►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 7/01/2019
Description
Watertown, SD: City Council Meeting agenda includes a transfer of Retail (on-sale) liquor License, the first readings of Ordinance No. 19-07 and 19-08 as well as Resolution No. 19-28
A
B
Let
us
pray
creator,
god
be
with
all
of
us
who
gather
tonight,
for
this
meeting.
Lead
us
and
guide
us
help
us
to
hear
the
wisdom
of
one
another
in
the
midst
of
it
all
help
us
stay
centered
in
you.
It
is
in
you
that
we
find
our
strength
and
our
Worth
be
with
us.
As
we
begin,
this
meeting
give
us
wisdom
and
courage,
patience
and
ears
to
hear
and
guide
our
words
and
our
actions.
We
root
ourselves
in
your
love.
First
and
always,
may
it
be
so
amen
again.
D
C
D
A
First,
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
consent
agenda
and
I
would
like
to
move
item
9,
which
is
the
council
consideration
to
reject
all
bids
for
the
2019
asphalt
patch
repairs,
project
number
1922
to
the
consent
agenda,
since
that
was
thoroughly
discussed
and
Rec
and
recommended
at
the
committee
meeting.
So
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
as
modified
move
by
Bueller?
Second,
by
l'olam
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item.
Number
two
is
public
comment.
A
Seeing
no
one
will
move
on
item
three
is
approval
of
the
agenda
motion
by
Bill.
How
are
second
by
Bueller
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
signify?
The
same
name
motion
carries
item.
4
is
council
consideration
of
resolution
number
19
27
approving
the
plat
of
Eastwood's
19th
edition,
subject
to
all
planning
requirements.
Look
for
a
motion,
second,
for
approval
of
a
motion
by
Solon.
Second,
by
l'olam
and
we'll
start
the
discussion
mayor.
E
A
A
motion
to
open
this
for
public
comment.
Is
there
a
second
second
motion
by
ville
Hauer,
second,
by
l'olam,
all
that
was
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
I
was
the
post
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
and
we
will
open
this
for
a
public
comment
and
I
would
like
the
first
comment
to
come
from
our
city
engineer:
Heath,
Vaughn
I.
Would
you
please
explain
the
project
absolutely.
F
Madam
mayor
members
of
council,
excuse
me
the
application
for
you
tonight
is
an
application
for
a
plat
of
brought
to
you
by
the
petitioners,
joy,
Nelson
and
Peggy
algún.
They
have
submitted
a
plat
of
Eastwood's
19th
edition.
This
is
following
the
preliminary
plan,
which
was
acted
upon
by
the
plan
Commission
on
June
20th
2019.
The
plat
is
the
plat
of
Eastwood's.
19Th
edition
will
create
ten
conforming
Lots
designated
as
r2
single-family
attached,
residential
district,
a
development
agreement,
an
agreement
for
the
construction
of
maintenance
of
the
private
road
and
a
stormwater
best
management
practice.
F
Development
agreement
are
included
as
supplemental
action
items
after
the
pending
approval
of
this
plat.
The
Planning
Commission
recommended
approval
at
the
June
20th
meeting
by
a
unanimous
vote
of
six
to
zero
for
the
approval
of
the
plat
I
do
have
a
the
plat
pulled
up
on
my
screen
if
Ray
would
wish
to
pull
that
up,
and
that
is
the
plaited
area
that
we
you're
considering
this
evening
and
the
ten
Lots
associated
with
it.
They
anticipate
developing
twin
homes
on
here
on
each
one
of
these
Lots.
F
A
Right,
thank
you.
So
the
the
council
has
just
had
a
lesson
in
parliamentary
procedure
and
so
I
hope
you'll
be
patient
with
us
as
we
try
to
do
things
correctly
in
line
with
Robert's
Rules
of
Order,
and
in
doing
that,
I
would
like
to
invite
the
public
to
come
forward
I'm
going
to
ask
for
those
in
favor
of
approving
the
plat
to
come,
and
then
those
against
can
come.
A
We'll
alternate
back
and
forth
and
I'll
actually
give
another
time
for
those
just
asking
a
question
or
making
a
comment
not
pro
or
con,
so
that
we
have
disbursement
throughout
the
conversation
of
those
in
favor
or
against
approval
of
the
plat.
So
I
will
start
out
by
inviting
anyone
who
is
here
in
favor.
That
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
approving
the
plat
to
come
forward.
G
Okay,
Mike
Tanner,
1279,
Sheree
Drive
northeast
in
Watertown
and
I
can't
say
that
I'm
either
for
or
against
the
the
plat
I
guess,
because
well
I'm,
not
anti
development
and
I'm,
not
against,
what's
being
proposed
here.
I
spoke
at
length
about
this
at
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
My
concern
is
a
long-standing
issue
that
we've
had
in
our
neighborhood,
as
it
relates
to
drainage
and
I
invited
Don
and
Glen
and
Reed
Helene
out
to
see
it
firsthand
last
week.
G
We
have
a
drainage,
ditch
a
channel
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
correct
wording
would
be.
That's
kind
of
where
the
cursor
is
there,
there's
seven
tenths
of
a
foot
of
elevation
change
along
there,
so
virtually
none.
There
are
tall,
reeds
and
cattails
growing.
In
there
a
garbage
collects
in
there.
It's
always
wet.
It
looks
bad
in
the
summertime
it
gets
sludgy
and
mossy
and
green.
In
there
it
looks
bad.
G
I
think
joy
will
build
nice
homes
back
there
and
I
think
it
will
be
a
good
fit
for
our
neighborhood.
So
we're
not
anti
development,
we're
here
again
tonight
to
talk
about
a
long-standing
drainage
problem,
all
of
the
water
from
this
plat
it's
going
to
flow
south,
that's
how
the
the
the
land
is
graded
toward
this
channel,
or
this
ditch
that
doesn't
drain,
and
we
just
have
concerns
over
how
it's
going
to
affect
our
backyards.
G
Our
neighborhoods,
my
shed
this
spring
when
everything
the
snow
and
everything
melted
off
my
shed
in
my
backyard,
was
a
lake
I
didn't
get
water
in
my
house,
but
I
had
water
at
least
probably
ankle-deep
or
more
in
my
entire
backyard,
and
my
sump
pump
was
running
all
the
time
and
all
of
our
sump
pumps
run
all
the
time
they
never
stopped
and
I
guess.
The
reason
that
I'm
here
talking
again
tonight
is
because
we've
been
working
on
trying
to
get
a
solution
to
this
drainage
problem.
G
Do
I
have
a
cursor
here
where
I
can?
Okay,
this
channel
right
here
yep
that
one
right
there
right
where
cherry
drive
takes
that
curve
toward
the
east.
There,
a
culvert
runs
underneath
there
all
of
the
water
from
the
east
drains
to
that
channel
and
the
channel
does
not
drain
I
looked
at
the
culvert.
Today
we
had
about
two
inches
of
rain
in
Watertown,
so
the
culvert
is
full
of
standing.
G
Water
culverts
are
designed
to
move
water
to
get
it
flowing
and
every
time
I
look
in
that
culvert,
there's
water,
that's
just
standing
there
and
Sarah
wrote
in
her
email
that
the
culvert
being
too
low
is
a
mystery
rod.
Deyoung
told
me
years
ago
that
it
was
accidentally
installed
too
low,
which
resulted
in
over
excavation
of
the
channel
downstream
to
make
it
flow.
So
this
is
a
man-made
problem
here.
G
I
know:
Heath
talks
about
the
history
of
of
drainage
in
this
area
dating
back
to
aerial
photos
from
the
early
2000s,
where
everything
drains
from
from
east
to
west
and
I
get
that.
But
the
problem
we're
dealing
with
when
you've
got
a
culvert
that
was
installed
too
low,
which
resulted
in
over
excavation
of
the
channel
downstream
to
make
it
flow.
That's
a
man-made
problem
and
it's
a
problem
that
we
have
been
imploring:
City
Hall,
to
fix
for
almost
five
years,
and
we
can't
get
anything
done
Sarah.
G
When
you
ran
for
mayor,
you
had
a
meeting
at
the
picnic
shelter
at
Eastwood's
Park,
and
you
told
us
that
you
recognized
this
was
a
problem
and
it
was
going
to
be
fixed,
and
here
we
are
five
years
later
and
nothing
has
been
done.
We've
been
told
over
and
over
again
it's
going
to
be
fixed.
I've
got
a
letter
here
from
Shane
Waterman
dated
October
5th
2015.
G
The
city
has
appropriated
funding
for
the
drainage
project
in
the
2016
budget.
Unfortunately,
this
means
construction
will
not
start
until
next
summer,
2017
that
came
and
went
18
came
and
went
here.
We
are
19,
nothing's
been
done.
The
city
is
working
with
an
engineering
consultant
on
the
pipe
/
tile
design.
Now,
when
I
read
that
pipe
and
tile
I
thought
good,
they're
gonna
do
something
to
move
the
water
and
solve
this
problem
with
pipe
and
tile.
G
Well,
then,
I
go
back
to
Sara's
email
from
yesterday
and
she
says
I'm
in
favor
of
beautifying
this
channel
to
make
it
less
objectionable
to
the
neighbors,
but
I
would
not
recommend
implying
that
we
can
do
more
than
that.
So
now
we're
talking
about
maybe
an
aesthetic
change,
but
not
fixing
the
problem
so
again,
I'm
not
anti
development.
I
I
told
the
Planning
Commission
were
not
snobby.
People
up
there
will
be
good,
neighbors
and
I
know.
G
Joy
will
build
a
nice
development
that
the
city
and
we
can
be
proud
of,
but
you
keep
building
up
there
without
fixing
this
problem
and
at
some
point
you
got
to
deal
with
it
or
you're.
Gonna
have
a
major
mess
on
your
hand.
The
other
thing
I
will
point
out
is
on
the
plat.
Can
we
pull
the
plat
back
up
again
on
the
southeast
corner?
I,
don't
know
if
I
have
a
cursor
here,
but
on
the
southeast
corner
of
the
development.
G
If
that
channel
problem
doesn't
get
fixed,
you
could
not
pick
a
worse
place
to
pile
snow
than
right
there
and
I
know
because
they
see
it
out
my
back
window
every
single
day,
so
I'm
not
opposed
to
the
plat
will
be
good,
neighbors
and
and
I
think
we're
all
resigned
to
the
fact
that
that
this
is
going
to
get
approved,
which
is
fine,
but
man
at
some
point
before
you
keep
building
over
and
over
and
over
up
there
you've
got
to
address
this
problem.
We've
been
knocking
on
your
door
since
2015
Sara.
G
When
you're
the
city
engineer,
we
had
a
meeting
upstairs
with
then
mayor,
Thorson
Don
was
there
Mike.
Was
there
us
and
engineering?
Was
there
everybody
recognized?
We
got
a
problem,
we're
gonna
work
on
this
and
get
it
fixed.
That
was
almost
five
years
ago
and
we
keep
building
and
nothing
gets
done.
So
fine
go
ahead
and
approve
the
plat,
but
I
guess
what
I
would
like
to
know
and
I'll
I'll
close
by
saying
I
guess
I
would
like
to
know
from
the
mayor
and/or
the
city
engineer
what
the
plan
is
to
fix
this.
G
You
folks
are
supposed
to
be
responsive
to
the
people
that
put
you
in
office
and
elect
you
it's
time.
It's
overdue
fine!
Do
this
development
and
expand
your
property
tax
base
and
make
the
city
look
better
and
create
more
housing
options
for
people?
That's
all
fine
and
I'm,
not
against
that
our
neighbors
aren't
against
that.
But
please
fix
this
at
some
point.
It's
got
to
get
done.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
Mike
I
would
like
to
address
some
of
the
things
that
you
said.
First
of
all,
you
didn't
read
the
entire
message
that
I
sent
out
loud
and
when
I
say
Mysteries,
because
I
truly
don't
know
how
the
culvert
elevation
was
set
and
I
didn't
know
how
much
too
low
it
was,
but
rod
too
young
later
said,
it's
only
a
matter
of
a
few
hundredths
of
a
foot
which
is
just
inches.
That
really
won't
make
an
appreciable
difference
at
all.
In
the
grade.
It's
a
flat
area
and
the
mystery
part
of
it
is
I.
A
A
Okay,
so
it
that's
the
mystery
part
of
it.
The
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
that
the
situation
exists
now
and
fix
is
not
a
word.
I
ever
used.
I
certainly
have
empathy
for
you.
I
I
do
I
understand
the
issue
that
you're
dealing
with
and
it
you
know
you
don't
like
it
and
I
don't
blame
you,
but
to
fix
it
is.
A
We
would
dry
that
up
and
we
would
have
to
mitigate
the
loss
of
that
wetland
to
the
tune
of
well.
We've
created
a
wetland,
and
it
doesn't
matter
it
exists
today.
What
we
would
dry
up
has
to
be
mitigated
at
a
four
to
one
ratio.
So,
in
other
words,
if
we
remove
one
acre
of
wetland,
we
have
to
create
four
acres
of
wetlands
somewhere
else
at
taxpayer.
A
Expense
and
I
I,
just
like
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
is
not
enough
to
pay
for
that,
and
it
won't
dry
it
up
to
change
the
grade
on
that
channel
because
everyone,
including
the
people
who
don't
like
that
behind
their
homes,
pump,
like
you,
said,
24/7
groundwater
out
of
the
ground
to
the
surface.
That
will
never
be
dry
as
long
as
there
are
houses
above
it
until
if
we
put
that
in
under
drainpipe
and
have
everybody
directly
tied
to
it,
we
could
do
that.
A
But
the
pro
is
that's
the
least
expensive
alternative
and
the
best
alternative
for
water
quality
control,
because
the
natural
wetland
exists
and
is
exacerbated
by
the
fact
that
everyone's
pumping
groundwater
to
the
surface,
there's
ample
habitat
for
wetland
plants
and
animals,
and
they
exist
there
and
that's
actually
good
for
water
quality.
It's
good
for
the
environment,
a
concrete
line
channel
or
a
pipe
under
the
ground
is
not
good
for
water
quality
and
it's
also
extremely
more
expensive
to
put
it
in
a
pipe
and
put
it
underground
and
dry.
It
up
like
the
neighbors
would
like.
A
But
the
fact
of
the
matter
is:
if
we
don't
put
that
in
a
pipe
that
everyone
connects
their
sump
to,
it
will
always
be
wet
because
people
pump
groundwater
to
the
surface
24/7.
We
had
a
recent
council
meeting
where
we
discussed
that
so
fix
is
not
a
word.
I
used
mitigate
is
a
word.
I
have
used
and
try
to
make
it
better,
but
I
have
never
claimed
that
we
would
dry
that
up
because
I
know
that's
not
in
our
budget
and
it's
probably
not
no
sorry,
Mike
I'm,
I'm
gonna
have
to
call
procedure
here.
G
One
question:
if
you
can't
fix
it,
why
do
you
keep
allowing
more
building
permits
east
of
that
channel
and
keep
exacerbating
the
problem?
If
it's
a
problem,
I
can
fix
you
keep
it.
I
mean
there,
there's
a
single-family
home,
that's
being
built
by
East
River
homes
right
now,
that's
under
construction
right
on
that
corner,
where
cherry
bends
across
the
street
Heilmann
is
building
more.
A
What
we
can
do,
we
can't
tell
those
people
to
stop
pumping
because
they
have
building
permits
the
city
issued
them
and
the
city
was
entirely
within
its
rights
to
do
so,
and
those
people
who
own
the
property.
Just
like
your
property,
you
pump
groundwater,
it's
the
problem
is
throughout
our
town
and
so
we're
recognizing
that
and-
and
we
can
change
things
moving
forward
so
that
we
have
dry
neighborhoods
but
to
go
into
a
neighborhood
which
has
this
condition
today
and
try
to
dry
it
up.
It's
just
not
cost-effective
and
and
I'm.
A
A
In
a
when
I
say
we
I
mean
the
City
Council,
probably
about
the
year
2001
I
think
was
when
they
decided
to
start
purchasing
the
land
for
that
purpose.
So
the
city
was
entirely
within
its
rights
to
use
that
land
in
that
way
and
I
I
can't
that
there's
any
fault
here
that
needs
to
be
fixed.
It's
it's
a
condition
that
exists
that
people
don't
like.
True
it's
a
nuisance
and
if
I
thought
this
were
a
flood
risk,
it
would
be
a
wholly
different
story.
A
But
this
is
a
nuisance
and
nuisances,
unfortunately
take
a
backseat
to
critical
issues
of
infrastructure,
failure
or
flood
control
in
those
sort
of
matters
which
need
immediate
attention.
And
so
that's
why
it
hasn't
been
done.
I
mean
we
do
have
the
money
in
the
budget.
We
want
to
make
this
more
appealing
and
not
everybody
hates
wetlands,
some
people
actually
like
them,
and
so,
if
we
can
make
it
a
little
bit
more
amenable,
it
would
still
perform
its
function
so,
and
that
was
a
lot
of
words,
but
anyway,
I
do
appreciate
your
concerns.
A
H
Connie
Johnson
1298
cherry
drive.
We
have
been
in
that
neighborhood
since
1996
before
anybody
ever
had
homes
there,
so
I
think
I
can
speak
for
what
the
water
has
done
and
where
it's
been
and
where
it's
going
and
I
can
tell
you
this
and
I'm
I'm
gonna
try
to
just
be
objective
here,
not
one
way
or
the
other
there's
more
water
up
there
now
than
there
ever
has
been,
and
it
doesn't
go
away.
H
It
used
to
go
away,
and
what's
really
sad
to
me
is
that
this
is
a
new
neighborhood
in
town
and
it
has
been
allowed
to
have
roads
that
are
constantly
the
curb.
Has
water
in
them,
because
people
are
running
sump
pumps,
all
the
time,
I
get
that
they
need
to
do
that,
but
the
water
is
there
all
the
time
it
doesn't
go
anywhere.
I
used
to
I
mean
I.
H
I
walked
that
area
a
lot
where,
when
it
used
to
be
corn
and
beans,
and
all
that
that
water
wasn't
there
and
so
I
can
say
that
just
from
observation
and
I
can
speak
to
what
they're
saying
is
I
agree
with
it's
an
issue
and
I
don't
understand.
I
guess
why
we
allow
brand-new
neighborhoods
to
get
this
way.
It's
nice,
it's
a
nice
neighborhood.
So
that
concerns
me.
The
other
concern
I
have-
and
this
is
a
question-
is
with
this
new
development
coming.
H
It
looks
like
it'll,
be
nice
I,
don't
have
any
yes
or
no
Zahn
that
my
concern
is
14th.
Avenue
is
a
half
a
road
there
and
from
19th
Avenue
19th
Street
to
25th
it's
a
half
a
road.
There
have
been
many
times
when
I
come
down:
14th
Avenue
there
you
have
to
move
over
and
because
the
shoulder
is
gravel.
Like
said
it's
only
half
of
a
road,
it's
never
been
developed
as
a
full
road.
H
It
is
when
it
gets
to
those
apartments.
Then
it's
a
full
road
with
kerb
on
both
sides,
but
on
the
north
side
of
the
road
of
14th
Avenue
there.
It
is
not
so
my
concern
there
is
traffic
and
often
times
I'll
be
coming
down.
14Th
Avenue
you
have
to
move
over
and
the
person
that's
coming
to
the
east
feels
like
they're
on
their
half
of
the
road
already,
so
they
don't
really
want
to
move
too
badly
so
and
with
construction.
H
Going
on
I
know
that
there
are
trucks
there
are
trailers,
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
parked
on
those
roads
and
I.
Don't
know
how
you're
going
to
deal
with
that
I
guess!
That's
my
question:
have
you
thought
that
out
ahead
of
time
that
maybe
that's
gonna
be
an
issue
that
you
only
have
half
a
road?
And
now
you
have
ten
more
Lots
20
more
units,
how
many
more
cars
coming
off
onto
half
a
road
there
and
that
traffic?
So
that
would
be
my
question.
Thank
you.
I
I'm,
a
colander
young
from
Austin
engineering
I
just
like
to
make
some
comments
on
the
drainage.
I
know
there
is
some
issues
with
kind
of
the
lower
flows
staying
in
the
channel
there
and
not
making
their
way
downstream.
So
it's
causing
a
nuisance
for
the
neighboring
property
and
we
are
working
with
the
city
as
part
of
our
development
to
incorporate
some
of
the
grading
to
get
the
the
channel.
I
So
it
has
a
better
slope
on
it
to
get
the
water
away
from
the
culvert.
You
know
farther
down
the
drainage
way
and
then
also
the
drainage
areas
for
this
new
development.
We're
actually
going
to
take
2/3
of
the
water
and
out,
let
it
into
the
main
channel
and
the
west
side
of
the
development
instead
of
the
the
east-west
leg
of
the
channel
on
the
south
end,
so
that
should
hopefully
mitigate.
I
You
know
any
concerns
about
drainage
issues
getting
into
that
part
of
the
channel
and
affecting
the
neighboring
property
to
the
south
and
then,
as
far
as
the
snow
removal,
once
this
channel
is
regraded
to
where
it
will
convey
those
flows.
You
know
to
the
main
channel
better
I
think
that
will
alleviate
a
lot
of
the
standing
water.
The
read
growth,
it's
going
to
be
more
more
of
an
issue
with
some
pumps
that
that
type
of
drainage,
I
guess
that's
all
I-
have
Thank.
J
Hi,
my
name
is
jessica:
lissy
I
live
at
1289,
Cherry,
Drive
and
I
was
one
of
the
first
homes
on
Cherry
we
actually
built
over
10
and
Connie's
driveway,
and
that
channel
was
never
there
for
a
whole
year
after
we
built
our
house,
we
moved
in
our
house
and
a
year
later
there
was
a
big
excavator
in
there.
That
was
digging
that
channel
again,
like
Mike,
said
I'm
not
against
developing
that
area,
but
there's
a
problem.
J
You
know
with
the
water
drainage
and
it
doesn't
drain
it's
a
issue
for
my
kids
and
my
husband
were
out
sledding
this
winter
back.
There
and
my
daughter
fell
off
her
sled
and
got
up
and
she
sunk
into
water
of
past
her
knees
and
my
husband
had
to
pull
her
out.
So
not
only
is
it
eyesore
for
us
who
pay
high
top
tax
dollars
in
that
neighborhood,
but
it's
also
a
safety
concern
for
our
kids
that
live
there.
J
Sarah
you
keep
saying
a
nuisance,
and
here
I
have
the
national
plumbing
code
and
in
chapter
11
it
says
that
in
the
case
of
one
and
two
family
dwellings,
stormwater
shall
be
permitted
to
be
discharged
on
flat
areas
such
as
streets
or
lawns,
so
that
so
long
as
the
stormwater
shall
flow
away
from
the
building
and
away
from
adjoining
property
and
shall
not
create
a
nuisance.
We
keep
using
the
words
that
this
is
a
nuisance.
J
So
me,
I,
feel
like
since
2013,
when
it
was
being
dug,
I've
had
open,
ended,
promises
saying
from
Mayor
Thorson
it
was
gonna
get
fixed.
We
have
the
meeting
Sarah
you
ran
off
fixing
that
your
whole.
Basically,
your
whole
complaint
campaign
was
that
you
were
gonna
fix
that,
and
so
again
we
have
concerns
that
it's
never
going
to
get
fixed
and
it's
constantly
creating
a
nuisance
for
the
rest
of
us.
A
Thank
you
and
my
campaign
wasn't
based
on
fixing
that
my
campaign
was
based
upon
enforcing
our
ordinances,
so
that
problems
like
these
don't
arise
in
the
future.
I
mean
it
exists.
Today,
I
can't
wave
a
magic
wand,
it's
going
to
be
extremely
expensive,
and
this
isn't
the
only
place
in
town
where
we
have
this,
although
you're
a
very
vocal
neighborhood,
this
exists
throughout
town
and
other
places
as
well.
So
is
there
anyone
here
who
has
a
comment?
G
A
G
Not
a
question
just
well.
First
of
all,
when
Don
visited,
we
had
a
handshake
agreement
Don.
Maybe
you
can
share
what
we
agreed
upon?
Okay,
but
you
mentioned
Sarah
at
a
council
meeting
last
month
when
we
were
debating
a
variance
to
build
a
house
up
in
that
area
that
when
you
are
in
a
wet
area,
that's
constantly
pumping
water.
Everything
is
wet
and
doesn't
drain.
It
shortens
the
life
span
of
the
infrastructure
in
that
neighborhood
correct.
Yes,.
A
G
Know
how
much
money
you're
spending
sinking
into
the
issues
up
in
Northridge
you're
going
down
the
same
path
again
and
if
you
want
to
spend
money
to
fix
up
a
bunch
of
potholed,
rutted,
junky
streets
and
they're,
already
falling
apart
and
they're
full
of
water
with
potholes
all
the
time.
That's
your
choice,
but
learn
from
what
happened
in
Northridge,
please
and
and
fix
it
and
done.
Maybe
you
can
share
our
handshake
agreement
from
a
couple
of
days
ago.
Thank.
K
I
want
to
acknowledge
the
fact
that
I
think
most
of
us
understand
that
that
the
problems
that
have
arisen,
the
concerns
that
are
out
there,
I,
don't
want
to
vilify
current
staff
I
want
to
make
that
clear,
but
in
terms
of
the
bigger
issue
we
had
a
similar
discussion
here
recently
and
how
we
do
develop
and
specifically
with
water.
One
of
the
first
issues
I
got
when
I
joined.
The
council
was
from
a
citizen
in
Ward
a
who
showed
me
their
house.
K
That
was
perfectly
fine
when
it
was
built,
then,
when
everybody
built
around
and
they
ran
all
the
water
down
to
their
place,
and
now
he
has
a
wet
basement.
So
this
issue
has
been
going
on
a
lot,
not
just
in
Ward
a,
although
it's
very
prevalent
up
there.
So
the
umbrella
issue
is
how
we
develop
in
watertown.
What
things
do
we
need
to
consider
to
mitigate
this
from
happening
in
the
future?
K
K
The
residents
around
there
said
were
not
a
post.
This
developments
actually
a
better
fit
and
I
think
what
was
being
looked
at
before
with
duplexes
versus
putting
big
complexes
in
there
and
it
in
the
the
the
thing
that
was
vetted
pretty
well,
though,
is
and
I'm
looking
if
anybody
heard
differently,
but
they
said
that
development,
if
it's
done
the
way
they're
designed
that
it
won't
cause
or.
F
Councilman
Roby,
madam
mayor,
the
short
answer
to
that
question
is
yes,
it
is
accurate,
based
on
the
calculations
submitted
by
the
consultant
engineer,
Austin
engineering,
that's
working
on
behalf
of
the
developer.
It
is
staffs
responsibility
to
review
those
calculations
to
make
sure
that
they
meet
all
the
design
requirements
of
our
stormwater
runoff
standards
that
we
have
adopted
by
past
councils
and,
in
this
particular
case,
the
additional
runoff
that
this
site
would
be
producing
because
of
the
new
impervious
area,
the
shingles,
the
driveways,
the
rooftops
that
increases
runoff.
K
The
other
point
I
was
going
to
make
on
this-
is
an
agreement.
That's
coming
up
one
of
our
next
agenda
items,
the
stormwater
best
management
practice
development
agreement.
We
don't
have
these
in
every
development.
We
should
I,
don't
believe
the
development
of
East
has
one,
but
this
gives
I
think
some
assurance
that
things
will
be
followed
through
and
there
are
it's
an
agreement
that
says
we're
going
to
do
the
drunk
the
runoff
properly.
Is
that
a
fair
weight
up
to
that's
that?
Yes,.
F
Councilman
Roby,
madam
mayor,
the
it's
called
a
BMP
development
agreement.
That's
the
best
management
practices,
which
is
a
catch
freeze
for
a
detention
pond
or
a
permanent
drainage
structure.
That's
required
to
be
built
in
order
to
mitigate
stormwater,
runoff
and
indeed
in
any
development
within
a
city.
F
K
K
The
I
again,
the
issue
were
voting
on
tonight,
is
to
prove
the
development
or
not.
Okay.
I
do
want
to
make
a
comment
that
I'll
address
what
Mike
said
it
I
did
go
up
there
and
see
with
Mike.
It
was
my
third
trip
to
Cherry
Creek
by
the
way
since
I've
been
on
the
council.
I
brought
it
up
at
some
numerous
occasions,
including
council
meetings.
K
L
You
know:
I
I
lived
on
Grandview
Drive,
built
a
home
over
there
some
years
ago
and
in
the
Cottage
Grove
Park,
which
is
just
south
of
Lincoln's.
Will
they
mitigated
the
runoff
where
they
were
having
a
lot
of
flooding
issues
down
by
the
by
the
high
school
north
of
the
high
school
in
the
junior
high
area,
and
that
was
done
with
burns
and
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
real
sure
about
the
elevation
here,
but
what
they
did?
L
Well,
you
probably
know
Heath
you've
probably
seen
that
by
now,
but
they
actually
did
excavate
that
so
it
would
hold
water,
and
then
there
were
culverts
place
that
would
meter
that
water
out
I
don't
know
if
there
I'm
not
saying
that.
That
would
be
the
thing
to
do
in
that
exact
spot.
But
there
may
be
other
areas
that
you
could
mitigate
that
runoff
because
that's
they
had
to
do.
They
had
to
do
it
clear
up
because
of
Northridge
because
of
the
way
that
was
set
up
years
and
years
ago.
L
All
that
runoff
ended
up
down
there
and
it
flooded
all
those
areas
in
that
little
Creek
area.
You
know,
is
there
a
potential
I
mean
it's
something.
We
should
absolutely
take
a
look
at
and
see
if
the
elevations
are
correct
to
do
that
where
it
would
retain,
and
it
allows
the
absorption
of
that
water
and
it
would
have
to
obviously
be
dug
out
to
a
certain
point-
that's
exactly
what
they
did
with
those
berms
in
Cottage,
Grove,
Park
and
I'm,
telling
you
what
it
worked
like.
M
A
A
Requesting
that's
up
to
the
council
if
you
would
grant
that
or
not
if,
if
you
say
no
they'll
have
to
haul
their
snow
out,
because
there's
no
room
on
their
site
for
snow
storage
and
you
know
private
roads
there.
That's
a
private
road
public
roads
have
a
Boulevard
within
the
right-of-way
where
the
snow
is
stacked.
This
development
doesn't
have
that
kind
of
space.
So
do.
A
Like
city,
no
I
I,
don't
know
of
any
other
agreement
like
that,
but
it's
not
to
say
that
we
couldn't
write
an
agreement
here
and
I've
suggested
that
it
be
a
revocable
agreement,
which
means
if
it
causes
a
problem
in
the
future.
The
city
can
say:
well,
we
changed
their
mind
with
no
repercussions.
It's
our
property,
we're
allowing
you
to
do
that
and
I'm
not
sure
this
would
cause
any
kind
of
a
problem.
But
if
councilmembers
think
that
this
would
be
a
problem,
then
well.
M
A
Well,
the
amount
of
runoff
that
you
get
from
a
pile
of
snow
is
it's
deceiving
us
it's
not
great,
but
it
would
serve
to
cause
the
ground
to
be
wet
as
long
as
the
snow
is
is
there
and
melting,
and
that
might
be
two
weeks.
It
might
be
three
months.
We
we
can't
predict
that,
and
some
years
I
mean
we
had
snow
and
the
snow
pile
one
year
till
into
July.
I
think
that
was
1998,
but
you
know
varies
other
years
it's
gone
by
March,
so
it
was
very
so.
F
Madam
mayor
councilman,
why
subsequent
action
after
this
plat
consideration
would
be
a
private
road
maintenance
agreement
and
within
the
confines
of
the
the
terms
of
that
agreement,
are
spelled
out
the
snow
storage
ability
of
the
developer.
As
the
mayor
indicated,
it
is
a
resettable
right
that
that
we
it's
not
an
perpetuity
that
we
would
allow
that,
but
it
is
a
reasonable
right
that
we
would
give
the
developer
to
store
snow
roughly
in
this
vicinity
right
here.
F
So
that
was
one
of
the
terms
that
we,
as
staff
stipulated
in
the
agreement
to
for
the
council's
contemplation
of
whether
to
allow
the
snow
storage
for
the
developers,
consideration
of
constructing
the
full
10
foot
wide
pathway
along
the
full
extent
of
their
developments
along
14th
Avenue
north.
It
was
one
way
that
I
felt
as
staff
since
I
can't
approve
whether
they
can
stack
snow
on
the
city
property.
One
way
that
I
felt
that
this
might
be
a
unique
situation
and
maybe
perhaps
weren't
the
ability
for
them
to
use
that
a
snow
storage.
E
The
follow-up
to
that
I
remember
watching
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
that
the
motion,
even
though,
was
approved
unanimously.
There
were
a
couple
of
conditions
placed
upon
that
motion.
One
I
think
you've
addressed
fully
with
with
Don's
concerns
about
will
that
development
exacerbate
runoff
into
this
area
and
the
Planning
Commission
was
asking
for
assurance
from
staff
and/or
engineers
involved
that
it
would
not
I
think
you
answered
that
question
a
little
bit
of
gold
when
Don
asked
the
same
question.
E
The
second
condition
on
that
on
that
motion
had
to
do
with
the
store
of
snow
issue
and
I.
Guess
what
I
just
want
to
point
that
out
that
that
was
a
concern
enough
of
the
Planning
Commission
that
there
was
a
condition
placed
upon
that
motion
so
that
we
would
so
that
we
don't
ignore
or-
or
you
know
you
know,
lessen
the
the
concern
that
was
expressed
about
the
snow
storage.
I,
don't
know
what
the
options
are,
but
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
that
was
a
concern.
E
The
Planning
Commission
did
place
upon
their
motion
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
just
in
general
I've
been
on
the
council
for
four
years.
One
of
my
very
first
meetings
in
fall
of
2015
this
issue
came
up.
I
mean
I
feel
for
folks
up,
you
know
Mike,
you
showed
us
around.
Like
you
said
last
week,
when
we
were
up
there
and
I,
you
know
I
empathize
with
you.
E
Unfortunately,
it's
not
the
issue
that
we're
dealing
with
directly
tonight.
We
need
to
stay
on
on
task
with
that,
as
far
as
approving
or
disapproving
the
Platt
for
the
Vela
pant,
but
this
is
something
that
does
need
ongoing
attention,
not
only
in
your
aired
with
what,
throughout
the
city
like
like
Don,
pointed
out
a
few
minutes
ago
that
we've
made
some
mistakes
in
the
past
I
hope
we
can
learn
from
them
what
the
fix
is
or
how
we
mitigate
it.
I
don't
know
at
this
point,
but
relative
to
the
the
what's
up
before
us
tonight.
E
A
A
There
are
certain
rights
that
people
have
when
they
own
property
and
if
they
are
following
our
rules
and
complying
in
every
sense,
it's
really
difficult
for
the
city
not
to
approve
a
development,
and
that
could
be
seen
as
a
taking
and
so
the
city
tries
to
accommodate
as
much
as
possible
and
being
responsible
and
I
would
like
to
reiterate.
I
believe
the
staff
has
done
this.
So
we
have
pretty
stringent
drainage
requirements
for
any
development.
So
I'm
going
to
ask
the
City
Engineer
to
respond
to
a
series
of
questions
about
this
development
and
Heath.
F
F
And
I
appreciate
that
question
because
allows
me
to
go
into
a
little
bit
of
a
background
behind
this
particular
drainage
basin.
This
is
a
tributary
basin
to
what
we
would
call
the
Willow
Creek
drainage
basin.
We
have
a
drainage
report
on
staff
on
hand
at
staff
here
at
the
engineering
office.
That
recommends
that
the
major
storm
event
in
this
basin
go
undetailed,
the
theory
being
that
the
tributary
is
going
to
the
Willow
Creek
Basin
for
the
major
runoff
event,
100-year
storm
event
get
to
that
basin
and
out
before
the
UPS.
F
The
further
upstream
flows
get
to
the
city,
the
logic
there
is.
We
don't
want
to
detain
these
major
event
flows
and
have
them
arrive
at
the
same
time
as
the
upstream
runoff
and
cause
more
catastrophic
flooding
within
the
community.
So
that
being
said,
this
particular
drainage
basin
is
not
required
to
detain
100-year
storm
event
so
long
as
they
can
show
that
those
flows
can
go
on
detained
without
having
adverse
impacts
to
the
downstream
properties.
That
is
one
of
the
calculations
that
we
went
back
to
the
developers
consultant
on
and
requested
that
they
perform
that
analysis.
F
Interestingly
enough,
the
the
direct
basin
that
this
area
gets
fed
runoff
is
just
shy
of
a
hundred
acres
and
the
calculations
show,
if
that
were
fully
developed
as
residential,
that
this
would
still
convey
the
major
storm
event
without
adverse
impact
downstream.
That's
without
any
consideration
for
any
future
detention
on
those
remaining
acres
to
be
developed.
That
is
strictly
everything
going
on
detained
and
those
flows
contributing
to
both
this
north-south
main
channel
and
to
the
east-west
portion
of
this
channel.
A
What
that
boils
down
to
is
that
we
do
not
expect
that
there
will
be
groundwater
pumped
to
the
surface
from
this
development
that
it
will
be
dry,
except
when
it
rains,
and
then
you'll
have
stormwater
runoff,
but
not
groundwater
pumped
to
the
surface.
If
everyone
in
your
neighborhood
and
upstream
did
that
that
channel
would
be
dry
except
during
a
rain
event,
and
obviously
that's
not
the
case
but
moving
forward
as
in
this
one,
we
believe
this
one
will
comply.
How
about
traffic
do
you?
F
The
subdivision
regulations
I
would
note
that
we
would
definitely
monitor
any
use
of
14th
for
parking
of
construction
trailers
and
things
like
that
to
where
we
would
follow
the
typical
and
customary
standards
of
all
construction
activity
being
contained
on
the
site
and
not
to
impede
traffic
unnecessarily.
That
way
and.
A
F
Madam
mayor,
and
that
is
vetted
through
the
design
review
team
that
the
staff
gets
together
with
the
fire
department,
wastewater
streets,
Department
engineering
planning,
building
services
and
we
review
all
the
design
criteria
that
need
to
be
met
when
it
comes
to
private
streets.
One
in
particular,
is
the
fire
department
and
their
need
for
access
with
the
fire
apparatus
that
they
operate
and
minimum
twenty
eight
foot
wide
street
width
is
provided
on
this
private
street.
That
being
said,
we
have
suggested
to
prohibit
parking
on
the
southerly
portion
or
the
outside.
F
Here's
a
map
of
the
street
configuration
the
westerly
southerly
and
then
over
here
the
easterly
portion.
We
are
requiring
it
no
parking
be
allowed
and
for
that
Rita
because
of
that
we're
able
to
place
the
hydrants
on
that
southerly
side
for
fire
truck
access
and
we're
also
requesting
that
trash
pickup
be
from
that
southerly
side
as
well
to
allow
garbage
truck
access.
A
F
Madam
mayor,
you
know
there
are
a
lot
of
boxes
to
be
checked
when
we've
at
a
subdivision
of
any
kind
through
the
community,
as
with
any
community
and
for
the
reasons
that
these
citizens
have
brought
forth
today
and
it's
imperative
for
us
as
staff
to
do
a
an
objective
review
of
those
Middle's.
And
that's
what
I
feel
we've
done
case.
Thank.
A
N
Is
this
watershed
area
performing
as
it
was
intended
to
twenty
years
ago,
because
I
think
that's
really
important?
We
can,
we
can
say
what
we
like
or
don't
like,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is:
is
it
performing
as
it
was
intended
and
if
it's
not,
then
we
got
to
do
something,
but
if
it
is
then
then
to
me,
that's
a
whole
different
issue
so
that
that
was
my
question
he's.
If
you
wanted
to
just
touch
mayor
what
your
thoughts
were,
cuz
I
know
you
both
responded.
Yeah.
F
F
You,
madam
mayor
councilman
Danforth,
my
from
the
information
that
I've
gathered
here.
I
agree
with
the
citizens,
this
segment
behind
their
house
I'll
zoom
in
on
it
again
here,
is
not
performing
as
expected
and,
as
we've
indicated
in
the
Planning
Commission
meeting,
that's
in
part
due
to
the
excavation
that
occurred
about
through
this
extensity,
much
see
it
on
this
aerial.
It
ends
about
right
here,
and
what
happened
is
it
was
what
I
would
say
call
were
excavated.
F
He
was
dug
a
little
bit
too
deep
to
where
it
does
not
bail
it
out
and
continually
flow
down
through
into
the
main
channel,
so
the
fix
the
mitigation,
the
correction,
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
that
city
has
been
aiming
to
do
is
to
regrade
this,
like
a
natural
drainage.
Swale,
a
natural
drainage
channel
would
be
really
flow
from
your
two
control
points.
F
Like
the
rest
of
this
main,
north-south
channel
does
with
that,
I
would
also
point
out
really
the
obvious
I
mean
if
you
look
at
this
north-south
channel
and
any
other
natural
drainage
channel
throughout
the
community,
whether
it's
Watertown
or
any
other
community
that
you
go
to
you
do
oftentimes
see
that
these
natural
drainage
channels
have
vegetation.
They
have
cattails,
they
have
Reed's,
sometimes
if
they're
not
managed
or
depending
how
they're
managed
and
how
they
need
to
be
managed.
F
So
that
being
said,
when
you
look
at
the
rest
of
this
channel
and
its
functionality,
we
have
not
received
any
other
calls
as
far
as
backwater.
But
you
know
our
next
choke
point
here.
If
you
will
or
a
control
point
as
far
as
the
flow
goes,
are
the
culverts
underneath
the
street
here
to
the
south
I
believe
this
is
12th
Avenue?
Is
that
correct?
Yes?
F
So
that's
your
next
control
point
that
would
be
of
concern
and
whether
those
are
our
size
and
performing
appropriately
and
I
believe
they
have
been
based
on
the
lack
of
flooding,
concerns
or
issues
like
that
that
we've
received
and
then,
as
you
continue
to
chase
this
further
south
and
downstream,
the
next
consideration
would
be
the
culverts
underneath
I
apologize.
I,
don't
have
this
street
name
memorized
either
channel
10th.
That
makes
it
easy,
and
then
you
know
your
once.
You
get
past
that
point.
It's
open,
channel,
4
they're
out
for
quite
a
distance.
F
A
Would
like
to
add,
though,
that
it's
it's
misleading
when
I
know
that
Austin
engineering
already
embarked
on
a
project
to
improve
the
drainage
and
I
mean
I,
think
they
tried
I,
don't
know
with
that
small
of
elevation
grade
change
throughout
a
channel
and
it's
it's
natural.
It
will
have
ups
and
downs
and
it's
going
to
naturally
create
little
ponds
and
pockets.
A
I
the
fact
that
there's
ground
water
being
pumped
to
the
surface,
even
during
dry
periods,
it's
going
to
be
wet,
no
matter
what,
unless
we
put
a
pipe
in
and
everybody,
including
everybody
along
Cherry,
Drive,
downstream
pipes
directly
to
a
pipe
there's,
some
drainage
that
will
have
water
in
it
all
the
time.
There's
a
lot
of
houses
and
that's
a
considerable
expense
to
go
to
to
dry.
It
up
and
I
already
said
this,
but
then
we
need
to
mitigate
the
loss
of
the
wetland.
A
So
there
there
is
a
cost
benefit
to
trying
to
dry
it
up.
We
can
try
again
to
regrade
the
channel.
I
know
that
I
know
you
don't
know
this
Heath,
but
we
did
try
at
night.
We,
the
developer,
tried
to
do
that.
The
upstream
developer
of
preview
tried
to
do
that
and
they're
just
not
that
much
fall
to
to
make
it
happen.
If
you
want
to
try
again,
I
guess
I'd
be
open
to
that.
A
But
I
don't
want
people
to
think
that
regrading
the
channel
will
dry
it
up
because
it
won't,
and
this
was
purchased
for
drainage
purposes.
It's
serving
drainage
purposes.
Natural
channels
often
have
little
pockets
ponds,
and
so
from
that
perspective,
this
is
functioning
in
the
way
that
we
expected
it
would
when
we
purchased
it.
So
does
that
answer
your
question?
Councilman
Danforth?
A
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments?
Okay,
I'm
gonna,
look
for
action,
then
motion
on
the
table
is
to
approve
the
plat
of
Eastwood's
19th
edition,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
five.
Is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
development
agreement
for
the
plat
of
Eastwood's
19th
edition
and
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval.
D
A
F
You,
madam
mayor
members
of
council,
so
the
development
agreement
correlates
directly
with
the
plat
before
any
plaque
can
be
filed.
The
developers
required
to
either
construct
all
the
public
improvements
or
enter
into
a
development
agreement
with
the
city
that
obligates
them
to
construct
those
public
improvements.
In
this
case,
the
development
agreement
also
includes
the
private
street
that
was
discussed
in
the
previous
action,
but
also
includes
the
necessary
wastewater
sanitary
sewer,
pipe
that
needs
to
be
put
in,
and
the
water
distribution
line.
F
F
Thank
You
councilman
Roby,
madam
mayor,
the
any
changes
to
the
construction
plans,
which
are
the
documents
pending
these
actions
that
we
would
receive
the
construction
plans,
would
outline
the
specific
details
for
the
construction
of
these
public
improvements.
Those
get
vetted
and
reviewed
by
city
staff,
just
like
the
plat
and
the
preliminary
plan
did.
We
want
to
make
sure
the
again
the
streets
are
constructed,
as
outlined
the
wastewater
or
the
sanitary
sewer
and
the
water
distribution
lines
and
the
drainage
components,
the
stormwater
runoff
BMPs
and
then
review
those
construction
plans.
F
What
I
would
do
is
require
that
the
developers
engineers
submit
to
us
an
amended
version
of
the
plan
for
us
to
review
and
approve
now
as
far
as
quantifying
minor
versus
major
changes,
I
think
that's
something
we
would
administrative
lead
aside
on,
if
I
feel
that
something
warranted
to
be
documented
on
a
new
plan
sheet
that
shows
the
amended
design
like
the
change
in
the
street
grade.
For
example,
we
would
require
that
be
submitted
on
a
new
draft
CAD
drafted
document
that
we
would
put
in
the
file
as
an
approved
amendment
to
those
plans.
F
A
This
development
is
somewhat
unique
in
that,
although
there
are
ten
Lots
in
it,
they're
very
little
public
improvements.
Most
of
the
improvements
in
here
are
private
they'll,
be
privately
owned
and
maintained.
We
will
own
the
sewer
and
we
will
own
the
sidewalk
or
the
bike
trail
that's
being
constructed,
but
we
will
not
own
the
road.
D
F
D
And
then
this
is
a
two-year
deal.
My
recommendation
would
be
that
we
have
street
and
sewer
go
out
when
you
guys
do
that
final
on
the
two
years,
it's
City
Engineer
within
two
years
recorded.
So
we
can
do
the
final
approval
that
make
sense
for
final
inspection.
So
we
don't
have
the
same
issues
that
we
had
to
these.
Oh.
F
D
F
That's
exactly
what
we
included
in
here
to
respond
within
I
had
Memphis,
fifteen
or
thirty
days,
so
that
upon
the
developers
engineer,
giving
us
notice
that
the
improvements
are
complete,
we
would
respond
in
a
timely
manner
to
go
out
and
make
that
final
inspection
and
then
take
those
improvements
to
Council
for
a
certification
of
completion,
and
this
is
something
we
did
a
while
back
here
with
with
eighth
Avenue
and
and
then
subsequently
that
would
trigger
the
one-year
warranty
period.
And
then,
at
that
point
we
bring
it
back
to
Council
for
final
acceptance.
Yep.
N
Even
if
there
might
not
be
any
aggravation,
it
would
be
deemed
an
aggravation
and
I
think
it's
a
bad
precedence
when
you
look
at
anybody
else
that
might
have
close
proximity
that
one
might
want
to
store
snow
for
whatever
the
reason
on
city
property.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
seriously
discussed
and
considered.
Okay,.
A
K
A
We'll
address
that
in
a
few
minutes,
anybody
else
have
any
other
comments.
All
right,
I'll
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number.
Six
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
stormwater
best
management
practice
development
agreement
for
the
plat
of
Eastwood's
19th
edition.
So
look
for
a
motion,
second
for
approval
motion
by
Bueller
and
second
by
Roby
and
Heath.
Will
you
please
tell
us
about
this
one?
Yes,.
F
Madam
mayor
members,
council
this
this
agreement
stems
from
our
post-construction
stormwater
BMPs
to
enter
an
agreement
with
the
developer
that
holds
them
responsible
for
the
ownership
and
maintenance
specs
of
any
best
management
practice
that
helps
manage
and
mitigate
stormwater
runoff
from
their
development.
There's
a
lot
of
language
in
the
agreement
that
particularly
relates
to
their
responsibility
to
keep
it
maintained
and
functioning
properly.
So
there
aren't
any
adverse
impacts
from
overflows
or
flooding
of
the
of
the
facility
without
proper
maintenance.
It
gives
the
city
as
I
indicated
earlier.
F
K
Just
kinda
want
to
repeat
what
I
said
earlier,
this
weighed
heavily
in
my
decision.
This
document
I
think
it's
a
great
document.
This
should
be
involved
at
every
development.
We
do
and
I
think
if
you
read
through
it,
what
it
does,
it
gives
recourse
to
the
owners
and
the
neighbors
in
this
case,
if
something
doesn't
perform
the
way
it's
supposed
to
once
the
developer
exits
the
project,
this
travels
with
the
land,
so
it
goes
out
in
this
case
to
the
homeowners
association.
K
A
A
Right,
thank
you
all
the
correction,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
no
mic.
This
is
the
one
item
number
seven.
Is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
an
agreement
for
the
construction
and
maintenance
of
private
road
for
the
plat
of
Eastwood's
19th
addition,
their
motion
for
approval,
move
by
councilman
bill,
Hauer,
second,
by
Councilman,
Danforth
and
Heath?
Would
you
please
describe
this
agreement
and
all
the
conditions
thank.
F
You,
madam
mayor,
this
agreement,
too,
is
part
of
our
subdivision
rating
and
requirements
any
time
a
developer
entertains
building
a
private
road
within
our
community
to
support
their
development.
We
want
to
make
sure
certain
criteria
are
met
to
allow
the
appropriate
ingress
and
egress
to
that
subdivision.
F
Again,
some
of
the
points
I
touched
on
earlier
I
won't
reiterate
them
all,
but
making
sure
it's
of
adequate
with
emergency
responders
and
public
services
have
access
to
and
through
the
roadway.
This
also
obligates
the
developer
or
their
assigns
in
the
future
to
be
financially
responsible
for
any
maintenance
activities
on
this
road
that
includes
snow
removal.
Patching
pavement
replacement
down
the
road,
all
those
aspects
of
ownership
and
maintenance
of
a
road
are
the
responsibility
of
the
developer
or
their
homeowners
association
in
the
future.
F
In
this
case,
I
did
comb
through
this
briefly
I
don't
see
and
I
might
have
missed
it.
But
to
go
back
to
the
question
of
the
repairs
of
the
sanitary
sewer,
it
does
say
that
the
developer
is
responsible
for
general
surface
repairs
and
I
can
continue
to
comb
through
this
after
the
meeting
and
make
sure
the
sanitary
sewer
repair
language
is
explicitly
in
there
if
it's
not
already
but
I.
In
some
ways.
That
goes
without
saying
that
they
are
responsible
for
all
surface
repairs
as
well.
F
A
A
N
A
M
Would
allow
them
to
dump
snow
from
the
roads
on
to
city-owned
property,
would
it
prevent
them
or
stop
them
from
taking
the
site
because
I'm
assuming
it's
HOA,
so
if
they
are
cleaning
the
driveways
and
the
sidewalks?
Can
they
take
and
put
that
snow
on
there
as
well,
in
that
in
the
on
that
city,
the
property
I.
N
I'm
just
going
to
ask
question:
let's
just
go
back
and
let's
say
that
this
is
already
done
and
let's
say
we
had
a
winter
like
we
did
this
year
or
we
had
a
winter
like
we
had
in
ninety
six
or
seven
whatever.
That
was
what
amount
of
snow
would
have
been
there.
What
would
that
look
like
what
kind
of
an
area
and
capacity
can
that
thing
hold,
that
cuz
you've
got
ten
Lots
two
different
driveways,
or
at
least
double
wide
driveways
right
and
everything
else
that
goes
weather,
plus
all
the
roadway?
L
A
F
Madam
Eric,
yes,
if
I
could
point
out
the
intent
behind
the
agreements
and
I'm
sorry
to
backpedal
on
this
one.
But
you
mentioned
the
grading.
The
grading
was
addressed
in
the
development
agreement
and
it
required
the
developer
to
go
into
a
separate
agreement
to
allow
for
the
off-site
grading
on
city
property.
F
The
snow
storage
is
addressed
in
the
private
road
agreement
and
it
also
requires
a
developer
to
enter
into
a
revocable
encroachment
agreement
to
use
the
city's
property
for
snow
storage.
The
terms
of
those
agreements
can
be
outlined
over.
We
wish,
as
you
know,
as
long
as
there
amical
between
the
city
and
the
developer,
and
something
that
I
would
work
out
with
the
city
attorney.
As
far
as
the
terms
we
would
want
to
apply
to
either
one
of
those
agreements.
As
far
as
the
grading
on
city
property
and
the
snow
storage.
A
So
right
now
the
city
mows
all
of
the
private,
all
of
the
public
property
and
is
responsible
for
maintaining
it
and
if
they
grade
it,
they'll
have
fill
and
then
they'll
seat
it
and
the
grass
seed
will
take
and
then
the
city
will
again
be
responsible
for
mowing
and
maintaining
the
differently
sloped
still
public
ground
correct.
That's.
K
Roby
Heath,
my
understanding
is
that
if
they
piled
a
tremendous
amount
of
snow
and
they're
in
a
big
snow
year,
if
it
caused
a
drainage
issue
with
the
ditch
we've
been
talking
about
all
night,
is
there
not
some
coverage
with
the
BMP
on
that?
That
applies
to
that
as
well.
Correct,
because
that's
gonna
be
that's
gonna,
be
you
know
water
runoff,
but
when
it
melts.
F
Yes,
if
I
understand
your
question
correctly,
councilman
Roby,
as
far
as
the
establishment
of
vegetation
on
that
disturbed
area
that
occurs
when
the
site
is
regraded,
they
would
be
responsible
under
their
BMP
requirements
to
make
you
know
the
vegetation
be
established
again,
which
would
help
prevent
sediment
runoff
from
the
snowmelt
I.
Don't
know,
if
that's
the
question
you
were
getting
at
I'm.
F
You
with
your
question
there
and
I
may
have
to
defer
to
the
developers
engineer
without
looking
at
the
contours
right
here.
I
some
of
that
snow
pile
would
likely
flow
unda
tained
to
the
channel.
Some
of
it
may
end
up
in
there
BMP
to
the
north,
depending
on
the
grade
is
left
behind.
In
that
snow
storage
area
is.
F
If
there's
and
that's
where
I'm
saying,
depending
on
how
the
final
grades
were
left
on
this
snow
storage
area,
it
could
be
split
where
the
piles
half
flowing
north,
the
other
half
is
falling
on
detain
to
the
south,
because
I
think
the
grades
will
be
fairly
tight
in
that
area
fairly
flat.
As
far
as
I
know,
it's.
A
O
Yes,
yes,
so
that
as
Heath
mentioned
the
future,
so
this
document
mentions
that
we'll
enter
into
that
revocable
agreement
with
the
developer
and
a
term
of
that
agreement
could
be
setting
some
sort
of
parameters
for
when
we
would
say:
okay,
no
more
snow,
this
season.
If
that's
what
you're?
If
that's,
what
you're
getting
it
I'm,
not
sure
right.
A
M
A
Motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Alright
item
number
8
is
approval
of
invoice
from
Randall
Stanley
architects
Inc
for
additional
services
in
the
amount
of
forty
thousand
forty
seven
dollars
for
the
Ice
Arena
project
and
I'll.
Look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval
motion
by
l'olam
second,
by
Bueller,
okay
and
I
will
describe
what
this
is.
The
Ice
Arena
project
had
apparently
been
approved
before
I
became
mayor
and
I
was
not
aware
of
that.
A
A
One
is
for
a
bill
for
$720
a
councilman,
with
my
permission
called
and
asked
about
the
number
of
parking
spots
that
were
calculated
as
necessary
for
the
Ice
Arena
and
the
architect
build
their
time
in
looking
through
their
records
to
see
what
that
number
was,
and
they
estimated
that
it
cost
them
$700
$720
to
look
that
number
up
for
our
councilman
and
I
objected.
I
said
we
already
paid
for
you
to
do
this
work
I,
don't
think
we
should
have
to
pay
for
it
again,
so
they
did
back
off
on
that.
A
A
It
says
that
if
this
design
isn't
done
by
I
believe
the
date
was
February
of
2018
that
any
work
beyond
that
date
will
be
billed
out
like
this
I
just
didn't
realize
that
was
happening.
So
here
we
go,
but
I
do
think
that
the
work
was
necessary.
There
were
some
problems
with
the
design
that
the
committee
found
and
was
not
happy
with
things
had
to
change
so
had
we
gone
ahead
and
built
the
facility
that
was
designed
before
I
was
mayor,
I,
don't
think
we
would
be
happy
with
it
as
a
community.
A
E
E
A
This
ends
one
phase,
the
preliminary
phase
and
if
we
decide
to
keep
the
location
of
the
Ice
Arena
across
from
the
Softball
Complex,
we'll
move
forward
with
that
and
the
next
stage
of
the
design
will
take
place.
We'll
get
the
dollar
amount
from
the
construction
manager
at
risk
and
we'll
go
into
final
design
and
construction
drawings.
At
this
point,
we
have
an
agreement,
or
that
has
to
happen
with
the
council
to
either
accept
or
not
accept,
building
the
Ice
Arena
at
the
mall
instead
of
at
this
location.
A
A
Other
questions,
their
comments,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
as
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion,
carries
item
number
10
is
update
of
the
concept
budget
for
the
airport
terminal
from
Meade
and
hunt
and
there's
no
action
required
on
this
and
apologize.
You
guys
have
been
waiting
for
a
long
time
so
Todd
sorry,
our
Airport
managers
here
and
will
you
please
do
the
introductions?
Yes,.
P
That's
Larry
Airport
manager.
We
have
Mitch
Walker
with
Mead
Hunt
and
we
have
Michael
Schmidt
with
Helms
engineering,
so
this
was
proposed.
The
airport
board
today
as
a
this,
is
the
final
draft
before
we
send
it
off
to
the
FAA
for
approval
for
the
concept
budget
report
for
the
for
the
water
Sun
Regional
Airport
terminal
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Mitch.
Q
There
we
go
all
right,
Thank,
You
mayor,
thank
you
to
the
council.
Do
we
want
to
hit
some
lights
here?
I
guess:
would
that
make
things
a
little
easier,
yeah,
we'll
just
ride
with
it
all
right,
wonderful,
so
I'm,
Mitch
Walker
with
Mead
and
hunt
first
off
I.
Just
wanted
to
thank
this
is
the
final
draft
of
the
concept
budget
report
that
has
been
now
published
and
will
be
sent
to
the
FAA
I'm
in
all
likelihood
tomorrow.
So
we
wanted
to
provide
counsel
with
a
presentation
on
what
our
findings
were.
Q
I
just
want
to
state
again
that
really
appreciated
the
airport
board.
In
this
process.
They
were
highly
engaged
throughout
the
entire,
the
entire
process,
so
I'll
just
speed.
Through
some
of
this,
we
were
hired
late
last
fall
to
do
a
two-fold
process.
There
was
discretionary
dollars
to
the
tune
of
1
billion
dollars
that
was
additionally
appropriated
by
the
FAA
for
small
town
Airport
development.
Q
What
the
city
wanted
to
do
and
what
Medan
hunt
provided
was
a
very
quick
study
as
to
what
that
what
that
would
cost
for
a
terminal,
a
terminal
study
right
now.
Your
terminal
building
is
over.
Fifty
years
old
and
has
been
added
on
to
a
couple
of
different
times
and
is
showing
its
wear,
so
we
looked
at
that
application.
Last
fall.
We
sent
that
in
we
found
out
in
March.
We
were
not
selected,
although
there
were
only
two
terminal
projects
that
were
selected,
so
it
was
a
pretty
pretty
small
amount.
Q
Step
two
is
to
is
to
provide
a
concept
budget
report
for
future
design
and
construction.
So
this
concept
budget
report
that
I'm
going
to
kind
of
go
through
briefly
today
is
a
requirement
whether
or
not
we're
we
get
supplemental
funding
in
this
fiscal
year.
Nineteen,
no,
the
additional
appropriations
for
the
FAA
was
five
hundred
million
dollars
this
year
and
we
feel
like
we're,
set
up
very
well
to
to
go
after
that
money,
but
again
regardless.
Q
If,
if
we
were
not
selected
for
supplemental
appropriations,
this
concept
budget
report
is
the
first
step
of
a
process
to
build
a
terminal
building
regardless
so
the
and,
if
and
if
we're
not
selected
immediately,
then
that
project
is
slated
for
2021
and
then
I
will
go
through
each
section
again
briefly
as
a
part
of
the
kind
of
set
but
you're
important,
and
then
just
if
there
are
any
questions
throughout
just
please
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand
or
just
blurt
them
out
and
my
goodness,
all
right.
So.
A
A
E
Can
you
I
mean
you,
Scots
are
saying
now:
okay,
we
were
turned
down
only
to
airport
or
only
to
terminal
products
were
approved,
and
then
the
next
sentence.
You
said,
oh
and
now,
we've
there's
500
million
that's
available
and
we're
situated
very
well
something
like
that.
Why
the
confidence
then
or
why
do
you?
How
can
you
say
that,
after
being
rejected
the
last
time
around
well.
Q
First,
off
with
the
1
billion
dollars
or
I
guess
right,
around
800
million
dollars
that
was
appropriated
just
in
in
March
is
when
the
final
notifications
came
out
that
takes
about
that
800
million
dollars
out
of
the
AIP
regardless,
so
so
that,
now
that
money
is
now
available
to
be
used
for
some
potential
discretionary
and
then
and
then
we
also
add
the
500
million
dollars
to
it.
Now,
there's
still
there's
been
discussions
with
the
FAA
that
that
they
understand
the
need
that
Watertown
has
now
that's
something
that
we
can't.
We
can't
lean
on.
P
There's
also
a
billion
dollars
every
year
for
the
next
four
years,
with
the
FAA
reauthorization
bill.
Mr.
Trump
put
into
effect
last
year,
the
being
the
five-year
longest-running
FAA
reauthorization
bill,
reauthorization
bill
since
the
80s.
So
with
that
there's
a
billion
dollars
every
year
for
supplemental
airport
improvement
projects.
Oh.
Q
Thanks
dad
so
this
is,
we
first
go
into
data
collection,
which
involves
terminal
inventory
and
then
forecasting
so
right
now.
This
is
an
area
of
the
terminal
area.
As
we
see
it,
we
focused
on
the
entry,
drive
the
loop
road
and
then
the
terminal
area
which
would
be
parking
areas,
the
terminal
building
itself
and
then
the
airfield
apron
where
the
aircraft
park.
Q
Q
Q
One
is
just
overall,
you
have
a
incredibly
small,
Airport
terminal
building
that
can
be
seen
just
today
when
there
were,
there
were
two
flights,
one
of
which
was
I
Rob's
or
irregular
operations
due
to
a
delay
out
of
Denver
that
resulted
in
two
aircraft
being
on
the
ground
and
the
people
that
were
in
that
facility.
Just
there,
it
was
over
capacity.
There
were
no
seats
in
the
pre
secured
area
as
well.
Q
Secondly,
amenities
and
and
I'll
get
these
as
just
very
basic.
Your
post,
secure,
hold
room,
only
has
one
toilet,
one
unisex
toilet.
So
once
you
go
through
security,
there's
just
one
unisex
toilet.
That
toilet
also
provides
a
secondary
use
as
the
TSA
private
screening
area,
which
is
just
not
ideal
for
anyone.
If
you,
if
you
require
additional
private
screening,
it
not
not
a
great
situation,
the
and
really
what
happens
when
it
comes
down
to
is
that
this
facility
is
just
not
equipped
to
handle
post
9-11
security.
Q
The
TSA
line
basically
encroaches
all
the
way
into
the
hold
room
area
so
much
so
that
what
they,
what
they
end
up
doing
operationally,
is
open
up
the
hold
room
area,
start
screening
passengers
through
and
then
have
a
gate
agent
there
to
already
just
assure
people
out
to
the
aircraft.
So
there's
not
a
lot
of
wait
time
in
that
hold
room,
which
is
it's
just
not
ideal
from
a
stress
standpoint
or
just
operationally.
Q
Q
What
ends
up
happening
is
you
have
people
who
are
trying
to
get
on
a
on
the
aircraft
or
go
through
TSA
in
the
exact
same
Q
line
as
people
who
are
actually
landing
in
Watertown
and
those
people
who
are
landing
in
Watertown
are
standing
in
the
exact
same
Q
line
waiting
for
their
bags
to
come
across.
That's
that
silver
roll-up
door
behind
all
of
those
people.
That's
not
even
taken
into
account
the
fact
that
this
is
a
meet
or
greeter
area,
so
you
would
want
to
have
families
and
people
waiting
for
their
loved
ones.
Q
Q
This
is
the
only
vending
machine
it
has
so
no
concessions,
really
no
gift
shop,
news
and
gifts,
the
the
apron
area
actually
slopes
into
the
terminal.
So
we're
talking
about
grading
quite
a
bit.
This
is
also
another
problem
that
we
have
we're.
You
know
on
a
significant
rainfall
that
hold
room
area
will
just
become
wet
today
again
as
well.
We
had
roof
leaks
in
a
couple
of
locations
within
the
terminal
building
and
then
baggage
makeup
area.
Q
Right
now
you
only
have
you're
only
able
to
screen
bags
by
actually
opening
them
up
and
individually,
swabbing
them
and
and
when
those
bags
stack
up
when
a
lot
of
people
check
luggage
that
becomes
a
real
problem
just
from
a
space
standpoint.
This
is
the
existing
terminal.
Building.
This
is
about
10,000
square
feet
also
includes
airport
admin
and
a
conference
room
as
well
as
FAA,
our
CEO
or
tech
ops.
Q
This
is
10,000
square
feet.
What
we
have
found
in
our
studies
based
on
industry
standards
and
and
the
employment
peak,
our
employment
numbers,
you
would
be
eligible
for
about
24,000
square
feet,
so
you're
well,
under
half
normal
size,
I'm
going
to
go
through
this
very
briefly
forecasting
models.
You've
seen
this
before
this
is
the
catchment
area
that
we
would
see
for
people
would
fly
from
this
catchment
area
out
of
Watertown.
Oh
it's
unique
about
this.
Q
Is
it
also
includes
up
towards
the
Aberdeen
area,
because
Watertown
flies
direct
to
Denver
and
then
also
next
month,
direct
to
Chicago,
whereas
Aberdeen
flies
just
to
Minneapolis?
Overall
there's
about
a
hundred
and
forty
five
thousand
people
that
fall
within
the
catchment
area?
Now
the
catchment
area
level
of
service
breeds
leakage
and
that's
kind
of
what
we
would
say
here,
the
level
of
service
or
just
the
facility
itself.
Q
It
kind
of
allows
for
leakage
to
other
airports
other
surrounding
airports
and
what
we
want
to
do
is
provide
the
facilities
and
the
rely
reliable
air
service
that
you
have
with
United
right
now
to
keep
those
passengers
flying
out
of
Watertown.
This
is
a
this.
Is
the
preferred
employment
forecast,
I'm,
just
gonna
focus
on
the
two
columns
to
the
right.
The
TAF
is
the
terminal
area
forecast,
that's
approved
by
the
FAA.
Now
you
can
see,
your
number
has
been
stagnant
and
has
been
has
been
stagnant
for
quite
a
while.
Q
That's
the
FAA
approved
number,
but
it's.
It
looks
like
that
because
of
again
past
unreliable
air
service,
where
you've
had
kind
of
a
roller
coaster
and
how
you're
in
planeman
civ
doing
right
now
your
employment
s--
are
through
the
roof.
It
is
really
incredible.
The
additional
air
service
model
that
you
see
directly
to
the
left
of
that
is
in
all
likelihood
what
your
number
could
look
like
now.
Q
I
state
this
because
you've
been
I,
guess
blowing
out
the
TAF
here
far
far
in
a
way,
but
we
still
want
to
use
that
Taft
number
as
our
general
design
guide,
because
we
don't
have
the
historic
data
to
back
that
up,
and
so
we
can't
really
battle
the
FAA
on
that
just
yet
until
we
have
more
data.
What
is
important
to
note
here
is
that
employments
themselves
don't
provide
us,
the
the
data
points
to
size
and
airport
terminal.
What
does
that
is
called
peak
hour
and
plane
passengers
so
peak
hour
in
plane?
Q
Passengers
are
exactly
what
it
is.
It's
within
a
peak
hour
of
your
operating
day.
How
many
people
would
pass
through
your
Airport
terminal
that
number
based
on
our
design
aircraft,
which
is
a
737-800
or
two
rj?
Seven
hundredths,
which
is
almost
what
you
had
today,
he
had
two
rj5
two
hundreds
that
provides
us
with
a
peak
hour
and
plane
passenger
design,
number
of
a
hundred
and
six
passengers,
and
I
just
wanted
to
state
here.
I
was
at
the
event
last
week,
having
United
operated
by
Sky
West
with
in
Watertown
is
just
great.
Q
You
can
see
with
the
three-month
in
plane.
Mints
have
been
up
114
percent
from
the
same
period.
Last
year,
when
I
was
speaking
with
people
at
the
airport
terminal
listed
today,
almost
everyone
I
spoke
to
was
actually
using
Denver.
As
a
connection
point,
we
always
state
that
these
that
these
airports
are
actually
connecting.
You
know
the
city
of
Watertown
to
the
world.
Q
Q
I
will
not
spend
too
much
time
on
this.
Just
note
that
we've
highlighted
that
peak
our
number
of
100,
which
is
our
design
guide
number.
These
are
these
are
sort
of
general
program
requirements
and
I
guess
I
would
note
just
when
you're
flipping
through
the
concept
budget
report
yourself
that
the
existing
the
existing
facility,
a
square
footage
numbers
are
in
that
first
column
to
the
left.
Q
Q
That
posed
a
problem
twofold.
The
building
has
just
reached
the
end
of
its
useful
life.
Roofing
is
is
leaking
currently
today,
even
building
systems
are
old
and
outdated.
It
doesn't
provide
the
opportunity
to
actually
build
out
when
you
need
to
expand
every
one
of
those
rooms
and
maintain
operations
throughout
construction,
maintain
air
service
throughout
construction,
so
that
just
seemed
like
it
was
not
going
to
be
the
right,
the
right
alternative
and
we
looked
at
alternative
2,
which
is
at
the
top
of
the
page
here.
Q
This
seemed
like
a
great
idea
to
to
further
separate
general
aviation
and
commercial
service
traffic
Center,
the
terminal
building
on
the
airfield.
What
it
did
not
do,
however,
is
utilize.
Existing
services,
utilities,
entry,
roads,
things
of
that
nature,
and
this
this
option
actually
would
have
in
all
likelihood
triggered
an
environmental
assessment
of
that
area
based
on
its
previous
previous
uses.
The
third
alternative
was
right
in
the
center
to
the
right
I
guess
that
is
the
current
FBO
or
the
general
aviation
terminal.
Q
That
also
seemed
like
a
great
location
because
it
would
push
GGA
service
down
in
this
plan
south
and
fully
separate
the
fully
separate
the
commercial
service
traffic
utilize
existing
infrastructure
as
necessary.
The
problem
is
is
that
we
would
have
to
relocate
the
FBO,
which
is
not
a
reimbursable
expense
by
the
FAA.
This
this
solution
would
have
been
the
most
expensive
for
the
city
by
about
double,
so
the
fourth
alternative
we
looked
at
was
that
Center
infield
area
that
you
see
here
just
right
in
the
center
of
the
page.
Q
What
we
look
look
at
doing
is
our
preferred
alternative
is
to
use
it'll
utilize,
some
of
the
existing
infrastructure
taxi
lanes
that
had
just
been
constructed.
Recently
utility
service
entry,
drive-in
parking.
We
would
be
providing
a
new
building
a
new
terminal
building,
so
phasing
would
not
be
an
issue.
We
would
build
the
terminal
building.
Well,
you
were
operating
out
of
the
old
terminal.
It
serves
as
kind
of
an
intuitive
focal
point
right
at
the
end
of
the
entry
drive.
Q
So
right,
when
you
turned
onto
Airport
Road,
you
would
see
this
terminal
building
and
it
maximizes
that
separation
again
from
GN
commercial
service.
The
cons
as
I've
mentioned
here
is
it
you
know
in
the
future.
It
I
feel
like
it
should
be
something
that
the
city
and
the
state
looked
to
to
try
to
separate
that
manufacturer's
park
traffic
from
passenger
traffic.
Q
What
this
came
to
is
our
proposed
floor
plans,
then
so
utilizing
that
space
program,
we
developed
a
concept
that
provided
efficient
flow
ample
ability
to
be
expanded
in
the
future
within
the
location
as
well.
So
you
can
follow
the
arrows
and
those
are
kind
of
general
passenger
traffic.
That's
how
they
would
they
would
come
in
right
at
the
top
of
the
page.
The
ticketing
area
is
just
to
the
lower
right
of
that
first
arrow,
and
you
would
drop
your
bags
there
there's
also
our
airport
ticket
officing
and
bag
screening.
Q
Q
We
want
to
be
able
to
provide
for
charter
traffic,
which
had
been
had
been
cancelled
due
to
the
due
to
the
size
of
the
existing
facilities,
so
we'd
like
to
be
able
to
bring
back
charter
traffic
as
well,
while
we're
looking
at
creating
flexible
space
in
the
hold
room
to
accommodate
that
charter
traffic
by
creating
sliding
partitions.
That
would
either
be
pre
secured
for
concessions
or
restaurant
use
or
when
closed
to
be
the
secured
area
and
then
designated
for
use
for
for
hold
room.
Q
Second
level
would
be
the
location
for
the
FAA,
sorry
FA,
this
batons
office.
Basically,
the
airport
admin
conference
rooms
ability
to
staff
up
because
I
in
all
likelihood,
that
is
going
to
be
something
that
potentially
will
happen
with
your
increased
air
service
and
then
so.
Cubicle
areas,
reception
areas,
conference
areas
and
mechanical
mezzanine.
Q
So
if
you
buy
a
ticket,
then
a
portion
of
that
ticket
goes
into
the
AIP
grant
amount,
and
if
you,
if
you
don't
travel
by
air
you're,
not
paying
into
the
airport
improvement
program,
the
state
has
approved
their
maximum
funding
to
the
tune
of
about
$200,000,
specifically
for
the
terminal
building.
They
will
also
contribute
to
infrastructure
work
associated
with
the
terminal
and
then
local
sponsor
share,
and
our
goal
is
always
to
minimize
local
funding
by
increasing
eligibility.
The
eligible
amount
of
spaces
that
they
are
allowed
allowed
to
be
funded
by
the
federal
government.
Q
So
this
was
a
this
is
the
budget
portion
of
the
concept
budget
report,
as
you
can
see,
general
overall
area
construction
costs
eligible
percentage
and
then
we
get
into
FAA
shares
state
share,
sponsor
shares,
we've
broken
this
out
and
do
individual
elements
for
the
terminal,
building,
the
apron,
taxi
lanes,
parking
areas
and
then
fees
and
and
design
fees
and
an
apron
reimbursement.
That
was
a
previous
job.
Q
So
all
told
we
requested
from
supplemental
funding
from
the
FAA
right
around
14
million
dollars.
The
state
share
would
be
maximized
at
about
$500,000
and
then,
if
we
were
able
to
increase
the
eligible
percentage,
this
number
would
the
the
sponsor
share
number
would
be
about
two
and
a
half
million
dollars.
Q
We
just
wanted
to
ensure
that
that
that's
kind
of
a
best-case
scenario-
that's
a
maximization
of
of
the
FAA
dollars,
with
trying
to
limit
as
much
sponsor
share
as
possible,
because
this
is
in
its
concept
phase.
You
know
we
would
anticipate
that
the
the
city
should
hold
roughly
four
million
dollars,
which
was
the
first
number
that
I
gave
you
last
fall.
Q
Schedule
we
will
be
providing
the
CBR
for
final
FAA
approval
this
week.
We
will
be
ready
to
if
possible,
select
fit
our
accept
fiscal
year.
Nineteen
dollars.
If
we
are
selected
for
supplemental,
if
we
are
not
selected,
the
terminal
project
is
scheduled
for
2021,
please,
oh
and
then
of
course
we
would
our
application
rolls
over.
A
R
Q
R
We
go
Mike,
Schmitt,
Helms,
&,
Associates,
well
sure
when
we
talk
to
you
guys
when
you
hit
10,000
employments,
that
puts
you
at
a
primary
status.
The
million
dollars
is
you
used
to
have
$150,000
a
year
a
year
for
your
entitlement
funds,
what
the
million
is
now
instead
150,000,
you
have
a
million.
So
as
long
as
you
maintain
at
least
10,000
employments,
you
will
have
a
million
dollars
of
entitlement
dollars
every
year
going
forward,
provided
that
the
the
FAA
doesn't
change
their
their
rules
and
their
their
appropriations.
R
R
It
doesn't
work
as
far
as
covering
the
local
share.
What
it
does
is
it's
part
of
that
federal
share,
so
whether
it's
supplemental
most
any
project
out
there
with
with
the
FAA
whether
it's
discretionary
entitlements.
The
first
thing
they're
gonna,
make
you
use,
is
your
entitlement
dollars
so
for
fiscal
year,
19
your
project
for
apron,
it'll
be
a
million
off
the
top
will
be
entitlements.
The
remainder
would
be
covered
with
discretionary
funds
from
the
FAA.
R
You
are
allowed
to
bankroll
a
couple
years
of
entitlements
so
but
I
believe
with
primary
airports.
I
think
you
can
only
go
two
years.
I
believe
I'd
have
to
get
back
to
you
on
that
one
small
GA
s
can
typically
roll
four
years
worth
of
entitlements.
So
if
they're
getting
$150,000
a
year,
they
can
bankroll
$600,000
before
they
start
losing
them.
R
Necessarily,
but
your
your
ability
to
compete
for
discretionary
funds
for
terminal
would
certainly
prohibit
you
from
from
that.
If
you
didn't
have
10,000
employments
I
I
can't
say
that
it
would
or
wouldn't,
but
seeing
your
Air
Service
grow.
The
way
it
has
sure
builds
a
good
case
along
with
the
CBR.
That's
why
they
do
the
forecasting
and
that's
why
this
documents
important
to
get
funding
from
the
FA
for
your
terminal
project.
This
is
really
the
the
meat
potatoes
of
your
justification
for
the
project.
R
A
R
They
you,
you
initially
pay
for
the
construction.
You
know
progress
payments,
whether
it
be
in
design
or
construction,
and
then
you
submit
reimbursement
requests
just
like
a
typical
AIP
project.
So
Kristin
would
send
all
the
bills
up
through
the
state
since
we're
a
grant
channeling
state,
it
goes
through
the
d-o-t
and
then
they
reimburse
what's
eligible.
Does
that
make
sense?
I.
A
R
Through
that
yep
it
goes
through
the
process
and
I,
don't
always
know
what
does
it
take?
Kristin,
probably
30
days,
ish
a
little
bit
more
so
once
she
sends
all
the
paperwork
up
to
the
state.
They
process
it
through
the
federal
system
and
then
then
the
city
would
get
a
reimbursement
check.
So
you
kind
of
initially
upfront
the
costs
but
then
get
reimbursed.
You
know
say
45
days
later,
for
those
expenses
that
are
eligible
and.
A
R
I
guess
one
thing
I
want
to
add
is
the
number
that
we're
talking
about.
Is
we
kind
of
looked
at
this
twofold?
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
our
ask
was
for
the
FA
side
that
we're
showing
the
most
eligibility,
so
we
have
the
most
federal
dollars,
but
also
on
your
guys's
end
to
make
sure
that
if
the
eligibility
doesn't
come
in
as
high
as
we'd
like
that
you're
covered,
because
it's
much
easier
to
tell
you
that
you're
gonna
spend
that
now
and
come
back.
R
L
A
L
R
If
you
know
you
have
an
apron
project
coming
up
so,
like
I
said,
the
first
thing
they're
gonna
make
you
use,
is
your
entitlement
dollars,
so
we
get
going
through
this
apron
project
and
start
with
that
and
all
of
a
sudden
you
get
selected
for
appropriations,
I'm,
not
sure
if
they'll
make
you
depending
on
grant
timing,
I'm,
not
sure
if
they'll
make
you
utilize,
your
2020
entitlements
or
not.
That's
I
can't
answer
that.
Honestly
without
you.
R
The
stars,
after
a
line
and
off
to
work
with
the
FAA
to
see
what
they're
going
to
do.
But
if
this,
if
the
city
were
to
get
awarded
supplemental
and
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
much
like
say,
December
you're
in
fiscal
year,
2020,
because
the
federal
government's
fiscal
year
runs
October
1
to
September
30
chances
are
you're,
set
your
fiscal
year,
twenty
twenty
dollars
or
entitlements
would
be
utilized
within
that.
That
would
be
my
guess.
I
don't
know
if
you
agree
with
that,
it's.
Q
There
are
two
different
avenues
here:
two
and
discretionary
normal
discretionary
would
require
you
to
always
use
your
entitlements
first,
no
matter
what
special
supplemental
applications
has
been
varying
and
to
some
degree
you
know.
Certainly
we
would
try
to
allow
you
to
use
your
entitlements
on
on
current
CIP
projects
first
and
then
the
request
for
the
fourteen
million
dollars
from
the
FAA
would
be
mostly
discretionary.
Then.
R
Mitch's,
correct
I
mean
we
would
have
to
work
with
the
FAA.
Obviously,
that's
what
we
would
fight
for
is
to
keep
for
you
guys
to
keep
your
entitlement
dollars
as
much
as
you
can,
but
the
end
of
the
day.
If
they
were
going
to
come
to
the
city
and
say
they
were
going
to
fund
the
terminal
building.
However,
your
fiscal
year
2020
entitlements
are
going
to
have
to
go
towards
it.
I
still
think
that's
a
really
good
deal
and.
Q
E
Q
I
would
say
within
the
next
six
weeks,
two
months.
Potentially
you
know
what
happens
right
now.
We
are
in
the
time
of
season
where
grant
applications
are
due
for
normal
projects
and
what
the
FAA
wants
to
do
is
look
at
normal
AIP
grant
projects
so
that
they
have
those
kind
of
ready
to
go,
and
then
they
can
also
look
at
their
supplemental
projects
as
well
and
well.
They're
doing
you
know
this.
This
grant
work.
Q
So
you
know
grants
typically
need
to
be
in
the
first
week
in
July
right
now
for
normal
AIP
funded
jobs
third
week
in
July
they
would
likely
be
getting
together
the
different
Airport
district
offices
around
the
region
and
then
making
selections
on
what
is
going
to
get
funded.
I
would
say
you
know
in
under
two
months.
We
would
know
that
yeah,
that
is
my
best
guess
and
and
I
have
been
wrong.
R
We
met
with
the
FAA
in
March
at
the
South
Dakota
airports
conference
I'm,
not
saying
we're
not
going
to
have
to
do
maybe
a
documented
cat
X.
Maybe
some
subsidiary
work
looking
at
and
different
environmental
things,
but
the
environmental
protection
specialists
did
not
indicate
that
a
full-blown
environmental
assessment
was
needed
in
that
area
which
would
take.
Q
O
May
yes,
I
just
want
to
point
out
for
the
record.
At
the
last
council
meeting,
the
council
approved
a
resolution
of
intent
to
enter
into
a
lease
with
our
potential
car
rental
business
at
the
airport
because
of
some
issues
that
they're
running
into
the
lessee
there.
Of
course,
as
you
noticed,
there's
the
there
was
not
a
lease
on
the
agenda
tonight
to
be
approved,
so
there
will
be
another
resolution
of
intent
coming
forth,
I
believe
at
the
next
meeting,
with
subsequent
action
at
the
first
meeting
of
August.
Thank.
A
A
Second
by
Dan
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
It
was
a
post
signify
by
saying
a
motion
carries-
and
this
was
your
last
council
meeting-
I
I
want
to
say
there
will
be
plaques
forthcoming,
but
at
a
later
meeting,
because
we
are
short-handed
and
didn't
get
that
done.
But
we
do
genuinely
appreciate
your
service
councilman
Danforth.
It's
been
eight
years
on
the
council
and
councilman
Thorson
was
four
years
on
the
council
and
councilman
Solem
12
years
on
the
council.
So
thank
you
for
your
service.
Let's
give
him
a
hand.