►
From YouTube: Plan Commission 01 09 2020
Description
Watertown, SD Plan Commission Meeting 1-9-2020
C
B
C
B
A
B
A
B
A
A
D
C
A
A
E
B
Thank
you
Mark.
So
this
is
a
zoning
text,
amendment
adding
chapter
21,
81
firework
activities
to
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown
and
amending
chapter
21
32
I
1,
light
industrial
district
chapter
21,
36
I
to
heavy
industrial
district
chapter
1303,
Public,
Safety
and
chapter
21
80
signs
an
outdoor
advertising
of
the
revised
darkness
of
the
city
of
Watertown.
So
there's
a
lot
of
amendments
within
this
this
resolution,
but
basically
this
is
having
to
do
with
fireworks
and
then
making
that
an
allowable
conditional
use
within
our
ordinance.
B
B
And
then
we
have
it
a
whole
separate
chapter
now
or
a
chapter
chapter
21,
81,
that'll
that'll
be
the
limitations
on
the
fireworks
activities,
so
there's
parameters
for
what
your
site
so
where
your
site
is
and
how
large
it
is,
what
zoning
it
can
be,
which
is
only
i1
and
i2.
So
then,
that
describes
those
requirements,
I
guess
if
you
were
going
to
ask
for
a
firework
use.
F
Mr.
chair
a
little
context
several
years
ago,
this
was
brought
up
before
the
Planning
Commission
and
City
Council
regarding
the
ability
to
sell
fireworks
within
the
city
of
Watertown.
At
the
time
there
was
only
one
operation
allowed
to
sell
fireworks
in
the
city
that
was
done
through
some
different
zoning
practices
and
what
end
up
having
a
llamas
bigshots
fireworks
was
looking
at
wine
to
sell
fireworks
in
the
county.
We
were
looking
at
trying
to
find
ways
from
the
county
to
get
him
annexed
into
the
city.
F
We
just
couldn't
come
to
any
sort
of
agreement
on
how
that
was
going
to
proceed.
The
ordinance
that's
here
before
you
is
relatively
similar
to
that
ordinance.
That
was
being
discussed
several
years
ago.
The
big
thing
here,
I
think
it's
probably
important
to
note,
and
you
can
see
it
in
your
packet
that
there's
been
some
GIS
analysis.
As
far
as
where
you
could
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
sell
fireworks
or
in
the
city.
So
brandy,
could
you
put
those
up
on
the
screen
mm-hmm
so.
B
In
your
packet
there
you
have
the
PDFs
and
then
here
Brian
with
first
district
provided
some
shapefiles,
so
we
can
just
see
it
in
real
time
at
our
GIS.
So
the
I
one
is
the
light
blue,
the
areas,
those
are
the
properties
that
fireworks
could
be
sold
in
the
eye
one
district
and
then
the
eye
two
is
in
the
yellow.
Now.
F
It
should
be
noted
that
mr
iyama,
who
is
looking
at
wanting
to
maybe
annex
into
the
city
his
property,
is
adjacent
to
that
relatively
close
to
that
area
there
his
plot
his
lot
would
fit
the
requirements
under
this
order.
So
if
he
was
to
annex
he
would
fall
within
the
parameter
being
a
half
a
mile
from
a
residential
zone
Jason
to
commercials,
c3
commercial
zoning
district,
and
he
has
a
minimum
last
size
of
one
acre
right.
F
Currently
loose
fire,
there
is
one
other
spot
that
doesn't
that
we
didn't
see
that's
out
by
the
airport
industrial
park
that
falls
in
the
same
parameters
of
the
i1.
So
on
the
surface
it
looks
like
we're
opening
the
door
for
fireworks
sites
throughout
the
community.
It's
really
gonna
be
relegated
to
those
areas
that
can
meet
the
performance.
F
B
It'll
be
very
site-specific,
and
so
and
we
we
added
those
parameters
because
we
wanted
to
protect
the
public,
the
safety,
Health
and
Welfare,
just
because
fireworks
are
explosives
and
they
could
be
dangerous.
I
know
that
was
always
a
concern
about
allowing
fireworks
to
be
sold
within
the
city.
So
did.
C
Well,
the
biggest
deal
is
we
the
way
we
went
about
doing
this?
Is
we
were
concerned
that
every
store
in
town
would
be
start
selling
fireworks?
And
that's
why
we
did
conditional
use?
It
has
to
be
a
hundred
percent
sales,
because
when
you
have
a
mixed-use,
you
have
more
product
mixing
together
and
more
at
more.
G
And
I
just
want
to
point
out
like
Todd
said,
this
is
very
similar
to
what
was
proposed
in
2014
and
in
2014.
It
passed
the
Plan
Commission
unanimously
and
then
I
went
to
City
Council
and
it
failed.
But
that
was
from
what
I
remember
more
to
do
with
the
fact
that
we
didn't
have
a
joint
jurisdiction
between
the
city
and
the
county
and
they
wanted
to
get
that
done
first,
and
so
they
denied
it.
G
B
G
G
G
B
And
a
reason
to
why
this?
Why
we're
bringing
this
forward
now?
Because
it
might
seem
like
it's
just
kind
of
a
random
time,
but
we
actually
water,
told
municipal
utilities,
has
an
agreement
with
big
shots
and
my
calaman,
because
he
is
connected
to
city
services.
So
he
has
to
be.
They
said
that
that
he
would
have
to
annex
by
2020
May
of
2020,
yes
yep.
So
we
would
get
this
this
amendment
as
long
as
it
would
go
through
City
Council.
B
F
F
H
A
G
F
A
B
So
when
I'll
amend
this
resolution
and
then
get
your
signature
again
mark
but
I'll
just
take
that
section
out,
then
obviously
that
will
that
I'll
go
forward
to
the
City
Council,
because
and
that's
what
they'll
act
on,
but
just
because
that
you
guys
are
the
plan
commission
and
you
act
on
title
21.
So
I'll
hit
that
section
from
this.
F
A
B
A
B
There
also
I
mean
they
living
there
for
for,
like
their
permanent
residents
or
just
also
occupying
space.
So
then
it's
not
as
available
for
other
community
members
to
utilize.
So
like
the
city
park,
they
have
the
30
day.
They
they
do
follow
that
30
day
stipulation
and
then
also,
though,
with
with
adding
the
language
from
April
1st
November
1st.
B
F
You
know
where
I'm
at
with
this,
based
on
our
conversation
yesterday,
I
feel
that
for
private
gam
grounds,
I,
don't
think
as
government's
business
to
say
how
they
go
about
operating
their
business
if
they
want
to
extend
it
to
60
80
90
days
out
of
the
season.
The
30-day
period
primarily
has
been
for
public
campgrounds,
giving
everybody
access
to
public
space
and
so
to
me,
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
30
day
rule.
B
That's
why
I
think
that
it
might
make
sense,
because
this
isn't
big
ordinance,
this
campground
ordinance
isn't
just
for
public.
So
I
think
that
if
we
want
to
be
more
strict
on
ourselves,
then
we
can
still
hold
true
to
that
30
day,
but
then
it
at
least
allows
because
we
don't.
We
also
don't
want
the
private
campgrounds
to
be
able
to
let
people
live
out
there
like
year-round,
so
I
think
that's
why
just
having
the
seasonal
dates,
I
think.
F
B
F
H
F
B
H
F
B
My
only
my
only
concerns
about
that
is
just
the
dates,
but
they
also
are
like
open
or
closed
so
I
think
that
extending
it
because
I
know
hunting
season
was
brought
up,
that
you
know
to
extend
it
longer.
So
if
somebody
wants
to
come
and
stay
through
pheasant
opener
and
whatever,
then
they
would
have
more
time.
F
B
Would
I
would
say
with
how
this
ordinance
is
written,
that
you
couldn't
leave
it
there
for
more
than
30
days
after
this
yeah
after
the
date?
And
because
you
would
think
that
the
person
who
owns
the
campground
would
be
charging
them
and
it
might
potentially
be
more
expensive
to
store
your
camper
outside,
instead
of
just
putting
it
in
a
storage
unit
or
garage,
and
then
I
mean
with
its
kind
of
at
their
own
risk.
Because
you
know.
D
F
A
quick
question,
I've
seen
in
other
campground
ordinances,
is
the
restriction
to
the
number
of
people
residing
in
the
camper.
If
it's
a
long
stiff,
it
becomes
a
long
term
camper.
So,
for
example,
we're
seeing
this
up
in
the
Northeast
the
state
with
the
wind
wind
farm
crews
that
have
been
coming
in
what
you
end
up
doing.
Is
you
get
a
single
camper
there,
but
there
might
be
eight
guys
living
in
that
camper
on
a
rotational
basis.
So
the
camp
ground
turns
into
something
of
a
man.
B
F
B
E
F
A
H
E
B
F
A
B
Yep
yeah,
because
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
he
had
brought
up,
that
he
couldn't
have
somebody
staying
there
for
over
30
days
now.
This
does
not
add
that
we
require
them
to
man.
The
campground
though,
and
I,
don't
know.
What
are
you
guys,
thoughts
on
that?
Do
you
think
that
it's
needed
and
that
we
should
add
it
or
leave
it
alone?.
D
F
F
E
The
market
will
take
care
of
itself
also
if
it
becomes
like
you
know,
the
wild
wild
west
and
there
you
are
right
there,
three-year-olds,
you're,
gonna,
get
you're,
not
gonna,
stick
around
and
it'll
take
care
of
itself
and
the
owner
will
either
kick
them
out
or
or
take
care
of
that
themselves.
Let
the
market
handle
it
instead
of
just
regulating
it
down
to
that
I.
D
E
D
Oh
yeah
I
mean
and
I
can't
think
who's.
The
old
gentleman
that
used
to
be
at
Memorial
Park
I
mean
if
you
were
driving
11
miles
an
hour.
He
was
out
there
yelling
at
you
and
you
could.
You
know
zip
through
City
Park
at
45
and
music
blaring,
and
that
was
the
norm.
So
I
I
think
from
the
neighbors
standpoint.
We
have
to
have
a
chance
to
review
it,
because
if
whether
it's
noise
or
litter
or
whatever
I
just
so.
D
I
H
F
D
Their
manned
very
little
anymore,
like
sandy
shores,
for
example,
occasionally
there'll
be
a
summer
part-time
person
to
make
sure
you've
got
your
campground
sticker.
Normally
they've
gone
again
to
like
a
campground
host
where
there's
someone
there
that
will
bring
you
firewood
and
make
sure
the
same
thing.
D
B
F
So
when
we
say
each
campsite,
sadly
at
least
2,000
square
feet,
we
mean
do
we
want
to
I've
seen
other
ordinances
when
they
put
minimum
pad
sizes
down
just
the
pad
sizer.
Is
that
the
actual
area
from
the
pad
and
the
living
area
thick
Vic's
ight,
because
like
because
most
most
places
they
they
like
the
pass.
D
F
B
C
I
F
F
F
G
We
as
the
city
having
any
issues
with
its
current
campground
ordinances,
or
is
this
proposed
change,
just
preemptively
to
a
campground
that
might
go
in
because
I
mean
we
of
those
nine.
All
of
them
are
currently
in
the
ordinance.
Just
you
number
six,
you
added
some
words
but
other
than
that.
All
those
are
already
in
the
ordinance
mm-hmm.
B
Nothing
that
I've
heard-
and
you
know
the
only
reason
that
this
is
because
it
was
a
request
from
the
citizen-
that's
working
on
a
potential
campground
that
that
was
just
something
that
he
had
brought
up.
So
that's.
Why?
Then
we
looked
into
it
to
get
some
feedback
and
then
also
it
means
that
everyone
thought
it
was
reasonable
and
then
and
because,
if
we
were
looking
at
having
a
manned
campground
or
whatever
it
doesn't
allow
for
that.
So
the.
F
Other
thing
that
other
campground
ordinances
also
have
to
do
is
they
address
some
sort
of
emergency
manager.
J'en
see
plans
whether
that
be
storm,
shelters
or
where
do
people
go
in
the
event
for
emergency?
That
could
be
just
a
plan.
That's
put
on
a
board
or
passed
out
just
I
mean
those
are
just
things
that
I've
seen
in
my
professional
life.
It's
it.
F
F
And
that
could
be
like,
for
example,
I'll
give
you
the
Lake
Poinsett
example.
What
they've
done
is
they
a
new
campground
came
in?
It's
gonna
be
200
units
face,
you
know,
that's
bigger
than
the
city
of
Lake
Preston
and
where
are
those
people
gonna
go
when
they
had
a
tornado
this
one
across
a
couple
years
ago,
so
they
decided
that
as
the
phased
it
for
every
X
number
of
units,
there
had
to
be
some
sort
of
a
storm.
F
B
C
B
Well
and
that's
where
cuz
so
right
now
with
number
two
there,
it
does
say
that
it
shall
be
supplied
with
water
with
the
water
supply
and
sewage
disposal
facilities,
including
washing
toilets
and
similar
facilities,
all
of
which
to
meet
applicable
city
codes
and
regulations.
I
mean-
and
it
could
just
be
added
as
like
three
to
say
like
that
for
X
amount
of
sites
that
there
would
be
appropriate.
B
F
G
F
B
So
we
met
yesterday
as
the
committee
for
the
lake
commercial
district,
and
so
that
was
Todd,
Diana,
Blake
and
Heath
and
I,
and
it
was
productive
meeting
and
we
got
through
it.
We
didn't
get
through
all
too
much,
but
it
was
good
discussion
so
right
now
it
was
just
our
our
purpose
or
whatever
our
goal
was
to
just
go
through
the
permitted
uses.
So
and
let
me
pull
it
up,
so
any
guys
can
see
it.
B
B
Okay,
well
about
there,
we
go
all
right
so
for
the
permitted
uses.
Then
right
now,
as
you
can
see,
we
have
a
retail
establishment,
service
establishments,
motels
and
hotels,
restaurants,
automobile
parking,
lot,
recreational
use,
campground
storage
units,
stored
shops,
apartments
using
the
upper
floors
of
commercial
buildings
and
recreational
facility.
B
So
we
thought
that
people
like
with
hotels
and
motels
people
might
have
concerns
about
that,
and
you
know
the
density
of
people
that
would
be
next
to
their
potential
single-family
home.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
protecting
the
existing
neighborhoods
and
homes
and
then,
but
also,
obviously,
the
whole
point
of
this
district
is
to
allow
for
some
commercial
activities
that
are
complementary
to
Lake
recreation,
and
so
this
wouldn't
just
be
for
Lake
capacity'.
This
would
also
be
for
Lake
Pelican
so
and
then
also
to
touch
on
with
the
storage
shops.
F
B
In
our
current
ordinance
that
we
only
have
storage
units
or
contractor
shops
defined
and
Heath
had
made
a
good
point
in
that
discussion.
That
contractor
shops
are
for
a
commercial
business
where,
if
somebody
was
wanting
to
do
private
storage,
but
they
wanted
water
and
sewer,
then
they
wouldn't
it
wouldn't
be
appropriate
for
them
to
have
a
business.
B
So
if
we
were
doing
if
we
were
calling
it
a
contractor
shop
for
them
to
do
private
storage,
that
wouldn't
really
be
appropriate
either,
but
that's
all
that
our
ordinance
allowed
for
when
Mike
came
in
and
asked
for
that
conditional
use.
So
that's
why?
Then,
the
definition
of
a
storage
shop
was
added
to
allow
for
somebody
that
wanted
a
bathroom
in
their
in
their
storage
unit.
So
then
that
definition
is
here:
it's
a
building
for
personal
use.
Only
as
a
storage
facility,
each
structure
is
allowed
to
have
water
and
sewer
utilities.
B
B
So
then
we
we
plan
to
meet
again
next
week
and
then
we'll
go
over
the
conditional
uses
and
then
also
get
into
the
design
standards
and
making
sure
that
everything
makes
sense
aesthetically
and
then
to
look
into
the
green
space
requirements
further
and
also
to
go
back
up
to
the
way
top
there
with
the
purpose.
It
was
good
conversation
there,
because
right
now
with
just
you
know,
it
says,
to
establish
appropriate
locations
adjacent
to
lakum,
Pesce
and
Lake
Pelican
that
are
conducive
to
Lake
commercial
activity
and
to
better
define
adjacent.
B
F
B
F
C
B
A
B
And
I
see
we're
going
with
it
because
it's
kind
of
like
our
light
industrial,
how
the
caretakers
residence
we
moved
that
down,
but
we
actually
caretakers
residence
does
allow
for
somebody
to
live
there
full-time.
So
then
that
would
just
be
a
way
of
knowing
that
in
this
industrial
zone
that
there
is
somebody
living
there,
but
I
mean
it's
a
good
point.
Just.
C
E
E
C
C
B
And
then
just
another:
no,
we
don't
have
to
go
there,
so
we'll
we'll
meet
again
next
week
and
we'll
go
over
the
conditional
uses
and
then
I
can
give
you
guys
an
update
at
the
January
23rd
meeting
and
well.
So
it's
not
just
conditional
use
as
though
we're
gonna
talk
about
the
design
standards
and
everything
so
hoping
within
1-2
meetings.
We
did
slide
off
two
hours
for
that
one.
So
hopefully
we
make
some
headway,
so
we
can
keep
this
moving
because
obviously
it's
time-sensitive,
where
we
want
to
get
something
on
the
books.