►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 12 19 2019
Description
Plan Commission Meeting 12 19 2019
A
A
C
D
A
B
C
A
B
Okay,
thank
you
bike.
So
this
is
a
zoning
text,
amendment
to
chapter
twenty
one:
twenty
six
seats,
local
commercial
district,
amending
the
conditional
uses
to
include
apartments.
This
is
something
that
we
talked
about
at
the
December
5th
meeting
and
I
was
able
to
make
the
public
notice
requirements.
So
that's
why
you're,
seeing
it
expedited
and
and
when
I
was
looking
at
this
trying
to
look
at
what
c1
and
c3
allowed
and
then
obviously
c2
being
the
local
commercial
c3
being
highway.
B
Everything
to
make
sure
that
you
know
if
there
was
an
application
to
do
something
like
that
that
that
it
wasn't
really
deterring
that
from
if
the
door
is
open
to
a
hallway
or
if
they
opened
outside.
And
so,
when
you
look
at
the
definitions
of
apartments,
it
actually
just
says
see
dwelling
unit
and
then
the
dwelling
unit
is,
you
know,
a
family
or
a
place
for
a
family
to
live,
and
then
they
have
all
the
different
types
of
dwellings
which
include
the
townhouse
or
the
the
condominium
single-family
home.
Any
of
those.
So.
D
B
E
E
This
is
something
that
most
communities
do
have
is
the
c2
or
is
the
commercial
above
residential
above
commercial?
You
see
a
you
know,
driving
through
workings,
you
see
it
more
and
more
everywhere.
We
don't
have
a
mixed
use
district
and
it's
something
that
I
know
that
staff
and
everybody
has
to
trying
to
come
up
with.
E
It's
been
something
that
we
were
working
on
it
when
I
was
on
the
Planning
Commission
as
well,
but
this
allows
you
know
eyesight
by
sight
addition
to
that
and
you
still
had
get
vetted
through
all
of
your
boards
as
well,
or
you
know
the
Board
of
adjustments
to
get
that
thing
through
I
just
feel
like
until
we
get
that
mixed
use.
This
is
a
good
way
to
accomplish
the
same
goal.
A
Thank
You
mr.
Lawrence
any
questions
for
mr.
Lawrence
anybody
else
to
speak
on.
We
have
close
the
public
hearing
yeah.
Just
to
echo
my
personal
thoughts,
I
guess
on
the
matter.
I've
long
been
a
supporter
of
mixed
use
in
commercial
environments.
This
is
something
that
again,
you
know.
A
lot
of
other
communities
are
doing.
A
I
travel
a
fair
amount
and
have
seen
some
of
the
work
that
these
committees
have
done
on
developing
these
mixed-use
neighborhoods,
and
they
really
lead
to
some
some
cool
things
where
you've
got
more
of
the
the
neighborhood
community
feel
improved
walkability,
improved
access
to
commercial
and
retail
things
like
the
downtown
that
we're
actively
trying
to
revitalize
those
buildings
were
all
originally
built.
With
this
exact
use
in
mind,
for
you
know:
commercial
on
the
main
floor
and
apartments
above,
and
it's
really
cool
when
communities
do
embrace
this
and
get
that
kind
of
development
going
I.
D
Above
commercial
right
now
and
conditional
uses
car
wash
a
standalone
hotel,
a
standalone
restaurant
just
stand
alone,
and
it
says
apartments,
it
doesn't
say
apartments,
residential
above
commercial.
It
just
simply
says
apartments
and
I
wonder
if
we
need
to
clarify
that
and
perhaps
put
something
about
mixed-use
in
the
commercial
I
mean
in
the
purpose
statement
up
here
that
that's
what
our
goal
is
now
with
these
changes.
So.
E
I
can
speak
to
that
as
well.
One
thing
that
if
you
have
a
large
C
to
parcel-
and
let's
say
you
have
a
business
or
a
mini-mall
over
here-
and
you
have
a
mini-mall
over
here-
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
throw
an
r3
in
the
middle
of
it
and
it
actually
has
a
community.
We
we
don't
do
that.
We
don't
spot
zone,
but
the
c2
it
by
definition,
is
for
the
neighborhood.
So
to
have
neighborhood
commercial
around
neighborhood
property.
E
I,
don't
think,
is
a
intrusion
if
you
had
a
mini,
mall
and
an
apartment
and
then
a
mini
mall
or
a
office
building
apartment
and
a
mini
mall,
but
you
wouldn't
be
able
to.
We
recommend
putting
r3
in
the
middle
of
to
see
twos.
You
know
what
I
mean
so
I
think
that'd
be
the
only
time
that
you
would
see
something
like
that
or
it's
about
the
only
time
I
could
I
could
think
of
something
like
that.
But
that
was
just
what
it
opens
up.
H
B
It
says
sea
dwelling
unit,
and
so
why
I
did
why
I
put
it
just
as
apartment
is,
because
you
can
put
them
on
top
of
commercial
buildings.
You
could
potentially
have
a
situation
where
it
made
sense
to
have
like.
If
you
wanted
to
put
apartments
on
the
ground
floor
say
you
want
to
put
them
in
the
back.
We
have
stipulations
like
that
in
the
c1,
but
I
thought,
instead
of
really
getting
complicated
with
it,
to
just
put
it
down
there.
If
we're,
okay
with
it
being
there
and
then
see
what
the
application
would
be.
Yeah.
A
B
Yeah
and
I
think
why
it's
so
specific
in
the
C
one
in
the
in
our
downtown
is
because
then
there's
not
parking
requirements
and
C
1.
So
that's
another
thing
too,
that
you
can
review
to
make
sure
that
there's
you
know,
and
we
would
do
that
to
a
staff.
But
those
are
just
things
you
can
look
at
as
far
as
screening
and
and
parking
requirements
and
everything
like
that.
A
A
A
B
G
B
Ok,
Thank
You
Blake,
so
this
is
something
that
we've
been
talking
about
for
quite
a
few
meetings
now
with
new
business
and
then
going
into
just
discussions
at
the
last
meeting
on
December
5th
when
we
brought
this
up,
I
had
just
explained
that
you
know
with
the
with
the
Planned
Unit
development.
We
are
trying
to
foster
a
district
that
we
don't
have
in
our
ordinance
today,
so
it
would
be
whatever
the
application
was.
It's
to
harmoniously,
mix
different,
implement
or
implement
different
things
of
different
districts
for
lack
of
better
words.
So
we
have
PUD.
D
B
B
So
then,
one
through
six
is
what
they
would
present
to
the
Planning
Commission
with
a
rezone
application,
and
then
these
are
the
things
that
would
be
important
to
for
you
guys
to
make
the
decision
if
the
PUD
is
appropriate
and
you
know,
protects
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
public
and
the
adjacent
developments.
And
then,
if
that,
if
the
PUD
plan
was
approved,
then
that
would
be
an
exhibit
to
the
rezone
petition
that
would
go
on
to
council
and
do
its
normal
to
readings
and
public
hearing.
B
A
B
Okay,
so
you'll
see
on
there
it's
all
redlined
of
what
it
used,
what
it
used
to
exist
and
then
what
exists
today.
So
basically,
we
just
had
a
lot
of
upfront
detail
that
they
had
to
bring
to
plan
commission
first
and
then-
and
I
believe
I
mean
it's
been
a
while,
since
I've
looked
at
how
it
was
originally
it
just
did
not.
B
It
was
a
lot
of
upfront
cost
and
time
for
a
developer
that
didn't
know
if
it
was
even
going
to
be
approved
and
they
were
looking
at
very
detailed
things.
That
should
be
more
so
in
the
subdivision,
ordinance
and
that
would
be
reviewed
during
the
preliminary
plan
phase.
So
it
was
more
so
just
taking
that
out
and
obviously
still
having
them
present
the
necessary
information
for
you
guys
to
make
the
decision
but
to
leave
the
more
technical
engineering,
details
and
analysis
up
to
the
staff.
A
And
so
part
of
a
part
of
the
front
steps
that
they're
going
to
take,
then
it's
more
of
an
interactive
working
session
in
which
they're
working
towards
the
general
outline
of
the
plan
and
the
overall
nature
of
the
development
versus
having
having
to
have
everything
completely
done
before
they
even
start.
The
process
yeah.
B
A
D
Well,
my
name
is
Bob
Drake,
I
guess
when
we
looked
at
this
PUD
and
we've
looked
at
a
number
of
plans
for
doing
things.
If
you
go
down
to
Sioux,
Falls
they've
got
three
different
PUD
plans
that
you
can
go
for
different
types.
You
go
to
Fargo
they've
got
a
real
broad
program.
This
is
another
tool
that
I
look
at,
would
not
even
for
developing
Stoney
point
that
it
allows
you
to
the
plans
can
get
rather
complex.
D
This
allows
you
a
little
latitude
to
be
able
to
land
the
ground
isn't
quite
square
like
your
buildings
are
square
and
it
allows
you
a
little
bit
more
latitude
to
get
things
done
so
we're
looking
at
putting
in
a
marina
putting
in
the
condominiums.
This
type
of
thing,
there'll
be
some
commercial
mixed
with,
with
retail
and
they'll,
be
air
with
a
residential,
and
then
you've
got
it's
just.
D
A
G
Hi
I'm
winning
Polly,
268,
North,
Lake,
Drive
and
I
just
have
a
question
about
purpose,
and
that
is
when
I
look
at
what
has
been
crossed
off.
I'm
wondering
why
the
last
part
of
that
and
will
not
be
harmful
to
the
neighborhood
in
which
they
occur,
has
been
eliminated
from
the
purpose.
I
know
that
it's
down
in
another
paragraph,
but
it's
written
differently,
so
I
just
asked
that
question,
because
I
think
there's
a
purpose
for
development
and
then
they're
coexisting
or
existing
neighborhoods
and
people
who
may
have
opinions
or
wishes
to
articulate
about
that.
B
I'm
gonna
try
to
find
here
where
we
here
well
I
know
where
it
was
crossed
out,
but
where,
because
I
did
touch
on
it
in
a
different
place,
I
just
felt
that
it
was
more
appropriate
that
it
would
be
something
that
we
would
actually
be
reviewing
rather
than
a
statement
and
the
purpose.
Because
then
the
purpose
I
was
just
trying
to
describe
I
mean
anything
that
we
look
at.
We
should
be
looking
at
the
adjacent,
neighborhoods
and
and
that's
that's.
B
A
And
so
in
the
purpose,
you
know
it's
just
a
general
statement
and
they're
both
in
the
application
and
modification
powers.
It's
actually
a
requirement,
then
for
them
to
provide
statements
in
there
as
part
of
the
application
that
it's
not
going
to
have
that
adverse
effect.
It
becomes
a
little
bit
more
stringent
than
just
a
general
purpose
statement.
I.
G
See
it
in
both
places
and
when
I
read
generally,
when
I
look
at
something
in
terms
of
purpose,
I
think
that
this
could
be
included
in
both
places,
because
when
I
look
at
purpose,
I'm
really
looking
at
the
overarching
intention
and
in
that
way
for
me,
it's
a
balance
of
allowing
for
multi-purpose
different
kinds
of
development.
But
it's
also
honoring
the
neighborhood,
the
people
who
live
there.
So
there's
that
kind
of
balance.
G
When
you
send
me
a
letter,
I'm
I'm
going
my
god.
What
is
this
I?
Don't
understand,
because
I
have
no
idea
what
you
all
do
and
so
I
I
was
able
to
spend
time
following
up,
but
I
also
had
worked
in
government.
Had
a
lot
of
respect
for
government
have
a
lot
of
respect
for
government
and
knew
that
there
were.
There
were
ways
to
do
that.
I
find
that's
not
so
true
with
a
lot
of
my
neighbors
that
I
talk
to
a
lot
of
people
just
trying
to
understand.
B
I
Well,
it's
redundant.
It's
further
down
in
the
document,
so
I
think
the
inverse
part
of
that
conversation
is
as
we
as
a
government
agency
are
always
looking
to
eliminate
redundancies
and
eliminate
duplicate
information,
and
but
on
the
flip
side
we
do
want
to
make
sure
it's
clear.
So
there's
that
fine
line
to
balance
and
make
sure
that
it's
clear
but
yet
not
redundant
so
I
think
that's
what
brandy
landed
where
she
did
with
the
information.
E
Mike
Lawrence
yeah,
when
looking
at
zoning
like
this
often
times
you
know
like
the
mixed
use,
it
didn't
really
fit
into
anywhere.
We
didn't
have
it
anywhere
as
a
zoning
develops.
You
know
you
need
a
PUD
to
get
ahead
of
the
curve.
If
somebody
comes
in
and
does
something
like
Dakota
Commons,
which
is
a
it's
a
beautiful
neighborhood
that
has
a
walking
trail
in
the
back
versus
sidewalks
on
the
front,
I
mean
which
is
different,
but
it
still
serves
the
same
purpose.
E
I
think
that
you
know
Stony
Point
is
gonna,
be
one
of
those
things
to
I.
Think
some
of
the
other
PU
T's
in
town,
beauties
and
and
many
communities
are
used
quite
often
for
for
things
that
don't
fit
inside
that
box,
but
I
do
like
what
they
do.
Change
is
that
were
made
as
far
as
getting
with
the
staff
coming
up
with
on
Sep.
E
You
know
running
it
by
people
before
you
put
them
a
whole
bunch
of
money
into
engineering
and
coming
up
here
with
hydrology
and
or
or
you
know,
plans
fully
engineered
plans
and
then
saying
I
mean
I've
always
had
the
belief
that
we
have
a
city
engineer
for
a
reason
he's
that
he
should
be
looking
at
that.
You
know,
I
said
on
this
board
and
I
was
looking
at
hydrology
reports
and
I'm
graduated
from
the
College
of
Engineering's
and
I.
E
Didn't
know
how
to
read
those
things
you
know
so
I
mean
that's
one
of
those
things
where
I
believe
that
you
know.
As
a
city
engineer,
we
have
to
rely
on
them
for
the
the
meat
and
then
for
the
concept.
It's
it's
here.
You
know
it.
Does
this
make
sense.
Does
this
check
the
boxes?
Yes,
isn't
something
we
thought
of?
Is
it
intrusive?
E
You
know,
like
one
Ian
says
that
you
a
lot
of
these
are
going
to
go
into
places
where
there
already
are
people,
so
it
does
need
to
come
through
this
board
and
get
vetted.
You
know
and
and
I
think
that's
more
of
the
purpose
of
this
board
is
to
vet
those
types
of
things,
and
then
the
engineering
should
probably
most
likely
be
left
up
to
the
engineer.
So
I
think
that's
that
the
process
that
they're
running
you're
gonna
get
a
lot
more
people
who
have
different
ideas
that
aren't
per
se
wrong.
E
E
There
I
mean
it's
a
it's,
a
good
neighborhood,
there's
a
lot
of
houses
in
there
and
it
serves
the
purpose
you
know
so
I
mean
just
because
it
doesn't
completely
fit
in
in
in
our
ordinance,
I
think
the
PUD
as
long
as
there's
a
tool
that
doesn't
cost
a
lot
to
get
into,
but
still
covers
the
same
basis.
So
you
still
have
the
engineering
it
just
that
at
a
place
where
it's
more
comfortable
and
I
think
that's
what
this
does.
I
love
the
way
that
it
sets
it
up
with
staff
beforehand.
E
B
Just
wanted
to
point
out
here
too,
on
2101,
the
first,
the
the
first
chapter.
We
you
have
the
purpose
of
zoning
ordinance.
So
that's
overarching
that
this
is
what
the
objectives
are
of
the
zoning
ordinance,
which
include
you
know,
to
foster
harmonious,
convenient
workload,
relationships
among
land
uses
to
ensure
that
public
and
private
lands
ultimately
are
used
for
the
purposes
which
are
most
appropriate.
You
know
there's
1
through
9,
so
those
are
all
things
that
should
be
taken
into
consideration
when
looking
at
any
zoning
district
or
ordinance.
For
that
matter,
the.
D
B
Yep,
so
that
would
be
so
when
the
pewdie
plan
would
come
forward.
It
would
be
presented
to
you
guys
as
a
rezone,
but
the
pewdie
plan
would
be
a
necessary
exhibit
to
their
petition.
So
then
that's
that
would
all
be
reviewed
and
then
it
would
be
the
same
process
as
if
somebody
was
proposing
to
go
from
R
1
to
R
3.
So
then
you
would.
You
would
recommend
that
rezone
to
PUD
with
that
approved
PUD
plan
to
Council,
and
then
they
would
do
that
same
process
as
I
reasons.
A
Think
it's
a
you
know,
it's
a
good
point
around
the
purpose
and
thank
you
brandy
for
pulling
this
this
up,
because
this
is
at
the
beginning
of
the
chapter
and
when
we
look
at
our
zoning,
it's
important
that
we
don't
just
look
at
one
specific
area
that
we
look
at
the
entire
chapter,
because
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
in
this
ordinance
book.
It's
pretty
extensive
that
references
back
to
other
areas
of
the
chapters
and
in
other
areas
of
the
chapters
apply
across
multiple
zoning
districts,
whether
it's
a
PUD
residential
property,
commercial
property.
C
A
question
for
you,
brandy,
so
I'm
gonna
come
in
with
a
okay
just
control.
This
here
I've
got
this.
This
is
my
first
PUD
okay.
Is
that
I
mean
it
okay
and
then,
as
we're
talking
and
and
I
come
before
the
board
and
I
get
that
okayed
and
I
go
back
home
and
then
I
decide
to
do
this.
Do
I
have
to
go
back
in
front
of
the
board
when
I
added
more
any
change.
B
I'm
changed.
No,
so
then
those
are
actually
spelled
out.
I'll
pull
that
so
for
the
amendments,
a
major
change.
Some
minor
changes
shall
include
a
change
in
local
street
patterns
street
name,
lot
lines,
development
phases,
subdivision,
name,
right,
right-of-way,
easement
or
right
away
with
easements
or
latin
block
numbers,
and
then
major
changes
include
major
street
plan,
drainage,
way,
detention,
pond
locations,
other
public,
open
space
locations
or
perimeter
boundaries.
B
I
mean
that's
a
good
point
of
adding
adding
that
I
mean
because
the
things
that
you
need
to
show
would
be.
You
know
your
proposed
land
use
areas,
maximum
building
height
and
maximum
number
of
units,
building
setbacks,
circulation,
parking
streets,
open
space.
So
these
are
all
things
that
you
would
initially
show
and
if
you
were
changing.
B
C
The
only
reason
I
ask
that
is
because
you
know
if
I
come,
and
you
know,
for
the
sake
of
saying
a
camp
recite
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
I
change
that
I.
Don't
you
know?
No,
that's
a
poor
example:
I,
don't
I'm,
just
I'm
just
playing
devil's
advocate.
Is
there
something
that
is
gonna
trigger
me
going
from
a
retail
store
with
apartments
above
it
didn't
change
the
structure
didn't
change
the
street,
but
now
I
decided
that
I'm
gonna.
C
Do
you
know
a
bar
and
haircutting
above
it
yeah
I,
know
I
sounds
like
I
know,
but
no
you
don't
say,
does
my
use.
Does
my
use
constitute
me
coming
back
in
front
or
isn't
that
a
big
deal
I,
don't
know
I
mean
there
again
we're
getting
back
to
the
harmful
thing,
because
we
approve
this
and
now
we're
approving
it.
We
didn't
have
to
approve
that
that'd
be
the
only
no.
A
C
A
E
E
No
but
I
agree,
I
mean
I.
Think
that's
something
that
if
you're
gonna
change
the
use
of
something
that
that
we
should
add
that
to
the
definition
or
to
the
major
changes,
I
mean
you,
you
don't
want
something
that
you
can
bring
in
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
here
you
go
watch
this.
You
know
so.
Yeah
I
mean
and
and
maybe
that's
something
in
the
old
beauty
that
wasn't
spelled
out
very
well
either,
but
some
of
the
things
that
were
wrong
with
the
old
Beauty
was
you
know.
E
If
you
did
a
structural
change
inside
your
building,
didn't
change
the
outside.
You
know
you
want
to
do
a
remodel
of
a
condo.
That's
inside
of
a
building.
You
had
to
come
back
in
front
of
a
board
to
change
the
the
insides
of
an
apartment.
You
know
where
this
kind
of
goes
around
that
so
I
agree
that
that
was
probably
that
that's
a
good
catch
and
it's
a
good
add
to
this.
E
A
Know
most
of
the
other
things
that
are
listed
under
the
minor
I
would
agree
or
minor.
You
know
the
phases
in
which
we're
doing
the
development
when
overall
is
approved
is
is
minor.
The
street
names.
You
know
how
you're
doing
the
exact
division
of
the
lot
lines
patterns
I
do
question
the
right-of-way
widths
and
the
easements.
I
To
your
point,
mr.
Chairman
I
I,
you
know
I
I'm
glad
we're
having
this
discussion
cuz
this
list
for
one
it
looks
like
a
definitive
list
and
I
know.
There's
gonna
be
things
that
come
up
that
aren't
on
this
list
and
we're
going
to
be
stuck
discerning.
Okay.
Is
that
a
minor
or
major
change,
for
there
are
things
on
this
list
that
I
agree?
I
You
know
should
that
be
up
to
the
city
engineer
or
the
engineering
office
to
waive
what
was
approved
on
a
PUD
when
it
comes
to
Street
with
you
know,
I
think
the
answer
to
that
is
within
reason.
Yes,
but
if,
if
we're
already
approving
a
minimum
street
width
through
the
PUD
through
this
board,
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
my
place
or
the
engineering
offices
place
to
allow
something
even
narrower
yet
or
more
compromising
I
guess
I
would
say
so.
I
A
Kind
of
where
my
head
was
at
you
know,
particularly
if
you're,
if
you're,
making
a
change
that
puts
it
out
of
alignment
with
one
of
the
existing
zoning
districts.
You
know,
since
that
is
one
of
the
considerations
that
we
would
look
at
at
the
beginning
of
the
process
with
the
PUD
when
we're
going
through
the
approval,
if
it
were
to
change
to
a
smaller
roadways,
for
instance,
it
seems
like
that's
something
substantial
enough,
that
the
board
should
take
a
look
at
it
when
it's
a
consideration
of
the
original
approval.
Maybe.
C
Just
by
adding
the
word
on
that
or
the
right-of-way
with
increase,
if
they're
going
to
increase
it,
certainly
we
wouldn't
care
if
they
increased
it
but
decrease.
We
would
so.
If
you
just
added
the
word
increase,
then
you
wouldn't
need
to
come
in
front
of
again
because
we'd
all
be,
you
know,
find
that
more
likely
I
don't
know
that
they
would
have
fun
in
Greece,
but
you
know
that
would
certainly
define
it.
B
So
it
you
know,
and
then
in
the
major
changes
it
says
a
change
in
the
major
street
plan,
so
those
would
already
be
called
out
like
if
it
was
going
to
be
a
collector
or
a
local
street
and
then
what
the
right-of-way
width
would
be.
So
it's
also
a
little
like
it's
arbitrary
because
it's
like
which,
which
way
would
you
take
which
would
you
say
it
was
impacting
the
right
away
with
which
yes,
it
would
be,
but
would
it
also
be
impacting
the
major
street
plan
most
likely?
C
Well
but
I
guess
to
Bonnie's
point:
maybe
people
aren't
gonna,
you
know
if
they're
widening
it
to
put
parking
on
there
and
Jo
doesn't
want
that
I
guess
you'd
be
in
on
those
meetings.
We
wouldn't
you
know
public
wouldn't
be
though
I
mean
I,
don't
know.
I
guess,
there's
always
a
flip
side
to
everything,
but.
A
B
Because
if
there
there's
an
unnecessary
easement
shown
and
say
they
changed
like
where
utilities
is
gonna
run
their
water
main
just
through
construction
phase,
then
that
could
be
a
like
that
could
be
pretty
cumbersome
to
have
them.
Come
back
to
change
an
easement,
you
know,
cuz,
you
can
vacate
easements
administrative
Lee
already.
I
Another
factor
with
some
of
the
easements,
the
final
determination
of
their
size
and
location.
It
does
depend
on
some
of
the
final
engineering
that
was
referenced
earlier,
which
will
come
later,
for
instance,
if
we
put
on
the
PUD
a
detention
pond
drainage,
easement,
and
that
pond
has
been
found
to
be
sized
differently
from
the
subsequent
hydraulic
report
and
technical
analysis.
I
F
I
In
relation
to
both
these
items
right
away
and
easements,
you
know
we
could
look
at
how
we're
doing
our
formal
Plath's
versus
our
admin.
Plats
administrative
Plath's
I,
cannot
execute
an
admin
plat.
If
there's
a
change
in
right
away
so
to
the
Chairman's
point,
it
might
make
sense
to
pull
right
away,
changes
out
of
an
administrative
approval
and
put
it
into
the
board's
approval.
However
easements
you
know,
I
can't
approve
class
with
easements
on
them
with
with,
without
any
you
know,
because
of
the
standards
we
have
in
place.
E
I
B
Well,
Don,
so
between
administrative
and
plats
that
come
before
the
governing
body
and
clarifying
the
language
there,
because
if
they're
I
mean
the
only
thing
the
as
long
as
everything
else
is
being
met,
a
plot
could
be
administratively
plaited
if
it
were
dedicating
if
it
was
showing
easements,
but
it
couldn't
if
it
was
showing
right-of-way.
So
I
think
that
it
would
be
fine
to
leave
easements
as
a
minor
change
in
right-of-way
as
a
major
change.
I
guess.
A
A
I
mean
it
comes
back
to
that
discussion
about
redundancy
and
in
the
code
I
mean
it
is
nice
from
a
user
standpoint,
somebody
that's
not
living
in
in
the
code.
You
know
all
day
every
day
to
to
have
those
kind
of
directional
references.
So
they
know
where
else
to
look
in
the
code.
So
I
see
benefits
in
in
both
you
know,
cleaning
it
up
and
simplifying
it,
but
also
and
maintaining
those
those
references,
especially
in
you
know,
modern
electronic
forms
where
you
can
click
a
link
in
and
move
to.
Another
section.
B
A
A
A
B
A
C
A
H
E
H
A
B
So
this
here
we've
been
working
on
since
September,
and
we've
had
discussions
here
and
there-
and
this
is
just
going
to
tie
up
loose
ends
with
this
pending
ordinance
amendment,
and
it
does
affect
quite
a
few
ordinances
but
in
small
ways.
So
this
will
affect
chapter
21
78,
which
will
add
communal
living
to
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
it'll,
amend,
chapter
21
63,
which
is
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements.
B
One
okay,
so
it
is
defined
as
one
or
more
persons
related
by
blood,
marriage
or
adoption,
including
foster
children
or
a
group
of
not
more
than
three
persons
unless,
in
the
our
three
district,
in
which
event
a
group
of
not
more
than
four
persons
is
allowed,
some
or
all
of
whom
are
not
related
by
blood
marriage
or
adoption
living
together
in
maintaining
a
qualm
comment,
dwelling
unit,
sororities,
fraternities
or
other
similar
groups.
Dwellings
are
not
included
in
this
definition.
B
So
when
we
also
reference
sororities
and
fraternities,
we
don't
even
have
we
didn't,
have
a
definition
for
it.
So
I
also
added
a
definition
for
that
and
then
added
it
also
to
the
r2
as
a
conditional
use
just
first
in
some
circumstance
that
we
would
have
one
of
those
situations.
So
then
we
have
design
standards
or
limitations
on
communal
living,
and
that
is
added
to
chapter
21
78.
This
is
a
new
chapter
and
having
enough
area,
and
so
that's
where
to
it'll
limit
where
this
can
happen.
B
A
B
Okay,
so
the
the
definition
I
finally
found
it
is
communal.
Living
is
a
building
or
place
other
than
a
fraternity
or
sorority
house,
where
a
group
of
four
or
more
persons,
but
no
more
than
six
persons,
not
related
by
blood
or
law
living
together
and
maintaining
a
common
dwelling
unit
and
then
fraternity
and
sorority
is
defined
as
a
building
that
is
intended
or
designed
to
be
occupied
as
a
residence
for
a
group
of
more
than
five
members
and
recognized
as
a
chartered
chapter
by
a
national
or
international
organization
or
society
most
likely.
B
Was
a
request,
and
then
it
really
we
begged
the
question
of
you
know
like
how
can
how
could
we
accommodate
something
like
this?
Because
if
they
can
meet
these
things,
that
would
be
intrusive
to
an
existing
neighborhood?
Then
what
you
know
might
not
have
it
as
a
conditional
use,
because
so
you
can
have
three
unrelated
people
right
now
in
any
neighborhood,
for
if
you're,
an
r3
and
then
so
now.
This
will
add
it
to
as
a
conditional
use
to
r1
c
r2,
+,
RF,
+
r3,
because
anything
that
you
have
in
r2.
B
B
D
B
D
B
Yeah,
because
you
know
when
you
like
the
lake
situation,
when
you
have,
when
you're
in
a
single-family
residential
district,
it's
it's
not
you're,
not
it's,
not
one
single
family,
maintaining
that
it's
a
different
family
every
weekend.
Who
are
there
to
have
a
good
time
and
yeah.
We
want
that,
but
then,
but
just
for
their
protections
to
I.
H
Do
know
the
state
has
an
issue
with
this,
also
because
it's
transient
use
compared
to
the
communal
living
and
they're
trying
to
get
a
handle
on
how
to
regulate
this,
and
you
know
their
safety
issues
be
a
life
safety
issues
for
transient
use,
people
are
uses
or
surroundings
of
buildings,
and
if
something
happens,
so
it's
being
looked
at
at
the
state
level.
2
brandies.
G
B
D
B
A
B
Most
likely
it'll
be
complaint
base
and
then
we'll
be
able
to.
You
know
so
stay
even
right
now
with
like
area
kids,
if
there,
if
there's
a
lot
of
on
street
parking,
that's
being
taken
up
or
people
are
just
noticing
extra
traffic
or
they're,
noticing
six
different
adults
coming
in
and
out
of
the
house,
then
it
would
be
yeah
a
complaint
based
and.
A
A
Looking
at
looking
at
the
zoning
districts
that
this
is
being
proposed
for
and
the
fact
that
it's
conditional
use,
I
I,
don't
have
a
problem
seeing
some
of
these
applications
come
before
the
board
and
then
we
can
make
an
informed
decision.
I'd
much
rather
see
something
and
know
about
it,
then,
for
it
just
happened,
and
nobody
knows
about
it.
So
hopefully
this
would
encourage
some
of
the
potentially
existing
uses
like
this
to
to
follow
the
letter
of
the
law.
G
C
B
A
B
So
this
I
added
to
the
agenda
on
Tuesday
following
the
council
meeting-
and
we
just
had
discussion
on
wanting
to
get
this
moving
forward
and
get
some
input,
so
I
saw
that
I
could
add
it
here
for
discussion
on
our
last
Planning
Commission
meeting
on
December
5th.
We
had
left
it
as
we
would
reconvene
as
a
subcommittee
and
then
you
know
just
really
dig
into
it.
But
I
thought,
since
we
have
the
opportunity
of
this
meeting.
B
So
I'll
look
into
that
and
see
just
take
just
measurements
of
different
properties
and
how
far
really
we
want
to
go
out
with
it,
because,
obviously
the
lake
commercial
district
is
going
to
be
complimentary
of
Lake
commercial
activities,
so
it
doesn't
necessarily
need
to.
We
don't
want
this
being
proposed
on
the
east
side
of
town,
so
well
we'll
look
at
what
would
be
appropriate
for
that
distance
and
then
Blake.
B
You
had
brought
up
the
materials
and
including
some
folk
products
which
I
agree,
and
we
can
get
that
added
in
here
and
kind
of
look
at
other.
But
I'll.
Look
at
that
email
you
sent
with
other
maybe
material
suggestions
and
green
space
and
open
space,
and
we
had
talked
about
that
too.
I
just
didn't
add
any
of
the
changes
just
knowing
that
we
were
gonna.
B
Do
the
subcommittee
I
knew
I
I
figured
that
we
would
wait
till
the
beginning
of
the
year,
but
then,
but
it's
kind
of
been
catalyzed
now,
especially
after
the
City
Council
meeting
on
really
getting
after
this,
but
by
the
time
I
mean
with
everyone
schedules.
It
probably
will
be
the
beginning
of
the
year
when
we
can
get
together,
but
hopefully
within
that
first
week,
I.
A
Think
we
do
need
to
prioritize
it
and
definitely
do
the
the
subcommittee
and
make
sure
we
got
a
good
amount
of
engagement
on
this.
You
know-
and
we
talked
a
little
bit
the
last
time
too
in
regards
to
this,
but
you
know
I
kind
of
see
the
concept
of
what
we
should
do
here
as
a
little
bit
of
what
we
did
in
the
gateway
overlay
district
in
relation
to
the
aesthetics.
A
So
it
may
not
have
exactly
the
same
language
as
the
overlay
district,
but
some
of
those
things
in
relation
to
the
green
space,
the
buffer
zones,
the
the
natural
landscaping
so
green,
greenery
tree,
counts,
natural
screening,
buffers
and
then
specifically,
some
some
language
in
I'd
like
to
see
that
encourages
lower
density
applications.
So
types
of
development
that
has
by
nature
a
lower
density
to
its
and
preserves
some
of
the
natural
elements,
so
trees
and
wetland
and
in
a
natural
environment,
would
be
beneficial
to
have
in
this
lake
commercial
district,
yeah.
B
And
how
it
is
right
now
and
we
can
expand
on
it,
but
obviously
that
was
something
that
I
wanted
to
take
into
account,
and
that
is
with
the
impervious
area,
shall
not
exceed
50%
of
the
total
lot
area,
which
is
a
lot
but
look,
and
so
even
not
looking
into
that.
You
know,
but
that
would
decrease
density
because
you
just
couldn't
build
on
50
percent
of
your
land.
Absolutely.
A
A
It
goes
a
little
bit
beyond
that:
I
guess
where
my
head's,
at
with
it
as
more
of
a
guiding
principle,
and
it's
really
about
you-
know
the
preservation
of
a
natural
environment
and
embracing
uses
that
want
to
preserve
that
as
much
as
possible.
So
even
beyond
just
you
know
a
percentage
of
law,
but
the
actual
types
of
uses
so
and
I,
don't
know
how
specific
we
can
get
on
that
other
than
you
know.
Having
some
language
that
strongly
encourages
that
kind
of
development.
A
B
What
we
can
do
to
for
anybody,
that's
watching
or
wants
to
be
involved.
Is
you
know
we
can
keep
this
on
the
agendas
as
it
transforms,
so
people
are
able
to
review
it.
We
can
I
mean
because
we
want
to
expedite
this.
We
want
to
keep
it
moving.
We
could
always
just
have
it
as
old
business
and
attach
it
to
the
agenda.
So
then
people
can
see
how
it's
progressing
and
then
definitely
feel
feel
free
to
contact
me
on
any
any
input.
Like
you
know,
my
my
email
website.
C
Albertson
I
just
I'm
impressed
with
the
fact
that
this
is
coming
before
us,
because
I
think
it
is
an
issue
at
the
lake
right
now.
We've
had
a
couple
of
instances
where
things
are
being
that
have
been
added.
The
c3
and
I
think
this
would
have
been
a
lot
clearer
for
the
council
because
we
really
struggled
with
it
as
to
whether
c3
was
the
right
thing
to
put
into
the
residential
area.
I
think
this
puts
some
specific.
C
Different
things
that
to
look
for
to
maintain
the
integrity
of
of
an
area
and
I,
think
that
that's
I
think
we
all
have
an
idea
of
what
we
want
the
lake
to
look
like,
and
we
also
know
what
we
don't
want.
The
lake
to
look
like
and
I
think
this
will
provide
a
way
to
do
that.
So
I
appreciate
what
you're
doing
there.
C
A
C
G
Thank
you,
winning
Polly
I
think
you
also
talked
about
automobile
parking
lots
moving
down
last
time,
I,
don't
know
if
it
was
decided,
but
that
was
certainly
part
of
the
discussion.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
for
including
all
the
things
that
you
were
talking
about.
Mister
chair,
because
I
think
those
are
when
I
read
through
this.
G
That's
what
was
I
was
looking
for
the
kinds
of
comment
that
you
were
making
about
the
aesthetics
of
the
place
for
everybody
when
they
come
to
use
the
lake
when
they're
driving
around
the
lake
and
so
I
look
forward
to
seeing
information
about
green
spaces
and
open
spaces.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Thank.
A
A
A
Well,
well,
beautiful
those
property
owners
also
have
a
right
to
develop
and
what
we've
got
to
do
with
our
zoning
districts
and
our
zoning
laws
is
to
try
to
strike
a
balance
of
what's
appropriate
for
the
area
without
stifling
you
know
their
ability
to
develop
to
some
extent.
So
that's
why
it's
important
that
we
have
the
correct
language
in
here
and
we're
addressing
the
needs
of
the
community.
Yes,.
I
B
I
B
And
that's
because
it
has
three
question
marks,
because
it
is
very
questionable
if
we
even
want
to
go
there
at
this
time,
because
we
met
extensively
at
the
beginning
of
2018.
It's
already
been
that
long
that
long
ago.
So,
but
that's
kind
of
you
know,
we'd
have
to
come
up.
We'd
have
to
add
that
to
the
ordinance
as
a
separate
chapter
have
the
limitations
and
design
standards
as
well,
but
that
one's
pretty
complicated
where,
if
we're
doing
the
resort's,
could
potentially
take
care
of
the
VRBO
situation.
A
B
A
I
think
that's
part
of
the
part
of
this.
You
know
concept
of
a
PUD
where
you
can
have
a
more
extensive
development
right
where
you
can
really
look
at
the
entire
development
and
what
the
conditions
related
to
that
should
be
and
how
we
should
approach
it.
Yeah
you're,
looking
at
the
project
more
holistically
right,
yeah.
B
And
and
that's
a
good
point,
because
when
we
were
doing
the
resort's,
we
were
going
to
implement
that
before
as
a
conditional
use
in
the
r1
before
we
had
a
commercial,
Lake,
District
or
lake
commercial
district.
So
now
that
we'll
have
this
in
place,
we
have
PUD.
We
have
options
where
we
might
be
able
to
strike
that
all
together
and
then
potentially
I
could
look
into
how
other
communities
are
handling
the
RB
O's.
B
A
Well,
certainly,
more
work
to
come
on
this
very
much
appreciate
the
community's
engagement
on
this
particular
topic.
I
know
everybody
is
eager
to
see
something
that
works
for
the
lake
and
it
is,
you
know,
going
to
going
to
actively
embrace
that.
You
know
significant
community
asset
right.
It
belongs
to
all
of
us.
Yes,.
D
F
B
So
this
is
in
regards
to
fireworks,
and
this
goes
back
to
2014
or
2015
when
big
shots,
fireworks
hooked
onto
the
municipal
utilities.
Water
is
provided
city
water.
So
then
there
was
an
agreement
there
that
said
that
they
would
do
this
as
long
as
the
city
looked
into
allowing
actually
I'm
just
gonna
read
this:
the
owner
agrees
that
it
will
voluntarily
petition
to
the
city
of
wonderf
rent
water
time
for
annexation,
as
soon
as
it
becomes
legal
to
sell
fireworks
and
city
limits,
which
is
currently
prohibited
by
our
safety
ordinance
or
within
five
years.
B
Whichever
is
sooner
so
that
was
May
23rd
of
2020
will
be
five
years,
so
we
need
to
look
into
this
and
we
have
extensively
throughout
the
years.
Actually
previous
planners
have
put
a
lot
of
work
into
it.
My
belief
first
district
has
created
map
references
to
try
to
try
to
like
implement
it
into
our
ordinance,
but
still
not
make
it
a
safety
concern.
So
what
we
would
have
to
do
is
amend
quite
a
few
ordinances
again
in
in
small
ways.
We
would
have
to
come
up
with.
B
Limitations,
okay,
so
we
would
basically
be
adding
in
the
I
one
and
the
I
to
industrial
districts.
We
would
have
by
conditional
use
warehousing
and
sales,
so
in
the
I
one
it
would
be
warehousing
and
sales
of
class
one
for
G
fireworks
is
regulated
by
the
Code
of
Federal
Regulations,
the
Consumer
Product
Safety
Commission
and
chapter
21
81
of
this
title,
which
is
that
will
be
the
fireworks
section
and
then
in
I.
B
It's
the
same
thing
it's
under
conditional
use,
but
you
can
have
higher
impact
fireworks,
a
different
class,
and
so
then
we
would
be
adding
chapter
21
81,
which
would
give
us
the
standards
for
firework
activities
in
the
i1
and
the
i2
districts.
So
this
there's
only
so
many
properties
that
this
type
of
use
would
be
allowed
to
even
be
on,
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
was
far
enough
away
from
you
know:
residential
districts
I'm
in
there
all
I
mean
it's
outlined
just
in
the.
F
H
Does
that
entail
packaging
is
basically
they
get
up.
They
make
their
own
a
sort
of
package
of
fireworks,
so
they'll
get
in
there
bottle
rockets
in
there
firecrackers
and
they
want
to
make
a
little
more
presentable
package.
One
you
buy
one,
you
get
assortment
of
items.
You
know
this,
there's
no
manufacturer
in
any
of
this
here.
He.
F
H
Yeah,
it
was
just
more
has
their
you
know
when
you're,
when
you're
handling
a
product,
you
know
it's
it's
substantially
safe,
but
when
you're
repackaging
movie
things
that
the
opportunity
for
things
that
get
broke
open,
you
know
you
just
you
know
compounding
risk.
Yes,
we
you
know,
we
we've.
We
vetted
this
quite
heavily
as
a
staff
and
reviewed
it
and
that's
where
we
came
up
with
you
know
this.
This
whole
zoning
change
and
we
needed
we
needed
a
purpose
in
a
place
or
a
tool,
but
it's
legal,
but
also
very
hindering.
H
A
Limiting
factor
there
right
is
the
proximity
within
half
a
mile
to
residential
or
PUD
zoned
districts.
That's
part
of
what's
driving
that
limited
number
of
properties
that
would
would
fit
this
criteria.
The
question
there
is:
what
about
residential
properties
that
build
after
the
fact
within
that
half
mile,
would
they
be
excluded
from
that
calculation?
If
they've
wanted
to,
you
know
further
develop
their
property?
A
F
A
I
One
factor
I
could
point
out
to
mr.
chairman:
I,
don't
know
if
this
addresses
your
concern
completely,
but
it
is
in
reference
to
the
zoning
districts.
So
if
this
were
built
or
this
use
were
going
to
place
within
or
outside
of
a
half-mile
from
a
residential
zoning
district,
it
would
take
a
reason
of
some
area
within
that
half
mile
to
become
residential.
I
Then
at
that
point,
in
order
to
implement
that
residential
use,
I
think
that
kind
of
curbs
some
of
your
concern
but
you're
right
that
reasonable
application
could
come
forth
and
we
would
have
to
a
staff
and
you
as
a
board,
remember
that
there's
a
facility
like
this
located
in
less
a
half-mile
that
area
and
then
decide
whether
or
not
it's
appropriate
to
rezone
that
area.
Yeah.
B
A
I
I
think
it's
good.
It's
definitely
something
that
we
need
to
address
this
this
issue
and
it
has
been
around
for
a
long
time.
I
was
on
the
board
when
we
talked
about
this
five
years
ago
and
I
remember,
you
know
all
the
conversations
that
we
had.
This
looks
like
it's
a
really
good
approach
and
I
know
you
guys
have
had
some
very
serious
discussions
and
vetted
this
out.
B
And
then
I'll
just
add
to
for
the
the
signage-
and
we
talked
about
this
at
a
previous
Planning
Commission
meeting
about
a
commercial,
a
business-
that's
commercial
in
nature,
but
in
the
industrial
zone.
So
what
I
did
there
is
I
added
in
the
zoning
districts
chart
in
2180
28
for
all
eyes
all
industrial
zones
I,
put
parentheses
with
a
footnote
K,
and
then
that
says
warehousing
packaging
and
sales
of
fireworks
uses
may
be,
may
use
allowable
c3,
signage
requirements
and
I
know
we
had
talked
about
doing
all
commercial
in
nature,
businesses
but
I.
A
I
B
H
B
I
Chair,
yes,
if
I
may
I
just
want
to
take
a
brief
second
and
commend
the
staff
on
some
of
the
recent
work.
I
mean.
If
you
look
at
the
agenda
tonight,
we
have
three
ordinance
amendments
before
you.
You've
got
two
more
proposed
ones.
Coming
down
the
down
the
chutes
I
think
the
last
council
meeting.
We
acted
on
almost
that
same
a
number
three
to
five
different
zoning
amendments,
so
I
just
wanted
to
commend
Brandi
for
her
work
on
us.
Helping
keep
everything
straight.
I
She's
got
a
lot
going
on
and
she's
doing
a
great
job
with
that.
I
just
wanted
to
commend
her
for
her
work
tonight
and
the
rest
of
the
staff
that
help
with
with
reviewing
these,
such
as
Matt
and
chip
and
Cannon,
has
folks,
because
we've
got
a
lot
of
improvements,
we're
wanting
to
make
and
we're
trying
to
be
sensitive
to
each
and
every
one
of
them
and
I
think
staffs
doing
a
great
job
at
helping
prioritize
and
keep
moving
forward.
Yeah.
B
A
B
E
We
are
working
on
the
design
for
a
campground.
One
thing
that
we
saw
in
your
ordinance
is
that
it
does
not
allow
people
to
stay
for
more
than
30
days.
There's
currently
only
one
campground
at
the
lake
that
follows
that
rule
there's
a
lot
of
seasonal
pads
at
Memorial
and
at
the
prop.
Both
we
were
wondering
if
you
guys
can
look
into
that,
we
would
like
to
do.
E
A
park
model
may
be
extended
to
a
time
period
of
like
April
1st
to
November
1st
or
you
know,
so
it
doesn't
become
a
yearly
thing,
but
I
think
if
you
put
somebody
in
one
of
those
neighborhoods
that
you
know
is
gonna
have
a
camper
that
sits
out
there
and
they
want
to
stay
for
the
season.
I
think
that's
actually
better
for
the
neighborhood,
because
then
they
know
who's
there,
yeah
buy-in,
they're,
always
there,
but
I
noticed
this.
One
thing
that
city
park
does
a
good
job
of
following,
but
the
rest
of
them.
A
I'd
like
to
look
at
a
few
different
areas
of
our
campground
code.
Actually
I
was
looking
at
it
in
relation
to
the
state
regulations
for
for
campgrounds
too,
so
you
know
South
Dakota
parks.
They
have
a
pretty
extensive
regulation
code
and
I
think
there's
some
aspects
of
that
that
we
could
embrace
from
a
community
perspective
as
well,
certainly
something
that
we
can
start
discussions
perfect.
D
C
E
D
E
It's
more
of
a
community,
it's
yeah
yeah
they
take,
and
when
you
have
somebody's
that's
there
all
year,
all
season
they
take
pride
in
their
spot.
You
know
you
see
them
plant
and
trees,
you
see
them
doing
things,
especially
if
they
have
by
you
know
on
the
spot.
So
that's
that's
something
we
want
to
look
into,
but
at
this
time
it's
not
legal
to
do
so.