►
From YouTube: Council Meeting 02 20 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
B
E
D
D
B
D
B
A
All
right,
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
consent
agenda.
Is
there
a
motion
and
second
for
approval
by
Bueller?
Second,
by
Y
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye?
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries.
The
second
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
approval
of
the
agenda
Sara
motion
and
second
for
approval
moved
by
veal,
our
second
by
Danforth,
any
discussion
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
signify.
F
Evening,
everyone
I
tried
to
pry
I
promised
Bruce
that
try
to
keep
this
to
a
five
minutes
apparently
might
go
seven,
but
we'll
see
how
fast
we
get
through
this
a
lot
of
juicy
information
good
evening.
My
name
is
todd
kaze
and
I'm
the
executive
director
of
the
first
planning
district
here
in
Watertown
every
year,
I'd
like
to
take
the
opportunity
to
come
and
visit
with
the
City
Council,
just
to
give
a
quick
overview
of
work
activities
within
the
district
in
within
Kyneton
County
in
the
city
of
Watertown
as
a
whole.
F
So
for
the
public's
information,
I'm
just
going
to
do
a
quick
synopsis
of
the
district
and
and
then
take
any
questions,
if
you,
if
you
have
any
but
the
first
district
is
one
of
six
regional
planning
and
development
districts
located
in
South
Dakota.
We
have
sister
offices
in
Rapid,
City,
pure
Aberdeen,
Yankton
and
Sioux
Falls,
we're
not
government
but
we're
creatures
of
government.
We
were
created
in
1971
by
Governor
Frank
Farrar,
under
an
executive
order,
and
we
operate
under
a
joint
powers
agreement
with
eleven
counties
in
76
communities
in
northeastern
South
Dakota.
F
Our
mission,
then,
is
still
the
same
as
it
is
today.
We
try
to
improve
the
quality
of
life
for
individuals
in
this
area
by
promoting
economic
and
community
development
projects
and
assisting
local
units
of
government
in
their
endeavors
to
to
do
those
things.
As
far
as
how
we
are
governed.
We
have
a
thirty-five
member
governing
body
which
meets
three
to
four
times
of
year.
They
establish
the
policies,
the
work
plan
they
budget
for
the
organization
they
hire
the
plant.
The
executive
director
on
an
annual
basis.
Currently
Brenda
Hanten,
is
the
chair
of
that
organization.
F
She
also
sits
from
the
County
Commission
Glanville
Hauer
is
the
municipal
representative
on
the
board
and
new
to
Watertown
Cris
chunkiness,
recently
appointed
as
our
at-large
representative
to
the
county
to
the
board.
We
also
have
the
chairman
of
the
Flanders
Santee
Sioux
and
sisseton-wahpeton
yachty
also
sit
on
the
board,
but
there's
three
individuals
from
every
county
how
we're
funded
it
varies
from
year
to
year,
but
not
a
whole
lot.
F
22
23
percent
of
our
operating
revenues
on
any
given
year
comes
in
the
form
of
dues,
all
counties
and
municipalities
for
the
population
over
100
paid
dues
in
to
the
organization,
and
we
use
those
dollars
to
leverage
other
state
and
federal
grants.
We
also
do
some
state
and
federal
contract
work
for
about
28%
of
our
operating
revenues
and
the
rest
comes
in
the
area
of
fee
for
service
work
and
we're
able
to
put
do
fee
for
service
work
for
our
members.
F
That's
at
rates
that
are
discounted,
competent,
comparable
to
the
private
sector,
and
that's
just
due
to
the
power
of
the
collective.
As
far
as
staff,
we
have
a
14
full-time
employees,
a
couple
part-time
employees.
A
lot
of
experience
on
staff
I've
been
with
the
district,
will
be
25
years
may
been
the
director
going
on
10.
As
far
as
what
we
do.
We
are
very
well
known
for
being
application,
prepares
grants,
loan,
applications,
private
public
side
of
the
equation.
F
We
work
on
those
proposals
all
over
the
place
on
a
yearly
basis
if
projects
are
fortunate
to
be
funded
through
state
and
federal
dollars.
We
also
help
with
the
red
tape
management.
There
is
no
free
dollars,
there
is
no
free
lunch,
there's
always
some
strings
attached
to
it,
and
we
have
expertise
and
doing
environmental
reviews
and
and
and
taken
the
things
that
are
required
of
the
state
and
the
feds
when
it
comes
to
planning
and
research.
If
there's
a
topic
that
you
have
an
interest
in,
he
wants
some
research
on.
F
We
do
a
lot
of
base
research
across
the
boards
in
a
wide
variety,
from
anything
from
HR
to
planning
and
zoning
to
nuisance,
to
economic
development,
meeting
facilitation
what-have-you.
We
also
have
some
specialties
that
we
do
work
in.
We
do
work
with
tax
increment
financing
and
especially
in
smaller
communities.
Geographic
information
systems
is
really
something.
That's
that's
involved
with
every
aspect
of
our
business,
so
we
have
three
full-time
and
two
part-time
people
just
work
in
GIS
database
management,
and
then
we
also
have
revolving
loan
funds.
F
The
first
District
Development
Company
is
a
sister
organization
under
our
umbrella
for
staff,
people
that
work
with
private
entities
where
we
use
revolving
loan
funds
on
our
own
portfolio,
and
we
also
are
a
Small
Business
Administration.
Certified
development
company,
where
we
participate
with
local
lenders
and
individuals
looking
at
expanding
and
starting
new
businesses
in
the
area,
and
then
we're
always
out
there
supporting
state
and
federal
programs
and
have
an
impact
on
our
membership.
F
So
that's
about
a
twenty
five
dollar
return
for
every
dollars
worth
of
dues
across
the
district
in
Kyneton
County.
Here
we
have
seen
between
2008
and
2017,
all
over
ten
million
in
grants
about
twenty
three
dollars
in
return
on
investment
over
the
year
over
the
years
in
Watertown.
Specifically
this
last
year,
we
had
about
one
hundred
sixty
eight
thousand
dollars
that
came
in
and
grants
that
our
office
was
able
to
assist
since
2008.
That's
been
about
three
million
in
grants,
so
we've
seen
about
a
thirty
five
dollars,
any
six
cents
return
on
investment.
F
As
far
as
just
some
specific
projects
here
in
Watertown
up
until
about
last
fall,
Luke
Muller
would
attend
all
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board
meetings
providing
technical
staff,
and
he
still
does
that
with
staff
on
a
weekly
basis
meeting
with
them.
I'm
talking
about
acting
as
the
conduit
he's.
Also
the
kite
and
County
Zoning
officer,
but
Luke
does
a
lot
of
help
with
the
Planning
and
Zoning
for
the
city
of
Watertown.
We
do
a
lot
of
GIS
database
work
for
the
city.
We've
managed
that
911
database
we
assist
in
address,
designing.
F
We
host
your
website
that
has
the
GIS
information.
We
also
maintain
the
different
database
sets
for
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Department
Ted
hater
in
our
office,
who
I
think
you'll
be
talking
to
in
a
few
minutes
on.
Another
issue
is
currently
administrating.
The
CDBG
Boys
and
Girls
Club
CDBG
grant
that
was
awarded
last
year
for
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
improvements
we
helped
in
assisting
in
getting
that
grant
to
the
city
for
that
project.
F
Luke
is
smaller
in
our
office
has
also
been
working
for
a
couple
years
on
the
comprehensive
land
use
plan,
and
that's
going
to
be
coming
to
you
I
guess.
My
understanding
is
sometime
before
June,
where
for
your
approval,
greg-nog
worked
with
J
lat
early
last
year
in
January
February
time
on
the
Tony
Hawk
Foundation
grant
application.
That
was
a
$10,000
grant
to
help
with
a
skate
park
and
Greg
also
worked
I
think
with
Mike
on
the
solid
waste
grant
application,
which
the
city
recently
received.
F
One
hundred
sixty
eight
thousand
dollar
grant
and
one
hundred
two
thousand
dollar
loan
for
those
projects,
and
this
year
we
also
did
some
fire
response
maps
for
the
fire
department,
as
they
were
looking
at
trying
to
identify
future
sites.
For
a
new
fire
station
somewhere
down
the
road,
so
we're
very
busy
not
only
in
Watertown,
not
in
Carrington
County,
but
throughout
the
district
as
well,
and
my
mantra
is
always
to
tell
our
members
all
you
have
to
do
is
ask
and
we're
pretty
responsive.
F
Sometimes
it
doesn't
happen
as
fast
as
we'd
like
to
get
it
out.
Maybe
you'd
like
to
have
it
done,
but
all
you
have
to
do
is
ask
and
we'll
be
there
to
support
you
in
whatever
issue
you
grant
writing
policy.
Gis
what-have-you
with
that
I'd
be
more
than
glad
to
take
any
questions
that
you
might
have
and
then
I
guess.
Finally,
we
really
enjoyed
our
working
relationship
over
the
years
and
look
forward
to
another
good
year.
All.
C
Realize
I'm
not
technically
not
independent,
Here,
I
am
or
I
have
conflict.
There.
Cuz
I
said
on
the
first
district
board,
but
I.
My
observation
from
seeing
it
from
the
inside
its
money
well
spent
that
we
as
a
community
invest
with
the
first
district.
So,
let's,
let's
not
ever
second-guess
where
our
dollars
are
going
because
they're
being
quit,
put
to
good
use
and.
F
A
A
G
Good
evening,
Scott
McMahon
captive
support
services
with
Watertown
Police
Department,
and
tonight
we
are
asking
for
your
authorization
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
Brookings
Police
Department,
their
911
center,
specifically
as
well
as
Brown
County
communications
as
part
of
the
next
gen
911
statewide
process
that
we're
going
through
we've
been
asked
by
the
state
and
i1
coordination
board
to
have
a
primary
and
secondary
backup
piece.
A
piece
AB
standing
for
public
safety
answering
point
to
our
Center.
B
A
H
G
The
state
from
the
next
gen
9
on
one
position
through
this
date.
There
is
an
agreement
that
each
piece
have
had
to
select
a
primary
and
secondary
backup,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
if
we
should
become
overwhelmed
at
our
911
sire
for
like
a
tornado
or
event
or
something
like
that,
or
we
would
have
technical
failure
that
nine
one
call
won't
get
dropped.
It'll
automatically
be
forwarded
to
the
next
911
Center
in
this
case,
which
would
be
Brown
County
and
if,
for
some
reason,
Brown
County
could
not
answer
that
call.
G
G
H
G
They
said
sure
we
have
one
that
we've
used
in
the
past.
They
sent
that
to
me
and
I
forwarded
that
on
to
Brown
County,
as
well
as
the
city
of
Brookings
and
both
of
their
governmental
boards
have
agreed
to
the
agreement.
Okay,
so
now
we
just
need
our
agreement
and
then
that'll
stay
in
place.
It's
a
contiguous
agreement.
There
is
no
expiration
expiration
date
and
the
agreement,
so
it'll
remain
in
effect,
unless
one
of
the
parties
decides
that
they
would
like
to
be
excluded
from
the
agreement
where.
I
G
I
G
I
G
This
is
really
the
one
of
the
focal
points
of
next
gen
9
1
1.
If
you
look
at
our
current
situation
today
with
Centrelink
on
a
911
trunk
line,
if
there
would
be
a
cut
or
some
kind
of
a
failure
that
we
don't
yet
know
about
at
the
police
department-
and
you
tried
dialing,
911
1
and
it
doesn't,
work
is
not
going
to
go
anywhere
with
next-gen
9
on
1.
The
all
intention
or
purpose
behind
that
is,
that
call
will
now
go
somewhere.
It's
not
going
to
be
a
failed
call
that
doesn't
go
anywhere.
G
C
G
You
know
with
the
current
911
system,
as
it
is
elsewhere,
where
they've
had
failures
and,
and
sometimes
people
don't
know
that
those
failures
exist
and
tell
Centrelink
is
able
to
identify
through
their
what
they
call
a
9
1
repair
Center
in
Minneapolis
Minnesota,
where
they
can
see
what
trunks
are
doing
and
they're
monitoring
those
trunks
for
failures
and
when
they
identify
it.
Oftentimes.
It's
related
to
some
type
of
a
cable
cut
or
similar
situation.
G
There's
also
some
particular
details
that
need
to
be
worked
out
too.
As
far
as,
for
example,
if
our
piece
app
was
in
a
state
where
it
could
answer
a
nine
one
call
and
now
Brown
County
answers
it
for
us.
How
are
they
going
to
relay
that
information?
Back
to
us?
We
have
a
couple
options.
We
have
a
phone
number
that
is
in
the
911
center.
That
is
not
a
published
phone
number.
So
that's
one
option.
The
other
option
is
both
us
and
Brown.
County
have
radio
communications
where
they
can
get
on
the
radio.
G
A
state
water
tone,
int
station
and
say
Watertown
is
brown
Brown
County.
We
have
traffic
for
you
and
then
we
can
relay
the
message
that
way.
Currently
Brookings
does
not
have
access
to
that
state
int
channel,
but
they
plan
on
getting
an
int
standing
for
interagency
where
multiple
agencies
can
be
on
that
channel
and
both
talk
on
the
channel
and
receive
on
the
channel.
G
G
They
have
an
int
or
interagency
channel
so
that
they
can
speak
with
a
están
ambulance
or
whatever,
and
once
it
is
that
they're
trying
to
speak
to,
but
not
all
fire
departments
have
that
capability.
So
that
will
probably
be
something
we'll
look
at
in
the
future
or
the
agencies
will
have
to
look
at
individually,
see
if
they
can
move
that
direction
or
we
continue
with
the
phone
and
radio
communications
from
piece
up
to
piece
out.
A
A
A
B
You
mayor
RFPs
were
sent
out
and
received
back
for
banking
services
in
2017.
At
that
time,
municipal
utilities
determined
that
they
would
continue
services
with
Great
Western
Bank
Council
rejected
the
proposals
for
banking
services
in
the
summer
of
2017.
I
am
proposing
the
agreement
with
Great
Western
Bank
be
approved
as
presented.
A
couple
of
the
changes
of
the
agreement
from
the
previous
year
is
the
monthly
service
fees
will
be
$800
a
month
versus
950
dollars
a
month,
and
the
other
change
is
that
interest
is
calculated
on
the
funds
a
little
bit
different.
B
The
previous
agreement
was
based
off
of
federal
funds
rate
plus
two
basis
points.
The
current
agreement
will
use
the
91
day,
t
bill
rate
plus
8
basis
points.
The
terms
of
this
agreement
were
discussed
with
Adam
at
municipal
utilities
and
in
Great
Western
Bank
I
request.
The
council
approve
the
banking
service
agreement
and,
if
you
have
any
questions,
please
ask
any.
B
Think
the
reason
if
I
go
back-
and
hopefully
I,
get
this
right
when
the
RFPs
were
sent
out,
the
RFPs
included
the
city
and
municipal
utilities,
funds
together
when
they
came
back
and
were
proposed
to
the
City
Council
utilities
stated
that
they
wanted
to
remain
with
Great
Western,
so
the
RFPs
would
have
included
basically
the
funds
for
us
together,
which
probably
could
have
changed
what
the
RFPs
came
back
ad.
So
if
I
remember
right
based
off
of
that,
the
council
then
just
rejected
the
proposals.
E
On
the
committee
on
that
it
was
me
when
you're
on
it
was
anybody
else
with
just
the
two
of
us,
the
other
council
members
down
I.
Think
there's
just
two
of
us
I
I,
think
what
you're
saying
is
is
what
I
remember
and
that
we
had
the
RFP
go
out
when
we
got
the
responses
back
utilities
that
they
chose
a
different
path,
quite
frankly,
so
that
I
think
and
their
mind
nullified
the
RFP.
E
B
That
would
have
been
the
city's
responsibility
and
shortly
after
this
happened
in
the
summer
of
2017,
which
it
seems
like
a
long
time
ago,
and
but
then
there
of
course
was
some
changes
to
the
finance
office.
So,
from
my
standpoint
with
the
finance
office,
we
have
new
positions.
New
people,
changing
of
banking
services
is
quite
a
big
deal.
B
We
would
have
to
train
people
on
the
internet.
Banking
and
there'd
be
some
other
things
also
taking
into
consideration
that
utilities
did
not
want
to
change
banks.
We
would
then
also
have
to
start
the
process
of
pulling
the
CDs
out.
Our
current
funds
are
all
together,
so
we
invest
our
money
together,
so
we
would
have
to
as
we
cash
those
start
to
keep
some
of
that
money
back
to
start
to
separate
the
funds.
B
B
So
at
this
time
that
was
my
recommendation
is
to
continue
with
Great
Western
for
the
time
being
part
of
this,
if
I
remember
right,
when
the
RFP
went
out,
I
believe
it
was
sent
out
with
the
thought
that
the
city
finance
office
and
also
utilities
would
do
some
of
their
own
processing
of
cheques.
I
would
like
to
gather
more
information
on
how
many
cheques
and
I
currently
have
our
front
staff.
Doing
that,
how
many
checks
do
we
take
in
how
much
work?
C
A
couple
of
comments
I
definitely
have
to
defer
to
Kristen
and
your
staffs
recommendation
on
this
I
mean
you
you,
you
balance
us
off
me
before
it
showed
up
on
the
agenda.
I
realize
that
that
we
make,
that
is,
I
mean
we're
not
dependent
upon
the
utilities
for
making
this
decision,
I
mean
I,
don't
think
that's
a
factor
here
necessarily
or
should
be,
but
by
the
same
token,
there
definitely
are
economies
and
efficiencies
that
are
realized.
If
we
can
keep
this
relationship
together
and
as
I
understand
that
there's
also
been
until
now,
we
have.
C
We
have
borne
that
the
cost
of
Great
Western,
Services
and
you've
had
some
kind,
some
conversation
with
utilities
that
they
may
be
receptive
to
sharing
in
that
cost
going
forward,
which
is
a
change
for
the
path
so
to
me,
III
think
we
were
if
we
were
to
make
a
change
or
trying
to
fix
something
that
isn't
broken.
You've
got
a
20-year
relationship
practically
that
is
working,
that
I've
got
the
utmost
respect
for
both
institutions,
but
I
I
would
really
like
to
see
us
stay
with
with
the
with
the
Great
Western.
B
There
wasn't
in
it's
hard
for
me
to
kinda
I,
didn't
write
all
that
down,
because
I
kind
of
felt
like
after
they
were
rejected.
They
were
rejected
at
that
point.
If
I
do
remember
correctly,
if
the
city
was
to
take
on
the
responsibility
of
processing
the
checks,
there
would
be
no
monthly
service
fee
for
from
reliable
I
think
if
they
would
take
on
the
processing.
It
was
a
$500
a
month
fee.
So
there's
a
little
bit
of
difference
in
the
fees
but
and
I
can't
I
can't
speak
too
much
to
the
interest.
B
I
I
didn't
prepare
to
probably
talk
about
the
interest.
You
can
see
that
the
interest
rates
that
Great
Western
proposed
they
changed.
How
they're
going
to
calculate
interest
on
this
current
agreement
and
I
do
think
that
in
their
proposal
this
past
summer,
they
had
at
that
point
to
use
the
91
day
bill,
so
that
is
similar
to
the
summer.
J
K
Sure
in
and
that's
just
if
this
didn't
go
out
for
RFP
again,
we
bid
way
back
in
May
at
that
time.
I
can
tell
you
and
I
have
the
sheets
that
were
part
of
your
packet
in
May.
Okay,
just
just
to
give
you
a
little
recap
one.
We
we
proposed
us
two
different
ways:
we
proposed
of
a
fee
of
five
hundred
dollars
per
month
if
we
did
all
the
check
processing
or
we
proposed
a
no
fee.
If
you
used
deposit
capture
software
that
actually
deposited
the
the
cash
those
checks
right
into
our
bank
electronically.
K
At
that
time
also,
we
were
proposing
a
twenty
two
basis
points
over
the
T
bill,
which,
at
that
time
very
Western,
was
proposing
15
basis
points
over
the
same
one
and
now
they're
proposing
eight
basis
points.
So
you
know
as
I
look
at
this
a
little
bit.
If
you
don't
without
negotiating
and
going
out
for
bids,
they
just
took
seven
basis
points
on
all
your
money
away,
plus
they
did
lower
the
fee.
They
had
proposed
nine
hundred
fifty
dollars.
We
had
proposed
either
five
hundred
or
zero.
K
Was
the
fan,
the
interspaces
difference,
yeah
and
in
our
proposal
22
basis
points
was
the
low
point,
because
we
had
a
sliding
scale
on
that,
depending
on
on
your
bank
balance
and
that
would
have
went
up
to
31
at
434
basis
points
depending
on
on
balance,
which,
at
that
time
you
you
would
have
easily
been
in
the
34
basis
points
area.
So.
A
K
No,
at
least
they
know
there
was
no
cost
to
that.
Basically,
and
basically
how
that
system
works
is
right.
Now
you
run
in
a
tape
or
you're,
adding
all
your
checks
together,
while
it
runs
to
the
Machine
and
does
the
same
thing
for
you.
The
county,
Cottington
county,
uses
that
system
today
and
has
for
for
many
years
now.
So
it's
it's
proven
if
it
works.
K
B
On
that's
that's
the
point
that
I
said
it
would
I
think
our
office
and
I
am
currently
having
Sarah
and
our
office
gather
that
information
daily
she's
keeping
track
of
how
much
cash
cash
comes
in
and
then
she's
also
counting
the
number
of
checks.
Now
this
is
our
slow
time
for
checks,
so
I
don't
feel.
I
would
have
a
good
grasp
of
that
until
the
summer
comes
when
Park
and
Rec
picks
up,
and
we
have
lots
of
checks
come
through.
So
that's
what
was
difficult
for
me
at
this
time
to
determine.
B
E
B
E
I
A
B
Okay,
so
I
think
a
little
bit
of
the
difference
is,
if
you
look
at
the
top
portion
the
interest
on
the
idle
funds
at
the
time
the
summer
of
bidding
was
I,
think
around
it
looks
like
0.93
0.97,
currently
right
now,
I
actually
had
I
looked
at
what
the
two
different
rates,
comparing
great
westerns
previous
contract
to
the
one
that's
in
front
of
you
today,
the
federal
funds
rate
is
at
one
point.
Five
and
the
91
day
bill
is
at
one
point,
five,
seven,
so
I
don't
know
and
I.
B
Don't
can't
speak
for
a
lot
of
stuff
in
regards
to
the
interest
in
banking,
but
it
seems
a
little
bit
higher.
So
I
don't
know.
If
that's
why
it's
a
timing
issue
of
when
I
approached
to
renew
this
agreement
that
they
couldn't
do
the
fifteen
I
can't
that's.
The
only
thing
that
I
can
see
is
that
there
is
a
difference
between
what
the
current
interest
rates
were
at
at
the
time
of
the
RFP.
To
now.
I
J
K
Actually
have
our
original
bid
for
you
at
that
time
we
were.
We
were
saying
that
we
would
be
twenty
two
basis
points
over
the
three
months
CMT,
which
cm
the
three
months
CMT
and
the
91
t
date.
T-Bill
are
basically
the
same
thing
there.
The
reason
for
the
terms
is
not
every
not
every
day.
Does
the
United
States
government
sell
ninety
one
day,
two
bills,
but
there's
an
implied
rate
in
the
yield
curve
and
that's
what
a
CMT
rate
constant
maturity
Treasury.
K
J
K
J
Great
Western
to
go
to
a
one-year,
so
you
guys
can
get
some
ground
on
your
feet
a
little
bit
and
get
the
department
more
mature.
In
regards
to
your
experience,
that
seems
like
from
I.
Don't
know
if
that's
unreasonable
or
not
to
ask
them,
but
from
our
perspective
it
seems
reasonable
and
and
I
do
agree
with
Don
I
think
that
there
is
a
process
that
we
have
to
be
very
sensitive
to
and.
J
A
C
C
B
I
think
within
a
year,
yeah
I
think
that's
fair
to
say:
I
could
get
a
better
handle
on
the
amount
of
checks
that
are
processed
in
our
office.
I.
Think
the
big
question
is
going
to
be
probably
the
discussion
of.
Do
we
separate
funds
I
think
that's
more.
What
it's
going
to
come
down
to
I
do
think
within
a
year,
yes,
I
will
probably
be
able
to
take
on
a
little
bit
more
change,
but
I
think
the
biggest
thing
will
be
at
that
point:
where's
the
words.
The
split:
do
we
split?
Do
we
stay.
M
C
B
Say
yes,
that
we
would
then
want
to
I
mean
like,
as
I
stated,
I
did
work
on
this
agreement
with
Adam
at
the
utilities
and
Great
Western.
So
I
think
that
if
we
change
something
as
significant
as
the
terms
of
it
that
yes,
it
would
only
be
right
to
go
back
to
Great
Western
and
see
if
they
agree
as
well
and.
I
A
J
I
do
think
just
this
comment
to
it.
If
we
look
to
to
make
a
change
at
some
point,
whenever
we
I
think
we
also
have
to
do
some
qualitative
work
in
regards
to
the
cost
of
the
change
mm-hm,
because
that's
very
real
expense
to
us
and
so
I.
Would
you
know
if
that's
the
direction
that
ultimately
good
we
go?
That
needs
to
be
part
of
our
our
justification
for
what
we
do
or
don't
do
definitely.
B
B
L
I
would
agree
with
what's
been
said
in
terms
of
giving
it
some
credence
to
the
process,
but
I
also
appreciate
what
you're
saying
Kristin,
that
having
six
months
of
experience
is
totally
different
than
a
year
and
a
half
also
and
I
think
next
year
you
would
probably
be
able
to
give
us
both
the
savings
that
they
might
get
through,
another
Bank
or
the,
but
also
the
cost
of
changing.
And
so,
when
you
put
those
two
together,
I
think
that
might
really
help
us
make
the
decision.
J
Either
yay
or
nay,
based
on
what
you
have
in
writing,
or
could
we
say
like
to
change
the
motion
to
a
one-year
term?
If
we
approve
it
and
they
don't
approve
it,
then
obviously
it
starts
over.
Something
has
to
happen,
but
at
least
if
we
approve
it
and
they
approve
it.
We're
done
from
this
aspect.
Correct
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
do
that
or
not
I
believe.
N
You
can
yes,
you
can
make
a
motion
to
modify
to
approve
the
terms
of
the
agreement
with
the
modification
of
changing
it
from
one
year
from
three
years
to
one
year.
That
way,
they
don't
have
to
come
back
to
Council.
If
they
agree
to
it,
then
they
could
just
sign
it.
It
can
be
done
if
they
don't
agree
that
it
would
have
to
come
back
to
council.
We.
N
J
A
E
D
C
A
B
A
All
right
item
number
six:
is
approval
of
resolution
number
18,
oh
four,
to
adopt
the
Coddington
county,
pre-disaster
mitigation
plan
2017
to
2022,
and
this
was
recommended
by
the
public
works
committee.
Is
there
a
motion
and
second
move
by
Buehler?
Second
by
manty
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
A
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
7
is
recommendation
of
an
alternative
accommodation
for
two-way
traffic
on
camp
a
venir
at
highway
81,
and
there
was
a
recommendation
by
the
public
works
committee
to
consider
eliminating
the
signal
and
look
at
alternatives
after
the
d-o-t.
Does
some
traffic
study
on
this
intersection?
J
I
G
G
G
So
when
you
look
at
a
crash,
you
look
at
a
few
different,
attributing
factors
whether
that's
vehicle,
roadway
or
driver
circumstances,
in
the
six
that
I
looked
at
for
those
were
north
and
southbound
intersection
related
crashes,
so
in
other
words
they
weren't
in
the
boundaries
of
the
intersection,
but
their
intersection
related,
which
normally
means
first
cars
stopped.
Second
car
comes
up
and
doesn't
stop
and
Clyde's
with
the
rear.
So
in
that
case
we
had
for
those
that
were
on
north
and
southbound
81.
G
We
had
one
vehicle
that
was
westbound
on
Camp,
that,
for
whatever
reason,
accelerated
out
of
control
went
across
the
intersection
and
hit
the
curb,
and
then
we
also
had
one
in
one
crash.
That
was
an
intersection
related,
meaning
that
it
happened
within
the
boundaries
of
that
intersection,
and
that
was
a
vehicle
that
was
southbound
and
a
t1
hit.
The
brakes
didn't
stop
for
the
red
light
slid
through
crashed
with
another
vehicle.
G
So
the
point
of
these
crashes
are
the
reason
for
looking
at
him
is
to
try
and
determine
cause,
and
what
it
appears
is
that
had
that
signal
light
not
been
there,
probably
four
or
five
of
the
crashes
probably
would
have
never
never
occurred.
So,
in
other
words,
I
agree
what
the
state
DoD
engineer
person
that
was
here
that
sometimes
a
traffic
signal
can
be
more
of
a
hindrance
than
it
can
be
of
a
positive
nature.
So
his
assessment
is
the
same
approach.
G
That
I
would
do,
which
is
take
a
look
and
do
a
study
and
find
out
how
many
vehicles
want
to
proceed
west
across
the
road
versus
making
a
right-hand
turn
as
I
do
every
morning
on
my
way
to
work,
and
then,
of
course,
you
also
need
to
study
the
pedestrian
traffic
and
that's
always
a
huge
concern
for
Public
Safety
law
enforcement
is
to
make
sure
that
our
pedestrians
stay
safe
in
the
community.
So
you
know
just
as
as.
G
G
So
that's
what
that
traffic
study
will
do
is
determine
if
we
are
going
to
increase
the
possibilities
of
intersection
crashes,
crashes
versus
intersection,
related
crashes,
so
it'd
be
interesting
to
take
a
look
at
those
studies
and
and
like
say
if
the
light
is
removed,
we'd
certainly
be
in
favor
of
a
pedestrian
type
alert
system.
Thank.
A
G
Oh
yeah,
sorry
about
that
it
was
2016
through
2017,
so
a
two-year
period
that
we
at
the
police
department
investigated
six
crashes.
I
should
mention
as
well
that
the
Highway
Patrol
did
look
at
four
crashes,
but
I
don't
have
any
information
as
far
as
how
they
happened,
why
they
happened
or
the
severity
of
the
crashes,
but
the
ones
from
the
police
department
that
we
did.
I
can't
look
at
those
and
and
like
I,
say
using
some
of
my
experiences
accident
reconstructionists
to
try
and
find
factors
that
attributed
to
the
crashes
great.
G
A
J
There's
other
areas
up
and
down
of
highway,
81
that
where
we
always
have
traffic
and
we've
got
a
lot
of
traffic
coming
off
the
side
streets
without
lights,
sure
you
know
you
coming
off
of
arrow,
for
example,
no
brand
you
can't
go
through,
but
you
know
you've
got
the
curve
right
same
thing
as
you
come
by
Foxy's
and
Hubbard
they're
going
south.
There
are
streets
there
that
have
a
fair
amount
of
traffic
that
there
is
no
sub.
Do
we
see
higher
incidence
in
those
types
of
intersections
today?
Do
you
know
well.
N
G
A
Mm-Hmm
anyone
else
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
It
was
a
posting
if
I
were
saying,
nay
motion
carries
thanks.
Scott
item
number:
eight
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
2017
annual
ms4
report
for
DNR,
and
this
was
recommended
by
the
public
works
committee.
Is
there
a
motion
in
second.
H
L
A
Was
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries
item
number.
Nine
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
agreement
for
engineering
services
to
HDR
engineering
Inc
in
the
amount
of
twenty
two
thousand
seven
hundred
ninety
five
dollars
for
the
wastewater
treatment
facility,
administration,
building
space
evaluation
project
number
1817,
and
this
was
recommended
by
the
public
works
committee?
Is
there
a
motion
and
second
for
approval
move
by
l'olam?
Second,
my
Solem
any
discussion
or
questions
I
just.
E
Have
a
question
I
mean
this
was
fairly
well
vetted
out
in
the
committee
and
it's
gonna
get
approved,
need
to
have
Mike,
hang
out
all
night
through
a
meeting
to
support
that
when
he's
already
been
through
the
ringer
wants
and
and
I'm.
If
we
do
need
him,
that's
great
I'm,
just
asking
terms
of
efficiency.
Well,.
A
E
Just
I'm
looking
for
ways
to
you
know
be
more
efficient
and
I
know
that
I
think
the
committee
is
do
that
because
we
take
action
in
the
committee's
I.
Think
that's
a
real
bonus
for
us,
but
so
I
just
we're
using
city
resources
when
I
think
we
have
already
vetted
the
project
now.
If
we
do
need
them
here,
then
we
do
I.
Just
thought:
I'd
raise
the
question.
That's.
A
H
Might
have
to
look
at
just
what
each
project
is
and
if
there's
opposition
on
it
I
mean
that
would
probably
be
the
bigger
concern
area.
If
there's
a
lot
of
public
input
on
it,
I
think
we'd
have
to
look
at
that.
But
if
it's
something
like
this
works
in
engineering
services,
I
mean
it's
like
hey
we're
gonna
make
sure
that
we
it's
feasible
to
do
this
I
think
we
could
move
through
that
pretty
quickly.
I
think.
C
A
E
Watertown
date,
the
legislature
I
know
some
of
you
here
are
going
so
there's
a
bus
going
out
with
about
30
people,
I,
don't
I,
think
and
then
there
will
be
some
others.
It'll
travel
out
there
independently.
So
just
an
FYI
on
that.
That's
I've
gone
to
this
before
it's
a
good
chance
for
us
to
talk
to
the
legislators
out
there
and
every
now
and
then
bend
their
ear
a
little
bit.
So
that's
just
an
FYI.
Thank.