►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 09 16 2019
Description
Agenda Items include Resolution No. 19-41, the second reading of Ordinance No. 19-12 as well as the first reading of Ordinance No. 19-09.
C
C
D
D
E
B
A
F
A
We
received
a
request
for
approval
of
the
pyrotechnics
permit
for
the
fireworks
at
the
burning
of
the
W
event.
It
was
the
same
plan
that
they've
done
in
the
past
safely
and
successfully.
There's
nothing
wrong
with
the
plan.
It
was
just
too
late
to
get
it
on
an
agenda,
so
I
unilaterally
approved
them
and
gave
them
permission
the
choice
to
either
tell
them
the
camber
in
the
w
or
go
ahead
and
approve.
C
A
F
A
By
Bill
Haller
in
a
second
by
l'olam,
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
item
number
4
is
approval
of
resolution
number
19
41
authorizing
the
mayor
to
sign
a
clean
water
state
revolving
fund
srf
loan
application
in
the
amount
of
five
million
dollars
to
fund
the
wastewater
treatment
facility,
Administration
Building
project
number
19,
17,
cert.
A
G
If
you
recall,
this
item
has
been
part
of
the
discussion
and
past
action
items
that
the
council's
take
in
regards
to
the
design
of
a
well
first,
some
scoping
work
and
then
subsequently
the
design
of
a
new
administrative
and
garage
and
shop
area
building
out
at
the
wastewater
treatment
facility.
The
current
facility
is
a
reached
more
or
less
reached
its
useful
life,
and
it's
not
an
ideal
arrangement
to
continue
to
utilize
for
much
longer.
G
As
far
as
the
operations
at
the
wastewater
treatment
facility
go,
the
design
is
progressed
and,
as
is
about
complete
I,
think
we're
at
about
90
99
%
complete
on
the
design.
So
now
we're
looking
into
subsequently
bidding
this
project
and
looking
at
getting
our
financing
in
roll
all
lined
up
for
this
project.
So
what
that
led
us
to
do
was
look
at
applying
for
an
SR
F
loan
through
the
state
for
the
entirety
of
this
project.
G
I'd
like
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
in
detail
about
the
numbers
on
that
application
and
the
funding,
but
I'd
first
like
to
defer
to
superintendent
Berger
who's
here
this
evening,
and
he
can
touch
on
some
of
the
details
of
the
project.
Answer
any
questions
you
might
have
regarding
the
project
itself.
But
then
I've
got
a
short
summary
on
the
numbers
and
where
we
fall
in
relation
to
this
srf
application.
G
H
You
so
I'll
just
try
to
provide
a
brief
history
of
this
project
in
2011.
The
wastewater
facility
had
an
evaluation
done,
and
this
recommended
a
space
requirement,
evaluation
to
define
the
department's
needs
in
terms
of
space
space
needed,
and
so
the
space
evaluation
completed
in
2018
developed
the
concept
to
replace
the
existing
administration
building
and
the
operations
workshop
with
one
structure
just
to
touch
on
those
two
buildings
independently
a
little
bit.
H
H
It
will
have
the
break
room
with
appliances
his
or
her
locker
rooms,
copy
room
file,
storage,
room,
HVAC,
room
electrical
room
in
a
mechanical
room
and
send
I
guess
after
that
space
evaluation,
then
we
did
place,
do
an
application
to
place
this
on
the
state
water
plan
back
in
2018.
It
came
before
the
council
and
Public
Works
for
me
back
in
July
of
2018,
so
we
are
on
the
state
water
plan.
At
the
state
water
plan
point,
the
opinion
of
probable
cost
had
a
rather
large
contingency
of
25%.
That's
prior
to
design
was
design
completed.
H
So
the
budget
for
this
project
in
2020
is
five
million.
Twenty
five
thousand
dollars
with
the
rollover,
a
one
hundred
nine
thousand
one
hundred
dollars
from
the
2019
design
contract
being
under
budget.
We
have
about
five
million
one
hundred
thirty-four
thousand
one
hundred
dollars
of
budget
money
out
there,
and
so
it's
very
close
to
where
we
started
when
he
started
going
down
this
path.
H
So
if
we
have
favorable
biddings
where
we
would
hope
to
award
a
project
this
year
and
do
some
construction
next
year
again,
a
loan
application
by
October
1st
locks
in
the
current
low-interest
rate
of
two
and
a
half
percent
for
20
years
and
I
guess
yeah.
Just
the
spot
live
got
like
the
average
we'd
like
to
advertise
for
bids
and
in
award
a
bid
in
December
and
within
30
days
of
opening
bids.
You've
got
to
award
the
bids,
so
we
would
be
wanting
to
award
a
bid
in
January
for
this
project.
H
H
G
Yeah,
just
generally
I'll
add
on
some
details
about
the
funding
source
here,
as
Mike
alluded
to,
we
originally
were
thinking.
We
would
apply
for
roughly
a
three
million
dollar
loan
through
the
srf
program
and
fawned.
The
remaining
two
million
of
the
approximate
five
million
dollar
total
cost
through
cash
on
hand
at
the
at
the
in
a
wastewater
fund.
G
G
And
that's
that's
why
the
the
change
in
the
loan
amount
from
what
we
were
originally
thinking
and
we
maybe
didn't
even
show
those
numbers
with
counsel
previously,
but
that
was
the
original
thought
as
we
would
apply
for
3
million.
But
now
that
plan
has
changed
because
of
the
looming.
Primary
clarifier
repairs.
I
have
some
discussion
on
how
that
affects
the
rates
and
what
that
would
look
like,
but
I
see.
We
have
some
questions
we
could
feel
before.
A
D
H
That's
correct:
the
Braga
ROG
doors
would
all
be
on
the
south
side
and
then
so
when
the
staff
comes
in
and
they
have
alarms
in
82
vehicle,
the
telemetry
computer
and
they're
the
vehicle
that
they,
whether
it's
in
the
plant
or
out
in
the
sewer
system,
will
all
be
in
that
one
building.
So
they'll
respond
from
that
location
and.
H
C
F
H
I
G
I
H
I
J
J
I
J
H
I
This
this
is
a
pretty
big
deal.
Would
it
be,
would
it
be
a
good
idea,
maybe
to
have
set
up
some
some
sort
of
like
a
couple
of
sit
downs,
five
of
us
here,
five
of
us,
sir?
We
could
all
get
together
and
have
a
I
mean
some
of
us
have
been
through
it,
but
it's
been
a
while
yeah,
so
it
wouldn't.
It
would
be
nice
to
just
have
thought
my
kids,
something
you
might
want.
H
Know
I
was
supposed
to
get
a
preliminary
right
now,
they're
doing
the
evaluation
on
repair
versus
replacement.
We
know
that
the
dome
over
that
structure
is
about
a
million
dollar
dome
because
we
just
had
some
paid
for
my
insurance,
that
is
in
perfect
condition,
that'll
be
salvaged.
We
know
that
the
drive
is
about
23
years
old
and
I
wouldn't
anticipate
getting
50
years
out
of
that
piece
of
equipment.
So
we
would
hope
to
bring
that
along
with
us
as
well,
and
so
I
don't
have
that
number
tonight.
H
They
were
gonna,
try
and
give
me
a
rough
before
the
evaluation
has
done
an
email
today,
but
I
did
not
get
that,
but
what's
the
one
of
the
things
that's
changed
with
that
clarifier
it
was
identified
that
need
was
identified
in
2011
and
it's
a
circular,
concrete
tank
and
around
that
tank.
All
around
the
circumference
of
that
is
it's
a
it's.
A
channel
called
a
launder
and
it's
just
a
concrete
channel.
H
So
as
a
tank
overflows
and
in
a
circular,
all
the
water
is
overflows
is
captured,
that's
starting
to
pull
away
from
the
tank
and
break
up
so
whether
they
can
cut
that
up
and
use
portions
of
that
andrea
fix
it
to
the
sidewall
of
the
the
tank
is
unknown.
So
the
concrete
work
is
quite
big
there,
but
I
think
the
drive.
We
would
save
the
catwalk.
H
E
H
We'll
be
fine
this
this
this
tank
right
now,
it's
like
I,
said
it's
59
years
old,
and
but
when
you
build
a
tank
like
this,
you
coat
the
steel
and
everything
well
now
that
at
this
point
the
coating
and
we
have
Rico
today,
but
the
coating
is
failed
again
and
in
this
the
steel
is
weak
and
thin
in
places
it's
rusted
true.
So
but
I
don't
have
that
number
tonight,
but
we
don't
know
what
it's
going
to
be
so
that's
kind
of
where
we
want
to
go
tonight.
A
I
H
And
then
see
the
old
facility
well
yeah
and
you
could
see
the
operation
shop.
That
is
he
that
the
walls
are
leaning
in
cracked
and
we
could
look
at
this
clarifier
and
you
can
see
the
administration
building.
We
have
with
this
limited
functionality.
What
we've
had
for
24
years,
which
is
not
the
standard
in
the
end,
if
you
would
leave
it
at.
G
So
real
quickly
you're
the
funding
for
this
as
part
of
this
srf
loan.
We
have
to
show
on
that
application
how
we're
going
to
fund
the
payback
of
that
loan
and
in
talking
with
Kristin
and
Mike
we've
we've
drived
a
plan
that
we
feel
is
appropriate
necessary
in
order
to
move
forward
of
this,
and
that
the
state
would
likely
support
as
an
a
agreeable
way
to
fund
this.
G
That
rate
is
broken
out
into
two
components:
there's
a
base
rate
component
that
is
charged
generally
for
operations
in
maintaining
the
system,
and
then
there
are
surcharges
on
top
of
that
base
rate
right
now.
Our
split
is
roughly
$12.50
for
the
base
rate
and
$9.50
for
the
surcharge
that
surcharge
that
we
currently
have
on
our
2150
monthly
rate
is
from
past
loans,
past
funding
commitments
that
we
have
that
tied
us
to
add
$9.50
per
month
surcharge
to
our
base
rate
I
just
want
a
quick
show.
I've
got
a
couple
diagrams
here.
G
This
comes
from
a
regional
study,
a
regional
utility
study
done
by
a
consulting
firm,
a
e2s,
and
they
do
this
region-wide
and
it's
a
pretty
large
region
actually
that
it
covers
it,
extends
over
into
Colorado
but
then
closer
to
us
in
Iowa,
Minnesota,
Montana,
Nebraska,
North,
Dakota,
South,
Dakota,
Utah,
Wisconsin
and
Wyoming,
and
they
do
a
very
good
job
in
here.
Assessing
user
rates
for
all
different
types
utilities.
G
This
graph
that
I
have
pulled
up
right
now
is
the
historic
monthly
charges
for
6000
gallon
usage,
and
you
can
see
on
here
there's
a
water
and
wastewater
fee
associated
that
is
an
average
dollar
per
month.
For
that
average
gallons
of
usage.
This
is
for
towns
or
cities
of
5,000
or
more
in
population,
and
if
you
look
at
2019
we're
up
on
the
wastewater
category
over
35
dollars
on
average
per
month
for
sewer
usage
in
this
regional
study.
G
Now,
if
you
go
down
back
to
2009
2008,
you
see
that
we
then
start
to
see
the
numbers
that
we,
the
city
of
Watertown,
currently
charge
for
our
wastewater
usage
at
about
2150
per
month.
So
you
have
to
go
back
ten
years
and
averages
to
get
down
to
the
level
that
we're
currently
charging
our
community
water
utility
rates.
I
have
one
more
diagram
here:
I'll
show
you
quickly.
G
This
is
South
Dakota
specifically,
and
this
gives
a
demonstration
it's
a
real
good
chart
that
shows
the
hierarchy
of
wastewater
utility
charges
again
on
a
per
month
basis
from
all
the
respondent
communities
that
fill
out
this
survey.
You
can
see
that
Watertown
is
at
the
bottom
of
the
list.
Currently
I'll
note
that
these
are
2018
numbers.
G
The
reason
I
wanted
to
show
these
is
because
it
highlights
you
know
what
what
it
is
we
would
be
proposing
is
roughly
a
two
to
three
dollar
per
month:
user
fee
increase
in
order
to
cover
the
expense
of
paying
back.
This
loan
that
two
to
three
dollar
increase,
of
course,
would
bring
our
21:50
up
to
either
twenty
three
to
twenty
four
fifty
per
month,
and
that
would
be
a
two
to
three
dollar
increase
on
the
surcharge
portion
of
our
utility
rate.
G
J
G
G
Another
component
I
need
to
mention
is
we
do
have
the
utility
rate
study
plan
for
next
year
as
well,
and
that
will
look
at
whether
we
need
to
adjust
our
base
rate,
but
in
all
transparency
here,
I
wanted
to
make
sure
the
council
is
aware
of
that.
We
do
have
that
pending
rate
study,
they
would
look
at
whether
that
base
rate
needs
to
be
adjusted
or
not,
but
this
would
be
specifically
a
surcharge
adjustment
to
pay
off
the
terms
of
this
home.
All.
K
C
B
B
B
Actually,
all
of
them
were
kind
of
right
around
the
2008
2009
and
then
2011.
So
they
still
have
you
know
quite
a
few
years
left
to
pay.
I
will
point
out
too,
with
this
process.
Once
we
do
the
application,
the
state
also
works
to
make
sure
that
we
have
that
right
surcharge
to
cover
the
loan.
There's
all
the
debt
requirements
that
we
have
to
make
sure
we
do
so.
E
B
B
Resolution
924
was
actually
the
last
resolution
that
we
did,
and
that
was
where
we
established
all
the
different
rates
and,
like
I
said,
that's
part
of
bond
council.
When
this
application
goes
through
and
if
we
proceed,
then
they
will
help
to
make
sure
all
the
coverage
is
there
as
well,
because
there
are
quite
a
few
requirements
with
that.
G
B
Do
when
we
first
initially
looked
at
it,
it's
required
to
have
a
hundred
and
ten
percent
of
debt
coverage.
You
kind
of
always
want
to
give
yourself
a
little
bit
of
extra
room,
so
that
is
a
little
bit
higher,
but
if
customer
would
ever
leave
anything
like
that,
you
never
want
to
dip
below.
So
then,
each
year
with
these
SRS
loans,
we
do
provide
documentation
to
the
state
that
we
have
kept
enough
coverage
on
these
loans.
B
A
D
A
B
F
B
F
B
Process
at
that
time,
I
I
believe
is.
We
will
come
back
to
the
table
and
we
will
determine
where
our
shortfall
is
and
how
much
that
is,
and
then
we
do
have
a
few
options
that
we
can
look
at
I
guess
changing
up
whether
it
be
personnel.
You
know
we
have
that
wage
study
and
we
should
know
what
that
is
even
here
within
about
a
month.
Okay,.
F
And
then
just
a
comment:
I
guess
as
I
look,
this
I
support
the
budget.
I've
been
part
of
the
process
the
last
couple
of
months,
but
one
number
that
I
do
want
to
point
out.
That
does
concern
me
if
we
go
to
the
third,
the
third
page,
section,
I,
guess
of
what
section
to
the
third
page,
the
the
number
that's
concerns
me
is
I
realize
we
budget
conservatively
that
you
know.
F
I
I
B
Has
been
quite
a
while,
since
it
has
been
that
low
the
one
thing
that
I
will
say
is
we
do
have
quite
a
bit
to
set
aside
right
now
in
the
capital
outlay
portion,
it's
a
little
over
2
million,
so
that's
higher,
sometimes
than
it
has
been
in
the
past.
So
those
two
together
are
what
kind
of
works
for
your
cash
really
I
will
say
the
way
we
do
our
capital
outlay
is
we
do
not
restrict
it
as
far
as
legally
restricted.
B
The
council
would
have
the
opportunity
if
you
wanted
to
move
any
of
that
around
if
we
felt
that
we
needed
to,
we
could
slow
down
on
some
of
the
capital,
so
it
is
lower
than
you
know.
It
has
been
I
definitely
think
we
need
to
be
careful,
but
that
is
why
we've
had
plenty
of
the
discussions
in
regards
to
a
few
other
revenue,
sources
and
I.
Think
that's
what
we're
finding
is
we're
just
gonna
have
to
kind
of
think
outside
of
the
box
a
little
bit
when
it
comes
to
revenue
right.
C
A
Opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number.
Six
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
19.
Oh
nine,
a
zoning
text,
amendment
to
title
21
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
creating
chapter
21.5,
6dt,
downtown
overlay
district,
and
this
is
just
the
first
reading.
So
no
action
is
required
heath.
Would
you
tell
us
about
it?
Yes,.
G
Thank
you
mayor,
so
council.
If
you
recall,
this
item
was
before
you
back
in
August
I
believe
August
5th
of
this
year
and
after
discussion
it
was
sent
back
through
the
Planning
Commission.
We
wanted
to
look
at
revising
the
boundaries
of
this
downtown
overlay
district
that
would
essentially
effect
and
put
into
place
aesthetic
regulations
to
help
preserve
the
historic
nature
and
the
preservation
of
that
downtown
district.
G
We
have
done
that.
We've
Brandi
with
staff
here
our
urban
planner
randy
anton,
has
worked
with
with
me
and
the
planning
commissioners
and
come
up
with
a
new
boundary
that
has
a
little
bit
expanded
from
what
it
was
previously
and
has
since
passed
the
Planning
Commission
again,
and
they
voted
to
send
that
back
up
to
the
City
Council
is
here
before
you
tonight
for
first
reading,
Brandi
has
some
detailed
maps.
She
can
show
the
new
boundary
and
talk
through
that,
and
then
we
can
help
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
L
So
and
I
can
turn
some
off,
so
it's
easier
to
see
so
this
white
boundary,
that's
the
historic
preservation
district
and
then
the
black
boundary
is
the
urban
renewal
district
and
then
the
blue
is
the
downtown
overlay
district,
that's
being
proposed,
and
so
I'll
turn
on
the
historic
preservation
district
2
to
show
the
difference.
So
we
incorporated
some
of
both.
So
all
of
the
historic
preservation
district
is
within
this
downtown
overlay
boundary,
and
then
we
did
include
some
of
the
urban
renewal
district
as
well,
but
it
did
expand
into
residential
zoning.
L
J
L
For
the
most
part
we
did
so
we
included
all
of
first
Avenue,
which
originally
we
only
went
up
to
first
Avenue,
the
south
side
of
it
and
then
otherwise.
There
are
some
jogs
there,
where
there
are
only
half
streets
included,
but
we
felt
that
it
was
the
the
best
way
to
go
about
it
instead
of
running
through
alleys,
because
there
would
have
to
be
at
some
point
that
that
we
couldn't
have
the
complete
Street
just
so.
We
had
that
disconnected
I,
guess
and.
G
J
L
A
L
G
F
I
L
So
I
did
send
certified
mailings
to
or
no
not
certified
just
mailings
and
that
is
per
state
law
that
we
notify
anybody
that
will
be
within
this
boundary
and
I
haven't
received
much
feedback.
Just
people
will
call
just
wanting
clarification
on
things
just
because,
just
to
know
if
it
will
affect
them,
but
I
did
outline
outline
that
in
the
letter
to.
N
As
law,
along
with
the
letters
when
somebody
comes
up
to
get
a
building
permit
or
talk
to
somebody
about
changes
that
they
might
want
to
make
within
the
overlay
district,
are
you
guys
ready
with
here
you
go
so
that
you
know
just
guidelines?
And
do
you
see
what
I'm
saying
so
that
you
don't?
They
have
a
little
working
plan
so
that
they
can
write.
L
And
so
when
they
come
up,
and
so
the
only
time
that
this
overlay
district
will
affect
them,
if
they're
doing
substantial
improvement,
which
is
the
50%
of
their
assessed
value
of
their
structure
and
then
otherwise,
new
constructions
so
and
with.
What's
nice,
too,
is
having
these
overlay
districts
on
the
GIS
it'll
be
brought
up
to
counter
minor
heaps
attention
right
away,
that
they
are
within
the
district
and
then
we'll
walk
them
through
with
what
that
means,
and
what
the
what
requirements
they'll
be
needing
to
adhere
to.
M
A
Motion
by
Y
and
a
second
by
Helene,
okay,
I'll
talk
about
this
one.
This
idea
came
up
to
me
in
a
mayor's
meeting.
First
class
mayor's
in
the
state
of
South
Dakota
meet
twice
a
year,
and
one
of
the
issues
that
came
up
was
that
several
of
the
cities
have
experienced
some
issues
and
have
wanted
to
talk
about
it
and
one
city
actually
Aberdeen
had
drafted
a
policy
that
is
considerably
more
involved
in
this
and
goes
in
great
detail
to
define
all
of
the
terms
involved.
A
So
this
is
just
pretty
basic
and
simple.
If
you're
blocking
the
doorway,
that's
not!
Okay!
If
you're
standing
and
people
are
walking
by
you,
you
can
stand
there
just
like
anyone
else
and
request
that
they
stop.
You
can't
stop
them,
that's
all
this
policy
says
and
if,
if
the
council
would
like
to
further
define
what
is
okay
and
what
isn't
okay,
we
can
get
into
that.
A
I
just
wanted
to
get
something
out
here
quickly
before
we
have
an
issue
because
we
haven't
had
an
issue,
but
then
we
don't
have
a
policy
either
and
I
want
the
city
employees
to
understand
that
they
have
a
right
to
tell
a
citizen
who
is
blocking
them
or
keeping
them
from
doing
their
work
or
trying
to
come
into
their
personal
space
that
they
have
a
right
to
say.
That's,
not,
okay,
please
step
back
into
the
lobby
or
you
know
move
away
and
and
so
that
they're
prepared.
A
I
Thank
You
mayor
I
think
we
talked
about
it
before
last
time.
We
had
an
opportunity
to
look
at
this,
the
the
city
employee.
It
says
at
the
bottom
the
last
sentence
we
talked
about.
Do
we
need
to
specify
that
more
or
not?
Maybe
we
don't
but
I'm
thinking.
You
know
a
guy
from
the
street
department
could
say:
yeah,
it's
okay
for
you
to
go
behind
so.
A
A
The
city
of
Aberdeen
did
go
into
great
detail
and
listed
off.
I.
Think
I
personally
trust
the
city
employees
to
have
good
judgment
and
I
don't
want
to
assume
that
they
can't
think
for
themselves
about
whether
it's
appropriate,
a
person
being
a
street
department
employee
telling
someone
they
can
go
behind
someone's
desk
in
the
wastewater
department
or
in
City
Hall
I.
Just
don't
think
that's
going
to
be
an
issue.
I
I
think
it's
a
disciplinary
issue.
I
A
I
think
that's
an
education
matter
and
and
I
wanted
to
get
this
out.
I
will
circulate
it
to
all
of
the
city,
employees
and
I'll.
Mention
that
that
this
you
know,
use
your
judgment
to.
If
it's,
if
you're
in
someone
else's
space,
obviously
don't
give
permissions,
that's
not
appropriate.
You
can
control
your
own
space
and
that
is
appropriate.
I
I,
don't
know
that
we
really
need
to
get
more
detailed
than
that
councilman
Hoyer.
M
I
definitely
think
it's
step
in
the
right
direction.
I
do
think
we
need
to
maybe
go
into
a
little
more
definition
on
the
public's
access
to
and
use
of,
such
public
property
may
be
limited
or
denied
if
it
will
hinder,
disrupt
or
harm
the
intended
purpose
of
each
respective
place.
I
just
worry,
that's
a
little
too
vague,
and
we
might
need
to
just
finesse
that
a
little
bit
more
I
just
worry
that
I,
don't
think
Watertown
we're
gonna,
see
a
lot
of
picketing
or
protesting
in
our
future.
M
I
hope
not,
but
if
we
do
I
think
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
protecting
both
sides
adequately
making
sure
it's
clear
that
we're
not
able
to
overstep
or
prohibit
someone,
because
we
decide
to
and
it's
something
a
certain
way
so
I'm
not
saying
we
would
but
again
that's.
Maybe
we
just
need
to
define
that
a
little
bit
better.
Well,.
A
I
think
what
I'll
do
is
I
think
Aberdeen's
policy
is
probably
the
opposite
of
this
policy.
I'll
circulate
that
and
if
there
are
some
elements
of
it,
that
you
think
we
should
modify.
But
meanwhile
we
can
approve
this
and
I'll
circulate
it.
If,
if
that,
if
you're
feeling
that
it's
approvable
at
this
point,
I
just
like
to
get
going
with
it
and
let
the
city
employees
know
because
it
you
know,
I'd
rather
be
prepared,
at
least
in
general
terms,
than
not
agreed.
F
City
employees
know
that
this
is
coming
or
has
it
been
discussed,
I
mean
I,
don't
want
to
officer.
Look
like
that
where
you
know
your
foisting,
I
shouldn't
say
poisoned.
That's
work,
bad
choice
of
words,
but
you
know
giving
a
policy
out
there
without
some
input
from
the
employees,
so
I
guess
I'm,
just
saying:
there's
any
any
grounds
for
somebody
being
a
object
to
this
as
an
employee
or
gonna.
A
D
I'm
with
Michael
on
that's
the
only
thing
I
would
I
would
say
is:
if
there's
something
that's
not
allowable
or
you
know,
if
we
don't
want
to
have
people
in
there,
picketing
or
protesting
or
whatever
I
mean.
Obviously
disruptive
would
come
into
that
particular
item.
But
you
know
if
we,
you
know
that's
similar
to
like
the
court
house,
not
allowing
political
stuff
on
there
within
30
days
of
election,
something
along
those
lines.
I
mean
that's.
That
would
be
something
that
might
pop
up
where
they're
trying
to
collect
signatures
or
whatever,
which
is
fine.
D
D
N
A
N
Wife,
that's
the
person
I'm
talking
about.
So
if
you
have
a
public
person
who
comes
in
and
they
you
know
kind
of
push
past
and
into
Matt's
office,
for
example,
and
they're
asked
to
leave-
and
they
say
you
know:
I'm
gonna
sit
here
in
the
lobby
and
block
people
from
coming
in
or
whatever
are
there
any
consequences
to
that
public
person?
You
know
of
violating
this
policy
I'm.
A
J
C
A
I,
don't
know
I
mean
if
you're
just
an
employee,
doing
your
job
at
your
desk,
and
someone
says
this
is
a
public
building.
I
have
a
right
to
be
right
here,
telling
the
employees
their
rights
that
they
need
permission
to
be
anywhere
other
than
the
lobby
areas.
Basically,
and
and
if
you
haven't
granted
it,
you
have
every
right
to
say
sorry,
Charlie
your
rights
and
at
the
end
of
that
Lobby.
Until
you
get
my
permission
and.
N
How
you
know
how
far
away
do
they
have
to
let
make
those
people
go
so
they
can
still
do
their
job.
You
see
what
I'm
saying
that
there's
other
factors:
I
love
this
I
mean
but
I'm
just
thinking
you
know
what,
if
somebody's
on
the
street
department
is
doing
something
that
people
are
like?
No,
no,
no,
you
know
or
trees,
don't
cut
down
that
tree
and
I
chained
themselves
to
the
tree.
So.
N
Wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
was
remedy
for
all
the
staff
to
be
able
to
continue
to
do
their
job.
Even
after
asking
these
people
what
to
do
and
not
getting
that
the
staff
get
in
trouble,
you
know
what
I'm
saying
they
want
it.
They
need
to
understand
again
that
they're
safe,
if
they
take
actions
such
as
I'm
gonna,
call
the
police,
so
I'm
gonna
call
me
straight
Iser
right.
A
And
and
I
think
this.
The
intention
anyway,
is
to
clarify.
Yes,
citizens
have
a
right
to
be
on
public
property
or
in
a
public
building
at
appropriate
times,
and
as
long
as
they're,
not
hindering
the
purpose
or
blocking
someone
or
harming
in
any
way.
That
doesn't
mean
that
they
have
rights
to
be
wherever
they
want
whenever
they
want.
This
clarifies
that
so
I
think
it's
it's
helpful
on
both
ends
of
the
spectrum,
setting
some
pretty
general
boundaries
for
both
people
who
want
to
collect
signatures,
say
and
the
city
employee
maybe
doesn't
know.
A
C
N
A
N
H
N
Its
transparency
for
the
public
I
think
you
know
saying
that
yeah
you
could
be
here,
but
you
can't
interfere
with
and
that's
pretty
common
for
any
business.
You
know
or
any
organization
or
any
you
know,
structure
you
can't
you
can
do
it
to
this
fire,
but
you
can't
as
far
as
you
right
skull,
but
you
can't
interfere.
Sorry
yep.
F
Asked
the
first
paragraph
you
know:
I
share
some
same
concerns
that
Michael
pointed
out,
but
inherently
there
is
an
enforcement
and
education
aspect.
This
I
mean
staff,
I,
guess
I'm,
looking
at
our
Police,
Department
particular
need
to
be
aware
of
what
is
allowed
because,
let's
say
somebody
somebody's
picking
in
a
park
and
a
neighbor
calls
the
police
department
well
they're,
going
to
need
to
know
what
the
rules
are
as
far
as
what
kind
of
enforcement
is
going
to
be
allowed
or
what
what
action
is
allowed
are
not
allowing
the
part
of
someone
I.
J
A
F
D
A
A
A
A
G
G
Discussions
with
the
Corps
of
Engineers
on
have
not
gotten
any
direct
feedback
from
them,
which
way
that
would
prefer,
and
once
they
give
us
some
verbal
guidance
on
what
they
would
allow.
We
would
have
to
do
a
formal
application
for
that
regrading
effort
that
they
would
then
take
roughly
three
to
four
weeks
to
review
and
actually
give
us
a
permit
to
do
that.
Work
and
that's
where
we're
at
right
now
is:
we
began
the
discussions
with
the
Corps
and
anticipate
proceeding
with
the
formal
application
pending
their
feedback
from
our
initial
discussions.
G
Speak
to
that
mayor,
if
you
wish
yes,
councilman
Redeem
see
I
met
with
the
police
chief
and
Street
superintendent
and
myself
as
a
city
engineer
and
exploring
that
option.
There
was
also
requests
down
on
in
the
downtown
area
here
on
first
encamped
I
believe
was
the
other
location,
the
one
up
on
2nd
and
14th
from
a
technical
standpoint,
meeting
the
qualifications
for
a
four-way.
Stop
that
side
street
traffic
just
doesn't
generate
the
amount
that's
needed
to
technically
qualify
it
for
a
four-way
stop.
G
It
is
more
difficult,
but
on
the
off-peak
times
it's
really
not,
and
so
then
it
becomes
a
conflict
of
if
it's
worth
disrupting
that
14th
heavy
traffic
for
the
times
at
the
side,
street
2nd
Avenue.
Excuse
me,
2nd
Street
is
not
busy.
That's
we're
weighing
those
options
out.
I
would
lead
towards
heating
caution
to
putting
in
a
four-way
because
of
those
off-peak
times.
It's
really
not
justifying
it
very
well
at
all.
G
D
What
Jason's
talking
about
is
about
810
in
the
morning
in
3:30
and
then
Sunday
mornings.
I
would
guess
is
probably
the
peak
times
on
those
just
a
you
know,
watch
for
pedestrians,
or
do
you
see
a
lot
of
kids
riding
bike
there
as
well?
Well,
there's
that
bike
path
on
14th,
so
maybe
just
some
we
get
people
there.
H
C
A
M
Just
follow-up
from
last
time,
with
a
crosswalks
and
stuff
this
for
you
Heath,
but
I'm,
looking
at
1st
Avenue
Northeast
and
then
First
Avenue
southeast
here
in
the
downtown.
Maybe
I
just
missed
the
schedule,
but
are
we
looking
at
finishing
out
those
crosswalks
that
are
currently
missing?
I
mean
like
even
out
in
front
of
this
building.
There
isn't
one
there
so
painting.
C
G
M
G
Great
question:
councilman
all
your
the
response
to
that
one
would
be
that
the
street
department
hasn't
obviously
initiated
those
crosswalks
being
painted
and
they
did
not
get
it
done
in
one
fell
swoop
and
they
do
intend
on
coming
back
now.
I
can't
speak
specifically
to
the
intersections
that
they
have
remaining
and
superintendent
Bayne
and
is
still
here,
but
I
do
know
they
anticipate
coming
back
to
do
additional
crosswalks
throughout
the
downtown
area.
O
First
Avenue
South
staff
did
start
I
think
this
morning,
striping
that
I
don't
know
if
I
haven't
been
down
it
today,
but
we
are
working
on
that.
We
are
short-staffed
in
our
sign
in
signal
department,
so
we
lost
fell
it
to
a
different
department
here
about
a
month
and
a
half
ago.
So
we're
way
behind.
K
A
A
Okay,
other
old
business
I
do
have
a
piece
of
new
business.
That
I
would
like
to
announce
that
Terri
Kelly
has
been
appointed
as
the
interim
director
of
Parks,
Recreation
and
Forestry
Department
and
he's
here.
So
if
you
want
to
wave
Terri
and
that
was
not
formally
approved
by
the
park
department,
although
I
did
request
their
input
on
that,
and
everyone
was
strongly
in
favor
of
having
Terri
act
as
the
director
in
the
interim.
While
we're
advertising
for
a
new
director,
is
there
any
other
new
business
councilman
ville
Hauer
is.
F
There
anything
that
it
was
a
big
public
event
last
week
at
the
North
Shore,
and
there
are
several
several
in
the
room
that
were
here
considering
the
Stoney
Point
proposed
Stoney
Point
development
plans,
anything
that
you
care
to
say
I,
don't
believe
you
had
a
chance
to
be
there.
So
maybe
I'm
catching
you
off-guard
at
this
mayor,
but
I
know
it
was
a
big
event
and
generate
a
lot
of
interest
and
I'm
sure
gonna
be
generating
a
lot
of
questions.
Any
comments
you
care
to
make
them
well.
A
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
there
they
mentioned
that
they're,
they
know
they're
going
to
need
approval
of
some
zoning
requests
that
they'll
be
making.
They
have
not
made
any
requests
for
zoning.
They
haven't
made
any
requests
for
subdivision.
The
only
thing
that
they've
requested
is
grading
and
they
have
complied
with
all
of
the
requirements
for
grading
permits
and
they've
had
several
grading
permits
and
there's
another
one
pending
Heath.
You
want
to
add
to
that.
No.
A
P
You
I
would
just
piggyback
off
of
that.
I
already
had
the
pleasure
of
being
at
that
meeting
and
I
kept
thinking
that
it
would
sure
be
nice
if
we
as
a
city
had
a
comprehensive
plan
as
to
what
we
were
going
to
do
with
our
natural
resources,
specifically
our
Lakes
moving
forward,
so
that
when
something
like
this
comes
forward,
we
have
some
sort
of
a
policy
on
what
we
allow.
What
we
don't
allow,
as
opposed
to
doing
it
at
an
ad
hoc
1:1
measure,
I
think
it
would
be
nice
if
we
started
that
discussion
now.
A
When
you
have
the
lake
campus
Kumasi
plan,
which
is
really
close
to
being
approved
and
also
our
comprehensive
City
plan
is
been
in
works
for
several
years
and
also
close
to
being
approved
and
I,
we
don't
ever
get
down
into
the
details
and
a
comprehensive
plan
of
what
we
would
allow
in
a
development.
The
general
terms
people
can
do
what
they
want,
with
their
property
and
in
general
ways,
so
everything
that
they're
doing
is
allowable
there.
A
I,
don't
know
that
we
would
have
needed
to
do
anything
in
a
to
be
prepared
to
deal
with
their
request.
There's
just
so
little
property
left
at
the
lake
that
isn't
already
developed.
We
are
looking
at
some
other
changes
to
our
regulations
to
allow
different
kinds
of
development
at
the
lake,
because
the
lake
is
unique,
but
nothing
is
ready
yet
to
come
to
the
counselor
to
the
public.
M
Just
say
to
that
about
a
month
or
so
back
I
did
submit
a
preliminary
document
to
start
working
on
a
potential
zoning
for
the
lake
for
development,
so
I
mean
we
do
have
a
little
bit
going
on
it
in
that
direction.
Just
for
seeing
with
some
of
those
other
zonings
that
we
passed
a
while
back
there
that
we
were
likely
gonna
see
some
more
development.
So
there's
things
in
the
works
we
just
got
to
get
moving
on
mm-hmm.
C
M
For
other
new
business,
I
did
have
one
other
thing,
so
I'm
all
in
us
and
fun
for
sure,
but
during
Homecoming,
as
their
folks
were
coming
down
camp
and
their
bouncy
bounce
vehicles,
which
I
remember
doing
as
well.
We
might
want
to
look
at
in
the
future
advising
them
to
remove
the
trailer
hitches
because
we
can
sawzall
through
the
roof
of
a
van,
pretty
easy.
We
might
want
to
curb
off
those
trailer
hitches
because,
as
I
was
watching,
the
parade
the
hitches
were
digging
into
that
chip
seal.
C
O
G
As
far
as
the
formal,
addressing,
of
course,
that
entire
subdivision
and
the
Lots
have
been
plaited,
everything
is
pulled.
A
building
permit
has
a
an
address
associated
with
it.
So
as
far
as
the
GIS
documentation
and
the
county
records
and
google
maps,
and
things
like
that
that
that
should
start
populating
those
those
resources
with
the
addresses
that
have
been
issued
for
the
permitted
Lots.
D
I,
don't
know
I'm,
not
sure.
If
the
public's
been
aware
of
this
yet
but
I
know,
the
council
did
get
an
email
that
they've
Watertown
resident
that
has
been
successful
in
business
as
donating
hundred
twenty
Strider
bikes
to
the
elementary
schools,
I
believe
it's
next
or
this
Friday
at
10:00
a.m.
at
Jefferson,
it's
Jesse
Jones
of
Legends
suspension.
They
believe
he
graduated
92
I,
believe
and
then
with
Ryan
McFarlane,
the
CEO
and
founder
of
Strider
bike.
So
basically
pedal
s
bikes.
It's
to
help.