►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
B
D
A
First,
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
October
24th
2019
minutes.
I
need
a
motion
so
moved
I
have
a
motion.
Second,
second,
all
in
favor
aye
now
items
2,
&
3
are
specific
uses
contingent
upon
an
annexation
and
zoning
proposal.
That's
on
the
plan
commission
meeting
agenda
for
this
evening,
I'd
like
to
take
the
plan
commission
agenda
items
up
before
we
go
to
that
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
skip
to
item
4
on
the
Board
of
Adjustment
agenda
here,
which
is
Robert
graph.
B
Set
addition
is
proposed
to
be
constructed.
Fourteen
point,
eight
feet
from
the
side
or
south
property
line
where
a
minimum
20
feet
is
required
on
an
existing
2766
square
foot,
non-conforming
commercial
building,
which
currently
sets
ten
feet
and
fourteen
point
eight
feet
from
the
side,
north
and
south
property
lines
where
a
minimum
minimum
20
foot
is
required
and
21.5
feet
from
the
front
east
property
line
where
a
minimum
40
feet
is
required.
B
Currently,
the
property
utilizes
eight
non-compliant
inset
boulevard
or
on
street
parking
spaces
on
South
Broadway
for
customer
parking.
If
application
is
endorsed,
this
board
has
the
authority
to
require
fulfillment
of
any
and
all
boulevard
infrastructure
requirements
in
conjunction
with
any
structural
improvements
authorized
by
building
permit.
E
A
And
in
this
property,
like
some
of
the
others
in
the
area,
existed,
predates
the
the
c3
requirements
as
they
exist
today.
So
from
a
square
footage.
Standpoint
I
noted
that
this
this
one
has
a
significantly
lower
square
footage
than
what
would
be
required
to
plot
a
new
c3
lot
on
bare
ground
today.
Both
total
square
footage
and
and
lot
with
second
correct
correct.
B
E
B
F
E
F
We
just
thought
because
of
the
building
the
way
it
was.
We
approached
the
board
one
other
time
about
putting
some
adding
onto
the
back
garage
to
the
to
the
east,
and
we
just
pretty
well
decided
not
to
do
that
and
by
doing
what
we're
doing
here,
we
can
just
use
the
existing
heat
and
electricity
and
everything
that's
in
the
building.
What's.
B
F
F
It's
basically
cold
storage
and
we
just
then
we
decided
well,
maybe
we
put
plumbing
and
heating,
and
then
we
looked
at
all
the
prices
for
doing
that
and
that
it
when
it
gave
us
more
room
granted.
But
we
thought
just
tying
a
piece
just
out
in
the
building
would
just
be
a
lot
easier.
Okay
and
a
lot
cheaper.
B
He
has
a
space
here
of
20
feet
in
from
the
north
property
line,
20
feet
in
from
the
south
and
basically
up
to
this
non-compliance
structure
where
he
would
probably
come
back
to
the
board
for
enlargement
of
non-conforming
structure,
but
not
for
variances
from
setbacks
or
additional
variances
from
setbacks.
What's.
A
D
A
E
Chair
I'd,
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
I,
recommend
approval
of
the
18
by
18
addition
to
the
existing
building
as
applied
for
basis
and
reasoning
for
the
variances
that
the
city
has
blessed
the
southern
boundary
of
the
existing
building
and
with
a
previous
building
prepared
in
1985
the
enlargement.
Our
additional
does
not
further
intrude
into
this
into
the
southern
setback,
and
that
would
be
my
basis.
A
G
B
D
A
A
F
H
F
F
H
F
A
A
C
E
G
H
You
Blake,
so
this
is
an
annexation
and
zoning
proposal.
Here,
I'll
pull
it
up,
so
we
have
an
idea
of
what
what
area
I'm
talking
about,
and
so
there
there's
actually
two
kind
of
that
coincide
together.
We'll
talk
on
this
one
first,
so
this
area
is
being
proposed
to
be
annexed
and
zoned
as
C
3
highway
commercial
district.
The
owners
are
Bob
and
Pamela
Drake
and
they
have
petitioned
for
the
C
3.
H
Zoning
designation,
I'll
turn
on
the
adjacent
zoning,
so
you'll
see
to
the
north
in
the
West
it
that
land
resides
in
the
county
to
the
south.
It's
our
one
single-family
residential
and
to
the
east,
there's
c2
local
commercial
district,
which
is
competi
lodge
Park
dedication
is
not
required
since
its
proposed
to
be
commercial
property.
The
annexation
and
zoning
will
extend
to
the
centerline
of
the
public.
H
E
A
H
And
actually,
with
the
next
agenda
item,
that
will
be
that
area
that
will
make
it
adjacent
so
say
that
both
were
annexing
zoned
as
c3.
Then
this
would
be
adjacent
to
more
c3
zoning,
which
is
then
adjacent
to
the
highway.
I
think
just
for
the
use
of
what
the
property,
what
they're
hoping
to
do
with
the
property
c3
was
more
fitting.
A
A
E
A
E
A
E
My
mr.
mr.
chair
I
would
almost
recommend
that
we
have,
we
could
be
taking
comments
for
both
proposes
awnings
and
annexations.
At
the
same
time,
if
we
combine
that
public
hearing
for
both
action
items
well
said
we'll
have
a
separate
action
items
but
rather
than
having
a
public
hearing,
we
can
get
all
the
testimony
at
one
point
in
time,
because
these
they're
married,
maybe.
H
I
E
I'm
not
talking
about
the
action
I'm
talking
about
for
the
purpose
of
receiving
public
testimony
on
the
since
the
since
the
owner
of
the
property
owns
both
parcels
and
they
are
adjacent
to
one
another.
If
we
could
just
hear
the
public
comment
on
the
proposed
annexations
and
the
proposed
rezoning
as
both.
E
A
I
Mr.
chair,
if
I
may,
just
from
a
staffing
perspective,
I
might
recommend
that
you,
you
keep
the
parcels
public
hearings,
discussion
separate
just
because
you
may
not
want
to
have
one
parcels.
Discussion
influence
the
other
parcels,
discussion
and
consideration
of
separate
public
hearings.
They
are
two
separate
applications.
I
would
just
heat
caution
in
that
respect.
I.
E
Guess
where
I'm
at
you
know,
based
upon
staffs
discussion,
that
if
the
triangular
piece
is
zone
c3,
then
this
would
make
a
reasonable
ask
or
a
request,
because
it's
adjacent
to
c3.
If
that
was
the
case
I
would
then,
if
we
want
to
keep
him
separate,
I,
would
invert
it
and
deal
with
the
highway
20
application
first,
if
that
has
a
bearing
on
the
sub
subsequent.
That's.
J
J
A
H
So
this
gets
into
then
agenda
item
number
six,
and
this
is
Commission
consideration
of
resolution
number
twenty
1935,
a
zoning
text
amendment
to
chapter:
oh
whoops:
that's
not
it!
Okay!
This
is
20
1936,
initiating
annexation
of
a
tract
of
land,
contiguous
to
the
city
of
Watertown,
known
as
the
done
second
edition
and
and
then
the
subsequent
C
3
highway
commercial
district
designation.
So
let
me
pull
up
the
map
here,
so
you
guys
are
familiar.
H
H
H
H
D
A
L
Mike
Lawrence
I'm,
working
with
Bob
Pam
on
this
project,
I've
been
involved
on
some
late
competi
reasons
in
the
past,
which
you
know
the
precedents
you
set
less
than
a
mile
from
this
location,
very
similar
location.
That's
what
got
us
looking
at
this
particular
property.
We
started
working
with
mr.
Dahle
on
April
15th,
we
closed
a
or
we
signed
a
purchase
agreement
on
this
property
on
August
22nd.
After
the
after
the
rezone
of
the
other
property
went
through.
We
decided
that
you
know
it's
a
very
similar
location.
L
L
Well,
here,
I
am
coming
in,
and
I
took
that
into
consideration.
When
we
came
up
with
this,
we
looking
to
take
this
and
put
mini
cabins
on
it.
One
thing
about
Lake
campus
goes:
is
it's
a
great
asset,
but
if
you're
coming
from
Sioux
Falls-
and
you
want
to
come
down
here
for
the
weekend
and
stay-
and
you
don't
camp
in
a
tent
or
a
camper,
this
is
you.
You
have
no
option.
There
is
no
option
for
lodging
to
come
down
here.
L
I
spoke
to
some
of
the
neighbors
that
and
that
I
know
around
the
area
there
are
I.
Can
I
can
tell
you
that
you
there
is
some
people
that
are
going
to
be
worried
about
this?
Obviously
I
can
fill
a
room
up
pretty
good,
but
I
assure
you
that
we're
not
going
to
build
something
that
I
mean
I
live
less
than
a
mile
from
here
as
well
I
Drive
by
here
every
day.
Our
plan
isn't
to
make
this
place
worse
or
do
something
that's
going
to
put
the
the
neighborhood
up
in
arms.
L
I
spoke
to
Doris
Wilkie.
She
said
I'd
be
dumb
not
to
to
want
something
like
this
across
the
street
from
the
lodge
to
increase
traffic.
You
know
these
same
people
are
going
to
be
driving
by
Northshore.
These
same
people
are
going
to
be
coming
to
the
lake
and
spending
retail
sales
tax
dollars.
As
far
as
the
the
contractor
shops,
the
reason
I
went
with
a
contractor
shop
is
because,
in
our
ordinance
we
can't
put
a
toilet
in
a
storage
unit.
L
Most
of
these
things
are
going
to
be
privately
sold
to
private
individuals,
condos
that
many
of
these
people
that
live
close
by
that
don't
have
the
room
on
their
property.
For
some
of
the
things
that
they
want
in
there
that
you
know
we,
we
have
a
plan
for
16
unit,
16
unit
condo
units,
and
we
have
probably
9
to
10
of
those
spoken
for
I
mean
there's
a
demand
for
something
like
this
out
there,
the
closest
closest
storage
units
we
have
some
at
Lakeside
storage.
Otherwise
it's
on
the
other
side
of
the
lake.
L
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
do
regardless
of
what
happens
here
today.
Our
goal
in
purchasing
this
land
is
to
develop
it
and
I
want
to
make
that
clear.
As
if
this
plan
doesn't
work,
there
will
be
another
plan.
We
we
didn't,
buy
the
plant
the
land
to
sit
on
it.
We
think
it's
good
land
close
to
the
close
to
the
community.
We
are
going
to
try
to
develop
it
and
we
there
was
going
to
be
something
that
fits
in
the
box
or
has
to
be
fits
in
the
box.
L
You
know
when
you
purchase
a
piece
of
property,
we
did
purchase
it
on
the
precedents
that
was
set
less
than
a
mile
from
here
in
hopes
that
we
could
do
something
similar
at
the
same
time
adding
what
we
are
going
to
do.
We
could
have.
We
could
have
took
the
same
approaches
as
they
did
on
the
last
one,
not
my
approach,
but
not
any
I,
don't
think
he
still
knows
what
he's
doing
there.
I
don't
haven't
seen
anything
on
mr.
L
A
L
E
L
E
L
Other
thing
that
we
and
it's
something
that
I
kind
of
have
an
issue
with
the
way
that
they're
zoning,
some
of
the
zoning
is
I,
didn't
want
to
take
this
to
a
surveyor
just
to
get
the
things
that
we
have
in
your
packet
right
there
that
just
the
drawings
there
and
I
actually
paid
separately
for
a
survey,
that's
$4,000
worth
of
drawings.
You
know,
I
didn't
want
to
completely
design
a
campground
for
it
to
come
up
here.
You
know,
spend
another
25,
three
thousand
dollars
on
designing
a
campground.
L
M
L
Haven't
worked
with
the
staff,
that's
something
that
we're
going
to
have
to
do.
You
know
we
don't
know
where
he
Thuong
syngress
egress
out
there.
You
know
we
don't
know
how
much
lighting
that
we're
gonna
need.
We
don't
know
the
demand,
we're
not
going
to
build
100
cabins
and
hope
that
they
fill
up.
You
know
it's
more
of
a
see,
as
you
go
type
of
thing,
to
see
what
the
demand
is,
because
there
is
not
one
of
these
things
on
our
lake.
L
The
only
cabins
that
I
know
of
that
are
similar
to
this
are
the
ones
by
sandy
shores
and
I'm
told
that
they
fill
up
immediately.
The
first
right
when
they're,
open
they're
filled
up
that
day
for
the
entire
season
and
they're.
Just
two
little
tiny
cabins
sit
right
next
to
half
a
million
dollar
to
3/4
of
a
million
dollar
houses
and.
L
L
I,
don't
think
so.
With
the
time
change,
like
I
said
you
are
less
than
a
half
a
mile
away,
setting
a
precedent
on
commercial
property
when
a
developer
looks
at
something
that
a
council
like
yours
does
and
and
makes
that
precedence
and
says
we're
wanting
to
do
that.
That's
going
to
spur
more
people
to
get
into
that
commercial
development.
That's
gonna!
D
L
L
L
A
L
Well,
I
believe
that
you
know
the
the
far
north
portion
of
this
property
will
become
commercial
c3
as
well.
It
does
touch
the
highway
there.
We
have
a
marine
dealer
that
we're
talking
to
in
hopes
to
put
on
that
location
as
well,
so
whether
I
start
nap
there
and
zone
at
c3
backwards
or
work
this
way
and
go
that
way.
I
think
we
end
up
at
there
same
result
in
specific.
L
L
So
that
here's
the
map,
our
ingress
and
egress,
would
be
down
towards
the
lodge.
We
would
like
it
to
come
out
straight
towards
the
lodge,
so
everybody
comes
in
here
you
know,
has
the
ability
to
go
into
the
campus
collage.
There
is
the
secondary
access
that
would
be
emergency
only
and
that's
I
think
cuts
Avenue,
it's
kind
of
like
Memorial
Park.
When
you
go
around
the
curves,
they
have
a
little
spot
where
you
know
fire
trucks
and
medical
people
can
get
through.
It's
gated,
it's
chained,
but
it
doesn't
it's
not
for
the
everybody,
a
campground.
L
You
only
want
one
way
and
in
one
way
out
for
people
to
check
in
check
out
you
know,
so
you
don't
have
all
that
traffic
going
in
and
out
unnoticed.
We
have
all
of
our
hookups
and
refuge
down
here.
There
is
a
bathrooms
in
there
as
well,
like
I,
said,
oh
sure,
I,
don't
know
how
to
use
this
button.
So
we
have.
You
know
the
bathrooms
up
here
towards
the
lake
we
have
cabins
down
this
way.
This
would
be
more
pull
and
pull
out
type
of
camper.
L
So
we
don't
have
to
I
mean
this
area
is
a
little
bit
lower
where
this
you
can
build
a
permanent
structure
on
up
here.
So
that's
why
we're
thinking
cabins
in
that
area,
like
I
said
we
don't
know
if
this
business
model
even
works,
so
we're
not
going
to
go
out
and
and
try
to
do
the
dirt
work
on
the
entire
property.
Just
to
figure
out
that
you
know
nobody
wants
to
rent
a
cabin.
You
know,
but
I
do
think.
There's
a
demand
and
I
think
the
lake
itself
could
benefit
from
from
this.
L
A
M
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Julie
Knutson
I'm,
with
the
Watertown
Convention
and
Visitors
Bureau
and
from
time
to
time,
I
get
calls
from
developers
such
as
mr.
Lawrence
to
come
and
speak
to
the
project
that
they're
working
on
in
regard
to
the
visitor
industry,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
come
to
you
with
what
we
experienced
in
regard
to
I.
Guess:
I'll
call
it
the
lack
of.
M
Housing
at
the
lake
for
visitors
that
want
to
come
in
and
spend
a
temporary
amount
of
time
from
an
industry
standpoint
anytime,
you
can
put
people
near
water
or
on
a
lakefront
or
get
them
a
view
of
a
sunset.
That
is
definitely
something
that
people
gravitate
towards
and
so
having
the
lake
so
close
to
Watertown
you
can
see.
This
is
a
mailer
that
we
sent
out.
We
sent
out
30,000
of
those
your
year
before
2018.
M
We
use
the
lake
in
all
of
our
marketing
or
peak
season
marketing,
and
we
spend
a
extremely
large
amount
of
money
marketing
for
a
peak
season
and
with
having
the
lake
in
there.
We
get
a
lot
of
calls
and
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
would
love
to
come
here,
but
they
can't
stay
here
because
the
camp
groans
other
than
with
the
flooding
this
year.
M
The
campgrounds
are
typically
full
and
I
know
that
the
cabin
situation
out
at
sandy
shores,
those
cabins
just
go
like
hotcakes
I
mean
you
can't
rent
one
people
are
our
online,
probably
already
trained
too,
as
soon
as
it
opens
up
for
camping
they're
trying
to
get
in,
and
so
this
is
something
that's
growing
from
all
of
the
industry
experts.
They
talk
about
the
Millennials
and
they're.
You
know
wanting
the
experience
rather
than
just
going
to
a
city
and
not
having
anything
to
do
but
being
at
a
lake
and
on
a
lake.
M
If
you
have
a
boat
or
if
you
want
to
you
know,
take
part
in
water
sports
or
whatever
you're
not
going
to
go,
stay
in
a
hotel
and
then
just
come
out
to
Lake
and
go
back
to
the
hotel
if
they
want
a
water
experience.
If
they
either
come
here,
if
they
can't
stay
here
in
accommodations
that
they
want
we're
losing
their
business
to
other
other
places,
they're
going
to
Minnesota
they're
going
wherever
they
can
get
in.
M
So
it's
something
that
we
really
do
hear
a
lot
about
in
our
office
as
we
market
the
lake
quite
a
bit.
We'll
get
a
lot
of
calls
in
the
summertime
about
rentals
around
the
lake,
and
so
that
is
something
that
we
are
constantly
telling
people.
Well,
we
market
the
lake
and,
yes,
you
can
go
out
there
and
we
have
our
parks
that
you
can
spend
time
at,
but
nobody
wants
to
just
drive
out
there
and
swim
and
then
get
back
in
their
car
and
go
so.
M
It
really
is
something
that
we
do
see,
and
you
know
a
a
growing
demand
for
or
a
growing
request
for
is
housing
out
at
the
lake.
So
that's
kind
of
just
you
know
from
our
standpoint
and
our
perspective
that
this
isn't
anything
that's
going
to
it'll
it'll
definitely
be
a
good
thing
for
the
visitor
industry
when
people
are
coming
to
town
they're,
leaving
their
money
behind
and
I.
Think
that
the
additional
rentals
is.
M
F
Good
afternoon,
chrishelle
can
Watertown
development
company
I
too,
have
also
had
many
conversations
with
Mike
Lawrence
and
the
history
that
I
have
had
and
when
I
was
economic
developer
in
Devils
Lake,
North
Dakota,
where
we
did
start
commercializing
the
lake
there
and
the
economic
impact
that
it
had
has
increased
visitors
and
also
increase
of
the
tax
base.
You're
going
to
take
bare
land
develop,
but
that's
going
to
increase
the
tax
base
for
the
whole
county,
help
support
different
activities
and
as
well
as
driving
traffic
through
Watertown.
F
Of
course,
they're
going
to
spend
their
money
more
visitors.
So
as
a
development
company
and
and
as
we
talk
about
developing
Watertown
as
everybody
in
this
room
knows
like
campus,
is
a
huge
asset
that
if
we
can
bring
commercial
the
development
there,
it
just
brings
it
up
to
the
next
level
that
currently,
we
don't
have
and
I've
seen
that
firsthand
being
a
part
of
projects
and
Devils
Lake,
North
Dakota,
so
third
experience
and
visit
visiting
with
Mike
or
just
like
to
bring
that
up
so
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
F
A
J
J
D
J
Became
owners
in
1985
and
have
enjoyed
the
home
for
for
two
reasons:
one
having
lived.
We
live
in
and
tenth
the
maple
on
during
the
offseason.
We
enjoy
the
water
view,
but
we
also
enjoy
the
work.
The
rural
view
that
we
have
that
done,
farm
silo,
the
agricultural
area
and
the
openness
of
that
has
been
an
important
part
of
our
experience.
There.
J
Many
of
those
people
who
are
here
today
because
of
my
interest
and
making
them
aware
of
the
importance
of
what
was
being
proposed
here,
how
it
might
impact
their
property
values,
and
so
it's
we
want
you
to
know
that
we're
very
concerned
about
our
property,
we're
also
very
concerned
about
lakum
Pesce
and
the
appearance
of
the
area
that
surrounds
the
lake.
I.
J
Remember
my
impression
of
Lake
Poinsett,
going
by
on
highway
81
and
looking
at
a
trailer
camp
on
the
west
side
of
campus
or
upon
set
some
good
things
have
happened
to
improve
our
lake,
such
as
water
system
sewer
system
around
the
lake,
but
in
recent
years
there's
been
some
things
that
have
happened
that
has
made
us
very
sad.
Certainly
the
Stoney
Point
area
is
disappointing
and
tragic.
J
J
J
Watertown
is
the
only
large
community
in
the
eastern
South
Dakota
to
have
a
lake
large
and
beautiful
as
they
competitive.
As
far
as
we're
concerned,
it's
a
pearl,
Monday
or
Tuesday
I
went
to
City
Hall
to
see
the
details
of
the
campground
and
much
to
my
surprise.
They
didn't
have
any
they
did
not,
and
they.
J
J
It
says
that
no
manufactured
home
or
house
trailers
shall
be
located
on
in
any
campground,
except
that
one
shall
be
permitted
as
an
office
for
campground.
Now
they're
proposing
some
buildings
here
and
I,
don't
know
that
they
fit
with
what
the
ordinance
is
on.
Campgrounds
I
think
that
we
think
more
of
and
they're
not
supposed
to
be.
J
J
J
J
J
Clark
handsome
and
that,
once
the
votes
have
been
deposited
into
the
lake,
that
they
will
come
back
to
that
Lots
one
through
five,
four
four
storage
area,
while
the
boats
being
used
well
in
talking
to
mr.
Hanson
he's
indicated
that
that
is
only
a
sixty
six
foot
wide
area
and
typically
when,
if
you've
the
popular
boat
place,
access
is
known
as
sailboat
landing
people
drive
in
drive
around
and
then
back
their
boats
in
when
their
they
get
fairly
close
to
the
water.
J
J
N
My
name
is
Clark
Hansen
property
owner
at
444,
North,
Lake,
Drive,
I,
didn't
know
that
mr.
Austin
was
going
to
invite
me
up
here
tonight.
Thank
You
mr.
Austin,
but
I've
had
this
song
going
through
my
head
all
day
today
and
I'm
I'll
make
this
brief.
I'm
just
gonna
bullet
point
a
few
things
here,
but
the
song
that's
going
through
my
head
is
it
was
popular
in
the
late,
60s,
I,
think
and
and
it
was
they
paved
paradise
and
put
up
a
parking
lot.
N
Anybody
remember
that
great
song
never
knew
it
would
hit
home
like
it
has
right
now.
But
let's
start
with
the
timing,
my
wife
and
I
had
no
idea.
This
project
was
going
on
until
a
week
ago,
Wednesday
when
we
pulled
or
went
into
the
post
office,
and
we
had
notified
that
we
had
a
registered
letter
there.
J
N
J
N
N
Access
that
waters,
my
land,
along
with
mr.
MOG
and
I,
just
want
to
point
out
from
the
water
tower.
When
you
work
west
on
North
Lake
Drive,
approximately
one
mile
you've
got
the
South
Dakota
Highway
20
intersection.
Then
you
come
down.
You
have
cuts
Avenue
where
at
least
a
dozen
residences
I'm
sure
are
going
in
and
out
of
that
entryway.
N
Then
a
quarter
mile
past
that
you
have
the
compassed
collage,
then
immediately
past
that
you
have
for
50th,
Avenue,
intersecting,
North,
Lake,
Drive
and
then
just
a
hundred
yards
past,
that
you've
got
County,
Road
168
heading
off
to
Memorial
Park,
the
shortcut.
What
I
call
a
shortcut
to
that
stretch
of
North
Lake
Drive
is
one
of
the
absolute
busiest
stretches
of
Highway
around
the
entire
Lake.
You've
got
168
all
the
people
coming
from
there.
You've
got
for
50th.
You've
got
a
highway
20
North,
Lake
Drive
and
cuts
the
Avenue.
N
N
We
went
through
this
years
ago
with
her
Jensen,
and
this
and
the
entire
City
Council
was
out
there
herb
wanted
to
improve
it.
The
safety
concerns
negated.
What
they
were
going
to
do
at
that
time
that
sits
right
under
a
hill
I
call
it
the
roller
coaster
of
North
Lake
Drive,
where
you've
got
three
hills
in
a
row,
and
the
access
entry
is
right
at
the
bottom
of
a
hill.
It
is
totally
blind
to
traffic
coming
from
the
West.
I
have
lived
there
for
decades,
and
I
have
witnessed
dozens
of
accidents
and
near
accidents.
N
N
N
Are
you
talking
about
the
public
at
the
section
line
access?
Well
again,
that's
it's
66
feet.
You
cannot
with
an
extended
cab,
pickup
and
a
boat
behind
you.
You
cannot
go
down
there
and
turn
around
without
backing
up
on
mr.
mobs
property
or
my
property.
By
the
time.
You've
got
two
boats
sitting
down
there.
That
is
filled
up
and
worthless
to
anything
else.
You
want
to
do
there,
there's
no
launch,
there's
no
dock,
there's
no
room
for
that.
N
J
F
N
A
G
N
But
there's
a
if
you'll
permit
me
a
little
bit
more
time.
There's
up
a
cluster
muster
a
traffic
there.
Every
every
summer,
I'm
sitting
on
my
lawnmower
on
some
guy
with
a
36
foot
5th
wheel,
stops
in
the
middle
of
the
road
and
hollers
out
his
window.
Where's
Memorial
Park,
so
I
get
off
my
mower
and
walk
out
in
the
highway
and
explain
to
him.
J
Mr.
mr.
Hansen
has
given
me
a
chance
to
find
what
I've
been
digging
for,
and
that
is
a
document
that
was
prepared,
I,
think
by
the
earth
staff
that
says
before
a
conditional
use
can
be
issued.
The
Board
of
Adjustment
must
have
approved
ingress
and
egress
to
property
and
proposed
structures
Iran
with
particular
reference
to
automotive,
pedestrian
safety,
convenience
traffic
flow
and
control
and
I
suggest
that
that
has
not
been
done.
Yet
it
provides
for
location
showing
or
they're
gonna
locate,
refuge
and
surface
areas.
A
Up
mr.
Austin
for
the
public
hearing
right
now
we're
strictly
speaking
about
the
zoning
and
annexation
of
the
property,
it
sounds
like
what
you're
referring
to
is
related
to
the
conditional
use.
So
if
you
have
public
comment
related
to
the
conditional
use,
we
would
take
that
up
during
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
okay,.
J
We
have
and
will
heal
here
or
as
talking
about
smoke
and
other
things
that
occur
in
a
campsite.
I'll
have
to
admit
that
I
haven't
been
camping
for
years.
What
I
I
got
a
letter
addressed
to
the
plan
commission
from
gene
Barthel
by
Bethel,
I,
hope,
I'm,
saying
that
or
Bethke
I'm
saying
that
correct.
He
says
this
I'm
like
I
own,
a
cabin
at
438,
North,
Lake
Drive,
and
want
to
just
object
to
the
rezoning
of
the
property
north
of
me.
J
We
already
have
Lake
campgrounds
and
they're
only
half
for
one
weekend
a
year,
July
4th
the
increased
traffic
safety
and
security
as
well
as
a
place
of
quiet
at
the
lake
would
change.
The
boat
launch
is
now
nearly
unused
and
would
become
a
hub
of
traffic
and
parking
for
my
neighbors.
This
is
the
part.
I
was
interested
in
since
I'm,
not
a
camper.
Not
all
campers
are
loud,
inconsiderate
and
thieves,
but
you
cannot
guarantee
everyone
is
going
to
be
the
swell
folks.
They
have
next
door.
J
J
Carolyn
Hoffman
and
she
has
purchased
the
the
brick
home
and
made
a
very
substantial
advancement
and,
as
her
husband
is
just
recovering
from
eye
surgery,
Carolyn
is
on
my
right,
but
she
would
like
this
part
of
the
record.
We
are
opposed
to
the
development
project.
We
are
concerned
about
the
large
increase
in
traffic
in
the
proposed
development
plan.
J
If
it
is
approved,
this
plan
will
combine
this
considerable
amount
of
commercial
traffic
volume
with
the
existing
residential
traffic.
There
is
also
farm
traffic
that
includes
alarm
from
large
farm
machinery
and
heavy
trucks
using
highway,
20
and
168.
There
is
also
concern
about
project
protective
water
wetlands.
They
may
be
impacted
by
this
commercial
development
project.
There
are
four
designated
water
wetland
areas
about
a
quarter
of
the
property
in
the
area
known
as
the
triangle
up
here.
J
There
is
the
possibility
of
gas
oil
and
antifreeze
runoff
from
increased
parking
of
vehicles
and
boats
check
with
the
South
Dakota
DNR
and
game
fish
and
parks,
and
also
South
Dakota,
big
sioux
watershed
district
and
the
US
Army
Corps
of
Engineers.
Individual
permits
are
generally
required
for
projects
that
impact
greater
than
five
tenths
of
an
acre
of
water
of
us.
Individual
permits
are
required
for
activities
that
result
more
than
minimal
impacts
of
a
aquatic
environment.
J
We
are
also
concerned
about
the
safety
of
people
using
the
trail
system
and
using
and
just
enjoying
the
outdoors
and
their
own
yards.
We
have
a
large
investment
in
our
home
and
lakefront
property.
This
type
of
commercial
development
does
not
fit
in
with
residential
quality
of
life.
We
all
enjoy
and
expect
to
be
able
to
continue
to
enjoy.
J
Mercial
development
can
have
a
very
negative
effect
on
prey
property
values.
We
pay
property
tax
based
on
the
valuation
of
our
property.
Well,
taxes
go
down
if
the
property
values
go
down,
we
are
not
opposed
to
all
development,
but
by
a
but
any
approved.
Development
must
be
compatible
with
the
existing
properties,
and
that,
of
course,
is
one
of
the
requirements
under
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
We
are
not
opposed
to
all
developments.
J
Your
own
duties
list,
the
need
for
compliance
for
specific
rules,
govern
individual
conditional
use,
automotive
and
pedestrian
safety
and
convenience
traffic
flow
and
control
economic
noise.
Glare
or
order
effects
of
the
conditional
use,
exterior
lighting
with
reference
to
glare
traffic
safety,
economic
effect,
the
compatibility
and
harmony
harmony
of
the
properties
in
the
district.
We
hope
you'll
consider
our
objection
seriously
and
come
to
some
thoughtful
and
refocusing
conclusion.
Thank
you.
Jim
Othman
and
Carolyn
Hoffman.
J
A
O
I'll
cut
this
short
I'm,
dr.
William,
Howard
Randy
would
go
to
that
proposed
campground,
where
my
cat
is
right
there.
So
in
order
to
build
a
campground,
you're
gonna
have
to
build
that
up.
Otherwise,
it's
gonna
be
a
slew
of
campground
it'd,
be
just
like
pond
sit
down,
there'd
be
underwater.
So
if
you
build
that
up
right
there
and
then
have
you
go
to
the
west,
there
that's
a
natural
draining
from
where
we
farm
down
to
Lake
Camp
Eska.
H
O
The
creek
Randy,
so
you
go
across
there
and
they're
gonna
put
buildings
in
the
red
there
and
they're
gonna
build
that
triangle
up
there.
So
if
you
follow
that
Creek
and
then
you
go
to
the
west,
there
I
own,
that
80
acres
right
there,
so
we
farmed
front
and
back
north
and
south
to
that
acreage.
So
if
they
divert
the
water
at
all,
we
won't
be
able
to
farm
the
backside
of
that
farm.
O
Right
now
we
drive
to
you
about
a
foot
of
water
and
that's
all
right
for
a
combine
tractor,
but
if
they
close
that
outlet
for
that
Creek
that
will
back
all
the
way
up
clear,
clear
to
join
else's
place.
Actually,
so
then,
that
you
know
that
wouldn't
allow
us
to
farm
the
back
side
of
that
farm
plus,
there's
80
acres
in
the
county.
O
O
O
I
I
Holding
cells,
sediment
ponds,
there's
all
kinds
of
options
they
can
use
to
address
those
runoff
concerns
and
again
those
are
both
based
on
water,
quality
and
water
quantity
that
they
have
to
abide
by.
So
I
do
believe
that
some
of
the
concerns
from
particularly
the
pass-through
flows
that
you'd
be
concerned
about,
they
would
be
required
to
maintain
the
same
level
of
pass-through
flows
through
this
through
this
land
as
they
develop
it
an
account
for
that
and
their
grading
plan
and.
C
I
To
our
ordinances,
that
plan
would
become
available
after
annexation,
after
zoning
for
building
out
the
subdivision
to
be
part
of
the
subdivision
process
so,
depending
on
the
circumstance,
generally
speaking,
there's
what
we
would
require
is
called
a
preliminary
plan,
and
that
is
the
phase
where
everything's
been
annexed.
Everything's
been
zoned
and.
I
So,
of
course,
you
know
the
actually
before
you
right
now
and
this
meeting
is
strictly
the
annexation
and
zoning
and
then
subsequently
in
the
BOE
action,
we
would
consider
the
conditional
use
subsequent
to
those
approvals.
We
dive
deeper
into
the
level
of
detail
that
they
have
to
meet
the
engineering
design
standards
and
the
criteria
that
we
administer
an
engineering
office
and
the
planning
offices
for
the
city
and.
E
I
O
O
O
N
N
There
are
their
homes,
I
just
got
a
cabinet.
I
was
up
in
front
of
the
board.
I
bought
piece
of
land
and
I
asked
for
a
conditional
use
and
a
rezoning
of
it
at
that
time.
I
had
the
same
viewpoint
as
Mike
dead.
It's
gonna
be
developed
into
something
and
I
get
that
I
was
in
the
same
shoes.
I
was
right.
Next
to
an
r3
and
I
was
asking
for
a
c3.
N
N
N
J
J
J
I
would
see
this
water
that
come
in
and
and
underneath
the
bridge
there
I
just
assumed
that
was
coming
from
the
lake,
but
no
it's
coming
from
the
from
the
northwest,
and
you
see
there
on
the
sign
on
the
drawing
unnamed
and
that
crosses
the
the
campgrounds
and
I
know
that
if
something
happened
there,
that
could
cause
some
of
the
backup.
That
sector
is
concerned
about
yeah
I.
Think.
A
H
P
Please
state
your
name
for
the
record:
Austin
Schulz
I'm,
also
a
resident
in
the
r-1
398
North,
Lake
Drive,
so
I
get
that
there's.
Obviously
visions
of
tax
dollars
dancing
in
our
heads
as
we
look
at
the
proposal
and
definitely
not
against
any
development,
but
really
I
just
want
to
make
reference
to
work
that
proceeds,
the
purchase
of
the
land,
the
and
really
referenced
the
comprehensive
land
use
plan.
That's
been
out
and
I'm
gonna
be
referencing.
P
The
West
Campus
growth
area
portion
relative
to
sections
eight
I
think
is
the
one
that
this
ends
up
falling
in
and
so
in
there
really
kind
of
references.
A
lot
of
the
points
my
fellow
residents
have
made
that
are
in
opposition
to
this
is
that
the
traffic,
so
the
first
bullet
point
that's
contained
within
that
land.
Use
is
traffic
speeds
combined
with
the
proximity
of
existing
pedestrian,
sidewalks
and
or
trails
adjacent
to
the
North
Lake
Drive
is
a
major
is
of
major
concern.
As
we
look
at
the
proposal.
Obviously
there's
an
increase
in
traffic.
P
So
again
these
aren't
necessarily
my
points.
These
are
points
that
have
been
determined
in
the
land-use
plan.
Again,
all
work
that
precedes
us
so
again,
I
understand
that
there's
the
visions
of
development-
and
you
know
you
can't
stop
progress.
We
had
always
kind
of
remember
how
it's
been
and
I've
lived
there
for
and
I
don't
know
12
years
or
so,
and
we've
definitely
enjoyed
the
environment
and
in
which
it
is
we
understand
in
progress
and
growth,
but
in
terms
of
the
buffering
and
all
of
the
recommendations
within
the
Land
Use
Plan.
P
To
50
ohms,
but
again,
there's
the
sediment
of
discouragement
of
development
of
commercial
property.
In
this
section
and
in
which
we're
talking
of
we
talk
about
there's
another
bullet
point
of
those
sections
that
talks
about
in
1/4
mile
of
Lake
Camp
Eska
the
zone
is
an
aquifer
production
overlay
zone,
so
that
would
definitely
be
a
majority
of
the
35
acres
and
definitely
would
then
fall
within
the
section
in
which
they're
talking
about
the
storage
units.
So
in
a
lot
of
consideration,
not
only
just
the
cost
of
development,
but
what
the
city
needs
to
do.
P
P
You
know
the
purchase
of
this
land
with
the
grand
visions
of
what
it
could
be
and
can
bring
to
the
community.
I
just
remember
the
work
that
precedes
this
committee
in
terms
of
the
decisions
and
recommendations
that
have
been
made
through
that
comprehensive,
Land,
Use,
Plan
and
that's
to
add.
On
to
obviously
the
concern
of
the
current
residents
in
the
area
so
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
C
My
name
is
milu
Austin
and
I
have
a
cabin
at
386,
North
Lake
Drive.
At
the
end
of
our
block
to
the
west.
There
is
a
public
access.
It's
only
43
feet
wide,
so
it
can't
be
used
for
boats,
but
I
would
all
the
all
of
the
campgrounds
that
surround
Lake.
Camp
Eska
have
a
swimming
beach.
Now
people
come
to
camp
grouts
to
be
either
with
a
boat
or
to
swim.
I,
don't
think
they've
made
any
plans
for
that.
C
A
H
H
D
A
L
H
H
Interested
parties-
and
so
we
do
send
that
by
certified
mail
and
then
also
with
the
reference
to
that
some
people
did
not
receive
notification
is
because
we
do
a
boundary
of
250
feet,
which
I
did
outline
here
too,
and
that
is
selected
by
the
computer
just
through
select
by
attribute
or
location.
So
it
goes
within.
I
H
I
H
H
E
E
When
we
say
appeal,
we're
getting
I
want
to
make
sure
we
don't
mix
it
up
these
individuals,
40%
of
those
individuals,
could
appeal
not
this
decision,
but
a
subsequent
decision
of
the
City
Council
to
have
it
re
heard,
and
then
a
supermajority
is
required
on
a
rezoning.
However,
a
5%
of
the
public
in
the
last
general
election
were
to
sign
a
petition.
It
could
go
to
a
citywide
vote
on
any
rezoning.
E
D
L
I
I
I
wanted
to
just
emphasize
the
distance
that
we
use
a
staff
is
based
on
that
statutory
language,
so
that
it
keeps
us
from
arbitrarily
arbitrarily
or
subjectively
picking
and
choosing
the
distance
for
any
given
case.
We
want
to
be
consistent
and
uniform
with
each
case
and
that's
why
we
run
with
that
statutory
distance.
A
L
The
next
thing,
access
as
far
as
any
of
the
public
access
is
there.
If
you
know
the
city
wants
to
do
something
to
shut
down
those
closed
them
up.
No
access
points,
I
mean
that's
we're
fine.
With
that,
that's
not!
We
did
talk
to
campus
collage
Doris.
Obviously
she
runs
the
store.
She
would
like
people
to
drop
her
boat.
Their
boats
in
there
fill
with
gas,
get
groceries
and
things
like
that.
So
there's
another
access
point
that
is
fully
usable.
It
does
have
a
turnaround
point.
L
They
could
still
park
their
car
in
the
parking
lot
that
we
are.
We
are
considering
if
it's
not
underwater
correct.
As
far
as
the
wetlands
and
the
drainage
we've
had
DNR
on
site,
they've
done
permitting
on
some
of
the
the
property
already
as
it
was
sat
in
the
county.
We
also
have
you
know
as
far
as
commercial
c3
versus
with
with
land.
Next
to
it,
you
know
we
could.
We
could
look
at
that
in
different
ways.
L
A
lot
of
c3
connected
land
actually
increases
substantially
by
square
foot
of
property
value
so
and
and
and
that's
shown
in
a
lot
of
places.
As
far
as
being
like
concert,
I
agree,
it
looks
terrible,
that's
not
our
goal,
you
know
we're
not.
We
want
this
thing
to
be
as
good
as
possible
to
we're
not
going
to
create
something
as
far
as
that.
That's
you
know
not
good
to
the
to
the
community.
L
As
far
as
the
done
farm
we've
talked
to
one
elder
with
our
plans,
we
have
plans,
you
know
in
the
future,
for
the
80
across
the
road
as
well.
She
told
me
personally
that
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
she
chose
us
as
buyers
is
because
of
the
plans
and
the
vision
that
we
had,
that
she
supported
she
owned
that
land
for
I
think
a
hundred
years
her
family
has
had
that
land
in
their
name.
She
was
it.
Our
plan
was
very
important
to
her,
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
as
well.
L
L
Competi
collage
would
be
good
ones.
Sailboat
landing
is
another
one.
That's
within
a
mile
and
a
half
of
there
they're
all
places
that
can
launch
a
boat
Doris,
like
I,
said
she
owns
a
store.
She
understands
that
having
these
people
across
the
road,
as
she
told
me,
I'd,
be
dumb
not
to
want
something
like
this,
because
it
does
increase
I,
think
out
there,
who
isn't
gonna,
increase
her
sales
to
put
a
a
campground
across
the
street
from
a
large
store.
So
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
she
addressed
with
me.
L
When
I
was
there,
obviously
she
wants
to
keep
the
neighborhood
happy
too.
So
I,
don't
like
I,
said:
I'm
we're
not
trying
to
ruin
Lake
company
we're
not
trying
to
ruin
the
thing
we
bought
this
land
because
it's
adjacent
to
the
city
limits
which
is
needed
to
develop,
and
you
can't,
if
you
go
towards
city
limits,
there's
not
many
more
options.
So
this
is
the
first
options.
When
you
get
out
to
this
location,
it
gives
people
in
the
northeast
part
of
a
town
a
good
place
where
they
can
get
to
their
boat.
O
E
D
E
Version,
ok,
the
2010
version
was
not
shown
to
show
any
growth
in
the
perceived
time,
nor
it
was
to
be
left
in
a
rural
character
over
the
last
several
years
what's
been
going
on
in
the
and
the
preliminary
draft
that's
currently
online.
That
brandy
has
does
not
contain
all
of
the
proposed
changes
of
the
conversations
that
have
been
going
on
with
this
board
over
the
last
several
months
and
on
one
of
those
maps.
E
One
of
the
things
that
have
been
proposed
in
the
discussions
was
that
that
specific
piece
of
ground
that
triangle
in
that
area,
due
to
previous
actions
of
the
board,
some
discussions
that
had
gone
on
that
would
be
a
mixed-use
economic
development
area.
Now
again
that
hasn't
been
adopted
by
either
this
board
or
the
count
or
the
City
Council.
But
that
has
been
part
of
the
previous
discussion.
So
I
know.
That
was
something
that
you
were
just
curious.
I
know
we
don't
have
anything
to
show
at
this.
L
Were
willing
to
work
with
staff
like
I
said,
that's
a
thing
that
when
you
get
into
a
plan
like
that
it
doesn't,
you
know
doing
all
that
for
thinking
without
actually
going
to
an
engineer
and
getting
his
input
on
traffic
and
where
he
would
like
the
ingress
and
egress.
We
would
like
it
close
to
the
lodge
for
for
usability
of
the
patrons
in
campground
to
the
lodge
to
get
supplies,
propane,
etc.
L
I
I
put
up
a
1
Facebook
post
on
my
personal
page,
and
we
have
over
a
nine
of
the
16
that
we
planned
on
going.
People
that
would
look.
The
demand
is,
is
high
because
of
the
the
proximity
to
the
lake
and
the
and
the
people
at
the
lake.
A
lot
of
them
don't
have
room
or
size
limitations
on
the
sheds
that
they
can
provide.
You
can't
put
up
a
16-foot
side
wall
in
your
front
yard,
which
limits
putting
your
camper
in
a
spot.
L
You
know,
or
some
of
the
storage
in
your
in
your
yards,
some
of
these
lakeside
houses.
You
look
at
the
residential
garage
district.
You
guys
have
been
dealing
with
this
unpleasant
Lane,
there's
a
ton
of
people
that
want
outside
they
want
covered
storage.
They
want
a
place
to
put
things,
and
this
is
taking
that.
Like
I
said
we
plan
on
selling
these
units,
we
don't
plan
on
continuing
to
own
them.
There
will
be
a
a
Association
put
together.
These
people
will
own
their
own
spots.
L
There
will
be
the
pride
of
ownership,
we're
selling
it,
so
it
has
to
be
a
mark
of
marketable
building.
It
has
to
look
aesthetically
pleasing
somebody's,
not
going
to
want
to
go
out
there
and
purchase
something
for
forty,
fifty
sixty
thousand
dollars
that
is
just
thrown
out,
but
we're
seeing
the
demand.
We
know,
there's
a
demand
out
there.
L
We
know
in
the
county
that
they're
putting
these
within
one
mile
of
well
one
of
them's
in
city
limits
within
a
mile
of
the
loop
two
miles
of
the
lake
right
now,
and
he
can
build
them
as
fast
as
he
can
and
they're
filling
out
and
but
that's
on
the
other
side
of
the
lake.
So
the
people
in
the
northeast
part
of
town
they're
having
to
drive
all
the
way
on
the
be
the
west
southwest
southwest
side
of
the
lake,
which
makes
their
travel
time
to
get
their
boat
out
to
put
in
the
water
excessive.
G
L
Deal
with
some
wetland
and
some
drainage
issues,
there
we're
getting
a
lot
closer
to
the
we're
getting
a
lot
closer
to
the
wetlands
and
to
the
spot
that
you
know
mr.
Howard
was
worried
about
when
we
met
with
the
DNR.
He
actually
placed
our
you
know
what
okay,
our
first
one
to
be.
The
two
I
believe
it
is.
G
G
A
E
I
mean
I
think
what
Mike
and
Bob
and
everybody
is
talking
about
doing
is
great,
but
it
doesn't
mean
that
they
don't
get
hit
by
a
truck
walking
out
the
door
and
we
have
a
gas
station
out
there.
I
mean
it's
really
more
of
a
discussion
on.
Is
this
appropriate
piece
of
ground
to
be
annexed
into
the
city
and
ac3?
You
know
I,
don't
personally
care
what
these
guys
want
to
do
with
it
at
this
point
in
time,
I,
don't
even
think
it's
germane
to
the
discussion.
E
E
A
H
E
A
E
A
A
E
C
Only
point
out
that
there
are
some
cities
in
this
country
who
are
D
annexing
properties
that
the
annex,
because
it
costs
them
too
much
in
utilities
and
role
maintenance.
So
that
is
something
that
has
occurred
in
this
country,
maybe
not
here.
But
those
are
some
reasons
why
that
people
choose
not
to
an
extent
it's
because
of
those
long-term
costs
right.
E
But
those
long-term
costs
in
this
situation
from
an
annexation
standpoint,
there
is
no,
there
is
no
cost
to
the
city
at
this
point
in
time,
other
than
the
acquisition
of
1/2
are
right
away
for
piece
of
that
property.
That's
that's
there
that
we're
already
maintaining
the
interior
roads
that
would
be
developed
at
some
point
in
time
would
be
a
thing
that
we
would
be
looking
at,
but
I'm
going
to
presume
that
any
increase
in
taxation
from
property
values
wouldn't
pay
for
one.
C
E
A
H
D
H
A
I
That's
a
fair
question.
Mr.
chairman
I'd
hate
to
speak
on
their
behalf,
I
dunno,
just
looking
at
it
from
an
engineering
standpoint
you're
on
a
curvilinear
alignment
of
roadway
here,
which
of
course
would
be
a
concern
of
the
deities.
It
is
a
rather
large
radius
curve
which
does
help
to
better
accommodate
accesses
coming
on
to
it.
I
would
really
be
guessing
making
a
wild
guess
if
I
were
to
see
either
way,
but
I
can
see
where
it'd
be
justifiable
to
potentially
have
one.
E
Question
related
to
the
annexation
as
subsequent
and
the
subsequent
or
zoning
is
that
now
that,
if
we
annex
to
the
center
of
the
road,
the
city
would
have
that
half
road,
which
I
believe
is
a
County
Road.
Are
there
agreements
in
place
right
now
for
the
city
in
the
county
and
how
those
types
of
maintenance
is
handled.
H
E
E
J
E
Think
I'll,
just
I'll,
start
well,
I
think
many
of
the
discussions
and
arguments
we
get
really
are
regarding
the
openness
and
the
natural
beauty
of
that
area,
we're
very
moving
at
the
same
point
in
time.
There
are
arguments
to
be
made
regarding
the
individual's
use
of
property
and
property
rights
that
they
have
as
well
specifically
relating
to
a
piece
of
ground,
that's
adjacent
to
a
highway.
Now,
while
it
does
butt
up
against
other
roads,
it
is
up
against
a
highway
highway.
E
Commercial
would
be
the
most
appropriate
zoning
along
any
stretch
of
highway
20.
If
that's
what
somebody's
proposing
to
use
for
commercial
zoning,
the
question
comes
back
when
you're
talking
with
a
c3
zoning.
We
have
an
understanding
what
they
propose
to
do,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that's.
What
will
happen?
I
think
it
was
fairly
certain
if
these
developers
get
to
do
that.
That's
what
would
happen
and
then
the
question
becomes.
E
You
know
what
have
we
done
in
the
past
and
we
have
as
a
board,
issued
c3
zoning
along
Highway
20
in
within
the
last
six
months
out
there.
The
existing
land
use
plan
that's
been
approved,
doesn't
necessarily
promote
this
type
of
a
use.
The
one
this
the
current
one,
that's
in
process
does
have
some
cata
soles
in
there
and
some
map
amendments
that
would
show
this
to
be
a
mixed
use
area.
Well,
again,
that's
just
based
on
our
discussions
that
we've
had
over
couple
years.
A
Think
for
me,
you
know
the
the
biggest
standpoint
here
is
really
the
fact
that
this
is
adjacent
to
South,
Dakota,
highway
20
and
when
we
do
look
at
zoning
from
a
land-use
standpoint,
the
proximity
of
the
roadways,
the
design
traffic
patterns
and
in
things
are
things
that
come
into
consideration.
What
you
want
adjacent
to
a
highway
is
this:
this
plan
designation
of
the
c3
highway
zone.
That's
that's
typical
of
the
way
that
we
would
do
zoning
across
the
entire
across
the
entire
city.
G
E
Made
a
recommendation
to
annex
if
the
zoning
fails,
the
motion
still
goes
forth
to
the
City
Council's.
My
understanding
and
the
City
Council
would
have
to
establish
what
the
zoning
would
be
for
the
property.
I'm
back
would
clarify
that,
but
I'm,
that's
just
my
background.
We're
just
making
a
recommendation.
We
have
we're
not
the
final
say-so
on
this.
I
You
aren't
correct
if
you,
if
the
motion
is
denied
by
the
Planning
Commission,
it
would
still
move
forward
to
the
City
Council
for
ultimate
decision
on
both
the
annexation
and
the
reason
for
that
matter,
and
then
I
would
need
to
consult
with
Matt,
who,
unfortunately,
isn't
here
this
evening.
The
city
attorney
to
determine
what,
in
the
in
the
circumstance
at
the
City
Council
level
would
have
to
happen
as
far.
E
G
My
question,
then,
would
be
that
the
council
then
would
determine
what
zoning
would
be
appropriate,
I
think
in
either
instance,
the
council
determines
what
zoning
is
appropriate.
I
think
the
number
of
votes
is
what's
at
stake
here,
whether
it's
a
super
majority
or
simple
majority
required
for
the
council's
my
understanding,
I'm,
not
giving
legal
advice,
I'm,
acting
as
my
bread
and
recollection
as
a
as
a
commissioner
in
prior
experiences.
If
Matt
were
here,
I
think
that
was
at
that
point.
Can
they?
E
Know
if
what
ends
up
happening
is,
if
we
say
see
three
or
we
say
we
don't
recommend
a
zoning
designation
and
the
City
Council
they
have
the
c3
zoning.
If
the
c32
zoning
fails,
they
can't
amend
an
r1
or
c2
on-the-fly.
It
comes
back
to
us
again
with
a
subsequent.
Do
we
had
this
happen
before
I?
Remember,
Matt.
Explain
that
to
us
the
one
time
I
would.
I
Concur
with
Commissioner
Keith's
summary
there
as
my
understanding
that
they
could
not
amend
their
discussion,
their
motion
to
lower
grade
zoning
district.
It
would
have
to
come
back
by
the
applicant
to
be
resumed
a
different
way
that
would
hopefully
hopefully
be
amicable
to
both
boards.
At
that
point,
ultimately,
City
Council
I.
C
Do
have
some
concern
about
the
lack
of
a
transitional
type
buffer
zone
and
the
fact
that
that
2010,
Land
Use
Agreement
really
doesn't
address.
Even
though
a
new
one
is
in
process.
It's
fictitional
right
now.
I
have
an
issue
with
the
fact
that
what
the
c3
proposes
here
is
not
compatible
with
the
current
land
use
agreement
that
we
have
in
force
right
now
and
I
also
just
have
a
little
bit
of
issue
with
zoning
county
property
because
we're
assuming
that
this
will
be
annexed.
C
E
So
the
practice
has
been
historically
that
the
Planning
Commission
will
take
the
annexation
and
the
rezoning
at
this
meeting
and
and
then
because,
if
we
recommend
annexation,
we
recommend
the
zoning.
It
goes
to
the
City
Council.
So
we
are
in
a
sense.
We
are
in
essence
by
just
saying
we
recommend
acts
Asian,
we're
saying
we
believe
this
property
should
be
of
the
city,
and
so
since
we
believe
it
since
we
just
voted
702
think
that
this
should
be
the
city.
The
county
issue
goes
away.
We
think
it
should
be
in
the
city.
E
C
E
Correct
the
presumption
is
that
we
are
saying
that
it's
that
this
isn't
we
were
from
the
Planning
Commission
level.
We
are
saying
we
are
presuming
that
this
is
going
to
be
in
the
city
and
it's
going
to
be
in
the
city.
This
is
what
we
recommend
to
the
City
Council,
the
City
Council
blesses,
or
denies
that
that
reaction,
and
so
we
are
moving
forward.
We've
taken
the
first
step
5
minutes
ago
to
say
this
property
is
just
as
well.
It
could
be
in
the
city,
because
that's
what
we're
recommending
the
city
to
annex
it
and.
H
E
H
Throughout
this
last
year
we
have
been
going
through
that
Land,
Use
Plan
and
then
making
comments
and
then
giving
that
bath
to
first
district,
and
then
they
will
once
they
have
all
of
that
put
together,
then
we're
just
waiting
for
them
to
give
us
the
plan
and
then
we'll
bring
it
to
you
guys
for
adoption.
But
it
does
include
all
of
the
discussions
that
we've
had
throughout
the
year.
E
One
thing
I
could
see
if
this
was
to
be
zoned,
c3
they're
still
as
a
subsequent
action
and
the
subsequent
action.
What
is
they
as
a
cam
crowd?
I
for
some
reason,
I
think
there
are.
There
is
a
tree
line
or
something
along
a
portion
of
that
property
that
acts
as
a
natural
buffer
if
it
was
to
be
reasoned
and
they
come
back
with
this
I
think
you
can
address
an
increased
buffering
increase
in
distance,
because
I
think
the
ordinance
does
require
additional
screening
with
them.
E
A
We
do
have
you
know
other
situations
in
town
where
we
have
highway
commercial
immediately,
adjacent
to
residential
because
of
the
proximity
to
a
major
highway.
That's
one
of
the
things
to
consider
here
is
that,
while
there
is
residential,
there's
also
a
major
highway
coming
right
through
here
as
well.
I
I
Is
the
council,
subsequent
to
your
action,
wouldn't
approve
the
annexation
and
then
deny
the
zoning,
because
we
would
be
left
with
a
parcel
of
land,
that's
an
unknown,
so
by
default
the
annexation
would
become
null
and
void
as
well,
and
the
applicant
would
have
to
return
with
the
whole
new
application
for
both
annexation
and
zoning
again
with
a
different
zone.
If
that
helps
make
sense,
as
far
as
that
want
to
get
to
the
council
level,
that.
I
E
D
L
A
H
H
D
C
H
F
D
D
I
G
Folks
leave
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
There
will
be
part
of
that
process
is
conditions
that
can
be
placed
on
the
land.
So
if
you
have
input
on
or
have
some
sort
of
say-so
in
terms
of
screening
or
something
like
that,
I
would
suggest
before
folks
in
mass
leave.
If
you
have
any
input
or
comments
that
you
want
to
make,
that
would
be
the
time
to
do
that,
and
that
will
be
shortly.
Yeah.
G
G
H
A
E
D
H
As
far
as
what
they're
hoping
to
do
with
this
property
situ
does
allow
storage
units
as
a
conditional
use,
but
it
doesn't
allow
for
the
contractor
shops
and
the
storage
yards
and
that's
a
an
issue.
I
think
with
our
ordinance
I
think
we're
missing
a
definition
where,
if
you
know
cuz
it's
basically
just
if
they
can
have
a
connection
to
water
or
sewer,
and
so
that's
to
differentiate
between
the
storage
unit
and
then
the
contractor
shop.
H
A
A
That's
not
really
my
concern
here.
It's
about
the
zoning
district
and
the
use
and
c3
being
highway.
Commercial
in
my
opinion,
should
be
immediately
adjacent
to
the
highway
and
this
particular
parcel
is
not
and
well.
It
would
be
adjacent
to
additional
c3.
There's
a
substantial
amount
of
distance
between
the
major
highway
and
the
proposed
parcel.
G
And
I
can
appreciate
the
fact
of
wanting
storage
units
there
I
get
that
I
mean
everybody
who
wants
the
storage
unit.
I
am
not
in
favor
of
contractor
shops
whatsoever.
I
apologize
for
my
ignorance,
but
I'm
not
really
understanding
the
differentiation.
We're
talking
about
the
difference
between
having
a
toilet
not
ever
toilet.
H
A
E
E
G
A
So
I
think
you
can
see
it
jump
out
at
you
on
the
map
that,
where
we
are
close
to
residential,
we
tend
to
limit
it
to
fairly
close
to
the
major
corridor
where
we're
in
heavily
commercial
/
industrial
areas,
we
do
allow
it
to
go
a
little
bit
farther
away
so
in
in
this
particular,
you
know
use
case.
It
seems
like
it
flows,
counter
to
what
we've
done
historically,.
G
G
E
G
H
D
A
In
the
past,
you
know
we
have
looked
at
properties
that
are
substantial
size
like
that
and
required
it
to
be
broken
up
into
multiple
different
zoning
designations.
Just
because
the
northernmost
portion
of
it
touches
the
highway
doesn't
mean
that
we
would
approve
the
entire
parcel
to
be
one
zoning
designation.
B
G
G
Same
problem
we
had
with
the
Dahle
discussion
lake
by
itself
is
unique
because
of
what
it
is.
Truly,
the
r-1
designation
probably
doesn't
isn't
really
an
accurate
fit
either,
and
we
should
have
a
commercial
lake
district,
which
I
think
is
what
we
talked
about
last
time,
of
course,
but
we're
now
six
months
later
well,.
H
H
But
through
any
discussion
we've
had
you
know
we
we
talked
about
the
lake
commercial
district
being
the
purpose
of
it
is
so
that
there
are
conducive
commercial
businesses
that
are
complementary
to
the
lake
for
to
promote
commercial
activity
means
that
the
lake
is
basically
built
out
as
single-family
residential
and
actually
like
a
campground
would
be
proposed
to
be
a
permitted
use
and
as
a
conditional
use.
Then
this
is
where
I
came
up
with
a
different
definition.
So
contractor
shops
seems
to
be.
H
You
know
it's
for
a
commercial
business
to
potentially
conduct
their
business
out
of
there,
where
I
think
the
need
more
so
is
just
to
have
a
storage
unit
with
the
bathroom.
So
to
change
that
definition
and
then
that
that
would
be
a
conditional
use
as
long
as
well
as
storage
you
it's
just
because
storage
is
a
big
thing
at
the
lake
and
I
know
that
we're
always
trying
to
clean
it
up
and
we
limit
where
people
can
park
things
and
an
outside
storage
and
everything.
H
E
E
D
E
B
H
G
H
E
H
E
E
C
I
D
H
A
H
That's
okay
to
do
kind
of
what
the
our
G
district
on
pompous
co-drive,
that's
what
they're
doing,
and
so,
if,
if
they
would
be
condo
platted,
then
it's
just
a
matter
of
as
long
as
you're
able
to
meet
everything
in
the
zoning
district.
Other
requirements
and
and
the
our
G
district
does
have
a
lot
of
I
guess
restrictive
requirements
as
to
protect
the
aesthetics
and
the
amount
of
impervious
surface
on
the
on
the
lot
and
the
size
and
everything
so
yeah,
I
kind
of
lost.
My
chair,
the
table.
E
A
A
D
C
A
B
Staff
finds
that
campground
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
c3
highway
commercial
district,
421
2803
8.
The
definition
of
campground
is
a
plot
of
ground
for
public
use
upon
which
two
or
more
campsites
are
located,
established,
maintained
advertised
or
held
out
to
the
public
to
be
a
place
where
camping
units
may
be
located
and
occupied
as
temporary
living
quarters.
Campgrounds
for
tent
trailers
and
recreational
vehicles
should
be
cited
with
consideration
for
access
to
the
property.
The
campground
should
be
designed
to
minimize
the
impact
from
adjacent
major
thoroughfares.
B
The
applicants
submitted
written
request
and
survey
of
the
proposed
lot.
One
done
second
edition
said
drying
reflects
compliance
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
terms
of
the
ordinance
2100
202
to
be
7.
A
through
H
is
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses,
which
includes
board
review
of
ingress,
egress
off
street
parking
and
loading
refuse
utilities,
service
areas,
screening
and
Buffett,
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
neighborhood
chapter,
2163
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements
and
engineering
design
standards.
B
The
submitted
survey
does
not
show
off
street
parking
spaces
or
internal
road
layout.
However,
sufficient
area
exists
for
the
minimum
necessary
per
90,
no
412
off
street
autumn
automobile
parking
spaces.
The
off
street
parking
spaces
spaces
shall
be
provided
at
the
ratio
of
one
parking
stall
for
each
sleeping
accommodation
in
any
automobile
court
or
tourist
home
and
each
camp
unit
in
any
automobile
camp
chapter
21,
sixty-five
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses.
B
The
submitted
Docs
documents
do
not
indicate
plans
for
outside
storage
displays
or
screening,
but
the
outside
storage
requirements
of
the
ordinance
state
that
outside
storage
may
be
permitted.
If
acceptable,
screening
is
provided
and
approved
by
the
building
official
displays
of
merchandise,
which
is
offered
for
sale,
rental
or
lease
may
be
displayed
beyond
the
confines
of
a
building
chapter
21
73
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
Minimum
tree
requirements
that
are
going
to
be
required
for
this
development
site
is
122
trees
per
the
submitted
survey,
so
they
do
have
some
some
screening
going
on
there,
possibly
with
trees.
B
The
required
15
foot
of
grass,
Boulevard
sidewalk
trail,
curb
and
gutter
are
not
shown
on
the
submitted
survey.
Note
that
the
applicant
is
not
seeking
variances
from
any
of
these
requirements
and
title
24
subdivision
of
land.
The
campground
is
subject
to
successful
annexation,
zoning
2c3
district
and
plaiting.
This
board
must
consider
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
21:02
o22,
b7
A
through
H
in
chapter
21
70s.
D
B
E
I
I
A
D
D
E
E
L
This
drawing
his
bag,
like
I,
said
we.
We
threw
this
together
in
hopes
to
working
with
an
engineer
we
engineered
the
other
portion
of
the
property
and
it
cost
about
$3,500
for
that
portion
of
the
property,
the
one
that
which
was
denied.
We
thought
this
had
less
of
a
chance
of
passing,
so
it
it
is
not
fully
engineered.
We
work
with
staff
brandy
and
take
their
recommendations
and
the
recommendations
of
the
engineers.
However,
we
aren't
asking
for
any
changes
or
variances
being.
E
That
we
don't
have
a
detailed
plan.
I
know
that
was
a
concern
of
some
of
the
people.
I
may
be
in
the
audience
and
also
I.
Just
maybe
would
like
to
take
a
quick
opportunity
to
run
through
the
requirements
of
the
camera
round,
to
see
how
he's
perfect
for
to
get
us
on
record,
at
least
where
we're
at
you
bet.
You
don't
have
any
problem
with
each
campsite
containing
at
least
2,000
square
feet.
No.
D
E
E
E
E
Which
is
just
like
already
built
home,
but
not
manufactured
correct.
What
I'm,
the
city's
ordinance
and
you're
gonna
be
keeping
a
guest
list
accurate
records
as
far
as
length
of
time,
so
in
case
you
were
to
be
inspected
correct.
Do
you
have
any
issues
so
being
that
there
would
be
no
parking
associated
with
any
with
the
campground
on
any
public
street
at
all?
The
parking
will
happen
on
the
interior.
E
L
E
L
Oil,
the
highway
20,
we
talked
with
the
state,
they
don't
like
you
to
plant
trees
along
highways.
Next
to
them,
we
talked
to
the
conservation
office
and
we
were
trying
to
get
trees
planted
in
there
and
there's
a
distance
from
the
centerline
of
the
highway,
which
they
do
not
want
you
to
plant
trees.
So
we
would
follow
that
as
far
as
the
interior
roads,
we
would
be
planting
along
North.
L
E
L
E
Guess
the
question
is:
do
we
the
one
thing
that
maybe
be
up
for
discussion
is
whether
or
not
we
want
trees
to
have
something
of
a
fence
effect
and
as
a
screen
and
because,
especially
in
the
area
I'm,
just
throwing
it
out
I'm,
not
saying
that
anybody?
Does
it
I
just
want
to
throw
that
out
there,
because
the
ordinance
requires
that
we
address
screening
as
far
as
the
set.
E
E
L
E
M
L
D
L
G
D
G
L
Down
in
that,
oh,
it's
kind
of
it
would
run
around
by
the
wetland
on
the
road
there,
but
you
couldn't
get
all
the
little
squares
in
there.
I
mean
those
parking.
Isn't
isn't
that
large?
When
you
take
that
square
and
put
it
in
there,
we
will
not.
We
will
follow
any
DNR,
GF,
MP
and
Corps
of
Engineers.
So.
G
A
L
L
L
E
L
E
You'll
see
the
common,
the
common
anymore,
sixty
by
thirty
pads
is
what
you
see
is
the
standard
knowing
that
you're
gonna,
we
don't
know
exactly
the
density
of
the
homes
other
than
we
need
2,000
cabins
up
2,000
foot
for
each
cabin
there's,
no
objection
to
having
a
minimum
separation
distance
between
those
cabins
that
would
at
least
meet
fire
code.
Correct.
I
Mr.
chairman,
yes,
sir,
just
because
it
was
brought
up
again
recently
here
in
this
discussion
on
the
wetlands,
those
again
in
the
preliminary
plan
phase
any
proposed
work
adjacent
into
around
those
wetlands.
We
would
be
reviewing
that
and
as
necessary,
if
they're
proposing
any
encroachment
into
that
wetland
area,
they
would
have
to
get
the
appropriate
check
offs.
G
L
D
D
C
That's
gonna
leave
traffic
right
into
that
little
residential
area
that
secondary
access
right
across
the
street,
so
I'd
like
to
see
that
move
down
somewhere
up
somewhere
somewhere,
oh
not
across
from
cut
salve,
which
is
just
a
simple
residential.
It's
not
even
a
very
well-maintained
street.
From
what
I
see
so
I
would
really
yeah.
E
A
J
F
E
B
B
E
So
what
what
we're
saying
under
number
seven
is
that,
for
mr.
Austin's
understanding
is
that
you
can't
have
a
trailer
house
out
there,
but
you
can
have
an
off-site
constructed
home.
These
are
a
minimum
size
or
matt
and
two
for
those.
What's
the
minimum
size
for
that
off,
construct,
I'll,
say,
construction
home
to
be
located
out.
Cabin
depends.
B
B
J
G
Believe
that
these
comments
are
ratified
in
the
motions
and
the
subsequent
motions,
and
then
there
are
subsequent
development
agreements
that
occur
so
I
think
everything
is
on
the
up
and
up
mr.
Austin,
so
tiptoe
archways
your
fears
using
mr.
case.
So
when
we
talk
about
trees
or
something
like
that,
that's
incorporated
into
the
motion-
and
it
is,
it
has
the
effect
of
an
order.
N
Does
anybody
have
an
idea,
even
if
it's
only
under
a
seasonal
basis,
how
many
extra
men
it
would
take
to
be
hired
for
this
facility
in
fire,
department,
personnel
or
police
in
the
event
that
it
becomes
required?
I
would
imagine
it
would
fall
back
onto
the
taxpaying
homeowners,
unless
somebody
can
tell
me
different
I.
N
Just
see
a
large
portion
of
that
as
a
shortcut
to
the
lake
that
I
would
imagine
it'll.
Quite
a
few
people
aren't
going
to
head
down
to
Doris's
and
use
that
access
there
or
the
small
one.
That's
at
the
end
of
cuts,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
chaos.
Wait
enough
to
come
out
of
this,
that
everybody
will
have
to
deal
with
later
on
and
I
just
thought.
Maybe
we
could
avoid
that.
That's
all.
Thank
you
appreciate.
M
And
and
I
I
just
want
to
express
that
those
two
are
my
major
concerns
and
keeping
people
I
don't
want
to
please
people,
we
have
a
significant
investment
in
this
property
and
we
camped
and
our
kids
wanted
to
go
to
the
lake.
We
didn't
camp
for
the
campground
and
we
camped
for
the
lake,
and
this
doesn't
have
a
lake
in
front
of
it.
It.
M
You
know
we
can't
for
10
years,
like
my
husband
said
those
people
will
come
through
our
yards,
they
will
use
our
docks
and
help
themselves
and
I.
Don't
really
want
to
spend
my
relaxation
time
patrolling
that
if
this
campground
was
on
the
lake
I
would
feel
very
differently
about
it.
It's
not.
There
is
no
lakefront
I
mean
there's
a
couple
little
accesses
and
that
just
does
not
speak
to
me
as
a
campground
of
putting
ten
miles
out
of
town,
then.
C
You
know
right
there
right
down
from
that
is
where
I
turn
to
go
to
my
house.
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
go
farther
that
way
or
not,
that
road
is
heavily
traveled
by
trucks
and
I'm,
not
talking
pickups
I'm,
talking
semis
and
my
heart,
just
aches,
thinking
that
these
kids
in
this
campground
I'm,
not
even
talking
about
the
kids
on
the
lake.
That's
another
story
altogether
with
the
kids
in
this
campground
riding
their
bikes,
doing
what
they're
doing
being
kids
and
it
takes
one
accident.
C
P
Austin
schultz,
398
North,
Lake
Drive,
so
I
have
both
398
and
396
properties,
so
I
am
adjacent
to
the
public
access
that
is
referenced
by
Cutts
Avenue
to
the
lake.
So
I
agree
that
you
know
the
sediment
in
terms
of
the
the
right
away
or
the
the
passageways
from
the
campground
to
the
lake
right.
Is
it
being
that
yeah?
That
is
gonna,
be
an
issue
so
again.
P
Procedurally
right,
you
come
to
the
come
to
this
without
a
plan
of
development
of
ac3,
but
yet
we
zone
an
annex
on
this
basis,
make
that
decision
and
then
now
we're
putting
the
city
and
the
crux
of
an
issue
of
what
the
heck
do.
We
do
with
it
right,
so
we
make
these
side
dealings
of
or
public
and
on
record
dealings
in
terms
of
what
it
shouldn't
shouldn't
have
as
though
ac3
the
only
thing
that's
going
to
be,
there's
a
campground
right
we've.
So
the
the
proposals
in
front
of
City
Council
to
do
that.
P
This
is
a
c3
which
has
many
uses
gas
stations,
hotels
right,
you
can
go
down
the
list,
but
we're
sold
on
this
dream
of
it
being
a
campground
and
then
we
zone
it
as
c3,
and
so
we
open
ourselves
as
a
city
for
all
of
this
again,
also
in
the
comprehensive
land
use
prayin.
It
talks
about
the
major
safety
concern
along
North
Lake
Drive,
yet
we're
putting
more
public
and
more
traffic
down
this
risk
area.
That's
identified
and
documented
and.
P
Made
aware
to
the
public
and
and
the
city
is
on
record-
that's
saying:
there's
a
major
safety
concern
with
this,
so
it
opens
up
a
major
liability
for
the
city.
If,
unfortunately,
if
something
were
to
happen,
the
city
has
opened
themselves
for
major
liability
and
when
I
say
city,
I,
city
houses,
taxpayers,
you
know
for
this,
along
with
the
policing.
So
again,
I
share
my
disappointment
with
mr.
Austin
in
terms
of
the
proceeding
so
appreciate
your
time.
G
Austin
real
quick
yeah,
it's
Austin
right,
yes,
who's,
doc.
Okay,
sorry
at
this
phase
were
allowed
to
put
conditions
as
a
part
of
the
approval
or
the
disapprove.
We
can
either
vote
up
or
vote
down
on
there
and
if
we
vote
up
on
it,
we
can
put
conditions
on
it
if
we're
to
put
conditions
on
it
like
screening,
screening
means
fences
or
trees,
and
things
like
that
I
mean
I
could
see
the
southeastern
corner
being
a
particular
interest
to
you.
P
It's
bad
enough.
That's
already
going
to
be
a
commercial
zone
in
a
residential
and
lake
right,
where
the
the
nature
is
part
of
the
the
desire
for
people
to
be
in
that
residential
zone
and
hold
home
values
and
the
desire
to
be
there,
because
that
that's
what
it
is.
So
that
would
be
my
is
your
round
foilage
for
would.
P
E
E
E
There
were
as
a
condition
stipulating
the
owner
of
the
permit
to
be
responsible
for
those
individuals
that
are
doing
it,
and
there
are
certain
threshold
of
numbers
of
times
where
people
are
trespassing
on
property,
and
it's
documented
and
proven
that
they
could
forego
the
permit.
I
mean.
Is
that
something
that
would
trick
your
fit?
You
know
trip
your
trigger
I
mean.
Would
you
support
something
like
that?
I'm
just
looking
for
ideas,
no.
E
P
L
We're
here
we're
listening,
we're
acknowledging
all
this
like
I
said
we
didn't
suggest
or
come
up
with
a
great
plan,
because
it
does
front-load
it.
Knowing
that
there's
a
taste
for
this,
we
did,
we
wit
we
would
like
to
table
this,
come
back
with
a
better
plan,
talk
to
the
neighborhood
and
figure
out
what
we're
going
to
do.
E
L
K
I'd
just
like
to
make
a
comment:
I
come
here
representing
somebody
else,
but
I'm
strictly
speaking
on
my
own
behalf,
I've
been
coming
to
these
four
a
lot
of
years
and
sitting
through
some
very
full
houses.
Okay,
going
back
to
the
storage
once
I
sat
here
a
couple
years
ago
on
with
a
full
house,
people
arguing
about
having
campers
in
the
front
yard,
side,
yard
I
mean
I,
understand
both
sides.
K
K
If
you're
at
the
same
time
telling
people
they
can't
build
a
storage
unit
and
on
I
hate
to
say
this,
but
that
lands
been
there
for
a
long
time
and
somebody
else
could
have
bought
it
and
kept
it
as
nature,
but
somebody's
looking
at
investing
real
money
into
this
and
helping
the
city
bring
people
in
I
happen
to
know
both
of
them.
There
I
mean
I,
just
know
them.
I
know
it's
gonna
be
a
quality
development.
K
It's
not
gonna,
be
an
old
mobile
home.
Like
you
see
on
south
81,
when
you
head
down
south
and
the
people
worrying
about
crossing
their
property.
I
live
next
to
a
commercial
development.
It
has
a
casino
Bob
graph
that
just
was
here
and
some
car
sales.
If
I
have
a
drunk
personally,
even
the
conceal
at
night
walking
through
my
yard,
you
know
what
I'm
gonna
do.
I'm
gonna
call
the
police,
it's
not
up
to
somebody
else
to
provide
the
law
that
the
city
already
does
if
somebody
walks
across
their
yard.
K
Now
you
have
the
right
to
call
the
police
I
live
next
to
a
casino
and
I.
Don't
have
anybody
walking
through
my
yard,
that
I
know
of
so
I
just
think
that
everybody's
worries
get
so
heightened
because
somebody
wants
to
develop
something
and
people
want
more
taxes.
People
want
a
nice
arena.
People
want
the
rec
center
all
this
stuff.
K
It
takes
money
and
if
somebody
is
willing
to
develop
something
and
help
bring
money
into
this
community,
I
I
just
hate
to
see
that
there's
all
these
stumbling
blocks
over
and
over
and
over
again
that
people
have
to
go
through
because
somebody
don't
want
it
in
their
neighborhood
and
if
it
was
put
out
in
the
county
20
miles
out
there'd,
be
some
farmer
complaining
that
he
didn't
want
it.
That's
all
I
got
say
I.
K
D
E
A
J
J
I
But
that
is
the
crux
really
of
what
the
the
Board
of
adjustments
role
is
and
assessing
when
they
do
bring
forth.
If
they
do
bring
forth
another
conditional
use,
application
and
I
just
wanted
the
the
general
public
to
know
that
and
remind
the
applicant
of
that,
as
well
as
far
as
the
ordinance
requirements.
One.
L
Other
thing
that
might
make
this
a
little
bit
easier
in
our
planning
there's
a
30-day
maximum
that
you
have
on
campgrounds,
like
city
memorial
park,
has
a
somebody
that
that's
there
all
year-round
well
I
can't
do
that,
based
on
your
ordinance,
I
can't
have
somebody
on
site
living
there
for
free.
You
give
them
their
campsite.
They
would
look
over
the
campground
by
your
ordinance.
I
can't
do
that.
E
L
L
L
E
A
H
So
this
is
the
Commission
consideration
of
resolution
number
20
1935,
a
zoning
text,
amendment
to
chapter
20,
105
establishments
of
districts,
other
revised
ordinances,
the
city
of
Watertown,
amending
the
overlay
district
list
to
include
the
downtown
or
the
DT
downtown
overlay
district.
So
this
is
strictly
just
house
cleaning
when
now
that
the
downtown
overlay
district
is
effective,
it
just
needs
to
be
added
to
the
list
in
title
21.
A
A
H
So
the
idea
here
this
went
through
staff
discussion
and
with
it
being
right
now
in
ordinance,
we
allow
caretaker
residents
to
reside
as
permitted
uses
in
the
I
1
light
industrial
district
and
we're
suggesting
that
we
move
those
two
conditional
uses
and
that
more
so
comes
for
public
safety,
and
so
that
there's
record
of
it
at
least
that
they
would
come
before
the
board,
so
that
fire
and
EMS
services
would
know
that
there
was
a
residence
in
an
industrial
building.
Do.
H
E
F
H
So
this
is
the
this:
is
the
PUD
Planned
Unit
development
discussion
so
in
looking
at
this
and
how
we
currently
have
it
written
in
ordinance
and
we
haven't
in
I
mean
I've
been
here
three
and
a
half
years
and
I
haven't
seen
an
application.
We
don't
have
many
zones
that
are
pew
DS
and
that's
just
because
of
how
tasking
it
is
up
front
when
it
is
zoning
and
once
they
would
achieve
that
they
would
still
have
to
go
through
all
of
the
subdivision
requirements.
So
let
me
pull
up.
E
Basically,
brandy
isn't
pewdie
zoning
really
a
loan
to
create
something
that
we
can't
do
in
any
other
specific
zoning
district
that
we
have
in
the
city.
So
it
gives
us
flexibility
or
gives
the
developer
flexibility
to
do
something
that's
not
allowed
in
any
individual
or
a
mixed-use
type
of
development.
That's
why
we
use
the
PUD
s
yep.
H
Okay,
so
basically,
what
we
have
in
ordinance
right
now
is:
we
have
the
all
of
the
things
that
they
would
need
to
provide
or
actually
I'm
gonna
describe
what
what
I
would
propose
so
for
them
to
prove
that
the
pewdie
was
a
added
benefit
with
having
the
mixed-use
districts
together
and
how
they
were
structured
they
would
provide.
They
would
have
a
meeting
with
staff
as
our
DRT,
which
is
our
design
review
team.
H
We
would
have
a
meeting
we
meet
on
it
conceptually
because
this
is
also
so
we're
not
we're
being
more
cost
beneficial
to
development
and
and
encouraging
it
instead
of
being
cost
prohibitive
and
having
them,
spend
a
bunch
of
money
and
then
get
told
no,
so
they
would
come
and
meet
with
staff.
We
would
look
over
that.
H
You
know
comprehensive
land
use
plan,
look
at
any
of
the
things
that
could
be
of
a
concern
before
even
bringing
it
to
you
guys,
and
then
they
would
prepare
a
PUD
plan
which
would
include
all
of
the
one
through
six
and
I
actually
haven't.
This
is
an
updated
version
and
that's
not
in
your
packet,
so
I
and
I'll
send
that
out
through
email
tomorrow
and
then
tweak
it.
H
So
then,
if
the
PUD
plan
had
all
of
these
requirements
met,
that
would
be
an
exhibit
to
the
rezone
petition.
So
then
they
would
bring
it
forth.
So
you
guys
have
a
public
hearing
and
then
the
rezone
would
either
be
approved
to
be
a
beauty,
and
this
proposed
plan
would
would
be
what
they
would
need
to
work
off
of
as
they
went
forward
in
development.
So
when
they
started
working
on
their
preliminary
plan,
this
would
have
to
be
adhered
to.
H
Otherwise
there
would
there's
the
amendment
section
or
if
it's
a
drastic
change
from
what
was
approved
for
the
rezone,
it
would
have
to
come
back
to
a
public
hearing
and
then
just
so
it's
clear
that
building
permits
aren't
issued
off
of
this
PUD
plan,
which
is
a
zoning
designation.
Then
we
added
this
applicability
of
subdivision
regulations
that
just
reiterates
ordinance
anyway,
but
it's
just
saying
that
all
sections
of
title
20
for
the
subdivision
of
land
must
be
complied
with
in
accordance
to
the
approved
PUD
plan
prior
to
building
permit
issuance.
So.
E
A
very
layman's
step,
one
developer,
has
an
idea
step
two
he
comes
in
and
he
meets
with
city
staff.
I've
got
this
idea.
I
want
to
do
a
mixed-use
type
development
staff
says
here's
the
things
that
you
need
to
bring
back
to
us
staff
and
the
developer
gets
together.
They
talk
about
it.
The
outcome
in
general
agreement
and
staff
then
brings
the
plan
to
the
Planning,
Commission
and
and
the
City
Council,
and
we
have
a
hearing
on
the
planning
of
the
plan
and
the
resulting
at
the
same
time.
E
At
the
same
time,
if
the
rezoning
goes
through,
the
PUD
is
just
basically
like
a
holding.
It's
like
a
basin
we're
holding
everything
in
there.
They
can
do
their
PUD,
but
now
their
concept
plan
will
come
and
work
with
you
and
staff
and
you'll
come
up
and
make
sure
all
the
eyes
are
teas
across,
and
then
you
bring
that
plan
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
to
approve
as
a
preliminary
plan
yep
and
then
after
that
comes
the
planning
and
then
building
permits
will
come
after
that.
Yep.
A
H
A
D
H
E
H
And
the
requirements
for
what
they
had
to
present
was
very
tedious,
and
I
mean
it
was,
as
you
would
have
to
come
back
for
a
public
hearing
if
you
changed
an
interior
floor
plan
or
like
the
outside
material.
So
it's
just.
It
was
not
user
friendly,
which
goes
to
show,
because
we
haven't
seen
a
request
for
a
beauty.
E
B
E
H
E
H
H
Yeah
and
these
shouldn't
take
long
because
I
do
appreciate
all
you
guys
it's
time
and
yeah,
so
communal
living
is
so.
We've
talked
about
that
before
the
only
thing
that
I
want
to
touch
on
with
that
is
so
that
is
allowing
it's
a
group
home.
Basically,
it's
allowing
four
to
six
unrelated
people
to
live
together.
H
E
Just
thinking
that
some
people,
that
even
some
other
r2
are
stereotypically
a
single
family
doing
and
they
might
think
the
density-
we're
experienced,
I'm
experience
this
in
another
community.
That
I
think
it
would
be
better
to
do
a
conditional
use
of
something.
That's
a
stereotypically,
a
single-family
density,
because
we
are
talking
about
additional
parking
and
all
those
things
that
go
along
with
it.
So.
J
H
Yeah
that
sounds
good
to
me,
and
you
know
the
thing
with
r1
see
why
I
wanted
to
specifically
talk
about
that.
One
is
because
it
is
single-family
residential
compact
but
and
the
guidelines
that
we
have
for
the
communal
living
use.
It
I
mean
a
lot
of
the
Bertie's
would
have
a
hard
time
meeting
it
because
they
are
compact
and
you
do
have
to
provide
off
street
parking
and
whatever
else
we
had
in
that
ordinance,
which
that'll
be
coming
back
to
you
guys.
So
we
can
see
what
those
design
standards
are.
H
H
So
that's
all
for
that.
One
thanks
for
that
input,
guys
and
then
the
easement
vacation
discussion
is
just
going
to
be
added
to
ordinance,
because
it
is
already
I
mean
its
standard
policy
for
how
other
communities
go
about
dealing
with
an
easement
being
vacated
right
now,
we've
been
bringing
some
it's
it's
awkward,
how
it
is
in
our
ordinance,
because
it's
not
specific,
so
this
will
just
clean
that
up.