►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting - 04-23-2020
Description
Board of Adjustment Meeting - 04-23-2020
A
D
D
E
We
bring
up
the
area
here.
The
owner
applicant
is
Joel,
Cal
Hoff,
the
property
address
is
317
1st
Avenue
South
East.
This
is
a
conditional
use
request.
The
applicant
seeks
approval
to
construct
a
3290
square
foot,
building
in
the
c1
community,
commercial
in
downtown
overlay
districts
to
be
used
for
contractor
shops
and
storage
units
pursuant
to
21
24.
Oh
3,
11
and
12
of
the
zoning
ordinance
contingent
upon
compliance
with
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses.
Staff
finds
that
storage
units
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
c1
community.
E
E
There
also
to
look
at
chapter
21
56,
the
purpose
and
intent
of
the
downtown
overlay
district,
which
has
five
specific
provisions.
Chapter
21,
63,
off-street
parking
and
loading
requirements
needs
to
be
reviewed,
2165
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
commercial
uses.
This
is
allowed
outside
storage
being
a
commercial
use,
landscape
and
lighting
standards
for
chapter
21.
73
of
note,
this
property
is
not
exempt
from
the
landscape
and
lighting
standards,
as
the
grass
Boulevard
has
been
and
is
currently
in
compliance
with
21-7
302
one
double-eye
in
title
24,
subdivision
of
land.
E
The
parcel
is
a
legally
described
subdivision
of
a
plaited
lot.
It
complies
with
the
new
c1
area
and
with
requirements,
but
has
not
been
replanted.
So
this
board
must
consider
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
2100
202
to
b7
A
through
H,
and
the
chapters
and
titles
just
listed,
if
generally
endorsed
the
condition
of
conditions
of
a
Approval
such
as
parking
loading
outside
storage.
If
there
are
any,
must
be
specified,
as
a
building
permit
may
be
issued
upon
compliant
application.
Without
return
to
this
board.
D
Joe,
can
you
pull
up
the
file
on
this
one
and
show
in
relation
to
the
downtown
overlay
district,
which
was
a
new
overlay
district
that
was
just
recently
passed
and
fleshed
out
too?
You
know
what
the
intentions
of
this
district
needs
to
be
conducive
to
both
uses,
and
you
know,
appearance
and
how
the
downtown
district
is
going
to
redevelop
over
time.
D
F
F
E
Would
you
mind
reading
that?
Yes,
the
purpose
and
the
intent
of
the
downtown
overlay
district?
There
are
five
points
here.
Number
one
is
to
promote
development
of
a
compact,
pedestrian
oriented
downtown
consisting
of
high
intensity
and
Center,
vibrant
and
dynamic
mixed-use
area
and
residential
living
environments
that
provide
a
broad
range
of
housing.
Types
for
an
array
of
housing
needs.
Number
two
is
promote
a
diverse
mix
of
residential
business,
commercial
office,
institutional
educational,
cultural
and
entertainment
activities
for
workers,
visitors
and
residents.
Number
three
is
encouraged.
D
E
Mr.
Kyle
Hoff
is
just
looking
for
the
use
to
see
if
it
would
be
allowed
and
then
he
would,
you
know,
give
us
a
more
specific
idea
of
what
he
wants
to
do
for
the
aesthetics
and,
if
any
didn't
comply,
he
would
have
to
come
back
to
the
board
for
the
building
permit,
to
ask
variance
from
those
conditions
and.
D
E
E
D
D
D
D
E
B
F
Guess
the
question
I'm
having
right
here
is
that
being
that
there's
a
residential
youths
adjacent
to
a
seven
feet
and
if
even
if
I
go
a
story
and
a
half
I'm
running,
you
know
we
say
I'm
running
even
twelve
or
sixteen
foot
sidewalls,
that's
gonna
catch
the
shadow,
or
at
least
there's
going
to
be.
It's
gonna
be
right.
On
top
of
that
house.
F
Yeah,
this
is
chip
with
the
fire
department.
I
am
a
little
concerned
with
with
setback
I
know,
we
don't
have
any
I
know
it's
with
in
code,
but
we
have
residential
use.
You
know
we're
seven
feet
from
structures.
If
there's
something
we
can
how
we
could
make
that
a
little
safer
requirements.
Just
throwing
that
thought
out
there
and.
E
D
E
F
E
Well,
the
ordinance
there
is
a
table
for
setbacks
for
the
different
zone,
whether
it's
residential
or
non-residential,
and
in
the
table.
It
says
that
the
side
setback
for
the
c1
zone
shall
be
0
to
30
feet
depending
on
whether
it's
next
to
are
for
residential.
No,
it
does
not
specify
whether
that's
zone
or
use
but
I
believe
staff
has
been
thinking
that
it's
it's
the
zone.
E
F
B
This
is
brandy
if
I
could
just
add
something.
You
know
what
that
saying
are
and
I
believe
that
it
was
referring
to
a
district,
because
those
apartment
houses
are
actually
legal,
non-conforming
they've
been
grandfathered
in,
but
they
are
zoned
c1.
So,
in
that
situation
they
are
actually
the
use
that
they
have
is
not
permitted
in
the
district.
So
it's
more
so
like
do
we
want
do?
B
F
B
B
Don't
what
they're
doing
is
not
allowable
it
would
have
to
become
an
apartment
house
by
a
conditional
use,
so
basically
I
and
that's
where
I
don't
think
we
should
get
hung
up
on
that
saying.
30
feet
adjacent
to
are
because
the
use
isn't
allowable
in
the
district
that
they're
in
so
I.
Don't
think
that
it
should
deter
somebody
from
using
their
property
for
a
commercial
use
that
is
either
allowed
by
permitted
or
conditional.
F
What
I'm
gonna
argue
with
you
a
little
bit
because
I
believe
that
the
duplex
was
their
means
is,
is
a
is
a
vested
non-conforming
use
only
because
it
doesn't
have
a
permit,
which
is
an
administrative
act
that
could
be
done
relatively
easy,
so
the
the
use
itself
would
not
be
denied
because
it's
generally
compatible
with
everything
in
the
district.
So
I
think.
Yes,
they
do
have.
You
know
kind
of
dibs
yeah.
F
G
D
B
Well
and
so
the
battle
beans
that
we
just
implemented
the
downtown
anesthetics
district
overlay.
We
definitely
will
be
we'll
look
at
that
and
make
sure
that
he's
adhering
to
that
ordinance
and
then,
but
it's
more
so
just
if
he
can
make
a
contractor
shop.
Look
how
we
want
it
to
in
the
downtown
area.
Then
that
will
be
fine
and
if
he
is
not
able
to
meet
that,
like
Jill
had
said
that,
then
he
would
have
to
come
back
for
a
variance.
D
C
Ii
thought
I
hear
I
would
just
go
back
and
echo
the
statement
you
just
made.
I
think
that
really
this
alef
occation
at
the
heart
of
it
is
exactly
what
you
decided
is.
Is
this
use
appropriate
in
this
zone
and
that's
on
this
lot?
If
this
overlay
district
as
a
conditional
use
and
I
think
the
rest
of
those
criteria,
the
other
overlay
districts,
the
aesthetics
and
things
of
that
nature-
would
absolutely
have
to
be
ironed
out
with
the
subsequent
building
permit
application.
That
would
come
if
this
were
to
be
approved.
I.
G
Guess
getting
back
to
that
looking
at
his
drawing
here,
it
shows
what
two
feet
before
were
when
you
back
out
of
those
contractor
shops
on
to
First
Avenue
you've
got
two
feet
before
you're
backing
into
a
sidewalk.
Well,
if
you
have
somebody
coming
by
on
a
bike
or
walking,
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
develop
in
this
area,
you,
you
can't
even
see
if
they're
coming
around
the
corner,
cuz
your
vehicles
you're
still
inside
the
building,
so
I
guess
I
have
a
real
issue
with
that.
G
C
To
that
point,
that
was
also
discussed
at
the
staffing
level
and
review
of
this
application,
and
our
recommendation
from
a
traffic
safety
and
pedestrian
safety
standpoint
is.
If
the
board
were
to
entertain
approving
those
conditional
use,
we
would
recommend
seeing
that
that
setback
along
First
Avenue
South
be
required
to
be
set
in
because
of
those
three
garage
doors
that
are
being
proposed
there.
C
We
don't
think
it
would
be
safe
to
have
those
doors
right
on
the
edge
of
that
sidewalk,
just
like
what
was
described
by
one
of
the
commissioners
and
would
agree
that
maximizing
that
setback
would
be
appropriate
now,
I
say
maximizing
it,
because
we
do
have
stipulations
in
this
district.
That
would
allow
it
to
only
be
up
to
12
feet
setback.
D
H
C
Good
question,
commissioner
Hanson
that
also
was
discussed
and
we
do
allow
for
up
to
and
our
new
engineering
design
standards
we
just
adopted.
We
do
allow
up
to
a
36
foot
access
for
a
location
such
as
this,
so
I
think
that
we
could
accommodate
that.
The
only
issue
is
how
that
would
tie
into
that
alley
approach.
We
would
want
to
work
the
applicant
to
make
sure
that
it,
the
ally
approach,
doesn't
become
all
of
one
with
their
driveway
and
have
some
kind
of
separation.
There
would
be
the
minimum
requirement.
I
would
expect.
D
H
A
Was
Diana
back
to
when
Rhonda
mentioned
the
compatibility
with
the
downtown
overlay
district
I
also
have
a
concern
about
just
that,
going
back
to
21
Oh
OH,
but
a
through
H,
the
aged
part,
general
compatibility
with
adjacent
properties
and
I
guess
being
between
two
duplexes
and
essentially
surrounded
by
living
quarters
and
having
contractor
shops.
I
do
have
a
some
concern
about
the
general
compatibility
with
those
adjacent
properties.
D
And
I
think
you
know
generally
in
this
this
district.
We
understand
that
there's
gonna
be
redevelopment
right
and
that's
to
be
expected,
and
so
some
of
these
uses
will
continue
to
be
kind
of
mixed
within
the
zone
and
mixed
within
adjacent
areas
as
we
redevelop
it.
But
the
question
that
I
think
is
you,
you
know
what
is
that
appropriate
use
for
that
particular
lot
and
his
contractor
shop
specifically.
Is
that
the
type
of
use
that
that
fits
best
for
this
this
neighborhood
in
this
district.
H
B
B
Yeah,
he
wouldn't
even
meet
the
requirements
for
an
r2,
a
which
is
6000
square
feet
thousand,
and
this
is
a
this
is
a
property
actually
that
we
looked
at
specifically
when
we
changed
the
ordinance
in
for
the
c1
district
and
the
minimum
lot
size
requirement.
Because
of
these
small
parcels
that
that
are
there
and
then
also
that
they
have
more
buildable
area,
because
there
is
ZERO
setback.