►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting 3-19-2020
Description
My Event Description
A
C
B
C
A
A
Well,
for
those
of
you
watching
those
of
you
they're
here,
those
that
are
upstairs
kind
of
trying
to
do
things
on
the
fly
here
as
impacted
by
most
segments
of
society,
we're
kind
of
spread
out
here
in
the
audience-
and
you
know
on
the
board
up
here
and
we
have
people
upstairs
so
we're
trying
to
shift
people
through.
Please
bear
with
us
as
we
try
to
make
the
best
of
odd
situation.
We
have
two
board
members
also
participating
but
they're
online.
So
with
that
said,
I'd
like
an
approval
of
the
minutes
from
last
meeting,
we.
A
Okay,
then
I'd
also
make
the
announcement
that,
for
the
open
public
comment
section
of
the
meeting,
if
you
like
to
speak
the
vini
minute
item,
that's
not
on
the
agenda,
please
let
Jill
know
and
we'll
bring
up
toward
the
end
of
the
meeting,
any
other
announcements
Jill
or
should
we
get
started
all
right,
it's
going.
It
started.
The
first
item
is
number
two:
zero
zero.
Five,
six.
B
The
applicant
is
Jesse
Craig
for
Parkside
place,
LLC
the
approximate
property
address
for
the
property
is
fourteen.
Second
Street
northeast
current
owners
are
GT
brothers
LLC.
The
applicant
seeks
approval
to
develop
a
four-story
building
in
the
c1
community,
commercial
and
downtown
overlay,
dis
Erichs
to
be
utilized
as
apartments
over
main-floor
parking
and
commercial
uses,
including
alcoholic
beverage
sales.
This
is
pursuant
to
various
permitted
uses
in
the
scene,
one
zone
and
also
specifically
conditional
use
for
apartments
over
four
units
using
the
upper
floors
of
commercial
buildings
and
bar
or
tavern.
B
B
Specific
rules
governing
in
individual
conditional
uses
staff
finds
that
apartments
over
four
units
using
the
upper
floors
of
commercial
buildings
and
bar
or
tavern,
are
listed
conditional
uses
for
the
c1
district
and
that
bar
or
tavern
per
different
per
definition
is
any
establishment,
including
restaurants
and
gambling
establishments,
license
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
consumption
upon
the
premises
who
are
sold
or
provided
the
term
bar
or
tavern
shall
also
include
establishments
licensed
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
consumption
off
the
premises
were
sold.
This
is
a
proposed
redevelopment
project
in
downtown
Watertown.
B
This
application
also
needs
to
meet
the
purpose
and
intent
of
the
downtown
overlay
district,
that
is,
to
promote
development
of
a
compact
pedestrian
oriented
downtown,
consisting
of
high-intensity
employment,
center,
vibrant
and
dynamic
mixed-use
area
and
residential
living
environments
that
provide
a
broad
range
of
housing.
Types
for
an
array
of
housing
needs
number
to
promote
a
diverse
mix
of
residential
business,
commercial
office,
institutional
educational,
cultural
and
entertainment
activities
for
workers,
visitors
and
residents.
B
Number
three
encouraged
pedestrian
oriented
development
within
walking
distance
number
four
create
a
place
that
represents
a
unique
attractive
and
memorable
destination
for
visitors
and
residents,
and
number
five
enhanced
the
community's
character
through
the
promotion
of
high
quality
urban
design
and
historic
preservation,
the
ce-1
zone
is
exempt
for
parking
regulations.
This
particular
proposal
has
parking
that
is
in
a
in
the
enclosed
footprint
of
the
building,
and
also
the
c1
zone
is
exempt
for
the
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
B
For
such
things
as
green
space
on
the
boulevard,
the
a
Reap
lat
or
DLA
development
lot
agreement
will
be
required
for
development.
Now,
this
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
2100
202
to
b7
A
through
H
and
the
other
chapters
and
sections
I
just
mentioned.
If
generally
endorsed,
conditions
of
approval
must
be
specified,
as
a
building
permit
may
be
issued
upon
compliant
application.
Without
return
to
this
board.
A
A
E
I'm
Jesse
Craig
I'm
the
Builder
and
actually
is
a
mixed-use,
so
the
apartments
above
and
then
some
commercial
on
the
street
side
and
the
alley
side
and
then
parking
on
the
main
level.
So
the
intent
is
right
now
is
that
the
Gambhir
family
who's
selling
me
the
project
would
also
come
into
the
commercial
space
with
a
number
of
potential
commercial
businesses
to
use
that
use
that
space
for.
D
E
F
E
G
E
A
E
B
H
E
E
So
from
a
rental
standpoint,
though,
high-density
is
great,
but
from
a
rental
standpoint
since
I
own
the
building
and
manage
the
building,
people
aren't
going
to
rent
unless
they
have
a
place
to
park
and
they're
not
going
to
pay
or
you
know,
and
a
good
rent
that
I'm
looking
for
for
unless
they
have
an
enclosed
parking.
Also
so
I
these
kind
of
go
above
and
beyond
the
c1
in.
H
E
E
E
E
Yeah
with
that
we'll
be
leasing
from
Jesse
and
then
on
the
park
side,
we're
looking
at
putting
a
smoke
shop
as
far
as
not
cigarettes,
smoked
meat
shop
and
concessions
for
the
park
for
when
they
have
bats
those
functions
also,
so
we
can
use
it
for
dual
functions.
So
you
know
if
people
are
out
and
listening
to
the
band
and
they
want.
You
know,
pulled
pork,
sandwiches
and
things
like
that
and
the
concession
stuff
items.
E
E
Won't
be
quite
as
large
to
have
that.
That's
only
about
Jesse,
it
was
fifteen
hundred,
so
I
can't
take
off
by
ten.
It's
like
1,500
square
feet,
thirteen
and
a
half
square
feet
so
it'll
take
some
of
that.
It
would
take
up,
for
you
know,
doing
smoked,
meats
and
things
like
that.
But
basically
we
just
you
know,
come
up
concessions
for
events,
that'll
be
at
the
park
and
things
like
that.
H
H
E
So
I
can't
address
the
the
city
park
in
the
downtown
park,
but
on
the
ruins
project
that
will
probably
come
up
here
in
the
future,
where
the
palace
is
right.
Now
that
does
have
public
space
that
we
have
in
the
plan
for
public
bathrooms
and
also
a
warming
house
ice
skate
rental
area
for
the
downtown
park,
ice
skating,
rink.
So
we're
kind
of
planning
on
that.
E
A
C
D
A
B
A
B
A
D
F
B
B
B
B
So
there
are,
this
is
not
closed
yet,
but
Jerky's,
Livingston,
Stephenson
and
the
city
of
Watertown
are
the
owners
current
owners.
The
conditional
use
request
is
that
the
applicant
seeks
approval
to
develop
a
five-story
building
in
the
c1
community,
commercial
in
downtown
overlay
districts
to
be
utilized
as
apartments.
That's
72
units
over
main
floor
parking
and
commercial
uses,
including
a
Senior
Center
Senior
Center
Meals
on
Wheels.
B
This
is
pursuant
to
permitted,
uses
various
permitted
use
in
the
ce-1
zone
and
also
apartments
again
over
four
units
using
the
upper
floors
of
commercial
buildings
and
civil
social
organizations
as
conditional
uses
in
the
c1.
It's
contingent
upon
compliance
with
the
purpose
and
intent
of
the
c1
community
commercial
district
and
the
downtown
overlay
district
and
specific
girls
governing
individual
conditional
uses.
B
The
staff
finds
that
apartments
over
4
units
using
the
upper
floors
of
commercial
buildings
and
civil
social
organizations
are
listed,
conditional
uses
for
the
c1
commercial
community
district
and
the
the
definition
of
a
civil
social
organization
in
this
case
is
an
establishment
that
promotes
establishments
that
promote
the
interest
of
their
members
or
that
promote
a
particular
cause
except
labour,
political
or
professional
organizations.
These
establishments
may
provide
grant
making
foundations
or
Charitable
Trusts
raise
funds
for
social
welfare
activities
such
as
health,
educational,
scientific
and
cultural
activities.
B
They
may
solicit
contributions
and
the
and
offer
memberships
establishments
in
this
category
may
operate
bars
and
restaurants
for
their
members.
This
is
a
proposed
redevelopment
project
again
in
downtown
Watertown.
The
applicant
has
submitted
floor
plans
in
a
written
request
which
reflect
or
do
not
reflect
the
following
requirements
of
the
ordinance,
one
of
which
is
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses,
and
that
is
the
ingress
egress
again
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards,
an
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
rest
of
the
district.
B
The
purpose
of
the
c1
district
to
provide
retail
and
service
uses
that
serve
the
whole
community
and
supply
a
wide
range
of
goods
and
services
required
by
the
primary
marketable
population
and
to
permit
developments
of
the
community
retail
centers
of
a
size
and
in
the
locations
shown
in
the
comprehensive
lands.
Land-Use
plan
and
again,
the
purpose
and
intent
of
the
downtown
overlay
district
is
to
parole
development
of
a
compact
pedestrian
oriented
downtown,
consisting
of
high
intensity,
employment,
center,
vibrant
and
dynamic
mixed
use,
areas
and
residential
living
environments
that
provide
a
broad
range
of
housing.
B
Types
for
an
array
of
housing
needs,
number-two,
promoted
by
a
diverse
mix
of
residential
business,
commercial
office,
institutional,
educational,
cultural
and
entertainment
activities
for
the
workers,
visitors
and
residents
number
three
encouraged
pedestrian
oriented
development
within
walking
distance
for
create
a
place
that
represents
a
unique
attractive
and
memorable
a
destination
for
visitors
and
residents.
5
enhance
the
community's
character
through
the
promotion
of
high
quality,
urban
design
and
historical
preservation.
Again,
the
ce-1
in
this
area
also
is
exempt
from
the
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements,
and
it's
also
excuse
me.
B
It
is
not
exempt
from
the
landscape
and
lighting
standards,
as
this
does
not
fall
into
the
same
area
as
defined
by
ordinance.
So
this
property
is
not
exempt
from
landscape
and
lighting
standard
standards.
A
replant
or
development
lot
agreement
is
required,
so
this
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
2100
202
to
b7
A
through
H,
and
the
chapters
and
sections
I
just
described
if
generally
endorsed,
conditions
of
approval
must
be
specified,
as
building
permit
may
be
issued
upon
compliant
application.
Without
return
to
this
board.
A
E
This
one
is
short,
so
we
do
not
have
one
parking
stall
per
bedroom
on
this
one
with
the
clientele
in
that
age
group
they
didn't
necessarily
need
a.
You
know
parking
stall
per
bedroom
and
they
were
more
interested
in
having
a
large
enough
Senior
Center
to
accommodate
what
they're
used
to
now
and
then
into
the
future
for
expansion
and
more
members,
potentially.
A
E
E
E
So
if
you
see
me
sanitizing
my
hands,
I've
got
a
six
year
old
at
home,
that's
susceptible!
So
the
auditorium
parking
lot
on
the
other
side
of
the
block
or
of
the
side
of
the
alley.
That
will
not
be
that's
that
remains
City
city-owned.
The
two
smaller
parking
lots
that
they're
in
the
blue
that
there's
some
moving
parts.
E
Yet
on
that,
so
the
city
has
to
make
a
decision
on
whether
they're
gonna
sell
that
to
me
or
deed
that
to
me
for
this
project,
but
otherwise
the
rest
auditorium
park
other
than
the
Senior
Center
having
events
dances
at
nights
and
things
like
that
to
hopefully
utilize
it
that
would
all
remain
utilities.
I
wouldn't
see
any
any
issues
with
that
they're,
usually
pretty
good
at
be
able
to
shut
them
off
at
the
curb
and
things
like
that,
for
you
know,
new
utilities
that
have
to
come
into
that
site.
I
E
I
E
H
E
A
A
Right
any
other
discussion,
I
trust
that
that
the
developer
developer
will
work
with
the
city
for
any
you
know,
Wow
still
go
to
the
parking
and
and
the
landscaping
the
lighting
and
everything
else.
So
with
respect
to
the
conditional
use.
That
would
be
the
that
would
be
what's
in
front
of
the
order.
This
morning
this
afternoon,
many
other
discussion.
C
B
8Th,
Avenue
southeast
application
was
submitted,
requesting
to
construct
a
non-conforming
1,800
square
foot
commercial
building
on
a
substandard
13,000
square
foot
parcel
located
in
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district,
said
structures
proposed
to
be
constructed,
14
feet
from
the
front
north
property
line,
where
a
minimum
40
feet
is
required
on
a
13,000
square
foot
parcel
where
a
minimum
20,000
square
feet
is
required
and
deficient
in
minimum
off-street
parking
standard
requirements,
standards
and
requirements.
The
application
was
denied
based
on
the
following
ordinance,
ordinance
regulations.
B
21
o3o
2
prohibits
the
design
and
creation
of
non-conformities
21
1003
height
and
placement
regulations
for
non
rossette,
residential
structures
and
21
s
actually,
chapter
21,
6,
double
double
O
1,
the
requirements
for
open
yards
and
setbacks.
The
applicant
appeals
those
requirements
of
the
current
zoning
ordinance
staff
finds
that
there
is
a
2800
square
foot
area
of
compliant
buildable
area.
On
this
13,000
square
foot
parcel
upon
which
2980
square
foot
of
permanent
structures
currently
exists.
B
The
staff
had
not
a
lot
of
input
except
to
say
that
the
ordinance
verbatim
has
exclusive
verbage
on
our
specific
verbage
on
creating
non-conforming
buildings
and
structures
and
that
their
lot
size
requirements
are
to
be
of
a
certain
size
which
this
does
not
make
and
off.
Street
parking
and
loading
is
supposed
to
definitely
be
met
before
another
structure
or
a
non-compliant
structure
be
built
and
I
probably
won't
read
through
all
of
that,
but
that
is
in
section
21,
1003
to
a
B
and
C
and
2103
Oh.
Two
three
four
and
five.
D
D
C
K
J
J
Is
that
better?
Okay,
sorry
but
I
I
mentioned
I,
bought
this
property
past
December
and
that
building
that
sits
there
that
will
be
taken
out
and
that
is
kind
of
a
kind
of
made
of
blind
intersection
for
that
area,
probably
for
50
years
or
better,
and
you
know
if
there's
and
I
was
looking
for
an
inline
property
set
back
on
that,
because
I
do
own
the
rest
of
the
block.
That's
so
there
should
be
no
issue
with
parking
or
some
of
those
issues
and
the
house
there.
That's
labott
check
insurance.
J
J
J
D
E
J
B
Mr.
Kay's,
the
40
by
70
buildable
area,
if
you
can
see
the
little
hand
on
my
screen
that
that's
about
where
this
this
would
be
for
for
this
parcel
outlined
in
blue
the
exterior
lines.
That
parcel
would
lie
about
right
here,
and
it
would
be
a
total
of
about
2,800
square
feet
40
by
70.
That
is
the
actual
legal
buildable
area
of
this
parcel.
H
J
H
B
His
application
is
for
Lots
14,
15,
16
and
17,
and
the
westerly
portion
of
the
vacated
alley
that
runs
in
here
and
so
yeah,
that's
up
to
engineering
right
now,
but
he's
gonna
have
to
have
at
least
a
development
a
lot
agreement,
if
not
a
replanting
to
develop
further.
Here
is
my
understanding,
and
yet
this
is
the
parcel
that
he
has
he
has
described
to
us.
That
would
be.
B
F
Okay
with
these
buildings
so
close
together,
this
is
probably
a
chip
question.
Did
they
have
to
have
like
special
firewalls,
because
the
buildings
are
so
close
together
and
I'm?
Looking
at
the
overhang?
Is
there
gonna
be
a
problem
with
that
I
mean
the
overhangs,
are
gonna
kind
of
like
touch
really
close
there'll.
J
C
F
M
If
Brandi
over
here,
I
was
upstairs
when
I
when
I
called
in,
but
so
he
would,
he
would
be
required
to
meet
the
minimum
off
street
parking
requirements
for
whatever
his
his
structure,
size
was
and
then
otherwise
he
would
have
to
come
back
to
you
for
a
variance.
But
that
is
something
that
we'll
look
at
then
when
he
submits
a
commercial
site
plan
and
then
also
we
would
require
replac.
M
Just
because
all
the
parcels
are
there
not
complete
parcels
at
this
point
there
platted
Lots,
but
they
need
to
be
replanted
to
meet,
and
then
that's
where
we
can
look
at
the
setbacks
and
everything
and
then
also
to
add.
I
did
hear
another
comment
where
there
is
an
inline
provision
that
if
the
board
wants
to
consider
that
that
you
can,
you
can
look
at
the
existing
structures
on
site
and
and
and
then
have
him
conform
to
what
the
setbacks
are
of
those
that
are
there
at
this
point.
If
that,
if
that
buildings
removed.
J
B
D
They
were
small
25,
50-foot,
Lots,
I
I,
don't
have
a
problem
personally
with
the
variance
from
the
lot
area,
because
we've
done
that
many
times
on
these
old
existing
platted
Lots,
the
the
area
the
issue
are,
you
would
say
that
if
we
do
move
forward,
we
would
want
to
have
some
sort
of
some
sort
of
waiver
of
right
to
protest.
The
installation
of
sidewalk
or
curb.
If
and
when
that
would
come
about
and
also
I
know
it's
technically
non-conforming,
but
if
we
give
it
a
variance,
it
becomes
conforming.
J
A
H
L
H
F
H
H
F
B
What
needs
to
be
green
is
a
15-foot
Boulevard
if
the
boulevard
public
area
doesn't
meet
that
it's
supposed
to
come
in
on
to
the
private
property,
so
this
is
all
green
already.
This
part
here
has
an
extra
wide
parking
area
which
is
on
the
street.
It's
not
on
it's
not
off
street
parking,
so
this
doesn't
qualify
to
parking
for
off
street
requirements.
J
H
J
J
It'd
be
that
I
think
it's
the
size
of
a
building
that
won't
I
think
the
people
that
rent
it
it
would
have
to
fit
their
needs
if
it
was
if
they
were
a
larger
operation,
the
building
would
probably
be
too
small.
It's
it's
kind
of
setup
for
a
small
insurance
guy
lawyer,
different
type
of
business
like
that
investment.
D
D
D
B
M
B
G
F
J
D
C
J
H
H
No
unto
a
beyond
two
eighth
Avenue,
so,
where
he's
showing
a
parking
lot
on
his
on
his
plan,
a
driveway
whatever
you
wanna
call
it.
If
you
diagonally
parked
on
that,
you
know
turned
that
and
widened
it,
maybe
even
have
to
widen
it.
Obviously,
if
you're
gonna
diagonal
Park
on
there,
would
that
help
him
get
his
four
or
five
places
that
he
would
need,
or
is
it
still
too
short?
Is
it
still
this.
B
B
C
M
So
we
have
allowed
it
in
places,
but
this
foot
this
is
not
allowed
here
and
so
an
offsite
parking
easement
would
suffice,
but
you
should
make
that
a
condition
of
the
Ariane's
upon
you.
If
you
wouldn't.
If
you
want
to
approve
that
so
using
his
other
property,
you
could
do
an
off
site
easement.
That
would
make
his
parking
requirements
his
minimum
parking
requirements
sufficient,
but
you
would
just
want
to
make
that
a
condition
of
your
approval
where.
M
B
M
M
As
far
as
the
boulevard
parking
wouldn't
won't
be
allowed,
but
you
can
do
an
off-site
easement
because
you
own
the
adjacent
properties
and
then
entire
block.
So
if
you
were
able
to
make
the
parking
work
for
this,
this
piece
of
property
on
another
one,
you
could
do
an
easement,
but
if
you
weren't,
if
it
were
to
take
away
from
another
building
that
you
have,
then
you
would
still
be
in
the
same
position
of
having
to
come
back
for
a
variance.
Okay,.
M
M
The
boulevard
on
your
own
on
your
property,
so
if
we
can
do
an
off-site
easement,
but
that's
then
what
the
board
would
have
to
add
as
a
condition
to
the
variance
that,
if
you
need
to
use
your
other
properties
to
meet
the
parking
requirements
that
an
off-site
easement
would
be
allowed
and
then,
if
it
does
take
away
from
the
parking
of
your
other
existing
structures,
then
you
would
have
to
come
back
for
a
variance
at
that
time.
Okay,.
D
H
H
A
A
D
It's
gonna
be
cumbersome.
I
make
the
motion
to
approve
the
variance
from
the
minimum
lot
area
requirement.
I
make
a
motion
to
remove
to
allow
the
structure
proposed
structure
to
be
constructed.
14
feet
from
the
north
property
line.
I
further
make
the
motion
that
parking
has
to
be
contained
off
street
on
property
owned
by
mr.
Lance
burger
with
that
to
be
worked
out
with
staff.
D
If
the
parking
is
to
be
located
on
the
westerly
side
of
the
property,
a
sidewalk
needs
to
be
constructed
along
8th
Avenue,
so
those
people
can
get
to
the
building.
I
also
believe
that
the
15
foot
of
grass
space
a
14
foot
a
grass
space
to
be
put
a
lot
kept
along
the
north
side
of
heath
north
side
of
property,
which
would
be
on
the
south
side
of
8th,
Avenue,
southeast
and
a
waiver
of
right
to
protest.
The
construction
of
a
curb
and
or
sidewalk
at
that's
time
to
be
laid
out
by
the
city.
F
D
Bonnie
yeah,
if
he
parks
on
the
east
side.
My
motion
is
that
he
needs
to
construct
a
sidewalk
to
run
him
on
the
north
side
of
the,
so
he
gets
access
his
property.
If
he
doesn't
construct
on
the
east
side,
then
he's
going
to
work
with
staff
to
find
parking
suitable
to
meet
the
requirements
on
the
remainder
of
the
block.
D
M
M
C
B
C
J
B
B
This
all
needs
to
be
contingent
upon
compliance
with
the
purpose
of
this
C
3
highway
commercial
district,
20,
2.0,
102
location
and
21-point,
o
o
to
b7
through
a
through
H
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
staff
finds
that
the
applicant
seeks
to
create
a
new
1056
square
foot
patron
lounge
in
the
northeast
section
of
this
commercial
building,
offering
video
lottery
and
malt
beverages
to
their
customers
during
their
weight.
If
approved,
they
will
apply
to
city
council
to
transfer
their
alcoholic
beverage
license.
B
Bar
Tavern
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district
and
the
definition
of
bar
Tavern
is
any
establishment,
including
restaurants
and
gambling
establishments
license
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
consumption
upon
the
premises
or
sold
are
provided.
The
term
bar
tavern
shall
also
include
establishments
license
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
consumption
off
the
president's
or
the
precedent
premises
were
sold.
The
applicant
has
submitted
a
written
request,
site
plan
and
floor
plan
which
reflect
or
do
not
reflect
the
following
requirements
of
the
ordinance.
Again.
B
We
have
to
review
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses,
including
ingress
ingress,
egress
off
street
parking
and
loading
refuse
and
service
areas,
utilities,
screening,
buffering,
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility.
The
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements,
the
public,
right-of-way
or
Boulevard
is
being
used
in
this
case
to
accommodate
parking
spaces.
The
14
parking
spaces
shown
do
not
meet
minimum
design
standards.
B
There
is
no
indication
in
the
application
for
outside
storage
or
display,
so
we
don't
have
to
go
over
that
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
This
sub
standard
c3
zone
property
is
lacking
in
required
Boulevard
landscape,
which
is
grass
and
tree
improvements
and
utilizing
the
public,
right-of-way
or
Boulevard
to
satisfy
insufficient
off
street
parking
area.
The
parking
lot
requirements
include
that
there
is
no
screening
of
parking
lot
or
dumpster,
as
required
by
21-7
304.
B
B
Now,
the
variant
side
of
this
is
that
the
application
was
submitted
requesting
to
relocate
and
expand
the
floor
area
that
is
currently
used
for
the
sale
serving
and
consumption
of
alcoholic
beverages
in
the
operation
of
video
lottery
machines
on
a
substandard
parcel
in
the
in
the
c3
district,
it
is
deficient
in
minimum
off
street
parking
standards,
requirements
deficient
in
minimum
area
and
width
requirements
and
deficient
in
Boulevard,
public
right-of-way
and
landscaping
requirements.
It
was
denied
based
on
chapter
20
103,
which
prohibits
the
creation
of
non-conformities
or
the
expansion
or
increase
of
their
use.
B
B
They
have
a
current.
This
is
the
site
plan
for
the
building,
and
here
is
the
floor
plan
and
where
the
the
this
premises
was
approved
a
few
years
ago
to
have
this
area
as
their
lounge.
Now
they
want
to
expand
into
this
area,
and
it
is
the
old
areas,
400
square
feet
and
the
new
area
is
9375
or
excuse
me
1056
square
feet
on
a
9,000
375
square
foot
lot.
B
So
this
board
must
determine
for
the
conditional
use
if
there
is
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
made
concerning
2102
a2
to
b7
A
through
H
and
the
titles
and
chapters
I
just
went
over.
If
application
is
endorsed,
the
Board
may
consider
conditions
of
approval,
such
as
limiting
approval
to
the
lounge
only
the
building
only
etc.
If
they
so
desire,
fulfillment
of
any
or
any
or
all
lacking,
Boulevard
infrastructure
requirements,
and/or
any
other
conditions
they
deem
necessary.
D
D
C
A
I
see
the
applicant
is
here,
would
you
please
come
up
to
the
or
I
guess
you
said
you
sit
over
here
and
I?
Guess,
that's
that
the
new
the
new
plan
here
Batsy,
please
state
your
name,
Jason
Getty!
Thank
you.
Jason
can
kind
of
just
tell
us
what's
going
on
here
with
respect
to
you
get
your.
You
know,
introduction
letter
right
kind
of
kind
of
summarize.
What's
going
on
here,
yeah.
G
G
G
A
G
G
C
F
A
A
A
B
Parking
is
decided
by,
you
know,
different
ways
for
different
uses
and
in
this
case
it's
defined
by
seats
for
the
video
lottery,
which
I
believe
was
there
seven
Jason?
Yes,
seven
video
lottery
machines
and
seats
at
a
bar
area
and
I
guess:
we've
got
it
right
here,
and
so
that's
how
parking
was
determined
is
is
how
many
spots
were
needed,
20
and
in
the
laundry
the
laundry
you
saw,
see
and.
B
Laundry
actually,
the
building
official
did
the
calculations
on
the
parking
he
usually
does,
but
I
believe
he
used
service,
commercial
or
service
for
the
laundry
part
and
I.
Don't
think
that
would
expand
much
there
if
it
was
actually
that,
as
Jason
said
he
he
had
the
use
of
only
10
parking
spots,
the
last
time
he
came,
but
we
had
to
determine
what
parking
needs
were
based
on
the
offices
in
front
and
then
the
laundry
and
the
the
last
time.
Okay.
So.
M
So
I
think
for
the
the
parking
that
they
would
have
used,
the
community
commercial,
which
is
five
per
thousand
square
feet
without
the
now
relocation
of
the
casino.
Do
you
know
what
that
square
footage
is
of
the
remainder
of
the
building,
not
including
the
the
conditional
use
area
for
the
barge
a
ver.
M
B
G
B
G
G
A
G
M
M
M
F
A
H
But
no,
if
Jason
were
taking
that
front
area
and
fixing
it
up
to
put
a
tailor
in
there
or
a
dry
cleaner
or
something
related
to
you
know
a
shoe
repair
shop.
What
would
that
do
to
the
parking
then
I
mean
if
we're
not
adding,
barstools
and
and
and
three
more
machines
does
that
is
there
something
that
can
be
put
in
that
front
and
he
not
be
violating
parking?
We're
ok,
again
right,
he
wouldn't
be
here.
B
I
need
to
add
to
that
I'm
sorry,
I'm
I'm,
nodding,
yes,
and
yet
the
the
the
last
time
he
was
here.
He
was
approved
for
a
specific
area
and
a
specific
size
lounge
for
this
building
and
he
even
created
a
legal
description
basement
of
that
lounge
in
the
building
and
the
board
specifically
approved
that
not
the
whole
site,
not
the
whole
building,
not
the
whole
site.
So
he
would
have
to
be
here
regardless
to
change
his
location
of
that
casino.
But.
H
B
D
D
I
G
A
J
I'm
Ruth,
Swanson
and
I
live
right
across
the
street
from
Jason's
laundromat
and
when
they
first
approved
this
little
casino,
he
assured
us
that
that's
all
he
wanted
it
would
never
get
any
it's
just
a
place
for
people
to
go
and
lounge
while
they're
doing
their
laundry
okay
and
we
did
not
really
approve
of
it,
and
there
were
a
lot
of
us
here
anyway,
but
now,
there's
yeah
I
can
see
the
parking
problem
because
people
park
across
the
street
to
go
to
his
casino.
Even
there
are.
J
J
B
F
A
D
C
D
A
D
D
And
in
order
to
do
that,
we
handle
that
variance
first
and
then
the
question
then
becomes,
if
that
goes
through,
then
we
can
handle
the
conditional
use
permit
on
the
other
on
the
casino.
So
we're
dealing
with
lot
area
setbacks,
whether
or
not
he's
got
enough
parking
and
whether
or
not
he
can
have
a
bigger
casino
than
what
he
has
a
permit
for
before
that
move,
expanding
the
nine
conformity
or
whatever,
whatever
Jill
called
it
before
so
the
time.
If
we
get
a
second
of
the
motion,
then
we
can
have
a
discussion
on
the
parking.
D
A
It's,
and
even
then
it
was
was,
was,
was,
was
kind
of
questionable.
Now
it's
kind
of
flipped
entirely
where,
where
it's
a
casino
building
that
doesn't
have
enough
parking
spots
for
what
is
intended,
uses
and
I
understand
the
dilemma.
I
get
that,
but
it's
kind
of
one
of
those
things
where
you
know.
Maybe
this
isn't
the
best
place
for
a
or
appropriate
place
for
a
casino.
That's
that's!
That's
the
size
that
mr.
Getty
want
side
and
I
feel
bad
about
that,
but
I
I'm
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
sure
that
this
is.
A
H
Think,
just
you
know,
like
Todd
mentioned
earlier,
I
think
we're
just
trying
to
stick
him
in
something
that
just
isn't
gonna
fit
so
I.
Think
there's
just
too
many
we're
giving
too
many.
You
know,
bending
the
rules
too
much
I
mean
we
like
to
work
with
someone
but
I.
Just
it's
just
too
many
things
that
are
I,
guess
causing
it
to
be
a
problem.
M
C
Yeah,
the
variance
request
in
regards
to
the
lot
area
and
within
regards
to
the
the
infrastructure
in
the
parking
lot
is
an
older
lot
that,
in
my
opinion,
we
should
look
at
as
kind
of
a
grandfather
scenario
where
it
it
doesn't
meet
what
you
would
need
for
current
c3
definition
Lots.
So
just
look
Brandi
was
saying
this
was
just
all
commercial
in
their
commercial
retail,
we're
still
not
going
to
meet
those
requirements
so
purely
from
a
variant
standpoint
of
the
site.
I
don't
have
an
issue
with
it.
D
D
The
question
is
they're
going
to
have
to
come
back
and
address
the
lot
area.
A
lot
with
parking
and
I'm
comfortable,
approving
the
variances
to
all
those
things.
Question
then
becomes.
The
next
step
will
then
be
how
we,
okay
with
putting
a
bigger
casino
in
the
north
end
of
the
building
or
leaving
it
at
the
same
end
in
the
south
end.
That's
the
next
step.
The
second
step.
L
B
M
M
C
C
B
C
A
D
A
B
A
C
D
A
B
C
B
D
D
B
The
application
was
denied
based
on
21
Oh
302,
which
prohibits
the
design
and
creation
of
non-conforming
structures,
21,
1001
and
or
21
1002
height
and
placement
regulations
for
residential
structures
in
chapter
21,
60
on
required
yards
and
setbacks.
Open-Space
the
applicant
appeals.
These
requirements
of
the
current
zoning
ordinance
staff
finds
that
applicant
states
that
he
proposes
to
raise
meaning
demolish
and
exists.
An
existing
non-conforming
384
square
foot
accessory
structure
to
constrict
to
construct
a
672
square
foot
garage
non-compliant
with
a
required
minimum
setback
and
other
ordinance
regulations
due
to
the
location
of
utility
facilities.
B
This
parcel
located
in
the
r1
single-family
residential
district
is
limited
to
one
attached
garage,
one
unattached
garage,
greater
than
200
square
feet
and
one
storage
structure
less
than
or
equal
to
200
square
feet
per
single-family
dwelling.
This
parcel
also
has
one
boathouse
on
the
property
lakeside,
if
placed
within
10
feet
of
the
main
building.
B
The
minimum
required
yard
is
25
feet
in
addition
to
a
non
compliant
rear,
north
or
street
side
setback.
The
proposed
14
feet
is
also
not
sufficient
off
street
parking
length
in
front
of
the
proposed
garage
doors
as
any
vehicle
parked.
There
will
encroach
into
the
public
right-of-way
and
over
the
pedestrian
walkway
walkway,
which
is
required
to
be
improved
with
a
four-foot
wide
concrete
sidewalk
for
21
1002
3
see
a
garage
permitted
after
July
11
2008,
which
is
entered
perpendicular
to
an
alley,
shall
not
be
located
closer
than
20
feet
to
the
alley
line.
B
Rear
yards
by
the
way
for
homes
located
on
lakefront
Priti
will
be
treated
the
same
as
an
ally.
There
is
sufficient
buildable
area
on
this
property
to
construct
a
compliant
unattached,
accessory
structure
or
structures
without
variances.
This
board
has
the
authority
to
require
the
fulfillment
of
any
or
all
lacking
Boulevard
infrastructure
requirements
in
conjunction
with
any
structural
or
improvements
authorized
by
building
permit.
B
B
C
M
A
C
B
The
point
is
basically
brandies
he
would
be.
He
would
be
me
having
to
put
in
more
drive
space
with
our
driveway
space,
which
takes
away
from
the
the
boulevard
green
space
and
also,
even
though
there
probably
is
none
in
the
area.
Each
property
is
supposed
to
have
sidewalk
and
end
or
trail
at
the
lake.
This
property
has
none.
That's
typical.
B
K
K
You
know
you
understand
where
that's
at
out
there
or
that
our
cab
house
is
out
on
that
stretch
across
there.
So
I
mean
a
little
bit
different.
In
that
sense,
it's
not
in
a
traffic
that
mean
main
road
out
there,
but
Danny's
also
got
the
issue
of
the
utilities
right
there
in
front,
so
for
him
to
get
a
boat
in
there
as
one
of
his
one
of
his
problems.
There
currently
is
not
a
driveway
on
that
other
one,
but
there's
some
pavers
on
the
front
of
that
garage.
K
They
come
out
about
four
or
five
feet
from
in
summer.
That's
not
all
green
space.
Now,
anyway,
the
garage
is
not
in
the
best
shape,
it's
sagging,
pretty
bad
on
the
one
side.
So
obviously,
if
he
takes
it
down,
can't
put
his
thing
back
up.
He's
got
that
issue
too,
but
he
made
the
comment
to
me
about
one
of
the
reasons
not
to
push
that
back
further.
It
becomes
an
issue
with
the
neighbor
blocking
his
view.
K
K
From
that
site,
you
can
see
where
the
windows
are
on
the
other
guy's
house
to
the
right
there.
So
if
he
pushes
that
back,
you
can
obviously
gonna
make
some
difference
to
that
gentleman.
But
his
garage
to
the
right.
There
is
actually
currently
four
feet
closer
to
the
roads
and
what
this
know,
what
Casey's
asking
for
here,
but.
A
K
So
there
isn't
a
site
ISM
an
issue.
It's
it's
a
frontage
which
it's
basically
replacing
at
the
same
distance
that
the
current
one
is
not
asking
to
go
further
ahead
than
that,
but
does
it
does
it
make
for
the
difference,
though?
It
needs
to
have
at
least
some
type
of
an
approach
to
come
in
there
I
don't
know
I,
think
I
suppose
it
could
be
mean
still
made
grass
but
backing
in
there.
If
it's
muddy,
that's
gonna
be
somewhat
of
an
issue.
F
K
K
F
K
F
M
F
M
That's
where
usually
like
I
had
said
before:
that's
where
residential
lots,
we
usually
only
allow
it
one
access
up
to
36
feet.
So
that's
where
it
could
be
a
condition
of
this
variance.
If
it
were
approved
that
it'd
be
one
access
and
then
you
wouldn't
be,
you
still
won't
be
encroaching
the
utilities
right.
K
I
think
in
total
you'd
have
about
36
foot
because
of
if
I
can
reference
this,
it
looks
like
about
26
and
if
you
had
a
10
foot
drive
for
the
other
have
a
total
of
36,
but
to
connect
that
all
together,
I,
don't
think
that
would
then
you
take
away
green
space,
then
2.
By
doing
that,
I
don't
know
there
would
be
a
lot
of
purpose
and
tying
that
all
together,
but.
C
B
Well,
the
boathouse
isn't
really
considered
as
the
as
an
unattached
garage.
It
is
literally
called
out
in
the
ordinance
as
a
conditional
use,
which
it
probably
never
went
through,
but
it's
been
there
for
a
long
long
time
and
it
is
a
boathouse.
This
says
a
garage
on
Darwin's
plot
plan,
but
it's
a
boathouse.
It's
taxes.
K
A
A
C
D
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
everything.
The
proposed
structure
is
not
going
to
be
any
closer
or
nominally
closer
to
the
road
than
the
existing
structure.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
but
it's
going
to
and
it's
not
going
to
be,
and
it's
not
going
to
infringe
upon
the
side
yard.
So
it's
only
because
it's
bigger
and
closer
to
that
to
the
house
that
makes
it
part
of
a
second
garage
correct.
D
A
M
D
D
H
H
D
H
C
C
B
C
A
H
D
B
Is
a
conditional
use
request
with
with
an
appeal
and
the
owner
applicant
is
Jim
and
Shelly
peeper
the
property
address
will
be
six
hundred
fifth
Street
southeast.
The
conditional
use
request
is
that
the
applicant
seeks
approval
to
develop
a
two-story
building
in
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district
to
be
utilized
as
apartments
over
main
floor
commercial
uses
or
offices
pursuant
to
21/28
o26
office
building
with
2120
803
nine
apartments.
It's
also
contingent
upon
compliance
with
the
purpose
of
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district
and
2100
202
to
b7
A
through
H.
B
Specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
conditional
uses
office
building
is
a
listed
permitted.
Use
in
apartments
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district.
The
definition
of
office
building
is
a
room
set
of
rooms
or
building
where
the
business
of
a
professional,
commercial,
industrial,
financial,
religious,
institutional,
public
or
semi-public
persons
or
organizations
or
broadcast
stations
and
studios
is
conducted,
and
this
is
a
proposed
redevelopment
project.
B
Permission
therefore
has
been
granted
by
an
official
city
agency.
No
structure
shall
be
built
and
occupied
unless
the
minimum
off-street
parking
and
off-street
spaces
required
by
the
provisions
of
this
ordinance
are
provided.
So
then
we
go
to
chapter
21,
73,
landscape
and
lighting
standards,
which,
for
the
boulevard
and
right-of-way
requirements,
the
entire
public
right-of-way
excluding
the
street,
shall
be
devoted
entirely
to
grass
and
trees.
There
shall
be
a
minimum
15
foot,
width
of
grass
and
non-living
ground
cover,
such
as
payment
or
including
payment,
is
supposed
to
be
relegated
to
a
minimum
of
10%.
B
B
A
replant
or
development
lot
agreement
would
be
required
in
order
to
construct
as
proposed
and
to
move
on
to
the
variant
side
of
things
the
applicant
required
to
construct
a
non-conforming
five
thousand
four
hundred
and
forty
square
foot
two-story
building
on
a
substandard
11250
square
foot
parcel
located
in
the
c3
zone.
It
is
to
be
constructed
upon
again
the
eleven
thousand
two
hundred
fifty
square
foot
lot
75
feet
of
width
where
20,000
square
feet
of
area
is
required,
100
feet
of
width.
B
Have
one
I
guess:
I
should
finish
off
with
that
for
the
conditional
use
part
of
things
again,
this
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
2102
o2
to
be
7
A
through
H,
and
the
chapters
and
sections
I
just
described
and
if
generally
endorsed
conditions
of
approval
must
be
specified.
There
was
one
adjacent
landowner
that
left
a
voicemail
message
with
me,
so
I
did
not
talk
to
him
directly,
but
he
is
opposed
to
these
kind
of
uses
in
this
area
generally.
He
did
not
go
into
a
lot
of
specific
detail.
D
D
Shared
this
is
Todd
you've
just
to
fully
disclose
prior
to
the
applicant,
making
an
application
on
this
request.
I
did
have
a
conversation
with
them.
He
had
talked
to
me
one
day
about
development
along
Highway
81
and
where
I
thought
things
were
going
just
as
a
planner
and
something
that's
been
around
for
a
while.
I
knew
a
little
bit
about
what
he
was
proposing
to
do
here.
A
I
I'm
Ronnie
rush
and
I
own
that
house.
It's
516
there
with
that
all,
but
that
area
of
the
town
is
in
a
flood
zone,
the
property
where
the
medical-supply,
the
bank
and
that
strip
mall
on
the
front
has
all
been
filled
up
about
three
foot
above
the
eldest
three
or
four.
It
was
four
houses
that
are
in
that
corner.
I
So
therefore,
when
we
get
heavy
greens,
the
water
runs
down
that
alley
and
then
down
between
our
houses,
and
it
has
gotten
clear
up
to
my
basement
windows,
but
it
hasn't.
It
hasn't,
went
down
that
in
the
basement
yet,
but
with
he's
going
to
have
to
in
order
to
get
out
of
the
flood
zone,
he's
going
to
have
to
raise
that
about
two
to
three
feet
that
property.
I
So
therefore,
the
water
all
runs
to
the
east
there
and
there
is
a
small
gutter
down
between
the
medical-supply
and
my
fence
and
that
other
house,
but
it
doesn't
handle
all
of
the
water
that
comes
down
that
alley
and
that's
just
a
dirt
alley,
and
there
are
a
lot
of
heavy-duty
trucks
that
haul
oxygen
and
that
to
the
medical
supply.
There's
a
lot
of
traffic
down
that
single
lane
alley,
which
is
nothing
but
dirt
and
I,
don't
know
where
he's
gonna
park
or
where
he
has
any
plans
of
making
a
parking
lot.
I
I
L
Hi,
my
name
is
Jim
peeper
and
I'm,
the
guy
proposing
to
do
this
and
the
reason
we
want
to
do
this
is
we
currently
have
two
structures
on
there.
Now
we
want
to
take
those
off
and
then
we
want
to
get
put
in.
Oh
sorry,
we
want
to
put
in
a
commercial
building
with
commercial
on
the
bottom
and
then
residential
on
the
top,
and
we
want
to
take
those
structures
out
of
there
so
that
we
can
raise
it
above
the
flood
zone
to
take
it
out
of
the
flood
zone.
Okay,.
L
I
would
think
that
would
be
part
of
dealing
with
the
city,
because
you
know
we
don't
want
to
be
a
bad
neighbor.
We
don't
want
to
give
you
our
water.
You
know
that
mm.
That
is
certainly
not
our
intent,
but
we
would
sure
work
with
the
city
on
you
know,
whatever
we
need
to
do
there
to
take
care
of
that.
M
We
do
see
we
see
an
issue
with
parking
on
the
north
side
of
the
building
adjacent
to
six
Avenue
there,
where
that
angled
parking
will
come
off
it's
a
product.
It
looks
like
it's
about
10
feet
off
highway
81,
which
I
think
currently
it's
about
20
feet,
and
so
we
would
like
to
see
that
that
not
be
expanded
more
than
what
it
is
currently
today.
B
M
M
B
B
M
M
So
that's
where
I
was
getting
off
my
measurements
from
our
please
first
District
so
got
about
20,
so
as
long
as
you're,
not
making
that
as
long
as
you're
not
encroaching
further
into
the
setback.
281,
so
basically
just
keep
it
as
it
is
today,
but
no
making
it
smaller.
Because
on
the
site
plan
it
looks
like
it's
about
10
feet
and
that
would
be
even
not
compliant
with
our
Clearview
triangle
and
then
would
make
issues
for
people
pulling
out
when
they're
parking
and
maybe
going
into
the
intersection
causing
ruckus
there.
We.
C
B
The
according
to
my
conversations
with
a
building
official
this
this
parking
and
going
back
on
GIS
view
as
it
exists
here
now
not
on
the
site
plan
expanded.
But
it
has
been
here
for
forever.
Since
I,
we
can't
go
back
far
enough
on
the
GIS
pictures
to
see
where
it
did
not
exist.
So
we
don't
know
whether
there
was
actually
ever
formal
approval,
but,
unlike
some
of
the
other
ones
like
like
the
Lance
Lance
burger
parking
to
the
east,
or
excuse
me
to
the
West
that
one
had
expanded
through
time.
M
Basically,
two,
if
you
look
back
on
your
other
applications
tonight,
the
four
holdings
issue,
that
was
the
same
situation
as
this,
where
it
had
existed
and
that
there's
no
way
to
bring
it
into
compliance,
no
matter
what
for
what
this
lot
area
is
and
then
for
Lance
burger
they
he
had
sufficient
space
and
that
Bulova
parking
didn't
exist
today.
So
we
won't
want
to
create
a
larger
nonconformity,
which
is
what
we
would
be
doing
too
if
he
went
be
encroaching
further
281
and
just
leaving
it
as
it
exists
today,.
B
F
Okay
and
Jim,
would
you
propose
because,
like
the
neighbor
was
saying,
that's
just
a
gravel
alley?
Would
you
propose
like
doing
like
a
pavement
or
anything
on
that
alley?
Cuz
you're
gonna
have
payment
in
your
driveway
right,
correct,
okay
and
that's
the
only
way
they're
gonna
access
is
off
the
alley.
Correct.
No.
L
It'll,
actually,
we
went
and
talked
to
the
state
and
we
got
a
email
from
the
state
saying
that
there's
actually
there's
a
curb
cut
there
now
with
a
access
from
81.
So
then
we
can
access
right
from
the
front
and
we
can
you
know
exit
there
as
well,
and
the
state
was
fine
with
it.
They
didn't
see
any
problem
with
that.
They
just
kind
of
had
redone
that
not
that
long
ago,
and
they
were
just
yeah.
They
didn't
see
any
issue
there
at
all.
C
L
L
B
B
D
I
just
thought
my
recollection
was
when
they,
when
they
got
the
permit
to
revamp
those
you
know
there.
They
have
to
use
the
alley
as
the
main
entrance
and
because
they
can
only
exit
out
to
the
south.
In
that
development
and
I
thought.
The
recollection
was
that
there
was
something
stated
that
they
said
they
would
sign
a
waiver
a
right
to
protest,
to
allow
the
city
or
to
require
pavement
at
some
point
in
time.
So
the
question
then
would
be
is
if
this
development,
if
that
would
trigger
that,
would
that
be.
C
D
D
L
M
M
M
C
H
H
Issue
with
that
is,
you
are,
you
know,
along
with
the
other
apartment
building
that
we
did
allow
and
we
did
I'm
almost
positive.
We
asked
her
to
do
that
and
just
like
the
gentleman
said
who
lives
in
that
neighborhood.
The
trucks
come
down
that
I,
don't
know.
If
we're
gonna
have
to
go
to
everybody
and
say
we
need
to
pave
that,
but
it
would
that
much
added
traffic
to
that
poor
dirt
alley.
H
C
D
B
L
M
M
And
then
also
for
the
parking
lot
screening
that
adequate
screening
of
a
parking
lot
from
adjacent
residential
use,
property
shall
be
provided
or
residential
use
properties
across
the
right-of-way
from
a
parking
area.
It
just
goes
on
so
then
screening
shall
be
an
opaque
fence.
Wall,
berm
or
hedge
maintained
at
least
four
feet
in
height
and
in
such
a
manner
not
to
materially
impede
vision
of
an
inner
intersecting
streets,
alleys
and
driveways.
D
L
C
L
L
C
This
is
Eric
Scott
again
and
as
owner
of
not
an
adjacent
property,
but
a
property
in
the
proximity-
and
maybe
even
more
so,
is
just
a
Watertown
citizen.
I
think
this
would
be
a
great
use
for
this
area
would
really
upgrade
highway.
81
is
kind
of
weird,
because
it's
still
transitioning,
very
very
slowly,
from
commercial
and
far
from
residential
into
more
commercial
uses
and
I
think
this
would
really
improve
what
our
highway
looks
like.
That
area
has
seen
some
improvement.
I
think
612
flats
was
an
upgrade
to
the
aesthetics.
C
L
F
A
D
We're
gonna
you're
gonna
have
to
have
separate
actions
on
these
mr.
chair
I
believe
and
perhaps
maybe
the
first
one
would
be
to
handle
the
condition
used
to
see
whether
or
not
this
is
the
appropriate
use
of
the
land
and
then,
if
we
figure
that
it's
appropriate
from
the
use,
we
can
then
address
the
sum
of
the
variances.
Maybe
all.
D
Like
to
make
an
alternate
motion
or
ask
the
original
originator
of
the
motion
to
consider
the
following
as
a
friendly
amendment,
one
that
the
applicant
will
work
with
staff
on
screening,
the
residences
from
the
parking
lot
not
saying
it
has
to
be
offense
or
planning's,
whatever
the
applicant
wants
to
do,
what
it
needs
to
meet.
That
requirement.
D
B
C
D
D
I'm
not
sure
do
we
want
to
have
trees
on
the
on
the
west
side
or
not,
and
I
should
not
be
coming.
So
we
can
make
an
amendment
I'm
not
going
to
go
at
them.
The
variance
from
the
from
the
tree
requirement
a
variance
from
the
infrastructure
requirements
except
the
curb
and
gutter.
We
I
would
like
to
say
I.
D
H
My
only
concern
would
be
and
again
that'll
be
something
when
you
guys
address
with
staff.
What
he's
gonna
have
once
you
win
a
good
point
on
the
garbage
I'm
assuming
that's
gonna,
be
in
the
alley.
You
may
lose
a
spot
and
then
whatever
Brandi
is
talking
about
for
the
front
for
the
Clearview
triangle
up
there,
whatever
amount
of
space
we
lose
there,
it
just
may
affect
how
many
apartments
you
get
that's
all
I'm
kind
of
apartments
or
commercial
space.
You
know
right.
H
We
all
in
agreeance
on
that
I
mean
because,
if
you're
going
to
want
it
variance
from
that
you'll
be
back
up
here.
So
I'm
just
saying
just
for
warning
you
that
that
may
happen
once
you
figure
out
where
your
garbage
and
what
that
clear
view
triangles
going
to
create
for
space.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
Jim
yeah
so
okay,
so
your
your
apartments
may
change
numbers
or
your
building
may
change.
Space
is
all
I'm
getting
at,
maybe
so
just
forewarning,
just
pointing
that
out.