►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting - 04-23-2020 -2
Description
Board of Adjustment Meeting - 04-23-2020 -2
A
I
would
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
request
to
allow
a
contractor
shop,
slash
office
on
this
location,
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
that
there
is
a
five
foot
setback
on
the
east
side
of
the
property
on
the
north
side
of
a
property.
I
can't
remember
a
staff
suggestion
was
a
twelve
feet
on
the
South
twelve
and
it
and
and
with
that
and
then
I'll
go
with
a
I'll,
say
twelve
on
the
on
the
west
and
is
there?
Is
there
the?
Is
there
a
tree
planning
requirement
with
this
as
well.
B
D
A
Commuted
dad
I'm
sorry
thank
you.
I
will
make.
I
will
also
supplement
the
motion
by
stating
that,
as
long
as
the
storage
areas
are
not
sublet
and
it's
only
the
bathrooms
are
associated
with
the
single
contractors
shop
use,
then
they
would
be
fine,
but
if
they
were
to
be
storage
units
were
we
let
out,
then
they
would
have
to
close
those
doors.
C
E
Think
you
know
from
a
pragmatic
standpoint
to
me.
This
whole
structure
could
be
classified
as
a
contractor
shop.
I
know
that
those
definitions
that
we
have
in
the
ordinance
between
a
storage
unit
in
a
contractor's
shop
or
something
that
staff
and
I
have
been
frequently
having
to
read
through
and
look
at
and
the
primary
component.
That
spell
out
one
of
the
primary
components
that
differentiates
the
two
is
the
allowable
connection
to
water
and
sewer.
But
the
way
this
is
laid
out,
I
guess
from
a
practical
standpoint.
E
B
A
A
C
E
D
A
C
B
D
Well,
he
did
not
go
into
detail
on
lighting,
for
instance,
but
you
could
you
could
say
that,
because
this
is
nearby
residential
areas,
you
have
to
have
shoe
box
lighting
things
like
that
or
like
residential
lighting,
whatever
it
is
that
you
want
to
recommend
there
as
far
as
the
tree
this
this
does,
because
the
there
was
a
house
here
that
got
demolished
and
it
it
is
currently
basically
a
grass
boulevard
area.
It
has
to
maintain
at
least
15
foot,
but
this
setback
will
make
it
more
than
that.
D
C
G
Clear
that
up
for
me
Jill,
so
if
so,
when
we
were
when
we,
if
we
approve
this
with
the
setbacks
of
the
12
feet,
12
feet
on
the
alley,
we're
gonna
shorten
him
up.
Is
he
gonna
have
enough
you
I,
don't
know
how
is
he
gonna
access?
Those
three
garage
doors
with
the
boulevard
and
I
mean
is
that
gonna
effectively
lose
a
garage
door
to
the
south?
E
Would
defer
to
can
as
far
as
the
green
space
or
tree
planting
requirements
I?
Obviously,
yes,
that
36
foot
wide
allowable
maximum
driveway
width
is
going
to
eat
up
a
good
majority
that
Boulevard
I,
don't
know
what
the
tree
planning
or
green
space
requirement
would
be.
Here,
though,
I
missed
that
part.
D
D
Correct
what
it
says
in
the
c1
district
is
that
the
c1
district
basically
is
exempt
from
the
boulevard
requirements
unless
it
has
been
compliant
up
to
up-to-date,
basically,
and
then
it
is
not
allowed
to
become
non-compliant,
so
what
is
compliant
is
supposed
to
stay
compliant.
In
this
case,
it's
a
largely
a
grass
bear
lot.
B
We
have
no
idea
whether
it
was
there
wasn't
at
that
time,
we're
just
making
that
assumption
no
place
else
in
the
see
ones
on
the
district.
Are
you
allowed
to
have
any
landscape
requirements
unless
they
previously
existed
in
comportment?
If
you
passed,
it
say
at
least
in
if,
if
a
for
proves
or
whatever
thank
you.
D
C
D
D
D
So
staff
finds
that
the
applicant
seeks
to
enlarge
this
illegal
non-conforming
building
further
conflicting
with
the
regulations
of
the
c2
zone
and
further
impacting
the
parcels
already
insufficient
off
street
parking
situation.
There
is
a
profit,
approximately
four
thousand
forty
eight
square
foot
of
legal
buildable
area
on
this
substantial
eighteen
thousand,
four
hundred
and
twenty
four
square
foot
c2
parcel,
which
is
almost
twice
the
size
required
for
the
c2
local
commercial
district.
D
The
parcel
currently
has
approximately
eight
thousand
five
hundred
and
thirty
six
square
feet
of
building
coverage,
which
is
more
than
twice
what
the
parcel
is
allowed
per
ordinance
vault
core
regulations
if
it
were
being
basically
developed
today.
This
property
is
already
lacking
in
required,
Boulevard
landscape
grass,
tree
improvements
and
utilizes
public
right-of-way
Boulevard
as
an
over
with
driveway
or
aisle.
In
order
to
maximize
what
is
insufficient
customer
parking,
the
if
the
application
is
endorsed.
D
This
is
the
existing
building.
This
is
the
proposed
addition,
a
twenty
four
by
basically
sixty
in
the
center
of
what
has
become
it.
Originally
was
two
buildings
becoming
attached.
I
do
have
permits
from
these
structures
being
constructed
their
history,
so
basically
all
they're
doing
here
is
is
filling
in
the
middle,
but
the
parking
situation,
not
that
anything
can
really
be
done
about
it,
but
that
is
a
non-conforming
or
an
insufficient
amount
of
parking.
D
C
D
C
D
D
This
is
our
four,
which
is
mobile
homes.
Zoning
c3
is
highway
commercial.
Our
2a
is
residential
and
c2
local
commercial.
The
difference
in
C,
3
and
C
2
is
basically
C.
2
is
meant
for
higher
density
residential,
closer
to
higher
density
residential
areas
where
it
would
have
larger
setbacks
in
order
to
protect
those
areas.
Hello.
A
B
D
I
did
not
go
back
and
do
the
research
looking
through
all
the
minutes
here,
but
basically
this
has
been
razón
de
couple
of
times
in
about
1993.
It
reason
it
was
a
rezone
from
our
for
mobile
home
to
c3
and
then
in
about
2005.
It
got
rezone
from
c3
to
c2
and
if
I
remember
correctly,
that
was
kind
of
basically
because
of
the
parcel
to
the
east
and
what
he
wanted
to
do
there
and
what
was
allowed
in
that
zone.
D
The
mechanic
repair
shop
was
built
in
1984.
Then
there
was
a
garage
addition
variances
for
a
storage
building
in
1993,
a
storage
building
was
put
up
also
in
1993.
There
was
an
office
addition
in
1999,
and
then
there
was
this
corridor
building
addition
in
2000,
which
connected
connected
the
two
buildings
and
there.
D
A
The
application
the
application
says
that
he's
looking
at
wanting
to
enclose
the
area
to
add
space
in
order
to
for
storage
and
additional
working.
Is
that,
unlike
another
Bay
for
for
more
automobile
repair?
Or
do
we
know?
Yes,
yes,
okay,
okay,
and
so
with
this
additional
storage
space
and
bay
area
for
working,
how
much
more
business
are
we
expecting
to
generate
out
of
that.
B
A
A
F
B
F
D
F
B
B
I
didn't
review
this
at
all,
but
the
way
it
looks
you
know
he's
gonna
be
compliant
with
what
the
code
states.
You
know,
of
course,
he'll
build
it.
However,
you
know
some
comes
up
with
a
code
review.
When
this
is
approved.
You
know
he's
he's
gonna.
Do
it
staff
request,
so
I
have
no
issue
we'll
work
together.
C
H
F
G
D
G
F
D
B
H
Mr.
Engel
I'd
like
to
ask
you
another
question
about
that
parking
in
front
of
your
buildings.
If
this
area
isn't
closed,
will
it
do
anything
to
alleviate
parking
in
the
right
away
or
reduce
the
congestion
that
we
see
in
this
picture
with
these
cars
parked
bumper
to
bumper?
Will
that
change
that
at
all?
Well.
H
F
H
F
E
If
I
could
just
add
clarity
of
that
to
what
Commissioner
Ford
is
speaking
to,
is
there
off
street
parking
requirements
for
most
any
use
in
the
city,
I
off
streets?
That
means
on
the
private
property
within
the
bounds
of
the
parcel
or
the
lot,
and
so
what
we're
seeing
here
is.
This
is
a
very
wide
street
right-of-way,
as
those
yellow
lines
indicate
on
this
area
and
in
fact,
a
good
portion
of
that
parking
area
of
yours
is
in
fact
in
the
public
right
away
right,
wrong
or
otherwise.
E
A
Just
want
to
make
a
quick
comment:
I
think.
What's
going
on,
mr.
Ingels
property
is
no
different
than
the
situation
we
had
last
month
at
the
laundromat,
where
the
laundromat
was
using
portions
of
the
public
right-of-way
for
parking
I
think
we
are
all
pretty
much
on
the
same
sheet
of
music
that
somebody
wanted
to
propose
that
brand-new
today.
What's
not
something
that
we
would
probably
do.
However,
my
thinking
is
that
we
need
to
treat
mr.
Ingels
request
very
similar
to
what
we
did
with
the
laundromat
in
regard
to
the
parking
and
the
public
right
away.
A
It's
been
used
for
many
many
years
on
any
given
day.
You
may
see
that
many
cars,
you
also
I'm
sorry
I've,
driven
by
their
ties
and
Doug,
had
no
cars
out
front
I.
Think
it's
I
think
it's
an
issue.
This
is
a
an
existing
use
that
under
as
proposed,
if
it
was
brand
new,
we
would
not
allow
it
to
continue
I'm,
not
sure
that
he's
you
know
exacerbating
the
situation
whatsoever,
what
the
proposal
as
it
is
I.
F
H
Well,
I
think
that's
an
excellent
offer,
an
excellent
idea
and
certainly
answers
my
question:
is
there
another
way
to
to
do
something
with
that
parking
to
help
out
with
that
situation
and
and
not
use
the
public
right
away,
and,
if
that,
well,
that
that
space
is
definitely
available,
I
think
that's
a
great
solution
and
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up.
That's
very
generous
of
you
and
I
think
an
ideal
solution
to
that.
G
C
G
B
B
H
F
F
It's
really
tough
with
the
I
know,
the
grass
is
required,
but
it
is
so
hard
to
not
completely
destroy
everything
when
you're
moving
snow
in
the
wintertime
and
the
grassy
area
that
I
have
over
there.
I
just
went
through
repairing
all
the
damage
that
was
done
to
it
over
the
winter
and
adding
dirt
and
blanton
grass,
and
it
seems
like
it's
a
yearly
thing.
G
C
A
Suitcase
I'm
just
going
to
say
that
I'm
supporting
the
motion,
primarily
due
to
the
ability
of
the
applicants,
testimony
that
he
would
work
to
avoid
double
stacking
cars
and
also
based
out
of
this
extra
wide
right
away.
Not
normally
seen
in
this
in
this
area
of
other
66-foot
right
ways
puts
it
undue
burden
on
his
his
parking
abilities
there
and,
furthermore,
be
based
on
actions
that
we
did
last
month
in
relation
requests
at
the
laundromat.
His
reason
why
I
will
support
this
motion.
B
D
C
D
D
B
A
D
This
is
a
reconsideration.
It
is
not
a
new
application,
we're
just
reconsidering
what
was
approved
and
the
conditions
of
it
on
may
9th
of
2019,
which
is
within
a
year's
time
of
application.
Number
one,
nine
five
one
six
specific
use
or
excuse
me:
yes,
specific
use
office
building,
so
I'd
like
to
just
read
the
minutes.
Just
to
begin
with
Andy
hold
was
a
NEMA
hold
was
the
applicant.
At
that
time
he
seeked
approval
to
operate
a
specific
use,
office
building
and
appeals.
D
The
parking
limitations
of
such
use,
if
approved,
a
compliant
5,400
square
foot,
two
commercial
building
designed
with
a
single
public
entrance,
is
it
proposed
to
be
constructed
within
which
to
operate?
This
use.
The
staff
report
was
orated
second
section
21,
seven
401
five
states
that
no
customer
parking
shall
be
provided
in
the
rear
of
any
lot
hold
explained
that
he
arranged
the
parking
a
lot
so
as
to
limit
impact
on
the
residential
properties
to
the
east
city.
D
Engineer,
Vaughn
I
would
approve
a
4-foot
sidewalk
for
consistency
with
the
existing
connecting
sidewalks
adjacent
landowners
asked
questions
finding
that
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
according
to
2100
202.
To
b7
A
through
H
brink
motion
to
approve
with
screen
fence
on
the
west
side
of
the
existing
trees
and
parking,
as
proposed
Hanson's.
Second
end
and
motion
carried
unanimously.
D
C
A
My
name
is
Todd
Kay's
I'm,
the
executive
director,
the
first
District
Association
of
local
governments,
the
first
District
Development
Company,
along
with
the
first
District,
acquired
this
property.
Last
year
we
started
our
new
office
building
and
we've
been
there
since
November.
Since
that
point
in
time,
we've
been
working
with
a
landscape
architect
to
finish
the
landscaping
and
discussion
how
we
want
to
approach
the
screening
requirements.
I
have
spoken
with
Roger
Trebek
who
lives
to
the
south
of
us.
Can
I
share
a
screen
yeah.
C
A
A
That
is
grass
that,
if
you're
familiar
up
by
the
hospital
grows
to
a
height
of
about
four
feet,
and
we
would
create
a
natural
grass
wall
so
to
speak
in
our
front
yard,
we
would
I
would
rather
use
a
grass
and
trees
as
opposed
to
a
hard
fence.
That's
a
little
bit
softer
environment
and
we
have
not
heard
any
negative
response
from
the
neighbors
to
the
east.
I.
C
Do
recall
when,
when
this
came
before
us
previously
and
in
the
discussion
with
the
residents
at
the
time,
generally
preferred
a
natural
approach
to
it,
and
that
was
part
of
the
the
conversation
around
the
existing
trees
there
as
well
either.
The
other
benefit
that
you
have
in
this
approach,
it
sounds
like,
is
you're
moving
the
mature
trees
so
that
you
have
a
mature
screen
immediately,
as
opposed
to
trying
to
grow
something
new
that
takes
10-15
years.
A
Right
and
I
know
in
the
package.
You
know
you
can
see
the
actual
detail,
we'll
have
two
new
trees
planted
in
the
front
and
putting
some
new
horizon
Elmen
there,
where
it
says
Tannenbaum
pine,
that
area
there
will
be
that
feather
grass
that
we
were
talking
about
and
then,
while
getting
ready.
Hopefully
I
hear
the
next
few
weeks,
we'll
be
putting
down
side
and
then
we'll
have
a
bunch
of
plantings
around
the
north
and
the
south
sides
of
the
building
too
soft
those
facade.
D
A
A
They
appreciated
the
large
trees
coming
in,
as
that
helps
with
the
current
light
spillage
that
comes
off
that
property
between
up
until
10
o'clock
at
night,
when
we
have
the
security
lighting
on
and
the
other
person,
that's
renting
next
to
Roger
and
Lisa
Trebek
I
believe
her
name
is
Nancy.
She
said
that
she
had
no
problems
with
it.
She
would
prefer
that
than
a
hard
fence
and
on
the
South
rear
yards
rear
product
parking
lot.