![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/_c_xOJxAKfI/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 08 19 2019
Description
Agenda Items include the approval of two Airport Ground Leases. Additional items include Resolution No. 19-30, 19-31, 19-34, 19-35, 19-36, 19-38 and 19-39 as well as the first readings of Ordinance No. 19-10 and 19-11.
A
A
C
B
D
D
B
D
E
C
A
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
a
motion
carries
item.
2
is
the
public
comment
period.
This
is
the
time
set
aside
for
anyone
to
come
up
and
talk
about
anything.
They
want
seeing.
No
one
I'll
move
on
to
item
number
3,
which
is
approval
of
the
agenda
and
I,
would
like
to
move
item
number
13,
which
is
Airport
related
up
to
an
after
item
six,
so
that
the
airport
items
are
clustered
together
and
with
that
I'll
look
for
a
motion
for
approval.
D
A
A
There's
a
very
special
award
that
the
Finance
Officer
is
supposed
to
hand
me
so
that
I
can
award
it
to
her,
but
she
has
not
given
me
this
distinguished
budget
presentation
award,
but
I
can
still
announce
it
that
she
has
headed
the
department
and
the
department
gets
this
award
for
a
distinguished
presentation
of
our
budget
from
the
government
finance
Officers
Association,
it's
a
very
prestigious
award.
Not
very
many
finance
offices
receive
this
award,
but
we
did
so
I
think
that
we
should
acknowledge
our
finance
officer,
Kristen
Bob
Dean,
with
a
round
of
applause.
A
A
A
G
A
A
H
A
H
Safety
net
for
the
owner
of
the
building,
yeah
they're
gonna,
put
a
lot
of
money
into
this,
and
it's
it
should
be
a
long
term
commitment.
We
don't
want
to
go
too
long,
because
the
FAA
also
has
guidelines
on
the
other
side
of
the
coin.
In
case
we
need
to
have
that
area
for
a
taxiway
expansion
or
a
runway
or
or
such
like
that,
so
we
try
and
make
them
as
long
as
we
can
without
stepping
on
the
FAA
toes.
A
A
E
I
could
I
get
a
question
on
this
one
as
well
as
the
next
one,
because
these
are
both
airport
board
members
or
I.
Think
when
there's
an
entity
related
to
an
airport
board
member
are
these?
Are
these
terms
commensurate
or
comparable
to?
If
we
were
to
beliefs
into
you,
know
someone
not
on
the
airport
board?
Yes,
okay,
someone
I
want
to
get
that
out
in
the
open
and
clarify
that.
Thank
you.
Yep.
H
D
A
H
H
This
is
the
lease
is
the
same
format
at
the
864
as
well.
Two
percent
increase
and
I'll
go
down
to
the
map
and
show
you
where
his
hand
is
going
to
go,
and
it's
actually
on
the
second
I'm.
Sorry,
it's
on
the
second
taxiway,
it's
actually
over
here,
so
the
first
taxiway
and
the
second
taxiway
will
be
completely
full,
is
what
I'm
getting
at
we'll
have
two
spots
available
on
our
third
taxiway
that'll
be
available
and
I'll
get
into
the
reason
why
we
don't
have
one
spot
instead
of
two
in
our
next
item.
A
A
A
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
a
motion
carries
all
right.
The
next
item
is
actually
number
13
in
your
packet
and
that
is
approval
of
resolution
number
19
38
expressing
intent
to
enter
into
a
25-year
lease
agreement
renewable
for
10
additional
years
with
Yost
Aviation
LLC
for
property
located
at
the
Watertown
Regional
Airport.
A
D
A
H
This
is
John
and
Brenda
Yost
excuse
me
and
this
the
reason
it
can't
go
on
our
taxiway,
where
John
originally
anticipated
it
going.
Is
it's
too
big,
which
is
great?
It's
a
hundred
by
104
hanger,
so
the
biggest
size
we
a
lot
is
a
75
by
75
to
keep
our
safety
areas
in
object,
free
areas
on
the
taxiway,
so
this
is
104
by
a
hundred
same
terms,
and
this
one
is
actually
going
to
the
west
of
the
West
Lane
of
hangars.
H
We
have
some
overgrown
space
back
here
and
there
is
a
taxiway
that
leads
through
here.
As
you
can
see
on
the
picture
and
it'll
tie
into
this
line
right
here.
I
apologize,
they
didn't
blow
up
the
page
more,
but
there
is
a
taxiway
here.
So
he'll
go
back
behind
the
other
hangers.
This
has
been
cleared
by
engineering
for
drainage
and
all
that
stuff
for
that
area.
What.
A
A
D
A
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
resolution
number
19,
30,
adopting
the
district
boundaries
and
the
plan
for
tax
increment
financing.
District
number
8
city
of
Watertown,
South
Dakota,
an
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
development
agreement
with
the
Watertown
development
company
and
any
other
documents
as
necessary.
F
K
Hi
Tracy
with
the
fodder
town,
Development
Company,
so
TIF
district
number
eight
is
going
to
be
for
comprehensive
logistics
incorporated.
They
are
going
to
be
assisting
Terrax
with
some
of
their
parts
management.
Warehouse
distribution,
so
they'll
be
located
across
the
street
from
Terrax,
so
that
will
make
it
more
convenient
for
their
processes
so
to
reduce
their
costs
for
putting
a
location
here
in
Watertown,
we
did
create
this
TIF
district
and
we're
going
to
be
building
a
building
for
them
and
leasing
it
back
to
them
all.
K
E
K
B
To
clarify
the
the
processes
is
when
a
TIF
is
established
that
creates
its
own
fund,
so
as
Tracy's
speaking
to
for
each
one
of
these
TIF
districts,
it
becomes
its
own
fund
where
the
money
is
basically
accounted
for.
So,
as
those
revenues
do
you
come
in,
then
the
city
will
redirect
the
payment
to
Watertown
development
company,
but
each
of
these
will
have
its
own
separate
fund.
So
we
can
track
how
the
money
flows
great.
K
M
C
A
A
All
those
opposed
signify
were
saying.
Nay,
motion
carries
item
number
eight
is
approval
of
resolution
number
19,
31,
adopting
the
district
boundaries
and
the
plan
for
tax
increment
financing,
district
number,
nine
city,
Watertown,
South,
Dakota
and
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
development
agreement
with
west
side,
implement
inc
and
any
other
documents
as
necessary
by
Howe,
lien
and
I.
Think
Ville
Hauer
was
second
back.
K
K
A
E
B
D
K
G
B
Yeah,
just
to
clarify
normal
process
for
the
city
is
bills
are
submitted
by
a
cut-off
time
and
then
the
accounts
payable
Department
puts
those
in
the
council
gets
to
see
all
of
those
bills
before
they
are
actually
paid.
So
if
a
check
or
payment
doesn't
make
it
in
for
the
council
to
approve
I
need
authorization
from
the
from
the
council
to
issue
any
check
that
they
have
not
seen
prior.
So
that's
why,
when
you
hear
I'm
asking
for
authorizations,
because
I
don't
have
the
ability
to
do
that,
so.
A
O
E
O
E
Niche
case
and
these
tips,
the
Planning
Commission,
has
also
been
involved
in
this
process
as
well
and
they've
they've,
given
approval
to
what
came
before
them.
A
H
D
B
Thank
You
mayor,
so
the
resolution
before
you.
It
ties
in
a
little
bit
with
the
TIF
seven
that
we
just
art,
TIF,
715,
there's
so
many
TIF,
yeah
tip
10,
yes,
I'm
right
that
we
just
approved
so
during
the
conversations
with
us,
basically
paying
1.8
million
dollars.
We
need
to
determine
if
we
want
to
use
our
reserve
cash
funds
for
that
or
if
we
want
to
bond.
This
is
not
tied
directly
to
the
TIF.
B
It's
actually
tied
just
to
our
capital
improvement
funds
that
we
have,
that
we
are
doing
right
now
and
then
even
a
little
bit
if
there's
a
carryover
into
2020.
The
reason
we're
doing
that
is
because
the
1.8
million
dollar
payment
will
come
out
of
the
capital
improvement
fund,
which
cuts
us
a
little
bit
short
for
our
unreserved
balance.
So
the
council
needs
to
determine
if
that's
what
we
want
to
do
bond
for
this
it'll
be
about
two
million
dollar
bond
or
the
other
option.
B
If,
if
we
don't
want
to
bond
at
this
time,
because
there
are
other
projects,
I'm
kind
of
in
the
works,
the
other
option
that
we
have
is
to
push
back
a
few
projects
that
are
coming
before
you.
You
will
see
the
long
term
capital
plan
coming
probably
into
September,
and
during
that
time
we
have
almost
nine
point.
Seven
million
dollars
planned
to
be
reserved
for
capital,
so
there
is
some
play
with
how
much
we
set
aside
for
those
projects
so
that
that's
where
I'm
open
to
discussion
I
can
provide
any
more
information
that
you
want.
A
Alright,
so
just
for
clarification
we
we
could
use
our
reserves,
which
have
been
set
aside
with
other
projects
in
mind.
Then
in
the
future.
When
we
go
to
do
those
projects,
we
might
need
to
bond
at
that
time
instead
of
right
now,
meanwhile,
we're
saving
on
financing
charges,
so
we
do
have
reserves
that
are
set
aside
for
projects
that
we
wouldn't
have
to
bond
in
the
future.
But
if
we
spend
the
money
today,
then
we
might
have
to
bond
in
the
future
depending
on
how
our
revenues
go.
So
is
everyone
clear
on
that?
F
A
We
might
have
to
bond
for
them
to
do
them
at
that
at
their
scheduled
time,
because
the
money
would
have
been
spent
today,
because
we
have
the
money
accumulating
in
funds
for
these
projects.
We
set
money
aside
every
year
so
that
when
the
time
comes
to
you
know,
we
have
a
long
term
plan
and
when
the
time
comes,
we
have
the
money
ready
to
go,
but
we
do
have
some
projects
coming
up
in
the
future.
A
That
probably
will
require
bonding
at
some
point
and
if
these
future
projects
coincide
bond
once
for
multiple
projects,
rather
than
bond
a
little
bit
now
than
bond
a
little
bit
later
and
and
so
on.
So
it's
just.
How
do
we
want
to
use
our
money?
So
it's
project
money.
It's
set
aside
for
capital
improvements.
We
could
use
the
money
so.
I
I
think
our
decision
is,
do
you
want
to
buy
now
or
do
you
want
to
wait
when
something
else
comes
up?
We
make
a
bigger
it'll,
be
a
bigger
bond
process,
we'll
spend
less
on
financing,
origination
fees,
whatever,
etc,
etc.
All
the
setup
cost
of
a
bond
if
we
do
it
in
a
bigger
chunk
down
the
road.
That's.
I
B
Correct
just
to
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
on
the
plan.
When
we
talk
about
the
reserve
that
we
have
for
the
capital
after
we
do
our
initial
budget,
then
we
bring
back
our
long-term
capital
plan,
usually
the
following
month,
and
that's
where
we
establish
the
next
five
years
based
off
of
what
the
purchase
is
and
which
fund
it
lies
in
is
then,
where
I
over
that
next
five
years,
we'll
slowly
move
the
projects
up
with
the
plan
and
I'm
accumulating
our
cash.
So
it's
reserved
it's
not
necessarily.
B
You
know,
we
say
it's
restricted,
we
got
it.
It's
not
totally
restricted,
as
is
our
debt
service
is
a
restricted.
I
would
classify
it
as
it's
assigned
for
the
purpose
of
capital,
so
the
council
does
have
the
ability
to
move
that
around
when
we
discuss
our
plan
and
we
change
our
capital
outlay,
some
of
the
bigger
ones
that
are
in
there
right
now
that
are
holding
up
the
majority
of
of
the
money
just
so
the
council
is
aware,
when
I
say
9.7,
the
three
biggest
ones
that
are
in
there
I
should
probably
say
for
now.
B
B
A
B
I
A
B
Or
or
like
we
said,
if
there
is
in
the
works
a
few
other
even
within
you
know
the
next
six
seven
months,
if
we
decide,
we
could
still
do
that.
The
only
thing
is
is
like
I
said,
with
what
was
approved
in
the
2020
budget,
our
projection,
if
we
restrict
or
assign
this
as
it
is
with
us,
not
planning
on
the
1.8,
our
unreserved
fund
balance
is
low.
It
is
not
probably
where
we
want
to
be
yeah.
P
I
may
madam
Eric,
as
one
of
the
administrators
of
the
CIP
and
programming
some
these
long-term
projects,
especially
over
the
long
term
CIP
and
as
you
as
we've
reviewed
for
the
2020
fiscal
year.
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
note
I
love
the
idea
of
potentially
saving
the
possibility
of
having
a
bond
and
the
charge
is
associated
with
that
one
thing
just
to
keep
in
mind
just
for
the
council's
sake
is
just
for
my
experience
in
the
past.
P
You
know
five
years
from
now,
eight
years
from
now
counsels
change
over
the
perception
then
to
bond
a
specific
project
may
may
not
be
politically
favored
at
that
time,
which
could
could
help
skew
your
decision
or
decide
your
decision
today
on
whether
we
buy
now
or
later.
If
we
bond
now
today,
we
know
why
we're
doing
it.
We
know
what
it's
for.
P
If
we
wait,
you
know
we
I
as
an
administrator
that
CIP
Kristen
is
in
ministry
there
at
CIP,
the
next
mayor
as
an
administrator,
that
CIP
could
risk
getting
other
projects
pushed
off
even
further
because
of
the
political
climate
is
changing
over
time
and
whether
or
not
they
would
want
to
bid
for
specific,
proper
bond
for
specific
projects.
At
that
point
in
the
future.
B
In
terms
of
the
repayment
of
the
bond
yes,
I
mean
we
have
enough
cash
flow
to
do
that
this
will
be
there
again
a
debt
within
the
capital
improvement
fund.
So
that
to
me,
isn't
any
concern
looks
like
the
annual
payment
with
principal
and
interest
will
be
around
125
to
130
thousand
each
year.
So
that's
not
a
significant
debt
right
now,
I
think
it's
just
the
question
of
do
we
do
you
want
to
wait
and
see
if
there's
any
other
future
bonding
needs?
B
Or
do
you
just
want
to
tie
this
one
into
as
Heath
kind
of
stated?
We
know
why
we're
doing
this,
we're
tying
it
to
our
street
and
stormwater
and
park
improvements,
but
we
know
it's
because
of
another
project
that
basically
came
in
and
kind
of
wasn't
as
planned.
So
that's
kind
of
up
to
the
council.
I
think
I
think
it's.
If
we
we
have
to
determine
if
we
have
anything
else
coming
up,
it's
probably
better
to
lump
it
all
as
one
and
the
only
reason
is
is
because
you
save
on
your
fees,
so.
B
P
My
point
of
concern
could
be
addressed
as
simply
as
solidifying
the
memorialization
of
this,
the
why
we
did
it.
We
can
have
that
1.8
million
dollar
card
in
the
back
of
my
POC
in
the
back
of
Christmas
pocket
at
a
point
in
the
future,
when
the
council's
asking.
Why
are
we
bonding
for
this
project
fibers
down
the
road?
It
wouldn't
be
entirely
the
reason
why,
but
it
would
be
a
reason
as
a
reminder
of
you
know
what
we
did
on
this
action
today
and
all
that
good
impact,
our
funding
in
the
future.
P
I
L
B
I
B
B
A
I
A
D
E
Mayor
this
one
just
a
comment:
you
know
we're
gonna
be
looking
at
her
and
I
know,
Kristen
that
you
alluded
to
some
of
the
projects
that
coming
down
the
road,
I
guess
we're
so
close
to
looking
at
her
sketch.
You
need
the
next
five
years,
the
next,
what
month
or
so
anyway,
I'd
be
inclined
to
sit
tight
on
this
until
we
get
a
closer
look
at
that
and
then
decide
what
we
might
need
to
do
a
little
bit
later
time
and
just
my
two
cents.
B
Yes,
and
that
is
correctly
as
I
said
stated,
the
council
will
have
the
option
during
that
process.
If
you
want
to
pull
a
few
things
out
or
push
them
back
a
little
so
that
we're
not
restricting
as
much
that
is,
that
is
a
that
is
an
option,
especially
the
two
million
dollars
is
not
it's
it's
a
lot
of
money,
but
it
is
not
as
significant
as
some
of
our
other
bonds
that
we
have
done
so
to
say
that
we
need
to
bond
for
two
million
dollars.
I,
don't
want
anybody
to
think.
B
B
So
probably
the
the
biggest
four
that
are
currently
holding
up
the
assigned
for
capital
outlay
is
the
purchase
of
land
and
then
the
street
department
building.
That
was
one
kind
of
project
together,
the
Eastside
fire
station,
the
new
City
Council
administration
building,
that's
been
in
the
works
and
then
multiple
airport
improvements.
Those.
O
Are
the
those
are
far
larger
than
two
million
dollars?
I
mean
it's
gonna
end
up
funding.
You
know,
even
if
we
know
that
we're
gonna
go
for
one
project
or
two
projects,
you
know
if
it's
me
I'd
rather
wait
and
see.
If
that's
all
we're
gonna
happen
in
the
next
five
to
six
months
or
three
months
or
whatever
it
is
I
mean
that
would
be
my
recommendation
and.
B
B
A
P
You,
madam
mayor
members
of
council,
this
is
a
plat
of
Gulf
few
estates,
13th
edition,
and
it
is
inclusive
of
I,
believe
six
residential
lots
and
the
plat
exhibit
is
included
with
the
request
for
council
action
information.
One
of
the
points
to
call
out
here
is
that
this
does
include
a
development
agreement,
as
does
the
filing
of
any
plat
within
the
city.
We
require
certain
public
improvements
with
any
Platts,
just
to
give
a
quick
background
here
on
the
development
agreement.
P
Before
that
plaque
can
be
filed,
those
public
improvements
either
have
to
be
constructed
or
the
developer
has
to
enter
into
a
development
agreement
with
the
city
committing
them
to
performing
the
construction
of
those
public
improvements.
This
particular
plat.
There
aren't
many
public
improvements
remaining
from
previous
Platts,
but
there
are
a
few
drainage
components
that
are
hanging
out
there
from
Golf
View,
Estates
12th
edition,
and
what
we've
done
on
this
development
agreement.
P
It's
part
of
this
action
item
tonight
is
include
those
drainage
items
to
be
incorporated
in
that
development
agreement
with
the
approval
this
plat
and
authorizing
the
mayor
to
sign
that
development,
Brande
aunt
and
our
urban
planners
here
tonight.
As
well,
if
you
have
any
more
specific
questions,
we'd
be
glad
to
help
okay.
A
I
Can
you
put
it
up
on
a
map?
I
get
perspective
on
where
that
goes
at
the
big
picture
and
while
you're
doing
that,
I
have
a
question
the
last
time
we
just
did
a
proven
agreement
here
recently
there
was
a
name
escapes
me:
the
name
of
the
agreement
that
had
to
do
with
the
drainage
and
all
that
what
was
that
called
heath.
Q
P
A
D
O
Q
Yeah
because
they
had
to
go
back
in,
we
reviewed
this
entire
subdivision
and
then,
when
we
were
looking
at
Golf,
View
Estates
12th
means
that
the
preliminary
plan
was
expired.
So
then
we
had
their
engineers
go
in
and
make
sure
that
everything
was
built
to
spec
and
then
that's
where
some
of
these
things
were
noticed
that
the
berm
needed
a
little
more
fill
and
then
also
that
the
culvert
needed
replacing
it
was
damaged.
Q
I
Q
Q
Q
P
To
address
that
councilman
Roby
the
finished
floor,
elevation
that
Brandi
alluded
to
that
is
on
the
preliminary
plans
should
emphasize.
The
word
should
correlate
with
a
an
average
ground
water
elevation
that
was
observed
through
the
design
of
the
subdivision.
That
is
definitely
something
we
could
follow
up
on
and
see
exactly
what
the
preliminary
plan
shows
for
elevations
and
then,
if
those
elevations
look
appropriate.
P
A
L
That
piece
of
property
has
been
under
water
all
summer,
I
mean
there's
standing
water
and
they're
from
I'm,
gonna,
say
April,
1st
and
they're
still
standing
water
and
that
whole
thing
so
I
think
Don's
right
on
that
we
better
have
that
agreement
or
I.
Think
we
get
we're.
Gonna
get
big
trouble
out
of
it,
because
it's
it's
soaking
wet
the
neighbors
there
to
the
north.
I,
don't
know
if
they
have
basements.
It
looks
like
there
might
be
a
basement
or
two
there,
but
the
water
has
been
at
their
doorsteps
all
summer.
L
Long,
so
I
think
he's
right
on
I
think
we
have
to
really
make
sure
that
we
are
doing
the
right
thing
for
people
if
they
happens
to
be
a
dry
year
next
year,
and
so
the
water
is
gone.
That
looks
good,
but
then
you
get
a
year
like
this
and
it
there
has
to
be
a
very
good
drainage
problem,
drainage
situation.
There
it'll
be
a
disaster
right.
A
So
your
concern
is
that
we
would
want
to
be
having
a
document
in
hand
that
clearly
states
whose
responsibility
the
pond
is
and
who's
going
to,
maintain
it
and
gives
us
rights
to
go
on
the
property.
And
that's
what
a
BMP
development
agreement
does
gives
us
the
right
to
go
in
there
and
do
the
work.
If
they're
not
doing
the
work,
to
make
sure
the
pond
is
functioning
properly,
and
is
that
what
you're?
Looking
for.
I
Two
things
I
think
the
homeowner
deserve
some
protection
on
that,
such
that
they
have
water
problems
and
it
wasn't
done
engineered
properly
and
they're
executed
properly.
There's
a
recourse
for
the
homeowner,
and
the
second
thing
is,
you
know
we
just
got
done:
redoing
the
streets
up
in
Northridge.
What
about
half
the
regular
life,
because
water
management
issues.
D
I
There
was
I
believe
construction
issues
with
the
road.
You
know
we
keep
building
in
these
wet
areas
and
then
we
spend
money
down
the
earlier
than
we
should
have
to
to
fix
things
up
so
I
mean
I'm,
not
I,
certainly
like
to
see
us
go
forward
if
they
want
to
move
forward,
but
I
think
the
best
the
BMP
is
I.
Think
important.
A
Q
What
I'm
wondering
too,
you
know
it's
typical
for
residential
developments,
that
the
city
would
take
over
the
ponds,
the
regional
ponds
and
I'm
wondering
if
that
I
mean.
Would
you
prefer
that
route
instead
of
having
the
BMP
maintenance
agreement?
Or
would
you
rather
we
execute
that
document
and
keep
it
in
private
ownership?
Because
it's
just
typical,
because
when,
when
there's
a
residential
subdivision,
then
in
perpetuity
the
developers
gone
once
everything's
built
out,
then
there
isn't
anybody
there
to
maintain
it.
So
it
is
typical
that
the
city
does
take
over
those
detention
ponds.
P
Brandy
does
bring
up
a
good
point
that
it
is
typical
for
residential
subdivision
detention.
Ponds
to
be
taken
over
by
the
city.
I
would
eat
caution
to
that
until
I
had
time
to
personally
review
some
of
the
history
on
this
pond.
I
don't
know
if
there's
reasons
why
we
decided
not
to
years
ago
prior
to
my
time
being
here
and
if
those
reasons
would
still
be
valid
yet
today
on
why
we
would
not
want
to
take
this
one
over.
P
A
I
really
don't
want
to
take
over
ownership
of
ponds,
particularly
if
the
property
owner
isn't
asking
us
to,
and
this
property
owner
is
not
asking
us
to
take
it
over
I
would
prefer
a
BMP
agreement
that
gives
us
the
right
to
go
on
to
the
property
and
demand
that
the
maintenance
be
done
if
necessary
and
protect
the
city.
From
that
perspective,
and
if
they're
not
maintaining
it
and
it's
backing
up
and
causing
flooding
problems
in
the
neighborhood,
then
we
have
some
authority
to
go
in
there
and
order
that
done
through.
D
A
Agreement
which
would
be
recorded
in
perpetuity
so
I
think
that's
a
really
good
idea
to
put
one
there.
It's
our
standard
practice
now,
but
this
was
inching
along
through
the
years.
Actually
I
think
this
subdivision
had
a
restriction
of
no
basements
when
it
was
first
planted
many
years
ago
and
the
landowners
that
purchased
it
objected
came
to.
The
city
got
that
restriction
removed
and
people
had
problems
out
there.
We've
we've
been
our
staff.
Members
have
been
criticised
from
both
directions,
criticized
for
restricting
basements
to
be
constructed.
A
Leave
that
to
me,
if
I
want
to
do
that
to
myself
and
it's
at
risk
of
flooding,
that's
my
problem.
You
shouldn't
be
involved
to
the
other
side
of
what
you
allow
them
to
build.
This
basement
now,
I
own
it
and
it
floods
every
year.
You
knew
that
was
gonna,
be
a
problem,
and
you
let
it
happen
anyway
can't
seem
to
win
your.
I
Right
to
dress
those
two
points
and
the
first
one:
if
then
they
should
take
responsibility
for
the
pond
and
they
should
take
responsibility
for
the
roads
in
perpetuity,
because
that's
all
that
water
gets
pumped
out
ruins
the
road
ruins
the
base.
Then
the
city
gets
hung
out
in
the
bill.
If
we're
going
to
take
them
over,
then
we
we've
been
through
this
a
number
of
times
where
we've
got
the
wet
issues
in
town.
We
keep
building
on
marshland
or
wet
areas,
and
it
costs
us
a
lot
of
money
down
the
road.
G
Really
I
strongly
agree
with
Don
about
the
roads
as
well,
though,
and
it's
a
private
homer's,
it's
a
well,
it
is,
but
I
mean
it
was
a
created.
She
named
what
it
was
Dolphy
of
states
Inc
right-
and
it
is
not
unusual
for
homeowners
associations
to
maintain
private
roads
in
there
within
their
association
boundaries,
but.
A
This
is,
these:
are
public
roads
the
roads
are
already
built.
There
are
roads
to
maintain
in
perpetuity.
The
pond,
on
the
other
hand,
know
upon
this.
Private
always
has
been,
and
there
there
may
be
reasons.
The
city
may
not
have
wanted
the
pond
back
when
this
was
first
plaited
or
maybe
the
property
owner.
It's
not
here
to
speak
about
this,
so
we're
guessing.
We
don't
know
what
the
reason
was,
but
the
the
pond
is
not
currently
publicly
owned
and
it's
not
intended
to
be
publicly
owned.
At
this
point,.
O
O
P
A
Q
P
This
development
agreement
outlines
the
remaining
detention
pond
improvements
that
we
made
a
requirement
of
under
the
12th
edition
development
agreement.
There
are
a
handful
of
detention
pond
adjustments
that
needed
to
be
made
that
we
outlined
in
the
12th
edition
agreement.
We've
simply
carried
those
same
requirements
over
into
this
13th
edition
development
agreement
with
the
exact
same
completion
date
as
the
12th
edition
agreement.
Q
So
specifically,
the
improvements
were
to
replace
the
existing
CMP
culvert
with
an
RCP
culvert
with
flared
ends
on
both
sides
to
install
an
overflow
structure,
concurrent
to
the
replacement
of
the
culvert.
A
deed
restriction
be
submitted
and
recorded
for
the
detention
pond
area
which
has
been
completed
and
recorded,
and
then
that
the
berm
shown
on
lap
22
shall
not
encroach
within
the
lat
lines
and
shall
be
revised
upon
plotting.
A
Q
A
I
A
Q
L
Q
L
C
C
Kind
of
wondering
in
general,
when
we
did
that
last
development,
Terry
Road
up
in
the
Northeast,
we're
talking
about
doing
the
apartment,
buildings
and
stuff,
and
they
ended
up
deciding
to
do
slab
on
grade
wood
that
kind
of
just
put
into
the
agreement
when
we
approved
it.
It
is
like
this
I'm
really
on
board
with
Don
right
now,
I'm,
not
convinced
that
putting
a
basement
out
there
in
any
situation
really
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
because
we
already
determined
last
time.
C
We
were
talking
about
this-
that
the
average
groundwater
hike
is
pretty
much
just
a
guest
game.
Every
time
we
don't
have
consistent
system
of
measuring
that
anymore.
Somebody
drilled
the
hole,
looks
at
it
for
a
week
and
then
make
the
call,
and
if
this
has
been
flooding
consistently,
I
just
I,
don't
know
it
doesn't
feel
very
responsible,
even
if
it
made
printing
on
some
form
of
a
freedom
but
like
it
doesn't
feel
responsible,
letting
somebody
put
in
a
basement
that's
kind
of
pump
into
the
street,
which
is
going.
C
Q
C
A
Not
in
the
floodplain
like
that
and
I
I
think
that
the
normal
way
this
is
an
old
subdivision.
Most
of
the
houses
are
already
constructed.
There's
only
a
few
Lots
that
aren't
built
on
the
roads
were
built
years
ago.
We
already
own
them
and
they
left
a
few
Lots
here
and
they're
unplanted
and
unbuildable
there's
no
building
right
until
they
plat.
A
So
they
were
planning-
and
this
is
how
this
came
about
back
in
the
day
when
this
was
originally
planted,
they
were
required
to
put
a
detention
pond
in
and
they
did
and
they
didn't
plat
all
their
Lots.
So
we
go
through
time.
Things
change
the
part
of
our
code
that
requires
floor
elevations
to
be
shown
to
be
two
feet
above
the
ground
water
table.
Elevation.
That's
been
done
on
some
document,
but
we
didn't
do
the
document
that
normally
contains
that
information.
So
it's
in
some
other
document
and
how
do?
P
A
So
that
should
protect
that
those
last
few
houses
will
probably
not
have
basements.
But,
like
the
former
councilman
Danforth
said
he
did
have
to
comply
with
those
rules
when
he
built
his
house
and
he
wanted
a
basement.
So
he
just
elevated
it
and
put
a
lot
of
filler
around
his
house,
and
so
there
are
ways
I
mean
to
say
you
can't
put
a
basement
in
is
really
not
what
we're
getting
at.
What
we're
getting
at
is.
P
G
So
if
those
Lots
can
be
filled
or
whatever
they
need
to
be
at
this
time,
okay
now
are
we
causing
an
additional
issue
with
runoff
from
those
raised,
Lots,
elevated
Lots,
to
some
of
the
neighboring
Lots,
or
is
that
going
to
have
to
be
worked
into
the
plan
where
that
water
gets
off
of
those
Lots?
Do
you
see
what
I'm
saying
then.
D
A
Q
I
D
N
J
A
J
A
G
A
A
P
You,
madam
mayor
I,
will
apologize
and
note
that
things
are
getting
better
our
processes,
but
this
one
is
a
little
bit
of
an
inverse
of
the
previous
action
in
that
we
have
already
executed
a
general
development
agreement
with
Terrax
some
time
back
but
you'll
note
on
this
action.
We
are
now
referencing,
specifically
the
BMP
development
agreement
in
relation
to
their
detention,
pond
maintenance
responsibilities.
A
A
D
O
D
C
A
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
all
right.
We've
already
done
item
13,
so
we'll
move
on
to
item
14,
the
first
reading
of
ordinance,
number
19,
10,
approving
and
establishing
the
zoning
designation
of
c3
highway
commercial
district
for
the
tract
of
land
to
be
known
as
Andrey's
third
addition
subject
to
all
planning
requirements
and
there's
no
action
required
here.
It's
just
a
first
reading,
but
I'd
like
Heath
to
explain
a
little
bit
more
about
it.
Thank.
P
The
the
hopes
of
the
annexation
and
subsequent
subdivision
of
this
area
is
driven
by
the
extension,
the
desire
for
the
developer
to
extend
tenth
Avenue
through
his
property
and
that
Street
extension
plan
to
support
future
and
subsequent
development
of
any
future
Lots
that
you
might
plat
through
there
and
again
we'd
be
glad
to
help
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
So
this.
A
P
Yes,
madam
mayor,
that
was
one
of
the
concerns
I
had
was
leaving
it's
actually
other
two
separate
parcels.
The
back
half
of
some
residential
lots
here
that
would
remain
on
an
extant
Eyre
remaining
area
around
here
would
all
become
annexed
with
with
these
subsequent
actions.
So
we
have
reached
out
via
that
letter
to
encourage
them
to
sign
a
petition
and
from
a
planning
standpoint
to
eliminate
any
County
Islands
within
the
municipality.
E
P
Q
So
this
in
the
county
is
a
gland
and
obviously
a
bunch
of
farm
buildings
on
it.
So
once
it's
annexed
and
I
did
have
a
conversation
with
the
property
owner
Bob
Andrus,
to
make
him
aware
that
once
this
is
brought
in
into
the
highway
commercial
district
he's
still
going
to
have
to
Platt
and
son
subdivide.
So
at
that
time
he
would
probably
be
creating
non-conformities,
and
so
as
as
the
farm
exists
today,
if
something
were
to
go
away
because
of
unforeseen
circumstances,
then
they
couldn't
come
back
as
they
are
today.
So.
Q
Something
else
to
note
as
far
as
subdividing
goes,
they
are
within
the
sewer
water
territory,
and
so
when
they
come
in
and
once
they
plat
now
beans.
This
is
commercial
property.
It's
$5,000
per
lat
upon
platting,
so
that
that
is
something
that
they
are
aware
of
as
well.
Currently,
they're
served
by
a
private
well.
E
O
Commercial,
but
if
you
look
along
the
lines
on
that
zoning
surrounding
zoning,
are
we
gonna
see
this
come
through
as
industrial
for
part
of
that?
Essentially
it
was
attempt
to
have
an
it
yourself.
I
mean
all
that's
industrial
all
along
there
and
then
cp2
north
of
that
we're
going
to
see
another
zoning
teams
come
to.
Q
O
P
P
P
As
far
as
Zoning
is
concerned,
it
and
there
weren't
any
concerns
at
the
Planning
Commission
level
of
whether
this
should
be
i1
as
opposed
to
c3
I,
think
you
can
make
sound
justifications
for
either,
but
if
the
plan,
if
the
City
Council
had
concerns
with
that
I
mean
obviously
that
rests
on
your
decisions
here
on
whether
to
proceed
with
the
c3
zoning,
as
opposed
to
whether
the
community
would
feel
a
better
suited
as
an
i1
zoning
district.
Mister.
O
Q
O
O
A
A
D
P
A
Any
other
questions
all
right:
there's
no
action
required,
so
we'll
just
move
on
item
number
15
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
19
11
amending
chapter
3.0,
one
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown
regarding
dangerous
and
vicious
dogs,
and
let
Matt
kick
this
off.
No.
We
have
some
folks
here
that
might
want
to
talk
about
this.
J
Thank
You
mayor
this
is
the
culmination
of
about
a
year's
long
discussion
with
the
animal
control
board.
We
went
through
various
iterations
and,
and
the
purpose
of
it
was
to
kind
of
one
I
guess
was
to
give
us
more
a
more
solid
mechanism
to
euthanize
an
animal
if,
if
need
be,
if
we
determine
that
an
animal
is
a
vicious
animal.
J
Another
purpose
of
this
was
to
allow
for
the
dangerous
classification
for
animals
that
have
attacked
other
animals
and,
finally,
it
it
provides
kind
of
a
distinction
between
dangerous
and
vicious
dogs,
whereas
dangerous
animals
are
less
less
dangerous,
I
guess
then
a
vicious
animal
and
so
I
would
let
Councilwoman
Mandy
chime
in
as
she
would
like
or
I
see.
We
have
a
member
of
the
animal
control
board
here
as
well.
G
Guess
Matt
pretty
much
summarized
it
I'd
be
glad
to
answer
any
questions
that
anybody
has
dr.
rebar,
veterinarian
representative
of
the
council
is
here
or
a
council.
The
board
is
here
as
well.
G
So
we
really
thought
through
each
piece
and
made
sure
that
both
the
dog
and
the
owner
and
the
people
who
were
attacked-
or
you
know
everybody
pretty
much-
has
a
remedy
or
a
cover
covered
in
this
new
ordinance.
Does
that
sound
right
about
right,
mark
I?
Think
not,
okay?
Is
there
anything
else?
You
wanted
to
add
yeah
and
we.
D
G
Thing
that
we
like
the
most
about
this
are
the
two
things.
I
guess
that
I
feel
strong
is
about
is
one.
Is
we've
really
never
had
the
power
to
remove
a
very
dangerous
dog
or
very
vicious
dog
from
a
situation
we've
had
what
we
call
multiple
offenders,
dogs
that
have
done
severe
damage
to
a
human
in
several
occasions
before
we
are
even
able
to
remove
the
dog.
E
This
will
going
on
just
a
couple
of
comments,
so
this
definitely
it's
a
safety
issue
for
the
public
and
I
know
you're
always
treading
on
your
sacred
territory,
or
you
start
dealing
with
people's
pets,
but
it
really
is
a
public
safety
issue,
as
would
for
the
public
humans
as
well
as
for
other
animals.
Other
dogs
and
I
really
appreciate
the
effort.
The
control
board
has
gone
through
and
getting
this
before
us
and
really
strongly
encourage
that
we
vote
over
this
when
the
time
comes
in.
D
E
Couple
weeks
person
I've
got
is
curious:
does
anyone
receive
any
kind
of
feedback
to
the
public
of
thing
and
ran
a
front-page
story
on
this?
A
couple
weeks
ago,
death
and
now
coordinator
presentations
at
committee
meeting
a
couple
weeks
ago?
Has
anyone
received
any
feedback
on
this
either?
You
know
for
work
on
relative
or
to
this
since
those
presentation
and
that
media
exposure.
A
J
I
would
make
a
comment
that
some
of
the
commentary
that
I've
observed
both
in
regards
to
this
ordinance
and
throughout
the
country
as
this
as
this
issue
comes
up
in
different
communities,
is
that
people
are
very
supportive
of
it
not
relating
to
the
breed
of
the
dog
and
where,
as
it
relates
to
simply
the
dogs,
actions
and
temperament,
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
breed.
But
it
just
simply
has
to
do
with
the
dogs
actions.
G
Guess
I'd
have
to
we.
We
are
made
aware
of
them
as
they
come
through.
We're
told
that
there's
the
warrant
has
been
issued.
Are
the
declaration
has
been
issued
and
the
owner
then
has
a
opportunity
to
appeal
that
and
ask
for
a
hearing.
We
have
one
of
a
hearing
before
us
in
the
near
future
to
ask
to
overturn
the
declaration
as
of
right
now.
I,
don't
know
that
we've
seized
any
kind
of
or
that
we
have
any
kind
of
dogs
that
have
attacked
severely.
I
haven't
got
notice
of
it.
G
That's
why
I'm
looking
to
answer
people's
ghosted
I'm
looking
at
some
law-enforcement
people
what's
been
really
effective
for
us?
Is
you
know
the
use
of
the
you
know
our
law
enforcement
all
has
body
cams
that
really
helps
the
situation.
When
there's
questions
and
the
hearings,
you
know
and
appeals,
while
nothing
can
be
retroactive
until
this
is
so
example,
this
all
becomes
affected
effective
at
unapproved
and
when
whatever
time
has
to
be,
but
the
if
there's
a
dog,
that's
being
naughty
now
he
knows
past
behaviors
will
impact
if
he
does
something
in
the
future.
D
J
G
J
A
Thanks
for
all
your
work
on
this
no
action
tonight,
the
next
meeting
will
be
second
reading
in
action.
No
public
hearing
or
is
there
deep
No
yeah
all
right
item
number
16?
Is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
local
infrastructure
improvement,
grant
application
for
$75,000
for
the
detention
ponds
related
to
the
Terrax
development.
I
have
a
motion
by
Helene
and
a
second.
P
You
mayor,
so
this
item
is
related
to
again
past
commitments
from
the
past
year
and
a
half
that
we've
made
with
t-rex
and
moving
forward
with
this.
One
in
particular,
includes
the
application
to
the
state
of
South
Dakota,
the
governor's
office
of
Economic
Development.
This
is
an
application
that
would
be
made
by
the
city
on
behalf
of
t-rex,
who
is
the
developer.
What
this
grant
program
does
is
allows
for
local
infrastructure
improvements
to
be
funded.
It's
an
economic
development
tool
that
the
state
has
established
over
the
past
several
years.
P
It
is
a
part
of
the
build
South
Dakota
funds
program
through
the
state
if
this
were
executed
tonight.
If
the
authorization
was
given
for
the
mayor
to
sign
this
application,
we
would
essentially
be
carrying
out
our
commitments
that
were
agreed
upon
between
the
city,
the
Watertown
development
company,
the
governor's
office
of
Economic,
Development
and
Terrax,
who
all
were
party
to
this
discussion
of
the
goe
defunding
$75,000
towards
Terrax
detention,
ponds,
drainage
structures
that
need
to
be
constructed
on
that
site
and
that's
the
action
tonight.
P
If
this
were
approved
and
the
subsequently
the
grant
is
approved,
there
would
be
an
agreement
coming
forth
as
well
to
the
city
to
execute
again
with
us
as
the
applicant.
We
would
be
the
executors
of
that
agreement
as
well,
but
this
does
not
commit
the
city
any
financial
obligations
towards
these
improvements.
It's
a
hundred
percent
funded
through
the
program
and
no
financial
obligations
on
the
city's
behalf.
C
A
A
P
You
mayor
this
item,
I
was
approached
by
some
d-o-t
staff,
probably
a
good
couple
few
months
ago,
and
they
were
gearing
up
and
inquiring.
Whether
the
sea
would
City
would
have
interest
in
participating
in
this
program.
Generally
speaking,
what
it
is
is
the
the
d-o-t
has
federal
monies
available
to
them
through
the
Highway
Safety
Improvement
Program
from
the
feds
and
the
state
would
be
a
hundred
percent
responsible
for
the
cost
of
this
project,
and
what
this
project
includes
is
a
simple
replacement
and
upgrading
of
what
we
call
traffic
signal
head
back
plates.
P
If
you'll
notice,
every
traffic
signal
edie,
you
know
the
traditional
three
section
signal
head
will
have
a
black
back
plate
that
surrounds
it
and
what
those
back
plates
do
is
help
provide
just
a
little
bit
better
visibility
to
those
traffic
signals.
They
give
some
contrast
from
the
actual
the
color
component
of
the
signal
head
to
the
surrounding
skyline,
whatever
might
be
there,
whether
it's
buildings
or
blue
sky,
one
of
these
advancements,
so
that
have
come
to
light
through
the
Federal
Highway
Administration
is
the
implementation
of
retro-reflective
backplate.
P
That
goes
around
traffic
signal
heads
and
that
what
that
includes,
you
may
be
seen
these
in
some
communities
already
as
a
yellow
strip
of
retro
reflective
material
on
that
back
plate
surface,
and
so
the
d-o-t
has
targeted
for
intersections
throughout
Watertown
that
they
felt
that
the
traffic
counts
were
significant
enough,
that
these
back
plate
upgrades
would
be
warranted.
Those
four
say,
four
intersections
include
Willow
Creek,
Drive
and
19th
Street
northeast
1st
Avenue,
north
and
Broadway
1st
Avenue,
north
and
2nd
Street
East,
and
then
11th
Street,
East
and
3rd
Avenue
North
in
conversations
with
the
d-o-t.
P
E
P
Would
so
that
that
is
still
in
the
works?
It's
meant
to
be
finalized.
The
mayor
and
I
both
had
communications
with
the
d-o-t.
Regarding
that,
knowing
that
we
would
like
to
get
that
Hawk
system
installed
and
completes
I
think
that
their
attention
was
put
on
other
projects
that
they
felt
had
higher
priority,
one
of
them
being
a
traffic
signal
analysis
on
highway,
212
over
towards
the
Terry
readlyn
Arts,
Center
and
rightfully
so
they've
been
just
short-staffed
and
completing
both
those
efforts.
P
O
A
D
R
D
R
When
I
was
on
the
council,
like
we
always
just,
did
the
car
show
on
camp
and
never
asked
anybody
just
happen,
but
I
got
to
thinking
at
that
time.
You
know.
Maybe
an
issue
comes
up
later
on.
Well,
car
club
can
do
it
and
nobody
has
to
ask
anybody
so
I
thought.
Maybe
we
should
make
this
a
more
formal
presentation,
so
it's
approved,
and
that
way
anybody
else
has
anything
at
least
there's
a
process
where
they
can't
point
us
and
say
that
you
know
we're
doing
something.
R
Why
can't
they,
but
also
when
we
started
doing
that?
We've
asked
for
the
parking
lot
to
the
south
of
County
Fair,
because
we
decided,
oh
after
a
few
years,
that
it's
better
to
have
some
of
the
vendors
food
vendors
and
such
over
there
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
One
a
lot
of
the
car
people
really
don't
like
grease
and
stuff
going
around
near
their
cars
and
I
think
it's
more
practical
for
the
other
businesses
that
are
up
there
to
have
their
use
their
sidewalks
and
have
that
available
to
them.
R
And
it's
worked
out
really
good
the
last
three
years
and
don't
know
that
we
have
any
issues
just
for
practical
purposes.
What
happens
is
on
Saturday
morning
about
7:00
o'clock
team
of
guys
come
uptown.
The
city
brings
up
some
additional
garbage
because
the
ones
that
are
up
there
aren't
adequate
enough.
They
put
those
around.
They
put
some
signs
up
to
say
no
parking
after
10
o'clock
that
way
business
can
go
on
and
tell
about
that
time.
R
We
hire
a
couple
of
off-duty
police
officers
that
come
up
through
the
police
department
and
kind
of
check
to
make
sure
there's
no
cars
in
the
way.
You
know
that
if
there
is
anybody,
ask
them
to
get
those
moved
off
about
11
o'clock,
the
car
start
parking.
The
show
opens
up
at
noon.
It's
done
at
four
o'clock.
R
But
the
purpose
of
that
is
just
basically
to
make
sure
everybody
knows.
What's
going
on
a
couple
years
ago
we
did
take
maple.
That's
obviously
doesn't
work
this
year
anyway,
but
we
did
we've
been
able
to
get
by
with
400
cars
were
at
like
350
generally
the
last
couple
years,
so
it
works
well
enough
to
go
through
from
basically
down.
It
starts
from
just.
A
R
R
It
is
anyway
now
this
year
and
then
second
is
blocked
off
also,
and
then
we
go
generally
filters
unknown
past
the
senior
citizens
center,
but
that
at
parker
parking
lot
that
has
a
fountain
over
theirs
or
they
and
most
of
the
food
vendors
for
the
most
part,
are
some
type
of
nonprofit
group
that
could
set
up
over
there.
So
and
there's
you
know
those
are
open
to
contact
us
and
there
is,
as
far
as
the
car
club
goes,
but
nobody
gets
charged
anything
for
being
there.
We
just
need
to
coordinate
the
space.
A
R
Well,
obviously,
we
had
a
lot
of
people
come
to
see
the
cars
much
less
than
the
cars
start
coming
in
town
earlier
in
the
week
most
usually,
the
Memorial
Park
has
pretty
much
booked
up
way
ahead
of
time
for
that,
because
it's
full-
and
we
did
change
something
couple
years
ago
where
we
used
to
have
the
cars
meet
out
to
Memorial
Park.
In
the
morning
Saturday
morning
we
took
buses
and
they
had
garage
tours.
We
had
some
events
for
the
ladies,
but
we
changed
that
up
and
we
still
have
the
garage
towards
wood.
D
R
See
these
things
that's
what's
going
on,
otherwise,
it
just
all
happens
real
fast.
This
way,
they've
got
a
little
more
opportunity
to
see
that,
and
we
do
have
something
going
on
at
the
city
auditorium
for
the
women
that
choose
to
that
are
that
are
registered
with
a
car
that
there's
some
painting
thing
going
on
down
there,
that
they're
gonna
have
available
to
them,
so
they
can
just
walk
from
the
right
from
downtown.
So
so.
E
R
A
R
A
D
O
A
Opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Item
number
19
is
discussion
of
a
forestry
position
and
equipment
needs
for
the
2020
proposed
budget
and
I
see
Jada
Lange
is
here,
he's
the
director
of
Park
and
Rec
Department,
Park,
Recreation
and
forestry
department.
Yes,
I
get
that
forestry
part
in
for
this
exactly.
S
S
I
did
speak
with
Bruce
Bueller,
our
liaison
to
the
Park
and
Recreation
Board,
and
he
kinda
carried
it
forward
to
the
mayor,
and
here
we
are
this
evening,
so
I
just
wanted
to
share
what
I
am
thinking
about
would
be
adding
an
additional
position.
Currently
we
have
two
staff
members
in
the
forestry
department
and
our
parks
and
forestries
superintendent
he's
came
to
split
50-50
between
parks
and
forestry,
which
spreads
his
duties
very
thin.
You
know
there's
actually
a
lot
of
activity
that
goes
on
with
the
his
aspect
of
the
forestry
program
too.
S
When
we
considered
the
citizen
calls
that
we
get
about
their
trees
and
we
have
to
call
in
the
locates
when
we
were
going
to
do
tree
work.
That
type
of
thing,
it's
all
very
time-consuming
and
I-
think
if
we
could
have
a
lot
of
the
other
Class.
Eight
communities
in
the
state
have
some
type
of
city,
forester
they're
titled
differently,
but
that's
somebody.
S
That's
pretty
much
dedicated
to
the
forestry
program
and
I
think
with
the
impending
emerald
ash
borer
situation
that
we
have,
that
position
would
be
very
valuable
to
the
community
and
also
then
you
know,
equipment
needs
still
with
a
small
staff
there.
There
is
and
I
really
don't
know
what
the
title
of
the
equipment
would
be.
I'll
call
it
a
grapple
saw
truck.
You
probably
saw
there
is
one
private,
such
machine
in
town
and
it's
a
trillion
incredible
piece
of
equipment.
S
It's
you
know
it
would
greatly
improve
the
efficiency
of
the
forestry
program
in
the
community,
as
well
as
the
safety
not
only
for
staff,
but
also
for
citizens
and
property
in
the
community.
So
I
think
you
know
I,
don't
see
these
as
one
say:
I
see
them
as
needs
as
we
move
forward
with
the
forestry
program
and
community
and
that's
why
I
just
appreciate
this
opportunity
to
talk
about
it
with
you
folks
tonight
all.
A
B
Positions
in
other
communities
so
Joleen,
the
HR
director,
is
working
to
create
the
city's
Job
Description,
so
I
think
the
next
step
will
be
that
once
we
get
the
job
description
created,
we
will
probably
have
McGrath
work
to
grade
that
position.
Then,
once
that
position
would
be
graded,
then
we
would
have
a
better
understanding
of
what
impact
it
would
have
on
the
budget,
so
I
don't
think
as
well.
B
S
S
Know
I've
been
trying
to
contact
Sioux,
Falls,
Park
and
Rec
Department
because
they
do
own
one
there,
but
the
gentleman
I
wanted
to
speak
to.
He
wasn't
in
the
office
either
Friday
or
today.
So
I
will
try
and
get
that
just
throwing
a
price
out
there.
I
would
say
probably
starting
at
two
hundred
seventy
thousand
dollars
on
up.
D
S
S
D
S
You
know
like
so
our
forestry
staff
has
told
me
some
of
the
large
cottonwoods
that,
like
the
private
tree
service
has
taken
down
in
town,
they
can
do
that
in
about
an
hour
to
an
hour
and
a
half,
and
it
would
take
our
staff
probably
a
day
to
take
that
same
tree
down
and
we
do
have
throughout
the
community
boulevards
parks.
Golf
course
we
do
have
a
lot
of
cottonwoods
as
well,
not
only
considering
the
ash,
but
there's
a
lot
of
cottonwoods
that
need
to
be
addressed
in
the
community
right.
A
A
E
D
L
Think
Jays
on
to
something
because
the
cottonwoods
that
he's
talking
about
and
then
I
think
on
cattail
crossings,
I'm,
probably
wrong,
but
I
think
it
was
upwards
of
35
cottonwoods.
That
need
to
be
taken
down.
And
you
know
if
it
takes
the
guys
a
day.
But
this
could
do
it
in
an
hour
an
hour
and
a
half
it
is.
Does
it
take
great
long
for
you
talking
about
real
savings
and
Jay
said
earlier
that
we
probably
had
4,000
ash
trees
and
that
the
city
would
be
responsible
and
removing
so
maybe
I
mean.
S
Yes,
I,
don't
know
an
exact
number,
but
just
off
the
top
and
we
are
going
to
start
the
tree
inventory
we're
going
to
do
a
test
run
on
that
tomorrow.
Master
Gardeners
are
really
stepping
up
and
I
think
they're
showing
an
interest.
So
that's
great-
and
you
know
I-
would
probably
look
at
that
35
percent
one
thing
I
can
tell
you
is
that
urine?
O
O
S
L
S
S
We
absolutely
need
to
diversify
the
urban
forests.
You
know.
Not
only
do
we
have
all
the
ash,
but
if
we
say
we've
got
35,
we
probably
have
25
to
30%
maples
and
that's
probably
next
on
the
list.
So
we
really
got
to
be
conscious
of
that
and
we
are
quite
far
north.
That
hardiness
is
a
factor
that
it's
kind
of
hard
to
grow
a
lot
of
different
species,
but
we've
got
to
find
those
and
try
some
different
things,
get
them
out
there
and
see
how
they
do
for
us.
What
are.
S
Know,
there's
a
trying
to
stay
away
from
the
maple,
some
of
the
honey
locust,
some
of
the
Elms.
You
know,
they've
had
pretty
good
luck
with
them.
You
know
just
there's
species
that
we
haven't
really
tried.
That
I
think
we
should
like
an
Amber
Maki
or
as
shagbark
hickory.
Just
but
I
know
the
nurseries
are
having
some
problems
with
establishing
the
roots
on
those.
So
you
know
really
need
to
work
with
the
nurseries
and
the
communities
and
see
what
see
what
we
can
do
and
because
dr.
Baugh
would
recommend
and
no
more
than
10%
of.
D
C
S
D
C
S
L
Gears
Jays
here
could
I
just
change
gears,
because
I
had
a
situation
that
they
said
there
was
an
ear
accident
out
on
the
northwest
part
of
the
lake,
where
the
bike
trail
is
being
proposed.
What
what's
the
timeline
on
that
finishing
at
the
one
out,
you
know
on
the
hills
that
we
talked
about:
mario
parkour
Parkview.
What's
the
timeline
on.
S
Old
139
yeah,
okay
for
the
first
half
of
that
tool
in
wood
drive.
We
we
applied
for
the
transportation
alternative,
grant
that
we
were
successful
with
the
last
year
for
$400,000.
Now
we
applied
for
the
second
half
of
that
this
year
and
we
put
in
a
letter
of
intent.
The
Department
of
Transportation
has
been
out
and
done
their
inspection
and
now
I
think
that
application
is
due
October
1st,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
and
then
we'll
see
like
last
year,
it
was
in
November.
S
We
went
out
to
peer
and
gave
a
presentation
on
that
and
if
we
were
successful,
hopefully
we
could
do
both
of
the
grants
in
one
project,
both
phases
in
one
project,
and
that
would
probably
be
2022,
and
that
would
happen
you
know
hopefully
we'd
be
in
pretty
good
shape.
I
know
in
the
d-o-t
staff
was
out
here.
They
said
there
was
three
point,
four
million
dollars
in
request,
and
they
have
1.2
million
dollars
available
last
year.
S
They
had
money
left
over,
but
this
year
they
don't
so
but
I
think
they,
like
our
plan
and
approach
of
completing
the
trail
around
like
competi.
So
hopefully
this
can
go
through
and
we
can
get
that
grant
and
that
would
that
would
tie
the
trail
from
Park
View
Drive
to
the
northwest
corner
sandy
shore
Recreation
Area.
A
I
P
So
what
I
asked
Colin
to
do
is
to
provide
his
his
contact,
who
does
wetland
delineation
to
me
and
we
would
work
together
to
get
a
quote
for
their
services
to
do
that
delineation.
We
have
funds
in
our
budget
this
year,
as
you
know,
to
make
the
corrections
through
this
area,
I
would
pose
using
those
funds
for
the
professional
services
to
get
that
delineate
'add.
Once
it
is
delineated,
we
can
move
forward
with
getting
the
course
checked
off.
P
They
can
then
determine
and
help
guide
us
through
the
process
of
what
they
would
allow
us
to
do.
As
far
as
the
simple
regrading,
what
are
we
gonna
incorporate
in
a
tile
into
that
or
not
what
would
trigger
mitigation
and
all
those
kind
of
details
that
are
pending
yet
so
long
story
short
delineation
is
the
next
step
and
we'll
move
forward
accordingly
in
the
most
productive
manner
from
there.
N
D
N
A
New
business
I
do
have
one
item
of
new
business.
We
have
an
urban
renewal
district
in
our
town
and
every
year
the
council
has
the
option
of
considering
moving
forward
with
an
assessment
project
to
make
improvements
to
the
urban
renewal
district,
which
will
benefit
the
downtown
area,
and
so
the
council
will
be
considering
doing
that
on
the
3rd
of
September.
A
2019,
everybody
who
would
be
assessed
was
given
a
letter
notifying
them
of
the
hearing
and,
along
with
an
estimate
of
what
the
assessment
would
be,
and
the
project
this
year
is
the
lofts
development,
which
is
what
we
have
the
tip
for,
and
we've
been
doing
development
agreements.
Talking
about
this
a
lot
lately,
we
think
this
multi-use
development
is
going
to
be
game-changing
for
downtown.
It
includes
retail,
residential
and
a
parking
lot
use.
So
all
of
these
things
will
benefit
everyone
downtown
to
a
certain
degree,
and
it
is
a
very
exciting
project.
A
So
that's
the
plan
right
now.
That's
the
only
thing
in
the
plan,
but
it's
a
significant
item
and
that's
what
the
money
would
be
used
for
and
if
anyone
has
any
questions
the
they
can
come
and
see
the
assessment
roll
at
the
finance
office
and
see
how
that
works.
But
there
will
be
a
public
hearing
on
the
3rd
of
September.
A
C
New
business
I've
been
looking
after
a
little
bit
and
talking
to
a
couple
constituents
about,
but
I
know
that
we
are
going
to
be
striving
and
stuff
with
Road.
However,
when
we
took
all
the
lights
out,
we
didn't
really
put
something
adequate
back
in
to
indicate
that
those
are
in
fact,
Astrium
crossings
and
vehicles
need
to
slow
down
in
the
downtown
area
right
now,
I'm
kind
of
looking
at
actually
coming
up
with
a
solution
that-
and
it's
just
temporary
small,
not
very
specific.
C
That
I
think
we
kind
of
need
to
keep
in
mind,
especially
right
now,
when
we
don't
have
crosswalks
in
place
and
part
of
town
where
we
have
every
demographic
going
around,
including
the
elderly
and
small
children,
so
just
making
sure
that
we
make
vehicles
accountable
and
they
go
slow.
This
is
also
where
all
our
bars
are
and
if
we
try
and
increase
in
that
safety,
because
we
kind.
C
A
Thank
you.
So
if
you
couldn't
hear
what
Michael
Hoyer
was
saying,
he's
looking
at
a
plan
to
do
some
signage
or
markings
or
they
make
little
posts
that
are
don't
harm
cars
if
you
hit
them
and
they
just
bend
down
and
flat
back
up
just
to
warn
people
to
go
slow,
downtown
and
some
sort
of
plan
for
that,
so
that
people
realize
they
should
be
driving
slowly
downtown.
E
This
this
is
going
I
had
a
couple
things.
I
was
going
to
make
a
quick,
quick
comment
about
one
who
had
the
citrate
reach
out
and
I
think
there's
a
good
TSA
that
was
really
just
reminding
people
that
golf
carts
are
not
allowed
on
the
bike
path
unless
you're
on
the
bike
path
immediately
adjacent
to
the
cattail
golf.
This
reminder
that
you
know
that
we
gotta
buy,
buy
that
it
is
a
safety
hazard.
So
please
keep
your
golf
carts
off
off
the
bike.
E
Secondly,
and
Dan-
you
may
want
to
weigh
in
this
or
mayor
with
the
water
situation
out
at
Lake
competitor
right
now,
we're
getting
concerns
immense
criticisms,
complaints
that
or
whatever
they
thought
about
the
high
water-
and
just
you
know,
want
to
remind
people.
You
know
you're,
taking
a
risk
when
you
have
your
property
out
there
on
the
lake,
but
you
want
to
secure
property
to
make
sure
doesn't
start
floating
around
and
end
up
without
somebody
else.
E
The
waterfront
be
considered
of
others
when
you
got
your
boat
or
just
out
there
as
far
as
creating
a
way
and
just
a
really
not
much.
We
can
do
about
the
water
situation
out
there,
but
just
use
some
common
sense
as
far
as
securing
property
being
considerate
and
realized
that
you
are
taking
risks
when
you
have
property
out
there
in
the
water,
so
I
just
want
to
pass
out
word
on.
A
group
of
us
did
meet
around
the
table
last
Friday
to
kind
of
discuss
situation.
A
Right,
Thank,
You,
Glen
and
and
I
would
like
to
piggyback
on
that.
What
he
said
about
golf
carts
on
the
bike
trail
is
not
a
new
rule.
It's
a
rule
that
we've
had
on
our
books
for
a
long
time
and
people
gotten
Lacs
and
they're
starting
to
use
golf
carts
where
they
shouldn't
be
golf.
Carts
are
not
allowed
on
the
bike
path.
They
have
never
been
allowed
on
the
bike
path
unless
there
is
a
spot
which
has
special
consideration
and
is
signed
for
that
and
the
only
place
we
have.
A
That
is
immediately
adjacent
to
the
municipal
cattail
crossings.
Golf
Course.
It's
not
okay,
to
ride
your
four-wheeler
on
the
bike
path
by
the
other
golf
course
or
between
the
golf
courses
or
around
that
neighborhood,
because
there
are
golf
courses,
it's
illegal
now
it
always
has
been
so.
Please
keep
that
in
mind.
It's
a
safety
issue
and
then
the
the
lake
issue
as
well.
Thank
you
for
bringing
those
up.
Glen
you're.
G
Commenting
yes,
I've
actually
ran
into
people.
Who've
challenged
that
motorized
golf
cart
issue
because
they
had
a
battery-operated
golf
cart.
So
battery-operated
is
also
a
motorized
golf
cart.
It
was
flabbergasting
actually,
but
so,
if
you
don't
peddle
it
or
push
it
or
pull
it,
it's
motorized
right.
A
A
Don't
see
anyone
volunteering.
So
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
executive
session
pursuant
to
SDC
l1
25,
and
we
will
have
an
executive
session
this
evening
in
order
to
discuss
and
consult
with
legal
counsel
on
contractual
matters,
and
we
do
not
expect
to
take
action
upon
coming
out.
So
we
need
a
motion
to
go
into
executive
session
motion
by
Y
in
a
second
by
manty
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
all.