►
From YouTube: Finance & Safety Meeting 05 02 2018
Description
Agenda Items include a discussion on revenue for PLWC Sponsorship agreements, update on property insurance claim and a discussion on upgrading street light poles & fixtures in conjunction with the US Highway 212 Phase II reconstruction project.
A
Good
afternoon
we
will
begin
the
Wednesday
May,
2nd
2018,
Finance
and
Safety
Committee.
Meeting
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
agendas
or
motion
second
move
by
Bill
powers.
Second,
by
Albertson,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries
the
second
item
on
the
agenda
is
public
comment
period
and
this
is
the
time
for
people
who
may
wish
to
come
forward,
and
if
you
do
so,
please
state
your
name
into
the
microphone.
B
It's
on
my
name
is
christy
Lakai
and
I
work
at
the
Coddington
County
Heritage
Museum.
We
had
talked
with
mayor
Karen
a
little
bit
and
then
we
watched
a
video
of
a
City
Council
session
and
we
saw
that
there
were
a
lot
of
questions,
and
so
we
thought
it
would
be
great
for
us
to
come
and
answer
your
questions.
So
we
brought
all
sorts
of
information
and
answers
about
the
information
about
the
old
Carnegie
Library
that
we
use
as
a
museum.
Now
do.
B
D
I'll
jump
in
because
it
was
probably
my
comments
that
are
prompting
your
your
appearance
here
today
and
what
I,
what
I
had
posed
purely
out
of
ignorance,
was
in
reviewing
the
990
for
this
a
year
ago
for
2016,
which
is
a
public
document.
I'm
sure
you're,
aware
that
I
just
pointed
out
that
that
you
were
sitting
on
as
of
the
end
of
2016
and
I.
Don't
remember
the
dollar
about
right
now
and
just
posed
the
question
as
far
as
what
the
plans
are
as
far
as
utilization
that
money
at
some
point
in
the
future
sure.
B
We
received
it
bequest
in
1980
from
Clifford
Sanders,
who
had
been
a
member
of
the
Watertown
community,
and
that
was
we
were
supposed
to
use.
The
money
was
to
be
used
to
create
and
maintain
a
Historical
Society
in
Watertown,
and
so
we
do
use
the
interest
off
of
that
money
to
pay
our
bills.
We
have
at
any
time
it's
been
over
400,000
since
I
started
there,
but
lately
it's
been
going
down
a
little
bit,
but
we
use
the
interest
to
pay
our
bills.
B
We
have
a
yearly
budget
of
about
ninety
two
thousand
dollars
and
probably
almost
a
third
of
that
comes
from
the
interest
and
dividends
from
the
trust
money.
So
if
we
spend
all
of
that,
then
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
be
open,
year-round
or
have
all
the
staff
that
we
have,
because
that's
our
biggest
expense
is
the
staff
we.
C
D
A
follow
up,
then
I,
don't
know,
prepares
your
990,
but
you
may
want
to
suggest
that
they
classify
on
the
bottom
section
a
990,
the
balance
sheet,
how
that's,
presumably
that's
shown
as
being
undesignated
reserves
to
be
used
for
whatever
purpose.
There
are
several
different
categorizations
that
if
those
are
really
restricted
or
in
doubt,
which
I'm
not
doubting
what
you're
telling
me
folks,
you
may
want
to
have.
D
Whoever
prepares
your
990
change,
that
dezik,
that
classification
on
the
return,
so
that
doesn't
lend
confusion
for
someone
looking
at
your
tax
return
going
forward
without
that's
where
my
question
came
from,
because
they
were
shown
as
being
undesignated.
Reserves
be
used
for
any
purpose
that
you
could,
whereas
you're
telling
me
that
that
the
principle
is
really
restricted
or
it
or
endowed
even
the
way.
It
sounds
well.
B
B
We've
spent
almost
forty
thousand
dollars
using
grant
money
to
make
repairs
to
the
building
over
the
past
five
years.
So
we're
not
we're
not
just
like
waiting
for
things
to
fall
down
and
then
be
like
hey.
Somebody
fix
our
building,
we're
really
trying,
but
but
some
of
the
things
what
started
this?
All
as
we
wanted
to
replace
the
the
bathroom
sink
and
when
the
plumber
came,
he
said
you
have
galvanized
pipes.
B
Do
you
drink
this
water
and
we
do-
or
at
least
we
used
to
so
they
wouldn't
replace
the
sink,
because
the
plumbing
is
so
outdated
that
they
said
we
needed
to
replumb
the
whole
building
and
the
lighting.
When
the
when
the
electrician
came
for
the
lighting.
He
said:
how
long
have
you
been
working
like
this
and
we
didn't,
then
we
felt
bad,
because
we've
always
worked
like
that.
So
there
are
just
some
things
that
work
that
we
need
to
do
that
are
more
of
an
infrastructure
kind
of
a
deal
to
update
the
building.
B
There
are
lots
of
Carnegie
libraries
in
South
Dakota.
Some
of
them
are
pristine
and
beautiful,
and
some
of
them
have
trees
grown
out.
The
windows-
and
we
would
like
for
ours
to
be
at
least
kind
of
cool.
You
know
it's
a
cool
building,
so
these
are
some
of
the
things
that
we
have
done
over
the
last
five
years
and
we
have
had
grant
money
and
we're.
You
know
we're
not
we're
not
demanding
that
this
all
be
fixed
immediately
on
someone
else's
part.
B
B
B
But
then
in
the
1940s
they
ran
out
of
room
for
the
books,
and
so
they
built
kind
of
a
loft
in
one
of
the
big
rooms
and
that's
where
our
military
exhibits
are
now.
So
it's
only
I
think
I
want
to
say
it's
for
around
a
thousand
square
feet.
Maybe
it's
more
than
that!
I!
Don't
have
the
map
with
me
or
the
plans
right
now,
but
it's
a
very
small
room
on
the
second
floor.
That's.
B
B
What
we
did
was
we
moved
some
of
the
storage
around
so
that
we
could
offer
up
more
exhibit
space
and
that's
also
our
research
area.
The
basement
we
have
a
big
table.
We
have
all
of
our
research
books,
that's
where
we
let
researchers
set
up
if
they're
gonna
do
a
whole
afternoon
of
looking
for
things,
and
then
that's
also
where
we
have
history
club
that
meets
once
a
month
and
then
we
also
use
the
basement
for
the
murder
mystery
and
for
children's
programs.
B
It's
the
basement
has
exhibits
some
of
how
we
layout
the
museum
depends
on
where
the
stuff
is
because
the
piano
is
in
the
basement,
and
so
it's
gonna
stay
there,
because
it's
heavy
and
the
blue
cast-iron
stove
that
for
grown
men,
can't
lift,
is
on
the
first
floor.
So
that's
where
that
stays.
So
we
kind
of
work
around
where
the
heaviest
items
in
the
collection
are.
But
we
do
use
the
basement
quite
a
bit.
That's
where
all
of
our
board
meetings
and
our
like
history
club
and
that's
where
the
table
and
chairs
are
have.
F
B
A
B
B
I've,
read
it
and
I:
don't
fully
understand
all
of
it.
It
says
that
we
need
to
get
your
permission.
It
says
that
any
repairs
to
the
roof
of
the
structure
erected
there
on
may
need
at
the
present
time
and
I.
Don't
I
think
that
means
that
the
roof
is
our
deal,
but
we
haven't
paid
for
repairs
to
the
roof.
We
had
the
roof
repaired
last
summer
and
we've
had
it
repaired
in
2013
and
2015.
So
we
have
repaired
the
roof.
The
problem
is
it's
a
flat
roof
and
it's
tricky.
B
You
know
one
leak
only
leaks
if
the
roof,
if
the
rain
and
wind
come
hard
from
the
South.
That
leak
is
hard
to
find.
Unless
we
have
a
good
southern
storm.
Also,
we
have
trouble
finding
all
the
leaks
and
things
because
it's
the
roof
then
two
feet
of
air.
Then
a
foot
and
a
half
of
insulation,
then
the
ceiling,
but
the
ceiling
is
not
all
level
so
where
the
water
comes
through,
may
have
no
correlation
to
where
the
hole
is
so
so.
B
H
A
A
C
H
Just
a
further
comment:
I
understand
your
question
at
the
last
meeting,
but
the
Historical
Society
does
not
have
the
funds
to
sustain
itself.
Okay,
so
through
memberships.
Fundraising,
grants
is
what
you
know,
what
keeps
it
going
so
we
try
not
to
invade.
You
know
that
that
corpus
whatsoever,
it
is
not
a
restricted
fund.
However,
if
it
goes
away,
we
don't
have
operating
to
stay
open,
so
it
is
not
restricted
funds.
Okay,.
A
I
A
There
anyone
else
that
would
like
to
move
forward
to
come
forward
and
make
a
public
comment,
see
none
I'll,
move
to
item
three
approval
of
minutes
from
the
April
16
2008
teen
meeting
so
moved
by
Councilman
Solem
second,
by
Councilman
Albertson
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
everything
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
4
is
discussion
on
revenue
for
prey:
Lakes,
Wellness,
Center
sponsorship
agreements.
D
D
J
At
the
last
council
meeting
when
we
approved
the
last
two
sponsorship
agreements
with
vast
and
Dakota
Bank,
the
question
came
up
of:
where
do
we
put
the
revenue?
That's
coming
in
so
I
said
that
I'd
bring
it
to
the
next
Finance
Committee
and
we
could
kind
of
have
the
discussion
there
to
see
get
some
people's
thoughts
on
on
doing
that.
J
Currently,
the
main
one
from
prairie
lakes
is
going
into
the
fund
504,
and
that
was
put
aside
more
for
the
construction
part
of
it
kind
of
what
I
gathered
in
that
short
discussion
was
to
put
this
into
the
Prairie
Lakes
wellness,
centers
fund,
I.
Think
the
big
question
is:
do
we
want
to
assign
it
at
all
or
do
we
want
it
to
cover
more
of
the
operational
costs
as
far
as
utilities
personnel
stuff,
like
that,
so
I
open
it
up
to
the
committee
I.
J
I
would
say,
no
I,
think
I,
don't
know
if
there,
with
the
amount
of
dollars
I
can
see
it
being
used
more
for
the
operational
at
this
point
to
cover
some
of
those
I
know.
Last
year
the
utilities
are
quite
a
bit
higher
than
at
the
previous
facility,
so
my
recommendation
is
to
to
definitely
take
it
in
to
the
Wellness
Center.
Instead
of
the
capital
project
fund
that
was
set
up
to
build
it,
but
I
don't
see
the
need
to
assign
it
for
capital
improvements
at
this
time,
I.
A
J
You
can
I
will
say,
though,
our
other
agreement
that
we
had
for
the
premiere
softball
is
going
into
the
capital
project,
so
that
project
itself
is
putting
back
in
to
fund
504
as
well.
I
think
those
could
be
viewed
a
little
bit
differently,
as
those
came
about
a
little
bit
at
the
time
of
the
construction
of
the
facilities
where
these
are.
J
No
they're
payments
over
I
think
one's
five
years,
I'm,
not
sure
on
the
other
one.
A
lot
of
it
will
depend
on
even
just
the
construction
of
the
Ice
Arena.
How
long
that
would
take
so
it
kind
of
depends.
I
mean
at
this
point,
they're
still
rolling
into
that,
and
as
far
as
the
financials
would
go,
it
would
basically
depend
on
if
we
have
any
revenue
still
coming
into
it
it
would.
It
would
remain
there
where
it
is.
L
That's
I
want
to
just
to
bring
that
up
and
I
wish.
Donn
was
here
because
we
had
a
recent
meeting
about
the
financial
situation
of
the
ice
arena
and
we
did
talk
about
this
fund
and
I
guess.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up,
because
we're
kind
of
at
that
stage
where
we
need
to
figure
out
where
that
funding
is
coming
from
and
I'm,
not
saying
I'm,
not
trying
to
sway
either
way,
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
that.
That's.
That
was
a
discussion
point
at
our
most
recent
meeting
and.
A
E
L
E
A
E
J
Well,
that's
a
kind
of
a
whole
different
topic.
Then
we
have
three
million
dollars
of
bonds
money.
Well,
no,
we
can't
move
it.
We
establish
the
bond
for
the
purpose
of
building
three
facilities
and
if
the
Ice
Arena
is
not
constructed,
then
we
need
to
have
a
further
conversation
about
what
to
do
with
the
three
million
and
there's
options,
but
there
again
that
would
have
to
be
yeah.
That
would
have
to
be
further
discussed.
J
So
as
far
as
the
button,
the
bond
money
and
the
then,
the
other
agreements
that
were
signed,
the
two
million
in
the
I
can't
remember
what
premiers
was
yeah,
those
those
are
a
little
bit
different
in
my
opinion,
compared
to
the
two
that
we're
discussing
right
now,
like
I,
said
those
came
along
at
the
time
of
the
construction
of
the
facilities
and
I.
Think
that's
why
the
conversation
was.
Those
should
go
towards
the
504
fund,
which
was
for
the
construction
of
the
projects.
J
Now
the
two
that
we're
talking
about
now,
it's
been
quite
a
while
since
the
construction
and
we're
just
signing
these
in.
So
that's.
Why
I
think
it's
only
right
that
they
go
to
the
Wellness
Center
itself
for
operation,
because
I
would
hope
that
anything
down
the
line
that
premier
would
get
could
help
facilitate
the
operating
of
that
facility
and
the
same
for
the
future
Ice
Arena
that
if
we
would
get
another
one,
it
could
go
towards
the
construction,
but
later
on
sponsorships
would
go
towards
the
operation
of
the
facilities.
I
think
there.
A
J
Currently,
in
the
504
fund
there
is
right
around
three
million
dollars
of
bond
money
left
I
think
it's
2.9
so
around
there.
That
is
what
bond
money
is
left
for
the
ice
facility.
Also
in
the
2018
budget,
it
was
approved
to
transfer
two
million
dollars
from
fund
to
12
capital
improvement
on
to
the
capital
projects
fund,
so
that
transfer
is
happening.
It
happens
every
month
and
by
the
end
of
the
year
there
will
be
two
million
in
there
from
the
capital
improvement
fund.
Was
that
specifically.
J
J
M
Seem
like
we
should
use
that
for
the
operational
to
me
just
to
keep
it
where
it.
You
know,
when
somebody
went
out
and
recruited
that
you
know
the
money
that
we're
getting
here.
Put
it
in
that
operational
and
it
sounds
like
it's
a
lot
easier
to
get
out
there
than
if
it
gets
into
capital
dollars
and
once
the
budget
comes
in
once
John
gives
us
what
it's
going
to
cost
for
a
year,
then
at
least
we
would
have
money
to
help
pay
for
that,
so
I
would
suggest
operational
and
not
never
go
out.
E
I've
said
this
in
previous
council
meetings
and
in
other
meetings
that
we've
had
on
this
topic,
but
when
we
go
back
and
go
to
the
time
that
we
were
playing
in
the
bond
playing
in
the
facilities,
the
intent
at
that
time
was
something
to
think
those
discussions
and
originally
started
with
Mayor
Williams
and
then
went
on
to
Mara
Thorson.
But
the
intent
was
for
the
facility
naming
rights
to
go
into
the
construction
fund
and
that
any
additional
sponsorships
or
signage
whatever
within
each
any
one
of
these
facilities
would
go
back
to
itself.
E
Okay,
that
that
was
the
intent
now
I
know
things
change
and
then
that
act
subsequently
that
changed
somewhat
and
where
for
the
Wellness
facility,
it
was
agreed
that
the
prairie
lakes
naming
rights
would
go
back
to
the
construction
and
then,
if
we
got
to
the
point
where
we
were
able
to
get
a
sponsor
for
like
the
aquatics
naming
rights
for
the
aquatics
area
and
a
naming
rights
for
the
large
gym,
that
was
the
two
additional
areas
we
talked
about.
Not
a
sponsorship
like
you
would
have
a
sign
somewhere,
but
literally
a
naming
rights.
E
So
it's
the
mayor,
Karen
Aquatic
Center.
You
know
that
that
it
was
agreed
that
those
money's
then
under
the
naming
rights
scenario,
would
go
back
to
construction,
but
sponsorships
and
signage
that's
sold
within
there
would
would
go
back
into
the
the
operating
funds
for
each
facility.
Okay,
now,
that's
again,
that's
all
history,
yeah,
that's
history,
but
that's
how
we
kind
of
got
to
where
we
are
today
and
I
agree.
J
D
E
A
J
Thank
you.
This
is
just
kind
of
a
update
in
July
2017
when
the
hail
storm
came
through
after
that,
the
city
requested
that
our
all
of
our
buildings
be
looked
at
to
see
if
there
was
any
damage
about
a
month
ago.
I
think
is
when
the
claims
adjusters
came
in
and
provided
us
with
information
regarding
the
damage
from
that
storm.
J
The
city
had
close
to
two
million
dollars
worth
of
hail
damage
to
all
the
properties.
All
of
it
was
to
the
roofs.
It
wasn't
any
of
the
actual
sides
of
the
buildings
or
anything.
The
majority
of
that
damage
was
cosmetic.
It
was
not
considered
functional.
A
lot
of
it
was
due
to
metal
roofing.
That
would
have
the
dings
and
stuff
like
that.
So
that's
what
they
consider
cosmetic
around
a
hundred
thousand
was
considered
functional
damage.
All
of
the
functional
damage
sits
within
the
park
and
rec
fund,
and
that
is
a
lot
of
the
shingled
roofs.
J
Our
shelters
and
concession
stands
and
and
stuff
like
that
is
what
had
more
of
the
functional
damage.
I
did
get
a
group
together.
Utilities
was
involved
as
well
as
a
couple
council
members
and
then,
as
well
as
the
departments
that
really
had
the
majority
of
the
damage,
and
we
spoke
with
South
Dakota
public
assurance
Alliance,
which
is
our
insurance
carrier
about
different
options
and
kind
of
what
to
do
with
that.
J
Their
group
decided
to
take
the
full
claim
at
this
time
and
to
set
the
money
aside
in
those
departments
that
had
the
damage
and
it
would
be
assigned
then
for
future
capital
improvements.
If
repairs
do
need
to
be
made
or
if
down
the
road.
Any
other
type
of
improvement
needs
to
happen.
What
that
amounts
to
in
regards
to
insurance
is
with
this
size
of
a
claim
we
would
lose.
J
I
do
want
to
point
out
the
the
majority
of
the
cosmetic
damage
in
the
general
fund,
with
kind
of
all
the
departments.
That's
in
the
general
fund.
It
was
around
a
hundred,
fifty
thousand
Parks
and
Rec.
Their
cosmetic
was
around
two
hundred
twenty
thousand
and
wastewater
was
1.5
million,
so
wastewater
really
was
the
main
and
I
a
lot
of
that
was
at
the
big
domes
that
are
out
there
had
a
lot
of
I
suppose
the
denting
in
the
metal.
J
D
What's
this
going
to
do
to
our
overall
premiums
to
going
forward
and
I
think
the
the
feedback
we
got
was
well,
this
loss
is
being
spread
over
what
425
members
that
we
probably
wouldn't
see
an
appreciable
overall
increase
in
our
premiums.
Aside
from
losing
that
loss,
reserve
ratio
was.
Is
that
a
fair
statement?
Kristen.
A
E
There
any
hold
back
on
this
because
I
know
I'm
on
the
home
claims.
I
can't,
let's
say,
for
example,
I
got
a
house
and
I've
got
$20,000
worth
of
rough
damage.
I
don't
get
that
$20,000
I
get
you
know,
maybe
I
get
12,000,
they
hold
the
rest
of
the
back
and
you
would
only
ever
get
that
if
the
bills
for
repair
justified
it
that's.
J
K
E
D
K
D
A
Any
other
questions
or
comments
all
right,
you
didn't
need
any
action.
All
right.
Moving
on
item
number
six
is
discussion
on
upgrading,
streetlight,
poles
and
fixtures
in
conjunction
with
the
US
highway.
212
phase,
two
construction
project
and
Shane
is
here,
and
we
also
have
the
h2o
20
members
here
to
talk
about
this
I'll
tell
you
what's
going
on
we're
going
to
have
a
major
reconstruction
of
the
highway
going
through
town-
and
this
doesn't
happen
very
often,
probably
once
during
our
career,
and
so,
if
there's
any
change
that
we
would
want
to
make.
A
This
would
be
the
time
to
make
it
and
we're.
The
h2o
20
group
had
looked
at
lots
of
different
ways
to
upgrade
the
appearance
of
highway
212
in
conjunction
with
that
project
and
I.
Think
I
would
like
for
them
to
talk
about
what
they
asked
for
and
and
what's
left
over,
that
hasn't
been
rejected,
and
then
then
we
can
talk
about
costs.
N
Thank
you,
Mary
Karen
and
City
Council
for
considering
this
I'm
Diane,
Stiles
and
I'm
part
of
a
subcommittee
of
h2o
20
that
we
have
RIT
has
really
focused
on
the
highway
212
my
project
and
our
subcommittee
is
on
the
beautification
of
2:12.
What
we
want
to
do
is
invite
whether
its
future
citizens
or
visitors
to
Watertown,
and
we
want
to
give
them
an
inviting
front
door.
So
we
started
out
asking
for
the
world
and
Shane
was
very
patient
with
us
and
but
we
don't
mind
being
told
no,
so
we're
pretty
persistent
and
persistent.
N
So
we
had
started
out
and
we
wanted
like
the
medians
grassy
medians
with
trees.
In
them,
we
had
talked
about
lighting
options,
sidewalk
options,
bridge
options,
so
we
had
a
pretty
extensive
project
when
he
first
started,
but
then
we
realized
that
that
not
all
that
was
attainable,
especially
when
you
consider
the
financial
cost
of
it
and
then
also
just
the
logistics
of
snow
removal,
I'm
from
Kansas,
and
so
we
can
have
medians
and
then
South
Dakota
after
this
winter
I
understand
that
we
cannot
have
medians
for
the
snow
removal
piece
of
that.
N
So
so
the
last
kind
of
step
that
we
have
there's
a
few
things
that
we
looking
forward
we
could
still
accomplish,
and
the
lighting
is
one
of
the
main
main
focuses
so
if
you've
driven
through
Brookings
lately
and
they
went
for
the
upgraded
lighting
option
and
so
that
it's
the
black,
it
will
more
historic
light
pole
rather
than
the
cobrahead
light
poles,
which
I
learned
from
that
term
from
Mayor
Karen.
So
so,
instead
of
using
those
cobrahead
light
lights,
it's
the
more
decorative
light
pole.
N
There
were
some
upgrades
to
the
bridges
which
were
very
grateful
for
and-
and
the
idea
is
that
we
would
tie
all
of
this
together
and
it
would
be
inspired
by
other
elements
that
are
already
in
the
community,
so
starting
with
the
readlyn
Art
Center
I'm,
the
great
Vince
that
you
guys
put
up
at
the
zoo
and
stick
to
that's
constant
theme
to
tie
our
community
together.
So
that's
kind
of
an
overview
of
where
we
are
and
then
and
then
hopefully
in
the
future.
A
O
Thank
You
mayor,
they
separated
their
costs
into
three
columns,
I'll
point
to
the
farthest
column.
First,
this
is
what
theirs
they
predict.
Their
standard
lighting
system
would
be
their
50
foot,
poles,
there's
22
poles
in
the
phase
2
corridor,
I'll
call
it,
and
that
corridor
is
primarily
between
highway
81
and
19th
Street
East.
So
that's
the
the
area
that
we're
talking
about
for
decorative
lighting,
then
change.
It's.
O
Yep,
no
matter
what
option
we
choose,
that's
what
they're
planning
to
spend
based
on
their
estimates.
So
when
we
looked
at
there's
multiple
options
and
there's
a
40-foot
tall,
decorative
pole
on
a
30-foot
decorative
pole
and
of
course
the
the
main
difference
between
those
is
the
amount
of
light
that
they're
able
to
cast
onto
the
street.
So
if
you
look
at
it,
the
40-foot
pole
would
increase
the
number
of
lights
and
needed
from
22
to
46,
and
then
the
30-foot
pole
would
increase
that
number
to
58.
O
So
that's
really
how
the
primary
driver
to
the
increased
cost
and
then
the
the
state
did
a
very
good
job
of
breaking
down.
All
the
extra
costs
I
mean
even
putting
an
extra
wiring
for
each
of
the
bases
and,
and
that
would
be
required
so
bottom
line
is.
Is
they
have
a
seven
hundred
and
two
thousand
dollar
cost
for
a
40-foot
pole
configuration
and
with
their
portion
of
the
153?
That
would
have
reduced
the
city's
portion
549
thousand
roughly?
O
And
if
you
went
with
the
30
foot
pole,
there's
six
hundred
and
sixty-three
thousand
I
think
what
happens.
Is
the
extra
cost,
the
difference?
The
main
difference
between
these
is,
of
course,
is
the
extra
ten
feet
of
fixture,
even
though
there's
more
fixtures
there's
less
material
because
you
have
less
height.
So
so,
ironically,
the
30
foot
option
costs
six
hundred
and
sixty
three
thousand,
and
if
you
take
the
state's
portion
of
its
five
hundred
and
ten
thousand
I
was
actually
looking
at
those
numbers
to
be
flipped.
O
And
I
wasn't
anticipating
that
that
that
differential
would
be
enough
to
flip
that
I
was
actually
thinking
the
30
foot.
Pole
would
be
more
costly
because
you
added
more
lights,
but
these
are
the
numbers
they
produced
for
us,
and
this
is
what
we
have
to
consider
as
a
community
wanna
invest
in
decorative
lighting
in
the
Phase
two
corridor.
A
I
A
I
What
how
would
that
affect
our
maintenance
and
I?
Don't
know
how
much
maintenance
there
are
to
these
things.
I,
don't
think.
Leds
is
a
big
issue.
I,
don't
think
they
have
to
be
replaced
that
often
I
don't
believe,
but
as
far
as
just
the
upkeep
are
these
like
a
core
10,
you
don't
paint
something
surface
on
these
I.
Don't
there.
O
Are
options
the
the
costs
presented
here
are
a
painted
pole
and
that's
powder
coated.
So
the
paint
does
last
a
substantial
amount
longer.
The
standard
lighting
that
the
d-o-t
puts
in
there
is
a
fairly
weathering
material
so
that
they
have
very
little
maintenance
on
it.
So
to
say
that
these
deckard
polls
won't
have
any
maintenance
is
probably
not
correct.
O
And
the
other
thing
that
we
talked
about
too,
is
that
styles
of
light
poles
change
over
time,
and
so
you
may
not
always
have
an
exact
replica
say
10-15
years
from
now.
If
you
ran
short
on
your
inventory,
but
the
goal
would
be
is
that
we
recognize
that
there
are
some
operating
costs
and
try
to
account
for
that
as
we
go
forward.
Also.
I
The
besides
the
maintenance
part
of
that
I
think,
let
me
ask
it:
we
talked
in
any
other
communities
to
anybody
in
any
other
communities
that
have
used
these
for
a
period
of
time
to
see
how
they're
working
out
for
them
this
type
of
pole
and
then
the
safety
issue
as
well.
Do
you
see
any
safety
issues,
additional
safety
issues
by
having
that
concentration
of
of
poles
I?
Don't.
O
O
Differential
and
how
they
operate
a
motor
vehicle
I,
don't
anticipate
any
issues
from
a
safety
standpoint.
Having
more
poles,
of
course,
does
increase
the
opportunities
to
have
things
incidents
happen,
but
the
municipal
utilities
did
reach
out
to
Brookings
and
ask
some
questions
about
how
they
did
their
decorative
lighting
and
I.
Just
had
some
basic
information
from
Rapid
City
I
have
not
talked
any
noble.
A
Term
we
talked
to
anybody,
that's
had
them
long
term.
The
d-o-t
cover
letter
did
say,
though,
that
you
know
you
can
see.
We
can
see
from
here
that
the
vast
majority
of
the
cost
is
in
the
pole,
not
in
the
luminary
fixture
and
the
arm,
it's
in
the
pole,
and
so
if
we
kept
the
decorative
luminaire
and
arm
but
went
with
a
simpler
pole
and
maybe
a
less
expensive
finish
that
might
cut
the
cost
dramatically
and
they
suggested
we
look
into
that
and
so
I
think
we
probably
should
councilmen
so
do.
G
O
A
Can
just
look
down
town?
There
are
decorative
poles
downtown
at
the
Redland
center.
There
are
decorative
poles
and
you
can
see
them
around
and
and
actually,
when
you
leave
look
at
County
Fair
parking
lot
because
there's
traditional
standard
cobrahead
poles
in
the
street
and
then
the
along
second
Avenue.
We
have
our
second
street.
We
have
decorative
poles
Cosman.
Why
Shane.
G
A
A
E
A
In
Brookings
they
fund
raised
with
other
sources,
so
the
community
came
out
and
did
some
companies
made
donations?
We
could
we
could
take
it
right
out
of
100%
out
of
city
funds.
Could
ask
municipal
utilities
to
partner
in
some
of
the
cost.
We
could
ask
the
community
to
participate.
That's
entirely
up
to
the
council.
We.
E
Didn't
know
the
reason
why
I
asked
that
merit-
because
you
know
we're
just
sitting
here
10
minutes
ago
talking
about
capital
dollars
for
a
new
facility,
and
you
know
I'm
talking
about
another
half
million
dollars
capital
coming
from
somewhere
and
I'm.
Just
saying
you
know
somewhere
along
line
I
like
the
idea
of
it,
because
that
you
know
I
think
something
needs
to
happen
on
212,
but
again,
I
go
back
to
the
dollars
and
go
where.
Where
do
we
balance
this
all
out?.
A
The
issue
is:
we
have
one
shot
at
improving
the
look
of
that
corridor
during
this
construction
project
and
after
that,
it's
kind
of
too
late.
We'll
lose
the
the
fact
that
the
d-o-t
is
replacing
the
poles
at
that
time,
and
that
would
be
the
the
best
time
to
do
it
if
you're
so
inclined.
So
you
need
to
decide
if
you
want
an
upgraded
look
to
our
community.
How
much
are
you
willing
to
pay
for
it,
because
it's
one
thing
to
want
it?
D
O
O
D
And
then
just
a
couple
of
comments:
Diana
LuAnn,
Shane
mayor,
you
were
at
the
utility
board
meeting
Monday,
as
was
I.
Now
we
did
not
have
the
the
the
price
at
that
meeting,
but
I
will
sis
and
I
and
I
can't
speak
for
the
board,
but
I
think
I
have
had
a
pretty
good
sense
from
the
board
itself
that
there
was
definitely
some
interest
on
their
part
in
in
sharing
somewhat
in
in
this
project.
But
again
no
dollars
were
presented
at
that
point.
So
again,
I
obviously
can't
speak
for
them.
D
I
know
there
was
interest
on
their
part
to
entering
into
some
kind
of
agreement
or
relationship
with
the
city
on
this
I
would
say:
oh
man,
look,
this
is
being
an
economic
development
potential
I
mean
I,
I,
think
back,
I
know
Tareq's,
for
example.
That
was
one
of
the
points
that
they
raised
in
their
whole.
Conversations
with
us,
too,
is
that
you
know
enhancing
the
appearance
or
look
of
two
twelve
through
town
was
something
that
that
they
had
in
their
mind.
D
O
The
reason
this
is
time-sensitive
is
because
right
now,
they're
planning
on
obtaining
easements
our
land
for
twenty
two
pools,
and
if
there
you
need
to
collect
those
type
of
documents
from
all
the
landowners
for
58
or
forty
six
poles.
That
greatly
increases
their
amount
of
work
that
they
have
to
do
and
obtain
the
space
that
the
poles
are
going
to
occupy
and
the
whole
project
is,
has
a
taking
I'm
going
to
call
it
a
property
from
the
adjacent
property
owners
they're,
adding
a
six-foot
sidewalk
along
both
sides
of
the
roadway
throughout
the
whole
corridor.
O
But
then
that
means
that
these
light
poles,
then
would
be
another
footprint
outside
of
that
sidewalk.
So
that's
why
it's
very
important
for
the
d-o-t
to
know
whether
they're
pursuing
that
land
acquisition
at
this
point
in
time,
because
it's
going
to
increase
their
amount
of
man-hours
and
and
their
approach
to
that
project
and
I
know.
2021
sounds
like
a
long
ways
off,
but
when
you're
acquiring
land
from
that
many
property
owners,
it
takes
time
and
they're
even
struggling,
getting
all
the
documents
still
in
line
for
the
phase
1
project.
M
N
Know
I
think
if
I
could
speed
on
behalf
of
the
community
I
think
any
upgrade
would
be
appreciated
if
you
can't
afford
you
know
what
we
have
proposed
here.
It
even
like
the
idea
of
upgrading
the
luminaries
would
be
would
be
advantageous.
I
know
you
have
to
budget
or
you
have
to
balance
a
lot
of
different
needs
in
your
budget,
and
so
we
just
hope
that
there's
some
type
of
upgrade
that
will
help
welcome
people
into
the
community,
and
this
was
the
first
time.
N
F
B
K
K
You
know
it's
a
it's
a
over
all
aesthetics
and
we're
hoping
that
the
businesses
will
follow
a
line
with
new
signage
and
things
of
that
nature
as
well,
so
that
it
makes
us
look
cleaner
and
not
so
cluttered
I
think
it's
an
opportunity
that
we
we
have
to
look
at
and
and
see
if
we
can
go
forward
with
it,
whether
it's
this
particular
one
or
you
know
something,
that's
maybe
a
little
on
the
less
expensive,
but
has
an
aesthetically
pleasing
look
to
it.
I
think
we
should
definitely
look
at
doing
something
like
that.
Thank.
B
D
It
be
appropriate
because
I,
we
can't
make
any
kind
of
decision
today,
but
I
also
realize
that
we
need
to
make
a
decision.
This,
the
near
future,
will
be
appropriate
to
get
together
a
small
group
from
this
body
as
well
as
utility
board,
as
well.
As
you
know,
staff
and
h2o
xx
group
to
review
this
with
the
next
month
or
so
and
see
what
what
we
can
come
up
with.
D
A
Think
that's
a
great
idea
and
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
room
here.
The
in
the
cover
memo
that
came
with
the
message
from
the
d-o-t.
These
basically
said,
they're
looking
at
one
example
and
there's
a
ton
of
examples
out
there
that
we
could
work
with
and
maybe
get
those
costs
down
and
still
have
an
upgraded
look,
so
I
think
there's
figured.
F
A
E
For
clarification,
if
we
go
from
the
22
poles,
which
is
what
they've
been
planning
from
the
land
acquisition
standpoint
to
either
of
the
options,
the
46
of
the
56
total
poles
who
pays
for
that
cost
of
that
those
additional
locations.
Is
that
something
that
would
be
on
our
shoulders
above
beyond
the
22?
Okay,.
A
A
E
O
O
A
F
Think
in
the
support
of
this
project
and
that's
a
great
idea
to
get
a
group
of
people
together,
all
along
the
group
I've
been
in
in
your
offshore,
but
we've
been
continually
trying
to
create
decorative
corridors
to
the
city's
downtown.
And
so,
if
you
take
up
near
Hobby
Lobby
and
you
go
through
that,
my
kids
call
the
Rainbow
Road
the
Rainbow
Road
and
then
you
get
into
first.
It
doesn't
take
long
before
you
get
into
the
decorative
light
poles
as
you
go
towards
the
downtown
and
you've
done
a
good
job
of
that.
F
One
corner
that
you
know
looks
good
from
La
Ti.
So
looking
at
this
I
had
to
have
Josh
draw
me
a
map.
That's
why
it
took
me
so
long,
I'm,
sorry!
But
if
you
look
at
this,
19th
is
also
a
way
to
get
straight
up
and
over
81
there's
several
different
ways
to
get
into
our
business
district
from
81
or
from
212.
F
But
I
think
this
ties
in
to
what
other
groups
in
the
eight
Shoto
have
been
trying
to
accomplish,
and
so
that
to
me
would
be
another
really
important
factor
to
consider,
because
there's
no
sense
having
modern
here
and
antique
here
and
you
know
whatever,
because
that's
gonna
look
worse
and
and
so
I
am
hoping
that
you
will
be
successful
in
getting.
You
know
the
costs
to
where
we
can
all
say:
yeah
that'll
work,
but
but
do
keep
in
mind
that
anytime
we
create
this
type
of
decorative.
A
K
Just
going
to
add
one
thing
piggybacking
on
on
best,
if
we
can
get
some
photos
that
will
match
up
with
what
we
currently
have
in
our
areas,
you
guys
have
done
a
nice
chop
around
La,
Ti
and
I
know
that
we
have
some
decorative
lighting.
You
know
sporadically.
So,
let's
see
if
we
can't
get
a
plan
going
where
if
we
end
up
going
that
route,
let's
get
it
across
the
board.
A
I
Like
say
thanks
for
identifying
the
opportunity,
you
know
because
I
this
might
have
been
overlooked
in
and
getting
out
of
them
in
it
in
a
timely
fashion,
so
that
we
get
it
taken
care
of
and
I
Glen's
idea
of
a
committee
to
to
kind
of
study
this
and
see
what
options
are
out
there,
that
we
could
get
our
best
bang
for
our
buck.
I
guess
moving
forward
and
I'd
be
I'd,
be
happy
to
assist
in
that
regard
too.
So,
thanks.
A
All
right,
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
addendum
to
the
city
of
Watertown,
Watertown
development,
company
property
purchase
chain.
Don't
leave
it
and
development
agreement.
If
you
could
bring
that
up
on
the
GIS,
the
Andrews
industrial
park,
the
intersection
of
29th
Street
and
15th
Avenue
South,
we
have
a
development
agreement
to
develop
the
new
industrial
park
with
Watertown
development
company
were
essentially
partners
with
them
in
that
property,
and
we
had
previously
acquired
that
little
corner
lot.
That
was
the
first
part
that
we
acquired.
A
The
intention
was
this
was
all
going
to
be
part
of
our
agreement
to
develop
an
industrial
park,
and
when
we
did
the
agreement,
it
only
included
the
new
land
that
we
bought.
It's
separated
physically
from
the
two
parts,
are
separated
by
an
easement
and
a
little
piece
of
land
there.
So
it's
not
contiguous,
but
it
can
all
be
develop
together
in
concert
with
Watertown
development
company
assisting
us
in
that
process,
as
they
normally
do
on
our
industrial
park
developments.
A
And
so
this
addendum
was
drafted
to
include
that
little
strip
in
the
part
that
we
already
have
executed
for
the
the
new
industrial
park
down
below
so
I'm.
Looking
for
a
motion
to
recommend
that
we,
you
authorize
my
signature
on
the
addendum
to
that
agreement
for
the
greater
part,
no
motion
by
Albertsons
second
by
ville
Hauer
any
questions
or
discussion
that.
M
A
Eight
is
old
business
journey
old
business
number,
nine
new
business;
there's
no
need
for
executive
session,
so
I'll
look
for
a
motion,
second,
to
adjourn
well
by
Solem
second,
by
ville
Hauer,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
are
posting
five
say,
nay,
motion
carries.
We
are
adjourned.