►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting - 05-07-2020
Description
Board of Adjustment Meeting - 05-07-2020
A
Peat
is
that
correct
that
are
so
star.
Six
will
mute
your
phone
and
then
you
again
press
star
six
to
unmute
your
phone,
and
we
please
ask
that
you
have
your
phones
muted
again,
unless
of
course
you
want
to
speak
and
there
will
be
appropriate
times
and
opportunities
throughout
both
meetings,
where
the
public
has
an
opportunity
to
speak,
either
in
general
comments
or
in
specific
to
each
case,
that's
being
discussed,
so
please
feel
free
to
meet
your
phones
by
pressing
star
six
and
then
unmute
them.
B
C
B
Right,
thank
you.
I
would
like
to
make
the
announcement
that
be
open
public
comment
later
in
the
meeting.
If
anybody
is
would
like
to
speak
of
any
item,
the
side
on
the
agenda,
Jill
would
be
appropriate
for
you
to
make
the
announcement
of
of
who
that
we
know
was
on
this.
Call
that
you
know
is
that
on
the
roll
call
I
mean,
for
example,
mr.
white
I
and
others.
C
B
C
C
C
The
applicant
submitted
a
written
request
and
site
plan
which
reflect
compliance
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
terms
of
the
ordinance.
This
board
is
tasked
with
reviewing
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditions,
conditional
uses,
which
includes
ingress/egress
of
the
proper
off-street
parking
loading,
refuse
utilities,
service
areas,
screening
buffering,
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility.
C
It
will
also
review
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements,
and
the
submitted
site
plan
shows
46
off
street
parking
spaces
30
are
to
be
improved
and
16
will
remain
unimproved
until
necessary.
45
are
required
by
ordinance,
so
it's
meeting
compliance
outside
storage
and
display
requirements.
The
this
is
a
commercial
use
which
will
comply,
will
need
to
comply
with
the
ordinance
on
outside
storage
for
commercial
uses
and
outside
storage
may
be
permitted
if
acceptable
screening
is
provided
and
approved
by
the
building
official.
C
The
minimum
tree
requirement
will
be
met.
It
is
1
tree
per
50
feet
of
frontage
perimeter,
fence
and
dumpster
screening
are
specified
on
the
detailed
site
plan
sheet
number
1,
a
15-foot
grass
Boulevard
sidewalk,
curb
gutter
are
required
on
both
the
south
and
west
sides
of
the
property,
and
the
parcel
is
to
be
administrated
administrative,
Lea
platted.
C
E
C
As
as
Ken
said,
you
may
recall
that
very
recently
this
came
to
the
board,
but
additional
property
was
added,
and
so
therefore
the
ingress
and
egress
has
changed
the
access
to
the
property
and
some
of
the
parking
has
been
rearranged.
The
size
of
the
building
and
that
kind
of
a
thing
pretty
much
are
staying
the
same.
Ok,.
B
Because
at
the
when
we
had
approved
it
prior,
there
was
some
concern
about
the
entrance
at
that
time,
which
was
closer
to
the
corner
of
81
and
10th
Avenue,
that's
kind
then,
and
then
they
would
kind
of
collectively
agreed
that
what
they're
gonna
move
it
back
there
farther
east
I
should
say,
and
so
actually
this
would.
This
would
probably
work
out
better
than
the
way
they
kind
of
legs
in
terms
of
a.
B
A
F
A
Yeah
and
I
believe
Jill
there's
a
diagram
in
your
packet
I
guess
they
don't
know.
If
it's
in
the
packet
I
know
they
provided
a
turning,
what's
called
a
tracking
model
that
shows
a
semi
maneuvering
into
and
out
of
their
sights
for
delivery
purposes,
and
it
looks
to
be
adequate
and
appropriate
to
provide
enough
space
for
those
deliveries.
A
G
Brings
I
worked
with
the
Department
of
Transportation
and
we
did
at
the
Department
of
Transportation,
receive
an
access
permit
request
for
this
property
and
on
that
request
they
do
go
into
detail
on
turning
movements
on
as
far
as
and
turning
radiuses,
that
curb
those
cuts
and
we
look
at
distances
from
other
intersections
as
well
as
the
light.
So
all
that
is
being
analyzed
by
the
state.
G
The
approach
location
hasn't
been
approved
yet
by
the
state,
but
if
it's
wares,
we're
still
in
the
review
process
and
I
I
feel
like
it's.
It's
very
close
to
being
approved,
so
I
think
in
those
regards
I
think
at
least
the
d-o-t,
who
feels
comfortable
with
their
location
of
an
access
and
and
attorney
movements.
A
Mr.
Kay's
Commissioner
Kay's
that
would
be
handled
administratively
under
a
curb
cut
permit
from
the
engineer's
office,
and
if
we
were
to
receive
an
application
for
such
a
curb
cut,
we
would
check
it
against
the
newly
adopted
engineering
design
standards,
just
as
we
did
for
this
sites
review
and
see
and
make
sure
that
it
makes
the
minimum
setback
requirements
from
the
intersection
which
I
believe
in
this
case
was
100
and
I
forget
off
the
top
of
my
head.
It
was
like
140
feet,
I
believe
thank.
H
D
I
H
C
Right,
the
ordinance
reads
that
parking
lot
screening
adequate
screening
of
a
parking
lot
from
adjacent
residential
II
used
properties
shall
be
provided
where
residential
used
property
is
across
the
right-of-way
from
a
parking
area.
Screening
shall
be
provided
in
all
eight
all
cases,
except
when
the
right-of-way
is
an
arti
rear.
Arterial
screening
shall
be
an
opaque
fence.
Wall
berm
or
hedge
maintained
at
least
four
feet
in
height
and
in
such
a
manner
as
not
to
materially
impede
vision
at
intersecting,
streets,
alleys
and
driveways,
so
that.
D
H
Thank
you.
I
just
have
a
question
with
with
the
conditional
use
and
Julia
had
not
said
how
it's
a
new
application,
but
the
legal
description,
I,
don't
think
reflects
that
that
it
would
just
be.
They
have
the
conditional
use
for
that
south
part,
because
that
came
previous
previously
and
then
now
that
they're,
just
adding
that
north
part,
the.
C
The
legal
description
for
this
for
this
application
that
they
gave
me
I
used
a
lot
one
water
tone:
development
companies;
second
edition
it
this
it.
This
is
supposed
to
be
a
new
application.
It's
a
it's
a
new
application,
but
basically,
which
was
talked
over
previously,
but
they
they
did
make
this
change
and
therefore
its
new.
J
C
You
see
this
area
that
is
as
white.
These
indicate
parking
spaces
that
will
be
improved
immediately
for
the
store
and
then
along
here
you
see
kind
of
invisible
parking
spaces
which
help
to
make
up
the
required
amount
that
they
need,
but
they
in
in
there
their
franchise.
So
to
speak.
They
don't
usually
need
that
many.
So
what
they've
done
is
made
this
space
available
on
our
site
plan
to
show
us
that
it's
available,
if
needed
and.
J
H
D
B
D
E
Creek
I'll
answer
that,
for
you
on
our
commercial
properties,
we
have
a
required
number
of
parking
spots
by
ordinance,
but
many
times
that
in
all
the
parking
that
we
stand
require
within
our
ordinance
is
not
required
actually
on
the
site
to
comply.
Sometimes
there's
hundreds
of
parking
spots
that
are
not
required,
so
we
just
tell
them
they
have
to
put
in
enough
parking
spots
to
satisfy
their
customers.
E
If
that's
such
a
point
that
we
notice
that
they're
not
doing
that
week,
I'll
order
them
to
put
in
more,
but
they
have
to
save
the
gland
and
not
make
sure
that
it's
allocated
for
all
the
parking
required,
because
now,
if
the
change
of
use
comes
in
to
the
next
guy,
he
needs
more
parking
that
is
there
and
available
and
we've
not
jeopardized
it
in
the
future
for
the
next
canoe,
occupant
or
whatever.
Thank
you
so.
E
H
H
C
Like
to
make
one
clarification
here,
the
correction
actually
I
was
mentioning
the
legal
description
that
was
used
and
I
was
actually
looking
at
the
other
report.
The
legal
description
for
this
land
does
include
everything.
It's
the
South
two
hundred
and
eighty
point,
a
one
feet
of
the
Southwest
quarter
of
the
northwest
corner
of
quarter
of
section
29,
117,
52,
Cottington,
County,
less
the
South
33
feet
and
the
west
33
feet
thereof,
and
the
H
lots
thereof
unless
lots
one
and
two
of
Robie
Creek
addition
to
they
mean
municipality
of
Watertown.
F
Well,
getting
back
to
the
trail,
so
if
we're
and
I'm
fine
with
leaving
that
to
staff,
obviously
my
suggestion,
though,
is
because
it
is
a
neighborhood
store
and
we're
there
for
neighborhood
to
me
means
walking.
Perhaps
that
I
would
like
to
see
a
trail
that
leads
to
nowhere
rather
than
no
trail.
That's
just
my
personal
opinion.
I
D
Mr.
chair
I
think
I
really
think
it's
important
to
seriously
think
about
what
we're
going
to
do.
Regarding
screening
of
the
parking
lot,
that's
adjacent
on
to
the
tenth
Avenue
side,
I
think
I
think
there
needs
to
be
some
sort
of
screening.
It
doesn't
necessarily
need
to
be
a
fence.
It
could
be
a
few
trees
planted
along
10th
Avenue,
there's
nothing
wrong
with
planting
trees
and
adding
it
just
so.
D
It
helps
diffuse
some
of
the
lights
village
that
will
come
off
that
parking
lot,
I
I
would
move
to
I
would
reckon
to
move
forward
on
this
matter,
subject
to
some
sort
of
screen
edge
being
put
together
approved
by
staff
and,
at
the
same
time
I
will
put
in
for
discussion
purposes.
The
motion
to
require
a
sidewalk
on
the
tenth
Avenue
side
of
the
frontage
can.
H
I'm
gonna
clarify
just
cuz
with
it
being
discussed
earlier,
so
for
the
for
your
your
screening,
guys,
that's
already
required
by
ordinance.
So
if
in
2170
304
and
then
three,
like
others,
have
said
that
it
is
adequate,
screening
must
part
of
a
parking
lot
from
adjacent
residential
use.
Properties
shall
be
provided.
So
we
would
make
sure
that
that
happened
during
the
commercial
site
plan,
application
or
yeah
the
commercial
building
permit
application,
and
that's
already
in
ordinance.
D
H
A
D
B
A
H
So
and
right
now
an
organ
says
that
screening
shall
be
an
opaque
fence,
wall
berm
or
hedge
maintained
at
least
four
feet
in
height
and
in
such
matter
as
to
not
materially
impede
vision
at
intersecting,
streets,
alleys
and
driveways.
So
did
you
guys
want
to
specify
which
type
of
screening
you
want
out
of
that?
Otherwise
those
are
the
options
that
are
in
ordinance.
G
I
D
What's
the
point
that
I
was
trying
to
make
to
staff?
Is
that
I
know
recently?
I
don't
want
to
hamstring
the
development
so
that
they
have
to
come
back
and
say
you
know,
hold
the
fence
and
we
have
to
come
back
and
say
we
wanna
plant
trees,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
have
no
preference
of
whether
it's
a
fence
or
whether
it's
trees.
D
B
C
D
G
C
C
The
application
was
submitted
to
construct
a
non-conforming
7200
square
foot,
building
on
a
100
6789
square
foot
parcel,
which
equates
to
two
point
four
two
point:
four
or
five
acres
located
in
the
one
excuse
me:
I
won
light
industrial
district,
said
structure
proposed
to
be
constructed,
36
feet
from
the
front
or
north
property
line,
where
a
minimum
forty
feet
is
required
and
I
will
show
that
here
quickly.
Right
here
is
the
issue.
C
Okay,
so
staff
finds
that
this
is
a
new
development
on
a
bear
parcel
previously
utilized
as
railroad
property
storage
units
are
a
permitted
use
in
the
I
1
light
industrial
district
pursuant
to
twenty
one,
three,
three,
two
O
two
fourteen
storage
units
is
defined
as
a
building
or
buildings
for
the
storage
of
commercial
or
private
goods
and
materials
in
individual
units
within
a
common
structure
without
water
or
sewer
utilities
of
note,
the
following
were
not
addressed
in
the
application.
Garbage
receptacles
must
be
screened.
C
The
path
of
travel
is
not
shown
very
well
on
this,
but
I
do
have
a
drawing
that
was
submitted
later,
that
I'll
pull
up
in
a
minute
all
maneuvering
of
vehicles
to
access
the
units
must
be
done
on
the
private
property
and
outside
storage
is
permitted.
Here,
screening
may
be
required
if
adjacent
land
uses
are
residential
or
commercial.
The
minimum
area
a
compliant
I
one
parcel
can
have.
Is
thirteen
thousand
eight
hundred
square
feet
this
substantial
I
one
parcel
compliant
in
minimum
area
and
with
requirements?
C
This
ordinance
expresses
both
regulations
in
terms
of
maximum
building
or
structure
height,
maximum
lot
coverage,
maximum
floor
area
ratio,
minimum
setbacks
and
minimum
front
side
and
rear
yards
no
building,
structure
or
part
thereof,
shall
be,
shall
hereafter
be
built,
moved
or
remodeled,
and
no
building,
structure
or
land
shall
hereafter,
be
used,
occupied
or
designed
for
use
or
occupancy
so
as
to
provide
any
set
back
or
front
sight
or
rear
yard.
That
is
less
than
specified
for
the
zoning
district
in
which
such
building
structure
or
use
of
land
is
located.
C
B
Okay,
so
just
to
be
clear,
if
it
weren't
for
that
16
and
a
half
square
foot
edge
of
the
corner
of
the
building,
they
would
not
need
a
variance
so
you're
talking
a
sixteen
and
a
half
square
feet
on
a
eighty
plus
thousand
dollar.
Eighty
plus
square
foot.
Eighty
thousand
square
foot
plus
piece
of
property
say
that
again.
C
B
I
F
C
I
E
C
J
C
J
B
A
So
the
details
of
the
site
plan
have
not
been
thoroughly
vetted
and
reviewed.
Yet
you
know,
of
course,
the
application
before
the
Commission
this
evening
is
specifically
to
the
variance
for
that
encroachment
into
that
setback
area
that
northeasterly
corner
that
was
discussed
subsequent
to
this
action.
A
What
would
happen
is
the
applicant
would
submit
to
the
engineering
and
planning
and
building
divisions,
the
appropriate
commercial
site
plan
and
building
permit
application,
and
on
that
application
review
process
we
would
vet
in
detail
any
any
access
locations
are
proposing
any
required
paving
of
those
accesses
and
things
of
that
nature
at
that
time.
So
short
answer
is
no.
That
has
not
been
vetted
through
the
review
process
yet,
but
it
will
be
subsequent
to
this
action
when
the
applicant
submits
the
appropriate
application.
A
C
C
Don't
believe
so,
this
is
just
a
simple
matter
of
this
corner.
When
I
did
calculate
the
buildable
area,
I
did
take
out
the
the
easement
areas.
What
you
see
here
is
not
like
a
drive
area,
it's
an
easement
corridor,
and
so
that's
why
they
they
positioned
the
building
such
that
they're
off
of
there.
They
there
was
a
recent
and
I
guess.
I
did
not
have
that
in
my
report.
They
recently
acquired
this
bit
of
land
here
through
the
plan
Commission
and
City
Council.
C
A
Yeah
you're
correct
shifting
that
to
the
south
or
Southwest.
You
neither
be
encroaching
that
easement
or
the
front
set
back
at
that
point.
So
I
think
the
options
that
Jill
described
are
probably
the
the
primary
ones
for
the
board
to
consider
either
a
modification
in
that
corner
of
the
building
to
be
compliant
or
modification
in
that
northeasterly
wall
and
bringing
that
in
entirely
narrowing
up
the
building
or
granting
of
the
variance
are
probably
the
three
main
options
we're
looking
at,
at
least
with
the
information
we
have
in
front
of
us.
F
C
I
E
I
G
B
G
Came
up
with
the
access
points
are
in
the
right
location,
except
for
between
buildings,
2
&
3
there's
going
to
be
an
access.
There
won't
be
the
access.
The
parties
that
took
their
showing
on
this
drawing
are
actually
getting
moved
to
the
west
right
there
during
30,
so
there
won't
be
that
will
be
deleted
and
there
be
just
access
between
buildings,
2,
&,
3
and
then
between
1
&
2
and
then
also.
F
B
A
Who
address
commissioners
concerns
on
the
access
to
that
westerly
building?
I
would
also
emphasize
that
that
is
another
point
that
we
would
look
at
and
review
and
make
sure
that
the
requirements
are
met
to
have
a
paved
access
to
that
structure
and
I
think
it
would
be
as
simple
as
them
expanding
their
proposed
concrete,
paving
limits,
as
shown
on
this
plan.
That's
in
front
of
you
this
evening.
In
order
to
have
that
connectivity
between
buildings
1
&
2,
and
we
would.
We
would
certainly
address
that
administrative
Lee
at
the
site
plan
review
level.
B
It
seems
like
the
the
item
before
us
is
fairly
straightforward:
either
a
lot
of
them,
a
variance
for
16
and
a
half
square
feet
to
utilize,
a
piece
of
property
that
would
otherwise
be
difficult
to
see
what
you
could
do
with
this
with
all
the
easements
that
they'd
have
to
you
know,
work
around
and
build
around
or
or
not
grant
the
variance,
and
then
they
got
to
make
a
you
know
a
little
bit
of
a
funky
shape.
Building
there
in
the
corner.