►
From YouTube: Plan Commission 06-18-2020
Description
Plan Commission 06-18-2020
A
A
And
Stein
are
absent
with
that.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
three
on
the
agenda.
Invitation
for
public
comment
participate
participants,
the
middle.
If
anybody
would
like
to
speak
about
something
that
is
not
on
the
agenda,
we
reserve
a
time
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
For
that.
Please
stick
around
or
stay
on.
The
line
and
I
will
open
that
up.
When
that
comes
number
four
approval
of
the
agenda.
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda?
I'll.
B
A
A
A
B
Thank
You
Liam,
so
this
is
the
preliminary
plan
for
stony
points.
Second,
edition
lots:
one
and
two:
the
developer
and
owner
is
Robert
Drake
of
Stoney,
Point,
investments,
LLP
and
obviously
stony
point.
There's
a
lot
of
history
to
it.
I
just
want
to
take
you
guys
why
we're
here
today
this
is
for
the
Platte.
This
is
a
plat
of
Stoney
Point
second
edition
it's
recorded
and
there's
a
development
agreement
attached
to
it.
B
So
the
two
Lots
that
we're
looking
at
today
are
lot
1,
&,
2,
they're,
zoned
commercial
c2,
which
is
local
commercial,
and
that
was
done
in
2014
as
well,
along
with
this
plat
and
then
the
development
agreement
that
is
recorded
with
the
plat.
Had
this
caveat
in
there
that
said,
no
commercial
development
will
be
allowed
without
approval
of
a
preliminary
plan
by
the
Planning
Commission,
which
shall
include
adequate
assurance
that
all
required
infrastructure
will
be
provided
now,
that'll
be
all
required
infrastructure,
but
it's
specifically
under
streets.
B
B
It's
expired,
so
the
rest,
the
rest
of
the
land.
The
only
thing
that
we're
looking
at
today
are
the
bluish-gray
lines.
Here.
The
rest
of
the
land
will
have
to
be
preliminary
planned
at
a
later
date
when
they
are
ready
to
develop
those
portions.
They
are
ready
to
develop
lot
1
&
2,
but
they
have
to
meet
the
requirements
of
the
development
agreement
by
providing
adequate
access,
which
is
what
we're
accomplishing
with
this.
B
So
instead
right
now,
I'll
show
you
on
the
plat
right
now
there
this
was
just
right-of-way
floating
and
there
was
no
actual
right-of-way
or
even
private,
drives
designated
by
the
plat.
So
this
is
cleaning
that
up
by
providing
a
private
drive
that
they
are
designing
to
be
able
to
be
dedicated
to
the
public.
B
They
are
looking
at
different
options
for
for
how
to
go
about
that
with
financing
and
whatnot
for
it,
if
that,
but
so
now
they
will
be
accessing
Prairie,
Hills
AB
to
the
south
and
it'll
be
extending
through
their
property
to
provide
paved
access
to
the
commercial
labs.
Where
they
would
like
to
develop
as
far
as
detention,
obviously
drainage
is
a
huge
deal.
This
is
like
competi.
Water
quality
is
something
that
we
want
to
preserve
and
protect
so
you'll
see
here.
This
is
a
actual
jurisdictional
wetland.
B
They
will
not
be
encroaching
upon
that
these
other
two
areas
that
you'll
see
here
that
I'm
pointing
out
are
non-jurisdictional
and
I
did
confirm
that
with
the
Corps
today
so
and
they're
all
on
board,
with
what
they're
doing
with
their
project.
So
they
are
expanding
this
pond
that
some
of
you
will
know
as
Dennis
Arnold's
for
his
Prairie
Hills
development.
That
will
be
where
their
100-year
detention
will
be
conveyed.
So
all
of
the
runoff
will
be
conveyed
to
the
south
to
this
pond.
B
F
A
F
Casey
de
Boer
6205
Prairie
Hills
Avenue.
Thank
you
for
the
time
this
afternoon,
I
own
a
property
adjacent
to
the
properties
discussed
in
the
preliminary
plan
under
discussion
tonight.
First
off
I
would
like
to
say
that
in
general,
I
generally
do
not
have
issues
with
the
lot
development
being
proposed.
However,
whenever
there's
new
commercial
development
that
connects
to
long-standing
single-family
residential
property,
there
are
inevitably
some
issues.
I
have
had
the
opportunity
to
watch
the
project
evolved
over
the
course
of
the
last
year
right
outside
my
windows.
F
I
was
aware
what
I
bought
the
property
that
there
would
be
a
road
directly
to
the
east
of
my
property
or,
and
that
would
go
north
into
stony
point.
What
I
wasn't
aware
of
was
that
as
soon
as
that
property
or
that
road
got
to
the
north
end
of
my
property,
it
would
swing
out
to
the
west
and
be
behind
my
property
and
the
problems
that
that
would
probably
that
would
that
would
create.
For
me,
I've
shared
with
mr.
F
Drake
that
his
excavation
process
has
created
quite
a
tourist
attraction
out
of
Lake
Camp
Eska,
especially
on
the
weekends.
The
looky-loos
get
a
little
braver
and
they're,
usually
several
vehicles
a
day
that
will
drive
down
to
check
out
the
road
and,
what's
happening,
I,
think
they're
looking
to
park
in
the
marina.
F
Drake,
but
it
was
a
felt
it
was
important
to
get
on
the
record
as
a
concerned
as
this
road
is
currently
configured,
it's
the
only
road
for
the
development.
So
it's
going
to
see
a
significant
portion
of
the
traffic
in
the
future,
as
this
project
fully
develops
I
mentioned
earlier.
You
know.
New
commercial
development
and
long-standing
residential
zones
meet
there's,
often
issues,
and
this
is
one
of
those
to
me.
Those
are
usually
mitigated
by
transitional
zones
or
to
minimum
screening
and
buffers
that
don't
affect
to
preserve
the
residential
feel
of
a
neighborhood.
F
F
I
think
berms,
fencing,
and/or
foliage
to
screening
the
existing
residential
properties
from
the
impact
of
the
road
in
the
commercial
development,
as
well
as
straightening
Road,
would
be
appropriate
steps
to
be
taken
to
minimize
the
effect
of
this
property
or
this
project
on
my
peaceful
enjoyment
of
my
property.
I
would
hope
that
those
kind
of
conditions
could
be
placed
on
this
development
as
it
goes
forward
and
then
I
guess
maybe
retreading.
F
F
Why
would
you
design
the
only
interest
to
a
commercial
development
to
traverse
a
block
and
half
of
a
residential
neighborhood?
That
is
just
poor
planning
on
everybody's
part.
It
will
go
a
block
and
a
half
until
Prairie
Hills
Avenue
dumps
into
60th
Street,
Southwest
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
solution
to
that
at
this
point,
but
I
know
it's
going
to
become
a
perpetual
concern
for
that
residential
neighborhood,
the
amount
of
traffic
and
the
speed
of
traffic
as
this
being
the
only
entrance
to
a
commercial
development
that
has
great
plans
going
forward.
I.
G
Williams
I
have
stony
point
I
am
concerned.
I
have
brought
this
to
you
many
times,
I.
Think
you
are
aware
of
my
situation.
Our
family
I
constantly
find
that
they
are
not
doing
their
due
diligence
in
preventing
some
of
the
problems
that
are
existing
on
my
own
property
I
am
against
having
a
commercial,
restaurant
or
resort
right
behind
my
own
home.
G
Wish
there
were
other
solutions,
but
I
don't
see
that
they
are
doing
the
proper
things
at
this
time.
I
also
have
questions
earlier
today
there
were
commercial
trucks
parked
up
beside
my
pull
bar
I
was
quite
curious
as
to
who
was
there
and
what
they
were
doing.
Eventually
I
found
out
that
they
were
going
to
be
doing
some
work
up
on
the
other
stony
point
in
the
canal
and
start
digging
or
excavating
that
area
I'm,
hoping
that's
not
going
to
be
used.
My
easement
road
is
not
going
to
be
used
one
more
time
for
the.
G
C
H
Lawrence
I
work
with
Bob
Drake
and
we
work
on
this
project
together.
We
all
know,
there's
a
history
behind
this
property.
We
have
one
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out
that
Brandi
did
did
kind
of
leave
out
there
is,
you
know
you
guys
have
blessed
a
lot
itself
for
a
hotel
restaurant
Apartments.
We
had
to
come
for
that
conditional
use.
That
was
a
great
time
to
have
that
conditional
use.
We
talked
through
it
now
we're
just
trying
to
get
to
the
property
without
using
Kaunas
easement.
H
We
were
I
was
out
there
this
morning
with
that
contractor
I
actually
made
a
phone
call
to
him
this
morning.
Not
to
do
that
and
I
was
surprised,
I
got
there
before
him
and
because
they
brought
three
trucks
and
for
some
reason
they
left
one
there.
So
I
had
told
him,
hey
make
sure
you
don't
go
into
the
campground
side,
make
this
direction.
The
only
reason
that
we
had
to
go
that
direction
today
was
because
of
the
two
inches
of
rain
that
we
had.
H
It
was
didn't,
make
it
very
easy
to
get
up
from
the
other
direction.
So
you
know
this
is
this.
Is
this
process
right
here?
We
we
could
have
built
apartment
complexes
on
here
without
even
having
to
come.
Do
this
we
could.
We
could
come
in
here
and
do
a
residential
r350
unit
condo
without
having
nasa's
question,
because
it's
not
a
commercial
use.
It's
a
residential
use.
The
only
reason
that
we're
here
today
is
because,
in
that
50
unit,
condo
building
will
be
a
restaurant.
H
That's
the
reason
that
we're
here
so
we
have
went
through
five
renditions.
We've
done
everything
that
we
can
we're
at
not
asking
for
a
variance
on
anything.
As
far
as
this
were,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
is
get
people
off
of
condos
land,
get
the
drainage
onto
mr.
Drake's
land
and
and
try
to
I
mean
the
area
is,
is
very
contentious
and
and
I
feel.
Mr.
de
Bourgh,
we
don't
want
people
out
there
either,
and
we
want
to
make
that
clear
to
the
public.
This
isn't
private
or
public
property.
H
Yet
there
isn't
a
road
that
you
can
use.
People
shouldn't
be
driving
out
there
and
driving
around
through
there.
Where
we're
mr.
Drake
is
working
on
getting
some
barricades,
so
we
can
get
that
barricaded
off
so
that
ends
I
mean
we
don't
want
that
either
things.
That's
a
liability
on
us.
So
right
now,
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
is
is
kind
of
correct
the
the
sins
of
the
past
that
have
happened.
H
We're
gonna
we're
looking
to
bring
forward
we're
working
with
the
Watertown
development
company
to
bring
forward
a
tiff
that
will
get
the
marine
of
the
road
in
as
well
we're
working
with
contractors.
Already
like
I
said,
we've
went
back
and
forth
with
the
city
staff
five
or
six
times.
There's
tens
of
thousands
of
dollars
worth
of
engineering
built
into
this,
and-
and
we
have
when
working
with
the
city
staff-
we're
not
asking
for
variances
we're
trying
to
do
the
best.
H
We
can
in
an
area,
that's
very
contentious,
and
we
and
the
sooner
I
think
that
we
get
to
get
everything
done.
The
better
it'll
be,
and
it
just
takes
time
we're
gonna
be
bringing
the
zoning
for
the
rest
of
it.
We're
gonna
we're
gonna,
be
utilizing
the
new
CL
district.
We're
gonna,
try
to
bring
that
and
that,
then
their
zoning
will
be
taken.
Care
of
you
know
we're
hoping
to
have
this
area.
We
want
to
get
it.
H
Buttoned
up,
we've
been
working
with
hotel
developers,
we've
been
meeting
with
them
as
well
contractors
trying
to
get
this
thing
to
the
point
where
you
know
this
seven-year
process.
I
know
miss
miss
Connor,
Williams.
Last
time
had
mentioned
I
wish
they
would
have
just
done
a
residential
development
back
up
in
there.
Well,
as
you
saw
that
was
our
first
I
mean
mr.
Drake
would
be
done
he
this
project
would
be
over
by
now.
H
That
was
seven
years
ago
that
we
at
we
tried
to
do
that,
and-
and
that
wasn't
good
and
now
we're
coming
here
and
and
nobody
wants
that
either
mr.
Drake
purchased
the
land
he
wants
to
do
something
on
it
to
improve
access
and
and
habitable
properties
on
the
lake
to
get
people
out
here
and
I
mean
we're
anywhere
between
50
and
20
million
dollars.
H
On
a
building,
I
mean
that's
going
to
add
taxable
value
to
to
the
city
and
add
residences
out
there,
and
a
lot
of
the
people
that
are
interested
in
these
condos
actually
live
on
the
lake.
They
just
want
to
extend
their
time
on
the
lake.
They
don't
want
to
mow
lawns
anymore
and
they
don't
want
to
do
docks.
So
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
it,
which
and-
and
this
is
just
this-
is
literally
how
the
water
flows.
That's.
H
H
It
has
to
do
with
the
contractor.
We,
you
know
we
we're
not
going
to
go
ahead
and
get
the
whole
road
bid.
You
know
on
a
normal
project.
You
would
but
a
seven-year-long
project
like
this.
If
you
take
all
that
time,
we
spend
all
this
money
on
engineering
and
contractors
times,
but
we
would
hope
to
have
that
at
least
you
know
end
of
this
year,
beginning
of
next
to
get
it
in
there,
but
you
also,
you
have
to
leave
it
set
for
a
year
to
settle
yeah.
C
H
F
H
Do
a
contractor
would
have
to
to
submit
a
slip,
and
so
that
would
be
taken
care
of
if
there's
issues,
let
us
know
I
mean
we're
not
out
there
every
single
day
walking
around
making
sure
you
know
yeah.
We
had
90
mile
an
hour
winds
for
three
days.
Four
days
that
takes
stuff
down,
you
know,
I
mean
that's.
That's
know
that
there's
there
is
issues
like
that,
but
we
try
I
mean
if
there's
anything
wrong
with
the
road.
H
We
make
sure
we
try
to
get
contractors
up
there,
even
on
Kaunas
easement,
to
get
the
road
as
fast
as
we
can.
Obviously,
it's
not
a
drop
of
a
hat
type
deal,
but
I
believe
mr.
Drake
has
really
done
a
fair
job
of
trying
to
make
sure
that
this
is
done.
I
mean
we're.
We're
buying
a
whole
bunch
of
property
to
make
sure
that
nobody
uses
that
easement.
B
B
H
Yeah
we've
worked
close
with
DNR
GF
MP,
the
lake
Association
we
presented
with
them
in
front
of
them
on
Tuesday.
You
know
the
first
time
that
mr.
Drake
brought
the
residential
Channel
and
lots
through
they
weren't
on
board.
They
didn't
have
any
objections,
they're,
not
here
with
their
attorney
this
time.
So
things
have
been
a
lot
better.
We've
been
working
closer
with
staff.
We've
been
trying
to
do
that.
You
know
a
good
job
at
that
as
well.
G
H
Will
be
green
space?
There
would
be
an
outdoor
pool,
we're
hoping
to
have
a
fitness
center.
I
mean
and-
and
those
are
some
items
like
that-
we're
planning
on
building
a
marina
with
a
boardwalk
we
plan
on
connecting
it,
hopefully
to
the
trail
system
we
want.
We
want
it
to
be
a
place
that
people
can
get
out
and
enjoy
lake
in
Pasco
and.
B
Rhonda
I
might
add
to
that
is
not
typical
language
that,
when
they
plaited
that
that
should
have
still
like
the
residential
lots
and
we're
not
contemplating
those
with
what
we're
looking
at
with
the
prelim
plan.
But
if
they
were
to
come
back
and
rezone,
and
he
did
mention
that
they're
thinking
CL.
But
you
know
the
marina
and
everything
will
bring
a
recreational.
B
Aspect
to
the
property
too,
and
then,
like
he
mentioned,
with
just
the
condos
themselves,
having
a
pool
in
a
guard
and
whatnot.
But
that
is
definitely
something
that
if
they
were
coming
back
and
going
to
rezone
residential,
we
would
take
that
to
the
park
board
and
they
would
approve
and
that
we'd
get
the
5%
that
we
typically
do.
E
E
This
is
the
adequate
place
to
have
a
road
to
access
that
property,
which
should
have
been
done
when
the
original
plat
was
done,
so
we're
fixing
it
after
the
fact
and
I'm
guessing,
because
my
recollection
was
there
was
consternation
regarding
how
that
property
was
going
to
have
access,
and
so
the
developers
brought
us
a
road
there
they're
meeting
the
environmental
aspects
of
it.
The
question
is:
is
this
the
adequate
right
place
for
the
road,
and
that
should
really
be
the
basis
and
focus
of
our
discussion?
E
E
A
H
And
that's
something
I'm
on
a
development
committee
that
we're
trying
to
change
this
process
because
right
now
bringing
a
prelim
plan
after
you
have
tens
of
thousands
of
dollars
engine
of
engineering
into
here
and
then
and
then
finding
this
out
and
not
bringing
a
concept
plan
in
here.
It
raises
some
issues
with
a
developer,
so
we
are
working
on
maybe
changing
bringing
some
things
forward
that
we
can
get
that
you
know
changed
as
far
as
sure.
A
B
And
so
I
might
add
too.
So
if
this,
if
you
guys
would
approve
this
preliminary
plan,
I
was
checking
to
see
you
know,
revisions
to
a
preliminary
plan
and
when
that
has
to
come
back,
obviously
like
what
Mike
was
getting
at.
Is
we've
gotten
to
this
point
and
then
to
have
that
address?
It's
it's
a
little
late,
but
it's
not
something
that
couldn't
come
back
easily.
H
H
We
could
ask
for
is
some
flexibility
and
just
that
portion
of
this
plan,
where
we
could,
you
know,
straighten
that
out.
The
problem
is
we
we
want
to
get
started,
we
want
to
get
moving,
we
have
contractors
waiting,
we
have
architects
working
and
you
know
we
we
want
to
cut
every
one
though
so
we
can
get
this
thing
done.
So
if
we
could
have
some
flexibility,
we
will
work
on
on
trying
to
get
the
road
to
not
swing
in
there
when
we
have
to.
H
You
know,
like
I,
said
we're
bringing
more
more
things
up
here
in
the
in
the
future.
We
want
mr.
de
Bourgh
to
be
comfortable.
You
know
we
want
to
try
to
try
to
work
with
the
people,
because
it
is
a
it's
a
large
project
and
it's
a
lot
easier
if
you
work
the
people
than
if
you
don't
so.
If
there's
any
way,
we
can
approve
it
with
the
flexibility
based
on
that
and
or
you
know,
we'd
be
willing
to
plant
trees.
Do
some
screening
berms
and
we
have
a
lot
of
dirt.
A
H
A
H
E
I
only
think
it
would
be
is
that
you're
coming
into
an
s-curve
there
and
and
I'm,
not
an
engineer
so
I
think
definitely
depending
on
the
speed
loadings
and
what
you
got
going
there.
Whether
or
not
you
know,
I
understand
the
way
it's
laid
out
right
now.
It's
it's
a
little
bit
wonky
looking!
But
if
you,
if
you
were
to
come
in
where
you
don't
have
a
sharp
s-curve
coming
into
that,
and
if
this
is
a
35
or
40
mile
an
hour,
speed
limit
that
could
be
problematic.
Can
okay,
I
I'm
comfortable?
H
We
don't
we
don't
want,
we
would.
What
Brandi
has
up
there
is
I
mean
it's
great,
that
she
put
that
up
there,
but
we
would
not
be
building
a
road
with
two
askers
in
it.
We
would
because
there
is
a
you
know,
some
other
plans
to
the
west
there-
that
we
would.
We
need
that
road
to
look
that
doorway.
It
would
probably
go
straight
and
then
turn
yeah.
It
would
be
a
team,
but.
B
G
F
Thanks
for
the
question
I'm
just
looking
for
the
road
to
be
straightened,
so
it
doesn't
swing
behind
my
property.
I,
don't
get
all
those
headlights
in
my
bedroom
in
my
living
room
and
anything
we
can
do
in
addition
with
berms
and
foliage
is
great
as
well,
because
as
this
develops,
you
know,
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
stuff
up
there.
That
I
may
not
want
to
see
every
day.
So
whatever
we
can
do,
I
think
straighten
it
out
is
an
ideal
solution
with
some
berms
and
some
trees.
Thank
you.
B
One
thing
to
note
about
the
like
and
if
they
would
straighten
it
out,
they
would
have
some
space
there
to
be
able
to
berm
it
up.
He
sits
really
high,
so
the
berm
might
be
necessary
to
actually
get
some
heights,
but
otherwise
right
now
how
the
road
is.
It's
very
close.
It's
like
four
foot
off
the
wetland
so
then
they'd
have
to
if
they
were
gonna
fill
that
they'd
have
to
work
with
the
core
because
it's
jurisdictional,
but
they
probably
would
want
to
avoid
that,
not
that
it's
not
doable
all.
A
D
Randy
could
I
ask
you
a
question
real,
quick
I
know.
In
the
past
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
curb
and
gutter,
especially
as
it
pertains
to
controlling
the
runoff
in
the
water
I
see
on
the
the
design
that
they
have
a
curb
and
gutter
just
on
the
first
450
feet
on
the
west
side
of
the
road
is
that
fall
within
design
standards?
Yes,.
B
So
we
do
have
the
allowance
to
have
urban
rural
sections.
It
has
you
know
this,
this
type
of
development,
it's
appropriate
as
long
as
they're
not
needing
on
street
parking,
which
they
don't
because
right
now,
it's
it's
basically
I
mean
it's
a
road
up
to
the
development.
So
then,
once
they
get
up
there,
they
are
going
to
put
curb
and
gutter.
So
they
have
the
on
street
parking.
Otherwise
it'll
be
twenty
eight
feet
paved
and
then
four-foot
shoulders,
I
believe
that's
also
per
our
design,
standards
and
ash
toe.
B
B
A
I
Scott,
just
up
here
to
speak
generally
in
support
of
the
development,
especially
if
they
can
address
mr.
de
Bourgh's
concerns,
but
from
what
I've
been
following.
I
have
been
falling
close,
but
our
community
really
wants
to
see
like
campus
get
developed.
Kam
Pesce
is
a
water
town
jewel,
as
is
our
downtown,
but
its
water
town
has
so
many
great
things,
and-
and
this
is
one
of
them-
and
there
are
no
perfect
solutions-
there's
going
to
be
problems.
I
commend
these
guys
for
being
patient
being
creative
and
trying
to
address
everybody's
concerns.
I
Unfortunately,
in
development
and
with
progress
you
can't
and
change
you
can't.
You
can't
dress
every
single
concern
and
not
everybody's
going
to
be
happy,
but
lake
camp
SK
is
a
water
town
resource,
and
this
could
be
great
economic
development
for
a
community
which
we
need
that
which
would
help
in
in
not
just
on
the
lake
to
help
clean
the
lake
up
some
of
those
tax
dollars
some
of
those
things,
but
with
also
other
projects
that
we
want
in
town.
I
It
would
probably
also
bring
some
summer
visitors
or
people
that
would
come
into
our
community
from
out
of
town.
On
the
weekends
and
spend
their
tax
dollars,
instead
of
coming
from
souffl,
are
coming
from
Watertown
to
Sioux
Falls.
They
might
drop
some
tax
dollars
in
Watertown
for
us
to
spend
on
on
our
projects
for
our
city.
I
So
generally,
in
support
of
this
project
and
I
know
we
want
to
see
campus
get
developed,
there's
not
a
lot
of
opportunities
to
do
it,
there's
not
a
lot
of
places
to
do
it
and
as
far
as
I
know,
there's
only
one
developer
looking
to
invest
big
dollars
in
it,
so
generally,
just
in
support
of
of
this
development.
Thank
you
thank.
A
J
Yeah
Bob
Drake
just
wanted
to
point
out
a
couple
things
I
mean
we've
been
having
a
lot
of
traffic
up
there,
so
we
did
put
a
rope
gate
across
and
we
put
signage
on
that
end.
We've
had
the
signage
on
the
other
end
to
stay
out
and
because
that
wasn't
a
road
we
you
know
had
that
Fork
is
so
I'll
make
that
more
permanent.
As
we
go
over
right
now
we
have
a
rope
across
it
and
it
says:
do
not
enter
private
property
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
J
The
wetland
side
of
things
we're
pretty
careful
to
make
sure
we
protected
that
wetland
in
in
what
we've
put
down.
We've
seeded
it
to
grass
and
we've
done
that
on
that
on
the
other
side
of
the
road,
so
we
can
handle
the
runoff
that
would
occur
there
when
the
road
comes
in.
That
will
be
designed
up
to
actually
go
to
to
the
pond.
J
You
know
so
from
a
drainage
standpoint,
don't
further
protect
it
there
any
other
questions
here.
Oh
there
were
some
complaints
about
the
dust
and
whatever,
of
course
the
rain
took
care
of
it,
but
the
guy
that's
been
hauling.
The
sand
said
he
would
be
spraying
it
down
on
Monday,
so
that'll
be
covered
on
that
in
so
any.
C
C
J
I
mean
we're
talking
about
what
we're
doing
up
on
top,
and
it's
really
not
part
of
this,
but
when
we
get
when
we
get
to
the
redesign
of
everything
else,
it
would
probably
be
addressing
that
at
that
point.
So
right
now,
just
the
road
did.
Road
just
comes
up
and
we'll
run
a
call.
A
second
return
so
and.
B
A
B
A
G
Kondeh
williams,
I
still
have
concerns
about
the
runoff
and
especially,
if
there's
a
road,
that's
going
to
be
in
there
that
pavement,
there's
gonna,
be
a
lot
of
water
coming
down
rolling
down
that
road.
I,
don't
believe
that
anything
has
been
addressed
as
far
as
putting
up
barriers
and
stuff
to
protect
my
my
property
at
this
time
or
in
the
future.
Thank
you.
B
And,
and
to
when,
when
this
construct,
when
they
would
pull
a
permit
to
construct,
we,
we
would
definitely
and
we'll
we'll
pay
extra
attention
to
that,
make
sure
it's
reinforced
and
definitely
protect
the
runoff.
As
this
is
the
hill
and
it
it
would
go
down
hill.
So
we'll
make
sure
to
we'll
to
be
aware
of
that
and
protect
it.
B
B
I
think
chips
on
the
meeting,
but
he
was
so
they
were
all
part
of
the
design
review
team
and
we're
all
ok
with
it.
As
far
as
the
commercial
building
will
be
sprinklered,
so
the
one
access
is
fine
and
as
far
as
utilities
they
will
be
fine.
They
just
I
mean
they
have
existing
utilities
over
here,
where,
when
development
progresses
or
if
they,
when
they
put
this
marina
and
they'll,
have
to
address
relocating
that
and
they
they
were.
The
developers
have
been
giving
warning
of
that
just
so
they
can
plan
for
it.
E
Chair
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve,
subject
to
providing
the
applicant
and
staff
a
little
bit
of
an
opportunity
to
address
how
that
road
design
comes
in
to
have
the
least
amount
of
impact
on
mr.
de
Bourgh's
property.
If
I
don't
know
how
to
guarantee
that,
but
I
think
the
point
is
that
those
two
Lots
need
a
road
gently
where
they
end
with
road
ends
at
that
property's,
fine
and
probably
where
it
comes
onto
the
road.
A
E
Road
to
the
south
is
probably
okay,
it
just
seems
to
be
whether
or
not
the
curve
or
where
those
lights
are
going
to
be
coming
in.
If
there
are
some
things
that
can
be
done
and
I
would
be
willing
to
direct
staff
to
have
that
flexibility
in
working
with
the
applicant
and
if
they
can't
come
to
some
sort
of
resolution,
then
bring
that
back
before
the
board.
I.
A
B
D
My
thought
is
as
if
we
would
approve
it
with
the
intent
that
it
goes
back
and
gets
changed
and
fixed
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
we'll
know
exactly
what
it
is.
We're
approving
you
know.
We
don't
know
how
much
that
road
can
be
straightened
out,
especially
with
its
proximity
to
that
pond
and
other
grading
issues.
E
Well,
let
me
defend
my
position.
My
position
is
that
the
Planning
Commission
that
we
are
we
are,
we
are
charged
with
laying
out
a
general
location
of
roads,
utilities
development
when
it
gives
in
to
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
specifics
things
and
that's
I-
think
it's
somewhat
out
of
our
ball
of
wax
to
be
playing
with
and
I
think.
E
B
D
I
don't
know
if
I
have
a
substitute
motion
that
I
could
make
I
just
I
I
worry
about
approving
it,
not
knowing
where
it
will
be.
When
the
concern
is.
Where
will
the
world
be?
I
mean
I
I,
understand,
commissioner
K's,
and
that
you
know
that
it
should
be
looked
at
through
the
eyes
of
the
engineering
staff.
I
mean
they
do
know
a
lot
more
about
that,
but
at
the
same
time
I
it's
it's
it's
hard
to
just
kind
of
leave
with
an
open
checkbook.
In
my
mind,
I
guess.
A
Your
concerns
are
noted
and
I
don't
mean
that
sarcastically
I
mean,
but
it's
a
challenge.
It's
just
like
many
things.
There
are
it's
difficult
to
get
into
the
real
minutiae
at
this
particular
level
on
this
particular
board,
and
so
sometimes
we're
forced
to
work
within
the
tools
that
we
have.
So
there
is
a
motion
and
a
second
hearing,
no
further
discussion.
I
would
ask
for
a
roll
call,
vote,
Randy,
brink.
B
A
C
B
I
G
A
Motion
passes.
Thank
you.
Everyone.
The
next
agenda
item
is
I've,
got
to
make
sure
I'm
looking
at
the
right
agenda
here
next
to
Genda
item
is
seven
public
comment
again
what
everybody
was
waiting
for?
Is
there
anyone
in
the
room
or
on
the
internet?
That
wants
to
speak
about
anything
that
wasn't
on
the
agenda.