►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 12 16 2019 Part 2
Description
Agenda Items include the second reading of Ordinance No. 19-16, 19-17 and 19-18 as well as Resolution No. 19-54, 19-55, 19-56 and 19-57. Also included is the approval of a five-year lease agreement.
A
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
item
number
six
approval
of
resolution,
number
19
54,
approving
the
extension
of
present
boundaries
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
South,
Dakota
and
annexation
of
a
contiguous
tract
of
land
to
be
known
as
done
2nd
edition
motion
by
y
and
a
second
by
l'olam
and
we'll
begin
this
with
a
little
rundown
by
heat
and
then
I'll
open.
The
public
hearing.
B
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
mayor.
This
is
the
resolution
to
annex
the
property
that
was
just
discussed
thoroughly
as
far
as
the
zoning
to
c3
same
same
property
limits,
we're
talking
about
as
last
action
and
we'd
entertain.
Any
questions
pertaining
to
this
item
to
know
if
this
was
recommended
by
approval
by
the
Planning
Commission
by
a
vote
of
7
to
0.
In
regard
specifically
to
the
annexation
motion,
all.
A
Right,
thank
you.
I'll
go
ahead
and
open
the
public
hearing.
If
anyone
is
here
to
speak
about
this
item,
please
come
forward
see
no
one
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
entertain
discussion
from
the
council.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
about
this?
We
just
spent
a
long
time
debating
how
to
zone
this
once
it's
annexed,
not
seeing
any
questions
so
I'll
call
for
vote
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
A
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item.
7
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
19
16,
a
zoning
text,
amendment
to
chapter
20,
one
point:
zero:
five:
establishment
of
districts
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
amending
the
overlay
district
list
to
include
the
Det
downtown
overlay
district
motion
by
l'olam
in
a
second
by
manty
and
I,
would
like
Heath
to
explain
this
Thank.
B
You
mayor
this
is
the
second
reading
and
as
discussed
on
the
first
reading,
this
is
kind
of
a
housekeeping
item
pertaining
to
the
downtown
overlay
district
that
was
recently
created
in
the
creation
of
that
district.
It
was
simply
mitad
from
the
list
of
districts
in
the
zoning
ordinance
and
that's
what
this
action
will
do
is
add
it
to
that
list
of
zoning
districts.
Overlay
districts
in
the
zoning
ordinance
Thank.
A
C
A
Opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item.
8
is
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
19.
There
17
zoning
text,
amendment
to
chapter
21,
point
3
to
light
industrial
district
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
allowing
caretakers
residences
from
a
permitted
use
to
a
conditional
use,
a
motion
by
l'olam
and
a
second
by
Helene
and
like
Heath,
to
explain
this
to
us.
Thank.
B
B
Some
of
the
thought
and
logic
behind
this
at
the
staff
level
and
with
the
Planning
Commission
agreed
on
is
that
this
is
a
kind
of
a
life
safety
component
where
we
felt
it
was
appropriate
that
the
BOA
have
a
check
off
on
any
residences
in
our
I
want
district
for
the
conditional
use
process
and
help
prevent
any
residency
from
being
taken
up
without
the
emergency
responders.
Knowledge
of
that
so
that'd
be
way.
Action
would
then
theoretically
have
a
process
in
place.
B
A
D
B
Good
question,
councilman,
l'olam
I
believe
it
is
spread
at
several
locations
throughout
you
know,
there's
there's
a
good
focus
of
it.
Excuse
me
in
the
southern
part
of
town
kind
of
south
of
highway
212
and
as
you
go
out
east
and
on
the
far
east
side
of
town
there's
a
large
area
of
Iowa
out
there.
I
do
have
the
zoning
map
on
my
computer.
If,
if
you
care
to
see
that
pulled
up
on
the
screen.
D
D
A
A
E
D
D
F
A
G
B
You
mayor,
the
owner
of
the
property
Terrax
South
Dakota
incorporated,
has
submitted
a
petition
to
vacate
a
portion
of
the
30-foot
dedicated
right
away
that
currently
exists
and
separates
two
parcels
that
are
owned
by
Terrax.
The
right-of-way
is
currently
unimproved
and
there
are
no
utilities
within
it.
The
abutting
parcels
on
each
side
of
the
right
away
are
currently
under
the
same
ownership.
The
parcels
would
need
to
be
plaited
in
the
future,
for
a
building
permit
issuance
I
believe
they're
just
legally
described
at
this
point
on
platted
parcels.
B
The
parcels
would
not
be
affected
from
the
proposed
vacation
as
they
do
have
sufficient
frontage
onto
21st
Street
Southwest.
So
we
would
not
be
vacating
it
right
away
that
they
would,
while
always
had
access
to
or
needed
access
to,
because
they
do
have
that
access
on
a
21st,
Street
Southwest
that
currently
exists.
B
A
A
F
B
The
simple
answer
that
counts
monville
hours,
that
they
were
not
privy
as
one
of
the
applicants
to
the
to
the
vacate,
the
city
didn't
the
city
staff
I,
should
say
excuse
me-
did
not
see
it
necessary
to
require
them
being
one
of
the
applicants
for
the
vacate.
Okay,
we
think
that
there
is
maybe
even
for
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
discussion.
B
We
think
there
is
warrants
to
keep
that
strip
of
right
away
depending
on
how
those
properties
of
the
East
would
sell
or
develop,
because
the
southerly
portion
of
those
easterly
properties
does
not
a
but
a
public
right
away.
That
strip
to
the
east
is
the
only
portion
of
right
away
that
they
do
abut,
so
it
might
be
worthy
of
keeping
that
right
away
to
the
east,
at
least
for
the
time
being.
Okay,
thank
you
and.
A
H
C
A
B
So,
as
you
heard
in
the
public
works
committee
meeting
this
evening,
a
demonstration
or
discussion
I
should
say
on
the
lake
confess
Kumasi
plan
final
draft,
our
consultants,
confluence
and
idge
are
with
us
here
this
evening.
Jonathan
s
of
representing
those
two
companies
that
work
closely
with
us
and
with
Lake
Camp
Asaka
master
plan.
Study
Group
that
was
established.
I
would
also
like
to
recognize
Roger
foot.
B
He
was
our
project
manager
in
house
on
this
project
and
he's
here
as
well
this
evening,
but
we've
gone
through
a
presentation
with
the
Planning
Commission
level
presentation
now
at
the
council,
Public
Works
Committee
meeting
and
we've
got
the
final
draft
before
the
council,
and
this
is
just
a
formal
action
item
to
adopt
this
plan.
I
would
remind
the
council,
it's
not
a
formal
adoption
in
the
sense
of
the
comprehensive
land
use
plan,
but
more
the
adoption
of
a
steering
document
or
a
guide
document,
as
is
our
master
transportation
plans
or
things
of
that
nature.
B
D
It's
a
very
in-depth
document.
Hopefully
you
know
I
know
that
we
don't
have
a
chance
to
go
through
it
at
the
council
level,
but
if
they
watch
the
previous
meaning
they
would
be
able
to
go
through.
There's
some
very
big
items
in
there
potential
that
we
can
do,
and
hopefully
we
can
start
moving
forward
with
some
of
those.
But
if
you
look
at
it's
a
very
labor
/
financial
investment
that
would
have
to
be
done
to
it.
G
You
I
just
wanted
to
say:
I
read
it
I
really
liked
it
I
thought
that
they
did
a
very
good
job
taking
in
a
lot
of
considerations.
Even
they
took
questions
that
were
directly
confrontational
against
what
they
were
doing
and
they
answered
them
in
a
very
level-headed,
very
thoughtful
process.
I
applaud
them
for
that
I've
always
wanted
a
master
plan
at
Camp
Eska.
We
finally
got
one
I
will
just
say
in
lieu
of
the
conversation
that
we
had
earlier
tonight.
F
I
We're
always
available
for
result.
No
with
the
approval
of
this
yeah
that
ends
our
our
formal
work.
Obviously,
we're
gonna
be
accessible
for
updates
to
graphics,
continued
coordination
with
Public
Works
and
with
Roger,
so
I,
don't
consider
I,
consider
our
contractual
work
to
be
done,
but
you
know
these
types
of
plans
there's
always
some
ongoing
that
continues.
D
E
J
A
F
J
Thank
You
mayor
this
is
the
second
reading
of
the
budget
supplement
ordinance.
This
is
something
that
we
tend
to
have
to
do
every
year.
At
this
time
the
supplements
are
2019.
Budget
I
did
run
through
all
the
numbers.
At
the
first
reading
there
was
two
minor
changes
to
it.
There
was
a
couple
other
contract
items
that
were
caught
so
I
will
just
cover
those.
The
first
one
is
in
the
street
department
under
the
general
fund,
the
street
improvements,
which
is
actually
our
special
assessments.
J
There
was
an
additional
ten
thousand
dollars
needed,
so
that
went
from
eighty
thousand
and
ninety
thousand.
That
is
an
assessment
project
and
then
the
other
thing
is
under
the
capital
improvement
sales
tax
Fund.
For
the
miscellaneous
storm
sewer
project,
there
was
a
12,000
dollar
increased
necessary
for
an
IgG
contract
that
was
for
design.
So
those
are
the
only
changes
from
the
first
reading
very
minor
changes.
So
this
does
supplement
the
2019
budget.
I
do
want
to
point
out
again
that
there
is
quite
a
hefty
addition
under
the
snow
removal
fingers
still
crossed.
J
J
Take
a
while
we're
still
actually
in
the
process
of
going
over
there
right
now,
I
know
working
with
Chris
the
assistant
finance
officer
and
there
we're
making
sure
all
the
timesheets
and
all
that
ties
out.
So
it's
quite
a
process
it
we
won't
see
it
until
probably
I
would
say
almost
the
end
of
mid
to
end
it
2020.
Okay,.
F
A
couple
of
comments,
I
raised
the
point
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
It
seems
it
seems
like
a
like
a
lot.
They
were
making
an
additional
appropriation
for
I.
Guess.
I
would
like
to
say
two
things.
One
is
you
say:
it's
indispensable
functions
and
I
mean
that
that
is
a
true
statement
for
my
understanding
of
what
this
and
secondly,
most
of
these
items
were
items
that
we
had
discussed
at
some
point
throughout
the
year
and
a
weight
in
sauce.
J
Is
correct
and
I
will
point
out
that
a
number
of
the
ones
in
the
general
fund
were
also
because
of
donations
that
were
taken
in
the
next
two
items
are
allowable
to
do
because
of
the
grant
and
the
insurance
aspect.
But
a
lot
of
these
other
ones
were
coming
we're
donation,
so
the
money
was
there
and
thus
the
it
was
spent.
K
B
B
That
being
said,
you
know
I.
We
have
not
looked
at.
At
least
the
engineering
office
has
not
looked
at
pricing,
those
out
to
purchase
any
that
cost
does
get
paid
for
by
the
Corps
of
Engineers.
It's
still
taxpayers
money,
that's
getting
utilized
for
that
expense
at
the
federal
level,
so
I
do
acknowledge
that,
but
no
we
have
not
estimated
any
cost
for
purchasing
those
I.
J
A
J
Add
something
to
that
piece
too,
with
the
flood
supplies
and
materials,
the
majority
of
that
is
actually
the
rental
for
all
the
pumps
for
the
lift
stations
and
so
I
would
I.
Think
almost
80,000
is
for
those
the
generator
for
the
pumps.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
one
that
we
can
really
probably
get
away
from,
because
I
think
I
think
Mike
brought
in
like
23
to
make
sure
that
the
pumps
were
we're
going
though
I
did
want
to
clarify
that
right.
A
I
A
J
Thank
You
mayor:
this
is
what
we
call
an
automatic
supplement.
This
is
where,
throughout
the
year,
the
different
departments
have
received
grant
funding
and
then
in
turn
spent
what
it
was
for.
It's
kind
of
all
shown
there.
If
there's
any
specific
questions,
I
can
try
to
answer
them,
but
these
all
would
have
went
through
that
same
normal
process
to
where
they
were
authorized
to
apply
authorized
to
accept
the
award,
and
basically
this
is
where
we
said
to
make
the
the
numbers
work
at
the
end
of
the
year.
Thank.
A
J
Thank
you
Mir.
This
one
is
one
that
we
don't
actually
often
see,
but
this
is
also
considered
an
automatic
supplement.
This
is
for
I
think
if
everybody
remembers
our
large
hail
claim.
Some
of
this
work
is
finally
getting
completed
just
due
to
the
weather
and
the
timing.
So
the
majority
well,
not
the
majority.
All
of
it
is
for
the
roof,
repairs
that
were
necessary
throughout
the
city
in
the
different
parks
facilities.
J
So
the
total
there
does
come
to
143,
143
thousand
seven
hundred
thirty-five
dollars
and
I
know
Terry
Kelly
is
here.
If
there's
any
specific
questions,
the
majority
of
this
work
is
completed.
A
little
bit
of
this
was
put
into
the
Capitol
aspect
and
potentially
will
be
carried
over
into
2020
I.
Think
there's
a
couple,
roofs
that
just
timing-wise
didn't
fit
into
the
schedule
to
be
completed,
but
this
supplements
the
budget
in
the
revenue
was.
K
A
Signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Kristen
item
12
is
approval
of
resolution
number
19
56
authorizing
the
mayor
to
sign
the
bridge
improvement,
grant
big
application
for
the
third
Avenue
Northwest
bridge
replacement
project
number
1706,
have
a
motion
by
Albertson
and
a
second
by
y
and
I
would
like
Heath
to
tell
us
about
this.
One
Thank.
B
You
mayor,
our
consultant
engineering
design
group
IDG
from
right
here
in
Watertown,
is
assisting
the
city
and
applying
for
a
bridge
improvement
grant
for
the
third
Avenue
Northwest
bridge.
Several
of
you
are
very
familiar
with
this.
With
this
grant
application
process,
you've
seen
this
grant
application
come
in
front
of
you
in
2017
to
assist
with
engineering
cost.
Unfortunately,
at
that
time
we
were
not
awarded
that
grant.
B
We
have
since
anticipated,
applying
in
2020
with
a
complete
set
of
design
plans,
and
you,
some
of
you
may
remember
that
discussion
from
last
year
as
well,
however,
our
design
consultant
idg
was
tasked
with
addressing
a
technical
memo
from
the
d-o-t
that
required
them
to
do
some
further
investigation
and
ask
our
analysis
what
that
did
by
meeting
those
requirements
that
the
d-o-t
required
of
us.
It
did
push
back
the
final
design,
the
completion
of
the
design
work,
so
we're
faced
with
today,
where
we're
at
is.
B
If
you
approve
this
application
for
the
grant,
we
will
submit
that
by
the
January
2nd
deadline.
The
will
go
through
the
approval
process
that
the
do
team
that's
out
in
peer
and
our
bridge
score
this
year
is
sitting
at
fifty
two
point:
seven.
For
now
there
are
no
guarantees,
of
course,
but
that
is
a
very
high
score
in
comparison
to
some
of
the
bridges
that
were
awarded
funding
last
year.
So
the
consultant
and
staff
feel
that
we're
sitting
fairly
favorable
to
receive
a
grant
now
through
this
process.
B
If
that
is
awarded,
I
believe
which
comes
out
in
May
timeline.
Is
that
ready,
minister
April
May?
If
we
are
awarded
what
we
would?
What
then
would
happen
is
we
would
proceed
down?
The
d-o-t
path
of
their
process
is
to
continue
to
review
and
approve
the
final
plans
and
then
go
through
the
bidding
process
with
the
d-o-t,
and
that
would
happen
sometime
in
fall
of
2020.
B
So
what,
unfortunately
we're
at
today,
we
had
programmed
this
thing
and
budgeted
for
it
to
start
construction
in
2020.
But
the
timeline
now
looks
like
that's
going
to
get
a
sled
because
of
that
delay
and
the
necessary
delay
in
the
completion
of
the
final
design
that
construction
is
going
to
get
slid
into
2021,
but
also
to
know
we
just
completed
our
bridge
inspection
report
from
2019.
B
This
structure
was
one
of
those
that
was
analyzed
this
last
year
on
our
annual
bridge
inspections,
Vanessa
performed
that
work,
and
you
know
we're
happy
to
report
that
the
bridge
is
structurally
sufficient
to
provide
another
year
of
service
to
the
community.
There
aren't
any
concerns
with
that
in
mind,
keeping
it
posted
with
the
weight
limits
that
are
out
there
right
now.
We
do
feel
it
is
adequately
structurally
to
get
us
through
another
year.
All.
E
If
this
is
slated
for
2021
to
be
reconstructed,
that's
also
when
highway
212
will
be
reconstructed.
The
other
half
correct,
and
with
this
being
one
of
two
are,
you
know
a
major
artery
through
Watertown
third
Avenue
into
twelve?
Do
we
see
any
conflicts
there
with
traffic
flow
through
Watertown?
Well,.
A
The
with
212
being
diverted
yes,
I
mean
there's,
it
would
be
unfortunate,
but
there's
enough
routes
around
the
traffic
wouldn't
have
been
routed
up
to
third,
four
to
twelve
it'll
take
another
row:
it's
probably
fourth
Avenue
South,
and
so
you
don't
think
that'd
be
a
huge
impact.
Do
you
want
to
comment
on
the
heat?
No.
B
One
I
would
agree
with
that
with
that
mindset
that
I
think
that
the
detour
outing
with
or
without
the
third
construction,
probably
would
have
contemplated
third
to
begin
with
so
I
think
you're
on
the
right
track.
There
I
don't
know
Vanessa
if
you
have
any
other
thoughts
to
that
as
far
as
impacts
with
the
2/12
work
going
on
in
Phase,
two.
C
M
N
L
A
A
L
You
mayor
in
August,
the
council
approved
a
ground
lease
at
the
airport
with
GM
our
Aviation.
The
original
lease
contemplated
that
the
lessee
would
be
utilizing,
4500
square
feet
of
space
at
the
airport.
Our
leases
are
based
on
the
square
footage
footprint
that
they
utilize
for
their
building
and
they
change
their
mind
essentially
can
reduce
the
square
footage
of
their
building
to
3,600
square
feet.
So
this
addendum
reflects
3,600
square
foot,
building
60
by
60,
rather
than
4,500
square
feet
60
by
75.
As
the
original
lease
stated
all.
D
L
So
these
are
the
ones
where
the
private,
the
private
owners
build
their
own
building.
So
if
you
know
they
bill
it
to
the
spec
that
they
need
and
if
there's
room
for
us
to
lease
it
to
them,
then
we
do
so
so
I
I
think
there's
two
others
that
have
3,600
square
feet
but,
like
I,
said
Yost
Aviation's
is
ten
thousand
four
hundred
square
feet,
just
Huff
top
of
my
head
I
know:
there's
la
TI's
is
a
number
that's
escaping
me,
but
it's
not
3,600
square
feet,
okay,
larger
than
that.
So.
L
P
A
J
Thank
You
mayor
before
you
is
the
airport
liability
insurance.
This
comes
at
this
time.
Every
year,
with
this
authorization,
I
will
do
the
special
check
at
the
very
first
date
of
the
year.
I
will
say
that
it
was
quite
a
quite
a
jump
from
the
previous
one
about
$1,700
increase
with
that
being
said,
I
know,
part
of
the
attachment
that
was
sent
and
attached
to
the
agenda
goes
over
kind
of
what
the
airport
insurance
is
looking
like
and
that
it's
going
up
all
over.
So
we
are
part
of
that
group.
J
J
J
D
J
J
D
J
J
K
A
M
Thank
you,
mayor
and
members
of
council
well
I'm
here
tonight
to
ask
permission
to
replace
a
ambulance
that
unfortunately,
was
a
total
loss
on
November
26th
on
a
inter-facility
transfer
on
the
interstate.
Fortunately
enough,
patient
and
and
our
medic
crew
were
fine
during
that
accident,
but
we
did
have
a
total
loss
because
the
ambulance
actually
went
kind
of
airborne
and
into
the
median
and
actually
bent
the
frame.
The
the
appraisal
value
on
that
ambulance
is
around
$13,000
the
cost
to
fix.
It
was
most
double
that
so
they
did.
M
The
adjuster
did
a
total
loss
on
that
ambulance,
so
I'm
here
tonight
to
ask
for
replacement
dollars.
Those
dollars
would
come
from
a
supplement
in
2020
after
the
ambulance
is
delivered
in
march/april
range
at
some
point,
so
that'll
be
a
212
supplement
that
would
happen,
for
we
did
have
this
actually
appropriated
in
2021
long-term
capital
funds
of
of
$200,000,
so
I
kind
of
go
through
the
quote:
tab
that
you
see
up
there
on
the
screen
there.
This
would
be
through
our
same
company
that
we
buy
the
ambulance
from
it
is
a
remount
ambulance
brew.
M
The
the
ambulance
company
Horton
actually
manufactures
these
in
Ohio,
but
the
company
that
does
a
remount
is
in
North
Carolina,
so
this
amulets
will
be
put
on
the
flatbed
taken
to
North
Carolina
right
real
shortly.
Actually,
if
it's
approved
here,
the
cost
to
remount
the
ambulance
is
142.
984
thousand,
we
do
have
equipment.
That's
on
this
ambulance.
It
was
a
2009,
so
it
was
going
to
be
in
that
10
year
range
already
for
replacement,
along
with
the
equipment
and
with
the
the
$200,000
that
was
part
of
the
equipment
cost
as
well,
and
the
equipment
costs.
M
Are
the
life
pack
cardiac
monitor
it's
the
power
cot.
It's
the
stair,
tread
stretchers,
so
you're
talking
around
fifty
two
thousand
dollars
in
equipment
that
goes
on
this
essential,
life-saving
ambulance.
The
digital
radio
is
in
that
3200
range,
with
a
grand
total
of
198
thousand
nine
hundred
thirty-four
dollars.
So
again,
like
I
said
this
does
come
with
that
appropriated
funds
that
we
were
going
to
be
using
the
21
one
thing
I'll
add
is
the
next
ambulance
will
not
be
replaced
again
until
2023
I
was
wondering
the
next
one
will
be
Reed
replaced
so
that.
M
M
M
D
J
I
will
say
the
piece
that
is
nice
is
this
will
come
out
of
fun,
212
and
not
the
general
fund,
which
can
sustain
this
and
with
it
not
then
being
purchased
in
2021.
It's
not
such
a
significant
jump.
It
was
pretty
much
already
planned
in
2021,
so
we
should
be
okay
and
this
action
that
you're
giving
tonight
is
just
gives
Donn
the
authority
to
go
ahead
and
get
it
ordered.
So
I
will
be
coming
back
to
you,
probably
in
January
February,
to
supplement
that
budget
right
away
so
that
it's
just
not
forgotten
until
December
Kristin.
E
M
Sometimes
what
we
do
is
we
try
to
work
with
Lake
area
tech,
the
mid
fire
program
where
they're
able
to
utilize
some
of
this.
But
again
they
don't
even
want
some
of
the
ten
plus
your
old
equipment
cause.
They
knew.
You
know
the
medics
that
are
learning
they
need
to
have
up-to-date
equipment
as
well.
So
sometimes
we
use
it
for
training
if
we
can,
but,
generally
speaking,
there's
no
value
to
that
Josh.
So.
P
A
D
Q
You
mayor
so
I'm
very
excited
to
announce
that
we
have
offered
and
the
candidate
has
accepted
and
signed
a
potential
salary
of
forty,
two
thousand
eight
hundred
and
twenty
seven
dollars
and
twenty
cents.
So
she's
excited.
We
had
a
great
round
of
candidates.
We
had
about
twenty
applicants,
we
ended
up
interviewing
six
of
them.
It
was
a
very
tough
choice,
but
I
think
we
made
the
right
decision.
Q
L
A
N
The
risk
of,
let
me
tell
a
quick
story:
first
I
got
to
finish
the
story
with
Don's
ambulance
and
the
sliding
on
the
road
November
26th
blizzard
down
by
esta
Line.
At
that
same
moment,
we
were
delivering
a
baby
over
the
phone
at
her
residence
in
Estill,
and
one
of
the
dispatchers
was
only
by
sheer
luck.
N
Don
ended
up
having
to
ALS,
you
know
advanced
medic
crews
near
esta
line
and
because
that
second
crew
was
there,
they
assisted
in
the
delivery
of
the
baby
at
her
residence
and
s
line
that
family
wasn't
getting
to
the
hospital
in
Watertown.
So
it
was
kind
of
a
win.
The
ditch
yes,
but
they
had
two
crews
right
outside
ask
the
line
to
help
deliver
a
baby.
So.
D
R
So
just
real
quick,
as
you
know,
we
had
some
retirements
this
year
and
so
I
promoted
Kirk
Alice
to
captain
he's
going
to
talk
to
you
in
a
minute
about
some
vehicles
and
I
asked
Ryan
to
take
over
the
9-1-1
center
for
us
throughout
the
course
of
last
year
towards
the
end
of
last
year.
In
the
beginning
of
this
year
we
had
some
issues
with
staffing
in
there
we
had
to.
We
had
12
full-time
dispatchers
at
one
time,
we're
down
to
11
now,
and
we
have
four
I
believe
it
is
part-timers.
R
Well,
we
lost
one
of
those
and
we
promoted
one
one
position
left
so
Ryan
came
to
me.
He
says
it
just
doesn't.
Look
like
it's
working,
I
suppose
we'll
put
some
numbers
together.
Do
some
studies
visit
with
Kristen
and
let's
go
to
see
what
council
has
to
say
about
it.
So,
let's
see
what
Ryan's
got
to
say
about
it,.
N
We
added
the
12
full-time
positions
back
in
2009
and
since
then,
we've
added
two
part-time
positions
and
then
in
April
of
2018,
one
of
our
longtime
dispatchers
retired,
and
instead
of
filling
that
position
with
a
another
full-time.
Instead
of
continuing
to
go
with
12
full-time
people,
we
brought
on
two
more
part-time
people.
So
as
of
April
two
thousand
eighteen,
we
had
eleven
full-time
in
four
part-time.
N
We
tried
that
for
well
lives
at
about
18
months
now,
maybe
20
months
since
April
of
2018,
we've
essentially
had
a
revolving
door
with
people
staying
for
about
four
months
and
then
leaving
we've
hired
seven
new
part-time
people
since
April
of
2018,
and
they
stay
long
enough
to
almost
get
drained
in
and
then
they
quit.
So
what
we
want
to
do
is
put
it
back
to
the
way
it
was
where
it
was
twelve
full-time
people
and
continue
with
the
two
part-time.
N
So
what
we're
asking
for
is
the
we
want
the
twelfth
full-time
dispatcher
back
and
we
want
to
give
up
the
two
part-time
dispatchers.
This,
according
to
Kristin's
math
at
present,
were
projected
to
have
a
budget
of
eight
hundred
and
twelve
thousand
dollars
in
our
total
personnel
expenses.
This
would
take
that
from
me,
12
up
to
823,
so
it
adds
a
it
adds
about
what
twelve
or
thirteen
thousand
dollars
to
our
our
budget,
but
it's
still
under
the
eight
hundred
and
twenty
eight
thousand
dollars,
that's
allowable
in
our
personnel
line
for
next
year.
N
We
have
three
part-time
positions
right
now.
One
of
those
part-time
positions
has
expressed
no
interest
at
all.
She,
and
in
fact
she
says
she
likes
working
part-time.
Okay,
the
other
two
have
expressed
interest
in
working
full-time,
so
it
wouldn't
necessarily
be
us
terminating
any
any
existing
part-time
people
we
would
most
likely
be.
Of
course
they
would
be
open
to
anybody
that
would
apply,
but
it
makes
logical
sense
that
the
two
people
that
are
fully
trained
in
one
of
those
two
people
would
become
a
full-time.
K
Just
toss
out,
if
we
make
full
time
position,
it's
very
likely
that
we're
gonna
maintain
them
a
lot
longer,
because
just
looking
at
most
hiring
whenever
you
do
part-time
you're,
almost
making
a
loss
in
a
way
just
one
level
of
training
we're
having
to
retrain
somebody
all
the
time
is
a
mess,
so
it
we
can
do
it
right,
get
a
full-time
position.
We've
had
one
in
the
past.
That
sounds
good
to
me.
Defer.
P
P
N
A
mixture
I
think
of
the
schedule
the
shift
schedule
that
they're
being
asked
to
work.
You
know
it
bounces
around.
If
there's
nothing
consistent
about
it,
I
mean
it
is
a
stressful
job.
It's
working
weird
hours
as
you
just
talking
about
with
delivering
babies
over
the
telephone
and
and
much
more
stressful
calls
than
that
and
to
be
thrown
into
that
with
without
it
being
a
true
career
choice.
But
it's
you
know,
maybe
in
a
part-time
position,
it's
more
of
a
hey
I'll.
N
N
J
K
One
more
quick
question:
I
mean
kind
of
speaking
to
the
nature.
It
can
be
a
high-stress
than
my
traumatic
experience,
sometimes
as
a
dispatcher
with
some
of
those
calls
you
get
do
we
do
any
type
of
resiliency
training.
Anything
like
that
to
help
these
individuals
be
able
to
manage
that
stress.
Yes,.
N
Certainly,
in
fact,
we
have
a
critical
incident
stress
management
team
whereby,
after
some
of
these
traumatic
calls,
even
the
dispatchers
are
allowed
to
attend,
along
with
the
officers
and
the
medics
and
and
any
other
first
responders.
You
know,
as
our
frontline
first
response,
trying
to
make
sure
that
they're,
emotionally
and
mentally
healthy
and
fit
to
go
for
work
the
next
day
and
for
years
to
come.
A
All
right
anything
else,
I'll
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you
item.
18
is
approval
of
bids
receive
for
2020
patrol
vehicles,
motion
trooper?
We
have
a
motion
by
law
Lyman,
a
second
by
howleen
and
I.
Think
okay!
Well,.
K
R
I've
asked
Kirk
to
be
the
captain
over
the
our
fleet
and
we've
had:
we've
got
11
market
row,
cars
and
since
he's
come
on
board
he's
come
across
some
efficiencies,
and
so,
when
the
car
bids
come
up,
he
puts
specks
together
he
sent
him
out
and
then
I'll.
Let
him
know
I'll.
Let
him
I
won't
steal
his
thunder
here
I'll.
Let
him
know
how
they
came
in
so.
O
When
we
put
the
vehicles
out
for
bid,
we
got
notified
by
the
Dodge
motor
company
that
they
did
a
limited
release
of
Dodge
Chargers,
so
they
only
opened
the
bidding
process
for
the
Dodge
Chargers
for
a
30-day
window.
If
you
weren't
within
that
30-day
window,
you
could
not
order
or
receive
a
2020
dodge
Church
with
left,
which
left
us
with
no
option
in
in
the
bid
process.
So
I
went
to
Kristen
and
said
we
we've
been
budgeted
for
three
vehicles,
we'd
like
to
switch
it
and
get
two
Ford
Explorers
and
one
Dodge
pickup.
O
Its
Ford
Explorers
are
about
seven
thousand
seven
hundred
dollars
more
than
a
Dodge
Charger,
and
then
you
have
a
center
console.
It
comes
with
it,
so
we're
asking
for
eight
thousand
dollars
in
supplements,
so
we
can
continue
with
our
three
vehicles
as
planned,
but
we
did
move
on
to
a
Ford
Explorer
right.
O
Reason
for
the
pickup,
as
we
seen
a
need
for
it,
so
we're
going
to
give
it
to
our
run
out
of
our
sergeants
drive
it.
We
do
have
some
trailers
that
we
pull
from
time
to
time.
We
have
some
larger
evidence,
items
stuff
like
that
price
point.
Do
you
be
honest
with
you?
The
Dodge
pickups
are
cheaper
than
the
Ford
Explorers
they're
in
that
mid
$20,000
range,
so
they're
they're
a
viable
option
just.
R
O
Be
a
four-door
the
bids
we
got
as
a
Ford
or
Dodge
pickup,
with
the
RAM
box
for
the
storage
on
the
sides
and
it'll
be
marked
like
patrol
any
other
patrol
vehicle.
It'll
have
interior
lighting,
not
a
light
bar
on
top
and
graphics,
and
everything
like
that,
so
it'll
be
used
for
normal
patrol.
It
just
it'll
have
some
other
abilities
that
we've
never
had
before.
Okay,.
A
E
K
P
P
R
Did
that
was
probably
prior
to
the
Dodgers
becoming
all
wheel
drives?
We
had
some
that
were
rural
Drive
at
the
time
V
sixes,
but
they
went
to
a
Hemi
engine
with
all-wheel
drive
and
there's
been
some
issues
with
those
a
little
bit
along
line
two.
But
we
have
one
left
and
we're
kind
of
hoping
to
maintain
one
car,
because
there's
some
officers
who
prefer
to
drive
a
car
and
we
can
swap
the
equipment,
there's
no
additional
cost.
That
was
what
we
were
going
to
try
to
do
this
year.
I.
K
P
You
know
at
one
point
we
discussed
kind
of
looking
at
the
berms
and
throughout
the
community
to
see
if
there,
if
there
were
areas
that
we
would
be
allowed
to
expand,
to
extend
so
in
lieu
of
any
any
new
flood
problems
that
we
would
have
that
in
place
and
not
have
to
do
as
much
of
that
is
that
something
we've
looked
at
at
all?
We.
A
Have
looked
at
that
and
that
comes
up
every
time.
It's
a
good
question,
but
where
we
can,
we
have
we've
done
it
already
and
the
now
we're
kind
of
stuck
with
regulations.
The
locations
that
we
end
up
raising
temporarily
are
in
locations
that
we
can't
permanently
do
it
for
one
reason
or
another,
but
I
mean
we
could
do
some
things
like
flood
gates
on
the
road
crossings.
A
If
we
that's
pretty
expensive
and
we
haven't
wanted
to
go
there,
but
as
far
as
just
getting
those
berms
raised
up
where
they're,
not
in
a
road
that
we've
done
what
we
can
do
so
any
other
questions
or
new
business,
any
liaison
member
reports,
none
okay,
we
do
have
a
reason
to
go
into
executive
session
pursuant
to
SDC
l1
25,
to
discuss
and
consult
with
legal
counsel
on
contractual
matters
and
personnel
matters,
and
we
do
not
expect
to
take
action
upon
coming
out.
So
look
for
a
motion
for.