►
From YouTube: Council Meeting 09 04 2018
Description
Agenda Items include the transfer of a Retail (On-Off Sale) Malt Beverage License with Video Lottery and a Retail (On-Off Sale) Wine License. Also included is Ordinance No. 18-15, 18-16, 18-17, 18-18 and 18-19 as well as Resolution No. 18-35.
A
A
B
I
will
I
will
take
it
upon
myself,
definitely
father.
We
gather
tonight
after
this
day.
We
thank
you
for
the
blessing
that
you
give
us
as
individuals
as
citizens
of
this
community.
We
are
so
fortunate
to
live
in
the
land,
the
state
and
the
sea
that
we
do
now
that
we
ask
as
leaders,
council,
members,
mayor
staff
and
citizens
that
that
we
make
decisions
that
are
best
for
what
you
want
for
us
as
a
community
in
Jesus
precious
name.
We
pray
I'm
in.
D
C
D
E
A
D
A
Buehler
second,
by
Councilman
l'olam
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
two
is
public
comment,
and
this
is
the
time
set
aside
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak
about
something
that
is
not
on
the
agenda.
Please
come
forward
and
say
your
name
into
the
microphone.
If
that's
the
case,
see
none
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
three,
which
is
approval
of
the
agenda,
is
there
motion.
B
A
Is
the
appointment
of
Chris
Carter
to
the
municipal
utilities,
board
and
I
would
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval,
move
by
Councilman
Albertson
second
by
Councilman,
Thorson
and
I
will
say
a
little
bit
about
Chris
she's,
the
retired
operations
manager
for
the
public
opinion
newspaper
and
she's,
been
in
the
community
for
many
many
years
and
is
a
very
capable
woman
and
I'm
very
fortunate
that
she's
willing
to
serve
on
the
municipal
utilities
board.
So
any
other
discussion.
A
Anyone
else
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
item
number
five
is
application
for
a
transfer
of
ownership,
of
a
retail
on
off
sale.
Malt
beverage
license
retail
on
off
sale
wine
license
and
video
lottery
license
from
BMG
Enterprises
Inc
doing
business
as
happy
jacks,
North
maple
to
Schwalm
Corp,
doing
business
as
the
lounge
21
North
maple,
and
this
is
contingent
upon
Board
of
Adjustment
approval.
I
will
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval
and
then
I'll
open
the
public
hearing
after
that.
A
F
G
This
one
is:
there's
nothing
really
different
with
the
normal
transfer.
The
only
thing
that
was
different
is
when
the
transfer
came
up.
We
did
go
upstairs
and
ask
about
the
zoning,
how
that's
a
normal
process
and
at
some
point
I,
don't
know
when
this
did
not.
This
location
has
never
actually
received
the
Board
of
Adjustment
approval
as
far
as
to
be
a
bar
but
I
believe
it's
been
one
for
quite
some
time.
G
So
we
just
wanted
to
make
the
council,
where
that,
with
your
approval
tonight,
it
will
still
go
back
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
I.
Think
it's
set
for
September
20th
meeting.
So
then
this
license
would
not
take
effect
until
after
the
Board
of
Adjustment
has
seen
it.
So
it's
just
kind
of
it's
kind
of
little
housekeeping
that
I
don't
know
it's
been
probably
a
long
time
ago,
right
very.
A
A
H
I
J
A
Confusing,
thank
you
any
other
questions
or
comments.
Okay,
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
item.
Six
is
the
urban
renewal
district
assessment
roll?
The
resolution
number
eighteen
35,
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval
and
then
I'll
open
the
public
hearing
motion
by
Councilman
Danforth
second,
by
Councilman
bill
Hauer,
all
right,
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
I
suspect
there
are
quite
a
few
people
Vanessa.
G
G
This
come
this
is
coming
before
you.
The
urban
renewal
board
did
approve
putting
the
assessment
role
before
you,
so
the
finance
office
is
responsible
for
notifying
with
the
notice
of
public
hearing
and
then
as
well
as
putting
the
assessment
role
together.
So
what
you
see
before
you
is
the
current
assessments
for
those
properties
upon.
If,
if
it
is
approved
tonight,
then
the
next
step
is,
it's
actually
turned
over
directly
to
the
county
and
it
would
be
on
the
2019
taxes
of
those
properties.
B
G
E
A
K
Chairman
of
the
urban
renewal
board,
so
the
assessment
had
been
historically
in
place
until
about
five
years
ago,
where
it
was
taken
off.
Last
year
we
were
was
my
first
year
on
the
urban
renewal
board
and
we're
in
front
of
you
with
the
same
recommendation
to
assess,
and
through
the
end
of
this
year
we
ran
out
of
funds,
so
urban
renewal
board
has
no
funds
and
it's
kitty
to
do
any
improvements
downtown
the
main
reasons.
My
belief
of
the
main
reasons
for
it
not
going
through
was
a
lack
of
a
plan.
K
This
was
all
the
feedback
that
we
had
received.
We
wanted
to
use
the
2015
short
as
a
guideline
for
a
plan
going
forward,
but
it
needed
some
reworking
to
make
it
a
planning
tool.
So
this
year
we
applied
for
grants,
asked
a
lot
of
favors
and
came
up
with
basically
three
main
goals
that
we're
working
towards.
One
is
the
streetscaping
plan,
that's
in
the
front
lobby
here.
K
The
other
is
a
downtown
park
that
in
capitulate
encapsulate
some
of
the
elements
that
were
identified
in
the
Charette
that
it's
hard
to
get
on
your
typical
sidewalk
section,
and
then
the
third
thing
is
with
the
realization
of
a
downtown
park
and
the
improvements,
we're
gonna
need
some
help,
we're
a
volunteer
board
and
they
only
have
so
many
time
or
so
much
time.
So
we'd
really
like
to
get
a
downtown
coordinator
and
do
the
mix
of
things
eventually,
so
that's
kind
of
what
we
foresee
the
assessment
money
going
towards
in
the
future.
K
Ideally
we
want,
we
don't
just
want
to
spend
as
soon
as
it
comes,
because
we
don't
want
to
run
into
another
situation
where
we
have
absolutely
no
funds
to
act.
Anything
as
it
stands.
We
don't
have
maintenance
funds.
If
anything
were
to
break
down
downtown,
you
can
see
the
flowers
are
a
quarter
of
what
they
had
been
in
the
past,
so
we're
just
trying
to
get
things
back
up
to
status
quo.
A
Okay,
thank
you
any
questions
or
comments
from
the
council.
All
right
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
at
the
public
hearing.
Please
state
your
name
and
say
your
piece
and
if
there's
a
lot
of
people
here,
I
don't
know
if
everyone
intends
to
speak.
But
if
you've
heard
your
concern
spoken
previously,
please
don't
repeat
ad
nauseam:
try
to
keep
your
comments
to
a
reasonable
amount
of
time.
Just
a
couple
of
minutes,
if
possible
and
and
don't
repeat,
okay
Mike.
L
Glanced
burger,
you
know,
I
think
was
two
three
years
ago.
I'm
not
sure
might
have
been
longer
than
that,
but
we
had
a
petition
that
was
overwhelmingly
against
their
urban
a
little
tax
and
it
was
all
for
good
reasons.
You
know
only
certain
parts
of
that
downtown
is
being
fixed
up.
A
lot
of
us
are
being
left
out
of
it,
and
you
know
it's.
L
It's
a
heavy
tax
for
some
of
us
I
think
my
taxes
on
the
buildings
I
put
up
over
the
last
five
six
years
is
twenty-six
hundred
bucks
and
for
me
to
spend
twenty
six
hundred
bucks
just
to
fix
up
other
the
front
of
other
people's
buildings.
I
got
plenty,
I
can
do
with
it.
I
don't
need
to
spend
it,
spend
it
in
that
way
and.
L
L
A
L
L
E
L
L
D
A
L
E
L
N
N
It's
actually
quite
a
light
tax,
it's
less
than
four
tenths
of
1%,
so,
for
example,
if
they're
paying
$2,600
in
taxes,
that's
apparently
on
about
$700,000
worth
of
assessed
value
and
I
would
note
that
assessments
generally
are
very
low,
downtown
and
perhaps
throughout
the
city,
I
don't
know
so
there
just
isn't
there
isn't
any
of
us
that
is
taxed
heavily
if
you
assess
this.
The
second
thing
I
would
like
to
note
is
to
echo
what
Adam
l'olam
said,
and
that
is
that
these
funds
don't
go
to
fix
up
the
front
of
anyone's
building.
N
It
is
true
that
we
have
to
start
somewhere,
and
you
know
one
of
the
first
years
that
the
Ali
project
was
a
done
downtown.
It
wasn't
in
behind
my
building,
but
eventually
it
got
there,
and
one
thing
I
noticed
is
that
when
there
is
improvement,
it
starts
spreading
and
we
saw
that
with
the
Ali
projects.
N
The
public
money
that
went
into
the
alleys
was
multiplied
by
the
the
private
money
spent
as
it
spreads,
and
you
know,
but
we
had
to
cut
back
this
year
even
on
just
the
flowers
so
yeah
they
would
just
go
down
camp
and
part
of
the
way
down
camp.
But
that's
exactly
why
we're
here.
We
can't
do
it
for
nothing.
There
are
many
of
us
giving
our
time,
but
we
don't
have
any
staff
and
we're
one
of
the
few,
probably
one
of
the
few
boards
that
doesn't
exactly
fit
into
any
city
department.
N
That
would
automatically
provide
staff,
but
we,
you
know
we
need
to
get
back
to
where
we
have
some
funding
for
at
least
a
part-time
coordinator
in
and
I
think
that,
while
it's
really
important
that
the
city
as
a
whole
commit
to
downtown
vitalization,
and
so
the
huge
I
mean
the
main
working
or
is
when
we
get
to
some
of
these
projects
is
going
to
have
to
be
city
city
funds
generally,
not
just
the
tax
on
downtown,
but
I
do
think
it's
right.
Well,
it's
both.
It's
both
logical
and
I!
N
Think
morally
fair,
that
those
of
us
who
own
property
downtown
have
a
little
more
skin
in
the
game
and
in
a
0.375
or
whatever
assessment
is
really
very
little
asking
very
little
of
any
of
us.
I
hope
long-term
that
one
of
the
things
that
the
city
thinks
about
and
I
know
that
it's
that
it's
financially
tight.
N
But
a
suggestion
that
was
made
to
me
to
me
today
by
one
of
the
other
very
active
investors
downtown,
is
that
that
when
it
comes
to
large
expenditures
that
the
city
consider
fronting
the
money
and
then
making
special
assessments
so
that
people
can
see
what
they're
paying
for
and
honestly,
that's
I
think
how
we
got
sidewalks
in
Northeast,
South
Dakota
I
mean
in
Northeast
Watertown
was
that
sort
of
project?
So
you
know
this
is
really
this:
isn't
the
meat
and
potatoes
of
the
whole
downtown
revitalization?
N
This
is
their
most
kind
of
a
small
Bank
potato
chips,
but
we've
got
to
have
it
to
have
something
to
work
with
both
for
those
those
visible
things
that
that
do
help
in
the
short
term,
vitalize
energies,
downtown
things
like
the
flower
and
in
what
activities
we
can
create,
but
we
also
really
need
to
get
back
to
where
we
are
we're
routinely
adding
income
so
that
we
can
commit
to
some
some
long-term
things
that
we
simply
can't
do
with
zero
funds.
Thank
you
thank.
A
O
I
got
a
couple
questions.
First
of
all,
do
we
need
you
guys
own
property
in
Allentown?
Have
a
business
downtown
I,
don't
think
you
do,
and
so
it's
hard
for
you
to
feel
like
you're
being
penalized
for
being
downtown.
I
realized
that
the
I
like
downtown
Watertown,
it's
it's
a
beautiful
place,
but
it's
everybody's
place.
It's
just
not
the
business
of
us.
You
know,
so
my
feelings
are
if
they,
if
the
Main,
Street
or
urban
renewal
needs
money,
it
should
come
from
everybody,
not
just
penalize
a
few.
O
The
other
thing
is
it
just
it
just
doesn't
feel
right
to
to
be
penalized
for
being
downtown.
I
mean
I.
A
lot
of
our
businesses.
People
I
know
downtown,
can
can
go
anywhere
and
do
what
they
do.
We
don't
really
depend
on
walk
entry
and
a
lot
of
downtown
does
and
so
I
looked
up
urban
renewal,
I
googled
it
and
I
I
was
involved
with
this
when
mayor
Jensen
was
here
and
it
first
became
when
it
first
come
to
light.
O
Don't
think
that
we
all
got
our
own
buildings
to
take
care
of
I.
Take
care
of
my
building.
I,
keep
it
nice
I
got
flowers,
you
know,
I
got
grass
I'm.
Oh,
my
idea
is
if
the
people
like
Nancy,
wants
to
donate
or
have
their
own
deal
I'm
fine
with
that,
you
know,
I
mean
let
them
beat,
you
I
mean
let
them
have
their
their
organization,
but
why?
Why
do
we
got
to
pay
for
it?
O
I
I,
don't
make
you
know,
I'm
I,
don't
make
a
lot
of
money
like
a
lawyer
and
and
I
described
really
every
year
to
pay.
My
taxes,
I
struggle,
you
know
and
and
my
property
is
an
extra
thousand
dollars
under
two
properties.
I
have
and
that's
just
hard
for
me
to
come
up
with
so
I,
don't
know,
I,
just
I
think
you
guys
need
to
look
at
another
plan.
O
Making
water
tell
nice
and
stuff
but
I'm
just
not
I'm,
not
for
for
penalizing
or
taxing
just
a
few
individuals,
because
it's
no
different
than
somebody
comes
to
your
block
and
says
well
we're
going
to
form
this
organization
and
we're
gonna
raise
all
your
taxes.
So
we
can
do
something
around
this
block.
You
know
it's
it's
the
same
thing
you
guys
wouldn't
like
it
and
then
you
got
to
come
back
every
year
and
do
it.
O
A
O
P
To
bring
up
a
few
points,
even
though
I
I
mean
I,
served
on
the
urban
renewal
board
for
several
years,
I
believe
in
what
the
urban
renewal
board
is
about
and
what
it
was
should
be
working
for,
but
I
just
feel
like
we're
at
this
point
going
about
it
in
the
wrong
way
for
one
tonight.
It's
the
first
time,
my
first,
that
quote,
we
have
any
kind
of
a
plan.
Nobody
in
the
Uptown
it
bimbo
invited
at
least
that
I
know
up
to
a
meeting.
That's
the
third
share
with
us.
P
Some
of
the
things
we
see
a
picture
in
the
paper
that
says
they
want
to
put
a
skateboard
or
a
skating
park,
whatever
on
top
of
three
buildings
that
we
have
people
in
when
we
have
29
buildings
right
now
in
downtown.
What
would
be
the
core
12
black
urban
renewal
area,
29
of
them
that
are
currently
vacant?
And
when
you
don't
have
tenants
in
there
right
now
that
you're
collecting
rent
on?
How
can
you
afford
to
have
more
taxes
put
on
your
property?
P
For
that
reason,
I
guess
another
thing
that
I
I
think
that
we
are
being
shorted
on.
Is
the
urban
renewal
board
itself?
The
people
that
pay
in
are
the
property
owners,
not
the
business
owners,
even
though,
in
the
end,
the
business
owners
are
probably
going
to
be
asked
to
pay
more
rent
as
a
result
of
it.
But
yet
you
look
at
who
you
guys
have
appointed
to
that
committee
that
particular
board.
We
have
one
person
on
there
right
now
that
owns
property
in
the
uptown.
P
P
Therefore,
that
shows
me
that
we
have
increased
our
assessed
value,
that
we
have
on
all
the
properties
in
the
uptown,
but
yet
we
don't
get
to
collect
more
rent
if
I
mean
if
we
sat
there
and
raised
the
rents
on
our
building,
they'd
be
empty
because
there's
no
way
we
can
get
the
rents
in
in
the
urban
renewal
district
that
they
can
get
down
on
highway.
212
it
just
isn't
going
to
work.
P
P
That's
not
gonna
cover
hardly
a
dime
of
it,
even
the
scape
that
I
call
the
skate
park,
but
the
park
that
was
put
in
we're
scoot
shooters
is
there
is
no
way
that
I
mean
it
was
proposed
at
$900,000
is
what
the
paper
reported
well
look
at
how
many
years
that
would
collecting
taxes
from
the
property
owners
to
pay
for
that
and
we'd
be
knocking
down
three
properties,
two
of
which
have
businesses
in
them
to
be
able
to
take
that
so
I
guess,
I
I
think
we
are
kind
of
going
about
this.
The
wrong
way.
P
I
think
all
the
plans
should
be
put
in
place.
Meetings
should
be
held
with
all
of
the
property
owners
explained
how
this
money
is
going
to
be
spent,
including
how
the
city
is
going
to
put
in
money
towards
in
order
to
make
these
projects
go
and
then
go
from
there,
and
that
the
board
should
be
people
that
are
our
property
owners
within
the
district.
Thanks.
A
Thank
you
just
for
the
public's
benefit.
The
meetings
that
the
urban
renewal
board
holds
are
all
open
to
the
public
and
their
agendas
are
published
and
if
you
would
like
to
get
a
notification
of
and
of
the
meetings,
we
can
help
you
with
that.
You
can
get
a
text
message
or
you
can
get
an
email,
so
you're
notified
of
the
time
and
place
of
the
upcoming
meetings.
Q
Good
evening,
geyser
jeff
we've
talked
decimal
points,
and
you
know
from
my
past
conversations
with
you
that
I'm
pretty
black-and-white
I
don't
want
to
talk
about
right.
Now.
I
put
sixteen
thousand
dollars
out
of
my
pocket
into
the
serve
and
renewal
how
many
buildings
are
empty.
What
have
I
seen
change
I've
seen
the
color
of
the
flowers
change
that
doesn't
do
it.
Flowers
and
statues
do
not
do
it.
Q
It
looks
great
wonderful
between
my
city,
occupation,
tax
by
urban
renewal
and
my
property
tax,
since
I
bought
my
business
I've
spent
one
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars.
I
wish
that
was
in
my
retirement
property
owners
are
penalized
and
even
discriminated
against
for
having
buildings
in
Uptown
water
tone.
Fifteen
hundred
dollars
per
year
to
your
property
tax
is
a
huge
expense
and
there's
no
way
for
me
to
dispute
it
once
it's
been
put
in
place
because
the
way
the
system
is
set
up
is
the
herb
Marino
tax
comes
first.
Q
If
I
don't
pay
my
urban
renewal
tax
I,
don't
pay
my
property
tax.
If
I
don't
pay
my
property
tax,
my
license
that
I
need
to
operate.
My
business
is
exposed.
I
could
theoretically
be
put
out
of
business
by
not
paying
an
urban
renewal
tax.
To
me,
the
real
question
is:
what
type
of
businesses
will
succeed
financially
and
draw
support
from
the
community?
How
do
you
get
people
uptown?
You
have
to
have
a
draw.
Q
You
have
to
have
the
right
businesses
the
right
opportunities
for
those
folks
to
come
up
rather
than
go
to
the
Walmarts
of
the
world
where
Mon
passe.
We
need
to
find
out
what
is
the
niche
that
we
need
to
fill
I
have
yet
to
hear
anybody
tell
me
we
need
this
kind
of
business,
that
kind
of
business,
that
kind
of
business
to
bring
our
citizens
and
passwords
through
to
car,
Ocala
water,
dome,
I,
really
don't
think
and
strongly.
R
Yeah
jeff,
auto,
auto
repair'
I,
guess
I'd
like
to
start
out
by
you
as
property
owners
that
own
your
own
business.
So
how
you'd
feel
about
getting
taxed
on
your
property
and
then
getting
taxed
again?
It's
the
secondary
tax
I,
just
don't
think
it's
very
fair
at
all.
I've
probably
been
said
again
and
then
like
good.
As
other
people
have
said.
A
R
R
Let's
see
what
else
do
I
have
here,
I,
don't
know
like
out
like
a
park,
you
know
I,
don't
know
whose
that's
gonna
really
benefit
I
mean
as
far
as
the
adjacent
bar
or
something
that's
gonna,
be
by
there.
If
there's
a
band
playing,
you
know
they'll
benefit,
but
but
we
won't
see
anything
as
far
as
someone
driving
in
with
their
car
or
whatever
you
know,
because
we
I
think
he
uptown.
Businesses
have
changed.
I
know
Jeff
kind
of
said
that
but
years
ago
it
was
all
dependent
on
walk-in.
R
R
I
think
it
should
be
a
voluntary
tax
if
they
want
to
pay
and
I
just
say
lots
of
Venice's
businesses
won't
benefit
because
you're
just
helping
a
few
and
taxing
the
many
that's
what
I'm
thinking
you
know.
That's
kind
of
my
my
thoughts
on
it
so
and
it's
it's.
It
survived
for
five
years
with
with
no
funds
at
all
and
I
think
it
was
just
kind
of
a
fat
fluffy
cat
there
with
lots
of
money
in
it
and
we
like
to
not
feed
it
so
much
I,
guess
or
something.
Thank
you.
Thank.
E
S
My
name
is
Val
gronke
and
I
have
some
questions
about
this
tax.
What
type
of
businesses
are
there
downtown?
How
many
bars,
how
many
secondhand
stores,
how
many
shops,
how
many
are
serviced,
because
realistically
a
service
store
is
not
gonna
benefit
from
this
I,
don't
have
a
shop
there,
but
I'm
looking
as
a
consumer
and
as
a
consumer
I
don't
see
that
the
flowers
gather
pretty,
but
that
isn't
what
draws
me
downtown?
S
S
Let's
take
this
and
make
it
something
for
the
children,
because
you
need
to
have
everybody
come
downtown,
not
just
people
who
need
service,
not
just
women
and
not
just
men,
so
the
park
isn't
what's
gonna
do
it,
you
need
to
draw
the
children
you're
gonna
need
toys
and
you're
gonna
need
games.
I
think
that
one
thing
that
you
guys
got
downtown
is
absolutely
wonderful
for
a
community
mix
where
you
go
into
this
room
and
you've
got
an
hour
to
get
out
of
it.
Wonderful.
L
S
S
K
That
the
Urban
Renewal
board
has
invested
in
the
plan
that
is
there
today
granted
it's
not
fully
flushed
out,
but
we've
only
had
a
year
and
we
had
absolutely
no
funds,
but
we
have
pulled
in
every
favor
and
every
grant
that
we
possibly
could
working
for
the
downtown.
So
there
are
some
benefits
in
having
an
urban
renewal
board,
because
we
are
there
to
promote
your
property
and
try
it
the
best
we
can
and
I
agree
that
we
need
somebody
coordinated
and
say
that
all
these
amenities
are
downtown.
K
M
M
M
Just
today,
we
had
developers
from
Fargo
that
were
looking
at
some
projects
for
downtown
who
pay
taxes
in
Fargo
and
expect
services
out
of
those
taxes,
so
we're
also
working
on
which
we're
meeting
on
next
week,
because
some
new
plans
for
some
downtown
programs
as
well
that
could
tie
into
this
very
nicely
and
give
some
of
these
things
that
people
are
questioning
some
more
incentive
to
do
something
downtown.
So
just
looking
at
it
from
an
outsider's
perspective,
a
lot
of
good
bones
in
downtown
a
lot
of
opportunity.
M
I
think,
there's
a
reason.
There's
some
vacant
buildings
and
I
think
the
programs
we're
going
to
propose
will
help
start
changing
the
direction
of
that
so
I,
don't
nobody
likes
new
taxes,
but
I
think
there
is
a
nice
opportunity
to
get
the
momentum
switched
and
start
the
revitalization
of
downtown.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
F
H
Question
of
those
here
just
so
that
I
have
a
visual
I,
know,
we've
heard
from
several
of
you,
but
raise
your
hand
if
you
are
against
the
tax
at
this
point
as
we
sit
here
today.
Just
so,
we
have
a
visual
okay
and
please
raise
your
hand
if
you
are
for
its
this.
We
have
some
idea
of
who
is
here:
okay,.
A
Some
for
and
against
and
I
I
heard
the
comment
made
that
it's
the
downtown
is
everybody's
downtown
and
I
could
not
agree
with
you
more
about
that.
I
think
that
the
downtown
is
an
extremely
important
part
of
our
community
and
we
need
to
keep
it
alive
and
we
need
to
make
investments
and
and
I
could
see.
A
E
A
They
came
to
do
something
else
and
that's
how
it
happens.
We
we
we
have
to
take
care
of
our
community
if
we
want
it
to
thrive,
and
this
is
one
way
that
we
do
it.
We
do
assessment
projects,
oh
I
mean
we.
We
improve
our
roads
that
way
too
down
to
the
lake
in
pesco
water
project,
district
taxes,
its
members
for
improvements
that
are
good
for
our
entire
community,
not.
N
A
Those
who
pay
the
tax
so
I
see
it
as
kind
of
an
indication
of
community
pride
and
optimism
about
what
we
can
do
and
how
we
can
improve
our
community
and
I'm
looking
forward,
whether
it's
through
assessment
dollars
or
just
city
investment,
and
seeing
some
things
happening
downtown
in
the
future.
Are
there
any
other
comments?
Councillor
Lapworth,
okay,.
H
Well,
I
am
not
a
property
owner
downtown,
but
I
personally
am
a
strong
believer
in
a
strong,
uptown
or
downtown
I
I
I
have
the
opportunity
to
travel
a
lot
throughout
South,
Dakota
and
neighboring
states,
as
well
as
the
other
parts
of
the
country
and
and
inevitably
a
lot
of
those
communities.
Most
of
those
communities
have
had
a
revitalization
of
their
their
older
uptown
downtown
area
and,
speaking
on
our
behalf,
those
are
the
areas
that
we
go
to
we
enjoy
going
to
them.
We
really
do
the
question
then
becomes.
How
do
we
do
this?
H
That's
really
what
the
question
is
in
my
mind
when
I
spoke
to
individuals
now
over
the
last
couple
days
that
had
been
in
opposition
of
this
and
I've
I've
heard
their
concerns
and
I
got
to
say
that
I
agree
with
them.
I
I,
don't
like
the
idea
of
being
taxed
or
taxing
somebody
without
knowing
very
specifically
in
this
case
where
those
dollars
are
coming,
where
those
dollars
are
going
to
be
used
specifically.
H
Somebody
brought
it
up
to
me
today
and
I.
Guess:
I've
never
thought
about
it.
He
says
you
know
the
more
money
that
I
invest
in
my
building
in
my
property,
the
more
tax
I
got
to
pay,
not
just
on
your
property
taxes,
but
on
the
urban
renewal
tax.
He
said
so
I
invest
in
my
business
and
it's
helping
and
my
money's
going
to
somebody
else's
business,
and
you
know
so.
One
of
my
questions
is
I
know
that
urban
rural
districts
are
allowed
by
state
statute.
H
F
H
We've
got
a
wipe
the
slate
clean
and
we
have
got
to
regroup,
to
determine
whether
the
urban
renewal
district
and
what
it
is
is
a
useful
tool
for
us
here
in
Watertown
I've
had
some
people
that
that
have
showed
me
their
business
and
they
said
explain
to
me
how
I
benefit
from
this.
Why
am
I
in
the
urban
renewal
district
I
can't
answer
that
question
because
I
don't
know
how
the
urban
renewal
district
boundaries
ever
was
originated.
H
But
if
I
was
some
of
these
people
that
have
talked
to
me,
I
would
look
at
it
and
say
my
answer
to
them
is
I
really
don't
know
how
you're
gonna
benefit
because
they're
it's
either
their
type
of
their
business
or
it's
their
location
that
isn't
going
to
benefit
from
some
of
the
things
that
we've
talked
about.
So
okay,
you
brought
up
about
having
public
meetings
and
I
think
they
have
to
be
Vanessa.
I.
Commend
you
guys
for
all
the
work
that
you're
doing.
It's
not
easy.
H
You
got
to
feel
like
you're,
pushing
a
rope
up
a
hill,
but
I
think
we've
got
a
regroup
and
we've
got
to
do
it
together
and
I
think
some
type
of
community
meetings
that
are
outside
of
the
normal
orbán
renewal
district
board
meetings.
Similarly
to
what
we
did
when
for
all
the
time,
all
the
meetings
we
had
publicly
with
when
we
were
gonna
try
to
determine
what
our
building
was
going
to
be
for
the
Wellness
facility.
It
was
an
invite.
H
T
T
We
had
the
tax
at
one
time
and
then
we
felt
like
a
lot
of
people
are
really
unhappy
because,
as
Mike
said,
a
lot
of
people
didn't
know
how
they're
being
served
personally
I
think
the
mayor
has
hit
on
the
what
I
believe
and
that's
at
and
I
can't
imagine
you
could
ever
make
a
district
out
of
Watertown
but
I
believe
I
should
pay
to
go
downtown
to
be
in
the
Uptown
renewal
process
myself.
Now,
of
course,
somebody
can
say
well
then
go
give
them
some
money,
but
I,
don't
think
that's
the
point.
T
I
think
we
all
should
point
I
think
we
should
all
pay
0.375
then
to
bring
renewal
to
our
community.
This
is
everybody
will
say,
the
downtown
is
uptown
as
part
of
the
community,
but
I
don't
know
if
taxing
a
few
when
all
the
rest
of
us
and
get
a
chance
to
go
use.
It
is
really
the
answer.
I
don't
really
want
to
put
this
off,
but
I
think
community
meetings
to
see
how
we
could
do
that,
and
so
we
would
all
be
a
part
of
it.
T
I
think
we're
all
a
part
of
the
community
center
I
think
we're
all
going
to
be
a
part
of
the
softball
fields,
but
the
charettes
was
a
great
stepping
stone
there
and
I.
Don't
think
we
need
to
I.
Don't
think
we
dare
forget
that
downtown
uptown
was
a
major
area.
I
think
we
all
need
to
figure
out
how
we
can
pay
for
it
and
not
just
a
few
of
our
patrons,
because
there
are
arguments
all
over
for
people
that
have
I've
had
several
people
with
empty
buildings.
T
Tell
me
if
I
can't,
rent
out
my
building
and
now
I'm
going
to
come
back
with
the
tax
on
it
and
I
could
argue.
Well,
let's
get
this
person
in
to
help
help
fill
the
buildings,
but
isn't
it
all
of
our
jobs
to
do
that
and
I
I
would
like
to
see
this
not
past
tonight,
but
come
back
and
in
the
city's
lap
and
and
have
us
do
something,
just
as
the
mayor
suggested.
B
A
couple
of
comments,
III
agree
with
you
and
I
think
it's
something
that
that
we
as
a
community
should
all
bear
the
cost
on
whether
it's
working
to
the
budget
or
somehow
us
being
assessed
but
I.
Think
too
it's
something
that
that
we
as
a
community
all
bear
that
should
bear
the
cost
on
I
I
applaud
the
effort,
the
urban
duel
board,
I
guess
I
I
definitely
want
to
see
better
communication,
whether
it's
community
meetings
or
you
know
your
urban
rural
board
meetings
more
input
there,
because
it
is
a
thankless
job.
I
mean
I.
B
What
you
folks
are
going
through
I
applaud
that,
but
it's,
but
it's
tough
when
you
don't
get
any
feedback
until
a
meeting
like
this
comes
up
on
us,
also
I,
guess
what
concern
is
if
we
were
to
pass
this
and
we
hire
someone
to
bring
them
on
board.
We're
gonna
have
to
go
through
this
every
year
and
that
position
is
going
to
be
the
whims
of
the
council
each
year.
That
well
I
sure
wouldn't
want
to
be
in
that
person's
shoes.
B
If
I
knew
what
depended
upon
ten
people's
decisions
here
every
year
to
make,
that
decision
so
I
think
it's
something
that
we
as
a
community
need
to
support,
but
I've
got
enough
feedback
from
from
people
prior
to
this
meeting.
You
know
a
lot
of
you
made
your
your
points
loud
and
clear
tonight
to
that
I
support
the
concept.
The
idea,
but
but
I
can
support
this
tax
being
assessed
on
you
know
a
relatively
few
and
a
number
of
people
in
the
downtown
area.
B
D
I
just
got
a
couple
points
to
make
here:
I've
sat
on
that
board
before
for
quite
a
few
years.
This
the
dollar
amount
that
you
guys
are
talking
about.
It
really
is
a
drop
in
the
bucket
compared
to
the
amount
of
work
that
needs
to
be
done
to
the
downtown
area.
When
the
alley
project
went
through,
it
was
a
huge
dollar
amount
and
a
combination
between
the
city
utilities.
D
Everyone
got
together
because
they
read
it,
they
redid
plumbing,
they
redid
the
electrical
I
mean
it
was
a
huge
change
and
you
see
some
of
the
buildings
that
are
around
there
afterwards.
So
what
Nancy
has
said
about
you
know
once
it
gets
cleaned
up,
you
know
the
rest
of
the
buildings
around.
It
tend
to
do
the
same
thing.
D
You
know
as
far
as
parking
there's
like
nine
parking
lots
in
the
downtown
area.
They're
not
always
well
marked,
but
there
are
nine
public
parking
lots.
Sometimes
they
seem
like
they're,
private,
but
they're
public
and
I
don't
disagree
with
it.
I
owned
a
building
uptown
for
six
years.
It's
it's
never
fun
to
pay
any
taxes.
D
D
There
are
areas
of
concern
with
that
with
our
downtown
and
empty
buildings
lack
of
businesses
in
there,
it's
not
up
to
the
city
to
bring
businesses
in
at
the
same
time,
we
have
to
make
it
where
people
want
to
come
to
our
downtown
area.
So
it
is,
it
is
a
less
expensive
route
to
get
into
a
business
or
building
than
going
on
the
highway
or
going
on
to
the
major
thoroughfares.
You
also
lose.
You
know
the
amount
of
traffic
that
goes
by
so
there
are
some
trade-offs
to
it.
D
So
I
think
we
have
to
realize
that
there
are
positives.
There
are
negatives
to
both
of
those.
Now
how
we
go
about
doing
it,
you
know
we've
done
the
Charette,
which
was
open
to
the
public.
I
know
there
was
a
lot
of
people
that
came
to
it.
The
streetscape
has
been
done.
There's
a
plan,
that's
in
place.
Is
it
thoroughly?
You
know
fully
thought
through?
No,
it's
a
working,
it's
a
working
document.
However,
you
want
look
at
it,
so
we
have
to
look
at
that.
Make
a
plan
figure
out.
D
You
know
top
priorities
and
then
how
do
we
go
forward
with
that?
Whether
that's
a
partnership
between
urban
renewal
district
and
the
city
or
the
city
takes
it
on
and
I'm?
Okay
with
that,
whatever
we
plan,
we
have
to
go
with
it.
So
just
just
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
go
through
budgets
and
we
go
through
things
like
that
and
we're
talking
about
constantly
cutting
the
budget.
If
we
want
to
have
these
things
done,
we
need
to
come
up
with
the
money
one
way
or
another.
D
Now
whether
that's
everyone
gets
assessed
more
or
we
have
additional
taxes
that
go
into
it.
There
are
all
repercussions
for
I
mean
it
all
sounds
great
when
we
say
that
you
know,
I
need
to
pay
part
of
that
as
well
and
I'm.
Okay
with
that,
but
just
remember
when
tax
time
comes,
we're
all
we're
all
paying.
You
know
that
so
just
want
to
make
sure
everyone's
aware
of
that
those
are
my
two
cents.
Thank.
A
S
D
A
Misinterpreting
it
I
mean
we,
we
do
put
a
lot
of
money
into
marketing.
We
put
a
lot,
we
put
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
into
drawing
businesses
to
Watertown
that's
every
year.
We
do
do
that.
That
is
our
job.
They
approved
it
in
the
budget
has
an
individual,
though
we
cannot
say
where
it
whether
a
business
goes
in
or
not.
That's,
not
our
no.
D
Let
me
let
me
make
the
comment:
I
cannot
make
someone
come
to
town.
That
is
not
my
job
as
as
a
councilmember.
My
job
isn't
to
get
somebody
to
move
into
that
business
I'm,
not
seeing
that
we
don't
want
businesses
to
come
to
town
I'm,
just
saying
that
we're
not
fully
responsible
for
businesses
coming
here.
They
there's
a
partnership,
it
has
to
be
done.
We
have
a
convention
or
some
Visitors
Bureau.
We
have
development
company.
A
E
J
All
I
wanted
I
just
wanted
to
say,
I
think
I
agree
with
that.
There
are
businesses
that
would
not
benefit
near
as
much
as
others
would,
with
this
tax.
I
do
think
it's
unfair
from
that
standpoint.
I
I
did
time
as
well
on
the
urban
renewal
Lord
some
years
ago,
me
rephrase
that
I
served
on
the
board,
but
what
was
I
know
I.
J
Don't
have
anybody
to
misinterpret
that,
but
I
will
say
that
what
I
do
recall
when
I
did
we
had
a
director
that
was
a
part-time
director,
and
that
is
where
we
got
our
continuity.
That's
where
we
had
somebody
that
was
looking
after
this
week
after
week.
That
was
keeping
everybody
on
task
that
was
trying
to
get
to
raise
funds
work
with
the
building
facades
that
that
you
know
negotiated
and
worked
with
all
of
the
people
involved.
With
that
whole
process
and
the
board
members
that
went
away
and
I
think
that
was
a
mistake.
J
J
We
need
to
take
it
on
as
a
greater
responsibility
of
the
city
overall
in
how
we
approach
this
and
how
we
fund
it,
because
I
think
I,
don't
think
anyone
would
disagree
on
this
then,
on
this
council
that
we
want
to
focus
on
this,
we
do
want
to
improve
opportunities
in
our
downtown
district,
and
so
I
personally
ad
would
not
support
this
tax.
I,
don't
think
it's
right.
Somebody
said
taxation
without
representation.
J
I
think
it
kind
of
is
a
little
bit,
because
a
lot
of
folks
would
benefit
from
these
activities
more
so
than
others
would
buy
quite
a
bit
and
again
the
other
option.
The
other
part
of
this,
the
the
other
component
of
this
is
that
there
are
a
lot
of
folks
out
there
who
own
these
businesses,
but
they
don't
run.
They
don't
have,
and
they've
got
vacant
buildings
that
have
value
to
them,
but
they're
being
taxed
on
that.
So
I
don't
think
it's
the
right
thing
to
go
in
that
direction.
J
A
R
A
A
J
We
did
before
and
I'll
just
point
this
out
for
some
of
the
folks
that
don't
know
this,
we
had
a
part-time
person
and
and
to
me
it
worked
out
great
I
thought
that
was
enough,
but
you
gotta
have
somebody
running
the
show
and
you
got
to
have
somebody
stand
on
top
of
things
and
that's
that's
where
I
think
we
need
to
go
so
we
keep
moving
forward.
Instead
of
just
we
stop,
nothing
happens,
we
did
the
Charette
and
we
lost
a
lot
of
of
our
our
forward
movement
with
this
whole
project.
So.
D
P
That
part-time
position
was
a
shared
position
between
the
Watertown
Business
Association
and
the
urban
renewal
board,
I
helped
to
plan
promotions
and
they
helped
to
keep
the
communication
of
the
landlord
with
people
that
are
looking
for
places
in
there,
and
you
know
there
again,
I'm
gonna,
say
on
behalf
of
the
WBA.
We
are
more
than
willing
to
sit
down
and
try
to
work
out
something,
so
we
could
have
somebody
in
place
that
would
work
on
both
ends.
Okay,.
A
E
A
H
American
ask
one
question
on
the
topic
again
and
I:
don't
know
who
said
it,
but
maybe
Vanessa
did
maybe
I.
Think
the
the
urban
renewal
Board
or
the
district
has
some
type
of
ongoing
maintenance
obligation.
Is
that
correct
uptown?
Is
that
the?
What
is
that
involve
in
us
and
what
kind
of
dollars
is
that?
Just
for
that?
Just
for
that
purpose
of
they
have
not
some
funk.
Some
financial
obligation
right.
K
You
guys
we're
gonna
pay
for
the
flowers
we
went
from
16,000
to
2500.
So
that's
my
concern
with
the
assessment
not
going
through
is
that
it
went
to
a
later
date
and
I
would
encourage
you
all
to
show
up
again
when
we
talk
about
how
we're
going
to
fund
downtown
projects
as
a
group,
but
the
follow-through
wasn't
there
and
we
had
shortages.
K
K
H
The
city's
covering
any
expenses
that
you
did
have
because
I
think
there
was
something
with
the
restroom
public
restroom
and
something
else
right.
Yes
and
we're
covering
that
so
setting
aside
projects,
you
don't
have
any
ongoing
financial
requirement
of
you.
Is
that
correct?
No?
Okay!
That's
thank
you.
Okay,.
A
A
U
U
Thank
You
mayor,
so
this
goes
back
to
us.
We
formed
subcommittees
and
we
were
working
to
clean
up
our
sign
code
as
far
as
the
exempt
signage
and
the
temporary
signage
were
concerned,
so
the
exempt
signage.
Now
we
brought
it
into
compliance
as
far
as
being
regulated
by
content
neutrality
and
then
the
temporary
signage.
A
S
S
Nor
would
my
customers
be
able
to
get
their
stuff
in
and
out
so
we
we're
told
we
were
allowed
to
move
it
over
to
a
corner
which
would
be
in
front
of
my
office,
but
that
happens
to
be
right
where
my
drop
box
is
where
everybody
would
drop
the
money
and
stuff
like
that
when
nobody's
at
the
facility,
so
that
eliminates
them
from
an
evening
drop
to
move
it
over.
At
the
other
end,
we
have
a
business
over
there
that
rents
that
whole
particular
spot.
S
So
we
can't
put
it
there
because
then
he
can't
get
traffic
in
and
out
of
the
doorways,
and
they
have
big
overhead
doors
to
drive
trucks
and
stuff
like
that
in
so
our
biggest
concern
was
to
say:
okay,
we
have
a
sign
that
is
grandfathered
in,
and
we
just
want
to
add
to
that.
Sign
and
they're
saying
no.
We
can't
do
that.
S
I
think
that
as
a
person
that
owns
the
business,
that
my
boss
would
feel
that
this
would
solve
his
dilemma
by
being
able
to
add
on
to
his
sign
that
has
been
denied,
and
we
would
like
to
make
sure
that
everybody
is
aware
that
it's
not
that
we're
asking
to
put
a
whole
new
sign
up
in
that
area.
We
just
want
to
add
to
it.
S
U
U
A
G
A
H
H
A
A
A
H
H
J
U
A
This
is
just
one
part
of
it:
it's
it's
a
big
hairy
issue,
lots
of
facets
to
it
and
the
Supreme
Court
was
very
clear
on
this
part
of
it
not
so
much
with
other
parts
of
the
code,
for
whatever
reason,
I,
don't
know.
Why
any
other
comments,
all
right,
I'll
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Brandy,.
P
A
Next
item
is
number
8.
Second
reading
of
ordinance
number
18
16
amending
section,
21
point
o
201
regarding
membership
requirements
of
the
plan
Commission,
so
I
will
look
for
a
motion
second
for
approval
and
then
we'll
do
discussion
move
by
Councilman
Y
second,
by
Councilman,
ville
how're
Heath.
Do
you
want
to
talk
about
this.
U
This
will
allow
for
one
member
or
and
Board
of
Adjustment
member
to
be
to
live
within
the
joint
jurisdiction
area,
which
is
a
three
mile
radius
around
city
limits,
and
then
also
it
will
allow
for
two
alternatives
to
the
plan
commission,
which
is
consistent
with
how
the
Board
of
Adjustment
is
arranged.
Currently.
A
H
Mayor
I
understand
the
basis
for
this
no
I'm,
not
talking
about
the
two
alternates
I'm
talking
about
having
the
representation
from
outside
the
city.
We
have
city
boundaries
for
a
reason
we
have
County,
we
have
city,
we
have
municipal
or
townships
and
there's
a
reason
for
that.
The
decisions
that
are
often
made
at
these
levels
involve
city
proper
within
our
city
limits
and
I.
Think
the
people
that
are
on
those
boards
in
representing
them,
especially
in
this
case
I,
think,
should
be
it
must
be
within
the
city
limits.
H
A
I
respect
your
opinion,
but
I
I
will
point
out
that
we
that
these
boards
do
weigh
in
on
issues
in
the
fringe
area
that
we're
talking
about
expanding
this
too,
and
it's
up
to
the
mayor
to
appoint
members.
It's
there's
no
requirement
to
appoint
someone.
It
gives
us
the
ability
to
appoint
someone
who
represents
that
area
which
would
have
no
representation.
A
Otherwise,
and
this
is
something
other
communities
do
and
I
I,
don't
think
it's
a
bad
idea.
I.
It
gives
me
the
flexibility
and
you
as
the
consul
to
confirm
those
appointments
to
have
half
that
area
outside
the
city
limits,
but
within
our
joint
jurisdiction
to
be
represented,
because
that
Plan
Commission
does
make
calls
on
we.
You
know
we
review
Platts
in
that
area
and
we
look
at
subdivisions
its
issues
that
affect
that
area.
H
A
H
Me
then
one
person
from
out
there
isn't
the
solution.
The
solution
is
a
joint
jurisdictional
structure
that
we
already
have
I
most
of
the
issues
that
we
deal
with
deal
with
in
already
with
our
within
city,
the
city
limits
of
Watertown
and
I.
Don't
understand
why,
for
those
issues
we
would
have
somebody
that
is
not
a
Watertown
resident
city
of
Watertown
resident,
albeit
they're,
a
community
member
but
I
believe
that
that
is
the
intent
of
that
board
and
I
think
that
the
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city-
that's
what
it
should
be.
H
H
We
should
not
be
expanding
our
board,
composition
unnecessarily
and
I.
Think
that's
what
we're
doing
I
think
we're
accommodating
here.
That's
what
it
feels
like
in
my
opinion,
I
understand,
others
may
do
it
I'm,
just
looking
at
it
from
a
Watertown
standpoint
from
my
view
and
I'm
thinking,
it
seems
unnecessary.
We
already
have
a
structure
that,
if
there's
any
issues
to
address
it,
that's
the
joint
jurisdictional
body
that
that
exists.
That's
already
been
defined
and
my
recommendation
would
be
that
we
hold
to
the
current
requirement.
It's
just
where
I'm
at
all.
B
Deals
with
both
the
Planning
Commission
and
Board
of
Adjustment
I
mean
the
ordinance
that
we've
got
in
front
of
us.
Just
refers
to
Planning
Commission
I
realize
they're
one
and
the
same
groove
for
the
most
part,
but
I
mean.
Are
we
including
I
mean
those
are
ordinance,
include
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
A
B
A
And
we
don't
have
to
have.
This
does
not
require
reiterate
that
this
gives
us
the
option
and
the
council.
If
the
mayor
tries
to
appoint
someone,
that's
in
the
joint
jurisdiction
area
and
the
council
doesn't
think
that's
appropriate.
They
would
have
the
ability
not
to
confirm
that
member
and
actually
I'm
looking
at
doing
this
for
the
airport
board
as
well.
I
think
these
are
it's
good
to
loosen
it
up,
and
but
you.
H
A
C
H
Again,
I
look
at
it.
We
already
have
a
structure
to
deal
with
this,
that's
where
I'm
coming
from
so
we
have
boundaries
for
a
reason.
If
we
don't
have
boundaries
and
we
don't
have
governmental
structures,
then
get
rid
of
them.
Let's
just
have
one.
We
do
have
a
reason
for
our
boundaries
and
that's
where
I'm
coming
from
I
think.
U
There
could
be
value
to
it
with
it
being
within
the
joint
jurisdiction.
Having
that
one
spokesperson
as
far
as
our
comp
plan
and
what
we
see
is
developing
next
and
annexations
and
zoning
and
maybe
having
a
voice
for
where
they
might
be
at
on
a
certain
situation,
a
lot
of
the
times
they
are
petitioning
to
annex
--an
zone.
But
sometimes
there
are
I
mean
forced
annexation,
don't
happen,
but
that
would
be
maybe
it's
yeah,
but.
H
Brandy,
they're
gonna
be
dealing
with
issues
that
are
throughout
our
city.
They
aren't
going
to
only
deal
with
issues
that
are
in
the
the
joint
jurisdictional
area.
If
that's
what
the
case
was,
they
could
have
a
a
vote
or
a
say
in
that
area:
go
for
it,
but
they're
gonna
they're
gonna
sit
on
the
Planning
Commission,
a
Board
of
adjustments
for
somebody
that
wants
a
variance
on
a
garage
in
town
or
they
want
something
over
here
in
Times,
nothing
to
do
with
the
joint
jurisdictional
area,
but.
A
J
U
J
I
mean
I
I,
just
on
the
on
the
side
of
the
mayor
on
this
one
I
think
the
fact
that
we've
got
somebody
from
that
that
part
of
our
of
the
county,
that's
in
proximity
to
the
city,
they're
going
to
be
more
involved
in
week
to
week
with,
what's
going
on
so
I
think
that
from
that
standpoint,
that
could
be
a
benefit
to
us.
I
think.
A
A
E
C
A
G
Thank
you.
This
is
the
first
reading,
so
no
action
on
this
one
tonight
I
won't
go
into
too
much
detail
because
I
think
we've
been
through
the
budget
for
quite
a
few
hours
here.
So
the
ordinance
that
you
do
see
before
you
did
that
has
all
of
the
changes
that
were
made
during
those
budget
hearings.
So
just
so
you're
aware
everything
that
was
discussed
and
had
a
motion
is
now
into
the
ordinance.
G
There
was
three
items
that
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
were
kind
of
very
minor,
but
they
weren't
discussed
on
that
count
at
the
budget
hearings,
but
they
do
need
to
be
put
into
the
ordinance.
There
was
a
formula
error
in
the
City
Hall
expenditure.
It
just
didn't,
carry
down,
it
was
$320,
so
it's
not
a
large
amount,
but
I
wanted
everybody
to
be
aware.
I
also
did
put
in
DD
at
the
library
had
contacted
me
that
the
library
board
had
made
the
motion
to
put
in
the
$25,000
into
the
library
fines
fund.
G
So
I
did
increase
the
library
fines
fund
budget
with
the
library
board's
approval
of
that,
and
then
the
only
other
change
that
I
did
make
is
I
increased
the
the
Geo
bond
revenue
by
$4,000,
and
that
was
just
on
the
revenue
side
so
and
that'll
be
that's
that
part
of
the
tax
that
is
on
the
ordinance
so
other
than
that.
There
was
no
changes.
If
there's
any
questions,
but
this
will
be
the
first
reading
and
then
the
second
reading
it'll
be
at
the
next
meeting
and
then
it'll
go
into
effect
for
2019
any.
B
And
I
have
had
this
conversation
before
but
and
I
I
can't
reference
the
page,
but
it's
a
page
where
we
come
to
our
total
appropriations
and
then
capital
outlay,
accumulations
and
total
appropriations
capital
accumulations.
You
know
where
I'm
at
okay.
Will
you
explain
to
us
briefly
what
the
capital
outlay
accumulations
at
1231
18?
That's
significant
number.
What
can
you
explain
to
us?
What
what
that
is?
I.
G
Can't
explain
that,
okay,
so
when
we
had
our
last
meeting
on
I
think
it
was
a
30th
and
we
talked
about
our
capital
improvement,
our
long-term
plan.
The
reason
that
that
is
important
is
because
what
that
does
is
it
establishes
those
big
projects
that
we're
gonna
do
what
we
do
is
we
go
back
and
then
for
five
years
we
kind
of
lay
out
those
projects,
and
then
we
slowly
are
accumulating
those
dollars
to
be
set
aside.
G
G
A
H
Kristin,
if
I
I
understand
this
correctly,
so
the
work
we
did
on
the
longer-term
CIP
is
what
you're
referring
to
is
a
set-aside
of
dollars
and
accumulation
of
dollars
towards
that?
What
happens
when,
let's
say
a
fairly
large
number
that
has
accounted
for
within
that
either
gets
kicked
out,
never
done
or
moved
out.
G
Because
of
the
way
that
we
do
it,
it's
kind
of
a
rolling
amount.
So
if
the
project
would
go
away,
then
it
would
come
off.
Its
I
have
kind
of
a
whole
spreadsheet
where
the
first
year
and
then
the
second
year,
the
dollars
are
kind
of
accumulated
for
a
longer
period
of
time.
If
the
project
goes
away,
then
that
would
obviously
change
the
money
that's
set
aside,
so
it
doesn't
stay
in
place
if
the
project's
change
they
shift
and
the
dollar
shift
as
well.
G
A
Other
comments
or
questions
all
right,
Thank
You,
Kristen
item
number
ten
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
18
18
amending
chapter
2.01
regarding
day
and
time,
restrictions
on
the
sale
of
alcoholic
beverages.
This
again,
this
is
another
first
reading
Matt.
You
want
to
explain
this
a
little
bit.
Yes,.
F
I
can
do
that
thanks
mayor.
This
follows
from
our
discussion
last
week
or
the
last
previous
council
meeting
at
the
excuse
me
previous
committee
meeting,
where
we
discussed
that
the
state,
as
of
July
1st
this
year,
basically
reversed
the
way
they
allow
for
days
and
times
of
consuming
and
selling
alcohol.
Excuse
me
selling
liquor.
So
previously
the
state
said
that
every
day
except
the
alcohol
sales,
like
excuse
me,
liquor,
sales
were
allowed
every
day
except
Morial,
day,
Sundays
and
Christmas
unless
the
city
allow
it
specifically
allowed
for
it.
F
F
As
of
July
1st,
they
basically
reversed
that,
where
now
it's
allowed
every
day
of
the
year,
unless
we
decide
to
restrict
it,
and
so
what
this
ordinance
will
do,
essentially
at
all
it'll
get
rid
of
the
Memorial
Day
reference
in
our
ordinance,
because
that
falls
in
line
with
what
we
had
been
doing
previously.
The
state
will
just
allow
for
those
sales
on
Memorial
Day.
It
will
expand
the
hours
of
operation
on
Sundays
from
you
can
sell
now,
previous
to
seventies,
me
previous
to
eleven
o'clock
and
after
12
p.m.
excuse
me,
12
a.m.
F
so
basically
from
7
a.m.
to
12
hour
2
a.m.
on
Sundays.
Now
one
thing
that
Kristen
pointed
out
which
I
was
not
aware
of,
as
we
were
going
through.
This,
was
that
it's
not
spelled
out
in
ordinance,
but
council
a
few
years
ago
did
require
that
Sunday
sales
be
obtained,
a
$200
license,
which
I
was
not
aware
of
cuz,
it's
not
spelled
out
in
ordinance,
but
it
was
done
by
an
accounting
action,
and
so
this
would
the
way
this
is
worded
right
now.
Get
rid
of
that
requirement.
F
A
E
V
Yeah
I
can
generally
talk
about
this
course
Brandis
here
as
well
for
specific
questions,
but
we
have
this
first
reading
for
the
rezoning
of
the
next
phase
of
the
Eastwood's
addition
and
it
would
be
rezone
to
r1
single-family
residential.
We
have
worked
with
the
developer
and
review
of
their
their
zoning
information
and
also
their
parkland
dedication
that
went
to
the
parks
board
last
week
and
brandy
was
at
that
meeting.
V
U
E
E
U
U
B
M
B
U
V
U
E
A
X
X
H
X
A
A
You
item
13,
is
consideration
of
the
recommendation
by
the
airport
board
to
select
meet
and
hunt
architects
for
professional
services
for
the
design
and
construction
of
Watertown
airport
terminal
building
and
I'll.
Look
for
a
motion,
second
for
approval
by
Y.
Second,
by
law
and
I,
see
Todd
sires
here
to
tell
us
about
this
good.
Y
Evening
we
had
with
three
architectural
firms
put
in
for
the
selection,
TSP
meat
hunt
and
JLG.
We
hit
a
team
for
the
rubric,
actually
a
Colin
Paulson,
Heath,
Vaughn
I,
don
Roby
and
myself,
as
the
mayor
was
out
of
town.
Unfortunately,
she
couldn't
get
involved
with
this
one,
but,
but
hopefully
she'll
be
involved
after
this,
but
a
total
score
of
880
points
and
Heath
can
maybe
explain
more
about
a
rubric
than
I
can.
Y
V
This
is
kind
of
a
hand-me-down
requirement,
so
to
speak
as
far
as
being
qualification,
based
only
so
why
the
reason
that
somewhat
new
is
that
locally,
we
would
typically
look
at
a
fee
in
association
with
these
proposals.
We
were
not
able
to
do
that
in
this
case.
This
is
a
fee
neutral
qualification
based
selection
of
the
architect,
and
so
that
we
do
have
a
rubric
to
assess
those
qualifications,
and
that's
the
scoring
that
Todd
mentioned
that
we
went
through
as
a
panel.
V
It's
a
max
220
points
per
person.
That's
how
he
gets
the
880
times
the
four
panel
members
that
were
part
of
this
selection
process
and
through
that
meeting
and
discussions
and
the
scoring
we
came
up
with
the
meat
hunt
scoring
the
highest
based
on
his
qualifications
and
the
rubric
that
was
provided
in
part
through
the
federal
program
as
well.
In
South
Dakota,
the
OT,
a.
Y
A
B
Y
I
can
maybe
explain
the
process
a
little
farther.
This
is
the
first
process
we
need
to
as
you
as
a
group
in
the
city
of
Watertown
need
to
select
an
engineering
firm.
The
next
step
in
this
process
will
be
the
actual
fee
based
structure,
and
we
will
bring
that
back
to
you
and
the
actual.
The
federal
government
has
to
accept
that
fee
as
well.
A
E
H
So
what
does
this
mean
in
regards
to?
What
are
we
actually
going
to
get
they're
gonna?
Actually
design
assuming
their
fee
is
except
that
they're
actually
going
to
design
a
Airport
terminal
for
us
correct,
and
even
though
today
we
don't
know
that
I'm
aware
of
that,
we
actually
have
funding
for
this
Airport
terminal.
Y
Correct
to
the
federal
government
has
it
on
their
CIP,
and
this
is
work
is
really
confusing,
as
I
have
a
federal
government
CIP
and
then
the
city's
CIP
we
had
last
week
for
long
term.
The
federal
government
pretty
much
locks
up
five
years
out
we're
into
21
22
and
23
right
now
for
terminal
design
and
then
construct
22
23.
So
the
federal
government
does
have
this
on
the
radar
and
they
are
finding
federal
funding
for
this.
Y
But
if
they,
if
something
were
to
happen-
or
they
could
not
find
federal
funding
for
this,
we
would
not
do
this
project,
but
up
until
that
point
anything
that
we've
done
so
far,
such
as
this
1
billion
dollar
supplemental
program
that
we're
gonna
try
and
go
for
October
31st
is
our
deadline
to
get
that
in.
We
have
to
have
all
these
steps
in
place
and
anything
we
do
is
reimbursable
later
on
we'll
just
tie
it
to
another
product.
H
Okay,
that's
I
was
wondering
so
if
we
get
if
we're
on
their
list
and
funds
are
expended,
do
first
of
all,
do
we
pay
those
then
get
reimbursed
correct
okay,
and
so
that's
an
issue
kristan
looking
out
for
you
and
then
the
next
question
is
what
happens
if
that
project?
If
that
funding
doesn't
come
through
from
the
federal
government,
are
they
still
obligated
to
reimbursing
us
whatever
cost
we
have
into
it,
then
that.
E
A
E
A
I
Thank
You
mayor
on
August
23rd,
we
went
out
to
bids
for
a
new
loader
and
trans
source
was
a
low
bidder
who
met
all
the
specifications
and
they
actually
came
in
at
159
thousand
four
hundred
seventy
six
dollars
and
they
were
giving
it
a
trip.
Given
us
a
trade-in
allowance
of
20,000
twenty-four
dollars.
I
So
actually
they
were
quite
a
bit
under
all
the
other.
Under
tight
machinery
of
Aberdeen
are
do
of
Sioux
Falls
and
Butler
Machinery
of
Sioux
Falls,
which
we
were
expecting,
those
for
which
are
very
competitive
generally
in
government
bids.
So
I'm
asking
basically
that
the
council
would
approve
the
low
bidder
tonight.
Trans
source,
our
budget
amount,
was
145
thousand
dollars.
This
was
money
that
was
carried
over
last
year.
I
Our
lawyer
would
have
been
worth
more,
but
anyway,
where
we're
at
is.
We
need
an
additional
fourteen
thousand
four
hundred
seventy
six
dollars.
We
do
have
two
budget
lines
within
our
budget
and
our
street
budget,
where
we
would
be
able
to
pull
that
money
out
of
which
is
the
hotbox,
the
asphalt
hot
box
we
got
earlier
this
season.
I
I
I
This
bids
good
for
a
year,
but
the
the
bid
that
you're
approving
would
be
with
the
trade-in.
We
won't
have
this
same
trade
and
it'll
be
gone.
The
base
bid
price
that
everybody
has
given
here,
because
you
have
the
option
right
now
to
just
buy
this
straight
out
without
the
trade-in
but
I'm
recommending
we,
we
let
our
trade-in
go
they're,
giving
us
a
good
trade-in
value
for
it.
This
is
very
good
pricing.
W
I
speak
to
this
for
a
second
Toby
earlier
I'm,
with
transfers
tracking
equipment
out
of
Aberdeen
the
way
the
bid
law
reads
is
you
have
to
actually
first
award
both
pieces
of
this,
so
you
have
first
portion
of
it
is
base
bid
at
one
192
or
sorry
that
isn't
right,
sorry,
179
500!
So
that's
a
base
bit
just
to
purchase
the
machine
out
right.
So
we
have
two
parts
to
the
bid
and
then
the
second
one
is
with
trade.
W
So
in
order
to
purchase
off
of
it,
the
Commission
or
the
council
has
to
first
approve
of
option
a
and
then
approve
of
option
B
to
purchase
set
down
the
road
from
it.
If
it
is
not
awarded
today
off
of
this
bid,
then
you
will
have
to
rebid
it
down
the
road
you're.
Only
approving
portion
a
or
B
the
way
the
bid
law
reads:
option,
A
or
B
sorry,
option
A
or
B
and
City.
I
G
Normal
way
that
we've
done
it
is,
we
would
bid
that
out
that
way
and
our
normal
approval
from
the
council
would
be
to
take
the
bid
with
the
trade-in
and
then
it
would
be
a
total
base
bid
with
those
two
included
so
I
think
if
that's
a
dip
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
our
first
thing.
First,
so
we're
dealing
with
20
18th
budget
right
now.
That's
what
you
wanting
to
do
is
to
accept
the
trade
right.
I
I
G
I
I
W
V
I
could
rub
to
speak
to
this.
I
do
have
first-hand
knowledge
of
buying
off
other
government
entities
bids.
My
experience
with
that
was
that
they
wouldn't
have
to
take
action
tonight
to
approve
the
purchase
off
of
that
other
government
agency
bid,
but
could
at
the
time
we
want
to
purchase
it
into
the
two
2019
fiscal
year.
Is
that
not
correct.
I
V
W
A
So
I
think
we
need
to
act
on
the
motion.
That's
on
the
floor,
which
is
to
accept
the
low
bid
with
the
trade-in
and
purchase
this
year
for
159
for
76
the
loader
this
year
and
and
that's
the
motion
we
have
on
the
floor
and
then
after
that
action
is
done.
We
can
make
a
motion
to
accept
the
low
bid
without
trade
in
for
future
purchase
if
desired
in
2019,
correct.
A
We
wanted
to
rebid
it
in
2019.
We
could,
but
everybody
has
been
us
a
price
without
a
trade-in
there's
this
the
best
bid
and
the
bid
meets
the
specs.
So
while
the
while
we
have
the
bid
bond
would
give
ourselves
the
ability
to
buy
it
next
year
if
we
choose
to
or
to
rebid
it
if
we
choose
to
theirs.
Here's.
E
A
It
has
a
trade
in
or
not
so,
we're
we're,
accepting
action
on
them
actually
awarding
the
contract
and
then
will
approve
the
bids
with
this
low
being
a
little
bit.
If
we
choose
to
buy
off
of
it
in
2019,
and
then
we
have
the
option
we
aren't
obligated
because
we
haven't
awarded
it.
We've
accepted
the
bids
right.
I
F
A
I
A
D
D
A
A
H
A
A
V
Mayor
if
I
could
I
think
my
confusion
was
coming
into
play,
where
I
thought
that
the
the
179
number
was
another
government
entities
bid.
It
was
already
out
there,
so
I
was
confused
on
that
part.
If
that
were
the
case,
that's
where
my
comments
were
coming
in
a
play
to
where
a
week
we
wouldn't
have
to
take
action
tonight
we
just
purchase
off
that
bid
at
a
future
date.
When
we
ran
to
the
fiscal
year,
which
I
think
would
make
Kristin
a
lot
more
comfortable.
G
I
W
I
Q
A
F
I
mean
I
know
that
other
we're
able
to
purchase
off
other
entities
bids
I,
know
that's
a
thing.
I've
never
been
on
this
side
of
it
and
so
I,
don't
know
exactly
how
this
works
so
I'd
have
to
research
it,
but
I
I
know
that's
a
thing
and
I
know
it's
something.
People
do
and
the
contracts
do
sit
out
there
for
a
year
that
other
entities
can
purge
yourself
up
so
I'm
sure
that's
legal
somewhere
I,
just
don't
have
it
at
my
fingertips
at
the
moment,
I.
A
E
A
A
F
I
That's
true
what
Matt
was
saying:
they're
about
NJ
PA,
the
state
actually
on
all
their
trucks
they
this
year
they
got
just
a
chassis
bid
which
is
state
bed.
They
got
that
for
all
their
chassis,
then
all
their
add-ons
is
through
and
JPA
for,
like
their
boxes
and
plows
and
that
type
of
stuff.
So
it's.
D
A
A
We're
learning:
okay
item
number
15:
consideration
of
change;
order;
number
two
for
the
shooting
range
construction
project;
number
16,
19,
with
rounds
construction
in
the
amount
of
205,000
$144
69
cents
for
a
total
contract
amount
of
570
thousand
one
hundred
thirty
nine
dollars
and
69
cents.
Now
look.
This
was
recommended
by
the
committee
and
I
look
for
motion
second
for
whoville
will
buy
councilman
Albertson;
secondly,
councilman
Danforth,
and
he
would
you
like
to
remind
us
about
this
briefly.
Yes,.
V
Absolutely
mayor,
thank
you,
as
it
discussed
in
the
public
works
committee.
This
change
order
in
front
of
the
council
this
evening
is
for
two
hundred
five
thousand
dollars
hundred
two
hundred
five
thousand
one
hundred
forty
four
dollars
a
sixty
nine
cents
and
the
work
related
to
that
change
order
is
to
add
a
200-yard,
a
300-yard
shooting
bay
at
the
shooting
range.
V
The
project
design
work
is
incorporated,
and
the
excuse
me
this.
This
here
is
for
the
construction
work
associated
with
the
berms
and
the
grading,
and
also
the
shooting
structures
and
shooting
bays
out
there
at
the
site,
as
anticipated.
We'd
have
this
work
done
by
the
end
of
october.
According
to
the
contractors,
current
work
schedule
and
staff
recommends
award
based
on
the
current
funding,
that's
available
and
project
savings
on
other
projects.
It
would
supplement
the
over
on
of
this
change
order
on
our
current
budget.
A
Thank
you,
questions
or
comments.
It's
a
good
deal
we're
getting
these
lanes
that
we
want
to
look
for
action
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay,
motion
carries
thanks.
Heath
item
16
is
consideration
of
change
order.
Number
four
for
the
sanitary
sewer
replacements
project
number
1808,
with
donek
Inc
for
the
amount
of
eight
thousand
two
hundred
forty
one
dollars:
91
cents
for
a
total
contract
amount
of
five
hundred
twenty
thousand
two
hundred
nine
dollars
91
cents-
and
this
also
was
recommended
by
the
Public
Works
Committee.
V
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
This
change
order
is
in
relation
to
the
sanitary
sewer
replacement
project,
but
is
more
closely
related
to
the
excavation
work
regarding
that
project.
There
was
petroleum
contaminated
soil
encountered
on
the
project
that
we
had
to
deal
with,
and
this
amount
reflects
the
contractors
expense
and
having
to
deal
with
that
soil.
A
All
right,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
it
was
a
post
signify
by
saying
nay
motion,
carries
item
number
17
is
consideration
of
change
order
number
1
for
the
third
Avenue
Southwest
reconstruction
project
number
1806,
with
donek
Inc
in
the
amount
of
3,100
$24
7
cents
for
a
total
contract
amount
of
140
mm
$199
7
cents,
and
this
was
also
recommended
by
the
public
works
committee.
Is
there
a
motion
and
second
for
approval,
moved
by
counsel
with
Solem?
Second,
by
calls
one
Buehler
he'd
remind
us?
Yes,.
V
A
B
A
E
T
Albertson
I'm
thinking
back
to
what
Chris
said
about
having
these
different
things
that
are
out
there
that
you
know
might
be
looking
for
a
place
to
land
and
we
don't
have
any
money
set
aside
now.
I
know
where
we
are
in
the
budget
process,
but
we
don't
have
any
money
there
to
help
with
what
he's
saying
we
need
some
things
done,
or
at
least
may
need
to
help
with
some
things.
Is
there
an
option?
I
mean?
T
T
A
T
Just
wondering
if
we
should
keep
our
ears
open
here
in
case
you
are
seeing
something
that
that
we
could
help
with,
because
we
just
got
done
saying:
the
city
wants
to
help
and
now
you're
saying
you've
got
some
things
in
the
wings
and
but
I
think.
If
we
have
some
money,
then
I
think
we
should
be
ready
and
willing
and
able
to
step
up.
M
Thanks
Dan
appreciate
that
just
to
follow
up
to
is,
we
are
just
in
the
beginning
process
of
our
five-year
plan
and
our
goal
is
to
raise
1.2
million
more
than
we
raised
there
last
go-around
and
we're
pretty
confident
we'll
get
there.
But,
as
things
come
up,
it's
good
to
know
that
you
know
some
options,
because
it's
very
competitive
out
there
for
deals
and
part
of
our
plan
not
to
get
in
a
whole
lot
of
detail
now.
M
But
we
will
at
some
point
is
some
dedicated
funds
for
downtown
revitalization
through
our
fundraising
efforts
spelled
out
in
there
so
I
guess
that
meeting
is
tomorrow
on
the
Renaissance
zone
idea.
So
I
think
is
it
all
comes
together.
I
think
there'll
be
plenty
of
options
to
revisit
some
of
that,
but
we
can
certainly
stay
in
touch
on
what
we
have
and
I'm.
Usually
here,
if
you
guys
have
any
questions
as
well,
so
great.
G
G
B
G
No
I
I
think
we've
always
met
our
time
frame.
We
have
to
have
to
continue
to
get
the
GFO
a
award
for
the
kaffir.
We
always
have
to
have
it
in
by
June
30th.
That's
that's
the
standard
and
we've
always
met
that
so
I
think
I
think
it
works.
Fine
I
feel
that,
like
as
Glen
stated,
the
cost
is
very,
very
reasonable
and
I've
always
been
happy
with
William
wheels
work.
So
thank.
A
H
G
H
I'm
gonna
kind
of
give
this
out
to
you
because
you're
we're
in
that
business,
but
isn't
there
a
point
at
which
it's
good
to
have
a
separate
in
different
set
of
eyes
on
something,
at
least
for
a
period
of
time,
because
I
think
what
happens?
Is
you
look?
It's
the
same
old,
same
old
right
and
you
look
at
it
in
the
same
way
and
if
you're
missing
something
you
might
just
be
missing
it
missing
it
missing.
It
is
there
value
in
that.
B
There's
two
schools
of
thought
to
that:
Mike
and
Chris
and
I
had
that
conversation.
In
fact,
if
you
look
at
the
federal
at
for
publicly
held
entities
that
thus
are
box
legislation,
I
don't
get
to
explain
what
that
is.
That
was
passed
a
number
of
years
ago.
It
does
require
a
change
in
auditors.
Every
I
forget
what
the
period
of
time
is.
So
there
is
some
thought
out
there
now
I
bring
it
locally
here
and
based
upon
the
experience
that
we've
had
and
the
integrity
of
the
individuals
involved.
B
There's
a
lot
to
be
said
for
that
continuity.
I
know.
If
we
were
to
go
out
first
of
all,
there's
nobody
else
in
town
I
would
be
the
only
other
firm
in
town
that
would
be
qualified.
Do
it
be
the
my
predecessor
firm,
which
we
wouldn't
be
allowed
to
in
age
with
because
the
conflict
or
perceived
conflict,
so
we
be
looking
at
some
some
out-of-town,
firm
and
I
know
based
upon
the
bids
three
years
ago,
the
the
fees
would
be
considerably
higher.
G
G
A
A
Anyone
else
I
do
have
one
short
piece
of
oh
I'm.
Sorry,
all
those
in
favor
signify
were
saying
aye.
All
those
opposed
in
fire,
say,
nay,
motion
carries
wow
I'm,
getting
tired
a
little
bit
of
other
new
business.
The
State
Department
of
Transportation
is
holding
a
public
hearing
regarding
this
change
of
speed
limits
around
the
roundabout
and
that
public
hearing
will
be
occurring
in
the
camp.
Ask
a
meeting
room
of
the
Hampton
Inn
&
Suites
at
27,
29th
Avenue
southeast
in
Watertown,
on
Monday
September,
24th
2018
at
1
p.m.
A
and
and
the
changes
will
be
that
they
are
reducing
the
speed
limit
from
fifty
miles
an
hour
to
45
miles
an
hour
and
then
extending
it
further
along
the
highway,
and
this
is
all
because
of
the
roundabout
construction
work.
That
was
done.
So
not
my
gig,
but
I
thought
I'd
point
that
out
is
there
any
other
new
business?
A
We
do
actually
have
another,
an
item
to
go
into
executive
session
this
evening
in
order
to
discuss
and
consult
with
legal
counsel
on
a
contractual
matter,
and
we
do
not
expect
to
take
action
when
we
come
out.
So
I
look
for
a
motion,
second,
to
go
into
executive
session,
moved
by
Councilman
Y
second
by
Councilman
Danforth
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries.
We
are
in
executive
session.