►
From YouTube: Public Works & Safety Meeting 05 16 2018
Description
Public Works / Safety Committee agenda for 5-16-18
Agenda Items include a Local Government Certification Form in the State of South Dakota Emergency Solutions Grant Application.
A
B
B
D
A
A
This
is
the
time
for
public
input
if
anyone
would
like
to
speak
about
something,
that's
not
on
the
agenda,
but
just
in
general
terms.
This
is
your
opportunity
and
please
approach
the
microphone
see.
None
we'll
move
on.
The
third
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
agenda,
so
we
have
the
shooting
range
I'll.
Just
put
that
we
put
that
at
the
end,
we
have
a
couple
presentations
now
that
we're
doing
so
call
that
one
6a.
C
A
E
We
budgeted
in
2018
we
budgeted
$23,000
for
this
evaluation
for
the
administration
building
at
the
wastewater
facility.
We
contracted
those
engineering
services
with
HDR
engineering
out
of
Sioux
Falls,
South
Dakota
and
Al
Erickson.
The
project
manager
with
HDR
on
our
project
is
here
to
give
you
the
evaluation,
findings
and
recommendations.
I
would.
F
As
Mike
mentioned,
I'm
al
Erickson,
with
HDR
in
Sioux
Falls
done
a
lot
of
work
in
the
past
here
in
Watertown,
for
the
city
and
as
well
as
like
pesco
Water
Board,
and
this
particular
project
is
that
the
wastewater
treatment
facility,
where
we've
also
done
projects
and
it's
to
look
at
the
admin
building,
and
also
the
maintenance
and
shop
garage
at
the
wastewater
plant,
and
to
give
recommendations
on
what
should
be
done
there.
We
did
an
evaluation
back
in
2010
and
11
and
at
that
time,
that
was
more
of
facilities.
F
First
of
all,
we
looked
at
the
administration
shop
building
and
the
reason
we
looked
at
that
is
because,
if
that
was
not
gonna
be
repaired
or
made
whole,
you
know
bring
up
the
code
now
that
it
could
make
sense
to
incorporate
those
facilities
in
with,
in
with
a
proposed
change
at
the
admin
or
a
new
admin
building,
so
that
particular
building
was
constructed
in
three
separate
phases.
It's
a
concrete
block
construction.
They
rear,
upped
it
in
2000.
F
F
The
oldest
part
of
the
building,
which
is
to
the
south,
showed
the
most
severe
deterioration.
We
noticed
that
that
wall
is
currently
out
of
plumb,
whether
it
was
built
that
way
or
has
moved
that
into
that
position.
Now
we
don't
know,
but
it's
up
to
1/4
of
a
foot
per
foot
out
of
plumb
number
of
cracks,
stepping
up
and
down
from
the
windows
and
doors
showing
that
that
building
is
shifting
around
it
was
not
built
with
any
control
joints,
so
shrinkage
and
growth
within
there.
F
It's
got
to
go
somewhere,
so
that's
going
into
the
crack
into
the
joints
and
cracking
structures
continuing
to
move
because
they
fixed
joints
routinely
and
the
problems
reoccur
and
then
also
I'll
get
into
it.
But
there's
possibly
some
movement.
That's
due
to
freeze
thaw,
that's
occurring
and
a
real
wet
situation
on
the
back,
the
site,
drainage
on
the
back,
the
water
drains
to
the
west
and
then
also
tends
to
pond
that
way
from
surface
runoff
and
so
that
area
behind
there
is
constantly
wet
or
not
constantly,
but
most
the
time
it's
wet.
F
And
so
then,
when
we
get
freeze-thaw
in
the
wintertime,
it
causes
some
issues
and
then
that
water
also
migrates
through
the
wall
in
that
west
wall
on
the
inside
has
had
mold
issues
that
they
truck
they
try
to
combat
quite
often
and
just
comes
back
inside
the
wall
or
the
columns.
They
also
are
out
of
plumb
lean
about
3/16
of
an
inch
per
foot
too
so
kind
of
indicating
that
the
whole
building
might
be
shifted
tipping
over
the
lintels
above
the
door
show
significant
corrosion.
F
The
other
metal
lintels
like
that
span
that
opening
and
then
the
bearing
walls
on
the
sides
that
are
holding
those
lintels
up.
They
are
showing
significant
signs
of
damage
too,
and
what
we
noticed.
What
we're
there
is
that,
typically,
those
those
jams
that
are
holding
up
the
lintels,
they
should
be
reinforced
and
filled,
even
if
the
walls
aren't
those
that
a
minimum
should
have
been
and
they're
not.
We
sounded
them
and
they're
just
Hollow.
So
there's
really
not
a
lot
of
strength
there
to
hold
those
lintels
off
I'm,
just
showing
some
more
there's
that
top.
F
F
Our
opinion
is
when
you
are
get
into
repair.
Building
the
the
building
code
has
a
definition
that
they
call
substantial
substructure
all
damaged,
and
we
feel
with
this
limited
evaluation
that
we
did,
that
it
does
meet
that
category
and
we
didn't
see
any
reason
to
go
into
or
more
detailed
analysis,
because
we
figured
it's
going
to
go
there
and
then
what
that
does.
Is
it
says
that
anything
that
you
do
to
that?
Building
you're
gonna
have
to
bring
it
up
to
current
code
and
in
this
case
the
the
cost
to
do
that.
F
Just
does
not
make
financial
sense.
You
know
because
it's
such
an
old
structure
and
and
it's
not
constructed
properly
those
CMU
walls
without
grout
fill
and
without
structural,
reinforcing
would
not
mean
codes
of
you
know,
be
a
significant
undertaking
to
do
that
and
we
could
build
a
new
structure
or
cheaper
than
you
could
fix
that
one
and
the
the
bottom
thing
there
is
that
you
know
the
parrot
that
wall
blew
over
in
the
wind.
F
F
Then
we
also
recommended
that
they
watch
these.
You
know
formally
look
at
these
cracks
and
see
how
bad
they
are
and
keep
an
eye
on
them.
You
know
measure
them
and
then
make
just
to
make
sure
that
it
doesn't
start
accelerating
the
the
failures
so
that
it
could
collapse.
You
know
just
kind
of
keep
it
keep
a
more
focused
eye
on
it.
You
know
by
measuring
the
process
and
then
once
those
facilities
get
moved,
that
building
should
be
taken
out
just
because
it
is
going
to
be
a
maintenance
and
safety
issue
in
the
future.
B
E
And
then,
on
the
south
end,
there
are
three
garage
stalls
that
we
parked
vehicles
in
right
with
a
person
the
standing
taking
this
picture
where
they're
standing,
there's,
there's
two
parking
stalls
there
so
they're
what
we
do
have
five
garage
stalls
in
this
building
that
would
be
lost
of
this
building.
I.
F
F
F
E
F
F
The
existing
administration
building
is
about
25
years
old,
its
outgrown
its
functionality.
As
far
as
you
know,
it's
used
as
now
and
in
the
foreseeable
future,
as
I
mentioned,
we
did
that
evaluation
back
in
2010
and
11,
which
we
recommended
that
it
be
looked
at
further.
It
wasn't
part
of
the
sculpt
back
then,
but
we
recommended
it
and
we
looked
at
it
is
stick
built.
F
You
know
lumber
frame
structure
which
is
a
more
typical
or
residential
construction,
rather
than
industrial,
commercial,
and
that
was
built
by
Lake
area
tech
as
a
project
that
back
in
93
and
94.
It
does
not
currently
meet
ata
requirements
and
it
doesn't
have
sprinklers
or
fire
suppression
system
as
well,
then,
just
where
it
happens
to
be
setting.
It
also
doesn't
lend
itself
well
to
being
expanded
or
to
remove
some
of
those
Adu
limitations,
since
it
is
a
two-story
structure
and
that
second-story
is
a
little
difficult
to
get
into.
F
F
F
There
is
no
conference
room
right
now
if
they
have
a
conference
they're
just
sitting
kind
of
in
the
area
where
the
assistant,
superintendent
and
pre-treatment
have
their
areas
and
what
we'd
be
looking
at
is
doing.
More
of
a
a
conference
room
like
something
down
below
where
there'd
be
a
projector,
there
would
be
a
table
and
all
that
it's
just
more
like
be
set
up
for
training
and
and
for
having
actual
meetings.
F
Then
there
are
no
essentially
no
locker
room
facilities
and
there's
only
one
unisex
bathroom,
which
is
also
not
compliant
with
code
right
now.
Existing
document
storage
is
pre-stressed.
They
don't
have
enough
room
for
all
their
drawings
and
manuals
that
they
have
on
site
now,
and
the
existing
telemetry
room
in
areas
is
not
up
to
current
standards
and
improvements
are
proposed,
and
that
was
actually
proposed
back
in
the
2010-11
evaluation
as
well
that
that
needed
to
be
addressed
and
no
real
changes
have
been
made
there
sanest
an
either
vehicle
storage
is
inadequate
there
as
well
I.
F
B
F
F
F
This
is
a
thousand
feet
down
the
road
it's
closer
to
the
end
of
the
plant
than
it
is
to
the
beginning,
and
then
it's
tucked
behind
a
trickling
filter,
which
is
a
big,
concrete
structure
with
a
dome
on
it,
and
so
you
don't
see
it
till
you're
right
there.
So
it's
now
when
visitors
come
in,
you
know
they're
they
could
get
lost,
it
could
end
up
in
the
pretreatment
building
by
accident.
F
So
what
we
proposed
was
to
construct
a
new
facility
and
to
make
it
out
of
a
more
durable
construction
type
right
now.
Most
of
most
of
the
newer
facilities
out
there,
this
place
face
block,
and
that's
probably,
what
we'd
be
looking
at
the
top
photo.
There
happens
to
be.
The
sioux
falls
water
treatment
plant
that
we
did
and
that
that
was
constructed
back
in
the
late
80s
early
70s
early
80s,
and
that
building
from
the
outside
outside
and
specifically
this
looks
like
a
brand-new
facility
because
it
was
constructed
and
what
you
those
types
of
materials.
F
The
on
the
right
hand,
side
is
the
admin
building,
and
then
the
maintenance
shop
has
attached
that
one
as
well
as
very
similar,
and
the
bottom
one
happens
to
be
Bozeman
Montana,
that's
a
one
that
just
finished
construction
recently
and
I.
Think
if
we
go
out
in
that,
folder
you'd
probably
see
construction
vehicles
yet
so
mention
all
those
other
things.
F
Yeah
got
that
one
coming
so
the
proposed
office
space,
like
I,
said
we
went
through
that
question
here
and
through
that
we
came
up
with
all
these
particular
uses.
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
all
these,
but
Mike's
got
the
record.
If
anybody
wants
to
look
at
that,
we've
got
in
PDF
form.
You
can
give
it
to
you
as
well,
so
essentially,
when
you
had
all
it
would
have
four
office
spaces
for
the
management
and
then
another
five
cubicles
three
for
staff
and
then
two
for
the
supervisory
control
and
data
acquisition
systems.
F
A
F
The
area
that
currently
we're
proposing
where
we
put
that
and
the
gate
is
just
right
there
to
up
and
to
the
right
from
that.
So
as
soon
as
you'd
come
in,
you
would
see
it.
It
would
be
very,
very
noticeable
and
that
building
right
behind
it
is
a
new
pretreatment
building
that
was
constructed
and
what
about
2000.
E
G
F
How
far
away
that
existing
admin
building
is
and
kind
of,
cleverly
hidden
behind
the
trickling
filter
with
bad
I
know
what
everybody's
thinking
it
was
now.
How
much
is
this
gonna
cost
it's
a
big
building
and
with
the
construction
climate
right
now,
we're
looking
at
probably
in
the
four
and
a
half
to
five
million
dollar
range,
depending
on
when
it's
built
and
we've
got
a
25%
contingency
in
there
right
now
as
well,
because
we
are
at
this
conceptual
stage
that
can
be
tweaked
as
we
go
and
also
was
tweaking
how
the
building
climate
goes
right.
F
E
That
I'll
be
assessing
our
finances
to
determine
if
we
have
the
funding
to
proceed
with
a
project
like
this,
with
or
without
assistance.
I
do
know
that
our
wastewater
rates
are
so
low
that
they're
below
the
minimum,
so
we
wouldn't
likely
be
have
opportunity
for
any
grant
money,
but
there
would
be
SRF
loan
funds
available
and
we
did
retire.
One
loan
just
recently
in
2016,
which
frees
up
some
debt
service
there.
B
E
C
Have
one
so
if
I'm
following
the
years
and
the
you
know,
budgeting
process,
I
just
was
looking
at
that
building
thinking,
I'm,
not
sure
I
want
to
go
to
work
there.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
I
mean
and
I'm,
not
you
know,
being
overly
dramatic,
but
in
your
opinions
you
know,
are
we
still
on?
Are
we
still
safe?
You
know
waiting
until
you
know,
and
and
I
know,
that
new
facilities
also
increased
production.
C
E
I
see
that
the
operation
shop
that
masonry
structure-
hey
the
parts
of
the
walls,
are
broken
off
in
the
wind.
It's
it's
that
bad,
so
that
structure
should
be
demolished
at
some
point,
the
sooner
the
better
the
existing
administration
building
that
that
garage
stall
there,
the
trucks
are
so
much
taller.
Now
we
can't
Park
a
pickup
in
that
garage
door,
so
we
can't
really
use
that
for
a
lot
of
our
vehicles
and
so
what
what
we're
we
talked
about
a
little
bit
here
today
is
we
were
going
to
come.
We
have
to.
E
We
have
two
workshops:
the
collection,
the
sewer
collection
folks,
have
one
and
they're
building
on
the
south
end
of
the
facility.
This
one,
the
old
masonry
structure,
is
the
operator,
so
we
would,
we
would
put
them
all
in
that
same
building
and
would
probably
lose
a
garage
stall
down
there.
But
then
we
would
pick
up
the
garage
so
that
we
lost
there
and
at
the
operation
shop
in
this
new
structure
with
the
layout.
That's
we're
looking
at
right
now
so
well.
E
You
would
yeah
that
that
one
structure,
that's
good
for
cold
storage,
but
we
might
even
have
something
damaged
the
next
time
we
have
rewarder
those
walls
multiple
times
over
the
last
20
years,
and
it's
just
it's
it's
it's
just
not
plumb
anymore.
It's
just
rocking
in
the
wind
kinda.
Yes,
it
needs
to
go
the.
E
If
this
works
is
that
it's
out
of
the
way
of
a
future
additional
process
downstream
or
a
new
process
if
we
have
to
get
into
phosphorus
removal
or
something
so
I
think,
ultimately,
both
of
those
two
structures
will
get
demolished
and
in
the
not-too-distant
future,
but
that
operation
shop
the
masonry
structure
as
soon
as
we
can
get
afford
to
do
so.
Okay,.
B
F
A
E
The
only
supervisor
that
has
a
private
office,
you
know
you
have
to
do
employee
issues
and
evaluations
and
you
need
some
confidentiality,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
big
issues
and
again
that
was
a
picture
of
our
training.
A
training
session
is
helping
around
the
desk
of
the
supervisors.
Did
a
computer
and
I
think
I'm,
just
gonna
guess
but
I'd
say
the
supervisors.
I
know
I,
know
pretreatment,
they
do
a
good
30
sessions
a
year,
so
there's
probably
ninety
or
a
hundred
training
sessions.
You're
taking
place,
not
counting
the
staff
meetings
that
I
hold
weekly.
D
D
Got
a
safety
issue
that
should
be
a
concern,
and
second
thing
is:
if
you
can
wait
years,
you've
got
an
inflation
factor,
that's
going
to
take
place
anyway.
Right
so
I
mean
I'm,
just
saying
it's
it's
possible,
and
then
that
might
be
something
that
we
we
take
a
look
at
if
it
is
a
funding
issue
for
you.
E
Technical
financial
assistance
on
srf
loan
and
see,
what's
out
there
and
like
I,
said
I
think
what
we
really
need
to
do
is
we
need
to
move
forward
with
the
design
because,
though,
that
that's
money
we'll
spend
next
year
or
the
following
year
or
whatever
and
tighten
up
the
cost
a
little
bit
and
then
be
prepared
to
move
for
it
and
maybe
we'll
find
that
we
can
swing
it.
You
know.
A
E
A
I
I
I
And
it
is
an
improvement,
though
the
timings
are,
will
fight
to
bear.
They
are
now,
so
he
should
only
have
to
stop
once
going
through
there,
not
today,
it's
probably
sometimes
two,
maybe
even
three
times
we
do
have
a
little
problem
with
the
controller
up,
but
the
first
Avenue
Northeast
right
now
will
come
into
sync
the
rest
for
some
reason.
I
I
And
you'll
see
his
two
three
quarterback
a
gap
up
sometimes
get
a,
not
a
very
aggressive
driver
who
wants
the
whole
thing
clean
before
they
come
out.
It
does
his
best
to
simulate.
What's
there
up,
we
actually
did
come
out
and
ran
existing
vibes
on
a
track,
but
these
times
in
there
and
to
validate
the
model
to
make
sure
it
was
running
correctly.
So
it
gives
a
pretty
good
dictation
of
what's
going
on
out
there
first
North
for
South.
Basically
they
stay
the
same.
I
I
You
know
if
you
guys
are
in
favor
of
removing
it.
We've
been
looking
at
probably
installing
a
hawk
system
out
there
to
get
pedestrians
across,
which
is
similar,
what's
being
done
about
a
g1
up
north
by
the
Christian
school
or
device
in
the
daycare
up.
There,
we'd
have
to
only
remove
the
one
pole
in
the
North
West
quadrant.
I
A
G
I
A
I
I
I
G
A
A
K
A
A
K
I
Quotes
yeah
we'd
have
to
get
a
project
into
our
system
by
using
strictly
I'll.
Do
tea
money
we'd
have
to
go
to
you,
know,
put
the
other
contract
and
the
plans
get
put
plans
together
and
then,
of
course,
then
let
the
project
advertise
it.
So
it
does
take
a
certain
amount
of
time
for
us
to
go
through
our
process.
Okay,.
I
I
We
do
the
88
modifications,
but
you'd
have
to
be
responsible
for
the
adding
the
mast
arm
single
pole
in
the
southwest,
quadrant
and
stuff,
like
that
any
work
there.
If
we
do
the
a
da,
if
we
kept
the
signal,
we
would
have
to
tear
the
quadrants
out
they're,
all
not
compliant
for
having
we'd
have
to
put
two
buttons
in
each
quality
knowledge
quarter
now,
and
that
would
involve
now
right
away.
I'm,
taking
right
away
plus
reconstruction
of
those
quadrants,
so
we'd
be
looking
at
maybe
two
three
years.
D
I
They
got
so
bad
I
would
have
to
go
back
projects.
A
dog
would
be
the
kind
of
the
goal
wants.
You
guys
I
think
you're
going
to
go
to
a
tool
away
pretty
quick
here
or
that
was
our
desire
and
then,
at
that
time
we
just
go
into
flash
we'd,
actually
wouldn't
see
how
it
operates
and
with
the
next
you
know,
two
to
five
years.
I
wouldn't
change
much
okay!
Well,
no
before
even
then,
when.
A
I
I
B
A
C
C
B
A
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
joint
powers,
agreement
with
the
South
Dakota
game,
fish
and
parks
regarding
the
shooting
range
project
number
1619,
and
we
also
have
award
of
the
contract,
which
is
the
same
project.
So
these
are
together
and
Shane
will
let
you
explain.
K
Okay,
Thank
You
mayor,
we
did
take
bids
on
May
3rd.
We
received
six
bids,
they
arranged
from
three
hundred
and
sixty-five
thousand
dollars
to
seven
hundred
and
sixteen
thousand
dollars.
The
low
bid
was
submitted
by
iran's
construction
of
brookings
in
the
amount
of
three
hundred
and
sixty-four
thousand
nine
hundred
ninety
five
dollars,
which
is
amazingly
fifty
percent
lower
than
the
engineer's
estimate
of
seven
hundred
and
twenty
thousand.
K
We
did
reach
out
to
that
contractor,
discuss
the
bid
results
and
they
were
concerned
that
they
missed
something
but
upon
conclusion
of
our
discussion
with
them,
they
concluded
that
they
didn't
miss
anything.
They
just
simply
were
aggressive
on
their
prices.
So
with
that
they're
comfortable
proceeding
with
the
project
if
they
get
awarded
that
rounds,
construction
is
currently
working
on
projects
at
the
landfill
and
when
we
did
the
29th
Street
project
last
year,
they
were
a
subcontractor
doing
the
earth
work
there.
K
D
For
two
lanes,
do
we
have
now,
with
this
kind
of
a
number,
do
we
have
any
say
in
making
a
change
to
either
add
or
modify
one
of
those
lanes
or
either
Adaline,
or
to
modify
one
lanes
to
get
out
to
the
200
yards
or
is
there's
just
one
of
those
things?
We're
gonna,
throw
holy
water
on
and
don't
really
have
a
say
at.
K
This
point
we
wouldn't
propose
to
do
that,
mostly
because
the
grant
funding
and
all
that
stuff
was
kind
of
well-defined
and
it
would
take
a
substantive,
probably
have
to
rebid
it.
If
you
wanted
to
try
to
do
that,
and
so
we
by
law,
we
can't
go
15%
if
we
awarded
this
contract
today,
our
limit
on
adding
work
is
15%
and
that
200
yard
Lane
would
clearly
add
more
than
15%.
So
we,
if.
D
D
Because
I'll
throw
my
two
cents
and
I'm
this
again,
as
I
did
before
I
think
we're
we're
missing
a
very,
very
significant
part
of
the
user
group
by
having
all
of
the
hundred-yard
lanes
and
not
the
200-yard
lanes.
I.
Think
it's
going
to
take
out
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
users
by
not
having
something
greater
than
mounted
yards
just
and
with
this
number
coming
in
so
much
lower
than
the
engineering
estimate,
I.
C
D
I
mean
the
the
the
trend.
If
you
look
at
rifle
ranges
now
is
to
be
out
at
four
five,
six
hundred
yards
or
more
and
and
really
this
is
being
set
up
for
pistol
and
initial
sighting
in
that's
really
what
this
is
for.
So
it's
going
to
take
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
your
user
group
out
after
they
cite
their
rifle
and
is
what
I'm
saying
is.
K
Did
position
the
bays
and
the
project
to
allow
for
additional
base
to
be
built
to
the
east
that
could
be
longer
so
we've
cited
the
initial
project
such
that
could
be
expanded
in
the
future,
but
really
what
we
were
bumping
our
nose
on
is
that
a
lot
of
our
preliminary
cost
estimates
way
exceeded
the
anticipated
budget.
So
we
had
to
pare
it
back.
K
This
is
what
was
vetted
as
an
acceptable
target
to
for
the
project
initially,
and
we
did
anticipate
that
the
costs
were
going
to
be
pushing
seven
hundred
thousand
and
we
actually
went
to
the
extent
that
we
actually
passed
a
hat
around
between
the
city
and
the
game.
Fish
and
parks
wondering
how
we
were
gonna
cover
the
gaps.
If
we
fell
short,
so
we
were
really
concerned
about
overall
project
costs
and
just
amazed
by
the
numbers.
K
But
if
you
look
at
the
other
numbers
that
were
presented,
they
were
up
in
the
range
where
we
expected
to
be
so.
This
guy
happened
to
leave
some
money
on
the
table
and
gave
the
city
is
going
to
benefit
greatly
from
that.
But
if
you
get
above
him
much
further
we're
right
in
where
we
were
our
budget
concerns,
we're
gonna
begin
so
I
think
we've
gotten
a
blessed
project
here:
okay,.
C
K
Well,
we
have
the
award,
then
we
have
about
a
two
week
plus
process
where
we
get
all
the
contracts
awarded.
I
would
suspect
that
the
rounds
construction
would
work
hard
on
the
landfill
project,
get
that
to
a
point
where
they
can
move
their
equipment
down
to
here
and
begin
construction
down
on
this
project
so
and
it
might
be
possible
that
they'll
bring
equipment
up
here
as
well,
but
anyway
it's
it's
plausible
that
we
would
begin
construction
first
part
of
June.
B
D
B
D
And
I
don't
want
to
be
argumentative
on
this,
but
the
reason
why
I
was
told
there
wasn't
a
200-yard
Lane
is
because
of
funding.
Now
we're
half
the
engineering
cap
hold
or
the
estimate,
which
means.
Why?
Wouldn't
we
look
at
at
least
to
see
what
it
would
cost
them
at
this
time,
while
everything
is
being
pulled
together
to
see
what
that
would
cost.
A
D
D
A
Yes,
we
we
could
do
that
and
if
you
want
us
to
pursue
that
the
first
step
would
be
to
ask
the
game,
fish
and
parks
if,
if
they'd
be
willing
to
pay
for
75%
of
the
additional
part
and
design
it
like
they
did
on
this
or
if
that
would
be
all
ours,
because
we
didn't
I
mean
we.
Could
we
have
enough
budget
to
do
that?
Probably
mayor.
H
Yes,
I
did
have
a
discussion
with
the
game,
fish
and
parks
right
after
this
was
a
bid
and
I
did
bring
up
the
option
of
a
two
or
three
hundred
yard
Lane,
just
to
see
what
their
thought
was,
and
there
was
actually
a
lot
more
difficulties
designing
this
than
originally
thought
because
of
how
flat
it
was.
There
was
drainage
issues
and
I,
don't
want
to
say
that
they
kind
of
laughed
it
off,
but
they
did
kind
of
place
it
in
my
hands.
H
They're,
like
you
guys,
are
more
than
welcome
to
do
that,
but
it
would
essentially
rest
in
our
hands
to
design
it
and
go
forward
with
that
and
I
think
there's
a
lot
more
complications
than
just
saying
on
paper
that
it's
gonna
work
and
I
think
that's
kind
of
where
they
came
in
is
they
went
through
a
lot
with
the
grading
on
this
and
I'm,
not
saying
it's
impossible,
because
I
think
it
can
be
done,
but
I
think
it
would.
It
would
take
a
lot
more
effort
right.
A
The
longer
the
lanes
are
the
more
severe
the
design
challenges
are
so
we're
doubling
the
long
lanes,
and
we
had
significant
design
issues
with
what
we
have
here.
The
the
pistil
lanes
were
not
challenged,
but
the
rifle
lanes
at
a
hundred
yards
were
very
challenging
to
get
them
get
the
bottom
of
it
to
be
not
completely
underwater
because
we're
we're
in
the
floodplain
here.
A
So
if
you
double
that
length
you're,
probably
at
least
quadrupling
the
issues
in
it,
the
the
baffling
is
gonna
be
significantly
different
than
just
take
the
cost
for
a
hundred
yard
lane
and
double
it
for
a
200
yard
lane.
It
might
be
four
times
the
cost
or
more.
We
don't
know,
and
the
I
know
they
struggled
with
this.
We
we
went
through
their
struggles,
even
though
I
came
in
late
in
the
game.
They
were.
This
wasn't
an
easy
project
to
design,
even
though
maybe
it
looks
like
it
on
the
surface,
so
I
mean
we
can.
A
K
A
conclusion
on
that
we
did
talk
about
the
joint
powers
agreement
as
well,
and
that
has
a
Pitman
funds
in
it
and
they're
pretty
much
capped
at
where
we're
at
the
they
capped
it.
Based
on
this
bid
and
anything
above
that,
they
did
talk
about
if
a
little
slipping
quantities
happened,
that
they
would
negotiate
those.
But
if
we
wholesale
add
something
on
to
this,
it
would
not
fall
into
the
into
the
existing
grant
it
would.
It
would
initiate
a
whole
other
discussion
on
grant
funds.
C
D
For
this,
my
suggestion
Beth,
is
that
we
accept
what
we've
got
and
then
see
what
the
costs
are.
Now
you
know,
marriage,
we,
we
certainly
aren't
in
kept
abreast
of
the
difficulties
of
the
design
stuff.
We
just
look
at
what
we're
given
as
far
as
a
site
map
you
know,
so
we
don't
know
those
issues,
I
just
look
at
it
purely
from
a
user
standpoint
of
what,
if
you
look
at
and
the
majority
of
the
rifle
users,
they're
gonna,
be
disappointed
with
100.
A
D
I
agree
with
you,
so
I
think
that
bet
they
answer
your
question
go
back.
Is
we
accept
what
we
got
and
let's
let's
see,
if
we
can
look
at
what
a
cost
would
be?
You
know
if
it's
just
an
engineering
feat,
that's
not
going
to
happen.
Well,
then,
yeah
I'd,
be
honest
with
you
had
been
nice
to
know
that
before
we
ever
get
to
this
point,
because
maybe
this
isn't
the
right
location,
then.
H
A
L
B
C
Excuse
me,
then:
my
second
question
was
in
what
form
it's
obviously
easy
to
accept
the
bid
part.
Is
there
a
need
for
if
I
made
a
motion,
for
example,
would
it
need
to
be
amended
in
any
way
to
talk
about
the
exploration,
or
is
that
just
a
let's
do
that?
Let's
do
it
right
in
action,
okay,
okay!
So
so
my
may
come
unless.
A
A
K
So
the
game,
fish
and
parks
based
on
the
bids
that
we
just
awarded
did
prepare
a
document
that
establishes
the
responsibilities
of
both
the
city
and
the
game,
fish
and
parks
with
regard
to
commitments,
both
financially
and
otherwise,
and
what
I
mean
by
otherwise
is
game.
Fish
and
parks
had
dedicated
are
committed
to
putting
in
a
toilet
facility
they
committed
into
putting
in
shooting
the
benches
and
they're
still
posing
to
do
that
when
the
construction
reaches
those
points.
K
So
this
document
memorializes
the
agreements
at
the
city
and
that
game,
fish
and
parks
have
discussed
at
this
point
and
I
will
make
a
disclaimer
that
there
is
some
edits
to
this
document
very
superficial.
In
other
words,
if
you
look
at
the
bottom
line,
the
mayor's
name
is
spelled
without
an
H,
so
we
got
little
things
like
that
that
we're
we
just
tweaked
in
the
some
typos
so
to
speak.
I
didn't
get
that
attached
to
this,
but
I
had
you
know
in
the
file
and
ready
for
the
council
meeting
next.
K
A
C
We
had
talked
at
one
time
when
the
even
as
a
one-way,
but
particularly
when
Kemp,
went
to
a
two-way
street
of
putting
compact
car
motorcycle
parking
only
at
the
corners
of
intersections
and
possibly
alleys.
I
know
there's
some
yellows
yellows
curb
on
some
of
the
alleys,
but
there
is
a
lot
of
difficulty
right
now,
if
a
large
truck
or
a
suburban
or
something
like
that,
takes
that
first
parking
spot
right
next
to
the
intersection.
C
You
have
to
pull
almost
all
the
way
out
into
the
intersection
to
see
what's
coming
or
going,
and
you
know
I'm
thinking
of
pedestrians.
Things
like
that,
and
that
is
a
very
common
thing
to
put
in
a
city
is
to
you
know,
have
smaller
cars
and
motorcycles
on
the
corners
and
I
know:
we've
discussed
it
in
the
past
and
I
guess:
I'd
like
it
to
be
evaluated
and
see.
If
we
should
move
forward
on
that.
L
For
the
public
works,
just
a
discussion
or
thought
coming
up,
both
Glen
and
I,
received
email
from
a
fellow
that
was
on
North
Lake
Drive.
That
was
asking
about
the
forty
mile
an
hour,
speed
limit
and
wondering,
if
anything
could
be
done
about
that,
he
had
indicated
some
close
calls
out
there
and
of
course
we
know
with
the
with
the
part
out
there,
where
the
we
don't
have
a
trail.
Yet
it's
very
dangerous
and
forty
or
forty-five
miles
an
hour,
so
it
just
as
a
he.
J
I'll
give
you
an
update
from
my
perspective.
Dan
and
group
I
also
spoke
with
chief
McPeak
on
this
Monday
afternoon.
What
what
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
to
convene
a
group
yourself
myself,
the
mayor
chief
mcpeak,
probably
engineering
and
Rob
from
the
street
department,
just
to
take
a
look
I've
spent
about
an
hour
out
there
driving
around
Monday
afternoon,
observing
different
things
driving
at
different
speeds.
It
has
to
how
much
difference
it
would
make
a
time
wise
from
2-12
up
to
the
water
tower
on
highway.
20
just
has
some
interesting
observations.
J
Had
it
had
a
close
call
as
far
as
somebody
pulling
out
in
front
of
me
that
if
I
had
been
going
40
miles
now
or
at
the
time
and
I
weren't
watching
I
would
plow
right
to
this
individual.
So
point
well-taken,
Dan
and
I
would
like
to
a
could
convene
this
group
to
assess
I
know
it's
been
looked
at
in
the
past
and
it
wasn't
a
real
popular.
J
J
Right,
okay,
took
to
me:
there's
not
a
whole
lot
of
difference
between
that
stretch
of
highway
and
South
Lake
Drive,
which
the
25
mile
per
hour
speed
limit
and
the
40
is
your
cruising
out
there,
and
there
were
dogs
walking
people
driving
their
lawn
mowers
and
bat.
You
know
taking
lawn
mowers
out
on
the
street,
there's
a
utility
truck
a
mail
truck
just
a
lot
of
activity.
That's
a
very
busy,
and
this
is
the
middle
of
Monday
afternoon.
It
wasn't
even
a
busy
time
of
the
day.
D
A
D
All
around
the
lake
yeah
I've,
seen
it
too
and
I've
been
out
there
and
there's.
You
know,
you
know
I
get
it,
but
they
get
out
there
and
they
did
a
let
er
rip
along
South,
Lake
Drive
and
around
the
golf
course.
You
know
that
whole
area
and
I
just
think
we
need
to
keep
an
eye
on
that
and
maybe
just
spend
a
little
more
time
out
there.
Just.
J
All
the
comments
about
it,
you
know,
if
we're
also
looking
at
expanding
or
finishing
off
our
bike
path,
there's
gonna
be
sections
of
our
bike
path.
They're
gonna
be
be
running
alongside
that's
that
highway
or
that
road
out
there
at
times
that
definitely
not
a
safe
situation
where
you've
got
walkers
bikers
going
right
alongside
Ohio
our
street
at
40
miles
an
hour.
Hopefully.
A
Safer
than
it
is
now
where
they're
just
walking
in
the
roadway
any
other
new
business,
there's
no
need
for
executive
session,
so
I
look
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
Mumbai
Council
and
why?
Second,
my
councilman
Bueller,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
hi.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
okay,
we'll
take.