►
From YouTube: Public Works & Safety Meeting 5 30 2018
Description
Public Works / Safety Committee agenda for 5-30-18
Agenda Items include a consideration of proposal for Great Plains Sponsorships and an update on potential enhanced Highway 212 lighting project.
B
C
C
Any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion-
carries
item
number
2
is
public
input.
This
is
the
time
for
anyone
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
talk
about
something
not
on
the
agenda.
To
speak,
don't
see
anybody
so
move
on
to
item
number
3,
which
is
approval
of
the
agenda.
Their
motion
second
for
approval,
so.
C
Councilman
law,
second
by
Councilman,
Bueller
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
aye
motion
carries
item.
Number
four:
is
approval
of
change
order?
Number
one
final,
with
PKG
contracting
ink
for
the
wastewater
treatment
facility,
laboratory
replacement
project
number
1716
for
a
deduction
of
$1,500;
look
for
motion,
second,
for
approval,
moved
by
counsel
and
Buehler
second,
by
Councilman
l'olam,
and
we
have
mike
burger
here
wastewater
superintendent
to
tell
us
about
this.
Okay,
yeah.
E
The
work
on
the
laboratory
has
been
done
for
quite
some
time
now
is
back
in
November,
HR
degree
and
the
engineers
on
this
project
have
prepared
this
change
order
to
identify
the
liquidated
damages
for
the
project.
Pkg
did
not
complete
the
project
in
accordance
with
the
dates
that
were
established
in
the
contract,
so
they've
been
assessed,
liquidated
damages
and
the
amount
of
$500
a
day
for
three
days
for
a
total
of
1,500
dollars.
So,
if
approve
the
change
order
decreases
the
contract
failure
cost
by
$1,500,
and
it
has
14
days
of
time
to
the
contract.
E
There's
a
few
I
would
start
by
saying
the
contractor
requested
17
days
and
then
the
team
of
HR,
green
engineering,
city
engineering
and
wastewater
department
agreed
to
14
of
those
days,
which
was
the
extension
the
14
days,
but
we
assess
the
damages
for
3
days
and
one
of
their
contentions
was
that
if
they
had
been
allowed
in
the
lab
earlier,
they
might
have
been
done
on
time,
but
they
were
multiple
facets
to
the
project
that
we're
still
hanging
in
the
air.
At
that
time
there
was
a
reagent
shelf,
which
is
about
an
18-inch
shelf.
E
On
top
of
our
laboratory
counter,
we
had
two
of
those
installed.
One
came
the
right
size,
one
was
just
a
few
inches
tall,
so
they
had
to
reorder
and
they
had
to
wait
for
that.
There
was
a
dusk
duct
work
on
some
air
fans
on
the
roof.
They
were
misaligned,
they
had
to
be
corrected,
it
looked,
and
then
there
was
a
wiring
correction
to
the
fume
hood
switches,
and
then
we
had
to
have
the
fume
hoods
certified
to
put
that
they
were
actually
moving.
The
required
amount
of
air
a
hundred
cubic
feet
per
minute.
A
F
C
G
Thank
You
mayor
a
while
back.
We
we
have
identified
that
the
bank
along
the
north
side
of
Marina
Bay
Drive,
is
sloughing
off
and
it
will
impact
the
road
eventually.
So
we
hired
infrastructure
design
group
to
help
the
city
create
a
plan
to
stabilize
that
bank
and
there's
still
under
contract.
To
do
that,
however,
they
were
also
awarded
the
bike
trail
project
around
the
lake
and
that
project
is
going
to
require
some
additional
work,
be
done
to
the
box
culvert,
which
is
adjacent
to
this
area
of
marine
or
lake
or
a
marina
drive.
G
So
the
recommendation
that's
coming
from
IDG
to
the
city
is
that
they
would
incorporate
both
the
bike,
trail
work
project
and
the
stabilization
of
the
bank
of
the
Marina
Bay
Drive
under
one
project
and
they'll
get
better
bids
doing
that
and
they'll.
Also,
the
timing
of
the
work
will
be
better
for
disruption
of
public
transportation.
So
with
that
I'll,
let
Vanessa
add
to
that.
If
she
we're.
G
H
C
H
The
original
bank
stabilization
was
not
going
to
be
a
super
invasive
project,
with
the
needed
bike
trail
going
through
and
the
modifications
that
will
be
needed
to
that
WPA
box
culvert.
It
is
more
extensive,
so
it
does
move
the
city
to
lump
them
together.
Low
mobilization
costs
same
contractor
working
and
one
nice
cleanest
product
that
all
ties
together
nicely.
The
stabilization
is
not
ideal,
but
it's
not
unsettling.
So
it's
not
endangering
any
of
the
local
residents
at
the
current
moment
either.
H
C
Item
number
six
is
consideration
of
change
order
number
one
with
rounds,
construction
for
the
landfill
stormwater
improvements,
project
number
1818
in
the
amount
of
$5,500
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval
by
councilman,
Bueller
second,
by
Councilman,
l'olam
and
mike
burger.
The
landfill
or
excuse
me
solid
waste
superintendent
is
here
to
tell
us
about
this.
Thanks.
E
E
We
wanted
us
put
in
language
to
state
that
we
would
obtain
a
deal
watering
permit
prior
to
dewatering
if
we're
required
to
be
water-
and
we
might
have
to-
we
might
not
have
to
so
that
was
added
and
then,
as
the
manual
was
developed
and
edited,
there
were
some
references
to
sections
of
specifications
that
no
longer
existed.
So
it
was
kind
of
a
housekeeping
clean
thing,
no
cost
no
revision
to
contract
time
and
then
the
meat
of
this
change
order.
E
It
would
be
temporary
fencing
and
this
change
order
will
provide
for
the
installation
of
temporary
litter
fencing
in
areas
where
the
existing
fence
must
be
removed
for
the
construction
project.
So
the
existing
fence
must
be
removed
because
the
greatest
changin
on
this
berm
erode
that
is
the
top
of
the
landfill
and
then
we're
cutting
a
stormwater
ditch
into
it
to
collect
the
stormwater
that
comes
above
off
the
above
grade
garbage
when
it's
placed
to
get
it
to
this
dish
and
get
it
off
our
property.
E
And
so
with
that,
the
fence
had
to
be
moved
so
that
exposes
large
areas
of
the
landfill
to
litter,
leaving
our
premises,
which
is
well.
We
have
a
permit
requirement
that
we
we
control
litter
on
a
daily
basis.
So
our
first
line
of
defense
is
we
placed
temporary
fences
down
in
the
work
and
face
as
the
wind
shifts.
Then
the
main
line
before
that
literally
is
our
landfill.
E
B
C
E
C
Very
good,
excellent,
any
questions
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
they
motion
carries
thanks.
Mike
item
number
7
is
recommendation
of
city
participation
in
the
big
grant
for
the
third
Avenue
Bridge
and
associated
roadway
construction,
and
we
are
looking
for
a
recommendation
from
the
committee
on
this.
Yes,.
D
G
Thank
mere
third
Avenue
Bridge
Reap
replacement
is
scheduled
roughly
for
the
year
2020
we've
been
looking
at
a
lot
of
options
on
how
to
score
better
in
the
big
next
big
grant.
Application
we've
already
received
a
big
grant
that
covered
the
preliminary
engineering
stage
of
the
project
and
that
portion
of
the
project
is
wrapping
up
so
heading
forward.
We
did
ask
idg
to
help
us
identify
how
we
would
best
increase
our
point
limit
so
that
we
can
point
it
better
against
our
competitors
in
the
state
for
the
big
grant.
G
G
If
we
pay
for
a
hundred
percent
of
the
design
engineering,
which
is
estimated
at
a
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars,
we
would
get
a
full
ten
points
of
a
bump
in
our
big
grant
point
standing,
which
just
essentially
comes
in
at
about
30
percent
of
matching
public
funds
or
35
percent
right
in
that
range.
So
we
could
actually
pencils
out
for
us
to
pay
for
the
design
portion
of
the
project,
get
more
points
so
that
we
get
funded
better
or
in
a
more
timely
manner,
with
the
big
grant
and
I'll.
H
H
If
we're
doing
work
on
the
actual
bridge
itself,
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
extend
and
fix
some
storm
sewer
issues
and
roadway
issues
with
third
Avenue
itself,
and
since
it's
a
big
bridge
improvement,
grant
the
DoD
won't
pay
for
those
items,
so
that's
already
coming
would
have
to
come
out
of
City
dollars.
So
when
we
look
at
the
actual
structure
itself
and
how
to
move
forward,
what's
the
best
use
of
your
money,
this
last
year
is
a
pretty
crazy
year
for
big
replacement
grants.
H
There
is
nine
million
dollars
for
the
state
to
give
away
and
they
awarded
five
bridges
and
one
was
to
a
city,
but
every
single
one
of
those
bridges
did
kick
in
about
50%
and
it
was
extremely
aggressive
and
the
minimum
score
that
was
awarded
on
a
hundred
point
scale.
It's
actually
a
90
point
scale
for
cities
and
then
it's
a
percentage
base,
but
was
over
sixty
right
now,
the
third
Avenue
Bridge,
which
is
a
52.7.
So
it's
a
good
score,
but
this
year
it
won't
have
done
very
well.
H
H
That
being
said,
since
we
don't
really
want
to
construct
in
2019
because
to
12,
they
will
be
doing
the
bridge
on
the
big
sue
in
2019
and
wanted
construction
for
this
bridge
was
always
2020.
So
it
is
our
recommendation
that
you
actually
apply
for
the
big
grant,
which
isn't
until
December
still
doing
some
bookkeeping,
but
since
it's
budgeting
process,
this
is
rearing
its
head
now,
but
apply
in
December
without
a
local
match
and
just
see
where
your
score
lines
up,
because
there
are
additional
I
mean
the
pot
of
money
is
doubled.
H
H
H
This
is
just
based
percentage
only
for
engineering,
so
it's
not
going
to
be
180
thousand
dollars,
but
just
wanted
you
to
all
be
aware
that
I
know
that
many
of
the
cause
of
member
did
know
that
you
can
chip
in
more
than
your
20%
match,
but
there's
a
better
use
of
spending
that
money
and
the
reason
behind
that
is.
They
do
want
to
make
a
splash
with
their
money.
H
C
Okay,
are
there
any
questions
for
Vanessa
or
for
Shane?
So
we
what
we've
made
the
motion
for
is
to
accept
this
recommendation
from
infrastructure
design
group
which
says
apply
without
a
local
match,
so
chances
are
small,
but
then
we'll
will
get
bid
ready
plans
if
they
give
it
to
us
yay
no
match.
If
they
don't,
then
we'll
have
the
plans
ready
for
the
next
round
and
we'll
be
able
to
apply
with
plans
ready.
C
D
H
C
G
So
with
that
I
have
drafted
an
RFP
that
would
go
out
to
a
list
of
Engineers
firms
that
are
on
the
approved
state
list
to
conduct
that
traffic
impact
study.
So
I
put
that
together.
This
is
more
of
an
update
for
you
than
than
anything
to
act
on,
but
we
expect
that
that
document
would
be
ready
to
go
out
for
a
firm
so
that
you
can
make
a
selection
in
the
near
future
and
have
that
traffic
impact
study
done
so
alright.
C
Some
people
don't
know
that
and
it's
nothing
to
be
ashamed
of
all
right.
Thank
You
Shane,
any
questions
of
for
Shane.
Alright,
then
we'll
move
on
item
number
nine
is
discussion
on
campus
Kadeem.
Second
subdivision
letter
of
assurance,
development
agreement
and
brandy
Canton.
The
urban
planner
is
here
at
the
request
of
a
potential
buyer
of
the
land,
there's
an
outstanding
obligation
remaining
and
so
wanted
to
bring
that
forward
for
discussion.
Okay,
brandy,
okay,.
J
C
C
J
J
Okay,
so
currently,
currently
we
have
this
road
constructed
to
this
point
and
then
there's
a
turnaround.
Easement
and
the
agreement
says
that
within
ten
years,
which
would
have
been
2016
that
this
road,
which
is
eleventh,
would
have
been
or
no,
this
is
12th-
would
have
needed
to
be
constructed.
So
now,
I
guess
we're
asking
I
and
he's
interested
to
know
because
he
needs
to
make
a
decision
on
this
property
if
it's
worth
him
purchasing
and
trying
to
develop.
J
J
Thank
you
if
it's
necessary
for
a
secondary
access,
if
we
reroute
it
to
have
it
meet
up
with
Golf
Course
Road
and,
like
I,
said
right
now,
there's
a
turnaround.
Easement,
that's
recorded
with
this
plat
and
I
did
talk
to
the
fire
marshal
and
he
said
that
as
long
as
there's
not
over
30
or
I,
think
it
actually
was
2020
dwelling
units
that
he
is
okay
with
not
having
secondary
access,
but
I
guess
also
those
people
might
have
bought
those
Lots
I'm
thinking
that
they
would
have
secondary
access
in
the
future.
J
J
J
J
C
G
G
B
C
I
C
There's
still
some
detention
pond
things
left
over
and
some
sidewalk
things
that
also
haven't
been
done.
It
isn't
just
the
road.
There
are
other
outstanding
obligations
and
have
nothing
to
do
with
this,
so
probably
wouldn't
want
to
cancel
the
entire
development
agreement.
Without
considering
whether
or
not
you
want
to
refresh
those
obligations
or
pursue
them,
they
were
supposed
to
have
been
completed
by
2016
and
they
have
so.
D
I
J
Then,
but
if
the
Lots
aren't
sold
yet,
then
they
don't
have
sidewalk
II,
there's
so
there's
not
complete
connection,
but
usually
I
mean
if
it's
something
that's
being
dedicated
to
the
city.
If
it's
a
lot
like
a
detention
pond
area
or
a
park,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
developer
is
putting
in
that
sidewalk.
So
the
city
is
not
taking
on
that
responsibility
so
that
that's
one
area
that
should
have
sidewalk
and
I.
Don't
think
that
the
interested
party
is
opposed
to
running
sidewalk
along
the
property
lines.
Actually.
C
There'll
be
the
developer
or
the
owner
of
the
detention.
Pond
lot
came
to
you
already
asking
you
to
forgive
the
requirement
to
install
sidewalks,
and
you
said
no,
that
you
still
want
the
sidewalks,
but
but
so
they
would
be
required
adjacent
to
lot
a
and
all
our
ordinance
says
sidewalks
on
both
sides
of
every
street.
So
that's
supposed
to
be
the
developers,
responsibility,
and
so
that
would
presumably
be
in
a
new
development
agreement
that
would
result
when
we
cancel
out
the
old
one.
If
you
decide
to
do
that
so.
B
Can
I
clarify
something
the
so
the
developer
interested
party
would
everyone
you
use
that
term.
We
want
to
use
they're
not
going
to
develop
to
the
south
they're
they're
not
going
to
develop
those
other
lot
wait
a
minute
rephrase
a
question
did
do.
Does
the
developer
own,
that
property
to
the
south,
or
is
that.
J
Are
you
here
yeah
this?
This
area
is
included
with
this
plat,
so
it
is
owned
by
the
same
party
that
I
guess
is.
It
has
all
of
competitive,
doin's
second
subdivision
the
remaining
Lots
that
have
not
been
sold,
but
then
there
have
been
the
Lots
that
are
sold
so
there's
also
a
lot
other
parties
in
fall,
yeah.
I
C
And
this
isn't
unique
in
that
we
have
a
development
agreement
with
outstanding
requirements.
Our
ordinance
says
all
required.
Improvements
for
approval
of
a
subdivision
must
be
constructed
within
two
years,
and
we
gave
ten
years
for
this,
and
ten
years
have
passed
and
the
improvements
haven't
been
made,
there's
still
a
few
things
outstanding,
so
it
it
probably
has
some
bearing
on
some
of
those
other
development
agreements
with
outstanding
requirements.
Although
each
one
is
unique,
this
would
be
a
precedent
to
cancel
out
obligations.
C
I
C
Won't
get
involved
when
they
sell.
We
have
no
way
of
even
knowing
so
it's
just
audit.
This
is
recorded
it's
up
to
the
city.
If
we
would
choose
to
try
and
enforce
any.
We
have
probably
over
a
hundred
development
agreements
that
we've
recorded
and
we've
never
ever
enforced
any
of
them,
and
so
it's
it's
an
effort.
It's
disturbing
to
the
staff
to
know
that
the
developers
are
making
promises
that
they
aren't
keeping.
In
some
cases
they
keep
all
their
promises
and
everything
gets
done
in
other
cases.
C
The
whole
engineering
department
is
involved
in
compiling
a
list,
first
of
all,
of
all
of
the
recorded
development
agreements
and
then
they'll
be
looking
at
each
and
every
one
of
them
to
see
if
they've
been
satisfied.
So
we
know
that
if
they've
been
satisfied,
we
will
make
a
note
in
the
file
so
that
we
don't
have
to
wonder
if
they
haven't
been
satisfied.
We've
been
talking
for
years
and
years
about
doing
an
extra
layer
on
our
GIS
for
obligations,
and
you
may
have
heard
us
talking
about
our
obligation
layer.
C
This
is
just
one
of
many
and
so
it
since
the
council
authorized
going
forward
without
the
improvements
being
made,
there
was
a
promise
to
make
them
within
ten
years
that
hasn't
been
satisfied.
So
the
question
that
you're
being
asked
is:
how
comfortable
are
you
with
dismissing
some
of
these
requirements?
J
This
provision
here,
age,
I,
think
it's
yeah,
so
2h,
it
says
no
later
than
10
years
and
the
date
of
this
instrument
is
recorded
with
the
registered
deeds.
Proprietors
shall
construct
at
their
sole
cost,
the
sidewalk
adjacent
to
the
detention
pond
and
then,
and
then
it
references
the
remainder
of
34th,
Street,
West
and
11th
Avenue
north
to
city
standards
for
a
local
residential
street,
with
parking
on
both
sides
of
the
street.
J
The
after
mentions
Street
will
be
constructed
in
lot
a
or
in
the
dedicated
public
right
of
ways
in
accordance
with
anticipated
future
plats
and
the
location.
As
indicated
on,
the
attached
approved
preliminary
plan
layout,
which
the
the
preliminary
plan
wasn't
attached
to
this,
and
it
also
does
make
it
a
little
awkward
because
we
never
do.
We
don't
have
dedicated
public
right-of-way
as
per
this
plat
that
they
were
tied
to
so
and
then
that's
just
I
mean
those
are
the
main
ones.
I
know
I
went
through
and
highlighted
some
other
ones.
J
A
temporary
turnaround
shall
be
constructed
on
private
property
on
lot,
12
complete
with
compacted
subgrade,
and
so
it
was
supposed
to
be
improved
better
than
what
it
was.
But
that's
something
that
per
an
updated
development
agreement.
You
could
make
it
better.
You
know
and
say
that
it
has
to
be
improved
to
city
standards.
They.
C
C
C
C
D
My
my
personal
opinion
is
they
got
if
they
got
to
do
the
pond
of
standard
I
mean
that's
gonna,
be
a
bare
minimum.
I
mean
that's.
It's
I
mean
that
controls
flood
issues
and
everything
else.
They
should
have
the
sidewalk
around
there.
If
we're
gonna
have
side
working
around
the
rest
of
it.
Why
don't
you
put
sidewalk
around
the
retention?
Pond
I
mean
that
doesn't
even
make
sense,
so
we're
gonna
be
able
to
drive
sidewalk
and
also
I'm
you
hit
dirt.
D
So
as
far
as
a
road
I
understand
the
fire,
a
fire
marshals,
30
count,
but
personally
I'd
rather
see
a
secondary
entrance.
In
case
there
was
ever
a
major
catastrophe
or
if
services
need
to
get
in
there,
as
well
as
the
street,
Department
maintenance
and
snow
removal
is
always
an
issue
when
you
get
out
into
that
area,
especially
I'll
by
the
lake
and
out
in
the
open
areas
that
it
blows
through
there.
D
So
now,
whether
it
has
to
go
back
around
like
the
previous
drawing
I,
don't
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
an
issue
with
that
I,
don't
think
it
has
to
I.
Think
you
can
do
it
now.
Maybe
go
straight
out
to
Golf
Course,
Road
or
something
along.
Those
lines
you
know
would
be
in
my
opinion,
that
would
be
okay.
I
gives
them
a
secondary
access.
D
J
D
D
Yeah,
that's
33rd
yeah.
You
know
they
have
access
points
where
it
comes
in
and
house
essentially
like
a
frontage
road,
so
I
mean
that's
not
uncommon,
so
whether
we
break
into
quadrants
or
not
I
I
have
no
issue
with
that,
but
they
didn't
have
some
sort
of
a
road
that
gets
in
there
in
case
there
is
frankly
catastrophe
that
they
needed
to
get
out.
D
C
J
J
Well,
he
was
thinking
what
the
quadrants
will
come
if
he
has
to
put
a
paved
access
there
I
believe,
because
otherwise
the
sanitary
sewer
man
manholes,
can
be
extended
unless
they
had
all-weather
access.
So
then
that
would
come,
but
if,
if
it
wasn't
necessary
or
requirement
whatever
you
guys
decide,
he
was
willing
to
just
do
three.
B
B
J
B
D
C
C
C
I
I
H
C
B
B
I
D
I
C
F
That's
ever
looked
at
the
land
because
if
you
would
and
I
never
shot
up
with
a
laser,
so
I
can't
I
can't
say
for
sure,
but
I
would
say
a
minimum
of
two
feet
of
film:
you'd
have
to
fill
13
acres,
and
so
as
far
as
anybody
developing
it
I,
don't
I
don't
see
that
happening
because
it's
it
would
be
just
filling
the
engineers
feel
for
your
roads
and
your
sidewalks.
So
you're
talking
a
major
amount
of
money
for
someone
do
that
anyway.
F
That
well
yeah
and
then
not
only
that
but
like
if
Tom
and
those
guys
have
to
come
in
there
and
do
that
right
now
put
side
watching
roads
there
it'd
be
a
it,
be
a
sidewalk
and
then
down
a
hole.
That's
what
you'd
have
right
now.
If
you
would
require
those
things
before
a
building
permit
was
pulled
or
something,
whereas.
H
F
F
There's,
no
wonder
why
it
has
sat
that
way,
so
is
what
I
was
thinking
is
if
I
could
put
possibly
three
Lots
at
least
it'd.
Be
revenue
versus
this
I
mean
I
can't
say
for
sure,
but
if
I
was
a
banker,
it'd
be
very
scared
to
lend
any
developer
money
to
do
anything
because
he's
been
a
lot
before
a
house
ever
goes
on
this,
so
I
could
see
the
sitting
vacant
for
another
how
many
years
so
that's,
but
but
that's
up
to
you
guys.
F
But
if
a
roadway
asked
you
put
in
I
mean
you,
you
could
spend
I,
don't
know
a
hundred
dollars
of
dollars.
What
maybe
more
just
getting
that
one
road
going
through
there,
in
which
case,
if
that's
something
that
you
guys
are
gonna
require,
then
for
me
the
meetings
over
because
it's
not
gonna
happen
for
me,
but.
C
So
if
you
were
very
interested,
you
could
take
it
upon
yourself
to
draft
up
a
proposal
for
the
council
to
take
into
consideration
as
an
alternative
that
to
the
other
one,
and
they
could
then
take
action
to
upon
receipt
of
a
signed
development
agreement
to
do
the
alternative
that
they
would
forgive.
The
existing
I
was.
F
C
F
F
C
J
F
F
C
They
can't
I
mean
no
matter
what
you
say:
there's
gonna
be
people
that
disagree,
but
I,
that's
practical.
What
you're
saying
we
do
require
the
lowest
floor
elevation
to
be
shown
on
preliminary
plans
as
an
ordinance
requirement
and
that's.
Why
is
so
that
people
understand
they
can
see
what
the
ground
elevation
is
and
you
have
to
build
above
the
ground
water
table.
So
if
you're
looking
at
that
lowest
finished
floor,
is
six
feet
above
the
existing
grade.
F
C
D
J
J
D
Could
do
a
preliminary
action
plan
as
far
as
what
we're
looking
to
have
what
you're
looking
to
have
removed
from
the
existing
one
and
then
I
personally,
would
rather
see
one
of
the
gentleman
that
owned
it
come
with
it,
so
that
it
can
be
discussed
one
way
or
the
other,
because
worst
case
scenario,
we
could
say.
No,
you
need
to
put
that
road
in
now,
right.
D
A
C
Black
and
white-
and
we
can
see
specifically
this-
isn't
and
you
know,
I
hesitate
to
bring
one
forward,
knowing
that
we
have
ten
others,
yeah
and
I
mean
they
that,
in
fairness
to
the
council,
when
they
take
an
action
that
might
be
setting
a
precedent,
we
should
let
them
know
what
kind
of
other
ramifications
there
will
be
to
their
decision.
Okay,.
F
C
This
would
be
the
first
time
we've
ever
forgiven
a
development
agreement
and
it
might
color
the
way
they
approve
future
development
agreements,
because
if
they
find
that
one
in
a
hundred
development
agreements
isn't
honored,
you
know.
So
what
will
address
the
one
in
a
hundred?
But
if
we
find
that
it's
ninety
and
a
hundred,
then
that's
a
different
consideration.
C
D
A
Thank
you.
I
Adam
just
to
piggyback
on
what
the
Merritt
said
earlier.
You'd
imagine
bringing
in
the
other
the
current
landowner
to
reiterate
what
she
said.
Those
obligations
don't
just
run
with
the
owner
of
Lotte.
They
run
with
all
fifteen
homes
out
there.
So
if
you
wanted
to
bring
it
all
13
or
15,
I'd.
A
D
C
C
C
D
C
D
C
A
related
subject:
we
also
do
not
do
occupancy
permits
when
land
changes
hands
and
someone
new
buys
it
only
if
a
building
permit
is
taken
is
there
an
occupancy
granted.
So
someone
with
an
improper
use
in
a
zone
can
buy
property
and
start
using
it
in
an
inappropriate
way
and
they've
made
a
significant
investment
before
they
even
find
out
that
what
they're
doing
is
illegal
and
that's
come
up
before
people
who
find
out
that
well,
I
didn't
know.
I
couldn't
do
this
in
this
building.