![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/MXFMI_Pdeh8/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment 02-04-2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
B
B
C
A
Okay,
thank
you
Liam.
So
before
you
is
a
conditional
use,
application
and,
as
Liam
had
said,
Robert
and
Pamela
J
Drake
are
the
owner
and
applicant,
and
this
address
is
for
Stony
Point
second
edition
that'd
be
what
you
guys
would
reference
the
most
as
it
does
not
have
an
actual
physical
address,
yet,
as
there
hasn't
been
a
building
permit
issued.
So
the
applicant
seeks
approval
to
operate
a
facility
with
restaurant
condo
apartments
with
parking
garages,
rooftop
event,
venue,
beach,
bunkers
and
swimming
pool
in
the
c2
local
commercial
district,
pursuant
to
section
20
126.
A
A
That's
just
the
findings
that
you
have
to
look
at
to
approve
this
conditional
use
which
involve
ingress
and
egress
off
street
parking
loading
areas,
the
effects
and
the
effects
on
adjoining
properties,
ruffies
and
service
areas,
utilities,
screening
and
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility.
And
then,
just
to
note
on
here
we
do
have
a
reference
to
chapter
11,
o
9
swimming
pools,
which
actually
isn't
part
of
this
application.
As
that
isn't
something
that
the
Board
of
Adjustment
governs
in
Chapter
11.
A
E
A
B
F
F
We're
looking
to
you
know
get
approval
tonight
for
the
apartment
in
the
restaurant,
I
mean
that's
a
conditional
use
that
we're
asking
we're
not
asking
for
variances
on
anything
else
on
the
property.
We
are
just
strictly
asking
for
a
conditional
use
to
allow
apartments
which
were
you
know,
unanimously
from
this
board
and
the
City
Council
added
to
the
situ
very
recently,
as
a
use,
there
aren't
very
many
other
situ
places.
F
You
know
that
the
lake
has
the
most
c2s
it's
it's
and
that
was
discussed
when
we,
when
we
did
bring
up
to
see
to
where
they
were,
and
they
were
at
the
lake.
This
is
one
of
the
projects
that
we
had
in
mind
when
we
asked
you
guys
to
look
at
that.
I
know
that
there's
issues
with
access
as
far
as
the
access
goes
on
this
we
are,
we
are
looking
to
strictly
come
in
from
the
south.
F
There's
a
fire
alarm
going
off.
Should
we
should
we
get
out
of
here?
Okay,
good.
We
are
looking
to
come
in
from
the
south.
Mr.
Drake
has
acquired
the
land
right
now.
You
know
there
is
a
construction
road
there.
We
would
be
willing
to
to
bring
that
up
to
city
standards
to
bring
that
up
there,
it's
a
and
we
could
keep
it
as
a
private
road
and
telling
there
was
more
more
development
there,
but
we
do
want
to.
D
F
I
mean
this.
This
is
a
area
that
you
know
when
you,
when
you
take
people
from
out
of
town
and
a
boat
and
you're
driving
around
campus,
go
one
of
the
questions
always
is.
Why
doesn't
somebody
do
something
with
that?
I
mean
in
it.
It
just
looks
barren
there.
The
the
solution
to
that
is
to
put
something
nice
there.
That's
what
we're
gonna
want
to
do.
Something
to
keep
in
mind,
though,
is
we.
F
Do
have
20
other
acres
right
behind
here
that
we're
gonna
come
to
this
same
board
and
ask
for
for
other
things
that
we
want
to
build
there.
So
we're
not
going
to
do
this
one
to
the
point
where
we
wouldn't
get
to
all
be
allowed
to
do
the
other
two,
so
I
mean
that
gives
you
some
peace
of
mind.
We
want
to
put
a
nice
project
here
when
you,
when
you
build
on
land
that
cost
what
this
land
does
you
don't
put
on
something?
That's
not
nice
I
mean.
D
A
What
with
Mike
saying
that
will
work
with
them?
They
actually
have
to
work
with
us
on
getting
a
preliminary
plan.
That's
in
the
development
agreement
right
now
for
this
platted
property,
so
the
property's
platted
and
zoned.
But
we
need
to
memorialize
a
preliminary
plan
for
those
two
commercial
Lots
and
how
they'll
get
access.
G
A
So
it's
actually
so
when
we
lifted
this
and
we
amended
the
ordinance
and
we
put
apartments
as
a
conditional
use
when
you
in
the
urn
definitions.
When
you
go
to
apartments,
it
says
sea
dwelling
unit
and
then
under
dwelling
unit.
Then
it
has
all
these
different
types
of
dwelling
units
which
condos
is
one
so
when
Jill
prepared.
This
I
think
just
she
just
put
that
in
here
just
in
conversation,
but
they
are
theirs
they're
defined
separately,
but
they're
all
still
like,
underneath
dwelling
unit,
which
that's
what
apartments
refers
to
yeah.
F
H
F
Doesn't
exist
on
our
lake
currently,
but
we
have
quite
a
few
people
that
probably
a
list
of
2030
people
that
have
interest
in
these.
We
had
a.
We
had
a
big
unveiling
of
our
whole
overview
of
the
entire
project
and
Northshore,
and
we
we
had
a
lot
of
people
that
were
interested
in
this
being
that
you
can
see
the
entire
lake
from
this
point.
Do.
F
Have
not
designed
this
structure
yet
we
would,
we
would
rely
on,
like
I,
said
we're
not
asking
for
a
variance
on
that.
We
would
design
it
two
cities
within
city
ordinance
and
that
those
are
changed
that
changes
to
make
on
demand,
because
the
way
the
ordinance
Israel,
if
you
can
have
a
whole
bunch
more
one-bedrooms
and
you
can
have
four
bedrooms,
you
know.
So
if
our
demand
comes
in
a
whole,
bunch
of
people
want
two
bedrooms
versus
four
bedrooms
or
three
bedrooms
versus
that.
F
That
goes
on,
based
on
your
lot
size
and
a
lot
of
times
when
you're
designing
that
it
actually
comes
down
to
parking
comes
down
to
where
you
can,
where
you
can
find
the
parking
and
and
for
a
condo
like
this,
that's
going
to
be
for
the
price
that
we
want
to
solve
for
they're
not
going
to
want
they're
gonna
want
underground
parking,
they're
gonna
want
covered
parking,
they're
gonna
want
you
know
something
that
they
can
get
to
without
going
outside,
so
I
mean
it
does
kind
of
limit
you
there
as
well.
So.
H
F
I,
don't
yeah
like
I
said
we,
you
don't
spend
the
money
to
design
it
would
until
you
come
yeah,
you
you're
allowed
to
build
it
actually.
So
what
what
I
tell
people
a
lot
of
times
when
you're?
Looking
at
this,
you
could
look
at
one
or
two
Willow
Creek,
which
is
over
kind
of
on
19th
there
on
Camp
haveno,
they
I
think
crest,
don't
just
built
it
very
similar
to
that.
You
know
it's
a
it's
kind
of
a
residential
look
with
the
parking
garage
underneath
Kevin.
Please.
H
F
When
we
plan
on
sprinkling,
obviously
billing
code
makes
us
sprinkle.
Our
goal
here
is
to
like
I
said,
get
the
traffic
off
of
the
easement
road,
the
only
time
that
that
would
ever
come
into
play
if
there
was
some
sort
of
an
emergency
that
they
couldn't
get
through
on
the
other,
the
other
property.
You
know
you
we're
gonna,
have
a
road,
that's
paved
that's
wide
that
we
work
with
the
city.
Oncoming.
A
fire
truck
is
probably
more
than
likely
every
time
going
to
take
that
road
than
the
easement.
F
The
people
that
live
on
there
currently
up
there
there's
there's
houses
they'll
they're
more
than
likely
going
to
use
that
road
as
well
I
mean
it
kind
of
cleans
up.
The
situation
like
I,
said:
there's
there's
in
the
history
of
this,
this
land
there's
there's
kind
of
a
black
eye,
and
if
you
don't
change
that
black
eye,
if
you
don't,
if
you
don't
adapt
the
situation
and
change
it,
it
just
sits
there
and
it's
still
a
black
eye.
B
B
I
My
family
has
been
on
the
property
of
Stoney
Point
for
many
years.
I
object
to
this
presentation.
This
proposal,
as
it
is
given
to
you
and
is
laid
out
in
these
plans,
I,
don't
feel
that
it
is
appropriate
for
that
area.
I,
don't
approve
of
a
restaurant
in
my
backyard,
I
I
strive
to
do
the
best
that
I
can
for
our
community
and
I'm,
hoping
that
you'll
make
sure
that
things
are
done
correctly
and
when
they
bring
a
proposal
that
is
adequate.
That
has
the
eyes
dotted
and
the
t's
crossed
that.
I
I
Don't
know
how
much
of
this
the
people
in
the
community
want
I
think
something
beautiful
can
be
done
in
that
property.
I
think
it
is
a
historic
pardon
me.
It
was
a
historic
piece
of
Lake
and
Pesce
formed
by
the
glacier
on
Lake
Camp
Eska,
that
topography
of
Lake
Camp
Asaka
has
been
compromised
because
of
the
work
that
they
have
done
without.
I
I
I
Jamb
is
not
correct
bird
I'm,
sorry,
I'm
I'm,
looking
for
but
I,
don't
think.
Sometimes
it's
when
you
put
more
on
something.
The
quality
is
better
I
think
sometimes
that
the
dignity
of
Stony
Point
has
been
lost.
These
people
I
I
apologize
I,
don't
want
to
call
these
developers
have
not
done
a
very
good
job
about
maintaining
my
property.
They
have
I,
have
numerous
pictures
to
show
that
they
do
not
stand
by
their
word
as
often
as
they
should
I
have
been.
I
J
My
first
question
to
the
board
is:
if
you
look
at
the
last
page
of
the
agenda,
which
I
only
found
out
through
I,
signed
up
through
the
city
text
and
email
that
this
meeting
was
even
happening
today,
number
three
notice
shall
also
be
given
to
all
adjacent
land
owners,
which
would
include
myself,
and
my
husband
are
the
road
that
is
behind
our
house.
Our
land
goes
all
the
way
down
there.
I've
seen
all
of
this
development
happen
without
any
of
our
knowledge.
We
had
no
idea.
This
was
happening.
J
C
C
K
J
B
J
J
J
J
This
development
happened
without
our
knowledge
and
and
and
now
that
I
know
it's
we're,
not
adjacent.
It
still
affects
our
quality
of
life.
We
didn't
have
a
courtesy
from
the
developers
who
know
where
we
live
to
even
say:
hey
we're
doing
this
development
right
behind
you
all
of
our
back
windows.
When
we
built
this
house
were
four,
so
we
could
see
the
lake
from
every
view
every
window
in
our
house,
you
can
see
the
lake
even
from
sandy
shore.
We
can
see
sandy
shore
from
the
front
portion
of
our
house.
J
We
moved
here
in
2012
and
decided
to
build
here
in
2013.
We
chose
this
spot
as
there
wasn't
an
acreage
for
sale
within
a
decent
price
and
in
the
water
on
school
district.
We
didn't
want
to
be
in
town
either.
So
we
chose
this
because
the
excellent
compromise
of
country
and
city,
beautiful
views,
wildlife
and
peace
and
quiet
we
arguably
have
one
of
the
best
views
of
Lake
in
the
city.
You
can
almost
see
the
entire
lake
from
a
third
level
of
our
house.
J
This
will
be
taken
away
from
us
when
this
is
built
used
to
not
be
able
to
see
the
house
that
was
built
on
the
point
a
few
years
ago,
and
now
we
can
now.
Why
is
it
going
to
be
looking
at
condos
a
restaurant,
a
rooftop
event,
venue
swimming
pool?
I,
don't
want
to
look
at
that
I
want
to
look
at
the
lake.
We
will
never
get
this
back.
That's
why
purchased
land
out
here
for
the
views?
J
What's
gonna
happen
to
our
resale
value,
there's
currently
three
properties
for
sale
in
our
subdivision
within
the
last
few
months
we
plan
to
build
the
garage
right
where
the
road
begins
at
the
bottom
half
of
our
lot.
Now
that
if
this
goes
through,
we
probably
mom
I,
don't
want
boy
doing
around
my
garage
at
night.
If
this
is
a
24/7
venue.
J
We
never
hit
the
patrons
of
the
prop
at
all.
We
don't
even
realize
the
prop
is
down
there,
they're
very
quiet.
The
only
time
there's
noise
on
the
lake
is
the
fourth
of
July.
When
everybody
comes
out
to
shoot
the
fireworks
I'm.
Okay
with
that
for
one
day
a
year,
two
days
a
year,
I'm
not
gonna,
be
okay.
With
noise
200
plus
days
a
year
out,
there
I
encourage
you
to
vote
this
down.
J
The
developers
have
not
spoken
to
the
individuals
and
our
subdivision
that
live
in
this
area,
they're,
not
taking
into
consideration
the
people
that
live
out
here
and
want
it
to
be
nice
and
quiet
and
peaceful.
That's
why
we
moved
out
there.
I
am
for
the
development
of
water
tone,
new
schools.
We
have
a
new
rec
center.
We
want
to
do
a
new
Ice
Arena.
We
have
a
new
middle
school
softball,
complex,
Soccer
Complex.
We
want
to
do
a
new
football
field,
stores,
downtown,
etc.
Leave
the
lake
for
recreation
purposes,
I'm
gonna
echo.
J
L
My
name
is
Colt
ruching
guy
currently
reside
at
794,
North,
Lake,
Drive
and
I
am
definitely
in
support
of
a
project
like
this.
You
know,
I,
think
lakum
Pesce
is
very,
very
beautiful.
I
enjoy
spending
a
lot
of
time
out
there
and
I
think
we
need
more
assets
like
this
project
to
attract
you
know
not
just
the
people
living
on
the
lake,
but
the
people
you
know
outside
of
just
Watertown
this
predominantly
being
an
agricultural
based
and
driven
economy
within
Watertown
and
I.
Think
this
would
really
spur
more
than
just
that.
You
know
it
would.
L
It
would
be
good
to
everybody.
You
know,
and
we
talk
about
the
new
development.
You
know.
New
school
is
a
new
rec
center.
You
know
a
new
Ice
Arena.
Well,
we
gotta
have
a
way
to
pay
for
that
stuff
and
I
forced
any
more
outside
money.
Come
into
this
and
spend
their
money
here.
You
know
not
just
at
this
establishment,
but
everywhere
around
in
Watertown
and
I,
think
they
would
really
really
help.
Thank
you.
I.
B
F
M
M
If
you
compare
to
other
lakes
in
the
area
that
are
substantially
smaller
and
have
a
lot
more
going
on
whether
you
want
to
look
at
lake
madison
pancit,
all
of
those
lakes
have
similar
similar
things
more
restaurants,
more
attractions,
more
events,
I
think.
There's
a
lot
of
room
for
growth
on
Lake,
Camp,
Eska
I
know
that
change
is
hard
and
there's
there's
gonna.
You
know
be
people
in
opposition
which
we've
seen
tonight,
but
you
know
unfortunately,
sometimes
when
you
know
you
buy
a
piece
of
land,
another
land
is
purchased
around
it.
M
You
can't
control
that,
and
so
keep
that
in
mind
as
well.
I
know
not
everybody's
in
favor
of
it
and
when
it
changes
your
landscape
and
what
you
see
when
you
look
out
your
window,
that's
that's
difficult,
but,
like
I
said
you
can't
always
control
the
land
that
you
own
around
you
there's
farmland
across
the
street
from
my
house
and
that
could
very
easily
be
sold
and
developed
someday
too,
and
that's
just
a
chance
that
I
took
when
I
bought
that
house
and
something
you
know
that
you
have
to
live
with.
So
thank
you.
I.
M
B
The
question
here,
I
think
is:
is:
do
we
bless
this
piece
of
ground
for
restaurants
and
condos?
It
isn't
about
the
specifics
of
the
building
it
isn't
about
that
is.
Do
we
think
that
this
piece
of
ground
is
fit
for
that?
That
purpose?
That's
the
question
we
have
to
answer
here
today.
Do
we
have
other
proponents
or
opponents
to
the
motion,
anybody
else
from
the
public
that
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
or
against
this?
Please
state
your
name
Bob.
N
Drake
I
just
would
like
to
clarify
a
couple
things:
we've
tried
to
follow
all
the
rules
and
regulations
as
far
as
the
are
and
everybody
else
is
concerned
with
silt
fences,
and
otherwise
we
have
three
approved
grading
permits,
basically
that
allowed
for
those
for
putting
the
road
to
the
south
and
doing
that
and
we've
tried
to
follow
all
the
rules.
Whenever
there
was
an
issue,
a
problem,
we
tried
to
address
it
right
away.
We
also
introduced
this
whole
project
to.
N
North
Shore,
but
we
without
and
it
kind
of
gave
a
feeling
for
the
whole
project
and
we've
given
individual
tours
to
people
in
the
neighborhood
that
wanted
to
come
up
and
look
and
do
things
and
we're
we're
sure
willing
to
do
that
for
anybody
that
wants
to
see
what
we're
trying
to
do.
What
we're
trying
to
accomplish
so
just
to
answer
a
few
of
those
questions
that
we're
not
trying
to
pull
the
wall
over
somebody's
eyes
or
do
something
sneaky
or
underhanded,
or
anything
like
that.
Okay,.
D
N
N
N
F
A
I
agree
that
that
should
that
can
be
a
condition
but
like,
and
we
already
do
have
that
in
the
development
agreement.
So
when
we
bring
the
preliminary
plan
forward
to
the
plan
commission,
then
that
will
all
have
to
be
approved
and,
like
I
said,
with
the
development
agreement,
but
I,
don't
think
it's
bad
to
to
just
state
that
that
it'll
comply
with
existing
agreements
and
ordinance
and
and
we
would
not
give
occupancy
for
a
commercial
building.
If
that
road
wasn't
completed,
it
would
have
to
have
city
standard
to
whatever
standard
was
approved.
D
O
Staff,
so
yes,
mr.
chairman,
the
as
just
to
give
a
little
bit
of
a
background
here
to
try
to
paint
a
picture
in
a
house
would
proceed
from
from
this
meeting.
If
this
were
approved
as
a
conditional
use
as
Brandis
reference,
they
would
go
through
a
preliminary
planning
process
and
a
preliminary
plan
as
similar
to
other
plenary
plans,
have
been
brought
before
the
Planning
Commission
for
their
review
and
approval,
which
includes
things
such
as
the
public
or
private
roadways
utilities.
O
O
The
the
way
that
would
proceed
is
generally
speaking
as
you
would
allow
for
the
permit
to
build
the
road
and
the
building.
At
the
same
time,
you
would
just
hold
back
on
the
certificate
of
occupancy,
and
still
all
the
public
infrastructure
met
city
requirements,
which
would
include
the
public
access
public
utilities
to
service
that
commercial
site
and
things
of
that
nature
and
the
building
official
would
generally
hold
off
on
that
certificate
of
occupancy
and
tell
those
criteria
are
met.
Okay,.
D
Now
that
another
question
is
is
because
of
the
shoreline
is
so
valuable
there
and
it's
so
high
up
and
we
want
to
keep
the
aesthetics
of
the
neighborhood
as
much
as
we
could.
Will
that
be
part
of
the
their
planning
and
stuff
they
do
before
the
city.
Approves
it
to
make
sure
that
it's
they're
gonna
start
nightmare
come
true
or
dirts
falling
into
the
lake
and
stuff.
You
know
that's
going
to
be
maintained.
Is
that
gonna
be
part
of
it.
The
city
working
yeah.
O
Absolutely
so
any
grading
that
would
occur
on
that
lot
would
be
reviewed
through
that
process
as
well.
They
have
to
show
a
detailed
grading
plan
with
that,
the
middle
of
a
commercial
site
plan
and
any
any
measures
that
need
to
be
in
place
to
protect
from
erosion
or
things
of
that
nature.
Just
as
what
they're
grading
permits
the
developer,
the
contractor
would
be
responsible
and
held
accountable
to
those
same
conditions
and
in
terms
I
just.
O
Absolutely
and
to
that
point,
I
will
mention
that
the
developer
briefly
mentioned
this,
but
to
obtain
their
grading
permits.
For
example,
it
went
through
some
pretty
strenuous
check
offs,
not
only
at
the
city
level
but
at
the
state
level
as
well
we're
game,
fish
and
parks
in
the
Corps
of
Engineers
and
DNR,
and
then
the
city
all
chimed
in
on
the
review
of
those
grading
permits
before
they
were
issued.
So
there
are
the
appropriate
boxes
that
they
had
to
check
off
in
order
to
do
the
grading
on
that
lot.
B
A
C
K
D
A
And
you
guys
can
implement
higher
standards
with
approving
the
conditional
use,
but
as
far
as
parking
lots
go
and
having
the
buff
the
side
side
yard
buffers
for
green
space.
We
do
have
that
in
ordinance
and
for
whatever
they
were
proposed
in
their
commercial
site
plan.
We
would
review
that
because
there
are
protections
in
there
for
if
there's
residential
properties
of
budding
commercial
but
for
the
higher
standard.
N
E
And
I
believe,
like
has
been
mentioned,
this
has
to
come
back
before
us
with
the
preliminary
plan
a
lot
of
times
when
we
do
conditional
uses
there
isn't
a
preliminary
plan
that
comes
back,
but
when
this
property
was
zoned
c2
a
few
years
ago.
E
That
was
one
of
the
conditions
and
that's
why
this
one
has
that
additional
step
of
a
preliminary
plan,
so
it
so
that
this
this
particular
property,
is
a
little
bit
different
than
how
most
conditional
uses
get
handled
by
us,
because,
usually
once
once
the
conditional
use
is
acted
upon
by
this
board.
It
doesn't
come
back
to
us,
but
this
one
per
the
development
agreement
or
the
rezoning
or
the
rules
of
the
rezoning.
J
E
The
City
Council
recently
changed
the
C
to
commercial
conditional
uses
to
allow
for
apartments,
but
when
I,
when
it's
when
the
City
Council
approves
that,
is
there
a
referendum
period
before
it
goes,
becomes
effective
and
have
we
gone
through
that
period?
Are
we
and
I
guess?
My
ultimate
question
is:
are
we
able
to
act
on
this
today?
I.
K
K
E
And
that
I
believe
it
passed,
City
Council
at
the
January
21st
meeting,
so
I
had
imagined
it
was
published
on
that
Saturday.
The
25th
and
I
could
be
wrong
on
my
dates.
These
are
just
I
mean
I
know
it
was
on
the
22nd
was
when
the
meeting
was,
but
the
publication
date
I'm
not
100%
sure,
but
either.
If
it
was
that
put
twenty
days
referendum
period.
Is
that
what
it
is
yeah
that
put
us
there
and
that's
what
I'm
just
asking?
K
B
K
K
A
B
B
B
K
Would
suggest
that
it's
contingent
on
the
the
ordinance
change
becoming
effective,
just
tweaking
your
language
a
little
bit
there,
that
the
conditional
use
is
contingent
on
the
ordinance
becoming
effective?
So
then
so,
and
so,
let's,
let's
play
this
out
hypothetically,
it
gets
referred
in
in
passes
a
referendum
and
it
would
become
effective
after
the
passage
of
that
vote.
A
far-fetched,
hypothetical
scenario.
B
E
Was
just
you
know,
looking
at
our
duties
of
Board
of
Adjustment
there's
this
list
of
1
through
8,
the
first
six,
you
can't
touch
down
with
notices.
We
assume
that
those
get
handled
basically
by
staff.
You
know,
that's
the
the
notices
go
out,
you
know
and
the
the
public
hearing
is
held,
but
then
really
what
we
dive
into
is
number
seven
on
that
list.
A
through
H
we've
talked
about
ingress
and
egress
chip
chimed
in
with
that.
We
we've
talked
about
off
street
parking.
E
E
Utilities.
That's
been
discussed,
we've
discussed,
screening
we've
talked
about
how
that's
kind
of
come
back
up
at
a
preliminary
plan,
and
so
it's
signs
and
and
open
yards.
So
yes,
it
all
comes
down
to
is
in
my
opinion,
is
H
is
the
general
compatibility
with
the
jacent
properties
and,
if
that's
how
we
we
feel
that
this
property
fits
and
that's
how
this
property
is.
Zoned
I
know:
we've
heard
a
couple.
E
People
speak
on
that
you
know
they
wish.
It
was
something
like
houses.
The
one
thing
with
that
is
houses
is
not
a
permitted
or
conditional
use
based
on
what
it
is
currently
zoned.
It
is
owned,
see
so
then
we're
looking
at
you
know
what
what
uses
can
that
property
be
allowed
to
be
that
fit
the
the
character
of
the
neighborhood?
It's
kind
of
my
thought.
B
Any
additional
comments
from
board
members
regarding
what
brings
bringing
up
specifically
general
competitive
with
compatibility
with
adjacent
properties,
I
mean
strikes
me
there's
already
a
restaurant
there,
others,
a
commercial
uses
brink,
indicated.
There's
it's
a
c2
district,
it's
not
even
something
that
we're
really
allowed
to
do.
B
We,
the
c2
discussion,
just
happened
at
the
city
council
meeting
I
didn't
watch
that
I'm
not
entirely
sure
how
that
went,
but
obviously
the
past
so
including
apartments
condominiums
in
the
c2
was
obviously
okay
at
that
point.
So
I
think
it's
far
be
it
from
us
to
say
no
to
something
like
that.
Given
that
mean
the
discussion,
that
discussion
has
already
happened
in
terms
of
compatibility.
G
I
think
it's
just
worth
repeating
that
it
changes
hard
as
it
was
stated
from
the
audience.
I
agree:
I,
don't
you
know
I
do
not.
We,
we
have
a
gem
of
a
lake
and
I
think
that
the
developer
needs
to
really
look
in
the
mirror.
Hard
and
say:
am
I
doing
the
best
with
this
property,
and
he
can
you
know
knowing
that
the
neighbors
feel
the
way
they
do
I
think
they
just
need
to
take
that
under
advisement
and
and
and
I
trust
that
they
will
they
need
to
for
the
community's
sake.
G
So
we
do
put
you
know,
basically
our
trust
into
them
that
they're
going
to
do
the
right
job
when
they,
when
they
start
this
project
and
again
it's
going
to
come
in
front
of
us.
So
at
that
point,
if
we
see
something
that
we
really
don't
feel
comfortable
with,
we
need
to
address
it
then.
But
at
this
point
we
need
to
you
know,
untie
their
hands
and
let
them
see
what
they
can
come
with.