►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 4 18 2019
Description
City of Watertown, SD
B
A
B
A
Gonna
make
a
modification
or
in
a
minute
to
it,
we're
gonna
pull
item
5,
which
is
resolution
number
20
1908
to
amend
the
district
zoning
map
of
the
city
of
Watertown
for
property
generally
located
north
of
the
sailboat
landing
on
Lake
Camp,
Eska
and
legally
described
as
Lots
24
through
27
black
2
of
Lake
Ridge
addition
from
r1
single-family
residential
district
2,
C,
3,
highway
commercial
district,
subject
all
planning
requirements,
so
that
would
be
pulled.
Okay,.
C
At
mr.
chairman,
just
to
clarify
it
just
to
clarify
for
the
audience
sake
that
that
would
mean
that
that
that
particular
item
would
be
removed
from
the
agenda
tonight.
No
formal
action
or
consideration
would
be
given
to
it.
The
applicant
would
completely
remove
it
and
it
would
not
be
considered
again
until
they
would
reapply
at
which
time
new
notifications
would
have
to
be
posted
and
sent
out
at
that
time.
If
they
were
to
proceed
with
it
again
later.
D
D
B
D
D
Okay
I.
Thank
you.
I
want
to
say
that
the
support
from
brandy
in
terms
of
helping
me
understand
this,
because
I've
never
gone
through
it
before
in
a
very
non,
in
a
very
balanced
way,
just
being
an
excellent
public
servant
was
just
exemplary
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
that
and
I
know.
Other
people
want
to
thank
you
for
that
too.
Who
couldn't
be
here
and
she
let
me
know
how
we
could
deal
with
that.
So
thank
you,
yeah.
You
were
great,
thank
you
and
thank
you
for
all
your
work.
E
B
Okay,
fair
enough
as
long
as
we're
on
this
topic,
even
though
it's
not
on
the
agenda,
we
do
have
an
open
public
section
of
the
meeting
and
typically
do
that.
The
end
of
the
meeting.
However,
if
you're
here
to
speak
to
this
particular
item,
you
know
now
would
be
the
time
to
come
up
and
voice.
Your
opinion
on
that.
D
I,
as
I
said,
I'm
running
Polly
I
am
at
268
North
Lake
Drive,
my
property
backs
on
to
this
lot,
and
can
you
show
that
brandy,
where
that
is
and
I
have
my
parents
have
had
this
property
and
now
me
for
45
years
and
I
started
going
to
the
lake
six
decades
ago,
I'm
gonna
own
up
to
that
as
learning
how
to
water-ski
and
swim
and
used
it
for
my
enjoyment.
Until
my
parents
list
used
move
to
the
lake,
so
lots
of
commitment
to
the
health
of
the
lake.
D
My
number
one
I
have
three
real
concerns:
number
one.
This
is
a
residential
area,
it's
a
quiet,
neighborhood.
It
has
been
for
45
years
and
the
piece
of
property
that
is
being
identified
to
be
that
was
being
identified
is
on
the
corner.
As
we
look
up
it's
on
the
corner,
it's
on
highway,
2
to
our
highway
20,
then
Martin,
Avenue
and
then
across
the
street,
from
for
properties
in
so
the
sailboat
landing
and
then
the
next
property
owned
by
mr.
D
D
Dahle
owns
the
properties
behind
this
as
well,
and
so
my
concern
is
really
that
this
is
a
quiet
residential
area
and
that
zoning
2c3
would
bring
it
into
a
an
area
where
and
I
don't
know
what
he
plans
but,
regardless
to
plan
it,
the
permitted
uses
our
service
station
retail
establishment,
service
establishments,
hotels,
motels,
motor
vehicle
sales,
office,
financial
institutions,
restaurants,
clinics,
veterinary
clinics,
automobile
parking,
lots
and
farm
machinery
or
semi-trailer
sales,
and
because
we
don't
know
what
would
be
done
if
this
were
changed,
because
all
of
those
things
would
be
available.
I'm.
D
Looking
at
this
as
what
could
happen,
if
this
were
a
service
station
or
any
kind
of
property
that
drew
in
people
I
think
under
those
conditions,
I
look
at
issues
of
light
pollution,
noise
pollution,
the
potential
of
you
know
truck
idling
in
terms
of
noise,
I'm
very
concerned
about
water
pollution
and
the
safety
of
Lake,
Camp
Eska
and
in
general.
If
thing,
if
there
was
a
lot
of
coming
and
going
on
the
property,
just
a
general
safety
of
our
neighborhood.
D
This
is
a
wetland
sandy
area,
it's
a
hundred
in
the
hundred
year,
flood
plain,
but
even
at
forty
four
point,
four
inches
the
property
has
water
on
the
side,
in
the
ditch
and
in
the
back
sailboat
landing
at
forty
four
point.
Four
inches
was
about
halfway
full.
You
know
the
water
came
up
about
halfway
into
the
landing,
so
I
don't
think
we
need
to
look
at
a
hundred
year,
flood
event
to
imagine
what
kind
of
high
waters
can
do.
Even
though
this
is
a
raised,
property
and
ac3
would
have
lots
of
regulations
to
meet.
D
This
is
also
in
a
protected
water
for
just
aquifer
district
and
I
know
under
my
house,
the
water
just
percolate
sup,
it's
sand
there.
So
there's
no
protecting
my
house
when
the
water
comes
up.
It's
just
going
to
come
up
for
an
underneath,
and
that's
true
for
my
all
of
my
neighbors
having
been
here
in
the
97
flood,
so
I
think
another
big
issue
is
access.
I
was
advised
that
the
d-o-t
would
probably
not
very
unlikely,
provide
access
off
of
highway
20.
D
That
would
mean
that
we
would
be
looking
at
access
off
of
tiny
little
Martin
Road
or
the
residential
street,
just
like
your
residential
streets
in
your
neighborhood
of
North
Lake
Drive,
and
that
Street
is
basically
set
up
for
not
so
many
houses
on
the
way
up.
The
hill
toward
the
toward
the
water
tower.
So
I
have
a
concern
about
that.
D
I
also
have
a
concern,
because
in
the
notes
for
this
for
the
commercial
property
under
the
section
on
requirements
under
20,
1.100,
3.2
B,
it
says
partials
that
our
parcels
that
have
more
than
two
required
front
yards,
the
remaining
yard
shall
be
the
side
yards,
and
this
would
really
have
three
front
yards.
The
way
I
understood
it
and
the
setbacks
would
be
that
and
I
just
think.
That's
a
concern
for
us
that
it
has
three
sides
with
the
size
of
the
property.
It
can
also
be
60.
D
D
So
my
concern
really
is
about
this
and
once
that
designation
would
be
identified,
it's
reasonable
to
assume
that
the
rest
of
the
residue
property's,
an
r1
which
is
the
rest
of
this
property.
Going
behind
my
house
to
the
Dali
house.
It's
reasonable
that
the
likelihood
that
people
would
want
to
put
residential
president
Sosa
on
that
property
would
be
diminished
and
therefore
changing
the
nature
of
our
neighborhood
and
the
nature
of
the
lake.
D
B
For
things
that
we
do
need
to
act
on,
but
I
invite
you
to
come
back
and
anybody
else
that
would
like
to
share
additional
comments,
because
again
it's
this,
definitely
something
we
will
take
a
real
close
look
at
before
before
we
change.
I
would
also
just
as
a
side
note
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
it
is
it's
somewhat
unusual
to
have
r1
and
c3.
You
know
right
next
to
each
other.
Isn't
that.
A
A
F
A
G
H
State
Marlys
table
274
the
North
Lake
right.
My
parents
brought
bought
that
place
in
1964
and
we
have
been
there
all
this
time.
I
have
seen
floods
97
for
sure
my
when
we
got
the
ice
chopped
out
and
got
into
the
place.
My
mother's
bathtub
had
eight
inches
of
ice
in
it.
So
I'm
well
aware
of
what
can
happen
in
that
area
and
at
that
time
it
wasn't
so
much.
H
H
H
Just
don't
feel
that
it's
the
right
thing
to
do
and
as
it
is
that
neighborhood
gets
along
just
great
and
I
and
Roger
usually
has
a
pretty
good
garden
over
there
too,
and
he
says
he
can't
get
down
on
his
knees
anymore.
I
can't
either,
but
so
now
he's
built
his
up
so
that
he
can
still
garden,
but
it's
just
there
just
isn't
the
room
there
and
it
would
just
especially
like
on
holidays.
H
B
G
Name
is
Judy
Schmidt
and
my
husband
and
I
live
at
260
North
Lake
Drive,
so
this
directly
affects
us
Inc
and
keeping
it
short
I
just
want
to
say
that
we,
my
husband,
Al
and
I,
agree
with
what
one
mean
and
Mauro's
have
both
said
100%.
We,
instead
of
repeating
at
all
we
agree
with
what
they
say.
Thank.
A
B
B
E
B
B
G
I
B
A
So
if
you
see
in
your
agenda
packet
there,
what
they're
planning
on
doing
proximity
of
where
this
will
be
located,
it'll
be
directly
west
of
Tareq's
on
the
south
bypass
or
29th
Street,
it's
zoned
I
wanted
light
industrial,
so
they
plan
to
subdivide
that
into
three
Lots
they'll
have
a
ten
acre
and
then
they
have.
The
southern
lot
is
kind
of
up
for
whatever.
However,
that
ends
up
needing
to
be
subdivided
subdivided
but
they're,
starting
with
three
Lots.
I
A
A
I
I
A
Far
as
like
having
buildable
area,
you
mean
with
the
setbacks
and
everything
yeah,
and
you
know,
as
far
as
it
is
still
a
pretty
large
lot.
I
couldn't
tell
you
offhand
what
the
the
acre
acreages
but
we'll
have
that
for
the
preliminary
plan,
and
we
can
have
them
look
at
that
as
well,
and
so
that's
what
we
wanted.
You
know
just
feedback,
so
we
can
bring
that
we'll
have
another
design
review
team
meeting
before
we
bring
this
back
to
you.
A
I
I
A
We
did
discuss
that
and
the
city
also
owns
property
to
the
southwest
here.
But
the
issue
of
connectivity
is
that
Magellan
pipeline
that
we
can't
cross
and
then
the
end
rest
someday.
If
they
look
at
that
developing,
we
can
look
at
connectivity,
probably
to
the
south,
but
just
how
this
ended
up,
laying
out
how
they
have
that
Street.
What
that
was
appropriate
because.
F
A
B
C
Mr.
chairman,
just
to
follow
up
on
your
question
I,
as
you
may
already
know,
the
subdivision
regulations
outline
the
process
for
a
concept
plan
and
it
is
administratively
approvable
by
the
city
engineering
office
and
can
be
shared
with
the
Planning
Commission
for
informational
purposes,
and
we
just
felt
that
ahead
of
this
coming
up
on
the
next
meeting.
We
just
simply
for
that
reason
for
informational
purposes.
We
give
you
a
heads
up
and
share
it
with
you
this
evening.
Yeah.
G
A
B
B
A
B
A
So
let
me
pull
this
up.
So
what
we
have
here
is
these
lots?
Actually,
let
me
get
to
it
on
the
GIS.
These
lots
currently
exist
as
single-family
homes.
They
are
zoned
c1
and
so
as
far
as
them
continuing
their
their
use,
the
applicant
is
looking
to
rezone
it
to
a
residential
zone.
Now
what
we're
bringing
forth
to
you?
We
are
presenting
our
three
multifamily.
We
feel
that
our
2a
is
more
appropriate,
but
by
ordinance
staff
can't
administer
that
it
has
to
be
initiated
by
Plan
Commission.
A
A
C
So
mr.
chair,
if
I,
could
piggyback
on
what
brandy
had
to
say
in
review
of
this
application
as
an
r3,
there
were
concerns
and
creating
a
lot
of
non-conformities,
just
like,
for
example,
our
first
case
we
saw
this
evening
in
the
BOA
meeting
and
because
of
the
narrow
lots
and
the
structures
that
are
in
place.
We
did
review
this
against
the
art
to
a
standards,
and
this
does
fall
immediately.
Adjacent
to
an
hour
to
a
zoning
district.
C
We've
read
the
regulations
down
there
to
a
zoning
district
and
in
order
to
initiate
that
zoning
district
that
can
only
be
initiated
by
the
Planning
Commission.
So
this
was
a
roundabout
way
of
bringing
it
forward
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
your
consideration,
whether
you
would
even
entertain
a
residential
district
here
or
not,
and
if
you
were
to
the
staff,
would
recommend
that
it
be
through
the
initiation
of
the
r2a,
and
we
can
definitely
there's
a
lot
more
discussion
to
be
had
here.
Who
can
definitely
talk
more
about
this
and
for.
B
B
Typically,
it's
a
little
bit
more
controversial
when
you're
going
from
residential
to
commercial
in
the
particularly
liquation
like
this.
This
that
we're
kind
of
doing
the
opposite,
we're
taking
a
commercial
going
to
residential
which,
seemingly,
if
it's
okay
with
applicants,
you
know
I'm,
not
sure
they
need
the
adjacent
commercial
businesses
would
objected
to
something
like
that
unless
it's
not
parking
or
other
issues
use
anything
with
that.
A
A
I
nights
from
there
right
and
actually,
if
we
have
the
applicant,
come
up,
she
could
speak
to
it
because
she
did
solicit
other
neighbors
and
that's
why?
Because
it
started
out
with
309
West
Kemp,
and
then
she
was
able
to
talk
with
the
other
neighbors
who
might
have
the
same
vested
interest
in
wanting
their
residents
to
be
residentially.
Zoned
I
believe
that
they
weren't
interested
if
they
weren't
in
if
they
weren't
involved
with
the
petition.
I
E
So
if,
in
the
future,
if
something
like
this
comes
up,
we
should
probably
just
bring
this
forward
a
new
business,
not
send
out
letters
or
anything
like
that.
Get
your
get
your
input
as
to
whether
you
recommend
this
to
be
brought
forth
as
an
art
to
a
and
then
at
the
next
meeting.
We
would
bring
it
forth
as
an
RTA
so
going
forward.
If
your
recommendation
is
in
art
to
a
in
this
instance,
the
next
meeting
will
bring
it
forward
as
an
art
to
a
is.
F
There
any
way
at
the
next
meeting
that
we
could
include
more
of
the
residential
homes,
not
so
much
where
they
have
that
storage
in
that
old
gas
station
and
stuff
in
the
corner
of
4th
and
camp.
But
could
we
get
all
of
the
residential
homes
in
that,
because
I'm,
assuming
that
a
lot
of
them
are
some
of
them,
are
probably
parental
homes?.
A
Right
and
that
you
would
want
to
include
all
of
the
residential
if
we're,
if
so,
when
plan
can
do
it,
yeah
yeah,
and
so
if
this
is
plan
Commission
initiated,
then
basically
the
city
would
be
the
applicant
the
next
time,
and
so
then
you
guys
could
include
whatever
properties
you
wanted.
I
believe
yeah.
C
I
believe
that
as
a
Planning
Commission,
if
you
were
to
direct
staff
to
move
forward
with
initiating
that
to
a
expansion
to
those
other
properties,
we
can
move
forward
in
that
direction
and
provide
those
proper
notifications
and
follow
the
protocol
for
a
city
initiated
rezone.
What
I
suspect
might
happen
is
those
that
didn't
sign
on
for
this
Raziel
and
may
show
up
in
opposition
again
that's
just
speculation
on
my
part,
but
you
may
have
folks
that
would
show
up
in
opposition
for
some
of
these
properties
that
we
would
be
encompassing
in
this
district.
B
Does
this,
how
does
this
parallel
with
some
of
the
other
master
planning
discussions
we've
had,
that
is
to
say
one
of
the
reasons
we
were
doing
all
that
or
evaluating
or
discussing
is
so
that
we
didn't
have
necessarily
this.
You
know
kind
of
sliding
in
so
are
we
kind
of
going
against
the
exact
over
overarching
thing
of
that
of.
A
The
comp
plan
just
shows
it
as
existing
as
commercial
and
when
this
was
created
this
zoning,
it
was
just
it
was
blanketed,
blanket
zoned,
so
there
are,
and
so
a
lot
of
these
properties
to
have
the
conditional
use
that
allows
them
to
rebuild
in
in
case
that
their
house
were
to
be
destroyed.
So
they
do
have
that
right.
But
the
thing
that
the
reservation
with
that
is
just
with
different
financial
institutions
and
if
they'll
honor,
that.
A
G
A
Think
in
this
area,
if
you
guys
were
going
going
to
go
residential
I,
think
our
two-way
would
be
more
appropriate.
Just
because
then
I
mean
r3
even
would
have
been
slight
slightly
a
spot
zone.
You
know,
but
it
still
would
have
been
connected
to
residential.
So
but
then
our
two-way
will
be
content.
It'll
be
a
continuation
of
the
existing
are
to
a
zone
to
the
south
I.
F
C
Mr.
chairman,
just
to
go
back
to
your
question
regarding
the
comp
plan,
I
guess
a
couple
brief
comments
regarding
the
nature
of
a
reason
like
this,
when
considering
planning
and
zoning
function
within
a
city
in
general,
obviously
a
couple
things
that
we're
doing
here.
If
this
were
to
be
approved,
is
we
would
be
splitting
or
parsing
out
a
portion
of
that
c1,
the
westerly
portion
on
its
own,
dividing
it
from
its
otherwise
connected
to
the
majority.
C
The
c1
zoning
within
the
community
just
wanted
to
make
that
as
a
notes
and
then
also
a
slight
reduction
of
that
c1
zoning
district,
which
anytime
you're
changing
zoning
and
reducing
an
amount
of
an
available
zone.
That's
always
a
point
to
consider
granted
this
isn't
the
percentage-wise
isn't
a
huge
impact,
but
it
is
an
impact
nonetheless,
of
a
reduction
of
that
c1
zoning
districts
just
wanted
to
point
out
those
couple
of
general
topics
of
consideration.
B
K
K
We
have
a
lot
of
traffic
in
that
area,
trucks
and
stuff
like
that
coming
going,
I
don't
want
this
to
turn
into
a
situation
where
I'm
all
a
sudden.
In
argument
with
my
neighbors,
with
the
way
it's
zoned
another
question
that
was
brought
up
to
be
said
to
the
west
of
the
north,
half
of
that
to
the
east,
also
to
the
block
to
the
south
to
the
west
and
the
East
are
all
commercial
properties
right
now
they
look
like
houses,
but
they
are
actually
businesses.
A
one
cleaning
is
actually
kitty-corner
on
each
one.
K
K
If
it's
because
somebody's
trying
to
sell
the
buy
a
house
I,
don't
feel
that's
a
reason
to
rezone,
it
I
think
they
should
come
up
the
funds
a
different
way
to
do
it
like
I,
said
I,
don't
want
to
be
in
a
battle
down
that
alleyway
right
behind
my
business.
Many
same
ways
come
and
go
and
that's
how
my
customers
come
through
my
lot.
I
just
don't
want
the
confrontation.
I
know,
there's
other
situations
in
town.
We
got
commercial
next
to
residential
and
it's
a
battle
all
the
time
and
let
alone
word
light
industry.
K
I
L
It's
just
what's
fair
for
all
you
know
is
one
thing
and
and
I
am
concerned
about
the
mix
of
it's
it's
the
old
scenario
of
somebody
moving
next
to
the
airport
and
then
complaining
because
there's
too
many
airplanes
are
too
much
noise
and
that's
that's
my
concern
and
I.
Think
I
think
that
part
of
town
would
would
eventually
be
a
nice
commercial,
small
business
district
I
think
it's
an
extension.
B
M
And
the
realtor
4c
persons
that
owned
it
and
they
have
an
offer
on
it
from
another
realtor
in
town,
asleep,
Erickson,
but
and
they're
a
cash
buyer
and
their
concern
is
that
when
C,
they
want
to
beautify
that
the
neighborhood,
because
that
home
is
maintenance,
deferred
all
the
way,
and
so
when
they
his
buyers
come
in,
they
they
actually
fix
it
up.
So
it's
quite
nice
and.
M
It's
where's,
your
sunglasses
keep
going
so
the
issue
is
a
cash.
Buyer
can
do
what
they
want,
they
can
buy
it,
they
can
fix
it
up
and
they
can
do
anything.
But
if
it
burns
down-
and
there
is
a
rebuild
letter
on
this-
and
that's
not
the
correct
terminology
and
I-
did
get
that
four
leaf
spires,
but
the
bank
rejected
it
because
if
it
burns
down-
and
even
though,
with
this
letter
it's
supposed
to
be
solid
with
the
banks,
but
it's
always
the
banks
that
say
no.
We
don't
like
that
letter
anymore.
B
Rezoning
it
to
residential
when
it's
commercial
and
a
commercial
area
and
is
already
commercial
businesses
there
and
people
who
are
conducting
their
businesses.
You
know
trying
to
do
the
right
thing
and
then
all
of
a
sudden,
you
know
plop
a
residential
district
in
there,
and
then
you
know
the
issues
that
perhaps
would
ensue
with
that.
M
Though
and
I
talked
to,
the
knee,
I
was
given
a
list
of
the
neighbors
to
approach
the
ones
that
are
commercial
or
staying
commercial
and
they
only
had
the
one
and
it
was
the
lenders
and
they
have
that
a-one
cleaning
service.
They
want
to
stay
commercial
and
they're
just
down
a
couple
houses
plus
they
have
a
one
across
the
street,
so
they
want
to
stay
commercial.
So
they
we
took
their
name
off
the
off
the
petition
and
the
other
ones
always
wanted
their
home
residential.
B
E
B
They
were
concerns
of
be
able
being
able
to
connect
their
businesses
without
objection
or
interference
or
or
complaints.
If
you
will
from
people
who
you
know,
you
know
now
have
residential
his
own
house
there,
which
is
basically
all
it's.
This
is
financial
driven
I
mean
with
respect
to
a
bank
loan
or
financing
and.
M
I
think
when,
as
a
Realtor,
we
educate
our
buyers,
they
would
know
that
they're
buying
a
house
right
next
door
to
a
commercial.
So
they
would
it's
our
job
to
educate
people.
They
would
know
that
it's
a
possibility
of
more
noise,
so
they,
if
they're
against
it,
they
should
move
it
to
another
neighborhood.
N
N
N
B
N
Okay,
I
understand,
I,
think
these
people
are
protected
by
the
law
and
soar.
The
residential
people,
so
they've
got
the
right
to
conduct
under
their
zoning.
These
people
have
the
right
to
live
there.
The
real
reason
they
want
to
buy
that
house
is
to
make
it
a
nice
place
and
make
it
nice
and
they're
going
to
live
there
for
an
extended
period.
They
say,
but
they
also
buy
homes
in
watertown,
make
them
better
and
then
move
on
to
the
next
one,
but
I
believe
they
live
in
them
for
a
few
years.
N
B
L
L
J
L
L
B
L
Was
just
something
that
bothered
me
that
didn't
sit
right
and
I
just
to
me
that
house
I
definitely
agree
with
the
Aesop's.
It
needs
to
be
I've,
remodeled,
two
houses
on
West
Kemp,
and
you
see
how
I
remodel
them
and
that's
how
that
one
should
be
remodeled,
probably
and
something
else
put
in
there.
Maybe
but
I
totally
agree
that
it's
an
eyesore
I
walk
by
it
quite
a
bit
and
I'd
like
to
see
something
done
with
it.
But
I
don't
know
that
changing
it
to
come
to
residential
answer.
So
there
again
I
think
I'm
done.
L
B
M
On
well
when
I
started,
this
I
was
told
to
go
to
the
treasurer
and
ask
about
the
taxes,
because
I
thought,
if
people
are
going
to
ask
me
I,
should
have
an
answer
and
they
said
they
look
at
all
these
homes
that
are
zoned
commercial.
They
text
them
as
residential,
so
they'd
stay,
the
same
they'd
be
residential
they'd,
be
whatever
they
are
now,
whatever
their
taxes
are,
as
what
their
taxes
would
continue
to
be.
That's
what
they
told
me
at
the
treasurer's
office,
yeah.
F
O
Mark
Myron,
nothing
to
do
with
utilities
and
I,
don't
even
have
a
horse
in
this
race,
but
I
have
a
comment.
I
hear
all
the
time
at
these
meetings,
how
you
guys
want
to
keep
a
buffer
between
our
two
to
see
to
industrial
and
now
by
rezoning,
this
residential
you're,
putting
residential
right
next
to
industrial.
I
To
say
I
was
you
know:
gonna
go
along
those
lines
before
mark
got
up
and
spoke
in
the
past,
with,
with
our
to
a
I,
mean,
there's
a
reason
why
the
we
don't
allow
it
to
be
petitioned
for
those
are
hard
Lots
for
us
to
work
with.
We
see
a
lot
of
variances
with
those
and
we
saw
with
the
variances
tonight
even
and
then
to
do
it,
like
you,
said,
a
hodgepodge
here
where
it's
a
couple
on
both
sides
of
Street.
I
It
puts
us
right
next
to
some
industrial
property
along
with
kind
of
in
the
middle
of
commercial
and
not
to
mention
you
know,
the
application
is
actually
to
go
to
our
three
which,
if,
if
we
act
as
being
requested,
there's
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
set
back
issues
and
furnitures,
which
makes
it
hard
for
me
to
to
want
to
change
that
scene,
seeing
those
those
issues
that
will
be
created.
But
those
are
just
my
thoughts,
I
guess
the
members
of
the
board.
B
B
No,
you
know
in
in,
in
my
view,
for
if
we're
going
to
try
to
continue
to
apply
as
consistently
as
we've
had
to
or
try
to
again
for
the
over
overall
approach
to
you
know,
Community,
Planning
and,
and
you
know,
common
sense,
growth
and
so
and
so
forth.
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
things
I'm
struggling
with
with
this
thing
again
with
I
totally
get
why
you
know
they've
want
to
do
that
and
I
totally
understand
the
financing
and
totally
understand
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors.
I
A
B
F
F
B
F
I
And
I
would
agree
with
what
staff
member
Jill
said
that
you
know
when
you
do
get
a
lot
of
variances.
You
want
to
rezone
to
the
appropriate
thing,
but
the
the
c3
we'll
still
heard
that
the
r3
will
still
get
a
lot
of
variances
because
of
the
setbacks
that
it
has
the
only
way
we
could
get
around
some
of
those
variants.
I
Requesters
is
if,
instead
of
acting
on
what
is
petitioned
to
us,
if
we
were
to
choose
to
use
our
authority
as
planned,
commission
members
and
initiate
this
rezoning
on
our
own,
so
I
guess
it's
and
then,
although
we've
just
talked
about
it
a
little
bit
and
hold
something
you
know,
it
may
not.
I
feel
that
initiating
a
reason
when
it's
not
a
half
block
or
full
block
isn't
consistent
with
how
we've
initiated
our
to
a
properties
in
the
past
I.