►
From YouTube: Plan Commission 03-19-2020
Description
Plan Commission
B
A
B
I
have
a
couple,
so
we
are
going
to
postpone
item
a
and
I'll
pull
that
up
here
on
the
screen
that
it
will
be
the
election
of
Planning,
Commission
and
Board
of
Adjustment
Chairman
and
vice
chairman.
Yes,
it's
not
there's
not
time
sensitive
and
just
because
of
where
we're
at
on
time,
we
can
hold
that
off
until
a
later
meeting
and
then
also
I'll
be
I.
B
Have
an
amendment
to
item
F,
which
is
for
the
comprehensive
Land,
Use,
Plan
and
so
Luke
had
just
when
we
give
when
Luke
gives
that
presentation
remotely,
we
have
a
slideshow,
but
then
he
will
be
voting
in
then.
He
does
have
that
that
handout
that
I
gave
you
all
that's
his
changes,
and
so
that
includes
the
additions
now
that
we
have
adopted
the
CL
district.
So
that's
just
any
amendments
and
then
also
and
I
could
wait
till
we
get
to
that
item.
A
C
B
D
B
So
this
agenda
item
is
Commission
consideration
of
resolution
number
20
2009,
adopting
the
boundaries
of
the
tax
increment
financing
district
number
11
within
the
city
of
Watertown
South
Dakota.
So
this
is
like
it's
or
this
is
our
11th
TIF
that
you
guys
will
be
looking
at
here
today
and
it's
at
the
address
of
15
1st
Street.
B
Okay,
fifteen
first
Street
Northwest-
and
this
is
a
project
proposed
by
W
DC
and
the
developer
on
this
project
will
be
Eric
Scott
of
crust
own
builders,
I.
Guess
it's
a
proposed
mixed-use
of
commercial
and
housing
that
will
be
created
to
pay
the
costs
of
public
infrastructure,
property
acquisition
and
other
expenses
needed
to
facilitate
the
construction
of
a
16,000
square
foot
square
feet
of
retail
and
commercial
space.
E
A
E
E
A
E
E
A
E
B
G
G
H
I'm
guessing
what
chairman
Stein
might
be
referring
to
is
maybe
a
brief
overview
of
Tiff's
and
how
they
work
just
for
general
public
watching
as
we're
only
on
number
11
and
we've
done
quite
a
few
in
the
last
year.
You
know
so
there
was
a
long
history
of
Oh
Chris
Hill
can
water
telephone
company.
There
was
a
long
history
of
probably
no
TIF
activity
in
Watertown
for
a
while.
H
So
these
programs
are
tax,
increment
financing,
of
course,
and
the
word
tax
comes
up
kind
of
gets
people
excited,
but
what
this
does
is
it
takes
a
increased
value
in
taxes
that
are
going
to
be
realized
over
20
years
and
can
be
credited
to
the
developer
to
make
projects
happen.
So
Tracy
has
already
submitted
these
to
the
these
two
coming
up
to
the
state
and
they
already
have
been
classified
as
economic
development.
H
So
what
that
does
is
it
does
not
burden
the
school
district
or
the
county
as
far
as
the
revenue
that
they're
gonna
lose
in
the
meantime,
they'll
be
made
whole
then,
as
well
as
the
taxes
that
are
currently
being
paid
as
of
today
or
when
this
project
goes
into
effect.
Those
taxes
will
also
be
paid,
so
the
county
and
the
city
where
the
taxing
entities
will
still
receive
that
same
amount,
so
they
won't
be
losing
anything
they'll
be
deferring
to
when
they
would
get
this,
which
is
set
to
be
20
years
down
the
road.
So.
C
I
Necessarily
I'm
here
to
answer
questions
super
excited
to
bring
this
project.
We've
developed
a
lot
of
apartments
in
Watertown
and
I've
been
enamored
with
our
downtown
for
a
long
time,
but
it's
difficult
to
make
projects
work
in
downtown,
especially
when
you
have
to
buy
a
small
land
mass
and
potentially
tear
down
a
building
that
that
theoretically
has
value
right.
I
I
One
of
the
things
I
liked
about
it
was
the
size
of
the
property.
It's
actually
a
little
bit
larger.
It
leaves
some
some
room
to
do
things.
It's
also
not
one
of
the
most
beautiful
buildings
in
downtown
there's
a
lot
of
buildings
that
just
have
so
much
character
that
I
just
couldn't
couldn't
tear
down
honestly
or
wouldn't
wouldn't
want
to
tear
down
this
building,
doesn't
have
that
downtown
charm
I
think
it's
a
good
area
for
what
I
want
to
do.
It's
kind
of
a
little
quieter
corner,
I
like
what
surrounds
it.
I
I
like
the
little
building
on
the
corners
just
a
cute
little
downtown
building,
and
you
know,
as
I,
started
to
look
at
it.
There's
there's
only
probably
a
few
of
these
sites
left
that
that
that
really
have
a
big
opportunity
to
upgrade
and
I
like
the
way
I
can
I
can
build
an
l-shaped
building
around
this
and
create
its
own
little
courtyard
or
I
envision
its
own
little
Main
Street
feel
there
I'd
like
to
do
a
brick
paver
street.
No
guarantees
on
that.
I
E
I
I
E
B
I
B
A
E
E
C
E
G
C
I
This
is
Eric
scout
again:
I,
don't
I,
believe
that's
in
there
from
my
understanding
of
what
we've
done
is
because
this
the
TIF
district
is
tied
to
a
project.
That's
the
parameters
that
are
in
there.
So
if
I
came
back
and
said,
I
want
to
make
this
a
hotel
or
something
else
or
if
I
built
a
hotel.
The
TIF
district
wouldn't
necessarily
apply
to
a
hotel.
It
applies
to
an
apartment
or
a
mixed-use
building.
That's
my
understanding
of.
What's
in
there
there's
people
in
here
they
probably
know
more
about
Tiff's
than
me,
but.
F
G
B
A
A
B
D
A
B
It
for
8
second
Street
northeast,
which
is
the
County
Fair
banquet
hall
that
you
guys
would
relate
to
so
tip.
12
is
a
proposed
mixed
use
of
commercial
and
housing
that
will
be
created
to
pay
for
the
cost
of
public
infrastructure,
property
acquisition
and
other
expenses
needed
to
facilitate
the
construction
of
a
thirty-eight
thousand
square
feet
of
retail
use.
This
way
to
commercial,
commercial
space
and
36
car
tenant
parking
garage
on
the
first
floor
and
36
one-bedroom
apartments
total
on
the
second
third
and
fourth
floors.
B
B
Just
as
much
as
he
needs
except
downtown,
you
don't
actually
need
additional
parking,
but
that's
why
it's
a
conditional
use.
So
you
guys
can
look
at
that
so
he's
provided
that
for
one
one
parking
stall
per
bedroom
for
multi-unit
for
a
multi-family
unit.
That's
all
I
have!
Oh
sorry!
The
developer
is
Jesse
Craig
of
Craig
properties
right.
H
As
full
disclosure
to
as
we
keep
talking
about
Tiff's,
there
are
plans
for
maybe
one
or
two
more
as
we
develop
some
more
downtown
project
to
so
to
see
you
guys
are
aware.
I
think
there
might
be
one
in
April
and
then
maybe
one
more
to
follow
after
that
on
a
some
separate
project.
So
just
want
to
give
you
heads
up
that
at
some
point,
we'll
run
out
of
space
to
develop,
but
I
think
as
downtown.
Our
housing
needs
are
growing.
I
think
these
are
good
projects
to
keep
moving
forward
on.
Thank
you.
F
A
F
B
F
C
B
And
that's
something
that
we'll
have
to
look
at
when
we
vacate
it,
but
that's
just
what
they're
proposing
it
within
this
boundary
in
hopes
that
probably
that
they
can
work
with
that
landowner
and
get
it
figured
out,
but
we're
not
vacating
it.
At
this
point,
it's
still
an
active
public
right-of-way
they're,
just
including
it
in
the
TIF.
If
that
would
work
out
all.
B
B
C
A
B
B
So
you
guys
have
an
idea:
proximity,
River,
Ridge
Estates,
so
the
entire
area
owned
by
Greg,
Hoff,
teaser
who's,
the
acting
agent
for
High
Plains
development,
core
is
it's
already
annexed
and
then
they
zoned
it
egg,
a1
agricultural
district,
and
so
now
what
they're
proposing
is
to
rezone
a
portion
to
r1
single-family
residential,
which
is
what
their
whole
development
consists
of.
Today,
it's
nothing
out
of
the
ordinary.
It's
just
they're
ready
to
develop
it.
B
C
B
So
we
there's
a
stipulation
that
they
can't
develop
any
more
land
until
they
include
the
park
in
their
next
plat
and
the
Park
Board
approved
this,
and
we
approved
the
preliminary
plan
last
year
last
summer,
so
they
so
they
that's
where
this
area
here
includes
that
Park.
So
we
we,
as
as
the
Planning
Commission
or
even
as
staff,
wouldn't
wouldn't
approve.
Well
staff,
never
approves
anything,
but
we
really
would
work
with
them
to
bring
before.
We
would
bring
it
to
you
to
encourage
them
to
include
that.
B
D
C
A
F
B
B
Passes
unanimously.
Okay.
The
next
item
is
the
Commission
consideration
of
resolution
number
20
2013
approving
the
plat
at
Dakota,
Commons,
seventh,
addition
to
the
municipality
of
Watertown
in
the
cat
and
the
county
of
Cottington,
so
to
as
another
familiar
subdivision
is
Dakota
Commons
on
the
east
side
of
town.
B
They
have
an
area
here,
that'll
I'll
show
where
it's
annexed
and
zoned
and
they
are
zoned
as
a
PUD,
which
is
a
Planned
Unit
development,
and
so
they
have
different
stipulations
that
was
approved,
I,
think
2006.
When
this
was
annexing
zone,
the
entire
area
so
you'll
see
what
they're
proposing
to
plat
there's
already
a
street
constructed.
So
we're
not
we're
now,
there's
no
new
public
infrastructure,
but
there
is
two
lots
that
could
be
plaited
on
one
on
the
north
and
one
on
the
south
and
you'll
see
whatever
lot
numbers.
B
Those
are
a
lot
7
in
lot
25,
and
this
is
actually.
This
is
consistent
to
with
their
preliminary
plan
that
was
approved
or
plan
that
was
approved
for
this
pewdie
zoning,
and
so
the
only
reason
this
could
be
administratively
approved,
but
we
have
to
dedicate
that
sliver
of
right-of-way
that
fronts
both
of
those
Lots
so
and
we
and
staff
can't
do
that.
So
it
has
to
go
to
plan
Commission
and
council,
but
otherwise
it's
consistent
with
all
of
our
other
regulations.
A
A
G
F
B
B
The
same
comp
plan
that
we've
been
working
well
for
many
years,
but
more
diligently
through
the
last
year
and
we've
been
bringing
the
different
Luke's,
giving
you
guys
the
presentation
of
each
section,
and
then
we
came
back
with
any
amendments
that
we
wanted
to
make
to
it,
and
so
presumably
he's
included
all
that
and
unless
there's
anything
that
we
noticed
that
we
want
changed.
Otherwise,
this
is
the
presentation
of
the
2020
comprehensive
Land
Use
Plan,
given
by
Luke
Muller
from
the
Senior
Planner
from
the
first
District
Association
of
local
governments.
D
B
A
D
D
Brandy,
if
you
want
to
go
down
to
slide
22
and
then
work
your
way
down
there,
where
the
map
starts,
one
of
the
future
land
use
maps
identifies
the
existing
developed
area
of
which
we've
gone
through
and
updated
from
time
to
time,
as
this
board
has
recommended
to
do
so.
It
gets
into
some
of
the
transition
areas
that,
frankly,
you've
dealt
with
today
in
some
of
your
questions
that
come
up
and
trying
to
offer
some
guidance
into
how
to
handle
that
and
moving
past
that
from
the
developed
area
going
to
the
future
developed
area.
D
B
C
D
D
Bottom
line
is
I
will
stand
by
for
questions
after
making
the
last
point,
and
that
is
that
I'm,
hoping
that
the
motion
that
this
board
makes
after
public
hearing
will
include
one
amendment
that
I
believe
brandy
has
provided
to
the
board
and
is
available
for
the
public
to
review
as
well,
and
that
simple
amendment
is
just
to
incorporate
the
lake
commercial
district
that
this
board
approved
and
it
adopts
that
map
for
both
Lake
Pelican
and
lakes
Alaska.
There
were
really
no.
There
were
very
few
tax
changes
that
needed
to
be
done.
D
D
It
was
handled
slightly
different
than
the
previous
draft
had
it
handled,
so
we
just
had
to
show
that
in
a
couple
areas
and
then
the
last
point
I
think
Brandi
was
talking
about
it
at
the
time
of
the
agenda
and
that's
just
we're
hoping
that
that
motion
will
allow
us
if
we
have
a
blank
page
or
if
there's
a
typo
or
something
in
there,
that
you'll
be
okay
with
us
editing
those
things
as
long
as
there's
no
substance
to
it.
I'll
stand
by
for
questions.
D
D
Well,
like
that's
a
good
question,
the
text
that
was
added
into
there
and
actually,
when
you
go
into,
we
had
the
tables
that
indicate
the
sorts
of
uses
that
would
be
allowed.
The
original
draft
indicated
like
a
lake
residential
district
or
a
separate
zoning
district
for
that
area,
and
it
also
included
into
their
recreational
or
commercial
uses.
That
would
be
supportive
of
recreational
uses
along
a
lake.
So
the
bottom
line
is:
is
that
the
way
the
Land
Use
Plan
was
written
before
largely
supported
it?
D
C
B
I
think
they
did
a
good
job
of
taking
Oliver
anything
that
we
I
mean,
even
through
all
discussion,
all
of
the
considerations
that
we
went
through,
and
this
will
give
us
a
good
road
map
for
future
development.
So
and
it
will
be
nice
to
have
one
adopted
because
it's
long
overdue.
So
thank
you
to
first
district
for
all
your
help
and
and
your
continued
help
they're
always
there.
A
A
G
B
B
B
Consideration
of
resolution
number
20
2008,
a
zoning
text,
amendment
to
chapter
21,
8e,
addressing
city
identification,
welcome
signs,
number
dimensions
and
locations
of
individual
signs
in
maximum
total
sign
area
by
zoning
district.
So
if
you
looked
back
on
the
request
for
action,
I
just
kind
of
outlined,
why
we're
proposing
this?
And
in
our
current
sighing
code
we
don't
have
anything
that
allows
really
for
in
a
sort
of
exemption
for
City,
welcome
or
city
identification
signs
which
you
see
in
other
communities
as
a
welcome.
B
So
the-
and
the
thing
is,
is
that
sometimes
these
are
step
back
further,
that
from
the
right-of-ways.
There
is
no
commercial
message
from
these,
so
it's
not
it's
it's
a
unique
situation,
but
when
I
brought
this
up
as
new
business,
there
were
concerns
about
that.
It
shouldn't
just
be
completely
exempt.
That
Todd
didn't
want
to
see
a
double
decker
sign
whatever
that
is,
but
so
we
did
we
did
include,
or
what
I'm
proposing
here
is
to
the
table
that
this
would
still
be
considered
an
off
premise
sign.
It
would
be
freestanding.
B
So
then
it
would
have
to
adhere
to
this
table
21
80
28,
which
all
signs
have
to,
but
then
I
included
K.
So
I
put
a
footnote
on
the
side.
On
that
first
column,
that's
labeled,
K
and
kay
says
city
identification.
/
welcome
signs
that
do
not
convey
a
commercial
message
are
allowed
one
side,
one
sign
per
frontage
with
no
minimum
frontage
requirement,
a
maximum
area
of
2,000
square
feet
and
a
maximum
height
of
30
feet
in
any
zoning
district.
F
B
B
E
B
So
the
one
that
I
was
actually
so
the
the
project
that
I've
been
kind
of
working
on
with
the
subcommittee
from
the
h2o
20
group
is
the
interstate
sign.
So
in
that
situation
the
sign
that
we
were
allowed
per
our
ordinance
was,
it
would
have
looked
miniscule
and
it
it
was
just
the
it
that
wasn't
enough
because
of
the
setback
requirement.
Well,
the
right-of-way
is
so
large
there
and
I
get
it
that
another
so
from
highway.
212
to
back
where
that
sign
is
that's
a
large
area,
the
existing
sign
yep.
B
So
why
I
went
with
2,000
square
feet
is
because
that
the
the
existing
sign?
That's
there
is
like
1400
square
feet,
and
so
then
I
just
mm
just
as
a
cap
at
least
there
was
a
max
then,
but
then
this
would
be
for
any.
So
what
we
would
like
to
see
is
that
that'd
be
the
first
I'd.
The
city
I
did
because
like
if
you
see
like
what
Brookings
has
done
or
then
they
have
each
of
their
gateways
has
a
sign.
It's
nice,
it's
welcoming,
and
so
we
would
like
to
see
ours
updated
and
consistent.
B
C
F
B
But
the
thing
is
is
that
we
won't
really
be
able
to
tell
what
the
adjacent
zoning
is
like
I'm
thinking
north
81,
like
how
North
Ridge
is
up
there.
If
the
city
owned
property
up
there
and
wanted
to
put
a
gateway
it
sign,
they
would
most
likely
zone
that
residential
just
to
be
consistent.
So
you
didn't
have
this
spot
zone
for
this
sign.
F
B
C
B
Would
just
be
for
the
Gateway
signage
and
so
in
ordinance
right
now
we
do
have
that
for
signage
on
a
water
tower,
and
so,
but
we
do
specify
in
that
language
that
it
has
to
be
a
municipally
owned
property,
which
I
think
would
be
a
good
addition
to
this
language.
Just
so
somebody
is
I,
mean
I,
don't
know
who
who
would
do
that?
But
if
we
want
that's,
why
I
didn't
put
it
that
in
there
that
somebody
would
put
a
welcome
to
Watertown
sign
on
their
own
property.
F
No
because
you're
you're
approving
Authority
isn't
it
is
the
Board
of
Adjustment
when
it
comes
to
zoning
issues
like
this.
If
you're
talking
about
something
to
be
accepted,
you're
not
you're,
not
going
to
make
me
happy
with
with
the
residential
aspect
of
it.
But
that's
fine!
There's
six!
There's
six
other
people
on
the
board.
Oh.
B
B
B
F
Just
go
back
to
the
premise
and
and
your
entries
in
entry
ways
into
the
communities
are
going
to
be
on
primarily
to
twelve
eighty
one
and
twenty
right
yeah.
Those
are
so
all
of
those
are
highways,
so
you're
gonna
have
at
worst
as
an
r3.
So
let's
just
omit
r1
in
our
twos,
but
you're
gonna
have
at
nodal
areas
it's
going
to
be
commercially
zoned.
It
ought
to
be
strict
commercially
as
on
some
of
those
areas
or
you're.
Gonna
have
mixed-use
development.
What's
your
land
use
plan
is
laid.
B
E
G
C
B
Unless
it's
just
you
can
you
can
get
a
little
realtor
sign,
but
nobody's
gonna
spend
what
up
to
whatever
this
would
cost
most
likely,
but
that
we
are
working
actually
with
a
private
investor
that
isn't
interested
in
donating
money
towards
this.
As
long
as
we
can
get,
everything
worked
out,
which
would
be
a
gracious
donation,
so
it'd
be
such
a
nice
addition
line.
F
In
the
existing
sign,
that's
on
that
are
one's
own
property.
As
we
all
know
now,
the
interest
of
the
suit
to
the
city
of
Watertown
is
now
further
west
of
that
location.
Right,
because
we've
got
property
and
I
stand
ready,
proposed
to
develop
west
of
that
location
right
so
that
sign
it's
gonna,
be
about
a
quarter
or
a
half
mile
too
late
at
some
point
in
time
down
the
road.
So.
F
Still
I'm
still
again,
I'm
just
saying
I
think
not
signed.
It's
not
gonna,
be
a
welcome
to
Watertown
sonic,
because
you're
gonna
already
be
in
the
city
of
Watertown
before
you
even
hit
the
sign,
so
that
sign
is
going
to
be
gone
someday
right,
so
you
have
the
opportunity
still
to
keep
it
in
commercial.
Industrial
AG
are
three
zones
I.
F
F
A
So
if
we
allow
them
to
put
the
signs
in
residential
zone,
that
would
allow
the
use
of
that
property,
for
example,
that
you've
been
talking
about
out
by
that
water
tower,
because
it
is
a
nice
location,
it's
high
on
a
hill,
you
know,
and
it's
not
uncommon,
for
welcome
to
a
city
to
be
in.
You
know,
inside
the
city
limits
in
some
fashion,
for
example,
brookings
you've
mentioned
Brookings
a
lot
of
their
signs
are
actually
you
know
somewhat
in
in
the
city.
A
B
C
C
B
C
B
A
A
C
A
B
Just
so
that's
that's
followed
through
in
the
future,
because
this
is
a
it's
a
nice.
It's
a
great
gift
that
they're
that
they're
willing
to
to
give
for
for
the
purpose
of
the
trail
and
then
it'll
it'll,
add
a
nice
amenity
to
for
having
taking
people
off
of
South
Lake
Drive
in
that
stretch,
because
it
is
there's
a
lot
of
deep
ditches
and
it'll.
Just
it'll
be
more
safe
and
more
aesthetically.
Pleasing,
probably
too
any
idea
when
the
trail
would
be
put
on
it,
I
believe
this
summer.