►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment & Plan Commission Meeting 2 7 2019
Description
City of Watertown Board of Adjustment & Plan Commission Meeting
C
B
A
Right.
Thank
you.
A
couple
of
announcements
here.
First
of
all
would
like
to
advise
anyone
that
would
like
to
speak
at
during
the
open,
open
forum
that
will
be
later
in
the
meeting
this
one
make
that
announcement.
Please
make
sure
you
advised
Jill
if
you
want
to
speak
later
about
any
topic,
that's
not
on
the
agenda
and
speaking
of
the
agenda.
Is
there
going
to
be
any
changes
to
the
agenda?
Yes,.
B
A
And
with
that
in
mind
for
the
applicants
that
are
here
because
of
the
weather
and
other
conflicts,
we
are
down
to
kind
of
a
skeleton
crew
here.
So
if
anybody
that
is
in
front
of
the
committee
today
would
like
to
postpone
their
application
to
where
we
have
more
members
on
the
panel,
that
is
to
say
the
full
board,
which
would
be
seven
people
rather
than
the
five
feel
free
to
do
so,
a
in
order
to
pass
with
five
people
on
the
board
Jill.
That
would
require
what
that
we
require.
Okay
right.
So
no.
D
A
Okay,
so
so
that
being
said,
I
would
just
like
to
make
sure
the
applicants
today
I
understand
that
with
a
board
of
five
year,
you
would
need
four
yes
votes
in
order
for
your
application
to
pass.
Well
that,
if
that
in
mind,
if
anybody
would
like
to
resubmit,
hopefully
the
next
board
meeting,
we
would
have
a
more
of
a
full
complement
of
board
members.
A
E
A
B
The
owner
of
this
property
is
hold
Grapher,
ochres
oakerson,
south
dakota
investments.
Applicants
are
Mike
and
Teresa
Andrus
doing
business
as
the
Posche
dog
property
address
is
200
through
206
ninth
Avenue
South
East
locally
known
as
the
town
clock
mall.
The
staff
finds
that
this
property
is
owned,
both
see
three
highway
commercial
to
the
north
and
i1
light
industrial
to
the
south.
So
we're
working
with
a
double
zone.
Property
here
kennels
are
listed
use
by
conditional
use
only
in
the
a1
agricultural
district.
B
However,
the
applicants
describe
their
proposed
business,
primary
primarily
as
a
pet
daycare,
with
boarding
and
grooming
services
and
minor
retail
zoning
ordinance
sections
twenty
one,
twenty
eight,
oh
three,
eighteen
and
twenty
one,
thirty
two,
oh
three
allow
for
other
uses
which,
in
the
opinion
of
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
are
not
that
not
detrimental
to
and
of
the
same
general
character
as
those
enumerated
in
the
c3
and
i1
districts.
Among
the
uses
listed
are
veterinary
clinics
with
outside,
runs
and
without
outside
runs.
B
The
applicant
submitted
written
request,
site
plan
and
floor
plan
which
reflect
compliance
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
ordinance
requirements:
section
21,
o
o
b7
A
through
H
R
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses.
This
includes
board
review
of
ingress/egress
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening,
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
other
uses
in
the
neighborhood.
The
purpose
of
the
c
3
highway
commercial
and
I
1
light
industrial
districts
is
important
and
chapter
20,
163
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements.
B
The
site
plan
shows
a
parking
lot
with
138
paved
parking
spaces
for
which
six
interior
trees
are
required.
Chapter
21,
65,
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses.
Nothing
is
requested.
Anything
that
gets
done
must
comply
with
chapter
21,
6502
and
60
503
chapter
21,
73,
landscape
and
lighting
standards
in
chapter
21,
80
signs
an
outdoor
advertising,
the
minimum
number
of
trees,
Boulevard
trees
to
be
located
on
the
development
site
shall
be
one
tree
per
50
feet
of
frontage.
B
All
outside
dumpsters
or
other
garbage
receptacles
on
the
site
shall
be
screened
by
an
opaque
fence.
And/Or
wall
and
the
applicants
will
change
the
face
of
the
existing
signage,
but
don't
plan
on
adding
more
the
sidewalk
trail,
curb
and
gutter
referenced
by
titles,
5,
18
and
21
and
24.
This
parcel
is
adjacent
to
a
South
Dakota
d-o-t
street
improvements
project
scheduled
for
2019,
so
there
will
be
some
changes
made
there
to
the
boulevard.
B
This
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
2100
202
to
b7
A
through
H,
and
the
chapters
and
titles
just
described
for
a
pet
daycare
boarding
grooming
facility
to
be
operated
at
this
location.
If
endorsed
this
board
may
consider
conditions
of
approval
and
has
the
authority
to
require
fulfillment
of
any
lacking
requirements.
A
B
B
D
B
G
D
F
G
D
G
G
D
D
G
G
G
B
I
Very
good
question,
commissioner
case
and
I
actually
just
was
in
a
whispering
discussion
over
here
with
our
city
attorney
as
an
afterthought,
that
that
would
be
ideal
to
do
something
like
that.
We
did
not,
however,
bring
us
forward
to
the
applicant
early
on
in
this
process
and,
of
course,
would
be
something
that
the
property
owner
would
have
to
be
involved
in
in
rezoning
that,
but
from
a
staff
perspective.
That
is
absolutely
something
that
would
be
ideal
to
do.
D
D
Definition
in
the
zoning
order
does
not
apply
to
animals,
it
says
for
humans,
correct
and
then
my
other
quick
question
is
regarding
the
definition
of
a
service
established
and
most
service
establishments
are
ways
and
at
least
apply,
and
it
seems
to
be
more
for
human
services
as
opposed
to
animal
services.
It
talks
about
hair
salon
and
those
types
of
things
of
a
service
industry.
Do
you
have
other
service
industries
that
would
fit
in
the
c3
zone
in
the
past
that
have
some
sort
of
no
direction
with
animals?
None.
H
D
D
It
a
listed
use
the
vet
clinics
and
they
see
three
in
the
i2
one.
Yes,
that's
the
difference
here
for
me
and
I'm,
just
gonna
I'll
just
come
right
out.
I
support
the
use.
What
they're
proposing
to
do
I,
don't
support
the
process
that
we're
taking
under
here
I
do
not
have
an
affinity
for
making
up
uses
on
the
fly.
Legislating
uses
to
be
allowed
in
a
zoning
ordinance
through
basically
a
judicial
Fiat.
D
D
Would
like
to
see
my
section
of
the
ordinance
where
we
talk
about
any
other
uses
that
are
generally
in
compliance
with
other
sections
to
be
removed.
If
we
want
specific
uses,
we
take
them
and
we
change
the
ordinance
through
a
proper
legislative
process.
That's
my
project,
I
mean
that's,
that's
my
slant
on
I
think
it's
we
are.
We
are
adding
uses
to
a
zoning
ordinance
without
an
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
without
going
through
a
full
amendment
process.
So
that's
just
my
own
personal
slant,
so
I
will
be
voting.
J
D
Like
if
somebody
comes
before
you
and
they
say,
can
I
do
this
and
if
the
use
isn't
listed,
it's
not
allowed,
and
so
we
would
need
to
change
the
ordinance.
And
so
we
would
do
that
by
and
large
you're
gonna
hit
99
out
of
a
hundred.
It's
everyone,
so
I
see
an
ordinance
if
we
haven't
specifically
listed
kennels
in
the
AG
zone
as
the
only
place
for
them.
D
J
K
D
Point
is
that's
my
point:
I
mean
the
kennel
in
this
location.
It
maybe
not
be
a
bad
place,
but
any
other
other
c3
zones
that
the
kennel
might
not
be
appropriate,
and
so
the
question
is
in
this
spot.
You
are
in
effectively
by
saying
kennels,
okay,
your
spot
zoning,
without
going
through
a
formal
adoption
process,
and
so
if
the
motion
is
is
to
be
made
to
approve
and
in
its
past,
I
would
make
the
condition
on
that
motion
that
we
would
in
turn
review
before.
D
J
D
H
D
H
E
I
guess
I
have
a
question
for
our
attorney
Matt.
Do
you
see
an
issue
with
how
this
zoning
rule
applies,
or
in
your
opinion,
is,
is
allowing
us
to
use
conditional
use
number
eighteen
other
uses
which,
in
the
opinion
of
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
are
in
the
same
general
character
as
those
enumerated
is
a
okay
rule
for
us
to
go
by
well.
D
And
my
only
argument
to
this
with
the
state's
attorney
in
this
regard
is
that
we
have
the
the
use
enumerated
in
the
eggs
on
not
in
the
other
two
zones.
So
therefore,
that's
why
I
find
that
to
be
specific
and
any
of
the
other
uses
that
they're
talking
about
here
in
the
application
are
not
use,
is
similar
because
they're
not
contained
anywhere
else
in
any
of
the
other
uses
listed
as
a
conditional
use
in
the
c3
or
i1
zones.
A
Tend
to
agree
with
that,
it
isn't
like
you
know,
and
I
totally
understand.
Pat's
point
I
do,
but
is
the
is
the
request
reasonable
to
the
extent
of
similar
type
of
businesses
and
enterprises?
How
how
much
of
a
stretch
is
it
to
go
from
a
veterinarian,
clinic
veterinary
clinic
to
dog
care,
dog
daycare,
etc?
I
happen
to
think
that
that's
a
reasonable
step
and
if
there
are
larger,
more
sweeping
changes
that
we'd
want
to
make
to
some
of
the
conditional
uses.
That's
that's
great
too,
but
meanwhile
we
have
an
applicant
that
that
wants
to
and.
D
I'm
not
arguing
against
you
I'm
arguing
against
business
and
then,
if
that's
the
case
and
that's
the
basis
of
the
argument,
then
you
need
to
change
that
whole
property
to
it.
I
won
because
to
see
it's
not
it's
not
a
permit.
Abul
use
in
the
c3
zone.
The
veterinary
clinic
is
not
allowable
used
in
the
c3
zone.
E
A
I
Regards
to
Commissioner
cases,
comments,
I,
think
that
is
a
anytime
scuse
me
anytime,
you're
dealing
with
a
zoning
ordinance
in
the
administration
of
it
anytime.
You
can
remove
as
much
subjectivity
to
that
ordinance
as
you
can
that's
a
very
noble
cause,
and
it
makes
this
process
a
lot
more
systematic
and
consistent
from
one
application
to
another
and
I.
Believe.
I
That's
where
Commissioner
akiza's
comments
are
heading
towards
is
what
he's
proposing
does
help
eliminate
the
subjectivity
behind
these
decisions,
because
it
is,
it
could
differ
from
one
Commissioner
to
the
next
on
whether
these
uses
are
deemed
similar
or
comparable
to
the
otherwise
allowable
uses
or
conditional
uses
that
are
listed.
So
from
that
perspective,
I
completely
agree
with
Commissioner
cases
comments
as
far
as
we're
at
today
on
today's
language,
I
think
staff
was
dealt
with.
What
we're
having
to
deal
with
with
that
option
out
on
the
table
for
the
Alpha
County.
A
A
D
It's
not
so
much
a
rezoning
for
the
applicant,
it's
whether
or
not
we
were
to
change
the
ordinance
and
the
ordinance
adoption
process
is
about
a
42
day:
quickest,
yeah,
right
and
I'm
and
I'm
not
trying
to
up
you
know
I.
Think,
there's
I
think
there's
four
votes
in
favor
on
the
board,
if
I'm
counting
noses
as
we
speak,
but
I'm
just
stating
that
I
would
like
to
see
it
handled
differently
in
the
future.
That's
all
I'm
saying.
G
I
understand
your
position
and
I
respect
it,
but
because
this
is
so
new,
sometimes
you
need
to
try
it.
Then
you
know
what
Avenue
to
go
before
you
go
changing
and
that's
just
my
personal
perspective
on
it
without
knowing
without
trying
it
I
just
think
that
you're
creating
a
lot,
maybe
a
lot
more
work
than
necessary
without
trying
it
first
and
through
trials
and
errors,
is
where
we
learn
to
be
better.
So
that's
my
only
position.
L
Puts
the
city
in
is
if
a
new
concept
comes
along
that
has
not
been
described
before
ever.
You
know
something
we
10
years
from
now.
We
don't
have
any
even
conceived
of
yet
then
we
have
to
go
through
the
process
of
putting
a
word
into
the
ordinance
that
may
delay
a
business
open.
You
know,
and
so
that's
that's
an
argue,
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
push
back
against.
That
is
that
then
you
have
to
with
the
whole
process
and
that
business
sits
there
and
waits.
L
D
I
I'm
not
I'm,
not
arguing
with
humanity
I,
just
we
defined
kennel,
we
defined
service,
we
defined
vet
clinics
in
the
ordinance
and
what
she's
doing
is
a
combination
of
all
three
and
if
we
want
to
use
that
as
a
basis
for
for
doing
that,
that's
great.
But
then
then,
let's
just
call
a
duck
a
duck
and
and
change
the
ordinance
down
the
road
to
say
that
kennels
are
okay
in
the
c3
or
i1
district
pick
one.
That's
all
I'm
saying.
K
D
D
E
Have
a
question
for
staff
I'm,
just
looking
at
the
permitted
uses
and
in
like
the
c3
in
the
i1
zone
and
size
of
animal
comes
up
like
a
permitted
use.
Number
10
c3
is
veterinary
clinics
only
small
animals.
What
what
is
considered
a
small
animal
I
mean
they're
all
dogs,
a
small
animal,
are
their
big
dogs
and
little
dogs
in.
E
D
A
A
Joe.
Did
you
mentioned
letters?
Did
you
receive
any
letters
to
the
opposing
okay?
Thank
you.
Any
any
other
comments
from
staff
there
from
the
board
that
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
I,
don't
know
if
actually
ever
opened
it,
but
we're
closing
it
and
with
that
I
guess
I
would
entertain
a
motion
if
anybody
wants
to
make
a
motion
or
an
amended
motion
or
any
I'd.
B
A
B
A
B
The
owner
applicant
is
Eric
Scott
for
ke,
je
Holdings
LLC,
the
property
address
for
the
building
is
612
Fifth
Street
southeast.
This
is
a
conditional
use
request
with
an
appeal
of
the
ordinance
requirements.
The
applicant
seeks
approval
to
convert
sleeping
units
in
a
motel
located
in
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district
into
multifamily
attached
Row
housing
dwelling
units
pursuant
to
zoning
ordinance,
2120,
803,
18
again
other
uses
which,
in
the
opinion
of
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
are
the
same
in
general
character
as
those
enumerated
in
the
c3
disk
district
and
the
like
use,
which
is
apartment.
B
The
appeal
plans
submitted
reflect
10
efficiency,
dwelling
units
with
10
non-conforming
parking
spaces
on
an
8000,
250
square
foot,
parcel
said:
45-degree
parking
layout
shows
10
foot,
6
inch,
aisle
a
10
foot,
6
inch,
aisle
or
a
minimum
12
feet
is
required.
The
applicant.
The
application
does
then
not
comply
with
the
regulations
in
chapter
21,
63
and
21,
oh
3,
which
have
to
do
with
off
street
parking.
So
the
applicant
appeals
those
requirements.
B
Staff
finds
that,
first
of
all,
all
public
notice
requirements
have
been
met.
Neither
single-family
attached
dwellings
nor
row
houses
are
listed
uses
in
the
c3
district.
However,
the
applicant
describes
his
proposal
as
studio
apartments.
The
international
code
qualifies
the
proposed
as
efficiency.
Units
apartments
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district,
421
803
9
the
apartment
is
defined
as
dwelling
unit
and
dwelling
unit
is
a
residential
accommodation,
including
complete
kitchen
facilities
permanently
installed,
which
are
arranged
designed
used
or
intended
for
use
exclusively
as
living
quarters
for
one
family.
B
The
applicant
submitted
written
request,
site
plan
and
floor
plan
which
reflects
clients
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
ordinance
requirements.
Section
21,
Oh,
OH,
b7
A
through
H,
is
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses.
This
includes
the
board
review
of
ingress
and
egress
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening,
buffering,
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
area.
B
2120
801
is
the
purpose
of
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district.
The
purpose
is
to
establish
appropriate
locations
along
major
streets
and
highways
for
highway
and
automobile
related
retail
and
service
establishments,
and
to
to
promote
development
of
highway
service
centers
in
the
appropriate
locations
shown
in
the
comp
plan.
Chapter
20
163
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements
again,
the
site
plan
shows
parking
layout
for
ten
paved
parking
spaces.
However,
it
does
not
meet
minimum
standard
for
aisle
width,
chapter
21,
65,
outside
storage
and
display
requirements.
B
Nothing
is
specified
in
the
request,
but
it
must
comply
with
21
6502
in
chapter
21,
73,
landscape
and
lighting
standards
and
signs
and
outdoor
advertising.
The
minimum
number
of
Boulevard
trees
to
be
located
on
the
development
site
shall
be
one
tree
per
50
feet
of
frontage.
The
applicant
will
plant
one
front
yard
tree
as
indicated
on
one
of
the
site
plans
and
all
outside
dumpsters
and
other
garbage
receptacles
on
the
site
shall
be
screened
by
an
opaque
fence
or
wall.
B
B
This
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
2102
a
2
to
b7
A
through
H,
and
the
chapters
and
titles
just
described
to
convert
Motel
sleeping
rooms
to
dwelling
units
at
this
location.
If
endorsed,
this
board
may
consider
conditions
of
approval
and
has
the
authority
to
require
fulfillment
of
any
lacking
requirements.
A
H
Gonna
kind
of
speak:
this
is
an
existing
structure.
That's
already
existing
there.
The
driver
was
there
in
the
parking.
There
has
always
been
there
for
50
years.
The
he's
coming
in
he's
trying
to
redevelop
this
area
to
improve
it,
make
it
look
a
little
better
and
just
doing
the
best
of
what
he's
got
or
what
there
is
I
mean
you're,
not
gonna
change
the
parking.
If
you
want
it
wider,
it's
not
gonna
happen.
H
M
D
M
M
M
At
all-
and
it
will
be-
is
in
the
lease
as
well,
that
that's
a
requirement
and
that
there
will
be
you
know,
there's
absolutely
not
space
for
two
people.
The
parking
spaces
will
also
be
assigned
to
each
room.
So
if
somebody's
not
there,
that
shouldn't
be
there
or
somebody's
parking
in
there
that
shouldn't
be
parking
in
there.
Well,
no
we'll
have
their
license.
Plate
number
we'll
be
able
to
to
take
care
of
that,
and.
D
I
H
I
M
Did
study
that
and
I
can
speak
to
that
if
I'm
an
you're,
not
asking
me
as
an
expert
but
yeah
so
I
did
study
that
Jill
or
can
I.
Think
Ken
had
recently
sent
me
the
aisle
requirements,
or
perhaps
it
was
Jill,
but
either
way
I
got
those.
We
looked
at
those
and
we
were
compliant
with
everything,
but
the
12-foot
aisle,
which
is
what
is
required
for
45-degree
parking
as
a
12-foot
aisle
and.
M
We're
providing
ten
and
a
half
and
I
would
just
say
when
you
look
at
the
diagram
that
I
was
given
the
12-foot
backs
up
to
other
cars
or
a
building,
there's
actually
green
space,
just
on
the
other
side
of
this,
with
a
curb.
So
that
allows
you
a
little
bit
of
extra
space
to
be
able
to
back
a
bumper
or
something
over
that
space,
so
I'm,
confident
that
that'll
be
adequate.
I
M
D
What's
the
city's
policy
on
you
know,
gravel
and
and
and
having
you
know,
access
for
multiple
family
dwellings
where
their
primary
access
is
going
to
be?
This
part,
the
primary
street
access
is
going
to
be
an
alley
that
gets
to
where
they're
going
I
mean.
Is
that
gonna
degree
I'm,
gonna,
I'm,
gonna,
assume
I'm
gonna,
assume
that
that's
gonna
degrade
the
the
alley.
You
know
six,
eight
trips
a
day
per
unit.
I
That's
a
good
question,
commissioner
case
from
my
prior
experience,
not
being
intimately
familiar
with
how
our
regulation
reads
in
regards
to
that.
Typically,
what
would
you
at
a
minimum?
You
would
require
the
off-street
parking
requirements,
those
stalls
be
paved
and
the
access
to
them
be
paved.
I
can't
speak
with
certainty
that
that's
all
our
towns,
regulations
read,
but
that's
what
I'm
accustomed
to
seeing
is
that
at
a
minimum,
the
off
street
parking
stalls
are
paved
and
the
access
to
them
are
paved.
So
in
this
case,
you
are
correct.
I
D
D
D
M
What
I
would
say
is
you
know
it's
City
right
away?
Hopefully
the
city
takes
care
of
it,
just
as
the
township
road
that
I
live
on,
we
often
wind
up
being
the
ones
that
take
care
of
that.
We're
gonna
have
to
take
care
of
the
the
snow
on
our
lot
and
if
our
tenants
can't
get
in
or
out,
then
of
course
we're
gonna
have
to
pay
those
Maeve
away
through
the
alley.
M
D
M
We'll
have
to
more
than
likely
haul
the
snow
off.
I
lost
lost
you
there
for
a
second
Great
Western
Bank,
currently
piles
their
snow
kind
of
on
that
corner
and
it
spills
over
into
our
driveway
a
little
bit
or
it
does.
In
a
year
like
this
year,
we've
been
pushing
the
snow
up
there
for
now,
but
like
I
say,
if
we
can
reach
agreement,
the
Great
Western
Bank
that
we
can
use
a
little
spot
there
that'll
handle
it
on
a
pretty
open
winter.
Otherwise
it's
going
to
have
to
be
hauled
off
and
you.
K
Gonna
guess
that
he's
not
gonna
like
that
fire
lane,
because
I've
experienced
that
myself
and
I
think
I
we've
had
other
builders
up
here
requesting
the
same
narrow
driveway.
You
have
one
car,
that's
not
pulled
in
there.
The
right
way,
you're
not
going
to
get
fire
rescue
through
that
and
you
know
they're
not
gonna,
probably
go
around
the
alley.
They're
gonna,
you
know
get
the
quickest
way
there
with
that
being
said.
K
Well,
there
again,
okay,
so
my
point
being
I
I
we're
making
a
lot
of
stipulations
for
this
one
particular
property,
and
we
have
an
awful
lot
of
other
apartment
complexes
that
have
jumped
a
lot
of
Hoops
in
order
to
make
their
site
plan
work
and
so
I
guess
the
narrow,
the
narrow,
driveway
the
parking
situation
of
having
ten
cars
there.
Maybe
we
need
to
reduce
it
to
eight
units
there
or
to
accommodate
the
parking
and
the
gravel
access
to
it.
D
The
one
hand
I
can
see
that
you
know
if
there
was
some
sort
of
agreement
in
place
with
access
through
Great
Western
Bank.
If
we
had
to
get
a
fire
truck
or
an
ambulance,
I
mean
that's
more
than
likely
where
they
would,
the
fire
department
would
go
is
they
would
go
through
the
bank
parking
lot
and
you're
18
feet
away
from
the
doors
of
the
apartment
is
what
I'm,
assuming
is
how
that
would.
M
And
if
I
may
I
did
have,
we
did
have
chip
on
site.
We
had
him
inspect
the
site
as
well
and
is
inspect
the
building
for
fire
requirements
and
I
in
fairness.
I
didn't
ask
specifically
about
the
access
lane
or
any
of
that,
but
we
asked
you
know
what
we
needed
to
do
and-
and
he
didn't
raise
any
concerns
about
access
lanes.
M
A
M
Would
think
selling
in
the
building
is
I
mean
there's
hardly
any
lumber
in
the
building,
all
the
interior
walls
there
CMU
the
shower
walls.
The
bathroom
walls
are
all
C
mu,
which
is
masonry
block,
drywall
drywall
ceiling.
There's
there's
very
little
lumber,
there's
very
little
of
anything
to
Bernie
in
that
structure.
What.
M
Done
all
of
the
demolition
we
have
pulled,
the
permit
we've
started
on
construction
to
modernize
and
do
what
we
want
to
do
with
these.
If
you
all
don't
grant
our
request,
then
I
am
a
motel
operator
and
about
100,
no
motels,
so
I
guess
I
guess:
I'm
gonna
learn
the
business
a
little
faster
than
I
wanted
to
well.
E
D
N
H
M
M
D
B
B
No,
not
really
it's.
It
refers
to
dwelling
unit
and
then
dwelling
unit
is,
you
know,
permanently
installed
kitchen,
that's
the
thing
and
then
for
one
family
and
then
attached
role
is
a
multi-family
dwelling
in
which
each
single-family
dwelling
unit
has
a
separate
entrance
and
is
joined
by
a
common
wall
extending
from
the
basement
floor
to
the
roof
one
or
both
sides.
Multifamily
is
just
more
packed
together.
B
B
D
D
D
M
Don't
think
so
well,
I
would
just
say
if
you
want
to
go
to
the
site
plan.
We
worked
really
hard
to
get
as
much
green
space
on
a
very
small
site.
So
I
just
like
to
note
that
and
and
to
the
to
the
point
of
the
trashing
closure,
you
can
see
where
the
garbage
is
and
there's
a
screen
there
for
that,
as
well
as
a
little
more
green
space
there.
I
Mr.
chair,
if
I
may
I
did
this
quick
research
here
section
chapter
21,
63
of
the
zoning
ordinance
does
address
the
paving
requirements
and
it
is
our
regulations,
do
read
as
I
described
all
off
street
parking
areas
are
required
to
be
paved
and
the
access
to
them
are
required
to
be
paved
given
the
unique
condition
here
where
this
access
is
a
public
alley,
I
would
tend
to
concur
with
the
plan
that
was
thrown
out
that
the
waiver
right
refusal
of
cost
sharing
that
paving
for
this
portion
of
that
property.
M
J
D
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
I
would
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
application,
one
nine
four
zero:
seven
to
convert
a
hotel
motel
to
dwelling
units.
More
specifically
use
number
nine
apartments
in
the
c3
zoning
district
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
one
that
the
applicant
agrees
to
not
with
waiver
right
to
protest
the
future
paving
of
that
alley
at
his
pro
rata
share.
D
A
I
D
E
That
are
the
definition
of
our
ordinance.
It
says
it's
a
family
I,
don't
know
how
we
would
I
personally,
don't
know
how
we
could
regulate
that
I
mean
as
a
business
owner
I.
Imagine
he
doesn't
want
to.
You
know
more
people
than
than
they
can
fit,
but
I
don't
know
how.
If
the
definition
says
a
family
which
it
does
oh
I.
D
D
F
A
K
K
Think
that
there's
a
place
you
know
for
that
and
I
think
you'll
rent
them
out
as
extended
stay
Eric
I,
don't
like
the
idea
that
they're
considered
efficiency
or
studio
or
whatever
you're
going
to
call
apartments,
because
I
don't
think
that
that's
I
don't
want
to
sit
on
my
front
step.
Looking
at
commercial
around
me,
so
I'm
I'm
with
you
on
the
zoning
of
this
one,
just
the
opposite.
So.
D
H
Similar
and
then
all
up
and
down
any
place
out,
Main
Street
the
second
floor.
Apartments
of
any
of
those
I
mean
they're,
just
they
have
apartment
and
that's
all
they
got.
They
didn't
even
have
parking.
They
don't
even
have
one
spot
that
I
get
to
find
someplace
off-nominal
on
the
street
or
whatever
so,
but.
H
F
About
that
apartment
that
it's
now
an
apartment
on
the
main
floor
and
second
storey,
where
300
First
Avenue
northeast,
is
where
my
apartment,
where
my
office
used
to
be
and
I
had
to
move
out,
that
was
all
approved
to
have
B
main
floor
apartment
and
second-story.
There's
not
enough
parking
there
either.
C
A
K
C
A
A
B
D
A
A
J
A
All
right,
thank
you
would
like
to
make
the
announcement
of
any
the
invitation
for
public
comment.
If
anyone
would
like
to
speak,
please
advise
brandy
come
up
later.
Second
item
is
approval
of
the
agenda
now
feel
free
to
you
know
edit
this.
If
you
want
you
to
take
some
of
the
stuff
off
of
the
agenda,
I
think
you
get
a
bigger
girl.
J
Actually,
I
will
make
some
changes
before
you
guys
approve
it.
So
we
will
be
crossing
off
the
discussion
for
the
art
to
a
step
back.
I
want
to
wait
for
sure
that
likes
dolly
is
here
and
then
as
new
business,
because
technically
you
guys
have
not
initiated
staff
to
just
to
study.
This
would
be
the
discussion
to
allow
the
mixed
residential
commercial
uses
within
certain
districts.
D
J
A
D
D
A
J
Thank
you
mark,
so
this
is
the
rezone
of
lat,
one
of
the
WD,
a
second
addition
to
our
three
multi-family
residential
district
and
lot
to
to
be
of
WD.
A
second
addition
to
be
c3,
highway
commercial
district
and
for
clarity,
I'm,
going
to
pull
it
up
here
on
the
GIS.
You
guys
have
an
idea
other
than
the
vicinity
map
that
you
were
provided
of.
What
the
situation
is
here
for
this
rezone
request.
J
So
and
then
the
next
agenda
item
you'll
see
is
the
plat,
so
these
will
kind
of
these
go
hand
in
hand,
so
they
are
wanting
to
extend
the
boundaries
of
the
c3
zoning
district
for
a
proposed
building
and
and
basically
right
now
we
have
a
one
lot,
which
is
a
lot
one
of
wda
addition
which
has
split
zoning
and
by
ordinance
we
don't
allow
that.
So
it's
some
it's
something
where
we
required
a
plat
so
that
we
get
the
the
plat
we
get
the
one's
own
per
per
lock.
J
A
I
E
Duh
and
then
the
our
setback
ordinance
as
we
have
a
25-foot
front
setback
for
the
our
three
zone,
which
our
front
setback
is
what's
adjacent
to
the
property
or
adjacent
to
the
road,
as
you
can
see,
because
of
how
this
is
a
very
unique
lot
that
you
know,
there's
there's
only
a
small
portion
of
that
that
property
actually
zooms
and
that's
actually
adjacent,
and
then
it
turns
into
side
setback
where
our
side
setback
is
ten
feet,
which
you
know,
even
though
that's
kind
of
like
adjacent
to
the
highway.
It
gets
a
smaller
setback.
E
It's
just
a
unique
characteristic
of
this
lot
that
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
point
out.
Just
you
know
normally,
when
we
would
require
25
foot
off
the
road,
a
property
like
this
they're,
actually
closer
or
able
to
be
closer,
because
it's
only
a
10
foot
side
setback
which
I
know
that
buildings
already
there
and
they're
not
modifying
it.
But
it's
just
just
I
thought
it
was
a
unique
characteristic.
So
I
was
pointed
out
ya.
D
A
D
J
All
right
so
then
we
will
move
on
to
the
plat
of
WD,
a
second
edition
to
municipality
of
Watertown
and
the
county
of
Coddington,
and
so,
like
I
alluded
to
previously.
This
will
establish
the
lot
line
that
we'll
have
this.
Now.
Each
lot
will
have
the
their
new
zoning
designation
within
the
extents
of
the
property
boundaries.
A
A
E
J
I
I
The
concept
plans
can
be
approved
completely:
administrative
Lee,
upon
review
of
the
City
Engineer
and
the
staff,
and
may
be
brought
forward
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
information
purposes.
And
given
the
scope
of
development
being
proposed
here,
we
thought
it'd
be
prudent
to
bring
forward
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
information
purposes.
This
concept
plan
upon
staff
review
we've
determined
that
the
requirements
of
the
concept
plan
submitted
were
met.
They
needed
to
generally
provide
the
legal
descriptions.
I
The
joining
subdivision
names,
the
general
street
layout,
the
general
sanitary
sewer
layout,
some
general
locations
and
major
drainage
ways,
and
things
of
that
nature
and
I
only
walked
through
those
items
just
to
remind
the
Planning
Commission
of
the
general
nature
of
a
concept
plan
where
a
lot
of
the
other
specifics
will
follow
soon,
on
the
heels
of
this
middle.
With
a
preliminary
plan
which
the
applicant
has
are
initiated,
proceeding
with
so
before
you
today
is,
is
the
concept
plan
for
information
purposes?
D
D
Came
everywhere,
data
is,
and
some
of
the
discussion
that
came
out
of
that
and
I
would
still
support.
Is
that
the
idea
that
we
need
a
minor
collector
somewhere
in
this
section
and
while
25th
Street
was
the
minor
collector
Street
identified
in
the
comprehensive
Land
Use
Plan
due
to
the
topographical
and
wetland
issues?
It's
not
going
to
be
constructed
there.
D
Maybe
it's
not
constructed
to
a
minor
collector
status
at
this
time,
but
right
away
should
be
reserved,
and
if
this
is
a
minor
collector,
we
would
also
need
to
take
a
look
at
what
are
some
of
those
land
uses
that
are
but
Andrews,
especially
in
the
northern
part
of
the
development
and
whether
our
one
zoning
was
the
appropriate
zoning.
For
that.
F
D
J
That's
kind
of
the
the
reason
why?
Because
Eastwood's
doesn't
have
a
collector
because
twenty-fifth
didn't
happen
so
this,
and
we
also
made
the
comment
to
the
developer,
that
this
will
be
called
28th
Street
East
instead
of
Andrews
Trail,
because
this
would
connect
all
the
way
up
to
the
East
woods
development
to
the
north
and
then
so
to
keep
the
you.
J
I
Mr.
chair
to
Commissioner,
let's
keys
initial
question,
the
the
street
you're,
referring
to
in
East
woods,
would
probably
be
more
classified
as
a
local
through
from
a
transportation
standpoint
where
this,
what
they're,
calling
Andrews
Trail
on
your
diagram
there
would
be
considered
a
minor
collector
and,
as
Brandie
described,
would
have
that
further
connectivity
through
and
to
additional
areas
of
town
more
extensive
than
what
a
local
through
a
street
normally
would.
J
D
J
J
The
the
ones
that
we
specifically
noted
where
J
and
J
drive
the
Andrews
trail.
We
requested
that
be
changed
to
28th,
Street
East
and
then
Lakeview
Drive
and
B
Avenue,
Lakeview
Drive
just
a
little
confusing,
because
you
would
think
that
maybe
you're
at
the
lake
when
this
is
the
lakes
of
Willow
Creek.
So
but
just
four,
so
we're
not
having
any
confusion.
J
D
F
D
N
C
J
They
are
actually
going
to
have
that
be
highway
commercial
to
the
c3
they're
gonna
change
that
because
they
were
wanting
that
to
be
there's
an
existing
foundation
there
right
now
and
they
thought
that
the
that
that
was
more
of
an
i1
use.
They
were
thinking
like
contractor
shop
or
something
of
that
nature,
but
they
can
also
do
that
in
c3
and
that's
what
what
I
had
address
with
them,
because
it
is
sort
of
a
spot.
So
in
there
yeah.
J
D
Other
thing
brandy
that
we
haven't
talked
about
specifically
I,
think
you
know
if
we're
talking
the
commercial
zones
or
the
highway
commercial
zones,
all
the
way
up
to
the
south
side
of
Park
View
Trail,
then
we're
putting
r1
zoning
immediately
across
the
street
I'm.
Not
sure
r1
is
the
appropriate
zone.
H
A
D
F
D
F
F
K
J
D
F
D
E
D
D
D
Our
hope
is
that,
before
this
thing
fully
develops
out
that
we'll
have
an
alternate
commercial
district,
that's
more
yeah
I,
don't
care,
we
have
seat.
Okay,
we
have
15
commercial
districts
and
we
have
districts
that
reflect
what
the
actual
uses
are,
and
that
way
you
don't
have
to
go
through
variances
and
conditional
use
processes
and
they
make
things
much
more
streamlined.
K
K
I'm
not
so
sure
that
that
wouldn't
make
really
great
lots
where
you
actually
own
the
lake
as
opposed
to
have
it
being
city,
property
and
I'm
and
again
now
you
know
it's
not
going
to
be
like
I'm,
assuming
because
of
the
you
know
the
hill
eNOS
of
it
we're
gonna
have
a
little
bit
steeper
sides
to
it.
Are
we
concerned
what.
C
J
At
that,
when
we
get
the
grading
land,
the
final
grading
plan
to
make
sure
that
it
is
safe
and
then
also
the
city
will
not
be
accepting
all
of
those
detention
areas.
The
all
of
that
green
area
on
your
maps,
though,
that's
going
to
remain
in
the
developers
that
we
won't.
We
won't
take
that
over
to
maintain
it
or
anything.
So
only
the
park,
the
2.5
acres
over
here.
D
J
J
And
so
this
leads
us
into
our
next
item
on
new
business,
and
so
we
want
to
look
into
allowing
the
mixed
use
to
be
implemented
into
our
ordinance.
So
how
we
do
that
with
what
we
have
you
know
we
had
talked.
We
had
a
little
like
staff
discussion
as
far
as
potentially
adding
something
that
would
allow
for
combining
like
or
combining
multiple
uses
within
like
if
it's
a
conditional
use
and
a
permitted
use
that
you
could
come
and
ask
for
a
conditional
use
to
do
both
uses.
We.
D
F
D
E
D
And
I
think
we
just
want
to
you
know
if
we
want
to
start
encouraging
other
mixed
uses
in
existing
c3.
Those
would
be
something
that
we
would
probably
want
to
handle
from
a
conditional
use
because
people
have
purchased
c3.
Zoning
maybe
wasn't
ready
for
that.
But
if
we
want
to,
if
we've
got
a
virgin
piece
of
ground
here,
that's
asking
for
a
mixed-use
development.
Let's
just
develop
a
mixed-use
of
district
which
would
accommodate
not
only
this
developers
needs,
but
the
needs
that
we
are
looking
for
for
the
community.
N
N
The
c3
you
know,
zoning,
it's
just
this
is
another
allowable
use
of
it,
yeah
I'm
sure,
there's
other
portions
of
town
as
they
started
to
you,
know
change
over
from
residential
to
commercial
such
as
81,
and
things
of
that
nature.
I
mean
is
it's
changing
commercial
properties
yeah,
so
allowing
something
along
those
lines
might
be
a
better
way
for
us
to
go.
Yeah.
J
No
I
agree:
I
think
that
that's
much
I
mean
we
need
to
and
it's
making
it
complete
and
thorough,
where
we're
not
trying
to
piecemeal
it
into
things
and
making
it
more
complicated.
When
if
we
say
we're
okay
with
that
as
a
community-
and
these
are
the
things
that
we're
okay
with
then
well,
let's
make
it
a
permitted
use.
So
then
this
development,
for
example,
when
they
come
in
and
they
want
they
come
to
zone
they'll,
rezone
everything.
Then
they
can
just
put
that
on
there
and
it's.
D
N
You
look
at
Brookings
in
Volga
and
Sioux
Falls.
Has
that
and
things
like
that?
So
it's
it's
obviously,
there's
a
need
for
it
in
the
different
communities
and
that's
another
selling
feature
for
anyone.
That's
we're
gonna
do
more
subdivisions
that
are
mixed-use
I
mean
this
would
be
a
perfect
one
to
go
from
commercial
to
r3
to
r2.
You
know
why
not
just
c3
highway
commercial,
do
it
as
a
mixed-use
housing,
commercial,
mm-hmm,.
D
J
J
Yeah
and
the
nice
thing
is,
we
don't
have
to
recreate
the
wheel
because
it's
a
it's
been
done
so
well.
We
will,
as
staff,
will
look
at
putting
together
an
amendment
or
what
you
know
just
a
draft
and
then
we'll
bring
that
back
to
you
for
your
study
and
feedback
and
then
then
we'll
move
forward
with
you
know
going
through
the
public
hearing
processes
and
everything
of
implementing
that
ordinance.
Amendment
I
would.
D
I
I
I
know
that
they're
gonna
turn
around
a
preliminary
plan
submit
all
assuming
right
on
the
heels
of
this
concept
plan
discussion,
and
we
will
be
reviewing
that
through
the
design
review
team
one
more
time,
I
guess
I,
don't
know
Brandi
as
far
as
construction
goes,
I
haven't
been
any
conversations
regarding
that
timeline,
but
I
do
know
they
want
the
next
step
of
the
process
to
be
initiated
soon.
Here,
I
believe.
J
N
So
I
just
want
to
hold
them
up
on
anything.
So
that's
why,
if
we,
you
know,
the
preliminary
concept
plan
is
fine
as
far
as
layout
and
things
of
that
nature.
But
if
we
need
to
go
through
and
create
a
new
zoning,
you
know
let's
try
to
at
least
find
out.
What's
there
we
can
kind
of
plan
that
yeah
you
know,
so
it's
not
holding
him
up
to
start.
Okay,
we're
looking
at
doing
a
you
know:
mixed-use
zoning,
that's
going
through
it
yeah
kind
of
gives
them.
J
D
Where
is
this
city
on
the
lake
campaka
master
plan
as
far
as
being
submitted
and
brought
to
the
Planning
Commission
those
types
of
things,
one
any
any
more
discussion
on
resorts
and
the
pheasant
Lane
Ridge
project
I
know
those
are
all
a
lot
of
things
have
been
in
the
hopper
for
the
last
year.
We
are,
we
gonna,
be
moving
those
forward
this
year.
J
Pheasant
lane
was
resolved
and
the
resorts
we
are
waiting
to
hear
back
from
the
lake
and
Pesce
master
plan,
and
that
is
in
the
hands
of
the
subcontract
or
the
order.
The
AE
to
s,
infrastructure,
Design,
Group
and
confluence
are
working
on
finishing
that
up
and
I
believe
they
were
just
in
touch
that
well
I.
Think
I,
don't
know
if
I
I
think
that
I
recall
an
email
coming
through
that
will
be
getting
together
kind
of
as
they
like
to
have.