►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 2 5 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
If
you
join
me,
please
our
Heavenly
Father,
as
we
gather
here
this
evening.
We
are
so
grateful
for
the
kindness
you
show
to
us
in
this
fine
community
Lord.
We
are
so
blessed
with
gifts,
and
we
take
so
many
and
for
granted,
but
God
you've
been
good
to
us
and
blessing
us
with
gifts
under
heaven
and
every
gift
in
heaven,
Lord
the
love
and
the
laughter
that
we
share
Lord.
Even
the
difficulties
come
disguised
as
things
that
help
us
grow
and
become
stronger
and
more
like
you.
Thank
you
for
each
one.
B
That's
here,
Lord
they're
here
on
such
a
cold
night
and
it's
a
sacrifice
of
time
and
the
invest
in
our
community.
Thank
you
for
each
one
here,
I
pray,
you'd
compensate
them
Lord
with
treasures
from
heaven
be
with
their
families
and
help
them
Lord
God.
In
every
way.
We
think
on
a
frosty
night
like
tonight,
our
first
responders
who
are
or
protecting
us
those
guardians
that
watch
over
us
a
cold
night
like
tonight.
They
they
have
to
do
what
they're
called
to
do.
B
No
matter
what
the
weather's,
like,
we
pray
to,
keep
them
safe,
keep
your
hand
upon
them,
touch
their
families
Lord
and
bless
them
for
their
they're
part
of
this
community.
We
thank
you
for
other
gifts,
like
wisdom
and
insight.
Lord
pray
that
that
would
flow
freely
here
tonight.
As
you
say
in
your
word,
to
ask
any
of
us
would
ask
for
wisdom.
You'd
give
it
to
us.
We
thank
you
for
the
commitment
and
the
selflessness
here,
Lord
and
the
Lord.
B
D
E
F
C
F
C
A
H
A
Is
correct:
let's
try
that
again,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
all
right.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item.
Number
two
is
approval
of
the
agenda.
Is
there
a
motion
motion
by
evil
Hauer?
Second,
by
Roby
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
three:
is
application
for
a
temporary
location
transfer
in
return
of
a
retail
on
sale,
liquor
license
owned
by
Zeus
Inc
doing
business
as
second
Street
Station
as
follows:
a
for
the
period
of
5
o'clock
p.m.
A
February
16
2008
teen
to
2:00
a.m.
February,
17
2018
from
15
second
Street
Southwest
to
19:10
West
camp
and
there's
a
public
hearing
and
council
action
for
that
and
then
I'll
move
on
after
we
do
that
to
the
period
after
2:01
a.m.
February
17th
from
1910
West
camp
back
to
15,
second
Street
Southwest,
so,
starting
with
a
to
move
it
over
to
1910
West
camp
I
will
look
for
a
motion
and
second
and
then
open
the
public
hearing.
So.
A
H
H
H
C
A
This
is
for
the
pro
pheasants
banquet
by
the
way,
any
other
comments
seeing
none
I'll
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
okay
B.
This
is
moving
it
back
for
the
period
after
2:01
a.m.
February,
17
2018
from
1910
West
Kemp
to
15.
Second
Street
southwest
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
ask
if
there's
anyone
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
about
this.
G
A
L
This
is
a
interesting
result.
I
haven't
heard
from
any
individuals
along
this
route
either
so
I'll
quick,
do
the
summary
and
then
we'll
discuss
the
potential
for
assessments
or
not.
The
base
project
is
to
reconstruct
third
Avenue
Southwest
from
13th
Street
Southwest
to
18th
Street
Southwest.
If
you
recognize
this
is
the
back
entrance
to
the
Cooke
complex
and
the
football
field
stadium
is
to
the
north.
Here
there
are
nine
properties
along
the
north
side
of
3rd
Avenue,
which
do
not
currently
have
curb
and
gutter
across
the
properties.
L
We
sent
a
letter
out
to
property
owners
that
look
like
this
with
on
letterhead.
It
described
what
lot
they
owned.
What
their
frontage
was.
You
know
16
in
this
case
it
was
sixty
nine
point,
seven
feet
they
estimated
cost.
So
this
one
was
two
thousand
ninety
one
dollars.
We
sent
that
type
of
information
to
all
nine
property
owners.
I
only
received
one
phone
call
that
I'm
aware
of
I
do
in
honesty,
have
a
couple
of
phone
calls.
I
haven't
checked
from
late
last
week,
but
I
will
get
to
those
in
essence,
I've
gotten
zero
feedback.
L
L
That's
this
is
what
this
letter
indicated
is
that
we
desire
to
do
that
and
I
heard
nothing
so
which
is
kind
of
an
ironic
I.
The
other
projects
that
we
talked
about
assessments
on
I
I
had
people
come
in
I
had
people
phone
call
me
I
had
all
kinds
of
feedback
on
this.
One
I
have
had
absolutely
nothing
in
this,
which.
L
A
L
We
would
do
is
go
forward,
get
bids
as
if
the
everybody
you
know,
including
all
the
curb
and
gutter,
then
we
can
reconsider
us
the
assessments
upon
receiving
bids.
If
the
bids
come
in
way
high
and
we
get
a
bunch
of
opposition
would
be
one
way
to
do
it,
you
know
and
then
what
I
was
proposing
to
do.
If
we
do
this,
if
we
go
forward,
I'm
gonna
do
the
curb
as
a
alternate
bid
on
the
tab.
Then
we
can
prove
it
or
disapprove
it.
A
move
on.
L
A
A
L
I
L
A
A
M
L
L
L
Bet
you
we
can
do
that.
The
the
question
might
be
councilman
salam,
whether
we're
going
to
end
the
project
right
here
and
not
we're
not
playing
on
including
18th
street,
but
we
could.
We
could
certainly
expand
the
project
to
include
curb
here
right
now.
We're
planning
on
stopping
the
project
right
here.
I
think.
L
A
C
A
G
F
A
A
There
we
go
okay,
2017
was
a
busy
year
and
we
had
a
lot
of
new
things,
opening
which
were
really
nice
for
our
community.
I.
Don't
need
to
dwell
on
these,
but
starting
with
Hobby
Lobby.
At
the
beginning
of
the
year,
the
Wellness
Center
we
had
the
big
fourth
of
July
fireworks
celebration
like
got
us
nationwide
attention,
we're
planning
to
do
that
again.
This
year
the
opening
of
our
premier
Softball
Complex,
the
odyssey
theater
skate
park.
A
We
achieved
10,000
employments
at
the
airport
and
we
rehabilitated
29th
Street
southeast,
which
actually
is
the
beginning
of
the
2012
project
and
I'll,
explain
that
in
a
little
bit
our
budget
versus
our
actual
revenues
and
expenditures
were
very
close
to
being
on
track
and
Kristen's
working
really
hard,
putting
together
the
CAFO
and
that's
the
annual
financial
report
that
we
do
to
show
how
we
did
for
the
year,
but
it
was
pretty
close
to
being
right
on
track.
So
that's
good
sales
tax
revenues
were
up
for
the
year
2.8
4%
for
our
own
city
taxes.
A
The
taxes
collected
in
Watertown
for
the
state
were
only
at
0.7,
so
we're
taxing
a
little
bit
differently.
Then
the
state
is
also
our
BBB
bed
booze
and
board
tax
that
was
up
over
8%.
So
that's
really
a
good
thing.
That's
a
trend.
The
first
half
of
2017
was
pretty
flat
and
the
second
half
of
2017
was
actually
our
city.
A
Tax
revenues
were
up
like
four
over
four
percent,
so
over
the
whole
year,
it
averaged
out
to
two
point:
eight
four
percent
and
I
take
that
as
a
very
good
sign
and
a
positive
trend
building
permits
were
about
the
same
in
2017
compared
to
2016,
we
had
650
permits
issued
a
hundred
of
those
were
industrial
or
commercial
and
the
rest
were
all
residential
and
the
vast
majority
were
actually
remodels.
So
that
includes
new
construction
as
well
as
remodels.
We
did
have
a
couple
of
new
annexations
and
some
subdivisions
going
on.
A
A
I'm,
not
gonna,
read
all
these
new
faces.
Some
of
them
are
in
this
room.
We've
got
a
new
mayor,
of
course,
a
couple
new
council
people,
new
water
town
development
company
director,
new
finance
officer,
new
attorney,
lots
of
new
faces
in
Watertown
School
District
at
the
Mont
Marti
College
urban
renewal
boards,
all
new.
We
got
lots
of
new
faces,
so
a
lot
of
new
things
going
on
these
general
goals.
A
A
Oh
here
we
go
in
the
quality
of
life
management
strategy.
We
have
lifestyle
projects
and
we've
done
a
bunch
of
those
in
our
community,
we're
enjoying
the
benefits
of
those
I.
Believe
that's
why
our
tax
revenues
are
on
the
way
up
because
we're
having
tournaments
here
those
tournaments
bring
people
to
our
community.
They
buy
food.
Here
they
stay
in
our
hotels,
they
buy
gas,
it's
good,
so
we
have
a
couple
of
more
projects
that
are
underway.
The
Ice
Arena
project
is
under
design
at
the
location
across
from
the
softball
complex.
A
The
city
had
hired
an
architect
to
design
it
there.
When
I
became
mayor,
I
said
you
know,
let's
make
sure
we're
picking
the
right
location
and
we've
gone
through
the
iterations
and
still
think
this
is
our
location.
The
mall
has
approached
the
city
and
asked
us
to
put
the
Ice
Arena
there
and
just
to
let
you
know
where
that's
sitting
right
now.
We
have
asked
them
all
to
tell
us
explicitly.
A
The
putting
the
Ice
Arena
at
the
mall
is
appealing
because
it
would
require
a
rejuvenation
of
the
mall
and
we'd
see
you
know:
we'd
see
that
facility
from
the
highway,
which
has
a
lot
of
traffic,
so
that
would
probably
make
it
marketable
for
sponsorships
moreso
than
any
other
location.
But
we
need
to
know
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
to
build
in
that
location
because
it
might
be
more.
A
We
don't
know
yet
the
gun
range
we
heard
about
that
earlier
and
that's
moving
along
as
well
hope
to
build
that
this
year
and
get
it
done
the
Ice
Arena.
If
we
start
it
this
year,
we
expect
to
start,
but
we
certainly
do
not
expect
to
finish
it
this
year,
we're
underway
with
our
Lake
Camp
Eska
master
plan,
which
includes
the
H
2020
priorities
that
were
done
along
with
water
quality
and
a
bunch
of
other
things.
So
that's
a
real,
exciting
project,
we're
also
underway
with
a
downtown
streetscape
and
two-way
streets
project.
A
The
bike
trail
completion
around
the
lake
is
currently
in
the
hands
of
an
engineering
firm
to
give
us
a
detailed
plan
and
cost
estimate.
So
we're
looking
forward
to
finishing
the
plan
this
year,
not
actually
constructing
the
whole
trail,
but
we
might
get
some
of
it
built,
affordable
housing
framework
I
have
several
committees
working
on
this.
The
development
committee
is
currently
looking
at
our
development
standards.
We're
going
through
that
chapter
by
chapter
with
the
hope
of
bringing
by
the
end
of
the
year
a
proposed
development
standard
book
for
the
council
to
adopt.
A
Communication
strategy
is
something
that
I've
been
working
on
and
you've.
If
you
watch
the
council
meetings,
you've
noticed
it.
We
now
have
reinstated
our
public
works
and
Finance
Committee's,
where
we
have
minutes
taken
and
actual
action
taken
which
gives
direction
to
the
staff,
so
I
think
that's
a
good
thing.
The
meeting
structure,
where
we
use
Robert's,
Rules
and
and
people
ask
for
the
floor
and
talk
one
at
a
time.
I
think
that's
been
a
positive
change
as
well
and
I'm
instigating
this
month.
A
I've
been
talking
about
this
for
the
entire
time
have
been
mayor
and
haven't
started
it
till
now,
but
Friday
will
be
my
first
coffee
with
the
mayor
once
a
month
at
a
coffee
shop
somewhere.
The
first
one
will
be
at
gather
this
Friday
at
two
o'clock
for
an
hour,
or
so
just
an
open
floor
for
the
public
to
come
and
ask
questions
or
just
listen,
but
it
gives
people
a
chance
to
come
and
talk
to
me
and
I
have
to
make
an
appointment
to
have
a
meeting
with
me.
A
So
I'm,
looking
forward
to
that
and
we've
started
enforcing
the
ordinances
and
I
expect
that
not
that
we
didn't
enforce
them.
We
reinforced
most
of
our
ordinance
ordinances
in
the
past,
but
there
were
a
few
that
were
troublesome,
and
so
we
just
kind
of
looked
the
other
way
and
people
felt
that
the
ordinances
were
maybe
not
enforceable,
and
that's
why
we
looked
the
other
way
the
way
I
feel
about.
A
That
is
if
it's
not
enforceable,
let's
take
it
off
the
books,
but
we
won't
know
if
it's
enforceable
or
not
if
we
don't
try
to
enforce
it.
So
we
are
we've.
We've
made
some
chain
in
how
we
enforce
the
sign
code.
We
haven't
changed
the
sign
code
in
the
allowing
signs
in
the
right
away,
which
we've
always
had
a
provision
in
there
that
prohibited
signs
in
the
right-of-way
now
we're
enforcing
it,
and
we
have
had
a
little
bit
of
pushback
on
that.
A
The
economic
health
program
includes
staying
on
budget
having
a
reasonable
budget
and
sticking
to
it,
and
not
that
we
haven't
done
that
in
the
past,
but
I
think
we've
always
done
a
really
good
job
of
that
and
I
want
to
continue
that
and
keep
tabs
on
where
we
are
and
sales
tax,
as
I
said
before
we're
doing
very
well
at
the
moment
and
I'm
expecting
a
big
year
for
construction
this
year,
which
will
have
a
positive
effect
on
the
sales
tax
revenue.
So
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
good
year
for
sales
tax.
A
Also
I
expect
it
to
be
a
good
year
for
building
permits.
Time
will
tell,
but
with
the
available
land
for
developing
I,
think
we're
on
the
right
track.
So
we
are
doing
very
well
we're
holding
our
own
in
this
time
of
gnashing
teeth
where
most
communities
are
faced
with
declining
revenues
due
to
people
shopping
online.
That's
certainly
an
issue
here.
We
want
people
to
shop,
local
and
so
far,
Watertown
folks
have
been
faithful
in
shopping
in
our
stores,
and
we
hope
that
continues
so
I'm
giving
you
my
address
here.
A
I'm
a
planner
at
heart
and
I
like
to
see
planning
in
every
aspect
of
what
we
do
as
a
city
organization,
so
we're
planning
for
the
future,
always
with
all
of
our
projects.
I
love
that
they
lay
camp
ask
a
master
plan,
should
be
a
wonderful
document.
There
are
lots
of
people
that
have
stepped
up
to
the
plate
and
volunteered
to
help
with
this.
That
really
makes
me
happy.
The
downtown
streetscape
will
be
a
plan,
that's
completed
within
a
few
months
here.
A
It
will
give
us
a
document
showing
us
projects
that
we
can
do
in
our
downtown,
along
with
cost
estimates
and
priorities
on
where
we
could
get
the
most
bang
for
a
buck
and
hopefully
before
budget
time,
we'll
be
able
to
have
that
in
hand
and
maybe
bring
some
projects
forward
in
our
budget
and
we're
also
going
to
adopt
a
new
comprehensive
plan
for
our
community
this
year.
We've
done
updates
in
the
past,
where
we
just
have
a
little
update
document
that
we
adopt.
A
This
is
going
to
be
a
whole
new
book,
so
that'll
be
great
and
the
highway
212
reconstruction.
That's
a
long
term
project.
That's
been
underway
through
its
started
with
the
reconstruction
of
the
intersection
of
Highway
212
and
highway
81,
which
used
to
be
the
highest
accident
intersection
in
our
state
and
and
now
it's
much
better.
We
start
with
those
danger
points,
and
the
next
step
is
to
take
big
stretches,
will
be
taking
the
stretch
from
highway
20
to
highway
81
in
2019
and
then
in
2021
we'll
be
going
from
highway,
81
to
19th
Street
east.
A
Now
those
are
state
projects,
they're
not
City
projects,
but
this
is
our
community.
The
highway
cuts
right
through
the
heart
of
our
town,
and
these
projects
have
a
big
effect
on
us
and
we're
hoping
that
the
businesses
along
those
stretches
will
come
out
and
now
they'll
be
affected,
and-
and
we
want
to
help
them
in
any
way
that
we
can.
But
we
also
have
been
planning
for
this
for
many
many
years
and
we
have
a
bypass
truck
route
that
was
constructed.
A
The
southerly
access
route,
which
starts
at
29th
Street
East,
goes
south
to
20th
Avenue
south
and
continues
pass
highway
81
and
comes
out
up
on
at
the
intersection
of
Highway
20
and
highway
212.
We
aren't
fully
utilizing
that
bypass
route,
because
the
intersection
of
Highway,
81
and
20th
Avenue
south
is
dangerous.
So
the
state
has
been
reluctant
to
label
that
as
a
truck
route
and
encourage
trucks
to
actually
take
it
until
we
fix
that.
Well,
that's
gonna
be
fixed
this
summer.
A
That's
the
highway
81
roundabout,
which
will
start
as
soon
as
the
grounds
ready
and
will
be
finished
before
school
starts
and,
as
I
said,
that
we
started
the
29th
Street
that
got
us
prepared
to
take
the
extra
traffic
once
those
two
things
are
done.
We
will
be
able
to
safely
have
bypass
around
highway
212
so
that
we
can
reconstruct
those
stretches
and
we
really
couldn't
reconstruct
highway
212
until
those
projects
we're
done.
So
that's
a
really
good
thing.
A
Yeah
and
what's
ahead,
we
have
a
full
plate
of
city
projects
for
this
year,
with
the
most
prominent
being
our
Road
reconstruction
projects
and
numerous
other
projects
which
were
included
in
the
budget.
Of
course,
the
highway
roundabout
is
going
to
be
disruptive
and
that'll,
be
a
big
project
for
our
community
as
well.
I
expect
to
see
lots
of
development
in
our
gateway
overlay
district,
which
is
the
area
that
we've
been
looking
at,
changing
the
standards
and
hoping
to
see
some
movement
there.
A
So
all
in
all,
this
has
been
a
really
great
start
to
our
2018
and
I'm.
Expecting
continuance
of
that
trend
and
I
would
like
to
thank
everyone
who
is
helping
along
the
way
there's
so
many
people
that
have
stepped
forward
to
volunteer
to
participate
in
all
the
different
ways,
different
committees
and
just
helping
all
the
new
faces,
get
their
feet
wet
and
get,
grounded
and
and
I
think
we're
really
off
to
a
great
start.
A
I
You
mayor,
as
everybody
knows,
the
farm
show
starts
this
week.
The
chamber
of
commerce
had
contacted
us
requesting
permission
to
allow
the
consumption
of
some
distilled
spirits
in
this
Highland
room
of
the
Fieldhouse.
There
is
a
mixology
class.
That's
going
to
be
taking
place,
it's
actually
tomorrow,
and
state
law
does
allow
the
governing
body,
which
is
you
guys
to
permit
the
consumption
of
alcoholic
beverages
on
a
in
a
public
facility
for
a
period
of
24
hours?
And
so
that's
what
the
request
is
and
Tim's
here
I
see.
If
you
guys
have
any
questions.
Another.
N
Good
evening,
I'm
Tim
she
in
here
on
behalf
of
the
chamber.
Well,
we've
got
in
front
of
us
as
we've
put
thirteen
different
classes,
new
classes
at
the
the
farm
show
and
one
of
those
is
to
offer
a
local
mixologist
to
demonstrate
and
share
about
three
or
four
different
types
of
drinks
in
a
one-hour
period,
start
at
1:30
it'll
be
over
about
12:30.
We
have
about
25
chairs
and
then
in
that
room
in
the
facility.
N
F
N
K
I
A
Question
any
other
questions
or
comments:
councilman
Albertson
we're
just
getting
ready
to
vote.
F
F
A
F
O
As
you
see
in
the
bid
tab,
there
were
four
bids
received
for
the
sewer
jetter
truck.
The
little
bit
bid
does
meet.
The
specifications
is
from
Eliot
sanitation,
equipment
of
Grimes
Iowa
in
the
amount
of
three
hundred
and
seventy
six
thousand
four
hundred
and
ninety
dollars
less
one
hundred
and
seventy-five
thousand
dollars.
Training
for
a
net
bid
amount
of
two
hundred
one
thousand
four
hundred
ninety
dollars.
O
So
we'd
recommend
awarding
this
to
Eliot
sanitation
in
the
net
bid
amount
with
trading
of
two
hundred
one
thousand
four
hundred
ninety
dollars
and
again
the
unit
that
we
they
bid.
Here
is
the
new
version
of
the
camel
cheddar
that
we
are
trading
in.
So
it's
a
product
that
they've
serviced
in
the
past
force
and
that
we
are
currently
operating
and
the
vendor
has
informed
us
that
they
have
the
trade
and
pre
sold.
So
that's
how
they
came
up
with
this
significant
trade-in
value,
great.
G
O
Bid
was
received
here
for
the
portable
steamer.
The
sole
bid
does
meet
the
specifications.
It
is
from
technology
international
cooperated
of
Lake
Mary
Florida.
We
did
have
a
second
bid,
but
it
came
a
day
late,
so
we
could
not
open
it
or
consider
it
we'd
like
to
recommend
awarding
this
bid
to
technology
international
in
the
amount
of
seventy
six
thousand
seven
hundred
and
twenty
dollars
any.
K
O
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
Okay,
see,
I,
got
a
motion
and
second
right
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
all.
A
G
O
Were
opened
at
2:00
p.m.
on
Tuesday,
January
23rd
for
these
biosolids
dewatering
improvements,
five
bids
were
received.
We
had
a
nice
range
of
8%
of
the
low
bid
was
the
range
of
the
five
bids
about
eighty
five
thousand
five
hundred
fifty
dollars.
The
low
bid
from
Swanberg
construction
of
Valley
City
in
North
Dakota
was
determined
to
be
complete
and
the
int
design
engineers
HR
green,
recommended
awarding
this
bid
to
Swanberg
construction
in
the
amount
of
1
million
sixty
three
thousand
dollars
here.
O
We
are
not
awarding
the
alternative
a
a
telemetry
computer,
a
software
update,
as
we
are
budgeting
to
replace
that
computer
next
year,
so
we'll
have
new
hardware
with
a
new
operating
system,
whereas
the
current
computer
has
an
old
XP
operating
system
and
so
by
getting
in
the
new
operating
system
next
year,
we'll
be
sure
and
get
the
latest
version
of
the
telemetry
software
next
year.
Ok,.
A
Thank
you
and
this
received
the
recommendation
of
the
public
works
committees.
There
are
any
questions
or
discussion
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
8
is
consideration
of
bids
received
for
the
solid
waste
department
and
all
of
these
items,
as
recommended
by
the
department.
Yes,.
O
O
Two
bids
were
received
for
the
automated
truck
chassis.
The
low
bid
without
create
meets
the
specifications
actually
both
of
these
bids
who
didn't
meet
the
specifications.
The
low
bid
is
from
all
state
Peterbilt
of
Fargo
North
Dakota
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
twenty
four
thousand
five
hundred
and
eighty
five
dollars.
We
recommend
a
warranty
to
this
bid
to
all
state
Peterbilt
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
twenty
four
thousand
eight
hundred
and
fifty
dollars.
O
A
O
You
five
bids
were
received
for
the
automated
truck
body.
The
two
lowest
bids
did
not
meet
the
specifications
of
the
low
bid
that
didn't
does
meet.
The
specifications
is
from
sanitation
products
for
the
curb
tender
body.
We
have
four
curb
tenders
in
our
fleet
of
eight
trucks.
This
bid
was
the
amount
of
one
hundred
sixteen
thousand
seven
hundred
and
thirty
three
dollars
less
a
trade-in
value
of
twenty
two
thousand
for
a
net
bid
price
for
the
body
of
ninety
four
thousand,
seven
hundred
and
thirty
three
dollars
in
awarding.
G
A
O
The
second
lowest
bid
from
nor
the
truck
equipment
of
Sioux
Falls
did
meet
the
specifications
that
bids
in
the
amount
of
$50
in
eighty
eight
cents
per
container,
and
we
would
recommend
awarding
this
in
northern
truck
equipment
in
the
amount
of
fifty
dollars
in
eighty
eight
cents
per
container
delivered,
and
this
is
for
the
cascade
container
a
container
we
have
purchased
multiple
times
over
the
years.
Thank.
O
The
garbage
it's
going
to
be
all
three
colors,
it's
all
it's
it's
gonna,
be
about
nine
hundred
and
fifty
containers
and
of
the
blue
ones.
The
solid
waste
will
be
450
of
those.
There
will
be
275
green
yard,
waste
containers
and
225
of
those
beige
single-stream
recycling
containers.
How.
O
A
O
One
bid
was
received
for
the
sweet
quarter:
ton
crew
cab,
four
wheel,
drive
pickup
truck
for
the
landfill.
The
bid
meets
the
specifications,
it's
from
Watertown
Ford
Chrysler
in
the
amount
of
twenty
nine
thousand
one
hundred
and
eighty
four
dollars
without
trade.
The
used
unit
will
go
to
the
fire
department
and
we
compared
this
to
the
state
bid.
O
The
state
bid
did
not
have
a
log
box,
it
had
a
short
box
and
that
bid
was
109
dollars
higher
than
our
local
Viet
here
for
the
love
box,
so
we're
confident
we
have
a
good
price
on
this
truck.
It's
the
same
truck
we
bought
two
of
last
year
from
Watertown
Ford,
and
this
price
is
two
hundred
ninety
one
dollars
more
than
what
we
paid
for
that
truck
last
year.
Okay,.
O
A
Anything
else
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
but
those
are
posting
if
I
was
saying,
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Mike
item
number.
Nine
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
revised
intergovernmental
contract
with
South
Dakota
public
assurance,
Alliance
and
I
will
look
for
a
motion
and
second
by
Roby
SEC
meth
Orson,
and
we
will
let
Kristin
tell
us
about
that.
C
Okay,
Thank
You
mayor
attached
to
the
agenda,
is
a
revised
intergovernmental
contract
with
South
Dakota
public
assurance
Alliance.
The
last
contract
that
we
signed
with
them
was
in
1991
there's
just
a
couple:
changes
to
the
contract.
All
the
members
received
a
letter
and
I
kind
of
broke
down.
What
the
changes
are.
When
South
Dakota
public
assurance
Alliance
began
in
1987,
the
net
position
was
divided
into
two
different
funds.
One
was
to
cover
the
administration
cost
and
the
other
was
to
cover
the
claims.
C
There's
no
longer
a
need
for
the
split,
so
the
distinction
between
the
two
is
being
eliminated.
The
other
change
that
they
noted
in
their
kind
of
cover
letter
to
us
is
kind
of
deals
with
the
board
of
directors.
The
board
is
comprised
of
fellow
public
assurance
alliance
members,
as
well
as
the
executive
director
of
the
Municipal
League
and
the
South
Dakota
Association
of
County
Commissioners.
Those
two
positions
did
not
have
a
vote
before
and
now
they
will
have
full
voting
rights.
A
A
Michele
kochak
I
got
it
right
at
the
Finance
Committee,
okay,
so
this
agreement,
that's
in
the
packet,
has
no
red
lines
in
it.
This
is
an
agreement
that
a
similar
one
was
approved
in
2016
for
purchase
of
land,
Ryland
adjacent
to
industrial
land
in
the
city
for
the
purpose
of
a
future
industrial
park,
and
if
we
could
show
I
think
the
maps
in
there
on
the
end,
we,
the
council,
had
approved
this
in
2016
and
then
discovered
that
there
was
a
blanket
easement
across
the
whole
thing
which
killed
the
deal.
A
So
there
was
a
pipeline
existing
and
an
easement
was
retained
next
to
the
pipeline,
so
that
freed
up
the
rest
of
the
property
for
development.
The
pipeline
easement
did
isolate
the
north
corners
of
the
property,
so
they
aren't
included
and
neither
is
the
the
land
with
the
easement
on
it
for
the
pipeline,
so
the
remaining
land
is
smaller,
so
the
price
tag
is
smaller
as
well,
and
this
has
already
been
annexed
and
zoned
industrial.
P
To
add
on
to
the
mayor's
comments
on
this,
the
price
that
we
originally
were
gonna
pay
was
eighteen
thousand
dollars
an
acre
that
has
been
reduced
to
seventeen
thousand
five
hundred
dollars,
an
acre
and
a
reduction
in
acres
to
the
original
80.
Some
acres,
it's
in
the
area
of
around
75,
is
what
we'll
be
purchasing.
H
First
of
all,
this
was
discussed
and
recommend
approval
at
the
Finance
Committee
meeting
earlier,
but
I
want
to
also
clarify.
So
what
a
look
doesn't
look
like
we're,
jumping
the
gun
here.
This
actually
isn't
the
property
purchase
agreement,
and
this
just
our
agreeing
with
the
development
company,
so
that'll
be
a
separate
dock
been
coming
before
us
with
the
with
the
seller.
Actually.
H
P
P
A
D
D
P
Had
actually
in
one
of
the
during
the
negotiations
with
the
seller,
we
had
actually
asked
to
include
those
two
pieces
on
there.
Originally
we
didn't,
and
then
we
went
back
and
said,
yeah.
Why
don't
we
just
take
the
whole
thing
because
of
the
continuity
issue
there
and
then
an
option
on
the
easement
area,
because
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
weren't
taking
on
any
risk
of
whatever
happened
would
happen
if
there
were
a
disaster
with
that
pipe.
So
in
the
process
of
the
negotiation,
the
seller
pulled
back
on
those
two
triangles.
P
D
P
Would
agree
that
was
a
concern
of
ours
as
well
and
I.
Don't
know
if
that's
something
where
you
know
if
we
go
back
later
as
a
development
company
to
negotiate
that
or
if
that
is
something
since
it's
adjacent
to
land,
that's
already
owned
by
the
city.
If
that's
something
the
city
wanted
to
pursue
at
any
point
right
in.
D
K
P
P
We
could
you
know
we
could
go
back
and
try
to
renegotiate
that.
We
did
actually
have
an
option
for
the
easement
on
there,
which
was
to
just
give
us
a
year
to
try
and
see
if
there
was
any
risk
to
ownership
of
that,
but
they
that,
when
the
seller
came
back
on
the
counter,
they
said
just
the
area
below
the
easement
Johnsonville.
P
P
D
C
C
So
just
so,
everybody
is
aware,
and
on
the
same
page,
that
with
the
approval
of
this
later
on
in
the
year,
I
will
ask
to
supplement
the
budget
for
the
purchase
and
it
will
be
coming
out
of
fun
to
12.
We
do
have
that
little
bit
of
restricted
cash
set
aside
for
land
purchases
and
I
did
go
back
and
listen
to
the
meeting
in
2016,
and
that
was
what
was
discussed
to
use
and
so
I'd
kind
of
like
that
to
be
in
the
motion
as
well
to
use
the
restricted
cash
use.
D
D
C
One
difference
with
this
purchase
would
be
that
the
restricted
cash
for
the
land
is
eight
hundred
sixty
eight
thousand
five
hundred,
and
that
truly
is
restricted.
The
other
portion
would
come
out
of
your
unreserved
fund
balance,
so
you're
correct
in
the
statement
that
eventually
yeah
we
need
to
be
careful
of
the
unreserved,
but
for
this
land
purchase
it
is
its
own
restricted
portion.
A
Okay,
other
questions
or
comments.
Okay,
I
would
like
to
look
for
a
motion
to
approve
this
using
restricted
cash
for
the
purchase
and
to
ask
for
an
option
there
right
of
first
refusal
for
the
rest
of
it.
They
do
you
want
to
include
the
easement
areas
are
just
the
triangle.
This
is
the
triangles
someone
willing
to
make
that
motion.
I'll.
K
A
Opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you
all
right.
Item
number.
11
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
an
engineering
contract
with
infrastructure
design
group
for
the
Marina
Bay
Drive
bank
restoration
project
number
1812,
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval
would
by
row
B
second
by
Ville
how're
Shane.
L
Q
For
Shane
on
this
is,
is
there
any
chance
that
that
road
could
be
gone
over?
You
know
the
situation.
It
came
up
with
the
owner
out
there
that
he's
taking
care
of
the
grafts
and
all
that
stuff
along
there.
Is
there
an
option
there
to
help
that
situation
out
with
that
landowner
out
there?
Is
this
not
the
time
to
even
talk
about
it?
Maybe,
but
if
you're
going
to
be
looking
at
that,
you
know,
city
owns
the
land
to
the
north
era,
a
few
feet
and
then
there's
a
garage
deal
up
there
too.
So
I.
L
Guess
the
owner
could
approach
the
city
if
see.
If
there's
a
willingness
for
I
mean
we
it.
This
is
kind
of
a
unique
situation.
We
all
maintain
the
boulevards
in
front
of
our
homes
and
essentially
this
whole
triangle
is
part
of
that
Boulevard.
So
you
know
I'm.
Oh
my
Boulevard
on
two
sides
of
my
house.
Most
people
do
this
one's
kind
of
a
unique
situation
in
that
it's
larger
and
more
of
an
irregular
shape,
but
technically
either
one
of
these
property
owners
would
be
responsible
for
the
maintenance
of
Boulevard.
Q
A
It's
okay,
Dan.
It
is
unique
in
there's
two
property
owners
that
could
have
to
have
divvy
over
who
mows
it
and
only
ones
doing
it.
So
that
is
unique.
All
right,
so
I
have
a
motion
and
second
there
any
further
discussion.
All
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
All
right,
as
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion,
carries
item
number
12
is
consideration
of
engineering
contract
amendment
with
HR
green
ink
to
include
construction
management
and
observation
services
for
the
wastewater
treatment
facility,
bio
solids,
dewatering
improvements,
project,
number,
17,
15,
Mike,.
O
Thank
you.
This
amendment
is
for
one
hundred
one
thousand
dollars.
It
is
the
amount
that
was
budgeted
for
this,
these
construction
services.
Again,
as
mentioned
this
construction
observation
and
administration
and
I
guess,
the
actual
cost
will
depend
upon
the
time
the
number
of
hours
the
the
engineers
spend
on
the
project.
You
know
they
build
by
their
hourly
rate
for
the
different
individuals,
and
so
this
is
what
we
budgeted
for
it.
So
we'd
ask
for
your
approval.
All.
A
By
law,
second,
by
the
horror,
any
further
discussion,
this
had
the
recommendation
of
the
Public
Works
Committee,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
It
was
a
post
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries
item
number
13
is
consideration
of
change
order
number
one
to
the
contract
with
pkg
Contracting
inked
for
the
wastewater
treatment
facility,
primary
digester
rehabilitation
project
number
1612,
increasing
the
contract;
seven
thousand
seven
hundred
thirty-five
dollars,
eighty
four
cents.
A
O
Addition
to
the
cost
of
seven
thousand
seven
of
thirty-five
dollars
in
84
cents,
the
change
order
added
eight
days
to
the
contract.
A
couple
different
things
were
achieved
with
this
change
order.
First
of
all,
the
cost
of
the
change
order,
the
total
cost
and
five
of
the
eight
days
was
for
fixing
the
metal
cover,
as
they
jacked
that
up
to
the
air
to
get
it
out
of
the
concrete
tank
so
that
they
could
sandblast
it
prepare
it
a
repair,
metal
and
then
coated.
It
was
out
of
round
and
rubbing.
O
So
they
had
to
play
basically
the
reshape
it
made
it
fit
back
down
in
the
concrete
tank
without
rubbing,
or
that
would
be
scraping
off
the
brand-new
cornice
being
installed
to
protect
the
metal
from
rusting
out
over
time
and
then
the
additional
three
days
the
contractor
felt
that
they
were
held
up
by
the
engineer
after
the
metal
was
sandblasted.
They
found
additional
damage
that
required.
O
O
Just
spray
paint-
this
is
a
forget,
the
exact
diameter,
but
this
takes
about
50
foot
in
diameter.
So
this
cover
is
a
50
foot
in
diameter,
a
metal
cover
that
they
they
can't
powder
coater.
They
don't
think
they
spray
it
up.
They
sandblast
it.
So
it's
called
white
sandblasting
to
perfectly
clean
metal,
and
then
they
put
a
certain
thickness
of
coatings
on
it
layer
after
layer
till
they
need
a
certain
mill
thickness.
There's.
L
A
O
O
A
L
All
right
Pete:
will
you
put
my
screen
up
again
to
potential
assessment
projects
that
we
sent
out
petitions
to
the
adjoining
properties.
Looking
for
interest,
one
of
them
is
25th
Street
Southwest.
This
is
a
Worthington
tractor
parts
here
along
the
West
Side
co-op
has
this
large
property
to
the
east
and
then
several
local
residential
properties.
We
received
almost
unanimous
feedback
from
people,
even
if
they
wanted
to.
They
said
it
was
more
than
they
were
willing
to
pay
for
the
assessment.
L
So
in
essence,
there
was
no
support
for
continuing
on
with
the
project,
so
I'm
planning
on
that
process,
just
dying
with
the
petition
not
being
signed
or
supported
by
the
local
properties,
not
that
their
issues
are
going
away.
They
still
would
like
the
city
to
consider
possible
dust
abatement
or
you
know
other
maintenance,
and
if,
if
at
some
point
in
time,
the
city
decides
to
approach
the
assessment
process
a
little
bit
differently,
we
might
instill
some
interest
there
as
well,
but
right
now,
I'm.
L
L
Sheehan
there
you
go
I
wanted
to
say
a
different
name,
but
they
also
do
not
support
the
project
at
the
cost.
At
this
time
they
did
allude
to
the
when
the
rest
of
21st
Street
was
paved,
that
there
was
some
buy-in
or
city
agreement
with
the
local
property
owners
to
the
south
I'm
trying
to
investigate
what
the
nature
of
that
conversation
may
have
been.
I
haven't
gotten
all
the
details
and
that's
been
quite
a
long
time
ago
and
I,
don't
think.
There's
much,
there's
probably
records
deep,
deeply
filed
away,
but
I
haven't
gotten
to
them.
L
G
D
In
time-
and
it
was
before
my
time
here-
but
we
have
talked
about
this
a
few
years
ago-
it's
my
understanding
and
I
will
tell
you
saying
that
that
wasn't
supported
by
documents
by
memory
that
when
that
development
went
in
down
there
and
the
road
went
in
that
there
was
an
agreement
for
those
people
that
that
Street
would
be
finished.
Yeah
yeah
to
the
to
the
highway
right
and
whether
that
and
I
believe
it
was
right.
K
I'll
bring
my
question
up
to
about
fifty
thousand
feet
the
bigger
issue.
We
were
in
consistent
with
how
we
assess
the
streets,
and
we
just
talked
about
one
in
the
earlier,
where
there
were
some
curb
and
gutter,
and
some
people
that
already
have
curb
and
gutter
of
course
won't
be
assessed
because
they
were
assessed
previously.
Those
that
don't
have
curb
and
gutter
will
get
the
assessment.
In
this
instance.
K
You
know
with
fact
back
up
if
you
own
property
in
the
city,
you
assume
the
responsibility
goes
at
that
periphery
and
we've
had
some
issues
with
alleyways
and
things
you
want
to
do,
and
you
know
they'll
pick
winners
and
losers.
Issue
kind
of
keeps
coming
up
in
this
instance,
I
will
just
ask
the
basic
question:
if
we're
gonna
pave
those
streets,
why
don't
we
assess
them
like
we
assess
every
other
Street
every
other
landowner?
Where
is
our
consistency?.
A
K
L
And
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
understand
assessments
projects
can
be
initiated
by
the
council
in
the
city
and
brought
through
to
the
completion
you.
You
can
and
I
hate
to
use
the
word
force
or
enforce
the
assessment
on
two
properties,
but
at
some
point,
if
the
reluctance
of
the
joining
properties
doesn't
result
in
a
fruition
of
a
roadway,
there
might
be
some
at
some
point
in
time
where
the
community
has
to
step
in
and
say
we
need
a
road
here
and
what
what
those
steps
are
we
need
to
at.
L
I
L
Unfortunately,
that
waiver
of
right
to
protest
was
tied
to
if
a
building
got
built
over
on
the
east
side
that
also
triggered
a
waiver
rights
protest,
then
that
would
them
both
on
the
hook
to
build
this
road,
but
I,
don't
know
if
I
can
even
predict
when,
if
ever
a
building
would
be
necessary
on
the
east
side
of
this
road,
it
not
not
in
the
near
future.
Let's
put
it
that
way.
D
Going
back
several
years
on
this
same
topic
and
I
would
caution
us
on,
in
general
speaking
general
terms
of
accepting
the
liability
and
responsibility
for
the
cost,
but
in
these
roads
in
if
you,
the
discussion
that
took
place
a
couple
years
ago,
involved
this
road
specifically
and
at
that
time.
If
this
was
the
only
road
we
have
like
this
in
town,
it'd
be
an
easy
decision.
We
move
on.
If
you
get
to
the
south
side
or
Shopko,
is
that
whole
development
area
is
gravel.
D
D
If
that's
the
case,
then
and
I'm
a
landowner,
South
Shopko,
why
am
I
going
to
agree
to
do
anything
unless
it
gets
mandated
on
me
and
that
it's
it's
risky
for
us
to
do
that
so
for
us
to
accept
responsibility
of
it,
I'm
going
back
to
changed
comments
sooner
or
later?
Sometimes
we
just
have
to
make
decisions
to
do
it.
D
Well,
if
I
have
a
business
south
of
Shopko,
I'm,
just
gonna
keep
putting
it
off,
but
not
put
it
off,
put
it
off
and
then
Jesus
said
he
will
put
it
in
so
I'm
very
fearful
of
that.
Just
simply
because
we
have
not
one
incident.
We
have
quite
a
number
of
incidents
around.
We
got
one
john
up
in
your
area
off
of
14th
avenue,
that's
still
undone
today,
so
I
would,
I
would
very
be
very
cautious
in
that
direction.
A
L
L
We
believe
that
this
alley
it
has
50
I,
have
53
percent
support
for
that
project
right
now,
with
one
vote
that
we
haven't
heard
from,
and
he
signed
the
petition
the
previous
time
to
this
so
I
fully
expect
this
project
may
come
forward
for
an
assessment
and
well
I'll
just
update.
Yes,
that
comes
to
fruition.
Okay,.
H
Been
alluded
to
a
couple
different
times
tonight,
but
I
want
to
emphasize
Shane
you
and
I
were
at
the
meeting
when
the
bike
trail
was
discussed
by
the
design
team.
That's
been
working.
This
I
want
to
I
know
the
public's
aware
that
we're
working
on
this,
but
this
is
good.
This
is
not
going
to
happen
any
time
soon.
Hopefully,
we'll
have
a
plan
in
place
and
change
over
any
time
if
I
misspeak
here,
hopefully
we'll
have
a
plan
in
place
by
the
end
of
the
summer.
H
L
Yep
I
will
say
that
the
entire
plan
will
be
done
this
year
and
if
we
see
some
low-hanging
fruit
with
that
are
easy
stretches
that
we
wouldn't
want
to
go
out
for
I'll
call
it
outside
funding
or
grants,
or
something
like
that.
We
there
may
be
a
small
project
that
would
come
out
of
it,
but
nothing
big
planned
for
2018.
A
D
I
want
to
go
back
to
the
agenda
I'm,
just
a
couple
items
tonight,
just
in
primarily
the
consent
agenda
and
then
also
just
some
verbage
here,
but
throughout
our
agenda
tonight
we
have
many
uses
of
the
term
contract
agreement
and
contract
agreement.
I
think
we
need
to
be
consistent.
My
assumption
is
they're
all
the
same.
They're
all
contracts
we're
dealing
with,
but
I'll
be
honest.
D
A
Well
and
some
people
provide
us
with
a
form
that
says
agreement
at
the
top,
and
some
people
provide
us
with
a
form
that
says
contract
at
the
top.
It
means
the
same
thing
and
it
it's
both
would
require
authorization
for
signature.
We
need
to
keep
a
little
bit
of
flexibility
if
we
adopt
one
of
those
words,
we're
gonna
be
faced
with
having
to
get
approval
for
something
provided
to
us.
That
uses
a
different
word
to
mean
the
same
thing.
What.
D
That's
how
we're
doing
that
we're
using
their
word
in
this
case?
Yes,
okay.
Okay,
second
thing
is
in
the
past.
It's
my
understanding
anyway,
that
we
any
time
that
we
have
had
grant
requests
come
to
the
council.
They've
always
come
to
the
council,
not
been
on
the
consent
agenda.
Tonight
we
had
three
of
them
on
the
consent
agenda.
Is
that
something
that
has
changed
for
some
reason:
I.
A
C
The
only
thing
that
I
could
say
is
recently
I
can't
I,
don't
know
for
sure
how
long,
but
for
the
most
part,
when
they
are
doing
that
application
for
the
grant
that's
been
on
the
consent
agenda,
but
when
they're
actually
seeking
approval
to
accept
the
grant
that
usually
comes
more
on
the
actual
agenda.
What.
D
D
We
had
a
number
of
years
ago,
where
I
can't
remember
what
the
grant
was
called
was
for
the
fire
department,
and
we
got
a
fireman
fire
person
for
two
or
three
years
and
then
we
had
to
fund
a
year
or
two
or
whatever
years
was
after
the
fact.
We
need
to
know
those
things
going
into
it
because
tonight
we
get
no
detail
in
here
to
know
whether
I
should
object
to
that
or
not
because
there
are
some
other
situations
that
or
terms
that
we
should
be
aware
of
in
the
application
process.
D
That's
where
it
really
comes
down
to
us.
Do
we
get
it
or
not?
They
so
always
been
told,
don't
apply
if
you're
not
going
to
take
it,
then
the
other
one
is
on
some
of
these.
We
have
some
in
our
consent
agenda
for
agreeing
to
contracts,
but
yet
we
have
contracts
that
are
on
our
agenda,
not
in
the
consent
agenda.
For
example,
number
11
was
the
engineering
services
where's.
The
decision
made
whether
it
goes
into
the
consent
agenda
or
whether
it
comes
off
and
is
in
the
standard
agenda.
A
D
D
Okay,
the
last
question
I
have
is
in
regards
to
the
transfer
of
vehicles
when
we
budget
a
line
item
for
a
new
vehicle.
Let's
just
use
the
pickup
that
we
voted
on
tonight
most
the
time
we
don't
know
whether
that's
going
to
be
traded
in
or
not
traded
in,
so
we
go
on
just
what
the
cost
is
per
se,
so
who
has
to
say
whether
vehicle
ultimately
gets
traded
in
or
whether
it
gets
transferred
and
if
it
gets
transferred,
has
that
been
covered
within
the
budget
process?
D
C
Okay,
I'll
try
to
answer
the
couple
questions.
Normally,
we
do
not
expect
a
trade-in
on
any
of
our
vehicles
as
far
as
cars
pickups.
Any
of
that
it's
kind
of
been
our
process
to
ask
any
of
the
other
departments
that
don't
always
get
new
vehicles
if
they
need
them.
The
only
time
that
we
would
get
to
the
point
is
to
basically
sell
them
during
our
surplus
auction.
C
So
you'll
probably
never
see
a
basic
car
pickup
type
vehicle
with
a
trade-in
for
the
bidding
process,
because
we
try
to
pass
them
down
to
the
other
departments
that
don't
have
as
big
of
a
budget
to
get
equipment.
As
often
as
far
as
that,
it's
kind
of
been
when
the
vehicles
are
coming
up.
When
the
departments
know
they
have
a
budget
to
buy
a
new
one,
the
departments
that
say
need
a
vehicle.
They
will
kind
of
talk
amongst
themselves
and
it'll
be
determined.
C
D
B
D
L
Good
example
is
I
I've
gotten
a
police
vehicle
in
the
last
year,
but
then
my
vehicle
then
got
declared
surplus
and
sold
at
the
auction
or
transferred
to
another
department
so
that
the
vehicles
just
kind
of
trickle
down
through
our
system
until
one
lands
in
the
surplus
and
gets
sold.
That's
that's
kind
of
how
it's
been
it's
a
matter
of
attrition
yeah.
D
I
agree
with
the
process
trying
to
understand
how
it's
covered
approval
wise
and
budget
wise
cuz.
You
know,
because,
in
theory
is
that
what
we
agreed
to
tonight
when
when
it
was
said
it
was
going
to
be
transferred.
Did
this
so
you
know
part
our
vote
was
the
approval
of
that
transfer
right.
Okay,
all
right.
Okay,.
A
Is
there
any
other
old
business
under
new
business?
I
we
were
talking
about
whether
or
not
to
allow
storm
ponds
in
flood
plains,
and
that
was
a
discussion
at
the
public
works
committee
that
felt
like
it
could
use
a
little
more
air
time
than
a
little
bit
uncomfortable.
But
the
basic
question
is:
should
we
allow
the
pond
requirement
to
be
met
in
a
floodplain
and
if
so,
are
there
any
restrictions
on
the
recurrence
level
of
allowing
a
pond
and
here's
another
question
that
we
didn't
really
talk
about?
A
Does
it
make
a
difference
if
it's
going
to
be
a
city
owned
and
maintained
pond,
or
if
it's
going
to
be
a
developer,
owned
and
maintained
pond,
because
either
way
it
isn't
going
to
function
at
times
when
it's
in
the
floodplain,
but
furthermore,
it
might
be
damaged
significantly
periodically,
causing
increased
maintenance
cost
if
it's
allowed
in
the
floodplain.
So
there's
some
pretty
basic
questions
there,
councilman
Roby,
you
sparked.
K
K
A
K
That
that
makes
sense,
that's
them.
That
makes
sense
to
me
all
right.
So
it's
not
going
to
stay
with
the
development
any
time
a
developer
leaves
you
look
at
covenants
once
the
developer
leaves
it's
up
to
the
landowners
to
do
it
and
then
it
becomes.
You
know
self
enforcement,
and
that
creates
a
lot
of
conflict.
So
I'm
going
to
reiterate
my
concern
I
made
at
the
committee
meeting.
K
D
Cherokee
might
correct
in
saying
and
when
we
had
our
discussion
earlier,
you
said
this
is
not
a
flood
control
device.
It
is
a
water
quality
devices
which,
to
me,
is
a
little
bit
different
in
regards
to
its
function
right,
because,
quite
honestly,
if
it's
going
to
get
washed
away
that
what
a
little
bit
of
water
is
in
this
area
now
I
have
matter
how
big
it
is
and
the
whole
scheme
of
things.
If
it
doesn't
function,
it's
pretty
minor
it,
but
it
needs
to
get
repaired.
D
That
to
me
I
think
that's
an
important
discussion
period,
but
because
the
functionality
of
it,
if
it's
flood
control,
is
a
whole
different
issue
to
me
than
it
is.
If
it's
just
water
control
you
get
into
a
flood
environment
or
situation,
it's
not
going
to
function
properly
anyway,
that
little
bit
of
water.
If
it
goes
away,
it's
not
going
to
matter
but
I
go
back
and
on
maybe
that's
the
thinking
that
you're
you're
going
down
is
why
do
we
accept
any
of
that?
D
What
why
doesn't
it
just
stay
with
the
development
they
work
out
their
plans
and
how
they
divvy
up
responsibilities
and
participation,
it's
needed
for
that
hold
development,
whether
they
are
directly
associated
with
it
or
not,
Nord,
for
that
development
to
go
through.
So
why
does
the
city
accept
that
responsibility,
yet
in
any.
A
Manner
it's
to
encourage
economic
development
at
the
pond.
Maintenance
is
theoretically
pretty
minor,
but
this
is
where
I
throw
up
the
flag
when
it's
in
a
floodplain,
because
a
normal
pond
outside
of
the
floodplain
really
is
very
minimal.
You
have
to
maintain
the
weeds,
we're
not
going
to
do
that.
It'll
be
whoever's
out.
There
is
doing
that.
We
would
be
responsible
for
cleaning
it
out
every
few
years.
If
we
have
to-
and
you
know
a
couple
hours
of
labor
may
be
replaced-
we've
never
really
had
to
on
any
of
our
ponds.
A
Go
in
and
replace
our
outlet
works
because
they've
never
gotten
to
the
point
of
needing
maintenance.
They
aren't
things
that
get
used
regularly
like
a
road
that
wears
out,
but
I.
Just
I
have
a
real
problem
with
the
whole
philosophical
idea
of
putting
this
pond
in
a
floodplain
and
then
taking
the
risk
as
a
community
over
and
that's
you
know,
that's
why
we've
brought
it
to
you.
Councilman
loans,
where.
G
I
G
A
Have
extensive
floodplains
in
our
community
and
if
we
restrict
pawns
to
not
be
able
to
be
built
in
floodplains
that
could
create
a
potential
hardship.
This
particular
one
that
we
ran
izing
over
could
be
moved
away
from
the
creek.
They've
got
plenty
of
land.
There
is
just
they'd
rather
have
a
building.
G
O
G
G
G
D
A
Q
Of
the
things
that
comes
back
always
is
it's
about
water
quality
mm-hmm
that
you
know,
and
we
all
need
to
be
concerned
about
that
now.
I,
don't
know
at
what
level
that
we
take
responsibility
for
this,
but
water
quality
certain
has
to
be,
and
all
of
our
all
of
our
thoughts
when
we
have
something
like
this,
it.
A
J
So
we
require
this
developer
to
move
the
stormwater
pond
right
the
storm.
So
we
do
that
and
then
we
take
it
over,
but
we're
a
little
more
comfortable
with
that,
because
it's
out
of
the
floodplain
there
is
going
to
be
developments
where,
even
if
they
moved
the
pond,
they
can't
get
it
out
of
the
floodplain.
J
Are
we
so
are
we
in
hobbling
development
or
are
we
actually
I'm
wondering
if
developers
are
as
skittish
as
as
we
think
they
are
or
are
they
I
mean
I?
Don't
know
you
know.
If
we
are
saying
you
know,
we
want
the
quality
of
the
community
in
the
quality
of
your
project
and
whether
you
keep
it
or
we
take
it
on
as
a
city.
Are
they
and
we
say
no,
these
are
our
requirements
because
we
want
to
protect
the
city
and
we
want
to
protect
the
water
and
all
those
other
things.
J
A
A
G
Ask
I
mean
I
want
to
facilitate
development
as
well,
but
at
what
point
do
we
worry
about
the
health
of
our
individuals
versus
the
development
of
our
community?
I
mean
if
we're
a
hundred
year
flood
zone-
and
this
is
mostly
for
water
retention
and
removal
of
I,
assume,
oils
and
stuff
like
that.
Coming
off
of
the
parking
lots
correct.
So
do
we
want
that
going
into
I
mean
if
you
have
a
hundred
year
event,
you
have
a
hundred
year
event
there's
nothing!
You
can
do
to
stop
that.
K
Roby,
listen.
This
discussion
I
feel
like
we're
getting
in
the
position
of
insurer.
In
other
words,
we
are
going
to
insure
against
an
event
which
is
highly
likely
in
this
area.
We
have
a
lot
of
water
coming
north
of
south
around
here.
We've
had
bad
events
in
the
past
I
just
again,
I
feel
like
we're
being
put
in
the
position
of
we
have
to
ensure
against
that,
and
it
doesn't
seem
to
ring
well
of
me.
A
L
I'm
not
trying
to
make
this
technical
because
I
don't
want
it
to
be,
but
think
of
this
okay,
we're
not
uncomfortable
with
anything,
that's
at
or
above
the
hundred-year
flood
elevation,
but
in
order
to
convey
drainage
out
of
any
development
parking
lot
Street
those
pipes
are
below
ground,
and
so
your
outlet,
whether
that's
into
a
pond
into
a
stream
into
anything,
is
99%
of
time.
Gonna
be
below
the
hundred-year
flood
event.
L
A
A
A
H
Think
in
this
particular
development,
I
think,
with
the
what
the
developers
gonna
end
up
doing
is
going
with
the
individual
individual
ponds,
which
you
know
the
consensus
here
was:
maybe
that's
not
all
bad
and
I'm,
not
sure
with
the
developer
net.
So
it's
not
about
that.
But
what
have
we
done
now?
As
far
as
I
mean
we're
gonna
be
crossing
this
bridge
every
time
we
have
a
development
someplace
else
or
are
we
now
saying
that?
Well,
we're
know
that
we're
gonna
dig
our
heels
in
and
not
assume
responsibility.
What
are
we
doing?
A
I
will
say
for
water
quality
ponds,
it's
not
commonly
done
for
communities
to
take
over
regional
water
quality
ponds.
Those
are
normally
done.
On-Site
building
by
building
each
site
has
its
own
water
quality
facility,
they're
much
smaller
than
flood
ponds.
They
can
be
incorporated
into
landscaping
and
they
usually
are-
and
it's
I
think
that
we're
generous
in
allowing
a
regional
pond.
A
We
have
always
allowed
regional
flood
ponds
to
be
taken
over
by
the
city
and
moat
I.
Don't
think
we
have
any
private
flood
ponds
in
any
any
neighborhoods.
Those
are
bigger,
they
are
down
in
the
creek
they
flood
and
it's
a
safety
issue.
They
don't
have
those
all
over
the
place.
We've
got
them
isolated
and
manageable,
and
it's
because
there
is
a
public
safety
element
to
a
flood
pond.
It's
appropriate
that
we
maintain
it.
So
we
know
that
it's
maintained,
because
if
we
don't
maintain
it
and
it
washes
out
safety
is
at
risk.
A
A
A
Development
Morris
edition
up
there,
they
they're
having
to
build
these
facilities
and
they
asked
if
we
would
consider
taking
over
a
regional
facility
for
water
quality.
You
can't
do
that
everywhere.
If
you
have
open
channels
leading
to
it,
it
doesn't
work
because
the
pond
is
supposed
to
protect
the
open
channel
it'd
be
from
erosion,
so
that
makes
no
sense
to
put
it
downstream.
A
Of
the
thing
is
supposed
to
protect,
but
in
this
case
it's
all
piped
and
hard
surface
to
get
to
this
point,
and
so
from
that
perspective
you
know
yeah
well,
if
it
facilitates
development
sure
we
will
entertain
that
thought
and
I
looked
at
the
plans
and
saw
it's
inundated
every
10
to
15
years,
it's
under
water
of
Willow,
Creek,
and
and
so
that's,
where
I
kind
of
go
okay
straight
face
test
here.
Is
this
really
appropriate?
A
Maybe
we're
going
too
far
saying
that
we
will
help
you
out
by
providing
a
regional
pond
that
we
will
then
take
over
ownership
of
and
and
I
think
that's
what
I'm
hearing
from
you
is
that
you
don't
want
that.
You
don't
want
that
added
liability.
It's
not
a
public
safety
issue.
It's
a
potential
ongoing
expense
for
the
taxpayers.
D
A
A
Water
I
mean
we
haven't
known
in
general
and,
like
I,
said,
the
purpose
of
a
water
quality
facility
is
to
catch
the
pollutants
before
it's
in
a
raging
stream.
You
want
them
to
be
all
over
the
place.
Small
they
function
better.
That
way.
Bigger
ones
mean
higher
flow.
It's
more
difficult
to
remove
the
pollutants
from
larger
volumes
of
water.
You
can
incorporate
them
where
the
flow
is
small.
It's
only
one
building
and
the
parking
lot
draining
to
it.
That's
a
tiny
amount
of
water.
A
It's
not
moving
that
fast,
because
it's
a
small
volume
and
so
it's
easier
for
the
pollutants
to
filter
out
in
a
small
facility.
The
blades
of
grass
are
much
greater
in
comparison
to
those
grains
than
they
are.
If
you
put
a
whole
big
giant
development
toward
it.
So
it
is
a
paradigm
shift
in
thinking
from
flood
control
to
water,
quality,
they're
at
opposite
extremes
and
regional
water
quality
facilities.
That's
not
a
foregone
conclusion
that
we
would
accept
that
that's
a
new
concept.
This
is
really
the
first
time
we've
been
asked.
F
A
A
He
would
be
attacked
for
being
throwing
up
roadblocks
to
development,
and
you
know
slowing
things
down
and
making
it
hard
on
the
developers.
I
don't
want
the
staff
to
be
at
the
brunt
of
that
kind
of
criticism.
This
is
a
community
question.
This
is
a
community
question.
What
do
we
want
to
allow?
What
are
we
willing
to
give?
What
what
are
willing?
What
are
we
willing
as
a
community,
to
take
on
as
responsibility
and
liability?
You
are
the
representatives
of
the
community.
This
is
not
an
engineering
question.
A
This
is
really
a
philosophical
question
for
the
community
to
answer
and
I
mean
the
engineers
know
about
it.
We've
designed
them.
We
can
advise
you
what
they
look
like:
what
happens,
what
we
can
expect,
but
ultimately,
should
we
take
on
this
responsibility,
or
should
we
not
is
a
community
question
I.
J
They'll
call
me
throwing
up
a
road
luck,
but
I
would
be
opposed
to
the
community
taking
over
a
storm
retention,
a
regional
retention,
water
quality
pond.
We
have
what
30
units
and
we
get
water
for
two
or
three
days
in
a
few
small
areas
and
it
filters
through
and
we're
done
and
and
it's
individual
units
each
have
them
and
theirs.
I
see
it
happen
and
it
works
very
well
and
we
don't
need
a
big
regional.
A
A
In
residential
developments,
where
we
have
in
most
residential
developments,
a
detention
requirement
for
the
hundred
year
event
and
that's
a
big
pond-
the
water
quality
facility
is
incorporated
within
the
boundaries
of
the
flood
control
pond
and
it's
a
minor
part
of
it.
So
that's
a
that's
a
no-brainer
that
we
would
accept
that
because
it's
part
of
the
construction
can.
K
D
L
Do
you
want
we'll
talk
about
the
two
that
are
out
in
that
region
if
you
want
just
specifically
there's
a
water
quality
pond
by
Hobby
Lobby
right
here,
and
this
little
pond
right
here
is
for
8th,
Ave
and
I'll,
be
honest
with
you,
8th
Avenue
is
what
a
potential
buyer
didn't
like
that
pond
being
on
that
property
and
this
what
bird
this
to
go
wallet!
If
you
want
that
pond
to
go
away,
it
has
to
be
redone
somewhere
else.
That's
how
this
all
started.
F
A
Q
J
Was
going
to
be
my,
are
we?
Is
that
a
hypocritical
statement
you
know
in
the
sense
of
we
won't
take
it
on
if
it's
in
the
floodplain,
but
because
of
because
of
the
reasons
of
just
you
know,
water
quality
and
you
know
inundated
and
just
coming
apart
and
all
the
negatives
but
we're
okay
with
it
being
located
in
having
all
those
negative
things
happen.
K
A
K
A
K
Gets
a
development
I
lived
it,
and
this
was
in
Minneapolis
was
the
only
undeveloped,
undeveloped
piece
of
land
in
South
Minneapolis,
they
put
a
townhome
association
there
20
units
some
duplexes,
some
patio
homes.
They
took
a
corner
of
that
land.
They
dug
it
down,
they
created
a
retaining
pond,
it
was
for
flood
control,
but
also
water
quality,
and
that
was
part
of
the
Association
was
shared
equally
amongst
the
Association
I.
Don't
know
if
that
would
work
here,
the
commercial
development
that
sounds
kind
of
the
developer.
Yes,
it
was
a
one
or
going
owner
developer,
I.
A
A
J
J
J
Because
that's
what
one
gun
was
saying,
the
individual
ones.
Excuse
me
how
big
it
would
have
to
be
to
one
acre.
M
M
A
J
And
I
I
go
back
to
how
much
economic
development
are
we
going
to
squelch
by
not
having
our
community
start
to
be
firmed
and
turned,
and
you
know
start
undoing
what
we've
already
been
trying
to
do
to
improve
and
preserve
our
water
quality
and
make
this
again.
You
know
a
water
friendly
place
like
John
said
we're
taking
things
out
and
making
it
more
and
and
our
are
we
truly
gonna
thwart
development.
If
we're
looking
at
it
from
a
perspective
of
hey
developer,
we
want
you
to
have
your
development
in
a
really
nice
City.
J
We
call
this
water
town
and
we
want
our
water
to
be
really
cool
and
clean
and
great
so
develop
here,
but
play
our
game
and
make
sure
you're
going
to
be
clean
and
happy,
and
you
know
that
that's
that's
what
I'm
still
thinking
is
that
I
don't
know
that
we're
going
to
immediately
throw
development,
because
we
say
nope
we're
not
going
to
take
over
a
regional
retention
pond
for
stormwater.
Every
developer
is
not
going
to
run
away
tomorrow,
maybe
I'm
wrong,
I
hope.
No,
no
developers
run
away
please,
but
well.
K
An
attempt
to
summarize
I
am
NOT
an
engineer.
I'm,
not
our
hydrologists,
but
here
the
the
choice
I
think
that's
been
presented
to
us
is
the
normal
way
of
doing
things
is
they'll.
Have
retention
on
lots,
fare?
Okay,
that's
for
water
quality,
we're
not
talking
flood
control.
I
think
there
was
a
good
distinction
to
make.
So
the
choice
is:
do
we
do
it?
The
way
we
normally
do,
which
doesn't
seem
to
be
too
threatening
to
the
city
or
do
we
do
it?
D
Know
a
few
years
ago
when,
when
the
decision
on
where
to
put
the
police
department
was
made-
or
we
were
going
through
that
process
and
and
the
the
site
out
east
was
looked
at,
the
city
had
bought
some
of
that
land.
But
I
don't
know
if
I
I'm,
assuming
it
was
mined
at
some
point,
and
there
was
some
thought
of
filling
some
of
that
in,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
not
doing
that
because
of
its
purpose
for
flood
control.
So
John's
point
is
very
very
valid.
D
D
You
should
I'm
saying
I
said
that
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
within
this
community.
I
see
Mike
out
here.
Mike
was
part
of
that
discussion,
and
but
that
now
we're
gonna
take
a
look
and
say
now
we're
not
really
talking
one
instance
here,
folks
we're
talking.
Potentially
several
we
don't
know
and
now.
A
K
When
I
get
in
this
situation,
I'm,
not
the
expert
which
is
quite
often
I
need
to
simplify
in
terms
I
can
understand,
and
the
terms
I
understand
is:
if
they
do
the
flood
control
Pearlie
each
individual
property,
it
works,
it
might
work.
If
we
do
it
the
other
way,
I
I
don't
want
to
prohibit
or
inhibit
development,
but
I
believe
it
assigns
a
meaningful
amount
of
risk
to
the
city
which
I'm
quite
uncomfortable
with
at
this
point
so.
A
M
A
Right,
but
if,
if
you
want
to
start
saying,
we
shouldn't
allow
development
and
floodplains
in
water,
Talan
yeah,
that's
a
that's
a
huge
statement,
we
have
broad
floodplains
and
they
aren't
all
critical
carrying
capacity.
A
lot
of
them
are
just
low
areas,
adjacent
that
don't
have
moving
water
in
them
at
all,
and
we
should
allow
people
to
fill
their
it
won't.
We
I
mean.
L
Different,
what
the
mayor
saying
is
and
I
just
zoomed
over
to
it
real
quick.
The
new
theater
is
in
a
floodplain
and
we're
going
to
allow
with
the
right
methods
of
bringing
those
buildings
out
and
I
mean
you
know,
fill
those
are
going
to
get
those
areas
are
gonna
get
developed.
Otherwise,
all
of
this
shaded
pink
is
never
going
to
develop
right.
Is
that
what
I
mean
we
have
to
be
able
to
allow.
L
J
H
A
A
Don't
have
to
make
a
motion:
I
just
does
I'm
sensing
general
agreement
that
it's
inappropriate
to
have
regional
water
quality
facilities,
maybe
period
and
and
I
mean,
and
particularly
in
a
floodplain,
and
so
let
them
do
their
water
quality
facilities.
On-Site
and
just
like
we've
expected
and
I
will
tell
you.
That's
only
been
a
requirement
in
Watertown
since
2008,
but
it's
been
a
requirement
since
1991
in
the
larger
communities
and
and
I
worked
in
a
larger
community
and
it
was
not
allowed.
A
A
G
H
I
shame
you
you've
reached
out
to
a
number
of
communities.
I
I
agree
with
the
consensus
mayor.
You
try
to
put
me
in
the
spot
last
week
at
our
at
our
meeting
in
my
last
comment
was
I'm
a
strong
believer
in
the
collective
wisdom
of
a
group
and
I
I.
Definitely
abide
by
that,
but
I
guess
so
so
I'll
agree
with
what
I'm
hearing
but
Shane
you
have
reached
out
to
other
communities.
I
guess
I
would
still
like
to
know
what
you
know
how
you
know
how
they're
dealing
with
similar
situations
like
this.
A
Would
be
good
and
I
think
we
should
bring
back
a
revision
to
our
manual
to
the
council
for
adoption.
That's
something
the
council
adopted
in
the
first
place,
and
so,
if
we
revise
it
to
clarify
this,
we
would
bring
that
back
for
for
a
formal
council
action
at
that
time
for
now,
so
that
we're
not
holding
this
developer
up,
we
should
give
them
an
answer,
and-
and
does
anybody
disagree
that
the
answer
is,
if
you
want
to
build
it
in
the
floodplain,
it's
yours,
otherwise,
take
it
out,
I
mean
I.
L
L
L
F
A
K
K
A
We
we
don't
restrict
development
in
the
floodway
fringe.
Now,
I
I
will
say:
I
I,
don't
think
any
of
you
would
be
okay,
putting
this
in
the
floodway,
which
is
the
part
of
the
floodplain
that
we
reserve
and
we
don't
allow
obstructions
in
the
floodway.
The
flood
way
is
where
the
faster-moving
waters
go.
Part
of
this
pond
was
proposed
in
the
flood
way,
just
a
part
of
it
and
I
I
think
that's
a
bad
idea
and
I
I.
A
G
A
A
D
J
R
A
D
A
A
A
K
A
Yeah
I
mean
it's
the
more
of
these
that
we
get
the
more
burden.
It
is
upon
the
organization
to
keep
track,
make
sure
they're
not
filled
in
yeah
I,
had
the
fun
Duty
in
a
previous
community
of
going
out
and
locating
all
the
storm
ponds
in
a
watershed,
and
out
of
like
thirty,
five
of
them
only
one
hand
we're
still
there,
everybody
had
filled
them
in
they
had
you
know,
no.
That.
K
Goes
back
to
you,
nobody
wants
to
pay
an
assessment
right,
I!
Think
that's
going
to
be
extremely
hard
to
enforce
cuz.
If
something
a
council
decision
made.
You
know
25
years
ago,
I
think
that's
going
to
be
an
issue.
I
want
to
reiterate
one
other
thing.
You
said
Sarah
that
you
know
I'm
always
curious
what
other
communities
are
doing,
but
nobody
of
a
certain
size
of
city
allows
regional
that
flood
no.
A
E
L
I'll
I'll
read
this
almost
verbatim.
This
is
a
from
engineering
department
in
Aberdeen,
the
individual.
We
contact
has
been
there
for
over
20
years
and
he
can't
think
of
a
case
where
it
has
been
requested.
But
if
it
was
requested,
they
would
allow
it
and
ask
for
some
documentation
on
how
it
would
function
in
case
of
a
flood.
It
would
have
to
meet
their
design
standards
and
be
designed
in
order
to
create
storage
without
being
affected
by
the
flood
plain.
A
L
I
mean
armoring
techniques
would
depend
on
how
the
discharge
is
designed
and
if
there's
a
low
station
involved
and
I
mean
there's
lots
of
factors
here,
but
they
didn't
say
that
they
wouldn't
outright
allow
it.
They
said.
If
they
did
allow
it,
it
would
reach
a
high
scrutiny.
But
that's
that's
my
interpretation
of
what
he
see.
F
S
Not
an
engineer
but
have
lived
in
two
communities
that
experienced
flooding
quite
often
might
not
be
in
big
flood
and
Devils,
like
a
course
was
flooding
year
after
year
with
the
lake
so
different
type
of
flooding.
You
know
lake
flooding,
River
flooding
when
he
looked
at
when
they
went
to
develop
commercial
property
in
Devil's
Lake.
On
the
side
of
town.
There
was
a
new
Walmart
couple,
restaurants
to
hotels,
a
truck
stop.
S
How
their
grievance
were
made.
I,
don't
know,
but
we
could
certainly
contact
the
city
attorneys
from
mine.
Are
the
city
engineers
for
mine,
attend
Devil's,
Lake
and
find
out
different
state,
there's,
probably
some
different
rules
and
laws
and
regulations,
but
for
the
most
part
the
designs
were:
rock
riprap.
Large
facilities
and
development
went
right
around
them.
No
problem
and.
A
S
Were
all
flood
plain
never
developed
before
so
when
Walmart
wanted
to
build,
they
built
out
of
the
flood
plain
and
you
can
see
the
elevation
drop
where
their
pond
is
at,
which
is
right
along
the
highway.
You
know
you
pull
in
its
landscape,
like
I
think
he
hasn't
been
talking
about,
and
it
definitely
spurred
development
in
that
area,
allowing
those
ponds
for
lack
of
a
better
word
and.
A
E
A
K
A
K
To
something
like
that,
as
long
as
there
is
some
sort
of
you
know,
forfeit
forfeiture
of
right
to
protest
down
the
road
kind
of
thing,
I
think
it's
going
to
be
an
enforcement
issue
when,
when
the
event
happens,
and
especially,
if
it
happens,
you
know
two
years
after
it
happened
the
first
time.
I
think
it's
that
that
to
me
is
a
concern,
and
you
know,
like
you,
said
people
fill
stuff
in
over
the
years.
Things
forget
the
rotate
councils
and
people
out
of
here.
All
the
time
might
that's
a
concern.
A
L
That,
yes,
that
we're
clearly
not
gonna
on
it.
That
will
be
the
number
one
thing
to
take
away.
I
think
they
would
be
willing
to
go
back
to
the
individual
water
quality
facilities
on
each
lot,
but
this
question
won't
go
away
that
easily,
so
we
do
need
to
put
some
more
research
into
it.
I
think
right.
A
Well
and
I
think
that
putting
the
water
quality
facility
on
your
high
visibility
corner
instead
of
on
the
low
end
of
the
back,
is
not
not
really
very
good
forethought
and
this
this
owner,
who
is
requesting
that
that
pond
be
moved
I,
don't
blame
them.
Why
did
we
do
that?
We
did
that
just
to
hurry
up
and
comply,
and
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
creativity
with
probably
with
the
thinking
they
can
move
it
if
they
don't
like
it
right.
L
We
have
some
tasteful,
in
my
opinion,
tasteful
water
quality
facilities,
just
down
the
road
on
29th
Street,
that
you
know
they
look
like
grass
lawn
and
they
function
quite
well,
but
again,
that's
a
different,
slightly
different
area,
but
most
of
the
properties
drain
to
the
roads.
So
that's
why
they,
these
facilities
do
kind
of
tend
to
find
their
way
to
the
front
and,
unfortunately,
if
they're
not
done
tastefully
that
they
look
like
an
eyesore.
A
M
M
A
M
M
A
K
D
Quite
honestly,
that
I
know
it's
a
whole
separate
issue,
but
that's
been
talked
of
for
quite
a
while
and
probably
should
come
off
the
side
burner
and
get
looked
at
because
it
would
become
then
a
charge
on
your
utility
bill,
correct,
just
a
small
charge
that
would
come
off
whatever
it
is.
I,
don't
know
a
number.
It's
it
really.
A
M
G
A
J
A
A
R
I
could
I
ask
a
question.
You've
been
talking
about
floodplain
all
along
and
I've
got
a
customer
that
started
to
repair
some
damage
on
his
home.
They
had
a
fire
in
and
he's
repairing
the
damage.
Nothing
on
the
outside
of
this
home
is
damaged.
It's
all
on
the
interior,
he's
below
the
floodplain,
but
so
are
about
nine
of
his
neighbors,
because
they're
all
at
the
same
level
and
our
city
engineer
tells
him
that
he
cannot
fix
his
house
because.