►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment - 06-18-2020
Description
Board of Adjustment - 06-18-2020
A
A
A
B
The
owner
applicant
is
paul
carlson,
the
property
address
will
be
is
yet
to
be
determined.
It's
at
the
northwest
corner
of
golf
course
road
and
33rd
street
west.
This
is
a
conditional
use
request.
The
applicant
seeks
approval
to
construct
storage
units,
a
storage
units
facility
in
the
r3
multi-family
residential
district
for
212032
of
the
zoning
ordinance
contingent
upon
compliance
with
210202
2b7a
through
h,
which
is
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses.
B
D
C
B
B
The
2163
again
is
the
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements.
A
review
of
that
this
is
non-residential,
so
the
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
are
applicable
for
the
commercial
type
of
outside
storage.
None
of
that
was
indicated
in
this
application.
However,
chapter
21
73
is
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
That
would
include
things
like
lighting
screening
dumps,
dumpsters,
etc.
They
were
not
addressed.
B
B
The
under
undeveloped
parcel
is
currently
in
the
process
of
city
council
approval
for
re-planning
and
rezoning,
so
this
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made.
Concerning
the
above
chapters
and
titles,
we
addressed
for
such
use
to
be
operated
at
this
location
and,
if
generally
endorsed,
this
board
may
consider
conditions
of.
A
A
A
C
B
A
No
well,
we
can
do
it
one
or
two
ways.
We
can
have
a
motion
to
approve
and
then
discuss
and
then
either
vote
up
or
down
or
if
you'd
like
to
just
do
board
discussion
ahead
of
time.
You
know
in
order
to
tailor
emotion,
maybe
that'd
be
more
appropriate.
So
if
you,
if
anybody
from
the
board
wants
to
say
anything,
feel
free
to
talk
now,.
D
B
D
E
B
D
G
A
F
C
B
C
F
F
D
E
D
D
E
No
and
like
jill
said
this
is
a
commercial
use
going
into
an
r3
transitional
district
and
you'll
see
these
on
other
corners
too.
You
got
two
collector
streets,
and
so
really
what
you
guys
need
to
contemplate
is
age
and
if
it
fits
the
general
compatibility-
and
you
guys
do
have
the
screening
in
as
part
of
your
motion.
C
I
think
it's,
I
think
I
think
we
have
the
ability
to
attach
conditions
to
any
conditional
use
permit
as
long
as
it
has
a
rational
nexus
to
the
request,
and
if
that
is
a
question
of
whether
or
not
steel
buildings
at
this
location
is
something
you
know,
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
something
that
we've
required
in
the
past
in
other
r3
zones.
It
doesn't
mean
that
you
can't
do
it
moving
forward,
but
I'm
kind
of
on
the
fence
on
this
one.
A
I've
got
just
a
few
comments.
We've
got
a
motion
with
some
conditions
upon
it.
We've
had
some
good
discussion
about
siding.
Do
we
want
to
amend
that
motion
or
perhaps
let
either
to
adjust
the
siding
requirements
and
or
to
adjust
the
screening
requirements?
Perhaps
we
do
screening
four
sides
that
maybe
alleviates
this
issue,
or
we
do
four
sides
plus
some
sort
of
a
siding
requirement,
todd
any
input.
C
C
As
as
randy
said
it
is
a
collect,
those
are
collector
streets
where
you
would
normally
see
commercial
type
users
at
a
node.
I'm
thinking
you
know
it
would
be
nice
if
you
could
put
some
some
brick
on
on
the
front
or
something
like
that,
but
I'm
not
saying
that
they
need
I'm
not
so
much
in
favor
that
they
would
need
to
not
be
able
to
have
steel,
siding
there.
D
I'd
agree
with
chairman
or
mr
k's,
just
because
it's
this
is
the
first
building
kind
of
going
in
this
corner.
Although
there
will
be
residential
around
it,
the
residential
will
be
able
to
see
it
before
they
decide
to
purchase
and
buy
there.
So
I
don't
think
it's
impacting
the
the
neighborhood.
That
way
I
mean
that's,
that's
my
thoughts.
I
guess.
A
F
E
B
E
B
E
F
A
F
F
A
A
D
B
D
B
A
A
D
A
D
B
F
A
B
A
B
A
C
A
F
F
B
B
The
term
bar
or
tavern
shall
also
include
establishments
licensed
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
consumption
off
the
premises
where
sold.
Note
that
the
applicant's
alcoholic
beverage
license
does
not
include
gambling
facilities
at
this
time.
However,
if
approved
for
bar
tavern
use
here,
they
would
not
have
to
return
to
this
board
in
the
future
to
have
such
a
use.
It
would
be
through
their
licensing
and
city
council
before
any
conditional
use
shall
be
issued.
B
Just
for
your
information,
I
don't
believe
that
there
is
any
such
community
or
church
sponsored
organizations
within
that
radius
of
this
chapter.
21
20
or
2163
off-street
parking
and
loading
requirements.
Melissa's
concept
concept
plan
here
does
show
traffic
flow
and
parking,
and
it
includes
a
drive
up
window
pass-through
window.
B
Chapter
2165
is
outside
storage
and
display
requirements.
She
did
not
address
wanting
any
outside
display
or
or
storage
in
her
application.
Lighting
and
landscape
is,
as
shown
on
her
site
plan
here,
and
she
did
not
address
signs
in
outdoor
advertising
if
you've
ever
driven
by
it.
It
is
what
it
is.
I
don't
have
information
on
that.
This
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
these
chapters
and
titles
addressed
and
for
such
use
to
be
operated
at
this
location.
If
generally
endorsed,
this
board
may
consider
conditions
of
approval.
A
D
B
A
B
A
D
B
B
D
B
G
A
B
B
B
The
primary
structure
is
a
circa
1908
version
of
a
pair
of
town
houses,
also
known
as
single
family
attached,
for
which
current
ordnance
requires
a
minimum
of
two
off-street
parking
spaces
to
be
designated
for
each
single-family
dwelling.
Each
parking
space
shall
allow
the
exit
of
the
vehicle
they're
in
without
first
moving
another
car
or
vehicle.
Therefore,
the
site
plan
shows
a
maximum
of
three
legal
off-street
parking
spaces
in
front
of
the
structure.
B
2103025
restricts
enlargement
of
the
structure
without
compliance
with
the
minimum
required
for
off-street
parking
spaces.
If
generally
endorsed,
this
board
may
consider
requiring
conditions
of
approval,
such
as
off-street
parking
areas
sufficient
to
accommodate
a
minimum
of
four
legal
off-street
parking
spaces.
A
G
Yes,
allen
a-l-a-n
last
name
is
b-e-r-n-s
and
the
reason
for
the
request
for
the
variance
my
father
built
a
fish
pond
in
the
property
back
in
the
late
1930s,
we've
owned
the
duplex
since
1919,
I'm
the
third
family
owner.
I
live
on
a
farm
up
in
the
crocker
hills,
I'm
a
retired
zoning
enforcement
officer
from
omaha
nebraska.
G
So
eventually
I
will
live
in
the
property,
but
to
preserve
the
fish
pond
some
of
the
stones.
They
had
brought
back
from
mount
rushmore
back
in
the
late
1930s
and
it's
got
a
lot
of
significance
to
me.
There
were
three
fish
ponds
in
the
neighborhood
when
I
was
growing
up
the
walworth
property
right
across
the
street.
Mrs
mcintosh,
a
piano
teacher
on
2nd
street
in
the
eggies
and
the
next
block
across
from
mount
out
of
lutheran
church
was
the
thing
to
do.
F
G
What
what
I'm
going
to
do
the
east
wall
of
the
garage
is
you'd
have
to
look
at
the
survey.
I
think
it's
about
36
feet
in
length.
What
I'm
going
to
do
is
move
that
east
wall
out,
starting
at
the
seventh
avenue
side,
move
it
out
six
feet
by
a
length
of
24,
because
I
want
to
preserve
some
of
the
lilac
heads.
That's
up
against
the
fish
pond.
My
dad
was
a
very
environmentally
oriented
individual.
G
G
G
G
E
D
So
what
if
you
were
to
turn
the
garage
and
put
it
and
I'm
just
throwing
this
idea
out
there?
I
don't
know
that
the
board
would
approve
it
or
not.
If
we
came
off
of
the
side
of
the
the
duplex
and
got
and
gave
you
a
variance
on
the
nearness
of
it
to
the
existing
building
and
then
the
cars
would
enter
the
garage
through
the
alley.
F
G
B
D
G
A
D
C
Yeah,
I
view
these
types
of
expansions,
while
these
are
non-conforming
uses
legal
non-conforming
uses
the
expansion.
Realistically
is
not
it's
more
of
a
non-standard
type
of.
We
don't
have
that
in
this,
our
city's
current
ordinance,
but
it's
really
more
of
a
non-standard
use.
The
the
expansion
is
not
further
exactly
you
know,
causing
any
more
violation
to
the
ordinance
as
far
as
encroachment
on
to
the
on
the
property
and
in
conjunction
again
this
is
older
parts
of
town.
C
I
think
in
some
of
these
situations
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
causing
a
problem.
Two
previous
boards
have
basically
said
yes
to
this
request
in
the
past.
It's
the
same
landowner.
I
don't
know
what
why
his
expectation
would
be
any
different
than
it
has
been
on
the
last
two.
So
I
make
a
motion
to
approve
his
wreck
as
presented.