►
From YouTube: Council Meeting 06 17 2019
Description
Agenda items include the second reading of Ordinance No. 19-06 as well as Resolution No. 19-25 and 19-26.
C
A
Alright
I
can
see
that
the
chambers
are
full
of
people
who
may
want
to
speak
about
one
of
our
agenda
items
tonight
and
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
coming.
An
engaged
community
will
help
our
council
to
make
correct
decisions.
That's
really
important
and
my
goal
is
to
ensure
that
everything
gets
done
in
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
for
everyone
involved.
So
with
that
we'll
get
started.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
consent
agenda.
A
Their
motion
move
by
Bueller
second
by
l'olam
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries
item.
2
is
the
public
comment.
This
is
a
time
reserved
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
to
step
forward,
and
do
so.
Please
state
your
name
in
the
microphone
for
the
record
before
making
your
comment
and
if
your
comment
is
related
to
an
agenda
item.
Please
wait
until
that
agenda
item
is
taken
up
by
the
council.
Is
anyone
here
who
cares
to
speak?
A
A
B
A
Anyone
here
for
just
a
general
comment,
seeing
none
we'll
move
on
item
number
three:
is
approval
of
the
agenda
sold
by
Ville,
how
a
second,
by
manty
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
okay.
Item
number
four
is
the
one
you
were
looking
for
this.
A
So
have
some
rules,
souks
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
want
to
talk
about
this
I
will
allow
half
an
hour
for
public
testimony
and
in
order
to
make
sure
that
everyone
has
a
chance
to
state
their
position.
I
will
ask
each
of
you
to
limit
your
time
at
the
podium
to
a
minute
or
so
to
clearly
state
your
opinion.
Please
do
not
repeat
explanations
which
have
already
been
given
and
come
to
the
microphone.
You
say
your
name
before
giving
your
opinion,
and
this
is
not
a
debate.
A
Please
do
not
come
back
to
the
podium
once
you
have
had
your
time
unless
you've
been
summoned,
one
of
the
council
members
or
me,
and
so
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing
and
I'll
start
by
relating
some
written
testimony
which
we
received.
We
did
get
a
letter
from
Deanne
Ellison
roadie
of
264
North,
Lake
Drive.
She
is
strongly
opposed
to
the
rezone
due
to
safety
hazards
from
increased
traffic,
light
pollution
and
other
toxic
pollutants.
This
will
open
the
gates
to
more
zone
changes,
only
two
other
small
C
three
zones.
A
This
area
is
huge
by
comparison,
and
this
could
be
a
disastrous
precedent.
We
also
got
a
letter
from
Jan
Tate
of
292
and
296
Arizona
Avenue.
She
objects
to
any
commercial
development
on
the
property
in
question.
We
also
had
several
phone
call
testimonies,
given
one
from
Roy
Walsh
directly
west
of
this
application.
He
said
he's
in
favor
and
wants
to
do
the
same
thing
with
his
property.
A
D
D
We're
not
hearing
that
anything
on
that.
So
I
don't
have
any
idea,
and
if
we
change
that
to
the
commercial,
we
would
have
no
say
about
what
could
be
done,
Nura,
but
could
not
be
done
and
once
it's
changed
it.
It's
there
forever
and
I'm
wondering
about
if
it
it'll
be
a
lot
of
noise
and
a
lot
of
extra
traffic
that
we
wouldn't
have
Roger
won't
hear
the
traffic
because
he's
down
further
around
the
other
side
behind
the
trees.
D
My
driveway
lines
up
right
with
this
property
and
I
I
feel
that
we
have
had
everything
so
nice
and
quiet
and
stuff
there
and
putting
something
like
that,
and
it
is
just
not
the
right
thing
and
they
are
not
telling
us
what
they
would
do
with
the
property
either
Roger
our
room.
But
what?
Why
do
they
want?
D
We
have
had
this
piece
of
property
since
1964,
it's
good
and
quiet
residential
area,
and
we
wanted
to
stay
that
way.
If
it
came
in
your
street
in
town,
you
would
not
like
that
either
and
I
don't
know.
Does
this
go
just
for
the
rights?
Excuse
me
Rory,
lamb
and
Rogers,
and
then
does
it
go
for
the
slew
on
the
other
side,
clear
up
to
the
water
tower,
or
is
it
just
these
few
blocks
right
here
that
we're
discussing
that
we're
talking
about
we're.
D
D
D
They
I,
don't
think
they
should
be
able
to
tell
us
what
we
need
to
have
in
front
of
our
houses
and
there's
places
there
to
buy
gas
Airport,
there's
a
place
right
at
the
airport,
road
and
now
North
Shore,
whatever
they're
going
to
do
and
compass'
College,
so
I
don't
feel
we
need
to
have
a
convenient
start
on
whatever
I
I.
Don't
know
he
isn't
telling
us.
D
D
We
definitely
hope
that
you
will
see
that
this
isn't
an
option.
They
don't
have.
They
don't
tell
us
what
they're
doing
and
my
understanding
is.
The
city
doesn't
have
a
plan
for
it
either
and
I
think
it's
premature
to
try
and
do
something
with
that
when
the
city
doesn't
know
what
they're
gonna
do
with
it,
and
some
of
that
so
I
just
hope
that
we
can
solve
this
problem.
Thank.
A
E
You,
madam
mayor,
there
have
been
discussions
with
the
d-o-t
as
far
as
what
they
would
approve
here.
I,
don't
know
a
formal
application
has
been
made,
but
the
DoD
has
indicated
the
appropriate
dimension
from
the
intersection
of
Highway
20
and
what
would
be
Martin
Street
and
North
Lake
Drive,
where
they
intersect
and
the
urban
planners
in
here
as
well.
If
I
could
deferred
the
exactly
mention.
I
believe
that
they
gave
would
mean
that
it
would
have
to
be
a
shared
drive
amongst
the
applicants,
land
and
the
property
to
the
west
of
them
600.
E
F
A
The
the
condition,
if
you
can
see
on
this
map
this
property
is
mate,
has
already
been
plaited
into
Lots,
which
do
not
meet
the
district
requirements
for
the
commercial
zone,
so
they
would
be
non-conforming
Lots.
So
before
this
would
become
effective,
the
plat
would
have
to
be
completed,
making
conforming
Lots
to
the
c3
zone.
That
was
a
condition
placed
by
the
plan,
commission
or
approval.
A
So
if
it
passes,
then
the
I
will
hold
on
to
publishing
it
until
the
plat
materials
have
been
submitted
and
approved,
and
then
publish
the
passage
of
the
ordinance
and
the
ordinance
does
not
become
effective
until
20
days
after
its
public
publicly
noticed
in
the
newspaper
so
will
be
published.
So
we'll
wait
if
it
does
pass
so.
Okay,
sir,
go
ahead.
Please
state
your
name
Marlo.
G
Now
this
would
be
right
in
my
front
yard,
out
there
and
and
I
really
concerns
me
and
you,
as
elected
officials,
also
represent
the
residents
and
homeowners
of
this
area
and
can
set
precedent
now
by
allowing
a
business
to
be
started
in
someone's
front
yard
or
you
can
preserve
the
quality
and
solitude
of
living
on
the
lake
without
the
concerns
of
a
business
being
built
in
your
front
yard.
It's
just
that
precedent
that
you're
setting
anybody
anybody
at
any
time
can
come
along
in
a
residential
district
and
say
hey.
G
We
have
a
lot
here,
let's
rezone
that
so
I
can
start
a
business
and
that
that
really
bothers
me
and
and
again
I
didn't
buy
that
house
and
pay
taxes
out
there.
They
have
a
business
in
my
front
yard,
so
I
hope
you
will
just
honor
the
the
people
and
the
taxpayers
that
live
out
there
in
and
and
listen
to
their
concerns.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank.
A
H
Hi
Council,
I'm
brian
brand
right
I,
also
bought
a
property
out
at
the
lake
and
there's
nothing
like
living
off
the
lake
I
I
as
well.
I
want
to
retire
at
the
lake.
However,
I'm
extremely
excited
about
some
things.
Starting
to
happen,
our
lake,
because
I
feel,
like
our
lake,
really
is
so
underutilized.
It's
such
a
great
asset
I
mean
I,
have
friends
that
come
to
my
house
all
the
time
and
they
they
love
coming
there,
because
there's
virtually
nowhere
to
go
on
our
lake
I
mean
there's.
H
We
have
north
shortcoming,
we
have
Doris's
deal
there.
We
have
Kondos
thing
on
the
south
side,
but
it's
not
a
lot
for
our
an
entire
community
I
get
where
they're
coming
from
here,
but
it's
it's
no
different
than
if
there
was
one
hardware
store
in
town
here.
Nobody
wants
competition,
nobody
wants
it
across
from
them.
I
have
a
house
at
69th,
Lake
Drive.
If
they're
across
from
me.
It
is
what
it
is.
H
I'm
I'm
really
excited
I
I,
don't
think
it's
gonna
ruin
the
lake
just
because
we
get
a
few
people
come
and
go
on
just
because
if
they
have
a
business,
doesn't
mean
they
can
be
recluse
I
mean
they
still
have
to
have
the
same
rules
and
regulations.
We
have
to
have
them
on
every
street
corner
in
Watertown.
H
A
I
Madam
mayor
council,
Kyle
Holloman
with
Haugen
Nelson
Realty
I,
spoke
on
in
favor
of
this
at
the
Planning
Commission,
so
I'll
try
and
make
my
presentations
extinct
here
and
quick
and
not
repeat
anything
I'm
you're
talking
dolly
land,
ours,
r1
zoning,
there's
very
few
mult
different
zoning
categories,
around
Lake,
Camp
ESCO
right
now.
So
here's
Dolly's
land,
the
piece:
that's
it's
not
showing
up
your
the
piece.
That's
in
question
is
down
here
on
the
right
all
of
the
land
to
the
north
of
Highway
20.
You
can
see
on
this
thing
here.
I
That's
all
zoned
r1,
including
the
the
photo
on
the
Left,
which
is
Laframboise
construction,
so
you've
got
construction,
stuff,
they're,
all
in
r1
zoning.
So
unfortunately,
compass
K
is
just
landlocked
like
any
other
lake
in
the
region.
So
you've
got
confessed.
Collage.
That's
got
a
c2
zoning,
as
indicated
on
the
photo
on
the
right,
multiple
properties
on
either
side
of
those
of
that
facility
have
sold
in
the
last
12
15
years,
hasn't
negatively
impacted
property
values.
It
increases
the
tax
base
by
having
commercial
zoning
and
new
construction
going
around
you
talk
about
North
Shore.
I
That's
been
referenced
as
well:
North
Shore
was
on
the
open
market
for
224
days
in
2014
and
15
Sam
bacon
until
a
businessman
came
forward
and
decided
to
bring
it
forward
and
make
it
to
what
it
was
so
you've
got
a
c2,
Zoning,
they're,
completely
surrounded
by
r1,
also
backed
up
to
highway
20.
You
talk
about
the
prop
location.
Over
their
props
got
a
multitude
of
zonings.
In
there
you
got
our
one
you've
got
c2
you've
got
our
you've
got
egg.
You've
got
peds
out
there,
so
there's
a
multitude
of
zoning
there.
I
You
also
have
an
industrial
zone
piece
of
ground.
Around
Lincoln
Pesce
you've
got
I,
which
is
where
casino
Speedway
is
I'm,
going
to
great
detail
on
the
phone
calls
I'm
sure
you
receive
on
that,
but
it
does
pay
and
does
bring
tax
dollars
into
Watertown,
and
it
is
completely
surrounded
by
r1
zoning
as
well
I
mean
then
going
back
to
the
h2o
20
piece.
I
You
know
this
I
took
these
right
off
the
the
Community
Foundation's
pages
2,200
people,
respondents
of
the
community
over
10%
of
our
community,
talked
in
favor
of
of
the
h2o
20
initiatives,
and
one
of
them
was
the
fact
that,
like
mr.
brand
Wright
says,
the
common
responses
was
that
Lake
and
Pesce
is
frequently
cited
as
the
community's
greatest
natural
asset,
but
also
the
most
underutilized,
and
so
in
looking
at
potential
strategic
actions.
That's
what
this
this
group
is
is
referencing
here
today,
I
mean
the
unfortunate
part.
I
Is
we
don't
have
a
comprehensive
land
use
plan
for
Lake
Camp
Eska,
but
neither
have
many
of
the
other
lake
communities
in
the
Midwest
and
in
the
north,
I've
got
you've
got
Okoboji,
you've
got
Grand
Marais
and
you
also
have
Brainerd
Minnesota
all
residential
properties,
surrounded
by
commercial
I
speak
in
favor
of
this.
When
you
talk
about
increased
construction
and
and
commercial
properties,
commercial
properties
pay
a
higher
real
estate
taxes,
so
that
won't
negatively
impact
the
real
estate
tax
valuations
on
these
properties,
and
you
talk
about
anytime.
There's
continued
development
in
an
area.
A
G
J
Name
is
Aaron
Hanson
and
my
wife
and
I
we
live
at
the
lake
as
well.
One
of
the
one
of
the
things
about
living
at
the
lake
and
water
town
has
said
it
is
a
little
bit
noisy
at
times.
We
don't.
We
don't
mind
that
at
all
that's
part
of
it.
We
enjoy
the
fact
that
other
people
are
enjoying
the
lake,
that's
great.
If
we,
if
we
didn't
like
that,
we
we
would
have
selected
a
lake
and
there's
hundreds
of
glacial
lakes
in
our
area.
J
You
guys
are
all
aware
of
that,
and
many
of
them
don't
have
anyone
living
on
those
lakes
and
if,
if
that
were
something
we
were
concerned
with,
we
probably
would
have
done
that
we're
very
much
in
favor
of
it.
We
want
to
increase
accessibility.
The
lake
I
think
that's
important
for
people
who
live
in
town
or
maybe
live
out
of
town
to
have
that
same
accessibility
or
close
to
accessibility
that
we
enjoy.
J
J
It
would
fully
support
that
as
well
it
if
we
weren't
in
favor
of
it,
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
didn't
happen,
I'm
sure
that
myself
and
and
other
neighbors
would
all
pull
together
and
potentially
buy
that
land
and
ensure
that
that
that
didn't
happen,
I'm,
assuming
that
they
could
neighbors
in
this
area,
could
probably
do
the
same
thing
if
they
were
concerned
about
that,
and
they
could
do
whatever
they
want,
with
the
property
plant,
trees
or
whatever,
that
is
to
ensure
that
it
isn't
developed
so
to
increase.
You
know
our
tax
base.
J
M
L
Spoke
at
the
planning
zoning,
so
I
won't
touch
on
a
lot
of
that
things.
I
just
want
to
touch
on
some
things
that
people
have
got
came
to
me
as
far
as
uses
uses
in
the
c3.
That's
what
things
that
people
are
worried
about,
I
wanted
to
touch
base
kind
of
on
the
existing
campgrounds
campgrounds
are
only
allowed
in
the
c3
commercial
highway
district.
We.
M
L
How
many
campgrounds
around
are
like
currently,
so
we
are
already
having
the
same
uses
in
a
c3
in
three
different
areas
in
our
lake.
If
you
take
a
look
at,
let's
say
we
have
North
Shore.
We
have
this
piece
of
property.
We
have
mr.
Dunn's
land,
that's
across
from
campus
collage.
That
piece
of
land
has
been
approved
and
passed
this
board
as
a
c3k
highway
commercial
use.
He
just
didn't
plant
it
so
right.
In
line
with
this,
it's
already
been
approved,
c3
highway
commercial
I.
Think
you
got
to
take
that
into
consideration.
L
L
When
you're
go
to
these
meetings
and
you
look
around
the
lake,
there
isn't
very
many
pieces
of
land
that
we
can
utilize
for
commercial
usage
when
you
think
about
a
piece
of
property,
that's
between
a
boat
landing
and
a
c3
highway
commercial
or
highway.
It's
probably
like
I,
said
I
I
empathize
with
these
people.
I
really
do.
But
if
we
want
this,
which
I
go
to
these
meetings-
and
we
talk
these
things
over
and
we
everybody
says
that
we
should
do
it-
we
have
to
find
places
for
these
and
with
without
having
an
empty
lake.
N
N
Moving
to
Watertown
I
do
believe
that
there's
I
like
having
the
idea
of
an
aesthetically
pleasing
commercial
property
and
I
do
believe
that
there's
due
process
to
making
it
as
safe
as
possible
for
the
residents
and
I
don't
expect
that
we're
going
to
be
inviting
in
like
LA
Airport
traffic
into
that
area,
I
think
it's
going
to
be
reasonable.
I
also
own
a
business
in
town,
cocoa,
in
fitness
of
women's
retail
store
and
from
an
economic
business
standpoint
and
as
a
marketing
entrepreneurial
degree
or
someone
with
that
degree.
N
I
really
believe
that
what
we're
I
know
that
local
and
especially
rural
communities,
are
taking
such
a
hit
considerably
with
online
retail
and
just
people
moving
to
maybe
bigger
communities
and
from
somebody
who's
been
involved
in
public
service
and
seen
lake
communities
thrive
on
the
lake
say.
Do
you
have
and
utilizing
them
well?
N
But
you
know
I
see
so
many
friends
and
of
mine
and
young
families
who
flood
out
of
this
town
on
weekends
or
on
celebrations
to
go
to
Okoboji
or
go
to
Detroit
Lakes
or
go
to
Alexandria,
because
those
are
what
they
think
of
as
recreational
fun.
Lakes
and
I
know
that
we
can
retain
these
people
and
keep
these
tax
dollars
in
town
and
I.
Don't
know
about
you
guys,
but
I
really,
like
I,
mean
I
like
paying
sales
tax.
N
N
If
it's
across
from
my
property,
I
will
be
happy
to
know
that
more
people
have
access
to
the
lake
and
I
know
that
the
city
does
what
they
can
to
make
it
safe
and
accessible,
and
so
it's
not
such
an
interruption
to
the
to
the
people
living
on
the
lake,
but
I
think
it's
an
exciting
opportunity.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
O
All
right,
Gary,
Van,
Hill,
272,
North,
Lake,
Drive,
I'm,
very
new
to
this
area,
actually
just
bought
the
house
a
little
over
a
year
ago,
loved
it
not
really
saying
I'm
for
it
or
against
it,
but
I've
been
in
business
myself
a
long
time,
I've
rezone
two
properties
I've,
never
heard
of
where
you
rezone
a
property
without
intent
of
what
it's
going
to
be
used
for
it.
Where
people
are
just
supposed
to
swallow
and
say:
okay,
they
can
do
whatever
they
want
to
do
there.
O
When
I
bought
the
house
at
272,
I
was
told
how
much
money
I
could
spend
on
it
to
remodel
it.
I
couldn't
even
just
remodel
it.
The
way
I
wanted
to
I
could
only
spend
X
amount
of
money
to
remodel
it.
So
if,
if
I'm
not
trying
to
change
the
zoning
of
the
house,
I'm
not
trying
to
make
it
commercial,
why
would
you
be
so
tough
on
an
r1
when
they
just
want
to
remodel
their
home,
but
let
somebody
rezone
a
property
to
ac3
and
not
even
tell
the
residents
around
it.
O
What
it
is,
they're
gonna
do
with
it,
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say
just
like
I
said:
if
I
knew
what
it
was,
gonna
be,
I
wouldn't
even
say,
I'd
be
against
it.
I
just
can't
imagine,
there's
owning
a
property
and
then
let
that
person
maybe
sell
it
to
somebody
else.
They
could
do
whatever
they
wanted
and
not
make
it
clear.
P
P
That's
gonna
create
an
awful
lot
of
light,
wash
that
we
see
around
a
lot
of
convenience
stores
in
the
evening
and
when
I
moved
to
the
lake
almost
30
years
ago,
I
did
my
homework.
I'd
look
to
see
if
I
was
in
our
one.
I
didn't
want
anything
to
do
with
being
near
commercial
property
and
that's
what
I
was
moving
into
by
my
choice.
P
A
Q
Q
Yes,
of
course,
I
can
one
in
Pali
268
North,
Lake
Drive,
and
while
this
property
is
described
as
north
of
the
sailboat
landing,
it
is
actually
north
of
all
of
the
houses
down
to
the
corner,
which
is
about
278
North
Lake
Drive,
which
would
be
the
accurate
description.
So
it's
north
of
my
home
I
understand
there
is
a
lake
plan
being
developed
comprehensive,
like
parent
plan.
Could
anybody
speak
to
that?
Please?
What's
the
name
of
that
is
and
what
the
intention
is.
A
Q
Q
S
Q
Q
Okay,
so
this
that
we
have
used
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
a
plan
that
you
say,
you've
wanted
to
do
for
a
very
long
time
and
it's
almost
ready-
and
it's
looking
in
the
long
term
in
the
long
term
about
what
you
want
to
do
with
the
lake,
and
this
request
has
come
this
moment
right
before
the
plan
is
being
looked
at.
I
do
understand
from
you
Sarah
that
it's
going
to
take
time,
but
isn't
that's
what
this
is
about,
making
really
good
decisions
about
what
we
do
at
the
lake.
A
Caesar
property
can
be
anything.
Q
Q
Even
if
we
looked
at
a
C
2
that
has
to
do
with
the
residents,
but
right
now
the
choices
you're
making
are
something
that
we
have
you.
We,
the
people
who
have
done
this
plan,
have
no
control
over
my
understanding
and
I'm.
Sorry
that
the
people
from
the
people
are
doing
the
plan,
but
when
Vanessa
was
here,
she
said:
we've
scheduled
this
for
an
open
space
and
it's
an
open
space,
because
it's
we're
looking
at
all
of
the
lands
that
flood
and
we
don't
want
to
be
doing
development,
even
though
this
one
is
higher.
Q
We
don't
want
to
be
doing
development
in
those
places
it
flooded
this
year.
Not
only
did
it
flood,
but
our
sewers
didn't
work.
We
weren't
so
use
our
sewers,
so
you're,
looking
at
putting
something
any
kind
of
property
there.
That
could
in
fact
deal
with
the
infrastructure.
I've
heard
many
things
talked
about
about
what
this
might
be
and
I'm
not
saying
there
shouldn't
be
commercial
development.
I'm
not
saying
people
shouldn't
enjoy
the
lake.
Q
Q
There
is
one
dock,
there's
one
very
utilitarian
toilet
and
now
we're
talking
about
that
being
a
cost
to
the
city,
but
somebody
making
their
commercial
property
using
that
potentially
because
they've
talked
about
a
marina
as
access
a
business
using
that
as
direct
access
to
the
for
that
purpose,
as
well
as
that's
often
very
busy
with
people
in
the
community
who
want
to
come
out
and
fish.
There
is
no
light.
Q
Mr.
Cole
Haines
asks
well
what
about
the
light
pollution
there's
one
light
before
in
front
of
the
boat
ramp.
There
is
no
light
pollution.
Now
there
is
no
sound
pollution.
I
can
appreciate.
People
have
lived
on
other
lakes,
I
know
that
there
sounds,
but
it's
different
when
you're
talking
about
a
commercial
property
in
that
place
where
you
have
no
idea
what
will
happen
to
it,
and
you
have
a
plan
that
you've
paid
for
that.
The
city
has
put
effort
into
that.
Q
People
had
public
hearings
and
made
comments,
and
now
it's
almost
ready
for
consideration
and
up
to
you
to
make
excellent
choices
and
move
that
along
and
a
decision
seems
to
be
premature.
I
think
is
what
someone
said
that
it's
premature
for
this
time.
Let's
look
at
the
entire
plan.
Let's
make
a
good
plan
that
everyone
can
use.
One
final
point:
the
properties
that
are
c3
now
were
there
before
any
of
the
houses.
Q
Were
there
they've
been
there
6070
years
so
when
people
are
choosing
to
put
their
house
on
either
side
of
Lakeshore,
lunker's,
North,
Shore
or
pack,
their
houses
in
by
the
prop
those
are
choices
they're
making
now
with
existing
property,
that's
very
different,
then
changing
a
property
now
that
has
existing
properties
by
it.
I
see
that
it's
quite
a
different
thing.
Just
like
you
to
think
about
that.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
consideration
and
I
certainly
hope
we
can
implement
the
plan,
that's
being
developed
and
that
people
have
put
so
much
effort
into
thank.
A
M
Good
evening,
I'm
Vanessa
Victor
with
infrastructure
design
group
I
also
live
at
196
North
Lake
Drive
I
was
a
part
of
the
team
for
the
lake
confess
con
master
plan,
our
total
fee,
for
that
was
about
eighty-five
thousand
sorry
I'm
late.
We
were
actually
having
a
meeting
to
finalize
up
before
I
came
today.
M
T
My
name
is
Joanne
Ruby
I
grew
up
on
the
camp
Eska
when
I
was
just
a
teenager
like
camp
Eska
means
an
awful
lot
to
me.
We've
had
two
houses
on
three
houses:
I'm
a
competitor
and
my
family,
in
fact,
we'd
lovely,
confess,
cuss.
So
much.
My
daughter
wrote
a
song
about
growing
up
on
Lake
Camp
Eska,
compelling
memories
go
pretty
deep,
there's
nothing
like
sleeping
to
the
waves
and
on
and
on
and
on
many
people
have
had
their
given
that
to
their
kids
and
they
sing
it
because
they
grew
up
on
that
confessor.
T
It
means
so
much
to
so
many
people
and
I
am
one
of
them
Oh.
One
of
my
concerns,
I
think
one
of
the
biggest
ones
is
we
don't
know
what
it
can
be.
I
think
that
unknown
is
is
what
scares
a
lot
of
us
or
what
could
it
be
if
they
sell
it
or
whatever,
and
we
have
no
control
over
that
I
think
everybody
has
said
so
many
things
I'm
just
kind
of
echoing
it's
been
so
peaceful,
just
so
very
peaceful
out
there
and
it's
he
kind
of
hate
it
to
stop.
T
U
Hello,
my
name
is
Colt
Roush
Inc
I
live
at
794,
North
Lake,
Drive
I
am
for
the
rezoning
of
this
piece
of
property.
I'm
excited
about
the
way
this
community
is
growing
and
I
think
in
order
to
retain
young
families
like
myself
and
future
families,
you
know
to
keep
them
in
this
community
and
keep
this
community
growing.
This
has
to
be
one
step
towards
towards
that.
You
know
it's
one
step
of
many
that
need
to
be
done,
but
we
have
to
start
somewhere.
U
That
being
said,
I
don't
think
that
we
need
to
ignore
certain
aesthetically
pleasing
buildings
that
should
be
built
there
I
mean
we
have
too
many
pull
buildings
in
this
tenant
already.
I
think
that
should
be
something
that
needs
to
be
considered
when
this
is
being
developed
and
yeah.
I
think
I
think
it's
it's
something
that's
gonna
grow
and
it's
gonna
make
like
compressor
more
of
an
attraction
for
other
people
other
than
just
the
residents.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
E
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
I'll,
give
a
brief
synopsis
here.
Obviously
this
is
a
petition
to
rezone.
This
is
the
public
hearing
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinances
before
the
council
tonight.
This
action
has
passed.
The
Planning
Commission
on
may
23rd
on
a
vote
of
6
to
1,
recommending
approval
to
the
City
Council
that
final
approval,
of
course,
resting
on
the
city's
Council's
decision.
The
other
facts
of
the
case.
E
Depending
on
how
the
discussion
goes
and
what
information
the
council
would
like.
I
do
have
a
list
of
the
approved
c3
loose
uses
that
I
can
put
up,
along
with
the
conditional
uses
that
fall
underneath
that
zoning
district
and
I
also
wanted
to
touch
on
a
couple
of
questions
that
arose
just
for
informational
purposes
and
facts.
Regarding
the
case,
access
onto
any
city
streets
would
be
reviewed
at
the
time
of
developments
and
approved.
According
to
the
engineering
design
standards,
so
those
would
be
regulated
in
relation
to
those
requirements.
E
We
did
do
some
research
and
tried
to
find
any
documentation.
We
had
on
a
previous
reason,
applications
for
this
property.
We
could
not
find
any
information
in
the
minutes
from
previous
Planning
Commission
meetings,
that's
not
to
state
that
it
didn't
happen,
but
we
just
were
unable
to
find
the
historical
data
that
supported
what
exactly
was
applied
for
and
what
exactly
was
denied
or
why.
But
we
did
try
to
do
some
research
there
along
those
lines
and
the.
E
The
access
along
Highway
20,
where
he
touched
on,
would
be
at
600
feet.
I
also
wanted
to
point
out
too.
We
do
have
the
current
city
comprehensive,
Land,
Use,
Plan
and
again.
This
is
facts
related
to
the
case
and
the
use
of
this
land.
One
of
the
things
the
Planning
Commission
is
charged
to
do
is
to
reference
that
comprehensive,
Land,
Use
Plan
any
time
we're
looking
at
rezoning
a
property.
That
plan
does
include
a
future
land
use
map
and
does
include
the
area
around
the
lake.
E
This
particular
portion
of
the
land
around
the
lake
on
the
north
side
is
identified
as
mixed
use
in
the
2005
2020
copies
of
land-use
plan.
Of
course,
there
is
all
the
residential
uses
adjacent
to
the
lake,
but
this
particular
land
falls
into
the
mixed
use
category
on
that
comprehensive
land
use
plan.
Those
are
the
facts
related
to
the
case,
as
it's
been
presented
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
through
the
first
reading
at
City,
Council
again
we'd
be
glad
to
help
answer
any
further
questions
counsel
might
have
Thank.
K
E
E
E
K
You
couple
comments
I'd
like
to
make
on
it:
I've
read
through
the
various
seas,
the
commercial
zoning
regs
that
we
have
on
the
books
now
and
I
honestly
believe
that
any
one
of
them
doesn't
fit
what
we
want
a
need
to
do
at
the
lake
today
with
what
is
allowed
I
think
there
are
some
things
that
are
in
each
one
of
those
zones
that
we
wouldn't
want
out.
There
I
think
this.
We
are
behind
the
the
ball
in
regards
to
the
establishment
of
a
lake
zoning
district
at
Lake.
K
Competi
I
am
all
for
commercial
zoning
out
there
that
supports
the
lake
environment
and
is
done
appropriately.
Comment
was
made
to
make
it
look.
Aesthetically,
correct.
I,
don't
disagree
with
that.
We
have
nothing
in
the
books
today
that
would
govern
us
into
how
what
something
would
look
like
out
there.
So
I'm
hearing,
you
know
the
village
of
light
I'm
hearing
aesthetically
appealing
and
we
talked
about
not
knowing
what
the
uses
are.
I
think
the
the
application
today
and
I
and
mr.
Dahle
I
commend
you
on
bringing
this
forward.
K
I,
what
little
I've
heard
about
it
I
think
in
the
lake
environment
I
think
it
would
be
supportive
of
that
area.
I
think
it's
too
premature
I
would
not
there's
so
many
things
that
I
believe
are.
We
would
not
want
to
put
in
that
environment
that
if
we
rezone
today,
if
we
agreed
to
this,
no
matter
what
mr.
Dahle
says
today
or
anybody
else-
that's
here-
they
could
turn
around
tomorrow
and
do
something
completely
different
as
long
as
it
was
allowable
within
the
zone
that
was
approved,
and
for
that
reason,
I
can't
support
it.
K
We
are
premature
I
believe
we
ultimately
either
need
to
have
a
overlay
district
at
the
lake,
so
we
can
control
certain
things
like
what
goes
in
there
and
what
the
the
aesthetics
looks
like
I
think
those
things
need
to
happen.
I
think
we're
premature
in
this
I
think
there's
going
to
be
more
things
that
are
coming
out
there.
We
need
to
be
ready
for
it.
Let's
not
make
mistakes
that
we
will
have
to
live
with
for
a
long
long
long
time
we
have
a
lake.
Unfortunately,
it
doesn't
have
an
outlet
that
I'm
sure.
K
S
Got
a
few
questions
I'll
direct
towards
either
probably
Heath
or
Matt
Matt.
You
I'll
direct
this
one
to
you
and
I,
asked
a
question
two
weeks
ago,
with
the
first
reading,
what
we
we
have
to
either
up
or
down
approver
or
not
approve
the
c3
doesn't
in
other
words
we
cannot.
We
cannot,
as
a
council,
change,
that
to
a
c2
other
than
I
mean
that
the
applicant
has
to
make
that
move.
We
can
do
that
correct.
V
S
S
I
guess
I'll
direct
this
one
to
you
Heath
can
we
require,
as
you
know,
as
something
happens
out
there
now,
if
we
were
to
approve
this
I
mean,
can
we
can
we
require
buffering
I
mean
trees?
You
know
different
aspects
of
that
nature.
That
would
you
know,
help
minimize
the
sound
light
pollution
etc.
Well,
what
what
are
what
can
be
done
or
can't
be
done
in
that
regard?.
E
That's
a
good
question:
councilman
ville,
our
the
as
far
as
buffering
or
screening,
a
requirement,
the
chapter
xxi,
the
zoning
ordinance
covers,
what's
required
at
the
time
of
development.
I
can't
tell
you
off
the
top
of
my
head
and
I.
Don't
know.
Brandy
maybe
knows
that
information,
but
what
the
Building
Services
Department
would
administer
are
those
regulations
to
a
tee
as
it
required.
W
A
W
S
Thank
you
brandy,
the
mic
yet
I'm
concerned
about
the
bike
paths
running
on
the
south
side.
There
I
mean
that
now
that
would
be
a
safety
concern
of
mine
as
well
relative
to
the
bike
path,
but
I
will
say
that
my
wife
and
I
have
lived
in
Watertown
almost
40
years
now
and
time
and
time
again,
I
have
heard
that
the
the
need
for
additional
development,
commercial
type
development
around
the
lake
I,
don't
like
the
idea
of
essentially
spot
zoning.
S
If
that's
you
want
to
call
this
I
wish,
we
would
have
a
comprehensive
plan
in
place,
but
by
the
same
token,
mr.
Dahl
has
got
a
piece
of
property.
That's
r1
that
for
a
realistic
standpoint,
will
probably
never
get
developed
as
r1
and
and
I've
got
to
support
his
I
mean
the
as
a
property
owner
he's
got
the
right
to
what,
within
the
rules
go
through
the
process
to
use
his
property
in
a
manner
that
he
see
is
appropriate.
S
I
understand
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors
around
there,
but,
by
the
same
token,
I
as
a
councilmember
have
to
look
out
what
I
feel
isn't
the
best
interest
of
the
community.
Overall
and
I
feel
this
is
an
this
is
an
area
that
would
lend
itself
to
some
sort
of
commercial
development,
I'm
concerned
too,
not
knowing
what
that
development
is
necessarily
at
this
point,
but
I
also
respect.
S
A
You
I
I
would
just
like
to
reiterate
what
the
city
engineer
said
about
the
comprehensive
plan
we
did
undertake
the
lake
comp
Eska
master
plan,
which
is
not
a
comprehensive
plan.
We
have
an
adopted
comprehensive
plan
for
the
city
of
Watertown.
This
is
within
the
city
of
Watertown,
and
the
recommended
use
for
that
area
is
mixed-use,
which
it
is
in.
This
area
pointed
out,
there's
some
construction
buildings
and
some
residences.
There
are
mixed
uses
in
this
vicinity
at
this
time.
So
it
isn't
like.
We
don't
have
a
comprehensive
plan.
A
X
You
guys
gave
me
great
segues
to
this.
One
of
the
things
that
I
hear
fairly
often
is
the
lack
of
or
the
disappearance
of,
public
access
for
people
who
don't
live
on
the
lake
and
I.
Don't
know
if
it's
because
they're
not
well
marked
or
if
we
are
losing
them
or
if
they're
they're
not
available.
That
type
of
thing
and
I
was
wondering
if
brandy
or
Heath,
or
somebody
could
just
give
me
a
little.
X
You
know
after
me,
you
know
to
the
tea
but
I
kind
of
like
a
number
on
the
public
accesses
we
still
have
remaining
at
the
lake
and
then
the
other
thing.
You
know
again
I
understand
what
the
folks
who
have
houses
there.
I
say
that
you
know
they
bought
the
home's
peace
and
quiet
that
type
of
thing
and
I
I
agree,
I
mean
I,
but
I
live
across
the
street
from
a
scrap
metal
yard.
So
anyway,
the
lake
is
not
just
I.
X
Guess,
I
don't
want
to
insult
you
in
the
sense
that
I
do
understand
it,
but
I
also
hear
from
people
that
the
lake
is
becoming
just
something
that
people
who
live
around
the
lake
can
use
and
I.
Guess
that
I
want
to
bring
that
up
as
we're
discussing
different
uses
around
the
lake,
because
I
think
as
a
council
person
as
Glen
said,
I
owe
it
to
the
whole
community
to
take
a
look
at
this
project
and
any
like
it.
So
I
I
like
the
idea
that
people
want
peace
and
quiet
but
I.
X
Also
like
the
idea
of
the
young
lady
who
said,
let's
make
this
a
lake
that
the
city
can
use
that
the
whole
community
can
use
and
I
think
it
can
be
done
in
a
way
that
has
a
minimum
disruption
and
I
think
people
have
talked
about
that.
But
I
guess
I'd
like
to
know
a
little
bit
with
the
mixed
use
and
public
access.
That
type
of
thing.
That
would
help
me
understand.
A
Do
have
a
map
and
I
can
guide
you
to
it.
There
are
about
a
dozen
lake
accesses
or
more
at
the
lake
and
and
Heath
and
brandy
haven't
been
working
at
the
lake
that
long
I'm,
not
sure
if
they
are
familiar
with
all
the
access
points.
Essentially,
we
have
access
points
at
the
parks
and
then
at
every
place
where
a
section
line
is
extended
into
the
lake
and
brandy.
If
you
want
to
look
at
under
G
Lake
camp
ESCA
and
then
there's
public
access
do.
Y
While
she's
looking
I'd
just
like
to
comment
that,
when
Vanessa
tells
us
that
that
wasn't
a
proper
place
for
c3
or
C
and
I
know
it's
mixed-use
I'm
hearing
that
but
I
I'm
very
concerned
with
what
is
going
to
go
in
there.
If
I
were
a
property
owner
on
the
north
side
and
it
was
cold
because
I'm
on
the
south
side,
I
wouldn't
want
to
wake
up
to
something,
not
knowing
what
that
is.
I'm
very
concerned
about
this
tonight
and
and
Vanessa
really
kind
of
solidified.
Z
You
know,
there's
been
some
really
compelling
arguments
for
this
thing
tonight
and
you
know
Mike
and
I've
spent
a
lot
of
time
over
the
years
on
planning,
20
20
years
from
me,
Mike
your
dozen
years
or
so
I'm
sure
you
well.
When
you
look
at
from
that
standpoint,
you
know
we
eyes
had
to
ask
ourselves.
Whenever
we
made
these
types
of
decisions,
you
know
what
could
happen
down
the
road.
You
got
to
look
at
this
25
50
years
down
the
road.
Z
For
for
this
location,
but
we
also
have
to
be
sensitive,
I
think
to
the
folks
that
are
adjacent
properties,
the
people
that
live
by
it
they're
the
ones
that
affected
and
we've
heard
a
lot
of
great
arguments
from
folks
that
maybe
aren't
necessarily
adjacent
to
this
property
tonight.
But
we
have
to
look
at
you.
S
Z
Always
have
to
ask
myself
what
I
like
in
my
backyard
in
their
case
in
their
front
yard,
but
those
are
some
concerns
that
I
have
you
know.
The
other
thing
would
be
setting
a
precedent
for
further
development
to
the
west
I'm
all
for
developing,
where
it
makes
sense
around
Lake
and
Pesce,
and
in
trying
to
bring
more
business
in
and
trying
to
get
those
tax
revenues,
but
I
just
don't
think
that
we
want
to
set
a
precedent
for
continuation
and
I
do
recall.
Z
I
will
say
that
back
on
the
Planning
Commission
when
I
was
on
there
with
Brian
polish,
we
did
have
at
least
one
that
I
remember
was
a
storage
shed
application
that
was
turned
down
and
the
adjacent
property
owners
were
vehemently
opposed
to
that
as
well,
but
the
interaction
with
the
bike
trails
that
we
were
discussing
earlier,
I
just
in
planning,
it's
typically
not
a
good
transition
to
go
from
r12
ac3.
Usually
it's
our
it's
our
three.
Z
You
know
that's
how
we
typically
would
move
to
that
type
of
zoning,
so
I
think
it's
premature
and
I
would
like
to
see
that
the
the
plan
that
we've
paid
eighty
five
thousand
bucks
to
have
done
to
see
what
we
could
do
down
the
road
but
I
just
think
it's
premature
from
my
planning
experience
and
from
what
I'm
hearing
from
the
adjacent
neighbors
I,
don't
I,
wouldn't
have
I,
wouldn't
be
able
to
support
that
tonight.
Thank
you.
K
A
K
X
I
think
it
has
to
do.
Excuse
me
more
with
unimproved,
and
you
know
that
type
of
thing
you
know
you
can
drive
right
by
it,
not
even
see
it.
You
know,
because
he
it
doesn't
look
like
a
public
access
point
right
and
there's
no
facilities
or
any
kind
of
ramp
or
dock
any
of
those
kind
of
things
on
those
public
access.
They're,
pretty
primitive,
I
guess
is
that's
what
you
want
to
say
so
I
just
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
I
might
want
to
bring
up.
A
When
in
1997,
when
we
did
the
stabilization
project
around
the
lake
I
researched
all
the
access
points,
because
the
contractor
had
to
get
on
and
off
of
the
lake
all
over
the
lake
and
there
there
are
quite
a
few
unimproved
spots,
but
there
could
be
a
lot
more
to
because
anytime,
someone
needs
to
get
access
to
do
construction
on
their
shoreline.
That's
how
they
get
there
through
those
public
access
points.
Heath.
Were
you
able
to
find
that
map
yeah.
E
W
F
I'm
in
favor
of
doing
some
commercial
development
of
Lake
I
do
think
we
need
to
look
at
those
things.
Get
access
to
other
people
that
don't
live
on.
The
lake
I
do
have
a
question,
though,
if
if
this
were
to
get
approve
and
I'm
going
to
ask
this
towards
Heath,
if
I
could,
if
it
were
to
get
approved,
and
then
one
of
these
uses
come
up
down
the
road
that
a
vast
majority
of
people,
not
just
the
neighbors,
but
everybody
thinks
is
not
a
good
use
for
that.
E
That's
a
good
question,
councilman,
Roby
and-
and
one
point
that
we
should
hit
on-
is
that
in
the
zoning
ordinance
we
have
a
list
of
permitted
uses
and
if
any
of
those
permitted
uses
are
selected
by
the
landowner
to
be
utilized,
there's
no
formal.
Stopping
of
that
use.
That's
why
it's
considered
a
permitted
use
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
E
The
other
uses
that
are
also
listed
are
conditional
uses
those
take
approval
by
the
Board
of
Adjustment
in
order
to
use
the
property
in
those
manners,
and
so
there's
those
two
separate
lists.
The
permitted
uses
have
already
been
vetted
through
the
zoning
ordinance
and
by
City
Council
and
the
Planning
Commission,
and
subsequently
City
Council
has
allowed
permitted
uses,
and
so
the
the
future
review
of
any
development
that
would
occur
would
be
to
the
physical
improvements
meeting
the
building
setbacks.
The
proper
infrastructure
is
in
place,
the
access
control,
the
drainage,
runoff
considerations.
A
Z
Z
Bueller,
just
just
something
to
think
about-
and
this
is
how
we've
done
this
in
the
past,
with
conditional
uses,
we
really
didn't,
have
we
had
a
property
one
time
that
was
adjacent
to
r1
and
it
was
commercial,
was
already
built
for
commercial.
This
was
a
pass
in
discretion
from
years
ago,
and
what
can
take
place
is
you
can
we
can
add
a
conditional
use?
Z
F
A
perfect
I,
just
I,
don't
know
how
we're
gonna
get
commercial
development,
which
I
get
a
lot
of
pressure
for
I,
get
a
lot
of
people
saying
we
need
to
do
things.
The
lake.
We
want
commercial
development,
the
lake,
it's
a
big
thing
to
our
community
under
the
current
scenario.
I,
don't
know
how
we
do
it,
because
if
we
don't
approve
this,
that
we've
got
if
the
lake
is
well-known,
it
isn't
just
the
zoning
it's
the
rights
of
way
they
the
way
they
developed
the
lake.
F
It
never
kind
of
got
done
on
an
orderly
basis,
and
then
we
bring
it
into
the
city
back
in
the
early
70s
I
think
it
was.
If
you
look
at
the
maps,
there
isn't
much
that
lines
up
very
well
rights
of
way
property
lines.
We've
seen
some
of
that
come
through
the
council
in
the
last
few
years.
So
this
is
a
tough
one,
but
right
now,
I,
don't
know
how
we're
ever
gonna
get
any
commercial
development
done.
The
lake.
K
Donna
I
think
the
key
to
it
is
to
look
solely
at
a
plan
for
commercial
development
at
the
lake
and
not
take
the
the
current
citywide
commercial
zoning
criteria
that
we
have
used.
I,
think
the
animal
or
it's
an
animal
that
I
think
the
lake
is
its
own
little
animal
out.
There
I
think
we
have
to
be
very
cognizant
of
the
of
what
we
want
out
there,
because
it's
such
a
finite
area
that
would
be
available
to
us
to
support
the
lake
environment
and
I.
K
Think
we
create
something
that
whatever
it
is,
that
we
allow
out
there
and
wherever
it
is,
it
needs
to
be
complimentary
to
the
lake
I,
don't
think
a
a
parking
lot
with
a
bunch
of
combines,
and
it
is
complementary
to
the
lake.
We
have
other
places
that
those
things
can
go
to
a
vet's
veterinarian
shop
out
there
or
store,
or
whatever
they
are
clinic
I.
Don't
think!
That's
complementary
to
what
the
lake
environment
is.
K
I
think
there
are
certain
things
that,
through
some
work,
I
think
they
could
be
worked
on
and
I
think
we
could
at
least
narrow
down
the
opportunities
of
the
types
of
commercial
development
that
could
go
out
there.
That
would
would
at
least
take
some
of
the
concerns
that
I've
heard
here
tonight
and
that
I
would
have
and
do
have
a
way.
Now.
K
There's
no
question
that
no
matter
what
happens,
we're
still
gonna
have
no
matter
what,
if
we
had
the
perfect
environment
and
zoning
out
there
for,
for
some
commercial
development,
we're
still
gonna
have
people
that
are
gonna
be
concerned
with
access
and
noise
and
light,
and
whatever
those
still
gonna
happen.
But
at
least
we
narrow
down
the
mistake
of
allowing
something
to
go
in
out
there
that
we
just
don't
want
out
there.
K
It
just
doesn't
fit
that
environment,
so
I
think
that's
at
least
your
step
forward
is
is
to
take
the
time
to
work
on
the
commercial
development,
the
overlay
district.
Whatever
you
want
to
call
it
specific
to
the
lake
in
whatever
region
around
the
lake,
we
define
it
to
be,
and
then
at
least
we
have
a
starting
point.
But
if
we
use
today's
standards
and
our
definitions
and
zoning
and
uses
it's
not
going
to
happen,.
AA
Couple
things
here,
I
was
looking
at
was
reading
through
the
zoning
ordinance
here.
Permit
state
permitted
uses
service
stations,
retail
service,
hotel,
hotel
things
of
that
nature.
I
think
what
we
have
to
look
at
and
I
understand
my
concerns.
Actually
Mike
and
I
have
talked
about
this
a
little
bit.
You
know
trying
to
find
something.
That's
going
to
help
utilize.
The
lake
can
be
a
complimentary
business
to
the
lake.
I,
completely
understand
that
you
know
some
of
the
things
that
the
people
I
brought
up.
Concerns
are
about
storage
units
contractor
shops,
things
of
that
nature.
AA
Those
are
conditional
uses
where
you
have
to
go
back
in
front
to
change
that
or
to
be
able
to
allow
to
use
that
you
know.
As
far
as
trying
to
get
commercial
around
the
lake,
we
have
such
limited
land.
That's
available
that
that
fits
on
this.
This
is
along
the
highway.
There's
a
lot
of
traffic
there
anyway,
I
mean
now,
let's
be
honest,
there's
traffic
that
runs
from
city
water,
town
to
to
Florence
and
and
beyond,
and
takes
that
out
to
Webster.
AA
AA
No
one
wants
to
have
a
big
gaudy,
odd
object
behind
them,
but
at
the
same
time
we
have
to
look
at
they're
not
going
to
put
a
business
there
that
isn't
going
to
work
there
I
mean
I
mean
you
got
to
have
to
look
at
it
that
I'm
not
going
to
put
some
other
that's
going
to
fail,
just
because
I
am
allowed
to
put
it
in
there.
So
as
a
business
owner
and
someone
that
would
look
at
putting
a
structure
up
there,
yeah
see,
is
this
going
to
be
profitable?
AA
Is
it
going
to
be
work
there?
Is
it
gonna?
Is
it
gonna
fit
the
market
on
who's
gonna
be
out
there?
I'm
not
gonna,
bring
my
storage
stuff
from
living
in
the
southeast
part
sound
all
by
the
lake
and
putting
a
storage
unit
out
there
when
we
have
6,000
of
them
around
closer
to
town.
So
from
that
aspect,
I
mean
you
have
to
kind
of
give
some
of
these
people
a
little
bit
leniency
that
they're
going
to
make
a
good
decision.
That's
not
only
good
for
themselves,
but
it's
gonna
be
good
for
the
area.
AA
So,
whether
or
not
you
know
this
year's
a
different
animal
because
of
the
amount
of
water
that
we
had.
You
know
the
flooding
there
that
lot.
That's
a
couple
over
from
that
has
had
water
and
probably
I,
would
say
a
significant
amount
of
water.
It's
also
right
next
to
a
slough
I
mean,
let's
be
honest,
that's
a
natural
spot
for
that
water
to
sit
anyway,
it's
lower
than
the
Lots.
Next
to
it.
This
one
does
sit
up
it's
in
the
hundred
year,
flood
zone,
so
they're
gonna
be
minimal
stuff
that
they
can
build
on
it.
AA
Because
of
that.
So
those
are
items
that
we
all
have
taken
to
effect
and
you
get
a
look
at
through
the
zoning
ordinance.
What
the
requirements
are,
what
they're
allowed
to
build
on
I
mean
they're,
not
gonna,
build
you
know,
because
they
got
80,000
square
feet.
They're
not
gonna,
build
80,000
square
foot
structure.
They're
gonna
have
a
minimal
amount
of
setbacks
that
they
have
to
meet
on
all
sides
and
if
they
have
to
come
off
the
highway,
it
needs
to
be
something
that
works
coming
off
the
highway.
So
those
are
those
are
the
items.
AA
I
have
I'm
just
looking
through
that
and
looking
at
conditional
uses.
There's
a
lot
of
conditional
uses
that
I
personally
would
never
want
to
see
out
there
and
I.
Don't
think
anyone,
that's
looking
the
design
and
build
on
there
is
looking
to
have
either
so.
Those
are
my
concerns,
my
thoughts,
sorry
I'm,
just
gonna
stop
hitting
that
Thank.
F
Roby
I
regret
not
going
back
and
taking
the
time
to
see
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
and
I
will
definitely
do
that
after
this.
But
why
did
they
support
it?
I
mean
it
passed
six
to
one.
What
was
the
rationale
by
the
way
those
committees
are
in
place
to
look
at
issues
in
depth
and
make
recommendations
and
I
think
we,
as
a
governing
body,
have
to
take
those
recommendations
very
seriously.
Otherwise
we
don't
need
the
committee's,
so
they
serve
a
purpose.
Why
was
it
six
to
one.
E
E
E
Some
of
the
same
reservations
were
expressed
by
the
command
planning
commissioners
as
well.
Some
of
the
same
concerns
that
the
residents
have
and
that
some
of
the
council
members
have
shared
tonight,
we're
expressed
by
the
planning
commissioners,
so
I
think
it
was
a
pretty
well-balanced
discussion
in
their
determination.
I'd
say
those.
Those
two
points
probably
stood
out
the
most
to
me.
Looking
at
the
conferees
of
land-use
plan,
knowing
as
marked
as
mixed
use
and
the
community's
need
for,
or
the
perception
of,
a
need
for
more
commercial
activity
around
the
lake
Thank.
W
W
W
If
they
do
improve
to
up
up
to
a
an
acre
of
impervious
surface,
then
as
far
as
it
being
in
a
floodplain,
they
would
have
to
detain
their
drainage
on
their
property
and
then
release
it
at
the
pre-developed
rate
and
just
on
the
floodplain
they
can
develop
in
there
and
they
would
just
have
to
adhere
to
our
ordinances,
and
you
know
include
the
free
board
they
could
bring
in
fill
any
of
that.
This.
A
Area
has
had
Phil
brought
in
and
the
I
don't
think
that
most
of
this
was
under
water.
The
the
west
part
of
it
was
this
spring,
but
most
of
it
was
high
and
dried
because
they
have
placed
Phil
over
the
years
and
there's
nothing
preventing
that
right.
Now.
On
on
that
property,
yeah
other
comments
or
questions
all
right.
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
floor,
for
approval
of
the
rezone
request,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
AB
Y
K
AC
A
You
alright,
that's
it
for
that
one.
The
reason
was
proved
item.
Number
five
is
approval
of
resolution
number
19
25
resetting
the
on
sale,
alcoholic
beverage
license
fee
for
full-service,
restaurants
and
I'm
not
going
to
ask
for
a
motion
at
this
time,
because
there's
a
blank
in
the
dollar
amount
for
resetting
the
dollar
amount.
So
I
will
wait
for
folks
to
finish
moving
around
and
then
I'll
ask
the
city
attorney
Matt
Roby,
to
tell
us
about
this.
One.
V
Thank
You
mayor
as
you'll
recall,
the
council
back
in
April,
addressed
this
issue,
and
the
motion
at
the
time
was
to
continue
the
price
that
had
been
set
for
the
previous
10
years
to
this
meeting
to
redress
the
issue.
So
just
a
quick
history
lesson
back
in
2009
the
2008
legislative
session,
I
guess
the
the
legislature
created
this
new
on-sale
liquor
license
that
was
meant
to
be
sold
to
entities
that
were
restaurants.
V
Essentially,
they
sold
more
than
60%
of
their
had
more
than
60%
of
the
sales
of
their
gross
revenue
came
from
food
and
non-alcoholic
beverages.
Communities
were
given
the
option
to
whether
or
not
to
implement
it.
We
chose
to
adopt
the
ordinance
and
then
the
first
order
of
business
was
to
set
a
fee
based
on
the
current
fair
market
value.
At
that
time
and
based
on
that
fair
market
value,
the
fee
was
set
at
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars
by
state
statute.
V
That
amount
had
to
remain
in
place
for
ten
years
and
that
10-year
period
recently
expired,
and
so
that's
why
this
issues
come
back
before
the
council
to
be
to
be
addressed,
and
so,
as
I
said,
the
meeting
in
April,
we
addressed
the
issue.
The
council
approved
continuing
the
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars
to
this
meeting
and
it
was
put
back
on
the
agenda
based
on
that
motion
and
it's
up
for
your
consideration.
A
couple
other
points
did,
as
we
discussed
at
the
last
council
meeting
where
we
discussed
this
issue.
V
I
did
send
out
letters
saw
the
liquor
license,
holders
all
the
on
sale,
liquor
license
holders
in
the
community,
there's
27
of
them
asking
if
they
would
voluntarily
supply
us
with
the
information
that
would
let
us
know
what
they
paid
for
their
license.
Essentially,
I
did
obtain
information
on
ten
of
the
licenses.
V
Ten
of
the
27
and
based
on
that
information,
the
average
price
paid
was
a
hundred
and
seventy
eight
thousand
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
the
highest
price
paid
was
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars
and
the
lowest
price
paid
was
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
And
again
that
was
based
on
the
responses
from
ten
of
the
27
entities.
A
A
A
L
Alright,
my
name
is
Mike
Lawrence
I
didn't
want
to
come
up
last
time.
I
didn't
want
to
really
get
involved
with
it,
but
there
are
some
areas
and
it's
not
the
like
reason
that
just
happened,
but
there's
some
other
areas
that
me
and
a
partner
are
working
on
to
try
to
get
some
things
going
on
at
Lake
Pesce.
We
we
take.
L
L
There
was
a
couple
that
weren't
touched
and
it
one
of
them
was
the
higher
margin
as
a
bar
owner
and
Anna
Anna's,
the
owner
of
a
liquor
license
I
want
to
sell
the
crown
I
want
to
sell
the
top-shelf
I
want
to
sell,
doubles
with
a
license
like
this.
If
I
sell
a
hamburger
for
nine
dollars
and
then
I
sell
a
nine
dollar
drink
I'm
at
50%
already
with
one
cocktail
when
I
serve
that
with
my
license.
L
For
me
to
find,
come
out
and
and
pay
two
hundred
and
five
thousand,
where
somebody
else
paid
a
hundred
and
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
I'm
at
an
immediate
disadvantage
right
there
on
top
of
that,
I
have
to
quit,
selling
to
higher-margin
or
quit
selling
the
the
amount
of
alcohol.
For
that
reason,
as
well
so
I
can't
go
ahead
and
and
sell
the
highest
margin.
L
I
have
to
watch
it
out
if
I,
if
I
open
something
brand-new
at
the
lake
I,
don't
know
the
business
model
of
that
I,
don't
know
where
it's
gonna
land,
how
it's
gonna
land
I
can
watch
that
very
closely.
But
if
I
missed
that
by
1%
2%
3%
there.
If
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
if
I
go
over
41
percent,
you
have
my
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars.
Okay,
I
believe
I
agree
that
business
is
a
risk.
L
L
Something
else
that
I
wanted
to
make
notices
is
that
it
it's
not
loanable.
You
can't
use
this
collateral.
I
went
down
to
Dakota
Bank.
Today,
I
went
in
the
president's
office.
I
spoke
with
a
lot
of
the
liquor
license
owners
because
you
know
it
is
one
of
those
things
I.
There
is
some
place
where
we're
gonna.
Have
it
be
at
a
disadvantage
for
this
and
our
other
licenses
I,
don't
think,
there's
a
long
line
of
people.
I
know
I
talked
to
another
gentleman,
that's
here
today
that
would
need
another.
L
L
Another
thing
that
you
can
touch
on
is
everyone's
talking
about
how
they're
gonna
lose
it.
It's
a
they're
gonna
lose
money.
When
these
things
come
in
they're
gonna
lose
it.
Nobody
talks
about
how,
when
the
county
liquor
license
came
in,
they
made
that
money.
Nobody
says
well
that
wasn't
you
know
that
was
okay,
but
when
they
start
going
down,
one
of
the
reasons
I
think
they
went
down
is
because
we
started
implementing
the
two-year
rule.
People
were
holding
onto
these
liquor
licenses,
not
using
them
holding
them
as
as
hostage
which
grew
up
the
price.
L
L
They
set
a
minimum
of
that,
but
I
believe
that
they
put
these
licenses
in
place
for
a
reason-
and
that's
somebody's
told
me:
well
it's
for
the
people,
it's
for
the
franchise's
for
the
franchises
I
know
one
franchisee
here
for
the
had
paid
over
the
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
well.
This
two
hundred
five
thousand
license
was
available.
If
these
licenses
are
fair
apples
for
apples,
why
did
that
franchise
come
in
and
pay
$15,000
over
what
they
could
just
purchase?
One
for
I
I
truly
believe
that
they're
not
apples
to
apples.
It's
a
high
risk.
L
It's
a
risk
that
I
have
to
take
with
cash.
I
cannot
go
to
the
bank
and
borrow
or
I
can
like
bargains.
My
house,
but
I
can't
borrow
and
use
this
as
collateral,
which
the
other
licenses
that's
available,
for
you
can
do
that
with
the
other
license
this
license.
You
cannot
so
that
was
just
some
of
the
points
I
want
to
make,
and
thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank.
C
L
It's
that's
a
question
that
has
gone
through
my
mind
since
the
meaning,
the
last
meaning
it's
it's
a
tough
call.
If
it
was
different
and
I
wasn't
gonna
lose
it
immediately.
If
I
went
over,
it
would
be
higher
I
I
want
it
to
be
fair
and
and
I
guess:
I
have
accountants
appraisers
all
those
things
that
sit
on
this
board,
maybe
I'm,
not
the
right
person
to
come
up
with
this
number
I've
been
in
this
business,
a
lot
lower
amount
of
time
and
less
amount
of
time
than
most
of
these
people
who
have
the
license.
L
They
said
well
I
paid
for
mine
for
20
years.
It
took
they
had
that
ability
to
do
that.
The
bank
won't
give
me
that
ability
to
do
that.
So
I
have
to
take
a
one-year
risk
on
a
brand
new
business
and
hope
that
I
don't
go
over,
and
if
the
problem
is,
if
I
do
too
well,
I
lose
it
and
that's
scary
to
me.
It
really
is
to
jump
into
this
thing
and
take
that
risk
and
it'd
be
better
to
pull
the
license
out
of
my
current
current
place.
L
Put
one
of
these
licenses
in
there
these
licenses
are
built
for
restaurants.
Okay,
we
all
are.
Restaurants
are
operating
with
these
licenses.
Most
of
these
restaurants
can
fall
under
this
license.
Yes,
they
could
get
rid
of
it
and
make
a
bar,
but
the
city's
not
going
to
support
thirty
five
bars.
It
just
isn't
you
know,
and
so
I
I,
don't
know
what
that
number
is
I
like
a
hundred
thousand
or
less,
but,
like
I,
said
I'm,
not
gonna.
L
Take
that
number
I
just
want
you
to
know
that
there
is
a
difference
and
that
there
is
a
huge
risk
associated
with
this
license
that
you
have
to
put
something
other
other
than
the
business
on
the
line
for
you.
You
know
you
have
to
go
off
and
and
find
a
way
to
finance
that
and
that
financing
he
told
me
it's
like
the
city
has
a
has
the
first
right
on
on
that.
C
C
L
AD
A
M
AB
AD
V
AD
Well,
I
know,
speaking
from
business.
My
experience
has
been
that
I
would
have
no
concern
whatsoever
of
selling
more
than
40%
again
we're
mainstay
food
drink.
We
do
a
few
hours
of
alcohol
operation
on
the
weekends,
but
you
want
to
see
how
much
liquor
you
really
sell.
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
a
concern
of
anybody
going
over
the
40%
I
think
that's
unrealistic.
I
think
the
40%
has
easily
kept
underneath
if
you're,
if
you're
selling
food,
if
you've
got
a
good
restaurant
and
good
food
you're
not
going
to
go
over
that
40%.
AD
A
AE
AE
You
can't
sell
it
so
why
we're
jeopardizing
those
of
us
that
have
been
in
this
business
and
supported
this
community
and
paid
our
money
and
we
did
go
to
the
bank
and
when
we
bought
Foxy's
did
not
have
a
liquor
license
our
first
day
of
business,
we
did
$89,
it
was
a
business
that
was
going
under.
We
worked
for
two
years.
Blood,
sweat
and
tears
got
the
banks
to
trust
us
waited
for
a
license
to
become
available
and
we
purchased
one.
AE
AF
AB
AF
The
sand
and
sediment
you
want,
so
we
got
that
clear.
The
other
thing
is
I,
do
have
a
license
and
no
rain
I'm,
sorry
Randy
Grunwald
I
own
Dakota,
butcher
and
and
the
North
Shore
that
we've
been
speaking
about
today
and
I
hope
you
guys
come
there,
but
what
I'm
thinking
is
I'm
on
the
fence
on
this
too,
because
I
want
a
license
and
the
bank
valued
it
at
150,000
and
I
know.
AF
AA
AF
The
full
liquor
license
and
then
you
also
have
a
there's,
no
there's
no
distinguishing
what
you're
selling
as
far
as
booze
I
mean
booze
the
food
which
oh,
this
North
Shore
I
think
we
will
have
no
problem
hitting
that
the
food
like
the
Clifford
I,
can't
remember
your
name,
I'm.
Sorry,
I.
Don't
think
that
we'll
have
a
problem
hitting
that
number,
but
I
do
feel.
There's
a
value
in
the
original
license.
I
have
compared
to
the
license
that
I'm
trying
to
apply
for
tomorrow,
so
I
I,
don't
know
what
that
number
is
I.
AF
Am
you
know
some
of
those
like
Foxy's
I
appreciate
what
she's
done
for
40
years
in
this
business
and
built
a
great
great
business.
I
go
to
Foxy's
is
great
and
there's
great
food
and
that's
how
you
build
your
businesses
having
great
food,
not
because
they
can
pour
the
same
drink,
that
I
can
pour
I'm
pretty
certain.
You
know.
So
that's
how
you
build
your
business.
It
doesn't
have
to
any
much
to
do
with
the
value
of
the
liquor
license.
It
has
a
lot
to
do
with
how
you
perform
with
that
liquor.
AF
AF
AF
Because
you
have
you
don't
hit
that
number
that
you're
supposed
to
hit
well,
that
was
pretty
that's
like
building
by
the
hospital
and
they
pay
you
nothing
for
to
expand
their.
You
know
it's
it's
like
some
people
are,
are
investing
on
this
and
using
it
as
investment,
but
we're
I
think
the
people
that
are
coming
into
your
community
right
now
and
gonna
use
this
license.
AF
I
think
what
they're
using
it
for
is
that
drink
they're,
not
there
they're,
relying
like
Clifford,
says
they're
they're,
relying
on
their
food
to
bring
the
people
and
not
so
much
the
booze,
but
then
in
turn,
I
would
say
well,
if
they're
relying
on
your
food
to
build
your
business,
why
you?
Why
are
you
charging
us
so
much
for
your
liquor
license
right?
AF
So
so
that's
where
I'm
at
I
think
I'm
gonna
try
to
serve
a
lot
of
meals
out
of
our
place,
just
like
Clifford's,
just
like
Foxy's,
just
like
even
my
buddy
Harry's
over
behind
me
and
and
I'll.
Tell
you
what
it
it.
It
really
will
be
tough
for
me
to
borrow
any
more
money
from
this
town
after
the
money
I
stuck
in
North
Shore,
so
I
mean
they're.
AF
Gonna
have
to
pick
your
guys's
pockets
for
the
100
hundred
thousand,
or
are
you
guys
gonna
150,000,
whatever
you
determined,
but
you
can't
borrow
it
if
you
can't
borrow
money
against
the
license.
That
alone
is
really
supports.
The
depreciated
value
of
the
of
the
license
that
a
lot
of
these
places,
including
me
I,
have
already
I
borrowed
money.
On
my
other
license,
so
you
got
to
consider
that
too,
because
that's
part
of
your
that's
part
of
your
business
having
a
liquor
license
but
you're,
not
gonna
charge
me
a
license
for
the
food.
AF
Are
you
because
then
we'd
be
in
real
trouble,
because
no
I'm
just
kidding
on
that,
but
I
I'm
I'm
on
both
sides
of
the
fence?
I
can't
tell
you
what
to
do
charge,
but
I
do
know
that
in
the
past
last
the
last
couple
have
been
around
150,000
that
I've
that
I've
looked,
went
back.
I'm
sorry
go
ahead
further.
AF
C
AF
100
and
150
there
is
there's
less
value
just
because
mr.
Robie
is
gonna.
Take
it
from
me
when
I
can't
give
him
the
number,
so
there
is
less
value
and
I
hope
the
other
bar
owners
understand
it.
If
they
were
to
offer
me
my
license,
for
you
know,
offer
me
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
for
your
the
new
license
the
restricted
license.
You
want
to
call
it
for
this,
for
my
license.
I
would
never
do
that.
A
K
To
garner
people
come
in
here
and
having
this
discussion,
so
it
wasn't
not
a
well
thought
out
thing.
It
was
just
a
throw
out
at
that
point,
but
the
other
point
of
clarification
is
is
as
the
city.
It's
not
necessarily
automatic
that
if
they
don't
attain
the
60
percent,
that
they
would
lose
it
it
is,
it
may
be
lost.
Is
that
correct.
V
K
K
Because
of
the
risks
and
the
fact
that
you
can't
use
it
for
collateral
and
and
that
type
of
thing,
it
might
actually
raise
the
value
of
those
things,
but
my
last
comment
on
it
that
I
won't
say
that
I
won't
promise
that
a
comment
on
it
is
this.
Is
we
just
voted
on
rezoning,
a
property
at
the
lake,
because
it
was
the
right
thing
for
the
community?
It
wasn't
necessarily
as
what
we
heard
from
the
people.
K
It
may
not
have
been
the
right
thing
for
those
people
that
spoke
against
it
that
live
near
it,
but
the
determination
was
that's
what
the
community
wanted
and
that's
what
was
the
right
thing
for
the
community.
I,
don't
see
this
as
anything
different
than
that,
no
reality.
What's
the
what's
the
right
thing
for
our
community
and
we
talk
about
development,
commercial
development
and
bringing
in
businesses
and
a
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars.
K
We
asked
27
people,
we
told
them
at
the
last
meeting
that
it's
critical,
that
we
get
their
input,
that
we
know
so
that
we
have
good
information
to
work
from
and
we
got
10
out
of
27
that
responded
to
us,
which,
from
my
perspective,
when
I
heard
that
the
other
day
is
very
disappointing,
so
I
really
wonder
how
much
of
a
concern
it
is.
So
my
suggestion
is,
is
that
we
we
somewhere
take.
We
know
what
the
average
is
and
I
think
it
should
be
less
than
the
average
and
I
agree
with
mr.
K
A
Aberdeen
has
had
theirs
at
a
hundred
thousand
for
ten
years
and
they've
sold
one,
and
we
had
ours
at
205
for
ten
years
and
we
sold
zero.
Currently
Rapid
City
charges,
295,000
Sioux,
Falls,
260,000,
Aberdeen,
one
hundred
thousand
Brookings
one
hundred
thousand
and
that's
Matt's
research.
Did
you
hear
from
anyone
else
after
sending
that
message.
V
X
T
I
have
a
couple:
I
have
several
points,
one
being,
but
you
answered
one
of
them
with
how
many
of
them
sold
the
other
is
I.
Think
it
would
help
be
helpful
for
people
to
understand
a
little
bit
for
those
watching
and
for
those
in
the
audience
how
this
license
came
about.
I,
don't
know
that
people
understand
why
we
ended
up
with
restricted
license
that
we
have
sitting
here
that
we
haven't
sold.
X
V
X
A
follow-up
question
to
that:
I
think
that
the
comment
was
made
that
we
have
a
bad
license
and,
in
some
cases,
I
believe
that
we
absolutely
do
I
think
that
we
could
be.
We
could
serve
the
community
much
better
by
taking
a
look
at
what
would
spur
development
at
what
cost?
Would
that
be
effective?
That
food
thing?
For
you
know
somebody
whose
god
I'm
gonna
use
the
lounge
as
an
example.
They
sell
some
bar
food
and
things
like
that,
and
they
have
a
beer
and
wine.
X
X
We
either
need
to
make
this
low
enough
for
people
to
take
the
risk
and
get
started,
or
we
have
to
just
not
have
it,
and
then
we
have
to
take
a
step
back
and
look
at
our
other
liquor
licenses
and
say:
okay,
how
can
we
put
these
liquor
licenses?
Multi
bridge
wine,
whatever
it
is,
let's
make
a
more
more
user-friendly.
Let's
not
force
people
who
don't
need
a
license
such
as
this
to
have
to
buy
one
and
add
a
great
risk.
X
X
A
I
should
comment
piggybacking
on
that.
A
little
bit
I've
just
been
to
recon
the
retail
conference
in
Las
Vegas
and
met
with
retailers
from
all
over
the
nation,
and
you
know
we're
hoping
a
department
store
would
come
to
Watertown
and
we
talked
with
lots
of
different
people,
but
the
one
segment
of
the
retail
sector.
That's
really
interested
and
willingly
set
up
meetings
with
us
and
sought
us
out
its
restaurants,
and
they
there
is
a
desire
and
we
do
have
a
market.
That's
what
Buxton
told
us.
A
That's
what
retail
strategies
told
us
and
when
they
looked
at
our
numb
at
recon,
they
were
surprised
at
how
underserved
our
market
is
for
restaurants.
You
can
tell
that
from
the
numbers
that
they
have
access
to
so
I
think
that
having
making
it
a
little
bit
easier
for
restaurants
to
come
here
could
probably
help.
AB
S
Guess
is
the
accountant
to
me.
Gotta
have
I
have
a
couple
questions
for
you.
What
what?
How
was
that?
How
are
those
is
that
64-year,
how
are
those
numbers
looked
at?
What's
the
timing,
in
other
words,
you
apply
for
a
license.
You
get
it
today
tomorrow.
Whenever
is
it
then,
the
next
12
months
from
that
point,
or
what's
what's
the
cutoff
or
what's
the
measuring
period
there
do
you?
Do
you
know
that
from
what
you
got
the
statute?
It's.
V
The
calendar
year
so
the
renewals
are
licensed,
are
issued
for
the
calendar
year,
and
so
what
we
would
do
is
if
somebody
were
to
purchase
this
license
and
apply
for
it
in
June,
say
that
license
would
they're
selling
themselves
short
a
little
bit
with
the
timing
because
they
self
to
pay
the
full
amount
of
the
renewal
and
that
sort
of
thing
for
that
first
six
months.
But
then,
after
that,
we
would
look
going
forward.
We
look
at
the
previous
12
months
to
make
sure
they
met
that
requirement
before
we
would
renew
the
license
and
when.
S
S
Just
a
couple
comments
now:
I
guess
this
time
you
Mike
you
and
I
are
in
the
same
page
and
that's
not
I'll,
say
what
I
said
a
while
ago.
The
last
discussion
is
that
this
one
of
the
things
that
we
look
at
what
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
community
as
a
whole
and
expanding
our
restaurant
trade
is
something
that
again
we
have
heard
time
and
time
and
time
again
that
that
that
we,
if
we're
gonna,
get
serious
about
economic
development,
etc.
S
That
is
something
we
need
to
support
and
if
we
look
at
the
numbers
that
that
we've
been
given
450
is
the
lowest
price.
That's
and
sounds
like
that's.
What
recent
transact
and
they've
been
going
for
to
me
this,
this
restricted
license
has
got
to
be
less
than
150,000
dollars
again
just
to
get
a
number
on
the
table,
I
mean
what
were
we
added
in
procedurally
tonight
may
or
mean
I'm
ready
to
throw
a
number
out
just
for
sake
of
argument,
and
then
we
can
go
from
there
or
there.
A
Y
Think
it's
a
really
slippery
slope
on
this,
because
obviously
205
is
way
too
expensive
for
this
license,
but
I
think
we
really
have
to
worry
about
Jeff
and
Julie
and
and
the
other
people
we
want
to
worry
about.
Randy
would
like
to
see
Randy
do
well
in
our
community,
so
it's
a
slippery
slope
but
I'm
just
commenting
that
205,000
is
way
too
high.
Y
You
want
to
worry
about
the
community.
Well,
they
are
the
community,
and
so
somehow
we
got
to
worry
about
Randy
and
others
that
want
a
Mike
that
wants
to
come
in
with,
but
we
also
have
to
think
about
it.
So
I
don't
know
if
the
hundred
and
fifty
is
fair,
because
I
think
fairness
is
what
we're
after
for
two
sides
here,
Thank.
C
V
X
X
X
X
It's
not
apples
to
apples
and
so
I
think
that
I
believe
we
have
the
room
for,
and
it
was
proven
people
restaurants
wanted
to
come
here
so
and
I
think
they
would
if
they
came
here
and
they
were
successful
and
they
unlimited
liquor
license
came
up,
I
believe
there's
a
lot
of
them
that
would
probably
buy
the
unlimited
liquor
license
and
then
you
know
you
guys
have
paved
the
way
for
a
lot
of
good
people
and
a
lot
of
good
restaurants.
So
I
I
don't
mean
to
take
away
from
anything.
X
S
AB
F
S
K
K
V
I
would
anticipate
that
there
could
be
something
forthcoming,
the
legislature,
because
there
was
just
some
work
on
this
done
last
year
and
I.
Imagine
now
that
some
other
communities
are
looking
at
this.
There
may
be
some
other
issues
that
have
been
presented.
For
example,
the
issue
of
whether
or
not
licensee
would
get
all
their
money
back
or
not.
If
they
were
to
fail
the
6040
tests
and
I
imagine
there
might
be
some
language
and
statute
eventually
addressing
that,
but
there
isn't
currently.
C
AA
AA
You
know
my
idea
at
least
is
that
150
is
the
the
high
that
a
restricted
license
would
be
period
and
that's
how
you
have
to
look
at
it
that
if
you
can
buy
unrestricted
for
150,
why
won't
you
just
buy
that?
So
as
we're
looking
at
this
I,
don't
know
the
correct
answer:
I,
don't
know
if
you
put
a
term
on
this,
for
you
know
two
years
to
see
if
it's
something
that
you
know,
maybe
no
one
buys
this
over
the
next
two
years
and
you
can
look
at
it
again.
AA
I
mean
really
comes
down
to
is
we're
trying
to
predict
the
people
that
are
out
here
that
are
doing
business
and
have
been
doing
business
like
Julie
for
40
years
in
our
community
I.
Don't
want
to
hurt
them
to
the
point
where
they
get
closing
the
doors,
not
that
it's
going
to
happen,
but
it
is
something
that
is
a
possibility
and
I'm
sure
they
have
that,
no
matter
what
so,
we
just
have
to
look
at
what's
best
for
a
community.
How
does
it
affect
it?
Can
we
provide
more
licenses
that
bring
more
people
to
town?
AA
You
know
the
question
that
well,
though,
there's
only
so
many
people
that
go
out
to
eat
and
if
there's
more
places
they
go
to
you,
that's
just
what
it
is.
So
you
know,
however,
we
look
at
that,
whether
it's
125
or
hundred
so
I
mean
we
always
have
to
look
at
152
the
top
end,
so
if
it
falls
somewhere
in
there,
okay,
all
right.
Thank
you.
Matt.
V
To
say
something:
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
point
of
information
to
Mike's
question.
You
could
put
a
limit.
You've
got
a
term
on
the
resolution.
I,
don't
think
you
could
prevent
a
future
council
from
coming
in
and
the
interim
and
changing
it,
but
you
could
put
a
maximum
that
will
be
set
for
forcing
a
future
council
to
to
address
it.
At
some
point,
just
a
report
of
information
good.
T
S
B
AA
B
AA
A
V
A
AG
Y
AA
B
AA
S
S
C
B
A
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
authorized:
number
7
authorization,
Oh
number
6
approval
of
resolution,
number
19
26
expressing
intent
to
enter
into
a
five-year
lease
agreement
with
Rove
our
LLC
to
operate
a
car
rental
service
at
the
Watertown
Regional
Airport.
So
it
for
a
motion.
Second,
for
approval
moved
by
long
second
by
veil
power
and
any
discussion.
A
X
AH
V
G
A
AI
AI
We
have
both
been
in
the
auto
rental
business
in
Watertown
for
a
long
time,
I've
actually
started
renting
cars
in
1988
in
Watertown
and
I
I
guess
we
have
been
serving
not
only
the
local
independent,
we're
both
independent
rental
agencies
and
we
have
been
serving
not
only
the
local
community
but
serving
the
airport
at
no
cost.
We've
been
to
the
to
the
city
of
Watertown.
We've
been
providing
service
through
some
pretty
horrendous
times
here
with
the
airlines.
I
have
been
at
the
airport
since
the
70s
and
I
was
there
at
the
time.
AI
B
AI
You
know
other
than
the
fact
that,
back
in
the
days
when
the
flights
weren't
coming
in
and
and
we
weren't
our
rentals
but
weren't
being
completed,
I
think
Alan
had
the
same.
You
know
they
had
the
same
issues
that
we
did
and
I
just
think
that
it's
you
know
when
there's
a
local
and
local
companies
have
been
serving
it
more
than
adequately
and
at
no
cost
to
the
city.
I
guess!
That's!
That's
just
my
comment:
Thank.
AI
C
AG
AG
Gave
the
Alan
buyer
and
premier
auto
rental,
we
were
never
notified
of
it
and
then
I.
Had
my
secretary
look
back
in
the
paper.
There
was
a
little
tiny
article
in
the
paper.
We
do
not
get
the
paper,
we
were
never
notified
at
all
of
it
and
I
said
his
on-site.
We
have
storage
buildings,
we
keep
everything
inside
in
town,
we
pay
taxes,
everything
else
on
them,
storage
buildings.
AG
G
AG
Here
is
the
Nationals
gonna
walk
in
he's,
gonna,
take
the
cream
of
the
crop
close
us
halfway
down,
and
we
cannot
recuperate
it
again
and
they'll
walk
off
just
like
they
have
three
other
times
for
positive
into
own
there.
The
numbers
are
not
there
for
national
rental
and
I'll.
Give
my
income
tax
up
up.
He
wants
to
see
it
so.
V
Well,
it
doesn't
prohibit
you
know
if
I
land
at
the
airport,
it
doesn't
prohibit
me
from
from
calling
and
renting
a
car
from
one
of
the
local
businesses.
It's
my
understanding,
but
the
issue
here
is
that
there's
going
to
be
counter
space
in
the
airport
term.
No,
that
would
be
basically,
we
have
room
for
one
Kirk
Todd
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
so.
AI
AI
AI
A
AH
A
A
AH
S
AH
Booking
so
any
Expedia
Orbitz
Travelocity
site
people
can
connect
with
United
comm
through
or
I'm
sorry,
a
United
Airlines
ticket
out
of
the
airport
and
book
it
all.
As
one
package
is
essentially
what
it
is
they're
out,
they
also
offer
one-way
drops
and
we
have
seen
an
increase
at
the
airport
level
anyway,
for
one-way
drops,
asking
about
them:
they're,
actually
flying
into
Sioux
Falls.
Currently
right
now,
there's
business
in
in
town.
That's
flying
into
Sioux
Falls.
Do
the
company's
policy
of
car
rental
companies
that
they
rent
from.
AI
Would
like
to
speak
to
the
one
way
that
you
know
the
one
way.
Car
rental
is
actually
kind
of
a
myth.
The
one
way
car
rental
inquiries
were
because
the
flights
were
so
irregular,
they'd
get
a
planeload
of
people
here
and
then
not
be
able
to
fly
them
out
and
otherwise
that
it's
such
a
rare
thing
to
get
a
one-way
car
rent
to
all
people
are
the
people
that
are
flying
in
to
the
airport
are
flying
in
and
making
arrangements
for
their
cars.
S
A
AI
AC
A
R
E
In
those
regulations,
no
Platts
for
any
subdivision
can
be
filed
until
the
necessary
public
improvements
to
sustain
those
Lots
have
been
installed
or
they've
entered
into
a
development
agreement
with
the
city
that
obligates
them
to
construct.
These
certain
public
improvements
most
the
times
typical
public
improvements
would
occlude
the
street
curb
and
gutter
storm
sewer,
sanitary
sewer,
water
and
any
drainage
or
detention
necessities
that
are
needed
to
sustain
the
development.
E
E
This
would
include
I,
don't
know
if
I
am
I
zoomed
in
enough
there
for
the
screen.
The
calvin
industrial
park
generally
includes
this
lighter
green
outlined
area
and
the
three
Lots
that
were
included.
Excuse
me
in
that
plat
there's
also
a
stretch
of
right
away
that
was
in
that
plat
as
well,
and
that's
generally
speaking,
where
most
of
the
public
improvements
would
occur,
and
that
would
be
an
extension
of
17th,
Avenue
and
I
believe
this
was
28th
Street.
S
S
AJ
Chris,
shell
can
water
telling
Belmont
company.
We
are
looking
at
doing
a
TIF
district
for
that
to
cover
the
costs
and
doing
financing
on
our
own,
so
the
money
that
was
budgeted
could
be
used
for
other
things,
but
I'd
only
ask
that
you
wait
until
we
make
sure
TIF
districts
approve
and
everything
is
good
to
go.
But
that's
what
we're
shooting
for
right
now
to
help
use
the
pressure
off
development
off
the
city
that.
AD
A
Would
like
to
add,
this
is
a
in,
for
the
most
part,
a
very
similar
development
agreement
in
every
respect
to
all
the
other
development
agreements
that
go
along
with
Platts.
With
the
exception
of
the
sanitary
sewer
and
the
section
three
should
probably
be
amended
to
be
clear
because
we
have
two
alternatives
listed
and
we're
saying
we're
doing
both
and
we're
really
not
doing
both
we're
doing
B.
A
The
lots
will
be
served
by
private
lift
stations
to
be
installed
at
the
time
of
development
to
be
approved
by
the
City
Engineer
upon
a
commercial
site
plan
application
option
a
as
developer,
shall
install
or
cause
to
be
installed.
Sanitary
sewer
and
services
to
the
property
line
for
each
lot
served
and
we're
not
really
doing
that,
and
so
that
could
be
struck
from
the
development
agreement.
So
as
not
to
confuse
anybody
and
actually,
if
we
don't
have
any
questions
about
any
of
the
other
terms.
E
Madam
mayor,
yes,
if
I
may
just
for
a
point
of
clarity
for
the
record,
the
reason
the
3b
is
being
exercised
on
this
lot
is
because
of
the
nature
of
the
gravity
sewer
mains
that
currently
exist
under
15th
Avenue,
South,
East
and
29th
Street
southeast.
These
Lots
cannot
be
gravity
fed
to
those
existing
sewers.
E
There
is
subsequent
development
to
the
southwest
of
here,
where
additional
sewer
main
could
be
installed
and
will
also
require
a
regional
lift
station
to
serve
those
Lots
any
pretty
much
any
loss
to
the
south
of
this
area
would
have
to
be
served
by
regional
lift
station.
So
in
this
particular
case,
we
felt
that
appropriate
to
allow
these
three
individual
Lots
to
install
and
maintain
their
own
private
lift
stations
and
to
be
connected
to
those
public
sanitary
sewer
mains
in
15th
Avenue.
Yes,.
A
And
this
property
prior
to
subdivision
a
but
a
sanitary
sewer
main
it's
just
separated
from
it
by
a
pretty
deep,
ditch
and
physically
cannot
receive
gravity
service
from
that
main.
So
this
is
in
the
interest
best
interest
of
the
public
to
do
it.
This
way,
any
other
discussion:
okay,
I'll,
look
for
action
to
amend
the
motion.
All
those
in
favor
of
amending
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye.
R
A
Opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
okay.
Is
there
any
more
discussion
about
the
development
agreement?
Does
anybody
have
any
questions
in
general
about
that?
Okay,
I'll.
Look
for
action
on
that,
all
those
in
favor
of
approving
the
development
agreement
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
are
posting
and
if
I
was
saying,
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
A
AC
A
Our
policy
is
that
we
maintain
whatever
surface
the
property
owners
have
provided
for
us.
We
don't
typically
build
the
roads
for
people
and
if,
if
people
don't
like
the
gravel,
they
can
petition
to
have
it
paved
and
then
the
city
will
pave
it
and
assess
that
cost
back
to
the
property
owners
and
and
that's
an
option
here.
A
AC
A
AC
AC
It
leaves
us
to
hole
and
we're
gonna
end
up
with
other
areas
of
town
like
we
do
with
a
gravel,
unpaved
roads.
We're
gonna
have
one
alley:
that's
not
going
to
be
done
and
I
just
think
it
needs
to
be
put
on
the
list,
like
all
the
other
ones
were
and
make
sure
all
these
alleys
in
the
urban
renewal
district
are
done,
and
how
can
we
do
that
to
get
that
accomplished?.
A
Well,
that's
we've
seen
that
come
up
many
times,
even
on
public
streets,
where
we
would
really
like
to
see
him
paved.
In
fact,
on
12th
Street,
a
few
years
ago,
we
actually
put
regrind
down
because
they
they
wanted
it
paved,
but
the
property
owners
didn't
want
to
pay
for
it,
and
that
was
a
halfway
point,
but
we
we
haven't
been
paving
so.
AC
A
A
X
K
It
could
be
gone
that
you
know
there's
an
assumption
that
maybe
that
they
were
all
paved
at
some
point
and
that's
what
we're
doing.
As
the
mayor
indicated,
you
know
a
a
reconstruction
or
a
maintenance
on
it.
I
certainly
am
not
aware
which
ones
are
gravel
today
which
which
aren't
but
I,
don't
recall
that
we
had
made
a
commitment
to
do
all
of
them
and.
A
It
isn't
the
only
unpaved
alley
downtown.
There
was
a
petition
to
pave
that
alley
by
2nd
Street
Station,
which
didn't
get
done
because
of
the
price
I
think
and
they
they
chose
not
to,
but
that's
that's
another
one.
I
haven't
counted
them
and
in
conversations
with
municipal
utilities,
they
told
me
that
we
have
already
exceeded
our
commitment.
Downtown
on
the
alleys
and
I
haven't
checked
to
see
what
that
original
commitment
was,
but
they
seem
to
think
we
had
a
limited
commitment.
AC
AC
If
we
could
check
on
that
and
for
future
council,
some
of
you
will
be
around
here.
I
won't
be
when
we
do
other
alley
projects.
Keep
that
in
mind
with
the
rest
of
them,
because
I
think
it
needs
to
be
done
along
with
them.
We've
done
every
other
alley
and
we
don't
know
who
paid
for
him
or
who
didn't
and
we're
gonna
leave
we're
gonna
leave
one
unfinished:
that's
gonna,
be
in
close
proximity
to
other
potential
downtown
projects.
A
S
S
But
then
we
had
further
discussion
that
we're
also
looking
at
the
streets
around
town
and
the
feeling
was
the
streets
probably
take
priority
over
the
alleys
and
that
that's
where
I
recall
that
conversation
leaving
off
that
night
a
number
of
months
ago
that
the
streets
need
to
be
looked
at
first
before
the
alleys,
not
that
we
were
going
to
totally
disregard
the
alleys.
But
the
streets
are
gonna,
get
looked
at.
First.
A
R
AD
R
Through
yeah,
they
went
through
that
that
one,
but
that's
the
exception
to
the
rule.
This
is
a
you
know:
I've
stuck
a
lot
of
money
in
that
area
and
I
brought
nine
new
businesses
to
downtown
Watertown,
and
that
was
the
worst
area
of
downtown
and
I've
cleaned
it
up
and
but
nobody's
you
haven't,
been
put
other
property
owners
to
tear
up
their
alley
and
redo
it.
If
anything
you
they
don't
even
have
to
fight
for
it
all.
R
A
G
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
A
R
Y
It's
a
major
hit
for
the
library
at
this
point
in
time
now
they
do
have
fine
money,
but
fine
money
will
last
this
year
and
next
year
and
at
this
rate
and
the
fine
money
will
be
gone.
So
you
know
I
think
it
might
behoove
this
bunch
as
much
as
I,
don't
want
to
say
we're
going
to
find
a
way
to
make
money
or
raise
money
in
the
city.
But
if
we're
going
to
lose
four
hundred
thousand
dollars,
we
have
to
come
up
with
a
way
to
make
four
hundred
thousand.
So
it
doesn't
take.
Y
These
hits
on
because
it's
not
only
the
library
I
just
happen
to
serve
on
that
as
a
liaison
and
it's
it's
a
tremendous
hit.
Maybe
you
know
thousands
and
thousands
of
dollars
and
it's
easy
to
say
well,
just
cut
staff
or
just
cut
don't
buy
books
or
whatever,
and
there
goes
the
quality
of
your
library
just
a
point.
Thanks
for
that,
yeah.
A
I
have
asked
all
the
departments
to
keep
their
costs
flat
and
that's
what
you're
talking
about
is
because
the
cost
of
having
employees
has
gone
up.
You
have
to
cut
something
in
order
to
keep
our
costs
flat.
We
don't
know
that
we're
gonna
have
money.
I'm,
assuming
I
might
have
money
to
give
back
in
grants
to
replace
some
of
the
things
that
people
are
having
to
cut
out
of
their
budget,
but
so
far,
Kristen's
telling
me
I'm
in
the
hole,
even
keeping
it
flat.
A
She's
telling
me
I
may
need
to
cut
another
700,000
dollars
out
of
the
budget
somewhere,
and
so
we
have
a
way
to
get
around
that.
It's
just
we
haven't
wanted
to
do
that
in
the
past
we
can
have
a
stormwater
utility
fee
like
they
do
and
virtually
every
other
community,
but
Watertown
we
haven't
wanted
to
do
that
in
the
past
we
got
close,
and
the
mayor
at
the
time
said
we're
not
doing
this
and
it
was
the
last
time
we
did
it.
A
Look
at
that
was
2008,
the
economy
was
tanking,
and
so
maybe
we
should
look
at
that
again.
That
will
be
a
source
of
revenue
for
us.
We
could
do
a
street
assessment
which
could
generate
quite
a
bit
of
money.
A
lot
of
cities
do
that
we
do
not.
We
have
the
lowest
utility
rates
anywhere.
We
can
raise
our
utility
rates
and
still
be
the
lowest
but
generate
a
little
bit
more
revenue.
A
AA
A
F
Just
wanted
to
acknowledge
a
recent
success:
the
Convention
and
Visitor's
Bureau.
That
teams
done
quite
a
few
good
things
the
last
couple
of
years.
They
got
both
the
men's
and
women's
final,
four
basketball
for
the
North
Star
Athletic
Conference
they're
2021,
and
they
also
got
their
volleyball
super
six
through
2020.
So
that's
a
big
victory
for
us.
A
A
That's
awesome.
That's
really
great!
Thank
you
for
bringing
that
up
any
other
liaison
reports.
All
right.
We
do
have
a
need
to
go
into
executive
session
tonight
to
discuss
and
consult
with
legal
counsel
on
contractual
matters
and
personnel
matters,
and
we
do
expect
to
take
action
upon
coming
out.
So
I
look
for
a
motion
and
second
going
to
some
executive
session
motion
from
l'olam.