to
the
east
of
19th
Street.
So
in
the
first
time
a
new
bypass,
we
have
some
city
land
there,
I
think
mayor
and
I
and
Doug
have
kind
of
looked
at
that
as
a
as
an
area
of
origin
that
we
want
to
probably
look
at
it.
So.
A
A
F
D
F
And
somewhere
in
that
range,
we
pretty
much
take
care
of
a
lot
of
the
city
limits
and
and
have
pretty
good
coverage.
We,
we
are
just
just
over
a
mile
from
the
the
interstate,
with
a
with
a
pretty
good
shot
of
getting
out
there
and
on
the
extension,
but
it's
somewhere
in
that
area
would
be
a
good
good
spot.
We
also
notice
that,
on
that,
on
that
end,
we're
running
currently
running
about
600
EMS
calls.
We
also
notice
a
daytime
population
will
towards
that
interstate
with
the
industrial
parks
growing
and
stuff.
F
H
A
Anyone
have
any
questions,
this
is
remarkable,
and
so
it's
really
awe-inspiring
I
hope
that
the
community
recognizes
how
fortunate
we
are
to
have
such
a
well
trained
and
professional
staff
and,
in
addition
to
our
great
infrastructure,
to
to
support
our
defense
in
case
of
fire.
So
this
is
really
a
great
thing
for
our
community
and
I'm
very
proud
of
the
fire
department.
Let's
give
them
a
hand,
you
guys
look
great
thank.
A
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
18
14
amending
district
boundaries
by
rezoning,
218,
19th
Street
southeast
from
PUD
Planned
Unit
development
to
our
three
multi-family
residential
district
and
I.
Think
we
have
a
great
deal
of
people
here,
so
I'm
not
going
to
ask
for
a
motion
yet
but
we'll.
Let
brandy
give
her
presentation
and
then
I
will
open
the
public
hearing.
K
Thank
You
mayor,
so
this
is
the
rezone
request.
The
second
reading
on
public
hearing
for
the
property,
just
north
of
st.
Mary's
Cemetery,
along
19th
Street
I,
can
get
down
to
the
map
here.
So
currently
it
is
zoned
PUD,
which
is
a
Planned
Unit
development
and
the
petitioners
who
are
david
and
leslie
McElhaney
are
proposing
to
rezone
it
to
r3,
and
that
came
from
plan
commission.
K
They
recommended
going
forward
with
the
rezone
instead
of
presenting
them
their
development
plan
for
the
PUD
just
basically
because
what
they
want
to
use
it
for
is
multi-family
residential,
so
means
that
they're
not
asking
for
any
flexibility,
which
is
why
people
generally
use
pew
D's
if
they
want
to
have
more
greater
flexibility
on
the
land
or
structures
that
they
have.
Everything
planned
out
and
planned.
Commission
has
to
approve
everything.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
and
the
purpose
of
the
action
tonight
is
to
decide
whether
our
three
residential
multifamily
is
the
correct
zoning
use
for
this
land.
The
the
purpose
of
the
action
tonight
is
not
to
approve
any
specific
development
plan.
It's
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
requested
r3
is
appropriate
in
this
location
in
our
community,
and
it
is
consistent
with
our
comprehensive
plan.
A
So
with
that
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
I
see
quite
a
few
people
here,
I
received
a
petition
with
over
a
hundred
and
fifty
signatures
on
it
up
and
I
would
like
to
read
what
that
petition
says,
because
it's
really
not
addressing
what
the
city's
action
is
tonight.
The
petition
reads:
we,
the
residents
of
Watertown
South
Dakota,
along
19th,
Street,
South
East
between
highway
212
and
Kemp
Avenue
petition
the
City
Council
to
vote
against
the
building
of
excessive
numbers
of
multifamily
units
at
to
1890,
10th,
Street,
southeast
and
I'll.
A
Read
the
rest
of
it.
The
addition
of
144
apartments
will
create
traffic
safety
issues
for
individuals
accessing
19th
Street.
In
this
area
there
are
existing
traffic
lights
at
19th,
Street,
south
east
and
highway
212
and
19th
Street,
southeast
and
Willow
Creek,
/,
1st
Avenue,
Northeast
additional
lights
or
stop
signs
between
these
two
points
will
interrupt
traffic
flow
and
jeopardize
pedestrians,
children
and
bicycle
use.
A
This
extreme
number
of
units
will
create
traffic
safety
problems
for
years
ahead
with
a
high
density
population
of
144
units
in
this
small
confined
area
with
one
exit
point
safety
of
lives
relating
to
evacuation
of
these
residents
in
case
of
fire,
natural
gas
leak,
flooding,
tornadoes
etc
should
be
a
great
concern.
The
mayor
and
city
council
have
fiduciary
responsibilities
to
protect
the
safety
of
residents
accessing
19th
Street,
as
well
as
evacuating
apartment
dwellers.
A
In
times
of
crisis,
we
request
the
City
Council
to
reject
the
building
of
excessive
numbers
of
living
units
in
this
area,
and
then
there
were
a
very
large
number
I,
don't
have
the
exact
number
of
signers,
but
it
was
great.
The
numbers
were
great,
but
the
council
is
not
considering
tonight
the
building
of
144
units,
the
City
Council,
is
voting
upon
whether
residential
multi
zoning
is
appropriate.
A
Next
to
the
residential
multi
zoning
to
the
north
and
the
commercial
zoning
to
the
west,
so
that's
really
the
question
and
we
don't
have
that
many
zoning
classifications
for
apartments
apartments
can
be
built
in
a
commercial
zone
or
they
can
be
built
in
an
r3
zone.
That's
pretty
much
it!
If
you
were
to
zone
this
r2,
then
you
can
get
you.
A
You
wouldn't
be
allowed
to
build
very
many
units
or
if
you
did
our
one,
it
wouldn't
be
either,
but
this
area
has
been
identified
in
our
comp
plan
as
economic
development
and
apartments
do
fall
within
that
classification.
So
this
is
not
the
time
to
consider
how
many
units
are
built.
This
is
the
time
to
consider
if
multi-family
residential
zoning
is
appropriate
for
this
land.
A
If
that
is
passed,
then
the
owners
of
the
land
have
to
go
through
the
building
permit
process
to
present
their
what
they'd
like
to
do
and
if
it
meets
all
of
our
ordinances.
The
council
has
no
authority
to
deny
their
request,
but
they
have
to
follow
all
of
our
rules
and
the
PUD
zoning.
That's
there.
That
was
a
challenge.
The
PUD
zoning
is
like
a
building
permit
with
a
PUD
zoning.
A
You
can
only
build
exactly
what
was
specified
so
they
had
a
Planned
Unit
development
specified
for
which
the
zoning
was
applied
and
approved,
and
they
were
unable
to
meet
the
city
regulations
for
approval
when
they
came
to
get
a
building
permit
and
so
they've
discovered
that
that
won't
work.
The
PUD
zoning
is
inappropriate
for
this
location,
so
they're
opting
to
change
it.
They
could
change
it
to
another
PUD
zone
or
they
could
change
it
to
a
generic
residential
multi
zone
and,
like
all
other,
are
three
zones
in
our
town.
A
The
property
owner
is
entitled
to
develop
as
long
as
that
property
owner
complies
with
all
of
the
city
regulations.
So
I
want
everyone
to
understand
that
the
council
is
not
approving
a
144
unit
apartment
complex
if
they
approve
our
three
tonight.
All
they're
doing
is
saying
this
land
is
appropriate
for
residential
multi
and
then
the
property
owner
has
to
prove
that
they
can
do
it
in
conformance
with
all
of
our
regulations.
A
That's
not
the
question
tonight
so
with
that
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
I
would
ask
I
want
to
hear
what
everyone
has
to
say.
But
if
you
have
the
same
thing
to
say
as
someone
who's
already
said,
it
please
refrain
in
the
essence
of
time
we
would
like
to
get
through
this
tonight
and
if
you
have
a
comment
to
make
that
hasn't
been
made
by
all
means
come
forward.
Otherwise,
please
keep
your
comments
to
two
minutes
or
less.
L
My
name,
my
name,
is
Gloria
Jung
and
I
do
live
on
2nd
Avenue,
South,
East
and
yes,
I
understand
what
you
are
saying,
but
we
are
also
caught
in
a
dilemma.
We
aren't
saying
we
don't
want
an
r3
zoning,
but
if
you
do
approve
the
r3
zoning,
it's
my
understanding.
We
don't
have
many
rights
after
that.
We
don't
have
the
opportunity
to
protest.
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
tonight
is
let,
since
many
of
us
are
here,
give
you
our
reasons
for
why
we
don't
think
large
units
belong
on
this
particular
location.
L
So
if
you
are
willing
to
bear
with
us,
I
would
like
to
give
you
my
comments.
Luan
kosher
has
a
letter
from
a
resident
who
is
not
able
to
attend.
He
would
like
his
voice
heard.
There
are
other
people
here
in
the
audience
that
would
like
their
voices
heard
too.
So,
if
you
would
like,
if
you
would
just
please
bear
with
us,
let
us
give
you
our
side
of
the
story
and
then
you
can
tell
us
how
we
can
be
protected.
L
A
L
L
Street
is
Runnings
sunset
sunrise
estate
apartments,
consisting
of
36
units,
52
single
home
homes
and
a
small
number
of
twin
homes
on
the
east
side
of
19
are
three
condo
buildings
with
36
units
total
for
Plex
and
twin
homes,
totaling
20
units,
Willow,
Creek,
one
apartments
with
34
units,
3
single
homes
and
Watertown
family
eye
care
and
Family
Dental.
None
are
even
close
to
a
hundred
and
forty-four
proposed
apartments.
In
fact,
the
total
is
currently
181
units,
which
is
just
a
bit
more
than
the
proposed
parcel
or
proposed
apartments
for
one
small
piece
of
land.
L
Now
a
committee
of
six
individuals
took
a
petition
to
the
residents
just
mentioned
the
Willow
Creek
one
apartments.
Due
to
their
building's
security
system.
We
were
unable
to
contact
those
individuals
now
the
survey
focused
on
increased
traffic
safety
and
the
safety
for
those
living
in
the
large
complex.
The
survey
was
calculated
on
number
of
units
plus
individual
signatures.
A
unit
is
one
apartment:
condo
twin
home,
single
home
or
business
42%
of
the
sunrise
estates
signed
the
petition.
We
were
only
able
to
reach
15
units
but
all
signed
the
petition
to
my
knowledge.
L
100
fifty-six
signatures
were
collected
from
the
152
units.
Now
interesting
comments
were
made
by
the
signers.
One
comment
was
heard
so
often
I
will
address
it
in
a
form
of
a
question.
Later
there
were
suggestions
of
a
better
location
such
as
south
of
Walmart
or
14th
Avenue
and
23rd
Street
I
heard
I
heard
a
need
in
Watertown
for
two-bedroom
two-bathroom,
two-car
garage
housing
as
rentals,
but
heard
over
and
over.
It
was
disbelief
that
the
city
would
entertain
an
apartment
complex
for
this
size.
L
For
this
location,
there
are
strong
reasons
for
opposing
the
high
number
of
apartments
number
one
19th
Street
runs
from
highway
212
to
160,
ninth
Avenue.
It
is
a
busy
street
because
it
because
of
its
direct
access
to
highway
212
where
people
shop
it's
a
major
street
in
our
city,
where
sizable
areas
yet
to
be
developed
with
more
development
to
come
in
the
years
ahead.
It
does
not
make
good
sense
to
create
a
traffic
nightmare
today
at
highway,
212
and
19th
Street,
rather
than
making
piecemeal
decisions.
L
Long-Range
planning
by
the
city
needs
to
start
today
to
assure
smooth
traffic
flow
for
years
to
come.
Number
two:
two
of
our
committee
members
did
a
traffic
count
during
morning
and
evening
rush
hours
for
three
consecutive
days
and
one
day
of
lunchtime
traffic,
the
daily
average
was
three
thousand
one
hundred
and
eighty
six
vehicles
during
these
seven
hours.
We
think
that's
a
lot
of
traffic
number
three:
the
distance
between
highway
212
and
First
Avenue
Northeast
/
Willow
Creek
is
1/2
mile.
L
Within
this
short
span
of
space,
there
are
14
private
driveway
entrances,
plus
four
streets,
Camp
Avenue
camp
first
Avenue
Southeast
and
second
Avenue
Southeast.
Yes,
there
is
a
turning
lane,
but
with
the
addition
of
144
apartments,
accessing
19th
Street
by
those
living
and
working
in
the
area
will
become
exceedingly
difficult
apartment.
Dweller
cars
waiting
to
turn
left
into
their
new
complex
could
be
stacked.
A
long
distance
in
the
turning
lane
preventing
residents
of
the
Sun,
sighs,
sunrise,
apartments
and
condo
building
one
from
accessing
the
street.
L
It
could
back
to
2nd
Avenue
southeast
to
these
144
apartment
dwellers
will
impact
highway
212.
Also,
the
entrance
exit
to
Carl's
appliances
is
just
a
short
distance
from
this
major
intersection
and
oftentimes
has
four
or
five
cars
waiting
to
turn
left
onto
19th
Street
for
additional
cars
to
the
turning
lane
will
create
problems
for
this
business.
If
this
apartment
complex
is
approved,
eventually,
the
traffic
problems
are
forever,
as
there
are
no
good
fixes
number
four.
L
During
the
years
of
2015
to
2017,
there
were
19
traffic
accidents
at
highway,
212
and
19,
of
which
eight
involve
personal
injury,
with
additional
with
the
addition
of
144
apartments.
So
near
this
busy
intersection,
we
can
expect
the
number
of
accidents
to
increase.
It
was
announced
Saturday
on
radio
today
that
the
Veterans
Administration
outreach
will
be
relocating
to
the
snap
Fenderson
fitness
center
on
19th
within
a
year,
or
so
they
service,
3000
veterans,
and
this
too
will
increased
traffic
number
six
with
increased
traffic
on
19th
Street.
L
The
response
time
of
emergency
rescue
and
ambulance
vehicles
will
increase
and
lives
will
be
lost
number
seven
because
there
are
no
designated
crosswalks
between
the
current
stoplights
pedestrians,
especially
children
with
mothers
or
mothers
with
children.
The
handicapped
and
elderly
will
be
at
risk
crossing
19th
Street,
nor
are
there
side
walks
to
walk
to
the
stoplights
and
then
cross
over
in
the
event
number
eight
in
the
event
of
emergency
evacuation
due
to
the
high
and
density
of
people
with
access
to
only
19
Street
lives
could
be
lost
due
to
panic
and
congestion.
L
What
do
people?
What
do
the
people
who
sign
the
petition
want
to
see
on
this
site?
We
are
not
opposed
to
three
or
four
apartment
buildings
with
six
or
eight
units
or
four
plexes.
We
want
housing
that
will
complement
the
existing
area.
We
want
open
space
with
green
grass.
A
maximum
of
thirty
maximum
of
36
units
could
be
accepted.
So
long
as
the
look
is
appealing
and
welcoming
when
driving
past,
we
want
to
be
proud
of
our
area
of
town,
as
should
these
city
county
officials.
L
L
Many
units
will
have
more
than
one
vehicle.
All
will
be
accessing
19th
Street
from
14
driveways
plus
four
streets.
We
request
the
City
Council
to
hear
the
voices
of
those
signing
the
petition
and
understand
the
negative
impact
that
it
will
have
for
all
who
live
along
this
half
mile
section
for
those
using
19th
Street
start
starting
a
mile
or
two
back
and
all
visitors
to
the
city,
who
will
witness
congestion
and
the
undesirable
high
intensity
of
people
in
one
small
area.
L
L
A
You
thought
would
be
acceptable
are
three:
is
the
correct
zoning
for
that
and
that's
what
they're
proposing,
but,
aside
from
that
they'll
have
every
individual
has
property
rights
and
the
City
Council
has
no
authority
to
restrict
any
individual
developer
from
doing
what's
lawfully
allowed
by
our
ordinances.
You
may
have
a
beef
with
our
ordinances
and
that's
a
different
conversation,
the
the
correct
use
of
this
land.
A
L
A
The
current
PUD
zone
is
only
good
for
the
development
proposal
for
which
it
was
approved.
A
beauty
is
like
a
building
permit.
You
can't
take
a
building
permit
for
a
hospital
and
build
an
apartment
complex
with
it.
The
PUD
zoning
goes
explicitly
for
exactly
I'm
talking
about
how
many
units
the
shape
the
color,
the
type
of
siting,
the
driveways.
Everything
is
specified
in
a
PUD
and
they
were
unable
to
build
that
in
conformance
with
our
regulations
when
that
was
approved.
So
we
already
know
that
won't
happen
and
they
gave
up
trying.
A
So
this
is
a
new
proposal.
Our
three
is
probably
the
correct
zoning.
If
I'm
hearing
what
you're
saying
apartments
are
appropriate
there,
it's
it's
up
to
the
developer,
to
prove
to
the
city
that
they
have
followed
all
of
the
regulations
in
their
design.
But
that's
not
the
question
tonight.
The
question
tonight
is:
what
is
the
zoning
regular?
What
zoning
district
is
appropriate
for
this
land
and
we
don't
have
that
many
different
zoning
designations?
A
You
can
see
most
of
them
right,
there
are,
one
is
single-family
residential
are
two
allows
duplexes
and
for
Plexus
by
conditional
use
are
three,
is
apartments
and
commercial
also
allows
apartments?
There
is
commercial
across
the
street
and
we
do
have
a
long
term
plan.
It
identifies
this
as
an
area,
that's
appropriate
for
economic
development,
which
includes
apartments
or
commercial.
L
N
A
D
A
K
It
would
also
be
I'm
gonna
add
it
would
be
different
too
if
the
adjacent
zoning
was
our
one
single-family
residential,
but
because
there
is
multi-family
residential
and
commercial
adjacent
to
this
property.
That's
why
it's
appropriate,
and
especially
it's
also
it's
on
a
collector
route,
which
is
19th
so.
A
It
is
incumbent
upon
the
property
owner
or
developer
to
show
that
they've
been
able
to
meet
all
of
the
city
regulations
and
that's
difficult
to
do
they.
They
probably
can
build
more
than
a
six
Plex,
but
you
have
more
than
a
six
Plex
next
door,
so
I
mean
what
is
what
is
correct
from
the
city's
perspective.
The
first
step
is
what
type
of
land
use
regulation
should
be
applied
here.
So
if
LuAnn
wants
to
come
up
and
read
her
things,.
L
O
No,
this
letter
was
given
to
the
committee
that
was
working
on
it.
I
was
asked
to
read
it.
It's
addressed
to
the
Watertown
City
Council
and
honorable
mayor
last
week.
It
came
to
my
attention
that
an
out-of-town
builder
proposes
to
build
272
unit
apartment
buildings
on
the
property,
a
budding
st.
Mary
cemetery
on
its
north
brought
north
boundary
and
facing
19th
Street
southeast.
It
was
my
intention
intention
to
appear
before
you
in
person
this
evening,
but
a
health
problem
prevents
me
from
doing
this.
O
He
goes
on
to
introduce
himself
I
am
sure
because
of
my
advanced
age,
many
of
the
councilman
and
mayor
are
not
acquainted
with
me,
I'm,
going
to
summarize
this
in
out
of
respect
for
time.
Lifelong
resident
of
this
community
graduated
from
high
school
in
1941
military
World,
War,
two
doctor
of
medicine
returned
to
Watertown
because
of
my
roots
of
138
years,
returned
to
Watertown
to
raise
my
family
practice
medicine.
For
the
last
25
years,
I've
lived
in
Sky
View
condominium
at
190,
19th
Street
southeast.
A
few
points
of
concern.
O
I
wish
to
mention,
obviously
that
two
buildings
of
a
hundred
and
forty-four
rentals
seems
excessive.
The
single
point
of
entrance
and
exit
to
this
area
may
at
high
traffic
hours
poses
a
real
traffic
hazard,
a
single
street
with
a
35
minutes
35
mile
an
hour,
speed
limit
and
a
short
distance
from
highway
212
will
dramatically
increase
congestion.
O
O
Another
concern
there
appears
to
be
a
definite
problem
of
snow
removal
from
the
property
and
the
potential
for
inaccessibility
in
a
case
of
fire
raises
the
question:
a
proposal
to
build
a
few
four
plexes
on
this
property
was
rejected
a
few
years
ago,
because
there
was
no
provision
for
quote
a
settling
pond
end
quote
whatever
happened
to
that
requirement.
There's
certainly
no
provision
for
this.
In
the
current
plat
I've
watched
all
of
the
development
on
other
adjacent
properties.
It's
been
done
with
care.
What
the
quality
of
life
is
preserved.
O
144
apartments
of
relatively
low
rental
crammed
into
the
proposed
property
will
bring
all
of
its
attendant
problems
and
will
seriously
lower
property
values
and
quality
of
life.
I've
enumerated
only
a
few
negative
access
aspects
of
the
proposal
and
I
hope
that,
after
serious
consideration,
the
council
will
see
fit
to
reject
the
proposed
project.
Stanley
W
Allen,
jr.
MD.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
P
My
name
is
rich
Thomas
I,
don't
live
in
the
area,
but
I
am
the
sexton
for
st.
Mary's
Cemetery,
which
is
just
to
the
south
of
this
proposed
area
of
development.
I'm,
not
here
on
behalf
of
the
church
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
myself
and
I'm,
opposing
the
change
in
the
zoning
for
this
particular
parcel
of
land
because
and
I
know,
some
of
you
were
on
the
council
at
the
time
when
this
land
was
purchased
and
this
PUD
lay
be
labeling
or
zoning
was
given
to
this
parcel.
I.
P
Now,
with
this
idea
of
putting
in
a
developer
purchasing
this
land
from
them,
changing
the
zoning
to
r3,
which
I'm
sure
helps
the
sale
of
the
land
which
they've
been
unable
to
develop
for
a
number
of
years,
changes
the
whole
scope
and
it
puts
the
City
Council.
In
my
opinion,
in
the
position
of
helping
a
private
party
sell
a
parcel
of
land
so
that,
with
the
number
of
units
that
are
being
proposed
on
that
land
becomes
cost
feasible
for
the
developer.
P
P
Okay,
it
just
requires
a
different
kind
of
development
in
there
are
three
once
you
do,
that
these
people
that
live
in
that
area,
including
the
cemetery
itself,
have
no
basis
of
opposition,
because
that
allows
the
developer
to
do
everything
they
want
to
do
as
long
as
they're
in
compliance
with
city
ordinances.
Right,
that's
true!
That's
right!
P
You're,
not
there
to
oppose
the
number
of
apartments
that
are
there,
that's
up
to
the
developer
and
what
they
need
to
put
in
there
in
order
to
make
any
money
and
I
think
that's
the
wrong
role
for
city
government
or
any
government
to
do
that
at
this
point
in
time
they
bought
the
land.
They
got
the
PUD
designation
for
that
land,
but
now
because
they
can't
develop
it,
they
want
the
city
to
change
the
zoning,
so
they
can
sell
it.
So
it
can
be
too
and
I,
don't
think.
That's
the
role
of
city
government.
A
Q
Once
on,
second
17th
Street
and
I
live
in
the
area,
I'm
gonna
make
it
real
brief.
It's
just
more
of
my
opinion
of
the
zoning
the
way
it
is
right
now.
Nobody
in
here
all
my
neighbors
that
I've
spoken
with
are
against
having
multi
Multi
type
buildings
they're.
What
they're
more
concerned
about
is
the
number
of
residents.
Q
You
know
not
the
number
of
people
that
are
going
to
be
in
that
small
little
area,
I've
been
a
law
enforcement
officer
for
30
years,
I
retired
from
the
Highway
Patrol
and
worked
for
the
sheriff's
office
here
in
Cottington
County,
one
of
the
things
that
when
mrs.
younge
came
to
talk
to
me,
one
of
the
things
that
concerns
me
is
the
possible
crime
rate.
Okay,
I'm,
not
saying
that
that's
gonna
happen,
I'm,
just
saying:
there's
a
possibility
with
that
many
people
and
affordable
housing,
I'm
thinking
the
crime
would
probably
increase
in
that
area.
Q
What's
the
closest
Park
to
that
to
that
complex,
the
closest
one
is
just
to
the
west
of
us,
which
means
they're
gonna
have
to
cross
19th
Street
to
get
to
that
park.
Looking
at
that
as
a
safety
issue,
so
my
concern
is
that
is
I.
Don't
think
anybody
here,
this
neighborhood
has
a
problem
with
having
an
apartment
there,
but
I
know
that
you
can
you
don't
have
any
say
on
how
many
units
are
available,
that
that
could
be
placed
there,
but
we're
looking
at
it
at
the
worst-case
scenario.
Q
R
Alan
Swann
I
live
on
19th
Street
in
the
you
know,
one
219
Street.
My
concern
is
first
of
all
the
traffic
problem
with
that
going
to
any
kind
of
traffic
coming
in
before
I.
Get
to
that
I'd
like
to
ask
one
question:
the
the
no
cenotes
we
sent
out
were
sent
out
to
us
about
the
about
the
hearing.
They
said
the
first
reading
on
July
16th
in
the
second
reading
of
the
ordinance
and
public
hearing
and
in
the
council
action
on
that.
My
question
is
his
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
already
given
action.
Yes,.
A
A
N
K
R
R
K
K
I
met
with
this
gentleman
and
that
site
plan
was
only
given
when
they
were
going
for
the
PUD
when
they
needed
to
give
their
intent
for
development.
That's
why
they
had
that
plan
out
there,
but
that
has
not
been
approved.
It
hasn't
been
formally
submitted.
The
building,
official
and
Fire
Marshal
have
preliminary
looked
at
it.
Preliminary
looked
at
it,
but
they
have
not
approved
it.
They
need
to
wait
until
the
rezone
would
be
approved.
The.
A
R
R
K
A
R
It's
inappropriate
from
the
standpoint
that
the
traffic
control
problem-
you
have
a
tremendous
amount
of
traffic
going
from
there
to
the
fitness
center.
All
of
those
new
buildings
that
are
building
is
going
in
all
feed
into
19th
and
you're,
just
going
to
increase
that
much
more
traffic
and
I'm
saying
that's
a
problem.
I
think
we
should
consider
and
I
reached
respectfully,
because
the
City
Council's
asserted
due
to
the
traffic
problems
that
would
exist
by
making
it
the
unit.
That
would
be
a
multi
sized
unit.
Okay,.
A
L
A
Next
step
would
be
for
the
owner
to
provide
a
plat
and
get
the
land
described
by
plat
and
then,
after
that,
they
can
get
a
building
permit,
so
they
would
apply
for
a
building
permit
and
in
applying
for
a
building
permit.
They'll
have
to
prove
that
they
have
complied
with
our
drainage
rules.
Just
like
anyone
else,
and
you
know
that
is
what
hung
up
the
PUD
that
was
abandoned.
A
The
beauty
plan
was
approved,
but
it
had
to
comply
with
the
drainage
regulation
and
they
couldn't
make
it
work,
so
they
did
not
build
the
beauty
that
was
proposed.
There
wasn't
enough
room
for
the
drainage,
so
I
mean
if
someone
can
do
144
units
with
all
of
the
required
parking
area
and
all
of
the
required
drainage
retention
on
that
lot,
the
council
would
not
be
able
to
say
anything
about
it,
but
that's
the
same
rule
that
applies
to
each
and
every
person.
A
L
What
I
hear
you
saying
is
you
may
pass
it
to
it
r3
tonight
the
new
builder
developer
never
has
to
come
before
the
City
Council.
The
residents
living
in
the
neighborhood
will
never
have
another
another
opportunity
to
oppose
this.
It
will
just
sail
right
on
through,
provided
the
new
developer
passes
meets
all
requirements
that
are
now
in
place.
Is
that
correct.
A
That
is
correct
and
if
you
don't
think
that's
right,
then
you
don't
have
a
beef
with
this
development.
You
have
a
beef
with
our
general
regulations
in
our
community
for
zoning,
and
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
tools
there.
Three
resident
there's
four.
Actually
you
can
do
manufactured
home
courts
or
our
1
2
&
3,
which
is
single-family
duplex
and
apartments.
That's
it
for
residential
development.
If
you're
proposing
that
only
up
to
a
four-plex
be
allowed,
then
that
would
be
r2.
A
N
L
K
D
A
L
A
S
S
M
S
U
All
right,
thank
you.
Okay,
hi,
my
name
is
Darcy
Curtis
I
live
on
17th
I'm.
Only
a
couple
blocks
away
from
the
project.
My
concerns
about
the
situation
is
that
you
know
all
on
the
council.
Look
around
this
room.
These
people,
if
you
notice,
are
mostly
a
retired
crowd.
A
lot
of
them
have
mobility
issues.
This
subject
means
enough
to
them
that
they
got
out
tonight
came
here
because
they
have
concerns
very
viable
concerns
and
a
lot
of
them
are
on
the
same
lines
and
it
makes
sense
because
I
live
in
that
neighborhood
and
I.
U
Look
at
it
from
a
mom's
point
of
view
is
if
you're
gonna
build
a
large
apartment
complex,
whether
it's
36
or
whatever,
the
idea
being
is
that
yes,
a
new
Park
has
been
designated
on
Willow
Creek.
So
what
the
kids
are?
Gonna
walk
across
Willow
Creek
to
get
to
the
park
or
they're
gonna
play
human
Frogger
across
19th
to
get
to
the
park
on
my
side
of
the
street.
There's
there's
just
so
many
logistical
issues
with
this
that
everyone
has
concerns
about.
I,
think
it's
something
everyone
needs
to
take
into
account.
U
Like
I
said
these
people
didn't
get
here
easily,
it
obviously
concerns
them
and
then
look
at
the
number
of
names
on
that
list.
That's
only
a
fraction
of
the
people
that
have
these
concerns.
These
are
your
voters.
These
are
your
tax
and
have
legitimate
concerns.
So
when
you
take
this
under
discussion,
I
think
think
you
need
to
again
take
a
serious
look
around
the
room
and
at
that
list
and
realize
that
people
have
very
viable
concerns
that
need
to
be
taken
into
consideration
before
a
vote
takes
place.
So
that's.
V
S
V
We
do
these
in
phases,
so
the
first
phase
would
be
a
72
unit,
building
we're
not
going
to
come
to
town
and
put
up
144
apartments
and
in
hope
that
we
hit
the
mark.
We
do
these
in
a
phased
project,
so
the
first
phase
would
be
along
19th
Street.
The
second
phase
would
be
on
the
back
side.
Where
we're
also
you
know
we
want
to
be
good
neighbors.
We
want
to
be
aware
of
the
issues
we're
creating
within
a
community.
V
We
need
to
get
the
first
building
up,
evaluate
the
traffic
situation
on
our
own
property
as
well
as
onto
the
street.
So
we
are,
we
are
considered
of
that,
but
in
reality
the
these
are
not
affordable
units
either.
These
are
very
their
market
rate
apartments,
they're,
very
safe
I.
Personally,
in
other
communities
we
live
in
our
work
in
have
actually
lived
at
our
buildings.
They're
very
quiet
people
come
they
come
in,
they
go,
you
know
not
many
times
throughout
the
day
they
go
to
their
work.
V
They
come
home,
they're,
very
quiet
buildings
on
the
inside
and
on
the
outside.
We
do
not
see
a
lot
of
children
living
in
these
buildings.
In
fact,
throughout
the
through
phase
one,
we
have
23
two
bad
units
and
49
singles.
So
it's
it's.
Even
if
both
phases
were
there
we're
talking
154
potential
people
living
in
the
two
buildings,
we're
not
talking
about
a
huge
amount
of
traffic
generation
between
the
two
phases
and
especially
not
with
one
not
just
with
the
one
phase.
V
So
I'd
like
to
point
that
out,
but
but
they
are,
they
are
very
quiet,
very
safe
buildings.
We
do
not
have
a
lot
of
issues
we
self
manage
them.
So
we'd
be
aware
of
that
we're
on
top
of
the
garbage
situation,
the
maintenance
situation.
If
we
have
people
that
are
causing
problems
in
our
buildings,
we
remove
them.
V
E
A
W
W
Just
as
a
point
of
reference
is
there
anything
that
you
see,
I
mean
that
thing
that
comes
out
loud
and
clear.
Is
this
traffic
issue?
Do
you
see
any
way
that
that
can
be
resolved?
Is
there
any
way
that
we
can
have
traffic
move
toward
the
north
right
now?
Obviously,
that
would
be
one
way
to
get
out
in
and
out,
and
that
would
be
on
19th
and
3,000
cars.
A
lot
of
cars
today
is
there
anything
that
you
would
see
is
an
engineer
that
could
make
people
feel
better
about
this.
The.
X
A
Is
an
easement
on
the
lot
to
the
north
over
on
the
east?
End
of
the
property
to
the
north
has
an
access
easement
right
there,
where
the
arrow
is,
which
is
almost
at
the
east
end
of
this
parcel,
which
could
be
used
as
a
secondary
exit
out
if
necessary,
and
that
was
there
because
of
the
PUD
was
required
to
have
a
secondary
outlet.
I
A
I
The
question
I
have
is
is
sitting
in
their
shoes.
You
know
we,
we
have
our
ordinances,
that
will
talk
about
height
of
a
building
and
and
setbacks
and
we'll
talk
about
parking.
But
what
consider
this
a
little
bit
of
an
oddity
here,
because
it's
it
is
one
Road
in
I,
have
not
personally
seen
anything
I
had
before
I
got
Gloria's
email,
I,
wasn't
aware
of
anything
in
regards
to
what
was
going
in
there
just
what
had
come
before
us
with
the
request
to
change
to
an
r3.
I
A
They
do
when
it
comes
to
subdivision
and
if
they,
this
is
a
parcel,
and
it
is
already
a
subdivision
of
the
out
lot,
which
has
quite
a
few
once
it's
planted.
That's
the
opportunity
that
the
plat
comes
before
the
council.
That's
the
opportunity
to
talk
about
access
and
roads
if
it's
a
single
lot
and
they
have
but
a
road
that
meets
our
requirements.
But
you
could,
you
know,
potentially
ask
to
see
something
developed
to
allow
a
secondary
access
health.
Well.
I
Me
like
there
there
we
do
need
to
have
some
type
of
consideration
on
when
we
make
decisions
for
zoning
on
what's
going
in
there
when
there
is
a
possibility
or
probability
for
problems,
and
this
would
be
in
this
case
it
would
be
traffic
congestion,
as
is
a
concern.
That
would
be
my
concern
as
I.
Look
at
this.
We
think
of
the
other
things
that
they've
talked
about.
I
Those
are
builder,
those
are
landowner
rights
that
they
have,
but
when
you
get
into
the
traffic
issue
that
not
only
affects
those
people
that
are
living
there,
it
affects
those
people
that
are
around
there
or
use
in
this
case,
19th
Street.
So
I
think
we
do
need
to
take
into
consideration
what
a
hundred
and
forty-four
units
and
and
mr.
stencil
said.
One
hundred
and
fifty-four
people
I'm
not
sure
where
that
number
comes
from,
but
assuming
a
little
over
one
and
in
each
apartment.
A
A
Do
I
address
that
in
our
preliminary
planning
stages,
this
did
not
go
through
the
preliminary
plan
in
our
three-phase
concept
plan
preliminary
plan
plat
this
doesn't
have
an
approved
preliminary
plan,
that's
kind
of
what
a
PUD
is
and
you
could
send
this
back
to
the
plan.
Commission
preliminary
plans
are
done
at
the
plan.
Commission
level
and
traffic
is
a
consideration
of
a
approval
of
a
preliminary
plan
as
our
Road
layouts,
but
this
was
not
presented
as
having
any
Road
in
it.
A
To
force
them
through
the
whole
subdivision
process
and
do
a
preliminary
plan
for
one
lot
and
I
think
that
they
might
be
considering
two
Lots
I,
don't
know.
If
that's
still
the
thought,
then
there
would
need
to
be
a
road
if
they
didn't
abut
a
road,
and
that
brings
up
a
another
opportunity
for
review.
But
right
now
we're
not
talking
about
the
development
plan.
We're
talking
about
the
zoning,
and
this
is
in
our
comp
plan
identified
as
an
area
that
should
be
for
reserve
for
economic.
A
A
I
And
here's
where
I'm
at
it
is
absolutely
appropriate
for
r3
from
the
stand
point
and
what
we
would
typically
see
in
an
r3
area
it
would,
it
would
absolutely
be
r3
when
we
talk
about
how
we
want
to
develop
and
transition
from
commercial
areas
to
into
residential
areas.
So
it's
perfectly
set
up
for
that,
but
when
we
have
one
lot
that
we
don't
have
a
say
on-
and
this
is
this
is
an
oddity,
because
we
don't
have
very
many
three
acre
lots
or
whatever.
This
is
five.
I
Five
acre
lots
that
get
sold
for
development
in
town
for
residential
areas.
So
it
unto
itself
it
is
an
oddity
and
I'm
I'm
leery
of
the
traffic
issue,
myself,
I
really
am
and
I
mean,
like
I
said:
if
I
knew
they
were
gonna
be
duplexes
or
for
plexes.
What
was
let's
say
what
was
going
to
go
in
and
the
PUD
perfectly
fine
with
that?
We
could
do
this
and
there
may
not
be
144.
There
could
be
210
units
in
if
they
can
fit
them
in
there.
I
A
Y
K
K
Y
Some
of
the
things
Mike
said
they
are
three:
is
the
right
designation
just
spent
on
the
way
we
do.
Our
does
own
in
the
city.
I
think
are
three
is
correct.
I
also
think
that,
with
the
attention
on
this
issue
that
I
think
the
traffic
element
will
be
watched
pretty
closely
if
this
goes
through
and
there,
but
there
will
be
an
opportunity
if
something
comes
up
where
we
say
that
just
doesn't
make
sense,
there
will.
A
The
the
problem
with
our
process
is
that
they
don't
necessarily
have
to
come
forward
with
a
development
plan
before
they
plant.
Now
they
already
have
come
up.
They've
been
very
straightforward
about
what
they
want
to
build
there.
So
you
know
what
they
intend
to
build.
They
could
change
their
mind
and
come
forward
with
an
application
for
something
entirely
different
and
they'd
be
within
their
rights
to
do
that.
But
when
the
plat
comes
forward,
you
know
what
they
have
in
mind.
A
If
you
think
it's
too
much
for
the
traffic
on
19th
and
would
be
offset
with
a
rotary
to
the
north
on
the
east,
and
then
you
could
make
that
requirement
at
that
time
and
I.
Think
that,
that's
probably
you
know,
I
judge
you
by
the
number
of
people
that
care
deeply
about
this.
You
might
want
to
seriously
consider
that.
Z
Calls
me
long.
I
was
looking
at
this
I'm
trying
to
look
at
the
few
units
that
are
over
there.
One
Willow
Creek
Willow
Creek
things
like
that.
There
are
lot
sizes
for
two
Willow.
Creek
is
one
point:
seven,
six,
three
acres
and
one
Willow
Creek
is
one
point:
five,
five:
nine
acres.
This
is
five
point
one
five,
while
I
was
just
doing
some
quick
math,
the
five
point,
one
five.
If
you
take
the
same
amount
of
units
that
are
on
second
on
to
Willow
Creek,
it's
a
hundred
and
thirty
unit.
Z
Z
They
could
have
potentially
a
North
exit
on
the
east
side,
so
I
mean
really
you're
talking
some
of
the
same
things.
Nineteen
Street
is
meant
to
be
an
artery
Road,
it's
supposed
to
be
a
collector
Road
and
and
since
we're
talking
simply
on
Sony,
which
is
what
we're
voting
on
tonight.
Our
three
is
is
what
it's
supposed
to
be
I
mean
you
have
our
three
to
the
north.
You've
got
our
three
to
the
north
west
of
it.
Z
Z
We're
voting
on
tonight.
It's
it's,
not
what
they're
pointing
up,
unfortunately,
the
the
bundle
of
Rights,
which
is
what
people
are
allowed
to
have
as
homeowners
as
landowners.
You
have
those
rights,
I
mean
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
infringe
on
their
rights
to
build
something
which
is
not
what
we
were
elected
to
do.
I
mean
our
job
is
to
do
what's
best
in
the
city's
interests.
I
understand
I.
Do
not
disagree,
that
there's
gonna
be
some
traffic
issues,
but
that's
not
what
we're
here
to
vote
on
we're
here
to
vote
on
the
zoning.
D
Z
Don't
discount
the
the
traffic
by
any
stretch
of
the
imagination,
19
some
busy
street
anyway,
but
when
that
was
Walmart,
it
was
busier.
You
know
now
it's
running
it
doesn't
have
quite
as
much
traffic.
You
know,
I
mean
those
are.
These
are
items
that
have
come
after
the
fact
Walmart
was
built
30
years
ago.
You
know
runnings
took
it
over
15
18
years
ago,
so
I
mean
those
are
items.
You
know
the
units
that
are
built
around
it
we're
after
some
of
these,
some
of
them.
A
E
Got
a
few
questions,
the
first
one
I'm
not
sure
who
to
directed
to
the.
Maybe
it's
not
a
fair
question,
but
me
male
director
to
you
brandy.
Can
you
give
us
some
perspective?
What
would
be
the
density
of
the
number
of
people
living
in
the
PUD
versus
what
we're
looking
at
now?
Do
you
have
any
any
feel
for
that?
The.
E
So
you're
saying
forty
four
units,
and
probably
you
know
two
people
per
unit-
yeah,
okay,
just
trying
to
get
perspective
as
to
what
the
difference
would
be
versus
vr3.
Okay,
second
question
is
I
know.
Obviously,
traffic
is
a
big
issue:
I'm,
not
disputing
anybody's
numbers
or
their
thoughts
on
traffic,
but
I
mean
I
know.
We've
got
engineers
about
doing
traffic
studies
on
a
regular
basis.
E
I
mean
what
what
is
the
the
expectations
for
is
capacity
for
19th
Street
I
mean
I'm
again,
not
discounting
of
people
are
saying,
but
we
must
have
some
feel
as
to
what
that
road
was
designed
to
handle.
As
far
as
Chuck
I
know,
3,000
a
day
sounds
like
a
lot,
but
maybe
was
designed
to
handle.
You
know
four
or
five
thousand
I
I
and
I'm
not
hearing
that
so
I.
So
I
can't
really
place
an
opinion
as
far
as
a
traffic
issue.
E
A
E
Third
question
then,
is
I
know
this
was
addressed
at
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
I
believe
our
fire
marshal
address
this
I
mean.
Are
there
any
X?
We've
got
a
good
representation
from
our
fire
department.
Here
are
their
concerns
as
far
as
a
you
know,
act
appropriate
access
in
the
case
for
fire
out
there
with
what's
planned,
so
I'm,
not
sure
unfairly,
maybe
a
pull
of
address
it
to
Doug
or
done.
If
you
want
to
take.
F
That
yeah,
so
obviously
with
with
the
traffic
concerns,
it
would
be
nice
to
have
a
secondary
access,
but
the
way
the
the
plan
was
presented
to
move
into
this
far
forward.
To
this
point,
the
buildings
itself
had
adequate
enhanced
fire
protection
systems,
and
it
also
the
the
parking
lot
could
handle
a
turnaround
of
a
of
a
truck.
So
with
those
two
things
the
the
fire
marshals
recommendation
was,
it
would
not
require
a
second
entrance
to
that
and
that's
about
what
I
know
of
is
that
Creek
down?
Does
anything
else
I
forgot?
F
I
I'm,
a
strong
advocate
of
ownership
rights
and
and
and
whoever
owns
this
property,
I
I
believe
they
should
be
able
to
develop
within
their
there
the
right
that
they
have
to
do
that
with
exception
and
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
with
the
public
safety
question
here.
What
is
the
solution
now
we
heard
that
this
is
gonna,
be
done
in
two
phases
which
may
or
may
not
happen
could
happen
all
in
one
phase
we
don't
I
mean
we
could
be
told.
But
what
happens
if
we
have
a
congestion
problem?
I
I
really
am
gonna
call
it
a
congestion
problem
versus
a
street
capacity
problem,
because
it's
a
very
distinct
point
on
19th
that
you
would
have
a
problem
with
which
I
think
is
different
than
all
of
19th
and
it's
carrying
capacity.
So
what's
the
solution,
if
we
have
a
problem
other
than
to
live
with
it
well,.
A
There
really
isn't
a
solution
to
that
other
than
the
owner
might
struggle
to
rent
or
sell
units
there.
If
it's
just
impossible
to
get
in
and
out
and
that's
you
know,
shooting
themselves
in
the
foot
to
create
something
that
isn't
livable
and
that's
not
our
judgment
call.
That's
that's
private
enterprise
in
in
the
process.
Our
job
as
the
community
is
to
make
sure
that
all
of
our
regulations
are
followed
and
we
should
be
following
a
comprehensive
plan
or
giving
good
strong
reason
to
deviate
from
it
and
we
should
be
enforcing
all
of
our
regulations.
I
I
N
V
Know
we
don't
start
a
project
this
year
we
might
not
ever
do
the
project.
You
know
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
pressures
on
multifamily
construction
right
now.
The
market,
the
market
study,
tells
us
that
there's
a
need
here
and
we
can
help
provide
that
I'm
sure
that
need
would
be
here
in
the
spring.
The
problem
we're
fighting
is
is
that
inflation
and
the
construction
markets
has
been
running
rampant.
Our
cost
goes
up
dramatically
every
year
and
I
don't
see
that
changing
and
interest
rate
pressure.
So
just
between
those
two
things.
V
If
this
gap
pushed
into
a
winter
season-
and
we
got
pushed
to
a
spring
I'd
say-
there's
probably
you
know
probably
less
than
a
50%
chance
that
we
would
actually
be
able
to
pursue
this
in
the
spring.
We're
kind
of
a
tipping
point
with
the
economy.
Right
now,
where
tariffs,
interest
rate
pressures,
labor
shortage
are
really
making
these
projects
difficult
and
they're,
especially
difficult
in
smaller
communities
that
don't
have
don't
have
a
lot
of
rent
growth,
such
as
Watertown
and
other
small
communities.
We
work
in
so
it's
very
important
to
once.
V
You
get
these
things
moving
forward
to
keep
them
moving
forward
because
there's
so
many
elements
outside
of
our
control.
That
would
have
a
dramatic
effect
on
the
viability
of
these
projects.
Then
the
cost
to
pursue
them
is
very
expensive.
You
get
you
get
drawings
going
and
engineers
and
everything
else.
So
that's
from
my
perspective,
I,
don't
own
the
land.
You
know
my
perspective
is
to
kind
of
hit
our
dates
and
keep
things
moving
forward.
We
need
to
know
where
we're
at.
We
don't
have
the
pleasure
to
sit
back
and.
V
V
Nature
has
an
you
know,
store
for
us
this
year,
so
it's
really
really
tough.
To
say,
I
mean
we're
planning
to
move
forward
as
far
as
sitting
back
and
doing
the
talks,
the
hard
thing
about
multifamily,
because
I
sit
in
front
of
a
lot
of
councils,
a
lot
of
planning
commissions
in
a
lot
of
different
communities
and
I
and
I
in
a
lot
of
neighborhoods.
V
You
know
no
one
wants
it
in
their
yard;
they
don't
want
it
close
to
them.
They
don't
want
to
buy
too.
You
know
by
their
their
housing.
Whatever
it
is,
you
know
they
kind
of
build
it
up.
Is
this
these
huge
buildings?
I?
Have
all
these
troubles
that
come
with
it
I
think
the
valid
the
traffic
could
be
a
valid
point.
I
personally
would
want
to
see
that
19
streets,
a
big
Street,
we're
not
talking
about
a
lot
of
traffic
pressure
here.
V
AA
So,
if
I'm
looking
at
these
different
statistics
that
go
by
weekday
p.m.
AM,
PM
peak
p.m.
Saturday
peak
hour,
Sunday
peak
hour,
basically
on
weekends,
a
single-family
detached
house
generates
42%
more
trips
than
does
a
unit
in
an
apartment.
The
difference
is
even
greater
on
the
weekend,
58%
more
trips
on
Saturdays
and
50%,
more
trips
on
Sundays,
the
large
difference
is
seen
not
only
in
the
totals,
but
also
in
the
peak
hours
morning
and
afternoon,
weekends
and
weekdays
by
measure.
AA
It
is
clear
that
single-family
houses
generate
more
automobile
traffic
than
apartments
or
any
other
type
of
housing.
In
explaining
why
single-family
houses
produce
the
most
traffic.
The
Institute
of
transportation
engineers
noted
that
they
are
the
largest
units
in
size
with
the
most
residents,
but
also
pointed
out
that
they
had
more
vehicles
per
unit
than
any
other
residential
landowners,
and
it
goes
on.
But
I
tried
to
find
a
fact
that
would
help
us
take
a
little
bit
of
the
emotion
out
of
the
traffic
issue
and
I
hope
that
does
help.
So.
A
A
D
Z
A
G
A
AB
AC
AB
AB
A
A
A
A
M
A
The
next
item
we
did
take
action
right,
yeah,
okay,
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
18
0-7,
amending
zoning
district
boundaries
by
zoning;
mansell
addition,
southeast
of
sandy
shores
to
r1,
single-family,
residential
district
and
there's
no
action
required
here.
But
I
will.
Let
brandy
explain
this
Thank.
K
K
Why
you're
hearing
again
is
because
previously
they
were
proposing
to
annex
5.8
acres
and
then
now
what
they've
decided
and
mostly
because
of
the
sioux
rural
water
settlement
that
they
have
to
pay
eighty
nine
hundred
dollars
for
anything
under
35
acres,
so
they
decided
just
to
go
with
their
whole
property
and
annex
at
all
at
once,
so
they
weren't
faced
with
that
fee
again.
So
then,
now
they
are
proposing
to
annex
--an
zone,
12
acres
and
the
zoning
designation
will
be
our
one
single-family
residential.
E
Z
K
With
our
one
single
family,
the
minimum
size
is
nine
thousand
square
feet
and
as
a
condition
of
the
annexation,
we
are
requiring
a
plat
to
come
forward
where,
if
they
aren't
dedicating
any
right-of-way
or
any
public,
improvements
aren't
needed
and
they
aren't
creating
more
than
five
Lots.
It
can
be
administrative
leap
later'd,
so
they
they
can
subdivide.
K
Z
U
A
Next
item
on
the
agenda
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
prairie
lakes,
wellness
center
sponsorship
agreement
with
Travis
outfitter
incorporated
and
I'll
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval,
move
by
Ville
horror.
Second,
by
Rowley
discussion:
let's
see
Matt,
would
you
like
to
talk
an
organ
playing
Glenn.
E
This
is
the
the
next
one
to
come
now
before
this
group
regarding
a
sponsorship
arrangement
of
prolegs
Wellness
Center,
this
has
been
approved.
This
is
Travis.
Outfitters,
obviously
has
been
approved
by
Prairie
Lakes.
It
was
a
our
little
committee
of
Mike
Don
Bruce
and
myself
have
looked
at
it.
You
know
in
our
okay,
Matt
I,
believe
you
look
at
it
from
a
legal
standpoint.
E
AC
Had
asked
what
what
that's
going
to
look
like
if,
since
we
were
proving
it
after
the
first
and
nothing,
is
up
yet
that'll
be
up
to
to
travis,
essentially
if
they
want
to
take
some
more
time
on
the
back
end
or
if
we
modify
the
agreement,
so
I
would
suggest
that
we
approve
this
with
a
the
understanding
that
so
the
date
may
change
the
September
1st.
If
that's
what
Travis
Travis
chooses?
Ok
just.
A
AD
Want
before,
when
we
had
a
couple
other
sponsorship
agreements
come
forward,
we
had
a
discussion
that
when
we
continue
to
have
these
come
forward,
I
would
ask
the
council
if
they
want
it
to
be
operating
or
if
they
want
it
to
be
going
back
into
the
building
fund.
So
I'll
kind
of
let
you
guys
have
that
conversation.
The
last
couple
that
we've
done
that
were
these
types
for
the
sponsorship
we've
put
them
into
the
operating
so.
A
Z
Only
question:
maybe
the
more
of
a
caution
would
be
if
this
is
a
five
year
in
grievant
and
they
put
it
into
the
operating.
They
can't
use
that
as
their
budgeting
item.
You
know
four
five
years
from
now
it
may
or
may
not
be
there.
So
just
a
caution.
The
Wellness
Center
that
you
know
this
potential
money
could
drop
off
at
five
years,
so
it
would
be
more
of
a
cautionary
tale
than
yeah
good.
You
know
you
put
it
in
your
budget
and
that's
just
gonna.
A
Be
there
every
time
five-year
thing
good
point,
anything
else,
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries
the
next
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
plan
service
renewal
with
Johnson
Controls
for
maintenance
at
City,
Hall
and
I'll.
Just
say
that
this
is
we've
had
an
agreement
with
Johnson
Controls
for
many
years,
and
this
would
be
a
continuation
of
it
that
it
did
go
up.
A
The
cost
went
up
3%
about
3%
$160
and
we're
having
a
little
issue
now
with
the
air-conditioning.
So
we
need
to
call
them
they're,
not
yes,
and
and
they've
been
very
responsive,
this
being
an
old
building.
They
come
out
here
a
lot
so
I
look
for
a
motion,
second
for
approval
by
Councilman,
woman-man,
T
and
second
by
Councilman
l'olam,
any
discussion
or
questions
below
I.
AD
Of
tried
to
just
keep
it
basic,
like
I,
said
I
back
in
2017.
This
was
the
first
the
last
time
that
you
saw
it
kind
of
the
whole
renewal
package
for
the
maintenance,
and
this
is
basically
their
general
maintenance
for
the
heating
and
the
cooling,
and
they
come
in
and
I
think
they
run
their
tests
and
kind
of
check
everything
over
as
well
as
their
they're
kind
of
our
on
call
for
when
we
have.
A
I
think
that
we
call
tomorrow
morning,
all
right
so
any
other
questions
or
comments,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
10
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
an
agreement
with
OpenEdge
for
credit
card
services
and
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
A
second
then
we'll
have
action.
We
have
a
motion
by
Bueller
second,
by
solo
and
I.
T
On
top
of
that,
they
have
chips
already
with
their
hardware,
our
current
it's
not
required,
so
that
would
save
a
cost
and
future
if
all
credit
card
processing
required
the
chip
Spencer
could
not
be
here
tonight.
The
only
reason
I'm
here
is
to
let
you
know
we
did
bring
this
to
the
park
and
Rec
board
Spencer
presented
to
them,
and
they
also
are
recommending
to
the
council
for
approval
specifics
of
the
details.
G
All
right,
I'm
filling
in
for
Spencer
today.
Basically
the
way
I
understand
is
that
every
credit
card
processor
charges
their
fee.
The
rate
that
we
get
with
OpenEdge
is
0.3
percent,
so
say
for
your
debit
card.
You
get
charged
there
we
get
charged
1.6
percent.
It
would
only
go
up
further.
The
processing
fee
for
open
edges
0.3%,
so
it
then
be
1.9
and
then
so
on,
for
whatever
different
rates,
different
cards
offer
or
have.
G
D
G
Or
the
other
yep
and
Spencer
kind
of
gave
me
a
little
rundown
of
what
he
wants.
The
council
don't
know,
and
basically
everything
that
Terry
said
they're
one
of
the
few
processors
that
work
with
Civic
rec.
That
can
get
things
done
in
the
time
frame
that
we
need
to
that's
another
big
thing
too,
because
we're
kind
of
we're
trying
to
get
this
done
yet
in
2018
so
and.
A
A
AD
I'll
let
Terry
and
Pete
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
too,
but
when
this
agreement
first
came
before
you
as
well,
it
was
going
to
be
an
additional
$10,000
if
our
current
credit
card
company
that
we
have
could
not
tie
in
and
they
had
to
do
the
work
to
tie
that
in
after
we
went
back
and
we
look
to
the
credit
card
company
we
have,
there
would
be
those
additional
fees
so
going
with
OpenEdge
and
civic
rec
for
the
software.
We
won't
see
the
$10,000.
A
A
We
discussed
this
amongst
the
staff
about
what
would
be
best
not
looking
at
replacing
this
position
with
another
engineer,
but
instead
opening
up
a
new
position
as
an
engineering
tech,
and
so
that's
what
we'll
be
doing
will
be
opening
in
a
grade.
Five
engineering
tech
position.
That's
the
additional
position,
but
we
dude.
We
don't
have
any
intention
of
filling
the
vacant.
Engineer
position,
that's
not
in
the
budget,
so
this
creates
a
new
engineering
tech
position.
A
No,
no,
it's
not
filled,
so
we
had
three
people
we
had
to
text
and
an
engineer.
Now:
we've
got
to
do
tax
and
instead
of
filling
the
engineer,
position
we're
going
to
create
a
third
tech
position
and
not
fill
the
engineer
position.
So
we
will
end
up
when
we're
done
with
three.
We
had
three
we'll
end
up
with
three
we're
not
intending
to
have
actually
another
position:
we're
not
going
to
fill
the
engineer
position.
Z
A
Buddy
motion
my
Bueller
second
bylaw
any
questions
or
discussion.
All
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
was
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item.
12
is
consideration
of
change
order
number
3
with
donek
Inc
for
the
2018
sanitary
sewer,
replacements,
project
number
1808
for
an
increase
of
nine
thousand
six
hundred
seventy
dollars
for
a
total
contract
amount
of
five
hundred
eleven
thousand
nine
hundred
sixty
eight
dollars,
and
this
received
the
recommendation
of
the
Public
Works,
Finance
and
Safety
Committee
meeting,
and
we
had
discussion
at
that
meeting
prior
to
this.
W
A
X
This
is
a.
We
ran
into
a
couple
issues:
you've
seen
no
previous
orders
for
the
base
of
one
Street.
This
one
is
covering
six
inches
of
millions
for
the
hauling,
the
haul
they
will
go
in
scale,
so
weigh
it,
and
then
they
will
place
the
six
inches
of
millions
that
will
be
on
6th
Street
southeast
and
then
it
also
covers.
We
ran
into
a
service
connection
that
was
actually
eight
inches
instead
of
six
inches,
which
was
to
the
best
of
our
knowledge.
It
was
six
inches.
X
A
D
X
It
was
a
long,
complicated
process,
but
they
have
to
go
get
the
material.
They
have
to
go
to
a
scale
so
they're
driving
further
and
then
they're
going
to
place
the
material
and
then
what
so
we
estimated
at
750
tons
should
be
plenty
for
six
inches
of
millions,
and
it's
going
to
give
us
a
lot
better
base
course,
underneath
that
road
and
hopefully
long
term,
that
whole
Road
holds
up
better
than
a
lot
of
the
roads
in
town.
Z
A
All
right
any
other
comments
or
questions
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
14
is
resolution
number
18-34
establishing
the
license
fee
for
security
guard
employees
of
security,
guard
licensees,
I'll,
look
for
motion;
second:
approval
moved
by
man,
T
second,
by
law.
All
right
now.
Will
you
explain
what
this
is?
Please
yeah.
AC
Thank
You
mayor,
so
our
ordinance
currently
well
to
preface
this
there's
currently
no
security
guard
licensees
on
the
books,
if
I
understand
correctly,
but
our
ordinance
contemplates
that
you
could
be
an
individual
security
guard
or
an
employee
of
a
security
guard
and
you'd
both
have
to
be
licensed
in
the
same
way.
But
our
fee
resolution
does
not
distinguish
between
the
initial
cost
of
a
security
guard
company
versus
the
cost
of
a
security
guard
employee.
AC
So
what
this
does
is
it
says
if
you
come
forward
as
a
security
guard
company,
your
initial
cost
currently
under
the
fee
resolution
is
$500
for
the
first
year.
This
provides
that
your
employees,
then,
would
only
be
$50.00
for
the
first
year
rather
than
five
hundred
dollars
that
it's
currently
that
would
currently
be
required.
AC
So
we
had
a
group
come
forward
about
a
month
ago,
looking
at
potentially
starting
a
security
guard
company
and
hiring
Lake
area
tech
law
enforcement
students
as
security
guards
part
time
and
when
they
saw
that
currently
be
five
hundred
dollars
per
person
per
employee,
it
would
be
cost
prohibitive,
and
so
we
think
that
it
makes
sense
without
five
hundred
dollars
to
be
charged
to
the
company.
And
then
a
fifty
dollar
per
employee
charge
is
reasonable.
I
AC
I
D
AC
Because
so
in
this
business
the
security
guard
applicant
we're
required
to
the
Chief
of
Police.
In
fact,
I
guess
is
required
to
do
an
investigation,
so
we're
required
to
do
that
on
the
person
on
each
individual
licensee,
so
we're
required
to
do
work,
whereas
on
lift
they
do
all
the
background
check,
work.
AC
A
AD
Was
just
gonna
say
that
when
you
asked
about
the
background
check,
we
do
charge
for
like
I,
don't
know
if
you're
thinking
like
our
liquor,
licenses
and
stuff,
those
are
actually
paid
for
by
the
person
applying,
but
that's
kind
of
a
separate
type
of
a
background
check.
So
so
this
is
internal.
As
matt
said,.
A
Colin
was
going
to
give
an
update
on
the
sidewalk
issue
that
we
had
where
a
property
owner
was
requesting
that
the
city
come
in
and
repair
some
sidewalk
and
the
council
directed
more
information
to
be
gathered.
So
I
will
report
back
that
I
looked
for
other
situations
where
we
had
unimproved
right-of-way
such
as
this
with
a
sidewalk
going
through
it
and
I
could
only
find
one
other
place
and
as
far
as
I
know,
the
city
has
never
done
any
maintenance
on
that
one.
A
That
one
is
unimproved
eighth
Avenue,
which
is
just
south
of
Lincoln
school
and
I'm,
guessing
Lincoln
school.
Does
the
maintenance
on
that,
but
they're
adjacent
to
it?
The
city
does
not
do
the
maintenance
on
that.
That
was
the
only
one
only
one
I
could
find.
So
this
isn't
going
to
be
something
that
happens
very
often.
The
other
question
was
about
how
much
it
would
cost
and
Colin
did
those
numbers.
X
X
X
So
it
would
cover
this
panel,
the
sidewalk
through
there
and
then
the
panel
down
here
and
the
total
cost
was
two
thousand
three
hundred
and
forty-one
dollars
and
96
cents,
and
that
does
not
include
any
reinforcement
in
the
driveway.
So
if
we
were
to
do
that,
that
would
be
an
additional
cost
and
that's
based
on
our
current
contract
prices.
X
A
Repair
driveways
for
people
when
they
fail
driveways
are
in
the
public
right-of-way.
As
this
one
is
and
I'm
not
aware
of
any
case
where
we've
repaired
driveways
for
people,
the
sidewalk
is
in
the
right-of-way,
and
if
you're
confused
by
this
I
can
draw
a
picture
and
ready
to
do
that,
but
the
actual
right-of-way.
This
isn't
a
unique
case
where
we
have
right-of-way
without
a
road
in
it.
A
It
is
kind
of
unique
that
we
have
a
bypassing
sidewalk
through
there,
but
any
part
by
definition,
any
part
of
a
public
right-of-way
which
is
not
used
for
the
road
is
considered
the
Boulevard
and
it's
required
to
have
a
sidewalk
on
both
sides
of
every
right-of-way.
Every
street
in
town
and
the
property
owners
are
responsible
for
the
maintenance
of
those.
So
in
this
case
the
homeowner
that
has
the
driveway
should
have
been
required
to
extend
the
road
before
he
was
granted
a
building
permit.
A
But
since
it's
the
last
lot
on
a
road
that
doesn't
go
through
right
now
could
go
through
in
the
future.
It's
city-owned
property
to
the
north
and
if
the
city
ever
did
extend
that
road,
it's
possible
that
those
to
property
owners
adjacent
to
it
would
be
assessed
for
the
construction
of
that
road
and
they
would
be
required
to
pay
for
the
construction
and
maintenance
of
the
sidewalk
on
both
sides.
Every
two
sidewalks,
the
the
property
owner
on
the
east
side,
would
pay
for
the
sidewalk
on
the
east
side.
A
This
is
an
unusual
case,
so,
whatever
you
would
do
here,
I'm
probably
hard
to
even
imagine
another
case
like
this,
but
it
isn't,
unlike
any
other
corner
lot,
which
has
a
sidewalk
running
north
and
south
and
another
one
running,
east
and
west,
and
so
to
say
that
the
city
is
responsible
for
maintenance
is
a
dangerous
precedent.
We
don't
do
maintenance
on
any
sidewalks
unless
it's
city
property
adjacent
to
it,
not
right-of-way,
but
actual
city
property
like,
for
instance,
the
water
towers,
our
city
property.
We
do
the
maintenance
on
those
sidewalks,
the
parks,
our
city
property.
A
We
do
the
maintenance
on
those
and
this
one's
not
different.
In
that
respect,
the
difference
is:
there's
no
Road
in
that
right-of-way
some
day
some
day
there
may
be,
and
then
the
single
sidewalk
will
go
away
and
we'll
probably
have
sidewalk
on
both
sides,
and
since
this
was
allowed
to
put
in
one
sidewalk,
the
Road
cost
would
probably
be
assessed
back
to
the
adjacent
property
owners,
but
the
city
would
probably
build
the
sidewalk
on
either
side
because
the
property
owners
built
it
already
once
so.
I
Is
very
I
get
it,
but
I
think
the
thing
that
triggered
my
concern
on
is
first
of
all,
I'm,
not
sure
Ike,
again,
it's
just
fundamentals
but
I'm,
not
sure
I
believe
in
the
scenario
of
having
to
put
that
side
walking,
but
a
separate
issue
that
that
long
one
got
leads
to
the
park.
But
the
thing
that
concerned
me
is
it's
my
understanding,
I
don't
were
able
to
prove
this
or
not,
but
that
the
city
ordered
and
actually
had
constructed
the
segments
of
sidewalk
that
created
the
problem.
Is
that
fair?
A
With
public
dollars,
for
instance,
on
the
state
projects,
the
sidewalk
on
19th
Street
was
built
with
state
dollars.
The
property
owners
did
not
pay
for
that
sidewalk,
but
they
are
responsible
for
the
maintenance
of
those
sidewalks,
as
is
everyone
else
adjacent
to
a
sidewalk
in
the
public.
Right-Of-Way.
I
I
X
X
X
The
driving
driveway,
sorry
in
I,
I
guess,
there's,
there's
nothing.
I
can
say
for
sure
why
that
would
happen
to
the
driveway.
If
anything,
you
can
see
that
there's
some
cracks
in
the
sidewalk,
that's
how
I
would
see
it
fail
and
that's
what
I
would
determine
it's
trying
to
crack
and
that's
the
point
of
a
joint
is
it
allows
a
controlled
crack
instead
of
a
random
crack
like
this
sidewalk.
Z
I
Z
W
A
Yeah
and
normally
knowing
this,
we
would
order
it
done.
We've
ordered
many
many
many
sidewalks
that
are
in
this
condition,
repaired
by
the
adjacent
property
owner.
That's
our
standard
practice
is
when
we're
made
aware
of
a
sidewalk
which
is
in
disrepair,
we
order
the
adjacent
property
owner
to
repair
it.
So
if
that's,
if
you
want
to
do
something
different
here,
I
think
you
need
to
make
it
clear
if
that's
a
general
policy
change
for
all
sidewalks
in
all
public
rights-of-way
or
if
this
one
is
different
in
some
way,
specify
that
before
you'd
make
that
action.
W
Yeah
I
think
this
one
is
different,
because
mr.
Reese
has
indicated
that
the
city
did
the
job
and
that
we,
as
a
city
didn't
do
a
good
job
of
it.
You
know
that's
different
than
my
stuff
that
I
did
out
of
my
house.
I.
Did
it
I
and
I
wouldn't
expect
the
city
to
come
and
repair
my
driveway
now,
if
it
breaks
up
how.
A
E
X
Haven't
found
any
record
of
him
asking
and
I
I
personally
have
gone
through
emails
of
past
engineers,
I
guess,
but
another
thing
I,
don't
I
can't
tell
for
sure
about
the
sidewalk,
but
it
is
even
with
this
portion
of
the
driveway
and
it
seems
like
this
portion
came
up.
So
it
looked
like
this
was
probably
heaved,
which
caused
some
of
the
cracking
I.
Don't
know
that
for
sure,
but
I
mean
looking
at
a
sidewalk
like
that.
I
would
assume
that
they
would
match
into
a
driveway,
and
it
looks
like
it's
pretty
even
honest.
A
Just
looking
at
this
and
again,
we
don't
have
any
record
to
show
about
the
construction,
but
the
way
that
it
buts
in
my
my
thinking
is
that
that
curved
sidewalk
was
probably
installed
with
the
road
curb
and
gutter.
Before
that
homeowner
built
his
house
and
then,
when
the
homeowner
built
his
house,
he
was
required
to
put
well.
He
had
to
have
a
driveway.
A
He
installed
his
driveway
and
he
installed
per
city
requirements,
a
sidewalk
adjacent
to
his
property
within
the
public
right-of-way,
which
is
a
standard
requirement
of
all
building
permits
because
they
look
like
they
were
poured
right
up
to
that
sidewalk.
It
looks
like
the
curved
one
was
their
first
in
the
site,
but
I
mean
that's
just
what
looks
like
to
me
and
and
so
I'm,
not
thinking
the
city
built
that
I'm
thinking
that
was
probably
built
by
the
private
property
owner,
which
is
normal.
This
isn't
different.
M
A
M
Know
I
would
I
would
find
it
a
bit
of
a
burden
on
the
taxpayer
if
we
do
replace
this,
especially
without
any
proof
that
the
city
had
involvement,
involvement
with
the
construction.
That's
where
I
got
an
issue,
because
I
do
know
that
the
premise
for
him
to
get
this
replaced
when
he
was
here
was
the
the
substandard
construction.
To
begin
with,
one
of
the
things
we
were
kind
of
looking
for
too
was
an
engineering
assessment
to
see.
If,
if
there's
any
way
outwardly,
we
could
tell
if
this
was
constructed
poorly
and
apparently
that's.
M
E
X
Just
going
off
of
our
contract
price
kind
of
current
contract
with
our
and
usually
we
do
have
better
prices
than
if
someone
were
to
have
a
small
job
like
this
I
I
can't
speak
on
that
behalf.
I
didn't
get
an
independent
contract
or
a
quote
I
mean
so
I
guess
I,
don't
know
who
he
talked
to
I,
can't
I
couldn't
recall
who
he
talked
to.
If
I
don't
know
the
quote,
he
got
I
just
don't
know
what.
E
I
H
A
I
will
point
out
that
mr.
Reese
and
the
other
property
owner,
whoever
it
is,
are
eligible
for
cost-sharing
as
all
citizens
in
the
city
of
Watertown
are,
and
we
do
share
in
the
cost
when
someone
repairs
their
sidewalk
at
their
own
expense.
The
city
contributes
$2
a
square
foot
to
the
cost
and
he's
eligible
for
that.
Just
like
everyone
else,
and
we
do
get
quite
a
bit
of
people
taking
advantage
of
that
program
to
replace
their
sidewalks
in
the
public
right-of-way.
They
can't
replace
the
sidewalks
on
their
own
property.
With
that
cost
sharing.
AA
A
A
AA
These
are,
these
are
other
people
who
live
in
the
in
the
subdivision.
So
what
I'm
saying
is
that
you're
not
wrong
and
I?
Don't
disagree
with
the
fact
that
we
can't
go
around
and
fix
everything,
but
in
this
case
it
is
a
matter
that
public
perception
has
been
created
that
that's
a
City
track
of
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
that
the
city
is
responsible
to
fix
it.
You
know,
and
that
kind
of
thing,
because
it
goes
to
the
park
and
they've
seen
vehicles
they've
seen
mowers
that
type
of
thing.
AA
A
The
right-of-way
was
part
of
herzog
addition
plaited,
who
knows
30
years
ago
40
years
ago,
and
that's
probably
when
the
road
was
put
in
fact
that
it's
a
curved
road
isn't
unique,
there's
all
kinds
of
curved
roads
in
this
subdivision,
particularly
if
you
zoom
out
you
can
see
a
lot
of
them
are
curved
like
that.
But
this
is
the
only
one
I
saw
that
was
unimproved
right-of-way.
Y
A
couple
comments,
I
think,
sir,
makes
a
very
good
point.
If
we're
going
to
go
against
what
is
standard,
then
what
precedent
do
we
set?
So
what
is
the
anomaly
in
this
scenario?
I
think
that's
the
right
question
to
ask
and
driveways
are
made
to
be
driven
on.
Sidewalks
are
not
I
have
to
ask
about
the
point.
John
makes
I
do
recall
mr.
Rees
talking
about
this.
He
said:
there's
trucks
that
drive
on
there
if
they're
going
up
there,
maintaining
all
the
time
city,
trucks,
they're
driving
over
a
sidewalk
they're
doing
on
a
regular
basis.
Y
X
I,
don't
disagree
with
you
down
I
feel
like
if
it
was
just
the
truck
traffic
breaking
up
this
area.
It
would
be
more
than
just
that
corner
and
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
trying
to
like
bring
up
a
point.
I'm,
not
trying
to
argue
any
side
but
I
feel
like
you
would
see
it
down
the
whole
path
and
I,
don't
think
we're
seeing
that.
G
D
Y
AC
A
AE
A
AE
This
is
gonna,
be
the
easiest
thing
you
did
all
night
I
hope
we
talked
about
a
couple
of
months
ago.
The
Convention
and
Visitors
Bureau
has
a
proposal
in
front
of
them
from
John
Schmieder
with
the
huddle-up
group.
He's
a
sports
tourism
consultant.
We
had
him
come
to
a
council
meeting.
He
gave
a
presentation
that
is
videotaped.
Hopefully
you
all
watched
it.
I
came
again
probably
about
three
meetings
ago,
handed
out
the
proposal
to
everybody
copies
of
his
book.
Hopefully
you
all
had
time
to
do
your
homework.
AE
I'm
going
to
see
John
next
week,
I'm
going
to
be
in
Phoenix
for
esto,
which
is
a
marketing
conference,
and
we
have
a
September
one,
which
will
probably
have
to
push
that
back
a
little
bit
start
date
for
this,
but
the
reason
why
I
needed
to
come
is
I'm
here
for
your
blessing
I'm,
not
gonna.
Ask
you
for
any
money
right
now.
So
what
you
can?
AE
You
know
don't
sweat,
but
what
will
happen
is
that
the
proposal
was
for
$33,000
for
him
to
come
in
and
he's
got
a
five-step
process
that
he
will
take
watertown
through
from
a
SWOT
analysis,
identifying
partnerships,
opportunities
sponsors.
He
will
interviewed.
You
know
20
to
30
people
that
are
stakeholders
he
will.
They
will
call
an
interview.
You
know
that
you
guys
Park
and
Rec
the
CVB
all
of
our
board
members,
the
Wellness
Center
anywhere
with
that
we
have
floor
space,
the
high
school
athletic
director
and
just
to
get
a
feel
for
what
we
have
here.
AE
AE
He'll
then
come
and
do
a
two-day
presentation
to
the
leaders,
stakeholders.
He
does
a
public
forum
which
the
general
public
can
attend.
They
really
put
a
ton
of
work
into
it
in
there.
I
have
a
lot
of
confidence
in
them,
so
they
would
need
a
down
payment
of
half
of
the
$33,000
and
then
there's
five
thousand.
We
would
set
aside
for
travel
and
he
would
need
fifty
percent
of
that
down
in
2018
budget
year,
which
the
CVB
is
happy
to
do.
AE
What
I'm
here
today
to
ask
you
guys
about
is
the
support
in
2019,
with
the
end
of
the
project,
will
have
another
final
payment
that
will
come
due,
probably
in
January,
and
then
some
of
you
had
also
asked
about
keeping
them
on
board
to
help
us
going
forward.
They've
got
a
lot
of
really
good
relationships,
and
so
these
are
people
that
will
help
us
bring
in
a
lot
more
sports,
tourism
and
I.
Think
that
once
we
have
the
analysis
done,
it
just
makes
sense
to
form
a
partnership
with
them.
AE
So
there
would
be
a
cost
of
six
thousand
dollars
a
year
or
five
hundred
dollars
a
month
to
maintain
that
partnership.
If
we
decide
to
do
that,
so
really,
I
won't
just
want
your
support.
I've
put
the
budget
together
with
Kristen,
just
kind
of
highlighting
some
things.
We've
got
some
big
things
next
year
coming
in
that
are
gonna,
be
additional
cost
for
the
CVB's
so
which
may
include
moving
our
office.
AE
We've
got
another
full-time
person,
so
you
know
our
budgets
gonna,
look
quite
a
bit
different,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
before
I
hired
John
and
his
group
that
I
have
the
support
of
the
City
Council
going
forward
and
we
had
figured
in
some
costs
of
their
group
next
year,
but
this
year,
rather
than
asking
for
the
partnership
and
asking
for
funding
I,
we
I
believe
can
fit
it
into
our
budget
and
there
shouldn't
be
too
much
of
a
problem.
So.
A
Are
you
asking
for
a
commitment
to
budget
in
addition
to
the
CVB
money
that
we
set
aside
every
year,
I've
proposed
a
slight
increase
in
the
CVB?
It's
not
what
you
requested,
but
we're
we're
having
some
budget
considerations
that
were
restrained
and
sure
it's
like
two
or
three
percent
I.
Don't
remember
what
I
proposed
in
there
plus
the
bid
money
goes
straight
to
the
CVB
and
that's
been
dramatically
increased
and
so
there's
a
big.
That's
the
money.
That's
big
money
isn't
really
from
us.
The
money
right.
O
AE
AE
Hundred
we
have
some
additional
costs
next
year,
some
of
them
we
may
be
able
to
pick
up
with
some
sponsorships,
but
we
have
the
NSAA
championship
tournament
coming.
The
bid
is
giving
us
$5,000
for
that.
The
bid
money
is
used
primarily
for
the
South
Dakota
tourism
co-op
program,
which
doubles
our
money
that
they
put
into
it,
which
I
really
do
credit
our
success
to
reaching
out
and
getting
our
word
out
to
those
people
that
are
outside
the
you
know
our
immediate
area.
So
a
lot
of
that
is
spent
in
marketing.
AE
That
way,
but
so
I
had
in
there
for
just
some
additional
cost,
but
we
do
have
some
retained
earnings
as
well,
but
we
are
looking
also
to
move
our
offices,
which
would
be
I'm
working
with
Chris,
because
we
are
in
another
five-year
lease
and
we
are
out
of
room
and
so
in
order
to
move
forward
adequately
and
be
able
to
continue
to
grow.
That's
going
to
be
a
pretty
large
amount
of
money,
and
then
we
just
have
a
lot
going
on
next
year.
A
A
AE
No
I
know
that
I'm
just
here
to
let
them
know
if
I
spend
this
money.
Everyone
seemed
as
though
that
they
were
in
support
of
it,
but
no
one
has
addressed
any
questions,
and
so
they
don't
need
to
act
on
it.
I
just
think
that
it's
good
for
you
guys
to
know
what
we're
up
to
and
how
we're
spending
our
money
when
it
comes
to.
A
$30
I
think
it's
a
good
investment
and
I.
It
isn't.
I
just
want
to
be
clear
on
what
you're
asking,
because
if
you
put
that
in
your
budget
and
your
that's,
what
you're
explaining
the
council
doesn't
approve
that?
Okay,
they
only
approve.
What's
in
the
budget
book,
which
is
one
number
given
to
the
CVP
out
of
the.
AE
AD
We
do
actually,
if
you
look
at
the
18
book,
we
do
break
down
the
CVB's
budget
that
was
requested
a
couple
years
ago,
so
I
have
18s
in
front
of
me.
19's
will
be
handed
out
shortly
within
the
next
couple
days,
but
we
do
break
down
what
they
are
spending
on
salaries
and
the
different
advertising
in
marketing.
So
when
you
sent
the
budget
request
for
19,
you
had
kind
of
two
different
numbers.
A
part
of
that
was
to
take
out
of
some
of
your
reserves
too
right.
Yes,.
AE
AE
AE
AE
AE
E
I'm
in
support
of
the
project,
but
can
we
even
take
any
any
kind
of
action
on
this
tonight
and
then?
Secondly,
I
mean
we've
got
until
our
budget
hearings
take
place.
I,
don't
know
what
we
can
tell
you
Julie
at
this
point,
I'm
in
support
of
it,
but
I
feel
like
our
hands,
are
tied
media
at
this
immediate
time
relative
to
your
request.
Well,.
AE
Y
We
can't
take
any
action,
I
understand
that,
but
as
the
liaison
I
do
feel
a
need
to
speak
here,
I
will
just
say
that
I,
you
know,
we've
got
these
new
facilities.
The
plan
always
was
to
leverage
those
facilities.
I
think
this
is
one
of
the
first
steps
in
doing
so.
I
know:
we've
got
budget
issues
we're
gonna
be
facing,
but
I
just
would
make
the
comment
that
you
know
there
is
a
return
on
investment
here
on
this
I
believe
right.
A
AE
AE
That
you
know-
and
that
probably
won't
happen
right
away
either
so
I
just
before
we
get
into
any
kind
of
a
commitment
or
conversation
with
him.
I
just
need
to
kind
of
know
how
everybody
feels
about
it.
If
there's
questions
I
didn't
have
anybody
reach
out
to
me
personally,
so
I
just
am
assuming
that.
I
AE
I'm
service
with
him
yeah
yep
and
he's
been
he
used
chaired
the
National
Association
of
Sports,
Commission's
I.
Think
he's
the
only
one
that's
ever
done.
It
twice
he's
got
a
lot
of
connections,
people
to
speak
very
highly
of
him.
I've
talked
to
some
of
the
in
the
purple
as
well.
There's
a
list
of
his
clients.
AE
I
have
talked
to
those
individuals
as
well
when
we've
met
and
everybody
is
pretty
happy
with
him,
he
delivers
and
actually
he's
he's
handed
out
a
lot
of
really
good
advice
for
free
up
til
now
to
just
because
he's
just
that
kind
of
guy
I
kind
of
want,
your
you
know
in
the
family.
I
think
you
always
are
I.
Think
he's
just
genuinely
loves
what
he
does
so,
but
yeah
he's.
He
comes
very,
very
highly
recommended
history.
A
M
Would
like
to
comment
I
think
we
do
need
to
I
grew.
It
done
I
think
with
all
these
new
facilities
that
we're
trying
to
fill
up-
and
you
know,
get
as
much
activity
from
those
in
revenue
generation
as
we
can
I
think.
In
my
opinion,
it
is
important
for
us
to
do
what
we
can
to
support
this
initiative.
I.
D
A
AE
AE
A
Any
other
old
business
we
have
numerous
items
of
new
business
and
just
for
information.
I
have
numerous
RFPs
that
we'll
be
issuing
in
the
near
future,
and
one
Todd
is
here
to
talk
about
where
there's
an
airport
RFP
and
an
RFP
stands
for
request
for
proposals.
There's
no
obligation
in
issuing
an
RFP
there's,
no
obligation
that
we'll
spend
any
money.
The
proposal
will
come
back
with
spending
money
and
then
you'll
have
action
to
take
to
the
either
accept
the
proposals
or
not
so
Todd.
You
want
to
tell
us
about
the
airport
one.
AB
Sure
the
FAA
and
DoD
came
up
with
a
1
billion
dollar
infrastructure
program
through
the
federal
government
this
year
for
small
and
medium
sized
airports,
and
it's
still
in
the
works
right
now.
The
paperwork's
kind
of
all
over
the
place
they're
coming
out
with
new
updates
every
month,
but
the
deadline
for
this
is
October
31st
of
this
year.
So,
as
the
mayor
said,
the
RFP
for
engineering
services
would
be
our
first
step
and
this
would
be
for
a
terminal
project
and
essentially
the
lessor
scored
projects
was
what
this
was
meant
for.
AB
They're
kind
of
changing
their
ways
going
forward
here
with
the
wording
and
stuff
like
that.
But
I
did
talk
to
the
FAA
up
in
Bismarck
and
I
talked
to
the
state
d-o-t,
and
we
are
a
channeling
state
where
the
money
comes
through,
so
they
think
we
have
a
decent
shot
at
moving
our
terminal
project
up
from
2223
to
fiscal
years.
1920
is
when
this
has
to
start
federal
fiscal
year
1920
this
1
billion
dollars
has
to
be
spent
or
at
least
started
to
be
spent.
The
project
has
to
keep
moving,
though
so
so.
A
In
order
to
get
a
bite
of
that
big
pot
of
money,
we
have
to
make
application
by
the
end
of
October.
So
we
can't
do
that
ourselves.
We
need
a
consultant
to
help
us
with
that
process
and
that's
what
the
request
for
proposals
is
so
about
to
send
that
out
and
you'll
hear
back
soon
any
questions
for
Todd,
okay,
thanks
Todd!
Thank
you
and
the
the
next
RFP
that
we're
about
to
release
or
actually
we
we
released,
will
be
closing
soon.
A
We've
requested
proposals
to
do
traffic
impact
study
for
highway
212,
which
the
d-o-t
asked
us
to
do.
They
basically
wrote
the
RFP
for
us
and,
and
they
have
to
approve
it,
but
they
they
want
to
know
what
the
impact
is
to
several
change.
That
we've
asked
them
to
look
at
when
they
redo
phase
2
of
highway
212
and
those
are
their
three
things.
The
first
one
is
to
modify
the
intersection
of
11th
Street
East
with
highway
212
to
add
either
a
driveway
or
a
public
street
to
the
south.
A
That's
the
Montgomery
furnitures
building,
it's
private
property
to
the
south,
but
there's
a
signal
there
and
kind
of
an
unsafe
location
for
their
driveway
and
and
we're
looking
at
moving
the
driveway
to
be
at
the
signal
which
would
make
it
safer.
So
that's
one
thing:
they're
gonna,
look
at
the
another
thing
is
moving
the
signal
from
13th
Street
East
to
14th,
Street
East,
and
that's
the
one
that
goes
into
the
mall
and
it's
not
normal.
A
To
have
a
traffic
signal
go
into
private
property
like
it
does
now
currently
into
the
mall
they'd,
move
it
to
a
public
street
location
which
is
14th.
14Th
Street
leads
to
our
premier
softball
complex,
and
it
goes
by
high
V
on
a
public
road.
So
currently
people
cut
through
the
mall
to
get
to
the
signal,
and
this
would,
we
think,
be
a
pretty
major
improvement,
but
they
won't
do
it
unless
this
traffic
impact
study
shows
that
it's
the
right
thing
to
do,
and
then
the
third
location
is
17th
Street
versus
19th
Street.
A
Currently
we
have
a
difficult
intersection
to
maneuver
at
17th,
Street
East
and
the
d-o-t
doesn't
like
it.
We
really
don't
like
it
either
we're
looking
at
a
bypass
route
that
would
extend
10th
Avenue
south
over
between
17th
Street
East
and
19th
Street
East
19th,
Street
East
has
a
signal,
so
the
road
would
come
in
and
then
go
north
to
the
signal.
They
aren't
going
to
put
another
signal
at
17th
Street
and
it
probably
warrants
one
with
the
difficulty
of
that
intersection.
Right
now.
Just.
A
These
yeah
a
street
or
a
driveway
look
at
either
the
impact
of
either
now
there's
pretty
big
ramifications
to
the
cost
of
whether
that's
a
public,
road
or
a
driveway.
But
we've
had
we've
spoken
about
this
over
the
years.
It
just
doesn't
seem
feasible
to
do
a
public
road
there.
They
haven't
been
necessarily
wanting
to
dedicate
enough
right-of-way
for
us
to
do
a
road
correctly.
In
that
location,
a
driveway
would
serve
the
same
purpose,
but
it
wouldn't
require
dedication
of
land
for
public
right-of-way
and
it
wouldn't
require
setbacks
for
buildings.
A
A
So
we'll
get
those
RFPs
and
quickly
review
them
and
look
at
how
we
would
pay
for
them.
I
have
no
idea
what
it's
going
to
cost.
The
d-o-t
expects
us
to
pay
for
that,
so
otherwise
we're
gonna
get
the
same
thing
back
that
we
have
right
now
on
highway
212
when
they
reconstruct
it,
and
it's
just
not
great.
A
So.
The
third
request
for
proposals
that
hasn't
been
released
yet
is
an
economic
analysis
for
the
Ice
Arena
project
and
the
purpose
for
that
is
to
see
what
is
the
cost?
What
are
the
ramifications
to
us
for
building
a
pared-down
facility
versus
a
facility?
That's
built
out
exactly
like
we
want,
and
what
are
the
long-term
implications
for
revenue
generation
for
us
to
be
able
to
support
that,
would
it
be
self-supporting
and
how
so
I
think
that's
really
needed
before
we
go
and
accept
any
bids
on
building
an
Ice,
Arena,
so
I
think
it.
A
My
gut
feeling
is
that
the
Ice
Arena
will
generate
a
lot
of
really
great
impact
on
our
community,
and
but
there
are
a
lot
of
people
that
are,
you
know
and
myself
included,
want
to
see
the
numbers
actually
not
just
a
gut
feeling,
but
an
actual
analysis
I'm
not
capable
doing
that
and
I
don't
know.
If
anyone
on
our
staff
is
so
we're
gonna
get
a
proposal
for
doing
that,
and
hopefully
it
won't
be
too
expensive.
We
did
get
one
proposal
which
was
written
by
a
consultant.
A
I
A
A
A
A
AD
No,
no,
not
air-conditioning,
but
this
is
just
no.
This
is
just
for
informational
purposes.
I
wanted
to
let
the
council
know
that
we
received
notification
that
we
will
be
going
through
our
IRS
audit.
We
have
started
to
gather
the
information
and
the
auditor
will
be
in
the
office
August,
20th
and
21st,
so
we
will
begin
that
process.
So
thanks
thank.
E
Just
a
quick
invitation,
I
think
everybody
got
the
email
on
this
or
the
invite
in
this
next
Monday
afternoon.
Upper
Big,
Sioux
River
watershed
project
is
gonna,
be
taking
a
bus
up
through
the
watershed
area.
I
went
on
that
tour
two
three
years
ago,
very
very
interesting
as
far
as
projects
that
have
been
done
along
that
area
and
there
is
a
tour
on
Monday
afternoon.
So
these
may
interested
reach
out
to
Roger
foot
between
now
and
Monday.
A
The
next
item
is
executive
session
pursuant
to
SBC
l1
25
2,
and
we
will
have
an
executive
session
this
evening
in
order
to
discuss
and
consult
with
legal
counsel
on
a
contractual
matter,
and
we
do
expect
to
take
action
when
we
come
out
so
I
look
for
a
motion,
second,
to
go
into
executive
session,
moved
by
Councilman
Y
second,
by
Councilman
l'olam,
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
It.